►
From YouTube: Bend Neighborhood Leadership Alliance (NLA)
Description
If the video does not start automatically, please refresh your browser and press the play button located in the middle of the video screen or in the bottom left corner of the video screen.
If you would like to provide public comment during this meeting, please use this link https://bit.ly/3kkYDM7 to join the meeting live via Zoom.
To join by phone, please dial 1-888-788-0099 and enter Webinar ID 833 8468 3325## Use your telephone's keypad to provide public comment. To raise your hand, press *9. After the host provides you the ability to unmute, press *6 to unmute your microphone.
A
Changed
after
it
went
out
last
week,
and
so
we're
not
going
to
be
discussing
the
neighborhood
assessment
tonight
at
the
nla
we
are
going
to
save
that
for
june.
So,
if
you've
come
to
listen
to
that,
I
apologize
for
not
getting
to
you
sooner.
I
apparently
have
vacation
brain.
C
We
all
have
it
so.
I've
had.
B
B
Welcome
to
meeting
of
the
nla:
let's
do
roll
call
and
humor
me
as
we
do
this
roll
call.
Let
me
know
what
your
favorite
food
is
just
for
fun,
chair,
sears,
I
am
here
my
favorite
food
is
warm.
Raspberries
must
be
warm
vice,
chair,
kathy
roche,
yeah.
B
I
I
am
here
I
would
have
to
pick
sushi.
J
I
thought
we
were
doing
desserts
and
then
I
got
really
confused
elizabeth.
I
just
jumped
on
I'll
go
ice
cream.
I
guess
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
what
the
front
was.
I'm
sorry,
but.
B
C
Yeah
this
is
jim.
I
have
one
correction:
okay,
that's
in
the
member
christo
report,
the
second
bullet.
Okay,
it
reads
annual
board
meeting
june
30th
2022
and
what
it
should
mean
read
is
that
we're
working
with
the
city
to
delay
the
annual
meeting
beyond
june
30th
2022.
K
Yes-
and
I
just
wanted
to
send
out
a
reminder
for
the
minutes-
I
know
we've
had
a
lot
of
changes
in
the
the
past.
The
minutes
are
just
to
capture
action
items,
big
decisions
or
anything
that
the
committee
approves
on.
If
people
are
wanting
more
details
in
the
minutes,
we
just
recommend
that
you
go
and
rewatch
the
recording
of
the
meeting.
B
I
see
a
motion
from
elizabeth
how
about
a
second
and
a
second
from
karen
sorry
vote
to
approve
everyone
approved,
say,
aye
or
raise
your
hand
colonies
motion
passes.
Thank
you.
Let's
go
into
public
comment.
Do
we
have
anything
anyone
here,
michaela.
K
Great,
we
do
have
four
people
in
our
attendees.
Okay,
if
you
are
wanting
to
speak
with
our
nla
today,
please
raise
your
hand
using
the
raised
hand,
button.
K
And
it
looks
like:
oh,
we
got
somebody
all
right,
morgan,
greenwood,
I've,
given
you
the
ability
to
unmute
yourself,
try
to
keep
your
comment
around
two
minutes.
Thank.
L
You
kayla,
I
just
wanted
to
take
the
opportunity
to
introduce
myself
to
you
folks.
My
name
is
morgan
greenwood
I
am
taking
over
some
of
the
government
affairs
work
for
koba.
I
think
you
guys
might
be
familiar
with
karna,
so
I
just
wanted
to
take
the
opportunity
to
say
hello
and
introduce
myself
and
thank
you
guys
for
doing
this
work.
I
actually
got
started
in
community
development
and
housing
advocacy
in
a
neighborhood
association
in
eugene,
so
I
love
love
seeing
this
grid
of
folks
here.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
A
I
B
So
when
it
comes
to
the
rep
reports,
one
thing
that
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
in
the
meeting
is
as
we
go
through
our
rep
reports.
This
is
our
time
to
bring
up
concerns
or
issues
or
anything
else
from
our
neighborhoods
that
might
apply
to
the
city
in
general
right.
B
So
if
we
have
something
that
comes
up
a
concern
or
another
issue
or
something
we
want
to
look
at
that,
someone
wants
to
look
at
I'd
like
to
take
a
pause
and
check
in
on
that,
because
if
it
is
something
that
multiple
neighborhoods
are
interested
in,
then
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
tracking
that
and
at
the
very
least
putting
it
on
our
task
list
to
revisit.
If
we
can't
address
it
at
this
meeting,.
B
Okay,
let's
start
with
vice
chair,
cathy
roche,.
D
Yes,
our
group
10
is
continues
to
work
together.
We
just
lost
another
member
because
he
can't
afford
to
live
in
bend
and
he's
moving
to
las
vegas.
E
Okay,
marnie
smith
from
the
amphitheater
will
be
joining
us
at
our
board
meeting
this
thursday
at
five
to
talk
about
the
amphitheater
changes
and
the
concerts
and
answer
questions.
So
if
any
of
you
have
heard
or
have
questions
about
the
concerts
you're
welcome
to
attend.
Our
particular
na
gets
quite
a
few
comments
regarding
the
loudness
of
the
concerts
and
they
don't
realize
that
the
amphitheater
has
been
given
is
exempt
from
the
noise
ordinance.
E
So
we
do
a
lot
of
triaging
around
that,
but
marnie
will
be
at
our
board
meeting
and
we'll
be
answering
questions
so
we're
doing
a
special
mailing
in
the
next
couple
weeks
to
encourage
people
to
to
take
the
the
shoot
south
canyon
survey
and
also
to
become
a
member
of
the
association.
E
Lastly,
gilliam
pacific,
many
of
you
attended
their
presentation
on
their
project
they're
the
ones
the
owners
of
the
box
factory
and
they're
expanding
across
the
street.
They
did
submit
an
application
for
the
new
development
on
march
28th,
it's
for
18,
250
square
feet
of
commercial,
300
and
312
residences,
but
the
application
was
incomplete
due
to
a
glitch
in
the
traffic
study.
So
we're
waiting
for
that
to
be
completed
and
that's
it
from
southern
crossing.
C
Okay,
let's
say
we
also
had
a
board
departure
now
we're
down
to
two
people.
Unfortunately,
and
then
the
second
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
is
we're
actively
working
with
old
farm
and
also
we've
reached
out
to
larkspur
about
the
alpenglow
park
opening
celebration.
We
plan
to
have
booths
there
to
answer
anybody's
questions
and
also
to
sign
up
new
members
for
basically,
hopefully,
all
three
neighborhood
associations.
C
We
started
meeting
with
the
city
on
it,
we'll
be
meeting
with
them
to
kind
of
plan
this
event
and
it's
currently
scheduled
for
july
15th.
Thank
you.
F
Yeah
hi
river
west,
we
actually
got
a
request
on
facebook
for
the
speed
radar
locations
and
got
a
really
good
response
to
that,
and
it
looks
like
galveston
is
definitely
the
number
one
issue
and
it
has
been
for
a
long
time
and
city
doesn't
plan
on
doing
any
updates
to
that
until
2024,
so
we're
tracking
and
watching
that
we're
also
doing
more
work
on
the
website
communications
and
I'm
just
going
to
add
that
our
land
use
rep
is
stepping
down
from
the
land
use
networking
group,
but
I'm
glad
to
see
that
the
minutes
are
posted
on
the
nart
website.
F
So
we
can
track
what
actions
are
being
doing
in
that
in
that
group.
Thank
you.
M
There
we
go
yeah,
so
summit
west
has
their
next
meeting's
june
7th
and
at
that
meeting,
we're
going
to
have
both
ben
fire
and
county
emergency
services
representatives.
Who
will
be
helping
us
with
understand
why
we
don't
have
evacuation
routes?
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
solve
that
evacuation
route
issue,
but
that
and
fire
mitigation
efforts
that
are
going
on
both
in
the
county
and
the
city.
So
if
anyone
has
an
interest,
you're
welcome
to
attend
on
june
7th.
G
Hi
thanks
hi
everybody
for
century
west.
We
started
our
cleanup
events
in
april.
We're
doing
one
cleanup
event
every
month
through
september,
so
six
opportunities,
so
our
neighborhood
is
going
to
be
span
clean.
We
might
have
to
hit
century
drive
a
couple
of
times
because
that
seems
to
be
our
our
big
problem
area.
People
have
this
incessant
need
to
throw
out
banana
peels
and
orange
peels
on
their
way
up
to
the
mountain,
and,
as
we
know,
those
don't
really
go
anywhere
for
a
very
long
time.
G
We
also
sent
out
a
newsletter
and
asked
for
feedback
regarding
the
speed
radar
program
and
shockingly
I
received
about
30
responses
and
got
a
lot
of
good
feedback
and
they're,
not
necessarily
surprising.
Once
again.
Speed
on
century
drive
continues
to
be
an
issue
even
with
the
reduction
in
speed
and
we've
got
neighbors.
That
say
when
people
are
headed
up
to
the
mountain
you
know.
G
If
their
home
backs
up
to
century
drive,
then
that's
what
they
hear
is
that
acceleration
and
just
the
noise
from
the
cars
is
pretty
pretty
intense,
and
then
we
will
be
holding
a
cleanup
event
on
may
20th
and,
following
that,
we're
doing
a
bit
of
an
annual
meeting.
We're
gonna
make
it
more
of
a
social
opportunity.
G
We
will
at
least
speak
and
and
do
take
care
of
a
couple
of
items
of
business,
but
we're
going
to
try
to
have
something
more
socially
geared
because
it
it's
so
nice
to
see
people's
face
in
person
and
then.
Finally,
I
am
working
with
nicole
of
summit
west
and
we're
exploring
a
couple
of
opportunities
to
maybe
have
a
booth
at
the
farmers
market
for
northwest
crossing
to
also
drum
up
some
membership
for
our
our
neighborhoods.
That's
it.
H
Yeah,
okay,
so
we
had
a
hybrid
meeting
this
last
time,
they're
worth
three
four
one,
two
four
four
of
us
at
the
meeting
and
the
rest
on
zoom.
H
We
are
spending
most
of
our
time
now
discussing
the
various
ramifications
of
the
code,
amendments
that
may
or
may
not
end
up
being
amended.
H
It's
how
they're
going
to
affect
our
neighborhood
the
traffic
signs
survey.
We
got
that
back
in
and
we
sent
our
stuff
off
to
the
city
and
we
are
having
our
park
event
in
june
on
the
16th,
which
is
a
thursday
we've
got
music
in
the
park.
We've
got
pizza,
ice
cream
and
a
list
of
about
15
invited
guests,
meaning
tables.
H
A
Yes,
of
course,
savvy
borah
is
going
to
join.
H
Yeah,
good,
okay,
so
many
of
it
yeah
you're
all
invited
the
music
is
by
coyote
willow
and
certainly
should
be
a
good
time
free
pizza
and
ice
cream
by
the
way,
all
right,
that's
it.
B
I
Hi
from
southwest
bend,
we
held
our
spring
general
meeting
on
april
28th
had
okay
turnout
about
30
people,
it
was
on
zoom.
We
had
a
couple
of
speakers:
damien
cernick
from
the
city
talking
about
the
climate
friendly
and
equitable
community,
and
I
think
that
that
was
a
little
more
difficult
for
people
to
grasp
it's
a
fairly
complex
concept
and
got
some
feedback
that
that
was
a
little
confusing.
I
We
will
be
starting
our
neighborhood
cleanup
in
may
this
year.
The
official
start
date
would
have
been
the
day
after
our
general
meeting
and
our
new
coordinator
couldn't
be
there,
so
we'll
be
picking
that
up
in
may,
both
literally
and
figuratively,
picking
up
the
trash,
and
we
have
been
working
on
getting
word
out
about
the
deschutes
south
canyon
use
survey,
we've
gotten
about
almost
600
responses
so
far
and
some
from
every
single
neighborhood
association.
