►
From YouTube: Design Review Board - May 5, 2020
Description
Design Review Board Virtual Meeting Stream
May 5, 2020
00:18 Call to Order
00:45 Minutes
Old Business
02:43 A. Application H20-047: Applicant Lorian Peralta-Ramos requests approval for the replacement of a gate and alterations to a perimeter wall located at 347 Union St. SE. (TMP 121-09-05-005). CONTINUED FROM 4/7/2020
New Business
10:02 A. Application D20-001046: Applicant Mickey Anaclerio requests approval for the demolition of the structure located at 318 Richland Ave. W. (TMP 105-28-02-011).
17:12 B. Application D20-001047: Applicant Joy Albrecht requests approval for a series of additions to her home at 240 Newberry St. SW (TMP 121-29-10-012).
21:36 C. Application H20-048: Applicants Mark Mahoney and Betsy Wilson-Mahoney request approval for the addition of an outdoor chimney and expansion of their roofline to cover an existing patio at the rear of their home at 120 Colleton Ave. SE. (TMP 121-09-07-007).
28:55 D. Application H20-049: Applicant Carol Lynn Richards requests approval for the replacement of the garage door on her detached garage with a bay window at her home at 339 Marion St. SE (TMP 121-10-23-003).
35:46 E. Consideration of amendment to the Design Review process for art in the Old Aiken Overlay District.
F. Consideration of amendment to the Old Aiken Design Guidelines
You can send comments on future meetings at DRBComment@CityofAikenSC.gov
A
Okay,
I
want
to
welcome
everyone
to
our
may
fifth
online
meeting
of
the
design
review
board
tonight
and
we
have
a
number
of
applicants
who
are
off
camera
in
the
waiting
room
and
will
be
ushering
them
in
as
we
as
we
get
to
their
their
application
before
we
we
vote
on
the
minutes.
I
think
you
all
have
minutes
in
your
package,
if
you,
if
you
be
thinking
about
that,
we'll
have
a
motion
on
that.
B
A
You,
okay,
we've
got
a
motion
in
a
second.
If,
if
you
approve
that
raise
your
right
hand,
okay,
the
minutes
are
approved
and
I
will
say.
If
you
clear
your
throat,
it's
you're
gonna
be
on
on
the
mic.
So
that's
the
way
Zen
works
now,
if,
if
you
would
Mary
Catherine
I
believe
we
have
an
item
of
old
business
and
and
we'll
probably
want
to
invite
the
applicant
in
to
the
meeting.
Is
that
right?
Yes,.
C
D
C
E
C
And
I
will
publish
this
for
the
record.
It's
application
number
H
to
0-0
for
seven
applicant
Lori,
Ann
Peralta
Ramos
requests
approval
for
the
replacement
of
a
gate
and
alterations
to
a
perimeter
wall
located
at
347,
Union
Street
southeast.
That's
tax
map,
parcel
1,
1,
0,
9,
0,
5,
0,
0
5.
This
item
was
continued
from
your
April
7th
design
review
board
meeting
the
board
had
some
recommendations
on
ways
to
possibly
address
the.
C
Musician
between
the
applicants,
portion
of
the
the
cinderblock
wall
fronting
south
boundary
and
the
the
neighbors
continuation
of
that
wall,
and
the
recommendation
was
that
a
pillar
to
replicate
the
the
other
pillars
found
several
feet
down.
That
wall
would
be
an
appropriate
way
to
ease
that
transition.
You
gave
the
feedback
that
that
could
be
constructed
from
wood
or
brick
to
match
the
existing.
So
this
is,
they
have
submitted
a
a
replica
of
the
existing
pillars
in
wood
mm-hmm.
That's
what
you
see
on
your
screen
right.
A
A
I'm
personally,
I'm
not
sure
we
we
have
to
have
an
exact
replica.
You
will
see
the
now
this
the
image
of
the
gate,
and
you
see
two
columns
there
that
are
there
masonry
and
then
you
see
a
paint
line
over
on
the
far
left
and
I
think
the
paint
line
was
the
thing
that
was
kind
of
disturbing
that
you've
got
one
continuous
material
that
all
sudden
changes
abruptly.
