►
From YouTube: Housing Opportunity Fund Meeting - 4/7/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Require
asl
interpretation.
We
do
have
that
available.
We
have
currently
it's
she's,
labeled,
asl
interpreter
l,
so
you
want
to
pin
her
to
your
screen
in
order
to
view
her
interpretation
as
we
go.
B
A
Will
begin
with
our
roll
call,
I
believe.
E
B
All
right
now
we
will
continue
moving
on
to
the
adoption.
B
C
C
This
is
a
36
unit
apartment
complex,
composed,
primarily
of
studios,
one
bedroom
and
two
bedroom
units
offering
affordable
rents
to
seniors
and
residents
with
disabilities.
It
is
categorized
as
a
hud
section
221c
property,
which
means
that
all
residents
are
supported
by
project-based
vouchers
and
are
spending
no
more
than
30
percent
of
their
income
on
rent.
C
C
These
include
things
like
roof
replacement,
replacement
of
the
elevator
control
system
and
door
operator,
brick
pointing
and
caulking
a
new
boiler
and
ceiling
of
their
parking
lot
in
2021.
The
boiler
and
parking
lot
were
replaced
and
sealed,
respectively,
using
the
remains
of
the
replacement
reserves.
But
for
these
last
project
project
items
the
borrower
laurentian
hall
associates
incorporated,
is
requesting
from
the
ura
or
an
rgp
loan
of
350
000
in
order
to
cover
the
cost
of
these
last
items.
C
C
Lastly,
I
think
it
is
also
worth
mentioning
that
the
wrenching
hall
in
many
respects
reflects
the
discussions
around
the
purpose
of
the
housing
opportunity
fund
in
its
efforts
to
support
preservation
and
community-based
projects.
The
costs
for
these
renovations
are
considerably
lower
than
the
construction
of
say,
a
new
building,
all
the
while
maintaining
the
same,
if
not
more,
number
of
affordable
units.
C
A
A
quick,
interjection,
paul's
bradley
is
stuck
in
the
waiting
room.
If
someone
can
let
him
in.
C
C
Oh
rick,
oh
sorry,
can
you
hear
us?
Yes.
C
I
was
sorry
about
that
yeah,
so
I
why
I
just
finished
the
presentation
on
the
question
paul
and
I
was
now
opening
the
florida
questions
and
comments
and
introducing
you,
as
representative
of
the
bloomfield
garfield
corporation,
to
help
in
answering
any
of
them.
H
And
notice
that
the
repayment
of
this
is
50
of
annual
cash
flow,
I'm
assuming
that
that's
after
property
reserves
are
funded,
and
you
know
that
you
know,
there's
some
sort
of
sinking
fund
to
take
care
of
repairs
to
continue
to
operate
this
and
not
just
take
in
the
actual
cash
that
that
comes
in.
I'm,
not
correct
in
that
assumption
or.
H
F
I
We
have
pretty
much
the
same
arrangement
with
the
us
department
of
housing
and
urban
development.
They
are
the
first
mortgage
holder
on
the
property
and
it's
pretty
much
the
same
arrangement.
They
really
have
first
dibs
at
whenever
we
have
as
a
net
cash
flow
on
the
building
and
the
building
does
have
a
point.
I'm.
A
Sorry
is
anyone
else
having
problems
hearing
him
is
his
volume,
his
audio
quality.
J
It
would
be
helpful,
I'm
not
sure
if
the
minutes
are
being
captured
properly,
so
if
he
could
turn
up
the
volume
that
would
be
helpful.
I
I
All
right,
I
was
just
saying
that
the
we
have
the
us
department
of
housing.
I
Development
as
the
first
mortgage
holder
on
the
property
and
they
have
first
dibs
on
any
excess
cash
flow
that
we
have
on
the
project.
The
project
is
showing
positive
cash
flow
year
to
year.
So
there
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
direct
some
repayment
to
the
ura
after
we
have
satisfied
our
obligations
to
hud.
H
L
H
Do
I
need
to
read
that
I
know
why
nobody
makes
motions,
I
keep
forgetting
you.
Gotta
read
the
whole
thing
out.
I
I
moved
to
approve
authorization
to
enter
into
a
rental
gap
program.
Loan
agreement
with
wrenching
hall
associates
inc
in
the
amount
of
350
000
dollars
for
the
renovation
of
lynching
hall,
laurentian
hall,
a
36
unit
apartment
complex
in
garfield
in
the
garfield
neighborhood
in
pittsburgh.
A
Okay,
although
the
post.
C
C
It's
also
worth
mentioning
that
the
aforementioned
non-profit,
the
jewish
residential
services,
has
agreed
to
offer
a
100
000
grant
towards
the
funding
these
projects,
which,
if
the
rgb
loan
is
approved,
would
bring
the
total
funding
to
three
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
similar
to
the
wrenching
hall
as
well.
The
funding
for
the
loan
would
be
sourced
from
the
housing
opportunity
fund,
2021
budget
and
its
terms
would
also
include
a
cash
flow
repayment,
as
well
as
a
record
of
indeed
restriction
to
secure
long-term
affordability
over
a
40-year
period.
C
L
I'm
just
curious
what
what
are
the
the
rent
levels
for
for
the
units.
C
So
the
rent
levels
would
be,
I
believe,
629
per
month
for
each
of
the
1
bedroom
12
units,
and
it
should
be
mentioned
as
well
that
again
because
of
the
type
of
building
it
is
of
a
building
that
is
categorized
as
that
each
president
is
eligible
for
project
for
project-based
vouchers
or
so
are
spending
only
30
of
their
income
on
that
rent.
C
B
A
Right,
we
have
our
motion
our
second
and
and
opposite
order.
We
have
our
abstentions
for
the
record,
all
those
in
favor,
bye.
M
O
Yeah,
hello,
everyone,
my
name
is
brett
morgan
and
today
I
am
presenting
for
your
approval,
a
fsdp
grant
in
the
amount
of
260
thousand
dollars
the
completion
of
the
rose
street
project.
This
project
includes
the
new
construction
of
six
three
bedroom.
Three
bathroom
four-cell
town
houses
along
rose
street
near
I
know
this
map
is,
is
not
zoomed
in
too
much,
but
it's
near
the
intersection
of
bro
street
and
elmore
street
in
the
middle
hill
neighborhood,
and
because
the
the
request
today
is
260.
O
000
ura
staff
also
recommend
and
request
a
waiver
of
the
fsdp
program
guidelines
to
allow
for
130
dollars
provided
to
each
of
the
two
eighty
percent
units.
O
So
for
some
background
on
this
project,
our
chemical
development
group
originally
submitted
a
proposal
to
the
ura's
center
avenue
request
for
qualifications,
which
was
issued
back
in
october
of
2019.
