►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Value.May.7.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Value.May.7.2020
B
A
A
Definitely
definitely
somebody's
hobby
I'm
not
sure
the
value
proposition,
but
spammers
gonna
spam
Goodwill.
It's
good
to
see
you
all
it's
kind
of.
Hopefully
this
can
roll.
You
know
go
into
whatever
conversations
make
sense,
but
just
want
to
give
you
an
update
on
works
in
progress
and
see
if
we
can
get
a
few
things
over
the
line.
We've
got
some
good
activity
in
the
repository,
but
before
we
get
cruise
along,
are
there
any
other
items
on
people's
minds
that
we
should
add
to
the
agenda
ahead
of
time.
C
B
A
Great
yeah,
you
know
I'm
I'm,
always
open
that
we
can
always
go
to
the
conversation
of
like
is
value
its
own
group,
or
does
it
make
sense,
you
know
merged
into
common
merge
into
elsewhere?
I
have
no
ego
on
that,
and
right
now,
I'm,
just
gonna
keep
hitting
the
drum
of
like.
Can
we
be
very
crisp
on
adding
you
know
value
like
finding
valuable
definitions
that
aren't
elsewhere
in
the
chaos
project,
aggregating
them
with
some
instructions
on
usage,
visualizing
them
a
little
bit?
A
D
C
B
C
D
D
C
A
B
A
A
G
A
Starting
from
a
quick
update
for
everybody,
a
CMS
reminder
that
we
I
pulled
this
out
in
the
refactoring
of
the
value
group
and
what
we
agreed
in
last
meeting
is.
It
makes
sense
to
put
it
back
in,
as
is
it
still
needs
simplification,
because
it's
it's
kind
of
a
mash-up
of
VALIC
of
a
metric
as
well
as
a
very
deep
tutorial
and
Gerard
is
gonna.
Take
the
next
step
on
connecting
that
into
google
Summer
of
Code
collaboration.
A
B
A
Totally
fair
question
I
feel
let
me
pull
up
like
the
most
recent
edit
as
soon
as
we
got
to
the
observation
that
you
know.
Ultimately,
this
is
a
very
thorough
implementation
of
social
listening,
I've
used
social
listening
to
justify
a
head
count
in
my
team,
like
hey,
based
on
play,
and
it's
always
comparative
so
like
based
on
this
month.
First
last
month
this
month,
we're
growing
in
our
awareness
in
this
target
audience
I,
don't
currently
have
capacity
on
my
team
to
to
do
further
work
with
them.
A
If
we
want
to
have
specialization
in
this
additional
audience,
I
need
a
head
count
for
somebody
who
does
that,
so
it
does
help.
This
is
beastly
like
I've.
Never
but
like.
This
is
outside
of
my
scope
of
expertise,
unlike
actually
implementing
something.
This
deep,
but
yo
responded
very
well
to
it.
He
says
customers
of
the
charity
are
interested
which
validates
to
me
that
it's
something
that
resonates
with
people
from
value
point
of
view,
so
I
I
feel
comfort
with
it.
Staying
in
the
space,
that's
all
yep.
B
F
B
F
G
B
B
F
A
Well,
I
guess
it
doesn't
from
my
first
reading
of
it,
but
I'll
throw
out
there
that
you
know
I'm
still
working
under
the
premise
that
it's
already
an
accepted
metric.
Oh,
it
was
a
few
months
ago.
It's
in
the
catalog
and
like
our
goal
right
now
is
to
get
one
that
is
get
a
version
of
it.
That
is
more
descriptive
than
it
previously
was.
Maybe
a
little
simpler
has
terms
like
social
listening
in
it.
A
Get
that
out
there
and
that's
what
this
pull
request
does
is
just
get
a
iterative
draft
to
a
reasonable
state
for
somebody
to
land
on
I
still
think
it's
I
would
love
that.
I
would
love
that
next
step,
but
I
would
prefer
it
as
a
second
pull
request,
if
possible
to
do
to
start
the
deconstruction
of
it,
because.
A
A
B
A
And
and
yeah
we
can
point
people
to
its
component
parts
I
really
like
the
way.
You
said
that
Shawn
like
that
there
are
some.