A
So
the
the
the
suggestion
was
made.
Well,
why
not
have
a
vertical
element
there
and
they've
gone
all
the
way
to
replicating
those
I?
Guess
you
all
could
weigh
in
on
whether
you
think
that's
that's
necessary.
Personally,
you
know
I
think
you
could
probably
have
an
8
inch
wide
vertical
board
that
may
project
out
slightly
and
then
it
could
either
stop
at
the
top
of
the
masonry
or
it
could
go
all
the
way.
Go
all
the
way
up
and
I'm,
not
sure
we
really
need
a
sculpted
wood
column.
A
G
E
A
A
F
A
H
A
E
A
I
A
Mickey
we
we
just
talk
briefly
about
about
the
demolition
and
what
would
be
left
and-
and
we
know
in
the
future,
there
will
be
some
parking
spaces
for
the
for
the
bank,
presumably,
but
also
you,
you
were
discussing
what
what
would
be
done
on
that
exposed
wall,
because
I
think
that
that
may
be
part
of
the
next
project.
But
you
had
some
ideas
on
that.
Is
that
right?
Well,.
I
Really
all
I
want
to
say
is
so
what's
that
and
it's
almost
like
a
lean-to
because
we're
the
or
that
single
door
is
the
previous
picture
that
will
be
remaining,
but
the
wall
that
will
be
left
is
part
of
the
courtyard
and
part
of
the
prom
and
I.
Guess
that's
the
problem
wall
and
it
is
a
brick
wall.
Now
what
how
that
will
look?
I
Will
you
know
come
up
that'll,
be
that
will
be
how
it
will
look
as
the
demolition
is
done
yeah,
but
as
far
as
this
site
work
goes
that
will
be
coming
before
y'all
next
or
the
building
for
next
month's
made
mine.
You
know
I
couldn't
speak
to
that
is
now.
Okay,
okay,
but
I
will
say
this
in
listening
to
the
previous
meeting
in
the
work
session.
All
I
can
just
say
and
I
guess
I
got
this
from
all
of
you
all,
but
you
know
just
that
the
site
is
such
a
small
site.
I
A
I
I
G
I
Sir,
that's
an
actual
like
a
little
courtyard
that
he
has,
but
it's
very
it's
very
small
I
mean
you
can
kind
of
see
it
from
the
very
beginning
of
the
blue,
where
your
arrow
is
right
there
from
the
beginning
of
it's
like
a
little
courtyard.
But
then
it
grows
just
a
little
bit
further
back
and
there's
a
door
and
I
take
it
that
goes
into
his
into
the
restaurant.
Look
how
it
goes,
I'm,
not
sure,
but
I
was
able
to
peek
through
there
when
we
were
looking
at.
I
A
A
E
A
J
J
E
C
C
A
C
H20
cr-48
applicants
mark
Mahoney
and
Betsy
Wilson
Mahoney
request
approval
for
the
addition
of
an
outdoor
chimney
and
expansion
of
their
roofline
to
cover
an
existing
patio
at
the
rear
of
their
home
at
120
colleton
Avenue
southeast
X,
my
parcel
one,
two,
one:
zero,
nine,
zero,
seven,
zero,
zero
seven
and
we
have
mr.
Mahoney
and
mr.
Olsen
Mahoney
with
us,
and
she
has
done
some
renderings.
This
is
I
will
say
very
minimally
visible
from
any
angle
I'm,
especially
given
the
existing
tree
line,
but
it
does
meet
our
usability
definition.
So
thank.
A
You,
let's
see
and
Mark
for
coming
in
on
line
like
this
and
Mary
Katherine
is
exactly
right.
Technically
you
it's,
it's
barely
visible.
So
that's
why
we're
we're
reviewing
it?
It
sounds
like
a
great
idea,
an
outdoor
room
and
complete
with
fireplace
and
we're
familiar
with
the
location
and
I
think
that
it's
going
to
give
you
a
larger
house,
actually
willing
living
space.
A
D
D
Later
other
drawings,
there
we're
pretty
much
there.