So
that's
encouraging
and
exciting,
and
that's
it.
H
J
Thanks,
I'm
representing
larkspur.
N
J
Actually
have
our
spring
general
meeting
this
evening
at
6,
30
it'll
be
on
zoom.
So,
looking
forward
to
that
tonight,
our
board
has
been
in
kind
of
ongoing
conversation.
J
It
sounds
like
speed
on
certain
roads
is
not
a
unique
issue,
but
we've
been
talking
a
lot
with
representatives
from
the
city
about
some
of
the
maybe
more
low-hanging
fruit
kind
of
options
for
slowing
down
traffic
on
pedigree
and
making
that
safer
for
bikes
and
pedestrians
and
then
likewise
jim,
I
believe
larkspur
is,
is
in
to
participate
in
that
alpenglow
park
event.
J
But
we
just
feel
like
we're
all
a
little
strapped
so
probably
not
going
to
help
too
much
in
the
planning
of
that
event,
but
we
will
definitely
be
there
and
cheer
cheer
on
the
new
park
and
then,
finally,
tonight
our
guest
at
our
general
meeting
is
deputy
fire
chief,
trish
connolly
and
certainly
joining.
J
You
know
many
of
you
and
and
other
neighborhood
associations
with
concern
and
curiosity
around
how
we
navigate
fire
season
and
what
it
means
to
have
defensible
space
around
our
homes
and
become
more
resilient
and
then
also,
of
course,
water
and
and
how
we
can
best
manage
our
limited
resources
with
water,
so
we're
all
we're
all
in
a
similar
boat.
I
think
I
don't
don't
know
those
are
earth-shattering
new
issues,
but
certainly
on
our
radar.
So
that's
it.
B
For
orchard
district,
speaking
of
radars,
so
for
the
speed
radar,
we
do
the
same
thing
where
that
others
are
doing
where
we're
sending
it
out
through
our
newsletter
and
asking
for
responses,
and
we
generally
get
quite
a
quite
a
good
response
and
some
usual
culprits,
so
we
narrow
those
down
and
then
provide
them.
B
That
said,
we
know
that
council
has
that
on
their
list
to
look
at
so
my
expectation
is
that
the
nla
will
be
involved
in
that
conversation,
and-
and
so
that's
that's
where
we're
sitting
at
this
point,
I
see
a
hand
up
from
ian
yeah.
O
Yeah
just
a
note
on
the
short-term
rental
topic,
if
you're
interested
tune
in
to
the
councilwork
session
at
the
may
18th
meeting.
So
that's
next
wednesday
in
the
work
session,
staff
will
be
presenting
a
couple
of
potential
options
to
counsel
on
changes
to
the
way
we
regulate
short-term
rentals
based
on
council
feedback
from
a
work
session
on
the
topic
a
couple
months
ago.
So
the
follow-up
for
that
happens
next
week
on
the
18th.
B
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you,
everyone
for
your
participation
in
that
we
have
councilor
perkins
here.
Oh,
I
see
a
hand
lisa
sorry.
B
N
Like
to
think
you
can
hear
us,
I
I
got
a
short
two
second
report.
Reporters
the
board.
B
N
Three
days
ago
and
has
been
interested
in
the
shelter
code
development,
but
has
no
major
input,
this,
that's
any
different
from
what
the
nla
came
out
with
a
month
ago.
What
probably
is
the
biggest
news?
Is
the
our
board
has
completed
a
traffic
plan
for
old
bend,
neighborhood
or
a
small
neighborhood
with
narrow
streets
very
dense,
walkable
inviting
community,
but
we
have
two
issues:
one
broadway
street
has
been
paved
and
opened
up
and
cleaned
up
and
the
traffic
is
getting
high,
speed
near
amity
school,
and
that
has
always
been
an
issue.
N
In
fact,
wall
street
in
front
of
amity
was
taken
care
of
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
with
the
nssp
program
of
probably
more
often
greater
concern
in
cut
through
traffic
is
sizemore
street,
which
you
may
know
as
an
arrow
street,
from
franklin
south
to
the
colorado,
arizona
exchange
and
it's
designed
to
be
extended
to
an
industrial
way,
and
so
we
expect
it
to
have
considerably
increased
traffic,
and
the
traffic
plan
has
more
to
do
with.
Possibly
right
turns
only
when
you're
coming
south
on
the
arizona
to
which
would
obviously
keep
people
from
cutting
through.
N
Lastly,
we're
very
happy
that,
with
the
help
of
melanie
keebler
planning
for
the
deschutes
river
trail
through
through
our
south
neighborhood
is
beginning
to
get
action
and
the
city
is
taking
the
lead
on
that.
N
B
P
We're
still
in
the
process
of
planning
our
our
general
meeting
for
the
for
the
park
over
here
on
the
east
side
and
locksmith
is
going
to
be
joining
us,
and
so
is
southeast
bend
and
we're
going
to
be,
it's
gonna
be
kind
of
a
grand
opening.
P
I
think
it's,
I
think
it's
the
16th
anyway
I'll,
give
you
an
update.
When
I
get
my
my
act
together,
I
wasn't.
I
wasn't
prepared
to
jump
into
this.
L
B
B
A
Yeah,
so,
as
many
of
you
know,
we
have
some
elections
coming
up
or
term
ends
coming
up.
A
Sorry,
I
should
say:
term
ends
coming
up
in
july,
many
of
you
have
either
expressed
that
you
are
going
to
be
stepping
off
the
board
and
finding
a
replacement
for
yourselves,
and
so
what
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
do
is
maybe,
in
june,
come
back
to
this
group
and
do
one
more
election
of
chair
and
but
kathy's
going
to
remain
as
our
vice
chair,
but
she
has
also
expressed
her
intent
to
leave
in
july
because
her
her
term
ends
at
that
time,
and
so
what
I'm
looking
for
is
someone
who
is
planning
on
staying
with
the
nla
for
a
while
to
be
clear
summer
is
announcing
her
resignation
as
chair
she's,
still
going
to
remain
on
the
neighborhood
leadership
alliance.
A
So
she'll
be
here
with
us,
and
we
just
need
someone
to
fill
this
chair
role
so
think
about
it.
I'm
gonna
probably
be
reaching
out
to
you
over
the
next
month.
In
june
we
will
have
an
election,
and,
if
we're
unable
to
find
a
chair
to
fill
the
role
with
june,
we
might
end
up
taking
a
pause
for
like
a
month,
just
while
we're
getting
those
the
determines
taken
care
of
and
the
new
representatives
appointed.
A
So
what
that
might
look
like
is
like
a
july
off,
but
we
can
talk
about
that
as
it
comes,
and
we
will
first
look
at
june
and
see
where
it
goes
from
there
and,
as
I
said
I'll,
be
I'll,
be
looking
I'm
reaching
out
to
all
of
you
to
see
kind
of
where
you're
at
and
what
you're.
Thinking
for
the
future
of
your
position
on
the
nla.
B
And
related
to
that
michaela,
because
we
have
a
bunch
of
positions
turning
over
at
the
next
meeting,
can
we
please
revisit
the
appointment
process
and
I
know
it's
going
to
be
potentially
a
little
difficult,
as
I'm
sure
we've
all
heard
that
the
mayor
is
stepping
down,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
clear
and
understand
what
what
our
new
appointment
process
is.
A
Yeah,
absolutely
and
I'll
try
to
go
over
that
with
each
of
you
when,
when
I
call
so
that
you
have
an
idea
of
what
the
city
is
going
to
be
doing,
because
if
you
remember
we've
offered
to
do
some
outreach
to
help,
you
fill
those
positions.
A
What
that
means
is
that
the
nla
would
be
or
the
the
city
would
be,
advertising
that
the
nla
has
openings
as
we
do
with
most
committees
and
then
sending
those
people
who
express
interest
back
to
you
to
talk
to
you
about
potential
recommendations
or
how
you
want
to
move
forward
with
those
people.
So
we'll
go
over
that
next
meeting
and
then
also,
as
I
said,
follow
up
with
you
each
individually.
P
I
have
a
major
concern
with
that
whole
process
this
this
committee.
This
commission,
is
different
than
any
other
commission
or
council
advisory
committee
than
any
other,
because
we
have
a
legacy.
We
support
our
neighborhoods.
This
is
not
something
that
you
can
put
a
notice
in
the
newspaper
and
say
you
know
if
you're
interested
in
being
an
nla
representative
for
the
old
farm,
neighborhood
association
apply.
Now
because
you
have
you
have
to
have
the
background,
you
have
to
have
the
the
feeling
you
have
to
be
literally.
A
I'm
not
disagreeing
with
you
dave,
but
what
we
do
follow
is
city
code
and
the
city
code
tells
us
that
there's
no
requirements
for
them
to
be
board
members.
I
know
several
of
you
who
are
sitting
here
today
were
not
board
members
before
you
were
appointed
to
the
nla
and
when
you
became
nla
members,
you
joined
the
boards,
I'm
not
saying
that.
That's
the
the
right
process,
I'm
just
saying
that's
currently
how
it's
written
in
our
code,
and
we
have
to
follow
that.
It's
also
the
mayor's
prerogative
on
how
she
complains.
B
P
B
That
is
that
is
on
the
table.
I
agree
with
you
dave
and
I
see
old
farm
being
stuck
at
the
moment
and
I'm
gonna
be
reaching
out
to
you
and
your
and
your
chair
to
work
with
the
city
to
figure
out
how
we
can
how
we
can
figure
it
out
and
move
it
forward.
I
don't
have
this
as
a
discussion
topic
on
the
agenda
for
tonight
and
that's
why
I
asked
michaela
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
the
next
meeting,
but
I'll
be
having
conversations
with
her
and
others
in
the
meantime.
B
P
B
C
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
tell
you
my
experience.
I
joined
the
the
southeast
bend
board
the
same
day.
They
nominated
me
for
nla
rep
and
I
could
tell
you
it
was
they
tried
to
feed
me
a
lot
of
information.
It
was
like
drinking
from
two
fire
hoses
at
once
right
and
it
was
very
difficult,
and
I
know
I
didn't
feel
comfortable
knowing
the
community
for
a
number
of
months,
so
I
can
echo
what
dave
says
I
think
for
southeast
bend.
C
B
Thank
you,
jim
okay.
We
need
to
move
forward
with
the
meeting
anything
else
on
transitions.
At
this
point
michaela
did
you
have
anything
else.
P
Okay,
well,
I
looked
up.
I
looked
up
our
general
meeting
with
with
southeast
and
with
lagerspur,
and
it's
on
friday
january
june.
Excuse
me
friday
july
15th,
okay,.
H
H
B
I
apologize
that
I
had
to
be
gone
for
the
last
nla
meeting.
Thank
you
for
carrying
on
without
me
and
thank
you
for
the
amazing
conversation
that
you
all
had.
I
was
very
impressed
with
all
the
different
perspectives.
B
The
conversation
remained
very
respectful
and
I
feel
like
you
are
listening
to
each
other
and
I'm
grateful
for
that.
So,
based
on
that
meeting,
you
saw
the
letter
that
was
submitted
to
city
council
as
public
comment.
B
R
Sure
I
guess
I
want
to
start
by
saying
how
much
I
appreciated
the
letter
from
the
nla
and
how
how
it
was
done,
how
it
was
formatted,
the
information
that
it
provided.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
found
it
personally
as
a
counselor
extremely
helpful.
So
thank
you
for
that.
