►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Bloomington's
draft
climate
action
plan
we
have
with
us
lauren
travis,
the
assistant.
A
Director
for
sustainability
for
the
city-
and
I
believe
she
has
a
presentation
prepared
for
us.
A
So
we'll
first
do
that
and
then
have
questions
and
questions
from
committee
members
before.
A
Going
to
public
comment
and
then
back
to
committee
members
for
any
additional
questions.
A
A
Yes,
just
very
quickly
lauren
is
this
presentation
essentially
what
I
heard
last
week.
B
At
because.
C
C
Having
me,
I
apologize
about
all
the
delays,
so
tonight
we
are
discussing
the
climate
action
draft.
C
C
C
C
Reduced
over
time,
so
this
year,
at
the
beginning
of
the
year,
we
knew
that
we
were
working
with
a.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Across
the
country
are
engaged
in
dubuque
just
finished,
actually
a
climate
action
and.
C
Ann
arbor
adopted
on
june
1st
actually
of
their
first
plan
to
go
for
carbon
neutrality.
So
no.
C
C
Company,
even
though
we
just
have
a
draft
at
this
point,
we're
working
towards
something
that.
C
C
So
in
september
I
presented
in
front
of
council
the
climate
vulnerability.
C
C
C
C
C
This
next
slide
shows
exactly
what
that
looks
like
so
back
in
2008,
we
had
about
1.5
metric
tons.
C
C
News:
we've
kind
of
decoupled
those
two
things
and
we're
on
track
to
meet
a
28
reduction
by.
C
2025
to
this
point,
though,
to
really
make
sure
that
we're
continuing
to
be
in
alignment
with
what.
C
C
Money
from
electricity
costs
etc,
and
that's
across
the
community
as
well
so.
C
C
So
while
this
was
slated
to
be
completed
this
year,
there
were
some.
C
Put
the
project
on
pause
for
a
couple
of
months,
and
then
we
had
focus
groups
with.
C
Had
some
people
from
bloomington
transit
and
the
district
and
greater
indiana
clean
cities
and.
C
C
C
So
this
is
just
an
example
of
one
of
the
goals
and
increasing
energy
efficiencies.
A
C
We
have
goals
in
this
draft
plan
to
increase
energy
efficiency
16
for
electricity
and
12.
C
C
C
Energy
and
built
environment,
so
all
that
to
say
is
that
we
used
the
data
we
had
from
emissions.
C
To
help
get
us
there,
so
this
is
just
kind
of
an
overview
of
the
whole
thing.
I
reckon.
C
Recognize
it's
a
quite
a
comprehensive
document,
but
the
top
shows
the
different
mitigation.
C
And
then
just
go
back
to
metrics
just
to
make
sure
that
we
are
tracking.
C
C
C
I
really
would
like
to
get
questions
or
you
know,
feedback
from
council
members.
This
is.
C
Obviously,
just
a
draft
and
we're
circulating
among
members
of
the
public
and
community.
C
Or
yeah
we're
gonna
go
with
council
question
our
committee
member
questions
to
start
and
then.
A
We
will
also
move
to
the
public
and
take
any
comment
or
questions
from
the
public.
A
Council
members
could
take
up
public
questions
that
members
of
the
public
have.
B
Thanks
thanks
lauren,
you
know,
we've
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
and.
B
I'm
curious
to
kind
of
throw
it
out
to
the
group
to
see
what
they
think
about
it.
So.
B
B
Accounted
for,
and
maybe
the
report
needs
to
make
clear
what
that
is
so
so,
for
instance,
instance,.
B
Associated
with
those
goods
through
the
embedded
energy
in
it
through
the.
B
B
Have
other
other
benefits
associated
with
recirculating
wealth
and
and
so
forth,
and.
B
B
The
amount
of
local
food
produced
we're
cutting
emissions
and
that's
should
be
counted
for,
but.
C
For
instance,
you
had
mentioned
regenerative
agriculture
or
you
know,
carpet
sequestration.