There
is
something
to
be
said
to
component
parts
here
and
I.
Think
it's
the
same
thing
I'm
running
into
you,
share
a
voice
that
the
component
parts
or
whatever
you're
measuring
for
popularity
to
some
degree.
So.
F
A
A
Gonna
ask
the
same
yeah
the
same
kind
of
question
on
specificity,
I
run
into
this
a
lot
and
I
think
I
stole
this
from
lean
analytics,
like
the
idea
of
like
the
raw
metric
for
a
synthetic
metric
or
aggregate
metric
and
yeah
I'm,
not
sure
it
kind
of
goes
all
the
way
to
the
top
level
of
chaos,
but
I
do
think,
there's
something
to
like
to
adding
metadata
like
so
that
you
know
when
the
library
of
metrics
comes
together,
there
can
be
headers
like
hey.
This
is
a
synthetic
metric
built
up
of
these
raw
components.
A
You'll
want
to
understand
the
raw
components
if
you're,
just
starting
out
like
kind
of
those
those
kind
user-experience
breadcrumbs
that
leads
people
to
those
pieces
and
maybe
at
the
bottom
of
the
raw
ones.
You
can
say
like
this
raw
metric
is
used
in
this
since,
like
one
like
an
ad
for
their
value,
go
read
here:
I've,
never.
G
A
G
Will
nothing
I
really
really
enjoy
it
ever
since
Sean
is
introduced,
open-source
software
to
our
class
like
it,
it
just
took
the
class
in
a
direction
than
it
wasn't
expecting
and
but
just
kind
of
messing
through
the
different
metrics
within
chaos
and
having
to
do
this
assignment
and
spending
time
trying
to
come
up
with,
and
you
know
your
own
metric
and
looking
at
different
articles
and
how
the
data
is
used.
It
was
actually
really
cool
and
I'm,
probably
just
gonna
kind
of
stick
around
for
a
while.
That's.
A
F
B
It's
like
relationships
between
metrics
that
you're
trying
to
define
that
this
metric
is.
You
know
synthetic
of
these
raw
metrics
and
these
raw
metrics
are
used
to
roll
up
there
to
these
students
and
synthetic
metrics
we
can.
That
would
be
something
we
could
add
to
a
metrics
template
at
that
higher
level
and
folks
and
the
different
working
groups
to
do
that.
I.
B
Do
wonder
about
the
amount
of
time
that
it
takes.
I
I'd,
like
was
immediately
thinking
of
like
old
URL,
linking
things
like
you
linked
to
me
and
I'll
link
to
you
and
then
it
all
just
kind
of
falls
apart,
because
does
people
don't
maintain
that
that
linking
structure
so
is
what
you're
proposing
is
is?
Is
a
hundred
percent
agree,
but
maintaining
the
links
between
metrics
might
be
tricky
and
they
might
need
to
think
about
it
in
a
very
systematic
way.
C
B
C
B
B
G
A
Comes
I
put
this
in
the
category
of
infrastructure,
like
what
is
our
infrastructure
for
maintaining
the
link
from
github
repos
to
a
searchable
catalog,
yes,
and
if,
in
that
cycle
we
can
add
annotation.
That
would
be
very
valuable
and
yeah
if
there's
another
place
to
bring
up
that
conversation
I'm
not
going
to
join.
It
I
think
that
makes.
B
A
Cool
all
right,
so
moving
along
with
poll
requests,
I
proposed
one
before
I
got
involved
in
projects,
so
it
was
pretty
not
based
not
up
to
standards
but
I've.
Recently
updated
share
of
voice
still
very
much
a
work
in
progress,
but
the
answering
the
question
again
a
synthetic
metric
of
how
do
you
take
data
and
then
present
it?
You
know
in
a
way
that
provides
an
argument
to
it
and
started
to
to
clean
that
up.
A
So
there's
like
a
clear
implementation
metric
of
it,
but
the
I
think
we
we
were
talking
about
it
being
you
know
the
first
draft
was
it
was
just
saying
like
compare
two
things
and
show
that
you're
winning,
which
was
a
little
too
cowboy
but
I'm
starting
to
get
a
little
bit
further
along
when
this
gets
to
a
full
draft.
