►
From YouTube: Bend Neighborhood Leadership Alliance (NLA)
Description
If the video does not start automatically, please refresh your browser and press the play button located in the middle of the video screen or in the bottom left corner of the video screen.
Please use this link https://bit.ly/3eOYhu8 to join the meeting live via Zoom.
To listen by phone, please dial 1-888-788-0099 and enter access code 839 4631 7019## to join the meeting.
A
A
A
A
A
E
E
F
Have
some
attendees
so
at
this
time,
if
you're
interested
in
making
a
comment,
I
would
ask
you
to
raise
your
hand
if
you're
on
your
desktop,
you
can
use
the
raise
hand
function
at
the
bottom
of
your
screen.
If
you
are
calling
in
via
phone,
the
number
is
star9
to
raise
and
lower
your
hand.
So
if
you
could
do
that
now,
we'll
get
you
in
the
queue
for
public
comment.
A
G
H
So
we
established
that
district
in
2020
and
just
collected
our
first
year
of
increment
and
are
expecting
to
see.
Hopefully
a
lot
of
you
know,
redevelopment
in
that
area,
but
a
lot
of
as
funds
get
generated.
Some
public
investment
into
that
area
and
the
project
that
we're
presenting
on
today
would
have
kind
of
some
impacts
to
some
of
the
revenue
that
that
we're
anticipating
collecting
in
that
area.
G
Okay,
do
you
want,
do
you
want
me
to
kick
this
off
ali,
or
do
you
want
to
do
it?
Yeah
that'd
be
great
okay,
so
here
is
the
website
that
we
have
created
and
michaela.
If
it's
okay,
I'm
assuming
that
this
powerpoint
will
be
available
for
folks,
so
that
they
can
just
click
that
link
rather
than
memorizing
him.
F
G
So
the
sort
of
guidance
for
this
is
coming
through
council
goals
through
the
housing
goal.
The
four
this
is
just
a
very
brief
look,
don't
feel
like
you
need
to
memorize
this
yet,
but
these
are
the
four
we'll
be
talking
you
through.
So
this
is
just
the
preliminary
you're
getting
the
names
here.
That's
all
you
need
to
know
from
this
slide.
G
Really
quickly
vertical
housing
development
zone,
if
some
of
you
have
come
from
other
communities
in
oregon
that
has
been
known
until
recently
as
the
vertical
housing
tax
credit,
so
vhtz
or
vhdz
are
both
vhtc
are
both
the
same
thing
just
slightly
different
versions
of
the
state
law.
Mopdy,
as
we
call
it
is
the
multiple
unit
property
tax
exemption.
G
Both
of
these
two
tools,
muppy
and
vertical-
are
intended
for
use
in
our
more
dense
sort
of
central
areas
of
bend
and
we'll
get
into
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
They're
really
intended
to
promote
the
type
of
market
rate
development
that
we're
looking
for
the
non-profit
corporation,
low-income
housing
exemption,
and
we've
got
to
find
a
better
acronym.
For
that.
I
think
so
we
can
say
it
without
saying
all
the
words
is
intended
for
affordable
housing.
G
So
far,
the
reason
for
the
appeal
of
this
is
number
one:
city
council
has
really
been
trying
to
address
the
level
of
housing,
that's
needed
above
true,
affordable
housing,
because
we
know
that
a
lot
of
our
middle
income
populations
are
struggling
with
housing
these
days
as
well.
There
are
not
a
lot
of
tools
to
incentivize
that
middle
income
range.
This
is
one
of
those
that
exists
out
there
in
the
state
that
we
actually
have
control
over.
G
So
that's
sort
of
the
appeal
of
this
one
and
we'll
talk
you
through
each
of
these
in
detail
over
the
next
few
moments.
Okay,
so
again,
these
are
not
intended
for
the
most
part.
Several
of
them
are
not
intended
as
permanent
solutions
and
they're
not
going
to
be
our
similar
bullets.
I
think
we're
very
clear
with
that.
These
are
additional
tools
in
our
potential
toolbox
to
help
incentivize
a
little
bit
more
of
the
types
of
developments
that
we
need,
the
most
in
band.
G
In
addition,
council,
if
they
choose
to
pass
any
of
these
exemptions,
can
request
certain
components
of
that
development
that
they
may
not
be
able
to
get
otherwise
such
as
energy
efficiency
in
a
market
rate
development
they
can
require
affordable
housing,
there's
all
sorts
of
great
benefits
that
give
council
a
little
more
control
over
the
type
of
housing,
that's
being
built
or
type
of
development.
So
we'll
walk
you
through
these
as
well.
G
As
some
of
you
know,
we
have
at
least
one
what's
called
local
option
property
tax
exemption
in
place
right
now
for
affordable
housing.
That's
been
used,
I
think
about
10
times
or
probably
less
in
the
last
20
years,
which
is
about
how
long
we've
had
it
in
place
for
affordable
housing,
but
has
created
a
quite
a
number
of
units
and
has
really
benefited
the
community.
G
G
G
Oftentimes
really
does
have
to
be
considered
in
the
context
of
additional
staffing
capacity,
and
so
that's
something
to
just
know,
and
I
think
that
what
that
number
is
or
what
that
amount
is,
is
going
to
be
based
on
the
number
of
exemptions
that
you
help
council
choose
and
how
frequently
those
are
used.
So
we
don't
have
a
solid
prediction
of
that
yet,
but
hope
to
get
a
little
closer
to
that
through
this
process
for
the
market
rate,
property
tax
exemptions.
Again
it's
about
controlling
the
type
and
location
of
development.
G
However,
these
are
market
rate
proposals
and
so
there's
caution
to
be
taken
in
subsidizing
market
rate
development,
not
only
to
ensure
that
we
are
making
wise
decisions
with
public
funding,
but
also
to
ensure
that
the
public
understands
why
that's
important
and
why
we're
subsidizing
private
development
rather
than
just
letting
it
happen
on
its
own.
So
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
through
that
again
as
well
and
then
taxi
revenue.
H
Okay,
I
I
get
to
present
all
the
fancy
charts,
so
this
this
graph,
that's
on
the
slide
right
now,
just
kind
of
gives
an
example
of
what
a
property
tax
exemption
would
look
like,
and
I
want
you
to
kind
of
think
about
each
of
these
lines
as
a
different
type
of
of
land
land
use,
so
the
orange
line
raw
land.
I
think
that's
pretty
easy
for
us
all
to
envision.
H
It's
a
vacant
parcel
right,
so
maybe
like
a
field
like
troy
field,
for
example,
might
be
like
a
good
example
of
some
raw
or
vacant
land,
the
retail
only
line
so
the
yellow
line
in
the
center
of
the
graph.
I
think
that
a
good
example
to
think
about,
for
that
is
the
third
street
starbucks
that
was
recently
developed.
H
So
that's
a
a
five-story
building
with
four
stories
of
residential
above
one
story
of
commercial
ground
floor
uses.
So
three
different.
