►
Description
Tricaster stream test using the March 1, 2023 Complete Streets meeting.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
C
Brisbaneca.Org
forward
slash
meetings,
please
be
advised
that
if
there
are
technological
difficulties,
the
media
will
nevertheless
continue.
If
remote
participation
is
available,
the
agenda
materials
may
be
viewed
online
at
brisbaneca.org
at
least
72
hours
prior
to
a
regular
meeting
and
at
least
24
hours
prior
to
a
special
meeting.
C
Remote
public
comments,
remote
meeting
participation,
May
address
the
committee
participants
May
address
the
committee
aside
from
commenting
on
personally
aside
from
commenting
personally
while
in
the
zoom
webinar
the
following
email
address
will
also
be
monitored,
will
also
will
be
also
monitored
during
the
meeting
and
public
comments,
reviewed
will
be
noted
received
will
be
noted
for
the
record,
during
oral
Communications
or
during
an
agenda
item
that
email
is
t
santoyo,
that's
t
s
a
n
t,
o
y
o
at
CA,
sorry
c.
I
Dot
brisbane.ca.us.
C
To
join
the
zoom
webinar
at
zoom.us,
please
use
the
latest
version
of
zoom.us
forward.
Slash
download
the
web
address
for
the
webinar
is
at
https
colon
forward.
Slash
forward,
slash
us06,
w
e
b
dot,
Zoom
dot
us
forward.
Slash
J
forward,
slash
eight
two:
two
one:
three:
zero:
seven,
seven,
four
six
three,
the
web,
webinar
ID,
is
822-1307-7463.
C
B
A
C
C
B
E
G
H
Okay,
thank
you.
I
would
like
to
speak
out
against
permit
parking
in
lower
Brisbane,
which
I
think,
if
approved,
would
eventually
lead
to
permit
parking
on
all
residential
streets
in
town
I've
been
out
of
the
country
for
a
while
I.
Don't
claim
to
be
an
expert
on
this,
but
I
do
have
some
concerns
about
why
I
think
this
is
a
bad
idea
number
one.
How
much
will
this
cost
and
who
pays
to
enforce
this?
H
The
city
is
on
the
verge
of
eliminating
the
senior
shuttle
according
to
today's
star,
and
now
they
want
to
pay
for
parking
enforcement.
I
question
whether
we
have
the
time,
money
and
resources
to
enforce
this.
They
are
not
Millbrae.
We
are
not
Hillsboro
number
two
people
who
are
very
unhappy
that
water
and
sewer
rates
are
going
through
the
roof.
Why
should
they
now
have
to
pay
for
parking?
Three
I
feel
that
the
purpose
of
this
is
to
punish
people
who
have
more
than
two
cars,
which
means
multi-generational
families.
H
People
with
teenagers,
the
poor
living
in
multi-family
housing
situations
or
those
who
have
an
extra
car
for
family
visit.
Permit
parking
does
not
guarantee
you
have
a
space,
that's
in
front
of
your
house.
It
only
allows
you
to
park
on
certain
streets
personally,
I
prefer
that
our
Police
Department
focus
on
crime
and
not
who
is
parked
without
a
permit.
We
already
have
a
solution
to
those
who
leave
cars
unattended
for
days,
call
the
city
and
they
will
be
red,
tagged
and
towed.
H
Those
who
are
disabled
can
request
a
handicapped,
blue,
curb
I,
believe
in
front
of
their
homes.
The
focus
of
this
committee
is
supposed
to
be
Street
safety.
To
me,
this
is
about
creating
an
environment
where
neighbors
report
on
neighbors
and
the
city
profits.
The
committee
is
supposed
to
be.
It
seems
to
me
like
Overkill
and
government
intrusion.
Do
we
really
need
this
as
it
moves
if
this
moves
forward,
I
believe
it
should
be
voted
upon
by
all
residents
in
Brisbane?
Thank
you.
D
D
D
D
I
Are
you
I've,
been
resident
for
over
35
years
and
I
don't
really
see
a
benefit
to
having
parking
permits,
I'm
just
doing
this
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
it
it's
not
going
to
change
in
my
neighborhood
in
my
block
radius,
anything
people
still
people
park
on
the
street.
