►
From YouTube: Bend Neighborhood Leadership Alliance (NLA)
Description
If the video does not start automatically, please refresh your browser and press the play button located in the middle of the video screen or in the bottom left corner of the video screen.
If you would like to provide public comment during this meeting, please use this link https://bit.ly/34eQ54B to join the meeting live via Zoom.
To join by phone, please dial 1-888-788-0099 and enter Webinar ID 869 7884 2422## Use your telephone's keypad to provide public comment. To raise your hand, press *9. After the host provides you the ability to unmute, press *6 to unmute your microphone.
A
B
A
Chris,
are
you
here?
I
think
he
is
not
here
yet
cassie,
I
assume
is
not
here.
She
had
some
personal
stuff.
Come
up
will
not
be
able
to
join
us.
I
believe
dave
johnson.
A
A
A
A
So
before
we
jump
in
on
the
agenda,
I
do
want
to
request
a
change
I'd
like
to
after
we
do
the
minutes,
move
the
public
comment
to
after
the
presentation
on
houselessness
and
hear
the
public
comments
after
that
presentation.
Does
anyone
have
an
issue
with
that.
B
E
B
A
I'm
okay
with
that.
I
do
remember
agreeing
that
michaela
was
going
to
bring
it
up
and
discuss.
I
believe,
if
I
remember
correctly,
discuss
that
with
the
neighborhood
associations
as
she
gets
together
together
with
them,
but
does
someone
remember
something
different.
B
I
thought
it
was
going
to
be
sending
out
some
sort
of
survey
based
on
the
model
that
I
had
proposed
in
my
letter.
A
C
Okay,
this
is
michaela
yeah,
so
the
conversation
ended
up
being
that
we
would
do
a
combined
effort
of
surveying
the
neighborhood
associations
and
then
incorporating
that
survey
into
the
discussions
that
I'm
having.
While
I'm
with
those.
E
E
B
B
C
Yeah
we
can
have
kayla
revisit
the
minutes
and
see
if
she
can
make
an
update
to
that
section.
A
So
should
we
go
ahead
and
is
it
appropriate
to
do
a
motion
assuming
those
changes
are
made,
or
should
we
hold
off
until
the
next
meeting
to
approve
the
minutes?
You
can.
B
B
A
A
So
we're
moving
again
for
those
who
are
following
along
on
the
agenda.
We
have
moved
to
the
public
comment
section
for
this
meeting
until
after
the
presentation
on
homelessness.
So
let's
work
our
way
into
that
counselor,
megan,
perkins
and
city
manager.
Eric
king
are
here
they're,
going
to
give
us
an
overview
on
the
strategies
that
the
city
is
taking
to
address
these
issues.
A
So
we'd,
like
the
nla
members
to
take
this
information
back
to
your
boards,
specifically
the
the
new
information
you've
learned
or
things
that
you
haven't
discussed.
Yet
please
bring
that
back
to
your
boards
and
my
understanding
is.
This
presentation
is
available
to
us
as
nas,
especially
if
we
can,
you
know
get
at
least
a
few
of
us
together,
so
they
don't
have
to
do
it
13
times,
preferably,
but
that
is
available
to
us.
Counselor
perkins,
eric.
G
C
H
Okay,
I
see
it,
take
someone
else,
see
it
okay
great,
so
I
wanted
to
start
with
talking
about
sort
of
where
we're
at
right
now.
So
the
we
do
a
point
in
time
count
when
I
say
we
I
don't
mean
the
city
of
bend.
I
mean
the
homeless
leadership
coalition.
H
I
think
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
the
2022
results
are
going
to
be
probably
available
in
late
april,
but
just
to
kind
of
take
a
look
at
where
we
are
at
now.
First
of
all,
I
think
the
the
one
thing
that
I
always
see
when
I
look
at
that
chart
is,
I
mean
it's
been
going
up
and
it
it
went
up
for
covid,
but
it's
just
been
going
up
for
years
right
currently
as
of
as
of
2021
again,
these
are
not
these.
H
When
I
say
currently,
those
are
not
current
figures
because
they're
2021
numbers
we,
we
anticipate
around
1099
houseless
individuals
in
central
oregon.
154
of
those
are
unaccompanied.
Youth,
89
are
unsheltered
veterans
and
384
of
those
households
have
children.
So
we
had
a
13
increase
from
2020
and,
like
I
mentioned
it,
it
had
been
going
up
for
years
prior
one
of
the
you
know,
first
things
that
that
I
hear
every
time
I
have
this
conversation
with
people
is,
you
know
well,
where
are
they
from?
Are
they
from
here?
As
of
2021?
H
H
So
you
know
what
are
the
different
types
and
causes
of
houselessness.
You
know
oftentimes,
it's
sort
of
a
million
different
things
that
can
cause
someone
to
lose
housing
here
are
sort
of
the
types
one
is
one
is
temporary.
That
means
that
it's
it's
only
experienced
once
usually
due
to
some
big
crisis
that
that
happened
or
combination
of
crises.
H
The
other
is
episodic.
That
means
that
you
know
people
are
housed,
but
it's
not
the
most
stable
environment
and
oftentimes.
That
means
that
they're
moving
in
and
out
of
you
know
some
kind
of
treatment
and
it's
just
they're
sort
of
episodically
homeless.
H
Chronic
is
sort
of
I.
If
I
try
to
give
a
way
to
put
this
chronic,
is
sort
of
what
you
the
stereotype
right
of
the
of
the
houseless
community
is,
I
I
I
feel
you
know
is
that
that
you
know
those
are
the
people
that
you
see
that
are
are
houseless
chronically
due
to
a
lot
of
different
things
going
on
often
due
to
long-term.
You
know
health
conditions,
and
then
there
are
the
working
houseless
and
they
believe
me.
H
They
do
exist,
and
these
are
people
that
are
working
in
our
community
and
just
simply
can't
find
a
place
to
live,
and
so
you
know
that
kind
of
leads
directly
into
what
are
the
structural
factors
you
know
behind
behind
houselessness
I
mean
absence
of
affordable
housing,
particularly
for
those
in
our
community
that
are
making
minimum
wage
and-
and
you
know
then
the
the
idea
that
their
wages
are
not
you
know,
sort
of
aligning
themselves
with
with
housing.
H
Then
there's
also
structural
racism
and
discrimination,
and
discrimination
doesn't
just
mean
you
know
racism
discrimination.
You
know
a
lot
of
neurodiverse
community
members
really
struggle
with
healthlessness,
because
because
of
this
discrimination,
and
then
there's
our
criminal
justice
system
as
well
and
then
there's
also
individual
factors
trauma.
H
You
know
that
what
we
think
about
a
lot
mental
health
conditions,
substance
use
substance
use
you
know
any.
You
know
experience
with
violence,
lack
of
a
support
system,
a
lot
of
the
time
with
children
and
youth.
It
comes
from
some
form
of
family
trauma,
but
also
it's
it's
a
it's
a
sexual
identity
thing
as
well.
We
see
that
a
lot
in
our
in
our
welfare
system
and
in
our
houses
community
here
in
bend.
Even
so,
these
are
some
of
the
sort
of
the
types
and
causes.
H
So
everything
we
do
involves
our
council
goals
and
one
of
our
council
goals
is
to
take
meaningful
action
to
make
this
statement
a
reality
that
people
who
live
in
work
and
bend
can
afford
housing
invent
and
one
of
the
strategies
there
is,
you
know,
invest
in
programs
and
partnerships
that
result
in
collaborative
concrete
action
towards
ending
homelessness
and
bend.
H
H
H
But
finally,
and
the
thing
that
I'd
like
to
talk
about
last
is
is
the
strategy
of
you
know.
We
want
to
create
housing
or
facilities
to
house
500,
homeless,
individuals
on
a
temporary
or
permanent
basis.
So
that's
that's
the
one
that
you're
hearing
a
lot
about,
and
you
know
in
our
community.
That's
that's
what
we're
working!
You
know
that
we're
working
so
diligently
to
do
so.
Just
to
give
you
a
picture
of
where
we're
at
now
you
saw
the
number
central
oregon
about.
I
think
it
was
1099.
H
As
of
2020
2021
numbers.
We
have
280
shelter
beds
right
now,
so
you
can
kind
of
do
the
math
there.
It's
about
a
quarter
of
our
of
our
house's
population
can
be
sheltered
right
now.
179
of
those
are
high
barrier
and
96
of
those
are
low
barrier.
H
You
know
a
lot
of
the
the
the
shelters
that
we
have
had
open
in
the
last
couple
years
or
about
to
open
are
through
real.
You
know,
like
one-time
infusions
of
funds,
for
instance,
you
know
we
were
able
to
open
our
warming
shelter.
You
know
with
with
arpa
funds,
you
know
and
and
we're
able
to
open.
You
know
our
hotel
with
with
you
know,
state
funding.
So
it's
you
know.
These
are
often
one-time.
H
Infusions-
and
so
that's
part
of
our-
you
know
our
plan
to
look
for
more
permanent
funding
sources
and
more
sustainable
funding
sources.
In
addition,
you
know
we
we
have
to
really
do
a
continuum
of
housing
right.
We
need
short-term,
medium-term
and
long-term
housing
for
our
houseless
community
and
we
really
need
to
work
with
service
providers.
G
No
thank
you
councillor
perkins,
so
good
afternoon.
Everyone,
my
name,
is
eric
king
city
manager.
So
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
the
legal
context
that
cities
find
themselves
in
related
to
this
issue,
and
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
we
are
not,
as
a
city
are
not
a
direct
service
provider.
So
we
do
not
provide
public
health
behavioral
health
services,
so
we
are
not
the
end-all
be-all.
G
When
it
comes
to
talking
about
solutions
for
our
houseless
neighbors,
we
have
to
be
a
partner
and
we
are,
and
as
councilor
perkins
mentioned,
we
have
provided
funding
and
policy
work
and
there's
many
things
that
we're
working
on.
G
But
we
have
to
kind
of
understand
what
our
role
is
and
where
we
often
kind
of
intersect
with
the
community
and
a
lot
of
it
comes
with
what
people
see
as
those
the
visible
signs
of
of
homelessness
and
that
might
manifest
itself
and
and
folks
that
are
sleeping
in
the
or
camping
in
the
right-of-way
or
on
public
land
and
so
having
to
manage
that.
And
so
I
just
want
to
kind
of
talk
a
little
bit
more
in
that
role.
G
In
that
context,
and
just
make
it
clear
that
the
being
being
houseless
is
not
a
crime,
the
city
cannot
cite
somebody
for
their
inability
to
secure
housing.
It
is
a
it
is
a
problem
and
it's
a
nationwide
problem.
It's
a
worldwide
problem
and
are
that
has
even
been
further
defined
by
case
law.
So
there
you
might
have
heard
the
term
martin
versus
boise.
G
So
there
was
the
city
of
boise
that
was
citing
individuals
that
were
sleeping
in
public
rights
of
way
or
on
public
land,
and
the
courts
found
that
that
was
not
that,
citing
folks
for
being
homeless
and
making
that
criminal
was
not
legal
and
so
really
and
there's
some
subs,
and
we
have
attorneys
on
the
if
we
want
to
dive
into
that,
we
can.
But
the
the
the
main
point
is
that
our
ability
to
kind
of
regulate
the
right-of-way
and
really
provide
safe,
more
structured
housing
options
for
individuals
is
and
kind
of
regulating.
G
What
we
see
in
the
in
the
right-of-way
in
our
streets
and
sidewalks
and
public
lands
is
directly
connected
to
our
ability
to
have
that
shelter
capacity.
So
kind
of
ties
back
to
what
councilor
perkins
mentioned
with
we
have
about
280
beds,
shelter,
beds,
temporary
housing
units
available.
We
have
a
goal
to
increase
that
to
500.
G
We've
got
some
things
in
the
pipeline
to
be
able
to
have
more
housing
options,
but
right
now
we're
very
limited
everything
that
we
have
is
full,
and
so
it
provides
a
challenge
with
how
we
are
managing
those
those
rights
away,
public
lands
and
I'll
talk
more
about
this
here.
G
So
what
we
can
do
is
we
can,
as
a
city,
really
set
the
table
in
providing
more
opportunities
for
temporary
housing,
and
that's
what
we
have
been
doing.
Some
of
you
have
participated
in
that
effort
to
look
at
our
city
codes
to
to
expand
those
opportunities.
That's
something
that's
working
its
way
currently
through
the
planning
commission
and
will
be
coming
before
city
council
in
march.
We
also
can
work
with
our
partners,
and
we
are
you
know
in
the
the
we
have
the
opportunity
of
having
some
additional
funds.
G
The
american
rescue
plan
act,
funds,
14
million
were
dedicated
to
the
city
of
bend
and
so
a
lot
of
that
that
funding
source.
It's
one-time
funds
have
has
been
directed
towards
our
housing
crisis,
particularly
those
individuals
experiencing
homelessness,
so
that
has
helped
us
acquire
additional
shelters.