You
know
three
very
different
types
of
of
developments,
and
in
this
it
shows
the
tax
rate
that
all
three
of
these
types
of
developments
would
collect
over
a
30-year
period.
And
so
in
this
scenario,
you
can
see
that
right
that,
like
third
street
starbucks,
while
it
brings
in
more
revenue
than
a
vacant
piece
of
property
to
taxing
districts,
it's
not
significantly
more
versus
a
very
intense
development
use.
H
And
I
think
what
we're
hearing
when
we
actually
talk
to
developers
today,
is
that
that
you
know
the
difference
in
investment
between
these
two
types
of
projects
isn't
necessarily
going
to
be.
It's
not
how
to
make
it
or
break
it
with
this
exemption
program.
But
we
may
be
able
to
try
to
incentivize
certain
components
of
a
larger
scale
project
such
as
incorporating
child
care
facilities
or
increasing
the
amount.
You
know
reducing
the
cost
per
unit
for
some
of
the
rental
units
that
they
offer
in
their
development.
H
So
I'll
kind
of
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
this,
but
this
kind
of
just
gives
a
general
overview
something
to
consider
in
urban
renewal
areas.
So
urban
renewal
and
tax
increment
financing
collects
funds
from
increment
that's
generated
in
an
urban
renewal
area
on
taxes.
So
if
somebody
is
to
make
a
significant
improvement
on
their
building
or
on
their
on
their
property,
if
it's
within
an
urban
renewal.
B
H
That
that
amount
of
increment,
that
is,
that
is
created
from
that
improvement,
goes
into
the
urban
renewal
fund
and
I'm
I'm
kind
of
over
simplifying
urban
renewal.
And
if
you
are
curious
about
learning
more
about
what
urban
renewal
is,
it's
a
little
bit
complicated
and
I'm
happy
to
sit
down
with
any
of
you.
If
you
reach
out
to
explain
it
a
little
bit
more.
But
basically,
if
we're
considering
tax
exemption
programs
in
urban
renewal
areas,
it
pulls
from
some
of
the
same
funding
sources
that
we
can
use
that
urban
rural
funding.
H
This
program,
essentially,
the
city
identifies
a
zone
in
which
projects
within
that
zone
would
be
eligible,
and
so
you
establish
the
program
by
ordinance,
which
means
it
takes
a
city
council
action,
but
each
individual
development
project
actually
gets
has
to
go
to
council
for
adoption
by
resolution.
So
there's
an
opportunity
for
each
development
project
to
actually
be
reviewed.
H
We've
always
envisioned
that
if
we
were
to
pursue
this
program
that
we
would
focus
it
to
the
bend
central
district,
so
that
area
generally
between
4th
street
and
the
railroad
just
east
of
the
parkway
and
downtown
and
and
what
this
program
kind
of
the
requirements
of
this
program
are
more
dictated
by
state
statutes.
So
it
requires
that
the
ground
floor
of
a
development
have
at
least
50
percent
of
that
ground
floor
be
dedicated
to
non-residential
uses.
H
So
this
program
is
really
intended
to
incentivize
more
of
those
mixed-use
projects
and
sometimes
that's
a
harder
development
type
to
build
for
developers,
because
they're
they're
blending
sort
of
two
different
development
types
a
lot
of
times.
You
have
like
a
development
group.
That's
really
expert
like
as
an
expert
in
multi-family
development
or
they're,
an
expert
in
commercial,
and
it's
a
little
bit
harder
to
find
folks
that
have
that
experience
in
both
and
sometimes
ground
floor.
The
ground
floor
of
the
building
may
need
to
be
dedicated
to
some
of
the
residential
uses.
H
So
you
know
lobby
areas,
parking
tuck
under
parking
is
a
big
use
of
ground
floor
area
or
even
or
even
like
a
gym
space
for
the
residents
that
may
live
in
a
multi-family
building,
so
sometimes
that
fifty
percent
can
be
hard
to
meet
and
then
what's
unique
about
this
program.
That
differs
from
the
next
program
and
I
think
most
of
the
other
program.
I
think
all
the
other
programs
that
we
talk
about
today
is
that
taxing
districts
are
automatically
included
to
participate
in
this
program.
H
However,
they
have
the
option
to
individually
opt
in
or
opt
out,
so
there's
no
sort
of
guarantee
from
the
developer
side
that
if
they
get
the
approval
by
city
council
by
resolution,
that
any
of
the
taxing,
the
other
taxing
districts
will
participate
in
this
exemption
program.
So
sometimes
you
know
that
can
that
can
make
it
a
little
bit
more
onerous
on
the
developer
or
just
add
another
level
of
uncertainty,
of
whether
this
exemption
program
is
really
beneficial
for
them.
F
I
E
D
H
Yeah
so
some
of
the
products
some
of
the
programs
allow
for
like
even
existing
buildings
that
are
recently
rehabilitated
to
be
kind
of
grant.
You
know
you
could
apply
for
it
to
be
a
to
be
sort
of
grandfathered,
and
even
though
it's
not
a
new
project,
this
program,
kind
of
dictated
by
state
statute,
requires
that
the
project
kind
of
be
at
that
construction
phase
in
order
to
be
eligible.
H
H
H
H
So
this
this
is
very
similar
that
you
adopt
the
program
by
ordinance
and
then
each
individual
development
has
to
be
approved
by
resolution.
What's
really
different
about
this
program
is
that
taxing
district
participation
is
not
required.
However,
if
51
of
the
taxing
district
like
the
levying
taxing
districts,
so
that's
essentially
the
city
and
the
school
district
we
make
up.
H
E
H
So
what's
what's
really
a
pro
with
this
program,
is
that
the
city
gets
to
establish
the
eligibility
criteria
and
that
you
can
also
ask
applicants
or
or
developers
to
demonstrate
some
sort
of
project
feasibility.
So
essentially,
you
can
ask
them
to
to
give
you
more
of
their
pro
forma
and
have
sort
of
some
open
book
policy.
H
So
a
lot
of
cities
that
require
that
to
demonstrate
that
project
feasibility
hire
a
third
party
to
do
the
pro
forma
review
of
the
development
in
order
to
ensure
that
they
actually
need
the
the
tax
exemption.
There's
no
requirement
in
this
program
for
commercial
ground
floor
use,
although
kind
of
internally
we've
brainstormed.
H
If
we
were
to
pursue
just
this
exemption
versus
both
the
vhdc
and
mupd
that
we
may
require
some
type
of
commercial
ground
floor
use,
at
least
in
the
bend
central
district
on
the
main
streets,
and
then,
if
you
go
to
the
so
this
again,
this
program
is
widely
used.
Zela,
eugene
oregon,
and
this
shows
the
tax
levy.
You
know,
for
every
property
tax
dollar,
that's
paid.
What
percentage
goes
to
each
taxing
district?
So
you
can
really
see
that
51
comes
from
the
school
district
and
the
city
of
bend
otherwise
you're.
