►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 6-22-23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
Good
evening,
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
June
20
22nd
2023
special
meeting
of
the
Boulder
City
Council,
we're
going
to
get
started
with
a
short
special
meeting
and
then
move
to
a
study
session,
facilitated
by
council
member
Mark
Wallach
and
we're
going
to
get
started
on
our
meeting
with
an
announcement.
So
the
2023
boards
and
commissions
media
recruitment
period
is
now
open
from
May
29th
to
July,
2nd
2023..
B
We
are
accepting
applications
for
the
following
eight
boards
or
commissions,
the
beverage
licensing
Authority,
the
Boulder
Junction
access,
District
parking
and
also
travel
demand
management,
the
downtown
management
commission,
the
landmarks
board,
the
University
Hill
commercial
area
management,
commission,
the
open
space
Board
of
Trustees,
that's
a
new
opening,
as
well
as
the
environmental,
Advisory
Board.
Also
new
opening
find
you
can
find
a
boarding
commission
descriptions
and
vacancies
online
at
www.bouldercolorado.gov
forward,
slash
commissions
and
if
you
have
any
questions
or
need
assistance.
Please
contact
the
city,
clerk's
office
at
city,
clerk's
office
at
bouldercolorado.gov,
or
call
303-441-4222.
B
D
B
Thanks
so
much
and
now
I'd
like
to
ask
for
a
motion
to
amend
the
agenda
to
make
a
few
changes
and
that
is
to
add
item
1A,
which
is
declaration.
Honoring,
judge,
Linda,
Cook's
years
of
service
to
be
presented
by
council
member
folkerts
to
add
2B,
which
is
an
introduction
for
treating
consideration
of
a
motion
to
order
published
by
title
only
and
adopt
by
emergency
measure,
ordinance
8583.
B
D
D
Judge
cook
has
been
a
Transformer
transformational
and
inspirational
leader
during
her
long
tenure
at
the
boulder
Municipal
Court.
During
her
judicial
career
judge,
cook
continually
sought
to
identify
and
Implement
data-driven
and
evidence-based
practices
for
the
various
populations
served
by
the
court.
She
was
not
afraid
to
pursue
innovations
that
were
emerging
nationally,
thus
enabling
the
boulder
Municipal
Court
to
join
the
ranks
of
early
adopters
of
structural
improvements
to
the
criminal
justice
system
early
in
her
career.
D
In
an
effort
to
forestall
Quality
of
Life
violations,
judge
cook
partnered
with
the
CU
Boulder
office
of
off-campus,
Housing
and
neighborhood
relations
to
develop
the
curriculum
for
their
Community
Living
class.
This
class
proactively
educates
CU
students
about
potential
violations
in
an
effort
to
prevent
them
from
occurring
initially
as
a
court-ordered
sanction.
It
is
now
offered
to
CU
students
moving
off
campus,
both
by
CU
Boulder
and
local
landlords.
D
Underlying
many
of
the
violations
committed
by
young
adults
is
the
misuse
of
substances.
Judge
cook
worked
collaboratively
with
the
20th
Judicial
District
to
migrate
minor
in
possession
violations
which
were
previously
filed
in
the
county
court
to
the
boulder
Municipal
Court.
In
tandem
with
that
initiative,
she
worked
with
CU
Boulder
to
screen
for
and
identify
interventions
specifically
tailored
to
the
young
adult
age
group.
D
That
conference
opened
her
eyes
to
the
possibilities
presented
for
working
with
people
experiencing
homelessness
later
that
year,
the
the
court
hired
its
first
homeless
Navigator,
with
the
assistance
of
Hands-On
navigation
services
and
in
partnership
with
the
Boulder
Police
Department's
homelessness.
Outreach
team
unhoused
individuals
were
able
to
successfully
transverse
the
journey
from
living
on
the
streets
to
permanently
Supportive
Housing.
D
The
Court's
homeless
Navigator,
who
largely
operated
on
an
Outreach
basis,
became
the
model
for
Outreach
Services
among
the
many
homeless
service
providers
now
operating
in
Boulder
County,
in
collaboration
with
the
faith
community
and
non-profits.
There
are
now
numerous
sites
where
unhoused
individuals
can
not
only
access
clothing
in
a
meal.
D
They
can
also
be
seen
by
a
medical
or
mental
health
provider,
have
their
animals
seen
by
a
veterinarian,
apply
for
public
benefits
and
identification
documents
and
complete
coordinated
entry
in
2019
judge
cook,
applied
for
and
received
a
technical
Advanced
Grant
to
study
the
possibility
of
implementing
a
community
Court
based
on
positive
feedback
from
this
endeavor
judge
cook
applied
for
a
community
Court
Grant
from
the
U.S
department
of
Justice's
Bureau
of
Justice
assistance
in
2020.
The
boulder
Municipal
Court
was
one
of
the
few
sites
awarded
such
a
grant.
D
The
boulder
municipal
courts,
commun
Community
Court
program,
is
the
only
Community
Court
program
that
is
operating
on
a
mobile
basis.
As
such,
it
is
being
studied
as
a
model
for
the
center
for
justice.
Innovation
in
2018
judge
cook
traveled
to
Washington
DC
to
join
a
group
of
11
other
Municipal
Court
judges
from
across
the
country
to
explore
the
possibility
of
creating
a
national
Municipal
Court
Alliance.
D
The
initiative
was
funded
by
the
MacArthur
Foundation
and
hosted
by
the
national
league
of
cities,
as
their
designated
leader,
judge
cook
has
continued
to
work
with
this
cohort
group
and
others
to
grow
this
organization,
in
all
that
she
has
done.
Judge
cook
has
been
Guided
by
the
principles
of
collaboration
and
procedural
fairness.
D
She
understands
the
value
of
allowing
people
who
appear
before
her
to
work
with
her
to
have
the
opportunity
to
give
voice
to
their
individual
perspectives
even
more
than
her
leadership.
She
is
appreciated
for
her
ability
to
focus
on
the
individual
before
her
and
make
them
feel
respected
and
heard
throughout
her
22-year
career
with
the
city.
Judge
cook
has
made
a
deep
friendship
with
so
many
of
us
that
work
for
the
city,
her
colleagues
around
the
state
and
the
nation
and
the
Boulder
Community.
D
H
Well,
it's
first
of
all
thank
you
for
that.
It's
very
overwhelming
it.
H
This
is
I
have
been
so
fortunate
to
have
been
supported
by
many
City
councils
throughout
my
career
and
by
all
the
collaborations
from
people
both
at
CU
in
the
city
and
out
you
know
in
the
community.
None
of
this
would
have
happened
with
me
alone.
It
it
fires,
everybody
and
so
I've
been
very
fortunate
to
have
the
support
for
for
going
forward
with
those
Innovations
and
the
collaborative
the
collaboration
necessary.
So
thank
you
so
much.
B
Well,
things
are
all
from
us
to.
You
judge
just
so
much
appreciate
your
many
years
of
service
to
the
community
and
you
will
be
dearly
missed,
although
we're
grateful
that
you're
willing
to
come
back
and
assist
from
from
time
to
time,
and
we
are
looking
to
your
looking
forward
to
your
final
Court
update
here
in
a
few
minutes
as
well.
B
Very
good
I
wonder
if
I
might
start
by
calling
out
2C,
which
is
about
appointments
to
the
better
public
meeting
project
and
Sarah
Huntley.
Are
you
available
to
talk
about
what
that
is
and
and
who
we
are
considering
for
appointment,
appointments.
I
Try
some
new
things
hear
from
our
community
about
what
works
and
doesn't
work
and
really
try
to
forge
a
path
forward.
That's
Innovative
and
exciting,
and
more
engaging
for
everybody
who
participates
in
these
meetings.
One
of
the
suggestions
that
we
staff
members
who
have
been
working
on
this
shiv
have
had
is
to
make
sure
that
council
is
kept
up
to
date
about
the
work
there
are
going
to
be.
I
A
few
asks
where
really
getting
input
from
Council
Members
would
be
helpful,
and
so
we
had
requested
that
we
have
to
ad
hoc
appointees
from
Council
to
kind
of
help,
advise
us
and
to
fill
in
some
of
the
gaps
where
we
think
a
council
perspective
would
be
really
valuable.
We
have
a
couple
of
council
members
who
expressed
some
interest,
but
it
looks
like
we're
coming
down
to
a
recommendation
that
we
have
two
council
members
in
particular
Matt
Benjamin
and
Rachel
friend,
who
could
get
appointed
for
this
phase
of
the
work.
I
And
what
I
want
to
just
explain
is
how
we
anticipate
this
project
rolling
out.
We
think
there's
going
to
be
a
flurry
of
consultation
with
the
council
appointees
over
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
because
there
is
going
to
be
a
set,
an
assessment,
push
that
happens
in
July
August
and
maybe
even
a
little
bit
into
September,
where
our
partners
with
national
civic
league
will
be
doing
some
interviews
with
some
representative
community
members,
some
council
members
and
then
also
pushing
out
a
general
tool
that
allows
anybody
in
the
Boulder
Community
to
give
their
feedback
on.
I
What's
worked.
And
what
hasn't
worked
and
that
activity
is
going
to
be
happening
this
summer
and
into
early
fall,
then
I
would
anticipate
that
there's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
of
a
lull
where
our
NCL
Partners
assess
all
of
the
information
that
they've
received,
and
then
they
will
come
back
to
us
in
late
fall
early
winter,
with
recommendations
of
some
things
we
might
try
and
pilot,
and
so
one
way
of
looking
at
this
was
thinking
about
well
who's,
going
to
be
on
Council
in
2024
when
the
pilots
work.
Another
way
of
looking
at
it.
I
That
NCL
has
suggested
has
been
to
have
one
council
member
who's
been
on
Council
and
seen
engagement
during
covet
and
post
covid,
but
then
also
have
someone
who
was
on
Council
and
saw
engagement
pre-covered,
because
the
pandemic
has
such
been
such
a
pivot
point
for
the
Public's
expectations
from
these
meetings,
what's
even
possible
with
technology,
and
so
that
was
a
recommendation
they
made.
So
the
staff
is
suggesting
that
we
appoint
Matt,
Benjamin
and
Rachel
friend
when
Rachel
Cycles
off
Council.
We
should
have
a
few
months
to
kind
of
get
our.
I
Have
everybody
get
their
feet
beneath
them
and
then
we
could
make
a
decision
then
as
to
who
might
pick
up
the
council
liaison
specific
position
as
we
move
into
piloting
phase.
J
B
K
Thanks
Aaron
I
I
I'm
going
to
be
voting
against
2B,
but
I
I
felt
I
owed
it
to
my
colleagues
to
to
explain
why?
If
you
give
me
just
a
second,
let
me
just
call
it
my
notes,
and
let's
just
take
a
couple
minutes.
I
appreciate
you
indulging
me.
K
K
Several
panel
members
rejected
the
idea
saying
they
wanted
to
send
a
signal
to
Council
of
some
of
the
panel
members
described
the
unilateral
Works
stoppage
as
a
sit-in
or
a
strike,
regardless
of
whether
the
panel
doesn't
take
on
new
cases
as
a
result
of
their
own
unilateral
work,
stoppage
or
under
a
console
moratorium.
K
The
panel
has
said
that
that
it
will
still
work
on
the
10
cases
that
is
already
accepted,
which
I'm
happy
about
and
that
this
is
work
which
the
deputy
City
attorney
says
is
expected
to
take
through
September
to
complete
Council,
expects
to
adopt
revisions
to
the
police
oversight
panels
enabling
ordinance
in
early
October.
K
So
the
ordinance
changes
would
roughly
coincide
with
the
exhaustion
of
the
police.
Oversights,
there's
going
to
be
police
oversight,
panel's
existing
funnel
of
10
cases,
but
by
imposing
a
moratorium
on
taking
new
cases
this
summer,
which
cases
would
presumably
be
handled
in
the
fall.
The
panel
will
have
little
or
nothing
in
its
on
its
plate
once
the
moratorium.
Council
moratorium
ends
on
October
20th,
which
is
the
date
which
is
being
proposed.
K
While
input
from
the
panel
is
welcomed,
as
the
consultant
wraps
up
her
work
this
summer,
it's
hard
to
imagine
that
the
efforts
to
provide
that
input
will
distract
the
panel
from
accepting
cases
that
in
fact,
won't
work
on
until
the
fall.
In
any
event,
I
I
have
to
ask
what
happens
if
the
police
oversight
panel
is
important.
The
police
oversight
panel
ordinance
change
is
recommended
by
the
independent
consultant
later
this
month
and
ultimately
adopted
by
Council
in
the
fall
are
not
accepted
susceptible
to
some
or
all
the
members
of
the
police
oversight
panel.
K
We
we
already
know
that
some
of
the
changes
currently
requested
by
the
panel
are
unlikely
to
be
approved
by
Council.
Will
the
panel
then
unilaterally
continue
their
work
stoppage
indefinitely
until
they
receive
what
they
want?
If
that
unilateral
work
stoppage
continues
beyond
the
end
of
any
Council
imposed
moratorium,
will
the
panel
then
be
in
violation
of
the
law
which
will
might
draw
yet
another
code
of
conduct
complaint
which
will
need
to
be
investigated
by
independent
Council?
K
So,
finally,
I'm
concerned
about
the
present
that
this
Council
moratorium
sets,
especially
in
response
to
panels
refusal
to
work,
but
the
city
has
about
20
boards
and
commissions
in
addition
to
the
police
oversight
panel,
unlike
the
police
oversight
panel
members,
who
do
in
fact
get
paid
for
this
service,
the
residents
who
serve
on
these
20
boards
and
commissions
are
unpaid
and
from
time
to
time.
Some
of
those
board
members
are
unhappy
about
one
thing
or
another
by
capitulating
to
the
police
oversight.
K
Panel's
refusal
to
work
is
Council
signaling
to
the
20
other
boards
that
it's
okay,
if
they
go
out
on
strike
if
their
demands
are
not
met.
What
would
happen
if,
for
example,
residents
serving
on
the
planning
board,
stop
processing,
site
review
applications
or
the
landmarks
board,
stop
preserving
historic
buildings
or
the
beverage
licensing?
Authority
stop
Prosecuting
liquor
law
violations.
K
However,
last
week
the
deputy
City
attorney
advised
us
that
there
is
no
urgency
in
appointing
a
special
counselor
to
deal
with
this
work
stoppage
code
of
conduct
complaint.
We
could
literally
wait
on
that
appointment
for
another
couple
of
months.
Pass
the
revisions,
the
police
oversight
panel,
enabling
orders
and,
assuming
that
the
panel
then
got
back
to
work,
the
complaint
would
become
mood
and
we'd
be
dismissed
without
the
need
for
an
investigations
for
those
Reasons
I'm
going
to
vote
against
the
moratorium
tonight.
Thanks.
F
Yeah
I'm
kind
of
of
the
same
point
of
view
it's
unclear
to
me.
You
know:
are
we
doing
this
for
the
benefit
of
the
oversight
panel,
which
doesn't
seem
to
wish
us
to
do
this
or
for
our
the
benefit
of
the
city
council,
as
Bob
mentioned
I?
Don't
think
we
would
permit
this
on
the
part
of
any
other
board
or
commission,
and
it
sends
a
rather
bizarre
message
you
can
go
on
strike.
You
can
refuse
to
perform
the
role
for
which
you
will
appointed.
F
You
can
leave
important
work
undone,
but
not
to
worry.
There
will
be
no
consequence
for
doing
so.
I
I
am
very
uncomfortable
with
that
I
don't
find.
There
is
a
great
rationale
for
the
direction
which
we're
likely
to
take,
and
frankly,
I
would
just
let
it
lay
and
and
move
forward
on
the
the
stat,
the
ordinance
revision,
and
it
becomes
a
mood
at
that
time
that
we
passed
the
the
revision.
F
B
Thanks
Mark
anyone
else,
Genie.
E
I
was
a
bit
concerned
by
this
new
process
that
all
of
a
sudden
that
we
can
change
the
rules
because,
ultimately,
even
though
I
disagree
with
all
these
code
of
conduct
violation,
but
it
seems
like
all
the
sudden
there
is
a
special
process
when
before
there
was
no
special
process,
so
I
was
a
bit
confused
by
that.
But
I
would
like
to
maybe
ask
Bob
and
Mark
a
question
and
it
could
be
because
I
missed
a
little
bit
of
the
conversation
based
on
what
I
heard
from
the
two
of
you.
E
This
is
not
something
that
is
being
requested
by
all
members
and
it
seemed
it's
just
maybe
two
members
I
I,
see
that
some
of
you
are
frozen
on
my
screen.
I
hope
you
can
hear
me,
but
I
wanted
to
get
a
sense,
a
better
sense
of
whether
this
is
something
that
was
requested
by
all
members
or
is
it
something
because
two
members
are
pushing
and
now
we're
making
that
decision
because
of
them.
Ultimately,.
F
Through
my
knowledge,
the
members
of
the
police
oversight
panel
are
not
pushing
for
this.
They
specifically
rejected
coming
to
council
and
saying
you
know
this
would
be
better.
We
would
be
better
off
of
the
moratorium
and
freezing
everything
in
place.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
F
They
want
the
imprimatur
of
being
on
strike.
Okay,
I'm
I'm
good
with
that,
but
I
I'm,
not
sure
why
we
are
going
taking
these
steps
to
say
no,
no
you're,
not
on
strike.
You
know.
The
decision
that
you've
made
is
is
not
one
that
we
recognize.
All's
good
because
we're
giving
you
a
moratorium
and
it
seems
a
little
bit
backwards
to
me.
B
Judy,
do
you
mind
if
I
respond
a
little
bit
as
well?
And
it's
all
calling
you,
after
that,
the
just
that
we
did
get
emails
from
the
two
co-chairs
who
I
to
to
put
a
fine
point
on
it.
I
think
Les
requested
this
and
more
stated
that
that
they
felt
like
it
was
that
since
Council
had
brought
it
Forward,
they
thought
it
was
a
good
action
for
us
to
take
and
I
have.
I
will
mention
that
I've
spoken
to
additional
panel
members
who
had
a
similar
perspective.
B
F
B
I,
don't
know
that
I
can
fully
speak
for
for
panel
members
to
talk
about
an
exact
Chain
of
Thought
over
over
the
last
few
weeks.
But
I
will
say
that
there
is
some
distinction
between
requesting
something
officially
and
welcoming
us
taking
an
action.
L
G
Awesome
I
mean
I,
think
Bob
makes
a
good
point
about
precedent,
setting
and
other
boards
and
maybe
Ripple
effects
so
I,
just
I'm
wondering
if
someone
I
don't
know
if
it's
City
attorney
or
a
colleague
can
is
there?
Is
there
a
Counterpoint
to
the
letting
it
lie
like
if,
if
we
just
don't
appoint
a
special
counsel
and
and
then
we
get
through
this
and
they
essentially
are
on
strike
or
or
you
know,
sort
of
a
an
unstated
moratorium?
What
what
is
the
downside
to
doing
it?
G
That
way,
if
there
is
a
potential
downside
to
setting
precedent
of
like
you
know,
if
you
I,
don't
know
like
I
I,
wouldn't
want
another
board
to
kind
of
Hold
Us
hostage
like
you
know,
and
that
that
could
feel
not
not
not
a
good
precedent
to
set.
So
is
there
a
downside
to
to
Bob's
suggestion
here
or
or
and
I,
don't
know
if
that's
City,
attorney
or
or
I
think
maybe
mayor
Brackett
you,
you
asked
for
us
to
have
this
discussion.
G
M
Thank
you
good
evening,
Council
Aaron
Poe,
Deputy,
City
attorney.
This
is
an
unprecedented
matter.
We
have
not
had
a
board
take
action
like
this.
M
It
was
not
the
recommended
course
of
action
for
them
and
now
we're
in
the
circumstance
where
we
are
offering
Services
by
ordinance
that
at
some
point
will
not
be
delivered,
and
so
that's
the
basis
for
the
option
of
the
moratorium
and
I.
Think
council,
member
Yates
and
Wallach
bring
up
valid
concerns.
M
This
is
not
an
ideal
option.
It's
not
a
a
fix-all
for
this
situation.
M
M
B
K
K
What
were
they
stating
about
this
and
what
advice
the
WC
attorney
had
provided
at
that
meeting,
which
I
think
was
me
early
May
a
little
month
and
a
half
ago
and
I
was
advised
by
the
city
manager
and
my
colleagues
that,
rather
than
asking
the
police
oversight
panel
to
explain
themselves
or
tell
whether
they
wanted
a
moratorium
or
not
or
the
reasons
for
it,
that
I
should
simply
watch
the
video
so
I
did.
It
was
three
and
a
half
hours
long.
K
Many
of
you
probably
watched
it
from
end
to
end
as
well,
and
in
that
video
at
least
the
thing
I
was
told
to
watch.
They
were
very
clear
that
they
did
not
want
to
ask
Council.
Some
of
them
were
quite
Direct
in
I,
even
wrote
down,
some
quotes
I'm
not
going
to
repeat
them
here
now
about
our
public
record
about
why
they
didn't
want
Council
to
Grant
a
moratorium.
K
So
not
only
did
they
not
request
it,
several
of
them
outright,
refused
it
and
said
that
they
would
be
quite
put
off
if
we
granted
a
moratorium,
and
so
that's
what
we
were
told
to
to
rely
on
in
in
making
our
decision
tonight
and
that's
what
I
am
relying
on
making
our
decision
tonight
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
Aaron
has
had
some
offline
conversations
with
some
members
of
the
panel
and
is
representing
what
it
is
they
said
to
them,
but
none
of
us
I
mean
I'm
sure
that
what
Aaron
is
representing
is
true,
but
that's
not
evidence
before
us.
K
That's
not
the
record
before
us.
The
record
before
us
is
what
we
were
told
to
look
at
and
I
looked
at
that
and-
and
it
was
quite
clear
to
me
that,
with
the
exception
of
the
one
panel
member
who
voted
against
the
work
stoppage,
many
probably
most
of
the
panel
members
quite
frankly
did
not
want
a
council
moratorium.
B
Okay,
Lauren.
D
Thank
you.
Aaron
I
had
a
follow-up
question
sort
of
based
on
what
Rachel
was
talking
about
with
precedent.
Do
we
four
boards
like
planning,
board
or
historic
preservation
or
landmarks
board?
If
say,
two
members
moved
away
from
the
city
and
we
were
didn't
have
quorum
well,
what
would
happen
in
that
case
is
there?
Would
we
be
unable
to
move
things
forward
or
are
there
ways
in
which
the
city
might
go
forward
without.
M
Yes,
thank
you.
I
know.
The
planning
board
has
a
mechanism
where
they
can
call
back
former
planning
board
members
to
have
a
quorum
other
boards,
and
it's
close
to
have
been
you
know,
been
a
occurrence
in
the
past.
We
would
have
to
go
to
council
for
an
emergency
ordinance
to
appoint
someone
so
that
the
board
could
could
do
its
work
and
make
its
you
know
approve
or
hear
whatever
case
was
needed.
Otherwise,
without
a
quorum
they
could
not
do
their
work
under
the
ordinance.
B
J
I
appreciate
that
it's
actually,
this
is
an
interesting
conversation
to
be
having
I'm
glad
that
we're
having
it
sort
of
again
but
a
little
bit
more
nuanced
and
I
appreciate
the
points
made
before
this
and
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
just
really
pin
down.