G
So
now
we
have
purchased
the
second
street
shelter,
the
bend
value
in
or
division
street
shelter
and
then
we're
in
the
process
of
naming
these
facilities.
So
right
now
we're
they're
kind
of
just
named
by
their
location,
and
then
you
might
have
recently
seen
we
are
in
the
process
of
purchasing
a
hotel
for
some
short-term
needs
for
transitional
or
temporary
housing,
but
potentially
could
be
used
for
other
longer
term
uses.
G
We
also,
I
want
to
also
make
sure
that
it's
known
that
stay
on
that
slide,
that
our
funding
for
services,
although
we
do
not
provide
direct
services
we
do
provide,
we
are
what's
called
an
entitlement
community,
meaning
we
get
federal
funds
allocated
to
us
in
the
form
of
community
development
block
grants
and
those
funds
typically
are
directed
towards
services.
So
they
help
to
fund
programs
like
bethlehem
in
other
service
providers,
jbar.j,
etc.
That
have
are
providing
services
to
those
experiencing
homelessness.
G
There's
actually
over
60
organizations
just
here
in
central
oregon
that
are
serving
this
very
vulnerable
population
in
many
forms.
So
some
of
that
funding
that
comes
through
the
city
helps
to
support
those
efforts
and
then,
as
you
many
of
you
know,
we
have
a
very
robust
actually,
the
first
in
the
state,
affordable
house,
local,
affordable
housing
program
where
a
portion
of
our
building
permit
fees
so
permits
as
they
get
pulled
a
portion
of
the
those
fees.
G
A
third
of
one
percent
goes
into
an
affordable
housing
fund
and
a
committee,
much
like
the
nla,
helps
to
direct
those
funds
to
projects
through
a
competitive
process
and
then,
of
course,
and
I'll
talk
more
about
this.
This
is
very
much
front
and
center
of
this
managing
trash
debris,
public
health
and
safety
in
the
right-of-way.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
keep
everybody
safe
and
that
we
don't
you
know,
deteriorate
public
health
issues
and
having
we
with.
G
We
do
have
unsanctioned
camps
that
are
kind
of
tipping
into
that
realm,
and
so
we
have
policies
in
place
to
help
guide
us
through
those
to
ensuring
that
health
and
safety.
So
I'm
going
to
talk
more
about
that
here,
the
next
slide,
so
we
do
have
a
policy
in
the
city's
right-of-way
to
how
we
manage
public
health
and
safety,
and
so
the
first
is
kind
of
a
flow
chart
to
help
you
walk
to
help
walk
through
that
decision.
G
So
we
can't
just
if
somebody
is
on
a
public
piece
of
if
there's
a
camp
in
the
public
right-of-way.
If,
if
the
answer
to
that
is
yes,
then
the
next
question
is:
is
that
unsafe
and
there's
a
specific
set
of
criteria
that
are
in
that
policy
to
help
define
what
an
unsafe
campsite
would
look
like?
G
If
that's?
If
that
is
determined,
then
there
is
a
process
and
that
this
is
actually
codified
in
state
law
in
terms
of
campsite
removals
that
we
need
to
align
to
to
give
proper
notice
that
we
have
the
ability
to
store
any
materials
from
that
campsite
for
a
period
of
time,
so
that
that
process
would
be
triggered.
G
So
you
can
kind
of
see
that-
and
this
is
all
part
of
an
administrative
policy
that
we've
that
we
discussed
with
council
this
summer.
Initially,
this
was
applied
to
an
emerson
street,
so
you
might
have
heard
of
that.
G
We've
since
revised
this
policy
to
actually
include
different
layers
of
of
activity
so
including
just
trash
and
debris
that
might
occur
more
cleanups
that
would
occur
on
a
campsite
or
an
area
really
trying
that
first
trying
to
provide
some
basic
services,
some
sanitation,
dumpster
removal,
hand
washing
those
types
of
services,
and
then
we
do
get
to
that
point.
G
If
an
area
is
unsafe
and
it
is,
you
know,
receiving
a
lot
of
calls
for
service
a
lot
of
public
re
public
safety
resources
are
being
directed
in
that
area
and
there's
potential
health
and
safety
issues,
not
just
for
the
residents
and
businesses
in
that
area,
but
for
those
that
are
experiencing
homelessness,
they're
they're,
seeing
an
increase
in
their
their
risk
of
of
being
safe
or
public
health
issues
that
can
be
then
grounds
for
them
the
trigger
to
notice
for
removal.
G
So,
just
to
be
clear,
you
know
we
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
just
because
we
have
a
policy
does
not
mean
that
campsites
are
illegal.
It's
more
about
the!
How
we
go
about
determining
if,
if
a
camp
site
is,
is
unsafe
or
meets
a
certain
threshold,
I
think
I'm
going
to
turn
this
back
over
to
oh
one.
More
one,
more
piece
of
information
on
this
is
that
we
did
update
our
what's
called
specific
community
request.
Form
service
request
form.
G
So
this
is
the
ability
for
the
community
to
go
online
and
report
a
whole
multitude
of
of
things
that
might
be
occurring
in
the
right-of-way
and
just
to
back
up
what
is,
when
I
say
right-of-way.
What
does
that
mean?
That's
the
the
area
that
the
public
owns,
basically
from
kind
of
curb
to
curb
and
even
a
little
bit
beyond,
so
it
might
include
the
sidewalk
or
a
landscape
strip.
That's
the
the
land
that
that
we
as
as
a
community.
G
We
we
own
that
we
might
rent
some
of
that
property
for
utility
companies
for
their
wires
that
go
underneath
the
road
or
been
broadband
etc.
But
it's
the
publix
and
and
we
have
we're
guided
by
laws,
typically
state
laws
that
that
help
us
manage
that
right-of-way
and
then
we
also
have
our
own
local
codes
as
well
and
so
again
anything
occurring
in
that
right-of-way
from
potholes
to
trash
and
debris
to
snow
removal
efforts.
G
We
have
a
one-stop
shop
kind
of
form
that
has
been
recently
updated,
made
it
made
easier,
but
also
something
that
you
can
easily
go
on
your
phone.
If
you
see
something
in
the
right-of-way
and
it's
a
communication
tool
so
that
we
can
track
and
report
when
we
do
have
issues
in
our
right-of-way.
So
the
link
on
the
on
this
page
gives
you
a
direct
access
to
that.
G
All
right
and
then
the
in
terms
of
policies,
contracts,
good
neighbor
guidelines,
so
those
are
all
tools.
Interestingly
enough,
I
used
to
work
for
the
city
of
portland,
one
of
the
things
that
I
did
was
negotiate
good
neighbor
agreements
around
community-based
facilities
like
group
homes
and
other
things
in
neighborhoods
that
you
know
how
do
you
co-exist?
The
idea
of
integration
in
the
community
and
and
that
good
neighbor
agreement
is
opportunities
to
actually
build
those
communication
channels
both
ways.
G
So
those
are
those
are
tools,
and
I
know
the
homeless
leadership
coalition
has
worked
really
hard
to
develop.
Some
template
the
neighbor
agreements,
as
we
begin
to
see
more
facilities
in
our
community
and
how
we
can
manage
that
proactively
instead
of
in
that
reactive
mode
and
then
stepping
back
administrative
policies
and
contracts.
G
So
there
are,
there
is
work.
That's
that's
currently
just
beginning
around
a
more
comprehensive
code
that
would
manage
camping,
not
just
in
the
right-of-way
but
on
public
property.
So
I
mentioned
we
have
some
policy
work
already
in
place
that
complies
with
state
law
in
terms
of
how
we
manage
the
right-of-way,
but
there
is
more
work
to
be
done
and
work
that
will
happen
over
the
next
year.
But
again,
a
lot
of
that
regulation
needs
to
be
tied
directly
to
our
ability
to
have
some
capacity
for
temporary
housing
options,
so
they
go
hand
in
hand.
G
I
think,
if
there's
anything
to
take
away
from
this
presentation,
there's
not
just
one
side
of
the
equation
to
focus
on
it's
really
looking
at
this
holistically.
G
So
now
I'm
going
to
turn
it
back
over
to
counselor
perkins
to
discuss
some
of
this
more
specific
strategies
around
increasing
capacity
and
some
of
the
code
work
that
again,
some
of
you
have
been
involved
with
that
is
coming
before
the
planning
commission.
I
think,
as
early
as
next
week,
in
a
public
hearing.
H
So,
first
I
wanted
to
talk
about
outdoor
shelters
and
what
they
are
and
what
they
aren't.
You
know
I
think
again,
the
first
thing
that
comes
to
a
lot
of
people's
mind
when
they
think
of
outdoor
shelters
is
sort
of
what
you
see
in
the
you
know:
unsanctioned
camps
around
our
community
and
that's
not
what
an
outdoor
shelter
would
be
an
outdoor
shelter
is
basically
you
know
a.
It
could
be
anything
from
what
you
see
at
veterans,
village,
or
you
know
it
technically-
could
be.
H
It
could
be
tents,
but
in
a
you
know,
in
a
managed
environment,
the
ones
that
we
have
in
the
pipeline
right
now,
the
two
that
we
put
out
an
rfp
and
there
were
two
responses
from
the
same
organization
and
neither
of
them
included
any
form
of
tents,
they're,
all
sort
of
pallet
structures,
tiny
homes,
sort
of
similar
to
veterans,
village,
but
probably
a
little
less
developed
than
than
veterans
village,
those
the
the
contract
and
the
location
announcement
for
those
will
be
going
before
councils
in
march.
H
I
forget,
which
meeting
and
we'll
be
able
to
kind
of
look
at
both
of
those
two
outdoor
shelter
contracts.
At
that
time
and
and
announced
the
locations
you
know,
the
idea
behind
outdoor
shelters
is
that
they
would
provide
you
know
they
would
have
to
have.
They
would
have
to
have
sanitation
service,
they
would
be
able
to
have
addresses,
which
is
a
key
thing,
that
a
lot
of
our
houses
community
is
missing
and
is
actually
preventing
employment
in
a
lot
of
ways
or
preventing
them
from
receiving
important.
H
You
know
benefits
from
from
the
state,
and
you
know
federal
benefits
as
well:
they're
going
to
have
community
member
rules
and
regulations,
good
neighbor
agreements
and
there's
going
to
be
admission
criteria
for
the
people
that
who
are
going
to
live
there.
You
know
that's
another
thing
that
I
hear
a
lot
when
I'm
talking
to
people
about
this
is
like
they.
You
know
it's
not.
This
is
like
you
open
the
gates,
and
it's
it's
the
first.
You
know
10
people
that
show
up
it's.
H
If
their
people
are
going
to
be
chosen
to
live
there.
Who
can
you
know
sort
of
follow
those
rules
and
are
committed
to
their
own
case
management
plan?
We
you
know
we
had
really
strong
rfp
criteria
for
for
these
outdoor
shelters
for
the
city
of
bend,
and
you
know
one
of
the
really
really
important
parts
of
the
criteria.
H
Having
heard
you
know
from
the
community
is
that
the
very
first
step,
step
after
sort
of
the
contract
is
awarded
is
to
go
out
into
the
community
in
the
nearby
neighborhood
and
really
talk
with
the
community
about
how
they
envision
the
shelter
working
and
how
they
can
work
together
with
the
community
in
order
for
everyone
to
feel
safer.
So
you
know
the
other
thing
just
a
little
bit
more
on
this.
You
know
it
there's
going
to
be
24-hour
on-site
management.
Seven
days
a
week,
there's
going
to
be
fencing.
H
You
know
the
trash
is
not
going
to
be
flying
around
there's
going
to
be
trash,
enclosures
there's
going
to
be
a
pet
relief
area.
So
you
know
it's
going
to
be
a
very
different
thing
and
something
that
we're
not
used
to
seeing
because
we
don't
have
any
managed
outdoor
shelters
in
our
community.
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
things
that
that
one
way
to
sort
of
increase
capacity
for
shelters
and
then
next
our
hotel
renovations.
H
So
you
may
remember
that
gosh.
I
believe
it
was
in
april
that
we
purchased
the
the
bend
value
in
with
a
two,
almost
a
three
million
dollar
state
funding
award
from
project
turnkey.
So
the
idea
is
that
the
project
turnkey
was
you're,
taking
motels
and
hotels
and
you're
turning
them
into
shelters.
H
When
I
talk
about
sort
of
what
project
turnkey
and
what
this
division
street
shelter
really
is,
is
going
to
be.
I
always
talk
about
sort
of
this
escalator
right
and
we've
got
at
the
bottom
of
the
escalator.
You've
got
people
that
are
living
on
the
street,
and
then
you
know
this
kind
of
environment
is
really
from
people
that
are
more
close
to
the
top
of
the
escalator,
the
top
being
you
know
stable
housing.
These
are
people
that
that
are
going
to
be
chosen
to
live
in
this
environment.
H
That
really
just
need
a
transitional
place
to
live.
