►
From YouTube: DEI Short Term Task Force Meeting #2
Description
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Short Term Task Force Meeting #2
A
For
july
20,
20
20
20.,
this
meeting
will
be
recorded
and
made
available
to
you
all
of
the
short-term
task
force
members
as
well
as
available
to
the
public
when
requested
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
bend.
I
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
your
time
today,
not
only
for
this
meeting,
but
for
your
input
and
expertise
as
part
of
the
short-term
task
force.
A
Similarly,
to
the
last
meeting,
we'll
have
aaron
brooke
from
allyship
in
action
assist
in
the
facilitation
of
this
meeting.
In
addition
to
all
of
this
short-term
task
force
members,
we
have
council,
liaisons,
jenna,
goodman,
campbell
and
bruce
abernathy,
and
we
have
barb
campbell
joining
us
today
and
then
from
our
city
staff.
We
have
city
manager,
eric
king.
A
C
D
E
F
B
F
B
History
and
context
of
the
land
that
we
are
on
and
then
before
white
people
called
this
place.
Central
oregon
was
a
place
where
indigenous
people
lived,
traveled
traded
fished
for
generations
as
they
continued
to.
Today.
Those
indigenous
communities
include
the
northern
paiute
moscow
or
klamath
warm
springs,
people
and
others.
B
B
A
D
E
D
E
D
B
D
B
D
B
B
D
B
B
H
H
I
H
H
H
D
Yeah,
if
I
could
try
to
maybe
clarify,
I
don't
know
if
I
it
was
phrased
clearly,
but
my
understanding
of
that
feedback
and
folks
from
council
or
staff
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
was
that
that's
yeah,
but
one.
That's
not
a
task
for
the
task
force
right,
but
I
think
the
the
feedback
was
around,
maybe
even
on
just
such
a
minor
level
of
the
order
in
which
the
recommendations
appear,
or
you
know
things
like
that.
D
I
think
there
was
a
request
just
to
make
that
crystal
clear
that
the
the
ways
in
which
the
recommendations
do
speak
to
what
city
council
had
kind
of
articulated
that
they,
you
know
hoped
from
the
outset
that
the
committee
or
commission
would
include
so
I
apologize
if
that
came
across.
That's
indicating
something
otherwise,
but
enough.
Other
folks
on
council
staff
want
to
further
clarify
that
point.
I
I
could
jump
in
really
quickly.
I
think
I
think
we
you
know
maybe
could
benefit
from
any
further
thought
thoughts
that
you
have
on
those
two
primary
roles
that
we
had
initially
envisioned
and
at
the
same
time,
I
believe
that
part
of
our
goal
with
this
with
with
establishing
the
short-term
task
force,
was
that
we
would
that
we
would
get
further
recommendations
for
what
other
roles
this
the
commission
would
would
play.
I
So
I
think
just
you
know
tying
into
those
those
two
parts
of
the
goal
that
we
had
initially
envisioned,
but
then
you
know
obviously
also
recommending
anything
further.
So
you
know
I
didn't.
I
didn't
put
this
particular
recommendation
in
there,
but
that's
that's
kind
of
my
two
cents
on
there
that,
yes,
those
are
two
of
the
primary
roles
that
we
initially
envisioned,
but
part
of.
H
H
H
D
Yeah,
when
we
get
to
kind
of
just
the
next
point,
access
I'm
happy
to
pull
up
both.
You
know
what
you
sent
over
the
kind
of
piece
you
extracted
from
the
say:
eugene
human
rights
commission,
but
also
pull
up
just
the
basic
information
for
the
some
of
the
other
models
that
were
discussed
last
week.
If
folks
want
to
see
what
they,
what
they
include.
H
D
D
Great
well,
I
guess,
then
we
can
move
on
and
kind
of
talk
about
that
question
of
models.
If
there's
questions
there,
I
don't
know
if
city
staff
wanted
to
clarify.
Maybe
I
know
there
were
a
lot
of
questions
last
week
or
that
last
week,
10
days
ago,
whenever
that
was
around
needing
more
information
about
the
particular
scope
and
recommended
authorities
of
the
test
of
the
permit
dei
committee
or
commission,
do
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
kind
of
narrow
down
what
exactly
those
questions
are,
so
that
task
force
members?
J
D
Sure
thing
yeah
I
just
wanted
to:
maybe
you
would
be
willing
to
distill
down
kind
of
what
more
or
what
level
of
detail
would
be
needed
from
your
side
of
things
to
understand
the
scope
of
authority
or
responsibilities
that
the
group
is
asking
for.
I
think
there
were
some
questions
about
that
last
time.
J
D
J
J
I
think
it's
staff's
job
to
identify
any
obvious
legal
issues
or
really
insurmountable
problems
with
the
recommendations,
but
in
my
view,
it's
really
up
to
the
task
force
to
make
largely
the
recommendations
they
want
to
make
with
input
from
us
as
needed.
So
I
want
to
be
careful
not
to
feel
like
I'm
trying
to
steer
that
conversation
about
how
detailed
the
recommendation
should
be
much
what
they
are.
H
H
H
That
is,
to
set
up
a
smaller
working
group
in
this
meeting
and
give
it
a
very
clear
time
frame
in
which
to
meet.
I
don't
think
it
will
take
a
lot
of
meeting,
maybe
one
meeting
of
the
working
group
and
then
put
whatever
that
meeting
comes
up
with
before
the
entire
steering
committee
get
their
approval
and
move
on.
C
Let
me
just
remember:
I
appreciate
where
you're
going,
and
I
would
imagine
that
I
was.
I
was
probably
one
of
the
instigators
for
the
confusion
that
people
are
going
in.
I
think
part
of
the
dilemma
is
that
your
committee
has
been
grappling
with
this
and
thinking
about
this
for
many
many
months
and
I'm
sure
in
many
situations,
many
many
years,
if
not
decades,
whereas
for
a
lot
of
the
counselors,
this
will
be
relatively
new.
I
personally
thought
that
what
you
sent
from
the
eugene
human
rights
commission
was
perfect.
I
mean,
from
my
perspective,
yeah.
F
C
Helped
to
alleviate
a
lot
of
either
fear
or
concern,
so
I
jenna
I'll,
let
you
weigh
in
as
well
like
I'm,
not
necessarily
convinced
that
you
need
to
go
through
all
these
things,
to
guess
what
the
council
leader
might
not
want,
and
obviously
I'm
an
individual
counselor,
but
from
my
perspective,
something
like
that
was
very,
very
helpful.
This
is
this
is
a
this
is
a
new
entity,
a
new
body
for
the
city
and
the
more
that
you
can
give
us
some
examples
that
allow
us
to
visualize
something
that
helps
us
understand.
C
H
H
I
think
we've
come
to
that
view,
certainly
in
the
past
couple
of
meetings,
and
so
there
is
a
very
strong
basis
on
which
to
move
forward,
anything
that
we
can
do
to
expedite
it.
I
would
support
now.
What
I
would
also
add
to
that
is
that
the
council
should
be
made
aware
that
what
we
have
prepared
in
the
way
of
existing
recommendations
is
for
the
council's
guidance.
H
J
If
I
may
just
for
context
first
in
terms
of
process,
yes,
if
council
ultimately
directs
the
city
to
proceed
with
forming
a
commission
or
committee,
part
of
that
direction
will
be
to
the
city
attorney's
office
to
to
write
the
code,
write
the
ordinance
that
establishes
and
sets
the
the
framework
and
authority
and
responsibilities
of
that
committee.
And
that's
that's
some
that's
process
that
we're
familiar
with.
J
You
spoke
of
kind
of
developing
work
in
a
work
plan
just
for
context.
The
last
committee
that
the
city
created,
I
think,
was
the
neighborhood
leadership
alliance.
I
want
to
say
2018
or
so
once
that
ordinance
was
written.
The
committee,
the
committee,
the
alliance
was
established
and
members
were
appointed,
that
body
spent,
I
think
a
year,
maybe
figuring
out
what
their
work
plan
was
going
to
be.
D
So
I
appreciate
that
those
perspectives
vermeer.