You
know
really
the
the
pros
and
cons
here
and
and
to
be
clear.
If
I
remember
from
our
last
meeting,
we
still
have
to
just
we,
we
have
discretion
on
when
we
don't
have
to
appoint
a
special
counsel.
Now
we
can
wait
a
little
bit.
J
The
question
is:
how
long
can
we
wait?
Can
we
wait
until
the
new
ordinance
is,
is
created
and
passed
and
effectively
nullifies
the
need
for
such
complaint,
or
is
that
complaints
anchored
in
space
and
time
to
where
no
matter
what
we
do
later,
we
still
have
to
reconcile
that
thing.
So
that's
a
question:
I
have
because
I'm
trying
to
understand
the
pros
and
cons
here
if
we
go
through
this
process
of
a
moratorium
versus
we
don't
need
to,
and
we
can
just
continue
the
work
I'm
trying
to
sort
of
get
a
sense.
M
Foreign,
you
know
I
think
a
reasonable
amount
of
time.
We
have
to
appoint
a
special
counsel,
so
there's
no
deadline
in
the
ordinance.
It
isn't
60
30,
you
know
15
days,
I,
don't
think
that
would
allow
us
to
postpone
it
indefinitely,
but
I
think
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
and,
of
course
it
would
be
up
to
a
court
to
determine
what
reasonable
was
in
these
circumstances,
I
think
probably
waiting
until
October
might
be
too
long.
J
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
I'll
just
say
that
the
precedent
piece
weighs
a
bit
I
think
on
that
front,
and
it's
it's
worth
noting
that
that
that's
a
real
it's
a
weird
precedent:
we've
put
ourselves
in
the
other.
The
other
point
I'll
just
make.
N
J
Of
is
there's
a
very
unfortunate
situation.
That's
occurred
that
this
panel
will
not
get
to
weigh
in
on.
We
had
a
use
of
force
that
resulted
in
death,
and
this
panel
will
not
get
to
touch
that,
and
so
the
circumstance
of
all
of
this
I
think
is
tragic,
because
the
nature
of
this
oversight
panel
is
to
do
exactly
those
most
extreme
cases
and
they
put
themselves
in
their
position
not
to
review,
probably
one
of
the
more
important
ones
that
are
out
there.
J
So
I
think
that's
just
unfortunate
that
we're
in
that
situation,
all
in
all.
M
Thank
you,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
no
complaint
to
my
knowledge
has
been
received,
the
shooting
death,
so
that
is
not
in
queue
to
be
heard.
In
theory,
it
could
come
in,
they
could
be
back
to
work
and
they
would
hear
it
and
also
tonight
we're
not
asking
for
appointment
of
special
counsel
for
the
code
of
conduct.
Just
consideration
of
the
moratorium.
O
It
be
appropriate
to
ask
Aaron
why
the
two
co-chairs
asked
for
the
order
moratorium
or
to
have
them
tell
us,
or
is
that
not
appropriate.
B
I
think
that's
me
I,
you
know
so
the
the
co-chairs
each
sent
us
emails
and
so
I
I
think
I'd
refer
Council
to
those
emails,
because
that
was
their
official
statement
on
the
matter.
I,
don't
have
them
right
in
front
of
me,
so
I
wouldn't
want
to
try
to
summarize
them
right
this.
Second,
if
that's
all
right
Tara,
but
welcome
you
to
look
them
up
quickly.
If
you'd
like
to
Rachel.
G
I
will
say
that
I
I
came
in
very
prepared
to
just
you
know,
vote
Yes
and
and
move
on
like
I.
We
have
have
had
a
lot
of
police
oversight
panel
discussions
in
the
last
six
months,
so
I
want
to
put
that
out
there
and
I
think
you
know.
Bob
made
a
made
a
pitch
that
probably
landed
with
my
legal
side
like
I
am
I,
don't
want
to
set
bad
and
unnecessary
precedent.
G
You
know
at
this
job,
but
that's
I,
don't
think
it
benefits
the
city,
our
boards,
anyone
so
I
that
just
made
me
it
gave
me
some
pause,
so
what
I
would
ask
is
I
think
we
have
this
schedule
to
pass
an
emergency.
So
is
this
an
emergency?
Can
we
come
back
to
it
in
you
know
we
all
love
to
keep
re-looking
at
this
like
so
can
we?
G
P
Yeah
I'm
I
kind
of
made
my
feelings
clear
last
week
and
don't
feel
like
I
need
to
repeat
that,
but
I
think
that
passing
on
it
and
punching
would
be
a
mistake.
I
feel
like
sitting
in
this
place
of
uncertainty
is
a
really
hard
thing
for
any
group
of
people,
and
so
I
would
prefer
that
we
figure
this
out
tonight,
whatever
it
is,
just
just
figure
it
out,
so
that
there's
some
certainty
and
we
can
move
forward.
B
Thanks
and
I'll
call
myself
and
then
Mark
and
just
say
just
reiterate,
just
a
little
bit
of
what
I
said
last
week,
but
the
I
think
the
the
purpose
of
this
is
to
remove
the
threat
of
legal
action
and
and
complaints
from
the
police
oversight
panel
members,
while
they're
doing
the
work
of
revising
the
ordinance-
and
you
know
I've
heard
that
that's
saying
that
okay,
we
don't
have
a
fixed
timetable
for
a
pointing
of
special
counsel,
but
at
the
same
time,
Aaron
post
talking
about
that
it
may
the
reasonable
amount
of
time.
B
May
well
be
less
than
the
amount
of
time
that
it
takes
to
revise
the
organ.
So
I
think
that
threat
of
legal
action
will
still
hang
out
there.
If
we
do
not
pass
this
and
in
fact
it
might
prompt
additional
complaints
or
lawsuits
and
such
so
so
I
I
would
love
to
just
go
ahead
and
get
this
done
tonight
so
that
we
can
move
on
and
let
the
panel
do
their
ordinance
revision
work.
And
then
we
won't
have
to
touch
this
again
in
until
we're
considering
the
ordinance
revisions
and
I.
F
I
would
take
a
different
view.
Mayor
I
would
let
it
sit
or
anywhere
from
90
to
120
days,
I'm,
not
overly
concerned
that
we'll
be
flooded
with
a
slew
of
litigation.
I
think
it's
within
our
discretion
to
do
that
and
I
would
just
let
it
lie,
and
in
90
to
120
days
we
can
see
where
we
are
with
respect
to
the
ordinance
revision
and
what
we
need
to
do
with
respect
to
a
moratorium.
But
the
the
precedent
of
this
really
does
distressed
me.
F
A
bit
and
I
would
like
to
not
create
that
precedent
tonight.
B
K
Yeah
I
I
said
my
piece:
I
just
wanted
to
ask
a
question:
if
it's
okay
with
you
Aaron,
go
ahead,
it's
a
question
of
Staff,
probably
for
Nuria
Nuria.
Is
it
possible
that
we
could
move
forward?
The
is
the
stated
reason
for
for
wanting
to
have
a
moratorium
or
Workshop
ages
so
that
the
police
oversight
panel
can
I,
guess,
work
with
us
or
or
make
some
suggestions
on
revisions
to
their
neighboring,
ordinance
and
I.
Don't
know
if
we're
going
to
make
them
happy
or
not,
but
that's
a
different
issue.
K
I
know
that
we're
going
to
receive
a
report
or
update
or
something
like
that
from
from
Farah
at
the
end
of
next
month,
which
is
great
I,
look
forward
to
that
and
then
the
the
actual
ordinance
first
read
and
second
reading
for
the
actual
changes
don't
happen
until
October.
Is
it
possible
that
can
be
moved
up
until
either
August
or
September
I
know
we
have
a
very
full
calendar,
but
you
know
to
to
Aaron
pose.
You
know
observation.
K
We
we
couldn't
let
this
special
counsel
appointment,
sit
too
long
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
shorten
that
period
of
time
to
Mark's
Point,
let
it
sit,
but
rather
than
having
it
sit
for
four
months,
which
is
kind
of
what's
what?
What
would
be
the
case
that
we
don't
do
a
more
trim
tonight?
Is
it
possible
that
we
can
move
that
into
August
or
even
into
September,
with
a
little
bit
of
extra
work?
Maria.
Q
So
I
appreciate
that
council,
member
and
we'll
say
that
August
is
not
likely
and
I
don't
want
to
I,
don't
want
to
necessarily
preclude
that
October
I
think
we
were
trying
to
go
for
October
5th,
but
the
consultant
and
the
working
group
really
have
a
schedule
of
some
engagement.
Q
I
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
the
consultant,
I'm
happy
to
go
back
and
speak
to
her,
but
I
can't
imagine
that
it
is
going
to
be
a
significantly
accelerated
time
frame.
Given
the
work
and
the
engagement
that
we
want
to
do
with
this
and
to
be
able
to
bring
that
ordinance
through
the
parties,
including
CAO,
the
rest
of
the
panel
staff,
to
take
a
look
at
that
as
well.
But
I
am
certainly
happy
to
look.
I
just
know
that
it
won't
be
August
and
happy
to
consider
September.
Q
But
I
will
also
say
that
September
is
a
very
full
calendar,
particularly
with
budget,
as
we
are
entering
that
timetable
and
if
we
were
able
to
do
something,
we
might
have
to
look
at
a
special
meeting,
I'm
happy
to
get
back
to
council,
but
I
I
think
it
is
a
a
rush
that
is
already
on
a
timetable
that
is
accelerating.
K
Oh
thanks
Mary,
that's
helpful,
I'm
actually
going
to
agree
with
with
Aaron
Nicole
on
on
their
point
that
we
should
just
vote
Yes
or
no
tonight.
I
I
do
agree
that
having
us
hang
out
there
for
a
long
time
sounds
like
probably
till
October
probably,
is
unacceptable.
We
may
draw
another
complaint
against
us
for
failing
to
respond
to
code
conduct
complaints.
So,
let's
just
decide
tonight,
that's
where
I'm
at
I'm
gonna
vote
no,
but
if
there's
a
majority
that
wants
to
go
yes,
then
that's
fine.
B
Very
good,
so
if
folks
are
okay,
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
call
for
or
invite
emotion
on
the
consent
agenda,
that
would
be
the
The
Next
Step
Nicole.
P
I
moved
to
approve
the
consent
agenda
with
Matt
and
Rachel
as
the
representatives
to
the
forgetting
what
it's
called
better.
R
B
Second,
I'll
I'll
go
ahead
and
second,
it
Alicia
I
think
we
have
a
roll
call.
C
R
B
E
K
And
Yates
yes,
but
no
in
the
moratorium.
B
Okay,
well
thanks
everybody
for
talking
that
through
continues
to
be
a
challenging
issue.
Bob,
you
have
an
additional
thought,
not.
K
On
this
item
we
talked
about
it.
A
lot
but
I
did
I
did
want
to
congratulate
and
thank
judge
Khan
for
agreeing
to
serve
as
our
intramunicipal
judge
after
judge
cook
retires.
Nuri
I'm
wondering
are
we
prepared
tonight
to
talk
about
whatever
process
is
for
the
permanent
employment,
or
is
that
something
that's
going
to
come
to
us
later
in
the
summer?.
Q
That
is
something
that's
going
to
come
later.
We
did
not
anticipate
knowing
that
this
meeting
was
full,
that
we
would
talk
about
it
tonight.
Great.
K
Well,
I
will
look
forward
to
that
and
I
just
want
to
thank
judge
Khan
for
for
for
agreeing
to
service
our
intro
municipal
judge.
B
L
Thank
you
all
and
I'll
be
just
really
brief.
I
just
wanted
to
say
what
a
privilege
it's
been
to
work
with
judge
cook
for
these
past
21
years
and
really
appreciate
everything
she's
done
for
our
court
and
I
appreciate
all
of
you.
The
support
you've,
given
our
court
for
so
long
and
I'm
very
excited
about
the
the
next
stage
for
our
court.
I
really
look
forward
to
Leading
our
team
and
being
a
part
of
it
and
I
look
forward
to
meeting
you
all
in
person.
B
C
Yes,
sir,
thank
you.
Our
public
hearing
is
item
three
on
tonight's
agenda
and
3A
is
the
second
reading
and
consideration
of
a
motion
to
adopt
ordinance,
8577
rezoning,
approximately
1.01
acres
of
land
located
at
5405
spine
Road,
an
adjacent
right-of-way
from
the
industrial
General
to
the
business
Community
to
zoning
District,
as
described
in
chapter
9-5,
modular
Zone
systems
of
the
BRC
1981
and
setting
forth
related
details.
This
is
referenced
under
case
number,
lur
2022-00057.
S
Thank
you,
I
understand
someone
over
there
will
be
driving
the
presentation
all
right.
So
as
Alicia
just
mentioned,
this
is
the
second
reading
of
an
ordinance
which
will
rezone
5405
spine
Road
next
slide.
Please
we
don't
need
to
read
this
one
because
Alicia
just
read
that
so
next
slide,
please.
S
S
So
the
site
is
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
spine
and
Lookout
roads
and
is
occupied
by
an
existing
14
643
square
foot,
building
constructed
in
1982.
It's
housed
a
variety
of
industrial
and
office
uses
over
the
past
40
years
and
currently
contains
an
office
use.
There
is
a
Surface
parking
lot
with
39
Parks
parking
spaces
next
slide,
please.
S
So
the
site
is
located
within
the
boundaries
of
the
Gun
Barrel
Community
Center
plan.
This
was
adopted
in
2002
and
there
was
much
public
participation
and
the
plan
established
the
vision
for
redevelopment
and
much
of
the
Gun
Barrel
commercial
in
the
office
area.
With
the
goal
of
emphasizing
Urban
Development
patterns
with
a
diverse
mix
of
vibrant
uses,
the
plan
provides
direction
for
reviewing
public
improvements
in
private
sector
development
proposals
in
the
area
on
the
land
use
designation
assigned
in
the
gun
barrel.
S
S
These
are
areas
these
areas
are
the
focal
point
for
commercial
activity
serving
a
sub
Community
or
a
collection
of
neighborhoods.
They
are
designated
to
serve
the
daily
convenience,
shopping
and
personal
service
needs
of
nearby
residents
and
workers
and
support
the
goal
of
walkable
communities.
Next
slide,
please.
S
So
the
existing
Zoning
for
the
site
is
IG.
Industrial
General,
that's
defined
as
general
industrial
areas
where
a
wide
range
of
light
industrial
uses
and
some
complementary
residential
uses
maybe
allowed
in
appropriate
locations.
So
the
existing
Zoning
for
the
site
is
not
consistent
with
the
underlying
land
use
designation
next
slide.
Please.
S
So
this
shot
shows
the
surrounding
context.
The
immediate
surroundings
primarily.
S
S
So
this
slide
just
shows
all
the
properties
that
are
surrounded
in
yellow
are
properties
that
have
been
rezoned
following
adoption
of
the
Gun
Barrel
Community
Center
plan,
so
you
can
see
I
won't
read
through
all
of
them,
but
you
can
see
that
there
are
several
sites
that
have
been
rezoned
from
industrial
General
to
community
business.
Zoning,
high
density,
residential
and
Regional
business
sounds
consistent
with
the
underlying
language
designation
and
the
gccp
next
slide,
please.
S
So
the
key
issue
for
discussion
tonight,
which
is
the
same
key
issue
that
was
discussed
at
the
planning
board
hearing,
is,
is
the
rezoning
request,
consistent
with
the
required
review
criteria
for
rezoning
next
slide?
Please,
so
these
criteria
are
found
in
section
9219
e
of
the
boulder
Revised
Code.
S
It
says
the
city,
the
city
council,
shall
Grant
a
rezoning
application.
Only
if
the
proposed
rezoning
is
consistent
with
the
policies
and
goals
of
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan
and
for
an
application,
not
incidental
to
a
general
revision
of
the
zoning
map,
meets
one
of
the
following
criteria.
So,
first
we're
going
to
discuss
consistency
with
the
bvcp
policies.
Next
slide.
S
Please
staff
finds
that
the
proposed
rezoning
is
on
balance
consistent
with
the
Boulder
Valley
comp
plan
goals
and
policies,
in
particular
policy
2.19
neighborhood
centers,
which
supports
evolution
of
these
centers
to
become
mixed-use
places
in
accordance
with
area
planning
efforts
and
is
also
tied
to
the
community
business
land
use
designation
policy.
2.09
neighborhoods
is
building
blocks
policy,
2.24
commitment
to
a
walkable
and
accessible
City
in
policy,
5.01,
revitalizing,
commercial
and
industrial
areas.
S
So
the
remaining
review
criteria,
the
applicant,
must
demonstrate
by
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
the
rezoning
meets
one
of
the
following
criteria.
So
in
this
case
the
applicant
has
shown
that
the
proposed
rezoning
is
necessary
to
come
into
compliance
with
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan
map.
Specifically,
as
mentioned
above
the
Boulder
Valley
comp
plan.
Land
use
designation
for
the
site
is
community
business,
whereas
the
existing
zoning
is
industrial.
General,
The,
bc2,
Zone
district
has
been
determined
by
planning
staff
to
be
consistent
with
the
community
business
land
use
designation.
S
Therefore,
we
find
that
the
proposed
rezoning
will
bring
the
psych
into
compliance
with
the
underlying
land
use
map
next
slide.
Please,
oh
I,
guess
I
just
kind
of
read
everything
that
was
going
to
be
on
this
next
slide,
but
this
is
just
the
definition
of
the
community
business
Zone.
S
So
in
terms
of
the
review
process,
this
is
quasi-judicial.
Planning
board
makes
recommendations.
City
council
is
the
ultimate
decision
Authority
in
terms
of
the
public
notice
process,
written
notice
was
sent
out
to
Property
Owners
within
600
feet
of
the
site,
as
well
as
posted
on
the
property
staff,
has
received
no
comments
or
questions
from
the
public
on
this
application.
S
Next
slide,
please
I'm.
So
in
conclusion,
staff
finds
that
the
proposed
rezoning
application
does
meet
the
resulting
criteria
of
section
9219e
of
the
boulder
Revised
Code
and
finds
the
proposed
rezoning
request
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan
and
the
gun
barrel.
Community
Center
plan.
S
Next
slide,
please:
this
is
the
suggested
motion
language,
which
is
a
motion
to
adopt
ordinance,
8577
rezoning,
approximately
1.01
acres
of
land
located
at
5405,
spine
Road
and
adjacent
rights,
away
from
the
industrial
General
to
the
business
Community
to
zoning
District,
as
described
in
chapter
95
modular
zone
system,
BRC
1981
setting
forth
related
details
next
slide
now,
I
can
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
B
Seeing
no
questions,
then
we
can
go
to
the
public
hearing
and
we
have
one
person
signed
up.
They
will
get
three
minutes
to
speak.
So
are
we
ready
to
bring
Lynn
Siegel
online
for
for
her
testimony.
T
Trying
to
talk,
but
you
were
talking
I,
don't
exactly
know
what
I
want
to
say
on
this
issue.
T
T
It's
not
mine!
It's
also
following
nine
City
boards
and
trying
to
read
an
awful
lot
of
stuff
that
I
don't
have
a
clear
idea
of.
What's
Happening
Here
I
could
have
read
all
the
stuff
behind
this
understand.
It
I
think
that
I
want
more
of
a
business
Community
than
Industrial
side
here,
but
maybe
I,
don't
because
all
the
industrial
spaces
in
Boulder
are
getting
pushed
out
east
further
and
further
and
further,
as
we
have
less
and
less
land,
because
everything
is
about
the
housing
God.
T
T
When
I've
got
nine
City
boards
to
follow
I,
don't
have
a
lot
of
time
to
you
know
just
throw
around
so
I,
don't
like
to
see
businesses
and
Retail
just
exiting
my
immediate
area
and
I.
Think
that's
probably
what
you're
trying
to
do
here
is
get
more
business
here
unless
industrial
right,
but
we
need
industrial
too.
Don't
we
because
we've
stuck
housing
in
every
industrial
site
done.
B
N
I'll
make
a
motion
to
make
a
motion
to
adopt
an
ordinance
if
that's,
okay
with
anybody.
U
B
J
All
right
I'll
make
an
option
to
adopt
ordinance,
8577
rezoning,
approximately
1.01
acres
of
land
located
at
5405,
spine,
Road
and
adjacent
rights
of
way
from
the
industrial
General
IG
to
the
business
Commercial
to
bc2
zoning
District,
as
described
in
chapter
9-5,
modular
zone
system,
BRC,
1981
and
setting
fourth.
R
J
R
B
C
B
F
Thank
you
so
much
mayor
good
evening
and
welcome
to
tonight's
study
session
of
the
Boulder
City
Council
I
am
mayor,
Pro
tem
Wallach,
and
thank
you
for
joining
us
as
this
is
our
final
meeting
before
our
summer
break.
I
am
sure
that
all
questions
will
be
pertinent
and
all
comments
will
be
focused.
F
F
Our
second
item
is
the
Boulder
County
Clerk's
presentation,
2023
and
Beyond
election
review,
which
will
include
an
update
on
ranked
Choice
voting
and
staff's
presentation
regarding
potential
ballot
items.
And
lastly,
our
last
item
is
information
regarding
the
2024
city
of
Boulder
energy
conservation
code
development
project.
F
Before
we
go
into
our
work
items,
I
would
like
to
outline
how
the
meeting
will
be
conducted,
we'll
review
staff's
presentations
for
each
of
the
items
and
then
we'll
have
a
time
for
questions.
At
the
end
of
the
presentation,
we
will
conduct
our
Council
discussion
with
staff.
F
Q
Thank
you
so
much
council
member
and
our
mayor,
Pro,
tem
I,
should
say
and
I'm
going
to
try
to
keep
all
my
comments
short
today.
But
I
will
sneak
in
just
a
note
of
gratitude
to
judge
cook,
as
she
gives
her
last
official
Municipal
Court
quarterly
update.
It
has
been
a
privilege
to
work
alongside
her
and
see
the
work
that
the
community
that
the.
Q
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
those
kind
words
Maria
and
it's
so
great
to
have
you
as
our
city
manager,
given
that
the
Austin
Community
Court
is
one
of
our
role.
Models
for
this
initiative,
so
that's
been
very
beneficial.
H
I
was
told
earlier
that
there
were
points
in
time
when
my
voice
broke
up.
So
if
that
happens,
please
flag
that
for
me,
I'll
turn
off
my
video,
because
that
can
help
with
me
tonight.
First
of
all,
good
evening,
mayor
and
members
of
council
with
me
tonight
is
Nia
Nguyen
he's
our
lead.
Navigator
Nia
worked
at
the
boulder
shelter
for
the
homeless
in
a
variety
of
capacities.
For
four
years,
when
we
hired
Megan
Newton
to
replace
our
first
navigator,
we
also
hired
Nia
to
work
alongside
her.
H
He
left
us
briefly
to
coordinate
the
be
their
team,
but
came
back
as
our
lead
Navigator.
When
Megan
moved
over
to
HHS.
He
is
a
hard
worker
and
has
an
incredible
understanding
of
the
topic
of
homelessness
in
general,
as
well
as
the
of
the
various
individuals
experiencing
homelessness
in
our
community.
Do
we
have
the
presentation?
B
H
Okay,
so
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide
and
the
reason
I'm
discussing
this
tonight
is
I
just
want
to
give
you
a
deeper
understanding
of
the
work
that
these
Navigators
provide.
It
can
be
very
confusing
when
we
also
have
the
be
their
team.