I
might
just
ask
you
know
just
to
distribute
the
wealth
Shawn.
Do
you
mind
if
I
tag
you
in
this
one
I
wrap
up
and
you
could
give
it
a
review?
Yeah.
D
A
B
G
B
F
F
A
A
A
F
A
A
A
So,
ultimately,
its
share
voices
related
to
value
in
the,
in
the
sense
that
it
is
a
competitive
value
like
what
is
the
relative
value
of
I?
Think.
Actually,
the
image
in
here
was
the
the
best
thing
to
clarify
it.
So
if
we
we
show
the
the
difference
of
like
our
growing
influence
in
us
in
conversations,
this
data
was
from
social
media
and
public
blog
posts
and
forum
posts.
A
Yet
PR
a
are
public
relations
and
analyst
relations
had
this
tooling.
That
was
working
so
I
wanted
to
reuse
it
and
talking
to
Lawrence
from
the
the
new
stack
like
we
talked
about
this
I
think
him
and
I
him
and
I
are
in
firm
agreement
that
it's
it's
a
somewhat
terrible
metric,
but
it's
really
really
effective.
A
When
people
like
it,
some
companies
offer
tools
like
automatic
automatic
tools
to
grab
stuff
from
social
media
and
gather
that
kind
of
data,
but
I
think
we
can-
and
you
know
honestly,
should
provide
open
source
alternatives
of
doing
that
of
grabbing
this
information,
which
we
do
grab
a
lot
of
this
information
already
through
through
github
issues
through
through
forums
through
mailing
lists,
and
then
we
could
talk
about
what
people
are
talking
about.
I.
H
A
H
H
G
A
G
A
A
H
I
mean
the
SEMS
when
we
produced
it.
Our
biggest
issue
was
that
a
lot
of
people
were
using
social
listening
tools
too,
abstract
quantitative
data
and
record
behavior
over
opinion,
which
is
why
we
built
the
SCMS
was
to
make
the
opinion
part
bigger
and
the
behavior
part
a
little
less
invasive,
and
it
was
the
system
from
there
that
this
is
kind
of
showing
and
that's
not
to
say
that
it's
not
in
any
way,
I
think
that
the
share
of
voice
metric
as
you
have
it.
H
F
H
A
F
You
talking
about
content,
oh
okay,
yeah,
yeah
and
and
social
share
of
voices,
essentially
how
influential
am
I
in
a
space
as
a
brand
or
as
a
good,
not
getting
that
right.
Yeah!
Absolutely!
That's
such
a
lot!
Really!
What
about
I'm
more
concerned
about
Samantha
thinking,
I'm,
getting
it
right
since
I'm
trying
to
describe
what
I
think
is
her
world
so.
H
A
B
G
B
A
G
A
You
know,
then,
he
added
a
ton
of
really
smart
ideas
where
people
kind
of
self
assess
and
put
it
on
a
sliding
scale,
and
then
you
know
my
my
conclusion
is
really
that
internal
and
external,
as
I
presented
originally
they're,
not
mutually
exclusive
and
not
even
necessarily
necessary
to
getting
metrics
out
there
like
right
now.
I
just
cared
that
we'd
get
some
used
and
useful
valuable
metrics
into
this
project
and
I
think
that
the
focus
groups
for
me
are
quite
honestly
a
distraction
from
that
ends.
B
The
reason
that
I
would
push
them
a
little
bit
is
because
the
way
that
the
so
developing
metrics
for
metrics
sake
is
at
least
in
the
way
that
cash
project
has
run
for
years
kind
of
been
not
not
the
focus.
So
the
focus
is
to
identify
the
goal
that
you're
trying
to
achieve
whatever
that
goal
might
be
mm-hmm.
B
B
And
so
that's
what
the
focus
areas
are
is
identifying
what
those
goals
could
be
another
goal
within
value,
who
would
be
perhaps
to
articulate
the
economic
impact
of
participating
in
a
project
so
we're
at
determine
the
economics
associated
with
participating
in
an
open
source.
So
those
are
the
kind
of
these
high-level
goals
that
you're
trying
to
achieve
right,
so
you're
trying
to
gain
clarity
on
on
those
goals,
and
so
in
order
to
achieve
those
goals.
