►
From YouTube: Design Review Board May 3, 2022
Description
Design Review Board
May 3, 2022
6:30 PM
Call to Order
Minutes
Old Business
None
New Business
A) Election of Vice -Chairman
B) Application CERD227001028: Applicants Will Rogers and Neil Stevenson request approval to construct a new warehouse and showroom at 1275 East Richland Avenue (TMP 121- 11- 02-005).
C) ApplicationCERD22- 001027: Applicant The Aiken Corporation requests approval to demolish the house at 147 Newberry St NW (TMP 121- 21- 02- 001).
Information
Adjournment
A
Welcome
you
all
to
the
may
actually
that
it's
may
already
meeting
of
the
design
review
board.
We
appreciate
your
attendance
and
participation
and
our
board
usually
reviews
minutes
from
the
previous
meetings
and
we'll
hopefully
have
a
motion
on
those
shortly.
A
If
you
haven't
presented
something
before
us,
we
we
do
recommend
that
you
come
to
the
center
lectern,
where
you
can
be
recorded
and
give
your
name
and
your
address
and
in
just
a
few
minutes
we'll
we'll
get
into
the
applications,
but
do
do.
I
have
a
motion
on
on
minutes
here.
Previous
meetings,
mr
chairman,
I.
A
A
C
Mr
chairman,
I
like
to
open
with
one
I
don't
know
it's
in
a
form
or
nomination
or
emotion.
Is
it
nomination?
It's
a
nomination.
Yeah
I
like
to
nominate
board
member
john,
like
michael.
A
It's
a
nomination,
mr
attorney.
Do
we
need
we
needed
a
second
we're
just
we're
just
now
putting
names
on
correctly.
B
B
A
Second,
all
in
favor
of
closing
the
nominations
raise
your
right
hand.
A
Okay,
so
we
have
a
one
one
candidate
now
and
I
think
it'd
be
appropriate
to
go
ahead
and
vote
vote
for
our
nominee
john
mcmichael
here
for
vice
chair
you're
willing
to
serve
yes.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
All
in
favor
of
john
mcmichael,
being
vice
chair
of
the
design
review
board,
raise
your
right
hand.
Okay,
yes,
and
so
I
think
it
was
unanimous.
John
thank.
A
E
A
Good
and
I
believe
that
to
for
the
record
that
josh
stewart
is
recusing
himself
for
this
particular
application,
because
they've
had
some
involvement
with
this
project
good
and
now
I'm
sorry,
if
you
give
your
name
officially
for
the
record
sure.
F
It's
neil
stephenson
with
neil
stevenson,
architects.
My
address
is
680
king
street
charleston,
south
carolina
29403.
F
D
F
I
I
brought
some
presentation
drawings,
which
might
help
understand
the
property
a
little
bit
more.
They
weren't
as
good
as
I
I
mean.
I
think
that
there's
still
some
tweaking,
but
for
the
most
part,
that's
in
a
nutshell,
I
mean
I
think
that
there's
definitely
some
improvements
that
can
be
done
as
far
as
we
wanted
to
have
those
little
cupolas
on
the
roof
a
little
bit
bigger.
They
came
out
a
little
smaller
on
presentation,
and
I
think
that
there's
still
a
little
bit
of
tweaking
with
the
colors
that
we're
still
working
okay.
A
So
it'll
it'll
be
close
to
a
dark
bronze
brown
panel
metal
panel.
Then
for
the.
A
F
Yes,
I
know
there's
a
very
bright
green
and
I
know
that
the
the
owner
is
interested
in
a
putty
building
and
a
lighter
green
and
he
he
was
actually
saying
he
might
want
it
lighter
than
this.
Okay,
so
sometimes
the
renderings
are
hard
to
kind
of.
A
F
A
I
think
that
would
be.
We
would
probably
have
the
motion
that
you
follow
up
with
with
actual
color
samples.
So
good
it
admit
you
are
trying
to
achieve
a
green
trim
on
the
metal
work
and
maybe
the
windows
and
indoors,
okay
and-
and
you
all
have
presented
a
very.
A
F
A
That's
what
you
were,
what
yeah?
That's
what
we've
seen
previously,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
asking
all
the
questions.
Do
you
all
have
other
questions
before
we
get
to
the
site.
G
A
No
there's
nothing
because
there's
three
front:
it's
it's
a
it's
close
to
the
street,
which
I
think
we
prefer
you
don't
it's.
