►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Study Session 4-12-22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
As
we're
waiting
for
a
confirmation
friendly
reminder,
we
have
interpretation
this
evening
for
our
first
piece
and
mr
mayor,
I'm
happy
to
bring
up
interpretation
slides
when
we
get
there.
C
D
I
I
mean
it.
I
have
to
switch
to
spanish,
which
I
haven't
right
now,
which
is
why
we
can
talk.
But
when
I
hit
the
record
button,
it
only
gives
me
the
pause
or
the
stop
recording
button,
not
the
record
locally.
D
Sure
let
me
stop
recording
on
this
end
and
then
hop
in
the
spanish
channel.
Please
begin
that
local
recording
and
then
I'll
record
to
the
cloud,
and
hopefully
that
should
clear
it
up.
Okay,.
D
D
Thank
you
all
so
much
and
councilmember
friend,
as
you're,
ready
to
begin
the
meeting
I'll
bring
up
those
interpretation
slides.
C
D
Your
proton
friend
happy
to
do
that
emily.
Please
pull
up
those
slides
and
we'll
go
over
here.
So
a
reminder
to
everyone
that
this
meeting
is
interpreted
tonight.
You're
available
to
participate
in
english
or
in
spanish,
every
participant
will
need
to
choose
their
interpretation
language
using
the
icon
below
looks
like
a
little
globe,
a
friendly
reminder
to
click
mute
when
not
speaking,
to
limit
background
noise
next
slide.
Please.
D
And
a
few
reminders,
please
keep
in
mind
to
speak
slowly,
clearly
pronouncing
each
word
and
taking
a
breath
between
sentences.
D
Please
don't
interrupt
one
another
or
or
a
speaker
if
you
own
a
headset
with
a
microphone,
it's
helpful
to
to
use
it
and
selecting
one
language
channel
for
the
session
is,
is
most
helpful
for
our
interpreters
and
encourage
us
to
avoid
using
any
idioms.
That
may
be
very
difficult
to
interpret
all
right.
Thank
you
so
much.
We
can
pull
those
down.
C
Thank
you,
ryan.
I
am
a
notoriously
fast
talker,
so
please,
you
know
give
me
any
hand
signal
if
you
feel
that
I'm
going
too
fast.
So
tonight
we
will
be
discussing
three
items.
First
is
racial
equity
plan
one
year
progress
update
second
east
boulder,
sub-community
plan,
90,
finish
update
and
then
third,
we
will
be
adding
an
item
on
the
library
district
process
update
and
first
we
have
three
announcements
and
I
believe
we
have
slides
for
those
thanks.
C
C
Covid
vaccine
next
slide
second
announcement.
C
We
are
still
doing
recruitment
for
boards
and
commissions
for
the
following
boards,
because
we
have
still
openings
due
to
low
number
of
applications
and
the
boards
eligible
are
beverage
licensing
authority,
boulder
junction
access
district
for
both
parking
and
travel
demand
management,
board
of
zoning
adjustment,
cannabis
licensing,
board,
design,
advisory
board,
downtown
management,
commission
library,
commission
and
university
hill,
commercial
area
management
commission,
and
for
the
next
slide,
I
believe.
C
C
K
Thank
you
so
much
mayor
pro
tem
and
no
slide
today,
but
really
a
reminder
and
an
exciting.
It's
not
really
an
announcement,
because
we've
said
this
a
little
bit,
but
we
are
coming
back
to
in-person
meetings
and
we
are
excited.
I
want
to
remind
the
public
that
we
have.
We
will
be
coming
to
in-person
meetings
starting
april
19th.
K
K
C
Thanks
nuria,
I'm
very
excited
to
be
going
back
next
week,
myself,
okay
and
now
we
will
kick
off
the
proper
study
session
content
here.
So
first
up,
I
think
I
will
turn
it
back
over
to
nuria
and
staff
to
dig
into
the
racial
equity
plan.
One
year
progress
update.
K
Thanks
so
much
mayor
pro
tem
and
frankly,
we
have
so
much
information.
I
will
not
do
any
framing
and
send
it
right
to
amy
kane
for
the
phenomenal
work
that
staff
has
been
doing
on
the
racial
equity
plan
so
far
so
amy,
it
is
yours.
A
A
My
name
is
amy
kane
and
my
pronouns.
Are
she
her
and
hers?
I
identify
as
a
white,
middle-aged
female
and
am
currently
able-bodied
I'm
joined
tonight
by
my
colleagues,
taylor,
ana
sylvia
and
ryan,
who
will
also
introduce
themselves
when
they
get
to
each
section
of
the
presentation
this
evening,
and
so
I
intentionally
asked
my
colleagues
to
support
tonight's
presentation
because
it's
a
representation
of
how
this
work
is
the
responsibility
of
all
of
us,
not
just
a
few
of
us
and
so
the
work
to
date.
A
A
So
next
slide
please,
as
we
mentioned,
we
do
have
interpreters
this
evening,
so
we
are
intentionally
going
slowly.
However,
we
do
know
that
you
have
a
packed
agenda
and
so
we're
just
lifting
up
a
few
of
our
goals
and
some
project
examples
that
have
supported
those
goals
and
tonight
we're
also
going
to
talk
about
at
high
level
a
couple
of
the
priorities
that
we
have
in
2022
and
then
time
for
a
discussion
for
all
of
us
and
with
that
being
said,
I
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
pass
it
to
nope.
A
I'm
still
doing
this
one.
So
if
I
could
go
ahead
and
have
the
next
slide
please,
so
we
can
dye
them
now.
I
will
pass
it
over
to
my
colleague,
ana
sylvia
and,
like
I
mentioned
before,
we
are
just
going
to
go
over
a
few
samples
of
this
of
support
for
the
goals
that
we've
outlined
in
the
racial
equity
plan.
The
memo
has
a
much
more
robust
and
extensive
list
of
the
actions
to
date.
So,
anna
silvia,
do
you
want
to
take
it
away?
Yeah.
B
B
B
This
goal
is
really
to
operationalize
and
normalize
understanding
of
how
institutional
and
structural
racism
exists
within
our
community
and
within
our
government
body,
as
well
as
it
really
the
trainings
that
we
carry
out,
offer
really
practical
tools
for
city
employees,
supervisors
and
even
boards
and
commissions
and
volunteers
who
serve
for
the
city
of
boulder.
Currently
we
have
three
trainings
three
comprehensive
trainings
offered
at
the
city.
All
of
these
trainings
are
facilitated
by
staff
members
who
have
really
made
additional
commitments
to
do
this
work
and
just
a
big
shout
out.
B
The
following
numbers
are
just
some
highlights
of
what
we've
done
in
this
goal
area:
the
first
training
that
will
highlight
the
advancing
racial
equity,
the
role
of
government.
This
training
specifically
offers
an
overview
history
of
racism
and
the
government's
role
and
the
responsibility
that
it
has
in
order
to
dismantle
this.
B
All
current
new
incoming
employees.
Supervisors,
including
council,
is
a
mandatory
training
and
an
example
of
leadership
of
all
of
council
has
actually
taken
this
training.
The
following
training
that
we
have
is
bias
and
microaggression
training.
This
takes
us
to
a
deeper
level
of
understanding
of
how
our
own,
biases
and
microaggressions
can
show
up
in
the
workplace
and
around
our
community,
and
so
this
offers
some
tangible
tools
to
really
interrupt
those
dynamics,
and
currently
that
is
a
mandatory
training
for
all
employees,
including
leadership
and
council,
and
soon
in
202.
B
B
We
have
about
16
and
we're
actually
seeing
more
colleagues
of
color
committing
to
bringing
their
own
experiences
to
support
and
grow
this
work
that
can
sometimes
be
painful
and
challenging,
and
at
times
it
could
be
really
overwhelming,
but
they
are
there
to
share
their
own
experiences
and
support
and
grow
this
work,
and
I
want
to
personally
thank
these
colleagues
who
bring
so
much
value
and
essence
to
these
trainings
we're
also
seeing
actually
our
colleagues
having
such
a
stronger
foundation
as
they're
coming
on
board
as
facilitators,
and
so
I
believe
this
is
such
a
strong
reflection
of
the
hard
and
hard
work
that
our
colleagues
in
the
first
cohort
have
really
done
to
set
up
a
foundation
for
the
rest
of
our
facilitators
who
are
coming
on
board
and
it
really
offers
sustainability.
B
One
of
the
models
that
we
use
for
this
training
is
a
model
that
we
call
a
train
the
trainer
model,
in
which
our
first
cohort
is
actually
being
served
or
they're,
serving
the
new
coming
cohort
as
mentors
to
be
able
to
really
get
them
along
into
their
journey,
and
then
the
racial
equity
instrument
tool
is
a
tool
to
help
us
dig
deeper
at
root
causes
of
why
inequities
exist
through
a
strategic
and
intentional
framework.
B
This
is
available
to
all
employees
is
not
mandatory,
but
we
are
seeing
more
colleagues
interested
in
actually
taking
this
training
and
really
expand
their
knowledge
with
very
tangible
tools
in
order
to
drive
change
the
numbers
that
you
see
here
they
are
a
reflection
of
colleagues
trained
through
2021..
B
This
is
honestly
quite
exciting
because,
as
facilitators,
we
are
often
examining
the
content
and
making
sure
that
we
not
only
remain
relevant,
but
that
we
remain
supportive
of
everyone,
and
this
is
is
a
reflection
of
the
growth.
That's
happening
within
the
trainings.
Their
input
is
super
valuable
and
is
necessary
for
us
to
really
continue
moving
forward.
A
I
think
I
have
this
one,
but
thank
you
anna
sylvia,
so
goal
number
two
is
justly
do
it
and
the
the
item
I
want
to
lift
up.
That's
in
support
of
this
goal
is
about
our
new
justice,
equity
diversity
and
inclusion
team
toolkit
that
we've
developed
for
departments
so
early
in
2020,
a
project
team
started
to
assemble
a
team
to
put
this
toolkit
for
departments
so
that
we
could
put
systems
in
place
at
the
departmental
level,
not
just
at
the
entire
organizational
level
that
really
helps.
A
Colleagues
lift
up
this
work
within
their
own
department.
A
The
pandemic
did
slow
us
down
a
bit,
but
I
am
thrilled
to
announce
that
in
march
we
released
the
jedi
team's
tool
kit
and
that
is
attached
to
the
memo.
If
you
had
a
chance
to
look
at
that,
the
racial
equity
plan
calls
for,
within
the
logic
model,
for
all
departments
to
establish
their
own
departmental
jedi
teams.
A
A
Definitely
like
that's
in
specific
alignment
with
the
service,
the
business
service
that
each
department
provides
and
then
also
helps
departments
in
the
development
of
their
own
departmental
equity
plans.
So
it's
really
a
guide
for
departmental
leaders
and
for
team
members
to
develop
and
involve
their
jedi
team
in
coordination
with
the
larger
organizational
efforts
by
the
end
of
2020,
it
is
anticipated
that
18,
more
departments
will
have
launched
or
started
to
launch
their
departmental
jedi
teams
with
part
of
that
work.
A
When
they're
doing
that
analysis,
we'll
talk
about
it
a
little
bit
more
about
how
that
ties
into
the
racial
equity
instrument
that
ana
sylvia
was
just
referring
to.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
pass
it
on
back
to
ryan
we're
going
to
go
a
little
bit
out
of
order
with
our
goals,
but
if
you
could
advance
to
the
next
slide,
I'm
going
to
ask
ryan
to
take
it
from
here.
D
Thank
you
thank
you,
amy
and
thank
you
council
for
making
the
time
this
evening
for
this
update.
My
name
is
ryan
hanson
city's
community
engagement
manager.
I
identify
as
a
white
cisgender
male
currently
able-bodied
and
within
the
city's
racial
equity
plan.
D
I'm
also
excited
because
we'll
have
more
focus
on
east
boulder
sub-community
plan.
Later
in
this
evening-
and
here
we'll
just
take
a
deep
dive
into
the
work
of
commute,
connectors
and
less
on
the
plan
itself.
D
Right
as,
as
you
know,
this
is
a
long
range
planning
project
is
really
shaping
the
the
future
of
east
boulder
and
the
initial
applications
of
the
working
group
to
support
this
work
yielded
no
zero
residents
of
east
boulder
sub-community
area,
and
it's
not
that
surprising
right.
This
is
a
very
industrial
and
commercial
area
with
one
residential
neighborhood
san
lazaro,
a
mobile
home
park
with
213
homes.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
a
resident
of
san
lazaro
was
participating
to
elevate
the
voices
of
those
community
members.
D
We
entered
into
agreement
with
asante
amistad
and
two
promotors
anna
natti
served
as
community
connectors
in
our
first
long-term
pilot
of
this
community
connector
model,
and
a
note
that
the
zan
lazaro
community
is
within
the
areas
of
the
within
the
boundaries
of
the
planning
area,
but
is
across
the
street
from
the
city,
is
outside
city
limits
and
is
not
served
by
city
or
water
and
has
led
to
confusion
of
community
members
of
you
know
what
are
what
city
services
they
are
able
to
access
or
are
not,
and
these
community
connectors
were
specifically
active
participants
in
the
working
group
and
assisted
with
engagement,
design
and
implementation,
so
materials
activities
were
relevant
for
their
neighborhood
and
that
the
perspective
of
underrepresented
community
members
were
elevated
to
working
group
staff,
planning,
board
and
city
council,
and
they
received
a
stipend
for
their
time,
expertise
and
co-designing.
D
A
few
things
to
mention
here
about
language
barriers.
Let's
use
a
monolingual
spanish
speaker
and
we're
able
to
provide
interpretation
and
translation
of
materials
throughout
this
multi-year
process
and
I'll
note.
This
is
really
a
structural
change
to
you
know
both
dedicate
the
funding
needed
to
cover
interpretation
and
translation.
D
You
know
another
key
challenge
was
complexity
of
information
within
this
plan
with
some
working
group
members
serving
decades
and
familiarizing
herself
with
local
government
and
others
brand
new
to
the
process.
Critical
staff
support
was
really
necessary
early
on
and
throughout
the
process
specifically
meeting
for
homework
sessions
with
our
community
connectors
to
share
context
and
to
make
sure
they
were
able
to
better
anticipate
what
would
be
important
for
them
to
share
with
the
full
group.
D
D
You
know
the
the
team
found
that
english-speaking
working
group
members
could
really
quickly
share
an
online
survey
with
an
hoa
next
door
with
a
lister,
and
that
really
did
not
work
well
for
our
san
lazaro
and
spanish
speaking,
community
and
lettian
anna
worked
tirelessly
to
provide
a
lot
more
context
to
work
directly
with
community
members
and
share
more
information
about
how
the
decisions
in
this
plan
would
affect
them.
D
We
had
several
in-person
sessions,
paper
copies
were
brought,
and
I
think
this
really
led
to
another
structural
shift
later
in
the
process
to
really
focus
on
designing
engagement
sessions
for
spanish
speaking
community
first
and
then
adapting
that
approach
for
english
speaking
sessions.
D
This
process
was
really
valuing
lived
experience
and,
while
this
comprehend,
you
know
those
those
far
out
issues
and
when
those
recommendations
may
come
into
place,
it's
also
focusing
on
the
lived
experience
today
and
ann
and
leti
were
really
clear
and
sharing
how
difficult
that
was
and
getting
people
more
used
to
being
asked
what
they
think
and
that
there
were
many
barriers
to
community
engagement
that
were
in
place
and
a
lot
of
trust,
clear
and
others
in
the
community
about
our
lack
potable
water
and
drinking
water,
cooking,
water
and
being
very
inconsistent
in
in
their
community,
and
I
want
to
specifically
highlight
their
recommendations
in
the
plan
that
would
not
have
been
included
without
participation
of
ivana
latin
really
being
clear
about
some
cultural
and
spanish
language
programming,
belmont
city
park,
really
with
an
emphasis
on
youth
and
after
school
activities
and
another
quick
example
here
that
you
know.
D
Sometimes
the
long-term
plan
doesn't
give
a
lot
of
room
to
address
immediate
issues,
but
because
dedicated
staff
were
there
and
hearing
the
needs
and
had
built
that
trust
through
community
connectors
residents
were
able
to
share
a
lot
of
safety
concerns
and
walking
late
at
night,
and
our
terrific
staff
and
comprehensive
planning
were
able
to
write
a
grant
secure
external
funding
to
bring
solar
lighting
for
for
many
in
this
neighborhood,
and
you
know,
I
think
we
were
really
able
to
deep
more
deeply
understand
some
lazarus
community
issues
and
context
and
having
latino
participating
in
this
process
helped
us
to
continually
learn,
and
I
will
note
that,
after
the
success
of
new
connectors
within
the
east,
boulder
working
group,
we've
seen
adoptions
of
this
model
within
reimagining,
policing,
the
police
department,
master
plan,
boulder
parks
and
rec
master
plan
and
comprehensive
flood
and
stormwater
master
plan.
L
Awesome
thanks
so
much
ryan
good
evening
council
if
we
could
just
advance
the
next
slide.
Thank
you
so
much.
My
name
is
taylor.
Ryman
I
identify
as
a
white
non-binary
queer
person
with
deep
southwest
roots
and
I'm
going
to
tell
a
little
bit
about
goal,
3
and
goal
5.
again.
We
want
it
a
little
bit
out
of
order,
but
for
speaker
flow,
this
worked
out
so
goal.
Three
of
the
plan
was:
is
community
commitment
which
intends
to
strengthen
partnerships
and
collaborate
with
the
community
members
and
organizations
that
demonstrate
a
commitment
to
ending
racism.
L
The
dedication
was
also
done
in
collaboration
with
local
living
relatives
of
tate,
including
his
son
penfield,
tate
iii,
and
three
of
his
daughters,
paula,
gale
and
chicago
tate.
I
can't
speak
enough
about
their
enthusiasm
and
collaboration
in
this
work.
It
was
so
valuable
to
have
their
partnership
because
it
helped
us
steward
the
dedication
in
a
way
that
was
meaningful
and
brought
dignity
to
tate
the
second's
history
of
service.
L
During
the
event,
tate
iii,
his
son
remarked
he
had
a
love
affair
so
deep
and
long-lasting
with
this
city.
This
is
sort
of
the
ultimate
tribute
to
him.
So
this
example
ties
to
a
few
of
the
goal.
Three
strategies,
including
partner
with
the
community,
seek
opportunities
to
support
and
promote
the
value
of
diversity
and
recognize
the
history
of
institutional
racism
in
boulder
next
slide.
Please
goal
five
of
the
plan
is
representation
matters
which
aims
to
eliminate
barriers
and
create
opportunities
to
build
a
diverse
workforce
across
the
depth
and
breadth
of
local
government.
L
One
of
the
primary
strategies
outlined
in
the
plan
highlights
working
with
boards
commissions
and
working
groups,
so
in
the
last
year
we've
considered
evaluated
and
embarked
on
several
changes
to
boards
and
commissions
to
meet
this
goal,
one
of
which
council
recently
got
to
experience.
Those
changes
were
a
little
bit
more
on
the
administrative
side
working
on
the
appointment
process,
but
kind
of
taking
a
step.
D
L
Thanks
appreciate
that
feedback
selected
interpretation,
so,
as
I
was
saying,
the
the
appointment
process
was
one
of
those
things
that
we
changed
recently
a
little
bit
more
on
the
administrative
side,
but
we're
also
trying
to
really
take
a
step
back
and
we've
convened
a
board
and
commission
group
of
liaisons
and
secretaries
to
partner
on
a
more
strategic
approach
to
integrating
dei
and
aboard
and
commission
work
and
operations.
L
Often,
when
discussing
things
like
programs,
policies
suggesting
training
and
the
like,
so
what
this
says
to
us
is
that
leadership
from
council
is
being
noticed
on
these
commitments
and
that
board
and
commission
representatives
also
believe
advancing.
This
work
supports
their
mission
next,
while
respondents
reported
general
enthusiasm
and
commitment
for
dei
work.
Many
also
raised
concerns
about
the
lack
of
training,
skills
and
structure
to
integrate
into
their
groups.
Some
boards
note
other
structural
challenges
like
current
board
relationships.
L
L
These
anticipated
changes
in
new
embarkments
could
serve
as
a
good
opportunity
to
support
integrating
dei
early
on
in
the
process
to
guide
the
vision
for
these
transitions
in
leadership,
strategy
and
organization.
So
coming
out
of
the
dei
assessments,
those
are
some
of
the
takeaways
that
we
had
and
now
in
collaboration
with
our
facilitator,
angela
davis,
not
the
educator,
but
also
a
very
incredible
individual.
L
L
B
Thank
you,
taylor.
If
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
as
we
look
into
2022
and
beyond.
These
are
just
some
of
the
many
ongoing
efforts
or
new
initiatives
that
are
going
to
be
our
focus
for
this
year.
These
efforts
are
really
crucial
crucial
as
part
of
as
we
continue
to
build
our
foundation.
B
B
The
city
is
actually
being
sought
out
as
a
leader
in
this
work
to
learn
more
about
how
we're
operationalizing,
organizing
and
ultimately
just
implementing
very
intentional
specific
strategies,
and
so
we
understand
that
this
work
requires
a
multi-system
approach
across
various
sectors
of
our
community
and
by
creating
strong
partnerships.
We
can
really
support
one
another
and
can
ultimately
continue
to
serve
our
community
in
a
much
better
way.
B
You
saw
you,
you
heard
taylor
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
diversity
inclusion
blueprint
and
by
taking
an
inventory
and
analysis
of
what
organizational
policies
are
currently
in
place.
Then
we
can.