We
have
ambassadors,
we
have
case
managers
with
other
entities,
so
I
really
wanted
to
dial
that
in
for
you
next
slide,
please.
H
H
All
right
next
slide.
Please
I
broke
this
navigation
worked
down
into
phases
based
on
some
system.
Mapping
work
that
our
peers
in
Austin
did
their
work
is
depicted
in
slides
included
at
the
end
of
this
PowerPoint
and
while
I
don't
intend
to
discuss
those
slides,
I
thought
you
might
be
interested
in
having
them
as
a
reference
for
the
future.
H
Incidentally,
that
work
that
was
done
in
Austin
was
founded,
funded
by
their
downtown
Austin
Alliance
in
2018,
and
then
in
2019.
They
followed
it
up
with
mapping
of
the
behavioral
health
systems
for
people
experiencing
homelessness.
H
H
What's
important
to
remember
here
is
that
anyone
May
disengage
at
any
step
along
the
way
of
any
of
these
phases,
we're
going
to
talk
about,
in
which
case
we're
coming
back
here
to
this
slide
and
attempting
Outreach
all
over
again
next
slide.
This
is
the
same
slide
at
the
two
circles
in
green
indicate
where
our
Navigators
play
a
role
in
Outreach.
Outreach
is
not
their
primary
job
function
as
it
is
for
be
there,
but
they
will
engage
in
Outreach
and
referral
if
the
need
presents
itself
Nia.
W
Yeah
first
off
good
evening
councils
and
thank
you
for
having
me
here
tonight
and
to
answer
judge
Cook's
questions
it's
about
20
to
25
of
individuals
who
will
refuse
to
engage
with
us
on
our
first
attempt
of
making
contact
with
them.
H
H
And
do
you
have
an
idea
of
the
average
number
of
times
it
takes
before?
Somebody
agrees
to
engage
with
you?
Yes,.
W
This
really
depends
on
the
client,
but
on
average
it
takes
three
to
four
tries
before
they
really
trust
us
and
sit
down
and
do
anything
with
us
all.
H
Right,
thank
you
next
slide,
please.
H
So
this
slide
is
an
attempt
to
provide
some
metrics
for
this
Outreach
phase
on
the
center
column.
Is
the
exact
metric
that
we're
providing
numbers
on,
as
you
would
expect,
given
their
respective
roles,
be,
there
has
more
contacts
with
more
individuals
than
our
Navigators
during
this
space,
and
you
saw
some
of
this
data
in
different
format
in
your
safe
and
managed
spaces
update
a
few
months
ago.
H
Next
slide,
please,
okay,
so
the
next
phase
is
client
engagement
and
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
client
engagement
typically
falls
into
lead
three
large
categories
defined
by
the
circles
at
the
top
and
then
at
the
bottom.
I
have
the
the
entities
that
mostly
participate
in
those
various
Columns
of
tasks.
Next
slide,
please!
H
But
again,
if
you
look
at
the
areas
highlighted
in
that
glowing
lime,
green
borders,
you
will
see
that
our
Navigators
are
primarily
working
during
the
engagement
phase
to
assist
with
service
needs
for
those
who
are
unhoused
and
unsheltered.
So
accessing
public
benefits
accessing
Wellness
appointments
and
very
significantly
helping
them
keep
appointments
in
the
criminal
justice
system,
and
that's
not
just
in
our
court,
been
in
all
of
the
courts
where
they
may
have
cases
here
in
Boulder
County.
H
W
H
Right,
thank
you
next
slide.
Please
again,
another
slide
showing
metrics
for
the
various
service
needs
our
Navigators
help
to
provide,
and
this
is
where
you
begin
to
see.
The
shift
in
roles.
The
Navigators
are
much
more
involved
than
be
there
in
assisting
people
with
service
needs,
especially
those
needs
that
are
associated
with
the
criminal
justice
system
involvement.
Although
again
there
still
is
a
little
bit
of
overlap.
H
I
do
want
to
call
out
one
difference,
be
on
the
be
their
side.
You
will
see
a
reference
to
referrals
by
and
large
and
on
the
Navigator
side.
You'll
see
completions,
and
that's
because
an
individual
must
complete
the
task
associated
with
their
service
to
earn
dismissal
of
a
community
Court
eligible
case
and
in
fact,
The
Navigators
are
often
accompanying
the
person
to
the
appointment
if
it's
medical
or
dental
or
mental
mental
health
or
whatever
so
well,
be
their
tracks
referrals.
H
So
it's
a
fair
amount
of
time
that
gets
eaten
up
with
these,
with
helping
people
navigate
these
systems
by
accompanying
them.
Can
you
tell
us
about
the
work
that
you
did
with
one
client
Nia
to
help
him
complete
his
out
of
custody,
competency,
evaluation.
W
Yeah,
a
couple
of
years
ago,
we
had
a
client
who
was
older
to
do
out
of
custody,
competency,
restoration
and
due
to
covid,
all
of
his
restoration
meeting
were
being
done
over
the
phone,
and
the
client
has
no
phone,
no
laptops
and
he
has
pretty
severe
memory
issues.
So
what
happened
was
I
ended
up
going
out
to
look
for
him
every
time
he
has
an
appointment
and
I
would
bring
him
back
to
the
Chester
Center.
W
We
would
let
him
use
one
of
our
hearing
room
there.
We
would
tone
a
movie
on
for
him
on
on
one
of
our
computers
and
let
him
watch
as
he
wait
for
his
appointment
and
the
the
wait
time,
usually
about
an
hour
and
a
half
to
two
hours
long
and
when
it's
time
for
the
appointment,
I
just
come
out
with
a
phone,
and
we
call
the
restoration
worker
together
and
I
said.
W
H
All
right,
thank
you,
not
you
just
froze
also,
so
you
may
want
to
turn
your
video
off
I
thought
that
was
a
very
creative
approach.
That
neot
took
to
make
sure
that
this
individual
was
able
to
keep
his
competency
appointments.
Once
he
was
restored
to
competency.
He
was
able
then,
to
go
forward
and
see
his
felony
charges
through
to
the
end
all
right.
Let's
next
slide,
so
we're
now
going
to
talk
about
the
Free
Housing
stage
next
slide.
H
So
here's
sort
of
the
main
categories
of
what
needs
to
happen
in
the
pre-housing
stage
of
Engagement.
It's
focused
primarily
on
the
tasks
needed
to
get
a
person
onto
the
wait
list
and
document
ready
for
housing
next
slide.
Please
so
again,
those
glowing
green
shapes
are
functions
that
our
Navigators
help
to
perform
and
we,
along
with
other
service
providers,
are
very
involved
in
the
Free
Housing
phase
of
Engagement.
So
one
of
the
other
main
service
providers
at
this
stage
is
focus
re-entry.
H
But
there
are
a
couple
of
others
too.
The
there
is
an
asterisk
next
to
that
box
on
the
left
that
or
on
the
right.
That's
marked
skill
building
videos.
They
are
funded
by
our
community
Court
Grant
and
should
be
done
by
the
end
of
September,
but
some
of
the
topics
that
we're
going
to
have
are,
for
instance,
how
to
get
ready
for
housing
once
you're
on
the
list.
H
What
steps
to
expect
once
you've
been
matched
with
a
voucher,
how
to
set
boundaries
with
your
unhoused
friends
once
you
move
in
and
how
to
secure
meals
and
food
and
so
forth.
H
A
couple
more
questions
of
our
highest
utilizers
say
our
top
45
utilizers
across
multiple
parts
of
the
system.
What
percentage
of
those
would
you
say
have
done
that
the
ice,
the
DAT.
W
H
W
H
H
You
can
see
in
the
center
what
the
metric
is
and
as
we
progress
into
these
pre-housing
tasks,
the
role
of
the
Outreach
workers
such
as
be
there
really
drops
off
and
the
role
of
the
Court
Navigator
really
picks
up.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
Next
phase
is
housing,
so
if
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
this
is
an
attempt
to
capture
the
many
steps
that
occur
once
a
person
on
the
waitlist
is
matched
to
housing.
H
It
may
not
be
all
inclusive,
but
it's
pretty
comprehensive
and
if
you'll
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
again
we
use
the
lime
green
squares
to
depict
the
phases
where
our
Navigators
are
involved
and
not.
What
would
you
say
is
the
percentage
of
people
that
you
work
with,
that
lack
the
the
skill
to
navigate
these
systems
and
these
particular
housing
tasks
on
their
own.
W
So
I
don't
have
any
data
on
this,
but
if
I
have
to
estimate
I
would
say
about
70
to
80
percent
of
folks
lack
the
skill
to
navigate
these
systems,
if
not
higher
than
that.
All.
H
Right,
thank
you
Nia
and
then
so,
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
you
can
see
the
typical
amount
of
time
that's
spent
by
The
Navigators
at
each
of
these
on
various
phases
in
the
housing
process.
Nia,
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
a
move-in
day
looks
like
and
who
is
involved?
Yeah.
W
It's
usually
an
extensive
list
of
people
who
involve
in
move-in
day
it's
the
housing,
the
housing
case
manager,
the
Navigator,
the
hot
obese
team
for
transportation,
the
property
manager
and
the
client
themselves.
W
What
will
happen
is
the
property
manager
will
reach
out
to
us
and
let
us
know
when
they're
available
for
lease
signing
and
move
in,
so
we
usually
have
to
go
out
and
find
the
clients
after
after
the
property
manager.
Let
us
know-
and
we
let
them
know
when
the
move-in
date
is,
and
on
the
day
of
the
move-in,
we
go
to
the
client
wherever
they're
staying
and
we
helped
load
their
properties
into
the
truck
or
van
that
we
have
that
day.
We
bring
them
to
their
apartment.
W
We
do
a
quick
walk-through
of
the
apartment
to
make
sure
everything
is
proper.
We
go
through
all
the
rules
and
policies
with
the
client
and
property
manager.
Then
we
signed
a
lease
and
after
that
we
usually
have
to
call
Excel
to
have
the
electricity
turn
on,
and
sometimes
clients
need
help
with
Furnishing
the
apartment.
W
W
H
You
if
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
we're
going
to
discuss
now
the
housing
retention
phase
and
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
H
H
This
is
not
enough,
particularly
in
the
early
phases
of
being
housed,
but
our
Navigators
in
concert
with
many
of
the
other
service
agency
partners
that
you
see
listed
there
work
together
to
develop
a
plan
for
regular
check-ins
on
whatever
schedule
is
appropriate
for
the
individual
client
and
on
average,
that's
about
three
times
per
week.
Eventually
is
building
home
comes
fully
online.
The
Navigators
may
be
able
to
step
back
from
some
of
this
work,
but
if
you'll
go
to
the
next
slide
again,
you
can
see
this
is
where
our
Navigators
play
a
role
I'm
wondering
now.
W
Yeah,
we
have
a
client
who
moved
into
an
apartment
in
Longmont
earlier
this
year
and
it
was
us
the
community,
Court,
b-hub,
Focus,
re-entry
heart
and
mental
health
partner.
All
worked
with
this
client
and
we
all
knew
that
she
would
be
someone
who
would
struggle
to
keep
her
housing.
She
has
lost
her
housing
four
times
previously,
and
so
we
would
set
up
a
bi-weekly
meeting
to
talk
about
her
specifically
and
we
check
in
on
her
about
four
times
a
week
and
because
she
stayed
in
Longmont
and
she
was
such
a
social
person.
W
She
was
really
struggling
with
not
being
able
to
hang
out
with
all
of
her
friends
that
were
here
in
Boulder
and
she
didn't
really
have
any
support
group
in
Longmont,
and
so
she
got
really
depressed
and
she
started
drinking
a
lot.
She's
binge
drinking
quite
a
bit
and
she
stopped
eating
completely.
So
there
was
a
day
when
me
and
the
hot
officers
was
there
to
check
in
on
her,
and
we
found
her
in
her
apartment
lying
in
her
bed
and
not
able
to
get
up,
and
she
was
vomiting
a
lot
of
blood.
W
That
day.
There
were
quite
a
bit
of
blood,
but
next
real
bad,
so
we
had
to
call
for
the
paramedic
and
ask
them
for
a
transport
to
Boulder,
so
we
can
get
her
on
an
emergency
hold,
and
so
she
was
in
there
for
quite
a
bit
of
time
a
few
days,
and
then
she
got
transitioned
over
to
the
trt
program
with
mental
health
partners.
She's
doing
better
now,
she's
very
happy
that
we
were
there
to
help
her
one
thing.
W
W
H
You
neonat
all
right
we're
going
to
shift
gears
now
and
I
just
want
to
follow
up
on
something
that
was
asked
about
at
a
previous
council
meeting.
So
if
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide
has
to
do
with
camping
cases,
and
you
can
go
to
the
following.
One
I
know
that
this
came
up
in
the
discussion
about
safe
and
managed
spaces.
H
When
council
member
Yates
asked
a
question
about
outcomes
in
camping
cases
and
Dr
Reinhardt
from
the
police
department
attempted
to
answer
the
question,
but
I
do
want
to
emphasize
for
you
that
it's
the
court
records
management
system
that
contains
this
data,
not
the
police.
They
have
the
filings
part,
but
we
have
the
outcome
part.
H
H
Second,
if
you
assume
that
most
of
the
ten
percent
of
cases
from
20
to
23
that
are
are
still
open,
if
you
assume
that
they
ultimately
result
in
dismissal
or
go
past
retention,
then
the
numbers
for
eventual
dismissal
also
end
up
being
pretty
similar,
so
the
32
plus
the
10
percent,
would
be
similar
to
the
42
percent,
plus
the
two
percent
on
the
bottom
lines.
F
All
right
that
I
think
that
is
my
cue-
does
council
have
any
questions
of
in
yet
and
by
the
way.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
presentation.
It
was
extremely
informative
and
I
want
to
at
least
have
my
colleagues
ask
whatever
questions
they
need
to
ask
any
hands.
F
P
Yeah,
thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
that
that
was
really
informative.
One
of
the
questions
that
I
was
wondering
about
is
in
terms
of
folks
who
work
their
way
into
housing
through
Community
Court.
H
F
P
You
I
this
just
just
sort
of
a
general
comment
in
judge
cook,
since
it's
your
last
evening
with
us,
I
figured
I
would
just
say
it
here,
but
you
know
I've
heard
from
a
number
of
people
just
the
way
that
not
just
this
community
court,
but
also
the
work
that
you've
done
with
restorative
justice
at
the
University.
What
a
difference
it
has
made
I
think
in
terms
of
working
with
complicated
systems
and
trying
to
get
them
to
work
better
for
the
people
involved.
P
I
just
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you,
I
think
you
know,
you've
really
changed
lives.
You've
helped
do
some
transformation
of
systems
in
your
decades
with
the
city
and
it's
kind
of
what
we
all
hope
we
can
do
as
public
servants
and
I
just
want
to
sincerely
thank
you
for
everything
that
you've
done
for
the
city
so
and
thank
you
for
sending
us
out
with
us
a
wonderful
presentation
as
well.
Thank
you.
B
Yeah
well
I'll
start
by
saying
also
thanks
that
was
very
informative
and
not.
It
was
great
to
have
you
here
with
us
today
and
some
of
those
stories
that
you
were
telling
were
really
inspiring
about
how
you
know.
City
staff
are
really
going
above
and
beyond
to
help
folks
who
are
really
struggling,
get
into
a
better
place
in
their
lives.
So
that
was
just
very
impressive
and
makes
me
proud
of
our
city
organization
that
we're
doing
work
like
that.
B
So
thanks
for
being
here
and
talking
us
through
that
and
then
judge
coach
just
wanted
to
Echo
Nicole's
thanks
and
you
know,
you've
been
a
transformative
leader
in
the
municipal
court
for
over
20
years
and
you've
made
such
a
difference
in
so
many
people's
lives
and
we're
just
you
know,
deeply
deeply
grateful
for
all
of
that
work.
So
thank
you
for
being
with
us
one
last
time
and
talking
about
the
the
all
the
difference
that
you're
making
that
the
court
is
making
in
our
community.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
so
much
Mark
and
I
think
it's
the
same
for
me.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
judge
cook
for
the
great
and
thoughtful
presentation
and
thank
you
for
all
the
work
you
have
done
in
Boulder
and
also
just
hearing
your
presentation
tonight.
It's
it's
truly
inspiring
to
know
that
you
have
done
such
great
work
in
supporting
our
most
vulnerable
members
of
the
population
and
also
for
bringing
that
to
give
those
personal
stories.
So
thank
you
so
much
and
it
means
a
lot
and
thank
you
for
your
service.
E
A
F
K
Well,
I'd
like
to
add
my
thanks
as
well
judge
cook,
you
you've
been
a
great
example
to
us,
a
mentor
to
many
of
us
and
we're
all
going
to
miss
you.
We
wish
you
well
in
your
retirement
and
thank
you
also
for
for
bringing
along
judge,
Khan
It's,
very,
very
easy
and
smooth
transition
that
you
should
be
very
proud
of.
K
Of
of
your
success,
or
at
least
your
interim
successor
I
also
want
Council
to
know
that,
in
addition
to
all
the
work,
the
judge
cook
does
to
help
vulnerable
populations,
and
obviously
it
would
be
easy
for
a
judge
to
Simply
sit
on
the
bench
in
a
black
robe
and
hand
down
sentences,
but
judge
cook
is
is
far
more
than
than
that,
but
but
I
also
want
folks
to
know
that
what
judge
cook
has
done
here
in
Boulder
has
been
recognized
at
the
national
level
as
well.
K
Judge
cook
is
one
of
the
founders
of
a
National
Organization
of
Municipal
judges,
and
she
has
been
a
leader
and
mentor
to
many
missile
judges
around
the
country
in
Sharing
Boulder's,
best
practices
with
other
cities,
and
so
it's
not
just
the
great
work.
The
judge
cook
is
doing
here
in
Boulder,
but
also
the
great
work
that's
being
done
in
other
communities
around
the
country
tree
under
judge
Cook's
leadership.
So
thank
you.
Your
honor.
F
G
Piggybacking
on
what
Bob
just
said,
You
know,
despite
the
judge
cook
your
busyness
and
you
know,
National
status.
G
You
have
always
been
generous
in
giving
your
time
to
us
as
council
members
I
think
you
spent
like
two
hours
with
me,
onboarding
when
I
started
and
showing
me
around
and
I'm
sure
that
you
did
that
for
all
of
us
and
really
gave
us
a
perspective
and
and
you've
been
always
sort
of
unflinching
and
in
your
on
you
know
your
bird's
eye
view
and
on
the
ground
perspective
of
what's
really
happening
in
Boulder
and
you've.
Shared
I.
Think
what
we
needed
to
hear.
G
So
thank
you
for
that
and
I
I
just
want
to
also
appreciate
I.
Think
one
of
the
first
times
we
crossed
paths
was
at
a
homeless
Memorial,
probably
five
years
ago
and
I.
Remember
you
just
getting
a
lot
of
hugs
from
people
that
had
gone
through
your
court
system
and
as
a
a
fellow
attorney
being
pretty
impressed
that,
like
a
lot
of
people,
don't
don't
maybe
want
to
hug
the
person
who
was
sentencing
them
so
that
I
thought
that
spoke
volumes.
G
J
Thanks,
Mark
and
I,
you
know
these
are
great
opportunities
for
us
to
really
gush
over
people
who,
in
many
ways
do
work.
That
I
would
say
is
greater
and
more
impactful
than
any
one
of
us
sitting
on
Council
and-
and
you
certainly
exemplify
that
and
I
think
any
one
of
us
on
Council
would
love
to
be
able
to
leave
a
lasting
impression
on
our
community.
J
The
way
you
have
judge
Koken
and
it's
just
a
testament
to
everything
you
have
done,
and
it's
also
great
to
sort
of
see
in
these
reports
and
and
how
you've
transformed,
certainly
our
local
justice
system
at
the
municipal
court
level.
It's
a
breath
of
fresh
air
because
of
all
the
hard
things
we
hear
at
the
state
level
and
nationally
with
regards
to
courts
and
the
justice
system.
J
In
that
sense,
and
to
see
such
great
work
here
gives
us
hope
that
there
are
there
are
these
nuggets
of
places
where,
where
good
is
being
done
for
the
right
reasons
and
helping
people
so
I
I
appreciate
that
a
lot
and
I
really
hope
you
great
Endeavors
on
on
your
next
Journey.
So
so,
thanks
for
all
that
great
work
and
appreciate
you
setting
up
judge
Khan
for
some
great
success.
O
Well,
judge
cook
I
want
to
personally
thank
you
for
helping
me
a
non-lawyer
understand
all
that.
I
could
possibly
need
to
understand
on
the
courts
and
how
things
work
and
all
the
time
you
put
into
teaching
me
all
the
Articles
you
sent
I
have
reading
materials
till
the
end
of
time,
and
but
I
would
want
to
say
that,
besides
all
the
accolades
you're,
truly
a
great
person
and
also
fun-
and
you
know
that's
one
of
my
highest
values-
so
I
appreciate
everything
that
you
are
to
us
and
to
Boulder.
O
F
Any
other
comments,
if
not
judge,
cook
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
presentation
and
thank
you
so
much
for
your
long
service
and
I
hope.
The
next
step
in
your
journey
is
going
to
be
a
fruitful
one
and
and
enjoyable
be
well
take
care.
Thank
you
all
right
with
that.
We're
going
to
move
to
our
next
item,
which
is
the
Boulder
County,
Clerk
presentation,
2023
and
Beyond
election
review
and
support
presentation
regarding
potential
ballot
items
for
that.
F
I
am
going
to
turn
again
to
our
city
manager
to
introduce
the
matter
and
take
it
from
there.
Q
Thank
you
so
much
mayor,
Pro
tem.
We
have
an
amazing
team
that
is
working
on
elections,
and
that
starts
with
a
woman
who
needs
no
introduction
to
you
all
our
fabulous
Court,
Clerk,
Elisha,
Johnson
and
I
will
say
too
that
our
CFO
will
later
on
be
giving
a
presentation
on
the
petition
items
but
I'm
going
to
toss
it
to
you
Alicia
to
frame
as
ever
she
would
like
and
to
introduce
our
Boulder
County
guest.
C
Oh,
thank
you
Nuri.
That
was
such
a
gracious
introduction.
I,
so
appreciate
it
good
evening
again,
mayor
mayor,
Pro,
tem
and
members
of
council
I'm
Elisha
Johnson
serving
the
city
as
your
city,
clerk
and
Records
manager.
It
is
my
honor
and
privilege
to
introduce
this
evening.
Our
esteemed
my
esteemed
counterpart
in
the
county
are
Boulder
County,
Clerk,
Molly,
Fitzpatrick
I
have
worked
with
Molly
and
her
team
these
past
two
and
a
half
years
as
your
city
clerk
and
admire
the
job
that
she
has
to
do
as
I
am
the
election
official
for
the
city.
C
X
Thank
you
so
much
Alicia
I
really
appreciate
that
warm
introduction
and
it's
certainly
been
such
so
enjoyable
to
work
with
you
and
the
rest
of
the
Boulder
City
staff
on
all
elections
related
matters,
and
especially
this
big
one
that
voters
will
be
facing
this
fall.
So
big.
Thank
you
to
you
and
the
team.
We
enjoy
the
partnership
as
well.
X
I
believe
I
have
about
10
minutes
which
I
appreciate
and
then
we'll
dive
into
q.
