►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting January 11, 2022
Description
Planning Commission Meeting
January 11, 2022
6 PM
Call to Order
Minutes
Old Business:
none
New Business:
A) Election of Officers
B) Application 22- 20013 Annexation Request, TMP 123- 06- 01- 007, 915 Brookhaven Drive, by Swint E. Bradberry Jr.
C) Application 22- 20014 Annexation Request, TMP 107- 05- 06- 009, 336 Savannah Drive, by Kelly Couch.
D) Application 22- 20015 Annexation Request, TMP 106- 07- 02- 003, 109 Lynwood Drive, by Kris & Cynthia Helmick.
E) Application 22- 20016 Annexation. Request, TMP 122- 09- 08- 016, 183 East Pine Log Road, by Beverly M. Giles.
F) Application 22- 91001 Concept Plan Revision Request, TMP 107- 13- 17- 001, Society Hill Drive, by Woodside Village Residential.
Adjournment
A
A
Meetings
are
public
forums
in
which
many
opinions
are
expressed
in
the
business
of
the
city
must
be
conducted
as
such.
Disciplined
honorable
and
professional
decorum
is
paramount.
Courteous
and
respectful
communication
is
required
during
public
hearings.
All
questions
and
statements
from
the
public
shall
be
directed
to
the
chair.
If
you
wish
to
speak,
raise
your
hand-
and
I
will
recognize
you-
please
approach
the
pro
the
podium
and
state
your
name
and
address
in
order
to
allow
an
opportunity
for
everyone
who
wishes
to
address.
The
planning.
Commission
speaker
should
limit
their
comments
to
the
subject
being
discussed.
A
Each
speaker
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
address
an
issue
and
may
only
address
an
issue
once
unless
questions
from
the
planning
commission
are
posed
to
the
speaker.
I'll
also
add
that
we
are
a
recommending
body.
If
you
do
not
agree
with
our
any
of
our
decisions
tonight,
you
will
have
a
chance
to
take
it
up
with
city
council.
A
B
A
A
E
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
F
Hello:
everyone
I'm
kent
baldwin.
I
live
at
621
carlton
avenue
here
in
aitkin,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time,
consideration
tonight
on
behalf
of
silver
bluff
development
which,
as
you
know,
has
been
the
long-term
developer
of
the
village
at
woodside
since
its
conception.
So
we
appreciate
you
hearing
us
tonight.
F
F
Marie
did
a
great
job
outlining
what
we're
we're
trying
to
get
approved
here.
As
you
know,
the
the
village
is
in
the
pr
zone.
It
was
originally
approved
in
2005.,
and
the
fundamental
component
of
this
design
and
the
vision
of
the
village
is
a
mixture
of
residential
uses,
commercial
uses,
retail
restaurants
and
other
open
space
amenity
elements.
F
It
creates
a
vibrant
community
for
a
diverse
mixture
of
single
and
multi-family
housing,
and
so
far
we
feel
like
we've
done
a
good
job
accomplishing
that
goal
from
the
outset.
This
development
was
planned
as
a
mixture
of
single-family
homes,
town
homes,
cottages
and
attached
multi-family
units,
including
rental
apartments,
mixed
in
with
the
potential
for
residential
over
retail.
F
the
areas
evolved
over
the
years
as
we've
adjusted
to
market
conditions
and
forces
and
in
the
immediate
area
we
included
some
information
in
our
package
that
showed
this
townhome
area.
The
area
that
we're
proposing
now
and
the
residential
area
in
and
around
this
area
was
originally
approved
for
62
units
in
2005
and
we've
reduced
and
changed
our
product
mix
there,
and
you
know
now.
We're
currently
in
this
area
would
would
end
up
developing
48
units.
F
There's
considerable
interest
in
larger,
more
upscale
rentals
in
the
village
we've
been
approached
by
many
woodside
residents,
as
well
as
others,
for
you
know
a
preferred
option
of
a
larger
rental,
as
opposed
to
a
for
sale,
larger
townhome.
It's
always
been
intended
for
a
mixture
of
residences
in
the
village.
F
You
know
we've
we've
intentionally
designed
and
been
conscious
of
the
relationship
to
the
existing
buildings,
townhomes
that
are
already
built
and
feel
we've
come
up
with
a
a
concept
and
architectural
design
that
will
work
well
with
what
we've
already
done
in
the
village,
we've
communicated
our
plants
to
the
area
to
the
woodside
village,
neighborhood
association,
as
well
as
the
residents
september.
28Th
of
2021,
we
met
with
the
hoa
board,
as
well
as
some
residents
that
are
directly
impacted
and
behind
the
proposed
building
to
review
their
concerns
and
show
them
what
our
plans
were.
F
We
sent
out
on
october
the
6th,
an
email
and
flyer
announcing
what
we
were
planning
on
doing
to
all
the
residents
in
the
village
and
then
again
on
december,
the
14th
of
2021,
a
follow-up
was
sent
out
with
an
update
and
informing
them
that
we,
you
know
we're
gonna
address
the
city
for
approvals
for
this.
For
this
building,
the
primary
concerns
at
the
time
from
residents
and
within
the
village
was
density.