They
can,
you
know
they
can
handle
having
you
know
their
their
own
room,
their
own
bathroom
and
again
they're
going
to
be
carefully
chosen
for
for
that
that
site
and
if
you
do
really
want
to
know
sort
of
what
what
we're
doing
in
terms
of
awarding
these
rfps
and
these
contracts,
I
like
to
really
refer
people
back
to
the
project,
turnkey
virtual,
open
house.
H
I
was
so
impressed
by
by
what
neighbor
impact
was
saying
in
terms
of
all
of
the
ways
that
they're
going
to
make
the
people
living
in
in
the
hotel
in
the
shelter
feel
safe
and
the
way
that
they're
really
working
to
make
sure
that
the
people
living
around
it
and
the
businesses
around
it
are
also
feeling
safe.
H
So
this
right
now
with
the
project
turnkey
shelter,
we
are
hoping
to
open
it
on
a
temporary
basis
on
an
emergency
basis.
Sometime
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
I
think,
and
then,
as
of
may
31st,
we'll
be
shutting
it
down
to
do
some
renovations
that
we
delayed,
because
we
saw
this
emergency
need
and
because
we
sort
of
are
in
the
winter
months,
even
though
you
wouldn't
know
it.
H
If
you
went
outside
today,
so
that
is
it
for,
for
sort
of
our
hotel,
renovations
and-
and
eric
also
mentioned
that
at
our
last
meeting,
we
you
know
proved
approved
the
purchase
of
the
the
rainbow
hotel,
so
we're
doing
sort
of
the
due
diligence
period
right
now
with
that
next
is
our
safe
parking
program.
H
So
safe
parking
program
basically
allows
you
know
a
building
owner
property
owner
to
allow
some
limited
overnight
parking
on
their
property,
and
you
know
the
idea
is
that
there's
sort
of
two
ways
you
can
go
about
it.
You
can
do
there's
a
there's,
a
three
there's
three
vehicle
used,
which
is
an
overnight
camping
policy
and
then
a
transitional
overnight
parking
policy
which
is
up
to
six
vehicles,
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
like
sort
of
applying.
H
You
send
an
application
to
the
city
and
it's
just
a
way
to
provide.
You
know
this
temporary
situation
for
for
people
to
be
somewhere
stable
with
their
with
their
vehicles
or
with,
however,
they're
sort
of
coming
to
you.
It's
just
a
safe
shelter
program,
and
so
far
it
has
been
where
we
have
two.
We
have
two
safe
parking
areas.
Right
now
in
our
community
and
the
the
successes
are
pretty
incredible.
I
mean
100
of
participants,
report
feeling
safer
and
more
supported
once
enrolled
in
a
safe
parking
program.
H
Over
30
guests
have
participated
in
the
safe
parking
program
and
the
average
day
has
been
about
six
months.
The
average
age
has
been
55
and
from
those
those
over
20
families
have
found
long-term
housing
and,
more
more
importantly,
to
the
neighbors.
No
complaints
have
been
have
come
from
the
neighbors
adjacent
to
the
sites,
so
we're
really
hoping
that
this
is
something
that
we
can
start
partnering
with
more
of
our
community
members
on,
because
it's
it's
such
a
successful
program
and
it's
a
really
small
thing
that
you
can
do.
H
H
For
years,
we
just
had
a
temporary
warming
shelter
for
a
couple
of
months
during
the
winter,
but,
as
we've
seen
not
only
is
the
need
great
for
for
our
houses
community
just
to
have
a
place
to
lay
there
like
lay
their
head
at
night,
but
we
have
a
lot
of
extreme
weather.
You
know,
for
you,
know,
between
smoke
and
and
cold,
and
a
lot
of
things
going
on
in
our
city,
so
that
shelter
has
ended
up.
H
H
If
we're
talking
again
about
my
my
escalator
analogy
here,
it's
sort
of
a
step
up
right
from
from
living
on
the
street,
because
you
you
go
there
at
night,
it's
congregate,
you
know,
you're,
there's
just
there's
a
line
of
beds,
you
receive
dinner
and
then
the
next
morning
you
leave
the
the
good
news
and
the
great
news,
potentially
great
news,
is
that
shepherd's
house
is
going
for
a
proposal
for
a
navigation
center
at
that
same
location
and
what
a
navigation
center
is
is
basically
it's
a
shelter
combined
with
day
services
and
davis
day,
services
really
just
mean
resources
for
our
houseless
community.
H
You
know,
because,
if
you're,
if
you're
spending
your
entire
day,
looking
for
housing
for
that
evening,
you're
not
able
to
connect
with
a
lot
of
the
service
providers
and
just
the
services
and
the
things
that
you
need
in
our
community.
Maybe
it's
a
shower
again.
Maybe
it's
a
mailbox
just
things
that
will
will
help
our
houses
community
really
be
able
to
take
that
next
step.
H
So
we're
going
to
be
reviewing
that
contract
very
shortly
and
again
this
was
money
that
came
from
the
state
and
it
came
from
the
state
because
it's
something
that
we
really
truly
need
in
our
community.
H
And
then
we
get
to
the
shelter
code
amendments,
so
I've
heard
from
a
lot
of
people
about
this.
I've
talked
a
lot
about
this,
the
just
to
kind
of
go
back
to
how
this
all
came
about
the
sounding
board
to
house.
Our
neighbors
was
a
city
manager,
appointed
committee
and
we
started
meeting
in
april
and
our
last
meeting
was
in
december.
I
believe-
and
the
idea
is
to
really
that
the
group
really
helped
the
staff
develop
a
strategy
to
allow
varying
types
of
shelter
and
transitional
housing
city-wide.
H
So
who
was
on
this?
Who
was
on
this
sounding
board?
I
was,
I
was
lucky
enough
to
be
on
it.
Councillor
campbell
was
on
it
a
member
of
the
planning
commission,
the
homeless
leadership
coalition,
the
neighborhood
leadership
alliance,
affordable
housing,
advisory
committee,
homeless,
service
providers,
the
bend
economic
development
advisory
board.
They
also.
We
also
came
together
over
that
period
of
time
to
delve
into
this.
You
know
another
question
I
get
asked
all
the
time
is
I
don't
understand
why
you
did
this?
We
already
had
something
in
place.
H
Well,
currently,
everything
is
sort
of
treated
as
temporary
housing,
and
you
know
we
don't
have
these
the
current
standards
as
they
stand
now
they
don't
provide
any
certainty
for
anybody
and
the
idea
being
if
we
can
standardize
this,
provide
certainty
for
neighbors
and
and
really
guarantees
on
the
maximum
size
and
durations
of
these
shelters,
but
that
would
be
really
important
for
the
community.
H
H
Another
part
of
this
was
that
you
know
during
the
pandemic,
the
oregon
legislature
passed
a
lot
of
bills
to
allow
homeless
shelters
to
be
easily
cited
in
cities.
H
You
know
seeing
that
it
was
an
emergency
during
the
pandemic,
but
all
of
those
laws
have
expiration
dates,
and
so
you
know
we
really
wanted
to
work
on
a
more
long-term,
longer-term
solution,
and
you
know
again
just
to
also
you
know,
reduce
any
barriers
that
we
that
we
can
have
in
order
that
we
can
start
building
up
our
capacity
for
for
shelters
in
our
community.
H
You
know
I'm
going
to
repeat
it
again:
280
rooms
right
now
and
1099
central
oregonians
who
are
houseless.
You
know
another
reason
for
the
code.
Changes
was
that
you
know
that
again
to
have
operating
guidelines,
good
neighbor
agreements
and
and
communication
to
neighboring
property
owners.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
that
that's
you
know
something
that
is
codified
and
there's
sort
of
three
different
permanent
shelter
types
and
two
temporary
shelter
types.
H
We've
got
the
outdoor,
the
multi-room
and
the
group
shelters
the
outdoor
shelter
being
what
we
talked
about
earlier,
multi-room
being
like
the
hotel
and
group
shelters
being
like
second
street
and
then
two
temporary
shelter
types,
which
is
a
temporary
shelter.
H
For
instance,
when
the
smoke
shelter
opened
up
at
first
presbyterian
and
then
a
provision
for
hardship,
housing,
which
I
know
many
of
you
have
heard
and
talked
a
lot
about
recently,
you
know
that
is
the
the
idea
behind
that
is
for
a
property
owner
to
be
able
to
allow
one
rv
or
vehicle
to
park
on
their
property.
H
If
they're,
if
they're,
going
through
some
kind
of
hardship
in
terms
of
of
housing
in
our
community,
you
know
so
where,
where
are
we
at
with
this
now,
the
planning
commission
is
going
to
be
meeting
next
monday
at
5
30.
I
believe
and
encourage
you
all
to
you
know.
Listen
in
you
know,
you
know,
share
share
your
feedback
about
these
code
changes
and
then,
after
the
planning
commission
makes
their
recommendations
they'll
go
to
council
and
again
I
encourage
you
know
we
want
to
hear
from
you
encourage
you
to.
G
We
also
want
to
be
thinking
a
little
bit
bigger
picture
longer
term
about
how
we
can
address
some
of
the
root
causes,
how
we
can
get
the
community
engaged,
because
this
is
again
not
a
city
of
bend.
Issue
alone,
we've
got
a
our
non-profit
community,
the
county
that
provides
as
an
agent
of
the
state
providing
public
health
and
behavioral
health
support
services
and
many
others.
So
how
can
we
put
this
all
together?
G
So,
as
referred
to,
we
formed
a
task
force,
a
city
county
task
force
that
was
made
up
really
putting
the
experts
doing
this
work
really
at
the
center
of
the
conversation,
so
that
you
know
we
aren't
we're
relying
on
that
expert
on
the
ground,
knowledge
and
expertise
to
help,
inform
the
plan,
and
so
that
work
took
place
between
about
april
march
or
april
of
last
year
and
it
concluded
in
december,
and
that
plan
was
then
presented
at
a
joint
city
county
meeting
just
a
few
weeks
ago.
G
Both
agencies
are
continuing
to
provide
feedback
for
that
plan,
that
this
will
really
serve
as
the
basis
for
a
collaborative
office
between
not
just
the
city
of
bend
and
deschutes
county.
But
all
now
all
four
cities
in
deschutes
county
have
signed
on
to
want
to
collaborate
and
really
address
this
issue
in
a
much
more
coordinated
fashion,
and
so
this
strategic
plan
has
kind
of
five
core
elements
to
it.
You
can
actually
read
it
online.
G
There's
a
website.
That's
been
developed,
called
houselistentdeschutes.org
that
has
some
communication
messaging,
that
I'll
talk
about
just
to
get
everybody's
to
to
be
to
get
on
the
same
page.
With
some
of
this
information,
because
it,
I
think
a
lot
of
people
come
with
with
fear,
and
we
want
to
start
to
really
get
be
equipping
folks
with
real,
solid
data
to
be
to
serve
as
a
foundation.
G
That
then
leads
into
the
the
plan,
and
the
plan
is
a
really
a
ten-year
plan
that
has
a
vision
mission,
all
sorts
of
detail,
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
those
details
today.
This
just
gives
you
a
high
level
sketch
of
what's
included,
which
I
mentioned,
including
the
getting
the
community
and
actually
getting
the
private
sector
engaged
in
helping
to
to
not
only
support
some
of
these
solutions
but
help
to
fund
some
of
these
efforts
getting
coordinated
on
our
on
our
funding.
G
We've
got
city
city
funds,
county
funds
being
more
efficient
with
how
those
get
deployed
really
expanding.
So
we
just
have
not
kept
pace
with
that
growth
that
we
talked
about
and
having
more
housing
options,
so
really
keeping
an
eye
on
those
the
different
types
of
facilities
that
are
needed,
and
when
we
talk
about
serving
those
that
are
are
homeless,
there
is
actually
a
federal
definition.
G
There's
a
coordinated
entry
system
that
that
really
filters
who
gets
access
to
those
services,
it's
a
prioritization
sort
of
metric
and
then
there's
a
continuum
of
care
that
is
right
now
kind
of
all
monitored
by
the
huma,
the
homeless
leadership
coalition.
They
they
help
they.
They
receive
some
of
that
funding
from
the
federal
government
to
do
that
work.
So
we
want
to
support
that
work,
not
duplicate
it
and
enhance
it
and
fill
in
the
missing
pieces
of
the
system.
G
It's
like
we've
got
this
ladder
that
has
missing
rungs
in
it,
so
there's
a
for
example,
really:
a
high
need
for
permanent
supportive
housing
where
we
we
have
housing
temporary.
We
have
these
shelters,
but
having
those
wrap
around
services
available
right
there
on
site
is
really
important:
finding
space
for
those
that
are
unsheltered
and
really
moving
away
from
what
we
have
right
now,
which
is
a
lot
of
unsanctioned
camps
and
having
more
more
structured
environment,
safer
environment
and
then
the
bigger
picture
really
is
about
increasing
and
kind
of.
One
of
the
reasons.