So
if
it's
around
social,
you
would
say
what
are
the
questions
that
would
help
shed
light
on
on
that
goal.
B
H
I
also
want
to
add
to
that,
when
creating
a
metric
on
your
and
you're
kind
of
flipping
the
script
of
what
people
typically
do
when
they're
trying
to
identify
their
own
key
performance
indicators
in
their
own
business.
So
if
you
think
about
what
is
that
process
going
to
look
like
for
the
average
community
manager,
marketing,
analyst,
marketer,
etc,
how
exactly
are
they
going
to
build
their
KPIs
in
your
system,
and
then
you
have
to
predict
how
that's
going
to
work?
That's
a
lot
more
difficult
to
do.
H
G
A
C
So,
for
example,
taking
your
example
like
okay
I'm,
a
marketer
I
want
to
assess
the
value
of
my
product.
I
am
a
developer.
I
want
to
assess
the
words
of
my
project
in
a
different
context.
Everybody
brings
their
own
different
context,
so
should
all
of
them
consider
the
same
metric
or
my
focus
is
dependent
on
my
context
and
I
want
to
pick
the
random
and
fight
sample.
C
I
will
consider
it
on
the
marketing
side
in
the
social
side
and
I
look
for
those
metrics
in
the
value
context,
if
I'm
more
considered
on
the
financial
side,
I
just
look
at
the
ROI
only
to
cost-effective
sighs.
So
maybe
that's
where
my
suggestion
was
to
have
a
categorization
which
helped
me
to
look
at
my
specific
context
and
take
the
value
from
those
senior.
That's
what
my
thought.
One
other
question
is
they
do
everybody
look
at
the
same
metric
or
T
based
on
the
context,
look
at
the
different
avenues
within
that.
A
So
I'd
say
the
what
matters
is
whatever
the
is
financially
viable
to
a
stakeholder
or
budget
holder,
and
that's
not
the
same.
Just
because
you're
in
marketing
doesn't
mean
you
have
a
single
answer
to
that.
You'd
have
to
ask
just
because
you're
an
engineering
you
can
have
a
thousand
people
in
engineering
with
different
ones.
Those.
H
Kpis
then
it
doesn't
make
sense
for
us
to
predict
what
that
value
is
so
much
as
the
problem
space
or
the
data
set
that
they're
choosing
they're
kpi's
from
we
can
give
them
that
we
can
give
them
here's
this
system
tells
you
all
these
things.
If
you
find
value
in
this
set,
here's
the
KPIs
that
matter,
we
can
give
them
a
data
set,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
we
can
say
this.
One
individual
metric
provides
this
specific
value.
A
Right
I
think
I
here.
Are
you
saying
that
to
make
sure
that
the
data
set
is
going
to
be
the
the
common
denominator
of
the
possible
value?
People
are
going
to
derive
from
these
things
like
what
information
they
need
to
be
gathering
and
we
may
be
able
to
offer
them
patterns
by
which
they
can
look
at
that
data
set
and
present
value,
but
we're
not
going
to
know
which
one
it
is
ahead
of
time
based
on
something
like
their
job
title,
we're
gonna
get
their
technological.
H
Limitations
and
allowances
theory.
So
when
we
produce
something
a
piece
of
technology
or
manner
of
doing
something,
there
are
advantages
and
disadvantages
that
lead
to
allowances.
We
know
what
a
lot
of
those
allowances
are,
but
there
are
some
hidden
allowances
that
they
will
discover
that
we
can
never
anticipate
first
place
if
we
focus
less
on
the
value
in
specific
and
more
on
the
data
set
they'll
go
the
rest
of
the
way.
A
B
B
B
Both
about
discovering
kind
of
the
conversation
about
a
project
or
an
organization's
involvement
in
a
project
is
that
this
is
so
maybe
a
focus
area
is
about.
You
know,
understanding
like
external
conversation
or
external
voice
or
something
along
those
lines.
That
would
be
a
focus
area,
I'm
sure
I'm,
not
getting
the
words
quite
right,
and
so
in
order
to
do
in
order
to
to
understand
that
space
better
right.
