►
From YouTube: Bend MPO Policy Board meeting 07/21/2020
Description
The Bend MPO is managed by a five-member Policy Board comprised of representatives from Bend City Council, Deschutes County Board of Commissioners and Oregon Department of Transportation. All members have been appointed by their respective agencies. The agreement establishing the MPO regulates the business procedures of the Policy Board and all decisions are made in public meeting settings.
B
C
B
B
This
is
part
of
the
fun.
Nobody
knows
nobody,
the
scientists
didn't
think
it
would
still
have
its
tail
right
now.
They
thought
that,
because
you
could
see
it
in
the
early
early
morning
at
first
and
they
thought
that
when
it
switched
to
where
you
could
see
it
in
the
early
night
time
that
at
that
point
you
the
tail
wouldn't
be
visible
and
the
opposite
is
true.
The
tail
is
bigger
and
more
visible
than
it
was.
It's.
B
B
C
A
A
D
A
A
D
A
B
F
D
D
B
G
G
But
the
main
topic
here
is
showing
you
what
the
tac
has
recommended
as
far
as
project
criteria
to
use
in
the
application.
The
criteria
is
really
the
core
of
the
application
and
beyond
that,
the
application
itself
is
pretty
standard.
So
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
all
the
details
of
the
application
instructions
really
just
the
main
more
important
part,
which
is
the
project
criteria
section.
So
as
we
go
through
this
I'll
ask
at
the
end
of
each
slide.
G
I
gave
a
quick
update
on
that
funding
process
development,
essentially
that
attack
work
group
had
been
formed
and
that
they
were
developing
project
application
criteria
and
some
sort
of
ranking
scoring
process
to
go
along
with
that
now
fast
forward
to
june.
At
the
june
tech
meeting,
the
tac
took
the
work
that
the
subgroup
had
done
and
essentially
reviewed
it
edited
it
and
finally
recommended
approval
of
the
application
to
the
policy
board.
So
that's
that's
where
we
are
today
any
questions
on
the
on
the
timeline
of
this
process.
G
B
B
G
It's
so
that's
sort
of
the
the
challenge
with
this
is
trying
to
apply
criteria
to
a
funding
program
that
is
so
broad.
But
what
I'll
address
is
that
well
number
one
on
and
on
the
next
slide,
we
get
into
federal
requirements
around
needing
some
sort
of
a
process
require
around
it,
but
at
the
end
of
it
all
these
are
discretionary
dollars.
It's
up
to
the
policy
board
to
decide
what
gets
funded,
but
we
do
need
some
sort
of
criteria
to
help
us
evaluate
these
projects.
G
G
So,
no
so
that
is
actual
transit
service,
so
bus
service,
it's
just
the
the
way
to
use
stbg
dollars
to
fund.
That
is
that
it
has
to
be
purchased.
It's
called
purchase
service,
so
it's
just
the
name
of
it.
Essentially,
we
would
still
be
funding
bus
service
routes
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
for
just
capital
costs
for
transit
projects.
It
could
actually
be
for.
E
G
C
C
G
G
E
G
Yeah
yeah,
I
can
definitely
definitely.
I
can
definitely
do
that
for
you,
okay,
so
a
slide
about
scpg
federal
requirement
so
as
an
mpo
allocating
our
stbd
dollars
to
other
entities,
we
do
need
to
have
a
process
around
this,
which
is
what
we're
doing
today,
and
it
should
include,
as
a
second
bullet
states,
development
of
criteria
to
assist
in
funding.
Prioritization
again,
that's
where
the
tac
has
come
in
to
help
develop
that
main
part
of
the
application.
G
G
The
intent
of
the
criteria
is
simply
is
simply
to
be
used
as
a
tool
to
evaluate
project
submittals,
and
I
say
that,
because
you
know,
stp
dollars
can
fund
a
broad
range
of
projects
and
because
of
that,
it's
possible
that
a
good
project
or
a
project
that
the
policy
board
wants
to
fund.
It
may
not
fit
these
few,
given
criteria
very
well,
but
remember
discretionary
dollars.
G
G
G
G
G
So
that
is
the
challenge
with
having
the
broad
range
of
projects
that
you
can
fund.
So
what
we
had
decided
is
that
in
the
application
we
asked
the
applicant
to
include
metrics,
where,
where
they're
available
and
and
we
would
consider
that,
but
we're
not
specifically
stating
which
metrics
to
him
to
include.
G
We
thought
that
the
easiest
thing
to
do
was
to
have
you
know,
criteria
that
we
feel
is
is
important
for
the
npo,
but
it
would
be
up
to
the
applicant
to
demonstrate
how
well
their
project
supports
that
criteria,
and
if
there
was,
if
there
were
measurable
objectives,
they
can
include
that,
but
if
there
weren't
then
then
they
wouldn't
need
to.