It
can
really
offer
us
an
in-depth
look
at
what's
currently
working
what
may
need
some
form
of
change
or
modification
and
maybe
even
determining
or
examining
some
policies
that
are
actually
creating
some
unintended
consequences
for
our
community
and
our
and
our
colleagues.
B
Currently,
these
initiatives
are
very
much
tied
to
the
logic
model
and
outcomes
and
the
organizational
wide
work
that
is
happening
across
the
city
and
keying
on
the
progress
and
work
of
these
few
initiatives
will
really
assist
in
centering
experiences
and
voices
that
are
have
been
historically
been
excluded
and
be
a
driver
for
decision
making
across
the
organization.
So
these
are
just
a
few
of
the
the
goals
for
this
year.
You
can
go
to
the
next
slide
and
then
we'll
pass
it
on
to
80.
A
So
I'm
going
to
touch
a
little
bit
on
the
2022
department
work
plans.
As
I
mentioned
previously,
these
were
outlined
in
the
racial
equity
plans.
Logic
model
departments
are
expected
to
launch
their
jedi
teams
and
we're
working
towards
18
departments
launching
or
preparing
their
jedi
teams
by
the
end
of
2022,
as
outlined
in
the
jedi
team
process.
One
element
which
we
have
been
piloting
with
our
colleagues
in
open
space
and
mountain
parks
is
a
departmental
assessment,
and
this
helps
establish
departments
establish
where
people
are
in
their
own
racial
equity
journeys.
So
what
trainings
are
necessary?
A
So
all
departments
who
have
established
a
jedi
team
are
being
required
by
the
end
of
2022
to
do
an
inventory
of
their
departmental
policies
and
practices,
and
so
they
can
determine
which
policies
should
be
reviewed
and
updated.
Utilizing
the
racial
equity
instrument
so
next
slide.
Please
I'm
just
going
to
ask
you
to
go
ahead
and
read
this
quote
to
yourselves.
A
So,
while
we
are
still
in
the
normalization
phase,
we're
still
normalizing
language
and
understanding,
we
also
are
leaning
heavily
into
operationalizing
many
of
the
tools
and
practices
we've
been
developing
over
the
past
year
or
so
so.
You'll
also
see
that
our
work
continues
to
focus
on
the
work
that
we
all
need
to
do,
including
you
as
policy
makers
and
stewards
of
democracy,
and
so
next
slide.
Please,
we
do
have
some
council
questions
for
you,
I'm
hoping
that
you
had
a
moment
to
review
these
in
the
memo
and
just
questions.
A
A
So
with
that
mayor
pro
tem
friend,
I
would
pass
it
to
you
to
open
up
the
conversation.
Thank.
C
You
so
much
amy
kane
what
a
great
presentation
everyone!
Thank
you
so
much
to
all
who
participated.
So
what
I
think
I'll
do
is
just
open
it
up
for
questions
from
council
and
then
we
can
have
discussion
and
then
sort
of
a
summary
and
make
sure
that
we
answer
amy's
questions.
So
if
you
have
questions
about
the
presentation,
let's
kick
off
with
those.
C
M
All
right
ice
breaker,
someone's
gotta,
go
first,
so
I
for
one
a
great
presentation:
it
is
having
lived
here
almost
22
years.
It's
a
profound
and
marked
evolution
for
our
community
to
be
focusing
on
this
work,
and
it's
just
it's
great
to
see
it
and
it's
great
to
be
a
part
of
the
city
staff
and
see
it
on
the
inside
and
to
see
you
know
how
people
are
taking
to
this
across
all
departments.
M
So
it
just
makes
me
proud
to
be
a
part
of
the
community,
but
also
to
be
you
know,
on
city,
council
and
a
part
of
the
city
staff
in
that
capacity,
so
great
work
and
I'm
just
really
proud
to
be
a
part
of
it.
You
know
one
question
that
does
come
up
in
one
of
the
charts
that
was
brought
up
in
the
memo
is
kind
of
thing
about
goals.
In
terms
of,
is
there
sort
of
a
minimum
percentage
goal
for
racial
equity
ambassadors
per
department?
M
I
know
some
departments
are
smaller
and
bigger,
but
is
there
some
sort
of
minimum
that
you
want
to
set
to
see
if
a
department
is
sort
of
falling
off
having
that
sort
of
minimum
amount,
or
is
that
just
too
fluid,
in
which
case
to
sort
of
have
any
sort
of
goal?
So
I'm
just
sort
of
curious
if
there's
something
there
with
regards
to
that.
A
Thank
you
for
that
question.
We
did
not
set
that
standard.
However,
when
we
presented
an
update
to
our
city
leadership,
the
direct
department
directors
back
in
december
of
2021,
we
requested
that
each
department
provide
at
least
one
person
who
was
interested
in
being
an
equity
ambassador
and
as
we're
moving.
A
This
work
forward
start
to
have
the
conversation
within
departments
of
who
is
interested
first
in
being
members
and
starting
up
that
jedi
team,
so
anna
silvia
myself
and
other
members
of
our
core
team
will
be
working
with
departments
as
they
start
their
jedi
teams
using
the
tool
kit
and
helping
them
work
through
that
assessment,
we
try
to
use
the
feed
the
hungry
approach
in
this
work
and
we're
finding
that
we've
ample
people
raising
their
hands
saying
I
want
to
be
a
part
of
this
so
yeah.
Thank
you
for
that
question.
Matt.
G
Thank
you
main
pro
tim
brennan
and
thank
you
for
the
wonderful
presentation
from
every
member
of
staff
and
for
all
the
extraordinary
work
that
you
all
are
doing.
G
When
we
talk
about
operationalizing
the
racial
equity
plan,
it's
kind
of
hard
to
understand
what
that
means,
but
you'll
do
a
great
job
of
laying
out
all
the
different
steps
that
are
being
taken
and
that
the
east
folder
sub
community
plan,
as
a
case
study,
was,
was
really
informative
and
a
great
example
of
how
we're
doing
some
new
things
that
we
haven't
done
before,
which
is
really
inspiring
to
see,
and
I
think
it's
really
informed.
G
The
discussion
we'll
have
in
a
little
bit
on
that
very
plan
which
I'm
looking
forward
to
my
question
was
one
of
the
things
particularly
interested
in
in
is
how
we
are
using
the
the
racial
equity
instrument
and
the
rapid
response.
Racial
equity
assessment,
like
those
tools,
would
which
seem
to
be
like
a
practical
way
of
analyzing
our
decisions
in
our
decision
space
and
how
they
might
be
affected
by
these
ideas.
A
D
I'm
happy
to
take
that
and
thank
you
for
for
the
question.
I
think
we
are
seeing
the
the
work
with
racial
equity
instrument
moving
forward
in
a
few
different
ways.
One
key
way
is
is
training
more
staff.
D
I
want
to
say
the
the
most
recent
numbers
we've
close
to
a
100
members
of
staff
who
are
trained
in
the
racial
equity
instrument.
Part
of
what
we've
heard
from
these
staff
members
is
more
of
their
colleagues.
D
They're
they're
encouraging
more
their
colleagues
to
participate
in
the
training,
so
everyone
can
be
on
the
same
page
in
implementing
that
racial
equity
instrument,
and
so
we've
been
offering
four
trainings
a
year
for
staff
to
be
more
familiar
with
that
instrument,
and
we
did
work
really
closely
with
a
number
of
different
projects
and
council
priorities
last
year
to
to
walk
through
parts
of
the
racial
equity
instrument
as
as
a
cohort,
and
we
we
saw
some
success
with
with
that
model
and
having
a
cohort
of
support
for
implementation
of
that
instrument.
D
We
have
not
been
using
the
rapid
response-
racial
equity
assessment
as
much
because
it
was
really
more
put
in
place
to
address
care's
funding
and
some
of
the
quick,
sorry,
coven
federal,
coveted
relief
funding
as
the
city
was
making
quick
decisions
to
make
sure
that
we
had
an
input
from
communities
of
color
in
in
those
decisions.
D
We
are
looking
at
a
variation
of
the
rapid
response,
racial
equity
assessment
for
use
with
our
community
connectors
and
residents,
because
we've
heard
a
lot
of
requests
for
for
feedback
and
similar
to
the
role
that
recovery
equity
connectors
played
in
the
end
of
2022,
to
have
more
of
an
ongoing
focus
for
for
that
team
to
provide
insight
and
an
evaluation
for
proposals,
policies
or
decisions.
B
Part
of
also
one
of
the
things
that
we
notice,
for
example,
with
the
gap
in
data,
is
that
the
racial
equity
instrument
tool
really
requires
our
colleagues
to
dig
in
deep
into
numbers
and
collecting
data
on
what
we're
seeing
across
the
city
and
because
there
is
that
gap.
Hence
one
of
our
efforts
for
these
years
to
really
tighten
that
up
and
being
able
to
now
have
a
team
of
just
incredible
talent
and
awareness
around.
How
do
we
create
this
data
source?
C
Thanks
aaron
nicole
you're
up.
E
Thank
you
and
yeah.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation.
I
just
had
a
couple
questions
about
the
presentation
and
rachel
am
I
understanding
correctly
we're
asking
questions
about
the
presentation
right
now
then
we'll
get
to
the
questions
that
we
were
okay,
perfect.
So
one
of
the
questions
that
I
have
is
just
around
the
trainings
that
are
being
done
for
staff
as
well
as
for
council
and
it's
a
question
of
sort
of.
E
If
is
there
a
plan,
or
when
will
we
move
to
having
trainings
that
are
kind
of
bipark
specific
for
folks
to
go
to
and
sort
of
be
in
a
kind
of
a
safer
place?
E
I
know
this
is
something
that
I've
done
in
my
work
at
the
university
and
it's
really
kind
of
a
critical
part
of
these
trainings,
because
putting
people
who've
been
victims
of
racism
into
a
group
with
non-bipot
people
who
are
just
learning
about
their
racism
is
sometimes
really
traumatic,
right
and-
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
you
know,
if
there's
a
plan
for
that
or
how
that's
evolving
in
terms
of
providing
specific
spaces.
For
for
folks
who
could
say
opt-in
to
a
training.
That's
just
for
bypass
folks,
because
they're
talking
about
different
issues,
often.
A
A
However,
we
are
going
to
be
working
on
building
a
policy
for
employee
resource
groups
or
for
affinity
spaces
for
for
marginalized
staff
members,
so
they
can
have
that
space,
so
we're
hoping
to
have
that
started
here
in
the
next
quarter
when
we
get
back
from
some
of
the
travel
with
a
gear
member
meeting
next
week
and
we're
hoping
to
learn
some
more
from
our
colleagues
across
the
country
about
some
of
the
best
practices
for
that.
E
B
So
I
can,
I
can
speak
to
that
a
little
bit.
I
really
believe
in
the
intentionality
of
creating
affinity
groups
with
the
sensitivity
that
not
everyone
is
going
to
be
at
a
place
where
they
want
to
join
in
that
group
right.
I
think
everybody
goes
through
this
social
justice
journey,
including
people
of
color
right.
We
have
biases
as
well.
We,
depending
on
our
identities
the
sensitivity
around
it
is.
B
We
have
to
respect
where
people
are
at
and
it's
not
necessarily
seeing
ourselves
as
victims,
but
really
creating
a
space
for
everybody,
including
white
individuals,
who
really
want
to
explore
what
it
means
to
have
white
privilege
and
examine
even
fragility
that
comes
up
during
trainings
to
have
a
space
to
do
that
among
other
white
colleagues.
That
can
really
support
the
accountability,
but
also
for
us
at
least.
B
You
know,
for
people
of
color
to
have
a
space
to
go
gosh
this
happened
and
without
being
questioned
or
knowing
that
there's
going
to
be
a
space
to
be
validated.
How
do
you
build
resiliency
with
that?
Because
we
have
to
and
we
do
and
we
do
a
great
job
at
it,
but
then
how
do
we
then
support
each
other
as
colleagues
within
these
spaces,
and
so
there's
just
their
sensitivity
around
it?
B
But
there's
also
intentionality
and
we
don't
want
to
just
create
groups
just
because
it
sounds
like
a
good
idea,
but
rather
because
we
know
it's
actually
going
to
be
of
support.
So
potentially
the
first
thing
that
we
do
is
actually
evaluate.
What
is
the
need?
What
is
the
interest
on
having
these
groups?
What
would
sort
of
be
the
composition
of
these
groups,
because
we
need
to
include
our
lgbtq
community?
B
Perhaps
people
with
disabilities
right,
that's
a
whole
other
topic,
so
I
think
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
intentionality
behind
it,
but
I
appreciate
the
thought.
E
You
I
had
just
a
couple
of
other
questions.
One
is:
is
there
space
for
youth
involvement
or
is
that
being
worked
on
as
well?
And
I'm
just
I'm
thinking
of
a
wonderful
project
that
my
emotion,
healing
and
growing
up
boulder
did
together
that
was
kind
of
getting
some
youth
perspectives?
I
think
for
reimagining
policing,
perhaps
so.
I'm
just
curious
as
to
you
know
where
that's
fitting
into
some
of
the
current
work.
If
at
all,
yet
you
know
it's
still
yeah
so
newer.
A
Still
definitely
newer,
we
do
have
a
robust
relationship
with
growing
up
boulder.
We
are
in
conversation
last
well
pre-pandemic.
We
did
have
a
partnership
with
the.
I
have
a
dream
foundation
where
we
ran
an
internship
program
for
students.
I
think
it
was.
I
think
it
was
like
eight
to
ten
students
that
we
brought
in
for
a
six-week
program
and
they
were
placed
in
different
departments
across
the
organization.
A
A
Someone
can
correct
me
on
what
that
is
called
to
date.
We
did
lose
funding
for
that
during
the
pandemic
and
so
nuria.
That's
one
of
the
things.
I
want
to
talk
to
you
about
about
how
we
can
bring
that
programming
back,
but
also
really
looking
at
in
2023
working
with
cu
partners
and
how
we
can
build
a
internship
program
with
our
partners
up
at
cu
as
well,
and
that's
something
that
council
member
joseph.
A
E
Thank
you
and
just
one
other
question
around
the
toolkits
and
the
goal
of
getting
jedi
teams
in
all
of
the
different
departments
by
the
end
of
the
year.
I'm
just
wondering:
are
they
kind
of
being
given
specific
goals
or
outcomes
or
anything
you
know
within
the
departments,
sort
of
what
is
the?
A
A
We
need
to
just
start
having
these
conversations
more
broadly,
other
departments
have
been
having
these
conversations
and
they're
at
the
phase
where
they
are
ready
to
take
an
inventory
of
their
policies,
their
programs,
their
practices
and
really
start
diving
deep
into
the
work
and
changing
those
at
the
departmental
level.
A
You
also
asked
about
youth
engagement
and,
as
I
was
talking
about
that,
it
led
me
to
believe
to
remember
too,
that
our
junior
ranger
program
they
have
adapted
our
bias
and
microaggression
workshop
to
have
that
for
their
onboarding
process,
with
not
only
their
junior
rangers,
but
also
their
temporary
and
seasonal
employees.
So
that's
an
example
of
a
department,
who's
gone
beyond
where
many
of
our
departments
are
at
this
point
in
their
journeys,
because
they've
built
that
jedi
team
and
they've
been
going
through
that
process
of
the
assessment.
C
F
Thank
you
so
much.
I
think,
council
member
spear
raises
a
good
question
about.
F
F
Sometimes
these
trainings
you
leave
not
feeling
better
but
feeling
worse
right
and
maybe
part
of
it
as
well,
and
I
was
looking
at
the
and
I've
talked
with
people
who
are
considered
bipark
who's
been
through
these
trainings
and
they
said
well,
it
just
doesn't
feel
comfortable
the
way
the
training
was
set
up
and
my
experience
as
part
of
it.
But
I
my
question
to
you:
actually,
I'm
looking
at
the
slides,
you
said
about
987
staff
has
participated
in
this
training
and
my
question
to
you.
After
the
training
have
you
polled
them
to
find
out?
B
To
that,
so
in
every
training
we
actually
wonderful
colleague,
emily
sandoval
has
created
a
link
for
people
to
fill
out
a
whole
evaluation
to
actually
be
able
to
see,
engage
the
the
the
knowledge,
the
impact,
the
understanding
of
each
of
the
outcomes
or
the
goals
for
each
training.
B
With
that,
I
also
want
you
all
to
know
that
we
do
keep
in
mind
those
dynamics
that
are
inevitable,
and
that
can
happen,
and
so
with
that
facilitators
were
really.
We
were
very
intentional
from
the
beginning
and
even
in
the
second
cohort
bringing
in
the
various
voices
and
identities
within
our
facilitators.
There's
we
actually
do
a
standard
practice
in
the
model
where,
if
we
can
pair
up
an
individual
who
identifies
as
white
with
a
person
of
color
to
facilitate,
then
that
and
same
thing
with
another
other
identity.
B
So
if
it's
somebody
who
identifies
as
male
and
female
right,
keeping
in
mind
those
dynamics
so
that
there's
those
perspectives
being
abroad,
but
that
they're
also
heard
in
a
much
more
open
way.
One
of
the
things
in
terms
of
my
approach
and
taking
more
the
the
lead
on
the
training
curriculum
and
the
content
is
really
empowering
our
colleagues
of
color
to
really
know
that
this
can
be
the
space
for
us
to
share
the
things
that
we
have
gone
through.
It's
not
easy,
but
it
was
in
the
cohort.
We
actually
noticed.
B
Most
of
the
facilitators
in
the
first
cohort
were
white,
and
I
think
that
was
that's
a
testament
of
sometimes
the
dynamics
that
we
face
where
well.
We
just
want
to
see
if
people
are
actually
going
to
follow
through
we're
actually
going
to
see
if
our
facility
facilitators
are
our
white
colleagues
are
really
going
to
talk,
walk
the
talk
and
actually
going
to
offer
support,
and
so
now,
with
this
new
cohort,
we're
actually
having
more
facilitators
of
color
jumping
in
and
saying,
I
want
to
be
part
of
this
movement.
B
I
want
to
be
part
of
this
initiative
because
my
story
matters,
and
so
that's
the
approach
we
take
and,
of
course
it's
always
the
respect.
Again,
we
always
saying
the
as
we're
prepping
facilitators
is.
B
It
is
totally
up
to
you
how
much
you
end
up,
sharing
and
not
sharing,
because
you
are
the
one
who
come
first,
you
got
to
take
care
of
self-care,
especially
after
those
trainings
that
can
be
really
triggering,
but
ultimately
knowing
that
our
colleagues
really
come
to
those
trainings
with
so
much
willingness
to
learn
and
to
be
challenged
by
choice,
but
I
think
it
makes
a
difference
and
then,
with
that
with
council
member
fear,
that's
where
you
know
those
affinity
groups
can
really
be
helpful
just
to
find
that
supportive
space
part
of
our
other
effort
in
these
facilitators
is,
we
have
monthly
gatherings
that
are
quite
open,
very
not
as
structured
as
one
would
imagine,
because
we're
trying
to
interrupt
the
the
the
spaces
of
how
structure
we
are
sometimes
in
meetings,
and
so
sometimes
these
are
spaces
where
we
get
to
say
and
talk
as
a
as
a
facilitator
of
color.
B
This
was
a
really
hard
experience
and
people
can
share
and
validate
that
other
people
can
chime
in
and
say
what
is
it
that
I
can
do
as
another
facilitator
to
really
help
you
through
that
process
and
really
make
it
very
relational?
I
really
believe
in
relational
versus
transactional
work
because
that's
how
we
get
to
transformation
within
our
city.
So
that's
something
that's
happening.
I
don't
know
if
that
helps
answer
your
question.
Councilmember
joseph.
F
No
thank
you
for
that.
Thank
you
for
that
answer.
I
wanted
to
go
back
and
ask
you
a
question
about
the
equity
tools
and-
and
maybe
I
thinking
maybe
that's
something
amy
could
answer.
I
was
a
little
bit
confused
as
to
how
many
tools
we
have
and
because
you
mentioned,
we
have
a
lot.
There
are
many
many
tools
and
it
seems
like
we're
still
developing
tools.
So
I'm
just
I
just
don't
understand
how
many
equity
tools
we
have
yeah.
A
A
We
also
have
those
that
group
of
cohorts-
that's
applying
it
to
some
of
the
council
priorities
from
2020.
What
year?
Is
it
this
year
right
2021?
So
we
have
that
one
during
the
pandemic,
we
release
the
rapid
response,
racial
equity
assessment
and
that's
a
very
high
level,
quick
and
dirty
four
questions
that
we
apply
to.
We
were
applying
when
we
were
thinking
about.
Okay,
we've
got
this
funding.
We
need
to
get
it
spent.
We
have
like
zero
time
like
here's,
how
we're
gonna
go
through
that
process.
A
We're
utilizing
that
one
less,
although
we
have
had
some
departments
and
colleagues
take
that
that
rapid
response,
racial
equity
assessment
and
utilize
it
and
when
we
hear
about
it,
we're
like
please
use
the
racial
equity
instrument.
There's
far
more
community
engagement,
that's
involved
as
well
as
far
more
recommendations
on
data
for
disparities
on
race
and
ethnicity.
A
Then
we
have
the
departmental
assessment.
The
departmental
assessment
is
very
internal,
so
departments
can
assess
where
they
are,
there's
a
work
group
assessment
within
that,
but
then
also
an
individual
assessment.
So
we
can
say:
okay,
the
city
manager's
office
will
pick
on
us
right
because
we
haven't
done
the
assessment.
Yet
we
have
about
five
people
in
our
department
and
I'm
making
these
numbers
up
totally
because
we
haven't
done
the
assessment
we
have
about
five
people
who
really
have
taken
all
the
workshops
are
committed
to
utilizing.
