►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.D&I.August.5.2020
Description
CHAOSS.D&I.August.5.2020
A
Sure
yep,
so
just
so
everybody
kind
of
knows
the
process
so
about
every
six
months
or
so
we
do
kind
of
a
formal
release
of
metrics
that
have
come
from
the
different
working
groups
and
dni
has
been
working
on
three
different
metrics
kind
of
over
the
last
six
months,
and
so
they
they've
gone
through
a
public
review
period.
So
the
hope
is
is
that
today
we
can
kind
of
give
our
sign
off
that
the
metrics
are
ready
for
release.
A
A
Yeah,
I
made
you
co-host
just
in
case,
so
you
can
see
that
these
metrics
have
been
labeled
as
release
candidate
or
metric
release,
metrics
candidate
release.
A
Issue,
matt,
broberg
and
ray
pake
also
had
some
comments
as
well.
That
I
think
have
all
been
been.
A
A
D
D
D
B
D
A
D
E
In
for
a
second
because
I've
been
in
a
place
where
they
really
worked
very
hard
to
make
sure
everybody
felt
well
welcomed,
and
then
the
first
thing
when
I
said
about
my
difference,
is
we're
not
equipped,
but
you
told
me
you
can
come.
I
came
and
then
you're
telling
me
I
should
come
equipped.
E
That
is
really
the
opposite
of
inclusion.
That
is
just
let's
look
diverse,
let's
sound
inclusive
and
I
think
I
think
it
hurts
when
people
follow
the
recipe
on
how
to
look
good
and
we
give
them
the
recipe.
And
then
they
say
what
we
follow
the
recipe,
but
they
don't
understand,
understand
the
substance
of
the
recipe.
E
It's
a
very
painful
place
to
be,
and
I
don't
wish
it
for
anyone
else
because
it
broke
me
for
about
a
year
and
a
half
in
that
project.
So
sorry
to
be
very
dramatic,
but
can
we
kind
of
think
of
how
we
can
tell
people
and
actually
be
welcoming?
If
you
can't,
then
don't
put
it
so.
A
Sure
so
I
mean,
I
think,
you're
totally
it's
an
excellent
point
and
I
mean
we
we
need.
I
think
we
need
the
recipe
still
as
as
is
here.
We
need
to
send
the
signal,
but
then
there's
also
kind
of
what
you're
talking
about
the
the
next
step
of
actually.
E
Doing
work
price
for
it
until
we
become
an
ideal
society
looking
like
we
want
to
become
ideal,
that's
great,
but
the
price
is
paid
by
the
people
who
realize
they're
not
included
in
that
ideal,
and
it's
a
very
lonely
price.
A
E
So
could
you
put
the
link
for
that?
Oh,
it's.
E
E
If
the
project
I
was
in
did
not
say
we
welcome
everybody,
irrespective
of
a
title,
irrespective
of
education,
irrespective
of
gender
race,
blah
blah
blah
blah
if
they,
if
they
said,
but
we
are
not
equipped
because
github
doesn't
have
accessibility,
then
accountability
would
fall
on
github,
but
they
don't
want
to
say
that
because
okay,
you
know
you
see
what
I
mean
like
like
who
ends
up
chasing
the
missing
piece
of
the
information
that
it's
not
their
fault.
But
then
github
says:
let's
not
get
into
the
can
of
worms.
E
You
know
so
so
it's
just
somebody
has
to
say,
but
please
note:
github
is
responsible
and
they're
not
really
matching
up,
and
we
can't
go
elsewhere.
For
instance,
that
way
we
start
to
actually
close
gaps,
as
opposed
to
say,
as
opposed
to
try
to
find
a
way
not
to
mention
the
gaps.
E
Which
I
I
personally
I
don't
know
how
to
wrap
my
head
around,
not
mentioning
the
gaps
and
I'm
too
blunt
and
inappropriate.
So
so
I
I
don't
know,
how
can
we
find
the
middle
ground.
D
Matt,
can
you
patch
put
that
patch
up
again
or
the
link
to
it.
D
E
You
know,
because
I
know
for
sure
the
project
I
was
in
had
other
other
members
who
were
neurodivergent,
and
I
know
for
sure
that
the
aspect
of
finding
ways
to
have
them
properly
equipped
were
addressed
to
have
them
on
board
and
that
that's
where
it
cut
more
right.