D
A
Then
well,
let's
go
to
the
site
plan.
Yes,.
A
In
a
minute
sure
there
is
we'll
finish
and
make
sure
he
gets
his
his
application
presented
and
then
we'll
ask
for
comments.
Certainly
now
on
the
on
the
site
plan,
I
think
you
all
probably
will
be
working
with
the
planning
department
on
things
like
dumpster
locations.
A
Okay,
now
you're
the
architect
on
this
particular
part
of
the
parcel,
but
is
there
some
planning
going
on
for
the
additional
just
for
our
information?
There.
F
A
A
Did
is
there
a
civil,
your
is
this
an
architectural
site
plan
that
you're
working
on
that
you
did
and
then
you
have
a
civil
guy
who
will
be
working
correct
alongside
you,
okay
yeah.
We
noticed
a
corner
setback
thing
there.
I
guess
that's
that's
for
sight
lines,
it's
actually
a
15
by
30
triangle
in
the
bottom
right
corner.
A
A
A
And
it
looks
like
that
the
drive
way
this
was
a
little
confusing,
not
a
show
stopper
at
all,
but
it
looks
like
the
paving
goes
into
the
rear
of
of
the
main.
Do
you
call
it
a
manufacturing
facility,
or
is
it
an
assembly
building
or.
A
Okay,
so
it-
and
I
think
you've
got
some
it's
some
trellis
or
lattice
work
on
the
back.
There
I
saw
in
elevations.
Yes,
there
we
go.
A
A
A
Right,
yeah,
we'll
we'll
call
you
back
up
if
we
have
a
question
that-
and
we
may
on
the
on
some
of
these
property
line-
sure
issues.
A
In
fact
I'm
going
to
let
you
go
be
on
standby
and-
and
you
may
not
you're
the
architect,
you're,
not
the
surveyor.
You
may
not
be
able
to
answer
property
line
questions,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
mr
reggie
ebner
if
he
would
like
to
come
forward
because
he
had
he
had
some
questions
to
do
with
trump.
A
He
represents
the
delivery,
stable
adjacent
right
and
former
council
member
yeah.
D
F
G
Reggie
ever
165
foxhound
run.
All
of
these
have
to
do
with
the
property
lines
and
setbacks.
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
buildings
or
the
arrangement
of
the.
E
A
Well,
it'll
be
difficult
to
record
your
comment
now.
Why
don't
you
do?
I
think
I
think
architects
got
that
document
and
maybe
if
he
could
follow
along
just.
D
A
Now,
if
you
want
to
just
reference
them
real
quickly,
all
right.
G
G
All
right,
the
first
concern
is
that
gaston
road
on
that
side
of
the
richland
does
not
exist,
okay
and
it
when
we
bought
them.
I
stated
this
in
there
when
we
bought
the
property,
we
thought
the
gaston
road
existed
and
the
homework
wasn't
done
by
whoever
did
the
plot
plan
and
the
road
was
decommissioned.
Sometime
in
the
70s
by
the
jacobs
family
and
so
on
his
plan.
He
shows
150
foot
right
away
for
gaston
road
which
doesn't
exist,
and
he
also
shows
it
on
one
of
the
other
plants.
Sure.
A
And-
and
I
think
what
the
the
the
point
is,
is
that
the
the
the
gaston
barn
property
goes
right
up
to
this
property
line
on
the
east.
A
G
All
right
so,
mr
hardaway,
who
is
here-
and
he
has
a
question
in
a
minute,
but
the
the
center
line
of
the
ditch-
is
the
property
line
for
the
cash
delivery,
stable
and
also
for
mr
hardaway
and
for
this
development.
G
Okay
and
there's
an
easement-
and
this
is
another
question
I
had
there's
an
easement
which
is
about
approximately
10
feet
wide,
maybe
15
feet
wide,
where
the
ditch
is
and
then
there's
dirt
and
trees
on
each
side
of
it.
It
takes
up
about
40
feet.
One
of
my
questions
is:
where
does
the
building
line
start?
G
A
Yeah,
it
typically
would
be
from
the
legally
the
property
line
and
where
the
pin
where
the
pins
are
and
then
you
would,
you
would
you'd
measure
over
from
that
it
wouldn't
have
anything
to
do
with
ditches
or
roads
or
anything
like
that.
