►
From YouTube: 12-5-22 Cannabis Licensing Advisory Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
A
A
D
D
B
A
E
D
D
Mistaken
kristen
or
don't
feel
free
to
jump.
and
since
you've
done
these
a
few
more
times,,
but
the
liquor
license
would
have
to
go
through
the
same
process,
just
like
marijuana
or
where.
If
you
get
a
new
license,
you
still
have
to
go
through
the
processes.
There
is
a
transfer
of
ownership,
option,
but
you
have
to
be
up
to
date,
on
all
the
text
and.
D
A
A
A
A
D
G
G
G
G
G
A
So
here
we
have
a
business,
that's
kind
of
a
scoff.
law
hasn't
done.
Things
right
and
and
kristin
has
to
take
steps
to
remove,
that
licensee,,
but
that
property
itself
has
been
in
use
historically,
for
say,,
a
decade,
or
more
as
a
cannabis
business.
The
property
itself
currently
would
be
excluded,
whereas
it
wouldn't.
A
A
B
B
B
A
A
B
D
F
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
B
B
G
B
B
J
B
B
We've
always
tried
to
live
by.
I
added
my
notes
to
the
the
jamboard,
and
I'm
I'm
going
through
the
retreat
summary,
and
I
don't
have
any
questions
about
what
was
discussed,
or
what's
in
there.
So
more
just
if
there's
more,
you
know
that
you
all
are
gonna,
discuss
I'll,
be
interested
in
hearing
that.
E
B
Evan,,
did
you
want
to
address
that,
or
yeah,?
I
I
brought
it
up.
so
I'll
I'll
I'll
address
it.
Here.
I,
I,
what,,
the
the
thrust
of
the
conversation,
surrounded,,
the
idea
that
we
tend
to
make
motions
on
the
fly,
and
in
doing
so
the
language
of
them
can
get
a
little
muddled,
having
the
having
the
opportunity
to
present
motions
and
the
language
specific.
For
that
emotion.
Before
we
step
into
the
conversation,,
I
think
presents.
G
An
opportunity
for
us
to
be
a
little
more
concise
about
what
we're
actually
recommending
some
things
are
in
the
affirmative..
Some
things
are
in
the
opposition..
It's
it's
hard
for
us.
to..
I
think
reasonably
all
understand
exactly
what
every
motion,
that
myself,
or
brian,
or
any
of
you
guys,
are
bringing
up
kind
of
you
guys
are
bringing
up
kind
of
in
the
heat
of
the
moment,,
so
I,.
Think
kind,
of
presenting
presenting
language,
for
motions
is,
is
a
way
to
kind
of
continue
contain
the
conversation,,
because
I
I
also,
believe
when
we
make
motions..
G
We
also
end
up
getting
into
the
most
passionate
conversations
of
the
of
the
debate.,
so
I
think
it's
just
a
way
to
approach
this,.
I
don't
think
it's
mandatory
I,
think
looking
at
the
notes
here,
we're,
not
talking
about
saying
that
it
is
a
necessary
thing
to
pre,
consider
motions,
but
at
least
for
myself
I
have
4
written
that.
I
would
like
to
consider
in
january
that
I
will
be
submitting
to
you
guys
after
notes
taken
from
tonight..
G
I
saw
it
in
kind
of
the
notes,
and
and
just
wanted
to
understand
what
what
the
process,,
or
what
that
that,
outside
of
like
the
regular
process
promotions
in
the
meeting,,
what
the
conversation
was
about
there,
and
what
what
but
I'll
see
moving
forward,
or
what
we'll
see
moving
forward..
So
I
I
think,
just
if
we
approach
this
with
with
concise
language
for
our
motions,,
they
can
be
more
valuable
to
counsel,.
So
that's
where
it
came
from
cool
thanks
for
explaining
that
in
the
least
concise
way,
possible.,
I
apologize.
D
G
B
B
B
G
B
D
D
D
D
B
B
I
B
B
J
B
B
I'm
talking
about
the
policy
suggestion.
form.
go
ahead,,
kate.
I
have
a
question
based
on
what
was
discussed
earlier
and
based
on
the
suggestion
form
itself..
The
proposed
language,
that
jeff
put
in
his
not
the
email
to
city
council,
as
well,
as
the
policy
suggestion,
form,
citing
to
the
6,
14,
7,
and
6,
16,
7.