A
and
I
will
be
talking
about
ranked
Choice
voting,
but
I
also
wanted
to
take
the
opportunity
just
to
kind
of
go
over
what
we've
been
up
to
the
last
year
or
so,
and
what
the
next
year
and
a
half
will
look
like
and
also
provide
some
key
information.
X
Key
updates
statistics,
fun
facts
just
so
you
have
in
your
back
pocket
and,
of
course,
talk
about
ranked
Choice
voting,
but
there's
also
a
lot
going
on
in
elections
besides
just
ranked
Choice
voting,
but
we
will
just
go
ahead
and
dive
in
and
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen.
Let's
see.
X
Let's
see
Alicia,
could
you
confirm
verbally
that
you
can
see
this
I've
lost
yeah?
So
you
can
see
it
perfectly.
Thank
you,
perfect.
All
righty.
So,
let's
see
here
like
I,
said
some
key
facts
for
you
all
about
Boulder
County
voters.
Right
now
we
have
228
000
active,
registered
voters.
In
2014
we
had
184
000
active
registered
voters,
so
the
county
has
grown,
not
that
that's
a
surprise
to
anyone.
X
The
majority
of
our
voters
in
Boulder
County
are
unaffiliated.
We
have
47
unaffiliated,
followed
by
the
Democratic
party
and
then
the
Republican
Party.
X
This
data
in
the
following
slides
can
be
found
on
our
maps
and
data
section
on
our
website,
so
lots
of
good
fun
data
to
to
dig
through
there
later
usually
I
say
this
is
a
fun
fact.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
fun
fact
for
this
audience,
but
Boulder
County
voters
Longmont,
actually
just
surpassed
Boulder
about
a
year
ago,
with
more
registered
voters
in
the
city
of
Boulder.
So
a
little
interesting
tidbit
there,
but
you
can
see
the
breakdown
of
all
of
the
active
voters
by
City
on
our
website.
X
X
We
did
offer
Spanish
language
ballots
for
the
very
first
time
in
the
2022
general
election,
and
so
if
a
person
came
into
a
vote
Center
and
wanted
to
vote
a
Spanish
ballot,
we
were
able
to
produce
that
for
them.
On
top
of
that,
the
state
actually
offered
a
Statewide
hotline
that
offered
language
assistance
over
the
phone
to
voters
in
a
lot
of
different
languages,
so
that
was
a
great
new
offering
and
we
are
looking
forward
to
continuing
that
this
year
as
well.
X
We
also
launched
a
know,
your
voting
rights
effort,
and
this
effort
was
designed
to
really
Center
the
experiences
of
Voters
who
have
historically
faced
discrimination
or
challenges
with
voting,
and
so
this
effort.
This
campaign
is
designed
to
really
Center
those
experiences
and
make
sure
that
those
voters
know
that
you
know
they
absolutely
have
a
right
to
vote.
Here's
where
you
go
for
resources,
here's
how
you
escalate.
If
you
have
any
sort
of
issue
with
voting,
and
so
we
really
want
to
affirm
proactively,
affirm
the
rights
of
all
voters
in
Boulder
County.
X
We
know
that
we
have
a
diverse
demographic
here.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
proactively
affirming
their
right
to
vote
and
that
they
know
that
we're
a
resource
here.
We
want
everyone
to
participate.
We
will
continue
this
in
2023.
You
all
were
wonderful
in
letting
us
put
up
these
posters
in
City
buildings
would
love
to
continue
that
partnership
I'm
in
promotion
of
this
as
well.
X
X
We
did
host
a
early
day
event
with
effa
that
went
off
really
well
and
we're
continuing
to
look
at
how
we
can
partner
with
effa
so
really
across
the
board
in
in
2022
and
looking
ahead
to
this
year,
we're
looking
at
how
we
can
continue
to
implement
elections
with
an
equity
lens,
and
this
these
fun
facts
and
other
updates
and
Nuggets
are
captured
in
our
post-election
data
report,
and
so
you
can
find
that
on
our
website.
X
We
do
produce
that
after
the
election,
so
we
can
always
look
for
kind
of
what's
been
going
on
there
at
a
high
level.
We
have
four
back-to-back
elections
starting
this
fall.
We
have
the
2023
coordinated
election.
X
Of
course
coming
up,
and
so
we
are
in
the
full
swing
of
things
we
go
to
print
on
our
voter
instructions
in
August
ballot
content
is
due
in
September
to
our
office,
and
then
we
re,
we
start
printing
and
mailing
ballots
actually
in
September,
so
it
is
going
to
be
a
busy
year
as
we're
implementing
and
executing
this
coordinated
election.
We
will
concurrently
be
planning
the
March
presidential
primary.
We
anticipate
that
date
is
going
to
be
March
5th.
X
The
governor
has
not
yet
determined
that
that
or
is
not
yet
vocalized,
that
that's
absolutely
going
to
be
the
date,
but
we
do
expect
that
it
will
be
super
Tuesday,
and
then
we
have
the
Statewide
primary
on
June
25th
and
then
the
general
election
on
next
November,
of
course.
So
four
back-to-back
elections
starting
this
fall
from
2023
key
updates.
X
We
launched
a
program
in
partnership
with
Saint,
vain
Valley
school
district
and
the
Boulder
Valley
School
District
called
excuse
me
high
school
voter
registration
awareness
week.
We
created
this
holiday
or
this
week
A
couple
of
years
ago,
really
to
promote
student,
Civic
engagement
and
awareness
on
opportunities
to
register
and
vote.
We
had
another
great
year
this
year.
Bvsd
is
always
a
wonderful
partner,
got
lots
of
students
registered
and
educated
on
how
they
can
participate.
X
We
also
had
a
great
year
at
the
legislature.
We
successfully
passed
a
funding
modernization
bill.
This
was
huge
because
our
the
way
that
elections
were
funded
was
wildly
outdated
and
we
were
under
resourced
in
many
ways,
and
so
this
helps
catch
up
a
little
bit.
Now
we
have
more
support
from
the
state
than
we
did
in
years.
Previous,
as
mentioned,
we
will
offer
Spanish
language
voting
again
this
year
at
in-person
vote
centers.
X
We
are
installing
more
drop
boxes
in
the
county
and
then
of
course,
as
everyone
knows,
we
will
be
implementing
ranked
Choice
voting
for
the
first
time
for
the
city
of
Boulder,
okay,
so
ranked
Choice
voting
overview
just
for
a
little
bit
of
context
for
those
I
know
most
folks
on
this
call
know
about
this,
but
the
voters
decided
in
2020
to
elect
the
mayor
using
ranked
Choice
voting.
X
As
soon
as
that
ballot
measure
passed,
we
quickly
got
to
work
with
the
Colorado
legislature
to
pass
a
bill
that
requires
the
secretary
of
state
to
adopt
rules
and
guidelines
for
the
conduct
of
RCB
elections.
Since
then,
both
the
city
of
Boulder
and
Broomfield
county
have
decided
to
either
had
already
decided
or
decided
to
conduct
RCV.
X
This
fall
so
we're
coordinating
with
them
on
a
lot
of
this
work
as
well,
and
a
lot
of
what
we've
been
doing
this
year
is
I'll,
go
over
that
in
a
second
but
just
preparing
in
coordination
with
the
city
Incarnation
with
Broomfield
in
the
state
of
how
this
is
going
to
actually
play
out
and
what
it's
going
to
look
like.
X
It
is
a
very
big
undertaking
and
it
does
impact
every
facet
of
our
elections.
We
have
been
looking
at
ballot
design.
What
are
our
print
procedures?
How
do
we
process
the
ballots?
We've
upgraded
our
voting
system,
we're
in
the
thick
of
that
right
now.
How
are
we
conducting
public
testing
of
the
ballots?
How
are
we
conducting
testing
of
the
equipment?
X
How
do
we
result
report
the
results
and,
of
course,
how
do
we
educate
voters?
This
is
a
big
change
in
how
they're
going
to
be
voting,
and
so
we've
been
working
really
closely
with
the
city
to
determine
how
to
educate
the
voters
on
this
big
change
and
then,
of
course,
post-election
audit
as
well,
so
at
a
high
level,
what
we've
been
doing
so
far
this
year,
first
I
would
say
we
have
been
securing.
X
We
started
securing
our
resources
last
year
and
the
beginning
of
this
year
to
help
Drive
the
planning
and
the
implementation
and
the
execution
of
the
work.
The
secretary
of
state
did
produce
rules
earlier
this
year
that
we
reviewed
commented
on
and
started
really
you
know
updating
our
own
procedures
and
documentation
and
plans
around.
X
Like
I
mentioned,
we
have
upgraded
our
or
we're
in
the
process
of
upgrading
our
voting
system
right
now
to
install
the
new
trusted,
build,
which
is
the
new
software
for
ranked
Choice
voting
and,
of
course,
communication
planning
has
been
a
big
part
of
that
as
well.
So
that's
what
we've
been
up
to
in
terms
of
the
implementation.
X
Looking
ahead
for
the
rest
of
the
year,
it's
about,
you
know
really
finalizing
those
procedures,
because
we're
in
the
thick
of
testing
right
now
and
we'll
be
finalizing
the
procedures
before
we
mail
out
ballots
in
September
and,
of
course,
thinking
through
how
we're
going
to
test
differently
for
our
public
logic
and
accuracy
test.
How
we're
going
to
audit
the
contest
as
well
and
how
we're
going
to
report
the
results
from
a
Communications
standpoint.
X
I
think
I've
covered
a
lot
of
this,
but
you
know
we
feel
that
we've
put
a
lot
of
great
plans
in
place
to
really
hit
the
ground
running
from
this
point
forward
with
educating
voters
on
these
changes.
We've
developed
in
partnership
with
the
city,
city
and
county
content
for
the
website,
we'll
begin
social
media
posts,
and
we
know
that
the
city
of
Boulder
has
the
June
I
believe
newsletter.
X
That's
coming
up,
and
so
there's
going
to
be
some
information
included
in
there
and
then
we've
also
been
working
on
our
voter
instructions,
since
those
go
to
print
pretty
soon
again.
This
is
going
to
be
a
big
change,
so
we're
really
trying
to
promote
this
or
think
this
through
every
angle
that
we
can.
X
You
know
our
plans
include
social
media
press
tv,
voter
emails
insert.
You
know
we're
thinking
through
how
we
translate
all
of
this
education
and
Outreach
to
voters.
X
Even
you
know
we're
also
thinking
of
how
we're
training
our
judges,
because
voters
are
going
to
walk
into
the
vote
centers
with
lots
of
questions
so
again
we're
really
putting
this
layer
of
ranked
Choice
voting
on
everything
that
we
do
and
including
in
all
of
our
current
Communications
and
adding
on
new
layers
of
communication,
specifically
about
ranked
Choice
voting
I'm
a
little
over
time.
So
I
just
want
to
highlight
that
you
know
other
things
that
we're
working
on.
In
addition
to
implementing
the
elections,
just
is
really
centered
around
security.
X
You
know:
we've
had
great
partnership
with
the
Department
of
Homeland
Security.
As
you
all
know,
election
officials
and
offices
are
facing
threats
and
so
working
through
some
of
those
suggestions
from
them
of
how
we
Shore
up
our
physical
security
spaces.
X
X
Myths
and
disinformation
does
continue
to
be
a
challenge,
and
so
we
just
continue
to
say
to
everyone.
You
know
if
you
hear
something
that
it
doesn't
sound
right
or
feels
inaccurate,
please
reach
out
to
our
office,
so
we
can
work
to
escalate
that
to
our
appropriate
contacts
and
hopefully
get
issues
resolved
before
they
spin
out
of
control.
So
with
that
being
said,
I
will
leave
it
on
this
slide.
X
It's
always
one
thing
we
like
to
say,
you
know
just
go
update
check
your
voter
registration
make
sure
it's
current
always
include
your
email
address,
so
we
can
get
folks
on
our
email
list
as
well
and
then
with
everything
that
I've
just
gone
over.
Most
of
this
is
completely
open
to
the
public,
and
so
we
would
love
for
City
Council
Members
to
come
to
our
about
processing
center
tour.
X
This
year
we
will
be
talking
about
ranked
Choice
voting
and
any
other
community
members
as
well,
and
with
that
I
will
stop
sharing
my
screen
and
take
any
questions
that
folks
have
knowing
through
that
really
quickly
want
to
respect
everyone's
time.
So.
F
Great
I
don't
think
Matt
Benjamin
is
first
up
and
then
our
mayor.
J
Next
Market
Molly,
thanks
for
being
with
us
and
I'll
first
apologize
because
I
I
talked
way
up:
Elisha's
skills
at
bringing
great
food
to
our
Council
meetings,
so
I
I'm,
sorry,
I,
said:
hey
I'll,
see
you
in
person
got
you
excited
for
the
great
food
we
get
to
eat
to
join
us.
So
sorry,
it's
virtual!
That
was
on.
J
Will
do
so
I
appreciate
the
presentation
and
also
how
quickly
you
and
your
team
have
really
gone
after
that,
so
I.
Thank
you
for
that
and
I.
My
questions
are
are
kind
of,
maybe
maybe
a
little
more
in
the
weeds,
not
surprising
since
since
I've
I've
been
knee-deep
in
the
RCV
stuff
for
a
while
so
question
on
on
ballot,
have
you
or
have
you?
J
Is
it
your
discretion
or
was
that
discretion
of
of
our
secretary
of
state
with
regards
to
the
maximum
number
of
mayoral
candidates
that
you
would
fit
on
a
ballot,
I
I?
Think
in
some
previous
conversations,
I
don't
know
the
rules
like.
If
20
people
were
running
for
mayor,
we
probably
would
not
be
putting
all
20
on
a
ballot.
There
would
be
some
down
selection.
So
is
there
some
rule
that
says
hey?
X
Yeah
the
we're
we're
really
looking
at
how
we're
going
to
lay
out
this
contest
right
now.
There's
a
lot
of
different
layout
considerations,
both
from
the
what
can
you
fit?
What
can
the
voting
system
support?
X
What
can
the
actual
ballot
card
support?
What's
the
best
for
scanning?
What's
the
best
for
voters,
so
there's
a
lot
of
different
ballot
layout
design
considerations
generally
speaking,
I
believe
the
voting
system
does
have.
X
X
J
Okay,
I
appreciate
it
just
you
mentioned
misinformation,
and
some
of
that
comes
in
the
form
of
oh
well.
These
these
ballots
will
just
become
infinitely
long
and
so
I
wanted
to
sort
of
help
set
that
up
that
they
actually
do
have
some
constraints
built
into
that.
So
so
I
appreciate
you
looking
back
at
that.
The
other
one
has
to
do
with
kind
of
pre
and
post
surveys.
Other
communities
that
have
embarked
on
this
journey
to
sort
of
Reform
their
elections
have
surveyed
voters
before
and
then
survey,
voters
afterwards
and
so
I
didn't
know.
J
If
there
was
a
coordination
between
you
at
the
county
or
at
our
city
level
or
or
a
broader
coordination,
where
we're
surveying
Broomfield
and
Boulder
voters
pre
and
post.
So
we
really
get
a
sense
of
how
people
are
feeling
about
it.
What's
maybe
left
in
terms
of
Education,
where
we
maybe
missed
where
we
can
do
better,
but
overall,
just
sort
of
tell
the
story
of
of
how
that
works.
So
I
didn't
know
if
there
was
planned
for
that
type
of
understanding
of
of
where
voters
are
before
and
then
maybe
after
the
election.
X
Yeah,
there's
not
been
anything
formal
discussed,
we
are
going
to
be
doing
extensive,
Outreach
and
Communications
and
events,
and
so
we
do
plan
to
get
feedback
and
solicit
feedback.
That
way
so
we'll
have
some
anecdotal
information,
but
there
won't
be
anything,
at
least
on
our
end,
we're
not
doing
anything
formal
right
now
to
solicit
that
input,
but
we
will
be
saying
you
know
kind
of
doing
a
debrief
post-election
and
so
would
welcome
any
feedback
from
this
group.
X
In
terms
of
what
you're
hearing
from
voters-
and
you
know,
voters
should
email
us
as
well,
letting
us
know.
Here's
what
you
know
from
our
experience
really
met
the
mark
in
terms
of
the
Outreach
here's.
What
could
we
could
be
doing
differently?
X
I
think
you
know
we
are
looking
at
Best
Practices
with
the
city
of
Boulder
with
Broomfield.
You
know
reaching
out
to
other
states
to
get
their
experiences,
but
in
terms
of
that
direct
feedback
from
voters,
it's
going
to
be
informal
and
anecdotal
right
now,
while
we
get
our
underneath
us
and
we'll
certainly
take
feedback
as
we
get
it
into
future
planning.
J
J
You
know
working
with
you
to
take
some
of
your
load
off,
but
would
you
be
open
to
participating
if
the
city
where
to
initiate
that
kind
of
thing
and
and
make
you
know,
obviously
make
sure
it's
not
on
you
and
I
I'm,
just
throwing
that
out
there
as
I
hated,
my
colleagues
so
make
sure
Elisha
doesn't
reach
through
and
and
give
me
a
an
upside
the
head
as
I,
maybe
obligate
her
to
a
survey
but
nonetheless
I
just
sort
of
curious.
J
If
you'd
be
open
to
that,
if
we
sort
of
worked
together
on
that
and
took
some
of
that
burden
understanding,
you
know
how
much
work
you
guys
got
to
do
to
get
to
and
through
in
past
November.
X
C
I
may
jump
in
there
real,
quick,
Molly
and
man
if
that's
okay,
I
just
wanted
to
say
John
and
I
have
talked
about
surveying
after
the
election.
Unfortunately,
what
our
biggest
concern
right
now
is
education,
because
it
is
a
totally
new,
different
type
of
voting
system,
and
so
we
are
talking
about
after
the
election,
possibly
working
with
comms,
to
maybe
set
up
some
sort
of
survey
that
we
can
send
out
with
specific
questions
on
how
the
election
went.
J
B
Molly,
thanks
for
being
with
us
tonight,
good
to
see
you
and
I
want
to
offer
a
little
bit
of
an
apology,
but
a
very
big.
Thank
you,
because
we
put
a
big
work
item
on
your
plate
by
adopting
ranked
Choice
voting,
because
that
was
our
voters.
That
did
that,
but
really
appreciate
you
stepping
up
and
getting
this
done.
This
is
not
an
easy
task,
so
very
appreciative
there.
My
question
is
about
right,
so
we
know
in
ranked
Choice
voting.
B
If
you
have
more
than
two
candidates
and
none
of
them
get
more
than
50
on
the
first
round,
then
you
go
to
a
second
round.
You
drop
off
the
lowest
candidate
vote
getter
and
then
do
the
second
round,
Etc
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
How
is
that
going
to
end
up
getting
reported
out
after
the
election?
You
know
there's
a
lot
of
complexity
there.
So
do
you
do
you
all
know?
Yet
how
that's
going
to
end
up
getting
in
what
you
publicly
report.
X
That's
a
great
question:
there
are
options
and
right
now
we
are
evaluating
those
options
and
thinking
through
different
impacts
of
you
know
all
the
different
ways
that
it
could
look.
But
we
do
know
that
we
want
to
prioritize
providing
as
much
transparency
to
the
public
as
what's
happening
as
the
ballots
are
being
uploaded
and
results
are
being
counted
and
there's
different
tools
that
we're
looking
at
to
help
support
that
at
a
very
basic
level.
X
We
can
produce
a
report
we're
looking
at
how
we
can
layer
on
more
transparency
to
really
demonstrate
what's
happening
as
the
rounds
progress
so
I'm
not
prepared
to
commit
or
speak
to
exactly
which
path
we're
going
down
right
now,
but
I
can
tell
you
those
are
really
our
guiding
values
as
we
make.
This
determination
is
providing
the
greatest
amount
of
transparency
to
the
public
as
early
as
possible,
and
so
I
would
be
happy
to
come
back.
B
P
Thank
you,
and
thanks
Molly
for
this
presentation,
as
well
as
just
for
all
these
years
of
work
to
get
us
to
this
point
appreciate
it.
My
question
is
just
around
the
sort
of
post-election
day.
P
Processing
of
ballots
and
I
was
just
wondering
in
places
that
have
made
this
switch
to
transition
to
ranked
Choice
voting.
Have
they
seen
a
larger
number
of
ballots
that
needed
to
be
cured
or
anything
else
to
kind
of
suggest
like
places
where
additional
education
efforts
might
be
helpful
or
anything
like
that.
X
Good
question
so,
in
terms
of
curing
a
ballot,
the
opportunity
to
carry
a
ballot
really
occurs
before
the
ballot
is
separated
from
its
envelope.
And
so
that's.
If
a
voter
has
a
signature,
discrepancy
or
didn't.
You
know,
Mark
a
signature,
and
so
at
that
point
in
the
process
the
ballot
has
not
been
separated
from
its
envelope
and
that
voter
still
has
the
right
to
cure
their
ballot
and
they
have,
until
eight
days
post-election
day
to
do
that
and
still
have
their
ballot
tabulated.
X
But
what
I
believe
you're,
referring
to
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
Nicole,
is,
if
there's
adjudication,
more
adjudication
errors
on
a
ranked
Choice
voting
contest
than
a
non-rcv
contest.
And
so
you
know,
adjudication
and
improperly
marked
ballots
are
a
big
part
of
our
process.
Generally,
we
have
a
so
if
a
voter
doesn't
follow
their
voter
instructions
for
whatever
reason
and
makes
an
error
on
their
ballot,
and
you
know
marks
it
out
in
some
weird
way
and
tries
to
correct
it.
X
What
happens
is
that
ballot
will
go
to
a
bipartisan
team
of
Judges,
a
Republican
and
a
Democrat?
Who
will
look
at
that
ballot
to
determine
voter
intent
and
so
for
intent
and
and
they'll
work
through
that,
together
to
enfranchise
the
voter
as
much
as
possible?
I,
don't
know
off
the
top
of
my
head.
X
What
the
experience
has
been
with
RCV
contest
in
other
states,
but
what
I
do
know
is
that
the
voter
intent
guide
will,
you
know,
produce
information
on
how
to
how
our
judges
should
be
looking
at
that,
and
they
will
be
following
that
and
we'll
hopefully
be
able
to.
You
know
provide
that
information
after
the
election,
at
least,
if
how
it
you
know,
implement
or
impacted
Boulder
County,
but.
X
What
other
states,
what
that
was
like,
but
as
I
talk
to
other
states,
I'll
be
sure
to
ask
that
question,
because
it's
a
good
one.
J
When
we
were
working
on
the
ballot
measure,
we
looked
a
little
bit
at
that,
and
other
states
have
done
it
more
recently.
But
when
we
were
looking
at
2020,
one
thing
that
was
noticed
is
the
complaints
that
came
on
with
regards
to
sort
of
that
adjudicating
part
were
that
people
realized
that
they've
only
filled
in
one
when
they
had
the
opportunity
to
fill
in
multiple,
and
then
they
were
wanting
to
fix
that.
That
was
a
common
complaint.
J
That
I
know
was
done
in
other
places,
I
mean
I,
say
common
didn't
happen
a
lot,
but
that
was
the
of
the
complaints.
That
was
the
one
that
sort
of
stuck
out
when
we
were
doing
our
research.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
helps.
Answer
your
question
a
little
bit
there
Nicole
and
I
appreciate
you
Molly
for
letting
me
sort
of
add
a
little
bit
of
that,
but
that
was
what
we
heard.
P
Thanks
and
Molly
thank
you
and
thank
you
also
for
teaching
me
new
vocabulary
word
and
the
difference.