C
B
A
With
one
at
a
time
for
now
and
just
alternate
among
committee
members,
if
councilman
bruce.
A
Rosenberger
or
piedmont
smith
have
questions,
councilmember
repeat:
mount
smith
go
ahead.
D
Yes,
thank
you.
I
have
not
magnet
made
my
way
through
the
whole
report.
A
It's
it's
meant
to
be
question
period.
Yes,
perhaps
you
can
ask
about
that.
D
All
right:
well,
I
have
a
question
more
specific
question,
so.
D
When
you
talk
about
the
cost
savings,
I
really
do
not
understand
how
those
are
calculated
and.
D
It's
not
the
appendix
or
anything
it.
It
looks
to
me
like,
like
in
the
introduction
on
page.
D
I
one
nine
there's
that
blue
box
with
transportation
savings
potential,
energy
efficiency.
D
And
renewable
energy
savings
potential
waste
reduction
savings,
and
it
just
seems
like.
D
D
Understanding
yeah
well,
I
would
agree
that
we
can
add
definitely
more
citations
in
that
section.
C
Potential
savings
in
places
that
might
not
be
a
good
caller,
but
I
don't
I'm
not
going
to
speak.
D
That
you're
not,
but
so
so
that
further
explanation
would
be
really
helpful.
I
think
okay.
E
E
Kind
of
bop
around
in
the
whole
draft
right
now,
maybe
touching
on
what
complimentary
talked
about.
E
We
prioritize
like
getting
to
numbers
more
than
something
just
like
increased
local
agriculture.
E
Like
growing
a
local
food
economy
and
growing
resilience
and
like
climate
action
right
so.
E
C
C
C
E
A
I'll
go
ahead
with
with
one
it.
It
correct
me
from
wrong
lauren,
but
it
looked
like
to
my
to.
A
My
memory
anyway,
this
is
this
is
the
first
time
the
city
is
in
any
sort
of
planning
document.
A
C
Nothing
is
set
in
stone
in
this
document.
It's
a
draft,
so
the
dates
in
different
cities
have.
C
C
C
Forum
for
the
community
members,
I've
asked
like
what
degree
do
you
agree
with
this
statement?.
C
C
A
Sorry,
I
should
have
said
earlier:
it's
like
it's
like
the
same
question,
sort
of
clarifying.
A
A
Sort
of
2030
and
2050
target
as
part
of
this
plan
like
more
explicit,
perhaps.
A
If
that's,
what
we're
doing
and
where
we're
going,
which
I
would
support
like,
I,
I
think,
maybe.
C
Goal
because
it's
a
little
bit
further
out,
you
know
30
years
being
neutrality
is
a
little.
C
B
Cropland
and
so
forth
and
then
tree
cover
as
strategies
for
sequestration.
It
mentions
biochar.
B
B
Studies,
you
know
they
sequester
the
equivalent
carbon
of
a
of
a
forest.
So
you
know,
given
the.
B
Fact
that
you
know
tree
cover
is
great,
but
if
we,
if
we're
concerned
about
biodiversity.
B
B
You
know
pollinator
and
forage,
and
things
like
that
for
wildlife,
so.
B
Do
you
think
that
there's
a
place
in
the
report
where
we
can,
we
can
put
some
emphasis
on
on.
B
B
You
know
some
prairie,
forks
or
grasses.
You
know
we
could
do
the
equivalent
of
planting
trees.
C
I
think
there's
some
actions
related
to
increasing
native
species
and
I
think
there.
C
Could
just
be
explicitly
talking
about
prairie
within
that
section,
and
the
sequestration
related.
C
B
And
you
know
having
an
entry
for
prairie
to
explain
to
people,
you
know
why
it's.
B
B
D
Yeah
lauren,
I
wanted
to
ask
about
a
couple
of
tables
in
the
introduction.
D
113
1-13
it
has
this:
the
heading
of
city-wide
greenhouse
gas
emission
forecast.