R
As
most
of
you
are
aware,
we
had
a
very
packed
house
last
wednesday,
both
virtually
and
in
person,
and
I
think
we
heard
from
from
about
50
people
or
so
testifying
at
our
public
hearing
for
the
shelter
code
amendments-
and
I
was-
I
was
really
impressed
by
how
the
majority
of
the
people
really
were
respectful
and
listened
to
one
another,
and
you
know
stuck
to
sort
of
facts
and
and
and
details
about
the
code
amendments
rather
than
you
know,
stereotypes
and
and
name
calling,
and
I
just
I
thought
that
was
really
impressive
and
I
was
I
was.
R
I
was
really
pleased
as
a
counselor.
R
R
I
think
the
the
number
one
thing
that
we
heard
over
and
over
again
is
that
on-call
site
management
is
something
that
a
lot
of
people
feel
you
know
really
uncomfortable
about,
and
thought
was
a
really
bad
idea
for
for
our
community.
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
asked
city
staff
to
make
a
change
on
was
to
remove
the
on-call
part
of
that,
so
that
it
would
stay
that
it
so
that
it's
it's
on
safe.
R
Another
thing
that
we
heard
a
lot
about
and
and
something
that
you
know
I
felt
pretty
strongly
about-
was
that
not
only
is
the
the
hardship,
shelter
component,
you
know
really
controversial
for
for
a
lot
of
you
know
for
a
lot
of
really
legitimate
reasons,
but
also
I
I
also
sort
of
felt
personally
that
it
wasn't
really
going
to
achieve
what
we
wanted
to
achieve
out
of
it
and
that
there
were
other
options
and
ideas.
R
You
know
from
a
housing
perspective
that
could
achieve
that.
So
basically,
we
also
asked
staff
to
just
entirely
remove
the
hardship
part
from
the
proposed
code
and
then
the
last
major
thing
that
we
that
we
asked
for
was
straight
out
of
your
letter,
which
was
to
add
neighborhood
associations
in
sort
of
the
outreach
and
communication
part
for
for
where
a
shelter
is
located
and
so
that'll
just
help.
That'll
help.
R
Neighbor
associations
really
help
stay
informed
about
you,
know:
potential
new
locations
in
their
neighborhood
and
then
a
fourth
sort
of
smaller
part
of
this
is
for
temporary
shelters,
which
are
those
shelters
that
open
up
generally
speaking
in
terms
of
you
know,
with
a
smoke,
shelter
or
something.
You
know,
an
emergency
that's
happening
in
our
community
raised
some
some
concerns
about
what
there
was
the
planning
commission
had
added
good
neighbor
agreements
and
outreach
to
the
public.
R
We
asked
staff
to
bring
us
back
some
options
for
that,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
if
something
is
a
shelter
is
going
out
in
a
state
of
emergency
that
they
really
can
get
going
as
fast
as
they
can
to
address
this
urgent
need
in
our
community.
So
we're
going
to
be
hearing
about
all
of
that
at
our
meeting
on
the
18th
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
N
It
doing
staying
a
little
further
away
from
the
schools.
B
Okay,
thank
you
related
to
that.
Oh
karen.
E
Oh,
I
just
had
a
quick
question
related
to
the
end
shelter
you
were
gonna.
I
believe
council
was
going
to
look
at
the
the
unsanctioned
camps
and
sort
of
what
kind
of
rules
applied.
Do
you
have
a
timeline
for
that.
O
Yeah,
I
I
think
the
15th,
and
so
the
idea
is-
and
this
is
a
chance
for
me
to
say
something-
I've
said
it
before
city
of
bend.
We
don't
really
have
sort
of
a
modern,
comprehensive,
legally
defensible
section
of
our
code
on
how
when,
where
and
under
what
circumstances,
people
can
and
cannot
use
public
places
to
sleep,
so
we
don't
really
have
anything
to
enforce.
O
There
is,
I
think,
some
recognition
that
we
probably
need
one.
We
have
several
things
to
work
with,
including
some
recent
state
level
legislation
and
federal
court
decisions
that
set
some
some
parameters
and
boundaries
on
how
we
do
this.
They
they
don't
say.
We
can't
do
anything,
and
I
don't
think
anybody
has
taken
that
position,
but
we
do
have
some
sideboards
that
we
have
to
work
within.
So
the
idea,
I
think,
has
been
to
do
a
work
session
with
council.
L
O
Education,
public
input
sort
of
how
we,
how
we
map
out
how
we
get
from
sort
of
opening
the
book
on
this
topic.
I
think
again
at
that
second
meeting
in
june
to
eventually
co
amendments
to
the
municipal
code
that
will
set
some
parameters
on
how
public
space
can
and
cannot
be
used.
So
I
think
it's,
it's
probably
gonna
involve
some
process.
O
I
can't
give
you
a
timeline,
wouldn't
even
hazard,
a
guess
on
when
we're
gonna
get
done,
but
we're
gonna
start
talking
about
it
in
june
and
to
me
it's
it's
really,
it's
kind
of
the
other
side
of
the
coin
of
the
shelter
code
amendments.
There
are
some
reasons
to
work
on,
in
my
opinion,
the
the
shelter
code
amendments
first,
because
those
are
sort
of
a
capacity
building
effort,
and
then
we
come
in
on
the
other
side
with
the
public
space
regulation.
O
So
these
things
really
do
work
together,
and
so
as
soon
as
the
shelter
code
amendments
are
are
done
in
whatever
final
form
they
take.
Then
we'll
start
the
discussion
about
the
other
sort
of
the
other
part
of
this
sort
of
two-part
effort
to
address
this
issue.
So
that's.
That's
what's
coming,
probably
in
june.
G
Hey
thanks
for
calling
on
me
just
as
a
side
note
in
terms
of
the
n,
a
notification,
I've
had
a
lot
of
questions
from
various
land
use,
chairs
and
so
land
use
chair.
Networking
group
is
meeting
this
thursday
I
reached
out
to
makayla
and
to
colin,
and
it
sounds
like
we're
going
to
have
somebody
attend
from
the
city
to
walk
us
through
some
of
those
questions
so
partially.
What
we're
asking
is,
is
this
a
land
use
process?
G
Will
there
be
a
notification
to
neighbors
in
addition
to
the
n
a?
How
does
it
affect
the
comprehensive
plan
if
there's
any
any
effect,
and
then
we're
asking
questions
around?
What
liability
does
the
n
a
or
the
cities
assume
if
a
land
use
notice
is
not
forwarded
to
the
neighbors?
So
we're
very
anxious
to
to
have
this
discussion
and
kind
of
flush
this
out
a
little
bit
more.
B
Thank
you
lisa
for
taking
that
on
and
I'll
be
excited
to
to
hear
what
you
learn
and
how
this
might
actually
play
out.
B
Okay,
I
wanted
to,
as
promised
reach
out
to
you
for
feedback
on
the
different
approach
that
we
used
for
the
public
comment
letter
from
the
nla,
so
instead
of
just
looking
at
strict
majority,
first
prioritizing
consensus
and
then
talking
through
a
majority
and
then
talking
through
at
a
high
level
the
points
where
there
was
not
consensus,
any
specific
feedback-
and
I
know
I'm
stepping
down
his
chair-
so
I
won't
be
directing
another
letter
like
this,
but
I
do
feel
it's
important
to
ask
for
that
feedback.
It's
a
letter
representing
this
group.
B
S
B
S
So
I've
got
a
slide
show
and
I
see
I
can
share
screen.
So
let
me
open
it.
S
B
And
then
we
can
time
to
talk
great.
Thank
you.
S
S
You
michaela
thank
you,
nla,
I'm
honored
to
be
here.
I'm
robert
anderson.
I've
been
a
vend
resident
for
a
couple
of
years,
although
I've
been
a
landowner
here
for
almost
six
and
my
background
is
in
architecture
and
planning,
and
I
am
one
of
a
group
of
the
sabin
green
space
leadership
council,
so
say:
ben
green
space,
quick
intro
to
us.
We
are
grassroots
volunteers
coming
out
of
three
bed
neighborhoods,
the
those
you
see
there.
S
We
are
we're
most
of
these
neighborhoods
or
these
neighborhoods
are
directly
adjacent
to
the
coid
site
and
we
formed
this
group
in
response
to
threats
of
co,
80
site
development,
and
our
goal
is
to
preserve,
to
shoot
south
canyon,
for
public
use
and
for
official
park
land
in
bend.
S
So
a
little
background
on
on
the
shootstaff
canyon,
most
of
you
are
probably
familiar
with
it.
It's
a
roughly
145
acre
track
in
near
southwest
bend.
It's
adjacent
to
and
south
of
blakely
park
boarded
on
the
west
by,
of
course,
by
the
deschutes
river,
and
it
provides
a
major
southwest
extension
to
the
historic
canal
trail
all
the
way
to
the
mouth
of
the
canal
onto
the
chutes.
S
It
acts
as
a
hub
connector
between
the
east-west
running
historic
canal
trail
and
the
northwest,
of
course,
to
shoot
river
trail,
which
leads
into
downtown
and
beyond,
and
the
old
mill
district
and
this
these
heavy
green
lines
you
see
here
on
this
map
on
the
right
comes
straight
out
of
the
bend
parks
and
recreation
trail
map.
So
it
hosts
multiple
trails
that
are
on
the
bend,
parks
and
rec
trail
map.
S
And
it
is,
the
site
is
an
integral,
if
not
completely
recognized,
part
of
the
existing
park
and
trail
system
and
its
status
is
a
little
confusing
to
many,
I
think,
bendits,
not
least
of
which
is
that
there
are
existing
parks
and
rec
facilities.
You
know
trash
cans,
dog
bags,
signage
that
exists
there
already.
S
S
Or
vehicular
cyclists,
I'm
I'm
a
vehicular
guy
myself
and
you
know
don't
mind
getting
out
and
being
with
cars,
but
this
map
has.
I,
in
my
opinion,
has
a
problem,
and
that
is
that
I
think
it
overestimates
the
skill
level
and
underestimates
the
stress
for
what
we
think
of
as
recreational
cyclists,
particularly
the
connections
between
the
east
side
and
the
west
side
of
bend
across
the
parkway
are
not
easily
negotiated
and
there
just
aren't
a
lot
of
ways
to
get
across
and
don't
involve
some.
S
You
know
pretty
white
knuckle
if
you're,
if
you're
a
recreational
cyclist,
some
white
knuckle
cycle,
perhaps
as
a
response
to
this
bed,
bikes,
bedbikes.org,
local,
grassroots
organization,
cyclists
has
done
their
own
map
second
opinions
or
providing
your
assessment
of
what
constitutes
low
stress,
cycling
and
what
they
think
recreational
cyclists
can
use.
And
this
on
the
on
the
map
you
see,
the
blue
and
the
green
are
their
ideas
about
what
recreational
cyclists
can
can
use
comfortably.
S
An
interesting
finding
of
this
is
that
the
historic
canal
trail
is
the
only
east-west
connection
across
the
parkway
that
works
for
recreational
cyclists.
So
it's
it's
really
can
be
thought
of
as
an
important
collector.
If
you
will
for
recreational
cycles
who
don't
want
to
get
out
and
dice
it
up
in
traffic.
S
Looking
at
the
site
in
a
little
bit
more
detail,
we'll
have
several
detail,
slides
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
some
city
slides
the
site
has
about
eight
and
a
half
miles
of
trails.
It's
very
highly
used
and
these
the
numbers
that
you
see
here
for
usage
of
the
such
river
trail
and
the
canal
trail
come
from
2016
and
they're
a
six
month
summer
month
is
the
top
line
numbers
and
the
bottom
line
numbers
are
estimated
here
long.
S
S
S
Regarding
trees
and
woodlands,
the
site
has
about
64
acres
of
high-density
woodlands
with
an
equal
amount
of
of
medium
density.