So
so
it's
like
if
there
is
accessibility
and
if
the
accessibility
is
being
labored
on
for
certain
people
and
not
for
other
people,
then
I
wasn't
welcome
not
for
my
inaccessibility
but
for
my
other
lack
of
you
know,
meeting
a
particular
criteria.
E
D
Okay,
I
think
I've
got
a
rewarding.
Let
me
know
if
this
covers
it
signal
to
newcomers
that
everyone
is
welcome
and
how
to
be
successful.
Given
the
structure
limitations
see
below
of
the
project
resources,
yes,
and
then
we
could
have
a
list
of
hey
we're
good
for
everybody.
We
we're
on
github
and
we
have
these
issues
or
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
so
having
the
base
and
the
intro
up
in
the
objective,
but
then
breaking
it
pointing
out
and
breaking
out.
D
A
A
A
In
the
chat,
if
you
want-
and
I
can,
I
can
just
update
this
pr.
D
A
F
No
no
worries
I
was
just
going
to
ask
if
it
would
merit
putting
a
separate
section
under
the
step.
One
understand
where
we
could
say
you
know:
there's
accountability,
diverse
participation,
rules
and
consistency,
blah
blah.
We
could
say
something
about
understood
or
acknowledgement
of
limitations,
and
then
you
know
there.
We
could
ask
a
question
or
prompt
the
leaders
or
prompt
whoever
to
put
things
in
words
explicitly
like
we.
E
Absolutely
so
so
I,
if
every
project
indicated
that
when
we
had
members
who
tried
to
use
github,
they
found
it
inaccessible
that
would
that
would
actually
make
the
problem
real,
instead
of
it
being
more
like
gas
lighting
like
you
have
to
write
it
all
the
way
to
go
to
the
head
of
developer
relations
on
github
to
realize
that
okay,
you
know
nobody
else
knows
about
this
problem,
because
nobody
else
realizes
it's
a
problem
so
yeah.
I
think
a
lot
of
developers
sadly
quit
before
they
stay
the
road.
E
I
quit
from
a
lot
of
things
before
so
I
didn't
really
have
a
choice
so
but
yeah
at
the
end
of
the
line.
Github
has
a
page
that
says
they
need
government
regulations
for
accessibility.
Please
email
us
doesn't
work
and
in
the
end
they
say
we
can't
really
help
you
so
or
or
or
something
as
we'll.
Let
people
know
you
know
either
way
you
don't
get
anything
so
yeah.
A
Perfect
so
maybe
elizabeth,
I
will
update
the
pr
with
amy's
comment
and
then
you
can
merge
mine,
and
then
you
can
update
the
step
one.
What
you
just
talked
about
like
a
second
pull
request
and
I'll,
merge
yours
and
together
we'll-
and
so
I
think,
maybe
that
would
take
care
of
this
and
then
once
that's
done.
I
think
we
can
close
this
issue
and
signal
to
kevin.
How
does
that
sound.
A
It's
the
second
one.
I
was
peeking
ahead
a
little
bit.
A
So
the
the
next
one
is
from
miriam
on
issue
inclusivity,
and
so
the
premise
of
of
this
is
how
issues
github
issues
can
kind
of
help
from
an
inclusivity
perspective
and
how
they
can
be
used
to
kind
of
foster
that
so
that's
the
premise
of
this
matt
broberg,
who
is
not
on
or
miriam's,
not
on
matt,
had
suggested
matt
and
miriam
were
having
some
discussions
just
about.
I
think
clarity
about
the
metric.
So
if
you
want
to
take
a
second
to
take
a
look
at
those.
A
Just
to
provide
clarity
on
the
metric,
I
don't
think
they
are
from
the
way.
I
understand
like
fundamental
changes
to
the
metric,
but
just
kind
of
ways
to
to
represent
it
slightly
differently
and
miriam
said
great
to
matt's
comments.
So
maybe
another
thing
would
be:
do
you
think
I
should
ping
matt
broberg
to
issue
a
pull
request
to
suggest
these
changes?
A
I
can
do
that
anyway.