They
don't
use
their
garages
for
one
reason
or
another.
I
It's
it's
not
going
to
change
the
amount
of
cars.
We
don't
have
a
problem
on
our
street
of
people
parking
and
leaving
their
cars.
So
I'd
be
curious.
If
there
is
information
about
how
many
cars
have
been
towed
over
the
last
12
months,
because
they
were
left
on
the
street,
a
lot
of
people
claim
that
people
park
and
go
to
the
airport.
I
So
I
don't
know
if
that
information
is
available,
but
I
think
that
residential
parking
permit
doesn't
really
help.
I
also
have
a
question
without
going
knowing
the
entire
program
is.
If
you
have
someone
coming
to
visit
for
a
day
or
two
or
for
spring
break
or
the
holidays,
what
is
how
many
days
can
they
park
on
the
street
without
having
a
sticker
before
there's
an
issue?
C
J
We
were
asked
by
the
city
council
to
take
a
look
at
what's
going
on
and
it
was
at
the
park
trying
to
think
of
the
word.
There
is
an
availability
for
guest
parking
students
that
go
to
college
we've.
We've
really
turned
this
Insight
out
and
I
hope
that
you
will
get
an
opportunity
to
read
the
document
in
full
when
it's
done
and
of
course,
once
this
goes
to
the
council,
which
will
be
very
soon,
certainly
bring
your
comments
to
them,
and
thank
you
for
being
here
tonight.
F
J
Hi
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
we're
calling
this
a
living
program
the
first
year
we
will
be
looking
at
and
asking
people
to.
Please
comment
on
how
it's
working
for
you
so
that
changes
can
be
made
and
it
evolves
into
a
program
that
works
for
everyone.
There's
been
an
awful
lot
of
discussion
about
people
being
unhappy
with
parking
and.
B
That
that
will
free
up
some
space
and
also
to
try
to
get
a
start,
weeding
out
some
of
the
Bad
actors,
like
people
that
come
here
that
leave
their
car
and
they
and
they
go
to
the
airport
and
there's
people
that
have
not
just
two
or
three
cars.
They
have
a
lot
of
cars
but
having
you
know,
having
said
that,
in
terms
of
the
the
cost
of
the
programs.
C
C
Let
me
back
up
some
70
of
the
respondents,
felt
parking
was
a
problem
in
Brisbane
and
some
64
percent
of
the
respondents
favored
a
parking
permit
program
either.
Some
that
in
mind
we
came
up
with
initially
a
public
outreach
program
and
when
we
reviewed
that
with
Council
Council
felt
that
the
problem
of
parking
in
the
city
was
severe
enough,
that
public,
Outreach
type
of
programs
would
not
be
effective.
C
G
C
E
I
comment
there
when
I
went
back
over
that
came
up
with
our
last
meeting
and
I
went
back
over
all
the
minutes.
So
when
we
brought
when
staff
brought
the
agenda
item
to
Council
in
April
of
2021
the
committee,
which
was
somewhat
different,
somebody
some
of
them
have
to
be
a
parking
permit
program.
If
all
those
other
things
didn't
work
again.
Looking
at
how
that
changed,
the
situation
and
I
think
the
committee
actually
also
suggested
at
the
time
that
there
be
a
vote
before
implementing
such
a
thing.
E
C
C
C
At
the
April
7
2022
city
council,
meeting
survey,
results
were
shared
and
the
committee
thought
staff
requested
feedback,
and
this
and
the
committee,
through
staff,
requested
feedback
from
Council
on
their
three-part
plan
and
current
one
encourage
residents
to
clean
out
and
park
in
garages
to
improve
street
parking
capacity,
to
implement
a
residential
street
sweeping
program
with
enforcement
and
three.
If
one
and
two
were
not
sufficient
to
implement,
then
a
residential
parking
permit
program
at
the
meeting,
the
cssc
was
directed
to
by
Council
to
focus
on
residential
parking
permit
program
to
be
brought
back
to
council.
C
C
F
Guess,
in
that
case,
yeah
we
sort
of
skipped
over
the
recommendations.