It
would,
it
would
be
measured
and,
of
course
the
zoning
will
dictate
that
and
I'm
not
sure
we
even
know
yet
exactly
what
the
use
would
be,
because
it
could
be
10
feet
or
it
could
be
30
feet.
But
but
that
does,
I
think,
does
that
answer
your
question
then.
G
Yeah,
in
this
case
the
eastman
is
pretty
narrow.
So
if
you
use
the
property
line
in
a
15
foot,
setback,
you've
got
10
foot
of
good
or
got
10
foot
of
dirt
there,
and
then
you've
got
only
a
5
foot
area.
So
somebody's
gotta
deal
with
the
with
the
scdot
right.
A
G
A
A
Yeah,
the
the
surveyor
really
needs
to
update
and
that's
not.
This
is
an
architectural
site
plan
and
not
a
survey.
I
think
so.
He's
he's
he's
trying
to
use
what
he
was
given
and
I
believe
that
the
the
city
is
going
to
require.
You
know
a
a
licensed
survey.
A
G
The
next
part
and
I've
talked
about
the
ditch
already
and
then
the
corner
easement,
and
here
again
the
question
would
be:
where
does
the
corner
easement
start?
Does
it
start
at
this
scdot
event,
or
does
it
start
at
the
land
line
and
there's
a
difference
of
about
five
to
eight
feet.
A
A
G
A
G
A
Okay,
thank
you
and,
and
maybe
we'll
have
the
architect
step
back
up.
Thank
you
for
coming
and
then
then
we
had
another
comment
I
believe
from
a
neighbor.
Maybe
you
want
to
come
up
and
give
us
your
name
and
then
we
can
maybe
kill
a
bird
with
two
birds
with
one
stone.
A
J
Hello,
my
name
is
cliff
hardaway.
I
live
at
1316
park,
avenue
southeast,
which
is
the
the
victorian
home
on
the
other
side
of
the
barn,
formerly
known
as
the
I
think,
the
gaston
nice
house,
or
something
like
that
right.
J
D
J
Fine,
the
only
real
question
I
have
is
just
wanting
to
make
sure
that
there
is
a
tree
line
in
that
ditch
that
we
talked
about
that
runs
along
there
is
you
know,
and
I'm
assuming
that
that
won't
be
disturbed?
A
A
F
680
king
street
charleston,
so
I
I'm
sorry
that
the
owner's
not
here
he
was
not
feeling
well
and
he
thought
it
would
be
prudent
to
not
come
infuse
ill.
F
So
I
was
actually
just
trying
to
reach
out
to
him
to
find
out
some
find
some
questions
or
answer
some
questions,
but
I
think
in
general
the
idea
of
having
some
tree
strips
along
the
property
line
just
as
a
buffer
for
everybody,
is
going
to
work
out
fine.
I
don't
think
that
that
will
have
a
problem
with
that.
A
Right
and
in
fact
you'll,
if
you
don't
have
those
they're
going
to
probably
require
you
to
add
some
trees
sure
so
you
might
as
well
take
advantage
of
the
ones
that
are
there.
A
A
So
so
now
the
buffer
is
is
right
to
the
left
of
the
building
itself.
F
F
As
far
as
the
the
wedge-shaped
property,
I'm
a
little
confused
about
that
as
well,
I
think
that
might
have
been
a
property
that
was
conveyed
to
this
property
through
some
kind
of
abandonment.
But
I'm
not
positive.
That's.
A
F
A
A
That's
right,
I
don't
know
who
your
surveyor
is,
but
they
they
probably
need
to
kind
of
get
started
on
this,
because
the
planning
department,
the
other.
F
I
believe
they're
in
the
process,
but
I
hadn't
heard
anything
from
them
in
a
while,
so
I'll
probably
have
to
check
in
on
them.
A
D
A
Now
we'll
see
if
any
others
would
like
to
speak
with
respect
to
the
actual
buildings,
if
you,
if
you,
if
I
think
mr
evan
are
satisfied
at
the
moment
and
the
the
new
survey
will
will
answer
a
lot
of
that.
This
is
not
really
a
licensed
surveyors
document
here.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
we'll
ask
if
anyone
else
would
like
to
speak
either
for
against
mr
ronaldo,
you
you
want
to
speak
about
this
particular
application.
K
Sir,
that's
for
you
to
determine
yes,
okay,
so,
mr
chairman,
I
would
and
members
of
the
design
review
board.