That's
not
a
problem,
so
why
don't
I
do
that
and
hopefully
we
can
get
these
in
and
then
I
can
do
a
review
if
that
works.
A
B
Okay,
oh
the
next
one
is
documentation,
usability,
I'm
putting.
B
Thank
you.
That's
very
kind
of
you
very
kind,
okay,
so
this
one,
let's
just
see
if
I
share
the
right
screen
here.
B
Okay,
we
touched
briefly
on
this
one
last
time
I
don't
know
if
there
were,
let
me
just
go
down.
Unfortunately,
I
don't
remember.
Oh,
I
put
a
comment
in
but
no
no
said
anything,
but
it
was
mostly
about
the
phrasing.
I
think.
Let
me
go
back
and.
B
B
A
Yeah,
so
it
was
just
trying
to
address
ray's
point
there
at.
C
B
A
Fine,
so
it's
just
kind
of
like
the
last
one
with
ray
or
whichever
one
something
on
the
objectives
it
was
two
ago.
I
guess
I
was
just
trying
to
provide
some
clarity
for
ray.
I
did
not
issue
a
pull
request
for
this.
It
was
just
simply
a
suggestion.
B
Mm-Hmm,
I
think
we
it's
it's.
We
can
accept
that
suggestion
that
you're
basically
saying
where
should
it
go
right
like
it's,
it's
kind
of
like
a
good
quantitative
metric,
although
yeah
it
could
be
like
more
about
an
indication
of
yeah.
I
don't
know
what
it
depends
on.
Maybe
the
type
of
issues
now
I'm
just
giving
my
own
opinion
about
it,
but
but
yeah
can
we
not
just
accept
that
suggestion?
It
seems
like
a
good
one.
A
I
can
so
why
don't
I'll
issue
a
pull
request
on
this?
To
add
this
as
a
bullet
point,
it's
a
pretty.
I
think
it's
a
not
a
major
change
by
any
means
and
I'll
ping
ray
I'll
ask
ray
to
review
this,
and
I
think
he
can.
I
don't
know
if
he
can
merge,
but
I'll
always
ask
for
his
feedback.
B
B
F
B
Oh
yeah,
there's
just
this
like
these
questions
like
how
comfortable
it
like
make
just
making
it
like
more
about
like.
Was
there
any
language?
You
didn't
understand
terms
you
didn't
understand,
rather
than
just
asking
about
general
comfort,
just
as
a
way
of
like
getting
at
specifically
what's
confusing.
I
H
Minor,
go
ahead.
Sorry,
no,
no
problem,
I
feel
like
it
would
make
sense
to
added
a
line
under
28
that
asked
that
question,
because
it
can
be
two
separate.
H
Sounds
good,
I
also
we
had
a
similar
situation
with
some
of
matt
berber's
suggestions
that
still
has
an
open
pull
request
from
georg
right.
Under
that
comment
that
we
were
just
talking
about.
Is
it
a
pr
for
making
is
yeah,
and
he
he
put.
H
A
A
H
Okay-
and
I
just
want-
I
know-
you're-
going
to
hate
me
for
this,
but
I
had
a
last
second
change
to
the
to
the
inclusive
leadership
just
so
there
was
something
I
mentioned
to
mozilla
only
and
I
changed
it
to
mention
all
kinds
of
project
managers
and
stuff.
So
it
was
just
a
quick
request
that
seems
reasonable.
H
B
A
D
A
Sure
so
justin,
so
we
we
do
with
the
metrics
release.
We
do
release
changes
that
occurred
between
releases
like
a
release.
Notes
document
is
that,
would
that
be
helpful,
or
are
you
thinking.
J
Yeah,
definitely,
I
just
think
you
know,
probably
just
a
summary
of
the
changes
might
be
a
little
easier
for
folks
there
to
keep
up
with
the
yeah.
A
A
A
Oh
yeah,
we
do
that
kind
of
by
default
yeah
we
do
it
so
I'll
show
you.
Let
me
pull
it
up
real
quickly
here.
A
So
this
will
be
updated
when
the
release
occurs.
So
right
we
have
all
of
the
metrics
this.
These
are
all
of
the
atomic
metrics
that
the
different
working
groups
release,
but
also
as
part
of
this,
we
also
do
a
release.