J
D
D
D
D
D
L
C
C
C
D
B
D
I
D
I
I
I
B
Yeah,
to
to
alana's
point
of
kicking
the
can
down
the
road,
laura,.
My
question
to
you
is
gonna,
be
I
are
we
just
spinning
our
wheels
making
a
recommendation
to
counsel
on
on
this
issue.,
or
is
this
something.,
but
to
inspire
some
kind
of
collaboration
towards
the
solution?
That
jeff
should
be
petitioning
the
planning
board
to
make
these
changes
like
it
seems
to
me,
like
the
hands,
are
popular.
F
D
D
D
But
it
sounds
like
maybe
we're
gonna
try
that
option.,
so
this
was,,
then
the
next
option.
no
go
ahead.
laurel,.
Do
you?
Do
you
think
that
you
or
kathy,
could
go
to
city,
council,
and
ask
them
like?
Is
this
appropriate
for
us
to
be
making
a
recommendation
on
this
issue,
and
in
at
least
then
they
could?
If
they
say
no
jeff
should
be
going
to
planning
more
than
at
least
jeff
knows
who
he
should
be
petitioning,
as
opposed
to
petitioning
us
of
council's
not
going
to
listen
to
whatever
recommendation,
we
make
on
this
issue.
F
D
D
B
F
D
It
sounds
like,
you
either
recommended
or
you
don't.
are.
We
gonna
send
up
a
recommendation,
and
council
is
gonna,
say,
well,.
This
isn't
within
clouds
per
view.
Jeff
needs
to
go
to
planning
border
needs
to
go
to
some
other
board.,
so
it'd
be
nice..
If
we
had
some
direction
from
council
as
to
how
because
there's
something
that
we
should
be
taking
up,
so
you
can
either
ask
counselor,
or
not,
and
then
council
can
either
say
yes
or
no,
or
go
a
different
direction.
yeah.
alright,
okay.
D
D
E
J
Wants
from
us,
right
in
terms,
of
what
they
want
us
to
recommend,
or
not.,
I
think
from
my
perspective,
from
map,
and
from
this
like,.
I
I
think
that
if
it
touches
cannabis,
businesses,
or
the
community
because
of
cannabis,,
I
think
that
we
should
discuss
it,
and
then
I
think
if
we
were
to
ask
or
recommend
that
this
be
taken
up
by
city,
council,.
J
We
could
also
just
say,
if
not
us.,
if
not
planning
board,
like
then
who
right
like,
we
could
have
a
recommendation
that
says
that
like
who
should
be
discussing
this,
and
if
it's
city
council,,
then
great
but
the
recommendation,
could
be.
You
know
something
of
that
sort.
But
when
I
think
about
whether
we
can
talk
about
it
or
discuss
it,
it
is
if
it's.
J
B
M
M
Just
to
pass
that
information
to
council.-
even
if
we're
not
the
ones
necessarily
where
it
actually
would
be
our
recommendation,,
if,
if
we
all
are
saying
hey,,
this
kind
of
seems
unfair,
or
you
know-
maybe
you
should
be
reconsidered.
I
don't
see
the
harm
and
saying
that
and
passing
that
information,
to
council.-.
E
G
G
G
G
D
D
N
N
Bored.,
when
you're
ready
to
take
that
on
what
we
were
hearing
in
the
past,
was
that
you
wanted
to
get
through
hospitality
first
before
taking
on
the
additional
quasi-judicial
role,.
But
that's
not
that
in
stone
and
you
all
can
re
revisit
that.
Whenever
you're
ready
since,
that
has
already
been
included
in
the.
G
D
B
F
B
Touching
cannabis
businesses,,
because
this
is
the
this-
is
the
forum,
for
that,
for
the
community,
at
least
the
starting
point
yeah,,
I
was
you
know,.
I
was
just
gonna,
throw
something
out
there,,
that
if
we
did
make
a
recommendation
for
something
like
this,,
we
would
potentially,
have
more
clarity
on
what
city
council
thinks
is
okay,
with
us,
recommending
or
not,
because
it's
possible
that
we
give
the
recommendation.
J
And
then
they
say,,
you
know
this.
Is
you
know,
thanks,,
but
we
don't
really
want
this.
So
maybe,
if
we
do
that,
we
could
get
more
clarification
just
by
doing
it..