A
The
racial
equity
instrument
understand
the
goals
outlined
within
the
racial
equity
plan
and
how
all
the
pieces
fit
together
and
what
action
steps
we
need
to
take
moving
forward.
So
we
can
look
at
that
department
and
say:
okay,
we
need
to
get
better
on
our
training.
For
this.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
everybody's
normalized
we're
all
speaking
the
same
language,
and
then
we
inventory
those
internal
policies
or
their
programs
or
the
practices
right
and
have
that
group
then
start
to
apply
the
racial
equity
instrument.
For
that.
So
really
it's
like
three
main
tools.
A
The
the
unfortunate
thing
is
that
we
say
instrument,
tool
or
instrument
where
people
say
tool.
We
also
have
the
tool
kit,
which
is
really
a
framework
for
department.
I
guess
right.
We
like
process
the
toolkit,
which
is
really
a
handbook
for
departments
as
they
start,
their
jedi
work,
their
own
departmental
teams
and
it's
a
step-by-step
process
of
utilize.
A
B
One
more
if
you
can
keep
with
all
the
tools
with
that
one
more
thing
that
ryan
mentioned
is
so,
if
you
can
think
of
it.
All
of
that
is
for
internal
purposes
right.
One
of
the
things
we
are
developing
and
I
can
speak
to
this.
I'm
taking
the
lead
on
this
with
other
people
is
in
developing
a
not
a
shorter,
but
just
a
more
condensed
version
of
that
instrument
tool,
but
for
departments
to
fill
out
in
order
for
community
connectors
and
residents
to
give
us
their
feedback.
B
So
if
they're
thinking
about
you
know,
let's
say
the
library,
as
this
happened
last
year,
they're
thinking
about
creating
educational
pods
for
the
summer,
how
does
the
program
manager
fill
all
of
this
this?
This
format?
That
is
not
necessarily
the
equity
instrument
tool
for
an
internal
process,
but
more
for
outer.
B
How
do
how
do
community
connectors
and
residents
get
a
good
sense
of
what
they're
thinking
about
the
program
who
they're
going
to
outreach?
What
their
strategy
is
and
then
being
able
to
receive
genuine
and
honest,
live
feedback
from
those
communities
that
are
so
connected
to
their
outer
networks?
To
say
this
is
a
great
idea.
Yes,
this
would
serve
our
communities
and
these
in
these
ways
or
for
them
to
actually
say
no
you're
going
to
waste
your
time.
B
A
F
I
have
lauren.
C
Up
next
and
then
I'll
call
myself,
and
then
we
can
roll
into
answering
staff's
questions.
H
Thank
you
rachel.
I
really
appreciate
you
guys
bringing
all
of
this
work
forward.
It's
it's
a
lot.
One
of
the
questions
I
have
is:
how
are
we
making
sure
do
we
have
a
process
of
checking
in
internally
or
externally
to
see
to
get
kind
of
feedback
on
overall
how
our
implementation
is
going
with
this
important.
A
Project
awesome,
thank
you
for
that
question.
Councilmember
focus
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
outlined
in
the
logic
model,
which
is
teeny
tiny,
it's
when
you're
reading
the
racial
equity
plan,
but
it
does
lift
up
some
of
that
feedback
that
you're
talking
about,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
hoping
to
do
in
2023
is
to
embark
on
another
community
perception
survey.
A
Previously
we
also
internally
when
we
started
this
work,
we
had
done
an
employee
engagement
survey,
and
so
we're
in
conversation
about
is
that
the
right
approach
to
check
in
on
this
work?
Or
are
we
going
to
be
implementing
that
through
many
surveys
that
we're
doing
bringing
back
micro
surveys
that
we
were
doing
during
the
pandemic?
So
that's
part
of
that
evaluation
process.
A
It
will
tell
you
that
some
of
the
feedback
that
we
have
received
internally
has
really
come
from
the
surveys
that
ana
silvia
and
equity
ambassadors
have
been
putting
out
after
perf
after
the
workshops.
So
we've
gotten
some
good
feedback
there,
but
then
there's
the
qualitative
feedback
opening
from
colleagues
and
I'll
ask
on
a
silvia
to
lift
this
up.
It
was
a
conversation
we
were
having
the
other
day
about
the
shift,
we're
seeing
in
the
participant
conversations
during
some
of
these
workshops.
B
Yeah,
that
has
been
a
huge
talent.
One
of
the
things
that
I
mentioned.
The
presentation
is
just
really
being
keen
and
listening
to
what
are
what
the
feedback
of
our
colleagues
is
and
when
I
was
facilitating
a
training
with
another
facilitator.
It
was
very
apparent
that
people
want
to
really
get
to
the
yes.
We've
heard
all
it's
not
that
we've
just
heard
all
this,
but
we
know
it
now:
we've
gotten
various
trainings,
we're
really
excited
we
are.
We
want
to
be
very
intentional.
B
How
do
we
then
have
more
tools,
more
things
to
go
through,
and
so
that's
how
we
end
up
then
shifting
a
little
bit
more
of
well,
the
history
and
the
the
the
resources
and
the
terminology
is
important,
but
as
people
are
becoming
more
familiar
with
it,
what
they're
actually
wanting
us
to
provide
is
these
very
tangible
steps
to
take
action,
whether
it's
personally
or
professionally,
and
so
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
shift
that
we're
seeing
and
how
we'll
actually
just
accommodate
some
of
our
training
content
to
be
more
more
driven
towards
those
changes
and
ultimately,
really
continue
to
encourage
our
colleagues
to
keep
asking
the
question
why
why
do
we
do
that?
B
This
way?
Why
is
it
that
how
we
has
has
it
always
been
this
way
and
really
getting
to
the
root
cause?
So
that's
really
how
we
can
then
create
and
fathom
systems
change.
A
One
of
the
other
things
that
we're
also
going
to
be
lifting
up
this
year
are
case
studies
to
help
our
colleagues
understand
and
say:
okay,
I've
been
through
the
training,
I'm
still
having
my
pro
my
difficulty
of
really
wrapping
my
brain
about
what
I
can
do
in
my
role
as
ex
right
and
so
seeing
these
case
studies
and
getting
more
robust
communication
out
to
our
colleagues
across
the
organization
is
an
opportunity
to
just
provide
people
for
more
ideas,
more
opportunities
to
connect,
and
then
we've
heard
from
some
of
the
connectors
the
impact
externally
on
what
this
work
is
having
for
them.
A
As
as
a
member
of
the
community,
and
I
I
believe
we
have
some
more
connectors
coming
on
board
soon,
who
are
people
who've,
historically
been
very
critical
of
the
city?
Rightfully
so,
and
are
now
saying
feeling
like
they
have
an
active
role
to
play,
and
that's
really
exciting
is
not
to
be
not
everybody
across
the
organization
internally
is
like
this
is
awesome.
Let's
do
more
of
this
right.
We
do
have
people
as
we're
doing
our
evaluations
as
we're.
A
Having
conversations
that
we
know,
we
have
more
work
to
do,
and
so
that's
some
of
that
is
one-on-one
conversations
meeting
with
people
trying
to
meet
them
where
they
are
and
finding
out
what
it
is,
that
motivates
them
to
help
bring
them
along,
and
so
some
some
of
that
hard
work
that
we
talk
about.
Is
that
hard
work
and
that
hard
work?
That
is
such
hard
work.
So
thank
you
for
that.
C
You're,
good
okay,
so
if
you
could
put
the
questions
up
that
we
need
to
answer,
while
I'm
asking
my
question
that
might
move
us
along
and
then
mine's,
I
guess
an
extension
of
kind
of
lauren's
question
and
your
answer
to
that
question:
amy,
you
know
we're
doing
a
lot
of
work
internally
and
making
decisions,
I
think
with
with
an
eye
towards
jedi
principles
and
racial
equity.
C
A
Yeah,
thank
you
for
that
question.
Mayor
pro
tem.
I
did
want
to
lift
up
that.
I
copied
and
pasted
the
questions
in
the
chat
as
well
for
folks,
if
that's
helpful
for
the
hosts
and
panelists
to
see.
Hopefully,
I
hit
enter
on
that
in
answer
to
your
question
like
this
is
systemic
change
that
we
need
to
do
across
the
community.
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
meeting
with
some
of
the
service
groups
across
the
community
and
talk
to
them
about
our
work.
A
I'm
going
to
do
a
church,
a
presentation
at
a
church
in
october,
who's
very
invested
in
this
work
and
share
the
resources
and
the
tools
and
the
knowledge
that
we
have.
We
also
do
have
some
of
our
community
partners
who
have
asked
if
we
could,
you
know,
host
trainings
for
them
and
we're
in
a
very
government
space.
A
So
we,
you
know,
give
people
resources
or
talk
to
them
about
partners
who
we've
worked
to
advance
this
work,
it's
the
the
one-on-one
relationships
with
our
partners
across
the
community
that
helps
advance
this
work
and
you
all,
as
policy
makers
and
ambassadors,
have
to
be
involved.
A
In
those
conversations
we
did
host
one
of
our
pilot
projects
that
we
didn't
have
that
we're
short
on
funding
now
for
is
our
community
conversations
about
race,
and
you
saw
that
outlined
in
the
memo
where
we
had
a
partnership
with
cu
university
of
colorado,
boulder
and
representatives
from
naropa
and
also
from
boulder
county,
and
we
put
together
a
dinner
series
that
we
had
groups
of
community
members
do
a
four
part.
The
first
pilot
was
four
part
dinner
series.
A
The
second
was
a
six-part
dinner
series
where
community
members
could
come
together
and
have
conversations
focused
on
the
racial
inequities
in
boulder
and
what
they
could
do
as
individuals
to
help
shift
the
systems
and
the
the
interactions
that
they
have
with
people.
So
those
are
just
some
of
the
things,
but
it's
you
know
it's
all
of
us
and
what
is
our
role
as
government
individuals,
right,
stewards
of
democracy
and
just
helping
support
community
how
they
can
in
these
conversations.
C
O
I'm
particularly
interested
in
answering
what's
going
well,
and
what
what
excites
you
most
so
amy?
You
know
I'm
a
huge
fan
of
yours
and
the
team
and
this
great
work,
I'm
also
a
huge
fan
of
that
jedi
acronym.
I
think
it's
fantastic.
You
can
never
forget
those
words.
Now
there
you
go
my
one
of
my
favorite
things
was
when
I
was
on
parks
and
I
did
the
bison
microaggression
workshop.
I
think
it's
interesting
we're
talking
about
it.
For
me,
it
was
actually
life-changing
things
that
I
didn't
think
about
ever
before.
O
Maybe
conversations
I
had
with
people
that
thought
differently
than
me.
I
still
remember
it
was
at
least
a
year
ago,
right,
amy
and.
P
O
Still
remember
it
to
this
day
so,
but
I
ryan.
I
also
want
to
thank
you
about
mentioning
that
march
31st
planning
board
meeting.
I
got
to
listen
to
that
video.
It
was
excellent.
O
So
I'm
going
to
go
for
it,
but
tell
me
if
I'm
speaking
too
fast,
because
I
don't
want
people
to
get
bored,
I
like
when
things
happen
in
real
time,
not
just
concepts,
but
when
things
really
do
get
done
so
most
of
the
exciting
things
for
me
or
about
what
got
done.
That
would
be
the
hiring
of
a
revenue
agent
fluent
in
spanish,
translating
key
sections
of
the
sales
tax
website
into
spanish
and
spanish
translation
of
the
2020
covid
business
grants
direct
assistance
to
help
small
businesses
fill
out
applications,
including
translation
assistance.
O
O
I'm
very,
I
was
very
excited
about
some
things
that
I
learned.
For
the
first
time:
equitable
prioritization
of
water
uses
less
reliance
on
price
to
incentivize
behavior
equity
in
the
flood
and
stormwater
master
plan
update
now
I
know
that
stormwater
is
not
a
real
thriller,
but
I
actually
think
it
is
and
was
very
excited
to
hear
that
we
were
applying
the
equity,
the
equity
plan,
to
our
master
plans
as
well.
O
I'm
excited
about
that
and
for
my
very
last
exciting
points,
I'm
going
to
say:
anfield
tape,
municipal
building
renaming
and
the
austin
mural
the
land
acknowledgement
which
is
really
special.
You
know
it's
it's
very
deep
and
climate
justice
collaboration
and
the
wonderful
community
connectors
program.
O
These
are
the
very
exciting
things
for
me
and
as
far
as
council
goes
the
fact
that
we
were
able
to
do
something
about
the
boards
and
commissions,
and
we
continue
to
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to,
chats
and
walks
and
office
hours
from
community
members
that
we
do
not
hear
from
so
much.
So
I'm
hoping
that
that
would
happen
in
a
great
way
and
lastly,
I
want
to
thank
anna
silvia
about
your
comment
about
it
being
relational
as
the
most
important,
because
relationships
are
how
we
get
change
and
how
we
actually
change
ourselves.
C
That
top
ten,
thank
you!
Tara!
I'd
like
I'd
like
you
to
do
more
of
those
anyone
else
want
to
answer
the
two
questions
I
will
say
in
about
two
minutes.
We
will
be
at
at
time
for
this
if
we
wanted
to
be
on
track
for
time,
so
just
throwing
that
out
there
mayor
brockett.
G
Well,
tara,
thank
you
for
that.
That
was
such
a
great
list.
I
just
I'll,
say
ditto
to
your
list.
You
covered
the
highlights,
and
so
we'll
won't
say
them
all
over
again.
I
will
call
out
the
unique
connector
program,
though,
because
I've
just
found
the
their
involvement
to
be
so
powerful,
the
the
people
from
the
different
walks
of
life
that
are
not
always
as
represented
at
open
comment
and
city
public
hearings,
so
getting
that
active
outreach
and
hearing
from
them
directly.
G
I've
just
found
incredibly
helpful
in
the
initiatives
that
they've
been
involved
with,
and
I
really
appreciated
hearing
again
about
the
how
east
boulder
sub-community
plan
about
the
the
very
active
involvement
from
from
those
folks
and
in
some
innovative
ways,
and
it
sounded
like
it
made
a
real
difference
which
is
just
fantastic.
G
Right
because
I
think
it
is
something
that
we
should
be
working
into,
everything
that
we
do
and
while
I
I
strive
to
keep
it
in
my
mind,
always
on
every
issue,
and
I
think
many
many
of
us
do
and
the
city
staff
does
as
well.
It's
not
always
as
explicit
in
some
of
the
analysis.
G
So
my
in
terms
of
like
what
would
be
helpful
to
me
is
just
the
more
of
that
that
we
can
get
on
on
a
topic
by
topic
basis.
I
think
the
the
better
off
we'll
all
be
so.
I
know
it's
not
quick
and
simple,
but
we're
not
in
this
work,
because
it's
quick
and
simple
right
like
we're
doing
it,
because
it's
important
so
the
the
more
that
we
can
apply
that
tool
or
or
the
rapid
one
if
it's
suitable
for
some
some
other
things.
I
think
the
better
off.
G
G
You
know
we
have
our
economic
and
social,
and
you
know
we
have
a
three-legged
stool
thing
that
that
comes
in
in
each
thing
and
you
I,
I
would
welcome
a
a
fourth
one
of
saying
you
know
how
has
racial
equity
been
addressed
in
this
particular
topic,
so
it's
kind
of
a
big
ask,
but
it
would
be
really
helpful
to
know
how
much
we've
been
able
to
analyze
it
in
each
in
each
area
or
or
if
we
weren't
or
to
what
extent
we
have
so
that
that
would
be
my
request
to
the
extent
possible.
E
Nicole,
thank
you
for
the
first
one,
I'm
just
going
to
echo
aaron,
the
community
connectors
was
kind
of
consistently
where
at
least
I,
as
a
policy
maker,
feel
like
I
get
the
most
helpful
information
in
terms
of
thinking
about
making
decisions,
and
things
like
that.
So
thank
you
for
that
program
and
thank
you
to
all
the
community
connectors
who
are
working
really
hard
to
make
sure
that
we
have
have
representation
in
our
engagement.
So
thank
you.
I
think
in
the
interest
of
time.
E
I'm
just
gonna
pick
a
couple
of
barriers.
I
I
do
feel
like
they're
a
lot
they're
they're
significant.
We
are
a
majority
white
community.
We
are
a
majority
white
decision-making
body.
We
have
all
kind
of
had
racism
baked
into
us
since
we
were,
I
mean
even
before
we
were
born
honestly
undoing.
That
is
hard.
So
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
barriers,
but
one
of
the
things
just
around
this
engagement
topic
that
I've
been
thinking
about
is
reading
through
the
racial
equity
plan.
E
Reading,
through
all
the
progress
that's
been
made,
I
don't
really
see
where
there's
accountability
for
us
as
council
people
to
take
equity
into
account
in
our
decision
making.
I
just
don't
you
know,
I'm
not
seeing
accountability
for
us
right.
I
mean,
I
guess,
maybe
it
kind
of
comes
with
the
ballot
box
ultimately,
but
I
I
would
really.
I
would
love
that
I
feel
like
it's
missing.
It's
it's
a
critical
piece
of
this.
E
How
can
we
ensure
that
decision
makers
are
prioritizing
this
work
and
I
think
the
other,
the
other,
and
you
know
there-
you
know,
I
think,
as
long
as
long
as
I'm
here,
I
will
certainly
continue
to
bring
those
up,
but
you
know
I
would.
I
would
really
just
love
for
us
to
think
about
that.
How
can
we
set
future
councils
up
for
success
in
this
work
by
bringing
in
accountability
and
the
the
other
thing
I
will
bring
up?
Is
you
know
this?
E
This
workout's
really
hard
and
it's
difficult
to
have
these
conversations,
and
I
think
that
sometimes,
as
a
city,
we
we
run
into
contention
with
some
of
the
groups
that
are
working
toward
racial
equity
in
our
community,
and
I,
I
wonder
how
we
how
we
can
sort
of
commit
as
a
city
as
a
council
to
working
through
that,
rather
than
backing
away
from
it,
because
that's
challenging
because
it
doesn't
feel
good.
How
can
we
kind
of
dive
into
it
and
make
sure
that
we
are?
E
You
know
if
we're
finding
contention
if
we
are
feeling
attacked
or
something
like
that?
How
do
we
dive
into
it?
How
do
we
work
on
understanding
the
situation,
rebuilding
or
maybe
building
for
the
first
time,
some
of
the
trust
that
needs
to
be
there,
because,
as
a
city,
we
just
we
don't.
We
don't
have
a
great
history
when
it
comes
to
racial
equity,
and
I
really
appreciate
you
know
that
we're
talking
about
this
now
and
focused
on
it.
And
what
is
our
plan?
E
How
are
we
working
through
some
of
those
situations
where
things
get
hard
so
that
we're
not
creating
barriers
between
us
and
as
a
body
and
groups
in
the
community
and
there
you
know,
I
think
it's
a
lot
of
conversation.
It's
a
lot
of
listening,
it's
a
lot
of
sitting
through
hard
spaces,
and
you
know
that's
certainly
work
that
we
can
all
do
as
council
people
and
a
staff.
I
think
yeah.
Thank
you
for.
A
M
Thanks
rachel,
I,
I
won't
repeat
the
good
stuff-
that's
been
said
before
me
and
I
know
we're
sort
of
short
on
time.
So
I'll
touch
on
two
two
questions.
You
know
what
really
excites
me
about
this
work
and
you
know
speaking
as
a
privileged
white
man,
it's
the
personal
and
community
growth
that
comes
from
this.
It's
the
knowing
and
having
experience
that
this
is
hard
work.
It's
like
working
out.
M
I
mean
you're
sore
and
that's
a
good
thing,
because
I
think
that
means
you're
pushing
your
own
personal
envelope
in
new
places,
rather
than
just
being
in
a
safe
place
where
it
doesn't,
try
you
it
doesn't
tax.
You
doesn't
move
me
and
that's
what
I
enjoy
about
the
work
is
it
expands
me
as
a
person,
and
so
I
like
to
keep
us
going.
M
I
hope
others
revel
in
that
expansion
of
who
they
are
as
a
person
as
an
individual
as
a
parent
as
a
as
a
spouse
as
a
community
member
as
an
employee,
all
those
things.
This
is
expansive
work
and
I
think
we
all
grow
from
it
and
that's
what
excites
me
the
most
is
the
growth
we
are
already
seeing
across
the
the
city
department.
M
In
that
aspect,
in
terms
of
you
know,
barriers,
I
think
you
know,
one
of
them
is
really
like
getting
city
staff
and
council
to
what
I
would
say
is
it's
not
quantifiable,
but
but
a
saturation
point
at
which
our
racial
equity
work
becomes
a
foundation
of
our
institutions.
I
I
think,
we're
still
building
that.
M
But
to
me
I
think,
as
we
get
closer,
we
get
to
a
place
of
diminishing
returns
where
we
put
more
and
more
work
to
get
there
but
you're
sort
of
at
the
tail
end
of
the
curve,
and
so
I
think
forging
through
that
process
to
get
to
that
saturation
point
where
it
is
just
foundational,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
a
big
barrier
and
I
know
I'm
committed
to
getting
there.
I
just
know
and
really
to
kind
of
nicole's
point
it
gets
hard
and
we
steer
away
from
the
complexity
and
the
challenge
of
it.
M
But
I
think
we
need
to
sort
of
drive
harder
to
do
that
and
that
I
think,
is,
is
a
barrier
to
get
to
that
place
where
it's
institutionalized.
C
Thanks
matt
juni
and
then
lauren,
and
then
I
will
call
on
myself
if
there
are
no
other
hands.