Notes,
which
is
every
working
group
kind
of
assembles
like
here,
are
the
new
metrics?
Here's
what's
changed,
we,
I
don't
know
we
did
some
grammatical
updates
or
whatever
it
might
be.
You
know
in
this
next
round,
so
this
is
something
that
comes
by
default.
B
B
J
B
C
Yes
sure
sorry,
I
haven't
spoken
a
lot
today
when
you
speak
when
you're
on
a
call,
you
suddenly
realize
you
haven't,
used
your
voice
because
I'm
fairly
new-
and
I
haven't
been
to
many
of
these
meetings-
and
I
do
lack
a
bit
of
background
context-
do
let
me
know
if
this
is
kind
of
either
relevant
or
irrelevant,
but
within
the
objectives
section
of
the
documentation,
dash
usability
and
markdown
file.
C
I
was
thinking
that
there
was
something
that
I
experienced
when
I
was
working
a
lot
with
parents
that
had
to
set
up
tech,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
had
to
be
really
careful
of
within
this
other
context
was
that
parents
or
carers
in
as
far
as
like
inclusion
of
people
that
have
a
and
basically
time
diversity.
C
C
Diversity,
so
are,
is
your
documentation
taking
into
account
that
there
are
people
out
there
in
the
world
that
still
want
to
be
part
of
the
community
and
contribute
that
might
only
be
able
to
digest
documentation
or
do
things
in
these
sections
and
actually
don't
have
the
what's
the
word
privilege
of
yeah
long
long
periods
of
time
is
that
something
that
doesn't
doesn't
exist?
I
can't
I've
stand,
and
I
can't
kind
of
see
anything
that
kind
of
uncovers
that
those.
D
Projects
recognize
the
fact
that
some
contributors
are
full-time
employees
who
are
dedicated
to
this,
and
then
there
are
some
who
do
it
on
their
own
time
type
of
deal
and
I
think
that's
kind
of
what
you're
addressing
the
ability
to
say.
I
can
sit
here
for
five
hours
and
read
this
documentation
versus
okay
in
between
meetings.
I'm
going
to
read
this
for
five
minutes,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
at
our
level
or
at
the
project
level,
thoughts.
A
So
I
I
have
never
thought
of
this,
so
thank
you
for
for
bringing
this
up.
I
just
have
never
thought
about
people
having
different
amounts
of
time
to
read
documentation
right.
So
this
is
what's
super
cool
about
this
group
right,
so
I
I,
if
I
look
at
so
I'm
gonna
share
my
screen
again
arrow.
C
G
A
bit
to
share
here
in
this
covid
age,
he
is
I
I
when
is
listening
to
her.
I
I
could
really
identify
with
that
whole
issue,
because
oftentimes
at
intel,
they'll
they'll
set
up
hour-long
meetings
right
and
they
don't
even
leave
for,
for
example,
you
know-
and
I
think
it's
so
nice
with
our
our
group-
that
you
at
least
leave
10
minutes
at
the
end
to
transition
to
the
to
the
new
meeting
but
oftentimes.
G
What
I
found
having
duncan
at
home
now
and
being
a
homeschool
parent
and
and
full-time
worker,
is
that
I
it
used
to
be
I've.
I've
solved
for
this
now,
but
it
used
to
be.
I
could
occupy
him
for
like
20
minutes
in
a
time
or
even
a
half
hour
at
a
time.
G
So
half
hour
meetings
worked
a
lot
better
for
me
than
full
hour
meetings,
so
that
and-
and
I
it
didn't
I
I
wouldn't
have
identified
with
this
until
this
whole
age
of
courage-
where
I'm
like.
Oh
wow,
I
actually
have
to
keep
him
moving
and
do
my
own
stuff
right.
Do
my
own
work
and
our
meetings
are,
you
know,
used
to
be
until
I
got
it
under
control
really
difficult,
so
I
I
can
identify
with
with
this
particular
particular
piece.
B
G
D
E
I
think
I
think
it's
navigatable
exactly
is
the
word
so
yeah,
like
I
really
hate
it.
When
I
have
to
scroll
through
one
markdown
file,
that
has
everything
and
then
you
know
it
might
be
easily
navigatable
that
you
don't
go
to
another
page,
but
it's
not
humanly
navigatable.