I
think
sometimes
we
end
up
talking
about
whether
we
should
do
something,
and
maybe
there's
already
agreement,
or
some
kind
of
like
testing
of
the
waters
of
where
everybody
feels
like
it
should,
be,
and
whether
it's,
fair
or
not
to
have
this
kind
of
thing,
but
it
may
be
just
be
faster
for
us
to
make.
G
G
G
G
G
B
D
D
D
D
G
G
G
B
I
would
just
go
a
little
further,
and
add
and
engage
other
boards,
and
commissions,
as
required
to
effectuate
the
change
in
other
sections
outside
of
clouds,
per
view,
to
say
that
our
recommendation,
is
not
only
to
consider
guards,
recommendation
for
the
marijuana,
ordinance,
6.,
14,,
7,
and
16
7,,
but
also
to
engage
planning
if
required,
to
update
their
section,.
So
if
you
want
me
to.
G
G
C
K
B
K
K
K
K
B
K
G
B
F
G
D
D
G
G
G
G
Preventing
and
otherwise
capable
business
from
operating
in
a
location
where
they
have
always
opted
the
this
should
be
a
recommendation,.
We
have
no
problem
with.
We
can
recommend
we're
not
telling
them
to
change
it,
but
we
can
certainly
say
hey,
council,
please
look
at
this,
and
if
this
is
logical,
then
there
may
be
other.
E
D
D
B
Alana
yeah,,
I
hear,
what
and
everyone's
saying,,
and
I
think
that
we
can,
but
it's
very,
very
clear.,
that
it's
a
motion
to
propose
a
recommendation
which
is
in
our
purview.
and
if
we
need
to
make
reference
of
other
actions,
activities
that
needs
to
be
done
in
context
of
this,.
I
think
that's
only
going
to
be
helpful,
there's
obviously
been
a
great
deal
of
confusion
around
who
needs
to
begin
this
process.
So
I
think
us
kick-starting
it
and
then
also.
I
B
Without,
the
additional.-
I
think
it's
much
better
with
it.,
because
it
addresses
the
reality,
which
is
that
this
is
incomplete.
without.,
further
work
being
done,
and
in
and
specifically,
I
guess,
this.
oh,.
I
think
the
reason
why
I'm
particularly
on
this
wanting
to
include
it
is
because,
in
the
past,.
I
B
B
B
J
D
D
J
D
Yeah.
well,,
my
recommendation,
is
to
you
know,,
as
as
the
lawyer
should
follow
what
the
law
says
of
course,
the
ordinances
say,
but
yes,.
I
think
it
would
be.
You
know
either
to
shut
down
or
to
say,
like
hey,
you
guys
and
then
point
to
the
ordinance
that
might
be
they
would
like,
send
it
back.
Yeah.
F
K
K
K
E
B
B
B
I
C
M
J
J
J
N
N
B
B
D
Yeah,,
I
believe
so
I
don't
know
the
background
of
the
jam
board
other
than
I
know..
We've
had
discussions
about
it.,
but
you
know:
there's
public
access
to
the
jamboree,.
Kristin
may
know
a
little
bit
more
about
the
technicals
behind
that
it,
sounds
like
what
alpha
is
doing
with
sending
it
to
individuals.
D
J
D
N
D
B
N
N
I
haven't
used
it
before
for
like
editing
a
document..
What
we
did
last
time,
was
we
edited
it
and
sharepoint,
and
then
we
made
that
sharepoint
document
visible
to
the
public
and
included
the
link,
to
the
document
in
our
packet,.
So
anyone
that
wanted
to
view
it
could
open
the
packet,
view
the
link
and
and
get
into
the
document
that
way.
D
K
D
K
K
P
J
J
Great
line.
I
mean
in
the
interim.,
could
you
just
have
someone
share
their
screen
to
show
the
document,
and
then
have
it
in
the
next
meeting
packet,
and
we
just
discussed
cause
we're
just
discussing
the
format,
right
now.
Obviously,
we
wouldn't
necessarily
be
able
to
edit
it,
but
we
could
discuss
it
or
take
our.
K
J
J
B
C
K
I'm
going
to
open
up
the
minutes
and
see
got
it.
oh,
okay,.
I
didn't
catch
that
part..
I
I
just
thought
you
were
just
doing
the
sharepoint.
I
do
see
it
here..
It
says
that
that
is
the
language
only..
If
ventilation,
systems,
ensure
non-consuming,
customers,,
workers,
and
first
responders
are
safe
from
the
health
impacts
of
secondhand.
smoke..