O
That
rfq
featured
the
availability
of
some
170
parcels
along
center
avenue
that
were
owned
by
either
the
ura
or
the
city
and
the
rfq
had
several
key
objectives,
including
implementing
the
greater
hill
district
master
plan,
supporting
the
growth
of
minority
owned
and
women-owned
firms
and
businesses,
as
well
as
lowering
barriers
of
entry
into
developing
housing,
commercial
and
mixed
use.
Projects
in
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
the
center
of
rfq
and
its
projects
were
later
incorporated
into.
O
What's
now
the
avenues
of
hope
initiative,
which,
as
many
of
you
know,
spans
several
commercial
corridors
throughout
the
city
of
pittsburgh,
21
rose
street,
was
one
of
seven
of
the
projects
originally
selected
by
the
rfq
review
committee,
and
they
have
since
been
working
through
the
ura's
disposition
process,
as
well
as
getting
the
necessary
approvals
required
for
financing
through
the
forced
sale
development
program.
O
So
far,
they've
received
approval
of
their
proposal
package,
which
was
from
the
ura
board
in
august
of
2021
and
they're
now
going
to
the
area
board
next
week
for
approval
of
final
drawings,
final
evidence
of
financing
and
the
authorization
to
execute
a
deed.
So
as
a
respondent
to
the
center
of
rfq.
O
The
21
rose
development
underwent
an
extensive
community
input
process.
For
instance,
the
project
first
went
through
the
hill
district's
development
review
panel
and
scored
favorably.
The
project
was
then
presented
at
numerous
community
meetings
where
feedback
was
solicited
directly
from
middle
hill
residents
and
then.
Lastly,
the
project
was
presented
before
the
hill
district
consensus
group,
which
started
dialogues
with
the
development
team
regarding
the
design
and
affordability.
O
The
project's
total
development
cost
is
currently
just
over
2.8
million
dollars
and,
in
addition
to
the
proposed
fsdp
grant,
the
capital
stack
includes
a
first
mortgage
commercial
construction
loan
from
bridgeway
capital,
as
well
as
a
combination
of
grants
from
dced,
keystone
communities,
program,
bridgeway,
capital
and
neighborhood
allies,
and
the
development
team
is
also
providing
some
equity
and
deferring
developer
fee.
So
this
requested
260
thousand
dollar
grant
would
support
soft
costs
associated
with
the
construction
of
two
of
these
six
units,
which
are
expected
to
be
sold
to
eighty
percent
ami
home
buyers.
O
At
180
000
a
unit,
the
other
four
would
be
sold
at
market
rate.
The
two
affordable
units
would
remain
affordable
for
a
period
of
99
years
and
that
is
per
the
fsdp
program
guidelines.
O
This
grant
is
tentatively
sourced
with
hof
2019.,
so
you're
a
staff
thus
far
been
working
closely
with
our
kendo
development
group,
as
well
as
the
pittsburgh
housing
development
corporation,
who
has
served
as
the
non-profit,
applicant
and
technical
assistance
provider,
and
the
development
team
also
includes
their
architect,
cipriani
studios
and
the
general
contractor
and
co-construction
manager,
medco
commercial
group.
Our
kendall
development
group
will
be
serving
as
the
other
co-construction
manager.
O
So
with
that
today
we
have
stefan
johnson
with
rose
street
ventures
lp
and
justin
belton
with
the
pittsburgh
housing
development
corporation
on
the
call
say
a
few
words
and
help
answer
any
questions
regarding
these
authorization
requests.
Thank
you.
P
Thanks
for
that
brett,
this
is
stefan
johnson
with
our
kennel
development
group.
I
just
wanted
to
again
say
a
few
words
about
the
particular
project.
Again,
this
project
was
created
to
really
create
inspirational
ownership
opportunities
for
current
and
future
hill
district
residents.
P
The
development
team
saw
this
as
a
unique
opportunity
to
build
upon
work
on
connecting
the
dots
with
the
middle
hill
and
all
the
other
development
happening
in
not
only
lower
lower,
lower
hill
and
other
parts
of
the
area.
P
We
felt,
as
this
was
a
strong
opportunity
to
partner
with
the
community,
to
help
revive
the
brand
of
the
hill
district
as
well,
and
and
lastly,
we
saw
keep
the
key
component
of
this
development
is
really
helping
to
change
the
narrative
of
historic
disinvestment
in
the
area,
and
so
the
team
has
worked
tirelessly
over
the
last
few
years
to
put
together
the
right
capital
stack
to
support
this.
P
Obviously,
due
to
rising
an
ongoing
construction
costs,
we've
had
to
stagger
the
timing
around
this,
but
we
do
feel
now
we
have
the
appropriate
capital
stack
to
be
able
to
move
forward,
and
the
fsdp
pro
fsdp
program
dollars
will
help
again
to
contribute
to
the
construction
of
the
two
affordable
units
which
will
be
at
80
ami.
H
P
Sure
yeah,
so
in
working
with
my
realtor
real
estate
team
out
of
keller
williams,
we
will
pre-market
the
for
sale
homes
or
pre-sale
the
for
sale
homes,
probably
starting
as
soon
as
the
after
land
disposition
is
approved.
That
strategy
will
be
both
both
online
and
via
social
media.
P
We're
also
looking
to
engage
the
hill
district
cdc
to
leverage
the
hill
district
100
program,
we'll
also
be
marketing
these
through
the
hill
district
consensus
group,
shilling
heights
collaborative
and
uptown
partners.
So
all
of
the
local
cdcs
and
constituents
and
rcos
in
the
area
will
also
be
a
part
of
that
marketing.
Pro
campaign
as
well.
Q
So
this
is
adrian
speaking,
I'm
just
going
to
raise
this
process
point
again.
The
I
believe
that
this
group
really
needs
to
have
a
deeper
and
more
focused
conversation
on
when
and
how
we
are
exceeding
limits
that
that
were
agreed
upon.
You
know
at
the
start
of
our
work,
so
I
it's
absolutely
not
that
I'm
not
supporting
this
project,
but
I
do
think
that,
as
a
group,
we
do
need
to
explore
that
and
we
do
need
to
have.
You
know
a
deeper
sense
of
what
parameters
we're
using
to
make
those
exceptions.
R
I
I
hear
you
adrian:
can
can
that's
right?
Can
everyone
hear
me?
R
Yes,
yes,
okay,
yeah,
so
I
definitely
hear
you
what
I
don't
want
us
to
do.
I
think
we
still
need
to
somewhat
take
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
just
to
maintain
some
level
of
flexibility.
R
No,
I
don't
think
any
of
us
would
have
would
have
imagined
that
covet
would
have
had
the
impact
that
it
has
had
on
the
construction
industry
and
costs
et
cetera.
So
just
just
thinking
about
leaving
flexibility
for
for
unknowns.
You
know
and
things
of
that
nature.
