►
From YouTube: City council meeting Jan 26 2021
Description
Biloxi City Council held a regular scheduled meeting on Tuesday, Jan. 26, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. at Biloxi City Hall. To see the agenda, visit https://www.biloxi.ms.us/agendas/citycouncil/2021/012621/012621agenda.pdf.
A
Litigation
grant
award
for
father
ryan
waterwell
the
same
for
circle
park
water
well
and
to
receive
7
30.
Excuse
me:
783,
20,
requesting
the
assistance
of
harrison
county
with
davis
road
and
we're
adding
5-0
resolution
requesting
the
assistance
of
harrison
county
and
the
city
of
gulfport
and
repair
to
bees.
Road.
C
D
D
D
B
D
C
Another
question
that
had
come
up
just
for
whenever
this
does
something
that
might
be
covered
is
multiple
times
today.
People
have
asked
me
about
the
enforcement
of
burn
bans.
If
you
know
this
on
those
two
days,
if
it
will
be
allowed
in
the
city
during
the
burn,
if
we
have
burn
bans
as
well,
so
right
all
right,
we'll
have
a
motion
I'll
move
it
all
right.
Second,
in
england,
first
by
george,
second,
by
felix
guns,
all
in
favor
all
right,
5-0.
D
And
you
know
in
honor
of
his
mother
and
a
member
of
our
police
department
family,
so
mike
we're
sorry
for
your
loss,
and
you
know
we'll
all
be
together
one
of
these
days.
But
it's
a
tough
deal
right
now.
But
it
is
a
great
pleasure
for
me
to
to
say
read
this
proclamation,
whereas
january
17th,
2021
almighty,
god
called
susan
shank
home
to
dwell
with
him
in
his
glories
of
paradise.
D
Susan's,
unwavering
dedication
and
diligence
during
her
tenure
with
the
city
of
biloxi
provided
a
vital
service
to
our
citizens.
Now,
therefore,
I
andrew
fufoe
gillich
mayor
of
the
city
of
biloxi,
to
commemorate
and
commend
the
lifelong
devotion
and
accomplishment
of
susan
and
shank
and
do
hereby
proclaim
the
17th
day
of
january
2021.
As
susan
and
shank.
D
D
F
F
Some
other
updates
work
has
started
this
week
on
the
bay
view.
Boardwalk
our
walkway
from
forest
avenue
to
kensington
in
ward
1
work
also
began
on
the
infrastructure,
segment,
sm-1
and
sm-2
in
ward
1.
This
week,
work
on
the
parallel
roadway
in
ward
2
is
scheduled
to
be
completed
in
march,
and
2
rail
crossings
will
be
closed,
nixon
and
dory
streets
work
was
completed
on
the
elsie
place.
Extension
in
ward
6,
the
tanglewood
water
line
in
ward,
3,
bellavi
parkway
in
ward
7,
and
the
first
phase
of
the
eagle
point
park
in
ward
7..
F
We
just
wanted
to
do
that
just
because
we
we
see
some
little
snippets
about
projects,
but
I
think
with
you.
If
you
write
it
all
down,
you
realize
just
how
much
work
is
getting
done
right
now.
We
talked
a
few
years
ago.
The
the
the
word
of
the
day
was
happening
now
and
we
finally
arrived
at
a
point
where
your
your
efforts
supporting
our
infrastructure
projects
is
showing
fruit.
Now
we're
really
finishing
a
lot
of
work
and
it's
timely
and
as
as
we
finish,
these
we'll
we'll
remind
you
about
that.
F
B
D
B
D
D
I
think
we're
going
to
use
some
of
those
rocks
down
on
the
point.
You
know
we
had
a
project
that
would
that
little
place
where
there's
a
good
soft
shelling
right
there
at
the
end
of
the
sea
wall
by
the
seafood
industry,
museum
coming
back
and
there's
some
debris,
I
think
the
idea
was
to
use
some
of
those
rocks
granite
or
whatever,
whatever
the
limestone
big
rocks,
to
relocate
some
of
them
down
there
to
cover
up
some
of
the
debris.
D
H
F
D
One
drain
in
the
middle
of
that
section
right
across
from
the
boat
tonight.
I
think
that
still
would
be
you
know,
taken
into
fact
so
they'll
be
over
the
top
of
the
drain.
As
I
recall,
there's
one
outfall
from
bay
view
to
that
to
that
water,
but
that's
it
kind
of
naturally
goes
in.
I
haven't
looked
at
the
the
plans
yet,
but
that's
there's
still
one
outfall
there.
D
C
I
You,
mr
president,
as
has
been
mentioned
several
times
over
the
past
couple
of
years
and
and
last
month,
I
believe,
if
not
a
few
weeks
ago
by
ms
newman
litter
continues
to
be
an
issue
in
some
parts
of
the
city
and
mr
leonard,
you
had
noted
that
might
be
worth
making
a
budget
note
next
year
to
get
a
big
truck
for
public
works
to
haul
some
of
this
debris
and
stuff.
What
I
would
suggest
also
is
that
we
look
at
litter
teams,
whether
they're
two
or
three
man
teams.
I
I
Businesses,
just
because
people
throw
things
out
the
window,
but
just
a
note,
perhaps
for
next
year's
budget,
also
the
lights
at
the
north
end
of
the
pops
ferry
bridge
are,
I
know
we
were
looking
at
that
and
there
were
about
a
dozen
or
14
lights
out
it
those
been,
I
think
they
were
leds.
I
can't
recall
what
the
issue
was,
but
it's
mentioned,
maybe
five
or
six
weeks
ago.
Are
we
moving
forward
on
that.
F
J
I
agree
with
tisdale:
we
can
call
the
beautification
crew,
but
I
think
it
will
pay
off
in
the
end.
I
don't
know
with
covet
everyone's
hurting
anyway,
but
it'll
pay
it
pay
for
itself.
In
the
end,
because
you
know
people
want
to
live
where
it's
beautiful
people
want
to
invest
where
it's
beautiful
and
right
now,
it's
even
mostly
in
those
areas.
I
discussed
last
time
it's
still
horrible
horrible.
Thank
you.
B
You
know
we
have
an
ordinance
in
the
city
that
says
these
signs
are
not
supposed
to
be
put
out
in
60
days
before
election
and
when
we
set
and
there's
an
election
cycle
when
it
signs,
you
sign
up
whether
you
first
sign
up
the
last
to
sign
up.
You
sign
the
or
put
up
after
the
last
person
signs
up
when
you're
the
first
to
last
doesn't
matter,
and
that
was
a
reason
for
the
rule
being
put
in
place.