C
F
Yeah,
no,
I
don't
have
them
in
front
of
me,
but
I
remember
what
we're
talking
about
so
here,
the
stuff
that
are
doing
well.
I
agree
fully
with
tara
the
entire
list.
I
I
support
and
conquer
with
everything
that
she
said
and
the
two
points,
or
at
least
the
things
I
put
the
asterisk
around-
is
the
community
connectors,
because
again,
community
engagement
is
so
important
to
all
of
us.
Council
members.
We
want
the
same
access
that
is
available
for
someone
who
is
wealthy.
F
F
So
I
really
think
it's
a
great
program
and
I
hope
other
cities
will
learn
from
us
for
best
practice
purposes
and
another
thing
that
I'm
happy
or
how
could
I
say
that
I'm
proud
that
we
undertake,
which
was
the
municipal
building
name
change
to
honor,
mayor
tate?
That
was
really
great.
It
was
impactful.
F
People
have
reached
out
and
told
me
how
proud
they
were
and
they
feel
there
was
some
type
of
a
restoration,
because
a
lot
of
us
know
the
history,
the
work
that
he
done
was
truly
amazing
in
the
community,
but
at
the
same
time
there
were
pain
and
hurt.
So
that
was
a
real,
some
form
of
restoration
and
we
can
call
it
restorative
justice
as
well,
because
he
was
such
a
unitarian
someone
who
did
great
work
in
the
community.
F
So
now,
let's
talk
about
the
barriers,
I
have
to
say
my
the
barrier
that
I
see
it's
similar
to
the
question
that
I
asked
earlier.
There
are
a
lot
of
tools,
a
lot
of
them.
I
I'm
sure
you
think
they
are
very
helpful.
F
My
fear
is
when
you
have
a
tool
for
everything
it
might
get
to
be
too
much,
and
I'm
wondering
why
do
we
have
so
many
tools?
Why
isn't
it
consolidated
to
one
or
two
tools?
Because
having
a
lot
of
tools,
you
may
think
yeah,
because
we're
being
specific
when
it
comes
to
each
issues.
But
I
wonder
how
effective
is
that?
Having
that
many
tools,
I
like
the
question,
or
at
least
the
comment
made
by
nicole
earlier
about
the
engagements.
F
You
mentioned
a
lot
of
the
partners
again,
that's
part
of
our
job,
to
reach
out
to
community
and
you're
doing
that.
I
don't
have
too
many
comments
about
that.
But
hopefully
you
know
there
is
deep,
deep
engagement
in
bringing
every
group
together
groups
that
are
frustrated
with
us,
because
that
happens.
There
are
quite
a
few
groups
that
are
frustrated
with
us,
but
still
bringing
them
as
part
of
the
conversation,
because
that's
part
of
the
work
as
well
and
overall,
I
think
it's
great.
F
I
would
like
to
see,
I
think
who
mentioned
that
there's
a
council
member
who
mentioned
something
I
think
it
was
aaron
mayor
brockett.
He
said
something
about
concrete,
concrete
actions.
That's
what
I
get
out
of
what
he
said.
I
would
like
to
see
more
concrete
steps
coming
out
from
this
racial
equity,
whether
it's
the
guiding
coalition
or
just
from
your
department.
F
When
you
come
before
council
and
you
make
statements
and
it's
very
highly
theoretical-
and
it's
good.
We
aspire
to
these
wonderful
things
and
tara
mentioned
10.
so
that
that's
a
lot
right,
but
I
think,
coming
with
concrete
actions
and
stuff
that
we've,
what
we've
taken
to
make
people's
lives
better
in
the
community.
H
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
what's
been
said
around
what's
working
well,
I
have
an
additional
comment
on
that
which
is
you
know
I.
I
appreciate
the
city
taking
a
really
foundational
approach
and
looking
at
what's
within
control
of
the
city's
organization
itself,
really
focusing
in
on
the
training,
the
hiring
you
know,
things
that
start
and
end
with
the
city
and
the
city
organization,
and
I
think
that
that's
helps
build
the
foundation
of
trust
as
we
move
into
other
decisions
and
outreach
in
the
community.
H
What
I'm
excited
about
is
is
sort
of
those
next
steps.
I
have
to
admit
I'm
more
excited
about.
You
know
what
those
policies,
what
once
you've
gone
through
the
departments
and
done
these
assessments
and
start
to
look
at
the
policies
coming
from
the
departments
and
what
kinds
of
changes
can
be
made
there.
H
That's
for
me,
that's
the
work
that
I
think
sort
of
similar
to
the
work
that
we're
doing
on
climate
change.
Looking
for
these
pieces
that
have
ripples
beyond
what
we're
doing
and
trying
to
have
impacts,
you
know
the
biggest
impacts
we
can
to
create
positive
change.
H
H
There's
you
know
our
personal
and
growth
as
a
community
on
these
topics
and
celebrating
success,
and
for
me
I
don't
know
why
everything
relates
to
climate
change,
but
that's
like
the
recycling
symbol,
like
they're
kind
of
these
three
pieces
that
all
feed
together
and
so
making
sure
that
we're
sort
of
reinforcing
all
of
those
and
as
council
members,
I
think
we
can
help
by
having
difficult
conversations
publicly
and
you
know
kind
of
helping
show
how
we
are
working
through
these
issues
and
the
struggle.
C
Thanks
lauren
so
I'll
go
next
briefly,
and
I
think
that
we
are
a
little
bit
over
time
here,
so
I
will
say
I
agree
with
the
the
positives
about
what's
going
well
and
I'm
excited
about
a
lot
of
the
same
things.
Other
people
are
excited
about
the
the
barrier
that
I'm
most
concerned
about.
I
would
say
that
hasn't
been
discussed.
C
I
say
that
as
someone
who,
who
does
not
intend
to
run
for
office
again,
so
it's
not
self-serving.
I'm
saying
like
we
have
to
bring
the
community
along
or
else
you
know
it
won't,
have
long-term
success
and
impact.
So
you
know-
and
the
second
part
of
that
question
is
policy
makers.
C
How
do
we
mitigate
those
barriers?
You
know
I
think
lauren
was
just
getting
at
that
with
having
the
hard
conversations
and
amy
mentioned
one-on-one,
so
I
think
we
may
need
to
dig
deeper
with
you
know
our
our
constituents
and
constituencies
and
and
really
help
to
build
those
bridges,
because
I
think
we
all
believe
earnestly
in
this
work
and
and
want
this
to
succeed
and
and
want.
If
we
have,
you
know
if
we
run
an
issue
through
the
racial
equity
instrument
and
it
you
know
it
points
strongly
towards
you
know.
C
This
is
going
to
be
helpful
and
the
community's
not
with
us
on
that.
Then
then
it
could
get
undone
and
I
think
that
that's
a
heartbreaking
result.
So
that's
the
barrier
and
I
hope
that
we
we
can
dig
deep
as
as
leaders
in
helping
create
sticking
solutions.
So
with
that
I
think
amy
I
will
ask
if
we
have
answered
your
questions.
C
Okay,
yay,
everybody
feels
complete,
that's
wonderful,
okay,
so
we
are
going
to
wrap
up.
This
is
exciting
to
be
one
year
into
this
work.
We
got
a
lot
of
work
left
to
do,
but
thank
you
all
for
sylvia
and
and
amy
and
ryan
and
taylor,
for
this
great
presentation
and
for
all
the
work,
you're
doing
and
nuria
and
teams
with
that.
I
think
I
does
anybody
want
a
break
right
now
before
we
go
into
part.
C
Two
of
this
can
I
see
a
hand
if
anybody
I
see
a
couple,
we
do
want
a
break.
Okay,
let's
take
a
five
minute
and
then
we
will
come
back
and
dig
into
oh
we'll
dig
into
the
east
boulder
sub
community
90
for
those
still
here,
we
are
now
going
to
end
interpretive
services.
C
C
C
Not
this
week,
you're
up
in
two
weeks,
I
think
with
that
okay
and
we
have
matt,
so
we
will
get
going
with
the
second
agenda
item
for
tonight,
which
is
the
east
boulder
sub
community
plan,
90
point
feedback,
discussion
and,
and
before
we
get
into
this
before,
I
turn
it
over
to
nuria
and
staff.
C
Just
saying
I
think
we
will
hold
any
clarifying
questions
that
we
have
during
the
presentation
until
after
both
staff
and
the
work
group,
and
I
think,
a
planning
board
member
do
their
presentation.
So
please
just
jot
down
and
hold
your
questions.
Thank
you
kathleen
for
that.
Until
the
the
end
of
all
three
of
those
okay
with
that,
I
will
turn
over
to
nuria.
K
R
Great,
thank
you
so
much
for
having
us
tonight.
We
have
a
presentation
to
go
through
so
I'll.
Ask
emily
to
pull
up
the
slides
perfect.
R
I'm
really
excited
to
be
here
to
share
the
latest
draft
of
the
east
boulder
sub
community
plan
and
hear
council's
feedback.
This
is
an
important
plan
for
the
community
and
it's
been
a
great
project
to
work
on
with
city
council
over
the
past
three
years.
So
emily.
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide
and
we
will
take
a
look
at
the
agenda,
I'm
gonna
we'll
do
a
presentation.
R
First,
we'll
walk,
counsel
through
pieces
of
the
east,
boulder
plan
and
I'll
be
joined
by
my
colleague
jean
sanson
from
transportation,
and
then
we're
going
to
hear
a
report
out
from
the
march
31st
planning
board
session,
from
our
outgoing
planning
for
chair
david
ensign
and
then
we'll
also
hear
from
erin
bagnell
who's,
a
member
of
the
east
folder
working
group
and
she'll,
be
speaking
about
the
plan
and
and
the
working
group
process.
R
Then
we
we
have
just
a
couple
of
questions
for
council
and
the
questions
are
intended
to
help
us
make
final
changes
to
the
plan.
Final
edits
and
and
really
work
on
finalizing
the
project
so
next
slide.
Please.
R
So
the
east,
boulder
sub-community
plan
is
only
the
second
plan
of
this
scale
that
the
city
has
ever
done.
The
last
sub-community
plan
was
the
north
boulder
plan,
which
was
completed
in
the
90s
and
we're
still
working
on
the
implementation
of
recommendations
from
the
north
boulder
sub
community
plan.
So
you
might
think
of
things
like
the
north,
boulder
library
or
upgrades
to
north
broadway.
R
Next,
please,
sub
community
plans
are
part
of
the
city's
suite
of
tools
to
help
us
implement
the
broad
goals
of
the
boulder
valley,
comprehensive
plan
at
the
neighborhood
level.
So
once
a
sub-community
plan
is
adopted,
it
will
help
guide,
changes
to
development
standards
and
zoning
and
inform
planning
and
funding
of
our
capital
improvement
program
for
years
to
come
as
an
example,
one
of
the
council
member
questions
that
was
sent
in
advance
of
tonight's
meeting
was
about
how
the
sub-community
plan
and
updates
to
the
use
tables
would
work
together.
R
R
So
the
project
has
been
going
on
for
three
years.
R
We
kicked
off
the
planning
process
in
2019
and
went
through
a
series
of
tasks,
first,
conducting
an
inventory
and
analysis
to
really
understand
what
the
existing
conditions
of
the
sub-community
are
and
then
coming
up
with
ideas
for
potential
changes
to
the
area,
testing,
the
outcomes
of
those
changes
and
developing
strategies
for
future
implementation.
We
were
last
with
city
council
in
july
to
review
and
discuss
the
60
draft
plan
and
today
we're
nearing
completion
of
the
plan
and
looking
for
your
feedback
to
help
refine
recommendations
and
complete
the
project.
R
Next,
we've
had
excellent
participation
by
the
community
throughout
the
process
over
23
different
engagement,
events
and
opportunities.
R
I
think
24,
if
we
count
the
the
most
recent
community
meeting
and
the
process
has
also
been
guided
by
a
working
group
of
21
community
members
who
have
met
30
times
over
the
last
three
years
to
help
shape
recommendations
of
the
plan
and
communicate
the
project
out
to
the
community.
R
R
R
So,
just
as
a
reminder
before
I
go
into
the
plan,
here
are
the
key
questions
that
we
will
pull
up
during
the
discussion.
Next,
please,
okay.
So
the
draft
plan
for
those
that
are
new
to
the
project,
the
east
boulder
sub
community,
is
located
north
of
arapahoe
and
east
of
foothills
parkway
and
includes
some
key
community
assets
like
belmont
city
park
and
boulder
community
health
foothills
campus,
along
with
a
lot
of
light,
industrial
businesses
and
office
parks
and
we've
seen
some
recent
change
in
the
area.
R
R
R
R
We've
heard
strong
support
from
community
members
for
15
minute
walkable
neighborhoods
the
planet
accomplished
accomplishes
this
with
key
land
use
changes
that
will
allow
for
a
better
mix
of
uses,
including
housing.
We've
heard
some
people
are
concerned
about
increased
traffic
congestion
congestion.
R
The
plan
outlines
different
strategies
to
manage
future
demand
on
roadways
in
east
boulder,
and
we've
heard
that
the
plan
should
provide
details
about
how
all
of
this
will
happen.
The
plan
also
includes
an
implementation
section
where
policies,
projects
and
programs
offer
a
path
to
realization
of
the
plan's
vision
over
the
next
several
years.
R
Next,
please
so,
there's
four
major
components
of
the
east
boulder
plan,
a
land
use
plan,
a
connections
plan
that
recommendation
section
that
I
just
mentioned,
and
then
finally,
the
55th
and
arapahoe
stationaria
plan
this.
This
particular
component
offers
more
detailed
recommendations
for
one
of
the
key
areas
of
change
in
east
folder.
So
I'm
going
to
walk
through
these
different
sections
and
give
you
a
sense
of
of
what
the
plan
covers.
Next,
please.
R
So
we'll
start
with
the
land
use
plan.
The
recommendations
for
land
use
includes
changes
to
the
current
bvcp
land
use
map.
Approximately
250
acres
that
are
currently
designated
as
light
industrial
are
proposed
to
change
to
mixed-use
neighborhoods.
This
modification
will
bring
new
opportunities
for
integrating
residential,
commercial
and
retail
spaces
and
places
with
existing
sub-community
businesses
in
workplaces.
R
Next,
please,
at
the
60
draft
council,
asked
staff
in
the
working
group
to
consider
additional
locations
for
expansion
of
the
mixed
use,
industrial
designation
to
a
couple
of
locations,
including
the
area
south
of
pearl
street
and
an
area
north
of
flatirons
golf
course.
After
carefully,
considering
these
changes
and
asking
the
community
about
these
options
and
potential
outcomes,
the
plan
extends
the
mixed
use.
Industrial
land
use
category
to
the
55th
street
corridor,
envisioning
a
connective
corridor
between
the
station
area
at
55th
and
arapahoe,
and
the
flatiron
business
park.
R
Next,
please,
this
section
of
the
plan
also
looks
at
each
of
the
proposed
areas
of
change
to
describe
how
these
areas
might
evolve
in
the
future,
and
what
some
key
features
of
each
neighborhood
might
include.
You'll
also
see
that
this
section
describes
conceptually
how
much
of
different
types
of
space
might
redevelop
in
the
future.
This
def.
This
defines
how
we
think
about
the
potential
for
new
homes
and
changes
in
jobs
numbers
next.
Please.
R
The
land
use
map
describes
a
lot
of
changes
to
mixed-use
neighborhoods
feedback
from
boards,
and
many
community
members
described
a
desire
for
more
detailed
guidance
on
what
those
neighborhoods
should
include
and
what
they
look
like.
The
place.
Type
section
of
the
plan
provides
that
additional
guidance.
Next,
please.
R
Place
type
descriptions
and
performance
standards
will
help
inform
any
future
zoning
changes
that
we
make
to
these
areas
of
change.
Since,
since
the
sixty
percent
draft
council
and
community
feedback
informed
the
combination
of
some
place
type
designations
and
how
we
work
to
further
distinguish
the
differences
between
these
types.
R
Next,
please,
when
we
apply
these
place
types
to
the
sub-community
and
model
out
potential
impacts,
we
anticipate
that
the
recommended
land
use
changes
and
design
guidance
for
place
types
could
allow
for
approximately
5
000
homes
in
east
boulder.
We
would
conservatively
anticipate
that
about
a
quarter
of
these
homes
would
be
permanently
affordable.
R
R
R
There's
a
of
course
a
lot
of
interest
in
how
the
new
homes
in
the
area
is
balanced
with
jobs,
so
here's
a
breakdown
of
potential
homes
and
additional
jobs
that
could
be
created
for
these
areas
of
change.
An
important
consideration
when
we
talk
about
future
jobs
is
that
any
job
projection
is
actually
a
measurement
of
space.
R
R
If
there's
further
questions
about
this,
I'm
happy
to
walk
through
our
methodology
during
the
question
and
answer
discussion
period,
but
for
now
park
west
neighborhood
we
are
anticipating
375
new
jobs,
so
that's
not
total
but
new
jobs
and
then
to
compare
that
to
new
homes
in
the
area
we're
looking
at
1
300.
R
in
park
east,
it's
125
new
jobs
along
the
55th
street
corridor
and
flatiron
business
park.
The
concept
includes
200
new
jobs
and
at
the
stamp
or
the
stationary
at
55th
narapaho.
There
is
workspace
for
2000
jobs.
But
again,
these
jobs
numbers
really
represent
space
and,
as
we
continue
to
come
out
of
the
pandemic
and
different
businesses
retool
how
they
accommodate
people
and
employees,
these
numbers
will
certainly
change.
R
S
Thank
you
kathleen
and
good
evening
council.
My
name
is
gene
sanson,
a
principal
transportation
planner
with
the
department
of
transportation
and
mobility.
So
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
transportation
mobility
chapter
of
the
east
boulder
sub
community
plan.
S
So
today,
when
we
think
about
east
boulder,
it's
an
area
that,
as
as
you
all
know,
over
the
years,
has
largely
been
designed
for
motor
vehicles
and
options
to
travel
by
any
mode
other
than
a
vehicle
are
fairly
limited
and
dispersed.
Patterns
of
development
have
grown
up
around
the
car,
and
so
street
blocks
are
typically
long
and
disconnected
and
as
land
uses,
change
and
infill
and
redevelopment
bring
a
greater
mix
of
jobs
and
housing
to
the
area,
as
kathleen
just
described.
S
This
chapter
of
the
plan
supports
the
vision
of
the
land
use
plan,
while
also
responding
to
the
many
many
community
comments
we
received
about
transportation
needs
and
upgrades
in
the
area.
So,
let's
start
with
the
connections
plan
the
plan.
The
connections
that
are
shown
here
are
intended
to
support
new
land
uses
by
one
improving
access
into
and
through
these
redevelopment
areas
to
expanding
the
pedestrian
and
bicycle
network
throughout
the
sub
community
and
then
third
creating
opportunities
for
street
activation
and
vibrancy
in
these
evolving
15-minute
neighborhoods.
S
So
the
major
recommendations
of
the
connections
plan
should
look
pretty
consistent
with
with
what
was
included
in
the
60
draft
and
in
response
to
council
feedback.
We
updated
our
map
to
simplify
the
recommendations
and
show
the
full
system
of
proposed
improvements
in
a
more
readable
way.
So
in
the
map
you
see
here
the
geographic
extent.
R
S
S
Also
in
response
to
questions
from
council.
Prior
to
this
evening's
meeting,
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
all
the
connections
and
the
transportation
network
improvements
in
the
plan
will
safely
accommodate
truck
and
goods
movement
along
with
safe
and
comfortable
pipe
bicycle
and
pedestrian
travel
to
minimize
conflicts
between
those
users.
S
So,
as
per
our
transportation
master
plan
and
our
low
stress
walk
and
bike
network,
we
match
up
our
bicycle
and
pedestrian
treatments
like
buffered
bike
lanes
or
vertically
separate
separated
bicycle
facilities
with
the
characteristic
of
the
environment,
so,
for
example,
on
larger
high
volume
streets,
our
approach
is
to
create
greater
separation
and
protection
for
bicyclists
from
vehicles
and
then
on
our
local
streets.
We
use
more
of
a
shared
approach,
a
slow
speed
environment
for
vehicles
and
bicyclists
to
minimize
conflicts.
S
S
R
Thanks
gene,
if
you
could
advance
the
next
slide,
so
the
next
piece
of
the
plan
outlines
recommendations
for
policies,
programs
and
projects
that
will
help
implement
each
of
our
plans,
goals
for
access
and
mobility,
arts
and
culture,
design,
quality
and
place,
making
housing,
affordability
and
diversity,
resilience
and
climate
commitment
and
local
business.
R
R
R
R
A
regional
mobility
hub,
planned
at
55th
and
arapahoe
will
be
served
by
high
quality,
high
frequency
bus,
rapid
transit
in
the
future
as
part
of
the
state
highway,
7
brt
project
that
the
city
has
been
working
on
in
collaboration
with
cdot
rtd
and
our
neighboring
communities.
The
station
area
plan
provides
site-specific
guidance
next
slide.
Please
site-specific
guidance
on
issues
like
redevelopment
strategies,
design
characteristics
and
building
performance.
R
R
R
R
So
those
are
really
the
major
components
of
the
sub-community
plan.
After
collecting
your
feedback
tonight,
we'll
be
working
on
making
final
changes
to
the
plan
and
completing
the
documents
we're
scheduled
for
a
joint
public
hearing
with
planning
board
in
may,
and
both
bodies
will
need
to
approve
the
plan
for
adoption
following
adoption
we
can
be.