I
think
a
couple
things
I
I
heard
from
that
are
one
kind
of
that
willingness,
at
least
on
your
part,
to
potentially
put
in
more
time
if
time
is
needed
and
kind
of
the
recognition
that
things
will
unfold
right.
It's
not
all
going
to
happen
tomorrow.
What
I
might
suggest,
if
folks
are
open
to
it,
is
continuing
to
kind
of
go
through
the
agenda,
because
it's
possible
that
we
that
that
additional
meeting
or
meetings
won't
be
required.
D
If
you
all
feel
you
know
depends
you
know
how
many
kind
of
revisions
you
all
feel
like
you
need
to
make,
but
I
seem
to
be
hearing
from
folks
at
the
city.
Is
that
there's
not
necessarily
you
know
major
revisions
that
need
to
happen,
and
so
I
wonder
if
it
would
be
helpful
to
just
go
ahead
and
start
walking
through
kind
of
what
what's
there,
what
I
did
as
well.
F
D
Correct
yeah,
and
that
was
my
attempt
to
kind
of
summarize
what
I
was
hearing
so
certainly
let
me
know
if
folks,
if
that's
not
what
you
were
saying
or
are
not
what
you'd
like
to
have
included
there,
I
wonder
if
it
would
be
maybe
most
helpful
at
this
point.
I
did
you
know
kind
of
summarize
these
on
the
slides,
but
I
could
maybe
just
share
the
screen
that
has
the
document
in
it,
so
I
can
type
into
it.
If
folks
have
you
know
changes
they
want
to
make
along
the
way.
B
C
H
D
D
D
Is
there
anything
that
folks
would
want
to
change
about
that
or
add
to
it
and
or
are
there?
You
know
if
there's
pressing
questions
from
from
staff
or
counselor
things
that
don't
make
sense
or
you
would
like
clarified,
please
let
us
let
the
group
know
so
I'll
kind
of
pause.
Each
of
these
that
I
don't
hear
feedback
we'll
kind
of
move
forward,
but
let
me
know
we
can
always
jump
back
if
you
think
of
something
a
little
later
on.
D
All
right,
so
the
second
recommendation
was
that
the
the
human
rights
and
equity
commission's
rule
include
the
following.
Obviously
there
are
a
number
of
items
here,
we'll
start
with
kind
of
that.
First,
one
which
is
to
respond
to
complaints
of
discrimination
and
or
violations,
depend
equal
rights
ordinance,
so
any
changes
or
additions
or
subtractions
to
that
piece
of
it
sounds
like
that's.
Something
folks
are
still
interested
in.
H
D
D
K
I
don't
think
the
detail,
it's
the
concern,
it's
how
the
document
is
presented
rather
than
trying
to
do
this
idea
of
bullet
points.
We
should
actually
try
some
paragraphs
to
kind
of
get
a
better,
fuller
description
right.
So
I
think
that
rather
having
all
these
bullets,
as
vermeer
was
saying,
we
should
consider
just
this
restructuring
the
documents
so
that
those
details
can
come
in
cohesively
as
a
paragraph
as
opposed
to
all
these
individual
bullet
points.
L
This
is
keisha,
I'm
just
wondering
looking
again
at
the
in
referencing
the
document
on
the
feedback
and
asking
to
make
it
easier
to
digest,
and
I'm
just
wondering
whether
part
of
it
is
is
the
task
force,
and
I
think,
ian
kind
of
referred
to
this
as
well,
is
as
a
task
force.
Are
we
overstepping
the
bounds
of
the
recommendations
as
opposed
to
acknowledge
that
it
should
be
what
what
should
be
the
job
of
the
commission
once
it's
established
and
those
commission
members
to
create
to
fill
in
this
detail?
L
K
M
Yeah,
no,
I
think
that's
accurate
what
joanne
just
mentioned.
I
think
this
is
really
it's
kind
of
a
blending
of
both
pieces
of
feedback
of
saying,
please
do
tell
us
where
there
are
blind
spots
and
but
to
also
to
the
extent
that
you
can
be
concise
and
just
offer
a
framework
so
that
we're
not
being
we
do
want
the
the
permanent
commission
committee
to
to
really
fully
put
all
the
details
here.
So
I
think
your
voice
is
going
to
come
across
more
strongly.
M
If
you
more
that
you
can
kind
of
just
speak
pretty
concisely,
I
think
from
a
counselor
perspective,
they're
just
dealing
with
such
a
high
volume
of
issues.
So
at
that
level,
and
just
when
you're
just
beginning
to
scope
out
the
committee
it's
best
and
I
think
you'll
be
more
effective
if
you
can
kind
of
focus
on
what's
the
most
important
thing
and
again,
what's
as
joanna
said,
what's
the
missing?
What
is
the
blind
spot?
What's
the
missing
thing,
the
thing
that
we're
missing
the
most
and
highlight
that.
D
So
I
think,
if
you,
if
it
was
something
you
wanted
to
do,
I
could
see
there
being
like
a
maybe
a
path
in
between
those.
What
I'm
hearing
from
folks
in
that,
because
you
talked
about
paragraphs
as
well
during
kind
of
providing
that
that
context
and
background,
and
I'm
wondering
how
to
separate
out
kind
of
the
more
actionable
pieces
from
the
context
or
if
it
feels
like
you,
want
to
connect
else.
D
I
can
see
a
variety
of
ways
right
or
do
you
want
that
context
to
really
stay
with
the
the
primary
bulk
of
the
recommendations?
Right
because
I
think
you
know
you
could
certainly
approach
it
like
having
a
summary
version
of
that.
That's
you
know
very
simple
and
more
of
an
outline
or
you
could,
you
know,
have
it
as
it
is
or
you
could,
like.
You
said
kind
of
turn.
Some
of
these
bullet
points
into
paragraphs.
D
K
No,
I
think,
eric's
clarification
of
having
kind
of
the
structure
right.
This
specific,
more
kind
of
like
the
structure
of
how
I
will
function
clarifies
what
are
the
the
points
that
we
need
to
highlight
right
as
we
give
our
recommendations
so
yeah.
I
support
the
idea
of
reframing
some
of
these
bullets
to
kind
of
get
down
more
into
the
the
structure
and
the
values
that
will
be
the
foundation
for
the
inaction
plan
right.
D
Okay,
so
in
terms
of
moving
forward
through
this,
what
feels
most
helpful,
I
think
we
could
go
through
the
whole
thing
and
just
see
if
there
are
kind
of
content
changes
that
you
all
want
to
make
and
then
maybe
go
through
it
a
second
time
to
think
about
structure,
or
we
could
think
about
the
structure
as
we
move
through
each
point.
There's
probably
other
things
I
haven't
thought
of
ways
to
approach
it.
What
would
feel
most
helpful
for
the
group.
N
Hi
this
is
denise.
I
would
suggest
perhaps
just
looking
at
the
top
bullet
points,
not
all
the
0.1.2.3
we've
got
10
or
11
statements.
Let's
just
look
at
those
and
revise
the
come,
revise
the
rest
of
the
text
assuming
we're
in
alignment,
and
we
can
make
it
more
powerful
by
shortening
a
lot
of
these
details.
D
D
Sounds
good
great,
thank
you,
wonderful,
okay,
so
it
sounded
like
we
were
good.
We
all
were
good
on
one
and
see
two.
I
mean
I
think
we
probably
should
at
least
highlight
these
kind
of
more
top
level
within
that,
if
that's
helpful,
creating
a
creating
a
formal
process
by
which
the
commission
can
intake
and
respond
complaints,
the
next
one
was
facilitating
impacted
parties
and
connecting
to
and
navigating
community
resources
to
access
care,
support,
education
and
or
resolution.
D
E
I
guess
in
the
interest
of
maybe
shortening
some
things
on
the
document.
This
seems
to
be
covered
by
2.1.2
for
me
and
right
about
facilitating
impacted
parties
and
connecting
to
resolution
which
the
bully
and
eeoc
would
would
do
right.
Presumably,
I
also
like
the
more
active
language
of
facilitating
versus
informing
with
respect
to
connecting
parties
to
boli
or
the
eeoc.
D
F
N
Agreement
again,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
here
under
insure
the
commission's
role.