B
It
makes
it
a
fair
election
for
everybody,
and
everybody
keeps
saying
it's
unconstitutional.
I
don't
see
how
it's
unconstitutional
when
we
said
it
by
the
city,
it's
just
a
federal
election
cycle,
everything's
put
in
place
and
nobody
can
give
anybody
permission
to
put
signs
out
against
the
city
ordinance.
B
So
whatever
we
have
to
do,
that
makes
us
right.
It
should
be
done.
You
have
a
couple
candidates
right
now,
putting
sounds
out
all
right.
The
rest
of
the
councilmen
are
not
doing
it
because
the
cycle
says
you
put
them
out
february,
60
days
before
the
election,
so
you
don't
have
this
election
run
you're,
not
right,
and
when
it's
fair,
it's
got
to
be
fair
for
everybody.
B
You
know
I've
addressed
this
with
you
all
before
you
know
I'm
waiting
here
now,
I'm
getting
I'm
trying
to
get
phone
calls.
So
how
can
they
can
do
it?
You
won't
do
it
because
it's
not
right
to
do
it,
because
not
a
city
ordinance.
We
should
not
put
a
sign
out
to,
I
think,
it's
february
5th,
to
6th
60
days
before
the
election,
so
either
you
know,
code
enforcement
need
to
do
what
they're
supposed
to
do
go
pick
them
up.
We
have
signed
owners
in
the
city.
B
B
What
you're
going
to
do
is
follow
the
rules
of
the
city
it
was
unconstitutional,
then
it
should
have
been
addressed
a
long
time
ago,
because
they've
been
using
this
same
thing
right
for
the
last
30
or
40
years
in
these
elections.
It's
just
something
that's
been
done
that
way
and
all
of
a
sudden
it's
unconstitutional.
B
D
Let
me
call
peter
up
here
with
us,
because
some
of
the
the
interactions
we're
getting
with
the
mml
and
what
they
had
notified
to
the
cities
in
in
mml
regarding,
I
guess,
ordinances
beautiful.
If
you
could
jump
in
and
provide
a
little
information
regarding
what
it
was
said,
not
that
it
was
unconstitutional.
But
I
mean
what
was
questioned
from
the
state
or
the
the
information
that's
coming
down
from
mml.
Regarding
that
ordinance.
K
When
it
first
came
up,
we
contacted
the
candidate
tried
to
get
a
commitment
that
he
would
remove
the
signs
and
not
put
any
more
signs
up
at
that
point.
You
know
the
timeline
to
the
timeline
was
getting
closer
and
closer.
I
mean,
I
think,
we're
a
week
and
a
half
away
and
then
about
the
same
time,
mml
we
got
a
flyer
from
them,
reminding
us
this
was
a
supreme
court
case
in
the
last
two
or
three
years
where
a
city
had
a
60-day
ordinance
and
they
felt
that
was
against
somebody's
right
to
free
speech.
K
This
you
know
if
a
person
in
in
that
owns,
a
house
wants
to
express
support
for
a
candidate
that
was
ultimately
challenged
and
that
statute
was
found
to
be
unconstitutional,
not
necessarily
saying
that
ours
is
unconstitutional,
it's
very
close
to
that
one.
But
mml
was
trying
to
warn
everyone,
look
at
your
ordinances
and
be
cautious
about
going
into
people's
yards
basically
and
pulling
their
signs
up,
and
things
like
that-
and
I
mean
just
I
think,
between
covid
and
between
the
hurricane
and
the
cleanup.
K
D
I'm
an
appreciative
of
that.
You
know
we
had
a
number
of
days
to
go
before
it
becomes
a
moot
issue.
I
guess,
but
you
know
we
would
ask
that
there
is
an
issue,
some
law
on
the
books
as
far
as
how
we
proceed,
but
you
know
I
guess
over
the
next
couple
of
days,
we'll
come
to
an
understanding.
What
needs
to
be
done
immediately
to
you
know,
to
move
forward
with
this
normal
election
cycle
and
we
will
contact
the
you
know:
people
as
we've
been
contacted.
B
Yeah
anybody
signed
up
was
given
the
same
sheet,
told
the
same
thing,
and
now
you
said
three
weeks
into
it
doing
it
wrong.
It
was
unconstitutional.
It
was
unconstitutional
three
weeks
ago,
anybody
signed
up
should
have
been
told.
Yes,
you
could
put
signs
out
yeah,
that's
all
the
candidates,
that's
running
and
that's
what
this
audience
says:
no
sign
until
60
days
before
the
first
election
and
that's
what
everybody
was
abiding
by.
So
now
we're
looking
at
something
that
you're
all
changing.
No
right
angel
we're
responding.
B
B
These
things
are
controlled,
they
all
run
on
a
certain
time
when
you
run
when
you
sign
up
and
everything
else.
So
now,
there's
nothing
against
free
speech.
Anybody
can
run.
That's
great
competition,
isn't
good,
that's
not
a
problem.
The
problem
is,
everybody
was
told
you
had
60
days
before
the
first
election
and
you
could
put
and
it
was
highlighted
it
emailed
everybody.
B
D
You
know
the
website's
up
period,
okay,
there's
some
certifications
by
the
parties
they're
running
through
so
I
mean
there's
some
additional
things
that
we
need
to
research
and
I'll
do
that
in
the
next
few
days
and
we'll
come
to
you
know
to
a
conclusion
with
this
in
the
next
few
days,
but
there's
some
additional
things
with
executive
committees
who
are
running
this
elections,
these
elections
that
have
to
have
some
strength
in
what
they
do
to.
I
don't
know
what
their
position
would
be
with
regard
to
the
ordinance
in
the
city,
but
it's
their
elections.
D
B
Talk
to
you
all
about
this
a
couple
different
times,
you
know,
but
you
do
anything,
didn't
go
to
the
tv.
You
did
it
at
the
council
meeting.
That's
what
we
do
as
council
people,
you,
probably
don't
council
meeting
at
the
right
time
at
your
council
report
and
you
think
it's
not
right.
It's
not
paying
for
any
politician
or
a
candidate.
That's
wrong!
That
didn't
put
any
signs
up
when
they
told
when
you
signed
up.
Do
not
put
they
signed
up
for
sick
today
before
the
first
election
yeah
by
the
law.
K
At
when
it
first
came
up,
should
we
change
that
time
to
when
someone
first
qualifies
make
that
the
time
when
you
can
put
signs
up
then,
as
we
got
more
into
it
and
started
trying
to
peel
back
the
onion
a
little
bit
it's
like
well,
are
we
even
allowed
to
have
any
time
limit
on
signs?