I
think
we
we
need
to
definitely
have
the
guidelines,
but
recognize
that
this
is
a
ever-changing
environment
and-
and
we
need
to
you
know,
maintain
some
level
of
flexibility
to
to
respond
to
that.
Q
I
would
wholeheartedly
agree
derek,
and
I
think
to
your
point:
we
do
know
that
the
landscape
has
changed
especially
related
to
costs,
and
that
should
be
something
that's
informing.
The
parameters.
Q
S
Q
I
think
that
we
put
this
on
the
agenda
several
meetings
ago,
a
full
revisitation
again
of
assumptions
that
we
made
and
ways
that
we
want
to
look
at
applications
forward.
We
had
talked
about
potentially
some.
You
know
even
some
application
changes
so
that
we
get
so.
The
folks
who
are
applying
for
funding
have
a
clear
and
equitable
sense
of
how
decisions
are
made,
and
also
so
that
we
are
reflecting
our
knowledge
of
how
these
programs
are
rolling
out
and
what
the
needs
are.
Q
Q
What
did
we
know
and
believe
two
years
ago,
three
years
ago?
What
do
we
know
and
believe
now?
How
is
that
reflected
in
our
grant
making?
How
is
that
reflected
in
the
applications?
How
was
that
communicated
to
community
partners
that
are
putting
in
applications
again
so
that
there's
transparency,
transparency,
equity
and
flexibility.
N
Yeah,
I
think
we
had
talked
about,
and
I
think
this
would
be
very
helpful,
doing
a
session
with
developers,
and
we
do
have
some
in
our
group
and
we
could
invite
outside
ones
to
kind
of
understand,
because
derek's
right,
like
hovit,
has
really
changed
the
game
in
terms
of
both
for
sale
and
rental
financing.
So
we
could
have
a
session
to
look
at
what
typical
gaps
look
like.
How
are
they
funded?
N
N
A
So
why
don't
we
hold
this
part
of
the
thought
for
two
agenda
items
down
when
we
talk
about
our
administrative
items,
committee,
work
moving
forward
and
see
if
there's
a
motion
on
this
piece
in
particular,
because
I
imagine
that
this
may
come
back
up
and
the
very
next
agenda
item
and
if
we're
going
to
think
through
it
from
a
more
structural
perspective,
I
don't
want
us
to
lose
track
of
all
the
items
that
are
particularly
pertinent.
Just
to
this
piece.
A
A
Did
I
cut
discussion
pretty
much
truly,
I
do
I
just
don't
want
us
to
mix
to
make
their
funding
dependent
on
us
figuring
out
what
we're
doing
with
the
larger
picture,
which
is
not
necessarily
this
particular
developer's
issue.
I
do.
M
Have
a
question,
but
if
we
need
to
sure
to
the
developer,
you
mentioned
that
you
will
be
working
with
the
hill
cdc
and
the
consensus
group
etc.
And
I'm
wondering
what
have
been
the
extent
of
your
conversations
today.
P
When
we
presented
this
project
to
them
many
months
ago,
we
had
the
discussion
that
once
the
project
was
ready
to
go
live,
we
would
spend
more
time
understanding
how
to
embed
the
two
affordable
products
into
the
different
programs
and
what
that
looks
like
so
again
we're
still
in
the
final
stages
of
that
happening.
So
when
that
those
activities
happen,
we
will
re-engage
those
different
constituent
groups.
M
I'm
not
clear
on
exactly
how
their
process
works
with
the
development
review
committee.
Could
you
explain
where
you
are
in
that
process?
I.
P
We're
we're
done
with
the
development
review
process,
with
the
will
cdc
shin
lee
heights
collaborative
and
we're
we've
passed
that
that
particular
point
of
the
actual
development
we're
at
the
stages
now,
where
we
are
finalizing
land
disposition
and
final
final
construction
financing
with
our
lending
agent
before
we
start
to
go
back
out
into
the
market
and
bring
these
these
products
on.
So.
K
P
Sure
so
these
are
three
bedroom.
Three
bathroom
sizes
range
from
13
1390
to
about
1440
square
footage.
M
If
we're
ready
for
a
vote,
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
to
authorize
entering
into
an
fsdp
grant
agreement
with
rose
street
ventures
in
the
amount
of
260
000
for
the
construction
of
six
new
town
homes,
including
two
affordable
units.
A
R
And
this
is
derek.
I
need
to
recuse
myself
as
well
great
project,
but
I'm
recusing
myself.
A
A
I
believe
you
are
correct.
Okay,
all
those
in
favor.
B
O
Thank
you.
Everyone.
T
Hi
good
morning
my
name
is
victoria.
A
T
And
I
am
here
today
presenting
the
brazen
north
residences,
oakland
planning
development,
giving
oakland
planning
and
development
corporation
request
construction
grant,
financing
in
the
amount
of
325
thousand
dollars
to
finance
development
costs
for
four
four-sale
single-family
homes
on
fraser
street
in
south
oakland,
each
home
will
be
a
four-bedroom
two-bathroom
unit
and
sold
households
at
or
below
80
ami.
T
T
These
four
homes
will
be
included
in
the
oakland
community,
land
trust
providing
affordable.
Excuse
me
permanently:
affordable
home
ownership,
opportunities
to
home
buyers
at
or
below
80
ami.
In
the
oakland
neighborhood
of
these
four
units,
one
will
be
reserved
for
household
experiencing
homelessness
and
two
will
be
reserved
for
households
with
special
needs.
These
homeowners
will
have
access
to
supportive
case
management,
services
and
financial
coaching
through
opdc's
financial
opportunity
center.
T
Additionally,
each
home
will
have
one
bedroom
and
one
full
bathroom
on
the
first
floor,
making
these
homes
easily
adaptable
for
multi-generational
families
and
families
with
special
needs
for
years
to
come.
Opdc
plans
to
begin
construction
this
spring
and
plan
to
complete
construction
in
november
2022.,
in
addition
to
committing
their
own
equity,
opdc,
has
been
awarded
the
federal
home
loan
bank,
affordable
housing
program
and
has
a
commitment
for
a
construction
loan
from
west
bank.
M
U
U
So
it's
definitely
a
great
area
to
add
to
home
ownership
in
the
community,
land
trust-
and
these
lots
are.
You
know,
properties
that
we've
assembled
specifically
for
development
of
infill
new
construction
really
to
fill
missing
teeth
in
the
area
and
provide
you
know:
permanent,
affordable,
homeownership
opportunities,
and
we've
presented
the
project
a
couple
of
times
to
the
south
oakland
neighborhood
group,
who
were
enthusiastic
about
about
the
the
new
development
and
new
homeowners
being
part
of
the
neighborhood.
H
U
Yeah
so
a
couple
we've
held
for
for
many
years,
you
know
to
to
package
the
financing
and
assemble
the
development,
and
the
two
of
them
actually
are
more
so
yeah.