I
appreciate
that
good
to
know,
but
but
I
think
what
would
be
really
interesting
to
see
is
post-election.
Do
we
see
a
difference
in
the
adjudication
rates?
2023
versus
2021,
for
example,
or
you
know
even
2020,
so
just
something
that
can
help
us
understand.
Do
we
have
places
where
you
know
we,
as
a
city
can
kind
of
continue
doing?
P
Do
we
need
to
continue
doing
more
education
over
the
next
couple
years
before
our
next
right
choice?
Voting
election
I
I
personally,
would
find
that
really
helpful
for
us
on
Council
to
be
able
to
help
our
community
make
this
transition.
X
Yeah
and
we'll
definitely,
you
know
one
of
the
things
I
don't
think
I
spoke
to
this,
but
it
is
on
the
slide.
Is
we
are
going
to
produce
a
a
mock
ballot
later
this
summer?
To
start
you
know
showing
that
to
people
and
showing
this
is
what
a
properly
marked
ballot
looks
like
here's.
What
improv
you
know
so
just
so
folks
could
really
start
getting
used
to
it,
because
it
does
look
different
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
the
voter
instructions
we'll
include
that
as
well.
X
I
know
that
a
lot
of
folks,
don't
necessarily
read
their
voter
instructions.
So
that's
why
we
layer
on
all
the
other
Outreach
as
well,
but
would
love
your
help
in
promoting
that
mock
ballot
that
we'll
have
to
voters,
so
they
can
start
getting
a
preview
of
it.
C
And
also
just
to
jump
in
there
and
call
the
queen
as
well.
We
also
have
set
up
on
our
website
our
ranked
Choice
voting
website
and
we're
working
on
that.
Now
we
have
an
interactive
sort
of
like
a
practice
ballot
for
people
to
actually
be
able
to
go
in
and
kind
of
play
with
and
We've
ran
it
by
the
county
clerk's
office
and
that
team
and
they
approved
it
and
I-
think
John
he's
on
the
call
as
well.
C
He
we're
on
the
final
stages
of
that
and
we've
also
included
that
web
page
with
specific
information
in
our
in
our
I
would
say,
are
preliminary
setup
of
information
that
we're
going
to
be
handing
out
to
voters
at
various
areas
in
the
city
and
also
we're
going
to
be
at
festivals
and
different.
Things
like
that.
But
they'll
have
that
opportunity
in
person
to
kind
of
play
with
the
ballot
as
well.
P
Can
I
call
a
quick
question
off
of
what
you
just
said,
Elisha
well.
Will
this
be
translated
as
well
into
Spanish
as
the
the
ballot
is
now
Molly.
X
We
are
going
to
have
a
website
about
RCV
that
is
also
translated
into
Spanish
and
so
we're
looking
at
you
know
all
the
different
things
that
we've,
because
we're
still
developing
we've
got
a
really
good
plan,
but
we're
developing
out
what
that
looks
like
and
and
how
we
translate
it,
but
that
would
be
a
key
component
is
making
sure
that
our
materials
are
accessible
in
that
way
in
the
Spanish
language.
F
G
I
threw
my
hand
at
Mark
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
Molly
for
being
with
us
and
spending
your
time
with
us
this
evening.
It's
always
good
to
see
you.
You
have.
F
Think
we
all
share
that
sentiment.
Thank
you
so
much
for
appearing
before
us
and
being
so
clear
and
informative,
and
on
that
I
think
we
will
move
to
our
next
item.
Q
The
next
item
in
this
item
right
in
item
two,
which
is
the
conversation
on
potential
ballot
items
and
for
that
Cara
is
gonna.
Kick
us
off.
Okay,.
Y
Thank
you
Marianne
good
evening,
Council
Cara,
Skinner,
Chief,
Financial
Officer
and
as
the
presentation
is
being
brought
up,
this
is
an
update
that
we
talked
about
back
in
May
when
we
had
our
first
discussion
with
regard
to
ballot
measures,
and
tonight
it
really
is
an
update
and
I'll
just
keep
talking
we're
gonna
I'm
gonna.
First,
kick
it
off
back
to
Alicia
and
she's
going
to
give
you
an
update.
We
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
Y
Thank
you,
she's,
going
to
give
you
an
update
on
the
community
sponsor
to
City
petitions,
and
then
it
will
kick
back
to
me
and
I
will
provide
you
an
update
on
the
really
the
polling
with
regard
to
the
potential
extension
of
the
0.15
sales
and
use
tax,
and
then
I
will
kick
it
over
to
Wendy
Schwartz
from
housing
and
Human
Services.
Who
will
provide
you
a
little
follow-up
information,
as
requested
in
May
with
regard
to
the
potential
future
behavioral
health
tax
and
potential
uses
of
that?
C
All
right,
thank
you,
so
very
much
Cara
the
only
if
you
would
go
to
the
next
side.
Please
next
slide.
As
we
know,
we
received
two
citizen
initiative.
Petitions
in
the
city
clerk's
office,
the
first
one
we
will
cover
with
this
slide-
is
the
safe
zones
for
kids.
It's
a
petition
requesting
to
amend
the
BRC
chapter,
8-3-21
prohibiting
items
adding
the
particular
chapter
as
cited
below,
which
would
be
an
additional
detector
C
on
March
1st
2023.
The
petition
was
approved
for
circulation
by
me
and
on
they
elected
on
that
I'm.
C
Sorry,
on
that
particular
day,
they
elected
to
utilize.
Both
the
online
petitioning
system
and
paper
petitions
on
June
15,
2023
I
certified
the
petition
sufficient
with
a
total
of
3784
valid
signatures.
Those
signatures
were
gathered
both
online
and
in
person,
and,
as
you
see
here
by
the
figures
as
they
are
broken
down,
3
301
of
those
were
obtained
by
the
paper
petitions
and
483
were
attained
by
the
boulder
direct
democracy
online
system.
This
petition
would
not
have
been
deemed
sufficient
without
the
483
valid
signatures
utilized
through
the
bddl
next
slide.
Emily.
C
The
second
petition
that
came
to
the
city
clerk's
office
for
validation
was
the
extension
of
the
existing
0.15
sales
use
tax
to
support
Arts
culture
and
Heritage.
This
petition
was
seeking
to
renew
and
extend
the
0.15
sales
tax
use
to
actually
fund
the
arts
and
culture
initiatives.
C
Now
that
petition
was
submitted
for
review
and
was
approved
by
circulation
by
me
on
May,
the
4th
of
2023,
they
also
elected
to
utilize,
the
online
petitioning
system
and
paper
petitions
and
June
15th.
Their
petition
was
certified
sufficient
with
a
total
of
3560
valid
signatures
again
both
gathered
both
online
and
in
person.
You'll
see
that
3
153
signatures
were
retained
by
paper,
petitions
and
407
through
the
bddo
system,
and
again
this
petition
would
not
have
been
deemed
sufficient
without
the
utilization
of
the
bddl
I'm
gonna
turn
it
back
over
to
Cara.
Y
Thanks
Felicia
next
slide
so
going
to
the
potential
ballot
measure
regarding
the
expiring,
0.15
sales
and
use
tax
next
slide,
and
thank
you
Emily
for
advancing
slides
as
directed
by
Council.
Y
We
did
engage
a
expert
polling,
firm,
probolsky
research
and
they
are
going
to
perform
a
statistically
significant
survey
for
us,
and
the
survey
you
know
as
intended
is
to
provide
really
valuable
information
to
council
as
they
contemplate
placing
a
ballot
measure
on
on
this
November's
election
and
so
really
wanting
to
ask
thoughtful
questions
that
will
provide
really
good
information
for
Council
to
consider
the
survey
will
be
statistically
significant,
it'll
be
both
phone
and
online.
Y
The
phone
survey
will
be
both
landline
and
mobile,
and
the
online
survey
will
be
accessed
By
Invitation
through
a
text
message
or
via
email.
The
poll
will
be
in
English
and
Spanish.
We
are
expecting
to
be
beginning
the
poll
next
week
so
end
of
July
or
end
of
June
into
early
July,
and
what
are
we
testing?
We're
only
testing
the
0.15
sales
and
use
tax
extension
back
in
May.
Y
When
we
talked
about
potential
ballot
measures,
there
were
two
other
measures
that
Council
considered
that
night
Council
compensation
changes
as
well
as
a
potential
behavioral
health
tax
and
their
the
determination.
Y
That
night
was
that
did
not
want
to
consider
either
of
those
items
for
this
November's
election,
but
there
might
be
potential
interest
for
a
future
election,
and
so
we
heard
direction
to
poll
on
those,
but
in
discussion
with
our
with
probolsky
research,
they
recommended
we
hold
on
those
two
items
and
not
have
it
be
part
of
this
polling
and
really
that
was
informed
by
if
that
those
two
questions
or
one
of
them
would
be
on
a
future
election.
Y
In
fact,
a
even
your
election,
the
voter
profile
is
very
different
than
the
voter
profile
for
this
November
odd
year
election,
and
so
they
want
to
ask
questions
that
are
really
relevant
for
this
voter
profile.
Y
So
we'll
be
testing
only
the
0.15
sales
tax
extension
and
the
survey
is
really
going
to
focus
on
gauging
overall
sentiment
and
then
sentiment
regarding
specific
city
services
and
those
city.
Services
really
are
focused
on
general
fund
funded
Services,
since
this
is
an
expiring
general
fund.
General
purpose
tax
as
well
as
some
you
know,
recent
Community
and
Council
priorities.
Y
It
will
specifically
test
ballot
language
and
that
ballot
language
that
will
be
tested
is
really
taken
from
the
prior
ballot
that
was
approved
by
voters
20
years
ago,
with
some
updates
to
reflect
current
Service
delivery
and
that
testing
of
the
ballot
language
will
first
begin
with
what
is
sort
of
considered
an
uninformed
test.
And
then
the
survey
respondents
will
be
provided
some
additional
information
in
the
form
of
questions
and
then
the
ballot
language
will
be
retested.
Y
So
it's
sort
of
considered
and
and
provides
information
to
council
about
the
results
in
an
uninformed
and
then
with
more
information
or
informed,
and
then
last
we
plan
to
test
a
20-year
extension
versus
a
no
Sunset.
We
did
discuss
back
in
May,
maybe
20
years,
30
years
and
no
Sunset
and
and
the
on
the
vice
of
our
Consultants.
They
say
the
the
results
would
likely
not
be
very
different
between
20
years
and
30
years
and
so
recommended.
We
just
test
20
years
versus
no
sunset.
Y
They
also
recommended
in
the
no
sense,
no
sunset
ballot
language
testing,
to
say
until
future
voter
action,
because,
frankly,
any
tax
could
be
modified
by
Future
voter
action,
but
then
it
sort
of
informs
them
of
that.
So
we're
working
through
that
and.
Y
I
think
that's
the
end
of
this
next
slide.
Oh
yeah
next
steps.
So
as
noted
June
July
we're
going
to
watch
the
poll,
we
are
scheduled
to
come
back
to
you
on
July
20th
for
first
reading
of
ballot
measures.
We
we
are
anticipating
putting
multiple
versions
on
the
consent,
calendar
for
Council
consideration
and
then
that
evening,
we're
also
anticipating
presenting
the
polling
results.
If
we
get
the
result
in
advance
of
July
20th,
but
very
likely
after
the
agenda
item
materials
are
due,
we
would
send
out
those
polling
results
to
council
via
hotline.
Y
Y
Next
slide,
so
next,
as
we've
talked
about
I
mentioned
earlier
back
in
may,
we
did
talk
about
the
potential
for
future
behavioral
health
tax
ballot
measure,
and
there
was
some
requests
from
Council
for
some
follow-up
information.
Z
Thank
you
good
evening:
Council
Wendy,
Schwartz
housing
and
Human
Services,
based
on
Council
Direction
at
the
May
11th
meeting.
We
did
do
some
work
on
refining
examples
of
potential
uses
of
funds
under
a
behavioral
health
tax
ballot
measure
and
those
examples
are
shown
on
this
slide.
The
ideas
are
based
on
efforts.
The
city
already
has
underway
or
maximizing
plans
of
Community
Partners
working
in
Behavioral
Health.
Z
The
first
two
items
are
related
to
the
planned
homeless
Services
day
Center,
specifically
on-site
clinician
Services,
as
well
as
prescriber
services
on
site
for
Behavioral
Health
medication
management.
The
next
item
is
related
to
an
interagency
group
here
in
the
county.
The
high
utilizer
team
that
has
been
working
on
solutions
for
people
that
have
very
heavy
interaction
across
multiple
services
and
systems.
There's
a
preliminary
proposal
from
this
group
that
covers
supportive
services,
including
Behavioral
Health
Services.
That
would
also
be
a
potential
use
for
this
city.
J
Work
that
that
you've
done
Wendy
with
the
team
on
the
baby,
the
potential
use
of
the
behavioral
health
tax,
a
question
I
have
is
those
those
three
uses
being
it
sort
of
the
behavioral
health,
clinician,
Behavioral,
Health,
medication,
management
and
sort
of
the
a
high
utilizer
behavioral
health
support
are.
J
Those
would
would
are
those
not
being
done
at
all
unless
this
money
is
is
secured
or
are
they
done
just
paid
for
differently,
or
are
they
going
to
be
sort
of
applied
to
the
day
service
center,
but
just
at
a
much
lower
level?
So
can
you
explain
like
where
they
may
or
may
not
exist
without
this
sort
of
tax
in
in
going
forward.
Z
Absolutely
absolutely
so,
with
regards
to
the
services
that
are
referenced
at
the
day,
Center,
then
those
would
there's
going
to
be
on
the
the
basic
Behavioral
Health
Services,
there's
going
to
be
some
basic
Services
planned
through
existing
programs
there.
Z
Z
So
that's
a
jail
transition
program
and
I
know
that
the
staff
planning
the
day
Center
have
already
had
some
discussions
with
those
types
of
services
interfacing
with
the
day
Services
there's
the
building
Home
Retention
team,
which
includes
behavioral
health
support,
which
will
be
connected
to
the
day
Center
and
our
staff
in
HHS
all
also
is
including
those
services
in
some
additional
applications
for
State
funding.
We
think
that
we
can
make
some
arrangements
with
mental
health
partners,
as
was
done
with
the
CRC
for
possible
Telehealth
services
and,
of
course,
there's.
Z
You
know
what
is
done
across
the
community
already
in
terms
of
referrals
to
Mental
Health
Partners
for
for
needed
services
in
the
in
the
community
in
terms
of
the
medication
Management
on
site.
I.
Think
that
there's
not
a
current
specific
plan
that
connects
funding
to
to
that
service,
but
that
doesn't
that
doesn't
mean
that
one
can't
be
developed
with
another
source
of
funding.
Z
It's
it's
just
not
there.
Yet,
in
reference
to
the
high
utilizer
behavioral
health
support
that
plan
we've
got
kind
of
some
interesting
timing
issues
with
this
discussion,
because
that
is
a
plan.
That's
still
really
gelling
in
that
group
and
as
I
referenced.
That's
something
that
council's
going
to
be
hearing
more
about
through
an
IP
in
August,
and
so
that
you
know
the
funding
of
that
entire
plan.
Z
Q
Z
Q
Can
add
to
that
Wendy
I,
apologize,
council,
member,
but
I
think
Wendy
spoke
to
that
really.
Well,
I'll.
Note
too,
that
that
plan
and
we're
trying
to
be
a
little
thoughtful
to
our
partners,
because
we're
still
vetting
that
and
there's
a
lot
of
Partners
involved
in
that
work.
The
County
Mental
Health
Partners
the
DA's
office.
Q
Certainly
a
variety
of
Staff
from
different
departments.
There's
just
a
lot
of
people
and
what
they
have
learned
are
both
not
just
what
services
can
we
give
some
of
our
most
chronic
folks
that
are
the
most
difficult
to
serve,
but
through
that?
What
can
we
learn
about
the
gaps
in
the
systems
that
exist
and
what
can
that
group
really
bring
up
to
to
deal
with
those
gaps
as
we're
doing,
and
some
of
those
will
be
legislative
thoughts?
Q
Some
of
those
will
be
some
additional
types
of
funding,
and
so
the
package
we
want
to
share
with
all
of
our
partners
because
it
will
not
just
be
a
city
of
Boulder
initiative.
This
really
is
a
multi-jurisdictional
multi-agency
public,
private
partnership
that
is
super
thoughtful
and
thorough,
and
that's
why
I
think
you'll
get
more
information
about
that.
J
Thank
you
for
that
context.
Marianne.
Those
are
all
my
questions.
I'll
just
sort
of
maybe
just
finish
on
a
quite
with
regards
to
just
the
county.
Here
is
the
sort
of
the
elephant
in
the
room
with
regards
to
their
their
discussion
of
potential
Behavioral
Health
tag,
so
we're
we're
adding
fractions
to
what
their
capacity
is
so
I
I
hope
that
we
continue
to
keep
them
moving
in
in
the
right
direction.
As
that.
A
K
Just
well
I
kind
of
a
question,
but
just
elicit
a
advertisement
for
Alicia.
We
talked
about
the
two
resident
initiatives
and
the
city
initiated
0.15
sales
tax.
What
we
did
not
talk
about
and
I
know,
we
won't
need
to
pull
on
this,
but
I
wanted
just
for
completeness
of
record
for
anyone's
watching.
We
do
have
a
fourth
ballot
measure
initiated
by
the
city
and
that's
a
charter
cleanup
Alicia.
Can
you
refer
to
that
as
well?.
C
Yes,
sir,
thank
you
for
the
question
Bob.
The
charter
cleanup
is
part
of
our
internal
Council,
requested
type
initiatives
and
those
will
be
presented
to
council
with
the
first
reading
of
the
ballot
measures.
The
cao's
office
is
working
on
that
now
to
draft
those
ordinances,
but
our
thought
tonight
was
to
bring
you
the
update
on
just
if
the
petitions
were
certified
and
if
they
were
not
certified,
but
we.
AA
F
I
do
not
see
any
further
comments,
in
which
case
thank
you.
So
much
Wendy,
Cara,
Nuria
I
was
very
informative.
Great
presentation
and
I
look
forward
to
further
work
on
all
these
matters.
F
F
One
two
three,
four
one,
two,
three,
four:
five:
by
a
bare
majority,
we
are
going
to
have
a
break
we're
going
to
reconvene
at
8,
23.
U
C
A
A
Q
You
so
much
mayor,
Pro,
tem
and
I'm
super
excited
for
the
next
item.
I
know,
for
some
it
is
a
dry
one,
but
for
others
it
is
really
critical
as
we're
trying
to
meet
our
climate
goals
in
the
city
of
Boulder,
so
I'm
going
to
send
it
over
to
our
director
of
planning
and
development
services,
Brad
Mueller
to
kick
us
off
and
do
some
introductions
of
his
own.
R
Thanks
Miriam
I
am
in
fact
going
to
introduce
a
couple
new
faces
to
you
excited
not
only
for
this
evening's
discussion
but
in
the
case
of
Rob,
excited
to
round
out
actually
Rob
and
Josh
rounding
out
our
building
division
Staffing
we're
in
a
much
better
place
than
we
were
not
all
that
long
ago,
Josh
Hanson
is
going
to
be
making
the
presentation
this
evening.
Gosh
is
our
energy
code.
R
Compliance
examiner
and
joined
us
about
six
seven
months
ago,
he's
hit
the
ground
running,
has
just
an
incredible
background
in
these
matters
and
incredible
passion,
we're
lucky
to
have
him
with
us
and
then
I'd
also
like
Council,
to
welcome
Rob.
The
Adrians
Rob
is
our
new
cheap
building.
Official
I
think
you
all
know
how
we've
struggled
a
bit
to
to
get
that
position
filled,
but
Rob's
jumped
in
now
six
weeks
and
is
is
doing
a
great
job
and
we're
happy
to
have
him
with
us
too.
R
U
Yeah
hi
cool
seems
are
frozen
here,
yeah
hi
everyone.
Thank
you
for
your
having
us
this
evening.
I'm
Rob
Adrians,
as
previously
the
Chief
Building
official
up
in
Weld
County,
so
I've
just
jumped
across
I-25
to
the
other
side
here.
So
I'm
excited
to
be
here.
U
With
that
I'll
just
hand
it
off
to
Josh
she'll
be
presented
on
our
energy
code.
Thank
you.
AA
Thank
you
rob
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
go
ahead
and
share
my
screen
now
to
put
up
my
presentation
all
right.
Let
me.
AA
Yep,
let
me
so
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
introduce
our
two
of
our
Consultants
that
are
actually
on
the
call
as
well
that
are
going
to
help
us
with
this
update.
AA
We've
got
Sally
Blair
with
naresco
and
Robbie
Schwartz,
with
build
tank,
also
on
the
call
and
they're
going
to
be
helping
us
as
we
work
through
this
process
of
updating
our
energy
code.
So
let
me
go
ahead
and
follow
your
presentation.
R
AA
V
A
O
Y
A
A
AA
AA
Okay,
then
we
will
do
the
old-fashioned
way.
So
let
me
pull
up
my
presentation
and
people
go
from
there.
AA
Let's
try
this
one
more
time
if
it
doesn't
work.
Oh
there
we
go.
AA
R
One,
a
quick
email
it
to
me
or
the
clerks.
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
Please
Advance
the
slide
and
click
through
it
yeah
all
right
there
you
go
you're
good,
and
so
the
this.
This
item
really
is
an
introduction,
a
high
level
introduction
to
our
2024
Boulder
energy
conservation
code
development
project.
AA
As
many
of
you
may
be
aware,
by
2030
we're
targeting
a
reduction
carbon
emissions
of
70
percent
by
2035,
looking
to
be
a
net
zero
when
it
comes
to
carbon
emissions
and
then
looking
to
be
carbon
posited
by
2040
or
in
which
case
buildings
are
actually
able
to
absorb
more
carbon
dioxide
than
they
produce,
and
so
before
we
really
jump
into
this.
AA
This
development,
this
code
development
project
I,
wanted
to
look
back
at
kind
of
the
history
of
how
we
got
here
and
and
go
from
there.
Please
Advance
the
slide
and
then
click
through
a
couple
more
times
keep
going,
keep
going
and
a
couple
more
times.
AA
One
more
one
more
and
then
one
all
right.
So,
let's
start
with
the
residential
energy
code
map
so
before
I
really
want
to
dive
into
this.
Just
so
everyone's
aware,
this,
the
energy
code
really
pertains
to
buildings,
residential
and
commercial
buildings
and
so
I
know,
there's
some
other
items
that
will
come
up
as
we
discuss
this,
but
the
primary
focus
really
on
this
is
to
look
at
residential
and
commercial
buildings
with
respect
to
energy
code,
and
so,
as
we
jump
into
oh
back
right
there
perfect.
AA
So
as
we
jump
into
the
history
of
kind
of
how
we
got
here,
we
want
to
understand
really
what's
the
definition
of
a
residential
building,
just
to
make
every
make
sure
that
everyone's
on
the
same
the
same
plane,
and
so
when
we
refer
to
a
residential
building,
we're
talking
about
our
one
or
two
family
dwelling
as
well
as
town
homes
and
R3,
or
R4
occupancies
and
R3
and
R4
occupancies,
R3.
Think
of
them
as
dormitories
or
sororities.