Section
I'm
wondering
is
that
part
of
the
discussion
later
if
there
may
or
may
not
be
a
re?
Sorry,
not
a
revote
I'll,
say
but
reassessment
of
the
previous,
the
recommendation
about
the
discussion
between
purpose
and
recommendation
where
we
say
adopt
the
recommended
parking
permit
program.
If
you
scroll
up
a
little
bit.
C
F
C
F
E
Now,
I
to
interject
I
had
thought
that
that
was
how
we
concluded
the
last
meeting.
Was
it
had
come
up
that
had
the
committee
and
again
you're
reconstituted?
There
are
some
new
members,
so
a
prior
membership
of
the
committee
recommended
the
six-step
plan
that
I
well
I
think
well
I
think
that
From
staff's
perspective
I
think
we
we
need
to
know
you
are
recommending
something
or
you're
not
to
bring
it
to
council.
Otherwise,
if
you're
not
recommending
it,
then
why
would
we
even
bring
it
forward
to
council.
C
K
At
least
I'm
not
sure
what
the
entire
consent
is
at
least
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
entire
consensus
is,
as
a
committee
is,
but
at
least
for
I
think
in
terms
of
recommendation
I
think
if
the
city
council
decided
to
implement
decide,
they
wanted
to
go
the
parking
permit
route
or
the
parking
permit
program.
This
was
our
recommendation
to
them
about
how
it
should
be
set
up.
I,
don't
know
necessarily
I
think
it's
one
of
those
things
where
we
don't
as.
C
A
committee
one
of
the
council
members
correct
as
to
what
what
a
parking
program
would
entail
and
how
it
should
be
structured
to
which
another
council
member
said,
that's
costly.
We
have
a
committee
that
works
with
already
in
the
city
that
works
with
streets
and
parking
and
safety
and
pedestrians
and
bicycles.
Let's
ask
them
to
look
at
this,
and
that
is
the
complete
streets
committee.
That's
us,
so
I
think
we
have
obviously.
B
C
F
E
C
E
A
PR
we
we
want
something
more
solidified
about
this
I
as
a
staff
person
that
don't
live
in
this
city,
I'm
the
neutral
one.
That
does
what
I'm
told
you
guys
are
representatives
of
the
community.
So
that's
that's
different.
It's
not
simply.
Your
supervisor
told
you
to
do
this
task.
You
are
the
eyes
and
ears
of
the
community.
You
got
a
little
bit
of
feedback,
we
did
the
survey,
we
got
a
bunch
of
feedback,
you
know
what
we
don't.
We
don't
really
know
a
lot
of
people
may
come
and
say
we
don't
want
this.
B
More
personal,
a
character
or
criteria,
you
know
how
we
feel,
and
you
know
how
we
feel
about
this
program
and
the
first
recommendation
that
we
gave
them.
You
know
they
looked
at
it
and
then
they
came
back
with
with
something
that
we
didn't
recommend
them
and
now
we're
here
we
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen
after
they
review
this
report.
B
F
Christian
that
the
wording
is
sort
of
the
issue
and
I
think
that
I
don't
diminish
the
work
the
council
has
done
in
last
year,
plus
before
my
time
even
and
I
agree
that
the
work
is
there
I
think
if
there
were
a
permit
program.
This
would
how
we
do,
but
personally
I
don't
agree
with.
You
necessarily
I
think
that
maybe
we
put
that
up
to
vote.
F
F
Given
the
new
Council
on
sort
of
what
the
feedback
we've
heard
and
the
collection
of
feedback
in
the
last
say
a
couple
months,
sort
of
coming
back
to
what
is
the
issue
record
sort
of
is
reflects
what
the
committee
record
sort
of
is
reflects
what
the
committee
feels,
but
we
still
present
something
to
council,
potentially
in
terms
of
what
they
requested
from
us
or
or
maybe
not
I
mean.
If
the
committee
doesn't
want
to
vote,
then
I
yeah.