But
yeah
I
mean
good
question.
That
is
something
that
we
need
back
and
forth
on.
C
C
Okay,
because
I
just
you
know,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
you
know
that
that
there's
some
measurement
of
success,
whether
it's
a
a
certain
percentage
towards
that
success,
because
if
it's
not,
if
there's
no
success,
then
then
we're
gonna
have
eggs
on
our
face.
So
I'll
open
that
discussion
up
to
the
group
just
curious
thoughts,
feedback.
F
Yeah
chris,
this
is
tyler.
I
think
I
mean
one
of
the
things.
I
think
that
we
could
do
pretty
easily
is
do
an
annual
report
on
how
our
how
all
of
our
dollars
are
allocated.
Not
only
this
10
to
15
percent
that
we're
discussing
here,
but
also
the
dollars
that
go
to
the
city
each
year,
as
well
as
the
dollars
that
come
in
for
internal
purposes.
F
C
H
E
E
F
Yeah,
the
the
way
the
federal
highway
trust
fund
dollars
are
allocated
has
changed
over
time
with
each
major
transportation
bill,
but
this
program
is
has
been
one
of
the
core
programs
of
the
highway
trust
fund
for
almost
almost
30
25
years,
at
least
maybe
close
to
30
years.
So
it's
been
around
a
very
very
long
time.
It's
been
the
flexibility
that
we
have
today
has
existed
for
most
of
the
lifespan
of
this
program.
So
it's
been.
It's
been
one
of
the
core.
F
E
Well,
I'm
just
thinking
yeah
I
mean
if
it's
from
gas
tax,
economic
activity
and
road
fees.
You
know
this
this,
it
is
pulling
off
the
you
know,
10
to
15
percent,
but
you
know,
project
supports
economic
development
is
below
bmt.
I
mean
it's
just
interesting
dynamics
here.
Is
this
really
the
intention
of
this?
Because
I
can
see
that
this?
This
is
a
good
system.
You
know
want
more.
E
B
So
you
know
it
seems
kind.
You
know
I
for
one.
I
don't
want
david
abbas
to
have
to
spend
you
know
hours,
filling
out
paperwork
for
the
mpo
regarding
the
60
of
the
stbg,
I'm
happy
to
just
have
him
come.
You
know
pop
back
into
a
meeting
and
say
you
know
either
it
was
devoted
to
something
specific
or
it
went
into
payment
presentation
preservation.
B
E
I
mean
yeah,
that's
the
big
picture
for
the
majority
of
the
funds
and
I'm
this
is
the
smaller
part
of
the
funds
to
10
to
15.
And
you
know
this
is
the
fair
and
equitable
way
to
make
an
application
process
for
review
in
a
public
process
and
put
a
point
system
in
place.
So
we
all
get
scoring,
but
I
mean
just
it
seems
like
it's
getting
a
little
heavy
where
you
know
advocate
for
sidewalks,
for.
E
B
B
As
a
teacher,
you
know
right
now,
looking
at
the
left
side
of
this
chart
versus
the
right
side,
that
right
side
would
need
to
be
at
least
a
50
point,
total
score
or
something
to
capture
all
of
these
things
that
are
over
here,
but
I'm
not
really
advocating
for
that.
It's
just
a
comment
that
I'm
making
about
the
road
we
could
go
down
to
make
this
even
more
complicated.
B
A
But
really
just
the
idea
to
come
back
and
make
sure
that
we're
using
our
we're,
giving
certainty
to
the
people
that
are
applying
and
then
there's
a
regular
funding
cycle.
So
they
know.
So
it's
not
just
one
person
showing
up
at
a
meeting
saying
hey.
I
need
to
use
these
dollars
or
I
need
some
dollars.
Can
I
have
that
to
me:
that's
not
a
fair,
equitable
way
to
distribute
the
dollars,
because
there
could
be
projects
that
are
every
bit
as
good
as
one
person
showing
up
and
saying
hey.
A
You
know
for
people
to
make
an
application.
You
know
this
is
this
rubric
is
very,
very
detailed,
probably
a
little
bit
more
than
I
was
thinking,
but
but
if
it
works
out,
you
know
for
the
tack
board,
you
know,
for
the
attack
to
be
able
to
you
know
to
have
you
know,
have
these
criteria.
I
guess
the
question
I
have
is:
is
it
six
points
total
free
save
for
that
upper
category?
A
A
B
G
And
we
can
we
can
so.
This
is
draft
right.
This
is
what
the
with
attack
had
recommended.