B
There
are
questions
that
we
can
ask
to
improve
transparency
on
that
area
and
those
those
questions
whatever
they
might
be
can
be
answered
via
these
two
metrics,
and
so
these
two
metrics
ultimately
answer
a
question
which
actually
provide
additional
insight
on
this
school,
and
are
these
two
metrics,
like
the
only
two
metrics
that
provide
insight
on
external
communication?
No,
of
course
not,
but
do
they
improve
transparency
in
towards
that
goal?
Yes,
100%,
and
so
then
we
have
a
focus
area
which
is
whatever
again
external.
B
H
To
kind
of
ground
it
because
I
have
experience
with
what
I
believe
share
of
voice
is
based
on
and
the
SCMS
I
would
say:
they're
both
kind
of
flip
sides
of
the
same
coin
and
they're
both
trying
to
count
social
listening
as
a
matter
of
brand
reputation.
So
the
company
value,
rather
than
having
a
here's,
a
number
that
you
can
place
on
this.
The
reward
the
benefit
of
applying
either
share
a
voice
or
the
social
currency
metric
system
is.
B
B
A
A
A
Okay,
cool,
while
we're
in
the
the
heart
of
this
I
want
to
aspect
what
other
focus
areas
come
to
mind,
but
maybe
that's
a
bit
of
a
dead
end.
First
I'll
ask
like
what
what
is
like
the
next
actionable
step
to
propose
implement,
throw
a
focus
area
into
the
the
mix
here
in
in
value
group.
Well,
there
seems
to
be
one.
B
B
This
is
sometimes
I.
Don't
know
that
it's
necessary
when
you
say
social
I,
don't
know
that
the
question
that
I
had
gotten
was
necessarily
around
social.
It
was
just
like
I
need
to
save
engineer
time
by
participating
in
open
source.
How
do
I
calculate
the
amount
of
development
work
time
that
I'm
saving
period?
You
know
back.
A
A
B
A
B
B
It's
super.
It's
it's
obviously
a
hard
question
so
because
it's
still
it's
a
question,
that's
still
asked
pretty
regularly
and
so
again
then
we'd
have
this
focus
area
and
we'd
say
here
are
a
couple
metrics
like
whatever
the
questions
are
that
can
help
shed
light
on
how
you
might
calculate
the
savings
of
developer
time,
yeah.
A
A
A
A
B
H
Might
as
I
think
about
it,
I'm
wondering
if
it
might
be
better
to
generalize,
because
it
sounds
like
you're
looking
at
hard
investment
and
soft
investment
at
the
same
time.
So
reputation
is
a
soft
investment.
Social
listening
is
the
way
that
you
determine
that,
but
you're
also
looking
at
hard
investments.
H
What
is
the
ROI
of
this
community
and
that's
a
hard
question,
but
it
seems
to
go
kind
of
hand-in-hand,
so
if
you
were
to
generalize
it
out
of
social
listening
and
into
just
what
are
the
ways
that
you
can
use
measurement
tactics
and
metrics
in
order
to
determine
the
ROI
more
generally,
that
might
be
a
good
focus
area.
I,
don't
know
so.
B
H
B
It
has
been
those
terms
have
come
up
before,
not
here
but
like
in
other
conversation.
So
it's
not
the
first
time,
I've
heard
it
and
it
was
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
so
and
it
was
like
hard
and
soft
was
in
the
sense
of
like
human
conversation.
Soft
like
commits
hard.
You
know,
like
kind
of
these
two
different
things,
my
my
one,
hesitation
and
I,
don't
know
how
other
people
feel
about
this,
but
I'm
always
a
little
concerned.
That
soft
implies
less
important.
B
A
A
I
think
that's
like
very
it's
one
of
those
ones.
You
like
want
the
secret
handshake
before
using
that
language,
because,
like
you
get
people
are
letting
you
know
like.
Oh
I,
get
that
these
are
both
important
they're,
just
classification,
so
that
I
understand
the
information
and
people
that
don't
get
that
when
they
say
soft,
they
imply
bad
or
less
important
or
or
soft
as
in
week,
and
not
soft
as
in
useful
and.