C
Our
original
recommendation
was
the
public
outreach
program
and
then
later
on,
if
everything
failed
after
our
I
think
it
was
12
months
of
trial
or
something
Karen
we're
going
to
try
the
public
Outreach
and
the
the
incentive
program
for
context
of
what
our
original
recommendation
was,
which
was
the
six
point
plan
or
the
multi-point
plan,
and
rather
than
just
saying,
Implement
a
parking
permit,
implement
this
parking
permit
program,
and
we
would
then
go
through
the
details
and
the
work
that
we
have
put
in
putting
this
together.
For
the
last
year.
J
And
a
lot
of
Sega,
it
feels
like
Overkill
and
a
lot
of
repetition
to
me
personally,
we've
been
there,
we've
been
given
this
back.
This
is
our
job.
To
do
the
work
we've
done,
I
think
is
good
work
and
I
would
be
willing
to
express
that
this
is
what
I
believe
is
the
best
route
to
go,
that
we
can
Discover
at
this
point
and
in
that
I
think
this.
B
Is
very
good
work
and
I
don't
want
to
be
shooting
it
from
the
hip
saying
I'm,
not
necessarily,
as
you
know,
as
a
citizen
of
Brisbane
endures
at
this
point
a
parking
permit
program,
but
this
was
given
to
us
and
you
know
we
need
to
give
it
to
council,
but
there
were
also
other.
You
know,
conversations
that
went
on
that
I
think
was
mainly
clear
to
us
that
we
will
make
you
know
we
will
work
on
this
and
they
were
going
to
do
the
public
Outreach
Outreach.
B
E
I
guess
I
was
bringing
in
a
sense
of
like.
Would
it
possibly
change
how
you
guys
feel
about
it?
If,
when
you
did
Outreach,
you
found
you
heard
from
those
two-thirds
to
maybe
it's
even
more
four-fifths
of
people
that
you
talk
to
that
say.
Yes,
yes
do
this,
we
you
know,
we
know
there
are
some
people
that
don't
like
it,
but
they'll
get
used
to
it.
If
we
need
this,
we
need
this.
This
is
going
to
improve
parking
and
would
that
help?
If
that
were
the
case,
but
I
don't
know.
If
it's
the
case,
we.
B
J
There
yeah
we
have
spent
hours
on
absolutely
little
tiny
points
of.
How
is
this
going
to
work
and
who's
it
going
to
be
disadvantaged
and
who's
going
to
be
helped
and
we've
taken
into
account,
affordability
for
people
and
we're
we're
calling
it
a
living
project
and
I,
don't
see
any
problem
with
recommending
this
for
the
council
to
look
over
give
us
their
feedback.
I'm
we've
worked
way
too
hard
to
not
stand
behind
our
work.
C
K
A
K
B
E
Well,
I
I
think
the
way
this
was
mine.
Language
I
think
this
part
of
the
draft
right
and
I
think
I,
don't
know
if
that
was
my
intent.
But
to
me
it
reads,
as
we've
developed
these
guidelines
at
your
request
here
they
are
that's
what
I
see
we
this
is.
We
do
recommend
these
guidelines.
This
is
our
work.
E
C
D
C
J
E
B
F
Thoughts
all
right,
I'll
be
open
to
that
as
well.
I
think
to
Karen's
point,
if
we
add
in
a
public
recommendation
for
public
vote
to
the
end
of
this
document
saying
you
know,
the
committee
recommends
this
program
subject
to
public
vote.
I'd
be
very
much
in
favor
of
that,
but
you
know
up
to
the
committee
I
think
so.
Okay
I
would,
with
that
wording.
I
would
accept
the
adopt
then
Christian's.
F
The
last
guideline
would
be
so
I
guess:
I
moved
to
add
to
the
guidelines,
then
sort
of
a
to
put
this
up
to
public
vote.
If
the
council
decides
to
adopt
this
sort
of
as
part
of
our
recommendation
at
the
end
at
the
last
step,
sort
of
after
the
guidelines,
the
last
step
would
be
subject
to
a
vote
of
the
public.
Let's.
C
C
Okay,
the
program
will
be
in
effect
throughout
Central
Brisbane,
including
visitation
Avenue,
excluding
private
roads
and
the
back
side
of
San
Bruno
Avenue,
for
which
no
street
parking
exists.
We're
okay
with
that,
as
I
look
around
just
raise
your
hand,
you
don't
need
to
for
a
prompt
I
guess.