Bushings.
It's
really
a
a
major
source
of
green
that
what
we
call
green
lung
greenhouse
gas
sequestration
for
the
city
of
bend
sitting
where
it
does.
S
As
many
of
you
know,
if
not
all
of
you
know
the
the
governor's
order
executive
order.
2004
has
issued
broad
directives
for
all
state
agencies
to
basically
take
major
actions
to
encourage
carbon
sequestration
and
storage.
And
it's
it's
it's
fairly.
It's
fairly
vague
in
its
in
its
in
the
way
it
sort
of
delegated
this
authority,
but
and
a
lot
of
people
have
sort
of
assumed
that
the
major
thing
coming
out
of
this
is
more
dense,
housing,
sort
of
and
we'll
talk
about
that
in
a
minute.
S
But
the
first
thing
to
come
out
of
it
was
really
something
that
happened
last
year,
which
was
the
global
warming
commission
in
the
state,
basically
issued
a
set
of
recommendations
for
statewide
land
use
planning
that
is
really
focused
on
greenhouse
gas
sequestration
and
a
no
net
annual
loss
of
natural
and
working
lands
and
waters,
which
is
when
you
stop
and
think
about
it.
There's
really
quite
something:
there's
there's
more
to
come.
S
This
is
this
is
really
just
the
beginning,
but
this
is
a
major
asset
in
terms
of
of
greenhouse
gas
being
a
greenhouse
gas
sink
looking
at
habitat
and
wildlife.
S
The
blue
part
of
the
map
you
see
here
is
the
the
is
the
chutes
river
area
special
interest,
metro,
which
is
riparian
it.
The
yellow
areas
are
the
the
primary
and
secondary
wetlands,
the
prime
existing
on
the
river,
of
course,
and
the
second
room
is
existing
along
a
stream
and
serving
also
as
bird
habitat.
S
There
are.
I
have
seen
lists
of
over
500
species
of
birds
that
have
been
observed
on
this
site.
The
ben
bullets
enlisted
100
said
that
there
were
130,
but
they
were
being
extremely
conservative
in
this
manner,
and
this
is
quite
a
haven
for
in-town
bird
watchers
and
it's
it.
The
list
is
very
long
and
if
you,
if
you
go
there
yourself,
you
might
well
see
a
tannager
or
a
kilder
or
almost
certainly
a
stellar
stain.
S
So
it's
under
threat
of
development
and
there
are
really
a
number
of
challenges
for
developing
this
site,
as
first
we've
already
mentioned
this
in
the
area.
The
river
area
special
interest,
the
the
blue
area
to
the
to
the
west
edge
much
of
the
site
is
rocky
and
steep
habitat
we
just
sort
of
talked
about.
S
Vehicular
accesses
is
pretty
challenging.
There's
some
area,
there's,
there's
a
there's:
an
access,
gravel
road
off
the
tongue
up
there
on
the
right
coming
off
of
brookswood
and
there's
possible
access
from
milo,
milo
avenue,
but
other
than
that.
It's
it's
going
to
be
challenging
to
gain
significant
access.
S
There
is
a
scenic
easement
which
covers
the
entire
site,
which
goes
for
12
more
years
and
not
the
least
of
which
there's
a
significant
amount
of
public
opposition
to
developing
this.
As
a
you
know,
under
the
private
ownership
and
sales
to
what
they
may
already
perceive
as
a
public
park.
S
So
I
want
to
talk
about
again
the
site
in
the
context
of
the
city
and
I'm
going
to
move
that
I'm
going
to
move
this
side
up
here.
Okay,
it's
a
little
easier
to
see
because
I
like
to
be
able
to
sort
of
see
what
I'm
talking
about
by
moving
the
postage
same
size,
people
off
to
the
side.
So
in
late
2016
ben
city,
the
ben
city,
sort
of
cut
a
deal
with
the
state.
H
S
And
in
return
for
that,
they
would
have
opportunity
zones,
areas
of
densification
growing
up
now.
High
density
is
kind
of
a
catchword,
especially
when
it
comes
to
high
density
housing.
Why
do
we
like
high
density?
Well,
it
chews
up
probably
less
ground
per
capita
to
develop
houses
and
that's
a
good
thing,
but
the
real
reason
is
to
get
people
out
of
cars.
S
S
S
That's
the
primary
commercial
zone,
core
of
ben,
and
if
we
map
out
an
area,
that's
a
third
of
a
mile
from
that
that
sort
of
irregular
blue
bubble.
That's
really
the
walkable
core
of
bend
and
the
source
that
that
url
shows
the
the
source
for
the
walkability
standards
at
the
setting
third
of
the
mile.
S
But
you
know
if
you're
going
to
be
doing
dense
development.
It
really
needs
to
be
happening
inside
that
irregular
blue
level.
So
to
speak.
S
So
that
suggests
that
only
five
of
the
nine
opportunity
zones
are
really
suitable
for
high
density,
housing
and
and
the
ones
that
sort
of
lie
outside
you
can
build
high
density
housing,
but
you're
not
going
to
get
people
out
of
cars
you're
just
going
to
be
creating
more
traffic,
and
so
this
is
a
problem
because
you're
you're
kind
of
fighting
yourself,
if
we
look
at
what's
really
happening,
currently
happening.
These
are
this
is
from
ameritrade.
These
are
permitted
and
in
process
multi-family
housing
unit
permits
these
are
unit
counts.
S
S
Now,
there's
not
an
insignificant
number
outside
the
welcome
zone
too,
almost
2
800,
but
more
than
a
third
of
those
occur
in
on
one
in
one
development,
which
is
the
stevens
track,
which
I
think
has
some
amount
of
of
commercial,
that's
planned
for
it
as
well,
so
there's
some
local
commercials
going
on
there
as
well.
It's
sort
of
a
pud,
but
what's
really
what's
really
happening,
is
we
have
to
respect
this?
I
mean
this
is
this?
Is
the
this?
Is
the
essential
structure
of
ben.
S
So
we
have
to
ask
the
question:
if
it's
not
suitable
for
for
housing,
it's
it's
got
some
definite
constraints
and
challenges
in
terms
of
the
details
of
getting
developed.
What
is
it,
what
is
the
highest
and
best
use
for
this
piece
of
property?
Well,
sorry,
it's
already
a
de
facto
public
park.
It's
a
central
location,
natural
area.
It's
it
has
great
accessibility
to
pedestrians
and
cyclists.
S
Official
park
status,
if
we,
if,
if
it
were
to
be
officially
apart,
it'll,
improve
the
surrounding
property
values.
This
is
a
concept
called
value
capture
from
my
planning
days,
where,
basically,
the
increased
property
valuations
and
taxes
help
actually
pay
for
the
improvements
and
the
acquisition
of
land
to
to
do
public
improvements,
such
as
parks
or
even
metro
stations,
which
is
what
it
came
from.
S
There
are
a
number
of
climate
initiatives
that,
if
we
preserve
this
as
open
space
as
green
space
that
will
meet
at
both
state
and
local
level,
which
are
actually
too
many
to
go
into
in
detail
the
highest
and
best
use
for
this
property
is
to
be
recognized
as
a
central
park
for
bed.
It's
really
it's
really
kind
of
that
simple
and
that's
straightforward.
S
That
sort
of
brings
it
back
to
south
to
say:
ben
green
space
brings
it
back
to
us.
Here's
the
four
segment
green
space
has
been
involved
in
the
public
awareness
campaign.
You've
probably
seen
our
street
signs
and
we've
been
sticking
hundreds.
S
Of
flyers
and
doors
we've
been
undergoing
research
and
presentations
such
as
this
one
and
some
organizing
within
the
neighborhood
association
community.
We
are
trying
to
increase
our
outreach
to
all
neighborhood
associations
in
bend
and
obviously
the
nla
is
part
of
that.
S
We
are
in
formation,
it's
taking
more
time
than
we
like,
but
that's
the
way
it
is
at
salem,
we're
a
formation
of
a
501c3
entity
to
raise
funds
to
continue
our
outreach,
but
also
even
to
assist
in
if
we're
successful,
in
the
fundraising
that
we
hope
we
are
to
assist
an
actual
purchase
of
the
land
for
for
public
use,
so
we
obviously
need
help
we
need.
We
need
help
from
ben
parks
and
rec.
We
need
help
from
the
neighborhood
associations
and
we'd
like
you
to
join
us.
S
B
I
appreciate
the
presentation
I
did
want
to
set
a
little
bit
of
backdrop.
My
understanding
is
that
we're
seeing
this
presentation
and
hearing
this
information
so
that
we
can,
as
an
nla,
know.
B
More
about
what
three
of
our
nas
are
are
actively
working
on,
and
it's
also
a
property
of
interest
in
the
entire
southwest
area
of
bend.
It's
not
this
presentation.
This
topic
is
not
part
of
council
goals
and
it
has
not
been
identified
in
the
nla
strategic
plan,
but
it
was
requested
at
the
nla
meeting
and
there
was
support
by
the
mayor.
So
we're
able
to
hear
this
topic
in
addition
to
mr
anderson,
being
here,
brian
rankin
from
the
city
he's,
the
long-range
planning
manager
is
here
and
colin
stevens.
B
T
I
could
start,
I
thought
it
was
a
great
presentation,
good
job
robert.
I
think
there
was
one-
maybe
one
area
where
I
think
maybe
there
maybe
is
a
misunderstanding
around
the
work
that
happened
in
2016..
T
I
think
your
suggestion
was
that
that
site
would
be
used
or
have
to
be
used
for
high
density
housing.
I
believe
I
think
I'm
correct.
S
T
T
T
The
zoning
for
the
site
was
residential
and
I
believe
the
plan
or
the
comprehensive
plan
designation
was
public
facilities
because
it
was
in
public
ownership.
So
in
2016
the
public
process
that
was
underway
with
the
urban
growth
boundary
expansion
basically
took
a
look
at
almost
all
the
large
green
field.
Areas
left,
basically,
all
the
large
properties
left
in
bend.
So
what?
Where
are
the
areas
where
there
is
a
ripe
for
redevelopment?
T
And
I
think
you
did
a
great
job
of
summaries
summarizing
why
those
more
urban
and
central
sites
were
considered
opportunity
areas,
you're,
you're,
correct
they're,
by
a
great
concentration
of
amenities,
so
those
those
sites
that
are
in
the
core
of
the
city
essentially
got
a
an
up
zoning
to
go
more
vertical
to
do
a
broader
range
of
mixes,
but
the
site
that
you're
talking
about
had
it
basically
received
a
comprehensive
plan
designation
which
matched
the
zone
that
was
already
on
that
site
in
2016,
which
was
standard
residential
zoning.
T
So
the
the
actual
zone
and
the
comprehensive
plan
are
standard
residential
zoning.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
folks
around
the
table
here
understand
that
the
actual
entitlement
that
is
allowed
under
the
current
comprehensive
plan
and
the
zoning
code
are
kind
of
your
average
standard
residential
zones
that,
like
most
of
bend,
is
in
what's
called
rs
residential
standard,
so
that
density
range
goes
up
from.
I
think
it's
as
low
as
four
and
as
high
as
like
seven
units
breaker.
I
would
call
it
your
average.
Your
average
bend
neighborhood.
T
That
is
predominantly
single
family,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
folks
are
not
thinking.
Oh
they're
going.
You
know
the
city
plan,
for
you
know
big
big.
You
know
mid-rise
buildings
in
this
area.
It
was
done
at
that
time
to
create
the
matching
between
the
zone
and
the
comp
plan,
designation
and
you're.
Absolutely
right.
I
would.
I
would
not
say
that
we
maybe
struck
a
deal
with
dlcd
or
the
department
of
land
conservation
development.