So
two
of
these
here
would
be
that
through
the
property
reserve
that
we
were
able
to
assemble
those.
U
So
returning
you
know,
tax
delinquent
properties
back
to
to
the
tax
rolls
and
then
two
others.
We
were
a
private
acquisition
from
from
a
landlord
and
we
acquired.
If
you
see
in
the
picture
there,
there's
a
white
house
in
in
the
image
that's
an
existing
home
in
between
the
green
one
and
the
red
one
in
the
picture.
That's
a
house
that
we
also
owned
was
and
then
two
of
the
we
purchased
that
from
a
private
investor
owner
so
also
converting
rental
back
to
home.
U
Ownership
is
also
an
important
aspect
of
our
work
in
oakland,
so
so
it
was,
I
come
and
that'll
be
renovated.
That
house
will
be
renovated
and
also
in
the
oakland
community,
land
trust
for
for
permanent,
affordable
home
ownership.
So
it
was
a
combination
of
both
the
property
reserve
and
private
acquisition.
Just.
U
R
Can
you
give
us
a
sense
of
the
context
of
what's
around
these
homes?
Is
it
is
it
rental?
Is
it
home
ownership?
Can
you
give
us
a
sense
of
that
context?.
U
Sure
yeah
it's
a
mix.
There
are
homeowners,
just
adjacent
the
the
white
house.
You
see
in
the
picture
there
at
the
top
next
to
the
green
one.
At
the
end,
that's
a
homeowner
and
that's
a
house
set
of
pvc
built
probably
12
years
ago
and
sold
to
a
homeowner
there's
homeowners
across
the
street.
A
couple
of
rentals
mixed
in,
but
in
this
area
the
home
ownership
rate
in
this
area
of
fraser
street
is
is
higher
than
in
some
other
areas
that
are
more
dominated
by
student.
Rentals.
H
I
guess
to
keep
things
moving
I'll
make.
There's
not
further
discussion
I'll
make
the
motion
to
recommend
approval,
to
authorize
entering
into
a
for
sale
development
program,
grant
agreement
with
oakland
planning
and
development
corporation
in
the
amount
of
to
325
000
dollars.
A
second.
A
B
Any
opposed
we've.
A
Oh
sorry,
congratulations
and
we'll
move
on
to.
I
believe
our
next
item
is
some
administrative
items,
so
this
is
where
I
was
hoping
to
move
to
to
move
that
conversation
around
guidelines
to
this
piece,
but
with
a
couple
of
announcements
and
caveats
that
we've
had
some
transitions
at
the
ura.
A
Since
our
last
meeting,
as
I
think
most
people
are
familiar,
shayna
madden
is
no
longer
with
the
ura
she's,
actually
leaving
our
glorious
region
in
favor
of
more
rural
opportunities
out
west,
and
we,
you
know,
certainly
enjoyed
working
with
her
and
wish
her
the
best
of
luck.
A
Also,
diamante
walker
is
no
longer
with
the
ura
and
we
certainly
wish
her
the
best
as
well
under.
Understandably,
those
are
two
two
significant
losses
for
for
our
efforts
and
collaborations
at
the
ura,
and
I
think
explain
some
of
the
delays
that
we've
seen
in
these
conversations
that
we've
had
previously
about
moving
certain
items
forward,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
and
for
us
to
keep
keep
in
mind
that
they
are.
A
You
know
just
shorthanded
beyond
where
they
had
been
previously,
as
we
think
about
what
recommendations
we
can
make
moving
forward.
While
certain
positions
are
still
being
filled
because
I
don't
believe
that
they
had
filled
the
tina's
position
actually
prior
to
shayna's
departure,
so
it's
kind
of
a
little
bit
of
a
compounding
effect.
A
So
for
us
to
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
cut
work
through
solutions
to
different
items
and
things
of
that
nature,
and
with
that
I
think
evan
did
you
have
the
report
out
as
well.
One
of
the
things
that
we
had
discussed
at
our
last
meeting
was
potential
elections.
Last
year,
diamante
had
led
the
charge
in
the
nominations
committee.
A
Her
being
absent
has
perhaps
stalled
that
as
well,
but
also
we
wanted
to
highlight
the
vacancies
that
currently
exist
and
will
be
coming
up,
because
that
was
something
that
we
had
also
talked
about
previously,
and
I
believe
evan
may
have
a
list
of
terms
that
are
expiring
in
vacancies
for
us
to
look
at.
F
Kelly,
I
apologize
might
have
had
a
miscommunication.
I
don't
have
that
for
like
this
meeting
right
now,
but
okay
or
if
you're,
I
don't
dare
do.
We
have
something
on
that.
A
Sorry,
sorry,
to
put
you
on
the
spot
for
the
miscommunication
there
are.
I
believe
there
are
four
individual
four
current
advisory
board
members.
Oh
there
we
go
current
terms.
We
have
right.
A
So
we
have
dr
bay
and
council
president
kell
smith,
who
were
set
to
expire
this
year
three
for
next
year,
the
remainder
for
the
following
year,
and
then
I
believe
there
may
be
a
couple
who
may
have
previously
expired
already
and
are
thank
you
so
now
I
was
like
looking
at
your
square,
but
didn't
want
to
put
you
on
the
spot,
who
have
expired
already
and
we're
waiting
for
the
new
administration
to
make
those
appointments.
A
I'm
not
I'm
not
sure
about
that,
but
also
just
this
is
something
that
we
were
interested
in,
perhaps
seeing
stabilized
over
the
next
month
or
so
before,
engaging
in
elections
or
at
least
wanted
to
put
out
that
out
there
as
a
conversation
for
folks
to
have,
and
with
that,
I
have
rambled
long
enough
open
the
floor
to
questions
comments.
Concerns
on
any
of
the
of
my
previous
statements.
G
Kelly,
this
is
jennifer
wilhelm.
I
did
just
want
to
say
a
couple
things
to
the
group.
First,
I
want
to
introduce
myself
because
I
don't
think
everyone
knows
who
I
am,
but
I
am
jennifer
and
I
am
the
chief
lending
officer
at
the
ura
and
I
will
be
shepherding
the
housing
department
until
we're
able
to
identify
a
director
which
we
are
working
on,
and
I
hope
you
know
that
we
will
find
a
really
amazing
individual
very
soon.
G
We
are
also
starting
interviews
for
retina's
position
next
week,
so
I'm
hopeful
that
we
will
at
least
be
able
to
announce
that
we
have
identified
someone
at
the
next
meeting.
So
we
are
rounding
together
and
making
sure
that
we
are
still
doing
the
good
work
and
derek
and
evan
are
doing
an
amazing
job
leading
that.
But
I
did
want
you
to
know
that
we,
we
certainly
are
still
paying
attention
and
making
sure
that
things
are
moving
forward.
So
if
anyone
has
any
questions
or
concerns,
you
can
always
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
me
directly.