H
So
if
a
development
were
to
offer
child
care
facilities,
do
we
want
to
outright
allow
them
to
participate
in
the
exemption
if
they
incorporate
energy
efficiency
or
green
building
features
if
they
have
extra
costs
with
their
project,
that's
associated
with
in-filler
redevelopment
projects
such
as
environmental
cleanup?
That
could
be
another
automatic
eligibility
criteria.
H
This
is
really
dense,
but
I
wanted
to
kind
of
just
give
an
example
of
what
the
numbers
would
actually
look
like.
So
this
is
an
example
project.
It's
assumed
to
be
in
the
bend
central
district,
so
within
the
core
area,
tax,
increment
finance
area
and
the
current
use
of
the
land
is
an
industrial
use.
So
you
can
see
the
the
current
land
use
in
the
photo
on
the
top
left
and
currently
that
property
pays
around
twenty
thousand
dollars
in
property
taxes.
H
So
let's
say
they:
they
continue
to
keep
that
use
on
their
site
by
2025,
with
just
a
three
percent
annual
increase
or
assumed
annual
increase
in
taxes
they're
paying
around
24
000
in
taxes
in
2025.,
and
the
graph
on
the
bottom
shows
how
much
of
the
revenue
over
the
you
know.
The
next
14
years
is
going
to
go
into
the
urban
renewal
district
tiff
fund,
which
is
that
85
000
versus
what
is
sort
of
the
frozen
base,
which
is
the
amount
of
tif.
H
H
So
then
let's
say
this:
instead
of
this
industrial
use,
the
property
owner
decides
to
build
a
pretty
intense
development.
So
the
development
proposed
on
this
site
is
a
five-story
building
for
residential
stories
over
one
story
of
a
mixture
of
ground
floor,
commercial
uses
with
137
ish
residential
units,
so
after
they
after
they
make
this
pretty
significant
investment
on
their
property
and
their
property
gets
reassessed
for
taxes.
H
And
let's
say
that
that
project
is
assumed
to
take
place
in
2025.
Their
new
tax
rate
goes
from
24
000
to
425
000,
so
that's
an
annual
tax
rate,
that's
going
to
increase
by
3
ish
every
year.
So
if
we
assume
that
we
approve
this
tax
exemption
program,
what
that
would
result
in
over
that?
Let's
say
it's
a
10-year
exemption
where
80
percent
of
the
improvements,
but
not
the
land,
are
exempt
from
taxes
and
that
all
taxing
districts
participate.
H
H
It
definitely
has
an
impact,
but
this
time
we're
still
able
to
collect
the
frozen
base
to
the
urban
rural
district
and
still
generate
some
tax
increment
that
can
go
into
the
urban
renewal
area
more
than
what
would
have
happened
in
the
no
build
scenario,
so
just
kind
of
some
numbers
to
keep
in
perspective.
If
you're
wondering
what
that
would
look
like
and
then
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
amy
to
talk
about
the
next.
I
I
One
of
the
things
that's
unique
is
that
it's
allowed
anywhere
in
the
city.
It
can
be
partial
and
there's
no
unit
minimum,
so
this
may
be
really
attractive
to
the
city
of
bend
because
we
could
do
duplexes,
triplexes
or
four
plexes,
and
even
a
single
family
home
could
take
advantage
of
this
exemption.
I
Another
unique
part
of
this
exemption
is
that
it's
limited
to
folks
that
are
60
of
ami
or
less
for
the
first
year,
but
then
what
we
would
hope
is
with
stability
and
housing.
Those
people
would
be
able
to
increase
their
income,
and
so
the
income
is
eligible
up
to
eighty
percent
the
year
after,
if
the
city
chooses
there
is
a
hundred
percent
exemption,
if
approved
by
the
jurisdictions
representing
fifty
one
percent,
just
like
muppy.
So
if
we
get
the
city
and
the
school
district,
we're
in
good
shape
next
slide,
please.
I
If
it's
not
inconsistent
with
any
of
the
legislative
tenants,
it
can
be
existing
housing
or
new
development,
and
it
includes
housing
or
excuse
me,
land
held
for
development
for
housing
at
another
time,
which
is
a
nice
option.
It's
currently
in
use
across
the
state
and
the
one
con
that
we've
heard
consistently
is
that
it's
onerous
for
the
nonprofits
to
apply
every
year,
but
we're
hoping
we
can
simplify
that
application
process
and
make
it
as
painless
as
possible.
G
G
G
So
that
gives
you
a
sense
of
sort
of
the
range
here,
so
that
will
cover
a
good
portion
of
our
working
class.
I'd
say
that
is
not
already
covered
by
the
affordable
housing
exemptions
that
we've
talked
about.
What's
interesting,
I
think
about
this.
One
is
that
we
would
be
in
charge
of
creating
the
formula
that
allows
for
how
much
of
that
property
is
going
to
be
covered
and
how
long
so,
the
maximum
length
of
this
property
tax
exemption
is
10
years.
G
What
tillman
county
did-
and
this
would
be
the
staff
recommendation
as
well-
is
the
percentage
of
the
development
that
is
dedicated
towards
these
types
of
units,
so
middle
income
units
would
dictate
the
length
of
time
that
the
exemption
is
in
place.
So
for
simple
math,
because
I,
like
the
simplicity,
let's
say
it's
a
10
unit
development
and
that
developer
has
committed
to
two
of
those
units
being
at
this
middle
income
range.
G
That
would
mean
that
20
of
the
development
is
middle
income,
and
so
they'd
get
a
two-year
exemption,
because
that
is
20
of
the
total
time
limit.
If
that
developer
committed
to
100
of
those
units
in
that
middle
income
range,
they
could
get
the
full
10
years
and
it
would
scale
sort
of
along
those
lines.
G
G
One
of
the
cons
to
this,
which
is
kind
of
a
theoretical
con
at
this
point,
is
that
in
theory,
affordable
housing
developers
could
choose
to
use
this
exemption
instead
of
developing,
affordable
housing
and
they'd
raise
the
income
limits
that
were
allowed
in
affordable
housing.
It
wouldn't
be
affordable
housing
at
that
time.
I
think
that
the
reason
I
say
this
is
hypothetical
is
because
most
of
our
affordable
housing
development
community
is
very
committed
to
developing,
affordable
housing.
That's
what
they
do
and
they
do
it
well.
E
G
So
with
that
next
slide,
so
go
ahead.
Keep
going
so
I
think
I'm
going
to
hand
it
back
to
allison
right
now.
Is
that
true?
Or
do
you
want
me
to
I'll?
Go
through
it?
You're
still
muted,
never
mind
I'll
go
through
it,
so
we're
in
the
process
of
shopping,
this
presentation
around
to
various
committees,
and
we
are
looking
for
a
volunteer
to
help
support
this
process,
so
we're
creating
kind
of
a
subgroup
to
a
prize
staff
on
what
works
best
for
this
community.
G
Some
of
the
things
that
we'll
be
looking
for
your
feedback
on
are
listed
here.
Does
it
make
sense
for
us
to
look
at
all
four
of
these?
Should
we
add,
you
know
a
commercial
component
to
mukti
and
allow
for
vertical
to
not
actually
move
forward.