T
It's
just
the
law
that
you
are
as
a
city,
we're
required
to
figure
out
where
we
can
become
more
efficient
with
our
land
through
goal.
14,
it's
a
legal
requirement.
Before
you
expand
your
urban
growth
boundary.
You
have
to
actually
demonstrate
the
department
you
are
becoming
more
efficient.
One
of
those
ways
of
becoming
more
efficient
is
to
reduce
and
remove
these
plan
zone
conflicts.
T
So
that's
what
happened
there
and
the
other
thing
was
also
in
recognition
of
the
view
chat
easement
you
mentioned,
so
we
did
not
count
that
property
as
providing
additional
housing
and
predominantly
would
have
been
assumed
to
provide
single-family
detached
housing.
So
I
just
wanted
to
provide
that
clarity
but
the
rest
of
the
presentation.
I
thought
excellent
facts
and
I
really
appreciate
the
information,
so
I'm
here
for
questions
I
just
that
was
the
only
thing
I
picked
up,
though,
and
make
sure
folks,
folks
understood.
S
If
I
may,
brian
thanks
thanks
for
the
input,
I
would
only
observe
that
what
we're
really
talking
about
here
is
a
clear
conflict
in
public
interest,
and-
and
I
I
think
that
and
by
conflict
I
mean
I'm
getting
back
to
this
concept
of
highest
and
best
use
is.
This
is
the
the
is.
The
small
is,
as
you
suggest,
the
small
number
of
residences
that
this
property
could
provide
to
the
city.
Does
it
outweigh
the
use
of
the
property
as
a
green
lung
in
central
park.
P
S
I
actually
didn't
schedule
myself
for
this
meeting.
I
was
scheduled
for
it.
I
would
say
I'm
asking
for
the
nla
to
be
aware
of
of
the
issue.
B
H
Yes,
thank
you.
I
I
think
that
was
a
great
presentation.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
details
I've
been
in
bend
about.
I
don't
know
four
years
now,
I'm
on
the
north
east
and
it's
a
rapidly
developing
area,
lots
of
building
going
on
many
of
us
over
I'm
on
the
board.
Of
course,
many
of
us
over
here
are
bikers
recreational
and
otherwise
and
are
always
looking
for
ways
to
get
to
the
other
side
and
to
enjoy
the
you
know
that
all
that
it
has
to
offer.
H
Well,
here's
here's
my
issue
we're
having
our
annual
meeting
in
june
on
the
16th
in
the
park
and
I
would
love
to
have
you
invite
you
to
to
present
there
just
have
a
table,
so
I
could
explain
all
of
this
in
an
email,
but
I
just
wonder
how
do
I
get
in
touch
with
them?.
B
So
we've
got
time
for
two.
Maybe
three
more
questions:
cathy
roche.
D
Hi
everybody-
I
was
just
searching
up
habitat
information
and
this
whole
area
is
shown
on
the
u.s
fish
and
wildlife
service
webpage
as
habitat
for
the
oregon
spotted
frog.
D
So
the
sooner
you
talk
to
them
the
better
and
it
would
seem
that
having
it
as
a
park
would
be
way
preferable
to
having
it
as
housing,
and
it
would
be
really
silly
to
go
to
all
the
effort
to
develop
housing
proposals
in
there.
If
they're,
not
if
they're
going
to
say
sorry
charlie,
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
or
do
something
else
with
this
they're
sort
of
an
ultimate
agency
that
you
have
to
pass
things
through.
So
I-
and
I
would
just
say,
I'm
from
northeast
bend
very
north.
D
There
east
bend
and
I
have
recreated
there
and
I
think
it's
quite
pleasant,
but
it
does
need
management.
You
know
like
the
park
has
all,
as
you
mentioned,
the
parkinson's
or
the
ben
park
and
rec
has
already
started,
putting
up
trash,
buckets
and
signs,
and
things
like
that
which
definitely
gets
the
impression
that
you're
doing
something
that's
quasi-legal
when
you're
in
there.
So
thank
you.
That's
all.
I
So
I
am
wondering
this
may
be
a
question
for
colin
or
brian,
with
the
ugb
expansion
in
2016,
how
many
units
were
counted
to
be
included
in
that
particular
opportunity
area,
and
with
that
I
was
just
wondering
in
the
big
scheme
of
things.
It
there's
a
perception
that
there
has
been
just
breakneck
speed,
development
and
many
probably
high
density
developments
occurring
since
2016..
I
What
are
the
numbers
that
have
been
completed
or
in
progress
or
permitted
so
far,
so
looking
at
the
number
of
units
that
would
be
counted
within
that
coid
property
opportunity
area
versus
how
many
units
we've
accomplished
so
far
in
bend
and
how
those
numbers
weigh
against
each
other.
I
hope
that
makes
sense.
T
I
T
Sense-
and
I
can
give
you
the
the
easier
answer
first,
because
I'm
going
to
have
to
roll
through
my
emails
to
try
to
find
something
to
help
address
your
second
question
and
I
doubt
we'll
be
able
to
have
the
exact
calculation
but
the
because
there's
a
view
shed
easement
over
that
entire,
at
least
most
of
that
property.
I
believe
the
view
shed
easement.
I
don't
know
if
it
covers
the
entirety
of
the
property,
but
it
certainly
covers
a
portion
of
the
property
that
can
be
seen
from
across
the
river.
T
The
view
shed
easement
was
there
to
protect.
Essentially
the
view
from
the
I
think
it's
mount
bachelor
village
across
the
river,
so
there's
view
shed
easement
on
it
and
because
of
that
view,
shed
easement
and
the
complexity
of
that,
and
that
you
should
easement,
I
believe
expiring
in
2032-
is
that
it
is
it
2032
or
2034.
T
T
So
there's
no,
it's
not
part
of
our
capacity
for
20-year
capacity
for
housing.
The
other
question
I
let
me
pull
up
an
email.
I
don't
think
we
have
anything.
That's
comprehensive!
It's
a
it's,
a
very
simple
question
and
the
the
I
think
the
best
kind
of
answer
is,
I
think,
we're
without
including
that
site
so
not
including
this
coid
property.
I
believe
we
have
produced
darn
near
like
70
or
so
of
the
housing
that
we
expected
to
produce
by
2028.
Don't
quote
me
on
that
number,
but
it's
not
like
30
percent.
T
It's
not
90!
It's
somewhere
in
that
in
that
range,
I'd
have
to
have
to
go,
dig
around
and
find
your
answer
out,
but
a
substantial
amount
of
housing
has
been
built
to
get
us
between
that
2016
and
2028
number.
I
think
we're
tracking
slightly
ahead
of
what
we
would
assume
would
be
an
annual
rate
of
housing
production
and
still,
obviously
not
keeping
up
in
terms
of
housing.
Price
increases
and
such.
I
So
is
there
a
place
that
somebody
can
find
that
information
online
or
look
that
up
and
see.
T
Not
readily,
that's,
I
think
that's.
I
would
call
that
an
enhancement
to
existing
data
systems,
so
we're
building
the
data
systems
now
to
at
least
track
building
units.
So
we
have,
you
know,
building
units
by
type
by
location,
building
our
gis
and
data
systems
to
be
able
to
do
that.
I
think
the
next
step
in
that
is
to
be
able
to
essentially
compare
it
to
metrics
we've
compared
it
to
older
metrics
city
council
had
some
like
a
road
to
2000
housing
units.
T
So
we
tracked
for
that
purpose,
but
not
for
purposes
of
tracking
against
larger
kind
of
policy
objectives
that
are
further
out.
I
anticipate
doing
that,
but
it's
it's
a
little
bit
of
work
to
get
all
the
systems
to
agree
with
one
another.
Q
One
place
you
can
get
some
sort
of
real-time
data
on
on
development
is
on
the
city
council's
goals,
page
there's.
Actually
a
housing
mix
goal
that
you
can
go
to
and
it
it
does
have
some
breakdown
about
units
completed
by
type
for
fiscal
year,
2001
through
23
and
same
thing
for
units
under
construction.
It's
got
by
type,
a
single
family,
multi-family,
duplex,
townhomes,
etcetera,
so
that
that
data
is
available
on
the
city's
website
under
city
council
goals.
B
T
Sure
so
question
to
the
technical
experts
running
this
meeting
who's
driving.
The
presentation
is
it
you
is
it?
Is
it
me?
It's
not
me.
B
T
Okay,
so
one
moment
because
I
wasn't
sure.
T
It's
funny
we
we
just
we
had
some
discussions
from
our
communications
team,
some
of
michaela's
co-workers
in
her
department
we
were
talking
about.
T
I
would
call
it
human
norms
and
average
like
human
interaction,
behaviors
well,
because
we're
going
back
to
in
person
now
as
if
people
have
forgotten
how
to
be.
You
know
welcoming
accommodating
in
a
real
real
life
setting
to
one
another,
so
we're
getting
trained
on
how
to
be.
Essentially,
you
know
human
again.
Let
me
turn
my
my
raised
hand
function
off
there
lower
hand.
Is
that
all.
T
Here
we
go,
let's
do
this
and
we
have.
T
Alrighty,
so
I'll
try
to
get
through
this
pretty
quickly
here.
Okay,
sorry,
I
have
to
dip
around
my
screen.
Okay,
can
you
see
that
the
e
stevens
road
concept
plan
concept
of
community.
T
So,
let's
get
to
the
title
slide:
I'm
the
long-range
planning
manager,
the
growth
management
division
and
my
name
is
brian
rankin.
Let's
try
to
get
the
next
slide
to
come
up.
Okay,
so
I'll
try
to
go
through
this
pretty
quickly,
and
then
we
can
try
to
have
some
time
for
questions.
So
last
year
the
oregon
legislature
approved
a
bill
called
house
bill
3318.
T
It
was
a
bill
that
applied
to
bend
and
allows
ben
to
essentially
expand
its
urban
growth
boundary
on
a
specific
parcel
of
land,
subject
to
a
number
of
different
requirements
that
are
in
the
bill,
the
bill
broadly
states.
This
is
you
know,
trying
to
address
part
of
the
housing
supply
issue
and
then
do
that
price
increases.
T
The
housing
crisis
and
part
of
that
includes
having
market
rate
housing
as
well
as
deep,
restricted,
affordable
housing
also
to
have
a
complete
community
which
includes
a
mix
of
uses
and
will
allow
people
to
not
have
to
just
purely
you
know,
drive
from
the
site,
places
to
work,
recreate,
go
to
school,
etc,
and
some
statements
about
having
you
know,
good
transportation
systems,
as
well
as
some
real
specific
process
deadlines.
The
process
deadlines
are
kind
of
essentially
a
two
or
three
step
process.
Finish.
T
A
concept
plan
by
june
send
that
to
the
department
of
land
conservation
development,
the
city
sends
in
some
letters
the
department
of
state
lands
owns
this
property.
The
state
of
oregon
owns
that
subject
parcel
there.
The
subject
parcel
is,
if
you're
familiar
with
the
southeast,
it's
south
of
stevens
road,
north
of
ferguson
and
it's
it's.
The
property
adjacent
to
a
development
that
is
has
been
planned,
has
been
approved
and
is
currently
being
constructed.
T
All
this
property
was
originally
owned
by
the
state
of
oregon.
They
sold
off
the
first,
I
think
320
acres.
This
is
the
remainder
260
acres,
and
so
it's
one
of
the
rationales
for
this
is
you
know,
state-owned
land
and
the
proceeds
from
the
sale
go
to
k-12
schools
in
the
common
school
fund.
T
We
had
a
local
planning
process
by
the
way
this
this
was
really
finalized
at
the
end
of
the
legislative
session,
and
then
we
adjusted
some
budgets
and
tried
to
get
a
project
rolling
as
quickly
as
possible.