What,
if
somebody
wants
to
put
a
a
sign
up
six
months
before
an
election
in
their
yard?
I
mean
you
get
into
the
and
it's
called
content
neutral.
B
L
B
B
D
Your
own
laws,
again
we've
responded
to
some
things
from
information
that
was
released
in
a
short
term,
a
few
you
know
days
ago.
With
regard
to
mml
and
that
kind
of
read,
you
know
she
had
a
little
bit
of
different
position,
but
you
know
what
I
can
say
right
now
is
in
the
next
couple
of
days.
We
will
respond
according
to
ordinance,
already
have
some
recommendations
on
what
should
be
done,
given
the
ground
conditions
right
now,.
B
M
M
I
got
a
couple
of
things,
but
before
I
go
to
that,
I
just
want
to
follow
up
on
councilman
lawrence's
statement.
I
you
know
I
tend
to
agree
with
you,
mr
lawrence.
It
is
a
it
is
our
our
rule
or
our
law
or
the
ordinance,
and
if,
if
there
was
a
resolution,
connor
saying
coming
from
this
council
that
we
support
that
ordinance,
I
would
certainly
support
that.
M
If
that's
necessary.
That's
all.
I
want
to
say
about
that
right
now,
but
moving
forward
in
my
ward.
I
just
want
to
point
out
a
few
things:
a
reunion
place
there
was
a
damaged
lift
station.
The
fence
around
the
lift
station
was
damaged.
I
think
I
reported
it
in
a
a
previous
meeting.
It's
still
laying
on
the
ground.
Those
residents
are
really
concerned
about
it.
I
don't
know
who
has
jurisdiction
to
put
the
fence
back
up.
M
M
F
M
Lane
yeah
she
lived
on
kennedy
lane,
that's
christine
davis,
I
believe
is
she
had
some
interest,
but
if,
if
we
need
some
additional
nominees,
just
you
know
just
let
me
know,
and
then
I
just
have
a
question.
Some
of
the
neighborhoods
are
are
doing
a
good
job
cleaning
up,
but
there's
a
lot
of
little
small.
F
M
M
F
D
D
He'll
pick
it
up,
yeah
the
construction
debris,
that's
done
not
in
mass,
you
know
not
have
a
big
project,
but
you
know
pelican
way
should
attack
that
on
a
weekly
basis,
but
if
it's
just
loose
leaves
that
that's
an
issue
with
it
with
everyone
with
us
and
them.
So
you
know
if
it's
loose
leaves
put
it
in
a
bag
and
it'll
be
picked
up,
and
you
know
again,
if
there's
still
a
problem,
our
you
know,
utility
group
will
get
to
it.
Okay,
as
fast
as
we
can
all
right.
N
Thank
you,
mr
president,
we're
pretty
much
wrapping
up
most
of
the
work
over
knees,
biloxi
particular
ward
too,
and
I
just
wanted
to
check
with
walt
to
try
to
get
me
a
report
or
maybe
just
get
you
after
the
meeting
about
some
of
the
claims
that
are
still
out
there.
We
just
I
had
a
few
people
asking
me
about
the
claims,
so
just
kind
of
we
made
the
time
together.
N
O
O
That's
ravishing
our
community,
that
study
escalating
not
too
long
ago.
A
month
ago
we
had
a
shooting
right
on
nixon
street
and
and
just
the
other
night
we
had
another
shooting
and
one
of
the
bullets
came
through
our
window
and
it
could
have
very
well
been
me.
It
could
have
very
well
been
my
son
and,
and
I'm
here
to
I
know
it
might
sound
impossible.
I
want
you
to
know
that
we
have
a
good
city
councilman.
I
thank
god
for
councilman
guys.
O
I
thank
god.
This
time
we
have
cameras,
so
we
did
get
the
incident
on
cameras
this
time.
Councilman.
Thank
you
for
giving
me
and
my
son
the
money
to
help
us
to
get
the
cameras,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
so
much
for
always
answering
our
call.
But
mayor
is
going
to
take
you
it's
going
to
take
the
citizens
of
east
biloxi,
it's
so
much.
I
can
say,
but
I
don't
have
enough
time
to
say
it.
I
am
a
minister.
O
We
do
do
outreach
ministries
in
the
community.
I
am
out
there
in
the
community
on
a
constant
basis,
so
I'm
inside
the
problem
and
so
customer
guide.
Mr
mayor,
I'm
asking,
I
know
it
might
sound
impossible,
but
I'm
asking
for
a
town
meeting,
sir.
I
do
have
some
recommendations
and
my
recommendations
are.
Maybe
we
can
use
john
in
your
backpack.
O
O
N
She
signed,
you
know
she
did.
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you,
and,
and
and
that's
just
true
to
our
community
policing,
just
a
little
bit
more
community
policing
is.
Is
it's
basically
what
we're
asking
and
we
were
fortunate
to
be
able
to
put
up
put
those
cameras
up
so
that
we
have
a
lead
on?
You
know
the
the
person
who
is
generally
the
same
person
over
and
over
doing
it
and
we'll
be
in
touch.
I've
been
working
with
pastor
luther
fairly
on
that
issue.
So
thank
you
again.
D
To
respond,
this
is
not
a
question
and
answer,
but
we
will
I
mean
eyeball.
The
eyeball
face
to
face
talking
through
the
problems
is
going
to
be
the
first
step
in
solving
the
problem.
So
you
know
we
want
to
keep
it
safe,
friendly
and
beautiful,
for
you
know
for
everybody
that
calls
himself
biloxi
and
that's
what
we're
going
to
do.
Yes,.
C
You
all
right,
I
don't
really
have
much.
The
first
thing
is
on
the
debris.
It
ended
up
being
a
really
good
job.
I
know
all
of
us
were
frustrated
at
one
time
because
we
were
getting
so
many
calls
and
everything,
but
for
the
most
part,
all
of
the
debris
in
my
ward
and
as
I
drive
the
city
most
of
it
is
picked
up,
so
they
did
a
really
good
job
and
hopefully
we
can
get
what's
left
quick.
C
C
We
have
a
several
issues.
Number
one
is
if
we
have
a
sign
ordinance
that
sign
ordinance
doesn't
just
apply
to
city
elections,
that
sign
ordinance
has
to
apply
to
every
election,
and
you
know.
Just
last
year
we
had
our
statewide
elections
and
we
had
statewide
officials
putting
up
signs
in
january
that
are
four
foot
by
eight
foot
all
over
our
city
and
no
one
said
anything
about
those
signs.