Do
we
prioritize
these
in
different
ways?
You
know:
are
the
zones
that
we've
looked
at
the
right
zones
and
then
do
we
hate
them
all?
I
don't
know
so.
G
All
of
those
questions
I'd
say
are
on
the
table
for
you
to
have
that
discussion
with
us
with
other
committees
and
then
eventually
with
the
taxing
districts
as
well,
so
the
three
of
us
will
be
cruising
around
to
all
the
different
taxi
districts
and
talking
to
first
their
staff
and
then
their
board.
Next
steps
are
we're
reviewing
with
the
community
building
subcommittee
of
council
at
the
end
of
february
and
then
we'll
bring
it
back
to
council
for
a
decision
later.
On
I
mean,
I
think
our
next
one
is
the
timeline
on.
J
G
G
The
phased
adoption
that
we
have
in
this
last
bullet
in
april
to
june
is
because
a
couple
of
these
exemptions
have
very
interested
parties
that
are
waiting
to
determine
so,
for
instance,
one
of
the
developments
it
does
not
feel
like
they
can
put
true,
affordable
housing
into
the
development
unless
they
have
a
property
tax
exemption
such
as
mufti
in
place.
That
really
helps
with
their
pro
forma
to
be
able
to
allow
for
things
like
affordable
housing.
We
have
another
affordable
housing
developer
that
is
sort
of
holding
tight
for
the
non-profit
exemption.
G
If
we
choose
to
pass
that
through,
so
we
may
prioritize
some
of
the
discussions
to
go
a
little
earlier
than
some
of
the
others
vertical
housing.
If
we
don't
have
anyone
in
the
wings
for
that
and
there's
not
as
much
interest,
you
know,
we
may
choose
to
de-prioritize
that
a
little
or
potentially
even
put
it
to
the
side
for
now.
So
that's
what
that
scaled
time
frame
is
allie.
Did
you
want
to
add
anything
before
we
move
on.
H
G
G
G
Repression,
so
this
the
sunset
is
in
state
law
and
most
it's
not
all
of
the
property
tax
exemptions
that
I'm
aware
of
at
state
law
do
sunset
regularly.
However,
to
date
they
have
all
been
renewed
by
the
legislature
regularly
as
well,
so
that
sunset
is
not
the
end
of
the
exemption.
If
that
makes
sense,
that's
the
end
of
new
applications
for
the
exemption,
so
folks,
who
have
already
qualified
for
that
exemption,
would
continue
it
through
the
term
that
they've
been
approved
for
it's
just
we
wouldn't
take
new
exemption
requests
at
that
point.
C
Thanks,
I
actually
have
a
couple
of
questions.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
time
for
all
of
them,
but
one
question
was
that
on
on
your
graphs
after
the
10-year
period,
then
there's
that
big
jump
and
presumably
does
that
I
mean
I
would
guess
that
if
there's
a
multi-unit
rental
situation
that
that
would
translate
into
rent
going
up
for
the
residents
there
or.
G
Nothing
yeah
so
so
this
is
solely
so
kind
of
different,
so
the
property
tax
exemption
that
is
in
place,
it
sort
of
depends
on
the
development
if
it
is
an
affordable
development,
let's
say
and
we're
looking
at
kind
of
this
back
end.
Those
rents
are
completely
controlled
by
law
and
won't
go
up
in
the
same
way.
This
is
simply
the
bill,
and
so
this
is
the
sort
of
math
that
developers
are
looking
at
at
upfront
when
they're
choosing
whether
or
not
to
develop
out
a
building
bi-state
law.
G
H
So
I
wouldn't
expect
it
to
be
sort
of
like
a
direct
translation
of
you
know
the
year
the
exemption
goes
out.
They'll
want
to
keep
those
those
units
within
market
rate.
If,
if
they're
market
rate
projects
and
if
they're,
if
they're,
affordable,
housing
or
deep
restricted,
then
they
would
maintain
be
maintained
as
deed,
restricted,
typically
for
30
years.
L
G
G
M
Oh,
thank
you.
I
was
wondering
where
this
is
all
coming
from.
At
the
outset
of
the
presentation,
you
all
said
that
this
mechanism
has
been
used.
I
think
you
said
less
than
10
times
and
I'm
wondering
is
that
a
I
take
it
that's
a
small
amount
and
if
it
is
a
small
amount,
why
hasn't
the
city
used
it
before
and
why
are
they
pushing
it
now
and
then
what
have
other
cities
have?
G
Yeah
so
I'll
clarify
that
a
little
so
we
have
one
existing
property
tax
exemption
in
place
right
now
it
is
called
the
low-income
rental
property
exemption,
or
something
like
that
in
terms
that
nobody
uses
anymore,
but
that's
what
it
is
in
state
law.
So
that's
what
we
still
call
it,
and
that
is
the
one
that
is
really
geared.
It
was
geared
towards
affordable
housing
developers
who
don't
already
qualify
for
any
number
of
other
exemptions
historically
in
bend
really
until
2017
2018.
G
When
I
came
on
board,
we
really
only
had
a
handful
of
affordable
housing
developers
who
worked
in
this
region.
That
has
changed
significantly
in
the
last
five
years
and
we
now
have
I'd,
say
national,
affordable
housing
developers
who
are
interested
in
developing
in
bend
because
of
the
incentive
systems
and
sort
of
support
that
they've
received
from
us.
So
that's
that's
a
huge
step,
so
we
I'd
say
half
of
the
uses
of
that
property.
Tax
exemption
have
been
within
the
last
five
years,
maybe
even
within
the
last
three
years.
G
G
What
has
happened
is
that,
as
we
continue
to
grow,
council
has
recognized
that
they
want,
like
any
I'd,
say,
city
council,
a
little
bit
more
control
over
how
that's
happening.
So
we
can
do
that
through
things
like
code
changes
and
zoning,
or
through
tools
like
this.
That
sort
of
are
separate,
but
also
do
allow
us
to
control
the
type
of
development
and
the
mass
and
scale
of
that
development
more
than
we
would.
G
I
hope
that
that
clarifies
a
little
bit
sort
of
the
exemption
that
I
mentioned,
and
only
using
that
10
times
and
sort
of
what
we're
doing
now
within
that
cds
I'd
say,
have
varied
uptake
on
these
exemptions.
The
nonprofit
one
is
in
strong
use
all
through
a
lot
of
communities.
That's
one
that
that
is
used
in
most
places.
We
just
didn't
need
it
until
recently,
and
that's
the
other
thing.
We
don't
often
pass
policy
here
just
for
the
sake
of
it.
G
Usually
we
wait
until
there's
something
ripe
where
we're
ready
to
go
and
that's
what
happened
with
the
non-profit
and
with
the
mufti
exemption.
We've
done
a
lot
of
work
internally,
trying
to
predict
what
this
looks
like.
How
many
folks
would
use
it
and
there's
a
few
too
many
variables
today
for
us
to
get
a
really
solid
understanding
of
exactly
the
number
of
dollars?