D
And
then
the
two
paragraphs
talk
about
business
as
usual.
D
Or
I
could
it,
it
seems
to
show
quite
a
big
reduction
from
2008
to
2050.
D
D
C
Accelerate
that
trend
that
wouldn't
have
happened
otherwise,
does
that
answer
your
question.
C
So
what
are
we
looking
at
here
this
table
this?
It
doesn't
have
a
heading.
D
Confusing
to
me,
okay,
it's
city
of
bloomington,
so
only
with
another
administrative
boundaries.
C
Differently
where
we
would
be
in
2050,
if,
if
trends
continued
in
the
way
that
they
are
so.
C
C
To
that
definitely
so
the
is
2008
the
baseline,
that's
used
throughout
the
document.
D
2008
emissions
2008
is
the
first
year
that
we
have
the
utility
data.
F
D
The
context
of
the
tables,
please
thank
you.
A
E
E
C
E
E
C
C
C
On
a
given
trip,
and
so
when
you
look
at
the
counts
of
how
are
people
getting
to
work,
I
think.
C
Things,
like
you
know,
bicycling
transit
walking
it's
kind
of
a
level
priority
in
the
same
way
that.
E
Do
you
think,
are
these
strategies
like
in
order
of
importance
or
just
or
not.
C
C
C
C
The
most
important
component
equity
is,
or
you
know,
public
health
is
so
there's
just
you
know.
A
I'll
go
ahead.
The
question
at
this
point
in
the
draft
and
and
looking
forward
to
a
final.
A
Document
in
the
next
few
months,
what
type
of
you
know
what
what
types
of
things
might
change.
A
Based
on
council
member
feedback
and
input,
as
well
as
feedback
and
input
from
residents,
is
it.
A
More
kind
of
the
things
we've
been
talking
about
adding
you
know,
titles
to
to
certain
charts
or.
A
There
also
some
room
on
you,
know,
strategies
or
actions
or
that
type
of
thing
as
well.
C
I
think
that
there's
room
on
starter
student
actions,
especially
the
actions
because
it
kind
of.
C
C
That
road
with
our
particular
business,
etc
or
organization
council
member
feedback,
I
would.
C
C
It's
not
perfect
and
then
also
just
a
lot
of
you
have
experience
on
council.
You
know
how.
C
Another
is
there
a
way
that
we
could
change
that
or
adopt
it,
a
different
framing.
That
would
be.
C
C
Think
it
is
well
suited
to
the
community.
So
I
think
if
you,
if
you
look
at
the
feedback,
form.
C
General
feedback
about
the
plan
that
doesn't
fit
very
neatly
into
a
small
box
and
so.
B
Yes,
I
had
a
question
lauren
about
making
this
current.
That
is
postcoded.
B
Mouse
travel
through
commuting
and
and
and
so
forth.
But
I
think
just
because
we're
in
a.
C
D
The
the
the
bar
chart
at
the
end
of
the
transportation
section
that
you
were.
D
D
Bar
is
reduce,
city-wide
off-road
and
lawn
equipment.
Emissions.
D
Are
going
to
be
in
off-road
and
lawn
equipment,
so
this
is
because,
like
leaf
blowers
on
mars,.
C
Actually
produce
a
lot
of
pollution
relative
to
what
you
would
think
for
the
size
relative
size.
C
Of
it,
this
is
based
on
a
environmental
protection
agency
model,
so
we
can
put
an
asterisk
next
to.
C
C
C
C
C
Council
that
it's
as
accessible
as
possible,
can
I
ask
a
follow-up
question,
of
course,.
D
But
it
is
on
transportation,
so,
at
the
beginning
of
the
transportation
chapter.
A
A
Rosenberger
sorry,
to
interrupt
it's
okay,
I
was
I
was
going
to
ask
about
in
relation
to.
E
C
E
Whole
well
eleven
percent
reduction
of
transportation,
that
was
transportation,
okay,.