R
We
can
begin
working
on
implementation
of
the
plan,
which
will
begin
with
making
the
land
use
changes
to
the
bbcp
land
use
map
and
kicking
off
studies
for
code
changes
next,
please
so
that
wraps
up
my
presentation,
I
would
like
to
turn
it
over
to
our
planning
board.
Chair
who's
been
involved,
I
think
throughout
the
life
of
the
project,
david
ensign
and
then
we'll
hear
from
our
working
group
member
erin
bagnell.
R
So
I
invite
you
david
to
say,
hello
and
speak
and
great
to
have
you.
J
Great,
I
should
be
unmuted,
and
hopefully
you
can
hear
me
good
evening,
city.
Council
members.
I
appreciate
the
invitation
to
have
one
last
duty
as
a
planning
board
member
and
meet
with
you
to
give
you
a
brief
summary
of
the
march
31st
review
of
the
90
plan
that
you
see
in
front
of
you
tonight
and
to
address
any
questions
you
might
have
that
I
can
answer
on
behalf
of
the
entire
board
from
planning
board's
perspective.
It's
rewarding
to
be
able
to
work
on
strategic
planning
for
comprehensively
envisioning.
J
I
did
want
to
mention
that
on
that
march
31st
meeting
we
were
able
to
hear
from
several
other
working
group
members
erin
bagnall's,
going
to
be
here
tonight,
but
we
also
heard
from
community
connectors
anna
cronin
casa,
siberia
and
lady
garcia,
who
provided
unique
perspectives
on
their
contributions
to
the
working
group,
and
we
also
heard
from
peter
owaida
and
laura
kaplan.
J
So
it
was
really
great
to
hear
from
this
diverse
group
what
resonated
with
them
during
the
process
throughout
the
life
of
the
working
group.
We've
also
had
john
gerstell
a
planning
board
member
who
served
as
our
liaison.
So
we've
benefited
from
his
extensive
knowledge
of
the
work
and
we
really
appreciated
john's
commitment.
Q
J
Attending
all
of
those
working
group
meetings
planning
board's
feedback
on
the
90
draft
of
the
plan
was
generally
supportive
and
there
was
appreciation
expressed
for
how
feedback
on
the
60
plan
from
last
year
were
addressed.
The
walking
tours
that
staff
organized
for
council
members
and
boards
really
helped
people
visualize.
The
proposed
changes
members
expressed
enthusiasm
about
introducing
transit,
oriented
development
into
our
land.
You
said
designations
and
the
place
types
are
really
useful
to
inform
what
potential
zoning
might
look
like.
J
So
some
general
concerns
that
planning
board
members
have
expressed
in
the
past
and
also
articulated
in
this
last
review
include
generally
whether
there
will
be
mechanisms
in
the
plan,
land
use
and
zoning,
to
assure
that
there
will
be
a
positive
effect
on
reducing
the
jobs,
housing
and
balance
in
boulder.
J
The
second
big
one
is
whether
we
will
be
able
to
make
progress
in
missing
middle
and
affordable
housing
ownership
with
the
plan,
the
third,
whether
there
will
be
ways
to
assure
a
good
mix
of
housing
types
and
the
fourth,
whether
we
can
keep
the
industrial
and
commercial
spaces
affordable
as
these
areas
become
more
and
more
attractive
for
development.
J
So
all
that
each
member,
of
course
has
a
different
perspective
on
these
concerns.
They
get
to
the
ongoing
recognition
of
the
tension
between
market
forces
and
our
desired
outcomes.
J
J
The
concerns,
though,
that
I
enumerated
led
to
a
couple
of
the
areas
kathleen
mentioned
in
the
memorandum
that
some
board
members
asked
for
further
analysis
on
the
first
being
the
maximum
build
out
area,
calculations
and
job
projections
for
flat
iron
business
part
and
the
second
being
a
list
of
local
mixed
use,
industrial
neighborhoods
that
are
comparable
to
what
could
be
expected
for
proposed
mixed
uses,
industrial
and
of
east
boulder,
so
being
able
to
kind
of
see
what
an
equivalent
type
of
neighborhood
is
either
within
the
boulder
area
or
another
colorado.
J
Community
kathleen
also
summarized
recommended
revisions
to
the
draft
plan,
which
is
that
second
key
issue
that
you'll
be
discussing
tonight.
I
won't
repeat
them
all
since
they're
in
your
packet,
but
I
wanted
to
mention
that
I
did
see
council
member
wallach's
concern
about
referencing
the
airport.
J
Analysis
of
the
airport-
and
I
think
most
of
the
other
board
members
kind
of
said.
Oh
no,
we
should
you
know.
Potentially
it
should
be
addressed
as
just
a
placeholder
or
acknowledging
that
it's
within
the
boundaries,
but
it
would
be
out
of
scope
to
do
any
kind
of
strategic
commentary.
So
I
think
that
was
it
was
just
like,
like
we
do
with
the
power
plant,
which
is
also
mentioned
in
there,
just
mention
that
it's
in
the
boundaries
but
that
it
isn't
being
addressed
in
this
version
of
the
plan.
J
So
with
that
I'll
just
say
that
I
appreciate
that
kathleen
captured
all
the
recommendations
that
we
had.
I
think
all
the
board
members
expressed
a
lot
of
appreciation
of
staff,
kathleen
gene,
gatza,
gene
sansom
and
working
so
hard
over
the
last
three
years
to
fuse
the
plan
and
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
T
J
Well,
these
are
the
actually
the
people
from
the
first
bus
tour
that
the
working
group
did.
I
think
I
I
I
used
that
picture
like
in
a
review.
We
did
way
back
about
two
three
years
ago,
so
it's
kind
of
cool,
oh
and
by
the
way,
I'll
just
say
that
I
did
do
that
last
meeting
from
iceland,
because
I
didn't
realize
I
would
be
in
a
third
meeting
in
march,
so
the
meeting
ended
at
somewhere
close
to
four
in
the
morning.
C
You're
a
champion
david
ensign,
okay,
back
to
kathleen
david
you're,
not
going
to
go
anywhere
right
now,
right,
you're,
going
to
stay
and
answer
questions.
R
Great
so
now
I'm
very
happy
to
introduce
aaron
bagnall,
who
has
been
on
the
working
group
also
for
the
for
the
life
of
the
project,
so
erin
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you.
U
Thanks
kathleen
and
good
evening
to
you
guys,
council
members,
thanks
for
hearing
from
me,
my
name
is
aaron
vagnell
and
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
working
with
kathleen
and
gene
godzilla
and
gene
sanson,
and
so
many
other
great
wonderful
city
of
boulder
employees.
Throughout
this
last
three-year
working
group
process,
it's
been
a
really
long,
but
very
valuable
experience.
I
think
everyone
felt
that
feels
that
way
and
we're
excited
to
see
this
some
come
to
some
sort
of
culmination
soon
and
get
to
the
rest
of
the
good
work
that
needs
to
be
done
here.
U
It's
been
great
to
participate
in
this
working
group,
I'm
a
longtime,
boulder
resident
and
a
member
of
the
design
community
and
an
avid
biker.
So
all
of
these
things
are
good,
once
they're
realized
they're
going
to
be
so
exciting
for
myself
and
honestly
what
an
amazing
opportunity
that
we
have
here
with
the
east
boulder
to
plan
for
the
future
of
boulder.
U
What
I
wanted,
my
main
message
really
is-
and
I
said
this
to
the
planning
board
last
week
or
two
weeks
ago.
What
you're
seeing
tonight
in
front
of
you
is
about
balance.
There's
there's
been
a
lot
of
many
different
conversations
with
people
of
many
differing
views.
U
As
I'm
sure
you
know,
there
are
people
in
boulder
that
would
prefer
things
remain
exactly
the
same
and
an
equal
amount
of
people
that
would
like
them
to
change
more.
So
in
planning
for
the
future
boulder.
We
have
to
entertain
a
lot
of
different
options
but,
most
importantly,
make
good
educated
decisions
as
as
leaders.
So
what
I
did
for
the
planning
board-
and
I
think
I'm
going
to
do
for
you
here.
Q
U
Is
walk
through
the
areas
of
change
with
the
on
the
plan
and
just
go
through
how
we
came
about
deciding
where
to
put
the
areas
of
change
because
they
are
strategic,
so
kathleen,
I
don't
know
who
would
be
able
to
put
up
that
map.
If,
for
me,.
U
So
I'll
just
keep
talking
while,
while
you're
bringing
this
up
in
my
as
I
said,
these
areas
were
strategically
chosen
by
the
working
group
through.
L
Q
U
Varying
a
lot
of
meetings
and
discussions
and
city
staff
did
a
great
job,
selecting
a
variety
of
working
group
members
from
a
lot
of
different
areas
of
the
community
and
had
a
lot
of
different
perspectives.
So,
as
a
group,
the
main
goal
of
the
plan
is
to
increase
areas
of
walkable,
diversified,
neighborhoods
and
communities
in
the
areas
most
appropriate
and
preserve
areas
of
affordable
industrial
where
they
are
most
appropriate.
U
So
analysis
of
the
existing
east
builder
area
plan
boundary
that
you're
looking
at
right
here
in
the
red
dot,
there's
no
residential
within
the
city
limits.
So
there
is
san
jose
community,
but
that
is
currently
not
within
city
limits.
Hopefully,
will
be
at
some
point
and
there's
a
poor
really
poorly
connected
multimodal
transportation
network.
They
none
of
these
communities
are
currently
connected
to
one
another.
So
this
process
is
going
to
change
that
and
and
make
a
better
east
boulder
in
the
future.
So
we
have
in
planning
for
the
future.
U
We
decided
that
strategic
densification
made
the
most
benefit
for
everyone,
so
I'll
start
with
belmont
park
west.
U
Walkable
same
is
true
for
belmont
park
east.
This
is
a
there's,
an
established
neighborhood
to
the
northeast
san
lazaro,
a
city
park
to
the
west,
multi-use
greenway
connections
to
the
south.
It's
within
the
elbow
of
these
transit
corridors,
belmont,
pearl,
parkway,
55th
and
so
again
allowing
for
a
mid-density
development
of
homes.
Here
creates
a
lot
of
opportunities
for
people
and
adds
community
benefits
to
the
neighborhood.
U
Then
we
have
flatirons
business
park.
So
this
is
where
we
thought
is
a
great
opportunity
within
this
existing
business
and
officerian
boulder,
that's
already
starting
to
kind
of
show
its
own
little
funky
personality,
there's
an
adjacent
bike
path
to
the
east
and
the
north.
It's
bounded
by
the
55th
so
and
this
provides
an
opportunity
to
allow
for
what
boulder
needs,
transit
connection,
improvements,
housing
and
community
innovation.
Sorry,
I
messed
up.
U
Housing
and
community
innovation
helps
it's
hard
to
read
and
and
look
at
this
slide.
At
the
same
time,
I
apologize
so.
Lastly,
there
is
the
55th
and
arapahoe
station
area.
What
we
commonly
refer
to
as
stamp
the
transit
oriented
development.
Part
of
the
area
plan
is
quite
appropriately
at
the
intersection
of
arapaho
and
55th
arapa
being
the
transit
quarter.
That
will
connect
our
community
of
boulder
to
all
our
communities
to
the
east,
one
of
them
at
least
you've
heard
from
gene
sanson.
U
U
So
thanks
for
allowing
me
to
go
walk
through
with
that,
I
I
look
forward
to
hearing
your
discussion
tonight
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
about.
The
working
group.
R
Great,
thank
you
so
much
erin.
That
really
concludes
our
our
presentation
for
the
evening.
So
we'd
love
to
answer
questions
and
go
through
the
discussion.
C
Thanks
so
much
kathleen
and
david
and
aaron
for
the
presentations,
so
we'll
do
the
same
thing.
Sort
of
this
time,
we'll
start
with
questions
to
the
three
presenters
and
then
we
can
have
some
discussion
and
then
we'll
make
sure
that
we
answer
kathleen's
two
questions.
I
think
there
are
two
at
the
end,
so
kicking
us
off
again:
matt
benjamin.
M
I
wasn't
gonna
dive
into
a
question
to
me.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
aaron
having
been
a
part
of
two
working
groups
over
the
last
four
years.
It
is
an
immense
amount
of
work,
it's
hard
work
and
it's
the
epitome
of
community
dedication.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
aaron
and
the
rest
of
the
working
group.
It's
a
vital
part
of
how
we
do
our
work
on
council
and
certainly
how
many
of
the
boards
and
commissions
get
the
informed
stuff
they
need
to
make
their
decision.
M
O
Okay,
so
I
have
four
questions,
possibly
three
depending
on.
If
I
could
read
my
handwriting
or
not,
the
first
one
is
going
to
be
as
far
as
community
feedback
goes.
O
Some
community
members
have
written
to
me
that
outside
of
the
east
boulder
sub
community
plan
area,
for
instance,
south
of
arapahoe,
that
they
didn't
feel
like
they
were
a
part
of
the
discussion
and
they
have
a
lot
of
what
happens
to
them
at
55th
and
arapahoe
is
going
to
be
very
important
to
them,
especially
what
kind
of
retail
they
want,
and
traffic
etc.
But
mostly,
I
would
say
retail.
O
So
is
there
going
to
be
an
opportunity
for
those
neighborhoods
south
of
arapahoe
to
be
able
to
weigh
in
on
what's
going
to
happen
at
55th
and
arapahoe
with
the
stamp
area?
R
Sure
so
we
are
nearing
the
end
of
engagement
for
this
project.
We
have
done
you
know
a
lot
of
outreach
to
the
neighborhood
south
of
arapahoe.
R
There
have
been
multiple
postcard
mailings.
Information
about
the
project
was
included
on.
I
think
it
was
the
march
utility
bill
that
went
to
all
utility
customers
throughout
the
city
and
we've
had
representatives
from
neighborhoods
south
of
arapaho
participate
on
the
working
group
as
well.
So
there's
we
really
are
at
the
end
of
this
process,
but
as
changes
come
through
future
projects,
you
know.
Certainly
there
will
be
continued
engagement
for
discussions
on.
I
think
the
regional
mobility
hub
and
stations
along
east
arapaho.
O
So
kathleen
just
just
because
I
was
on
the
parks
board
during
the
res
restaurant
experience.
O
There's
it's
best,
not
a
small
amount
of
community
members
said
they
knew
nothing
about
this,
and
so
I'm
just
throwing
it
out
there
that
maybe
there
is
some
more
it's
all
for
positive.
I
I
I
think
most
of
it
so
maybe
there's
some
other
way
for
those
that
feel
like
they've,
been
missed
to
reach
out
to
them
and
in
terms
of
what
they'd
like
to
see
specifically
in
the
areas
that
affect
them
most,
which
would
be
you
know,
retail.
O
I
would
think
so,
I'm
just
suggesting
that,
but
I
appreciate
all
that
you
and
I'm
just
reading
emails.
So
I
don't
I'm
not
saying
you
didn't.
Do
it?
Okay!
The
second
thing
is,
I
have
a
question
on
middle
income,
housing
which
is
very
difficult
to
put
in
our
city
right
now,
so
how
do
peop?
How
do
you
expect
this
to
happen?
R
R
V
Good
evening
so
jay
sugnet
with
housing
and
human
services-
and
I
was
a
part
of
the
development
of
the
2016
middle
income,
housing
strategy
and
yeah,
and
this
was
definitely
discussed
extensively
with
the
community
and
the
working
group
as
well.
Definitely
a
citywide
concern
and
sort
of
this
missing
middle
and
middle
income.
So
the
way
that
we
are
we're
trying
to
approach
the
the
sub
community
plan
is
to
focus
on
that
diversity
of
housing.
V
So
we
have
an
opportunity
to
create
additional
housing
in
250
other
additional
acres,
and
in
that
is
you
know
how
do
we
provide
a
diversity
of
housing
types?
We've
done
really
well
with
the
single
family.
We've
done
really
well
with
the
medium
to
high
density
right,
it's
that
stuff
in
between
it's
the
duplexes
triplexes
fourplexes
townhomes.
V
So
that's
the
missing
middle
type
and
unfortunately,
the
missing
middle
has
separated
itself
from
middle
income
right,
so
our
middle
income,
we
typically
think
of
80
to
120
percent
that
missing
middle
is,
is
not
necessarily
affordable,
particularly
new
to
middle
income.
So
that's
been
our
big
challenge.
V
Citywide!
I
can
talk
more
about.
You
know
all
the
things
that
we've
done
to
try
to
address
middle
income
and
all
the
initiatives,
but
I
think
the
the
bottom
line
that
we're
trying
to
get
across
is
that
we're.
We
have
an
opportunity
to
create
a
lot
more
diverse
housing
types,
things
that
we
don't
typically
depart
the
market
doesn't
necessarily
provide
and
that
the
future
implementation
piece
is
the
rezoning.
V
O
O
Okay,
so
then
my
I
guess
my
last
question
is
going
to
be
in
terms
of
transit
and
depending
on
rtd
lol.
We
have
this
thing
called
the
transit
village,
which
actually
doesn't
have
transit.
Does
it
so
I'm
wondering
how
we
can
ensure
that
we
actually
do
have
transit
from
rtd
or
we
do.
We
have
another
plan,
because
it
would
be
sad
if
we
made
a
whole
transit
hub
with
no
transit
yet
again.
R
Yeah
I'll
I'll
ask
gene
sanson
to
speak
to
planning
for
transit
with
then
potentially
without
rtd
and
and
how
that's
playing
out
locally.
S
Tara,
that
is
such
a
great
question
right,
particularly
given
the
lack
of
transit
at
the
at
boulder
junction,
which
we're
hoping
to
see
come
back
over
the
coming
years,
but
you
know
in
terms
of
planning
a
new
tod
area.
We
certainly
need
the
t
in
there
and
we
are
working
with
rtd
to
restore
and
enhance
the
jump
service.
S
That's
there
today
and
think
about
extending
it
further
east,
but
but
more
than
that,
we're
working
really
closely
with
our
regional
partners
like
boulder
county
and
our
communities
to
the
east,
to
think
about
other
ways
to
deliver
transit
service
and
particularly
transit
service
on
colorado
7..
So,
for
example,
right
now,
we
have
a
an
application
in
for
federal
funding
to
begin
express
service
between
I-25
and
boulder
on
colorado
7..
This
could
be
operated
by
rtd,
although
I
don't
believe
they
have
the
drivers
to
do
so
now
they
could.
They
could
bid
on
that
project.
S
It
could
be
operated
by
cdot
or
another
provider
like
fia.
So
you
know
at
this
point
in
time
we're
really
getting
creative
about
how
to
continue
to
move
this
project,
as
well
as
others
forward
to
provide
the
transit
service
that
we
expect.
Q
U
C
Thanks,
tara
and
thanks
gene-
and
I
forgot
to
thank
you
earlier
for
your
presentation
portion
two
and
and
then
we
are
up
with
mayor
brockett
for
questions
thanks.
G
Well,
thanks
to
everyone,
who's
been
involved
for
so
long
dave,
echo
bob's
appreciation
for
all
the
work
that
you've
done
on
playing
board
over
the
years
and
good
to
have
you
back
in
the
states,
but
we
sure
are
gonna
miss
you
on
planning
board
here
coming
up
and
aaron
the
extraordinary
work
you've
done
on
the
working
group-
and
I
know
that's
been-
it's
been
a
lot
of
work
for
you
and
and
your
colleagues
so
huge
huge
appreciation
for
all
of
that,
and
the
staff
work
as
well
I'll
just
mention
is
the
first
time
I
had
first
chance.
G
I
had
to
work
with
gene
godzilla
and
gene
samson
at
the
same
time
and
they
called
themselves
the
pair
of
jeans,
which
I
thought
was
super
cute.
So
that
was
a
lot
of
fun
too.
Okay,
so
a
couple
questions
one
is
so
once
we
adopt
the
plan,
we
need
to
change
some
land
use
designations
to
kind
of
match,
the
the
plan's
vision.
What's
the
schedule
for
that
like
what's
the
process
for
getting
that
done
and
when
could
we
expect
that
to
come
forward.
R
Yeah,
so
changes
to
the
land
use
map
resulting
from
a
sub-community
plan
can
happen
at
any
time.
So
we
would
expect
to
following
adoption
of
the
plan
work
on
that
over
the
summer,
and
really
that
would
be
the
first
piece
of
implementation
that
we
would
need
to
do.
G
R
Yeah,
I
imagine
we
would
get
started
in
june
and
we
have
sort
of
the
the
framework
and
process
lined
out
so
yeah
by
the
end
of
the
summer.
I
would
anticipate
if
everything
goes
well,
that
we'd
have
those
the
land
use,
map
updated.
G
Okay,
that's
great
to
hear
I'll
look
forward
to
that,
I'm
coming
forward
once
we
get
there
and
my
other
question
was
we
got
a
letter
from
at
least
the
the
owners
of
5150,
valmont
and
kind
of.
I
I
dove
into
the
the
points
that
they
were
making
and
it
was
interesting
because
right
we
have
the
whole
area
of
belmont
city
park
and
all
the
city
parcels
are
marked
park
for
good
reason
right
and
then
there's.
G
This
seems
like
the
one
last
parcel
of
private
land
in
there
is
this
5150
belmont
and
they
were
saying:
hey
we're
still
proposed
for
community
business,
but
that,
like
parkside
place
type
seems
like
that.
Could
work
really
well
for
our
parcel
and
that
seemed
interesting
to
me.
So
just
want
to
see
if,
if
that
seems
like
a
reasonable
idea
to
to
you
all
or
what
you're
thinking
for
that
one
specific
parcel
in
the
middle
there.