Each
household
address
May
apply
for
and
receive
up
to,
two
permits
accessory
dwelling
units
adus
may
be
issued.
A
C
Additional
permit,
okay,
guest
parking
should
be
included
in
a
program,
but
cssc
did
not
decide
upon
a
specific
recommendation
on
the
number
to
be
allowed.
Staff
suggest
14
permits
per
year
per
household
and
seven
per
year
for
adus
guest
parking
would
be
allowed
whether
the
household
obtains
a
year-round
parking
permit,
year-round
parking
permits
or
not.
F
Sorry,
on
the
previous
point,
one
thing
we're
not
I
guess
addressing
here
is
additional
premise
beyond
the
first
two
permits,
that's
when
we
discussed
previously
and
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
have
a
note
here
to
let
Council
kind
of
think
about
that,
some
more
so
it'd
be
sort
of
Beyond
two
permits.
What
would
that
look
like
whether
for
fee
or
something
else
that
we
might
recommend.
C
F
Perhaps
there's
a
comma
and
a
a
common
a
period
there
may
we
add,
in
with
the
option,
to
purchase
additional
one
or
with
with
additional
or
Council
allowing
additional
ones.
It's
on
the
under
the
two
permanent
part.
We
stick
up
to
two
permits
and
there's
a
comma
and
a
period
so
either
the
common
needs
to
get
rid
of
there
or
I'm.
Okay,
just
leaving
in
the
living
document
as
well.
I
think
we
don't
need
to
necessarily
explicitly
say
that
I
think
it's
something
that
we
discussed
and
yeah
we'll
be
addressed.
F
Guess
we
did
discuss
sort
of
allowing
something
Beyond
two
if
someone
would
have
more
than
two
vehicles
and
so
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
addressed
elsewhere,
I
don't
see
any
other
bullet
points.
That's
why
I
kind
of
brought
it
up,
but
I'm
not
sure
whether
that
should
just
be
in
living
document,
something
that
we
address
and
just
note
it
or
have
it
here
explicitly
stated
I.
B
Think
I
I
I,
remember
you
know
talking
a
little
bit
about
this
one.
One
idea
was,
you
know
not
not
to
sort
of
have
a
a
a
parking,
a
parking
you
know
gift
permits
and
then
people
that
have
more
means
they're
going
to
buy
a
lot
right
and
also
to
discourage
it
for
the
you
know,
third
to
be
more
more
expensive
so
that
those
are
the
the
two
percussion
things
that
we
went
back
and
forth
back
and
forth.
F
E
Can
I
comment?
I
did
talk
to
Commander
Garcia
when
I
drafted
that
part,
because
quite
honestly,
if
if
Council
says
yes
there's
a
program
and
we
start
it,
it's
gonna
be
him
police
staff
that
are
going
to
look
at
those
type
of
exceptions.
It's
not
going
to
probably
be
you
guys,
the
committee,
and
he
said
he
didn't
want
to
explicitly
say
that
in
here
it's
kind
of
I,
don't
know
it's
a
very
gray
area
right.
E
E
C
F
Guess
the
question
is
where
to
input
that
part,
then
that
would
probably
be
under
sort
of
I
guess
discussion.
Would
it
be
or
be
on
the
end
here?
I
guess
be
under
the
very
end
where
this
is
sort
of
subject
to
you
know
the
our
committee
would
recommend
a
public
Vote
for
This,
given
the
sort
of
severity
of
the
program.
F
B
C
C
C
D
C
The
second
item
on
our
work
plan
for
last
year
was
investigate
the
potential
for
one-way
streets,
Mariposa
and
Monterey
between
visitation
and
Solano,
and
actually
we
had
started
working
on
that
when
Council
directed
us
to
work
on
the
parking
permit
program
Karen.
Is
that
still
a
high
priority
to
the
city
that
one
way
that
change.
C
The
fourth
item
was
study:
pedestrian
path
on
West
Side
of
Bayshore
Boulevard
from
San
Bruno
Avenue
to
Old
County
Road
at
the
city
council
meeting,
where
we
were
directed
to
work
on
parking.