AA
Something
like
that,
and
so
2017
was
really
our
first
dive
into
our
own
energy
code
here
at
the
city
of
Boulder,
and
so
what
we
really
looked
at
doing
first
was
looking
at
some
of
the
larger
homes
that
were
really
coming
through
the
city
to
make
sure
that
they
could
do
the
right
thing
and
really
have
a
lesser
impact,
and
so
we
made
a
requirement
to
have
those
at
Net
Zero
on
the
2020
kobec.
AA
So
the
most
recent
version
that
we're
actually
currently
on,
we
decided
to
tighten
those
reins
a
little
bit
and
actually
look
at
making
houses
that
were
equal
to
or
greater
than
3
000
square
feet
be
Net
Zero,
and
so
one
thing
to
note
on
this
is
the
majority
of
the
homes
that
we've
seen
come
through
the
city
that
are
great,
that
the
majority
of
them
are
going
to
be
greater
than
3
000
square
feet,
so
they're
already
at
Net,
Zero,
and
so
just
wanted
to
touch
on
that.
AA
So
everyone
can
be
aware
of
that
also
some
other
some
other
things
that
were
introduced
with
the
kobec
this
time
around
or
the
city
of
Boulder
energy
conservation
code.
If
you
see
kobak,
that's
what
we're
referring
to
is
we
had
it
in
some
performance
backstops.
So
these
performance
backstops
are
really
items
that
you
cannot
trade
away,
and
so
these
items
are
typically
your
envelope
items
or
the
the
exterior
of
the
building.
AA
So
we're
looking
at
the
insulation,
values,
window
values,
things
of
that
nature
and
backstops,
basically
meaning
if
our
code
says
you
have
to
do
it,
you
can't
go
to
a
lesser
version
of
that
which,
when
we
are
modeling
and
doing
energy
models
for
this
you're
able
usually
to
trade
below
and
above
on
things.
So
that's
why
we
have
these
backstops
in
place
that
you
can't
go
below
those
numbers.
AA
We
also
introduced
solar,
ready
and
solar
offset
requirements
for
residential,
so
solar
ready.
We
basically
require
300
square
feet
on
the
roof
to
be
available
for
for
future
solar
panels
and
then
on
the
offset
requirements.
What
we
have
is
anything
that's
heating
outside
of
the
building
that
really
uses
a
fossil
fuel,
as
as
its
heating
Source
has
to
be
fully
offset
through
Renewables
and
then
the
last
thing
that
we
really
introduced
the
2020
covet
was
making
EV
ready
requirements
for
on
the
single
family
side.
AA
So
next
page
please
so
here
we
wanted
to
really
look
at
kind
of
where
we
came
from
with
the
commercial
energy
and
where
we're
kind
of
going,
which
is
what
we'll
talk
about
in
here
in
a
little
bit,
and
so
the
first
thing
I
wanted
to
find
really
is:
what
is
a
commercial
building?
AA
A
commercial
building?
Please
go
ahead
and
click
through
a
couple
of
them,
so
commercial
building
is
basically
defined
as
any
buildings
that
are
not
residential.
So
we
always
love
the
building
code,
definitions
right,
so
anything,
that's
not
residential
book
it
again.
This
also
is
actually
going
to
include
multi-family
R2
occupancies,
which
is
becoming
more
common.
It
seems
like
here
in
the
state
of
Colorado
and
so
R2
most
people.
AA
Think
of
that
as
well
are
it's
residential
and
so,
with
a
lot
more
of
the
codes
that
we're
seeing
more
multi-families
moving
under
the
commercial
Umbrella
Just,
because
the
international
building
code
or
the
IBC
actually
governs
multi-family
construction.
So
that's
why
we're
seeing
this
this
change
in
Noob
over
into
the
commercial
Spectrum?
AA
We
really
wanted
to
look
at
where
we
could
start
with
our
energy
code
and
where
we
kind
of
look
to
move
it
in
the
future,
and
so
the
2017
kobec
was
developed
off
of
the
2012
energy
code,
the
international
energy
code,
and
so
looking
at
that,
the
city
decided
to
look
at
using
one
of
the
metrics.
AA
That's
used
for
the
energy
code,
which
is
this
ashery
90.1-2010
standard,
and
so,
instead
of
just
taking
the
standard
at
face
value,
which
the
requirement
typically
is
to
be
at
zero
percent
better
or
better
than
what's
required,
we
decided
to
say
no,
that's
not
enough
for
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
in
the
city
and
we
required
a
30
savings
above
that
Target
click.
Again,
please,
and
so
one
of
the
other
items
we
actually
introduced
here
also
was
the
solar
ready
requirements
for
these
commercial
buildings.
AA
Please
click
again
a
couple
of
times,
and
so
the
2020
kobek.
What
we
did
was
we
actually
looked
up
the
Annie
on
these,
these
Energy
savings
requirements
and
we
looked
at
requiring
20
to
25
percent
savings
which
it's
lower
than
30
savings,
but
we're
also
measuring
it
against
a
a
2016
Baseline
versus
a
2010
Baseline,
which
is
going
to
be
a
lot
more
stringent.
AA
The
other
thing
to
note
here
is
the
mention
of
an
eui
savings,
so
eui
stands
for
energy
use,
intensity
and
so
think
of
this
as
a
miles
per
gallon
for
a
commercial
building
on
the
residential
front,
you'll
hear
the
term
ERI,
which
is
energy
rating
index,
and
so
it's
the
same
thing
there.
It's
basically
miles
per
gallon
on
a
single
family
home.
Please
click
I
think
about
three
more
times,
and
so
some
other
things
that
were
introduced
in
this
code
as
well
as
we
talked
about
previously
with
residentials.
AA
We
had
performance
backstops
that
were
in
place.
We
also
required
solar
to
have
a
five
percent
energy
offset
for
any
commercial
building.
So
when
the
buildings
are
built
and
modeled
of
that
energy
usage,
a
minimum
of
five
percent
has
to
be
offset
by
active
solar
on
site
and
then
the
last
thing
that
we
really
upped
the
Annie
on
I
want
to
say.
Is
we
brought
in
electric
vehicle
capable
ready
and
evse
requirements
under
the
2020
Kovac.
AA
Next
slide,
so
here's
a
quick
timeline
on
this,
so
we've
already
met
with
the
planning
board
on
the
sixth
of
this
month.
AA
We
previously
met
with
the
environmental
Advisory
board
on
the
7th
of
this
month
and
then
currently
we
are
meeting
with
a
city
council
to
get
your
feedback
and,
as
we
progress
through
this
presentation,
I'm
going
to
try
and
touch
on
some
of
the
feedback
we
got
from
the
planning
board,
as
well
as
the
environmental
Advisory
Board,
as
we
filter
through
this
presentation.
So
apologies
in
advance
because
I
don't
have
my
notes
up
in
front
of
me
so,
but
please
feel
free
to
click
through
the
rest
of
the
slide.
So.
AA
Currently
we're
meeting
with
the
city
council
tonight
to
discuss
this
project.
The
next
steps
really
are
going
to
be
stakeholder
engagement,
all
right
there,
stakeholder
engagement
and
so
we're
going
to
look
at
engaging
the
community
as
well
as
different
stakeholders
to
get
their
feedback
on
the
process
as
we
work
through
it
and
on
the
different
items
for
Energy
Efficiency
to
make
sure
that
it's
in
line
with
you
know
what
the
community
and
the
stakeholders
are
thinking
as
well.
AA
As
what
the
city
envisions
for
their
future
and
then
lastly
or
not,
lastly,
but
the
next
step
really
will
be
once
we
have.
The
draft
code
is
to
bring
it
back
to
planning
the
environmental
Advisory
Board
as
well
as
city
council,
and
have
them
review
and
basically
look
to
approve
and
then,
during
the
fourth
quarter
of
this
year,
we're
really
targeting
to
do
the
initial
public
reading
of
this
energy
code
to
get
to
just
move
the
project
along
really
and
get
additional
feedback,
and
hopefully
adoption
and
implementation.
So
next
slide.
AA
Please.
So
here
are
the
areas
of
focus
that
we're
really
going
to
look
at
in
this
presentation.
Please
do
a
couple
more
clicks,
and
so
the
first
two
areas
of
focus
that
I
really
want
to
look
at
are
going
to
be
dealing
with
our
performance
targets
for
our
energy
code.
AA
So,
basically,
looking
at
you
know
making
our
buildings
more
energy
efficient
as
we
look
to
move
to
Net
Zero
Energy,
as
well
as
Net,
Zero,
carbon
and
then
part
three
four
and
five
or
excuse
me
part
two
is
an
alternative
pathway
that
we're
considering
looking
at
for
residential
compliance
and
then
part
three,
four
and
five
really
pull
everything
full
circle
as
we
talk
about
electrification,
natural
gas,
offsets
and
then
look
at
really
embodied
carbon
reduction
and
overall
carbon
reduction
in
this
process.
Next
slide,
please.
AA
So
the
first
item
I
really
wanted
to
touch
on
here
is
our
performance,
Target
updates
and
please
feel
free
to
click
through.
V
AA
Right
keep
going
until
you
move
to
the
next
slide,
then
you
can
back
up
all
right
perfect,
so
the
proposed
code
updates
that
we're
going
to
be
doing
on
this.
One
really
is
for
the
residential
buildings.
As
we
mentioned
previously,
we
already
require
anything
greater
than
3
000
square
feet
to
be
Net,
Zero
Energy,
and
we're
considering
leaving
that
at
that
at
that
metric,
because
the
majority
of
the
new
new
build
homes
that
come
in
for
permit
that
are
greater
than
3
000
square
feet.
AA
The
majority
of
them
are
are
already
requiring
this
Net
Zero
Energy
requirement
for
the
homes
that
are
less
than
three
thousand
square
feet.
We're
really
looking
to
kind
of
revisit
these
targets
and
look
at
different
Avenues
really
to
to
make
it
available
and
make
Energy
Efficiency
available
for
those
that
may
not
be
able
to
build
these
three
thousand
square
feet
homes
and
it's
kind
of
really
really
focused
on
that.
AA
AA
Stakeholders
really
guide
them
through
through
our
code
to
kind
of
know,
really
what's
what's
going
to
be
expected
and
kind
of
move
that
needle
further
along
for
the
city's
Vision
on
the
commercial
front,
We
have
basically
three
path
lines
through
pathways
through
energy
code.
AA
Excuse
me,
the
model
Baseline
path
is
basically
our
first
pathway
and
this
one
is
you
model
a
building,
and
it
gives
you
a
certain
Energy
savings,
and
so
we
have
to
model
our
building
that
we're
proposing
and
make
sure
that
it
is
under
that
Baseline
savings,
and
so
what
we're
looking
on
this
path
really
is
to
consider
updating
this
percentage
reduction
as
we
currently
sit,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
at
20
for
all
electric
buildings
and
then,
if
it's
a
mixed
fuel
building
or
a
building
that
uses
electricity
as
well
as
a
natural
gas,
then
we
require
25
reduction,
so
we're
evaluating
those
numbers
to
see
you
know:
do
we
leave
them
there
and
change
the
Baseline?
AA
Do
we
move
the
percentages
and
make
them
more?
You
know
a
higher
reduction
requirement
and
be
around
the
same
Baseline
and
so
on,
and
so
these
are
some
of
the
things
we're
thinking
through
at
this
process.
The
next
item
is
our
fixed
Baseline
path,
and
so
a
sample
of
this
really
is
on
the
the
image
here
to
the
left,
and
so
the
items
that
are
in
blue
are
the
current
building
types
that
we
have
available
in
our
energy
code.
That
has
a
static
Target.
AA
So,
as
you
can
see,
under
the
2020
Kovac
column,
there
are
numbers
there,
and
so
those
numbers
are
eui.
Our
energy
use
intensity
Target
as
I
mentioned,
and
so
this
is
very
ecstatic
very
much
a
static
number
to
where
you
could
open
the
code
book
and
go
oh
for
a
10,
000
square
foot
office,
building
I
need
to
be
at
a
23.,
and
so
you'd
know
that
with
modeling
and
that
you'd
have
to
get
below
a
23..
AA
The
one
thing
that
you
may
notice
here
too,
is
that
there's
about
I
believe
six
items
or
six
building
types
that
are
currently
included
in
these
performance
targets
and
I
believe
this
probably
was
due
to
the
fact
that,
with
this
being
a
newer
kind
of
Avenue
that
we've
seen
over
the
recent
years,
there
may
not
have
been
a
ton
of
data
that
really
was
available
at
the
time
or
that
was
powerful
or
from
the
city's
perspective.
AA
We
may
not
have
seen
a
ton
of
other
building
types
really
outside
of
this,
and
we
were
looking
to
dip
our
toe
into
the
water
and
really
put
some
put
some
pen
to
paper
and
figure
out
some
building
types
that
we
could
give.
You
know
more
of
a
static,
Target
versus
a
moving
number,
which
is
really
the
model
Baseline
path,
and
it
pertains
specifically
to
buildings
so
on
this
fixed
Baseline
path.
What
we're
looking
to
do
is
update
the
eui
targets.
You
know,
as
you
can
see,
from
2017
to
2020,
we've
tightened
the
targets.
AA
Now
it's
not
a
ton
because
we
want
to
do
it
gradually.
We
have
until
about
20
30.
To
do
this,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
we
understand
the
cost
behind
everything
and
make
sure
that
you
know
we
take
you
to
the
point
of
law
of
diminishing
return
to
where
we
we
can
get
you
there,
but
if
we
go
any
further,
it's
really
you're
losing
some
value
there
and
so
we're
looking
to
kind
of
weigh
all
these
things.
AA
As
we
look
at
this
and
as
I
mentioned,
we're
going
to
update
the
eui
targets
as
well
as
looking
additional,
adding
additional
building
types
to
this
as
well
as
you
can
see,
you
know,
retail
was
example
or
low-rise
apartments
or
even
large
apartments
or
large
Apartments.
Excuse
me,
large
offices.
You
know
we
currently
don't
have
those,
as
you
can
see
the
question
marks,
but
these
are
some
things
that
we're
really
going
to
be
considering
as
we
move
forward
next
slide.
AA
Please,
and
so
the
doe
Zero
Energy
ready
home
option
here
is
one
that
we're
proposing
as
an
alternative
to
to
the
residential
piece,
and
so
this
program's
been
around
for
about
10
years
and
I.
AA
Believe,
as
of
so
as
of
today,
there's
about
between
I
want
to
say,
25
to
30
000
homes
that
have
been
certified,
if
not
are
in
the
process
of
being
certified
through
this
program,
and
so
some
of
the
strengths
for
the
Zero,
Energy,
ready
home
feel
free
to
click
through
this
till
the
next
slide
and
then
just
back
up
one.
So
the
deal
is
your
energy
ready
home
is
really
built
on
the
backbone
of
the
energy
star,
new
homes
program,
and
so
the
reason
for
me.
AA
Thinking
of
this
is
kind
of
being
an
option
as
an
opportunity
is,
you
know,
for
the
homes
that
are
larger
than
3
000
square
feet,
they're
already
requiring
Net
Zero,
and
so
this
program
is
great
because
it
focuses
on
Energy
Efficiency,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
energy
star
requirements
as
well
as
the
2021
envelope
backstop
and
the
energy
star
Windows.
It
also
requires
energy
star
appliances,
but
in
Lou
in
inclusive
of
the
EPA
indoor,
air
plus
certification.
AA
So
the
first,
let's
see
the
first
three
items,
the
energy
star,
certification,
the
envelope
requirements
and
the
windows
really
kind
of
pertain
back
to
the
energy
star
certification
and
the
Energy
Efficiency
of
the
home.
The
other
aspect-
that's
a
little
different
from
energy
code,
really
is
the
EPA
indoor
air
plus
certification.
So
this
is
an
additional
certification.
That's
required
for
this
program.
AA
The
benefit
here
is
that
we're
not
only
providing
the
customers
the
community
with
these
homes
that
are
going
to
be
energy
efficient,
but
healthy,
they're
going
to
have
a
healthy
indoor
environment.
Some
of
the
some
of
the
interesting
aspects,
too,
to
the
Zero
Energy
ready
home,
is
that
it
requires
the
HVAC
system
to
be
entirely
within
thermal
envelope.
Some
of
the
systems,
as
some
of
you
may
be
aware,
is
maybe
up
in
your
attic.
AA
It
may
be
in
your
crawl
space
if
you
have
a
crawl
space,
and
so
those
have
to
be
brought
into
condition
space
now
of
the
home.
It
also
was
one
of
the
first
programs
to
introduce
this
PV
ready
checklist.
So
it's
one
of
the
very
first
programs
that
had
the
the
solar
ready
requirements.
Hence
the
name
Zero
Energy
ready
and
then
it
also
introduced
recently
EV
ready
requirements
as
well
as
electric
ready
heat
pump.
Water,
heating
and
space
heating
requirements
as
well
have
been
introduced
to
this
program.
AA
So
with
that
being
said,
the
primary
reason
for
looking
at
this
really
is
not
so
much
for
the
homes
that
are
greater
than
the
3
000
square
feet
is.
This
could
still
apply
to
those
homes.
The
difference
would
be.
Is
they
still
have
to
install
solar
to
get
to
where
they
need
to
get
to,
but
for
the
folks
that
can't
afford
to
maybe
do
that
aspect
of
it?
AA
This
program
has
a
ton
of
incentives
that
are
available
out
there,
and
so
the
inflation
reduction
act
that
was
passed
last
year
has
some
what
incentives
that
are
available
through
that
program
to
help
to
help
homeowners
offset
some
of
this
additional
cost
or
by
the
end
of
the
project,
really
convince
them
to
consider
putting
on
solar
and
getting
to
Net
Zero
themselves
and
kind
of
empowering
them
to
do
that.
AA
So
we
just
touched
on
the
first
two
areas
of
focus
which
really
dealt
with
our
Energy
Efficiency,
put
two
more
times
or
three
more
times,
I
think,
oh,
two,
more
sorry
back
one,
so
we
just
touched
on
the
first
two
areas
that
really
deal
with
our
Energy
Efficiency
and
so
the
next.
The
next
three
pieces
are
really
going
to
look
at
more
of
the
carbon
aspect
and
kind
of
carbon
reduction,
and
so
next
slide.
Please.
AA
Our
and
then
back
one
hour
perfect
so
with
with
electrification.
What
we're
really
looking
to
introduce
and
consider
is
for
new
construction
or
level
four
alterations.
We
want
to
look
at
requiring
all
electric
space
and
water
heating,
as
well
as
have
electric
ready
requirements
for
other
appliances
like
stoves,
for
example.
AA
So
for
anyone,
that's
wondering
a
level.
4
alteration
is
basically
the
step
before
they
want
to
scrape
the
site
and
and
build
it
as
new
construction.
So
that's
why
we
lump
that
in
up
there
a
level
three
alteration
is
basically,
if
you're
doing
over
50
percent
of
work
in
a
building
and
it
it
extends
over
50
percent
of
the
building
area.
That
would
trigger
a
level
three
alteration.
AA
So
to
give
you
some
context
so
for
level
three,
what
we
would
look
to
do
is
because
they're
not
doing
as
much
work
as
new
construction
or
level.
Four
we'd
really
want
to
encourage
electric
ready
on
these
types
of
buildings
and
and
encourage
them
to
install
Breakers
and
panel
space
and
the
raceways
to
be
able
to
to
run
this
up
on.
AA
You
know
future
installation
of
a
electric
piece
of
equipment
and
the
way
we
consider
incentivizing
this
is
for
an
ER
Target
or
an
energy
rating
index
or
the
the
miles
per
gallon
on
a
home
instead
of
it
being
say,
ERI
of
50.
AA
We
would
give
an
allowance
of
say
a
55
on
this
to
really
help,
encourage
and
and
make
it
less
painful
for
them
to
to
Really
push
the
envelope
and
and
do
electric
ready
on
this,
and
so
just
to
make
note
of
that
as
we
kind
of
dive
into
this
is
you
know,
there
are
currently
two
municipalities
here
in
the
state
of
Colorado
that
are
well.
AA
Let's
talk
about
the
first
one,
so
crested,
but
it's
the
first
municipality
in
Colorado
to
require
all
electric
new
construction,
and
so
following
suit
right
behind
them
is
actually
Denver,
as
many
of
you
may
be
aware,
and
starting
January
1
of
2024
no
natural
gas
space
or
water
heating
will
be
allowed
to
be
installed
in
multi-family
or
commercial
construction.
Now.
That
being
said,
there
are
exceptions,
so
that
is
the
one
key
thing
of
how
they're
kind
of
maneuvering
around
that
currently.
AA
Actually
I
think
it
was
last
week
or
a
week
before
the
model
state
code
came
out
for
solar
ready
and
for
electric
ready
requirements
for
the
buildings
here
in
Colorado,
and
so
the
EV
charging
requirements
are
right
there
in
that
same
standard,
we
currently
we're
we're
in
compliant
about
90
the
we're
off
I
think
we
have
a
10
requirement
for
our
EV,
capable
or
EV
ready.
Excuse
me
and
the
state
now
requires
15,
but
from
the
the
boards
that
we've
already
actually
talked
to.
We
were
getting
a
lot
of
Echoes
of.
AA
We
need
to
really
consider
upping
the
total
on
those,
and
so
that's
something
we
really
want
to
look
at
is
really
considering
the
EV
charging
requirements
and
then
also
I
wanted
to
mention
that,
with
respect
to
kind
of
smaller
Lots
we're
looking
at
really,
you
know
I
think.
AA
Currently
it
requires
25
25
spaces
or
greater
or
25
spaces
or
less,
and
so
what
we're
really
looking
at
doing
is
bringing
that
down
to
I
think
it
was
10
spaces
or
or
less
to
really
kind
of
focus
on
making
these
impacts
and
and
being
able
to
provide
this.
This
infrastructure
and
this
this
EV
charging
as
we
look
towards
the
future
and
kind
of
our
our
goals
and
our
vision
with
the
city
and
the
last
piece
is
the
e-bike
charging.
AA
And
so,
as
you
become
more
and
more
aware
of
it,
probably
here
in
the
city
is
that
e-bikes
are
everywhere
now,
and
so
what
we
really
want
to
do
is
take
that
into
strong
consideration,
especially
say
for
multi-family
or
projects
of
that
type,
and
really
kind
of
consider
any
EV
bike
charging
requirements
to
help
really
pave
the
way
in
that
direction.
As
well
so
next
slide,
please.
AA
And
back
okay,
perfect
and
so
for
part
four,
which
is
the
other
side
of
the
coin.
So
we'll
say
here,
so
we
just
talked
about
electrification.
The
next
piece
we
want
to
look
at
is
our
solar,
offsets
of
natural
gas,
and
so
what
we're
looking
to
propose
is
on
the
residential
side,
really
really
want
to
provide
more
guidance
on
on
what
would
be
required.
When
we
look
when
we
talk
about
natural
gas
offsets.
Currently
we
require
any
heating,
that's
outside
of
the
home
or
the
dwelling
unit.
AA
That's
a
fossil
fuel
to
be
100
offset
by
Renewables,
but
the
question
comes
up
on
what
about
electric
resistance
heating
for
a
patio-
or
you
know
some
other
type
of
outdoor
Heating,
and
so
we're
looking
to
really
help
provide
some
more
guidance
on
that
front.
We've
also
heard
echoes
from
one
of
the
the
board
meetings
that
to
really
consider
looking
at
Natural
Gas
offsets
even
in
the
home,
not
just
outside
of
the
home
for
single
family,
and
so
that's
something
too.