M
A
So
we
can,
we
can
resume
our
earlier
conversation.
I
guess
with
just
with
this
in
mind
around
capacity
and
what
we
would
like
to
do
for
potentially
revisiting
those
caps
on
projects,
and
that
might
be
something
that
we
would
want
to
do
sooner
rather
than
later.
As
excuse
me
in
the
next
couple
of
months,
we'll
be
starting
our
allocation
plan
for
2023,
you
know,
no
sooner
does
2022
money
become.
A
You
know
one
year's
money
become
available,
but
that
we're
starting
to
evaluate
how
to
spend
it
the
next
year,
so
we
might
want
to
evaluate.
Have
our
just.
You
know
begin
our
discussion
on
those
that
cap
project
cap
situation,
so
we
can
know
how
far
that
money
might
go
next
year.
Thoughts,
comments.
Q
I
I
think
the
suggestion
that
was
made
related
to
having
a
developer
session
and
digging
into
this
more
deeply
is
really
a
great
one.
I
mean
it's
not
the
first
time
that
it's
emerged
and
you
know
I'm
I'm
not
sure,
and
I'm
certainly
going
to
defer
to
colleagues
here
if
pulling
something
like
that
together
for
next
meeting
would
be
feasible
or
if
we
would
be
looking
at
the
june
meeting.
But
I
do
think
that
conversation
would
be
incredibly
powerful
and
informative
for
our
transition
into
the
funding
conversations.
Q
R
I
I
think,
that's
a
good
idea
as
well
I'll
leave
it
to
the
ura
to
determine
if
it
can
be
put
together
in
time
for
next
meeting.
But
having
that
conversation,
I
think
is
is
necessary.
I
think
we
also
really
need
to
just
think
about.
R
N
I
think
it
might
work
well
and
thanks
adrian
for
supporting
this
concept.
I
I
think
it
might
work
well
as
a
discussion
outside
of
our
regular
meeting
that
anyone
who's
a
part
of
hof
could
attend,
and
I
I
would
volunteer
to
help
facilitate
it
with
the
ura
staff,
because
I
know
they're
going
through
a
lot
of
transition
right
now
and
I
think
derek
could
help
too.
N
Q
N
Mean
I
think
it
could
be
open
sure
I
mean
I
think
it
would
be
great
for
everyone
to
have
a
understanding
of
how
affordable
housing
works
and
how
complicated
it
is
so
yeah.
It
could
be
open
sure.
H
Yeah,
I
think
you'd
want
folks
that
are
actually
doing
it.
You
know
you
want
some
foot,
you
know
what
for-profit
non-profit
developers
that
are
doing
for
sale
and
affordable
for
sale
and
affordable
rental,
and
they
want
somebody
there
to
talk
about
landform.
Just
talk
about
the
deal
structure.
H
What's
going
on
with
costs-
and
you
know,
are
our
program
limits
reasonable?
I
I
don't
think
that
they
are
if
we
have
to
continually
waive
them
and
that
then,
while
that
isn't
you
know
it
might
not
mean
as
many
projects
getting
done.
It
also
points
to
the
cost
of
change
significantly
and
you
know
there's
more
resources
that
are
needed,
but
I
guess
I'm
a
broken
record
on
on.
Everybody
knows
where
I
stand.
H
G
I
think
it's
a
good
discussion
to
have,
and
you
know
we
can
prepare
some
historical
data
too,
to
show
how
much
we've
been
putting
to
deals
over
the
last
couple
years
and
if
we
change
the
thresholds,
what
that
might
mean
for
the
quantity
of
deals
we're
able
to
invest
in
as
like
a
baseline
for
some
of
the
discussion.
And
then
you
know
the
staff
can
work
with
you
to
schedule
a
time
to
put
forth
a
meeting
and
we'll
make
sure
everyone
is
notified.
S
So
I
have
a
question
it
sounds
like
this
is
folks
want
this
to
be
open
for
everyone.
Are
there
some,
maybe
some
recommendations
of
specific
names
so
that
we
could
so
that
we're
not
just
sort
of
you
know
this
idea
of
everyone
coming
into
the
table,
and-
and
I
don't
know
if
having
as
many
people
as
possible,
always
lends
a
productive
conversation
for
where
we're
trying
to
go.
I
think,
having
some
experts
and
if
there
are
some
recommendations,
I'd
love
to
hear
those
names.
S
N
I
mean
I
think,
we'd
want
to
include
specific
types
of
deals
like
a
one
tax
credit
deal,
one
preservation
deal
one
for
sale
deal,
maybe
one
from
a
nonprofit
developer,
one
from
a
for-profit
developer.
We
could,
it
would
be
more
types,
and
maybe
I
could
work
with
the
ura
and
I
don't
know
if
derek
wants
to
participate
too
he's
very
active
in
the
developer
community,
but
we
could
propose
something
and
send
it
around
and
see
what
you
guys
think.
S
You
know
even
just
what
you
read
it
off,
I
think
is
very
helpful
for
someone
who's
not
in
development,
and
so
I
I
think,
that's
a
great
place
to
start
and
and
if
maybe
that's
the
process,
we
start
with
with
that
list
and
just
kind
of
build
from
there
and
then
propose
that
to
the
ura
yeah.
R
I
I
agree
with
that.
I
think
also
just
having
developers
that
work
on
different
deal
types
can
also
be
helpful,
so
you
know
developer
x.
Does
you
know
preservation
as
well
as
new
construction,
but
also
maybe
some
for
sale
so
that
perspective,
because
they
can
kind
of
speak
to
it
from
various
angles?
But
then,
I
think
also,
as
lena
said,
nonprofit
representation
for
profit,
but
also
the
minority
developer
community,
because
there's
also
unique
challenges
there.
R
So
just
you
know,
I
think
we
can
have
representation
from
from
each,
and
you
know
between
the
ura
lina
and
myself.
We
we
know
everyone,
so
we
can
get
a
good
core
that
represents.
You
know
all
of
those
various
perspectives.
N
We
could
also
invite
the
housing
author.
I
think
the
housing
authority
is
a
big
piece
of
this
world,
that
we
don't
talk
about
enough,
and
so
including
one
of
their
deals
would
be
really.
Educational
for
all
of
us,
except
knowledge
is
on
the
board,
of
course,
but
I
mean
they're
the
deals
that
they
do
yeah.
I.
D
Think
that's
a
good
idea
actually,
and
I
would
be
willing
to
speak
to
my
colleagues
at
the
housing
authority
to
see
if
we
would
be
interested
or
available
to
do
something
like
that.
H
You
know,
we've
also
got
some
other
committee
award
like
we
have
the
rp
committee,
that's
sort
of
hanging
out
there,
which
would
be
good
to
you
know
we
had
some
recommendations
for
the
2021
and
2022
cycles,
but
with
2023
there
were
two
three
five
other
additional
things
that
we
were
looking
at
in
in
that.