We
have
an
existing
pay,
stone
patio
and
we'll
use
pay
stone
material
for
the
fireplace
and
for
the
pillars
and
Hardie
board
around
the
top
area
under
the
soffit,
and
we
have
an
existing
knee
wall
that
is
made
out
of
field
stone
that
we're
going
to
use
as
the
heart.
E
A
D
A
A
A
D
A
Yeah
I
was
just
wondering
what
you
think
is
an
as
another
as
an
artist
would
would
you
have
any
kind
of
a
yeah
any
kind
of
a
maybe
an
eight
inch
band
at
the
top.
That
might
be
the
same
material
that
would
possibly
project
out
or
maybe
slope
back.
It
looks
like
it.
It
looks
sort
of
contemporary
in
in
that
view,
right.
D
A
A
J
C
D
A
A
C
A
D
A
D
K
A
A
K
G
K
A
That's
right:
yeah
I,
think
the
that
sunroom
is
not
part
of
the
contributing
house
and
I'm,
not
sure
it's
really
contributing
house,
but
I,
don't
think.
There's
a
problem
now.
I
suspect
you'll
have
to
have
a
follow-up
application
where
you're,
where
you're
modifying
the
sunroom.
That's
not
in
this
application,
but
yeah.
G
K
K
A
E
A
K
K
A
A
K
A
C
A
A
D
C
A
C
C
B
C
C
Orange
is
old,
Akins
owned,
downtown
business
and
then
this
pretty
turquoise
is
everything
in
the
old
Lake
and
overlay
district,
but
not
his
own
downtown
business.
So
currently,
the
way
the
matrices
read
anything
here
in
orange
is
what
any
art
installations
require:
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
Anything
here.
Any
art
installed
here
does
not
require
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
and
so
the
direction
that
you
all
gave
at
the
last
meeting
was
that
you
wanted
to
amend
this
matrix
to
require
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
C
So
in
short,
any
art
installed
anywhere
in
the
old
Lake
and
overlay
district
would
then
require
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
So
that's
what
this
is,
what
the
matrix
for
this
these
type
of
properties.
This
is
what
it
currently
says:
it's
no
certificate
required.
We
you
have
before
you
the
option
to
vote,
to
amend
this,
to
require
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
and
I
replicated
what
we
have
for
the
downtown
business
zone,
which
allows
for
administrative
approval
so
I.
C
A
C
A
C
A
A
A
C
A
E
C
You
you
still
so
it's
two
separate
but
related
actions,
so
you're
the
outcome
of
your
discussion
last
month.
Was
you
liked
the
addition
you
like
the
guideline
amendments
then
had
some
formatting
change
or
a
clerical
error
that
needed
to
be
fixed
and
you
Lucy
wanted
to
change
the
word
rubric
to
criteria,
but
those
guidelines
still
need
to
be
amended
to
require
that
that
Aiken
Art
Commission
review
this.
H
C
Now,
looking
at
the
map
in
the
blue,
you
can
stick
whatever
statue.
You
want
or
paint
whatever
mural
on
your
house,
you
so
desire
and
you
have
no
jurisdiction
over
it.
Mm-Hmm
you're
in
amending
your
design,
review
process
aka
the
matrix
you're
saying
these
folks
would
now
have
to
come,
get
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
in
order
to
put
art
in
an
area
visible
from
the
road
and.
A
That's
what
we're
deciding
tonight
do
it
do
it
in
fact,
she's
she's
tailored
it
to
that
to
expand
it
out,
and
we
have
to
Josh
we're
just
voting
on
whether
we
want
to
do
that
that
we
want
to
do.
We
want
to
approve
art
that
goes
through
the
whole
lakyn
overlay
district
are
just
in
the
in
the
in
the
beat
business
district,
I
think
the
consensus
last
time
was
it
yeah.
A
J
A
C
A
C
C
C
C
H
A
A
C
A
A
That's
the
next
page
for
me
and
my
agenda
package,
but
okay,
do
you?
Let's
have
some
more
some
more
comments
on
on
whether
we
want
to
review
art
outside
the
business
district.
You
all
feel
like
that.
If
Katie
wanted
to
put
a
statue
of
a
chicken
out
there,
I
guess
Josh
would
not
approve
of
it.