I
think
it
just
didn't.
Have
the
full.
L
J
K
C
J
C
Q
I
B
B
I
I
B
J
J
J
In
the
section,
in
the
middle,
from
staff
for
this
one,,
the
one
that
we're
looking
at
now.
B
I
just
I
just
cut
and
paste
the
one
you
you
put
up
for
those
guys,
that
thought
that
that
was
the.
I
think,
the
from
what
I
I
I'm
understanding.
and
listen.
you,
you
added
the
the
kind
of
the
notes,
piece
of
it,
because
it's
context,
right
for
each
of
the
the
discussions,,
but
that
might
not
be
what
we
include
in
the
final
document
is
that
is
that
correct.
J
J
E
J
I
think
I
fix
that
sorry
about
that.
yeah,.
I
mean,
thank
you,
allison
for
providing
all
that
and
moving.
kristin's
information
over.,
but
I
do
think
that
what
we've
talked
about
is
getting
as
concise,
as
possible,,
while
making
sure
everybody
feels
that
the
full
argument
was
represented
in
the
document
that
goes
forward..
So
I
think
the
middle
part
of
your
document.
we
don't
need,
I
feel
like
the
chart,
gives
it
good.
J
you
know,
kind
of
cover,
page,
kind,
of
thing
stacy,
and
that
might
work
to
just
give
a
summary
of
what
the
motions
and
the
votes
were,
and
then,
where
you've
got
this
bulletin
list,
people
could
provide
comments
on
that
and
again,.
Not
every
person
has
to
write,
you
know
full
paragraph
or
whatever
they
get,.
You
can
agree
or
make
a
comment
on
what
somebody
else
is:
written.
so.
and
just
for
what
it's
worth,
I
mean,.
If
the
line
is
written,
per
comments.
brian
has
written,.
I
believe
most
of
his
is
that
right?
J
brand
yeah,
and
I've
done
a
version,
which
you
you
all
seen.,
but
maybe
what
we
could
do.
The
next
iteration
of
this
is
to
put
those
things
together,
and
then
give
the
rest
of
the
board
the
ability
to
write
more
or
to
agree
or
disagree
with
those
positions.
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
you
or
not,,
I
thought
it
was
kinda
like
due
today.
actually.
I.
just
thought
we
kind
of
wanted
to
not
have
to
sign
off
on
each
other's
blurbs,
and
that's..
M
C
M
B
K
B
M
M
D
M
J
So
I
think
I
got
it
so
that
other
people
can
see
it.,
but
they
can't
edit
it
kristen,.
You
could
just
click
on
the
link
and
see
if
it
would,
I
just
emailed
it
to
you,
again,
if
it
works
now
for
you,
you
don't
have
to
log
in,
you
should
just
be
able
to
see
it
cause,
if
that
works.
I
just
sent
it
to
a
colleague,
and
she
says
it
works
for
her.
So
if
that
works
for
you,
kristen,,
then
will
be
in
business.
B
B
G
Forgive
me
if
this
is
great,
and
then
I
have
to
step
away
for
a
second,,
but
I
notice
that
there
are
multiple
summaries
in
this
document.
Is
there
a
spot
where
we
have
the
particular
language,
of
the
recommendation,,
because
it
looks
like
we
have
summaries,
a
couple
of
different
ways,
but
there
I
believe
there
is
some
there's
some.
J
J
D
G
J
C
M
G
M
My
thought
was
that
there
would
be
some
sort
of
coverage,,
like
I
said,,
just
to
simplify
it
like,
kind
of
like
the
chart
does.,
I
guess
with
maybe
using
it
exact
language,,
then
the
votes
and
names
and
then
maybe
the
next
pages
would
include
our
specific
comment.
Yeah,,
I
think
as
much
as
I
live
in
spreadsheets.
the
concept
of
all
of
us,
making
a
column
for
comments
is
it's
aesthetically,
displeasing.
J
M
M
M
M
J
J
M
M
M
Who
was
present,
and
who
voted,
and
then
all
the
explanation,,
including
ex
officio
members
and
heaven,
if
you.,
I
think,
bullet
points
after
the
chart
of
the
exact
language
with
the
vote,
count
is
probably
our
best
bet
wants
to
comment
on
these
would
be
there.
Could
you
guess?
the
opportunity
to
express
a
little
bit
of
opinion
about
the
majority
of
the
things
that
were
voted
on
before
I
became
a
part
of
the
board.