Let's
say
that
we
would
forego
in
any
number
of
years.
G
So
so
those
are
the
types
of
things
that
we're
looking
at
right
now
to
try
to
get
closer
to
what
those
numbers
are,
but
there
have
been
varied
uptake,
so
I
talked
about
middle
income
only
in
use
in
tillamook
to
date
when
we
talked
to
them
a
number
of
months
ago.
I
think
there
was
one
development
that
was
sort
of
ready
to
go
there,
but
their
development
rate
is
also
much
lower
than
ours
generally.
So
it's
very
hard
to
predict,
but
we
do
have
good
examples
from
other
cities.
G
One
more
thought
on
that
before
I
let
it
go
and
I'm
sorry
I'm
talking
for
a
really
long
time,
but
I
just
think
that
this
is
really
important.
None
of
these
are
intended
to
be
permanent
without
ever
being
reviewed
again.
So
allison
talked
a
lot
about.
You
know
with
those
potential
muppty
and
with
vertical.
We
would
really
be
looking
at
those
for
a
very
limited
term,
and
I
think
whatever
we
decide
to
do,
the
staff
recommendation
will
be
to
evaluate
these.
Probably
at
the
five
and
seven
year
mark
and
decide.
Are
these
working?
G
Are
these
not
working?
Has
their
time
passed?
Do
we
need
to
do
more
all
of
those
sort
of
things
you
know,
let's
go
back
and
review
whether
this
is
giving
us
what
we
want
or
not
five
years,
because
it
takes
a
long
time
for
folks
to
really
scope
out
buildings
and
and
get
to
that
point,
and
so
that's
when
we'll
really
start
see
some
some
use
of
this
strongly.
If
it's
working
the
way
we
think
it
might
so.
I
hope
that
helps
and
answer
the
question,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
do
some
follow-up.
G
H
A
A
A
E
The
assumptions
that
they're
making
for
the
next
20
to
30
years,
and
so
you
really
need
to
you
know
you
don't
really
need
to
listen
hard
or
to
watch
it
all
the
time.
But
you
know
put
on
your
your
earbud
and
carry
your
phone
around
with
you
and
listen
to
that,
because
these
assumptions
that
they're
making
on
this
wastewater
master
plan
are
going
to
drive
where
bend
is
going
for
the
next
20
to
30
years
and
if
you're
not
aware
of
those
yeah,
you
know
you're
you're
hindered.
E
E
N
N
N
My
particular
neighborhood
association
is
adamantly
against
the
shelter
code
amendments
I
everyone.
I've
talked
to
is
against
them,
and
yet
I'm
the
guy,
that's
one
of
two
people.
That's
going
to
be
presenting
and
trying.
I
guess
I'm
I'm
in
a
quandary
in
that
I'm
presenting
them,
but
I'm
totally
against
them
from
the
perspective
of
who
I've
talked
to
not
personally,
but
mostly
from
the
80
percent
of
the
people
that
responded
to
the
survey
that
went
out
over
800
people
said
they
did
not
support
these
shelter
code
amendments.
F
F
I
don't
know
who
that
was,
but
I
wanted
to
jump
in
here
and
just
kind
of
give
you
an
overview,
and
I
think
this
is
good
for
the
entire
committee
to
know,
but
when
we
are
invited
to
a
work
session
with
planning
commission.
What
it
means
is
that
planning
commission
for
the
first
time
is
hearing
from
staff
about
the
issues.
They've
typically
been
given
a
packet
about
a
week
beforehand
to
to
look
over.
F
You
know,
we've
all
been
given
the
shelter
code,
amendments
that
are
being
proposed,
and
so
what's
going
to
happen
at
that
meeting
on
the
24th
is
that
the
staff
will
share
what
those
amendments
are
with
planning
commission
and
the
nla.
Bdab
and
a
hack
will
all
and
sorry
I'm
using
acronyms
the
bend
economic
development
advisory
board
and
the
affordable
housing
advisory
board
will
also
have
representatives
that
are
sitting
there
alongside
sean,
and
so
what
is
expected
of
the
representatives
that
are?
There
is
just
that
they
contribute
to
the
discussion.
F
If
there's
they
sit
and
they
learn
about
the
amendments.
If
there's
some
concerns
that
they
know
ahead
of
time
that
their
committee
and
constituents
might
have
issues
with,
they
can
bring
it
up
at
that
time,
and
but
what
we're
really
going
to
be
asking
is
that
people
listen
into
that
work
session,
people
being
the
public
and
that
they
hear
about
the
code
amendments
and
then
the
public
hearing
is
going
to
come
later.
F
So
the
work
session
is
first
and
then
it
goes
to
a
public
hearing
with
planning
commission
and
that
public
hearing
is
the
a
great
time
for
people
to
come
and
actually
get
their
comments
on
the
record
before
planning
commission.
So
the
nla
and
our
our
role
is
just
to
kind
of
share
what
we
are
hearing.
So
I
would
be
interested
to
know
if
any
of
you
have
had
comments
from
your
own
boards
from
your
own
constituents
that
you
want
to
share
with
sean
so
that
we
can.
F
A
F
Yeah,
so
you
know
the
expectation
as
an
nla
is
that
we
have
heard
about
the
shelter
codes
back
in
november,
and
we've
had
a
lot
of
communication
about
when
they're
coming
out
what
the
they
look
like
as
they've
been
created,
and
so
the
hope
is
that
you've
been
hearing
from
people
or
you've
been
asking
your
members,
and
so,
if
you
have,
this
is
the
time
to
to
chat
about
that.
So
it
would
be
too
late
if
I
was
to
ask
for
people
to
wait
and
and
send
me
messages
later.
A
A
O
F
O
Just
found
out
that
we
needed
those
just
now
and
and
so
our
meetings
on
monday
and
that's
that's
as
soon
as
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
get
response
so
I'll
just
see
what
we
could
do,
but
I
think
there's
going
to
be
some
thoughts
and
I
don't
have
that
you
know
to
document
tonight,
but
I'll
just
I'll,
just
send
it
to
you
michaela
if
that
works,
we'll
just
see
how
it
goes.
Thank
you.
F
A
K
The
primary
concern
is
about
the
unmanaged
camps
and
that's
not
part
of
the
amendments,
and
but
we
also
would
like
to
advocate
that
neighborhood
associations
be
informed
and
notified
as
much
as
possible
when
potential
shelters
would
be
located
within
their
neighborhood
and
that
we
would
have
a
role
in
communicating
that
to
our
members.
But
southern
crossing
does
support
the
amendments
at
this
time.
C
C
L
L
L
P
D
Also,
you
know
have
heard
similar
concerns
about
folks
who
are
living
in
unsupported
ways,
whether
that's
risk
of
fire
or
various
other
things.
That's
why
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
support
for
these
code.
Amendments
is
that
folks
here
recognize
it's
incredibly
difficult
to
live
and
bend
and
not
have
a
roof
over
your
head,
and
so
it
is
our
community's
responsibility
to
take
care
of
these
folks.