C
Based
upon
the
message.
That's
on
that
sign.
So
if
you
say
that
you
can't
have
a
political
sign,
that's
over
a
certain
square
foot
that
has
to
apply
to
all
signs
in
the
city.
It
can't
just
apply
to
one
type
of
sign.
It
has
to
apply
to
real
estate
signs.
If
you
say
it
can
only
be
out
for
a
certain
amount
of
time.
C
It
has
to
apply
to
all
signs,
not
just
political
signs,
and
so
our
ordinance
does
have
some
issues.
Now
I
don't
know
if
there's
ways
around
that
or
not,
but
there
are
multiple
supreme
court
cases
that
that
basically
shred
our
ordinance
completely
to
where
it's
not
even
relevant,
and
so
either.
We
need
to
re
revisit
and
find
a
way
that
we
can
write
it
to
where
it's
enforceable
and
it's
an
ordinance
that
we
use
for
all.
You
know
in
force
for
all
elections,
not
just
our
city
elections
or
either.
C
B
What
you're
saying
is
somewhat
true,
but
we
do
have
a
sign
on
the
center
city
blocks.
All
signs
and
we've
been
fighting
over
the
billboards
and
everything
else,
and
we've
been
through
a
bunch
of
meetings.
All
of
us
that
they're
trying
to
put
in
the
lighted
billboards
a
different
sign
and
we
stopped
them
and
they
were
trying
to
put
out
one
message
and
we
stopped
them
and
orton
says
they
don't
say:
city
election.
It
says
elections
yeah,
that's
what
my
favorite
ordinance!
B
C
We
will
now
move
on
to
our
public
agenda.
We'll
have
citizen
comments.
Each
person
will
be
allotted
three
minutes,
a
total
time
of
45
minutes.
We'll
start
on
my
left
side,
your
right
side
is
there
anyone
on
the
my
left
side
of
the
room,
your
right
side
that
would
like
to
come
and
speak.
If
you
will
please
come
forward
state
your
name
and
sign
in.
H
C
I
I
It's
pretty
clear:
there's
parcels
totaling
a
little
over
two
acres
on
the
biloxi
side
of
the
bees
road
halfway
between
switzer
drive,
the
railroad
tracks
and
highway
90.
property's
been
empty
for
a
number
of
years,
certainly
since
katrina,
it
falls
a
couple
of
lots
behind
where
the
old
olive
garden
used
to
be.
I
B
P
R
R
The
planning
commission
heard
arguments
from
both
sides
and
voted
to
to
approve
the
project.
You
know
they
approved
the
conditional
use
but
rejected
the
variance
request
for
the
site.
Now,
the
opposition,
all
the
comments
should
be
in
your
minutes
that
are
attached
to
your
packet
and
it'll.
Tell
you
each
person
that
got
up
and
spoke
and
and
what
their
argument
was
against
it.
But
that's.
B
What
I
was
trying
to
find
at
the
ocean
hospital
where
they
said
they
was
against
it.
They
keep
saying
it's
going
to
be
a
high
in
rv
fall,
and
yet
it's
not
concreted
because
there's
rocks,
I
don't
say
anything
about
this:
being
high
ended
rv
park
and
it's
2
acres
big
enough
to
have
an
rv
park,
we're
just
going
to
have
another
little
trailer.
R
Those
two
just
didn't
seem
to
go
together
and
they
felt
that
if
it
was
going
to
be
an
upscale
park,
then
let's
use
either
hard
surface
parking
or
some
type
of
brick
or
what
we
call
grass
creek.
You
know
the
the
lattice-shaped
concrete
block
as
an
amenity
in
there
and
they
rejected
the
variants.
So
they'll
have
to
use
some
type
of
hard
surface
in
there,
but
they
are
going
to
be
required
to
put
in
a
buffer
strip
around
the
property
and
they
don't
show
a
lot
of
amenities.
R
For
family
members
or
visitors
to
be
there,
while
someone's
going
through
extensive
health
care-
and
that
was
a
part
of
the
argument-
so
planning
commission
voted
to
approve
it.
The
conditional
use
again
with
any
conditional
use
if
they
fail
to
comply
with
the
conditions
that
were
put
on
it.
Then
the
planning
commission,
the
city
council,
had
the
right
to
revoke
that
conditional
use.
Permit
my.
B
B
B
B
I
mean
I
think
that
they
need
to
be
sent
back
and
we
don't,
and
if
you're
going
to
do
something
else
then
say
you're
not
going
to
do
upscale
tell
them
what
you're
actually
going
to
do.
What
you're
doing,
if
you
don't
know
14
of
didn't
really
affect
any
medical
hookups
for
14
trailers.
I
don't
think
so.
B
So
I
mean
I
mean
I
would
suggest
that
you
table
this.
Have
them
come
back
to
the
planning
commission
or
the
council,
which
was
exactly
what
they're
planning
on
doing
I'll
call
it
upscale
if
you're
not
upscaling
it,
but
that's
not
upscaling.
When
you
just
haven't
talking
14
trailers,
and
then
you
have
people
voice
their
pitch
and
their
opinions
against
it.
You
know
the
medical
people
and
that's
just
that
part.
There
bothers
me
right
there.
R
B
But
that's
not
going
to
say
the
meaningful
thing
making
statements,
or
I
mean
exactly
what
they're
doing
everybody
knows.
It
sounds
like
we're,
definitely
not
upscale
and
then
put
in
14
pads
they're,
not
even
concreted,
so
you
don't
bring
them
in
fine
buses.
Anything
like
that
walk
it
in
there
on
rocks
it
ain't
gonna
happen.
R
B
R
B
I
just
think
everybody
should
be
made
aware
with
the
opportunities
that
we
could
lose
here
in
the
long
run,
the
14
spots
to
lose
the
hospital
one
of
them.
You
know,
that's
just
not
a
good
thing.
That's
why
I
think,
there's
more
concrete
things
need
to
be
brought
to
us
as
a
city
council
to
weigh
against
both
things
that
we
have
to
do
the
14
trailers,
we're
gonna
lose
the
hospital,
that's
not
too
equal.
B
I
R
I
Okay,
nothing's
been
done
with
that
property.
I
know
that
you
know
folks.
What
can
you
do
with
an
old
hospital?
I'm
sure
somebody
has
an
idea
somewhere,
but
nothing's
happened
in
20
years.
You
have
an
apartment,
complex
and
a
hotel.
Also
on
that
block
the
hotel
fronts.