I
think
we
need
to
be
able
to
shorten
this
all
down.
What
are
the
core
things?
We
believe
the
commission
should
do
right
now.
We
have
about
15
things,
it's
some
of
this
too
much
detail.
That
really
is
when
the
working
group
gets
set
up
to
figure
a
lot
of
this
out.
So
I'm
not
sure
this
line
by
line
is
going
to
be
effective
today,
but
instead
trying
to
get
to
the
core
things
about
responsibilities.
N
B
D
So
folks
are
okay
with
that.
Well,
we
can
keep
moving
forward
here
to
the
next
kind
of
key
point
on
the
commission's
role,
and
I
think
you
know
in
spirit
with
what
I'm
hearing
folks
say.
You
know
you
know,
because
I
think
this
was
from
my
collections.
It
was,
you
know,
attempt
to
kind
of
really
be
as
exhaustive
as
possible.
So
if
we
come
across
ones
that
you
know
upon
further
reflection
feel
maybe
not
that
impactful
or
they're
not
really
adding
something
to
the
recommendations.
D
Overall,
you
know
speak
up,
and
I
can
you
know
kind
of
highlight
those
and
we
can
consider
if
we
need
to
keep
them
in
or
not
so.
The
next
2.2
is
alerting
city
council
to
trends
and
other
issues
related
to
bias
and
discrimination
that
arise
through
engagement
with
historically
marginalized
and
or
underrepresented
communities.
D
K
K
H
And
you
know,
I
would
also
add
that
you
know
in
terms
of
if
we're
going
to
be
advising
city
council
in
an
advisory
capacity.
A
lot
of
this
goes
under
that
advisory
role.
Alerting
city
council
is
equivalent
to
saying
we
want
to
have
a
role
in
helping
the
city
council,
identify
policies
based
on
existing
trends
and
issues.
L
H
H
D
I
appreciate
that
off
right.
It's
not
not
a
problem
for
me
to
to
consolidate
as
needed,
but
my
question
would
be
more
maybe
for
city
staff
around
the
process
piece.
If,
as
it
seems
like
things,
are
moving
forward,
there's
you
know,
I
guess
the
question
is
if
the
feedback
is
primarily
to
consolidate,
or
you
know,
make
more
concise
a
statement
to
what
level?
What
kind
of
like
to
the
word
is
the
approval.
M
Yeah,
no,
I
hear
what
you're
saying
I
think
what
we're
looking
for
is
maybe
for
this
for
the
committee
to
today
to
just
really
conceptually
buy
off
on
the
the
framework
the
wordsmithing
kind
of
slimming
things
down.
I
don't
think
that
we
would
need
a
verbatim
sort
of
approval.
I
think
you
can
still
keep
moving
forward
with
the
timeline
we've
sketched
out
having
this
go
to
the
subcommittee
next
week
and
then
we're
still
slave
we're
slated
for
the
full
council
on
august
19th.
M
So
I
I
mean,
I
think,
what
I'm
hearing
is
this
desire
to
take.
Take
all
this
work,
and
it's
just
now.
It's
just
packaging
at
this
point
to
make
sure
that
it's
it's
the
message
is
being
received
from
council.
I
I
think
your
the
wordsmithing
probably
wouldn't
need
to
occur
in
another
formal
meeting
as
long
as
you're
as
you're
making
recommendations
you're
giving
yourself
some
flexibility
to
to
do
some
of
that
work.
D
I
appreciate
that
clarification
yeah.
I
have
no
problem
doing
that
kind
of
summarization.
If
folks,
you
know,
like
you
said
again,
are
comfortable
with
just
you
know,
really
it's
important
and
any
other
concerns
about
the
language,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
folks
on
the
task
force
feel
comfortable
with
that
approach.
D
If
that's
helpful
for
you
all,
because
I'm
happy
to
kind
of
go
through
there
and
then
based
on
your
feedback
to
combine
in
and
consolidate,
I
wonder
if
it
would
be
helpful,
then
to
maybe
also
as
we're
going
to
just
kind
of
highlight.
You
can
tell
like
highlight
things.
What
feels
like
a
key
recommendation
right,
the
things
that
you
all
feel
are
really
are
most
important
because
it
sounds
like
there's
kind
of
a
separation
coming
out
in
that
sense.
Does
that
make
sense
to
folks.
D
For
sure
I
probably
used
too
many
words,
I
was
like
helpful
for
us
as
we're
moving
through
to
designate
or
highlight
the
recommendations
that
feel
like
the
most
crucial
and
important
trait,
as
we're
also
kind
of
I'm
hearing
feedback
right
now
be
included.
Still,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
have
a
clear
sense
of
the
ones
that
are
really
important
to
keep
I'll,
probably
ask
for
that
feedback,
as
if
that
makes
sense.
L
So
if
I
I
one
thought
I
have
is
just
that
you
know
I,
I
really
appreciate
your
very
consensus,
oriented
and
that's
wonderful,
but
it's
obviously
a
much
more
time-consuming
process,
and
I
think
we
all
I
I
will
speak
for
myself.
I
think
most
of
the
people
on
the
task
force
totally
trust
you
in
that
regard.
L
And
then
I
see
the
other
bucket
is
as
being
sort
of
a
support
and
and
giving
feedback
to
the
council
making
recommendations
based
upon
this
interaction
we
might
have
with
the
community
or
because
these
are
people.
The
people
on
the
commission
are
part
of
an
underrepresented,
historically
marginalized
community,
so
giving
that
feedback
input
to
the
city
and
then
the
other
bucket
is
obviously
just
sort
of
work
to
do
is
creating
then
the
action
plan,
and
so
it's
like
it's.
L
D
You
know
to
complaints,
piece,
the
advisory
role
to
council,
the
you
know,
I
guess
what
you
could
call
me:
the
staff
relationship
around
the
action
plan
and
then
the
feedback
around
the
process
itself,
other
other
kind
of
key
bucket
folks,
I
guess
interviews
where
we
kind
of
just
roll
through
this
a
little
bit,
if
folks,
think
of
other
ones.
Let
me
know:
does
that
sound
good
cool
yeah?
D
I
don't
want
to
belabor
the
process,
but
I
also
want
to
make
sure,
I'm
being
you
know,
inclusive
of
people's
perspectives
and
since
most
folks
don't
have
their
faces
visible.
I
can't
read,
you
know
the
cues
and
all
that
good
stuff.
So
so
what
I'm
hearing
right
is
that
2.2
through
2.6,
potentially,
you
know,
can
fold
into
that
advisory
role,
and
I
guess
I
would
say
too.
D
I
don't
know
if
you
want
this
called
out,
collaborating
with
other
city
committees,
commissions
and
departments
to
ensure
the
needs
and
priorities
of
historically
marginalized
and
underrepresented
communities
are
considered
in
all
goal-setting
and
planning
processes.
It
sounds
like
they're
to
some
extent,
that
is
the
direction
things
are
going
with.
Committee
and
commission
work
from
what
I'm
hearing
from
city
staff,
and
if
anyone
wants
to
echo
that
or
on
council
does
this
feel
like
something
you
want
to
make
sure
remains,
or
does
it
feel
like
an
unnecessary
level
of
detail?.
D
Okay,
so
then,
as
I'm
kind
of
scanning
through
the
rest
of
these
responsibilities,
the
ones
that
really
jump
out
as
being
different
than
what
has
already
been
discussed,
I
think
you
know
the
action
plan
right.
I
think
feels
very
distinct
from
the
other
items
and,
if
you
all
agree
with
that,
does
that
mean
yeah
seem
like
a
key
one.
D
J
H
L
D
D
D
Perfect
thanks
trying
to
keep
an
eye
on
the
mutes
as
they
they
turn
off.
So
the
next
one,
I
think,
is
one.
I've
heard
you,
while
speaking
to
wanting
to
keep
probably,
is
reviewing
the
standard
committee,
commission,
application,
yeah
and
addressing
any
barriers
that
might
exist
in
that
to
have
equitable
participation.
Is
that
a
priority
one?
You
all
want
to
keep.