D
On
a
personal
note,
you
all
know
that
I
participate
in
in
sheltering
people
when
the
weather
is
extreme
kind
of
on
an
emergency
basis,
and
this
population
is
near
and
dear
to
my
heart.
We
have.
We
have
truly-
and
I
wish
this
was
hyperbole,
but
we
have
a
humanitarian
crisis
on
our
hands
in
terms
of
housing
availability
in
our
community
and
the.
D
I'm
not
sure
what
you
what
you
called
it
kathy,
though
the
worst
case
scenario
imaginings
of
people
picturing
a
managed
camp,
looking
like
an
encampment
or
or
like
a
huddle
road
or
these
other
communities
that
pop
up,
because
they
don't
have
anywhere
else
to
go.
That's
just
not
the
reality
of
what
the
city
is
advocating
for.
M
Yeah
I'll
just
I'll
just
say
that
aubry
butte
is
having
its
meeting
tomorrow
morning.
We've
had
limited
discussions
about
this
issue
in
the
past
and
my
sense
about
the
group,
but
not
the
members
of
our
abna,
is
that
there's
a
recognition
that
it's
a
critical
issue
as
morgan
just
said,
but
I
think
there
is
some
serious
reservations
about
some
of
the
provisions,
but
I'll
get
a
better
sense
and
we'll
communicate
that
when
I
have
it.
A
N
N
A
A
I
love
having
dissenting
voices
because
it
gives
different
perspectives,
but
then
I
hear
what
you're
saying
about
this:
putting
you
in
a
difficult
position
right,
because,
if
you're
into,
if
you're
supposed
to
be
a
representative
and
of
nla
and
speak
to
the
majority
of
the
nla,
that's
in
contradiction
to
what
your
neighborhood
is
providing
input
on.
Is
that
what
I'm
understanding.
O
A
Q
Thanks
so
much
thanks,
I
have
a
mouthful
of
sunflower
seeds
because
that's
my
bad
habit
when
the
camera's
off
so
sorry.
For
that
I
did
so.
I
don't
know
so
my
this
is
a
supposition.
I'm
not
completely
certain,
but
my
my
take
or
educated
guess
is
that
sean
you
were
asked
to
participate
because
of
current
noa
members.
Q
Q
I
think
you
know,
I
think
at
the
least
the
it
would
be
great
if,
if
somebody
could
present
who
had
been
to
you
know
all
or
a
majority
of
the
sounding
board
meetings,
because
they
have
that
context,
we
don't
have
that
the
nla
doesn't
currently
have
that
you
stepped
in
ably
for
one
meeting,
but
that's
that
that
isn't
the
whole
scope
of
that
process.
So
my
take
is
that,
given
that
nla
doesn't
have
that,
somebody
needs
to
be
there.
Q
I
have
an
idea
of
who
that
might
be,
and
no
offense,
because
I
love
you
all,
it's
not
sean
and
it's
not
morgan,
because
I
think
both
of
you
have.
I
don't
want
to
say
you're
at
opposite
ends
of
the
spectrum,
but
I
think
we
are
one.
One
of
you
has
concerns
and
your
your
constituents
has
have
concerns
and
another
of
you
as
an
advocate
and
is
highly
supportive
of
the
changes,
and
that's
all
good.
Q
D
I
appreciate
how
you
put
all
that
in
thank
you
that
that's
that
that
doesn't
bother
me
at
all.
I,
and
I
also
would
support
summer.
If
you
wanted
to
do
that
or
if
there's
anything
I
can
do
to
help
or
help
with
talking
points
or
be
in
conversation
with
sean
I'm
open
to
all
possibilities.
I
do
think,
for
the
sake
of
that,
in
kind
of
what
you
refer
to
as
like
a
a
pretty
balanced
reflection
of
the
feedback
that
we're
getting.
D
You
know
that
participation
in
these
things
is
not
really
accessible
to
everyone,
and
certainly
those
who
might
benefit
most
from
these
code.
Changes
are
not
involved
in
that
conversation,
and
probably
you
know,
might
not
even
have
the
ability
to
access
a
community
survey
even
if
they
wanted
to.
So
I
just
hope
that
whoever
presents
takes
that
into
consideration
and
that
that
we
reflect
that.
That
probably
wasn't
a
very
broad
community
survey.
It
was
probably
people
who
are
the
most
passionately
engaged
and
possibly
with
a
lot
of
privilege.
A
So,
in
response
to
ian's
suggestion,
I
am
really
grateful
for
the
the
compliment.
I
will
take
it
as
a
compliment
and
that
that
you
feel
I
could
present
both
sides.
That
said,
I
do
not
have
the
capacity
to
take
this
on,
even
though
it
is
an
incredibly
important
topic
to
me.
I
just
don't.
I
don't
have
the
capacity.
So,
let's
get
creative.
What
else?
What
else
can
we
do?
P
Q
Yeah
I'll
jump
in
and
say
I
don't
I
don't
it's
not
forbidden
there.
There
is
no
such
rule.
You
know
we
I'll
throw
one
other
thing
out
there.
It's
it's.
It's
maybe
not
quite
the
same
depending
on
your
perspective,
but
you
know
we
have
somebody
who,
whose
job
it
is
to
kind
of
represent,
guide
and
advise
in
a
way
in
a
pretty
objective,
neutral
matter
and
her
name
is
michaela.
A
C
C
So
if,
if
there
is
still
time
because
I
said
there
was
concern
about
locating
a
managed
camp
next
to
the
school
bend
high
and
that
I
heard
feedback
about
the
the
driveway
campers,
I
mean
if
I
could
flesh
that
out
in
a
better
way
and
send
that
along.
If
that
would
work,
then
I
would
feel
like.
I
gave
a
more
complete
picture
of
what
what
I
have
heard
from
from
my
neighbors.
J
J
I
think
one
of
the
things
that's
been
missing
is
really
understanding
sort
of
how
decisions
have
were
made
on
the
sounding
board
over
the
course
of
those
six
months.
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
how
we
could
bring
him
back
or
or
if
he
could
provide
some
more
background.
I
know
that
he
gave
you
updates
at
your
meetings,
but
just
just
I
think
that
would
be
really
helpful
to
this
discussion
and
to
the
planning
commission
discussion.
F
Thank
you.
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
good
idea
for
the
next
time
that
we
meet,
or
maybe
hans
can
summarize
what
his
conversations
have
been
and
email,
and
I
can
share
that
it
might
be
not
be
before
the
planning
commission,
but
just
to
get
everybody
on
the
same
page
of
where
we
came
from,
and
just
to
remind
everyone
too,
that
these
changes.
F
L
Cathy,
you
got
again
I've,
muted
and
unmuted
and
stuff.
Now
too
many
times
I'll
put
my
try
to
put
my
face
up.
Okay
there
I
am,
I
will
be
mikayla's
back
up
if,
if
her
boss-
or
somebody
else
says-
oh
no,
that's
not
your
role.
Michaela,
I
will
get
with.