F
G
F
Just
like
the
town
homes.
Next
door
have
the
same
configuration,
their
garages
are
on
the
back,
face
the
alley
and
they
access
the
garages
from
that
alley.
Barrister
lane
there's
additional
parking
that
is
available
in
the
front
on
society,
hill
drive,
the
combination
of
the
garage
and
that
additional
parking
will
will
bring
us
up
and
over
the
city's
record
requirements,
which
is
one
and
a
half
parking
spaces
per
per
dwelling
unit
for
the
area.
F
So,
in
addition
to
the
society
hill,
parallel
parking
that
you
see
there
in
the
upper
part
of
that
you
don't
see,
it
is
a
parking
lot.
That's
behind
the
current
baldwin
building
and
medical
office.
That
is
also
has
available
parking
for
overflow
situations,
maintenance
and
upkeep.
You
know,
as
the
owner
we
plan
on
owning
and
managing
these
will
ensure
proper
maintenance
and
upkeep
of
the
buildings
in
the
area.
F
You
know
this
protects
our
investment
as
well
as
the
property
values
in
the
neighborhood
and
the
area
around
it,
and
we've
discussed
with
two
primary
home
sites
behind
the
building
that
will
back
up
to
the
garages
spoke
with
one
of
them.
Sarah
clader
one
of
the
residents
there
about
assistant
in
the
design
of
some
privacy,
fencing
and
walls.
If
she
feels
the
need
for
that,
we
built
her
house,
we
developed
the
property,
and
you
know,
hopefully
that
will
help
her
with
what
we're
doing
there.
F
We
think
this
will
be
a
great
addition
to
the
village
and
we
feel
the
market
is
is
interested
in
this.
We
expect
it
will
rent
and
lease
well,
it's
consistent
with
our
original
concept
plans
going
back
to
2005
and
subsequently
updated,
and
we
believe
we've
addressed
any
concerns
that
the
residents
have
had,
and
you
know
respectfully
ask
that
you
know
you
approve
this
application,
so
we
can
go
forward.
F
We
that
that
meeting
was
held
with
the
the
board
members
for
the
hoa
are
all
residents,
so
that
was
five
or
six
folks
and
then
the
two
lots
that
are
immediately
behind
it.
Sarah
sarah
cleator's
son
mark
mokel
attended
as
well
as
the
pistolies
who,
who
don't
live
there,
yet
they
have
a
lot
there,
so
they
were
at
that
initial
meeting
and
then
the
entire
village
was
informed
through
an
information
flyer
that
was
emailed
to
all
the
residents.
Okay,.
E
F
So
it
won't
be
less
family
there'll
be
14
apartment
units.
Given
the
mix
of
bedroom
count,
you
know
we
feel
like
the
overall
number
of
residents
versus
those
original
town
homes
were.
They
ranged
in
size
from
oh
2400
feet
up
to
over
3
000
feet
so
generally
family
with
kids.
You
know,
or
at
least
two
folks
versus
we
feel
there'll,
be
a
fair
amount
of
single
folks
in
this
bill.
A
D
F
F
There
was
a
designated
number
of
multi-family
units
as
part
of
the
assisted
living
complex,
as
well
as
square
footage
for
their
office
and
common
areas.
They
have
not
exercised
their
option
to
go
beyond
what
they've
already
built,
which
is
75
units,
and
I
think
it's
10
000
square
feet.
So
we
just
are
asking
that
those
footages
and
those
units
that
are
already
approved
and
would
have
been
built
in
benton
house
are
available
to
us.
For
the
balance
of
the
village,
we
tried
to
put
together
a
little
table
that
kind
of
shows
yeah.
F
A
G
G
There
are
the
town
homes,
and
this
is
just
my
pacing
it
off,
but
I
pasted
it
off.
Probably
a
dozen
times
are
about
240
feet
and
that's
for
six
units,
and
each
unit
has
probably
one
or
two
people
at
most
living
in
them
and
then
and
that's
12
garage
spaces,
because
each
unit
has
a
double
as
a
two-car
garage
the
apartments
there
they
don't
take
as
much
room.
G
G
You
did
not
have
any
leeway
at
all,
and
so
I
think
these
14
garage
spaces
are
going
to
present
a
problem
and-
and
I,
and
particularly,
if
you're,
going
to
build
walls
for
people
like
sarah
cleator,
the
people
backing
out,
aren't
going
to
have
any
you
know
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to.
You
know
to
back
onto
a
little
bit
of
grass
or
shoulder
of
road
or
anything.
G
So
so
I
think
I
think
that's
a
problem,
and
you
know
if
somebody
has
a
big
truck,
then
they're.
You
know
they're
really
going
to
have
a
hard
time
getting
out
so
I'd.
You
know
to
me
if,
if,
if
it
could
be
reduced
to
the
12
units
to
me,
it
would
make
more
sense
this
it.
It's
it's
very
dense
and
very
tight,
and
that's
that's.
Basically.
All
I
wanted
to
say
is
that
I'm
concerned
about
the
the
tight
garage
spaces.
It
may
be
legal,
but
it's
not
really
right.