G
Primary
reasons
that
were
you
know
in
this
situation
is
our
lack
of
affordable
housing
and
our
wages
are
not
keeping
pace
with
our
housing
price
escalation,
and
so
that's
a
supply
and
demand
issue
ensuring
that
we
meet
our
broader
housing
need
when
we
do
our
forecasting
our
forecasted
growth,
that's
all
part
of
our
land
use
system
and
then,
of
course,
supported
by
our
affordable
housing
program
and
the
number
of
units
that
we're
trying
to
to
kind
of
basically
catch
up,
and
it's
not
going
to
be
a
year
or
two.
G
So
I
mentioned
the
houselistentdeschutes.org
and
the
messaging
we're
really
trying
to
put
faces
and
stories
together
too.
It's
not
just
about
the
data.
It's
also
just
humanizing
the
situation
that
we're
in
instead
of
the
you
know.
What
we
hear
is
a
lot
of
again
fear
and
that
fear
is
real.
It's
not
something
to
just
you
know,
react
to
it
or
think
of
as
as
being
negative.
G
And
this
just
summarizes,
I
think,
all
of
the
the
the
information
that
you
just
heard
over
the
last
half
hour
or
so
and
kind
of
our
priority
areas
as
a
city
and
just
what's
happening
on
the
ground
over
the
next
couple
of
months
with
our
our
council
goal
of
the
500
shelter
beds
and
increasing
capacity
right
now,
because
we
are
in
a
crisis,
our
ability,
our
more
orderly
kind
of
management
of
the
city's
rights
away
in
public
land
and
what
that
what
that
looks
like
and
then
really
just
longer
term,
about
increasing
efficiency
and
really
taking
a
more
partnership
approach
to
this
issue
and
some
of
the
efforts
there.
G
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
this
in
any
great
detail.
But
you
can
kind
of
just
see
it
all
put
together.
Everything
from
our
temporary,
the
shelters
that
were
the
hotels,
the
outdoor
shelters
and
the
code
work
and
how
it
all
kind
of
fits
in
over
the
next
couple
of
months.
H
All
right
that
first
sort
of
that
quoted
area
at
the
top
there.
You
know
the
way
I
describe
that
is,
you
know
we
need
to
draw
a
straight
line
between
getting
people
off
of
our
streets
to
shelter
beds.
We
capacity
we
we
need
to
to
draw
that
line
as
a
community
and
understand
that
if
you
don't
like
what
you
see
now,
the
way
to
to
make
that
change
is
to
have
more
shelter
space
for
our
houseless
community.
H
You
know
this
is
something
that
we
as
a
council
feel
very
strongly
about.
We
have
prioritized
this
as,
as
you
know,
one
of
the
major
things
that
we
will
be
doing
on
our
time
in
council,
because
we
feel
like
it's
an
emergency
and
we
think
it
is.
We
have
to
get
ahead
of
it
now.
H
If
we
continue
to
ignore
it,
we
are
going
to
end
up
like
a
lot
of
the
places
that
a
lot
of
you
have
moved
from,
and
we
don't
want
that
to
happen
in
our
community,
and
so
we
feel
like
if
we
can,
if
we
can
tackle
it
head-on
now,
you
know
in
a
pretty
aggressive
way,
and
you
saw
on
that
slide
before
all
the
things
that
are
happening
just
in
the
next
few
months.
H
You
know
we,
we
are
hoping
that
that
will
mean
that
we
can
get
ahead
of
this
as
a
community,
but
what
we
need
is
is
we
need?
We
need
you,
you
know
we
need
the
nla,
we
need
our
neighborhood
associations,
we
need
our
neighborhoods.
We
need
people
to
really.
You
know
work
with
us
on
this
and
you
know
because
we're
moving
at
such
a
fast
pace.
I
understand
that
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
people
feel
that
they're
isn't.
H
You
know
a
lot
of
time
for
engagement,
but
we
really
truly
do
want
to
work
with
with
our
neighborhoods
and
work
with
our
community
to
how.
How
can
we
make
all
the
things
that
we're
doing
better?
You
know
none
of
us
have
done.
This
is
something
that
is
really
new
for
our
community.
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
these
different
shelters.
H
We
don't
have
you
know
the
code
in
place
yet,
and
so
we
we
want
to
all
work
together
on
this,
and
I
can't
really
stress
that
enough
in
in
order
for
that
to
make
to
be
successful,
and
so
you
know
we
we
have
there's
been
a
lot
of
sort
of
different
ways
that
we
have
already
started
to.
You
know,
implement
your
input.
You
know
one
of
the
things
I
think
about
the
most
is
again
the
the
the
request
for
proposal
for
outdoor
shelters.
H
You
know
the
first
and
most
important
component
now.
Is
this
neighbor
outreach
that
they're
going
to
be
doing?
Also
again,
if
you,
if
you
listen
in
on
the
project,
turnkey
virtual,
open
house,
you
know
they're
talking
about
sort
of
how
they
want
to
be
a
part
of
they
want
that
shelter
to
be
a
part
of
the
actual
community
and
they
want.
H
You
know
to
create
this
sort
of
two-way,
not
only
two-way
dialogue,
but
also
just
you
know,
just
just
you
know,
create
volunteering
work
on
art
projects
together,
but
also
you
know
had
neighbor
impact
has
offered
to
come
to
the
neighborhood
association
meetings
and
saying
like
what
do
you
need
to
hear
from
us?
You
know
to
make
to
make
you
feel
more
comfortable
about
this
happening.
You
know
in
in
your
neighborhood,
so
you
know
it's
the
the
answer
to
this.
What
what
do
we
want?
H
We
just
we
want
to
know
how
we
can
do
better,
and
we
also
want
to
know
you
know
your
solutions
and
your
your
input.
You
know
so
because
this
is
happening
and
there's
still
there's
still
time
for
input
and
for
for
change.
H
And
I
think
the
last
slide
here
is
just
here:
is
there
a
heck
of
a
lot
of
heck
of
a
lot
of
links
here
that
you
can
link
to?
If
you,
you
know
desire
to
like
find
out
more
about
any
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
tonight
and
then
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions,
and
I
also
believe
that
we
do
have
some
city
staff
here
to
answer
questions
as
well.
C
Thanks
megan
and
eric
so
for
everyone
here
we
have
about
15
minutes
for
questions,
so
we'll
get
jump
into
that
and
then
summer
has
moved
public
comment
to
the
end
of
that
discussion.
I
Pearson
yeah
yeah,
thank
you.
That
was
a
great
presentation.
One
thing
I'm
wondering
about
is
the
graph
that
you
showed
at
the
beginning
showed
a
steady
increase
of
folks
who
are
houseless
and
for
those
of
you
who
are
studying
this
and
employing
all
these
policies
to
improve
the
situation.
Do
you
anticipate
over
the
coming
years
that
that
increase
will
continue
as
steadily
as
it
has
over
the
last
period?.
H
I
know
that
for
the
the
2022
count
we
expect
a
double
digit
increase
again
beyond
that,
I
I
don't
I'm
not
a
service
provider,
so
I
can't
kind
of
you
know.
That's
again,
that's
the
reason
why
we're
trying
to
do
all
these
things
that
we're
doing
to
get
people
into
stable
housing.
G
Yeah,
well,
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
think
there
are.
There
are
some
national
data
in
terms
of
forecasting
and
some
modeling.
I
don't
have
that
that
information,
other
staff
might
have
it
and
if
we
we
can,
we
can
follow
up
and
provide
at
least
they're,
maybe
at
the
state
or
the
national
level,
some
forecast.
It's
really.
We
have
not
done
that
forecasting
here
at
the
local
level.
I
Yeah,
I
just
think
it's
important
that
we
sort
of
promote
the
idea
that
this
isn't
a
hopeless
situation,
that
that's
sort
of
sicipiant,
that
we
just
keep
making
changes
and
and
the
numbers
just
keep
going
up
and
we
never
really
catch
up
and
that
that
strikes
me
as
sort
of
a
a
dead-end
way
to
look
at
it.
But
I
think
it's
potentially
how
it's
seen
in
some
quarters.
H
Yeah
I
mean,
but
if
you
think
about
you
know
what
all
that
we
have
done
in
in
about
a
year
and
a
half
since
we've
really
devoted
you
know
tackling
this
issue
there
there.
There
wasn't
a
lot
done
as
a
as
this.
The
city
have
been
before
and
so
we're
we're
playing
a
little
bit
of
ketchup,
but
it's
it's
not
hopeless
and-
and
we
still
have
time.
J
Okay,
I'm
going
to
be
moderating
for
a
bit
because
summer
has
a
cough
and
makayla
has
asked
me
to
step
in
here
and
and
run
the
questions
so
be
sure
and
turn
off
or
take
lower
your
hand
when
you're
done.
Unless
you
end
up
with
another
question.
Let's
have
here
comments
from
jim
cristo
next
and
then
we'll
go
to
steve
pine
and
elizabeth.
B
Okay,
thank
you
kathy
yeah.
There
was
a
statistic
that
was
spoken
of,
like
84
of
the
homelessness
had
a
previous
residence
in
oregon.
B
G
E
K
You
got
it,
I
don't
even
need
to
say
it
so
about
three
quarters
of
the
people
who
at
least
responded
the
survey
when
we
asked
them
about
their
situation.
They
report
their
last
permanent
or
stable
residence
being
in
central
oregon.
So
there
definitely
are
people
who
are,
you
know,
come
into
central
oregon
and
find
themselves
without
a
home,
but
the
majority
of
the
people
who,
when
we
do
our
point
in
time,
count
when
they
share
information
with
us.
They
let
us
know
that
their
last
stable
residence
was
here
in
central
oregon.
B
G
G
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question,
so
no
that
really
we
right
now
it
is
not
illegal
to
be
camping,
just
physically
camping
in
the
right
of
way.
What
we're
concerned
about
is
when
it
becomes
unsafe
and
so
like
when
we
have
where
we
have
an
unimproved
right-of-way,
and
we
have
traffic
right
next
to
a
tent.
That's
that's
unsafe!
G
If
we
have
sit
where
we
just
aren't
able
to
provide
kind
of
basic
services
to
keep
the
the
the
camp
in
a
safe
in
a
safe
place,
where
there's
a
lot
of
calls
for
service,
if
we
see
violence
or
property
theft,
things
like
that
that
that
accumulation
of
calls
for
service
would
would
be
what
would
determine
that
that
camp
is
unsafe,
but
by
virtue
of
just
somebody,
that's
might
be
using
the
right-of-way
as
long
as
it's
not
causing
any
harm.
No,
that's
not
illegal.
J
Okay,
I
think
we're
moving
on
to
steve
pineman.
D
Yes,
thank
you
hi
to
the
city.
Thank
you
for
all
the
work
you're
doing
on
this,
and
I've
been
following
that
on.
You
know
through
several
modalities
there,
but
my
question
is
you
know,
given
that
we've
got
1099
currently
counted
and
the
the
acknowledgement
that
that
is
certainly
going
to
increase
as
bend
grows,
central
oregon
and
that
for
that
matter,
growth?
Is
there
a
particular?
D
I
know
it
has
to
do
with
funding
and
all
that,
but
is
there
some
reason
we're
not
shooting
for
a
thousand
or
something
like
that,
knowing
that
it's
going
to
take
five
years
to
accommodate
that
anyway,
right
just
just
a
question:
I've
been
in
several
communities
where
we've
done
this
and
it's
always
a
question.
Okay,
we
got
to
we
got
to
the
10-yard
line
and
then
it
moved
and
the
goal
post
moved
and
never
go
again.
Is
there?
Can
you
help
me
understand
that?
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you
for
calling
out
the
elephant
in
the
room
steve
we
had
to
start
somewhere
when
we
started
this
endeavor.
We
had
really
right
around
100
shelter
beds,
maybe
a
few
more
coming
online
and
we
knew
kind
of
the
work
that
was
ahead
of
us
in
terms
of
project
turnkey
and
then
potentially
federal
funds.
So
we're
really
trying
to
line
up
the
the
metric
with
what
we
knew
was
coming
online
and
what
we
could
do
realistically
before
the
code
amendments
happen.
K
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
were
battling
as
we
got
started
is
we
we
needed
a
whole
bunch
of
of
allowances,
even
in
state
law,
to
cite
shelters
in
the
city
of
bend,
because
the
shelter
code
changes
haven't
happened
once
they
happen.
That's
the
that
is
really
the
signal
to
the
private
market.
That
says,
there's
really
very
little
restriction
in
the
city
of
bend
for
you
to
tell
us
how
you
want
to
get
more
transitional
housing
and
more
shelters
online.
K
So
we
started
with
500
sort
of
recognizing
what
we
might
be
able
to
get
done
in
a
24
month
period
and
then,
at
the
end
of
that
24
month
period,
we'll
be
off
to
the
races.
Do
we
need
to
have
another
500
bed
goal?
Do
we
need
to
have
a
different
goal,
but
the
the
council
goals
are
only
for
a
two-year
time
period
and
I
can
tell
you
when
that
number
went
up.
There
was
a
big
int
take
a
breath.
I
mean
that
was
a.