I
would
welcome
some
degree
of
transparency
because
I
don't
actually
know
whether
I
have
a
comment
or
not,
because
I
don't
know
who
is
on
the
board
at
this
meeting,
and
so
when
I
at
the
appropriate
time,
if
you
can
enlighten
us-
and
I
think
it
would
be
courteous
to
the
residents
of
the
city
to
know,
for
example,
whether
ms
knowles,
who
used
to
be
on
the
board,
is
still
on
the
board.
K
There
was
a
movement
to
appoint
laura
blessing
thomas
at
the
motion
and
a
vote
to
appoint
laura
blessing
thomas
at
the
city
council
meeting,
and
I
frankly
find
it
a
little
astonishing
that
we
started
this
meeting
without
any
clarification
as
to
who
is
on
the
design
review
board
of
city
bacon
yeah.
So
so.
K
It
might
be.
I
don't
know
whether
what
my
comment
should
be
because
I
don't
know
whether
you
know
we've
written
a
letter
to
the
city,
not
the
design
review
board.
So
I
apologize
for
having
to
do
this
here,
but
the
circumstances
forced
me
to
do
that
that
we
think,
if
miss
blessing
thomas
has
been
appointed
to
this
board.
We
think
it's
an
illegal
appointment
unlawful
because
there
was
no
information
provided
on
her
qualifications.
K
A
Raleigh
and
let
me
let.
J
A
If
I
could
interrupt
you,
we
we
do
need
to
continue
making.
We've
got
a
motion
or
an
application
here,
and
I
don't
know
if
we
have
others
who
want
to
speak
with
regard
to
this
one,
but
but
I'll.
Let
mr
hawley,
if,
if
you
like,
would
you
like
to.
L
A
L
Resolved
and
one
this
is
a
legal
meeting,
two
the
board
is
legally
constituted
and
that
should
answer
your
questions.
If
you
disagree
with
that,
then
I'd
suggest
you
consult
with
whatever
attorney
you
want
to.
L
K
K
K
It
would
be
positive
for
the
relations
with
the
residents
going
forward
to
have
these
things
be
open
and
transparent,
rather
than
hidden
and
sort
of
in
the
middle
of
the
night.
That's
just
not
a
good
feeling
and
to
start
a
meeting
without
even
making
notice,
without
thanking
her
without
saying
anything
about
it.
It
just
shows.
What's
behind
it,
it
leaves
us
all
feeling
that
what's
behind
this
is
not
good,
because
her
dismissal
in
this
instance.
L
That's
not
something
that
is
not
dismissed,
her
term
expired
and
she
was
succeeded
by
someone
who
was
legally
appointed
and
it
was
done
at
two
discussed
at
two
public
city
council
meetings
and,
as
I
said,
if
you
want
me
to
discuss
it
with
you
further,
I
will,
after
at
the
appropriate
time
after,
but.
A
A
L
K
Given
you
the
answer
from
something,
I
I'm
going
to
make
a
statement
that
if
the
the
applicants
who
are
making
this
application
and
subsequent
applicants
are
entitled
to
know
that,
there's
a
dispute
and
in
my
view
the
dispute
will
be
litigated
and
that
I
find
that
the
behavior
of
the
city
council,
in
this
case,
in
particular
in
its
response.
Because
there
is
a
very
specific
section
of
the
ordinance
7.1.7
c
yeah.
K
Thank
you.
So,
on
the
basis
of
these
issues,
I
think
it's
important
also
for
the
other
members
of
design
review
board
to
know
that
it
is
possible,
and
we
will
allege
that
in
litigation
that
the
city
is
engaging
in
retaliatory
behavior
and
intimidation
to
show
members
of
the
design
review
board
that
if
they
disagree
with
the
city,
they
will
be.
A
Yeah
our
time
our
time's
up,
we
have
five
minutes.
You
have
five
minutes
and
thank
you
for
your
comment
now,
we'll
we'll
continue
to
ask
if
there
are
others
who
again
we're
expecting
folks
to
speak
with
regard
to
this
application,
this
particular
application
not
not
seeing
anyone
we'll
go
ahead
and
entertain
a
motion,
and
we
can
have
some
more
discussion
if
need
be.
B
Yeah
I'll
make
a
motion,
mr
chairman,
make
a
motion
that
certificate
of
application,
cerd
22-001028.
B
Be
approved
contingent
on
the
site
plan
as
as
was
presented
in
the
in
the
issues
that
were
brought.
I.