So
this
project
ran
from
october.
It's
running
now.
It's
closing
out
now,
essentially
in
the
actual
planning
process
movement
hearings.
T
During
that
process,
we
did
our
best
to
try
to
you,
know,
collaborate
and
coordinate
with
different
different
people
in
the
in
the
community
as
well
as
agencies.
We
ran
three
online
open.
Q
T
Press
releases
notifications.
At
that
time
we
could
not
have
in-person
meetings,
so
we
tried
to
replace
that
with
online
open
houses,
asked
survey,
questions
provided
information,
and
then
we
worked
extensively
with
ben
parks
and
recreation,
district,
school
district,
cascade
transit
and
the
department
of
state
lands
and,
of
course,
provided
some
public
notices
for
the
hearings.
We
had
our
planning
commission
hearing
last
night.
They
voted
to
approve
and
move
forward.
Wasn't
hearing?
T
So
it's
essentially,
these
are
concepts
in
order
to
influence
next
planning
steps
that
will
come
in
years
after
and
each
step
has
to
be
essentially
approved
by
at
least
our
city
council
planning
commission
all
the
way
from
a
concept
to
creating
a
community
which
would
be
at
the
very
end
of
a
process
and
some
kind
of
land
use
decision
by
our
planning.
Commission
city
council
and
that
kind
of
decision
would
be
a
master
plan
and
it
would,
of
course,
have
public
notice,
but
you
get
a
lot
more
details.
T
The
plan
itself,
you
can
go
to
the
growth
management
website,
our
website
and
you
can
type
in
like
stevens
road
track
and
you
can
get
a
link
in
any
number
of
browsers
and
you
go
find
and
review
this
report
introduction.
It
talks
about
the
site
itself.
What's
the
context
on
the
site,
the
surrounding
areas,
what
are
the
natural
features
on
the
site?
What
are
the
kind
of
amenities
on
the
site?
What's
happening
next
door?
Basically,
the
vicinity.
T
Q
T
You
pull
those
those
ideas
into
concept,
plan,
alternatives,
a
couple,
different
ways
for
the
property
to
develop
and
also
meet
the
requirements
of
the
bill
and
then
an
implementation
chapter
which
would
talk
about
what
would
happen
after
so
after
the
concept
plan,
there
will
be
another
step
and
another
step
and
then
technical.
There
are
technical
appendices
and
findings
that
talk
about.
You
know
basically
a
factual
basis
for
the
concepts
that
you'll
see
the
plan.
You
know
all
that
factual
information,
the
coordination,
the
input
from
the
public
suggested.
T
We
build
a
couple
different
alternatives
that
are
different,
give
people
choices.
Let
them
respond,
give
us
their
feedback,
and
I
can
you
know
to
share
that
feedback.
There
are
many
people,
I'd
say
it's
you
know
in
each
survey
it
seems
around
30
of
the
respondents.
Just
don't
want
anything
to
happen
with
the
site.
It's
beautiful,
open
space
people
have
trails,
there
are
informal
trails
through
there,
not
parks
and
rec
trails,
beautiful,
high
desert
wildlife.
T
I
was
talking
to
a
man
who
was
watching
a.
I
think
he
was
watching
an
eagle
or
a
hawk
eat
a
rabbit.
While
I
was
talking
to
him
about
this
site,
so
you
have
raptors
out
there,
you
have
rabbits
and
foxes
and
coyotes
and
beautiful
rock
formations
as
well.
So
it
is
a
pretty
sight.
A
lot
of
people
don't
want
to
see
it
developed,
and
then
we
get
more
input
on
the
other
side,
which
says
no
should
be
very,
very
high
density.
T
You
know
as
as
dense
as
possible.
We
need
more
housing
and
then
a
lot
of
comments
in
between
things
around
preserve
some
natural
features.
When
you
do
this,
you
know
make
sure
it's
safe,
make
sure
it's
accessible
and
walkable,
but
there
are
three
alternatives
that
we
have
developed
to
get
that
public
input
and
generate
some
ideas,
alternative
one,
and
these
are
maps
that
show
different
layouts
of
land
uses.
I
know
this
is
kind
of
technical.
T
We
don't
have
much
time,
but
essentially
kind
of
the
the
colors
which
are
kind
of
these
pink
colors
and
purple
colors
represent
different
kinds
of
employment
land.
The
colors,
which
is
kind
of
this
something
yellowish
color
across
most
of
the
site,
is
what
would
you
consider
the
lower
density,
housing,
types
of
standard
residential
density
and
then,
when
you're,
getting
these
gold
kind
of
gold
blocked
areas
you're
looking
at
higher
density
housing,
the
higher
density
housing
in
some
cases
would
be
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing.
T
That
is
an
important
part
of
the
bill.
There
will
be
20
net
acres
of
land
that
the
city
will
essentially
or
13
acres
that
will
be
purchased
20
that
need
to
be
protected
for
deep,
restricted,
affordable
housing.
This
is
housing
that
will
be
affordable
to
people
that
make
80
or
less
of
the
area
median
income
and
they'll
that
that
housing
will
be
kept
in
perpetuity.
I
think
for
50
years,
and
I've
also,
I
think
our
agreement
might
stretch
out
to
99..
T
T
We've
worked
with
parks
and
recreation
district
to
do
something
which
we
hadn't
done
before,
which
is
to
work
more
proactively
with
them
to
to
allocate
a
certain
amount
of
acreage.
It
would
be
mandatory
for
a
connected
trail
system
and
a
looped
trail
system
connected
up
here
and
then
connecting
out
to
those
regional
trails
that
were
shown
in
the
earlier
presentation
what
else?
Oh,
transit,
transit
services
serving
the
adjoining
property
to
the
west
as
well
as
this
site,
and
I
think
I
cover
most
of
those.
T
But
so
when
you
look
at
those
maps,
you'll
see
different
kinds
of
of
options.
Option
one
is
just
more
still
predominantly
housing,
but
it
has
more
employment
lands
and
it
has
fewer
lands
for
parks.
Alternative
three
on
the
other
side
has
more
housing,
bigger
and
more
parks
and
less
employment
and
alternative
two
is
kind
of
in
the
middle,
so
so
the
commonalities
there
are.
Essentially
all
these
alternatives
meet
the
requirements
of
the
bill.
You
just
meet
them
in
different
ways.
T
Most
of
the
site
would
be
housing.
There
will
be
land
for
a
wide
variety
of
housing,
types,
single,
family
or
single
unit,
detached
duplexes,
triplexes,
quadplexes
and
multi-family,
and
then
land
for
shops
and
cafes
places
to
work
as
well.
So
you
can
do
some
kind
of
production,
businesses
and
offices,
and
things
like
that.
T
Looped
trail
systems
are
also
a
part
of
each
alternative
and
then
the,
as
I
said,
the
d
restricted
housing
that
is
also
consistent
between
these
alternatives,
because
it's
required
by
the
bill
and
those
three
six
acre
sites,
basically
in
a
higher
density
designation
in
order
to
support
multi-family
development
and
then
two
smaller
sites
of
one
acre
for
home
ownership
models.
But
all
those
would
be
restricted,
affordable
and
available
to
people
that
are
making
either
60
percent
or
less
of
the
area,
meaning
income
or
80
less
area
median
income.
T
There
are
some
other
steps
that
have
to
happen.
Basically,
the
city
and
the
department
of
state
lands
have
to
enter
into
an
intergovernmental
agreement
so
that
the
city
can
purchase
some
of
that
land.
That
purchase
would
then
set
set
forth
a
mechanism
for
the
city
to
work
with
an
affordable
housing
developer
to
actually
build
a
project
in
the
years
to
come.
If
all
this
comes
together.
T
Some
other
really,
I
think,
interesting
learning,
as
well
as
development
that
occurred,
not
development,
but
the
process
that
the
bill
required
us
to
use
to
explore
different
topics
had
us
learning
and
how
this
kind
of
evolving
our
policy
approach
to
a
couple
different
issues,
one
historical
resources,
so
we've
coordinated
with
the
confederated
tribes
of
warm
springs
on
how
to
identify
and
protect
any
historical
or
archaeological
resources
on
the
site,
essentially
doing
a.
K
T
And
then
having
people
present
on
site
in
case
something
is
found
during
the
construction
process.
That's
called
an
inadvertent
discovery
plan
to
do
an
inventory
of
natural
features
and
trees
and
to
have
protective
measures
for
some
of
the
more
significant
trees
and
rock
outcroppings,
and
then
also
how
to
build
in
wildfire
resiliency
standards.
T
T
There
are
there's
a
plateau
area
and
then
the
trees
kind
of
show
up
this
way,
so
we're
going
to
walk
the
site
and
actually
inventory
the
larger
trees
identify
them.
So
we
can
figure
out
how
to
protect
more
of
those
in
subsequent
development.
If
that
occurs,
there
were
three
alternatives,
but
I
want
to
focus
on
alternative
three,
and
the
reason
being
is
that
we've
we've
talked
with
various
advisory
committees,
the
affordable
housing
advisory
committee.
The
planning,
commission
and
those
two
committees
have
gravitated
towards
alternative
three.
It
has.
T
It
has
a
it.
Has
this
essentially
a
principle
kind
of
of
urban
design
located
within
it,
just
to
explain
that,
essentially,
the
core
of
this
development
is
a
large
community
park.
29
acres
of
in
size,
which
would
have
active,
uses
some
of
the
things
you
see
at
some
of
the
larger
ben
parks
parks.
You
could
have
ball
fields,
you
could
have
soccer
fields,
you
could
have
more
structures,
but
that
larger
park
size
also
gets
you
an
ability
to
protect
natural
features.
T
So
if
you
can
imagine
an
active
space
as
well
as
a
natural
space
which
captures
some
of
these
areas
that
we
identified
as
being
particularly
valuable
in
terms
of
views
and
resources,
imagine
a
looped
trail
system
that
would
have
you
going
basically
being
able
to
do
loops
throughout
the
site
connecting
up
with
the
park.
Imagine
across
from
the
park,
you
have
a
five-acre
commercial
area,
you
could
have
shops,
businesses,
restaurants,
all
that
served
by
transit
and
then
that
flanked
and
bordered
by
higher
density
housing,
in
this
case
the
affordable
housing
which
would
be
located
there.
T
So
that
gives
folks
who
are
truly,
you
know
who
are
living
in
these
units
and
who
are
on
incomes
that
are
essential:
have
incomes
less
than
80
area
media
income,
having
really
great
access
to
parts,
commercial
transit,
as
well
as
a
nearby
school.
T
Two
thousand
over
two
thousand
dwelling
units,
it's
11.3
dwellings
per
gross
residential
acre.
That
makes
it
one
of
the
most
dense
cgb
expansion
areas.
It's
maybe
a
couple
units
more
dense
per
acre
than
some
of
the
ones
that
were
approved
in
2016.,
most
transits,
supportive.
Because
of
those
densities.
T
I
mentioned
how
there's
a
concept
of
focusing
the
density
with
open
space,
a
small
five-acre,
main
street
concept
on
wilderness
way.
Small
mixed
employment
area
mixed
employment
is
a
very
flexible
zone,
allows
a
variety
of
different
kinds
of
businesses,
from
light
production
to
office,
to
some
kind
of
quasi
retail,
and
even,
I
think,
even
some
kind
of
restaurant
retail
type
uses
and
then
39
acres
of
open
space.
T
The
council
has
goals
on
equity
and
so
part
of
the
equity
considerations.
Here
are
really
around
the
land
use
pattern
and
how
these
have
been
arranged
together.