E
K
Huge
idea
that
we
could
even
bring
500
beds
online
in
24
months,
so
it
was
it's
the
first
goal.
It
was
a
shot
at
what
we
could
do,
what
funds
we
knew
were
coming
and
then
really
we'll
set
set
the
stage
or
level
set
or
set
the
foundation
for
what
happens
in
the
next
two
year
period
in
the
next.
G
Two
years,
just
to
also
clarify
too
so
that
that
figure
is
central,
oregon,
so
1100
individuals
experiencing
homelessness
in
central
oregon.
G
That's
the
tri-county
area,
so
you
know
we
have
some
more
detailed
accounts
for
ben's
specific,
so
we're
hoping
that
again
through
this
collaborative
effort,
it's
not
just
the
city
of
bend,
but
it's
redmond
and
sisters
and
the
pine
all
stepping
up
to
do
their
part
in
increasing
some
capacity
and
also
you
know
the
way
that,
when
we're
serving
individuals
with
homelessness,
they
they
might
occupy
that
temporary
housing
for
a
few
months
to
be
able
to
then
get
into
something
more
permanent.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
turnover
too.
G
J
Hey,
I
think
elizabeth
rhodes.
F
My
question
was
basically
the
same
as
steve
pines
I
was
just
also
curious.
Is
the
500,
in
addition
to
the
280
or
just
a
total
of
500.
G
It's
a
total
of
500,
so
we
had,
as
carolyn
mentioned
the
hundred,
and
I
want
to
say,
60
70,
something
like
that
prior
to
the
council
goal.
So
we
have
already
added
over
a
hundred
beds
just
within
and
we're
only
six
months
into
our
goal
period
or
two-year
goal
period,
so
we're
making
some
good
progress.
G
I
think
you
know
realistically
we're
gonna
get
pretty
close
to
400
with
what
we
have
in
the
pipeline,
but,
as
carolyn
mentioned
some
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
to
just
set
the
table
for
more
options,
we
need
our
nonprofit
sector
to
also
come
to
us
with
proposals.
It
can't
just
all
be
city-led
efforts
so
that
the
other,
hopefully
that
other
hundred
or
so
to
get
us
to
that
goal,
can
be
done
through
more
of
a
partnership
approach.
K
And
only
one
more
thing
to
add
to
what
eric
said
is
that
historically,
the
city
of
bend
has
been
one
of
the
major
funders
of
the
existing
shelter
beds,
so
whether
when
we
major
funder
into
the
bethlehem
in
the
indus,
the
initial
work
at
bethlehem
in
the
expansion
of
bethlehem,
we
funded
all
of
the
winter
warming
shelter
beds
that
were
ever
open
seasonally
in
the
city
of
bend.
K
We
are
always
a
funder
for
j
bar
j
and
for
cascade
youth
and
families,
we're
always
a
funder
for
grandma's
house
and
and
the
others
who
are
providing
shelter
beds.
So
we
will
continue
to
fund
those
and-
and
we
would
have
anyway.
The
real
change
in
strategy
strategy
has
been
the
acquisition
and
the
investment
in
ongoing
operations
from
from
us
as
a
public
agency
and
where
we're
again
creating
that
environment
for
other
public
agencies
and
non-profits,
and
then
the
private
sector
to
step
up.
As
that
shelter
code
comes
online.
J
B
I
do
have
another
question
based
on
something
I
talked
about
a
minute
ago.
You
saw
talk
about
the
tri-county
area
and
I'm
wondering
on
the
homeless,
are
all
the
cities
in
the
tri-county
area
doing
something
similar,
in
other
words,
we're
attacking
this
thing
kind
of
in
a
parallel
fashion,
instead
of
one
city
doing
it
all.
I
know
we're
the
biggest
city
in
the
area,
but
what
are
the
other
cities
doing.
G
With
regard
to
this
yeah,
that's
a
great
question,
so
I
know
sisters
is
looking
at
a
more
permanent
warming
shelter.
Now
all
the
cities
in
central
oregon
have
a
warming
shelter
where
we're
one
that
now
has
a
permanent
warming
shelter.
So,
yes,
every
city
is
doing
something
and
they're
on
a
different
scale.
G
Redmond,
as
you
might
have
seen,
bethlehem
just
expanded
to
redmond
and
that
that
has
opened.
There's
also
talk
of
an
outdoor
shelter.
Much
like
what
council
perkins
outlined,
that's
in
development
in
redmond
as
well.
That's
called
oasis
village
so,
and
there
might
be
more
that
I'm
not
aware
of,
but
and
that's
really,
the
intent
of
that
collaborative
office
is
so
that
we
can
kind
of
learn
from
each
other.
Best
practices,
coordinate,
funding
and
just
be
more
efficient
with
our
resources.
J
G
L
K
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
that
the
most
basic
level,
what
we've
definitely
seen
is,
is
more
giving
so
whether
it's
pandemic
partners
that
really
started
a
very
public
view
of
how
we
can
connect
resources
to
humans
in
a
real-time
basis
or
just
the
giving
that
has
been
made
available
for
shepherd's
house
or
neighbor
impact.
I
mean
we
had
one
donor,
who
called
and
said
I
want
to.
I
want
to
pay
off
all
the
city
of
bend
water
bills
that
are
in
arrears
right.
K
So
you
know
you
have
people
coming
to
the
table
and
wanting
to
put
their
sort
of
their
personal
income
and
earnings
to
the
solution,
and
so
want
to
see
that
continue
and
to
continue
to
see
our
private
nonprofit
partners
and
our
religious
organizations
continue
to
have
that
level
of
private
investment.
Oregon
housing,
community
foundations,
the
oregon
community
foundation.
They
were
the
the
private
foundation
that
led
the
project
turnkey
and
that
really
set
them
up
for
other
private
donations,
foundations
and
others
to
come
into
that
sphere.
K
K
We
continue
to
look
to
the
private
sector,
to
fix
the
roof
of
the
shelter
or
to
help
us
do
some
lance
or
site
development,
or
bring
in
fencing
that
we
need.
But
I
think
the
big
thing
that
we're
really
talking
about
is
that,
up
until
now
in
the
city
of
bend,
it's
been
quite
onerous
to
open
a
shelter,
it's
expensive,
there's
significant
planning
requirements,
there's
significant
opposition
from
neighbors
with
the
shelter
code
changes
just
like
we
did
with
adus
or
child
care.
K
So
as
we've
made
it
easier
and
easier
or
less
regulatory
and
less
fewer
fewer
regulatory
barriers
to
building
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing,
we
are
a
place
per
capita
that
is
building
more
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing
than
any
other
city
in
oregon.
So
that's
broadly
what
we're
talking
about
it's
a
lot
of
different
things
and
a
lot
of
different
ways
the
private
sector
can
come
in,
but
those
are
the
types
of
things
we've
seen
and
I'm
sure
there
are
things
we
haven't
even
imagined
yet
and.
G
One
one
thing
that
we're
doing
too
just
to
enhance
that
I
have
somebody
in
my
office
kind
of
doing
some
research
about
setting
up
a
foundation
so
that
that
we
actually
have
local
foundations.
So
carolyn
mentioned
ocf
as
a
statewide.
Can
we
do
something
here
locally,
that's
easy
for
the
private
sector
to
provide
funding
or
other
assistance.
So
we
are
kind
of
trying
to
build
a
framework
for
that
as
well.
J
Okay,
then,
I
think
we're
out
of
our
time
for
questions
and
I
don't
see
any
more
hands
raised,
so
I
think
we're
moving
on.
A
Okay,
I
did,
can
you
guys
hear
me
through
the
mask
okay
good,
so
this
question
is
likely
for
councillor
perkins
and
maybe
even
mayor
russell,
if
she's
available,
I'm
with
orchard
district-
and
I
think
my
neighborhood
and
neighbors,
as
well
as
many
others,
the
biggest
piece
of
feedback
and
the
loudest
voices
that
we're
hearing
have
to
do
with
the
outdoor
shelters
that
are
going
to
potentially
be
in
neighborhoods,
and
so
we
are.
A
What
what
can
you?
What
can
we
offer
to
those
folks
in
response
to
that
concern,
and
I'm
specifically
thinking
about
the
one
on
9th
street
that
is
closer
to
the
school?
I
know
you
guys
have
heard
all
this
feedback.
Many
folks
are
feeling
like
council
doesn't
care.
What
can
we
offer?
What
can
we
say
back
to
those
folks
to
let
them
know
what's
really
happening.
H
Well,
I
think,
there's
there's
sort
of
two
parts
of
that
one
is
one:
is
the
code
changes
you
know
for
outdoor
shelters
and
what
I've?
What
I
would
say
to
that
is
that
if
you
have
specific
concerns,
you
know
please,
please,
you
know,
put
those
specific
concerns
before
the
planning
commission
and
put
them
before
council
so
that
we
can
hear
from
you.
This
is
this
is
not
a.
This
is
not
a
done
deal.
H
You
know,
there's
still
a
lot
of
process
to
go
through,
and
secondly,
you
know
I
just
I
continually
I'm
trying
to
point
out
again
that
that
what
you
see
in
our
city
right
now,
that
is
not
an
outdoor
shelter.
That
is
not
what
we're
talking
about
here.
That
is
not
what
the
two
locations
that
central
oregon
villages
you
know.
Should
the
contract
be
approved?
That's
not
what
they're
going
to
look
like.
They
are
going
to
have
management
they're
going
to
have
good
neighbor
agreements.
H
They're
going
to
be,
you
know,
secured
by
fencing
they're
going
to
have
places
to
put
trash
they're
going
to
have
you
know
so
they're
not
going
to
look
like
what
we
see.
I
just
really
encourage
people
to
kind
of
to
look
into
you
know
what
we're
talking
about.
Maybe
look
at.
You
know
what
the
rfp
look
like.
Look
at
what
the
code
change
is
like
to
really
see
that
that
that
is
what
we're
talking
about
for
for
the
future
of
our
community.
Not
you
know
2nd
street
and
not
huddle
road.
Maybe.
G
An
example:
a
real
life
example,
is
veterans,
village
that
that
is
actually
up
and
running
that
opened
in
december.
It's
right
off
of
paul
shall's
kind
of
near
the
911
public
safety
kind
of
campus
up
there
and
then
saint
vincent
de
paul,
another
10
kind
of
tiny
unit
village.
That
should
be
coming
online
here
in
march.
So
you
can
kind.
H
Yeah
and
and
it's
and
and
again
the
the
two
proposals
do
not
involve
tents
for
central
oregon
villages.
J
Okay,
michaela's
telling
me
we
need
to
move
on
on
our
agenda,
we're
behind
time.
If
we
catch,
if
we
catch
up
and
and
surpass
we
can,
we
can
have
maybe
a
bit
of
discussion
at
the
end
or
something
next
up
is
tax
exemptions
and
karen
berger
civic
is
going
to
do
that
and
then
I'll
be
following
her
up
with
something
about
an
art
actually
kathy.
A
C
Yeah
absolutely
so
we
have
several
attendees
listening
in.
If
you
have
come
here
today
to
provide
public
comment,
this
is
your
opportunity,
so
on
the
screen
will
be
some
directions
on
how
to
raise
your
hand
if
you
are
calling
in
from
phone
the
correct
way
to
raise
your
hand
on
there
is
star
nine
and
with
that
summer,
I'll,
let
you
read
our
preface
before
we
start.
A
Right,
so
this
is
a
message
that
we
that
we
read
before
public
comment,
just
so
everyone's
on
the
same
page
so
bear
with
me.
Any
person
may
address
the
nla
on
items
that
are
properly
the
subject
of
nla
consideration
in
order
to
run
an
efficient
meeting.
The
nla
will
not
respond
to
questions
or
engage
in
discussion
with
speakers
during
the
meeting.
The
nla
may
follow
up
with
speakers
after
the
meeting.
A
A
Please
know
this
is
an
opportunity
to
provide
public
input.
It's
not
a
time
to
insult
others
or
level
personal
attacks
or
threats.
Please
do
not
disrupt
the
meeting
or
in
any
way
discourage
anyone
else
from
participating.
People
are
free
to
disagree
with
each
other
on
issues,
but
we
must
do
so
respectfully.
C
Thanks
summer,
it
looks
like
first
up
on
the
list.
We
have
kathy
martin
kathy,
I'm
going
to
allow
you
to
talk
and
start
the
timer
for
two
minutes.
F
About
that,
oh
I'm
here
sorry
about
that.
I
was
accidentally
muted,
sorry
about
that.
Well,
first
of
all,
thank
you.
There's
been
so
much
helpful
information,
a
lot
of
information
presented,
I'm
not
sure
I
got
it
all
right,
but
I
have
two
questions
and
please
feel
free
to
answer
whatever
you
can
in
the
time
allotted
the
first.
One
is:
if
I
got
the
number
right,
I
think
you
have
three
million
and
project
frankie
turning
hotels
into
shelters.
F
My
question
is:
what's
the
specific
criteria
slash
metrics
are
in
place
to
ensure
that
those
do
not
just
stay
there.