E
We
have
three
parts
now,
instead
of
one
big
document,
documentation,
accessibility,
we
we
were
just
doing
the
usability
part,
I
think
in
one
of
the
other
two
parts
there
was
part
part
about
searchability
and
yeah
and
addressability
or
another
word
that
we
used.
A
Personally,
listening
to
the
conversation
and
kind
of
looking
at
the
objectives,
I
I
think
it
can
fit
here.
Okay,
I
think,
even
in
terms
of
I
don't
I
and
actually
I
don't
think
it
makes
a
huge
change.
I
think
the
data
collection
strategies
can
stay
kind
of
as
they
are,
I
think,
to
errol's
point.
Maybe
this
is
just
a
sixth
bullet
point,
whatever
the
title
is
and
kind
of
the
language
that
was
being
used
here,
like
navigability
or
you
know,
to
be
attempted
to
be
attentive
to
time
variations
that
people
have.
J
E
Yeah,
I
I
think
I
think
it's
it's
fair
to
say
that
all
of
those
three
metrics
will
overlap,
but
one
of
them
will
be
more
verbose
about
the
aspect
because
it
falls
in
its
purview,
whereas
the
other
one
will
be
more
generic
or
big
picture.
E
So
here
we're
saying
navigateable
or
I
don't
know
how
to
pronounce
it.
The
other
way
around
so
so
navigatable
is
a
very
broad
descriptor
for
many
many
verbose
aspects
that
are
addressed
in
one
of
the
other
two.
E
E
If
the
project
is
doing
their
job
to
make
it
accessible,
they
don't
need
the
metric
to
force
them
to
actually
own
up
to
the
tour
of
making
it
accessible
they're
doing
that
on
their
own.
They
could
use
this
particular
metric
to
ask
the
project
to
make
it
more
navigatable
to
them
and
that
works.
A
I
the
one
phrase
that
resonated
with
me
throughout
all
of
this
was
harold.
I
think
you
could
use
the
phrase
like
time
diversity
and
I
immediately
went
to
like
geographic
time
and
when
you
explained
it
that
was
not.
I
realized,
that's
not
what
you
were
talking
about,
but
that
I
don't
know
that
phrase
locates
me
pretty
well,
I
think
at
the
heart
of
what
you're
trying
to
get
at
that
people.
C
A
C
Ahead,
I
think
a
lot
of
everything
that
everyone
said
is
super
important
and
it
could
fit
in
these
other
headings
for
sure,
like
it
could
be
to
speak
to
structure.
It
could
speak
to
readability
a
lot
of
different
things,
but
I
think
that
there's
something
if
we're
talking
about
inclusion,
there's
something
generally
very
absent
about
breaking
it
out
into
a
separate
kind
of
bullet
point.
C
You
know
I
mean
it's
often
kind
of
one
of
the
one
of
these
ones
about
time,
diversity,
because
all
of
us
have
different
kinds
of
lives
and
we
all
manage
our
time
differently,
and
I
think
that
there's
very
little
said
about
the
kinds
of
people
that
are
again
drawing
on
some
stereotypes,
but
that
aren't
the
kind
of
people
that
have
that
privilege
or
luxury
of
doing
their
job,
and
then
they
spend,
however,
many
hours
after
their
paid
job
working
on
open
source,
because
you
know
they
don't
you
know,
aren't
the
primary
caregiver
or
they're
this
or
that,
so
I
think
it.
C
I
think,
there's
almost
a
kind
of
statement
to
be
kind
of
said
about
bringing
it
into
its
own
bullet
point,
but
it
I
mean.
I'm
equally
as
happy
that
it
gets
included
within
one
of
the
other
headings,
but
it
yeah.
I
think
it's
to
be
honest.
C
I
think
it's
up
to
you
folks
about
where
it
fits
best
because,
like
I
said,
I'm
not
100
sure
being
fairly
new
to
this
kind
of
working
group
where
how
it
actually
fits
best,
but
I'm
mostly
just
happy
that
it
was
useful
as
a
comment,
but
time.
C
F
To
ask
a
quick
question
so
like
something,
that's
really
helpful
for
me,
because
I
also
fit
into
that
where
you
know
a
lot
of
time.