AA
That
I
want
to
say
that
we're
we're
going
to
be
laying
out
and
considering
on
the
commercial
front,
as
we
mentioned
earlier,
five
percent
energy
offsets
required
through
solar
for
just
the
energy
use
in
the
building.
What
we're
really
considering
and
looking
to
push
is
if
the
building
is
going
to
be
using
mixed
fuel,
say
it's
a
laboratory
where
they
have
burners
and
things
of
that
nature.
If
it's
going
to
have
to
be
mixed
fuel,
then
we're
looking
wanting
to
require
100
offset
of
that
natural
gas
use.
AA
So
we
know
that
there
are
certain
instances
that
it's
inevitable
that
natural
gas
may
have
to
be
used,
and
so
in
those
instances
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
be
able
to
be
fully
100
offset.
And
the
first
thing
that
comes
to
mind
in
some
aspects
is
like
a
commercial
kitchen
or
something
like
that
of
that
nature.
And
so
the
last
slide.
Please
or
the
next
slide
excuse
me
and
so.
R
AA
And
so,
as
you
can
see
from
the
definitions,
we
really
have
two
types
of
carbon.
We
have
operational
carbon,
which
is
basically
once
the
building
gets
turned
over.
You
get
your
Co,
it
goes
into
full
operation,
it
deals
with
the
management,
the
processes,
any
maintenance
items
and
everything.
That's
basically
on
the
operational
side
of
the
building
and
it's
functioning
and
the
carbon
dioxide
it
produces.
AA
The
embodied
carbon
is
really
anything
from
the
extraction
of
those
materials
up
to
to
the
certificate
of
occupancy
for
that
building,
so
it
can
include
extraction,
Transportation,
manufacture
of
these
materials,
installation
construction
processes,
many
different
things,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
the
image
here
operational
carbons
about
I-
think
we
looked
at
it
earlier
and
it
was
about
you
know
it's
a
lot
smaller
portion
than
the
embodied
carbon
piece
really
as
what
it
takes
to
get
up
to
that
final
piece.
AA
That
final
stage-
and
one
thing
to
note
too,
is
buildings,
I
want
to
say
and
I
apologize.
I,
don't
have
my
notes
right
in
front
of
me,
but
buildings
account
for
about
39
of
the
global
greenhouse
gas
orb,
the
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
about
a
quarter
of
those
are
actually
due
to
embodied
carbon,
and
so
this
is
really
why
this
is
something
that
we
really
want
to
look
at
and
focus
on,
because
it's
something
that
we
can
actually
impact
so
next
slide.
Please.
AA
All
right
and
right
there
perfect.
So
there
are
a
couple
of
things
we
can
look
at
when
we
talk
about
embodied
carbon
and,
of
course
many
of
us
have
probably
may
or
may
not
have
heard
of
a
life
cycle
assessment
or
a
life
cycle
analysis,
and
so
this
is
a
similar
to
an
energy
model.
But
we
look
at
the
environmental
impact
of
the
building
over
the
useful
life
of
it
right.
AA
It
really
just
comes
down
to
thoughtful
selections
and
when
it
when
it
with
those
materials,
and
it's
just
having
that
forethought
up
front
to
really
make
those
choices
and
those
requests
to
ensure
that
we
comply
or
that
they're
able
to
comply
next
slide.
Please
all
right.
It's
going!
AA
Yeah
stop
Perfect
all
right.
So
our
next
steps
on
this
project
is
to
incorporate
the
feedback
that
we
heard
from
the
planning
board.
The
environmental,
Advisory,
Board
and
city
council
look
to
engage
our
stakeholders
in
the
community.
Look
at
possibly
having
some
in-house
or
open
house.
Excuse
me
meetings
with
some
stakeholders
in
the
community.
You
know
look
at
using
some
of
the
different
lists
that
we
have
to
reach
out
and
get
some
feedback
to
really
engage
the
community,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
my
intent
for
this
code
is
really
it's.
AA
It's
the
city's
code
and
it's
going
to
be
the
community's
code.
So
once
we
have
all
that
feedback,
we
really
look
to
incorporate
the
feedback
and
recommendations.
Look
at
drafting
the
2024
kobach
in
the
third
quarter
of
of
this
year
and
then
bring
it
back
to
the
planning
board
environmental,
advisory
and
city
council
really
to
get
your
feedback
any
tweaks
or
changes
that
you
feel
that
we
need
or
if
there's
anything,
that
we
fully
missed.
That.
AA
Does
the
city
council
agree
on
the
proposed
areas
of
focus
that
we
have
for
the
2024
koback?
Is
there
any
areas
that
you
should
see
that
we
should?
We
should
also
include
that
we
just
are
currently
and
then
from
the
city
city
council's
perspective.
Do
you
have
any
recommendations
on
any
Community
engagement
strategies
for
this
project?
AA
We're
really
looking
to
you
know,
expand
and
get
feedback
from
everyone
in
regards
to
the
community
engagement
piece,
just
to
make
sure
that
everyone
that
wants
to
be
heard
can
be
heard,
and
so
that
I
believe
is
all
I
have
and
so
I
I
want
to
say.
Thank
you
all
for
this
opportunity
to
speak
to
you
on
this
topic
and
I
open
for
questions
and
discussion.
F
All
right
and
for
questions
and
let's
lead
off
with
Lauren.
D
Thank
you
Mark,
so
I'm
gonna
have
some
stuff
to
no
one's
surprise.
I
will
have
some
specific
questions
here
with
the
Target.
The
eui
targets
for
commercial
energy
usage.
D
I
was
wondering
if
we've
looked
at,
if
there
are
any
more
standardized
codes
that
do
a
similar
thing
as
fun
as
Reinventing.
The
wheel
is
and
doing
something
different
than
what
everybody
else
is
doing.
If
there
are
things
like
if
the
international
green
code
touches
on
that
I
feel
like
have,
we
looked
at
that
other
yeah.
AA
Yeah
codes
in
that
area
yeah
and
that's
what
we'll
plan
to
do
when
we
look
to
update
our
eui
targets
is
to
look
to
those
different
standards.
I
know
that,
like
you
said,
igcc
is
one
of
them.
I
know,
NBI
has
one
that's
out
there
that's
available
as
well.
That's
got
some
good
information
and
data
behind
it
and
then
also
as
I've
mentioned,
you
know,
are
our
Consultants
naresco
have
worked
across
the
country
in
many
of
the
different
municipalities.
AA
They've
they've
been
the
boots
on
the
ground
in
California
in
their
Wars,
and
then
they
all
also
work
in
Washington
as
well
as
Nevada
or
not
Nevada.
Excuse
me,
New,
York
and
so
they've
seen
a
lot
of
this
as
well
and
kind
of
can
bring
a
lot
of
that
knowledge
and
experience
with
them
as
well
as
we
look
at
this.
V
And
Josh
still
I
think
I
might
add
again.
I'm
Carolyn
England,
with
the
Department
of
climate
initiatives,
is
some
of
our
neighboring
jurisdictions
have
have
also
been
transitioning
to
an
eui
pathway,
so
Denver
and
then
there's
some
others
that
are
looking
at
that
as
well
and
I.
Think
we'll
want
to
do
our
best
to
be
consistent
with
them
to
at
least
you
know,
drive
more
consistency
in
code,
application
for
designers
and
builders
that
are
working
across
those
jurisdictional
boundaries.
V
D
You
I
know
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
previously,
but
as
we
look
at
energy
as
we
look
at
trying
to
reuse
buildings,
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
I
notice
in
my
work
is
that
when
we
start
getting
into
level
three
alterations,
that's
where
I
start
seeing
people
weigh
really
heavily
whether
it
even
makes
sense
to
remodel
or
where
costs
can
go
to
the
point
where
it
financially
isn't
that
different
from
tearing
down
and
building
new
some
of
the
things
that
can
impact
that
are,
you
know,
zoning
issues
and
things
around
that?
D
AA
You
know
because,
like
I
said,
the
majority
of
the
of
the
projects
and
the
permits
that
we
see
that
come
through
the
city
are
really
existing
buildings
now,
and
so
we
want
to
look
at
that
really
and
analyze
that
to
make
sure
that
a
we're
living
up
to
the
city's
goals
and
Visions
but
to
make
sure
like
what
you're
saying
is
we
want
them
to
retain
the
structure
if
possible,
you
know
and
and
where
it
makes
sense,
because
that's
kind
of
back
to
the
embodied
carbon
piece,
it's
going
to
be
more
painful,
to
really
tear
it
down
and
bring
in
all
new
materials
versus
retaining
the
current
structure
and,
what's
there
and
so
I
guess
for
a
long
answer
to
a
short
question
from
building
code.
AA
Yeah,
we're
going
to
be
looking
to
update
the
existing
building
piece
to
make
sure
that
it's
it
it
it's
not
as
we
don't
want
to
push
people
away
either
to
do
the
work
without
a
permit
or
to
just
not
do
it.
You
know
so
that
we
want
to
really
look
at
that
and
really
weigh
that
out.
I
think
so
anyone
else
want
to
add
anything
to
that
sorry,
yeah.
V
No
I
think
you
did
a
great
job
of
touching
on
it,
I
think.
With
our
pass
code
update,
we
did
look
at
zoning
specifically
in
the
residential
code.
We
did
make
the
decision
not
to
make
the
adjustment
we
had
planned
for
the
alterations
or
some
and
I
I
think
I.
V
Think
it's
currently,
you
know
just
a
different
ERI,
Target
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
want
to
explore
in
this
code
update
is
like
how
much
of
that
makes
a
difference,
and
that
was
some
of
the
feedback
we
got
from
planning
board
as
well
is,
is
what
we
currently
have
actually
driving
that
retention,
or
are
there
learnings
that
we
have,
because
that
was
certainly
a
deliberate
effort
on
the
residential
side
that
we
were
making.
We
hadn't
yet
really
explorted
on
the
commercial,
but
that's
certainly
something
we
would
look
at
as
well.
D
Thank
you
and
then
in
terms
of
like
the
Brad.
Maybe
you
could
also
touch
on
you
know.
Are
there
any
things
we
could
anything?
We
could
look
at
in
terms
of
easing
some
of
the
Hoops
that
people
have
to
jump
through
in
order
to
get
go
through
that
retrofit
process.
You
know
I'm
thinking
about
adding
insulation
on
a
building,
that's
near
its
setbacks
and
requiring
you
know,
zoning
adjustments
or
various
things
like
that
or
if
they're
are
any
additional
areas
like
that
that
we
might
be
looking
into
at
this.
R
I
appreciate
the
the
question
I
I
have
to
admit
that
yesterday
this
conversation
was
really
my
first
introduction
to
the
idea
that
there
may
be
zoning
kind
of
aspects
that
interplay
with
the
broader
goals
that
are
being
addressed
in
part
by
the
energy
code
updates
that
we'd
committed
to
working
on.
R
But
we
definitely
see,
as
Carolyn
indicated,
that
that
there
is
that
relationship,
and
that
has
been
looked
at
in
the
past
and
we
certainly
will
commit
at
that.
You
know
moving
forward.
R
I
am
still
building
kind
of
a
comprehensive
understanding
of
climate
initiatives,
goals,
broader
goals
in
that
regard,
and
can't
speak
to
really
what
scope
that
kind
of
implies
and
probably
would
rely
a
little
bit
on
Jonathan's
history
to
speak
to
that,
if
I
can
put
you
on
the
spot
Jonathan
with
with
that
question,.
AB
Sure
Brad
good
to
see
you
all
Council
Jonathan
Cohen,
with
the
climate
initiatives,
Department
yeah,
I
I,
think
that
this
is
a
really
interesting
question
that
you
raise
councilmember
folkerts
I.
This
is
I,
think
a
great
opportunity
for
the
Departments
to
come
together
and
kind
of
think
about
the
synergies
between
where
we're
trying
to
go
and
look
at
the
full
package
of
tools
that
we
have.
AB
So
you
know
tonight
we're
talking
about
the
energy
code
we
should
be
thinking
about
when
and
where
do
we
Implement
some
of
the
changes
in
the
building
code
and
as
you
bring
forward
now
how
we
think
about
the
zoning
to
to
address
some
of
the
challenges
that
we're
facing
in
the
community
and
and
again
to
align
around
this
issue
of
of
climate
and
resilience?
AB
So
I
I
think
that
I
think
this
is
a
really
interesting
Dimension
to
add
into
the
project
and
I
would
just
suggest
or
perhaps
ask
that
the
staff
team
take
that
back
and
think
about
what
is
the
holistic
and
more
comprehensive
approach
that
could
include
some
of
the
zoning
some
of
the
buildings,
some
of
the
some
of
the
energy
code
updates
and
think
about
that
as
a
package.
R
And
I'll,
just
piggyback
on
it
on
one
comment:
Jonathan
just
made
two
about
the
relationship
not
only
to
the
development
code,
zoning
code,
but
also
the
building
code,
and
we
do
have
on
a
planned
work
schedule
to
update
the
building
code
here
in
the
next.
L
R
U
Yeah
we're
looking
at
adopting
the
2024
I
codes
when
they
become
they
should
be
published
by
January,
so
we'll
be
able
to
start
working
there
early
next
year
and
we'll
be
looking
at
how
that
integrates
with
all
the
other
land
use
and
energy
codes
that
we
have
adopted
currently
and
parts
of
that,
particularly
the
embodied
carbon
piece
might
be
impacted
by
the
the
building
code,
particularly
the
IBC
adoption
yeah.
R
D
And
related
as
we
you
know,
we
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
also
that
sort
of
the
changes
in
building
Technologies
are
pushing
forward
products
like
foam
insulation
and
things
like
that.
We
use
to
meet
our
energy
code
requirements,
but
that
those
products
can
cause
consequences
when
it
comes
to
deconstruction,
making
the
wood
products
that
would
otherwise
be
recyclable,
not
recyclable,
anymore.
I
know
that
you
guys
are
also
looking
at
an
update
around
that
Co
around
the
deconstruction
code.
D
Maybe
be
part
of
that?
Or
this
work
or
the
building
code
work.
V
Yeah
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
all
of
the
above
Lauren
and
definitely
we
did
have
a
chance
to
kind
of
check
in
with
our
circular
economy,
team
and
they're
they're
doing
some
some
good
working
groups
right
now
around
the
deconstruction
to
learn
more
about
where
the
successes
and
challenges
are
coming
and
using
that
to
inform
some
best
practices.
There's
a
lot
of
analysis.
V
That
needs
to
be
done,
but
I
definitely
think
we
want
to
start
to
take
some
steps
in
that
direction
and
I
think
it's
sits
very
well
with
what
Rob
said
is
certainly
as
we're
looking
at
the
IBC
update
thinking
about
things
like
you
know,
class
four
shingles
restrictions
on
the
types
of
insulation.
Those
types
of
things
would
be
really
well
suited.
F
B
Yeah,
thanks
for
the
very
detailed
presentation
Josh
I
can
tell
how
well
you
know
this
stuff.
It's
very
impressive.
I
just
had
one
question
which
was
and
noticed
a
difference
in
what
you
were
talking
about.
Then
what
I
remember
from
the
presentation-
and
it
was
a
difference
to
my
thoughts,
a
positive
one
but
just
wanted
to
check
in
which
was
about
the
electric
vehicle
charging
stations
and
I
think
in
our
packet.
It
talked
about
a
minimum
of
I
think
25
units
before
you
would
apply
a
10
standard
and
I.
B
AA
Yes,
I,
remember
correctly,
we
were
talking
yes,
so
we're
talking
about
the
EVPs
and
we
were
looking
at
the
parking
slots.
Basically,
what
we
were
trying
to
do
is
align
it
with
the
state
with
the
states
currently
requiring
because
I
know
that
they've
tightened
that
down,
and
so
the
intent
was
to
look
at
starting,
where
the
state's
requiring
it
and
then
building
off
of
it
there.
V
Yeah
and
I
think
what
we
put
in
the
packet
is
where
we
are
today
and,
and
we
neglected
to
put
where
we
think
we're
totally
going
to,
and
so
the
the
main
changes
is
I.
Think,
as
Josh
mentioned,
we
currently
Define
small
Lots
as
25
and
under
and
the
state's
going
to
Define
it
as
10
and
under
which,
and
then
I
think.
V
The
other
thing
we've
talked
about
is
I'm,
studying
a
different
definition
around
multi-family
of
10
and
under
recognizing
that
the
needs
are
there,
that's
some
of
the
feedback
we've
heard
and
then
I
think
we
anticipate
based
on
feedback
we're
Gathering
through
through
planning
board
EAB,
and
this
conversation
then
continuing
to
up
whether
it's
some
of
the
you
know
just
conduit,
install
and
other
things.
So
what
you
saw
in
the
packet
is
kind
of
the
starting
place.
It's
not
intended
to
be
the
ending
place.
B
Great
thanks
for
clarifying
yeah
I,
just
while
we're
on
the
topic
I'll
just
say
it
sounds
like
going
more
in
that
direction.
Stable
was
the
right
approach
that
would
be
increasing
the
EV
requirements
for
those
developments
between
10
and
25
units
or
spaces
20
post
spaces.
That
sounds
like
a
great
idea,
so
I'm
glad
you're
you're
moving
more
in
that
direction.
That's
my
only
question
thanks.
J
I
appreciate
that
Mark
and-
and
thank
you
guys
for
really
detailed
work-
I
mean
this
is
this
is
good
stuff
in
a
lot
of
ways,
so
I'm
glad
we're
embarking
on
that.
I
was
just
gonna,
maybe
piggyback
a
little
bit
on
what
Aaron
was
saying
about
EV
stuff
and
the
fact
that,
even
though
the
state's
sort
of
targeting
15
that's
based
on
really
a
state
average
and-
and
we
know
pretty
clear
that
Boulder
far
exceeds
that
state
average.
J
J
AA
I
I
think
that's
the
intent
yeah.
Is
that
we're
really
going
to
look
at
pushing
the
envelope
on
it
and
also
we're
trying
to
be
thoughtful
on
it
to
make
sure
that
you
know
it's
in
certain
in
certain
building
types
and
that
you
know,
maybe,
if
it's
a
retail
space
with
one
spot
out
front,
they
may
not
have
to
have
it
because
we
don't
want
someone.
You
know,
clogging
up
that
one
spot
for
the
whole
day
charging
their
car.
AA
But
you
know
with
multi-family
I,
think
there's
a
huge
need
for
it
and
I
think
really
that
we
can
really
make
strides
in
different
areas
and
really
live
up
to
kind
of
the
intent
and
the
vision
of
what
Boulder
wants
by
also
appeasing
what
the
state
does.
Blowing
well
I
want
to
say
blowing
it
out
of
the
water.
But
that's
where
my
background
so
I
apologize.
J
Let's
do
that
I
know.
I,
know
that
that's
where
Jonathan
likes
to
live
he
likes
to
at
the
bar
High
live
dangerously.
That's.
V
Right
and
that
having
had
the
privilege
of
actually
being
on
the
state
energy
cohort,
I
I
can
attest
to
that
really
was
a
consideration
right.
That
state
minimum
like
has
to
consider
rural
areas
and
and
other
areas
and
and
so
we're
very
familiar
with
how
those
got
set
and
we're,
and
we
definitely
those
are
the
Baseline
but
there's
some
great
starting
points
for
us
as
well.
J
Fantastic,
my
other
question
center,
around
kind
of
just
you
know,
incentives
on
how
we
get
people
to
these
targets
and
maybe
not
get
them
there,
but
also,
like
we
just
say
blow
them
out
of
the
water.
How
do
we
get
when
you're
thinking
about
developments?
J
How
do
we
get
people
to
exceed
them
and
so
I'm
kind
of
curious
about
like
or
have
we
thought
about
tiers
of
these
codes,
so
that
there's
you
know
if
you
hit
the
the
gold
tier
there's
these
sorts
of
benefits
that
come
from
it,
whether
it
be
Community
benefits
or
or
trade-offs,
or
if
it's,
the
silver
tier?
We
thought
about
doing
that
so
that
again,
as
people
are
looking
to
build
multi-family
housing
or
anything,
they
have
a
clear
sense
of
all
right.
J
I'm
gonna
do
the
Baseline,
but
if
I
really
want
to
go
there,
I
can
kind
of
quickly
do
my
evaluative
opportunity
cost
of
what
does
that
really
then
equate
and
get
me?
Is
it
you
know
not
having
to
do
site
review?
Is
it
you
know?
Is
it
just
all
of
those
little
things
that
we've
discussed
I'm
just
wondering
how
we
can
leverage
the
energy
code
to
drive
some
of
those
incentives
to
the
things
that
we
know
we
want
in
our
community
and
not
now,
but
but
20
years
down
the
road.
AA
Sure,
no
definitely
and
not
so
much
on
the
terms
of
the
EV
side
of
it,
but
we
were
talking
about
it
a
little
bit
earlier
and
as
as
council
member
folkerts
mentioned
earlier,
you
know
with
with
regards
to
like
exterior
insulation
right.
What
we
can
try
to
do
is
look
to
incentivize,
maybe
someone
that
well
instead
of
using
exterior
insulation,
that's
this
poly
ISO
board
that
always
ends
up
in
the
landfill.
AA
Why
not
use
maybe
roxol
or
something
that's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
less
embodied
carbon,
more
forgiving
on
the
environment,
but
there
is
going
to
be
an
increased
cost
for
that,
and
so
our
turn
would
be
well
we'll
give
you
a
five
percent
allowance
on,
like
our
your
target
that
you're
trying
to
hit
but
try
to
try
to
lead
with
a
carrot
and
kind
of
get
them
to
really
do
the
right
thing.
But
you
know
on
their
own
accord,
because
a
lot
of
the
times
we've
talked
about
it.
AA
It's
like
when
you
try
to
push
and
push
things
upon
people
you're
going
to
get
higher
resistance,
and
so,
when
you
have
options
that
are
available
too
on
the
table,
they
they
feel
like
they
have
more
of
a
selection
on
the
path
they
can
go
and
they're
more
apt
to
do
the
right
thing,
I
think
too,
but
but
I
think
that's
really
something
we're
looking
at
is.
As
I
mentioned.
AA
On
the
single
family
side,
there
are
incentives
that
are
available
and
then
I
know
that
there
was
some
discussion
on
the
possibility
of
you
know
larger
homes.
You
know,
look
at
maybe
having
them
subsidized
for
the
smaller
homes
to
make
sure
that
everyone
has
access
to
Energy
Efficiency.
You
know,
and
they
have
the
money
that's
available.
Let's
put
it
to
use
and
put
it
to
use
in
a
good
way
so
and.
J
I
I
appreciate
that,
but
maybe
my
question
was
really
bigger
than
just
staying
within
the
energy
framework.
In
terms
of
like,
like
you
know,
if
you
go
above
and
beyond,
maybe
you
get,
we
give
you
eye
bearings
right,
I
mean
I
mean
I,
like
really.
You
know
and
I
see
Brad
certain
who
wins
a
little
at
that
one.
J
J
That,
then,
are
that
are
tied
to
are
we
doing
gas
or
electric
appliances,
like
so
I'm,
just
thinking
like
think
bigger
in
terms
of
how
we
can
leverage
those
things
without
being
and
just
thinking
bigger
in
those
sorts
of
incentives
and
trade-offs
might
be
a
way
for
us
to
leverage
more
of
what
we
want
to
get
in
our
community.
So.
V
Yeah,
maybe
I'll
take
this
swag
it
that
one.