A
B
H
D
A
A
No,
they
don't
have
to
come
back
to
a
full
moon
meeting
to
to
look
at
this
color,
which
I
think
we've
done
before.
Okay,
okay,
did
we
have
second,
okay,
any
of
the
discussion
that
we
a
second
was.
That
was
one
point.
This
is
administrative
review
of
of
the
materials
and
colors.
H
A
Benjamin
moore,
historic
colors,
that's
what.
H
A
Referring
to
yeah,
okay,
any
other
any
other
discussion,
all
in
favor
of
the
application
raise
your
right
hand
all
right,
good.
A
Okay,
I
believe
he's
prepared
to
speak
if
you
could
just
officially
give
us
your
name
for
the
record
and
your
address
please.
My.
M
A
D
M
I'm
the
chairman
of
the
aiken
corporation
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
jackie
corporation,
the
vice
chairman
of
the
aiken
corporation,
mr
pat
cunning,
was
here
a
few
minutes
ago
and
had
to
leave
the
treasurer
of
the
aching
corporation
is
jason
raymond,
who
is
here
and
the
secretary
of
the
corporation.
The
other
officer
is
sam
erv,
who
is
also
here.
A
M
M
M
At
that
time
we
didn't
take
any
action
at
that
time
now
about
two
months
ago,
it
was
brought
to
our
attention
that
there
was
possibly
a
need
for
additional
parking
in
the
downtown
area
pros
maybe
due
to
the
pascal's
project
and
other
issues,
and
we
are
also
aware
that
saint
john's
methodist
church
has
been
looking
for
parking
for
quite
some
time
and
I
think
they
actually
were
interested
in
buying
this
property
at
one
time
for
parking
that
that
never
actually
proceeded.
M
And
then
I
know
that
there
have
been
issues
raised
with
the
church
by
possibly
parking
in
the
parkways
across
their
market,
which
I'm
personally
hoping
that
that
that
never
happens
it
could
protect
those
parkways,
but
at
any
rate,
there's
a
need
there
and
first
presbyterian
church
also
they're
right
across
the
street
from
me.
So
I
see
how,
when
they
have
special
events,
people
are
parking
in
the
parkways
and
public
safety
comes
along
and
gives
them
tickets
and
they're
unhappy
about
that.
So
there.
D
M
D
M
Issues
that
have
to
be
resolved,
such
as
potential
lease
of
the
property
with
the
city
or
other
interested
owners,
so
that
is
all
still
in
the
development
phase.
We
do
not
have
that
finalized
at
this
point.
It
is
obvious,
though,
that
the
to
us
at
least
that
the
house
that's
on
it
needs
to
be
demolished.
M
I
think
the
committee
is
already
aware
of
the
situation
with
mr
mcgee.
He
is
unable
to
move
it
and
remains
unable
to
to
move.
It
is
my
understanding
he
has
largely
stripped
porches
chimneys,
the
other
things
from
the
house.
At
this
point.
It
appears
to
me,
at
least,
as
is
a
layman-
I'm
certainly
not
an
architect
or
a
builder,
but
I
don't
believe
that
there's
any
viable
use
for
the
house
at
this
point,
so
we
would
we'd
like
to
demolish
it.
I
M
There
that
is
not
written
in
stone.
We
are
not
definitely
committed
to
that
plan.
It's
just
a
concept
plan,
but
it
shows
the
potential
of
the
property.
At
this
point
and,
of
course,
depending
on
how
this
goes,
we
may
want
to
have
less
parking
spaces
more
green
space.
I
know
sam
herb
has
looked
at
some
ideas
about
possibly
doing
some
green
pavers
type
things
in
it
to
make
it
more
ecologically
friendly
and
where
water
permeates
through
it.
So
there's
still
a
lot
of
unknowns
about
it,
but
our.
M
It
appears
to
us
was
to
to
to
go
through
this
process
with
this
board
to
see
about
the
limit
demolition
of
the
house,
because
if
we
cannot
achieve
that,
I
I
really
don't
know
where
we'll
go
with
it
or
whether
we
could
even
move
forward
with
it
at
all.
At
all,.
A
Yeah,
I
know
that
it,
the
house,
the
size
of
it
and
and
the
difficulty
in
using
it
in
that
location,
has
has
been
a
hindrance
to
even
selling
the
the
land
and-
and
I
see
you
know
proposed
use
that
which
parking
is,
is
a
logical
and
takes
the
pressure
off
off
of
the
parkway,
the
continual
request
of
churches
to
parking
parkways
did
I
understand
that
maybe
there's
potential
for
reuse
of
some
of
the
lumber
in
the
building.