G
M
J
F
J
B
B
Since
you
left
town.,
I'm
a
can,
I
ask
a
quick,
procedural
question.
for
you,
guys,,
so
in
order
to
have
the
exact
language,
written
from
each
of
these
motions,,
our
shaft
is
gonna
have
to
go
back
and
listen
to
each
of
these
meetings,,
because
our
minutes
did
the
summary,
which
is
the
summer.
You
guys
see
here,.
So
I'm
curious
as
to
like
what
sort
of
timeline.
D
J
But
the
this
section
was
yes,,
but
they're
all.,
it's
also.
neither,.
Neither
one
is
the
exact
language
of
the
motions.,
because
I've
written
down
some
of
them
throughout
the
course
of
time,
and
they're,
not
the
same
as
what's.,
so
yeah.
unfortunate.
okay..
I
I
I
fret
to
bring
up
this
proposal,,
but
reviewing
all
of
the
notes
from
the
the
minutes.
Prior
to
my
drying
in
and
reading,
everything
that
we
have.
I
would
say
that
the
language,
structure
of
the
actual
emotions,
is
sloppy,
and
difficult
and
hard
to
understand
and
it
changes.
I
mean.
G
G
when
you
listen
to
the
transcript.
I
think
that
we've
talked
about
this,
and
like
that,
like
kathy
was
like
very
certain
about
that
it,
it
was
like,,
not
really
an
option.
I
have
another
question,
since
we
voted
on
the
minutes
for
each
like
to
approve
minutes
at
each
meeting
following
you
know,.
Whenever
these
are
made
laurel,
we,
what
is
that
kind
of
mean?
We
were
all
then
agreeing
assuming
we
all
approve,
the
minutes
that
that
language
reflects
the
motions,
close
enough.
So
I
just
wanted
to
hear
from
you
guys,
what
your
expectation
is.
G
I
think
you
were
agreeing
to
the
summary
of
what
the
motion
was,
not
that
it
was
the
exact
language
necessarily.
yeah,,
but
that
you
agree
that
that
was
the
summary
of
the
actions
that
you
took
at
the
previous
meeting
yes..
But
you're
saying
this
is
like
an
immense
job
to
like
go
back
and
like
have
to
listen
to
all
that..
So
it
sounds
like
an
immense
job.
It
will
be
an
immense
job.,
and
that's
why
I
was
asking
about
timeline..
It
sounds
like
you
guys
can
still
call
comment
on
the
you
know.
The
bullet
points.
E
J
J
J
J
J
J
I
I
D
D
G
G
I
D
I
D
J
Q
Q
J
I
L
K
M
Alright,
I
was
just
gonna
ask
if
somebody
can
in
an
email
to
all
of
us,
right,.
You
know
these
dates
that
we
need
to
get
this
done
whenever
we
figure
that
out,
but
also
a
quick
reminder
and
how
to
properly,
not
mess,
up
the
google,
doc
would
be
really
helpful,
to
me,
like
whatever
somebody
was
just
explaining.
M
M
B
J
J
B
M
M
M
I
think
I've
got
that.,
but
how
do
you
get
these
other
comments,
here.
yeah,
or
like
robin
earlier,
noted,,
when
she
noticed
that
the
language
made
it.
so
that
wasn't
something
that
she
voted
for?
She
put
a
comment
there
to
flag
it.
Just
I
haven't
used
this
before.
If
you
take
so
say
you
didn't
like
the
word
products,,
you
just
highlight
it
and
this
little
plus
right
here
and
then
as
a
comment.
Q
Q
Q
Q
K
D
J
G
G
G
G
J
G
D
So
you're
you're!
Actually
what?
If
you
have
a
public
facing
social
media,
page,
you're,
actually
not
allowed
to
block
them,
or
like
delete,
their
comments,
or
anything
because
you're,
a
public,
forum,,
so
you're?
Creating
this
public
forum,?
Where
the
public
can
comment
for
your
personal
social
media,,
you
can.
D
D
D
C
D
D
D
D
J
J
J
M
G
G
How
I'm
going
to
have
a
discussion
with
the
other
people
in
this
group,
about
this,
while
simultaneously
trying
to
put
in
the
final
language
I
want
to
see,
those
2.
Things
are
very
very
different
here
and
I
think
they
need
to
remain
separate
and
I'm
happy
to
take
the
risk
with
the
public
commenting
potential.