R
Yeah,
so
we
had
certainly
looked
at
that
parcel
and
the
area
surrounding
the
park
and
really
tried
to
think
about
how
uses
for
that
site
might
pair
with
the
future
redevelopment
and
programming
at
belmont
city
park,
and
so
the
thought
was
that
that
would
be
a
community
business
use
that
could
support
park
users
and
and
the
idea
of
small
market
space
between
these
kind
of
growing
neighborhoods
on
either
side
of
the
park
was
one
idea
that
was
floated
in
in
community
vitality.
R
But
I
think
you
know
one
of
the
challenges
to
really
thinking
about
that
space,
as
maybe
just
residential
is
that
it
would
be
pretty
isolated
and
it
wouldn't
foster
the
creation
of
these
15-minute
neighborhoods
that
we're
really
striving
to
create
in
east
boulder.
So
that
was
some
of
the
the
background
and
thought
about
that.
Land
use,
designation.
Q
G
Thanks
for
that,
those
are
the
questions
I
have
on
that
I'll
have
some
comments
when
we
get
to
them.
Okay,.
W
Thank
you
and
thanks
for
the
presentation,
my
first
question:
if
anyone
can
answer
this
is
what
portion
of
the
east
boulder
sub-community
plan
that
we're
looking
at
tonight
is
in
the
opportunity
zone,
and
the
reason
I
ask
is,
as
it
goes
to
the
the
issue
that
was
raised
in
the
written
presentation
about
creating
incentives
for
developers
who
do
certain
things
and
as
as
the
opportunity
zone
is
itself
the
granddaddy
of
all
incentives
and
inducements.
W
R
So
there
is
a
portion
of
east
boulder
that
is
within
the
opportunity
zone,
and
I
don't
I
don't
know
off
the
top
of
my
head.
What
the
acreage
is,
I'm
getting
a.
W
R
Yes,
I
definitely
can
provide
it
and
someone
just
sent
me
the
the
map.
So
it's
everything
west
of
55th
street
north
of
arapahoe
and
west
of
55th
street.
R
Yeah,
so
in
our
in
our
calculations,
we
did
anticipate
that
25
at
least
would
be
affordable,
but
for
a
lot
of
the
redevelopment
we
are
anticipating.
R
W
Is
that
neighborhood
in
the
belmont
east
parcel.
W
Okay-
and
my
last
question
is-
is
going
back
to
something
that
tara
said,
I
I.
I
am
interested
in
understanding
how
we
will
get
middle
income
housing
when
the
market
seems
to
be
incapable
of
providing
middle-income
housing
to
date,
and
I
assume
we're
going
to
rely
primarily
upon
market
related
levers
to
to
get
housing.
How
are
we
going
to
miraculously
provide
the
middle
income
housing
that
we
don't
it's
like
an
extinct
species
at
this
point?
We
don't
see
it
anywhere.
W
R
Yeah,
I
think,
you're
right,
you
know.
Middle
income
is
the
most
challenging
housing
to
provide
in
the
current
market
because
we
don't
have
a
dedicated
source
of
funding,
federal
state
or
local
for
that
type
of
housing
that
type
of
development.
R
What
is
included
in
the
sub
community
plan
that
I
think
makes
some
strides
towards
creating
that
type
of
housing?
R
It's
like
you
know,
I'm
kind
of
walking
along
the
line
of
logic
here,
but
the
form
based
code
will
help
us
regulate
and
create
these
different
formats
for
housing
that
we
want
to
see,
and
so
it's
it's
a
little
bit
further
down
the
process
than
what's
really
in
the
scope
of
this
plan.
But
I
think
that's
what
we've
tried
to
describe
in
the
east
boulder
sub-community
plan.
Is
we
really
want
to
see
these
formats
for
housing
and
that
that
that
you
know
future
steps
will
help
to
implement
that.
C
H
Right
getting
bumped
up
in
the
queue
okay,
so
my
first
question
I
noticed
so
for
the
stamp
area.
There
was
a
really
fine-grained
plan
that
sort
of
looked
at
what
buildings
might
may
be
maintained.
It
looked
like
a
lot
of
things
around
floodplain
had
been
taken
into
account
with
looking
at
that
was
really
great.
Are
we
going
to
see
a
higher
level
of
detail
put
towards
some
of
these
other
areas
in
the
100
plan,
or
was
that
just
going
to
be
the
stamp
area
that
gets.
R
That
yeah,
so
the
the
stamp
area
has
that
level
of
detail
and
actually
has
an
area
plan
applied
to
it,
because
it's
been
identified,
sort
of
in
a
historic
series
of
of
work
on
the
east
arapaho
project
and
the
area
plan
and
consulting
for
that
area
plan
was
funded
by
a
grant
that
we
received
from
dr
cogg.
So
if
there's
interest
in
creating
area
plans
for
other
parts
of
east
boulder,
we
would
look
at
that
and
figure
out
ways
to
include
it
on
our
work
plan.
R
H
You
I
was
also
curious
around
at
the
beginning.
You
talked
about,
I
think
your
first
line
sort
of
started
with
the
whole
plan,
and
initially
you
had
done
an
assessment
of
sort
of
what's
existing.
H
I
was
wondering
if
you
had
looked
in
detail
sort
of
at
what's
existing
with
mapping
sort
of
the
place
types
used
there,
or
maybe
you
could
explain
how
you
got
to
where
the
place
types
are
on,
that
particular
parcel,
because
that
one
seemed
less
matching
of
sort
of
some
of
the
underlying
underlying
existing
buildings.
As
some
of
the
other
areas.
Sorry,
I'm
having
a
hard
time,
spitting
everything
out
right
now,.
R
That's
okay,
yeah!
So
for
the
first
part
of
your
question.
Yes,
we
completed
an
inventory
analysis
and
there's
a
a
report
out
there
that
we
completed
in
2019
that
mapped
and
looked
at
a
really
wide
range
of
factors
and
really
informed
how
we
selected
these
different
areas
of
change
and
what
we
proposed
for
the
different
areas.
R
So
I
can
send
that
report
around
if
you
haven't
gotten
a
chance
to
look
at
that
yet,
but
for
the
place
types
and
and
how
we
created
those
for
belmont
park
west
in
particular,
I
do
think
we
did
try
to
really
be
sensitive
to
the
context
of
that
area,
but
also
really
worked
hard
to
get
new
connections
through
there,
because
there
that
access
and
mobility
through
that
area
is
very
limited.
R
And
so,
when
we
started
to
work
through
those
new
connections
and
began
creating
more
walkable
blocks
and
thinking
about
adjacencies
of
the
park.
Adjacencies
of
the
trail,
some
of
the
existing
businesses
and
space
spaces
used
along
sterling
court,
the
adjacency
of
that
established
residential
neighborhood
to
the
north.
All
of
that
really
did
go
into
the
place
types
that
were
proposing
for
that
area
and
then,
when
we
tested
and
modeled
out
those
place
types,
we
did.
R
Assume
adaptive
reuse
for
a
number
of
buildings
in
that
area.
So
I
don't
know
I
think
kalani
hoa
is
here
who's
our
urban
designer
and
I
don't
know
kalani
if
you
wanted
to
speak
at
all
to
just
how
we
tested
the
place
types
for
that
neighborhood
in
particular,.
X
So
I
have
a
little
bit
of
a
delay
and,
as
my
lighting
adjusts,
so
we
did
some
based
on
some
of
the
feedback
that
came
out
of
the
working
group
and
some
of
the
place,
type
definition
and
residential
typologies
that
they'd
like
to
see
adjacent
to
the
park
versus
what
parts
in
that
area
maintain
some
of
the
businesses
at
the
ground
floor
and
possibly
add
some
mixed
use
areas
to
it.
X
That's
how
was
some
of
the
methodology
so
without
looking
at
some
of
the
models
you
know
piece
by
piece
and
parcel
by
parcel
I'd,
say
we
looked
at
about
eight
or
ten
parcels
throughout
that
area.
That
kind
of
just
on
a
cursory
level
would
would
fit
and
be
a
good,
a
good
rehab
and
a
use,
and
possibly
the
structure
could
support
you
know
residential
above,
but
that
obviously
is
without
us,
going
in
and
doing
an
investigation
and
really
looking
at
how
a
retrofit
on
this
would
work.
X
So
we
had
to
make
a
few
assumptions,
but
we
did
assume
I'd
say
want
to
save
maybe
40
of
the
parcels
through
there
as
an
adaptive
reuse
with
some
mixed
use
above
and
then
the
rest
of
the
new
portion
in
there,
because
there
were
some
businesses
and
some
buildings
that
are,
you
know,
possibly
ending
the
you
know
their
they're
aging
out
in
that
sense.
So
we
did
take
a
look
at
some
of
those
buildings.
X
But
I'd
say
it
was
feedback
from
the
working
group
as
far
as
what
types
of
housing
methodologies
and
then
also
with
with
the
importance
of
trying
to
maintain
and
keep
some
of
the
businesses
that
are
there,
but
also
introducing
some
opportunities
for
retail
to
provide
a
15-minute
neighborhood
in
there.
As
we
start
to
add
housing
and
some
of
those
other
business.
H
Thank
you
no
problem.
I
also
had
a
question
sort
of
as
we
were
looking
at
streetscape.
H
A
lot
of
this
area
is
really
not
out
west
belmont
park,
but
more
of
the
heart
of
the
industrial
area
is
really
heavily
impacted
by
flood
and
as
we
talk
about
streetscape
design,
I
was
wondering
if
there's
been
any
attention
put
towards
stormwater
retention
and
infiltration
in
the
streetscape
design.
H
You
know
a
lot
of
other
cities
do
a
lot
more
of
that
in
their
right
of
ways
than
we
typically
do
as
a
community,
and
then
I
was
also
wondering
if
that
might
be
something
we
might
look
at
through,
as
there
was
a
private
parks
piece
that
in
piece
of
this
plan-
and
so
I'm
kind
of
thinking
about
like
how
we
strategize,
where
those
parks
are
to
be
most
beneficial,
not
only
sort
of
as
social
spaces,
but
also
how
they
can
help
us
from
an
infrastructure
point
of
view.
R
Yeah,
so
for
the
first
part
of
your
question,
I
think
the
street
sections
that
are
included
really
are
intended
to
describe
the
different
mobility
facilities
that
are
being
provided
in
each
of
those
roadways.
But
we
do.
The
city
does
have
a
guiding
document
about
green
infrastructure,
for
transportation
facilities
in
particular,
and
that
plan
or
strategy
document
does
identify
a
number
of
roadways.
That
would
be
great
candidates
for
green
infrastructure,
and
so
55th
street
is
one
of
those.
So
we've
we've
called
that
out
in
the
plan.
R
R
So
this
is
a
program
that
we've
talked
a
lot
about
with
community
members
and
are
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
that
we
can
create
more
of
these
social
and
gathering
spaces,
but
they
may
be
located
in
or
owned
by
private
property
and
private
property
owners.
R
And
so,
as
redevelopment
happens,
how
do
we
create
these
spaces
in
in
properties
and
parcels
that
the
city
doesn't
own
today?
And
so
that's
that's
a
program
that
we've
identified
as
part
of
this
project
and
how
we
manage
it
and
implement
it
and
identify
that
the
prime
locations
for
some
of
those,
I
think,
will
uncover
as
redevelopment
occurs.
But
it's
it's
certainly
a
future
step.
H
So
the
plan
is
to
have
that,
be
something
that
is
examined
as
development
proposals
come
up
as
opposed
to
trying
to
have
a
long-term,
a
long-range
vision
for
where
we
might
want
to
encourage
those
to
happen.
R
So
I
think
the
first
step
that
we've
been
talking
about
is
just
inventorying
the
the
spaces
that
are
out
there
today
that
we
that
we
know
about
that
are
publicly
accessible
gathering
spaces,
but
they're
privately
owned.
So
that's,
I
think,
step
one
and
then
you
know
we
have
to
kind
of
work
with
our
our
partners
in
parks
and
recreation
and
community
vitality,
to
really
build
out
what
the
rest
of
that
program
looks
like.
So
I
think
I'm
I'm
not
totally
prepared
to
describe
what
our
our
future
plan
for
that
would
be.
R
But
what's
included
in
in
the
sub-community
plan
is
identifying
that
that
type
of
program
has
great
potential
for
east
boulder
and
could
be
applied
to
the
ui.
H
C
M
All
right,
so
I
have
a
few
questions
and
and
one
of
them's
a
follow-up
or
a
couple
of
follow-ups,
but
two,
some
previous
ones
asked
where
I'm
looking
more
clarity
but
one
the
question.
I
want
to
start
with
sort
of
just
about
housing
in
general,
and
you
know
the
slide
21.
M
That
was
shown
in
the
presentation
kind
of
laid
out
that
you
know
estimate
of
you
know
new
jobs
versus
new
homes
and,
as
we
all
know
that
when
we
get
down
into
actual
zoning,
there's
an
array
of
zones
that
fit
a
particular
land
use,
and
so
we
obviously
have
a
spectrum
of
the
density
of
housing
that
can
be
on
any
parcel,
and
so
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
ask
is:
where
does
these?
Where
do
these
estimates
lie
within
that
spectrum?
Is
it
maxed
out
in
terms
of
density?
M
Is
this
sort
of
a
high
water
mark
for
housing?
We
could
expect?
Is
it
low?
Is
it
in
the
middle?
So
you
may
have
answered
that,
but
maybe
it
wasn't
totally
explicit
for
me,
I'm
just
trying
to
gauge
where
we
have
room
for
for
thinking
about
housing.
As
you
know,
we
get
closer
to
implementing
and
redeveloping
these
areas
as
it
pertains
to
perhaps
this
estimate
that's
on
this
slide.
R
Yeah,
so
for
the
estimate,
that's
on
that
slide.
We
actually
went
through
these
different
areas
of
change
and
kind
of
conceptually
developed
them
under
our
rules
in
our
model,
and
so
that's
where
those
numbers
come
from.
I
might
ask
kalani
to
speak
to
whether
that's
at
the
high
end
or
low
end,
since
you
did
a
lot
of
that
modeling.
X
R
X
Parkside
residential
has
everything
from
flats
the
townhomes
in
there,
so
you
could
have
a
range
in
the
town
home
on
a
parcel
that
might
be
anywhere
from
12
to
20
units
per
acre
versus
in
the
flats.
If
you
have
on
a
mixed
use
building-
and
you
have
a
mix
that
has
a
higher
percentage
of
efficiency
living
units
you're
going
to
have
a
higher
density
count
in
there.
So
I'd
say
for
apartments
in
general.
X
If
we
were
just
to
generalize
the
density,
the
proposed
kind
of
count
for
something
like
that,
it
would
maybe
range
from
25
to
40,
or
so
that's
just
kind
of
a
rough
average
on
a
few
of
those
park
park
west
properties.
But
of
course
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna
depend
on
the
developer.
What
their
program
is,
what
the
mix
is
there
too?
X
As
far
as
the
density-
and
you
also
have
like
commercial
density
fars
in
there,
so
what
we
were
trying
to
do
as
we
looked
at
some
of
these,
is
how
do
we
maintain
good
public
spaces?
How
do
we
maintain
good
environmental
quality
through
that
area?
What
what
helps
in
that
respect?
X
And
how
do
we
create
better
housing
opportunities
and
maintain
some
of
the
businesses
through
that
area?.
M
Well,
I
appreciate
that
response,
and
maybe
I
didn't
quite
maybe
ask
my
question:
maybe
I
wanted
to
you
know
I
I
want
to
see
us
really
focus
on
a
lot
of
housing
and
yes,
my
question
with
the
the
plan
here
is:
if,
if
these
estimates
are
kind
of
maxing
it
out,
then
perhaps
my
aspirations
for
more
housing
require
a
different
type
of
prescriptive
application
of
land
use
and
zoning
zoning
to
increase
housing.
M
But
if
there,
if
the
estimates
that
you
had
were
at
the
high
end,
then
I'm
feeling
like
we
don't
have
much
wiggle
room
and
we
have
to
maybe
think
a
bit
more
broadly
about
how
to
increase
the
housing.
So
maybe
that's
that
maybe
is
more
specifically
what
my
question
was.
X
Obviously,
kathleen
will
have
more
information
on
some
of
the
housing,
the
variation
between
the
two.
But
if
there's
any
specifics,
I
can
follow
up
on
that.
R
Look
in
the
in
the
neighborhood
descriptions
in
the
plan
it
conceptually
lays
out
in
this
neighborhood
we
would
have
x,
number
of
town
homes
x,
number
of
flats
x,
number
of,
and
so
that
mix
that
is
described
in
there
is
conceptual
and
it
is
responding
to
the
place
types.
But
I
think
you
know
on
something
that
we
calculated
as
a
mid-sized
apartment.
R
I
think
the
the
square
footage
for
that
was
like
11
11
to
1500
was
what
we
considered
middle
and
that's
pretty
large,
so
those
units
might
be
smaller
or
could
be
smaller
or
could
be
closer
to
the
1100
square
foot
size,
and
that
would
increase
the
number.
So
I
think,
there's
wiggle
room
either
way.
M
That's
helpful.
I
appreciate
that
that's
sort
of
knowing
their
wiggle
room
is
helpful
for
me.
So
thank
you
for
for
answering
that
my
next
question
kind
of
dovetails
on
a
question
that
mayor
brockett
brought
up
with
regards
to
approving
the
plan
and
the
subsequent
land
use
map,
and-
and
I
know
that
it's
scheduled
to
kind
of
be
done
later
this
summer,
but
from
just.
Q
M
I'm
not
a
planner,
and
this
is
certainly
our
first
area
plan
for
this
council
serving
myself.
I'm
wondering
why
why
aren't
they
done
in
unison,
because
I
look
at
this
and
I
go
well
look.
It
looks
like
the
land
use
is
kind
of
very
well
laid
out
and
per
our
input
and
planning.
It
looks
like
we'll:
have
a
land
use
map
ready
to
go?
So
I'm
wondering
why
there's
a
delay
between
that
getting
approved
and
not
just
being
a
part
of
the
plan
when
we
go
to
approve
it?
R
If
you,
if,
if
council,
wanted
to
adopt
the
land
use
changes
at
the
same
time
as
the
plan,
that
is
an
option
that's
allowed
under
our
comp
plan,
just
process,
wise
and-
and
I
think
maybe
based
on
some
past
experiences-
we've
decoupled
it,
but
it's
not.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
that
way.
We
can
try
to
do
those
up
on
the
same
night.
If,
if
council
supports
that
and
wants
to
do
it.
M
Thanks
for
that
answer,
I
I
don't
know
what
the
will
of
council
will
be,
but
I
like
to
know
that
at
least
that's
an
option.
So
I
appreciate
that
the
other
question
I
have
centers
around
and
I
think
it
asks
us
in
the
hotline
and
so
harden.
If
I
didn't
pick
up
an
answer,
because
you
answered
a
bunch
of
the
questions
I
had
and
others
had
an
outline,
but
it
regards
sort
of
the
open
space
properties
and
in
particular,
open
space.
Other
is
a
is
a
flag
for
me.
M
It's
a
very
problematic
land
use,
as
we've
seen
with
with
cu
south
right.
It's
designated
open
space,
it's
owned
by
another
entity
and
there's
an
assumption
that
it's
public
and
it's
open
space,
and
it
just
muddies
a
lot
of
assumptions
about
what
the
land
actually
is
used
for
and
owned
by
it.
So
I
was
kind
of
wondering
if
there's
some
understanding
about
that
open
space.
Other
that's
within
this
area
and
if
it
runs
into
that
kind
of
complexity
of,
is
it
owned
by
a
third
party
designated
as
open
space
other.
M
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
could
shed
some
light
on
that
going
forth,
because
that
carries
a
rather
decent
corridor
along
the
the
creek
there
out
away
from
the
hospital
to
the
northeast.
R
Yep,
so
the
open
space
other
designation
can
apply
to
public
or
privately
owned
land
and
the
way
that
the
the
complicated
history
of
of
how
open
space
other
came
to
be
is
the
land
was
designated
as
open
space
prior
to
1981..
R
People
just
people
were
using
fat
markers
and
then
we
digitized
those
maps
and
that
that's
kind
of
what
happened
so
what's
been
great
about
the
east
boulder
process
is
that
we've
worked
really
closely
with
osmp
and
have
gone
through
all
of
the
oso
designated
land
in
east
boulder
and
tried
to
redesignate
areas
as
either
osa
or
osdr,
where
appropriate,
or
have
made
changes.
R
You
know,
particularly
in
that
belmont
park,
west
neighborhood,
where
there's
a
large
oso
swath
in
the
existing
bbcp
land
use
map
changes
to
that,
so
that
it
reflects
future
planned
uses
and
also
what's
on
the
ground
today.
So
we
worked
with
osmp
over
the
last.
R
So
it's
a
little
complex,
but
it
certainly
was
looked
at
really
closely
throughout
this
process
and
we
tried
to
really
clean
that
up
within
the
east,
boulder
sub
community
boundary.
R
M
That
detail
was
exactly
where,
where
I
was
hoping
we'd
go
on
that
sorry
for
everyone.
That
may
not
have
been
interested
in
that
question,
but
it
helped
me
certainly
understand
the
details
of
why
they're,
why
it's
there
and
where
maybe
it's
future
evolution
resides
and
the
work
certainly
done
by
osbt
and
osmp
on
that,
so
so
thanks
kathleen.
I
appreciate
that
that
basically
dovetails
my
questions
until
we
get
to
the
comments.
Thank
you.
C
Thanks
matt
lauren
did
you
have
another
question.
C
H
One
of
the
things
that
I
noticed
in
this
was
the
minimum
far
requirements,
and
I
don't
think
I've
seen
that
in
this
zone
before
so.