T
First
of
all,
there's
there
are
you
know:
a
wide
variety
of
incomes
can
be
housed
in
this
site,
if
not
in
the
deed,
restricted
portion,
but
also
the
at-market
portions,
because
the
density
is
essentially
higher
driving
unit
types
like
more
duplexes,
more
triplexes,
more
quad
plexus,
and
so
because
the
housing
mix
is
both
in
a
deed,
restricted
manner,
as
well
as
the
market
manner
being
in
that
higher
density
range
you're,
moving
in
towards
unit
types
which
are
more
affordable.
T
Connecting
this
with
those
lower
cost
publicly
accessible
amenities
such
as
parks
and
schools,
and
trails
and
open
spaces,
and
then
considering
the
needs
of
needs
and
desires
of
the
confederate
tribes
of
warm
springs
and
their
desire
to
make
sure
that,
if
there's
anything
significant
on
the
site,
they
will
identify
it
and
figure
out
how
to
protect.
That,
and
also
this
is
at
the
end
of
this
process
come
to
be.
T
It
will
be
probably
the
densest
concentration
of
parks,
park,
official
park
trails,
not
informal
but
dedicated,
essentially
or
easements,
to
ben
parks,
and
then
it's
great
transit
oriented
development
to
allow
folks
to
not
necessarily
have
to
drive
in
our
coordination
with
cet.
They
were
very
excited
about
serving
the
site
from
an
infrastructure
standpoint.
It's
a
serviceable
site.
Both
sewer
water
and
transportation,
are
relatively
efficient
compared
to
other
ugb
expansion
areas.
There
essentially
is
capacity
in
either
our
plan
systems
existing
systems.
T
And
this-
and
this
is
not
to
say
there
will
not
be
more
traffic-
there
will
be
more
trips
on
reed
market.
There
will
be
more
trips
on
27th.
There
will
be
more
trips
on
ward.
That's
that's
going
to
happen,
however,
we're
learning
that
those
trips
are
not
at
a
level
that
would
essentially
require
either
additional
lanes.
T
There
will
be
minor
intersection
treatments
that
will
be
required
and
what
we
really
learned
was
not
a
surprise,
but
it
was
interesting
from
the
modeling.
Is
that
there's
a
huge
amount
of
trip
capture,
so
people
can
actually
do
a
lot
of
things
they
need
to
do
in
this
area,
because
you
have
large
commercial
areas
right
next
door,
not
in
this
site,
but
in
the
stevens
ranch
portion.
Schools
parks.
All
these.
These
amenities
are
right.
T
Excuse
me
what
are
called
planning
amendments,
so
that's
another
public
process
to
talk
about
the
specific
policies
to
make
sure
that
these
concepts
actually
become
a
reality
in
the
step
they
would
come
after,
which
is
an
actual
development
application,
so
that
process
is
not
started,
but
those
are
those
planning
amendments
are
in
the
concept
plan
to
show
the
community.
This
is
what
the
policies
would
kind
of
have
to
how
they'd
have
to
be
structured
to
guarantee
or
get
close
to
this
alternative
three.
T
Planning,
commission
and
others
are
in
favor
of
that
concept.
Alternative
three,
so
I
just
want
to
you
know
mention
that,
because
it
seems
that
it's
gathering
some
steam
and
then
so.
The
next
step
is
going
to
the
council
in
june
for
their
consideration
of
this
concept
plan,
there
will
be
a
public
meeting
at
that
time.
T
People
can
provide
testimony
to
the
council,
we've
already
sent
out
public
notice
for
that,
so
we're
on
the
june
1st
agenda
and
then,
after
that,
there
are
some
requirements
in
the
bill
to
have
us
sending
this
to
the
department
of
land
conservation
development
they
have
to
approve
it.
We'll
enter
into
an
intergovernmental
agreement
with
the
state
agency
dsl,
who
owns
the
property
to
make
sure
that
affordable
housing
can
actually
will
actually
happen,
and
then
we'll
move
forward
with
those
inventories,
archaeological
survey
and
then
on
to
the
next
steps
of
the
bill.
T
I
So
I
noticed
that
on
your
shaded
elevation
model,
it
looked
like
some
of
the
more
interesting
rock
features
were
sort
of
in
the
northeast
quadrant,
and
you
had
a
like
some
of
the
high
density
residential
high
density
there
in
an
orange
box.
So
I
was
wondering
if
that
sort
of
spread
out
throughout
that
whole
sort
of
it
looked.
It
was
delineated
with
a
white
line
and
I
just
wondered
if
the
the
orange
box
was
sort
of
where
the
high
density
was
going
to
be
or
if
it
was
or
spread
throughout.
T
Right
there's
so
the
park.
Let
me
try
to
see
if
I
can
screen
share
to
answer
your
question.
Let's
see,
if
I
can
get
fancy
here,
one
sec,
there
we
go
so
now
I
can
see
you
and
oh,
I
can't
see
you
anymore,
but
I
can
see
this
so
you're.
Speaking
about
the
move,
my
lamp,
that's
so
funny
there
are
the
higher
topography
you're
right.
There
are
areas
of
essentially
like
kind
of
like
30
or
40
foot
kind
of
topographic
changes
right
and
they
tend
to
include
rock
out
crops.
T
So
the
portions,
if
I
can
scoot
up
this
portion
here,
is
included
in
that
community
park,
so
we
captured
that
portion
the
other
portions
that
are
higher
density.
Let's
see
some
of
those.
Let
me
let
me
back
up
a
sec,
so
we
tried
to
capture
that
most
kind
of
interesting
feature
in
the
park.
The
actual
locations
of
these.
By
the
way,
let
me
see
if
I
can
get,
I
want
to
stop
the
screen
share
come
on
this
conceptual
plan.
T
Is
there
are
certain
concepts
that
we're
trying
to
essentially
lock
in
proximity
the
size
of
the
park,
the
need
for
trails,
the
the
considerations
we
talked
about
in
terms
of
surveys,
tree
protections
and
then
the
amounts
of
open
space,
so
the
open
space
amounts
also
include
three.
I
think
three
acres
for
just
kind
of
areas
to
protect
unique
features.
So
we
do
this
at
a
conceptual
level.
Now
and
a
developer
is
going
to
come
in
and
say,
okay.
Well,
I
have
these
policies
that
guide
my
development.
I
know
I
have
to
do
these
things.
T
A
developer
has
some
flexibility
to
figure
out
where
to
actually
place
some
of
these
things
as
long
as
those
concepts
are
still
held,
and
that's
all
in
a
public
process,
so
things
like
exact
road
alignments,
you
know
developers
change
their
road
alignments.
They
may
have
different
road
alignments,
a
different
concept,
they're
free
to
do
some
of
those
things.
T
T
That's
where
you
see
the
developer
actual
road,
so
some
of
those
may
be
protected
by
a
developer
just
because
they
don't
want
to
deal
with
the
topography
they
may
want
to
put
them
in
some
of
these
small
either
the
community
park
or
in
a
trail
alignment
or
they
may
say.
Well,
you
know
what
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
take
a
road
through
one
of
these,
so
we
don't
know
yet,
but
that's
why
we
have
a
public
process
associated
with
the
master
plan,
to
help
make
those
decisions
and
get
people
involved
in
that.
D
Hi,
this
is
kathy,
I'm
the
right
chair
here,
but
I
was
reading
up
on
the
oregon,
revised
statutes
regarding
plan
developments,
which
I
guess
this
would
fit
into
a
plan
development
and
it
seemed
that
that
was
the
place
that
hoas
and
ccnr's
are
developed,
and
so
I'm
curious
as
to
whether
this
that's
what's
going
to
happen
here
eventually.
D
Are
there
going
to
be
hoas
as
part
of
all
this
and
are
there
going
to
be
ccnr's,
and
I
bring
that
up
partially,
because
I
feel
that
there's
an
increasing
divide
building
between
the
new
bend
and
the
old
wind
and
I
live
in
the
in
between
bend,
but
it
doesn't
seem
that
our
new
plan
developments
represent
any
of
the
values,
characteristics
or
values
of
the
old
band.
So,
and
I
guess
I
should
be
more
involved
with
the
stevens
road
track,
I
don't
live
nearby.
I've
had
other
things
to
concentrate
on.
The
other
thing
is.
T
So
two
good
questions
when
a
developer
applies
for.
What's
it's
you
you
mentioned
it.
There's
the
plan
unit,
development
or
puds.
We've
heard
that
term
and
bend.
We
tend
to
call
it
a
master
plan.
It's
a
similar
concept
where
you
know
developers
doing
a
big
development.
They
have
a
concept
in
their
development
and
then
they
as
a
developer,
sometimes
choose
to
have
a
homeowners
association.
Sometimes
they
choose
to
have
you
know
ccnr's
or
covenants
codes
and
restrictions
other
times
they
don't.
T
So
it's
that
part
of
of
the
development
process
tends
to
be
left
up
to
the
developer.
I
do
believe
most
of
these
larger
developments
tend
to
have
an
hoa
homeowner's
association
or
cc
dnr's,
but
I
don't
it's
not
certainly
not,
may
not
be
required
and
colin
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
do
not
think
it
is.
It
is
not
required.
T
T
The
other
question
was
around
bats
and
that's
a
good
question
I
forgot
to
mention
that
is
that
there
are
caves
on
that
big
site
that
I
showed
you
the
whole
site.
There
are
no
caves
on
this
portion
of
the
state-owned
land.
T
All
of
the
caves
are
on
the
the
site,
that's
to
the
west,
so
there
were
cave
systems
some
smaller,
some
larger.
It's
my
understanding
that
in
that
master
plan
the
developer,
the
developer
has
worked
with
ben
parks
to
figure
out
how
to
have
at
least,
I
think,
some
of
the
larger
caves
or
one
of
the
caves
preserved,
because
I
believe
it
either
had
some
bat
species
or
something
like
that.
T
I
I
haven't
read
the
details,
but
I
know
there
are
no
on
that
master
plan,
but
I
had
some
conversations
with
ben
parks
where
they
were
trying
to
figure
this
out.
How
do
you?
How
do
you
have
caves
parks?
How
do
you
figure
all
these
things
out,
but
there
are
no
caves
on
this
site.
They're
all
to
the
west.
D
B
So,
unfortunately,
we're
out
of
time
we
still
have
to
do
liaison
reports
so
for
those
who
folks
who
have
questions
michaela,
what's
the
best
way
to
get
their
questions
addressed.
A
Yeah,
so
if
brian's,
okay
with
it,
I
will
share
his
information
with
you.
D
G
Yeah,
let
me
try
to
be
brief.
Nart
did
not
have
a
meeting
this
last
month.
I
think
that
was
last
week
and
we
had
so
much
going
on
for
the
past
couple
of
months
and
there
was
the
major
focus
on
the
town
halls.
I
I
think,
overall
speaking
of
the
town
halls,
I
think
overall
we
could
consider
those
pretty
nice
success
in
terms
of
the
number
of
people
that
showed
up.
G
I
had
sent
out
a
summary
of
a
summary
report
of
the
attendees
and
the
numbers,
as
well
as
the
feedback.
We
learned
a
lot
by
having
these
events,
we
learned
an
absolute
tremendous
amounts
that
first
of
all
people
are
really
really
wanting
the
opportunity
to
to
talk
in
public
and
to
meet
in
public.
Like
this,
I
sure
hope
we're
able
to
continue,
because
the
participation
is
absolutely
out
there.
G
The
other
thing
that
we
learned
is,
we
need
to
have
venues
where
we
can
accommodate
200
plus
people,
so
I
don't
know
how
that's
going
to
be
possible,
or
maybe
we
have
to
continue
the
way
that
we
have
to
rent
out
each
to
rent
out
the
caldera
auditorium
or
any
of
the
high
school
auditoriums,
which
seems
to
be
the
primary
locations
that
can
accommodate
from
300
to
500
or
even
600
you're.