C
E
C
That's
what
that
graph
is
explaining.
So,
okay,
if
you
did
that
globally,
you
would
know
that
we
would.
E
A
Me
a
minute
thinking
through
this
earlier
when
I
was
reading
the
eleven
point:
nine
percent.
A
From
transportation,
for
instance,
that
that
is
neither
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
that
is
that.
A
A
A
It
the
the
percentage
of
emissions
that
the
transportation
sector
represents
in
our
economy.
A
A
Sure,
if
there's
an
easier
way
to
clarify
this
in
in
graphics,
but
I
think
it
is
going
to
be.
A
Confusing
for
folks,
I
don't
know
any
thoughts
on
that.
Go
make
sure
that
is
clear.
C
Reduce
overall
by
a
quarter
and
then
by
2050
to
zero
percent,
where
you
start
getting
in.
C
C
A
Okay,
I'll
stop
there
for
that.
One
thanks:
councilmember
go
ahead.
B
A
Yeah,
let's,
let's
cut
off
council
member
questions
or
committee
member
questions.
A
By
by
8
20.,
I
have
a
few
left
anyway
and
then
go
to
the
public
at
that
point,
and
it
would.
A
Always
come
back
if
there's
more
so
either
customer
pima
smith,
you
can
go
ahead
more
well.
D
I
I
wanted
to
add
on
to
what
you
were
saying:
councilmember,
flaherty,
that
it's
there
are.
D
A
lot
of
there
are
a
lot
of
charts
and
numbers
and
percentages,
and
I
was
going
to
suggest
just.
D
D
What
portion
it
is
of
everything
else.
I
I
just
think
it's
confusing,
for
example,
that
little.
D
Doughnut
chart
on
on
page
zero.
Three
that
councilmember
flaherty
was
referring
to
I
mean.
A
A
High
level
ones,
if
that's
okay,
I
guess
it
is
because
I'm
the
chair,
I
said
it's:
okay,
okay,.
A
The
the
I
guess,
a
couple,
questions
related
to
the
initial
actions
that
are
under
the
strategies.
A
For
each
strategy
are
meant
to
be
essentially
comprehensive
that
if
all
of
the
actions
that.
A
Are
listed
were
implemented
fully
that
we
would
meet
the
you
know,
projected
savings
for
the.
C
Strategy
still
stands
as
being
important,
so
I'm
just
thinking
of,
for
instance,
a
tree
canopy
goal.
C
C
A
Actions
are
that
we
may
need
to
modify
them
so
add
other
actions
or
take
different
actions.
A
Are
those
actions
available
in
some
sort
of
like.
A
A
Solutions
that
are
a
part
of
this,
but
there's
probably
others
that
are
not
and
just
curious.
A
About
those
and
like
what
what
that
will
look
like
over
time
in
terms
of
our
ability
to
add
or.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
About
someone,
that's
fully
completed
this
process
and
actually
use
the
same
consultant
body.
C
C
And
then
there's
other
cities
that
are
at
a
different
point
in
the
planning
process.
So.
C
There's
most,
but
not
all,
cities
have
some
version
of
planning.
That's
in
in
the
works.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
If
other
council
members
are
okay
with
it,
we
could.
A
Stop
councilmember
questions
for
now
and
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
public.
So
let's
do
that.
A
And
as
ms
travis
reminds
us
too
in
her
presentation,
there
is
a.
C
Another,
this
is
not
the
only
opportunity
to
engage
with
this.
We
will
be
discussing
it.
C
Meeting
it's
another
place
where
we'll
we
will
be
discussing
this
in
in
depth
as
well.
F
Great
any
messages:
stevens
we'll
see
you
now:
okay,.
A
Comment
this
evening:
let's
see
we'll
go
ahead
and
go
back
to
committee
members
then.
A
For
any
additional
questions
they
have
at
this
time
or
if
folks
would.
A
Like
to
make
comments,
I
think
either
is
appropriate.