A
M
When
this
first
came
up,
I
approached
mr
mcgee
to
see
whether
or
not
he
was
interested
in
solving
some
of
the
lumber
of
the
property
or
anything
else.
That's
in
the
house
that
he
might
be
able
to
use,
as
you
know,
he's
already
got
moved
one
other
house
over
to
his
property
on
williams
street.
Maybe
it
could
be
used
with
that
and
also
the
possibility
of
of
him
in
his
business
actually
doing
the
demolition
of
the
property.
M
If
he
chose
to
do
so,
he
did
express
an
interest
in
using
some
of
the
things
from
the
property
that
he
thought
he
might
be
able
to
use
and
he
did
express
an
interest
in
actually
doing
the
demolition
of
it.
M
I've
asked
him
to
give
me
a
price
for
that,
and
he
has
not
done
that
at
this
point,
but
I
think
he
remains
interested
in
it,
and
certainly
we
would
welcome
him
or
anyone
else
who
can
can
use
some
things
from
this
from
this
house
in
some
other
way
and
and
you
and
I
have
taught
mr
chairman
there's
another
group,
I
believe
in
town
who
who
takes
old
lumber
and
maybe
some
might
be
able
to
make
some
other
use
out
of
it,
so
any
type
of
reuse
of
it.
Certainly,
would
you.
M
M
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
was
a
valid
attempt
by
mr
mcgee
to
you
know,
try
to
move
it.
We
approve
that
the
re
you
know
relocation
of
it,
so
I
guess
now
we'll
have
to
consider
the
the
other
alternative.
Any
other
questions
of
was
just.
B
M
A
H
A
Proving
the,
I
would
say,
we're
proving
the
use
of
it
as
parking,
but
when,
when
he
gets
ready
to
actually
do
it,
I
think
he'd
be
bringing
some
some
sort
of
a
landscape.
Actually,
landscape
is
not
required
in
the
in
the
downtown
business.
A
A
It
it
it
it'll,
probably
just
go
through
staff,
a
staff
review,
and
now,
unless
you
want
to
make
a
motion
that
he
I
mean
you
could
you
could
request.
H
A
I
think
I
think
he's
not
totally
satisfied
with
this
layout.
In
fact
I
I
can.
I
can
see
that
you
may
you
may
need
those
to
adjust
it
some,
so
you
can
get
the
planning
strip.
It's
got
to
be
on
the
on
the
property
and
not
on
the
right
away.
There's
a
sidewalk
out
there,
but
my
recollection
is
that
they
require
some
separation
between
parking
and
street.
A
A
N
A
Okay,
we
won't
vote
on
the
fountain
right
tonight
then,
but
but
it
is
needed
in
that
location
by
churches,
if
no
one
else
so
good
we'll
see
if
anyone
else
wants
to
speak.
With
regard
to
that,
thank
you.
Yes,
you
come
forward
and
give
us
your
name
and
in
address.
Please.
N
Commissioners,
my
name
is
kelly.
Cornelius
addresses
160
lynn
drive
in
aitkin.
I
have
a
question.
I
have
a
couple
questions
is
this
part
of
the
newbery
street?
That
was
just
voted
on
to
be
conveyed
to
a
developer,
and
I
was
referred
to
this
this
body
at
the
the
most
recent
meeting
of
the
amdc,
and
I
was
told
by
mr
o'brien
in
reference
to
my
question
about
the
planning
commission.
N
N
A
Asking
me
you're
really
asking
questions
regarding
planning
commission
that
I
may
we
may
have
to
get
our
planning
director
or
someone
to
answer,
but
but.
N
And
so
my
question
is
what,
where
do
we
have
public
comment
for
this
and
what
is.
N
N
Well
because
newberry
was
mentioned,
I'm
asking,
if
that's
a
that's
a
part
of
it,
but
there
was
no.
There
was
no
place
for
regular
public
comment.
Well,.
A
There
there
is
tonight:
okay,
yeah,
you're,
you're,
commenting
right
now,
okay
and
you
know-
and
we
appreciate
you're
doing
that
so
do
you
have
it's
not
related
to
the
conveyance
that
was
done
a
while
back,
but
but
this
is
a
separate
parcel
that
that
is
directly
behind
peace.