M
And
I
just
wanted
to
let
the
committee
know
that
we
are
going
to
right
away
change
the
verbiage
on
our
website
and
our
communication
materials
so
that
we
don't
refer
to
our
committees
as
citizen
committees,
because
I
think
that's
not
that's
not
the
intent.
It
was
just
sort
of
hold
over
language,
we'll
change
our
communication
materials,
but
I
think,
to
the
extent
that
this
can
remain
in
there.
We
would
like
to
change
all
of
our
because
there's
lots
of
co
old
code
and
stuff
that
refer
to
our
groups
as
citizen
committees.
M
D
Thanks
eric,
that's
helpful
to
know-
and
you
know
one
thought
I
had
when
I
was
looking
through
these
is,
if
you
wanted
to
consolidate
some
of
them,
you
could
potentially
have
a
recommendation
around
creating
an
equitable
process,
application
process
or
things
of
that
nature,
and
there
are
probably
a
couple
of
things
that
you
can
combine
if
you
wanted
to
in
that
way.
But
it
sounds
like
something.
L
Aaron,
wouldn't
you
say
that
essentially
number
three
are
as
far
as
the
task
force
recommends,
that
there
be
a
review
of
the
standard
city
committee,
commission
application,
blah
blah
that
just
number
three,
because
essentially,
we've
already
started
to
do
that
and
number
four
five.
Six
and
seven
and
all
of
those
sub
points
are
are,
are
part
of
what
that
review
would
would
would
provide
right,
I
mean
essentially
you've
done.
We've
done
the
work
of
it
already,
but
that
that
the
the
recommendation
is
just
that.
F
E
E
D
E
L
Because
there's
two
different
things
that
we're
talking
about
right,
there's
there's
I
mean
in
some
ways
are
we
getting
ahead
of
ourselves,
whether
where,
although
time,
the
time
is
appropriate
that
I'm
sorry
I'll
put
my
video
on
you
that
that
the
we're
immediately
seeing
that
there
should
be
part
of
like
the
work
of
the
committee,
that
our
commission
that
we're
already
starting
is
saying
hey?
We
should
really
look
at
and
maybe
revise
the
standard
city
committee.
Commission
application
form
to
be
more
open
and
welcoming
and
dei
right.
E
L
And
focused,
and
for
whatever
committee
or
commission
positions,
but
then
there's
a
separate
thing,
which
I
think
is
what's
covered
in
number
eight
is
things
that
are
specifically
going
to
be
important
on
the
selection
of
members,
for
this
particular
commission
is
that
right
I
mean.
Would
other
people
agree
that
that's
they're
kind
of
two
different
things.
D
D
So
those
are,
you
know
around
financial
compensation
compensation.
It
looks
like
eric
already
kind
of
spoke
to
this.
One
looks
like
maybe
is
already
being
addressed
and
in
some
respect,
and
then
seven
is
kind
of
really
calling
out
specifically
the
types
of
folks
to
make
applications
and
membership
open
to
yeah.
What
are
your
thoughts?
Do
those
kind
of
fold
into
number
three
or
do
they
need
to
be
separate.
L
I
guess
it's
a
question
to
me
to
just
be
clear
on
is
it
are
all
of
these
things
things
that
we
want
to
see,
regardless
of
what
committee
someone
is
applying
to
right?
So,
for
example,
the
number
four
is
that
in
the
right
place
are
we
are
we
saying
that
that
number
four
should
be
on
all
applications,
regardless
of
what
committee
someone's
applying
for
or
is
that
one
specifically
should
actually
be
more
down
in
number
eight,
when
we're
talking
about
what
the
priorities
of
membership
are
for
this
particular
commission
committee.
D
Got
to
see
what
I
hear,
what
I'm
hearing
is
kind
of
there's
a
is
asking
if
some
of
these
recommendations
are
would
be
appropriate
to
apply
to
all
you
know,
to
put
towards
all
committees
or
commissions
right
as
best
practices
being
proposed,
and
then
what
things
are
specific
to
the
formation
of
this
particular
body.
Is
that
what
you're
saying.
L
Yes,
and-
and
I
kind
of
think,
I
feel
like
the
review
of
the
standard
committee
well,
as
eric
said
some
of
those
things
there's
already
that's
already
underway
for
them
to
do.
It
seems
like
the
review
of
the
standard
would
be
a
task
of
the
commission,
not
us
as
the
task
force
it's
getting
ahead
of
ourselves.
L
D
That
make
sense
what
I
think
about
yeah.
I've
always
wondered
if
something
I
thought
I
heard
in
previous
conversations
was
the
desire
to
have
that
application
process
addressed
before
folks
are
applying
to
be
on
the
commission
right,
so
that
it
can
support
right,
such
as
in
terms
of
like
order
of
operations.
But
I
could
certainly
you
know
kind
of
add
some
of
those
more
particulars.
You
know
within
number
three
and
make
that
kind
of
a
something
that
covers
all
those
various
ways
in
which
you
all
wanted
to.
D
E
I
was
gonna
say
I
think
that
you
know
the
council
can
certainly
look
at
reviewing
that
process
for
all
of
them.
But
to
me
I
see
number
three
as
specifically
asking
for
that
process
to
take
place
before
the
commission
is
formed
so
that
whoever
ends
up
forming
the
commission,
you
know
is
made
up
of
the
kinds
of
people
or
you
know
that
have
the
experiences
that
we
outline
in
number
eight.
E
D
L
K
L
L
Whether
the
whether
the
standard
application
needs
to
be
revised
or
not,
and
whether
that
happens
before
we're
trying
to
select
members
for
this
commission
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
really
matter
because
we
can
have
a
supplemental
application.
I
guess
a
commission
can
establish
its
own
supplemental
application,
or
is
there
restrictions
against
that.
B
J
You
know,
presumably
the
code
will
speak
to
how
many
members
are
going
to
be
on
the
body
and
what
kind
of
qualifications
experiences
qualities
that
the
council
wants
represented
on
the
body.
So
some
of
that
would
go
in
the
code.
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
more
of
a
code
question
when
when
we
get
there
or
an
application
question,
but
that's
one
place
to
address
the
makeup
of
the
body
so
that
it's
what
people
want
to
see.
D
J
Well
again,
from
my
perspective,
we
have
ways
that
we
are
used
to
doing
things
and
we
have
actual
rules.
I
don't
know
that
we
have
any
actual
rules
that
would
prevent
a
supplemental
application,
but
I
think
we
have
a
standard
form
that
we
have
used.
So
I
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
a
can't.
Do
it
question,
but
it
would.
It
would
be
different.
G
G
Is
we
never
want
our
applications
for
other
committees
to
be
seen
as
discriminatory
in
some
way,
because
we're
not
asking
the
same
questions
so
one
of
the
reasons
the
city
has
cities
have
the
same
applications
is
so
that
we
treat
people
the
same,
no
matter
what
committee
they're
applying
for.
So
I
would
think
if
we
think
there's
a
problem
or
something
that
we
would
like
to
add.
G
D
G
H
I
think
that
is
there
anything
that
prevents
the
selection
process
from
including
supplementary
material,
for
example.
If
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
people
who
serve
on
the
commission
have
some
specific
experience
that
is
relevant
to
their
service
on
the
commission,
can
that
information
not
be
submitted
in
a
sort
of
supplementary
mode?
M
J
D
D
G
I
think
ian's
right
cover
letters
and
information,
I'm
having
a
little
bit
of
a
vague
memory
that
our
accessibility
manager
didn't
ever
want
us
to
require
cover
letters,
because
there
may
be
people
that
have
some
limitations
on
their
ability
to
do
so.
So
we've
been
careful
from
the
ada
perspective
to
not
require
things
that
everybody
can't
submit.
M
Yeah
and
then
just
to
answer
the
question
around,
like
the
planning
commission,
there
are
for
certain
committees
or
commissions,
there
are
designated
seats
that
represent
specific
industries,
etc.
So
I
believe,
when
we
have
an
industry-specific
seat,
that's
open
that
we
attach
some
of
that
information
to
the
press,
release
and
communication
materials.
So
it's
really
clear
about
what
we're
looking
for
so
to
the
extent
that
you've
got
as
you're,
defining
this
commission
or
committee
that
you've
got
seats
that
you've
identified
representing
specific
interests.