So
I'd
like
to
get
that
going
once
you
raise
that
you
know,
but
you
guys
hire
folks
or
can
staff
this
prop.
You
know
that
we
should
get
back
on
that.
H
That
I'm
really
frustrated
with
is
that
we've
not
had
a
fair
housing
anything
since
a
kind
of
presentation
that
we
we
said
that
we
were
going
to
do.
I
wanted
you
know
six
eight
months
ago,
and
I
think
we
need
to
do
that
and
we
need
to
make
time
for
that.
Yeah.
Q
And
I
had
a
conversation
this
morning
related
to
what
we
were
going
to
be
looking
at
over
the
next
few
months,
related
to
fair
housing,
and
I
think
it's
not
just
the
committee.
We
had
wanted
to
do
more
from
a
presentation,
standpoint
and
deeper
dives
into
ways
that
our
decisions
are
connected
to
impact
influence,
fair
housing.
Q
So
not
just
even
the
committee,
but
you
know
today
we
didn't
even
have
any
public
comment
and
you
know
how
are
we
not
only
raising
these
conversations
learning
from
these
conversations,
but
also
engaging
community
in
these
conversations?
So
not
just
having
a
committee
meeting,
but
then
how
do
we
pull.
M
A
To
I
guess
to
the
second
point-
and
I
will
I
will
fall
on
my
sword
as
the
fair
housing
committee
chair
person.
I
would
certainly
be
willing
to
turn
that
chairpersonship
over
to
anybody
who
may
be
interested.
I
I
think
I
got
there
by
default,
but
that
and
the
overall
hot
share.
So
it's
a
bit
much
for
me
at
this
time,
so
just
throwing
that
out
there
if
that
remotely
interests.
A
You
please
hit
me
up,
and
I
will
we
can
have
a
conversation
about
that,
but
in
in
terms
of
also
administrative
items,
we've
seen
a
dwindling.
A
I
I
know
that
the
ura
itself
has
is
on
and
in
a
hybrid
format
and
certain
city
government
offices
are
moving
towards
being
in
person
again
I
it's
been
two
years
right
that
we've
been
seeing
this
dwindling
and
then
staying
depressed
piece
around
public
comment.
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
we
wanna
it,
whose
decision
it
ultimately
is
as
to
whether
or
not
and
when
we
return
in
person
or
to
some
sort
of
hybrid
version.
A
But
I
do
think
that
for
the
communities
that
we
are
trying
to
access,
we
may
you
know
from
a
fair
housing
perspective
and
even
just
advocates,
etc
they're
used
to
physically
showing
up
somewhere
and
that
I
think
that
that
might
have
a
positive
impact
on
that.
So
again,
I'm
not
sure
who's.
The
decision
that
ultimately,
is
if
that's
something
that
folks
would
be
willing
and
able
to
do,
but
just
flagging
that
that
might
be
part
of
part
of
our
problem
as
well.
H
I
also
think
it's
what
are
we
doing
to
make
sure
that
people
you
know
if
you're,
if
we're
serious
about
public
input,
we
probably
need
to
hire
folks.
That
will
help
make
sure
that
word
is
out
about
what's
happening,
it's
not
a
knock
on
anybody,
but
that
it's
not
anything
that
the
ura
has
ever
been
super
great
at.
You
know
that,
but
maybe
it's
looking
at
contracting
for
some
of
those
services
to
make
sure
that
there
is
adequate
notice.
H
I
I
also
agreed
kelly
about
in
person
or
hybrid
that
that
might
help,
but
it's
also
about
being
deliberate.
We
get
the
we
get
the
feedback
that
we
ask
for,
and
I'm
just
not
sure
that
we're
we're
spending
money
and
doing
things
that
we
need
to
do.
If
that's
something
that
we
want,
we
have
to
have
to
put
our
money
where
our
mouth
is.
I
think.
E
Q
No,
it's
just
that
you
know
I
was
in
a
meeting
this
week
and
the
big
mcos
in
pennsylvania
had
done.
They'd
done
listening
sessions
for
input
from
their
insurance
recipients
and
they
only
had
29
people
and,
if
you
think,
about
the
giant
mcos
in
the
state
of
pennsylvania
and
there's
only
29
people
that
are,
you
know,
feeding
in
it
really
takes
so
much
infrastructure
and
energy
and
engagement
to
really
get
that
ground
swell
and
make
those
opportunities
available.
Q
So
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
criticism
of
anyone,
but
we,
I
think
we
all
know
that
that
is
a
full-time
role
in
and
of
itself
and
how
you
know
we
as
volunteers
and
how
the
ura,
with
their
other
responsibilities,
are
really
able
to
do.
That
is,
is
a
challenge
and
so
having
good
conversations
and
questions
about
that
could
potentially
help
us
launch
into
the
future.
Q
And
you
know
I'm
looking
at
joanna
who
we
we
sort
of
met
simultaneously
and
starting
a
comment,
but
you
know
the
work
that
each
one
of
the
citizens
councils
is
doing
and
how
difficult
that
is
just
in
your
own
neighborhood,
let
alone
you're.
Really
thinking
about
the
entire
city
across
the
spectrum
of
housing,
users
and
consumers
and
how
how
we
can
engage
them
is
that's
a
big
question.
N
I
I
do
think
a
good
first
step
is
having
an
in-person
element.
I
just
I
think
people
are
really
zoomed
and
teams
and
skyped
and
whatever
else
out,
I
know
I
am,
and
it's
it's
hard
to
provide
public
comment
in
a
forum
like
this,
where
half
the
screens
are
blank
and
you're
just
like
staring
into
a
void,
so
I
think
having
I.
N
It
is
really
hard
and
I
hear
what
all
of
you
guys
are
saying,
but
I've
I've
went
to
a
community
meeting
in
homewood
last
week
and
there
was
so
much
turnout
and
so
much
dialogue,
and
it
was
really
positive,
and
I
just
I
hadn't-
had
an
experience
like
that
online
in
the
last
two
years.
So
while
we
could
keep
hybrid
for
people
who
don't
feel
comfortable
in
that
environment,
I
do
think
having
in-person
interaction
is
is
really
important.
B
A
Our
target-
that's
who
we
want
to
hear
from,
is
folks
who
are
showing
up
to
other
meetings
in
like
that's
their
space,
and
I
just
think
that
it
would
be
there's
a
certain
level
of
I
mean
we,
I
don't
think
we've
ever
hacked
the
accessibility
issue
of
low
and
moderate
income
folks,
either
from
a
technology
perspective,
and
I
think
that
pretending
otherwise
is
kind
of
deluding
ourselves.
You
know
not
just
us,
but
I
feel
like
everybody
who,
who
holds
to
a
ver
to
a
virtual
platform,
has
to
know
that.