So
specifically,
what
are
you
doing
to
get
them
educated
or
employed,
and
and
if
there's
a
plan
available,
where
can
we
get
that
plan?
So,
in
other
words,
there's
an
end
in
sight?
That's
the
goal
right
to
get
people
moving
on
and
two
how
much
funding
total
from
state,
federal
and
local
agencies
have
you
received
thus
far.
Those
are
my
two
questions.
C
Thank
you
kathy.
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
actually
shoot
me
an
email
with
those
questions
just
as
staff.
I
would
like
to
answer
those
for
you
and
we
don't
typically
respond
to
public
comment
in
the
meetings,
so
my
email,
if
you
can,
is
m,
as
in
michaela
oliver
at
bendorigan.gov.
C
And
it
looks
like
the
next
individual.
Your
screen
name
is
f
marcos,
426,
I'm
gonna.
Allow
you
to
talk
and
reset
the
timer.
M
Yes,
I
just
have
one
question:
now:
everybody
focuses
on
the
ninth
street
campground
that
you
wanted
to
implement.
Now
there
was
talk
about
putting
one
over
by
les
schwab
here
on
the
southwest
part
of
town
over
by
you
know,
albertsons
kind
of
by
china,
road
and
ponderosa.
I
that's
where
I
live,
where
the
they
just
put
250,
affordable
apartments.
M
You
know
what
I
mean
it's
kind
of
like
I'm
gonna
have
affordable
housing
and
a
campground
in
my
residential
area,
because
we
do
have
children
in
this
neighborhood.
We
have
everything
else
that
everybody
else
has
in
their
neighborhoods
and
we
take
care
of
our
properties.
We
pay
our
property
taxes
and
I
personally
I
don't
I
want
to
know.
Are
you
going
to
put
one
over
there
or
is
you
know,
because
I
haven't
heard
anything
about
that?
C
Okay,
thank
you
for
your
comment.
I
think
again,
that's
another
question
that
we
aren't
prepared
to
answer
today,
we're
just
an
advisory
committee.
That's
learning
about
these,
along
with
all
of
you
in
the
comments,
and
so
if
you
would
like
to
send
me
an
email
as
well
you're
welcome
to
do
that.
M
E
M
Okay,
yeah,
that's
just
my
concern.
I
mean
everybody
in
my
neighborhood.
You
know
we've
already.
We
fought
to
stop
the
apartment
complex
over
here
and
they
went
ahead
and
did
it
and
they
they
threw
it.
They
pushed
it
through
in
the
middle
of
the
night,
you
know
or
or
right
in
the
middle
of
cobit,
where
nobody
could
say
anything
so
and
we're
kind
of
upset
about
it,
because
we're
going
to
be
impacted
on
so
much
parking
from
these
apartments.
A
K
F
C
C
Yeah
it
looks
like
they're
trying
to
unmute
and
have
not
been
able
to.
N
I
believe
my
mic
is
working.
It
is
so
essentially
we've
got
all
the
major
towns
and
cities
of
central
oregon
dealing
with
the
houseless
issue.
City
council
is
announcing
that
it
is
an
emergency
situation.
City
staff
is
working
on
it,
so
as
most
of
the
portland
metro
area
and
a
few
other
cities
in
the
state
of
oregon,
we've
been
under
a
state
of
emergency.
N
Since
the
forest
fires
in
regard
to
housing,
we're
basically
been
under
a
state
of
emergency
during
covid
all
which
contributed
to
even
more
houselessness
how
much.
N
Why
is
the
state
not
initiating
emergency
recovery
procedures
to
help
fund
central
oregon,
where
they
could
literally
go
build
a
small
city
at
deschutes,
county
fairgrounds,
and
we
could
get
everybody
there
with
massive
infrastructure
health
care?
We
could
arrange
buses
to
and
from
there's
shopping
nearby,
and
that
would
be.
The
short-term
solution
sounds
like
you.
Guys
are
doing
good
on
the
mid
and
long,
but
it
sounds
like
we're
still.
Gonna
have
eight
or
nine
hundred
people
living
in
rvs
and
tents
around
the
area
for
a
few
years.
That's
it.
A
That's
okay.
I
think
I
think
I've
got
it
for
a
little
while
coughing
has
passed.
Let's
go
into
the
shelter
code.
Amendments
discussion
you
should
have
received.
You
did
receive
a
draft
of
the
letter
that
michaela
put
together
based
on
our
previous
discussions.
That
letter
is
presented
to
us
for
discussion.
We
can
make
any
changes
that
we
want
to
that
letter.
A
You
probably
also
saw
the
editorial
in
the
bend
bulletin
that
came
out,
so
we
can
factor
that
into
the
conversation
as
as
you
may
wish,
or
not,
and
I'm
going
to
pass
this
off
to
michaela.
At
this
point.
C
That
sounds
great,
so
just
because
I
want
to
have
a
good
discussion,
I'm
going
to
leave
the
screen
sharing
alone
for
now.
So
if
any
of
you
have
read
that
letter
and
have
comments
that
you
would
like
to
bring
to
the
table
at
its
changes,
this
is
the
time
to
do
that.
So
we
have
not
voted
on
anything.
This
letter
was
a
draft
of
the
comments
that
were
made
at
the
planning
commission
meeting
on
january
24th
and
the
discussion
that
we
had
at
our
january
meeting.
O
A
clarifying
question,
yes
for
us
to
approve
this
letter,
is
that
a
unanimous
decision,
or
is
that
a
majority
decision?
That's.
A
L
Karen
well
first,
I
want
to
say
I
thought
the
draft
of
the
letter
was
really
good.
I
thought
to
do
a
response
tactfully
and
respectfully
was
a
hard
task
and
that
you
took
it
on
and
did
it
very
well
michaela.
L
So
I
appreciate
that
I
guess
my
question
is,
and
maybe
I
missed
something
from
the
last
meeting,
but
what
kind
of
public
input
additional
public
input
are
we
looking
for?
It
seems
like
if
we're
saying
that
it
wasn't
representative
what
what
is
the
outcome,
that
we
would
hope
and
I'm
not
clear
on
that,
and
so,
if
someone
could
help
me
understand
that
better
I'd
appreciate
it.
C
I
think
that's
a
great
question
and
probably
the
reason
it's
not
clear
is
because
I
was
not
clear
so
if
we
can
talk
about
that
today
and
what
people
are
thinking
as
far
as
requesting
for
public
input.
That
would
be
great.
I
think
at
this
point.
We
know
that
we
were.
The
nla
was
not
necessarily
happy
with
the
way
that
the
survey
responses
were
handled.
C
E
O
We
last
time
we
met
did
we
kind
of
have
a
majority
consensus
that
that
we
weren't
happy
with
the
way
they
handled
the
survey
responses?
O
And
for
me
I
just
I
can't
remember,
but
to
me
I'm
still
in
a
in
a
place
that
that
says,
you
know
those
800
survey
responses
were
not
representative
of
the
city
as
a
whole,
and-
and
so
you
know
to
me
this-
this
makes
sense
that
it
wouldn't
be
given
as
much
weight,
but
I
do
join
and
I
know
that
the
larkspur
neighborhood
association
board
would
love
to
see
increased
public
involvement.
O
More
conversation,
more
opportunities
asked
those
kinds
of
questions,
but
I
don't
know
that
focusing
on
this
survey
is
very
helpful
in
this
letter.
Sure.
H
Yeah
I
mean
I,
I
would
going
back
to
sort
of
the
public
engagement
part
thanks
for
that
question
karen,
because
I
think
that's
something
that
as
a
council,
we
would
like
to
know
like
yeah.
What
are
you
actually
like
looking
for?
And
what
do
you
need
in
this
process,
because
you
know
public
engagement
could
could
mean
anything,
and
so
I
think
it
would
be
really
helpful
to
have
some
more
specifics
in
the
letter
to
go
to
council
so
that
we
can
that
we
so
that
we
can
better
assist.
A
So
the
paragraph
on
public
involvement
that
morgan's
referring
to
I
can
see
what
you're
saying
morgan
the
paragraph
sort
of
addresses
two
things.
It's
talking
about
the
survey
response
and
it's
it
does
mention
that
it's
not
considering
the
demographics.
It
wasn't.
You
know
covering
all
of
the
demographics
of
the
city
of
bend,
but
it's
also,
I
think,
the
way
it's
written
right
now.
It
sounds
like
it's
intended
just
to
say:
hey,
you
got
all
this
council.
A
You
got
all
this
input
that
you
asked
for,
but
we
don't
see
that
anything
is
happening
about
it
or
that
the
import
input
is
being
is
taken
in
and
considered.
Do
you
morgan?
Do
you
have
like
different
language
that
you
might
want
to
propose.
O
You're
saying
definitely
what
this
paragraph
suggests.
I
I
just
wonder
if
there's
a
difference
between
creating
meaningful
opportunities
for
public
engagement
and
for
people
to
have
their
voices
heard
and
their
questions
responded
to
to
me
to
me.
This
has
an
undercurrent
of
you
know
just
because
the
decisions
don't
line
up
with
what
people
want
to
have
happen.
O
They're
not
happy
with
the
public
involvement,
public
engagement,
and
I
think
it's
really
important
for
us,
as
as
a
a
group,
to
acknowledge
that
public
engagement
might
mean
sometimes
that
still
decisions
don't
go
everybody's
way.
Who
has
a
place
to
say
something,
but
that
doesn't
mean
there
hasn't
been
public
engagement.
Even
you
know,
if
we
don't
all
get
our
way
all
the
time.
So
that's
just
how
it
kind
of
reads
to
me
is
that
the
people
are
mad
in
in
those
survey.
O
Responses
because
they're
not
getting
their
way,
not
necessarily
because
they
haven't
been
heard.
A
Is
there
something
specific
we
can
ask
for
or
recommend
to
that
effect?
Maybe
just
a
response
of
here's.
What
we
have
from
council
or
planning,
commission
or
whoever
it
might
be
of
this
is
what
we
heard,
and
these
were
our
thoughts
about
that,
and
that
probably
sounds
completely
overwhelming,
because
there's
so
much
input
but
just
kind
of
trying
to
brainstorm
a
little
bit
as
councilor
perkins
head
is
exploding
right
in
front
of
us.
C
F
So
what
I
have
been
hearing
from
people
in
regards
to
the
public
outreach
and
engagement
is
that
people
generally
don't
feel
that
they're
getting
a
response,
and
it
does
seem
to
me
that
there
must
be
some
recurring
themes
in
this
particular
issue.
For
example,
locating
one
of
these
shelter
sites
next
to
the
school
or
near
a
school,
and
if,
if
there
are
some
recurring
themes
that
could
be
addressed
and
and
discussed,
you
know
that
that
may
go
some
some
way.
F
F
Those
are
are
times
for
people
to
comment,
but
they
what's
really
going
on.
Is
they
have
questions
and
then
they
never
get
an
answer
now.
Obviously,
michaela
has
offered
to
email
responses
to
people,
but
then
that's
an
extra
step
that
people
have
to
take
to
construct
an
email
and
and
send
it
out
and
wait
for
the
response
and
it's
it
doesn't
feel
very
responsive.
H
Yeah
elizabeth,
that's
that's
really
helpful
because
I
mean
I
you
probably
heard
it
in
my
presentation,
but
you
know
I
I
I
highlight
a
lot
of
things
that
I
hear
all
the
time
right
from
emails
from
communications
from
phone
calls
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
I
think
that
is
that
is
I
like
that?
H
It's
a
more
sort
of
specific
thing
like
here
are
the
top
five
things
we're
hearing
about
the
code
changes
you
know,
or
you
know
something
something
to
that
effect,
because
you
know
again
what
I've
been
encouraging
people
to
to
do
is
like.
We
need
to
talk
specifics
here,
because
you
know
the
the
code
changes
themselves
are
going
to
happen,
but
how
specifically
they
look
is
you
know
is
goes
through
this
process
with
the
planning
commission
and
with
the
council
and
with
public
input.
H
So
let
me
do
some
thinking,
maybe
with
michaela,
about
how
we
can
provide
that
information
to
the
nla
into
the
nas,
about
the
things
that
we're
hearing.
You
know
the
top
five
things
we're
hearing
about
code,
changes
and,
and
then
also
you
know
again
that
this
is
not
a.
H
This
is
not
a
complete
process
yet,
and
so
there
are
amendments
that
I've
already
sort
of
decided
that
I
would
like
to
make
to
the
code
changes
after
they
come
out
of
planning
commission
and
I'm
sure
there
are
other
counselors
that
will
have
them
as
well.
So
definitely
please
keep
the
feedback
coming.
E
Yes,
do
we,
we
read
the
the
new
homeless.
H
See
yeah
ccnr's
and
you
know
hoas,
you
know
yeah,
it's
the
same.
It's
with
it's
like
with
hb
2001..
It's
very
similar.
E
B
B
C
Are
on
a
timeline
right,
michaela
yeah?
I
can
clarify
so
I
believe
the
code
and
pauline
you
are
on
here.