C
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
keisha
for
those
clarifying
questions.
I
strongly
believe
that
number
three
review
the
standard
city
committee.
Commission
application
needs
to
stay
and
it
needs
to
stay
separately
because
there
is
historic
code
that
needs
to
be
addressed,
and
so
I
think
that
is
very
important
that
that
stays
as
an
item
on
itself
as
a
recommendation,
because
we're
not
looking
really.
K
So
it's
important
to
clear
that
history
and
make
it
updated,
and
that
would
just
add
that
remove
all
necessary
barriers
to
engagement
by
historically
marginalized
and
or
underrepresented
groups,
and
resist
re-traumatization,
re-traumatization
or
oppression
of
these
groups
as
they
engage
with
the
city.
And
then
I
think
that
it's
important
that
we
acknowledge
that
you
know
there's
a
historic
disinvestment
and
there's
a
historic
culture
that
has
kept
marginalized
communities
away
right.
K
I
would
like
to
so
as
far
as
the
culture.
I
thought
that
that
was
kind
of
the
piece
that
this
council
didn't
reach
out
to
the
task
force
and
ask
for
some
feedback
on
that,
as
kisha
was
mentioning
right.
There's
this
public
piece
of
the
commission
engaging
with
the
community
and
the
commission
engaging
with
the
council
and
the
city,
but
there's
also
this
huge
other
piece
which
is
the
city
in
itself
and
how
it
functions
as
we
are
going
to
be
working
on
putting
this
commission
together.
K
So
I
you
know,
I
sent
everyone
a
little
blurb
again
providing
that
framework
that
that
could
assist
the
city
without
necessarily
in
adding
all
the
all
the
nuances
right,
but
yeah
specifically
to
number
three.
I
would
like
to
see
not
only
the
removal
of
all
unnecessary
barriers,
but
the
active
engagement
with
these
communities
in
such
a
way
that
does
not
re-traumatize
or
inflicts
oppression.
H
H
F
H
K
K
K
Rodrigo
mentioned
that
it's
not
just
about
removing
barriers
to
access,
but
when
we
think
of
trauma-informed
approaches
and
the
new
information
we're
learning
not
only
about
how
to
run
businesses
and
organizations,
but
also
how
to
be
better
human
beings
with
each
other.
One
of
those
course
principles
of
trauma-informed
approach
is
not
re-traumatizing.
K
H
K
So
a
good
example
of
that
is,
I'm
gonna
come
back
to
the
rental
assistance
right.
We
tell
folks
to
go,
apply,
do
this
process
so
that
you
can
receive
assistance,
but
the
people
continue
to
hit
these
barriers
and
though
they
get
discouraged,
and
they
you
know
it's,
it's
detrimental
right.
They
lose
trust
on
these
organizations.
K
E
I
don't
know
if
anybody
will
hear
anything
if
I
can
interject.
I
think
that
what
I'm
hearing
aren't
necessarily
competing
ideas.
I
think
that
we
can
handle
this
with
coming
to
an
understanding
of
where
we
put
what
I
agree
with
joanne
that
the
part
about
reviewing
the
standards
should
be
a
part
of
this
document.
E
I
also
think
that
her
additional
point
about
you
know
the
sort
of
commitment
that
this
that
the
city
should
take
can
be
added
to
whatever
preamble
or
vision,
or
you
know,
vision
statement
that
we
add
to
the
beginning
of
this
document.
I
think
if
we
can
come
to
an
agreement
about
how
to
about
about
that
that
we
can
move
forward.
E
I
don't
know
if
I'm
hearing
that
I'm
hearing
things
right,
but
it
sounds
like
we
can
cover
what
joanna's
saying
about
you
know
re-traumatization
and
about
you
know,
cementing
common
language
in
the
preamble
and
also
have
this
third
point.
That
makes
it
clear
that
we
would
like
to
see
these
standards
reviewed
before
this
commission
is
established
to
remove
barriers
and
make
the
commission
have
people
who
we
want
to
be
on
the
commission.
Be
a
part
of
this
position.
Am
I
making
sense.
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
makes
sense
to
me
what
about
other
folks,
yeah
yeah.
I
think
we
can
definitely
accomplish
both
things
and
then
just
I
was
just
gonna
remind
you
know
there
is.
There
will
be
plenty
of
other
to
accompany
this
in
the
report
that
I
hope
you
know
we'll
capture
all
of
this,
these
kind
of
contextual
and
framing
and
nuanced
pieces
too.
So
if
folks
are
comfortable,
maybe
we
can
move
forward
to
number
eight.
Is
there
anything
that
folks?
Oh
sorry,
yes,
I
had.
O
Oh
okay,
I
was
going
to
add
to
what
you
were
saying
aaron
about
having
the
idea
of
the
preamble.
Could
the
preamble
be
something
more
like
overriding
principles
or
guiding
principles
of
these
recommendations
because
it
does
seem,
like
you
know,
a
lot
of
the
things
that
should
be
included
that
you're
talking
about
putting
in
a
preamble?
O
D
D
So
I
think
you
were
cutting
out
there
a
little
bit
but
yeah
I'm
hearing
this.
This
idea
of
kind
of
including
those
guiding
principles
in
you
know
the
introductory
piece
so
that
folks
have
that
framing
as
well
as
the
common
language.
I
want
to
honor
that
we
have
keisha,
had
a
question
and
then
bruce
and
then
there
might
be
others,
but
we
could
move
on.
L
Yeah,
just
I
would
just
sort
of
agree,
I
think
I
think
we're
maybe
persephorating
a
little
bit
too
much
on
this.
I
think
again,
like
number
seven
just
moving
on
it's
like
that's
the
pr
piece.
It's
essentially
it's
our
marketing.
It's
a!
I
think
we
could
simplify
that
and
again,
I
think
a
lot
of
even
all
of
the
bullets.
You
know
the
sub
points
in
number.
Seven
again
come
back
to
guiding
principles
and
I
think
also
it's
kind
of
jumping
ahead.
L
But
as
we
talk
about
that,
I
think
most
of
what
we
added
after
the
last
meeting
from
11
down.
I
think
a
lot
of
this
was
language
that
I
think
was
it
juliana
that
it
added,
and
I
think
it's
it's
all
wonderful
language,
but
it's
definitely
feels
like
it's
more
of
guiding
principles
than
actual
action
items.
You
know
I
mean
like
it's,
it's
it's
all
embedded
other
places
and
it's
about
how
we
think
work
should
be
done
as
opposed
to
the
what
of
the
work.
D
C
Yeah,
I
appreciate
that
and
I
sort
of
I
I
think
a
lot
of
my
comments
are
were
covered
by
keisha,
but
I
actually
has
from
from
from
a
different
perspective.
Seven
is
written
a
little
bit
differently
from
a
lot
of
the
other
recommendations
and
it
it
wasn't
clear
to
me
if
I
I
mean
on
one
level.
This
is
great.
C
These
clearly
are
marginalized,
historically
underrepresented
communities
and
populations,
but
it
wasn't
clear
is
the
implication
that
okay,
the
city
or
the
commission
will
provide
a
person
with
a
personal
computer
and
a
printer
and
a
smartphone
and
a
tablet,
and
because
there's
a
part
of
me
that
thinks
at
some
level,
if
that's
not
the
case,
this
is
really
confusing,
because
that's
sort
of
that's
sort
of
what
jumps
up.
I
I
I
agree
with
keisha
that
I'm
not
sure
you
need
the
sub
bullets.
C
I
would
basically
because,
if
you
think
about
it
in
in
five,
you
are
talking
about
some
kind
of
a
stipend
or
some
kind
of
a
compensation
to
help
people
cover
their
costs.
I'm
supportive
of
that.
I
just
found
this.
This
was
going
farther
than
that,
and
it
wasn't
wasn't
clear
and
it
was.
It
was
actually
written
quite
differently
from
the
other
recommendations.
D
Let's
hopeful
feedback,
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
is,
and
I
wonder
if
it's
all
these
ones,
that
start
with
ensure
where
it
it's
in
some
ways.