A
That's
that
there
are
folks
that
we're
not
reaching
in
that
way,
I
feel
like
a
lot
so
again,
I'm
not
sure
whose
decision
that
is.
E
I
but
like
a
lot
of
folks,
are
engaged,
you
know
to
get
the
fund
established
right
and
to
get
the
programs
designed
and
pittsburgh
united
was
really.
You
know,
fulfilling
a
lot
of
that
outreach
role
to
engage
folks,
and
I
think
that
was
very
effective.
I
think
now
that
the
programs
are
kind
of
in
place.
Some
are
over
subscribed
you
get
to
that
issue
that
all
non-profits
have,
which
is
we're
not
good
at
advertising,
and
yet
we
don't
have
enough
money
to
serve
everyone.
E
E
So
I
know
that
ura
is
like
on
a
skeletal
kind
of
situation,
especially
with
hof,
but
having
an
outrage
strategy
like
you're,
saying
kelly
to
go
to
people
to
come
to
meetings,
and
you
know
to
reach
people
where
they're
at
I
think
would
be
great
and
I
think
high
would
be
good
because
it's
just
kind
of
the
future.
E
It's
how
we
manage
our
health
and
it's
how
people
can
engage
where
they're
comfortable.
D
And
I
know
that
I
we
had
a
few
outreach
and
engagement
meetings
with
the
ura,
but
we
had
the
one,
and
so
I
can
circle
back
to
that
conversation
and
just
see
because
the
plan
was
to
put
the
the
goal
was
that
the
uar
was
going
to
put
together
like
a
plan
for
us,
so
that
we
can
engage
the
larger
public
and
I'm
confident
that
that
didn't
stop
so
I'll
just
circle
back
to
just
see
the
status
of
it,
and
at
that
moment
they
said
it
would
take
a
you
know.
D
It
would
take
some
time
for
them
to
do
that
so,
but
maybe
by
next
month
we
can
at
least
have
some
type
of
a
plat
skeleton
or
outline
to
see
like
some
engagement
ideas
that
stems
from
the
uras
professionals.
You
know
from
their
perspective
and
see.
Maybe
we
can
just
start
to
collectively
do
that,
and
but
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
did
come
out
of.
It
is
like
us
collectively
having
different
networks.
D
So,
even
if
let's
say
it
was
a
tweet,
if
we
all
retweeted
it
or
if
it
was
something
on
social
media
that
we
all
shared
it
or
if
it
was
in
an
email
that
we
forwarded
it
to
our
our
networks,
because
in
order
to
break
the
the
echo
chamber
of
the
internet
right
because
you
know
sometimes
one
person
sending
an
organization
sending
it,
it
may
not
be
seen
or
heard.
D
But
if
you
have
a
group
of
people
as
us
being
that
group
of
people
send
it
out
to
our
members,
it
also
would
help
as
well
as
the
agencies
like
the
housing
authority.
I
think
we're
willing
to
retweet
and
share
those
things,
but
instead
of
putting
all
the
illness
on
the
ura,
because
their
echo
chamber,
I'm
sure,
is
different
than
maybe
any
of
us
are
or
our
collective
networks.
B
A
I'm
sorry
to
put
you
on
the
spot
again,
but
we
have
rfps
for
community
outreach
professionals.
I
know
that
we've
done
like
we
had
last
year,
like
bernard
alexander,
was
on
the
list.
Biomarketing
was
on
the
list.
Can
we
perhaps
buy
emails
to
send
out
what
that
scope
is,
because
I
think
that
some
of
what
we're
talking
about
may
be
something
that
we're
already.
A
It
may
already
be
within
the
scope
of
their
contracts,
to
reach
to
do
some
of
this
community
engagement
and
outreach
piece
as
well.
So
just
so,
we
can
look
at
that
while
we're
thinking
about
it
from
a
community
engagement
perspective,
so
we're
not
reinventing
the
wheel
or
doing
things
that
folks
are
already
on
retainer,
for,
I
think,
would
be
helpful.
Okay,
yeah.
F
I'll
look
through
what
our
current
standing
is
with
those
groups.
I
believe
we
have
a
slate
of
approved
firms,
but
we
contract
them
for
individual
items
that
are
needed,
such
as
like
outreach
to
set
up
community
meetings
for
our
annual
allocation
plan
process,
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
know
that
we
have
anyone
just
flat
out
on
retainer,
but
if
there
were
ideas
for
us,
you
know
specific
purposes
to
use
some
of
these
firms.
I
think
then
we
would
move
towards
creating
a
contract
for
that.
Okay
task.
G
I
do
want
to
just
mention,
too,
that
the
position
that
we're
interviewing
for
is
going
to
be
coordinating
community
outreach
and
a
large
part
of
that
position.
The
title
and
the
title
of
the
position
are
the
words
community
engagement,
and
so
I
would
just
ask
for
some
patience,
because
I
think
that
when
we
have
this
resource,
we'll
be
able
to
have
some
capacity
to
do
more
with
what
we're
talking
about
and
to
coordinate
these
efforts
and
actually
push
out
a
more
comprehensive
plan
so
yeah.
G
H
So
you
know,
I
guess,
is
there
any
reason
we
can't
do
something.
We
talked
about
the
guidelines
and
program
limits.
Trying
to
put
something
together.
Is
there
a
way
that
we
can
do
something
unfair
housing,
because
I
mean
I'm
embarrassed
as
a
as
a
member
here
that
we
haven't
been
able
to.
You
know,
engage
in
that.
That's
not
anything
new
on
our
agenda.
It's
been
a
couple
of
years.
That's
been
bouncing
around.
H
You
know
I
kind
of
think
unfair
housing.
I
think
we
were
trying
to
look
at
how
we
can
overlay
that
fair
housing
component
into
the
things
that
we're
doing
boston
has
got
a
criteria.
H
You
know,
I
think,
that's
kind
of
where
I
thought
we
were
and
sort
of
on
the
cusp
of
trying
to
take
a
look
at
what
others
are
doing
around
the
country
and
seeing
how
we
might
be
able
to
adapt
that
here
to
pittsburgh
and
then
start
using
that
as
a
rumor
as
to
how
we're
looking
at
funding
for
these
programs
and
projects.
H
So
I
I
think
the
the
next
piece
would
be
it's
a
way
to
get
a
meeting
like
you
know.
Does
that
need
to
be
a
committee
meeting?
Is
that
something
that
we
can?
You
know,
ask
megan
or
someone
to
put
together
as
a
as
a
presentation
for
maybe,
if
it's
not
next,
a
month's
meeting
the
following
month
that
we're
actually
seeing
that
and
starting
to
work
on
that.
G
A
I'm
happy
to
I,
I
took
it
because
nobody
else
was
interested.
I'm
not
I
mean,
and
I
care
I
mean
we
all
care
about
fair
housing.
So,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
can
I'm
happy
to
step
aside.