Now,
that's
okay
came
out
smooth.
D
Yes,
lauren,
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
walk
us
through
another
of
the
charts.
D
It's
the
one
at
the
very
end
of
the
introduction,
so
it's
page
1-15.
C
Have
some
growth
which
increases
energy
use
overall,
and
this
shows
that
the
the
most.
C
C
To
treating
and
then
waste
again
like
reducing
the
amount
of
things
landfill,
but
the
reason
that.
C
The
wedge
for
energy
is
so
large
is
simply
because
coal
based
power
is
massively
polluting,
and
so.
C
A
D
And
does
it
need
to
be
a
wedge
diagram?
I
mean
what
what
benefits
do
the
dotted
lines
have
here.
C
D
It's
very
hard
to
to
see
any
of
the
other
colors
distinctly
so
maybe
also
going
up
close
into.
B
I
I
just
noticed
something
you
might
want
to
correct
if
you
scroll
up
a
little
bit
so.
C
B
I
also
agree
I.
What
I
do
agree
about
is
that
what
it
is
displaying
is
that
obviously,
energy
is.
B
B
B
So
anyway,
just
besides
those
labels,
2020
2018,
I
found
rather
confusing
thanks.
A
Let's
see,
oh,
I
did
have
a
question
just
about
emissions
tracking.
Are
we
still
planning
to
do.
C
A
Smith,
yes,
so
what's
the
timeline
for
completion,
so
how
soon
do
you
need
our
comments
or
I
would.
C
A
Let's
go
ahead
with
comments,
then,
if,
if
y'all,
like
any
final
comments,.
B
Give
you
a
lot
of
credit
lauren
for
tackling
a
a
very
complicated
you
know,
subject
and.
B
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
step
forward.
Okay,
we'll
get
there
too
so
that
changes,
but.
D
Need
to
get
it
right
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
average
person
can
understand
it.
And
that.
D
It's
accessible
so,
but
I
think
this
is
a
great
a
great
draft.
A
lot
of
work
has
gone
into
it.
A
E
E
A
Add
a
final
comment
as
well.
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
especially
to
to
you,
ms
travis,
and.
A
All
I
know
a
lot
of
folks
in
city
staff,
not
just
in
your
department
but
across
variety.
A
A
A
A
Than
our
initial
sustainability
action
plan-
and
I
think
that's
reflective
of.
A
Recent
years
and
the
capacity
building
just
around
how
to
how
to
tackle
this
at
the.
A
Local
level
is,
is
really
expanding,
so
that's
that's
all
great
to
see
and
yeah
getting
this.
A
A
Forthcoming
and
being
finalized
as
well
in
the
context
of
implementation.
So
that's.
A
How
we
make
decisions
and
building
in
an
analysis
of
you,
know,
anticipated
climate
impacts.
A
Of
certain
transportation
projects
or
things
like
that,
and
maybe
it's
something
we
need
to
be
a.
A
You
know
again,
equipment
and
other
things
like
that.
It
would.
A
By
example-
and
I
think
that's
I'll
leave
it
at
that
for
now-
oh
just
one
final
thought.
A
Kind
of
on
the
point
that
customer
rosenberger
brought
up
earlier
and
have
some
overall
also.
A
Areas
where
it's
harder
to
quantify
the
benefits,
you
know,
for
instance,
from
the
local
food.
A
Economy
or
relocalizing
various
things,
perhaps
we
could
look
at
reporting
emission
savings.
A
Don't
include
like
embedded
emissions
from
food
in
our
scope,
3
emissions
in
the
inventory.
A
Okay,
we
do
not
just
like
travel
okay,
so
yeah
I
mean
like
those
are
real
savings.
Of
course,.
A
A
A
Getting
back
to
you
before
december,
one
sounds
like
a
good
deadline
to
me.
A
To
to
get
additional
public
feedback
on
this,
but
yeah
very
much
appreciate
your
presentation.