Walmart
lane
and
the
apartment
complex
backs
up
it's
at
the
end
of
gateway
drive
and
it
backs
up
against
switzer
drive.
I
If
you
remember
there
are
a
number
of
clinics
in
there
and
and
some
of
that
space
is
empty,
and
then
you
have
the
old
gulf
oaks,
which
is
now
oceans,
behavioral
therapy,
and
they
do
good
work
and
it's
been
there
for
a
number
of
years
and
changed
hands
a
couple
of
times
and
then
on
the
corner
of
switzer
and
the
bees
road.
You
have
a
four-story
building.
I
There
are
a
number
of
doctors
in
there,
but
there
are
also
lawyers,
so
it's
not
exclusively
medical
or
medically
related,
so
that's
kind
of
the
lay
of
the
land
right
now.
I
can't
think
of
anything.
That's
happened
on
that
block
since
katrina.
Can
you,
mr
creel,
not
a
not
a
thing?
Is
there
a
medical
corridor
or
some
sort
of
medical
overlay
in
that
area?
I
I
I
Association,
the
gulf
coast,
realtors
association
and
they're
concerned
about
the
appearance
of
the
park,
but
with
that
buffer
it
could
be
landscaping.
It
could
be
a
privacy
fence
eight
feet
tall
for
that
matter,
yes,
sir.
So
how?
How
long
should
we
wait
until
the
these
properties,
if
they're
going
to
develop
as
some
sort
of
medical
card,
or
how
long
are
we
going
to
wait
or
how
long
should
those
property
owners
wait
before
they
decide
to
develop
their
property.
I
R
I
I
I
R
Q
I
For
the
past
20
years
there,
so
having
said
that,
I
would
I
would
assume,
as
mr
creel
mentioned,
that
mr
boudreaux,
if
you
had
specifics
about
what
kind
of
you
know
what
the
park
would
look
like,
what
the
plans
are
for
the
park
he's
the
best
one
to
speak
to
that.
If
you
had
questions.
Thank
you,
mr
glavin.
M
M
M
H
Mr
michovich
has
owned
the
property,
I
believe,
12
years
13
years
and
of
course
he
tried
to
sell
it
and
it
could
not,
and
he
was
looking
for
something
to
do
on
the
property
that
I
guess
from
the
hurricane
up
in
the
surge
zone.
I
mean
there
used
to
be
two
restaurants
there
on
the
corner.
That
did
very
well
that
was
always
packed,
but
but
after
the
storm,
people
are
scared
to
invest
their
money
in
that
area,
and
so
with
the
rv
park,
most
of
the
infrastructure
is
underground.
H
Also
when,
when
he
did
this
park,
he
wanted
it
nice,
he
wanted
large
little
sights
actually
the
the
sites,
the
smallest
site,
is
twice
as
big
as
the
city's
minimum
in
their
ordinance
every
oak
tree
on
the-
and
there
are
some
large
oak
trees,
every
oak
tree
was
protected,
avoided
sewer
design.
Everything
was
was
avoided
to
go
around
the
the
trees
and
save
those,
and
that
was
the
big
point
he
went.
He
didn't
want
to
put
asphalt
over
the
the
tree.
H
Roots
mainly
is
was
his
concern,
but
but
we
understand
it
has
to
be
a
hard
service
either
asphalt
or
it
could
be
brick
pavers
or
something
like
that,
which
would
serve
the
same
purpose
that
he
was
looking
for
behind
the
property
is
the
the
old
hospital
and
his
property
line?
Is
the
chain
link
fence
on
the
west
side
of
the
the
hospital
which
is
just
a
sea
of
dilapidated
asphalt?
He
feels
that
the
screening
will
screen
his
part.
H
B
H
B
H
Because
of
the
large
size
of
the
lots,
the
protecting
of
the
park
itself,
it's
just
going
to
be
a
nice.
It's
not
going
to
be
like
most
rv
parks.
You
see
they're
stacked
in
side
by
side.
You
can't
even
open
a
a
a
slide
out
because
it'll
hit
the
trailer
next
to
them.
It's
it's
these.
Like
say
some
of
these
lots.
These
lots
are
are
as
large
as
some
of
the
smaller
home
lots.
That's
allowed
in
the
city
of
biloxi.
B
B
H
B
H
B
F
B
C
C
B
C
N
B
B
D
C
N
I
Just
a
couple
of
comments
for
folks
who
may
be
following
this:
a
low-speed
vehicle
means
any
four-wheeled
electric
vehicle,
that's
capable
of
a
top
speed
of
no
greater
than
25
miles
an
hour
and
is
equipped
with
safety
equipment
is
required
under
figure
federal
regulations
and
there's
a
certain
reference
number.
Basically,
a
low
speed
vehicle
maybe
operate.
What
we're
saying
and
and
hoping
the
legislature
will
approve
in
the
private
local
bill.
I
90
may
cross
certain
streets
that
exceed
25
miles
an
hour
limit,
but
only
for
purposes
of
crossing
these
streets
and
the
crossing
must
occur
at
an
intersection
with
a
traffic
signal,
subject
to
the
applicable
laws
of
the
state
and
city
related
to
traffic
and
parking,
with
corresponding
penalties
and
the
vehicles
to
be
registered
annually
and
inspected
at
a
cost
of
75
dollars.
Registration
decal
displayed
on
the
left,
rear,
fender
the
vehicle
and
the
decal
is
non-transferable.
I
C
C
B
D
Q
C
R
M
C
C
R
C
C
R
N
Sir,
can
can
you
are
you
listen?
Can
you
can
you
have
it
done
in
about
30
days
the
the
cleanup
the
clean
up,
what
the
city
is
asking
for
you
to
do
yeah
for
30
days,
okay.
So
what
we'll
do
is
I'll
motion
to
give
you
30
more
days,
so
you
can
go
ahead
and
get
it
done.
Okay,
yeah,
okay,
that'll
be
fine
with
you,
okay,
so.
C
C
R
R
So
we
went
ahead
and
brought
the
trash
growth
and
debris
first,
and
then
ms
lund
has
a
building
official
hearing
about
the
structures
on
february
the
10th
and
based
on
what
we
can
get
worked
out
of
that
the
structures
may
be
coming
back
to
the
council
about
a
month
from
now.
So
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
on
these
and
miss
lund
is
here
to
to
respond
all
right.
Q
S
S
Respectfully
requesting
that
mr
lawrence,
either
recuse
himself
and
step
out,
or
at
least
refrain
from
commenting
or
participating
in
the
hearing,
as
it's
my
belief
that
he
has
a
conflict
of
interest,
he's
wearing
two
hats
here,
one
acting
as
a
councilman
and
one
acting
as
an
owner.