So
we
can
certainly
change
anything
if
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
apply
points
at
the
last
mpo.
We
we
used
a
high
medium
low.
Does
the
project
support
the
criteria
low
medium
high
and
there
were
no
points
applied?
However,
I
will
say
that
that
this
is
this
table
is
much
more
simple
than
what
the
process
that
they
had,
which
was
entirely
too
complicated.
G
E
B
A
So
andre
the
question
I
have
is
so
you
made
mention
of
safety,
and
maybe
it
was
more
in
reference
to
everything
in
the
green
section,
but
are
you
I
just
want
to
understand?
Are
you
saying
that
safe?
Did
you
say
that
safety
has
an
extra
it
pulls
extra
weight
than
the
rest
of
the
ones
in
green,
or
is
it
on
equal
footing
to
everything
in
green.
G
I
do
so.
The
next
slide
is
so
you
can
go
ahead
and
forward
it.
So
the
next
slide
again
I
don't
I
had
mentioned.
I
don't
think
I
need
to
go
through
the
full
application
and
instructions
with
you,
because
it
is
fairly
standard
administrative,
but
I
do
in
addition
to
the
criteria.
I
do
want
to
go
over
the
steps
in
this
application
process
so
that
you
can
see
what
we're
envisioning
as
far
as
how
this
would
work
with
staff
with
the
tac
and
with
the
policy
board.
G
G
Second,
once
that
application
period
closes,
then
staff
would
begin
evaluating
applications,
and
this
would
consist
of
you
know,
making
sure
that
the
project
is
actually
eligible
for
stbd
dollars
and
initially
or
applying
initial
project
scoring
based
on
how
well
the
information
that
the
applicant
provides
supports.
The
criteria
that
you
just
saw
and
next
would
be
the
tax
rule
in
this,
so
applicants
would
be
given
the
opportunity
to
present
their
projects
to
the
tac.
G
The
tac
will
review
all
applications
finalize
the
criteria
based
scoring
that
the
that
staff
had
drafted
through
a
consensus
process
with
attack
and
then
with
that
they
would
develop
a
project
funding
recommendation
for
the
policy
board
and
now
step
five.
The
policy
board
would
then
have
the
opportunity
to
review
the
applications
they
will
be
given
the
tax
funding
recommendation
and
also
a
presentation
of
the
project
would
be
given
to
the
board
by
the
applicant.
G
E
So
I'm
thinking
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
variations
of
possible
projects
and
what
I'm
getting
at
is
the
fact
that
over
the
years
we've
we
decided
to
invest
in
green
chart.
There's
the
curbs
sidewalks.
You
know
intersection
improvements,
you
know
maybe
trails
and
I'm
just
thinking
this.
E
We
have
a
whole
process
and
the
analysis
and
the
tack
and
the
staff
time
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
we're
like
well,
if
you're,
really
at
a
bike
lane
or
not-
and
you
know
how
much
of
a
route
did
we
just
purchase
that
we're
not
sure
it's
gonna,
you
know
be
well
attended.
You
know
I'm
just
thinking
putting
more
direction
to
this
up
front
instead
of
at
the
end.
E
A
Well
to
me,
I
don't
think
anybody
else
has
any
other
comments.
I'd.
You
know
happy
to
entertain
those
first,
but
I
you
know
at
least
for
this
initial
round.
I
would,
I
would
consider
just
leaving
you
know,
living
it
to
things
that
are
already
on
the
m-tip.
So
that
way
we
don't
have
to
amend
that
and
that
way
we
stay
consistent
with
that
plan.
C
B
B
I
would
think
maybe
the
policy
board
would
also
so
that
we
have
first
impressions
from
all
three
places
that
independently
the
tact
thought
that
this
project
scored
really
well
independently
staff
thought
that
also
that
went
but
the
board.
Do
you
know
what
I
mean
so
nobody's
been,
and
I
understand
that
the
whole
point
of
the
attack
is
to
advise
us,
but
I
don't
know
that
just
seems
like
that
might
be
a
place
to
start
discussions
is
what
how
did
these
things
score
from
the
three
different
groups
that
are
scoring.
B
D
B
E
B
G
Yeah
we
could
provide
the
applications
from
from
the
applicant,
the
original
scoring
that
sort
of
staff
started
initially
and
then
how
the
tac
revised
that
in
your
packet,
then
that
you
will
and
along
with
their
funding
recommendation,
but
at
the
end
of
it
it's.
You
know
it's
up
to
you
to
decide
what
of
course.
I
C
G
Well,
for
the
before
we
actually
do,
you
know
an
announcing
that
we're
soliciting
for
projects.