The
mayor
at
that
time
expressed
interest
in
in
this
particular
project
as
something
that
we
should
work
on
other
projects
that
we
had
not
that
we
had
on
our
wish
list.
C
D
C
B
K
I
was
just
going
to
ask
if
I
could
add
something
potentially
I
think
looking
into
ways
to
slow
down
traffic
on
San
Bruno
Avenue
is
important
between
San
Francisco
Avenue
and
the
top
of
the
ridge
of
the
hill
in
I.
Think
it's
something
we
can
look
into
to
see.
If
there's
any
way
we
can
slow
down
traffic
there.
Okay,.
J
F
I
guess
then
another
sort
of
note
similar
number
eight
reviewing
the
I
guess
shuttle
service,
but
also
access
points,
and
we
talked
about
the
master
plan
to
get
to
Sierra,
Point
and
sort
of
the
connectivity.
There
it'd
be
great
to
sort
of
review
that,
and
maybe
reevaluate
and
sort
of
you
know
reassess
what
that
looks
like
in
the
context
of
the
development
of
the
other
Sierra
Point
developments.
C
E
K
E
Yeah:
okay,
because
there's
preliminary
things
like
collecting
data
and
and
asking
police
to
go
enforce
there,
which
you
know
nothing
works
forever.
Even
if
you
put
up
something,
that's
a
traffic
calming
device,
I
think
we've
I've
talked
about
this.
Maybe
before
you're
on
the
committee,
you
kind
of
have
to
change
things
up
to
get
people's
attention.
E
J
Concurrent
with
the
planning
the
parking
so
that
if
the
committee
that's
working
on
that,
gets
all
the
way
to
the
end
and
then
they
present
it
to
us.
We've
had
no
input
and
it
might
really
mess
up
their
whole
plan.
But
if
we
can
somehow
have
an
opportunity
to
review
it
as
it's
being
put
together,
I
think
that
would
be
a
really
good
idea
and
I.
Don't
know
how
to
put
that
into
words.
B
So
for
number
eight
you're
saying
because
you
know
you
have
the
the
massive
development
Berkshire
point,
some
of
the
you
know
the
shorter
might
need
to
add
another
stop.
And
then,
from
your
point,
Linda
you're,
basically
saying
we
need
to
understand
better
how
they're
going
to
accommodate
their
parking
and
they
have
like
a
parking
structure
or
specifically.
J
For
I
know,
I'd
hate
to
see
a
parking
structure,
but
specifically
for
the
park
that's
being
developed
out
there,
which
initially
I
believe
was
supposed
to
be
small,
but
the
plans
have
gotten
very
big
and
I.
You
know
I.
If
you
don't
have
parking.
How
are
people
going
to
use
it?
So
we've
got
to
really
look
at
a
really
fine
finesse
way
to
allow
people
to
arrive
there
and
enjoy
it.
F
Mist
communication
I
think
there
was
some
sort
of
I
think
the
release
of
the
plans.
The
little
premature,
perhaps
saying
NASA's
going
tomorrow
to
council
to
sort
of
discuss
that
I
think
these
are
being
viewed
as
sort
of
proposals
or
plans.
I
think
that's
not
the
intention
originally
and
so
I
think
part.
This
is
sort
of
more
to
open
up
discussion.
F
I
think
the
parking
concerns
are
definitely
I,
think
we're
not
too
late
for
it
yet
and
I'm
not
sure
what
kind
of
wording
we
can
include
here,
but
it
is
I,
think
going
to
council
tomorrow
and
I
think
it'll
be
a
a
healthy
good
discussion
and
I
plan
on
being
there.
So
you
know
it'd
be
great
to
see
you
guys
there,
but
I
think
it
is
more
still
perhaps
a
again.
J
D
C
D
B
I'm
also
have
one
more:
if
you
guys
don't
have
any
more
to
say
about
point.
Eight
I
want
to
I
want
to
say
something
about
0.9.
Yes,
because
this
is
a
massive
Pro
project
and
I
know,
there's
been
you
know,
different
maps
and
so
forth
circulated,
and
at
one
point
you
know
it
would
be
good
to
have
a
refresher
or
better
understanding.