It's
small
chunks,
something
that's
very
helpful
to
me-
is
like.
If
you
go
to
medium.
It
says
this
is
a
six
minute
read,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
we
want
to
encourage-
and
I
don't
know
how
they
sort
that
out
or
how
they
figure
that
out.
F
If
there's
an
algorithm,
I'm
not
sure,
but
that
might
be
something
to
think
about
and
also
I
think
that
this
speaks
to
not
to
divert
the
conversation
away,
but
it
also
speaks
to
inclusive
issues
as
well.
If
you
can
kind
of
put-
and
I
think
this
might
actually
be
in
there-
the
small
medium
large
kind
of
grouping.
But
I
know
that
that
was
one
thing
that
our
pta,
our
parent
teacher
association
did
fantastically
well
to
get
volunteers.
F
To
do
things
was
to
be
upfront
about
how
much
time
you
think
it's
going
to
take
and
again
like
it's
super
hard
to
estimate
that
in
a
lot
of
places,
but
just
having
like
a
general
estimation
of
this
is
what
kind
of
time
commitment
this
means.
Then,
before
you
know,
you
jump
into
something,
I
think
is
super
super
helpful
for
people
with
limited
resources
and
limited
time
and
who
have
little
chunks
that
they
have
to
work
with
and
sort
sort
out
throughout
the
day.
So
just
throwing
that
out
there.
F
But
I
really
like
the
time
to
read
part
of
medium.
A
C
B
B
G
J
Yeah
great
yeah:
let's
make
that
really
quick.
So
for
the
last
couple
years,
folks,
some
folks
in
the
open
source,
diversity.org
community,
have
talked
about
trying
to
do
a
like
a
global,
open
source
diversity
related
summit.
So
we're
going
to
try
to
do
it
this
year
and
try
to
do
something
virtual
towards
the
end
of
2020
or
early
2021.
J
So
we're
doing
two
organizer
calls
or,
like
general
calls
of
interest
to
understand
or
to
get
an
idea
of
how
much
capacity
folks
would
be
interested
in
bringing
to
the
organizing
and
also
what
kinds
of
different
skills
and
areas
of
expertise
people
might
be
interested
in
contributing.
J
So
those
calls
are
in
the
link
I
put
in
the
zoom
chat,
but
both
fridays
14
august
at
1800
or
6
p.m.
Utc
and
the
second
one
is
friday,
2020
august
21st
at
1700
utc.
J
H
And
I
just
want
to
keep
everyone
updated.
I'm
going
to
push
myself
in
here
about
badging
and
just
say
that
we
have
pilot
testing
on
the
17th
the
last
one
and
we're
glad
to
have
any
anybody
join.
Who
would
like
to
it's
exciting.
H
Right
now
it's
by
an
email
basis
or
you
can
put
a
submitting
issue
to
our
badging
program,
but
I'd
say
just
email.
It
would
be
the
best
way.
H
A
So,
just
in
terms
of
volunteers,
I
know
we're
at
the
end
on
the
badging
program.
So
again,
this
is
for
events
to
be
able
to
demonstrate
that
they're
being
attentive
to
dni
related
issues,
and
so
what
matt
and
asta
are
looking
for.
Are
people
to
take
honestly
just
a
few
minutes
to
be
a
pretend
event
to
go
through
the
process
of
requesting
a
badge
and
then,
on
the
other
hand,
people
to
be
pretend
reviewers.
So
I
would
look
at
somebody's
submission.
A
You
know
and
say
your
code
of
conduct
is
not
posted.
Can
you
please
double
check
your
link
to
make
sure
it's
available,
so
there
on
one
hand
looking
for
people
to
do
fake
submissions
and,
on
the
other
hand,
they're
looking
for
people
to
do
fake
reviews,
which
should
be
really
it's
just
really
helpful,
because
it
just
helps
with
the
workflow
to
make
sure
it
all
goes
really
well.
B
Okay,
great
so
then
that's
it
right!
There's
a
the
open
in
for
summit
too.
Will
we
talk
about
that
next
week?.
D
A
B
In
the
it's
just
to
for
how.
G
Okay,
did
you
say
that
they
were
offering
that
for
free
registration
yeah,
it's
virtual.