I
was
just
wondering
what
inspired
that
and
you
know,
especially
as
we
talk
about
residential
and
not
being
so
important
to
the
community.
H
R
Yes,
so
that
that
language
of
minimum
far
was
flagged
also
by
our
working
group
and
came
up
at
planning
board
as
well,
and
we
are
meeting
with
that
consultant
team.
I
think
later
this
week
to
relook
at
some
of
that
and
make
sure
that
we
have
the
right
language
for
those
place,
types
that
are
within
the
station
area
plan.
R
At
one
point
in
the
process,
we
did
consider
whether
we
should
describe
each
of
the
place
types
and
the
residential
component
of
those
in
as
as
allowed
or
maximum
or
minimum
dwelling
unit
per
acre
and
in
general.
I
think
the
feedback
from
boards
and
staff
and
development
review
was
that
that
wasn't
a
great
tool
to
get
the
types
of
buildings
and
the
types
of
outcomes
that
we
wanted
to
see.
So
I
think
it
was.
It
may
have
been
in
the
60
draft
and
we've
removed
that
okay.
H
R
At
this
it's
certainly
more
work
for
our
team.
I
would
have
to
check
in
with
the
planning
director
and
we'll
look
at
our
work
plan
to
see
how
that
might
roll
out.
C
Is
that
it
for
round
two
lauren?
Yes,
all
right,
I'm
gonna
call
on
myself.
I
see
your
hand
up
tear,
I
don't
know
if
that's
for
comments
or
questions,
but
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
try
and
do
like
lightning
round
questions
here
kathleen.
So,
let's
see
how
we
do.
I
know
we're
over
already,
so
on
page
10
of
the
plan.
There's
acknowledgments,
can
you
add
staff
such
as
yourself
and
the
pair
of
jeans
in
there,
and
everyone
else
has
worked
harder
than
most
of
us
who
are
looking
at
this
just
for
a
couple
hours.
R
C
It
out
check
out
the
racial
equity.
One
there's
like
three
pages
of
thank
yous,
including
staff,
so
there's
precedent-
and
this
is
a
lightning
round,
so
you're
only
allowed
to
say
yes,
you
can
add
that
question
number
two,
I'm
kidding,
I'm
glad
you
can
add
it
question
two
overall,
like
that,
we've
had
a
lot
of
questions
on
jobs,
housing
balance.
I
appreciated
that
there
were
some
concrete
numbers
in
the
conceptual
slide
I
wanted
to
ask
dave
ensign.
C
J
I
think
that
really
the
the
planning
board
just
wants
to
keep
the
focus
on
that
as
much
as
possible.
So
I
think
that
there's
been
a
lot
put
into
the
plan,
but
as
we
go
to
the
zoning
there
could
be
some
specific
language
in
the
news.
You
know,
if
there's
rezoning
to
new
zones,
that
could
say
they
could
really
make
sure
that
the
the
housing
mix
is
higher
than
if
than
if
they're
you
know
so,
the
percentages
and
things
like
that
would
be
of
interest.
J
So
I'm
a
lot
of
those
may
apply
to
the
next
steps
beyond
the
land
use
changes
as
well,
but
we
just
don't
want
to
lose
side
of
that
and
I
think
the
other
complication
around.
That
too,
is
that
a
lot
of
the
numbers
are
like
these
max
max
build
out
numbers
which
probably
won't
ever
actually
happen.
So
it
it's
hard
to
to
have
concrete
answers
to
everything,
but
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
always
have
our
eye
on
that.
R
Yeah,
I
think
the
challenge
of
tracking
that-
and
I
guess
prioritizing
how
that
happens
would
be
challenging.
R
C
Maybe
we
can
do
a
straw
poll
at
the
end
to
see
if
that,
if
that
is
the
will
of
counsel
to
to
look
at
something
like
that,
my
next
question
again
lightning
round,
for
I
saw
that
there
were
you,
know
things
for
rooftop,
gardens
and
accessible
rooftops,
and
I
understand
that
the
height
limit
really
impacts.
What
people
do
on
roofs.
Would
that
require
a
charter
change
to
achieve
that
vision,
or
is
that
a
possible
code
change
that
could
help.
R
Yeah,
I
think
a
code
change
would
help
right
now.
Rooftop
opens
pieces
are
permitted,
but
for
spaces
that
are
not
at
ground
level.
I
think
we're
limited
to
no
more
than
25
percent
of
the
required
open
space
can
be
on
a
rooftop,
so
access
to
rooftop,
open
spaces
is,
is
challenging,
I
think
primarily
for
any
buildings
that
are
at
or
near
that
55
foot
city
charter
height
limit,
because
the
charter
does
not
permit
a
habitable
space
above
55
feet.
R
So
you
know
an
elevator
or
a
stairwell
opening
necessary
to
access
space
above
55
feet
is
not
permitted,
so
rooftop
spaces
that
are
at
that
height
are
rare,
but
below
55
feet.
It's
not
a
problem
as
long
as
that
building
receives
approval
through
height
modification
to
build
above
the
zoning
district
height,
which
for
a
lot
of
these
industrial
zones,
is
40
feet.
C
Okay,
that's
helpful,
thank
you
and
then
last.
This
is
not
I'm
sorry,
it's
not
even
going
to
be
close
to
lightning
round.
I
wish,
but
when,
when
we've
gotten
some
feedback
on
making
sure
that
this
plan
will
be
adaptable
for
future
sort
of
improvements
and
transit
and
land
use,
you
know
ideas
and
we
don't
want
to
lock
ourselves
into
a
2022
notion
of
what's
best
and
we're.
Looking
at
a
40-year
plan
kind
of
thing,
how
do
we
build
in
that
adaptability.
R
Yeah,
so
to
amend
the
plan
or
or
make
changes
in
the
future
amendments
to
sub-community
plans
and
and
what
that
process
is,
is
outlined
in
our
comprehensive
plan
and
would
require
approval
by
both
planning
board
and
city
council
and,
if
there's
any
major
change
to
something
like
the
land
use
map
or
any
of
the
major
policies
of
this
plan.
R
We
would
certainly
want
to
do
a
community
engagement
process
to
make
sure
that
those
changes
in
the
future
would
be
in
line
with
with
how
the
community
would
envision
east
boulder
evolving
for
connections
and
and
the
connections
plan.
There
is
a
amendment
procedures
section
at
the
very
end
of
the
document
that
describes
how
we
would
make
any
changes
to
the
connections
plan
and
those
those
types
of
changes
typically
come
up
through
redevelopment
and
there's
some
precedent
for
that
from
the
north,
boulder
sub
community
plan
and
things
like
tvap
as
well.
C
Okay,
that
sounds
more
complicated
than
I
wish
it
did,
but
understood.
Okay.
Next,
I
think
we
are
over
to
feedback
and
discussion
and
since
we
are
behind,
let's
just
make
sure
that
we
in
the
in
this
discussion,
if
you
would
like
to
answer
the
staff
questions
that
have
been
presented
and
if,
if
we
could
put
those
a
slide
up,
so
everybody
remembers
what
those
are
and
the
community
can
see.
That
would
be
great
tara,
you're
up.
O
I'll
just
combine
my
question
with
comments
there.
You
have
it
so.
My
first
questions
last
comment
is
I'm
thinking
about
our
climate
goals
and
the
fact-
and
I
was
thinking
about
equity
and
climate
goals
since
that's
what
we
talked
about
earlier
and
I'm
thinking
about
that
we're
going
to
have,
thankfully
25
affordable
housing,
hopefully
at
least
so.
How
can
we
ensure
that
we
have
a
a
good,
robust
urban
tree
canopy
and
not
heat
islands?
Because
you
know
when
we
read
about
equity?
O
Often
it
is
the
neighborhoods,
the
neighborhoods
that
have
low
the
lower
income
neighbors
that
don't
have
as
much
that
that
are
hotter.
That's
what
I've
read
and
I
think
that's
what
we've
I've
learned
in
the
four
months.
So
that's
a
kind
of
a
question
and
a
begging
that
we
please
have
a
tree
canopy,
because
in
the
some
of
the
pictures,
when
I
went
on
that
sub
community
tour
really
didn't
have
a
lot
of
trees.
It
looked
kind
of
hot.
O
So
that's
my
first
comment.
My
second
anybody
can
answer
that
if
they
want.
My
second
comment
is
along
the
lines
of
what
I've
learned
from
lauren.
Thank
you
lauren
for
all
you've
taught
me
is
I'm
hoping
that
we're
gonna
have
a
whole
lot
of
different
roof
lines
and
that
we're
going
to
and
we're
going
to
include
the
design
and
arc
the
wonderful
designers
and
architects
in
our
city
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
just
have
massive
square
buildings.
O
That's
my
dream.
That's
my
dream
for
east
boulder,
so
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
want
to
speak
into
that
or
if
I
just
leave
it
as
it
is
as
comments.
R
Yeah,
I'm
happy
to
respond
for
the
urban
tree
canopy.
Yes,
definitely
east
boulder
has
less
than
five
percent
canopy
today.
So
that's
well
below
our
our
goals
for
for
canopy
coverage
in
the
city,
and
you
know
as
properties
redevelop.
R
We
can
certainly
request
some
of
that
in
in
right
of
way,
but
I
think
we'll
be
working
with
folks
in
urban
forestry
to
look
at
other
tree
planting
programs
that
might
be
appropriate
for
east
boulder
in
some
of
these
areas
that
are
not
changing
as
well
as
areas
that
that
we
are
planning
for
change
and
a
lot
of
the
city-owned
properties.
The
city
owns
a
good
deal
of
property
here
as
well.
C
Tara
is
that
were
there?
Is
that
all
of
your
feedback,
or
did
you
have
other
comments.
O
R
G
G
Right,
it's
long
past
my
time,
I'm
sure.
Well,
just
on
your
first
question
about
whether
you
addressed
the
key
feedback
themes,
I
thought
you
absolutely
did.
I
think
every
iteration
of
this
has
gotten
better
and
it's
been
very
responsive,
really
appreciate
the
refinements
and
everything.
G
I
was
just
a
little
disappointed
to
see
the
area
south
of
goose
creek
on
the
west
side
not
being
marked
for
change,
but
I,
but
I
understand
the
reasons
for
it.
There's
lots
of
other
great
things
going
on
here.
So
that's
that's
fine
and
then
yeah.
So
then,
just
some!
I
have
a
few
comments.
I'll
try
to
get
through
this
quickly.
I
know
we're
getting
late.
G
Coming
back
to
the
5150
valmont
question
that
I
asked,
it
seems
like
that's
worth
looking
at
one
more
time,
because
the
like
that
parkside
place
type
does
allow
retails
and
shops
on
the
bottom
floors,
and
you
know
it
seems
like
that,
might
make
a
a
nice
integration
in
the
middle
of
the
park,
some
residential
with
a
few
shops
on
the
bond,
so
it
just
seems
worth
looking
at
again
on
that
one
lauren
asked
about
the
minimum
far
I
really
like
that
concept.
G
I
don't
think
I've
seen
that
anywhere
in
anything
that
we've
ever
done,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
idea.
So
if
somebody
says
hey,
you
know
what
I
really
want
to
do
is
like
a
little
building
in
the
middle
of
a
huge
parking
lot.
We'd
say:
actually:
no,
that's
that's
not
what
we're
contemplating
for
our
transit
oriented
development
area.
So
I
thought
that
idea
was
great.
G
But
I
think
the
concept
is
is
a
really
good
one
and
I'm
glad
to
to
see
that
I'll
agree
with
kind
of
the
direction
that
some
of
my
colleagues
were
going
in
about
a
desire
to
focus
on
housing
in
in
the
area
plans,
so
that
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
that
right.
We
we're
adding
a
lot
of
housing
potential
with
this,
which
is
fantastic.
It
seems
like
it
could
still
maybe
tilt
a
little
bit
more
towards
housing
over
jobs
from
where
we
are
right.
Now,
like
the
stamp.
G
I
forget
the
exact
numbers
you
put
on
there,
but
they
were
close
to
even
numbers
of
jobs
and
housing
contemplated
in
the
master
plan
area,
and
so
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
worth
looking
at
tweaking
the
parameters
a
little
bit
to
move
somewhat
more
towards
housing,
like
one
thing
that
occurred
to
me,
was
the
innovation.
G
Transitory
development
non-residential,
as
I
understand
it,
doesn't
allow
housing
at
all
in
it
and-
and
it
seemed
like
you
know-
maybe
we
could
still
allow
housing
on
the
upper
levels
and
I
know
we're
trying
to
balance
the
preservation
of
industrial
space.
But
if
you
give
people
choices,
you
know
if
the
demand
is
there
for
the
industrial
space
it
can
still
be
created,
but
if
we
also
allow
housing
as
a
choice,
we
might
get
a
little
bit
more
of
that.
G
So
I'd
suggest
looking
looking
at
that,
and
you
know
there
are
a
couple
that
don't
allow.
Well,
I
think
there
are
several
that
didn't
allow
housing
on
the
ground
floor,
which
I
think
is
generally
good
for
street
activation,
but
maybe
it
could
be
allowed
on
the
ground
for
for
the
use,
review
and
a
couple
of
those
so
just
encourage
looking
at
continuing
to
move
it
a
little
bit
more
towards
housing
rather
than
jobs.
G
One
little
thing
that
the
east
side
eats
idea.
I
thought
was
super
cool
about
having
like
a
parking
lot
area
where
food
trucks
could
gather.
You
know
for
the
the
businesses
in
those
areas.
Now
I
thought
it
was
in
the
kind
of
a
secondary
priority
list
and
just
a
thought
to.
G
Maybe
maybe
that
could
be
done
next
couple
of
years,
because
if
it's,
if
it's
just
designated
a
parking
lot
where
food
trucks
can
gather,
might
not
be
that
heavy
of
a
list
but
could
be
really
useful
for
those
businesses
that
are
there
currently
before
much
redevelopment
happens
on
the
on
the
transportation
side,
I
thought
we
got
a
a
couple
of
really
good
comments
from
the
public
on
the
transportation
connections.
I
think
we
had
one
of
our
newer
newest
tab.
Members
mentioned
the
the
concept
of
that.
G
Maybe
all
the
new
street
connections
don't
have
to
be
fully
oriented
towards
vehicular
access.
I
mean,
I
know
all
of
them
would
be
multimodal,
but
we
have
the
one
type.
That's
like
emergency
access.
Only
that's,
I
think,
only
used
in
a
little
bit
and
maybe
could
be
used
for
some
of
the
others
or,
if
not,
that
one.
You
know
something
like
a
vulnerable
style
street,
which
I
don't
see
in
this
plan,
maybe
that
you
know
something
where
cars
are
allowed,
but
very
much
as
secondary
participants.
G
So
I
think
somebody
mentioned
the
plan
for
the
streets
that
you
know
the
the
multimodal
uses
you
want
to
have
in
10
or
20
years,
rather
than
exactly
what
you
have
today
and
then
similar
to
that
community
cycles
made
a
great
point
about
the
plans
or
desires,
change,
transportation,
ideas
change
over
the
years
and
in
in
10
or
20
years.
G
By
the
time
we
get
around
to
this
again,
the
the
most
current
transportation
thinking
might
be
a
little
bit
different
in
terms
of
multimodal
streets
and,
while
the
I
love
how
the
stationary
master
plan
is
really
specific,
I
think
that's
a
strength
of
it.
It's
also
the
it's
very
specific
in
terms
of
what
would
be
allowed
or
required
in
terms
of
the
streetscapes.
G
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
build
in
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
on
those
with
maybe
like
this
is
the
currently
you
know
conceived
typology,
but
there'd
be
a
maybe
a
modification
process,
pretty
simple
that
could
improve
it.
If
thinking
changes
a
little
bit
over
the
years,
so
I
thought
those
ideas
were
really
valuable
to
consider
and
potentially
integrate
and
then
the
last
thing
I
will
say
I
think,
if
schedule
allows
doing
the
land
use
changes
at
the
same
time
as
the
plan.
G
Adoption
would
be
fantastic,
so
I
I
don't
know
if
that's
too
much
work
and
if
it
is
that
we
could
stagger
it,
but
you've
got
seems
like
almost
all
the
ingredients
right
here
baked
into
it.
So
I
think
that'd
be
fantastic.
If
that
could
be
possible,
and
I
will
stop
there
and
just
say
another
huge.
Thank
you
for
some
extraordinary
work
and
really
looking
forward
to
the
adoption
of
this
here
next
month.
E
Thank
you,
and
before
I
forget,
I
just
want
to
echo
aaron's
point
happy
to
support
also
the
changing
of
the
land
use
at
the
same
time
as
we're
moving
the
plan
forward
so
to
just
to
the
first
question.
Yes,
this
is
the
short
answer.
Yes,
I
I
thought
that
you
all
did
a
wonderful
job
of
incorporating
a
lot
of
different
feedback,
and
you
know
I
think,
one
of
the
things
that
always
tells
me
that
people
have
done
a
good
job
on
a
collaborative
project
is
that
nobody
is
100
happy.
E
So
I
really
do
you
know.
I
echo
some
of
the
comments
that
were
throughout
the
feedback
that
this
is
just
strikes
a
nice
balance.
So
thank
you
for
that.
I
also
just
want
to
give
you
a
commendation
for
paying
attention
to
the
arts
community
and
maintaining
some
of
the
spaces
over
there
and
incorporating
arts
into
that
area.
E
You
know
I
think
this
this
process
for
engagement
was
was
really
well
done.
It
was
you
know,
thorough.
There
was
lots
of
outreach
to
folks
who
worked
there,
who
live
in
neighboring
communities
who
live
in
the
manufactured
home
community.
E
That's
hopefully
going
to
be
annexed,
it
was
just
it
was
a
really
thoughtful
and
inclusive
project,
and
I
know
that
the
group
that's
been
working
on
this
for
three
years
during
a
pandemic
has
put
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
and
thought
and
intention
into
what's
what's
being
proposed
here,
and
so
my
question
is
really
around
that
last
section.
On
page
61
of
the
first
of
the
attack
attachments,
there's
just
a
little
tiny
bit
for
amendments,
and
you
know
process
about
amendments,
and
I
think
what
I
would
like
to
see.
E
Change
is
just
a
little
more
kind
of
intention
put
into
what
is
that
process
for
making
amendments
where
there
are
major
changes.
If
say,
you
know,
future
boulder
rights
do
need
a
lot
more
housing
if
they're
proposing
a
change.
E
What
is
the
process
for
making
sure
that
whatever
leads
to
that
change
is
as
inclusive
as
this
engagement
process
has
been
or
more
so
right
that
this
is
sort
of
the
benchmark?
Are
there
things
that
can
be
included
as
we're
thinking
about
amendments,
and
I
think
rachel
and
aaron
both
both
touched
on
this
too
right?
We
want
to
have
a
little
bit
of
flexibility
or
give
give
future
s's
flexibility
and,
at
the
same
time
make
sure
that
this
process
is
as
thoughtful
and
as
intentional,
I
think
you
know.
E
Sometimes
we
as
a
city
and
us
staff
and
the
community
goes
through
years
of
work
on
a
project
involving
lots
of
engagement
and
things
and
then
kind
of
get
sidelined
at
the
last
minute,
outside
of
kind
of
the
city's
engagement
process,
and
so
I
I
would
just
like
to
see-
I
guess
maybe
some
some
sort
of
protections
in
place
for
that,
and
you
know
to
that
point.
E
I
I
also
I
haven't
seen
the
emails
tara
that
you're
talking
about,
but
just
for
folks,
you
know
who
are
concerned
about
a
lot
of
change
in
this
area.
I
I
just
really
want
to
emphasize
that
the
north
boulder
sub-community
plan
was
started
in
the
90s,
and
it's
still
going
on
by
the
time
that
the
east
boulder
plan
is
fully
implemented.
You
know,
if
I'm
still
alive,
I
will
likely
be
retired
and
probably
someone
one
of
our
wonderful
retirement
communities.
E
You
know
so
it
really
is
is
a
long
long
process
and
change
doesn't
really
happen
that
that
quickly,
we're
really
planning
for
people
decades
in
the
future,
and
I
think
that
that's
important
for
us
to
keep
in
mind
as
we're
considering
these
types
of
changes-
and
that
brings
me
to
my
last
point,
which
is
just
a
shout
out
to
everybody
who
worked
on
this,
because
you
have
spent
three
years
of
your
life
working
for
something
that
many
of
you
may
not
see
right,
and
I
just
really.
I
appreciate
that.
E
I
appreciate
all
the
folks
from
the
surrounding
communities,
the
workers
everybody
who
contributed
to
this
effort,
because
you
this
was
true
service.
There's
not
a
lot
that
you
know.
Those
of
us
who
are
kind
of
working
in
that
area
or
living
in
that
area
now
are
going
to
see
right
away
and
that
it's
just
it's
really
inspiring
to
see
you
all
working
for
the
future
like
that.
So
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you.
O
Nicole,
if
I
could
just
say
that
the
people
that
wrote
to
me
was
actually
a
marginalized
community
and
their
community
connector,
they
were
the
ones
that
felt
like
they
were
left
out.
It
wasn't
who
everybody
thinks
I'm
just
throwing
out
to
the
community
that
I
just
was
told
to
just
keep
it
anonymous,
but
maybe
some
more
outreach
to
the
marginalized
communities,
south
of
arapaho
would
not
be
a
bad
idea.
Just
I
think
we'd
have
a
better
outcome
and
more
people
would
be
happy
and
I'm
thinking,
especially
for
what
kind
of
retail
we
put
there.
M
Thanks
rachel-
and
I
just
couldn't
state
just
how
important
and
how
great
the
work
is
that
has
gone
on
to
make
this
plan
work
over
three
years.