We
could
come
back
to
the
talk
and
and
ask
them
if
there
was,
if
there's
a
certain
language
that
they'd
like
us
to
use
for
this
first
round.
There
is
a
little
bit
of
that
addressed
in
the
application
instructions.
G
F
Yeah,
I
agree
man,
I
think,
and
bob
raised
a
good
point.
I
mean
the
federal
highway
administration
in
particular,
identifies
emphasis
areas
not
not
every
year,
but
you
know
fairly
often
they
will
put
out
identify
emphasis
areas
for
projects
and
for
the
planning
work
that
we
do,
and
so
I
think
the
board.
I
think
we
can
give
you
that
I
mean
you
should
have
that
discretion
to
say,
hey.
E
C
G
Yeah,
that's
that's.
That's
correct
the
sixty
percent
that
goes
to
the
city.
It
doesn't.
You
know
it
doesn't
have
to
go
through
an
application
process
and,
at
the
same
time
the
city
isn't
wouldn't
be
eligible
to
try
and
to
you
know,
to
apply
for
these
funds
for
dollars
that
they're
already
getting.
If
that
makes
sense,
sure.
J
A
So
andrew
just
to
confirm
what
you
just
said
to
understand
it
better,
so
the
city
would
not
be
able
to
play
for
categories
of
things
that
that
60
percent
is
already
going
towards,
but
they
could,
if
there's
another
project
or
something
else
that
that
that
60
is
not
going
towards.
They
could
apply
for
that.
G
The
next
step,
you
know
where
the
policy
was
being
asked
to
consider
approval
of
the
std
application.
I
do
have
here
that
you
would
like
no
clarification
on
transit
purchase
service,
which
I
could
do
and
then
adding
in
an
annual
review
of
funded
projects,
also
bringing
the
solicitation
language
announcement
language
back
to
the
policy
board
for
more
of
a
specific
project
emphasis
and
also
in
the
process
in
the
application
process,
giving
you
the
original
scoring
sheets
from
staff
and
from
the
tech.
E
A
B
G
Yeah
so
myself,
along
with
cet
and
city
staff,
I've
been
working
to
put
together
a
transportation
growth
management,
application
for
a
mobility
hub
feasibility
study
and
pilot
project
development.
We've
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
in
the
in
the
past
and,
if
you
remember
last
month,
andrea
bro
from
cet
and
karen
sworsky
from
the
city
gave
a
presentation
to
the
policy
board
about
you,
know
more
information
about
what
mobility
hubs
are
and
how
they're
planned
on
being
used
in
the
future
within
bend
based
on
cet's
transit
master
plan
and
the
tsp.
G
But
with
that
what
we
all
three
meaning,
the
mpocet
and
city
staff,
see
what
we
see
a
need
for
with
mobility
hubs
is
a
logical,
step-by-step
approach
to
how
they're
implemented,
how
they're
managed
and
and
that's
what
we're
hoping
to
get
out
of
this
grant
project.
If,
if
we
are
awarded
funds,
the
application
is
due
at
the
end
of
this
month.
It's
it's
just
about
ready
to
go,
but
we
do
need
a
letter
of
support
from
the
mpo
board
to
complete
the
application.
G
Since
the
mpo
is
the
primary
applicant
and
a
draft
letter
has
been
included
in
your
agenda
packet
for
your
consideration
or
or
or
editing,
so
if
you
have
any
questions
on
that-
and
I
do
if
you
have
any
questions
about
the
more
about
the
the
project
itself,
I
could
probably
answer
that
as
well.
Now
that
we've
kind
of
refined
it
a
little
more.
C
B
E
A
K
Thank
you.
Let's
bring
people
up
to
speed.
We
just
kicked
off
a
study.
Actually,
our
first
technical
advisory
committee
meeting
is
later
this
afternoon
and
we're
looking
to
see
if
we
can
find
a
location
for
a
interchange
that
would
connect
us-97
to
an
extension
of
18th
street
that
runs
through
the
juniper
ridge
property.
K
So
18th
street
would
continue
on
its
current
alignment
and
go
north
northwest
cross,
the
bnsf,
railroad
and
then
touch
down
so
on
the
map.
You
can
see
that
a
rough
look
at
the
study
area
that
is
not
fixed.
It
could
slide
a
little
bit
farther
north.
I
do
not
believe
it
could
go
any
farther
south
at
this
point,
but
we'll
be
looking
at
environmental
constraints.
K
Land
use
issues,
environmental
justice
issues
and
the
goal
is
to
come
up
with
some
concept
designs
that
potentially
work
in
locations,
but
then
also
show
the
potential
stumbling
blocks
or
restrictions
we
could
run
into
along
the
way.