I
would
volunteer
to
get
with
michaela
and
and
pull
together
the
notes
from
today's
meeting
and
present
them
at
the
planning
commission
meeting.
If
that,
if
the
group
wants
it
that
way,.
L
A
P
We
had
a
pretty
robust
discussion
around
the
climate
friendly
roles
and
one
of
the
things
that
came
out
of
that
meeting
was
support
for
having
some
type
of
community
education
event
around
the
climate,
friendly
and
equitable
communities
rules,
and
so
many
of
you,
I'm
sure,
have
seen
michaela's
email
to
us
all.
That
event
is
going
to
be
tomorrow
at
5
30.
It
is
a
zoom
meeting,
anybody
can
attend
and
we
will
have
representatives
from
the
dlcd
lcdc
as
well
as
city
of
bend,
to
help
us
better
understand
some
of
what's
happening
with
these
climate-friendly
rules.
P
P
A
A
E
F
L
A
F
A
F
F
A
A
A
F
A
B
Yeah
good,
I
have
had
some
zoom
problems
today,
yeah.
The
only
issue
I
had
is
the
transportation
advisory
committee
was
meeting
at
the
same
time
as
the
nla
in
november,
and
so
I
had
to
submit
comments
to
them
and
I
did
have
comments
but
at
10
dnla.
So
that's
my
only
concern
and
I
don't
know
if
they're
going
to
continue
doing
it,
but
they
did
it
back
in
in
november.
Thank
you.
M
Yeah,
I
just
I'm
new,
so
maybe
it's
not
even
appropriate
for
me
to
say,
but
I'm
wondering,
is
it
possible
to
do
it
sort
of
more
on
an
ad
hoc
basis
over
say
a
period
of
say
three
months
as
opposed
to
setting
a
date
and
time
for
the
entire
year?
I'm
not
sure
what
I
I've
never
met
any
of
you
folks
in
in
real
life.
So
it's
a
little
hard
for
me
to
say,
but
I'm
wondering
as
a
retired
person
who
does
do
some
traveling.
M
F
Sure
I
think
you
know
in
having
a
set
meeting
as
a
committee,
allows
a
little
bit
more
accessibility
for
people
and
who
don't
follow
the
updates
and
public
notices
that
we
put
out
there.
I'm
not
sure
what
our
limitations
are.
So
I'm
happy
to
look
into
it
further
and
see
if
we
could
do
it
on
a
quarterly
basis
or
just
revisit
this.
Every
quarter,
I'm
not
sure,
but.
F
F
A
F
K
F
Thanks
karen,
I
know
that
our
legal
office
is
looking
into
alternates
because
it's
been
a
question
that
a
lot
of
the
committees
have
been
bringing
up,
and
so
I
am
not
sure,
oh
ian
popped
up.
That's
always
scary,
if
that's
ready
to
go
out
yet
what
the
results
of
that
investigation
have
been
but
I'll.
Let
him
talk
to
you.
Q
Yeah,
it
is,
and
just
for
the
nla
as
a
whole,
so
we've
had
on
city,
advisory
boards,
commissions
committees.
There
have
been
sort
of
various
practices
that
have
developed
over
the
years
about
how
alternates
are
appointed
and
used,
and
so
we
started
recognizing
that
and
got
occasional
questions,
and
so
I
put
together
a
mmo
that
some
staff
liaisons
have
been
reviewing
and
it
is
ready
to
go
michaela.
Q
But
the
bottom
line
is:
is
that,
based
on
the
code,
alternates
can
be
appointed
by
the
mayor
and
council
for
reports
and
committees,
but
they
can't
that
doesn't
give
them
any
ability
to
participate
or
step
in
it's
basically
just
somebody
that
is
sort
of
pre-approved
for
subsequent
formal
appointment
to
the
border
commission.
If
a
vacancy
arises
so
alternates
exist,
the
mayor
council
can
choose
to
appoint
them.
Q
A
A
No
okay,
jim
did
you
have
something
quickly:
okay,
all
right
great,
let's
move
forward
with
the
letter
from
jim,
so
I
think
we've
all
had
a
chance.
Hopefully,
we've
had
a
chance
to
review
his
comments
in
his
letter.
Thank
you,
jim,
for
providing
that
I
pulled
two
two
main
themes
out
of
that
one
is
working
with
city
staff
to
make
sure
they
understand
the
role
of
the
nla
and
I
believe
michaela's
been
working
on
some
of
that,
but
now
that
I've
caught
her
with
her
mouth
full,
you
can
give
an
update.
F
F
A
B
B
Perhaps
one
could
add
to
it
as
saying
you
know
each
na
views
this
as
a
major
problem,
a
minor
problem
or
not
a
problem,
and
I
think
if
we
do
that
and
then
tally
everything
up.
We
could
get
a
good
idea
of
what's
really
important
for
the
n
a's
from
an
n
a
viewpoint,
and
then
we
could
kind
of
compare
that
with
what
the
michaela
had
put
together
and
see
if
we
agree
or
whether
there's
disagreements
and
we
can
kind
of
modify
that
to
kind
of
move
forward.
B
You
know
that
way.
I
think
each
na
might
feel
like
they've
been
heard,
and
if
we
all
have
the
same
problem,
then
it
probably
needs
to
be
a
high
priority
issue
there,
and
so
that
that's
kind
of
my
main
theme
there.
I
go
into
some
discussions
and
I
go
on
to
talk
about
an
interaction
I
had
with
one
of
the
city
project
engineers.
B
A
F
I
would
like
to
incorporate
some
of
your
comments
into
those
discussions,
because
I
will
be
going
to
all
13.
and-
and
I
can
summarize
those
in
my
notes
as
part
of
the
assessment,
I
think
if
you
wanted
a
a
quick
turnaround
on
yes,
no,
we
haven't,
or
we
do
deal
with
this.
We
don't
deal
with
this.
We
could
do
a
quick
survey
in
one
of
my
upcoming
newsletters,
where
just
one
person
from
each
neighborhood
would
click.
F
Yes,
no,
and
it
would
probably
be
just
like
the
chart
that
you
put
out
in
your
in
your
letter.
I
could
see
doing
that
as
well,
so
happy
to
do
either
way.
But
I
agree
with
you.
I
think
the
ultimate
goal
is
that
we
understand
what
the
true
barriers
are:
not
the
city's
barriers,
not
the
n
a's
barriers,
but
what
other
people
are
seeing
as
difficulty
to
access
the
neighborhoods
and
to
come
up
with
some
solutions
to
overcome
those.
So
I'm
open
to
direction
on
this.
F
A
B
You
know,
send
out
a
survey
to
all
the
nas
or
doing
it
through
an
art.
You
know
I
yeah,
I'm
not
really
sure
I'm
not
experienced
with
narc,
so
I'm
not
sure
how
that
would
work,
but
that
would
kind
of
be
an
aid
to
her.
So
she
could,
maybe
you
know,
concentrate
her
energies
on
you
know
taking
those
results
to
each
of
the
nas
and
talking
about
them
and
getting
you
know
further,
you
know
clarifications
and
you
know
input
from
them
rather
than
saying:
okay,
what's:
okay,
nax?