It's
my
understanding
from
searching
the
land
records
of
harrison
county
that
he
owns
a
parcel
of
property,
two
doors
down,
it's
my
contention
that
he
should
be
unbiased
and
with
his
ownership
I
think
he's
lost
some
objectivity.
B
C
B
B
Anyone
doing
me
recruiting
myself
about
anything.
I
represent
the
whole
street
and
the
whole
street
is
complaining
about
your
property
and
you
don't
seem
to
take
care
of
your
property
and
you've
been
before
the
case
several
times.
So
we
got
it
to
the
council
to
make
sure
that
we
hire
a
contractor
and
clean
up
this
property.
That's
why
I
see
it
before
the
council.
B
You
don't
keep
it
clean.
You
don't
follow
up
on
it.
The
houses
are
falling
apart.
They
need
to
be
secured.
The
land
needs
to
be
looked
like
everybody
else
is
in
their
neighborhood.
So
that's
about
me,
I'm
not
recusing
myself
about
anything,
because
I
represent
that
whole
street
and
the
whole
street.
That's
complaining,
not
one
person
so
that
that
ain't
gonna
wash
but
you
need
to
do-
is
we're
going
to
have
the
contractor
put
this
off
of
bed
and
then
clean
it
up,
and
then
you
need
to
look
at
repair
them.
B
Houses
or
you
can
demolish
them,
that's
the
next
option.
You
can't
just
let
them
fall
apart.
You've
got
buying
the
roofs
and
trees
growing
through
them.
Everybody
that's
been
out
there.
This
inspector's
been
out
there.
Everybody
looked
at,
we've
talked
talked
to
you,
you
go,
there
cut
the
grass
that
don't
get
it,
that
property
needs
to
be
cleaned
up.
Everybody
right
on
the
street,
everybody
probably
cleaned
up
all
right.
B
S
S
According
to
the
letter
from
mr
creel
dated
january
8th,
it's
come
to
his
attention
but
determined
that
that
these
two
parcels,
which
were
my
parents
properties,
are
in
violation
of
section
21,
19
11
of
the
mississippi
code.
So
that's
the
first
hurdle
and
sections
9
1
13
and
9
2
1
of
the
code
and
I've
got
both
of
those
here
and
those
require
that
the
property
be
cleared
of
all
high
weeds
grass,
underbrush,
brush
and
debris.
S
S
Now
this
past
weekend,
I
had
a
lawnman
go
out
and
he
mowed,
and
he
cleared-
and
I
spoke
with
mr
creel
yesterday
afternoon
about
it,
and
he
has
a
couple
of
areas
of
concern
between
the
sheds
and
the
fence,
and
the
smaller
house
sits
on
brick,
piers
and
there's
some
bamboo
and
like
wild.
I
don't
know
what
they
are
like
little
offshoots
of
oak
trees
and
weeds,
and
he
would
like
those
taken
down
too.
I've
already
contacted
the
yard
man
and
made
arrangements
with
him
to
come
address
mr
krill's
concerns
and
take
care
of
that.
C
Q
C
C
R
Out
there
over
the
weekend
and
they
mowed
the
grass
they
just
didn't,
they
didn't
go
around
the
perimeter
of
the
property
or
around
the
perimeter
of
the
smaller
house.
So
I
told
ms
lund
yesterday
on
the
phone
that,
from
my
perspective,
it's
still
in
violation
and
she
was
coming
in
today
to
ask
for
an
extension.
Okay.
C
B
B
Expired
july
2010,
what
did
so?
The
people
that
lived
there
every
day
which
you
don't
seem
to
care
about
at
all?
Otherwise,
you
take
care
of
property.
What
exactly
I'm
not
getting
an
extension!
I
need
the
city
to
hire
a
contract
to
clean
up
the
property.
You
need
to
do
something
with
them.
Two
houses
in
two
houses.
B
Here,
15
years
later,
oh
I'ma
fix
it
this
week.
These
people
up
here
is
upset,
see
people.
Here
they
want
to
speak.
The
people
that
live
on
the
street
want
something
done
immediately
and
15
years
later.
That's
not
the
time
to
come.
Do
it
because
you're
not
taking
care
of
your
houses,
two
of
them
on
that
street,
okay,.
C
C
S
C
M
S
That
this
notice
letter
was
sent
to
me
and
pursuant
to
this
I'm
to
clear
all
of
the
high
weeds
grash
under
growth
under
brush
trash
and
dupree,
and
that
the
city
is
respectfully
requesting
the
subject.
Property
be
cleared
of
the
violations
and
that's
when
I
hired
the
yardman
who
went
out
there.
It
says
if
you
are
unable
to
remedy
the
aforementioned,
then
the
city
council
will
hold
a
hearing.
M
Q
N
B
B
These
people
in
this
street
are
upset
by
15
years
living
with
this,
and
it's
always
cut
the
grass
a
little
bit.
Don't
do
anything
else,
that's
not
going
to
happen
now.
We
need
to
support
hiring
a
contractor
to
clean
this
property
up
and
then
it's
up
to
up
she's
actually
going
to
do
something.
She
said
she's
going
to
do.
C
Okay,
let
me
ask
mr
so
let's
just
say
that
we
do
not
grant
an
extension
you're
saying
it
takes
three
to
four
weeks
to
take
during
that
time
frame
if
she
takes
care
of
the
property.
I
believe
that's
what
mr
gynes
was
asking
during
that
time
frame.
If
it's
taken
care
of
by
the
time
all
the
wheels
have
turned
and
there's
a
contractor,
what
happens
then,
if.
R
If
she
removes
the
rest
of
the
growth,
that's
on
the
property
like
we've
talked
about,
we
would
still
we
still
go
ahead
and
kind
of
go
through
the
process.
But
if
we
let's
just
say
that
we
accept
bids
to
go
clean
it
up,
but
we
go
out
there
and
there's
nothing
to
clean
up.
That's
the
end
of
it.
It's
resolved
and.
C
C
K
S
S
S
R
R
S
C
S
In
it's
one
year,
this
is
the
statute,
mississippi
code,
2020
edition,
and
that's
what
I'm
pointing
out.
I
think
you
might
have
a
problem
with
the
notice.
The
two
years
is
for
a
different
section
of
the
statute.
The
one
that
applies
here
is
one
year,
there's
a
two-year
provision,
but
there
are
certain
characteristics
that
have
to
be
checked
off
and
we're
not
operating
under
that
subsection.