The
work
should
be
wrapped
up
by
early
next
year,
we're
hoping
in
the
january,
to
february
time
frame
depending
on.
If
we
find
anything
during
the
public
involvement
process,
we
might
need
to
reach
out
to
people
a
little
bit
more.
K
B
K
K
F
K
F
K
To
the
timing,
I
need
to
see
the
revised
project.
One
of
the
unique
things
we're
going
to
be
doing
is
what
I
would
call
a
combined
design
character
and
value
engineering.
It's
a
one
day,
all
day
workshop,
where
we
start
refining
concepts
with
both
the
technical
advisory
committee
and
stakeholder
advisory
committee.
K
C
Yeah
rick:
this
is
chris
for
the
study
area
that
you've
got
there.
Now
you
mentioned
that
I
guess
my
my
question
is:
what's
the
benefit
and
or
negative
of
of
going
up
just
a
bit
north
and
I'm
wondering
too,
do
does
harris
way
and
bowery
lane
play
a
key
role
in
this.
Is
this
why
those
two
roads
are
in
that
study
area.
K
K
K
And
then
you
have
been
cemetery
in
that
area.
So
these
are
items
that
you
would
likely
try
to
avoid
any
impact
to.
So
that's
kind
of
why
the
box
is
where
it
is
it's
kind
of
a
kind
of
the
sweet
spot.
If
we
did
go
farther
north,
we
have
to
start
taking
into
account
the
angle
to
get
across
the
railroad
from
a
design
standpoint,
but
also
from
the
dlcd
land
use
goal
exception
standpoint.
K
K
If,
if
the
interchange
site
was
within
the
urban
growth
boundary,
it
wouldn't
require
the
goal
exception
and
what
goes
along
with
so
once
we're
able
to
determine
a
location
discussion
becomes
goal
exception
or
minor
expansion
of
the
city's
urban
growth
boundary.
But
that's
okay.
That
will
be
part
of
the
pond
down
the
road.
A
Yeah
now
eric
I
appreciate
is
you
know,
evaluating
the
expansion
of
the
ugb.
You
know
with.
I
think
we're
probably
going
to
need
to
evaluate
that
in
regards
to
our
light
industrial
due
to
what's
going,
you
know,
because
of
the
north
corridor,
improvement
we're
taking
away
light
industrial
lands,
and
so
we
probably
need
to
make
those
up
somewhere,
and
so
I
think
that
could
be
an
easy,
quick
strike.
Ugb
expansion
and
a
justification
would
be
that
odot's
already
taking
away.
A
A
Keith,
I'm
sure
we'll
land
on
the
c-store
tab
and
that'll
likely,
you
know,
be
paid
for
through
urban
renewal
so
having
somebody
like
matt.
That
knows
that,
yes,
the
juniper
ridge,
earl
district
well
and
what
can
and
can't
be
funded
through
that
would
be
ideal.
So
I
appreciate
you
having
matt
there
as
well
any
other
questions
for
rick.
B
K
E
A
K
We
haven't
really
looked
at
the
distances
in
between
because
we're
just
getting
started,
so
it
may
definitely
play
into
it.
But
that's
that
workshop
I'd
mentioned
that
we'll
have
in
the
fall.
That's
why
we
look
at
concept
designs,
but
we
also
do
value
engineering.
So
as
you're
looking
at
those
designs,
you
look
at
the
elements
which
reduce
cost
and
then
basically
provide
the
best
bang
for
the
buck.
A
And
part
of
that
will
that
also
be
because
I
assume
at
some
point-
maybe
it's
not
initially,
but
at
some
point
west
of
the
highway,
we'll
need
to
get
connected
into
what
ultimately
will
be
hunter
road
and
kind
of
that
north
that
north,
that
golden
triangle
area
and
so
could
be
advanced
out
of
coulee.
Because
if
everybody's
got
to
go
through
cooley
to.
K
That
we're
not
precluding
that,
but
it's
really
not
in
the
the
scope
of
the
study,
but
what
we
would
be
looking
at
is
whatever
interchange
concept
we
come
up
with
to
go
to.
The
east
side
will
also
describe
what
it
would
have
to
what
it
would
take
if
you
wanted
a
western
connection,
we're
just
not
looking
at
doing
a
western
connection
as
part
of
the
study
right
now,
but
I
we
will
look
at
making
sure
that
whatever
we're
doing
is
compatible
if
there
was
a
desire
for
a
future
expansion.
I
Or
rick's
doing
a
really
good
job
of
walking
around
this
the
sensitivity
of
that
western
connection
and
why
you
know
if
the
the
north
interchange
got
removed
from
the
original
fbis
because
of
western
connection
and
and
we
we
want
to
make
sure
this
work-
can
proceed
without
that
additional
burden
right
now,
and
so
certainly
it'll
be
a
pass
fail
test
for
this
interchange
design
if
it
would
work.