If
someone
else
is
willing
and
able
to
serve,
we
did
have
a
doodle
that
went
out,
but
then
I
think
I
said
there
was
some
confusion
around
who
was
going
to
be
remaining
on
the
board
that
I
believe
kind
of
stalled,
some
efforts
and
activities
around
moving
moving
the
agenda
forward.
A
If
anybody
again
is
willing
to
serve
in
that
capacity.
I
wholeheartedly
welcome
that
and
again
just
in
trying
to
figure
out
what
some
of
those
our
ideas
are.
When
we
say
we
want
to
do
something
around
fair
housing.
Is
that
an
instruction
is
that
you
know
reviewing
guidelines
just
some
kind
of
more
of
a
direction
I
think
is
also
beneficial,
but
again,
if
there
isn't
someone
else
willing
to
serve
a
chair,
I
will
hardly
welcome
that
and
I'm
more
than
willing
to
step
aside
and
allow
them
to
do
so.
D
So
I
mean
I
can
step
up
as
a
chair
right
I
mean,
but
it's
just
about
who's,
going
to
work
with
me
to
make
it
work.
I
think
that's
the
end
of
the
I
mean
you
know.
I've
talked
to
megan
a
few
times.
I
understand
her
concern,
especially
now
that
we
have
a
new
presidential
administration
they're
like
really
putting
the
the
gas
on
the
aafh
regulations
and
laws,
and
things
like
that.
D
So
I
know
her
vision
is
that
we
have
a
the
hof
has
or
everyone
in
her
eyes-
and
I
can
understand,
has
a
aafh
lens
that
we're
doing
things
by
so
it
may
I
mean
you
know
so
if
we
need
to
have
a
smaller
meaning
to
identify
what
the
next
steps
are
mark.
You
want
to
join
me
on
that.
Maybe
it's
you
and
I
I
don't
know,
I'm
considering
your
passion
around
this,
which
I'm
with
you,
we
can
talk
offline
and
then
we
can
figure
out.
A
A
Yes,
thank
you
and
okay.
So
then,
we'll
we'll
put
that
hand
the
ball
over
to
knowledge
and
put
that
in
his
court
and
and
and
go
from
there
see
see
what
we
have
for
for
next
month.
Q
A
I
I
don't
have
a
list
of
who
was
participating
in
the
committee.
We
hadn't,
I
was
there,
you
were
there,
I
believe
lena.
Was
there
knowledge
and
mark,
I
believe,
and
then
megan
had
participated.
We'd
only
had
a
meeting
or
two,
and
then
we
had
megan
had
given
a
presentation.
Last
fall
on
fair
housing
as
part
of
the
earlier
part
of
the
agenda
for
these
meetings.
A
But
I
don't
believe
that
the
last
meeting
I'd
sent
the
previous
suit
I'd
sent
to
the
entire
board
and
we
did
not
really
get
critical
mass
around
any
particular
date.
And
then
we
found
ourselves
here
having
the
same
same
conversation.
H
S
H
A
D
All
right,
if
no
one
else
and
I'll
just
I'll,
initiate
an
email
with
us
five
once
before,
and
then
we'll
just
we'll
make
a
plan
and
we'll
have
something
back
to
the
board
by
next
month.
A
So
that's
percolating
within
the
next
month
and
lina,
I
think
you're
you
and
I'm
gonna
derek
sounded
enthused.
So
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna.
A
Capacity,
perhaps
we'll
work
on
getting
yay.
Thank
you,
derek
we'll
work
on
getting
us
moving
forward
on
convening
around
the
developers
and
these
caps
and
things
of
that
nature,
and
I'm
really
hopeful
that
we'll
have
our
rfp
guidelines
from
the
fall
combined
with
these
other
efforts
will
really,
I
think,
we're
on
track
now
to
have
everything
braided
together
nicely
for
when
we're
doing
our
allocation
plan
going
forward
so
very
exciting.
From
my
from
my
perspective,
so.
R
And
just
just
fyi
yeah
I
was
originally
at
least
encouraging
of
of
the
fair
housing.
You
know
conversation
and
the
committee,
but
you
know
I
just
haven't
too
much
going
on
I'll
help
lena
and
kind
of
stay
over
there
and
let
you
guys,
you
know,
take
the
reins
on
fair
housing.
So
just
for
clarity.
N
I
think
I
also
have
to
step
away
from
fair
housing.
I
I
don't
know
that
I
can
do
both
well
and
I
have
full
confidence
in
knowledge
in
the
team,
so
I'm
going
to
focus
on
the
other
one
right
now.
D
Perfect,
dr
bay,
you
about
to
jump
on
the
fair
housing.
G
A
Oh
excellent
follow-up
question:
we
will
work
on
that
and
get
that
back.
There's
also.
There
are
more
people
on
the
board
than
we
have
listed
here,
so
we're
going
to
track
down
everybody
who's,
not
on
this
list
as
well.
But
this
is
just
a
good.
I
guess,
jumping
off
point
and
I'll
make
a
note
to
find
that
out
for
you
yeah.
L
R
D
A
But
we
we
hope
to
see
you
next
month,
despite
that,
I
think
folks
have
been
have
been
serving
until
their
replacement
was
appointed,
which
is
how
sonya
is
still
gracing.
M
K
A
T
K
R
K
A
I
think
that
is
dr
bay's
way
of
getting
his
of
getting.
G
Yeah
I
will.
I
will
confirm
that
you
can
continue
to
serve
on
an
expired
term,
so
there
is
no
concern.
G
Unless
there's
a
personal
concern,
nothing.
A
All
right
do
we
have
any
other
business
on
the
agenda
or
any
other
administrative
items
that
need
to
be
addressed.
A
Any
other
internal
business.
B
A
All
right,
any
announcements
other
than
our
next
meeting
being
may
5th,
at
which
point
we
will
still
see
dr
vay,
sending
any
interim
appointments
with
everybody
else
who
and
so
yeah.
So
that
would
be
the
fifth
at
9
00
a.m.
Any
other
announcements.
A
I
will
be
attending
a
continuing
legal
education
course
on
fair
housing
in
two
weeks
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
reporting
some
of
that
back.
That'll
be
some
of
some
of
the
outside
things
that
best
practices
that
we're
discussing,
but
from
a
a
really
legal,
boring
perspective,
but
I'll
have
some
takeaways,
I'm
sure
for
the
rest
of
the
folks
from
that
for
for
our
next
meeting
and
happy
fair
housing,
that
is,
it
is
april
anyone
any
other
announcements.
N
I
think
there's
actually
a
fair
housing
event
in
the
hill
tonight
with
a
visiting
member
of
the
un
who
specializes
in
fair
housing
internationally
I'll
send
it
around.
I
know
it's
last
minute.
I
just
got
it
but
I'll
send
it
to
you
guys,
because
it
looks
fairly
interesting
thanks.