B
But
I
just
think
we
should
decide
before
people
start
writing
in
it.
so
that
we
don't
mix
it
up.
I
haven't
much
opposition
to
this
direction
that
we're
going
so
january,
third
comments,
by
all
and
I'll.
Take
the
I
mean,.
I
would
make
a
comment.,
but
I
think,
yeah,,
I
do.
think
that's
all
evan,
and
you
know
as
far
as
I'm
I
know,
I
will
commit
to
not
making
any
comments.
B
from
the
chart,
what
people
voted
and
I
can
put
their
names
on
the
next
section
with
a
bullet,
so
that
that's
where
you
write
your
explanation
for
whether
you
support
it
or
opposed
and
allison,
I
apologize,,
but
you
just
gave
me
suggesting.,
so
I
could
technically
make
any
edits..
I
wanted
right
now,
just
fyi.
B
J
G
G
G
But
it
turns
out
not
so
much.,
so
I
think
that
leaves
us
with.
We
have
to
answer
in
line
next
to
our
name
so
alison,.
If
you
can
effectuate
that,
so
that
we
can
actually
make
that
in
terms
of
us
discussing
something
that
we're
not
going
to
put
in
line
in
this
document,.
Is
there
a
way
for
us
to
do
that
prior
to
all.
G
D
D
D
D
D
J
J
J
C
C
C
C
J
Right.
we
have
editing
capabilities.,
so
next
to
your
name,,
you
can
copy
and
paste
your
information
from
your
other
document,
into
this
one
next
to
your
name,.
Next,
to
that
bullet,
point
just
anything,,
comments,
or
questions
or
whatever
that
that
we
can't
do.
I
just
wanna
make
sure
like
we're
not
submitting
our
response,
our
responses
and
not
the
comments.
C
C
C
J
Yeah.
alright.,
I
would
think
that
we
could,,
I
mean,
could
we
at
the
next
meeting,
go
through
each
motion,
and
just
sees
anybody,
have
any
questions,,
yes,
or
no,,
and
then
the
next,
one
yes,,
or
no
the
next,,
one,
yes,
or
no?
And
then
we
just
like
everybody
has
to
be
prepared
for
that.
So
the
conversation,
is
and
then
after
the
meeting.
that's,
the.
I
D
D
D
J
J
J
J
Hmm.
and
tonight.
I'll
put,
everyone
will
have
a
little
bullet
with
your
name..
Everyone
will
have
that.
by
the
end.
You
don't
have
it.
now.,
it's
just
the
first
one,
but
I'll.
Do
it
tonight.
yeah,
that
earlier
document
from
before
the
retreat.
I
had
sort
of
what
thought
should
I
use
just
joking.,
I'm
just
joking.
J
K
N
O
N
D
B
K
K
Can
we
make
any
changes,
things
of
that
nature.
so
please,
when
it's
that
that
time
at
future
meetings,
if
you
feel
like
the
minutes,
are
not
as
in
depth,
for
motion,
language,
or
things
like,
that,
because
they
are
action
minutes,
please
let
us
know
at
that
time,
because
we
have
the
document,
open
and
we.
K
B
M
M
Basically,
we
came
up
with
during
the
retreat
to
help
the
meeting
run
more
smoothly
and
effectively.
We
just
kind
of
put
some
examples
into
the
list
that
I
think
appears
in
another
place
in
the
packet
already
just
to
kind
of
clarify
further
what
was
talked
about
during
the
retreat
and
how
we
can
apply
it.
O
O
O
B
O
G
G
G
G
I
I
I
I
O
I
said
I
support
laws
suggestion.
and
if
we
make
a
formal
motion,,
we
can.,
but
it
would
be
great
to
have
a
follow
up
recommendations
for
cloud
meetings
included
in
future
reading
packets
for
the
board
that
was
okay,
with
staff,
then
sorry.
john.
go
ahead..
We're
happy
to
include
that.
That's
very
easy
for
us
to
do.
and
I'm
not
sure
that
there
needs
to
be
emotions
that
I'll
deferred
laurel
think
there
should
be
a
formal
motion
on
that.
D
D
D
O
O
O
I
I
I
Make
my
vote,
on
that
matter,,
and
I
also
just
know
in
and
of
myself
and
my
business,,
that
there
was
no
way
I
could
immediately
or
directly
benefit
from
how
voted
on
that
motion.