Looking
at
a
pretty
penny,
it's
fairly
expensive,
but
it's
worth
it
to
have
those
venues.
G
I
think
one
of
the
other
pieces
of
feedback
that
we
really
learned
is
people
want
the
opportunity
to
ask
their
own
questions.
What
we
did
during
the
town
halls
is
we
collected
on
index
cards.
We
did
the
best
we
could
in
terms
of
sorting
through
and
trying
to
identify,
duplicate
questions
and
people
just
really
want
the
opportunity
to
ask
their
own
questions
during
an
event
like
this,
but
I
thought
I
thought
it
was
a
resounding
success
and
you
know
for
the
neighborhoods
that
pulled
together
to
pull
this
off.
G
I
expressed
my
sincere
appreciation
for
your
contribution
and
we
just
made
really
great
progress
and
I'm
not
sure,
what's
up
next
for
nart,
I
think
we're
kind
of
back
to
focusing
on
operational
efficiencies,
but
stay
tuned.
I
think
I'm
up
next
also
for
the
council
meeting
is
that
right.
B
Yes,
if
I
could,
I
could
chime
in
for
just
a
minute,
though,
on
the
town
halls.
I
don't
know
how
many
of
you
were
able
to
attend
it.
I
would
agree
very
successful
format
for
getting
information
out
to
the
public,
so
some
that
is
hopefully
something
that
the
city
saw
as
a
successful
format
as
well,
and
we
can
continue
to
encourage
the
city
to
take
that
on.
G
You
know
one
of
our
as
neighborhood
associations.
Our
biggest
goal
is
engagement
and
we
want
to
inform
the
public-
and
I
felt
like
these,
the
town
halls
really
did
that
and
I,
I
sure,
hope
we
have
other
opportunities
in
the
future
to
do
something
like
that.
So.
B
G
I
can
give
you
a
very
brief
report.
I
wasn't
prepared
to
speak
at
that
meeting
and
I
I
think
michaela
and
I
talked
about
it
offline,
and
maybe
that
was
a
little
bit
of
a
learning
lesson
that,
from
an
nla
perspective,
we
should
always
be
prepared
to
speak,
even
if
it's
briefly
and
I
volunteered
to
work
with
michaela
so
that
we
can
at
least
come
up
with
just
a
format
of
something
quick,
something
that's
not
more
than
five
minutes,
but
it's.
G
It
just
seems
to
be
that
we
keep
having
these
check-in
meetings
and
this
time
it
was
supposed
to
be
this
listening
session.
So
we
didn't
have
a
report
prepared.
We
didn't
have
an
opportunity
to
pull
that
together.
What
I
when
I
did
attend.
I
learned
an
awful
lot
about
how
the
council
is
needing
to
revise
some
of
their
goals
and
in
particular,
if
you
look
at
the
climate,
friendly
and
equitable
communities.
G
You
know
this
is
putting
a
huge,
huge
burden
on
staff
and
I
think
that
they're
having
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
in
terms
of
figuring
out
how
they're
going
to
manage
through
everything
that
needs
to
happen
with
regard
to
climate
friendlies-
and
I
haven't
heard
the
latest,
but
last
I
heard
they
were
a
little
short
staffed,
and
you
know
I
I
know
it's
it's
difficult
to
get
all
get
to
all
of
these
things.
We're
asking
a
tremendous
amount
of
staff.
G
We've
got
code
changes
coming
out
of
our
ears
and
whether
it's
hb
2001
or
even
last
night's
planning
commission
meeting.
If
you
learned
about
senate
bill
458,
those
are
are
really
that's
putting
a
lot
of
burden
on
the
staff,
so
they
have
to
revisit
their
goals
and
I
think
we're
going
to
hear
more
from
them
in
the
next
couple
of
months.
B
G
You
for
your
time
and
that's
it.
C
C
Basically
s
b
458
is
implementing
hb
2001,
the
one
that
allows
middle
housing
in
some
single
family
units
and
there's
only
going
to
be
like
duplexes,
triplexes,
townhouses
and
cottage
clusters,
there's
not
going
to
be
multi-family
houses.
That
was
one
of
the
I
think
inconsistencies
that
I
found
early
on.
But
it's
corrected.
C
The
one
thing
that
really
struck
me
is
the
short
fuse
of
this
process
here,
because
by
state
law
this
has
got
to
be
in
place
by
july
1st
and,
unfortunately,
the
city
did
not
start
informing
people
until
after
our
last
meeting.
So
it's
not
really
afforded
the
nla
any
time
to
formulate
any
kind
of
position,
and
there
was
also
a
council
a
planning
commission
meeting
last
night
and
they
voted
to
go
ahead
and
send
it
to
the
city
council.
C
There
was
a
couple
of
very
interesting
comments
last
night
and
it
has
to
do
with
the
deed,
restricted
aspect
of
these
houses.
It's
going
to
go
on,
for,
I
don't
know
50
to
99
years,
but
there
were
some
concerns
expressed
number
one
by
me
in
that
you
know.
Mortgage
lending
companies
may
not
look
favorably
on
this
and
I
quoted
something
from
quicken
loans
and
that
if
they
have
to
have
a
default
or
foreclosure,
they
don't
want
a
lot
of
restrictions
and
therefore
they
I
say,
may
put
pretty
high
bar
on.
C
So
the
council
is
going
to.
You
know,
take
this
up
in
may
and
by
the
first
of
june.
It's
going
to
be
a
done
deal.
So
if
the
nla
wants
to
take
a
position
on
anything
here-
and
I
think
these-
the
two
items
I
just
mentioned
are
probably
the
only
two
things
that
we
have
any
chance
of
influencing
the
council,
because
I
think
this-
the
the
really
short
fuse,
I
I'm
not
sure,
was
really
necessary.
C
You
know,
I
think
they
could
have
done
this
a
couple
months
ago,
but
they
didn't
go
into
that
and
so
it
kind
of
puts
the
nla.
You
know
out
of
the
loop,
you
know,
at
least
for
the
planning
commission
and
then
the
other
one
about
the
you
know,
the
deed
restricted
housing,
so
I
just
you
know,
put
it
to
the
nla
and
you
know
is
there
anything
you
want
to
do
with
this?
C
G
G
So
one
of
the
big
concerns
that
I've
got
about
458
and
the
code
changes
is
we're
about
to
allow
for
the
dividing
of
lots
and
let's
say
that
you've
got
a
house
on
one
lot
and
all
of
a
sudden,
you
can
put
a
quad
plex
on
that
this
particular
code
change.
The
whole
goal
here
is
supposed
to
be
affordable
housing.
G
I
really
think
that
we
need
to
spend
a
little
bit
more
time,
looking
at
what
is
the
possibility
of
people
being
able
to
buy
this
deeded
housing?
The
lenders
that
I
have
checked
in
with,
and
I've
spent
a
little
bit
of
time
today,
further
checking
in
they
don't
want
to
lend
on
these
projects,
and
so
how
are
these
people
actually
going
to
be
able
to
get
into
them
if
they
can't
get
a
lender
that
will
actually
sponsor
them.
G
G
I
think
that
our
goal
is
very
wonderful:
we're
trying
to
find
affordable
housing,
we're
trying
to
find
a
way
for
people
to
afford
to
buy
these
homes,
but
I'm
not
sure
that
they
actually
have
the
mechanics
to
do
so.
The
second
concern
that
I
really
have
here
is
short-term
rentals.
What
is
to
prevent
anyone
from
buying
these
places
and
turn
them
into
another
vacation
rental?
There's
nothing
in
their
code.
At
this
point
that
is
going
to
prevent.
C
Yeah
very
well
said
lisa
and
that's
definitely
definitely
a
concern,
and
you
know
now
it's
like
up
to
us,
you
know:
do
we
want
to
do
anything
about
it.
B
C
C
B
Yeah,
if
it
was
june
1st,
when
we
were
actually
submitting
public
comment
that
we
could
maybe
pull
together,
but
if
it's
this
other
eight
date
of
it's
the
work
session
date,
then
I
don't
think
we
can
pull
anything
together.
Correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong
michaela
is
there.
If
we
were
to
pull,
let
me
back
up
a
minute.
Can
I
get
a
show
of
hands
of
folks
that
are
interested
in
having
this
conversation
to
see
whether
it's
possible
raise
your
hands?
B
A
Yeah,
I
can
do
that
and
I
think
that
I
mean
we
might
be
able
to
do
a
quick
shotgun
meeting.
I'm
just
not
sure
that
was
my
thought
too.
So.
B
I
know
it
would
likely
require
a
special
meeting
and
we
have
to
advance
notice
that
it
would
need
to
be
a
very
focused
meeting
with
specific
requests
or
suggestions
from
those
that
are
working
on
this,
that
we
can
discuss
and
then
and
then
pull
together.
But
let's
see
if
we
have
the
timeline
to
do
that
and
with
that
it's
six
o'clock
just.
A
A
second
summer,
yeah
brian,
I
just
would
like
to
hear
what
you
have
to
say,
since
I
know
you
have
more
knowledge
of
the
process.
No.
T
And
I
don't
want
to
take,
I
don't
want
to
take
away
from
anybody's
time
and
I
think
my
son's
waiting
at
practice
right
now,
but
have
you
been
briefed,
has
paulie
and
hardy
briefed
you
on
this,
because
I
I
think
getting
up
to
speed
on
that
from
a
staff
expert
would
be
really
helpful.
T
So
if
you
have
a
special
meeting
or
if
that's
even
possible,
I
would
suggest
bringing
in
pauline
hardy
because
having
having
good
facts,
I
think
will
help
you
formulate
your
position.
I
was
listening
to
the
short-term
rental
and
the
first
thing
that
came
to
mind
for
me
as
well.
The
spacing
standards
of
short-term
rails
would
still
apply,
so
you
know
you're
not
go.
You
wouldn't
necessarily
have
a
bunch
of
a
cluster
of
short-term
rentals,
for
example.
T
T
I
mean
I'm
just
just
a
suggestion
to
pull
pauline
in.
I
think
she
could
answer
a
lot
of
your
questions.
I
know
she's
a
busy,
a
busy
person
so
but
good
suggestion
there,
and
also
there
is
a
lot
coming
down
from
the
state,
and
I
just
want
you
to
understand
that
we're
all
dealing
with
it
we're
all
dealing
with
it
as
staff
and
as
a
and
as
a
community,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
this
is
just
around
regulatory
compliance.
T
B
Yeah
we
actually
received
those
as
an
attachment
to
an
email.
Was
it
just
earlier
today.
Maybe
I
just.
C
That
pauline
I
raised
about
11
issues
based
on
my
level
of
understanding
of
the
amendments,
because
I
did
go
through
them
and
had
a
lot
of
questions.
She
provided
answers
to
them
and
I
believe
they
were
sent
out
by
michaela.
I
believe
today,
their
their
answers
are
in
red
and
you
can
see
what
she
said.
They
had
one
inconsistency
where
they
amended
it,
and
then
a
lot
of
this
is
just
you
know:
application
of
various
state
laws
that
they
have
to
deal
with
so
anyways.
That's
that
is
available
for
everybody.
O
Sorry
summer,
I'm
just
gonna
jump
in
time
is
short
on
the
short-term
rental
question.
This
was
discussed,
I
think,
maybe
maybe
because
of
jim's
question
at
the
planning
commission
last
night.
So
I
won't
repeat
the
explanation,
but
if
anybody
is
interested
on
the
answer
to
the
short-term
rental
question,
it
was
it.
You
can
watch
the
recording
of
last
night's
planning
commission
meeting
where
this
this
was
on
the
agenda.