Lutheran
church,
I
guess,
is
some
town
houses.
Do
you
know
where
the
property
we're
talking
about?
Is
I.
N
This
parking
would
be
more
parking
and
maybe
eliminate
the
need
for
a
five-story
garage
or
whatever.
A
It's
not
it's
not
directly
related
to
that.
It
primarily
has
been
a
long-standing
need
for
the
downtown
churches
that
that
that
have
to
park
halfway
on
halfway
off
these
parkways,
and
they
often
ask
the
city:
could
they
pave
some
of
the
parkways,
and
this
actually
alleviates
that
that
need
for
at
least
one
church,
and
maybe
three
so.
A
N
You
know
parking,
but
so
where
do
we
come
in
the
future
to
in
our
public
comment
for
the
parking
garage.
A
Well,
this
one
is:
this
is
not
the
the
right
application,
but
the
garage
parking
garage
plans
will
come
back
to
us
in
a
month
or
so
they're
still
working
on
them.
They're
taking
comments
from
the
public
and
from
us
from
at
least
two
work
sessions
and
they've
gone
back
and
retooled,
and
I
haven't
seen
them
lately,
but
they'll
be
back
in
a
month
or
so
with
public.
You
know
at
public
hearings.
A
This
is
not
a
parking
garage,
but
the
advantage
to
parking
garages
is
that
they
eliminate
the
need
for
a
lot
of
parking
lots,
and
you
know
that
that's
a
sort
of
the
way
they
do
it
in
charleston.
I
guess
so
now.
We've
had
some
any
other
comment
on
this,
mr
and
ali.
Will
you
will
you
make
sure
it's
on
the
parking
lot?
A
K
So
thank
you
for
that.
I'm
sorry!
It's
luis
ronaldini
638
magnolia.
I
don't
think
I
did
that
correctly,
the
first
time
so
the
the
question
I
have
is
because
I
didn't
see
it
anywhere.
Is
this
poor
old
house
a
on
the
aiken
register?
Is
it
a
contributing
structure?
Is
it
a
non-contributing
structure
and
do
we.
D
A
The
in
the
downtown
overlay
district.
K
A
Have
certain
sites,
but
we
have
the
the
historic
districts
do-
have-
are
divided
into
contributing
and
non-rooting
right
that
doesn't
really
exist
in
the
downtown
overlay
per
se.
A
You're
asking
if
it
is
no
it
we
don't
have
any
knowledge
of
it
being
designated
a
historic
structure,
I
suppose
the
owner.
If,
if
I'm
incorrect,
they
can
correct
me,
but
I
don't
know
of
that.
Maybe.
K
The
case,
just
as
you
know,
as
you
know,
I'm
I'm
interested
in
demolition,
sure
issues,
and
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
there
was
any
reason
why
this
should
be
a
protected
structure
for
any
other
reason
other
than
that,
I'm
in
favor
of
this,
if
it
particularly
if
it
helps
with
the
parking
issues
downtown
because,
as
you
know,
the
parking
garages
is
controversial
and
there
are
links
between
what
you
can
park
in
these
places
and
when
you
have
to
put
in
a
parking
garage
correct.
A
You
yeah
thank
you
very
much
and
I
think
that
the
building
has
been
vacant
and
unoccupied
for
what
we
say,
eight
or
ten
years,
maybe
longer
than
that
and
and
unable
to
be
sold.
The
property
was
only
sold
through
this
many
years,
and
so
we
attempted
as
you
you
know,
the
city
attempted
to
work
with
mr
mr
mcgee
to
relocate
it
and
he
did
everything
he
could
and
but,
except
for
some
trees
in
the
way
would
have
been
able
to
do
that.
A
A
Second
motion:
second:
okay,
any
any
other
discussion
I
will.
I
will
reiterate
that
they,
the
I
think
the
intention
is
to
if,
if
they
can
reuse
the
lumber,
there
are
some
fairly
large
beams
in
the
floor
structure
I've
seen
and
that
if
they
can
do
that,
they
will
that'll
be
part
of
the
demolition.
A
Hopefully
we
we
that's,
that's
their
desire
at
any
rate.
So
all
in
favor
of
the
this
motion
for
147
newbury
street
raise
your
right
hand.
Okay,
thank
you,
and
I
believe
that
completes
our
work
tonight.
So
I'll
ask
for
a
motion
to
adjourn.