So
it
stuck
with
me
for
a
while,
even
though
I
had
found
it
important
in
the
moment
to
honor
the
concerns
that
I
was
hearing
from.
I
I
I
I
I
B
B
B
G
G
G
G
I
B
B
But
let's
say
that
we,
were
voting
on
something
that
would
advocate
for
more,,
research,
or
or
pay
money
for
some
research
and
and
that
we
could
directly
benefit
or
from
such
a
vote.
Then
I
I'm
talking
about
perception
of
a
very
specific
topic,,
not
I
I
know,
there's
2
people,
on
the
board
that
are.
I
I
I
Benefit,
and
to
recuse
themselves,,
so
I'm
I'm
not
sure
where
exactly
this
perception,,
your
fear
of
of
public
perception.
That
comes
from
a
certain
angle
of
a
certain
group
of
people,
that
have
a
certain
perspective
in
the
community,.
You
know
how
that
is
material
in
what
I'm
raising,
it.
I
mean,
it.
I
A
direct
conflict,
or
benefit
to
be,
had,
but
I
would
encourage
you,
to
maybe
discuss
that
through
with
me,,
because
there's
no
way
I
could
directly
benefit
from
this.
The
only
thing
I
can
directly
benefit
from
is
an
increase
in
square
foot
of
my
cultivation
and
in
as
far
as
this
is
not
going
to
increase
my.
I
O
So
just
wanted
to
thank
you
all
for
that..
I
was
just
gonna
respond
to
to
tom's
example.,
just
to
use
it
as
another.
I
I
guess,
from
my
perspective
right..
If,
if
we
were
talking
about
research,
and
you
wanted
more
research
on
cannabis,
of
course,
I
wouldn't
think
that
there's
any
conflict
there,
you
just
because
you're
doing
research,
or
you
want
to
do
extra
research,-
that
you're
not
directly
better
from
that
or
even.
G
If
we
don't
use
the
word,
directly,
like
you're,
not
better,,
if
anything
from
that,,
but
all
people
that
are
researching
candidates,
could
benefit
from
that,.
But
if,
if
it
was,
we
were
trying
to
say
that
this,
specific
company,
needs
to
do
the
research,,
and
that
was
you
then
yes,.
I
mean
you
obviously
should
recuse
yourself.
also,
like,.
I
know
that
we
did
talk
about
like
cool.
no,,
I'm
oddly,
that
one.
G
no,
we're
getting
that
that
time,
and
I
don't
wanna
open
that
so.,
but
that's
just
to
just
to
use
your
example,
and
how
I
would
view
like
whether
or
not
that
constitutes
a
conflict
of
interest,,
and
I
think
that
if
you
thought
about
it
too,
like
I,
I
would
think
and
actually
direct
it
to
you.
Do
you
think.
Do
you
see
the
distinction
between
the
2
and
do
you.
B
I
B
B
I
I
Yeah,
tom,,
I
I
really
got
to
ask,
where
are
you?
where
like,?
What
do
you
think
the
end
of
this
is
because,
let's
be
very
honest
about
this,
I
own
every
category
of
license,
in
the
city,.
So
am
I
supposed
to
recuse
myself,
from
every
subject:
matter.,
that's
crazy.!
The
reason
I'm
here
is
to
have
an
opinion
that
is
going
to
benefit.
G
My
industry,,
if
I
make
a
if
I
make
a
proposal
here
today
that
can
only
benefit
my
store,,
then
that
would
be
totally
inappropriate.,
but
if
I
am
making
a
recommendation
here,
that
is
for
the
benefit
of
the
industry
in
general,,
then
I'm
doing
my
job.,
I'm
not.,
it's
not
a
conflict
of
interest..
Obviously
my
interest
is
to
benefit
my
own
business,,
but
I
cannot
do
that,
especially
from
benefiting
the
public
that
got
me
here
like.
O
G
B
D
G
Yeah,,
I'm
not
sure
yeah.
I
have
also
spoken
to
2
other
law
firms
about
this,
one
is
in
colorado,.
One,
is
a
big
national
firm,
and
without
even
at
moment
of
hesitation..
They
both
advised
me
that
I'm
allowed
to
vote
on
anything
that
doesn't
single
my
business
out..
So
I
think
we
should
just
revoke
and
something
that
a
lot
of
them,
recuse,
your
cell,
phone,,
but
shouldn't
have.