S
R
S
S
C
Q
S
C
T
T
We
have
critters
rats,
snakes,
coons,
possums
everything
and
it
always
comes
down
to
the
same
thing.
They
get
her
in
here
and
she'll
come
just
like
the
day
before
she
comes
and
cleans
it
up,
and
then
it's
ghost
town
there
won't
be
nobody
there
for
a
year
and
we
have
a
lot
of
elderly
people
in
our
neighborhood
and
I
try
to
keep
everybody's
grass
most
all
of
them's
grass
cut.
T
You
won't
see
a
person
out
there
for
a
year,
so
something
needs
to
be
done,
needs
to
be
done
soon
and
it's
been
15
years
of
it
and
it's
it's
enough's
enough.
I
mean
I,
I
don't
know
about
y'all,
but
I
like
to
take
pride
in
my
neighborhood
pride
and
bluxy
and
that
there
is
no
way
of
taking
care
of
any
property
and
that's
just
disheartening
to
me
and
it's
just
not
fair
to
the
neighborhood.
You
know
she
lives
in
a
total
another
neighborhood.
T
T
It's
done
that
it's
been
been
that
away
for
15
years
and
I
don't
think
nothing's
going
to
change
unless
y'all
finally
enforce
what
you're
saying
and
what's
supposed
to
be
done,
and
that's
really
all
I
have
to
say
about
it,
but
I
hope
you
pray
that
y'all
do
get
something
done
for
us
and
you
know
we
have
a
lot
of
good
neighbors
and
you
know
we
all
take
pride
in
our
stuff
and
right
now
it's
just
like
you.
You
know
it's,
it's
just
not
fair.
T
C
P
I
am
a
the
firefighter
for
30
years.
I
bought
this
property
approximately
two
years
ago,
simply
because
it's
homey
nice
little
house
and
I
love
coming
to
biloxi
and
haves
for
probably
20
years
off
and
on,
but
I
decided
that
I
wanted
to
live
here
and
sooner
or
later,
I'm
retired
completely.
But
I'm
going
to
live
down
here
and
that's
my
goal.
P
My
problem
is
when
I
moved
in
the
yard
was
so
bad,
so
bad
the
fence
next
door
was
laying
completely
in
my
backyard
the
grass.
Next
to
it.
We
had
more
insects
and
such
like
that.
I'm
not
as
well
versed
in
the
law
as
miss
lund
is,
but
I
do
believe
that
I'm
very
familiar
from
being
a
fire
chief
for
about
10
years,
all
right,
chief
bonnie.
P
How
are
you
and
by
the
way,
I
understand,
there's
a
condemnation
process
and
we're
talking,
I'm
not
real
sure
on
the
policy,
but
at
a
point,
when
a
house
is
uninhabitable
and
that's
the
trouble
with
me
cleaning,
the
yard
is
one
thing,
but
a
house
that
becomes
uninhabitable
in
a
residential
neighborhood
becomes
under
at
some
form.
I'm
assuming
it
become,
comes
under
condemnation
and
if
it
can't
be
repaired
or
nobody's
maintaining
a
repair.
P
I
would
assume
that
that
at
some
point
it
needs
to
be
condemned,
especially
with
plants,
because
there's
tremendous
health
disadvantages
to
that
with
pest
and
vermin,
as
well
as
a
a
public
safety
risk.
You
do
have
homeless
people
like
everywhere
and
the
bottom
line
is
it
can
be
that
be
teenagers.
It
can
be
anybody
really.
They
may
take
residents
in
there
and
next
thing.
P
In
this
whole,
in
this
whole
scheme
of
things,
because
you
only
can
go
on
so
long,
I
haven't
been
involved
in
it
in
15
years,
but
the
same
time
been
going
on
15
years.
It
seems
like
a
waste
of
resources
and
not
getting
rid
of
the
properties
or
whatever
or
redoing
them.
You
know
to
make
a
neighborhood
where
you
could
rent
them
out
or
whatever
you
need
to
do,
but,
like
I
say,
I
think,
there's
more
to
it
than
just
cleaning
the
yard.
P
I
think
the
houses
are
a
problem
and
they're
not
nobody
could
live
there,
they're
uninhabitable
and
need
to
be
taken
care
of.
So
I
appreciate
your
time
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
that,
but
I
really
enjoy
what
I'm
seeing
here.
This
reminds
me
back
home,
same
difference,
we're
just
southern
folks,
like
you
guys.
Thank
you
very
much.
C
R
The
first
step
would
be
is
that
she
would
come
in
for
what
we
call
a
building
official
hearing
and
that's
where
the
property
owner
meets
with
me
to
talk
about
what
can
be
done,
what
needs
to
be
done
to
get
the
houses
back
to
a
state
where
they
can
be
lived
in
now,
these
these
houses
are
not
to
the
point
where
they
can
be
demolished.
I
mean
they're,
not
structurally
unsound.
R
We
do
a
feasibility
study,
we
have
the
billy
inspector,
go
out
there
and
do
that
feasibility
and
it
has
to
reach
a
certain
number
level
before
it
qualifies
for
demolition,
and
these
don't
come
close
to
it.
They
can
be
repaired
and-
and
there
are
some
things
that
need
to
be
corrected
more
so
on
the
smaller
wooden
house
than
on
the
other
okay,
but
we
once
they
reach
a
point
where
they've
caused
a
or
pose
a
problem
to
the
the
public.
That's
when
we
would
would
go
after
them.
R
Now,
on
the
on
the
wooden
house,
there
are
some
window
sills
that
need
to
be
replaced.
There's
some
banding
around
the
back.
That
needs
to
be
replaced,
they're
not
open.
So
you
know
there
was
no
evidence
that
homeless
people
were
going
in
and
out
the
shed
in
the
rear
of
the
smaller
wooden
house
was
open,
but
there
was
still
no
evidence
of
anything
that
could
be
closed
and
secured.
C
E
E
It's
been
brought
up
that
mentioned
before
that,
also
that
this
is
going
on
15
years
in
in
this
latest
discussion
of
the
condition,
and
I
don't
think
this
yard
was
cut
until
sunday
at
all
in
2020.,
there's
not
been
a
sign
up
there.
The
city
is
aware
of
it.
I
don't
know
what
the
actual
requirement
is
of
having
code
look
at
it
if
it
needs
to
have
a
complaint
made,
but
the
city
certainly
knows
that
this
property
has
not
been
maintained
for
15
years.