So
if
I
get
this
wrong,
let
me
know,
but
I
believe
the
code
does
not
require
a
24
hour
on
site
management.
It
just
requires
management,
and
so
is
the
recommendation
from
siebna
to
add
a
request
for
24-hour
on-site
management.
A
A
C
L
B
You
know
because,
like
168
hours
a
week
right
and
personally,
I'm
not
quite
sure
you
know
that's
the
position
our
board
came
up
with,
but
I
understand
there's
some
difficulties
doing
that
and
maybe
could
soften
it
slightly
that
you
know
the
investigative
ways
of
assuring
that
somebody
is
either
on
site
or
close
by
24
7.
It
could
be
you
know
across
the
street,
perhaps
instead
of
actually
up
you
know,
sitting
in
one
of
the
units
on
the
development
there.
B
A
C
Do
not
right
and
it's
seven
is
quorum.
B
A
So
I
do
see
a
majority
are
interested
in
doing
something
like
this.
Do
we
want
to
do
someone
want
to
make
a
motion
for
specific
requests
for
the
letter
for
language
to
add.
C
O
My
vote
would
be
for
that
option
that
michaela
just
shared
of
sharing
a
letter
when
it
goes
to
council,
rather
than
scrambling,
to
get
something
prepared
that
we
all
feel
good
about
ahead
of
the
planning
commission
meeting.
B
We
could
make
this
letter
just
a
preliminary
one,
but
we're
still
and
then
do
a
final
one
going
to
council
unless
we
get
some
of
the
ideas
before
the
planning
commission
now-
and
you
know
more
later
on-
instead
of
you
know,
trying
to
get
it
all
done
tonight,
we're
really
under
a
time
crunch
to
do
that.
A
J
What's
the
right
word,
surveillance
contact
at
that
facility,
depending
upon
factors
of
the
and
location
of
the
shelter,
so
that
if
it
were
near
a
school,
if
we're
near
things
that
people
felt
quite
concerned
about
that,
that
could
be
an
additional
negotiation
and
maybe,
if
a
location
came
up,
I'm
sort
of
thinking,
maybe
like
juniper
ridge,
although
many
people
think
that's
close
to
a
school.
J
But
if
you
were
someplace
that
it
wasn't
close
to
schools
was
was
where
the
shelter
was
sitting
in
more
with
the
neighborhood
composition
and
location
that
wouldn't
be
needed,
which
is
sort
of
what
I
don't
know.
If
veterans
village
has
24-hour
contact,
but
where
veterans
villages
it's
a
little
more
isolated
from
it's
not
near
a
school
say.
So
that's
just
a
suggestion.
A
O
I'm
being
a
little
tongue-in-cheek
saying
this,
but
I
I
would
also
like
a
phone
number
for
someone,
who's
24
7,
available
to
hear
my
complaints
about
neighbors
and
goings-on
in
my
neighborhood,
but
if
that's
not
available,
I'm
just
not
sure
that
we
are
ready
to
send
this
letter.
O
You
know,
even
as
I
read
the
section
on
the
distance
from
schools
and
parks,
you
know
the
the
bit
in
the
italicized
at
the
beginning
doesn't
really
actually
even
reflect
the
body
of
the
paragraphs
where
I
think
the
the
main
body
of
concern
is
for
a
low
barrier.
Shelter
near
young
children
are
some
of
the
complaints
we've
heard.
You
know.
I
think
there
are
other
ways
of
of
going
about
that.
O
You
know
and
we
don't
have
a
particular
yet
right
like
that's,
why
there's
been
so
much
so
many
challenges
around
conversation
with
9th
street
location
is
because
it
was
just
thrown
out
as
a
location
not
as
a
project,
not
as
any
anything
with
any
kind
of
details
attached
to
it
right.
So
everybody
seems
to
have
immediately
jumped
to
conclusions
that
it
will
look.
You
know
something
like
hunnell
road
when,
in
fact
we
don't,
we
don't
know
what
might
be
placed
there.
O
You
know
and
I'm
I
imagine
our
group
would
be
really
interested
or
that
at
least
the
larkspur
board
would
be
really
intrigued
about
hey
single
moms,
with
kiddos
at
bear
creek
who
are
living
in
their
vehicles
or
staying
on
a
friend's
couch.
Would
we
really
want
a
distance
limitation,
keeping
those
people
from
being
in
proximity
to
services
that
are
vital
to
their
kids
and
their
family?
O
You
know
would
that
be
an
alarming
dangerous
scenario
for
people,
I'm
I'm
not
sure
it
would
be,
and
so
I
think
we
just
need
to
be
cognizant
that
these
broad
strokes
of
saying
we
need
these
regulations
no
matter.
What
might
not
actually
serve
our
community
as
a
whole
over
time
and
that's
what
these
planning
commission
code
changes
are
all
about
is
serving
our
community.
A
I'm
hearing
I'm
hearing
that
we
may
want
to
table
this
letter
and
not
submit
a
letter
for
public
or
for
the
planning
commission,
but
continue
to
work
on
this
draft
in
order
to
submit
it
to
council
after
it
goes
through
planning.
Commission.
A
A
F
Well,
I
the
reason
I
voted
to
not
to
table.
It
is
because
I
am
not
sure
of
the
sort
of
the
ramifications
of
not
bringing
it
before
the
planning
commission.
So
in
the
timing
of
these
decisions,
what
is
the
difference
between
bringing
it
to
the
planning
commission
versus
waiting
and
bringing
it
to
council.
P
I
can
jump
in
and
speak
to
that,
and
this
is
there's
no
real
bright
line
answer,
but,
as
you
think
about
this,
it
might
be
helpful
just
to
step
back
and
think
about
the
process.
So
what
the
planning
commission
is
doing
here
in
what
the
city
calls
a
type
4
legislative
process
is
making
a
recommendation
to
city
council
city
council
is
the
legislative
body,
so
the
city
council
is
going
to
be
making
decisions,
is
the
shelter
code
adopted?
P
L
P
So
I
I
personally
don't
think-
and
I
I
think
this
about
any
advisory
body
that
is
making
a
recommendation-
I
I
tend
to
think
it
carries
more
weight
if
it
goes
to
the
city,
council,
otherwise
you're
in
a
position
where
or
the
body's,
in
a
position
where,
maybe
maybe
a
letter
is
submitted
to
the
planning
commission
and
then
maybe
based
on
things
that
happen
at
the
planning
commission
or
the
liberation
that
occurs
or
testimony
that
occurs,
the
body
thinks
well.
We
we
might
like
to
weigh
in
on
that
with
the
city
council
too.
P
Should
we
put
another
letter
together?
So
you
know
the
city
council
is
the
ultimate
decision
maker.
I
think
that's
where
the
input
probably
ultimately
really
needs
to
go,
whether
you
table
it
or
try
to
get
a
letter
to
the
planning
commission
totally
up
to
you,
but
that's
my
two
cents.
F
F
Not
not
specifically
to
that.
I
I
do
think
that
this
letter
addresses
the
complaints
that
I
have
been
hearing
from
neighbors
one.
Is
that
there's
not
enough
feedback
and
an
ability
for
residents
to
get
something
back
from
the
city,
two,
that
people
are
freaked
out
about
having
a
shelter
near
schools
and
and
three
that
good
neighbor
part
sort
of
addresses
what
jim
was
getting
at
with
having
an
agreement
of
how
the
place
is
going
to
operate?
F
And
that
has
been
another
comment
that
I've
heard
so
to
me
that
it
may
not
be
perfectly
crafted.
But
the
letter
addresses
three
main
things
that
I
have
heard
from
people
in
their
concerns
about
the
shelter
code.
So
yeah,
that's
just
my
observation
about
about
the
letter
from
what
I've
been
hearing
from
neighbors.
F
A
B
No,
I
thank
you
elizabeth
for
stating
that,
because
I
kind
of
believe
the
same
thing,
this
covers
the
majority
of
things.
The
things
that
sedna's
worried
about,
I
think,
is
you
know
having
a
good
neighbor
agreement,
a
lot.
You
know
good
provisions
and
I
think
that
something
that
you
know
could
be
added
for
our
testimony
before
the
council
and
so
I'm
kind
of
in
favor
of
moving
ahead.
And
although
this
letter
doesn't
address
everything,
I
think
it's
good
enough
to
get
started
here
and
that's
why
I
voted
not
to
table
it.
B
So
that's
that's
kind
of
my
view.
So
thanks.
A
A
I
Yeah,
I
don't
recall
what
I
this
summer.
You
just
said
that
we've
already
previously
weighed
in
with
the
planning
commission,
I
wasn't
familiar
with
what
that's
about
and
maybe
well
I'm
not
sure
what
that's
about,
but
my
feeling
is
that
the
primary
purpose
seems
to
me
of
nla
is
to
be
most
impactful
and
to
be
most
impactful.
We
need
to
be
focused
and
to
be
focused.
I
I
feel
like
the
commission
meeting
on
the
14th
is
where
the
public
will
be
more
involved
and
where
there
will
be
more
voices
about
the
concerns
on
these
issues,
on
the
code,
changes
and,
and
that's
where
we'll
have
a
chance
to
learn,
and
so
we'll
have
a
chance
to
sort
of
massage
the
letter
at
that
point,
based
on
the
input
that
the
the
public
has,
which
is
really,
I
think,
what
we're
trying
to
capture
ultimately.
So
I
I
I
feel,
like
I
agree
with
what
morgan
and
ian
were
saying,
that
we
should
wait.
A
So
at
this
point
we've
had
lots
of
discussion.
It
feels
like
to
me
we're
at
a
point
where
we're
either
going
to
submit
the
letter.
Basically,
as
is
or
we're
going
to
table
it,
and
so
I
think
we
have
one
more
vote
to
one
more
vote
to
do
and
I'd
like
a
motion
for
that.
C
Yeah,
I
would
just
real
quick
before
everyone
speaks.
I
just
want
to
remind
you
too,
as
jim
mentioned
earlier.
We
you,
as
neighborhood
association
boards,
can
still
submit
letters.
So
if
we
choose
not
to
submit
this
today,
your
neighborhood
association
can
choose
to
submit
a
letter
and
vice
versa.
So
if
you
don't
get
everything
included
in
today
and
we
do
move
it
forward,
then
you
can
back
it
up
with
whatever
your
neighborhood
wants
to
add.
B
E
M
O
C
A
So
I'll
be
honest,
I
am
not
crazy
about
taking
action
when
we're
so
close
to
tide,
but
I
guess
that's
how
a
democracy
works.
C
E
A
Yeah,
so
michaela
michaela
and
myself
and
kathy
will
work
to
review
this
letter.
Make
sure
any
of
these
comments
that
can
get
put
in
you
know
that
apply
to
what
we've
been
talking
about
can
can
be
modified
in
this
letter
kathy,
and
I
will
sign
it
and
send
it
and
make
sure
you
guys
get
a
copy.
J
A
O
O
Karen,
the
property
tax
exemption
committee
met
for
the
first
of
three
meetings.
Yesterday,
the
committee's
compromise
of
representatives
from
the
core
area
advisory
committee
bend
economic
development
committee
in
the
nla
staff
had
initially
presented
information
on
four
exemptions:
vertical
housing,
multi-unit,
non-profit
and
middle
housing
group
and
staff,
pretty
much
agreed
to
go
forward
with
middle
housing,
multi-unit
and
the
non-profit
tax
exemptions.
O
O
One
of
the
questions
on
the
table
is
if
the
applicants
should
have
to
demonstrate
financial
need
or
not,
it
can
be
applied
to
any
zone
in
the
city.
There
was
some
discussion
as
to
to
if
the
exemption
is
even
needed
with
the
building
boom
in
bend
and
if
it
could
be
targeted
to
a
specific
geographic
area
like
the
core
area
or
maybe
not.
O
The
biggest
thing
about
this
type
of
benefit
is
that
there
has
to
be
a
public
benefit
to
the
project
and
the
city
can
be
flexible
or
fairly
rigid
in
what
those
benefits
are
and
how
many
the
project
has
to
meet
from
the
neighborhood
perspective.
It
would
seem
that
the
more
a
project
can
help
address.
Unmet
community
needs
the
better
as
long
as
it
doesn't
become
such
a
cost
burden
that
the
project
becomes
too
expensive.
Karen
is
happy
to
provide
more
information
on
this
to
anyone
that
wants
to
know
more.
O
I
know
it's
pretty
complex
stuff
and
that's
a
lot
of
different
words.
The
nonprofit
exemption
requires
an
annual
application.
The
length
of
the
exemption
is
up
to
the
city.
It
is
limited
to
60
of
adjusted
gross
income
and
can
be
located
throughout
the
city.
So
these
tax
exemptions
are
really
complex.
I'm
happy
to
chat
with
with
folks
as
well
and
michaela.
Maybe
we
can
even
send
out
some
of
those
links
to
those
definitions
and
things
that
are
made
available
for
the
different
tax
exemptions
to
the
to
the
whole
group
yeah.