But
it's
not
the
goal
right
now.
I
A
I
A
F
All
right
I'll
kick
this
off.
We've
talked
we've
had
a
couple
presentations
to
the
board
about
this,
and
we
had
the
held
the
smart
cities
workshop
back
in
february.
I
think
january,
something
like
that
earlier
this
year,
this
was
a
project,
an
update
to
we've,
had
the
ips
plan
in
place
and
in
been
in
description
years
now.
This
is
the
second
update
to
that
plan.
F
This
update
was
primarily
funded
by
the
mpo
using
some
of
our
stbg
funding,
so
I
will
just
walk
through
a
couple
of
slides
here
and
I'll
turn
over
to
dave,
to
talk
about
some
of
the
highlights
of
this
current
plan,
update
to
our
presentation,
I'll
just
talk
for
a
minute
about
the
benefits
of
its
and
then
dave's,
going
to
talk
about
project
types
and
costs
and
some
of
our
partnership
opportunities.
Next
steps
now
I'll
wrap
it
up
with
just
a
slide
or
two
on
smart
city
strategy
and
where
we're
going
with
that
effort.
F
So
some
of
the
benefits
you
know
the
things
we're
really
striving
for
through
this
plan
through
some
of
the
projects
and
programs,
are
identified
as
increasing
the
safety
of
our
transportation
system,
which
you've
heard
over
and
over
again
through
all
of
our
other
efforts,
reducing
our
fuel
consumption
and
emissions,
reducing
delay,
we're
travelers
and
then
you
know.
A
big
big
change
now
is
providing
real-time
information
to
travelers,
and
I
will
let
dave
go
from
there.
F
D
B
H
So
thanks
for
the
introduction
tyler,
so
this
slide
you
what
we
basically
want
to
talk
about
is
you
know
why?
Why
are
we
updating
or
why
did
we
update
the
plan?
And
if
we
look
back
at
2011,
a
lot
has
changed.
I
mean
just
look
into
your
pocket
or,
what's
in
front
of
you,
have
a
smartphone,
that's
capable
of
so
many
different
things,
and
so
the
plan
was
a
little
bit
stale
and
sort
of
was
sitting
on
the
shelf,
and
so
we
wanted
it
to
be
a
lot
more
agile.
H
And
so
these
items
here
are
components
of
the
plan.
So
it's
it's
readying
the
plan
for
the
connected
autonomous
vehicles,
even
though
we
don't
know
exactly
what
that
means.
It's
putting
in
the
infrastructure
to
be
able
to
support
those
types
of
technologies,
the
safety
applications
there's
a
lot
more
defined
goals,
things
like
vision,
zero,
there's,
some
multimodal
goals,
etc;
tools
that
we
can
utilize
to
help
out
with
with
road
safety,
curve,
speed,
warning
signs,
etc.
H
There's
vehicle,
electrification,
so
transit
is,
is
continually
moving
towards
electric
electrification.
Excuse
me
and
then
there's
there's
more
and
more
electrical
cars.
You
look
at
the
number
of
teslas
that
are
out
there
and
you
know
how
do
we
accommodate
those
vehicles
in
conjunction
with
the
traditional
gas
stations
that
we
have
out
there?
Shared
mobility
mobility
on
demand?
That's
a
that's!
H
A
really
big
emerging
thing
where
just
having
a
smartphone
in
your
pocket
will
allow
for
the
opportunity
to
connect
with
a
number
of
different
trip
choices,
and
it
could
be
a
number
of
things.
Obviously,
if
we
look
at
bike
share
rideshare,
some
of
these
things
have
definitely
been
impacted
by
coronavirus,
but
but
how
they're
being
used
and
why
they're
being
used
are
things
that
can
be
addressed
with
this
plan
and
then
emergency
management.
H
We've
got
a
really
good
tim
group,
which
is
the
traffic
incident
management
team
already
really
working
to
collaborate,
so
that
includes
sheriff's
office,
the
police,
fire,
odot
incident
response,
etc,
and
so
it's
really
being
able
to
share
the
same
information
amongst
those
groups
so
that
we
can.
We
can
address
any
sort
of
emergency
situation
as
quickly
and
efficiently
as
we
can
next
slide.
H
So
those
are
that
that's
the
reason
that
that
number
is
so
much
higher
the
rest
of
them,
so
public
transport,
transportation
management,
traveler
information
incident,
emergency
management,
maintenance
and
construction
management
and
data
and
performance
measurement.