It's
it's
almost
kind
of
what,
in
some
respects,
folks,
are
asking
for
this
idea
of
like
saying
what
the
desired
outcome
is,
but
not
the
way
to
get
there,
but
I
can
see
how
in
this
case,
it
creates
some
confusion
about
what
the
expectation
is.
D
My
recollection,
from
the
conversations
and
folks,
let
me
know
has
been
misrepresenting
was
that
it
was
more
about
not
creating
like
not
trying
to
create
a
context
in
which
you
wouldn't
necessarily
need
those
like
you
wouldn't
actually
need
to
have
a
computer
in
order
to
effectively
engage
or
to
be.
You
know
mindful,
I
think,
of
those
of
the
fact
that
it's
not
let
that
be
a
barrier
right
to
participation.
D
C
K
Yeah
absolutely
thank
you
for
that
question
bruce
because
it
allow
us
to
kind
of
engage
a
little
bit
more
in
that
discussion
of
who
this
commission
is
for
and
who
should
be
there.
This
commission
is
for
members
of
the
community
that
have
been
historically
disinvested
right
when
we
think
of
equity.
We
think
of
the
unequal
distribution
of
time
resources
and
focus
with
the
explicit
intention
of
having
everybody
tried
right.
K
So,
yes,
it
absolutely
means
that
the
city
and
city
councilors
have
to
reinvent
how
you
engage
with
community
members
that
have
all
these
limitations
that
we
outnumber
there,
and
not
only
that
you're
able
to
work
with
them
right
to
invite
them
to
the
table,
but
that
they
are
given
the
tools
so
that
they
can
succeed
as
part
of
this
right.
The
idea
again
is
not
to
bring
folks
to
interact
with
the
city
and
then
feel
the
same
franchise
and
feel
like,
like
they're
not
equals
like
they're,
not
sharing
power
and
having
agency
right.
K
D
K
D
What
I
hear
both
of
you
saying
really
in
maybe
different
ways,
is
that
this
you
know,
is
essentially
calling
for
things
to
be
done,
a
little
bit
differently
right
and
so
and
and
like,
I
think
other
folks
have
said
in
one
way
or
another.
The
recommendations
may
not
necessarily
need
to
or
or
be
able
to
spell
out
every
detail
of
how
that
happens.
D
C
C
I
mean
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is
this.
This
list
wasn't
necessarily
helpful
and
I
don't
have
to
be
on
the
committee,
but
I'm
simply
saying
joanne.
I
totally
agree
with
you
if
there
are
15
people
who
apply
and
of
the
15,
these
people
have
have
some
of
these
things.
These
barriers-
that's
great.
I
I'm
not
opposed
to
it.
I'm
simply
saying
if,
if
you
ask
me,
if
I
have
somebody
who
can
communicate
with
the
broader
community,
I
I'm
going
to
put
that
person
higher
than
somebody
who
who
can't.
C
I
don't
think
that
makes
me
discriminatory.
I
think,
from
my
perspective,
I
may
have
a
different
perspective
of
understanding
what
it,
what
the
commission's
role
is.
I
think
I
guess
what
I
what
I'm
hearing
and
maybe
what
I
heard
you
say
was
this
commission
is
set
up
for
individuals
to
be
on
the
commission.
E
Yeah
bruce,
I
think
I
just
two
things
I
wanted
to
address
what
you've
said,
because
I
think
that
there
is
a
lapse
in
understanding
that
it
might
not
be
intentionally
discriminatory
for
you
to
say
I'm
guessing
that
what
you're
alluding
to
is,
if
someone
is
only
spanish-speaking
and
not
english-speaking,
that
you
would
put
them
above
someone
who
is
english-speaking
and
able
to
directly
communicate
with
the
public,
even
if
the
intent
is
not
discriminatory.
Yeah.
C
C
E
B
E
That
what
joanne
was
speaking
to
again
could
probably
be
covered
in
the
preamble
or
statement
of
values
or
whatever.
We
want
to
call
it
about.
Having
that
principle
of
making
sure
that
we're
trying
to
remove
barriers
for
people
who
have
barriers,
I
think
that
that
could
be
supportive.
We
can
scratch
number
seven
as
well.
I
I'd
just
like
to
jump
in
here
thanks,
thank
you
for
helping,
explain
that
and
hey
you
know.
I
think
those
are
some
really
important
points
for
us
to
consider
not
just
in
this
application
process
for
the
the
human
rights
equity
commission
or
whatever
we
end
up
calling
it,
but
for
our
committees
and
commissions
in
general,
like
how
does
somebody
engage
if
they
don't
have
a
personal
computer?
How
can
we
ensure
that
somebody
that
somebody
is
able
to
participate
just
the
same
as
somebody
who
doesn't
have
that
privilege?
I
So
you
know,
I
think
yes,
there's
some
place
for
those
for
the
those
observations
to
fit,
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
be
in
the
recommendation.
So
I
support
that,
but
I
do
think
that
you
know
again
just
chiming
in
in
support
of
of
keeping
number
three
in
there
and
perhaps
providing
some
sort
of
resource
kind
of
separate
document
that
can
be
a
resource
for
for
council
or
whoever.
I
I
You
know
here
are
some
barriers
to
people
participating.
We
should
council
should
be
provided
with
those.
We
should
know
that
and
we
should
have
a
chance.
You
know
we
we
should,
I
think
you
know,
try
to
address
those
as
soon
as
we
can,
because
we
are,
you
know,
for
example,
appointing
an
environmental
and
climate
committee.
I
You
know
we're
in
the
process
of
you
know
filling
those
positions,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
all
of
our
committees
and
commissions
are
as
accessible
as
possible.
That
will
take
some
time,
but
you
know
I
do
appreciate
just
the
fact
that
these
barriers
are
noted
and
outlined
in
more
detail
here
and
hopefully
that
can
be
captured
somewhere
else.
D
Yeah,
something
to
summarize
kind
of
what
I'm
hearing
at
this
point
is
that
that
folks
want
to
capture
this
information-
that's
in
number,
seven,
but
potentially
in
kind
of
the
guiding
principles
or
some
other
contextual
part
of
the
report,
because
in
some
way
that
it
does
feel
more
like
paradigm
shift
than
direct
action,
and
I
think
the
other
thing
I'm
hearing
is
that
it
will
probably
prompt
some
some
great
continuing
conversation
about
what.
What
does
it
mean
to
be
able
to
serve
on
a
committee
or
commission
kind
of
what
are
the?
D
Maybe
different
people
on
committees
have
different
roles
right,
but
what
I'm
gathering
for
our
purposes
today
is
that
this
maybe
fits
best
in
kind
of
those
guiding
principles
since
we're
getting
close
to
six,
but
we're
also
getting
close
to
the
end.
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
move
forward
mary
did
you
want
to
add
something.
G
We
have
issues
with.
We
have
to
have
public
meetings
and
in
order
to
have
public
meetings
you
either
have
to
be
there
or
you
have
to
participate
by
video.
There's
no
way
around
that.
On
the
other
hand,
we
have
tried
to
have
some
meetings
in
different
communities,
not
just
at
city
hall,
to
make
it
easier
for
different
segments
of
the
community
to
go
to
them.
Well,
that's
a
good
discussion
to
have
in
bend
with
this
task
force's.
G
You
know
input
on
well,
what
are
the
barriers-
and
maybe
that's
a
bigger
barrier
is
where
we
hold
meetings
than
saying
you
need
to
have
a
vehicle
or
ride
chair,
but
no,
we
just
need
to
hold
meetings
in
places
that
people
can
get
to.
So
if
we
have
that
principle-
and
maybe
we've
had
it,
we
know
this-
we've
talked
about
meetings
at
city
hall.
G
We
have
to
have
ada
accessible
meetings,
so
we
have
limited
spaces,
but
that's
something
that
this
commission
might
have
rotating
meetings
the
for
the
city
to
be
looking
at
and
how
you
can
put
that
maybe
up
front
might
not
be
quite
as
feel
resistance,
because
we
all
have
examples
of
oh,
but
we
couldn't
do
it
in
this
case.
Right
now,
in
covid
we
have
to
have
computers
right
there's
just
times
that
we
have
to
operate
differently,
but
then
maybe
we
provide
computers.