O
But
I
think
it
was.
It
was
a
you
know
very
preliminary
meeting,
just
looking
at
what's
most
feasible
moving
forward
and
I
think
sounded
to
me
like
really
looking
at
where
there's
flexibility
as
a
priority,
and
you
know
prioritizing
community
benefits
so.
A
J
It
has
a
mission
and
some
goal
statements
at
bendna
forums.org.
So
you
can
go
check
that
out.
It
was
founded
to
share
information
and
allow
open
discussion.
It
generally
has
a
representative
on
it
from
each
neighborhood
association,
but
that's
not
required,
and
anyone
and
in
the
city
can
attend.
They
meet
monthly.
They
have
been
meeting
via
zoom.
Many
of
the
zoom
meetings
are
recorded.
So
then
they're,
some
of
those
are
on
that
benaforums.org.
J
I
have
been
attending
from
bonna
boyd
acres,
neighborhood
association
and
at
the
last
meeting
I'll
just
give
you
a
recap
of
two
topics
that
they
talked
about.
Maybe
three
was
the
direction
from
the
department
of
land,
conservation
and
development.
That's
at
the
state
level
and
their
direction
for
establishing
climate-friendly
neighborhoods
within
cities
and
band
qualifies
to
meet
those
to
be
required
to
do
that,
so
we
were
having
some
discussions
about
where
they
could
go.
J
The
other
another
topic
was
short-term,
rentals
and
impacts
to
affordable
housing
and
impacts
to
overall
housing
supply,
and
we
didn't
get
to
talk
about
that
with
eric
king
and
and
carolyn,
and
so,
but
those
would
be
questions
about
something
that
influences
how
many
of
these
shelter
beds
you
need
if
you
can
influence
this
supply
of
housing
in
other
ways,
and
there
were
some
real
big
concerns
about
an
firm
called
picasa
that
is
entering
the
bend
market
and
it
buys
things
as
a
corporation
and
then
you
buy
into
time
shares
as
members
of
the
corporation
so
that
you
could
have
like
eight
people
who
own
the
house
sort
of
you
can
look
them
up
online.
J
If
you
want
to
know
more
or
you
can
ask
some
of
the
people
who
are
familiar
with
it
or
some
of
the
people
who
attended
the
nart
meeting,
and
then
there
was
some
discussion
of
other
developments
neighborhood
by
neighborhood
and
what's
the
what's
the
big
issue
for
each
neighborhood.
So
that's
how
kind
of
how
nart
rolls
and
the
discussions
that
they
have
are
more
open
and
less
structured
than
the
nla.
It
did
start
about.
J
The
same
time
as
the
nla,
but
it's
not
city
chartered
and
so
they're
a
little
more
freewheeling.
Are
there
any
questions
on
that?
C
Yeah,
I
can
just
say
I'll,
send
an
email
about
this
later,
but
as
part
of
the
assessment,
you
will
remember
that
we're
doing
a
community
survey
where
we
hire
a
professional
surveying
firm
and
that
survey
firm
has
been
selected
and
we
are
working
with
in
bold
research,
and
so
I
have
meetings
coming
up
with
them.
C
A
Good
thanks
for
representative
reports,
I'm
sorry
sean!
You
have
something.
Q
Well,
michaela
was
talking,
I'm
just
gonna.
I
know
it's
a
little
off
topic,
but
the
inclusion
and
diversity
training
that
we've
been
doing.
Is
there
a
quick
update
that
we
can
get
on
that.
C
Yeah,
so
at
this
time
the
facilitator
has
decided
to
not
move
forward
with
the
trainings,
and
so
I
would
ask
that
if
you
would
like
to
have
some
more
specific
dei
training
for
your
board
reach
out
to
me,
I'm
working
on
gathering
some
of
those
resources
so
that
we
can
give
it
to
those
of
you
who
are
interested
in
continuing
to
dive
into
the
eye
work.
A
Okay,
thanks
thanks
for
that
question,
sean
so
for
for
rep
reports,
michaela
and
I
were
visiting
and
thinking
about
prior
years-
and
I
think
the
rep
reports
section
was
initially
intended,
not
necessarily
for
a
general
update
on
what
each
of
us
have
been
working
on
or
our
organizations
have
been
working
on,
but
more
as
an
opportunity
to
bring
up
issues
potentially
for
discussion.
A
So
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
for
the
group
to
go
back
to
that,
and
we
can
have
more
discussion
about
that
on
a
future
meeting.
But
that's
what
I'm
thinking
I'd
like
to
do
is
move
back
to
using
that
time
to
bring
up
specific
issues.
I've
got
one
thumbs
up
so
in
cool.
So
in
that
vein,
does
anyone
have
since
I
would
usually
go
around,
but
since
we're
short
on
time,
does
anyone
have
an
issue?
That's
being
discussed
at
your
neighborhood
association
that
you
want
to
bring
to
this
group
sean.
Q
So
I
see
ian's
still
on
here,
there's
a
lot
of
confusion
on
this.
I
know
we're
hammering
this
homelessness
homelessness
issue,
but
there
seems
to
be
some
confusion
regarding
whether
or
not
these
code
changes
can
supersede
hoa
bylaws-
and
I
know
dave
johnson
asked
the
question
earlier
and
he
got
an
answer,
but
I've
heard
a
different
answer
as
well.
So
I
guess
in
simple
terms,
can
you
clarify
if
these
code
changes
will
or
could
override
hoa
bylaws
yeah.
P
I
can
try
and
the
earlier
question
had
to
do
with
ccnr's,
which
are
covenants
codes
and
restrictions
which
are
recordable
boy.
I'm
really
trying
to
give
a
simple
answer:
I'll
work
really
hard,
so
city.
P
Simple
answer
and
then
you
can
follow
up
with
phone.
I
mean
the
short
answer
is
no
they're
they're,
not
related
by
neighborhood,
bylaws
and
ccnr's
are
private
agreements.
They
are
enforceable
by
private
parties,
whether
those
are
hoas
or
other
property
owners.
The
city
doesn't
have
any
window
any
interests,
any
role,
any
any
connection
whatsoever
to
those
agreements.
So
if,
if
the
city
zoning
code
says
this
use
is
okay
here,
that
is
the
the
sum
total
of
the
city's
interaction
with
that
question.
If
there
are
bylaws
or
ccnr's
that
say
this
use
is
not
okay.
P
Here,
it
is
up
to
the
parties
that
have
an
interest
in
those
bylaws
and
the
ability
to
enforce
them
to
go
ahead
and
try
to
do
that.
So
that's
a
that's
private
enforcement
and
that's
entirely
up
to
private
parties,
hoa
members
or
other
landowners.
So
the
short
answer
is
no
there's
really
no
relationship
between
the
two
city,
zoning
code
and
hoa
bylaws
or
ccnrs.
Q
So
to
clarify,
I'm
not
sure
if
I
got
that
the
fifth
type,
which
is
a
hazard,
shelter,
emergency
shelter,
which
would
be
an
rv
in
somebody's
driveway
if
an
hoa
has
rules
against
that
or
bylaws
or
ccnr's
against
doing
so
with
a
an
answer
that
I
can
understand,
can
the
city
override
that.
P
City,
doesn't
city
doesn't
have
any
role
in
that
if,
if
that
happened,
so
if
the,
if
the
code
city
code
said
this
is
okay
and
the
bylaws
said
it's
not
okay,
I'm
really
trying
to
keep
this
short
summer.
P
P
Then
the
people
who
want
to
enforce
the
bylaws
they
can
go
ahead
and
try
to
do
it.
The
city
doesn't
have
any
any
role
in
that.
So,
but
that's
the
same
as
it's
always
been.
This
is
not
anything
new.
The
city's
development
code,
otherwise
known
as
the
zoning
code,
doesn't
have
any
interaction
in
any
regard
in
for
any
uses
related
to
any
ccnr's
or
any
bylaws
that
exist.
So
this
is
not
a
new
thing.
This
is
just
the
the
long-standing
state
of
affairs.
You've
got
the
zoning
code
that
says:
what's:
okay
and
what's
not?
P
Okay,
you've
got
bylaws
and
ccnr's
to
say:
what's:
okay
and
what's
not?
Okay,
they're
completely
different
universes
of
applicability
and
enforcement,
and
they
really
don't
they
really
don't
have
any
overlap.
If
somebody
says
our
our
hoa
bylaws
don't
allow
this
use,
I
think
what
I'm
saying
is:
don't
come
to
the
city
because
we're
going
to
say
we
don't
care
about
your
hoa
bylaws.
If
somebody
says
the
hoa
bylaws
don't
allow
this
use.
P
They've
got
to
talk
to
the
hoa
they've,
got
to
talk
to
the
property
owners
who
are
part
of
the
hoa
and
they
have
to
carry
out
enforcement
against
this
property
owner
that
is
allegedly
violating
h.o.a
bylaws
on
their
own.
The
city
does
not
have
a
role
in
that
and
that's
that's
the
same
for
every
city.
This
is
not
just
a
bent
thing,
that's
just
how
they
work
it's.
It's
generally
applicable
zoning
code.
This
applies
to
everyone.
This
is
legislation.
This
is
government
and
private
agreements
which
are
bylaws
and
ccnr's.
P
B
Okay,
thanks
yeah
we're.
We've
got
an
interesting
issue
on
boundaries
here.
I
know
it's
something
we
talked
about
over
a
year
ago
and
it
didn't
make
the
council
goalless
so
nothing's
happened,
but
we've
had
a
person
from
an
area
in
the
elbow
which
is
not
in
any
and
a
want
to
join
us
and
actually
be
a
board
member.
B
You
know
we're
trying
to
figure
out.
You
know
a
path
forward
here
and
would
appreciate
any
any
input.
Obviously,
we've
got
to
talk
to
old
farm
district
because
that's
our
neighbor
and
we
want
to
maintain
good
neighbor
relations
with
them,
but
we
don't
want
to
take
anything
they
have.
So
this
is
what
we're
wrestling
with.
We
don't
have
an
answer
yet,
but
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
what
was
going
on
thanks.
A
C
C
After
that,
then
we
can
talk
about
the
strategic
plan
and
I
know
we've
talked
a
little
bit
summer
and
I
have
talked
about
maybe
doing
a
meeting
where
we
can
go
back
over
that
strategic
plan
and
see
how
it's
changed
since
we
paused
in
september
and
and
so
on-
that
strategic
plan,
though
you
might
remember
that
we
have
boundaries
as
a
discussion
item
on
there
and
so
there's
an
opportunity
for
us
as
a
committee
later
on,
to
ask
council
if
we
can
continue
to
look
into
that
issue
or
if
we
can
start
to
look
into
that
issue.
A
And
that's
from
the
nla's
standpoint
right,
so
I
think
the
the
nas
as
organizations
can
always
make
that
request
right
and
have
that
conversation
with
the
liaisons.
C
B
A
So
if
you,
if
southeast
bend
and
old
farm
for
example,
are
wanting
council
to
spend
more
time
or
prioritize
any
boundaries,
you
can
certainly
communicate
that
to
them.
But
at
this
point
it's
not
an
active
goal
for
nla.
It's
hanging
out
there
in
the
wings.
F
I
would
just
say
that
one
of
our
top
concerns
is
the
number
of
str
permits
that
that
keep
rolling
in
and
it
it
really
does
not
match
up
with
with
the
city's
effort
to
provide
affordable
housing
when
short-term
rentals
are
there
for
vacationers,
and
we
are
seeing
a
lot
of
them
in
our
in
southwest
bend
and
tied
into
that
kathy
mentioned
the
picasa
timeshare
thing
that
that
just
is
another
example
essentially
of
another
sort
of
type
of
short-term
rental
and
there's
just
real
concern
about
how
these
two
activities
do
not
align.
F
Another
issue
of
concern
that
that
has
been
mentioned
already
is
the
the
rv
rv
residing
in
people's
driveways.
That's,
that
is
something
we're
hearing
a
lot
about,
just
not
knowing
what
that
would
look
like
and
how
that
would
affect
a
neighborhood
and
how
it
would
be
enforced
that
it
was
truly
not
somebody
renting
out
an
rv
space
in
their
driveway.
That's
that's
really.
You
know
part
part
of
that
picture
and,
lastly,
concern
the
concern
of
the
shelter
space.
F
The
the
managed
camp
near
the
school
is
not
just
for
the
fact
of
small
children
being
near
that,
but
potentially
the
access
to
more
drugs
to
high
school
students,
so
high
school
students
actually
seeking
out
a
place
to
acquire
drugs
and
potentially,
that
sort
of
place
being
an
access
point
for
that.
So
it's
another
added
nuance
to
that
issue.
C
Thanks
elizabeth,
if
I
could
just
point
out
too
at
the
bottom
of
your
agenda
for
today,
I
noted
that
there
is
an
upcoming
council
work
session,
where
they're
going
to
be
discussing
short-term
rentals
and
the
data
that
was
collected
from
a
short-term
rental
owner
survey
and
that
went
out
earlier
this
year.