We've
already
got
like
I
said
those
programs
in
place.
We've
got,
we've
got
software
formats
that
are
already
in
place
and
up
and
running,
and
so
it's
really
enhancing
those
so
that
we
can
utilize
those
better
and
more
efficiently.
H
And
one
other
thing
that
I
just
want
to
point
out
is
this
was
part
of
my
introduction
to
you
know
my
position
is
that
the
items
outside
of
pilot
projects
below
are
part
of
the
odot.
It's
called
a
tismo
strategy,
transportation
system
management
operations,
and
so
essentially,
what
what
the
agency's
looking
to
do
is
to
maximize
our
facilities
as
much
as
we
possibly
can,
just
because
of
the
cost
prohibitive
nature
of
expanding.
H
F
F
You
know
if
you
look
at
a
lot
of
the
planning
projects
that
have
been
underway
recently,
whether
it's
the
city
of
ntsp
or
the
parkway
study.
You
know
the
total
cost
of
projects
identified
in
this
plan
is
extremely,
is
relatively
low.
You
know,
or
almost
extremely
low,
compared
to
what
we
see
elsewhere,
and
so
you
know
implementing
this
plan.
F
H
H
Well,
this
breaks
down
that,
though
a
project
that
would
be
applicable
to
that
location
with
technology
that
could
support
the
goal
of
making
those
signals
operate
better,
and
so
this
this
first
slide
is
just
a
sheet.
You
can
see
it's
very
small,
but
if
you
look
at
the
number
of
of
different
colored
locations
and
there's
a
small
number,
that's
by
each
of
those
and
so
in
the
plan
you'll
be
able
to
go
to
the
map.
Look
at
a
particular
area
point
to
oh
there.
H
But
we've
made
a
lot
of
strides
in
in
communicating
with
the
partners
already
on
what
it
would
take
to
improve
the
travel
experience
to
and
from
mount
bachelor,
and
it's
really
just
putting
those
items
on
paper
and
identifying
who
those
partners
are.
So
I
just
wanted
to
share
that.
But
again,
information
that
is
is
captured
in
that
spreadsheet.
That's
associated
with
the
document
next
slide.
H
As
far
as
you
know,
what
is
trying
to
be
achieved
with
these
projects
so
again,
the
maps
are
sort
of
a
guide
that
ultimately
get
you
back
to
that
spreadsheet.
To
give
you
that
detailed
information
next
slide,
and
then
this
is
the
last
slide
I'm
going
to
address
before
tyler
takes
over,
but
there
are
a
number
of
different
opportunities
for
partnerships
on
each
of
these
projects,
and
so
we
wanted
to
share
a
couple
of
examples.
H
Andrea
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
the
cet
mobility
hubs
and
that
partnership
is
already
happening
in
the
sense
of.
If
you
looked
at
her
side,
you
look
at
the
the
agencies
that
are
identified
here.
It's
the
same
ones:
century
drive
corridor
as
part
of
this
process.
We
we
were
in
direct
communication
with
nonbachelor.
H
They
had
a
they
had
a
representative
at
each
of
our
our
team
meetings
and
same
with
the
forest
service,
because
it's
gonna
take
that
partnership,
arizona,
bond
wall
colorado
signals
so
that
that's
something
that's
happening
currently
in
that
odot
was
able
to
secure
an
etc
mtd
grant,
which
is
a
federal
grant.
That
basically
looks
at
its
related
devices
within
a
corridor.
H
H
Really,
just
looking
at
things
like
you
know
the
development
of
places
like
say
the
north
corridor,
where
there's
a
number
of
different
funding
mechanisms
that
are
being
applied
and
and
just
readying
ourselves,
for
you
know
the
the
tismo
type
infrastructure
that
could
help
support
some
of
that
development
and
then
and
then
just
kind
of
following
down
the
next
steps
are,
are
really
just
forming
teams
to
develop
implementation
strategies.
So
you
know:
how
do
we
want
to?
H
This
plan
is,
is
looked
at
as
a
companion
document
to
things
like
a
tsp
document,
so
a
tsp
update
like
for
the
city
of
ben,
will
allude
to
this
document
and
then
some
of
the
sort
of
nuts
and
bolts
of
the
its
components
are
contained
in
this
plan.
Currently
we
have
what's
called
the
region,
4
data
warehouse
consortium,
and
what
that
is,
is
it's?
H
It's
a
group,
that's
meeting
monthly,
it's
it's
a
number
of
different
members
of
the
city
of
ben,
some
of
their
their
data,
heavy
type,
people,
the
mpo
and
odot,
and
that's
currently
we're
looking
to
expand
it.
But
we've
got
some
some
tools
to
be
able
to
manage
the
system.