D
D
So
we
had
in
section
8
right,
we've
got
kind
of
the
again
is
that
is
this
something
that
folks
would
want
to
see
in
kind
of
a
guiding
principles
piece
or
does
this
feel
like
you
would
want
this
called
out
in
the
recommendations
I
mean
I'm
guessing,
as
you
know,
ian
I
think
suggested.
A
lot
of
these
kind
of
things
would
probably
end
up
in
the
code
language.
So,
if
that's
the
case,
I
don't
know
if
it's
helpful
for
them
to
remain
in
the
text
of
the
recommendations.
G
B
D
So
it
sounds
like
keep
that
there
so
then,
and
then
this
you
know
the
next
one
could
also
imagine
be
folded
into
one
of
the
other
pieces
around
access
unless
folks
feel
strongly
about
the
kind
of
frequency
of
meetings-
and
you
know,
generally
accessibility,
yeah.
So
I'm
good
folding
that
into
the
broader
topic.
D
Okay
and
then
the
last
of
the
kind
of
original
recommendations
was
to
direct
a
staff
member
or
consultant
to
serve
as
a
liaison
between
the
commission
and
the
city
and
support
the
establishment,
envisioning
and
development
of
the
human
rights
and
equity
commission.
With
you
know
a
couple
of
bullets
about
the
types
of
things
they
potentially
would
do.
Do
you
folks
want
to
keep
this
recommendation
in
there
around
staffing
and
support.
D
We
have
following
that
the
things
that
joanne
had
brought
based
on
the
conversation
that
folks
have
had
so
far
if
these,
if
folks,
are
comfortable
with
this
sentiment
being
in
the
guiding
principles
or
preamble
or
if
there
are
things
in
here
that
you
all
would
want
to
have
concretely
included
the
recommendations
because
it
kind
of
sounded
like
joanne.
Maybe
you
were
suggesting
that
kind
of
a
simpler
statement
like
oakland
had
could
encompass
a
lot
of
that.
K
Yes-
and
I
just
want
to
add
an
an
extra
little
comment
as
we
look
at
everything
that
we
work
in
and
how
we
envisioned
this
commission
to
work
and
and
what
we
wanted
to
serve
our
community.
Yes,
it's
evident
that
that
cannot
happen
without
a
cultural,
a
cultural
shift
within
the
city
of
ben
right,
and
I
feel
like
right
now.
Those
two
things
are
not
necessarily
supporting
one
another
right
and
so
yeah.
K
I
would
like
to
add
an
amendment
or
an
additional
recommendation
that
will
be
11
and
12
altogether.
It's
a
much
more,
simpler
statement
again.
Thank
you
eric
for
bringing
the
idea
of
framework,
because
I
think
that
before
I
had
the
awareness
of
how
I
can
implem
how
could
be
implemented,
but
it
wasn't
necessarily
a
clear
directive
right
so
so
I
share
that
with
the
group
and
I
can
share
it
on
the
screen
if,
if
folks
would
like,
so
you
tell
me
around
what
will
be
next
steps.
D
K
K
So
I
think
that
this
statement
right
talks
about
all
of
the
cultural
things
that
need
to
happen,
and
it's
very
to
the
point
right.
It
talks
about
the
budgeting.
It
talks
about
the
strategies
and
operations
with
the
intent
of
eliminating
inequities
and
creating
opportunities
for
all
people
and
communities.
K
D
D
Vote,
okay-
and
I
will
probably
bumble
this,
but
I
will
do
my
best
to
procedurally
do
this
correctly
right.
So,
let's
see,
I
guess,
is
there?
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
phrases
correctly?
The
dei
task
force
recommendations
with
the
notated
amendments
to
essentially
combine
similar
categories
and
to
move
the
kind
of
more
contextual
comments
into
guiding
principles
or
another
preamble.
L
D
M
Yeah,
I
think
it's
okay.
I
think
what
you're
what
you're
trying
to
do
is
convey
your
intent
and
you're
doing
it
fairly
broadly,
based
on
the
discussion
that
you
had
and
the
document
in
front
of
you
and
knowing
that
you
know
there
will
be
some
wordsmithing
to
to
help
collapse
this
a
little
bit,
and
I
think
it
would
be
good
practice
to
to
distribute
it
to
this
and
just
have
comments
and
making
sure
that
chalets
as
the
city
staff
person
is
on
it.
M
If
there
are,
you
know
further
refinements
wordsmithing
that
you
don't
talk
about
those
as
a
group,
but
that
you
can
feed
those
back
to
us
and
we
can
continue
to
fine-tune
the
document,
but
I
don't
think
we
are
at
a
point
where
we
would
need
another
meeting
unless
there
was
some
big
topic
area
that
you
felt
like
we
didn't
talk
about
today.
I
think
there's
it's
okay
to
kind
of
put
some
action
in
place
that
carries
this
work
forward.
L
Great,
so
so,
in
other
words,
we,
what,
after
you
know
we
can,
we
can
vote
on
it
and
then
aaron
can
still
distribute
just
sort
of
share.
This
google,
doc
and
people
could
add
additional
comments
again
mainly
just
to
not
to
introduce
new
topics,
but
just
to
help
to
consolidate
or
whatever.
Just
after
he's,
we
can
have
a
final
look
at
that
still
right.
G
G
The
issue
I've
run
into
it
just
depends
on
how
studious
editors
you
are.
If
you
start
to
really
want
to
change
what
he
might
think
is
the
intent.
It
gets
tricky
for
the
consultant
or
the
staff
person,
because
you
feel
like
this
is
kind
of
big.
I
might
not
want
to
change
this
without
a
new
motion
by
the
whole
group.
M
J
Can
I
break
in
with
one
kind
of
mechanical
question
mary's
advice
about
making
sure
we're
complying
with
public
meetings
requirements?
Did
I
understand
that
this
will
be?
I
mean
it's
in
the
form
of
a
google
doc
now,
but
what
I
get
a
little
bit
worried
about
is
having
one
member
of
the
body
makes
medicine.
J
Then
another
member
of
the
body
review
it
and
make
some
edits
and
and
if,
if,
if
doing
that,
via
this
shared
document
and
kind
of
building
on
or
maybe
even
commenting
on
or
responding
to
what
other
task
force
members
have
contributed
at
least
arguing
that
presents
a
public
meetings
problem.
So
what
to
happen
would
be.
If
I
mean
the
analogy
I
was
using
for
task
force
members
we
probably
should
have
done
earlier.
So
my
apologies
for
that.
The
analogy
I
like
to
use
is
a
hub
and
spoke.
J
D
D
D
M
Just
sorry,
sorry,
just
on
that
point,
I
think
it
might
be
helpful
to
so
that
it
really
gets
set
apart
as
a
as
I
was
doing,
I
mentioned
as
a
framework
as
almost
like
a
preamble
to
the
recommendation,
so
I
would
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
like
front
and
center
and
all
the
recommendations
stem
from
that
kind
of
preamble
versus
it
just
being
like
number
11..
Just
because
I
I
would
hate
to
have
it
get
lost.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
kind
of
front
and
center.
M
G
K
No,
basically,
this
recommendation
is
to
address
the
city
culture
that
will
be
able
to
facilitate
a
commission
in
the
way
in
which
we
are
suggesting
right.
I
guess
the
understanding
is
that
that
a
commission
of
this
capacity
in
the
way
in
which
we
are
advocating
for
may
fail
under
the
current
culture
right
if
people
are
deemed
as
not
valuable,
because
they
cannot
share
the
message
or
they
have
limitations.
G
And
I
would
say
I
don't
think
it
matters
where
it
is
it's
more
a
matter
of
what
it
is
like:
the
setting,
organization-wide
and
department-specific
priorities
related
to
equity
and
racial
justice,
measurable
metrics,
for
example.
That
looks
to
me
more,
like
potentially
a
future
council
goal
for
the
departments
and
for
the
city
manager.
F
H
D
H
K
K
K
The
idea
is
to
acknowledge
that
there
is
a
cultural
already
within
city
government.