E
E
E
C
C
S
S
S
That's
going
to
come
up
later
in
our
meeting
is
that
they
are
structurally
sound
and
what
I've
learned
from
him
is
that
there's
a
board
on
the
front
porch
inside
the
front
porch
that
needs
to
be
replaced,
and
there
are
two
screen
doors
on
the
brick
house
that
he
said
were
torn,
and
I
went
to
look
at
them
today
and
that's
not
the
case
they're
like
accordion
screens,
so
it
looks
like
it's
torn,
but
it's
not.
It
was
just
off
the
rail
and
I
put
it
back
this
afternoon.
S
S
S
The
shed
door,
he
said
was
open.
I
closed
it
this
morning
wanting
to
repair
rot
on
the
window
sills.
I
you
know
that
that
can
be
done.
That's
fine,
but
the
house
is
secure,
it's
locked,
it
is
habitable
and
I
think
it
was
mr
neal
that
mentioned
that
it
was
uninhabitable
unless
he
broke
in
he's,
never
been
inside
that
I'm.
C
Mr
krill's
made
it
clear
that
if
we
do
rule
against
you
in
this
or
and
close
the
case
that
it'll
be
about
three
weeks
before
it's
cleaned
up,
if
it's
not
cleaned
up
by
then
then
the
city's
contractor
will
go
in
and
personally
with
this
being
an
ongoing
issue,
I
think
the
city
having
two
years
to
maintain
the
property.
Unless
you
know,
maybe
this
will
give
you
incentive
to
maintain
the
property
over
the
next
two
years
to
where
we
can't
just
go.
Do
it
and
bill
you
for
it?
C
B
What
I
want
to
put
in
place
to
protect
the
neighbors
is
to
make
sure
that
you,
jerry
creel,
thought
looking
for
somebody
to
clean
this
property
up,
get
a
construction
person
to
start
cleaning
up
the
property.
That's
only
anything
going
to
get
done,
and
that's
your
job
to
get
that
done.
All
these
laws
and
I'll
see
for
15
years,
no
more
you
could.
No
more
could
move
in.
That
house
would
demand
the
moon
tomorrow
then
that
fungus
black
bow
nobody's
been
in
houses
for
14
years.
B
You
could
not
move
in
them
houses.
You
know
that
meant
anybody,
jerry,
no
one's
falling
around
have
support.
You
have
to
repair,
you
put
a
ton
of
money
in
it
just
to
move
into
them
and
to
clean
them
up.
You
cannot
move
in
your
house
tomorrow.
That's
not
the
problem
right
now.
The
problem
is,
we
need
to
support
the
city
council
and
support
our
own
laws
and
rules
to
make
sure
somebody
takes
care
of
property
she's
not
doing
it.
She
came
just
like
they
said,
cut
the
grant
sunday,
I
don't
get
it.
B
C
C
Q
U
The
original
will,
because
of
I'm
the
only
probably
last
living
relative
that
has
any
interest
in
the
property
as
far
as
having
done
work
there,
maintaining
it
and
to
protect
my
father's
interest
in
the
taxes.
That's
been
paid
on
the
property
up
to
date,
so
I
have
no
problem
with
removing
the
house.
I
just
wanted
to
do
it
where
I
have
the
legal
standing
to
do
that,
because
it's
air
property.
C
R
Q
R
R
The
charges
associated
with
the
demolition
are
added
back
to
the
taxes
as
a
special
assessment,
and
then
it
would
be
up
to
mr
parker.
You
know
to
make
sure
that
the
taxes
keep
getting
paid
and
that
kind
of
thing
in
order
to
maintain
the
property
until
he
can
get
it
changed
into
his
name,
but
all
we
would
do
is
remove
the
structure
and
clean
up
the
property.
U
So-
and
I
I
would
like
to
do
that,
but
I
want
to
do
that
as
executor
over
the
estate.
Currently,
I
have
no
legal
standing
in
order
to
protect
my
investment
if
I
go
pay
and
have
it
done
outright.
But
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
to
be
able
to
do
that
on
my
own,
whether
that,
instead
of
the
city
charging
an
outrageous
amount
to
come
out
and
do
it
and
you
know
to
be
two
and
a
half
times
what
it
what
I
could
get
it
done
for.
C
C
U
Q
Q
R
Here's
the
the
challenge
that
I
face
without
him
having
legal
standing
on
the
property,
I
could
not
issue
him
a
demolition
permit.
We
have
to
issue
a
permit
to
someone
who
establishes
site
control
of
the
property.
So
even
if
he
came
into
the
office
and
asked
for
a
permit,
I
would
not
be
able
to
issue
him
one.
R
U
Well,
that's
the
time
frame
I'm
looking
at,
I
haven't
been
given
an
exact
date
of
when
it
would
could
be
legally
accomplished.
But
that's
that's
what
I'm
faced
with
right
now,
but
if
you
can't
give
a
permit
to
someone
that
has
a
legal
standing
in
the
property,
you
can
give
a
permit
to
a
contractor
just
come,
tear
it
down
and
charge
it
to
the
taxpayer.
U
So
the
house
is
an
eyesore,
but
it's
not
going
to
fall
over
and
hurt
anybody.
It's
been
boarded
up.
There's
the
windows
are
boarded.
Somebody
would
have
to
have
an
eight
foot
ladder
in
order
to
climb
in
one
of
those
windows
to
get
in
to
gain
entry
to
the
house
or
go
through
the
roof,
and
all
of
this
started
because
lady
said
she
saw
flashlights
inside
the
windows
at
night
time,
which
is
impossible
because
the
windows
are
boarded
up.
B
R
R
R
N
B
You
let
me
something
to
you:
you
want
to
be
surprised
how
cheap
it
is,
the
contracts
that
don't
go
in
there
and
overcharge
you
to
take
them
down.
It
might
actually
benefit.
Mr
could
have
something
else
to
do
it
and
have
it
all
cleared
and
going
but
like
he
said
he
can
look
at
the
bid
himself
when
he
gets
it
in
from
anybody
he's
going
to
look
at
it.
So
yes
get
the
process.
B
C
All
right,
so
what
we'll
do
then
is
we'll
just
go
forward
close
this
case
and
in
the
process.
If
you
get
power
of
attorney,
you
just
need
to
stay
in
contact
with
mr
krill.
If
you
find
someone
that
can
do
it
cheap,
you
know,
and
you
don't
have
power
of
attorney,
get
someone
get
that
person
to
bet
on
the
job
for
the
for
you
know,
if
they
can,
you
know
do
it
cheaper
than
what
anyone
that
that
we
might
be
able
to
all
right.
This
case
is
closed.