One
of
them
is
called
litus,
it's
a
platform
that
was
developed
by
the
university
of
maryland
and
it's
a
data
aggregator.
So
we
talked
about
this.
H
You
know
third-party
big
data
type
collection,
things
if
you
know
any
device
that
you're
tracking
to
it
and
it
could
be,
it
could
be
vehicle
with
here
data.
It
could
be
strava
things,
you
know
bike
data
etc
and
we're
meeting
to
just
talk
about
how
to
utilize
that
data
to
help
support
the
the
operational
goals
for
this
area
and
how
to
plan
for
infrastructure
that
could
could
help
support
those
goals.
H
F
I'm
just
gonna
say
just
tim:
that's
traffic
incident
management,
correct,
that's
crashes.
Construction
zones
stalled
vehicles,
you
name
it.
It's
kind
of
that
all-encompassing
how
to
how
do
those
situations?
How
do
the
odot
and
the
other
agencies
within
the
region
work
together
to
clear
those
those
types
of
incidents
as
quickly
as
possible
to
help
maintain
flow
on
the
on
the
various
corridors
in
the
region?.
F
Smart
cities
I'll
spend
just
a
few
minutes
on
this.
We
had
that
smart.
As
I
mentioned,
we
had
a
smart
cities
workshop.
You
know
early,
I
guess
during
the
winter
period
you
know,
and
the
idea
here
is
that
this
its
and
transportation
system
management
operation,
it's
one
part
of
a
bigger
smart
cities
concept.
F
F
I
think
just
some
of
the
things
that
are
happening
right
now
already
mentioned
development.
The
mobility
hub's
concept,
we're
gonna,
start
moving
forward
on
that
planning
process.
Hopefully
you
know
in
the
next
six
months
or
so
parking.
Some
of
that
work
is
already
happening
and
that's
a
result
of
particularly
in
the
city
of
bend.
The
city
then
went
through
a
process
two
or
three
years
ago
and
developed
a
series
of
parking
studies.
F
F
There's
other
there's
a
lot
of
things
happening
already
within
the
region,
and
I
think
you
know,
as
we
come
out
of
covid
at
some
point.
You
know
in
the
next
year,
hopefully
we'll
see
additional
work
start
to.
You
know
percolate
up
from
the
within
the
city
of
bend
and
their
strategy
around
some
of
the
broader
community
components
of
smart
cities.
C
H
Okay
and
then
on
the
bottom,
which
is
kind
of
a
long
website.
If
you
just
google
odot
its
plans,
there's
there's
a
fairly
recent
web
page
that
has
been
developed
to
all
of
the
its
related
plans
throughout
the
state
and
the
deschutes
county
plan
is
in
there,
so
you'll
be
able
to
access
it.
That
way,.
E
E
F
And
I'll
just
give
you
a
quick
update
on
this.
If
you
recall,
last
year
we
went
through
a
process
and
we
updated
the
technical
technical
committee
bylaws
as
well
as
policy
forward
bylaws.
I
had
worked
with
justin
pretty
extensively
on
just
we
found
there
were
just
a
lot
of
gaps
and
missing
information
that
were
not
in
the
bylaws
and
one
of
the
big
gaps
we
have
in
there
was.
We
had
very
little
language
about
the
citizen
appointments
to
the
technical
advisory
committee.
Since
we
updated
the
bylaws
to
clarify
that
process.
F
We
put
an
application
due
date
of
august
15
and
then
I
believe
the
bylaws
states
that
a
subcommittee
of
the
policy
board
would
then
review
any
applications.
We
receive
and
then
bring
a
recommendation
for
fault
for
the
full
policy
board
to
consider,
and
I
think,
given
that
time
frame
our
next
policy
board
meeting
is
august
2nd.
D
F
18Th
august
18th.
Actually,
so
it's
just
right
after
that
application
closing
period.
I
think
my
recommendation
would
be
that
after
we
get
those
applications
that
the
subcommittee,
you
know,
two
or
three
members
of
the
policy
board,
meet
review
those
applications
and
then
bring
a
recommendation
to
the
full
policy
board.
At
its
september
22nd
meeting.
A
And
I
I
guess
the
question
I'll
have
for
that
tyler.
As
far
as
doing
I
I
I
appreciate
and
want
the
input
from
from
the
policy
board
members.
But
when
do
we
get
into
a
quorum
issue
and
how
many
people
can
we
have
and
who
can
we
have
involved
in
that
subcommittee
or
should?
Is
it
something
we
should
do
via
email
and
just
get
rankings
on
the
on
the
applications
or
how
should
we
move
through
that
without
creating
a
quorum
issue.