If
it
were
a
tiger,
it
would
be
okay.
A
H
A
J
E
J
J
G
C
C
J
H
B
H
C
As
of
now,
if
they
lived
in
the
blue
and
this
weren't
a
sign,
it's
not
some
auto
shop
and
that's
their
way
of
advertising
their
auto
shop.
It's
just
somebody
lives
in
this
house
and
wonderf
in
a
truck,
then
no
they
that
work
of
art
would
not
need
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
The
way
the
matrix
is
currently
and
so.
A
F
A
Yeah,
okay,
we
may
just
need
to
have
a
motion.
The
vote,
your
will
will
go,
will
be
going
all
night
on
this
and
we
really
still
have
another
motion
after
this
one's
I
think
now.
The
motion
that
Katherine
is
trying
to
get
us
to
address
first
is
the
nine
downtown
business
area
and
whether
that
that
would
be
art
would
be
reviewed
in
that
that
area
or
not
right
now
they
can
do
anything
they
want.
This
is
in
Katie's,
neighborhood,
I.
Think.
A
H
A
A
C
A
F
F
A
B
C
E
C
D
A
And
we
have
two
opposed
okay,
I
think
the
motion
carries.
Thank
you
now.
The
next
motion
is
actually
the
one
I
thought
we
were
going
to
be
doing
first.
This
is
just
simply
to
integrate
the
Aiken
Arts
Commission
vetting
process
that
that
would
take
place
before
any
art
comes
before
us.
Correct,
Mary,
Katherine.
C
A
A
C
A
C
The
feedback
that
you
all
provided
last
month,
mm-hm
been
pointed
out
that
this
last
line
under
the
current
a
few
samples
are
included
in
the
photographs
at
right.
The
way
the
page
is
actually
laid
out
in
the
guideline
document,
it
should
should
reference
at
left
so
I
fixed
that
and
then
for
the
new
language
being
added
Lucy
recommended
changing
established
rubric
to
establish
criteria.
A
C
E
C
Only
foxes
that
you
actually
approved
were
the
ones
that
were
on
the
Wilcox
property
and
this
City
Municipal
Building
property,
none
none
in
the
parkways
we
presented
them
to
you.
That
was
one
of
those
for
your
information.
This
is
happening
in
the
parkways
because
that's
been
the
precedent
but
and
the
board
comments.
But
there's
no
know
the
design
review
board
does
not
have
oversight
over
the
parkways,
but
council
did
approve
those,
but
it's
not
DRB
doesn't
get,
does
not
mm-hmm.
A
A
They
do
as
a
courtesy,
they
I
believe
almost
all
the
modifications
they've
made
to
including
that
Island
in
front
of
Smitty's
they
they
bring
to
us
and
for
input.
We
just
don't
vote
on
it,
correct
that
correct
yeah.
Okay,
now
we
have,
we
never
I,
don't
think
we've
had
a
motion
yet,
but
I
think
we
could
I
think
Lucy's
to
make
a
motion
looks
like.
G
A
Okay
motion
in
a
second,
it's
any
other
discussion.
I
think
this
one
we've
actually
had
plenty
of
time
several
months
to
to
go
over.
So
if
we're
all
clear
on
that
note,
further
discussion,
I'll
call
for
the
vote.
All
in
favor
of
the
additional
wording
in
the
Olek
and
design
guidelines
raise
your
right
hand,
okay,
good,
so
that
motions
now
does
that.
Does
that
take
care
of
item
C
enough?
Hopefully,
okay,
I.
H
C
That's
what
you
just
that's,
what
you
just
approved-
yes
mm-hmm
so,
but
but
just
a
so
the
matrix
is
done.
Nobody
else,
Planning,
Commission,
City
Council.
Nobody
else
weighs
in
on
that.
But
this
motion
that
you
just
made
is
a
recommendation
that
will
now
be
heard
by
Planning
Commission
and
then
recommend
to
City
Council,
who
has
two
readings
because
it's
the
street.
It
is
the
text
amendment
to
the
zoning
ordinance
and
so
it'll
be
some
months
before
we
get
the
final
approval
to
change
the
guidelines
so
for
now,
technically
we've
got
to
operate
with.