We
have
seen
it
at
play
in
these
meetings
and
I
think
it's
important
that
we
as
a
task
force,
even
if
the
council
did
not
tell
us
to
address
that,
that
we
address
it
because
we
see
it
because
we
are
interacting
with
it
and
because
we
know
it
will
it
will
create
barriers
for
this
commission
to
be
successful
in
the
way
we
envision
it.
K
F
K
Problems
that
our
communities
are
facing
are
rooted
in
the
culture
in
which
we
live.
So
I
think
that
us
as
task
force,
have
a
responsibility
to
address
the
culture,
not
only
because
we're
seeing
it
play
out
right
now,
but
also
because
it
will
be
necessary
for
the
commission
to
succeed
as
we
envision
it.
D
So
if
I
can
maybe
just
offer
a
quick
reframe
an
interesting
time,
so
I
feel,
like
I'm
hearing
you
all
say,
very
similar
things
in
just
a
slightly
different
way.
Maybe
what
I'm
hearing
collectively
and
also
from
mary,
I
think,
is
one
it
doesn't
sound
like
there's
a
really
a
functional
difference
in
whether
or
not
that
content
was
as
a
recommendation
or
as
a
preamble
to
the
recommendations.
D
So
I
think
the
question
that
would
just
be
you
know:
does
that
content
you
know
are
folks
comfortable
with
that
content,
living
and
kind
of
an
introductory
in
that
those
guiding
principles,
because
it
does,
I
could
see
how
it
does
feel
like
a
guiding
principle.
I
don't
necessarily
get
the
sense
that
it
would
have
less
impact
in
that
context,
but
yeah
I'd
love
to
hear
what
other
folks
are
thinking
or
if
folks
are
a
similar
mind
about
moving
forward
on
that
piece.
E
Yeah,
I
don't
think
that
point
that
should
keep
us
from
moving
forward.
I
think
that
what
I
heard
from
mary
was
clarification
about
what
the
recommendation
is.
The
recommendation
is
that
these
principles
be
upheld
throughout
the
process
of
establishing
this
commission,
and
I
think
that,
if
it
doesn't
matter
where
it's
at
then
I'm
more
than
comfortable
with
it
being
in
the
preamble.
E
E
K
E
M
Yeah-
and
I
just
just
as
eric-
and
I
think
just
to
reinforce
that
I
mean
that
I
see
this
as
having
more
power
as
a
preamble,
because
it
helps
guide
the
work
in
setting
up
a
commission,
but
to
me
it's
broader
than
that.
It's
about
hiring
practices
and
it's
about
council
engagement
with
the
community.
It's
about
policy
work
which
is
really
you
know
all
really
big
stuff,
and
I
think
that
nesting
the
specific
recommendations
about
a
permanent
commission
underneath
that
preamble
will
hopefully
help.
M
You
know
I
think,
elevate,
some
other
aspects
of
the
work
that
needs
to
get
done
with
council
and
by
putting
it
right
up
front
and
center.
It
creates
it's.
So
it's
sort
of
like
a
here's,
our
desired
future
state
and
it
will
help
create
a
picture
of
vision
for
folks
to
say.
Here's
a
piece
of
that
of
getting
this
committee
or
commission
up
and
running,
but
there's
a
lot
of
work
yet
to
be
done
so
yeah,
my
intent
was
not.
It
was
to
actually
give
it
more
weight
as
a
statement,
less.
A
I
would
just
maybe
even
recommend
I
don't
know
if
this
task
force
is
open
to
this
idea,
but
I
think
this
is
the
type
of
language
that
might
be
very
helpful
both
in
what
you're
talking
about
right
now
is
the
as
part
of
the
recommendation,
but
also
as
part
of
our
work
as
shared
governance
or
a
collective
impact
level
across
the
city
and
all
public
agencies.
I
think
that
you
know
this
could
be
if
the
task
force
is
open
to
it.
A
N
N
D
Yeah,
so
I
already
we
already
have
kind
of
drafted
just
from
all
the
past
conversations,
some
kind
of
contextual,
you
know
background
documents
for
the
okay
report
and
what
I
could
also
see
happening
is
maybe
there's
like
the
annotated
version
of
the
recommendations
right
in
the
report.
There's
like
there's
just
the
bare
raw
recommendations
and
then
there's
the
kind
of
you
know
you
can
read
further
and
find
you
know
kind
of
more
of
the
context
and
clarifying
details.
If
that
seems
like
that
would
cover
things
for
folks.
N
Right
that
does
because
then
you
have
a
framework,
you
have
the
core
recommendations
and
then
you
have
this
supplemental
support
document
which
can
help
inform
the
commission
as
it
gets
launched.
So
that
to
me
is
something
that
I
would
be
happy
to
be
the
first
person
to
say:
let's
move
forward
and
I'm
motioned
to
approve
this
direction.
L
Well,
just
with
what
shelley
reminding
us
of
sort
of
this
larger
collective
impact,
so
we
don't.
We
don't
reference
that
at
all
in
these
recommendations
and
I'm
thinking
shelley
that
that's
fine
right
we're
not
necessarily
wouldn't
need
to
add
that,
because
that
sort
of
ends
up
becoming
the
next
step,
with
an
action
plan
that
the
commission
would
sort
of
develop
further.
That
idea
is
that,
would
you
is
that?
How
you
would
envision
it
as
well.
A
I
don't
know
if
that's
clear,
I
don't
have
an
idea.
You
know
how
that's
going
to
play
out
because
it's
just
getting
going,
but
I
think
we
don't
want
to
lose
that
momentum
and
the
hard
work
that
you've
done
in
creating
this
important
framework,
and
so
I
I'm
just
I'm
offering
maybe
that
the
city
staff
take
forth
the
framework
on
behalf
of
the
task
force
to
to
to
provide
that,
maybe
as
a
as
a
base.
K
D
All
right,
well,
that
looks
like
we
have
approved
the
overarching
content
of
the
recommendations
and
as
indicated,
I
will
go
back
and
you
know
get
those
kind
of
cleaned
up
and
give
you
all
an
opportunity
to
make
sure
you
know
aligns
with
what
you
were
talking
about
and
it's
represented
correctly
but
yeah.
I
just
want
to
really
thank
you
all
for
for
all
the
work
you've
put
into
this.
D
It's
been
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
time
and
research
and
conversation,
and
I
think
it's
brought
up
a
lot
of
really
good
conversation
points.
You
know,
and
so
I
hope
you
know
that
not
just
that
you
know
the
content
of
the
recommendations.
I
think,
will
influence
how
things
move
forward,
but
you
know
the
conversations
that
you
all
have
had
and
but
the
points
that
you've
raised
as
well
are
there
any.
H
D
Oh
the
report
that
you
were
saying,
yeah
yeah,
I'm
happy
to
have
that
as
an
appendix
too.
I
think
if,
for
folks
reference,
if
you
didn't
get
a
chance
to
look
at
it,
it
was
like
a
report
that
kind
of
spoke
to
kind
of
assessing
the
need
for
eugene's
human
rights
commission
so
kind
of
another
big
questions.
Last
time
in
in
the
past
about
you
know
supporting
evidence
for
the
need
for
these
kinds
of
bodies,
yeah.
That
would
feel
helpful
to
share
in
that
context.
Looking
at
that
as
an
appendix.
D
A
Well,
I
just
want
to
maybe
make
sure
that
everyone
is
aware
and
invited
to
to
the
subcommittee
stewardship
subcommittee
meeting.
It
will
be
held
next
tuesday
july
28th
from
three
to
five
pm,
and
the
agenda
does
include
the
recommendations
from
this
group
to
the
council
stewardship
committee,
which
is
councillors
abernathy,
piper
and
campbell,
and
so
just
wanted
to
put
that
on
your
radar
for
for
next
week.
K
A
Yeah-
and
I
guess
I
would
just
say,
as
you
know,
a
final
before-
we
adjourn
just
a
deep
appreciation
to
each
of
you
for
your
time.
Your
commitment
to
this,
your
energy,
your
your
courage
to
speak
forth
into
this
this
space.
I
think
I
can
only
speak
for
myself,
but
you
know
this
is
this
is
new
and
we're
learning
and
we're
listening,
and
we
deeply
appreciate
your
your
commitment
to
this
process
with
us
at
city
government.