B
F
F
A
E
Sure
we
had
our
board
meeting
last
night
and
we
are
kind
of
regrouping
and
we
have
the
next
three
mondays
that
are
being
put
together
by
two
of
our
board
members,
and
it
has
to
do
with
who
we
want
to
be
when
we
grow
up
and
so
we're.
You
know
we're
talking
about
board
goals
and
anyway,
we
are
going
to
be,
like.
I
said
in
the
next
three
mondays
deciding
how
we
go
forward
as
a
boy.
A
B
B
This
kind
of
grew
out
an
idea
that
my
vice
chair
had
last
year,
and
so
I've
been
talking
to
old
farm
about
it
and
so
they've
decided
to
make
it
kind
of
a
permanent
meeting,
so
we'll
be
working
with
them
very
closely
in
these
meetings
and
hope
to
you
know,
expand
it
to
other
nas
like
larkspur
to
handle
the
whole
southeast
quadrant
of
bends,
that's
kind
of
our
ultimate
goal,
but
we're
starting
we're
starting
one
step
at
a
time.
So
thank
you
very
much.
O
I
didn't
get
to
say
this
at
the
start
of
the
meeting,
but
I
didn't
it's
too
late
to
change
because
the
minutes
were
approved,
but
I
did
I
had
a
technical
error.
I
didn't
oppose
the
nart
proposal
that
was
in
the
meeting.
I
don't
know
why
it
was
listed
as
opposed.
I
think
that
was
because
I
couldn't
get
my
mute
to
change
at
the
time,
so
I
was
just
going
to
add
that
and
I'll
keep
it
short,
but
that's
it.
Thank
you.
N
Yeah
we
had
our
meeting
or
board
meeting
about
a
week
ago.
The
we've
got
about
about
50
of
our
board
is
brand
new,
which
is
good
news,
so
we're
actually
rebuilding
our
board.
Our
our
focus
is
going
to
be
pretty
much
on
just
getting
them
up
to
speed
and
repopulating
the
various
committees
that
we
were
associated
with
before
that's
about
it.
P
Hi,
so
century
west
did
not
meet
in
december.
We
were
supposed
to
meet
and
unfortunately,
with
the
holidays
and
a
couple
of
illnesses,
we
had
to
cancel
our
holiday
get
together
and
we
were
all
really
bummed
about
that,
because
we
were
planning
to
do
this
in
person,
which
still
seems
like
such
a
novel
idea.
P
We
thought
that
we
were
going
to
resume
in-person
meetings,
beginning
with
our
january
19th
meeting
and
unfortunately,
kovid
is
forcing
us
to
reconsider
that
as
well.
So
we'll
continue
on
zoom
as
it
relates
to
board
activities,
we
will
be
planning
our
annual
meeting,
hopefully
as
we
get
together
on
the
19th.
We
are
not
doing
fire
ready
bend
this
year
because
we
recorded
all
of
those
sessions.
P
They
are
available
out
on
youtube
for
anyone
to
view
and
we're
planning
to
just
promote
the
heck
out
of
those
again
and
maybe
provide
a
few
other
resources
to
our
members
as
it
relates
to
fire
fire
readiness
and
fire
prevention
kind.
Of.
As
a
side
note,
I've
had
two
I've
had
one
opportunity
to
meet
directly
with
mount
bachelor,
village,
constituents
and-
and
that
was
in
october-
and
I
have
another
opportunity
to
meet
with
sunrise
village
coming
up
next
week.
P
M
E
Wastewater
master
plan
and
these
assumptions
are
very
deep
and
they
have
they
include
economy
and
employment
and
housing
and
infrastructure
that
are
going
to
be
directing
the
the
direct
we're
going
to
change
the
direction
of
the
city
for
the
next
20
to
30
years.
And
if
you're
not
aware
of
those
assumptions,
then
you're
going
to
be
hindered
because
you
know
it'll
happen
whether
or
not
we
or
anybody
else
are
concerned,
and
the
city
staff
has
made
its
assumptions
and
that's,
in
my
opinion,
that's
the
way
the
city
is
going
to
go.
M
Okay,
otherwise
abna
had
its
last
meeting
in
early
december.
We
meet
again
tomorrow.
I
think,
there's
there's
three
quick
things
where
we're
interested
in
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
to
slow
the
speeding
down
on
mount
washington
drive
and
so
we're
sort
of
gauging
whether
we
should
sort
of
get
more
active
about
this
or
whether
we
want
to
continue
to
play
a
neutral
role
haunts
us
work,
some
with
the
police
to
try
and
change
what's
happening
and
hasn't
had
a
lot
of
luck
because
of
their
lack
of
resources.
M
C
C
C
L
F
D
Yeah
similar
to
sean,
we
had
a
november
meeting
and
have
had
some
board
members
come
out
of
the
woodwork
from
our
general
meeting,
so
we're
getting
ready
to
onboard
them.
On
monday
at
our
first
meeting
of
the
year,
we
had,
I
think,
a
handful
of
us
in
the
dei
training,
which
was
great
in
december,
but
we
didn't
meet
in
december,
so
feels
like
we're
just
ramping
up
for
2022,
and
I
think
a
big
chunk
of
our
time
on
monday
is
not
only
onboarding.
D
A
District,
we
also
brought
in
a
couple
of
board
members
and
we
lost
a
board
member.
We
are
continuing
to
have
the
most
incredible
conversations
about
diversity,
equity,
inclusion,
completely,
fascinating,
all
different
kinds
of
perspectives
as
part
of
these
conversations
and
really
challenging
ourselves,
and
it's
difficult-
and
I
love
it.
So
I'm
proud
of
us
for
doing
that.
The
dei
lab
the
second
version.
There's
the
second
I'm
sorry
session,
I'm
really
excited
about.
We
have
several
of
our
folks.
E
F
And
I
can't
even
unmute
myself,
we
have
an
extra
minute,
so
I'm
gonna
spend
it
letting
you
guys
know
about
some
upcoming
stuff
that
we
have
going
on.
So
council
check-in
is
on
january
19th.
That
is
a
time
where
summer
and
or
kathy
is
going
to
be
attending
kathy.
This
is
a
surprise
to
you,
considering.
You
were
just
voted
into
vice
chair
tonight,
but
I'm
I'm
happy
to
chat
with
you
guys
about
that.
F
F
I
know
you've
been
working
really
closely,
so
maybe
that
would
be
an
appropriate
check-in
for
you
to
go
to,
and
I
want
to
throw
that
out
there
for
you
guys
to
decide
and
then
also
just
if
we
need
to
make
a
stance
as
a
committee
and
come
up
with
that,
and
I
think
we
were
talking.
There's
not
rules
really
set
in
stone.
Yet
they
could
be
changing
over
the
next
few
months,
and
so,
as
far
as
the
actual
code
suggestions
go,
maybe
we
don't
have
anything
to
say
yet.