So
just
just
a
reminder
we
did,
or
was
it
earlier
this
year
well
or
late
last
year
earlier
this
year
we
did
bring
the
community
benefits
project
forward
and
we
do
have
an
energy
related
criteria
within
that
right.
Now,
it's
it's
a
percent
Improvement
in
eui.
V
You
know,
certainly,
as
we
learned
from
that
I
think
there's
opportunity
to
allow
for
other
above
and
beyond,
I.
Think,
all
the
other.
Above
and
Beyonds,
we
heard
from
Council
that
you
want
to
be
the
base
code,
and
so
those
are
the
things
that
are
showing
up
here,
but
definitely
something
we
can
can
learn
from
through
this
process
and
maybe
bring
back
with
a
some
other
strategies,
but
do
know
that,
like
there
is
an
above
and
beyond
energy
related
component
in
the
current
Community
benefits,
site,
site,
review
criteria,
update.
R
Processary,
thank
you
and
just
to
clarify
if
I
can
piggyback
councilman,
no
wincing
for
sure
actually
more
recognizing.
As
this
conversation
and
conversations
leading
up
to
this
evening's
study
session
really
reinforces
I
think
the
interconnectivity
as
we
get
into
a
you,
know
a
broader
and
more
aggressive
Vision,
even
than
historically
how
that
really
does
imply
the
interconnectivity
of
all
these
different
codes
and
all
the
different
tools
that
we
need
to
exercise.
R
And
so
you
know,
as
a
relatively
newcomer
to
all
this
I
really
appreciated
our
opportunity
to
have
a
partnership
with
climate
initiatives
and
Jonathan
and
I
not
not
to
get
off
in
a
tangent
too
much.
But
Jonathan
and
I
have
talked
in
the
last
six
months
about
ways
to
strengthen
that
and
operationalize
that
even
more
than
that.
So
if
that
looked
like
Wednesday
I
apologize,
no
I.
J
Was
only
just
putting
you
on
the
spot
a
little
bit
Brad,
but
but
thank
you
for
that
song.
Those
are
my
questions.
I
appreciate
it.
F
Okay,
seeing
none
others
I
will
have
a
couple.
You
know
to
some
extent,
there's
an
inherent
tension
between
the
affordability
of
Housing
and
the
Technologies.
You
want
us
to
adapt
for
greater
Energy,
Efficiency
and
conservation.
Are
you?
Are
you
being
mindful
of
those
costs
not
so
much
with
respect
to
large
100
unit
developments
but
I'm?
Thinking
of
the
you
know,
1400
square
foot
home
somewhere
in
Martin
acres?
F
To
what
extent
are
you
impacting
the
price
of
being
able
to
renovate
that
home
with
some
of
these
new
requirements?
F
I
would
I
would
assume.
There's
some
impact
here.
I
know
you
say
that
there
are
incentives
that
are
available.
That's
what
you
said
in
the
slide,
but
is
it
to
what
extent
are
we
actually
imposing
additional
expense
for
those
well,
the
homes
that
are
likely
to
be,
at
least
in
their
present
condition,
the
most
affordable
in
the
community.
AA
So,
thank
you
very
much
for
that
question,
and
that
is
something
I
want
to
say
that
that
hits
a
little
close
to
home.
To
me
too,
because
I
I'm,
I
live
in
Firestone,
I
can't
afford
to
live
in
Boulder
and
so
the
equity
piece
and
making
sure
that
it's
available
to
everyone
and
really
analyzing
the
technology.
AA
That's
out
there
and
making
sure
that
it's
available
and
wanting
to
be
aware
of
the
cost
impacts
as
well
is
really
something
that
we
want
to
dig
into
and
understand
because
you
know
like
I
mentioned,
there
are
incentives
that
are
available,
but
you
know.
The
other
thing
too,
is
that
the
Zero
Energy
ready
home
is
going
to
be
a
lot
cheaper
from
the
reports
I've
seen
to
do
versus
a
zero
energy
home
and
the
main
point.
AA
Really
there
is
it's:
it's
the
Zero,
Energy
home
or
zero
energy
ready
home
really
is
a
starting
point
to
get
you
to
zero
energy,
and
so
with
our
consultant.
Naresco
I
know
that
they've
done
a
ton
of
work
on
Research
across
the
country
in
these.
In
this
the
Spectrum
as
well,
and
so
as
of
right
now,
I.
AA
F
Thank
you,
I
hope,
you'll
be
mindful
of
that.
My
my
second
question
is
as
follows:
I
was
emailing
with
the
council
member
Focus
this
morning
or
earlier
today,
and
it
turns
out.
We
both
have
some
interest
in
the
technology
of
cross-laminated
Timber.
Have
you
considered
that
as
a
technology
that
we
ought
to
be
encouraging
in
the
city
of
Boulder
and
it
comes
out
of
I,
believe
Scandinavia?
F
It's
been
used
in
buildings
up
to
10
or
12
stories,
so
it's
clearly
applicable
to
the
height
of
our
buildings
here,
and
it
has
been
advertised
as
containing
much
much
less
embedded
carbon
than
buildings
constructed
with
steel
and
concrete.
Is
that
any
component
of
what
you're
looking
at
I.
AA
I
think
that
that
would
be
something
that
we
would
never
turn
away.
If
someone
brought
that
to
our
attention
and
wanted
to
use
that
as
an
item
I,
don't
I,
don't
foresee
that
as
being
a
roadblock,
it
would
just
be
a
different,
a
different
approach
to
what
we
normally
see
for
building
right,
and
so
the
other
thing
too,
to
really
look
at
those.
AA
As
we
kind
of
delve
down
the
Avenue
of
embodied
carbon
is
that
is
you
know,
that's
one
of
the
pieces
that
we
really
kind
of
have
to
analyze
on
more
of
the
single
family
side
is
availability.
You
know
we,
we
love
to
have
some
of
these
Big
Timber
projects
and
these
cross-laminated
Timbers
that
are
readily
available
if
you're
Trucking
it
in
you
know,
you've
got
to
kind
of
look
at
the
analysis
of
you
know
with
the
embodied
carbon
aspect
and
bringing
it
in.
AA
You
know:
what's
the
impact
there,
and
luckily
it
does
have
a
lower
embodied
carbon
because
of
it
being
a
wood
product,
but
I
I
believe
that
you
know
from
our
perspective
I,
don't
think
we
would
turn
down.
AA
I
think
Rob
and
I
actually
were
talking
about
some
of
the
Timber
buildings
that
are
going
up
around
the
country
and
how
it
would
be
neat
to
see
that
here
in
Boulder,
and
so
I
think
that
this
would
be
something
that
I
think
that
if
this
was
brought
to
our
attention,
I
think
that
we
would
try
to
do
what
we
could
to
Foster
it
through
to
make
sure
that
it
it
would
be
an
option
to
build
that.
You
know
with
those
materials
we
would
never.
We
would
never
stop
someone
and
say
no.
F
I
guess
my
question
is:
would
you
go
further
and
try
to
incentivize
people
to
do
that?
I.
AA
Think
that's
I
think
that
kind
of
leads
back
to
what
we
were
talking
about
with
looking
at
you
know,
incentivizing
to
move
away
from
like
insulation
and
that
and
so
I
think
that
that's
something
we
could
definitely
consider
honestly
so
that
thank
you
for
that
feedback.
That's
that's!.
D
AA
F
D
Like
Mark
was
saying:
there's
not
only
does
that
reduce
carbon
emissions,
but
the
wood
actually
sequesters
carbon
right,
so
you
could,
with
a
switching
from
a
steel
or
concrete
building
to
a
heavy
Timber
build.
You
know
assuming
you're
looking
at
sustainably
forested
woods
and
all
of
that
it
might
actually
have
such
a
significant
offset
in
the
amount
of
carbon
that
it's
storing,
that
you
could
be
actually
making
the
building
carbon
negative
and
even
carbon
negative
after
a
significant
amount
of
operational
energy
goes
into.
D
You
know:
heating
and
cooling
it
so
I
I
think
I
would
like
to
see
us
really
look
hard
at
how
the
energy
code
and
what
kinds
of
targets
for
embodied
carbon
we
might
look
at,
because,
just
again
the
potential
impact
is
so
big,
and
so
what
like?
Could
we
look
at
not
having
a
strictive
energy
requirements
on
a
building?
That's
doing
something
that
is
so
transformational
like
that.
U
Well,
you're
fine
I
was
just
gonna
say
we
are
starting
to
see
some
of
these
Mass
Timber
buildings
appearing
in
the
United
States
that
really
originated
in
Scandinavia
they're,
still
very
new,
so
there
isn't,
as
far
as
I'm
aware
and
the
IBC
really
a
prescriptive
Pathway
to
construct
them,
but
that
doesn't
stop
anyone
building
them.
This
alternative
means
and
methods
approvals.
They
would
have
to
be
engineered
structures,
but
most
large
commercial
buildings
are
engineered
anyway.
So
it's
certainly
a
possibility
to
build
one
in
Boulder,
I.
U
V
And
if
I
could
I
just
reflect
back
to
council
member
focus
and
council
member
Wildlife
I
think
one
of
the
things
I'm
hearing
I
want
to
just
make
sure
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
is
is.
Can
we
explore
strategies,
for
example,
alleviating
eui
requirements
or
and
also
ensuring
that
any
of
our
like
envelope
requirements
or
others
aren't
prohibitive
as
a
means
within
the
energy
code
to
encourage
people
to
bring
forward
lower
and
body
carbon
materials
and
yeah,
I
and
I?
Think
very
much?
V
That
is
something
that
we
is
on
our
plan,
and
this
is
good
feedback
to
know
that
that's
a
good
direction
for
us
to
head.
F
Yes,
I
would
urge
you
to
do
that.
I
think,
there's
a
really
promising
technology
there
and
and
if
it's
endorsed
by
council
member
Focus,
she
knows
and
I
was
a
mere
Builder,
but
she
knows
so.
I
would
urge
you
to
take
a
close
look
at
that
all
right.
Seeing
no
further
questions
are
there
any
other
comments.
F
B
Great
well
again,
a
big
Kudos
and
thank
you
to
all
the
hard
work.
That's
gone
into
this.
It's
incredibly
detailed
and
a
good,
really
good
steps
forward
that
we're
looking
at
taking
my
one
piece
of
feedback
that
I
want
to
give
well,
first
of
all,
I
really
like
where
Lauren
was
going
with
that
and
that
Marcus
well
that
to
consider
those
allowances
for
much
lower,
embodied
carbon
materials.
So
just
a
plus
one
on
the
investigation
of
those
ideas,
but
the
other
ones.
B
I
would
really
like
to
see
us
move
to
adopt
a
an
approach
similar
to
what
Cresta,
Butte
and
Denver
are
doing,
which
is
the
all-electric
requirements
for
new
construction.
I.
Think
we
we
only
revise
our
codes
every
few
years
and
I.
Think
now
is
a
good
time
to
be
bold,
with
the
of
course,
the
scope
of
the
climate
crisis-
that's
upon
us,
and
so
the
buildings,
of
course
that
we
build
now
will
be
with
us
for
decades.
So
it
seems
like
it's.
B
It's
a
good
time
to
start
making
those
requirements
to
be
all
electric,
so
I
know
there's
some
nuances
to
that
of
things.
Like
you
know,
potential
exemption
for
a
commercial
kitchen,
and
things
like
that,
but
I
also
know
other
people
in
other
jurisdictions
have
thought
these
through.
So
I
I
would
really
appreci.
If
you
could
bring
us
back
when
we
get
to
these
codes
an
option
or
or
simply
just
something
that
implements
an
all-electric
requirement
for
new
construction
with
reasonable
carve
outs.
B
So
I
wanted
to
get
that
out
on
the
table
and
safe
Council
might
agree
to
giving
that
feedback
in
general.
P
Thank
you,
mayor,
Pro,
tem,
Wallach,
I
just
wanted
to
Echo,
first
of
all,
gratitude.
Thank
you
for
all
this
work.
That's
gone
into
doing
this
and
I
really
like
Lauren's
ideas
about
thinking
about
other
ways.
We
can
encourage
people
to
reuse
buildings
through
things
like
zoning
changes,
so
would
love
to
see
that
as
well.
This
idea
about
thinking
about
now
how
we
can
be
building
in
a
way
that
anticipates
future
dismantling
or
reuse
or
recycling
I
think
that's.
That's
a
wonderful
thing
too,
as
well
as
this
idea
of
embodied
carbon
I.
P
P
It
is
the
type
of
leadership
that
I
would
expect
over
to
be
having
on
climate
related
issues,
and
one
of
the
other
things
that
I
really
like
about
it
is
that
it's
considering
the
impact
that
our
city
and
what's
happening
in
our
city
is
having
on
other
communities
versus
just
thinking
about
what
is
happening
here
so
to
the
degree
that
we
can
incorporate
things
that
will
store
carbon
in
the
buildings
that
will
offset
or
not
offset
but
reduce
the
carbon
that's
being
emitted
in
the
production
Transportation.
P
All
of
that
in
materials
too
I
think
that's,
that's
a
really
good
thing
and
I
think
I
agree
with
Aaron's
point
about
the
moving
toward
all
electric
appliances
and
things
and
buildings
and
I
would
also
be
interested
in
that
intersection
with
the
embodied
carbon
issue
as
well.
So
it'd
be
interesting
just
to
to
see
how
those
overlap.
F
D
Thanks
and
I
really
appreciate
all
the
thinking
that
you
guys
brought
to
this.
The
residential
sort
of
Net
Zero
Energy,
going
with
a
pathway,
that's
more
widely
accepted
and
has
opportunities
for
rebates.
I
think
is
a
great
idea
doing
the
the
solar
for
commercial
I
think
in
the
way
that
you're
thinking
about
it
and
the
potentially
greenhouse
gas
offset
requirements.
I
think
makes
a
lot
of
sense
with
the
electric
vehicle
charging,
especially
on
for
pre-wire
I.
From
what
I've
heard
it
seems
like.
D
We
want
to
shift
charging
towards
daytime
charging
just
in
terms
of
grid
capacity
and
storage,
and
things
like
that
for
efficiency
reasons
and
so
I
question
a
little
bit
having
diff
having
the
commercial
requirements,
be
so
much
lower
than
the
residential
on
the
pre-wire
side,
because
if
we're
going
to
try
and
get
people
to
charge
during
the
day,
I
think
we
need
to
be
ready
with
the
infrastructure
for
that
and
then
for
as
Aaron
and
Nicole
talked
about
with
the
natural
gas
following
Crested
Butte
in
Denver
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
great
direction
for
us
to
go
in
and
something
I'd
be
excited
to
see
and,
like
my
post
hotline
post
talked
about.
D
F
Okay,
thank
you
any
any
other
comments
for
our
presenters
tonight
once
twice
up
mayor
Brockett,.
B
Well,
mayor
Pro
tem,
if
you
might
indulge
me,
could
I
request
a
straw
poll
on
the
all-electric
requirement
to
to
see
if
that's
a
majority
interest
of
council.
F
E
Yeah
my
question
is
I.
Don't
remember
all
the
detail
of
that
legislation?
Is
this
something
that
we
can
do
requiring
100
percent,
because
I
know
there
is
a
minimum
requirement,
but
can
we
require
100?
Is
that
Within.
V
E
And
okay
I
my
next
question:
well,
you
know
what
I'll
reserve
the
question
I
think
I
want
to
make
the
comment
Aaron
as
the
mayor
I'll
defer
to
you
to
make
that
request
of
100,
but
I
think
that
that
should
should
be
vetted
through
with
maybe
with
the
chambers
or
other
group
in
the
community
as
well,
but
I
will
I
will
follow
your
lead
on
that
one.
Thank
you.
V
And
we'll
definitely
take
that
as
a
response
on
our
question
number
three
that
we
asked
around
engagement
because
I
think
that's
a
that's
a
really
important
point
on
that
topic.
B
And
if
I,
if
I
could
clarify,
if
you
don't
mind
Mark,
this
would
not
be
a
final
decision
right,
we're
not
we're
not
making
decisions
tonight,
it
would
be
basically
to
show
a
majority
will
in
Council
of
having
this
be
one
of
the
things
brought
to
us
for
final
consideration
and
final
adoption.
So
it
would
not.
This
would
not
be
making
a
final
decision.
Obviously,
the
feedback
from
the
community
and
stakeholders
and
Technical
input
would
be
important
as
we
move
towards
the
final
adoption
in
the
Q4.
F
I
see
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven
eight
I
am
a
partial.
Yes,
I
would
like
to
see
more
analysis
on
cost
and
impacts,
but
with
that
caveat,
I
would
be
nine
as
and
so
that's
a
very
clear
direction
that
we're
taking.
F
P
It's
okay,
I
was
just
I'm.
Sorry,
I
was
waiting
for
the
engagement
strategies
and
things
with
that
and
you
know
I
know
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
business
Community
kind
of
Builders
reaching
out
there.
P
I
don't
know
what
the
right
approach
is
for
this,
and
so
I
will
defer
to
our
amazing
engagement
staff,
but
thinking
about
folks
who
are
really
impacted
by
the
climate
crisis,
even
here
in
our
own
Community.
How
are
we
hearing
from
them,
because
I
also
want
to
hear
from
them
what
it
is
that
they're
thinking
about
about
these
strategies
that
we
are
taking
to
to
make
things
more
energy
efficient
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
kind
of
carbon?
That's
out
there
in
general.
P
I
would
really
love
to
hear
from
someone
from
the
people
in
our
community
who
are
on
kind
of
the
front
lines
of
the
climate
crisis
and
when
I
think
about
people
like
that,
I
think
about
the
people
who
are
living
in
really
older
housing
stock
that
maybe
don't
have
money
to
become
more
energy,
efficient,
I.
Think
about
folks
who
are
kind
of
in
in
places
where
you
know.
P
Maybe
they
don't
have
air
conditioning
or
some
other
source
of
keeping
their
their
space
cool
those
kinds
of
things
and
just
going
to
give
that
as
a
general
thought,
I
expect
that
the
engagement
folks
will
be
able
to
articulate
better
who
those
people
are
in
our
community.
But
people
on
the
front
lines
of
climate
issues
in
our
city.
A
D
Wanted
to
follow
up
on
what
Nicole
said,
because
I
think
that
you
know
not
only
does
that
Community
either
bear
the
brunt
of
climate
change,
but
also
that
those
houses
are
less
likely
to
see
the
impact
of
our
energy
Co.
You
know
if
they're
not
being
remodeled
or
newly
built
they're,
probably
built
to
the
oldest
energy
code,
and
there
is
the
most
potential.
D
If
we
can,
you
know
find
a
way
to
make
it
make
sense
to
do
these
upgrades
that
there
would
be
big
savings
and
operational
energy,
so
understanding
sort
of
what
triggers
and
how
we
can
help
support
the
changes
in
that
in
that
area.
I
think
is
really
important.
O
We're
we're
paying
you
home,
I'll,
show
I'll
shut
my
light
and
begin
darkness
and
that'll
make
everybody
want
to
end
quicker.
No
just
kidding
I
would
say
that
right
now,
I'm
thinking
about
Empower
our
future.
All
those
folks
must
be
so
excited
from
this
conversation
waiting
for
this
moment
and,
of
course,
I,
think
Stuart.
O
If
you're
listening
and
out
there,
people
who
brought
me
to
their
homes
when
I
was
running
for
election
and
showed
me
their
totally
electric
home,
so
I'm,
hoping
that
the
engagement
we
do
is
huge,
all
the
people
that
have
been
waiting
for
this
moment
and
have
input,
that's
how
I
feel
about
it.
Thanks.
A
AA
Sir
I
just
wanted
to
add
one
quick
thing
that
I
thought
was
pretty
interesting
in
regards
to
the
embodied
carbon
aspect
and
our
our
actual,
where
our
consultant
actually
brought
this
to
my
attention
today,
but
I
believe
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
Sally.
But
there
are
two
municipalities
in
the
country
that
currently
have
embodied
carbon
written
into
their
codes,
one
of
them's
in
California
and
the
other
one
I
believe
is
Denver's
green
code.
And
so
this
is
something
that,
if
we
look
at
doing
it
would
be
something
to
pave.
AA
But
this
is
It's
a
newer
technology
and
I
think
that,
with
a
lot
of
that's
going
on
in
the
development
in
the
building
industry
in
general,
with
these
ESG
or
environmental,
social
and
governance
requirements
for
these
larger
projects,
I
think
that
by
us
looking
at
embodied
carbon
and
and
these
other
aspects
with
Energy
Efficiency
I
really
think
it's
going
to
help
help
these
these
other
entities
really
meet
their
goals
and
their
requirements,
because
I've
seen
a
lot
a
lot
newer
ones
from
coming
from
outside
of
the
state.
AA
The
SEC
has
certain
strict
requirements
on
developers
that
they
have
to
show
greens,
you
know
Green
programs
and
what
they're
doing
on
their
end
and
so
I
think
by
us
leading
the
charge
here
in
Boulder.
It's
going
to
help
them
and
there
will
be
some
pain
at
the
beginning
because
there
always
is
but
I
think
over
the
time.
They'll
learn
to
appreciate
really
kind
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
and
really
trying
to
move
the
needle
so,
and
thank
you
very
much
for
that
time.
Good.
F
Q
I
I
was
just
going
to
say
mayor
Pro
10,
that
I
really
think
you
and
Council
for
this
conversation
I
believe
staff
has
what
they
need,
but
what
I
really
wanted
to
lift
up
was
I
hope.
You
see
in
staff
the
passion
for
some
of
the
work
that
you're
talking
about
already
it's
a
matter
sometimes
of
timing
and
doing
them
as
we're
continuing
to
learn
about
more
strategies.
But
the
invitation
to
continue
to
talk
to
us
about
what
you're
hearing
that's
new
out
in
community
or
out
in
the
world
is
really
great.
Q
This
team
I
know
is
so
singularly
focused
on
moving
things
that
really
mitigate
and
are
thoughtful
about
our
sort
of
war,
with
climate
change
as
we're
moving
forward
in
in
many
different
ways,
and
it's
a
it's
an
amazing
team
that
is
really
at
the
I
think
at
The
Cutting
Edge
of
a
lot
of
the
work
that
is
happening
nationally
and
know
that
they
want
to
receive
that
as
we
move
forward
and
the
other
thing
on
note
and
I
appreciate
the
thoughts
about
those
that
are
most
burden
by
climate
change,
as
we
also
think
about
costs
that
could
be
incurred.
Q
That
know
that
this
team
thinks
about
that
and
that
as
we're
thinking
about
it,
we're
really
making
sure
that
we're
doing
no
harm
as
we
move
forward
and
yet
advancing
the
initiatives
that
we
need
to
be
that
we
know
to
be
true
to
really
addressing
the
climate
crisis
of
the
moment,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to.
Thank
you
for
this
thoughtful
conversation
and
lift
up
how
your
passion
really
does
match
the
passion
of
Staff.
Who
is
trying
to
advance
this
work
forward
as
well.
F
It
has
indeed
been
a
very
substantive
and
interesting
conversation.
I,
look
forward
to
your
further
work
on
it
and,
as
I
will
no
longer
be
recognizing
raised
hands
and,
as
we
have
completed
our
agenda
for
this
evening,
I'm
going
to
call
this
meeting
adjourned
at
the
time
of
9
43.
have
a
good
recess,
all
don't
get
into
too
much
trouble
and
we'll
see
you
all
again
in
July.