Tremendous
community
engagement,
I
won't
say
nicole,
said
it
just
perfectly
so
so
I'll
leave
her
statements
on
on
the
record
and
not
try
to
over
overdue
that
aaron's
points
are
also
spot
on.
So
so
I
think
those
are
key
pieces.
I
will
just
because
it
probably
requires
some
sense
of
a
nod
of
fiber
straw
and,
to
some
extent
is.
M
I
would
like
to
see
us
pair
the
passing
of
the
area
plan
with
the
land
use
map,
if
it's
not
insurmountable
in
in
the
next
month,
I'd
love
to
see
them
done
at
the
same
time.
So
that's
something
that's
helpful
and
and
then
really
to
aaron's
point
about
the
5150.
Your
relook
on
that
is
quite
helpful,
and
you
know
I
to
mark's
point
about
with
the
opportunity
zone.
I
mean
those
incentives
are
largely
financial
and
there's
certainly
a
lot
of
parameters
that
I'm
not
totally
familiar
with
with
regards
to
that.
M
M
M
I
would
really
like
us
to
be
more
descriptive
and
less
prescriptive
on
a
lot
of
this,
because
I'm
really
s-
I
don't
have
I'm
not
really
that
comfortable,
laying
out
a
plan
that
bakes
in
obsolescence,
because
it's
shooting
on
beyond
the
horizon
20
30
years
from
now.
I
I
that
that
makes
me
really
uncomfortable
and
I
think
that's
why
I've
struggled
with
providing
so
much
detail,
but
also
not
wanting
to
provide
detail,
but
not
being
totally
sure
that
there's
adaptability.
M
So
I
kind
of
want
to
bake
in
the
detail
now.
So
we
get
what
we
want.
I
I've
struggled
with
where
to
reside
on
that,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
we
need
to
really
rethink
how
we
define
our
revisions
in
within
the
boulder
valley,
comp
plan
and
think
about
requiring
you
know
every
10
years
we
just
check
in
and
make
sure
we
on
is
this
on
track.
If
it's
yes
thumbs
up,
we
move
on.
M
If
not
it
forces
us,
because
I
don't
think
unless
we
bake
in
those
sort
of
required,
check-ins
we're
gonna
just
get
busy
with
other
stuff,
and
then
it's
gonna
be
20-25
years
and
we
go
well
yeah.
Some
of
that
worked,
but
some
of
it
became
obsolete
because
times
have
changed.
So
I
I'd
like
to
consider
that
I
don't
know
if
that
can
be
done
between
now
and
may,
but
to
me,
I'm
just
uncomfortable
with
baking
in
a
lot
of
these
changes
and
not
adapting
to
changing
times
and
community
needs
and
being
totally
responsive.
M
So
that's
something
I'd
love
for
us
to
look
at
whether
it
can
happen
sooner.
That
would
be
great,
but
I
understand
that
might
be
a
little
bit
of
a
delay
there.
So
on
that
those
are
my.
Those
are
my
pieces
and
again
great
job.
Thank
you.
So
much.
C
H
H
The
west
of
belmont-
I
am
a
little
concerned
that
some
of
the
businesses
we
have
there,
you
know
so
one
of
the
areas
we
have
is
the
hands-on
industrial.
You
know
we're
talking
about
trying
to
create,
you
know
largely
fairly
affordable
industrial
space
and
some
of
the
space.
That's
there
right
now
that
meets
that
doesn't
look
like
it's
mapped
in
as
that
type,
and
I
worry
about
how
effectively
we
can
build
that
type
of
development.
New,
it
sort
of
seems
like
to
have
the
level
of
affordability
we'd
be
looking
for.
H
So
and
then
also
the
businesses
that
are
occupying
that
space,
I
think
our
businesses
that,
if
they
lose
their
space,
will
probably
not
be
in
boulder,
and
I
know
that
we're
talking
about
20-year
time
frames,
but
we
have
things
like
boulder
lumber.
I
mean
if
we
as
a
community,
lose
boulder
lumber.
H
We
are
now
talking
about
buying
all
of
our
lumber
from
home
depot.
You
know,
there's
just
that's
not
the
kind
of
business
that's
going
to
come
back
to
our
community
once
we
lose
it.
So
I
do
think
that
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
whether
it's
through
the
types
of
designations
we
have
in
that
area
or
a
really
robust
process
on
you,
know
ensuring
that
we're
keeping
the
businesses.
H
Especially
important
local
businesses
from
being
displaced,
I'd
like
to
see
a
lot
of
attention
put
towards
that
and
really
the
delivering
equity
options
or
outcomes.
There
was
a
section
that
had
three
of
those,
and
I
think
that
for
me,
that
really
summarizes
sort
of
the
three
most
important
things
that
this
area
plan
can
provide
for
us:
the
housing,
affordability
and
expanded
housing
options,
access
to
services
and
protecting
residents
and
businesses
from
involuntary
displacement.
I
think
that
those
are
really
core
to
me
and
what
we
need
to
deliver
here
and
then.
H
I
would
love
to
see
sort
of
an
overall
layout
for
a
preferred
parks,
open
space
plan.
We
often
was
you
know.
We
often
have
open
space
requirements
and
typically
in
developments,
those
are
not
coordinated
between
the
developments
and
we
end
up
with
weird,
not
very
usable,
not
very
publicly
accessible
spaces,
and
so
I
would
love
to
see
sort
of
an
overarching
idea
for
how
we
could
do
that.
A
little
bit
better
in
this
plan.
F
F
It's
heavily
industrial
there's,
not
a
lot
of
services
in
that
area.
So
that
might
that's
something
that
we
really
have
to
think
about.
So,
if
we're
going
to
limit
jobs,
what
does
that
mean?
Does
that
mean
we're
not
going
to
have
the
same
level
of
services
that
we
would
have
in
other
parts
of
town?
So
that's
something
to
consider.
F
So
maybe
the
issue
should
not
be
well:
let's
have
more
housing
and
less
jobs
which
the
good
idea,
but
at
the
same
time
consider
okay.
If
we
take
away
the
jobs
well,
people
still
have
access
to
the
same
level
of
services,
especially
if
we're
trying
to
create
15
minutes
neighborhoods,
which
is
part
of
a
climate
goals,
so
consider
that
I
agree
with
aaron.
I
like
his
comment
about
the
land.
Use
change
come
with
the
plan
at
the
same
time.
F
F
I
think
another
question
that
I
had
it's
a
comment.
It's
a
comment
similar
to
again
knowing
the
area
knowing
the
type
of
services
when
it
comes
to
transportation,
that's
something
that
we
really
have
to
make
sure
we
honed
in
on
the
level
of
access
for
for
that
area
and
the
role
of
rtd
actually
moving
forward.
I
don't
know
what
that
looks
like
because
again,
that's
a
long-term
plan.
So
that's
something
that
we
also
have
to
keep
in
mind.
W
First,
I
want
to
second
or
third
or
fourth
aaron's
comment
with
respect
to
the
focus
on
housing.
I
think
that's
an
important
element
and
lauren's
concern
with
the
displacement
of
core
businesses
in
this
community.
W
W
I,
the
the
emphasis
on
middle-income
housing
and
diversity
of
housing
types
is
really
central
to
this
plan
and,
as
I
read
it,
I
am
still
looking
for
more
detail
as
to
how
we
get
from
here
to
there
you
know
the
current
trends
in
in
boulder
are
almost
exclusively
to
produce
high-end
rental
housing
and
with
the
occasional,
very
high-end
townhouse.
W
So
that's
where
the
market
is
going
to
want
to
go.
Matt
may
be
correct
that
we
can
find
some
incentives
that
will
deter
that
and
and
guide
the
development
process
in
a
different
direction,
but
I'd
like
to
hear
some
articulation
of
what
those
might
be
and
how
they
would
work.
Simply
saying
that
we
want
middle-income
housing
when
I
don't
believe
a
unit
of
it
has
been
developed
in
this
city
in
the
last
few
years
is
is
important.
It's
that
it's
important
to
know
how
we're
going
to
get
there.
W
Otherwise,
this
entire
component
of
the
plan
has
no
substance.
The
plan
itself
speaks
to
sort
of
the
the
park
mosaic
as
a
default
housing
type
that
that
occurs
simply
through
market
forces.
W
In
20
years,
if
we've
developed,
4
000
units
of
park,
mosaic
housing
and
500
to
a
thousand
townhouses
that
are
ultra
luxury,
we
will
not
have
succeeded
and
I
would
like
us
to
succeed,
so
I
would
like
to
the
final
draft
of
the
plan
to
address
how
we
are
in
fact
going
to
get
to
that
middle
income
housing
in
a
way
that
that
I
can
understand,
because
at
the
moment
I
I
see
the
goal,
I
see
the
aspiration,
I
don't
see
the
methodology
to
get
there.
I
would
like
that
to
be
addressed.
C
Thanks
mark
okay,
tara
and
then
I
will
call
on
myself
and
then
try
and
wrap
us
up,
and
we
still
have
one
more
agenda
item.
Let's.
Q
O
That,
but
I
will
say
that,
if
we
are
trying
to,
we've
talked
a
lot,
especially
on
the
campaign
trail
about
nurses
and
firefighters
and
our
police
and
many
people
who
serve
our
community
moving
back
here.
Let's
say
from
some
of
the
outlying
communities
so
that
we
have
less
commuting
in.
We
definitely
have
to
have
the
kind
of
houses
that
they
would
move
from
their
house
in
the
suburbs
here.
O
So
I'm
going
to
agree
with
mark
and
really
hope
with
all
my
heart
that
we
consider
what
kind
of
housing
we're
putting
in
this
really
special
area
that
it
will
attract
back.
Some
of
the
people
that
serve
our
community
with
so
much
care.
C
Thanks
tara,
so
I
will
say
yes
to
answer
number
question
number
one
definitely
adequately
and
appropriately
address
the
feedback
that
we
gave
at
the
60
percent
draft
review
and
in
terms
of
suggestions
for
finalizing
the
plan.
I
just
want
to
say
that
this
is
an
outstanding
work
product.
I
was
so
impressed
with
the
memo
and
the
the
detail,
and
it's
hard,
I
think,
to
work
across
multiple
councils.
C
I
think
one
person
who's
worked
on
it
hard
on
this
plan.
If
I'm
remembering
correctly,
has
had
two
kids
born
over
the
time
that
we've
been
working
on
this
so
like
this
is.
This
is
taking
a
lot
of
feedback
from
again
different
councils,
different
planning
boards,
a
lot
of
community
members.
So
I
think
that
that
we
do
well
as
a
council
to
to
remember
that
we
can't
solve
all
of
our
problems
in
any
one
project,
and
this
is
this
is
beyond
good
enough.
Q
C
And
we
will
miss
you
and,
and
the
you
know,
all
the
community
members
and
the
work
group
members,
so
I
don't
have
any
other
specific
feedback.
It
sounds
to
me
in
wrapping
it
up
like
there
is
interest
in
in
sort
of
nudging
the
jobs,
housing
balance
more
towards
making
sure
that
we're
increasing
the
housing
component,
although
I
did
hear
one
one
person
say
otherwise,
and
then
it
sounded
like
there
was
a
lot
of
support
for
matt
and
aaron's
idea
to
to
do
a
unified
land,
use
change
and
adoption
of
this
plan.
C
If
possible.
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible,
I
know
you're
all
finishing
a
marathon
with
this
project,
so
I
I
would
imagine
you
heard
the
feedback
and
will
tell
us
whether
it's
possible,
but
are
there
any
staff
questions?
Do
you
feel
like
we
got
you
what
you
needed.
R
R
C
Okay
with
that,
I
think
we're
we're
done
with
the
90
review,
thanks
again
and
moving
on
to
the
third
agenda
item,
which
is
an
update
on
the
library
district,
because
it's
in
a
little
different
spot
than
when
we
last
looked
at
it.
So
I
think,
over
to
nuria.
K
Y
Yeah
thanks
nuria
good
evening
council
members,
chris
mastcheck
deputy
city
manager,
we're
here
tonight
real
quick
to
talk
about
next
steps
on
the
work
that
has
been
done
related
to
the
library
district.
Y
The
county
commissioners
then
held
their
deliberations
on
thursday
april
7th
and
the
county
commissioners
chose
to
table
their
agenda
item
and
not
adopt
a
resolution
in
the
direction
of
forming
a
library
district
by
resolution
and
the
commissioners
expressed
interest
in
really
exploring
what
would
really
be
a
hybrid
model
of
funding
for
library
services.
Y
That
would
not
be
purely
a
district
model,
but
would
also
include
continued
funding
by
the
city
through
sales
taxes,
and
so
we're
here
tonight
to
really
talk
about.
What's
next
and
city
and
county
staff
met
friday
of
last
week
and
talked
through
really
three
approaches,
and
so
we're
really
here
tonight
to
see
if
there
is
council
interest
in
any
of
these
three
approaches.
Y
The
first
approach
is
to
really
give
us
some
guidance
to
go.
Do
some
work
on
exploring
a
hybrid
funding
model,
we
brainstormed
all
kinds
of
interesting
ideas
and
quickly
on
friday,
there's
probably
a
lot
more
work
to
do
on
those,
but
that
would
be
the
first
is
kind
of
say:
okay,
we're
we're
interested
in
exploring
the
ideas
that
the
commissioners
raise.
Y
The
the
second
approach
would
be
before
we
go.
Do
any
analysis,
let's,
let's
see
if
we
just
need
to
have
a
council
member
or
two
and
a
commissioner
sit
down
and
understand,
based
on
the
current
approach
and
the
actions
of
the
the
council
and
the
commissioners,
they
were
pretty
far
apart
in
terms
of
the
the
actions
and
is
there
is
there
further
conversation
that
would
be
helpful
between
the
city
and
the
county
and
and
maybe
understand
that
from
the
the
council
and
commissioner's
perspective.
So
that's
approach,
number
two.
Y
The
third
approach
would
be
to
really
take
the
action
of
the
commissioners
as
not
an
interest
in
adopting
a
resolution
and
give
guidance
to
us
the
staff
to
stop
doing
work
on
the
library,
district
and
kind
of
go
from
go
from
here
and
see
if,
if
the
community
is
interested
in,
maybe
submitting
a
petition
or
something
like
that.
So
those
are
the
three
approaches
and
we're
we're
open
and
interested
in
hearing
any
thoughts
that
council
members
have.
T
Thanks
for
that,
chris,
that
was
really
helpful.
Are
your
options
one
and
two
mutually
exclusive?
I'm
not
sure
I
understood
a
real
distinction
there.
That
sounds
like
there's
some
work
that
staff
could
do,
but
also
council,
members
and
commissioners
could
also
be
talking
in
parallel.
Could
those
both
happen.
Y
Theoretically
they
could,
I
think
what
would
be
helpful
is,
I
think,
the
real
distinction
between
those
is
option,
one
we
would
take
as
really
or
approach
one.
We
would
take
as
direction
to
begin
in
earnest.
Some
some
pretty
significant
analysis
of
of
approaches.
Y
Option
two
really
is
before
we
go.
Do
any
more
major
work
as
staff.
Let's
understand,
if
there's
a
middle
ground
or
approaches
that
the
council
and
the
commissioners,
or
at
least
some
representatives
or
or
individual
council
members
and
the
commissioner
are
even
interested
in
and
maybe
thinking
might
be
viable,
so
it's
a
little
bit
of
direct
staff
is
to
go.
Do
work
is,
is
number
one
and
let
let
the
elected
officials
have
a
little
bit
of
conversation.
Israel
before
we
go
do
any
more
work
is,
is
number
two
does
that
help.
E
I
like
the
idea
of
having
one
of
us
one
of
the
commissioners
just
kind
of
come
together
and
talk
through
that
feels
like
a
better
use
of
everyone's
time
than
having
staff
try
to
come
up
with
something
that
you
know
may
may
just
not
go
anywhere.
So
that
seems
to
me
like
a
good
next
step.
M
Yeah,
I'm
gonna
echo
what
nicole
said
option
three
is
a
non-starter
for
me:
we've
done
too
much
work
and
had
too
much
input
to
just
throw
in
the
towel.
Now
we
need
to
forge
ahead
and
try
to
make
it
work
and
idea
option.
Two
is
probably
definitely
the
best
way
to
go
in
hopes.
I
wish
we
had
had
this
negotiated
conversation
when
we
had
our
public
hearing
to
me.
That
would
have
been
the
time
for
us
to
hash
out
guard
rails
and
non-starters.
We
missed
that
train.
M
W
As
we
are
all
professional
talkers,
you
will
not
be
surprised
that
I
share
the
view
that
some
conversations
is
better
than
no
conversation
and,
if
there's
a
ground
on
which
everybody
can
coalesce,
that
would
be
good.
And
if
not,
we
need
to
know
that.
So
before
we
put
staff
to
a
lot
of
theoretical
work,
we
got
to
at
least
get
a
better
picture
of
the
lay
of
the
land
and
that's
through
conversation.
T
Yeah,
I'm
going
to
agree
with
everyone.
I
think
conversation
is
good.
It
is
regrettable
that
we
didn't
have
this
sooner,
but
we
we
are
where
we
are.
I
do
agree
with
matt
completely
that
thrown
in
the
towel
is
not
a
good
option.
I
do
see
a
little
bit
of
a
hybrid
between
two
and
one.
I
could
see
some
conversations
happening
between
council
members
and
commissioners
that
might
require
some
additional
staff
work,
but
let's
get
the
conversations
going
and
then
if
staff
is
on
standby,
is
ready
to
do.
C
Thanks
bob,
I
have
a
question,
is
it
is
the
concept
chris
one
or
two
council
members.
Y
I
think
I
think
we'd
be
interested
in
hearing
from
council,
but
I
think
the
idea
that
maybe
we
were
thinking
was
was
maybe
just
one
council,
member
and
one
commissioner
to
really
join
us
as
staff.
In
some
conversations
and
to
you
know,
we
as
city
and
county
staff,
can
can
kind
of
talk
through
and
and
have
some
ideas
having
having
the
voices
of
our
elected
officials
is
always
helpful
as
well.
F
Y
I'll
I'll
look
to
the
rest
of
our
team,
but
what
we
really
talked
about
was.
I
thought
that
that,
if,
if
council
is
interested
in
in
this
approach
of
maybe
having
a
council
member
join
us
in
some
conversation
is
really
that,
if,
if
there's
anyone
who's
interested,
maybe
let
us
know
that,
but
if
then
it
would
really
be
staff.
I
think,
inviting
that
individual
council
member
to
join
us
recognizing
that
they
are
not.
They
are
not
delegating
council's,
not
delegating
authority
to
an
individual
council
member.
Y
It's
really
just
one
one
individual
council,
member,
representing
themself,
but
just
to
be
able
to
bring
that
perspective
into
the
room
as
well
as
then
having
a
commissioner
there
with
us
as
well.
So
does
that
help
answer
your
question?
Juni.
Z
You
could
take
that
approach
that
what
that
does,
if
you
do
take
that
approach
as
it
creates
a
much
more
formal
process,
that's.
C
Z
Yeah
people
are
interested,
and
I
I
guess
as
well
really
you
know
from
the
city
side
of
it.
It's
going
to
be
a
city,
manager-led
conversation
and
the
city
manager
would
invite
somebody.
So
as
long
as
you
amongst
yourselves
can
agree
that
nobody's
going
to
feel
offended.
If
they
did,
you
know
if
they
expressed
an
interest
and
weren't
invited,
because
there
are
also
open
meetings,
laws
that
need
to
be
complied
with
as
well,
depending
on
how
things
get
structured.
G
Yeah,
well,
I
was
going
to
say
I
mean
I'm,
I'm
happy
to
do
it
if
it
would
be
helpful,
like
maybe
have
it,
you
know,
I
don't
generally
try
to
elevate
myself,
but
if
having
the
mayor
is
the
point
person
is
helpful.
I'm
certainly
willing
to
do
that,
and
I
just
might
ask
teresa
david,
like
do
you
feel
like?
Are
we
better
off
with
two
council
members,
one
council
member
I
mean
and
in
both
cases
understanding
that
this
these
people
would
have
no
authority
designated
to
them
by
the
council
right?
Z
So
this
is
a
value
judgment
on
my
part,
but
I've
been
involved
in
many
of
these
kind
of
conversations
over
the
year
and
just
as
a
staff
member.
I
certainly
appreciate
having
the
perspective
of
a
couple
of
council
members
to
help
guide
me,
but
of
course
that
would
that
would
be
a
call
that
nuria
would
make.
C
E
I
was
just
gonna
advocate
for
just
having
one
of
us
and
not
having
it
be
that
that
formal,
we're
kind
of.
As
I
see
this,
and
maybe
somebody
can
correct
me
if
my
understanding
is
not
right-
that
we're
really
just
having
a
conversation
or
two
to
see
if
there
is
some
common
ground
that
could
potentially
be
found,
we're
not
going
to
be
making
decisions.
We're
not
sort
of.
E
Whatever,
if
something
is
agreed
on,
it
would
come
back
to
all
of
us
right
ultimately.
So
for
me,
it
just
seems
like
a
faster
and
more
efficient
process
to
just
have
one
city
council
person,
one
commissioner.
P
Thanks
rachel
members
of
council
teresa
taylor,
tate
city
attorney,
my
recommendation
would
be
one
council
member.
P
I
think
we
have
some
open
meetings,
laws,
issues
that
we
need
to
be
observant
about,
and
some
charter
provisions
that
we
need
to
be
careful
about
as
well,
and
so
I
I
would
urge
you
to
to
designate
in
a
very
informal
sort
of
way.
One
person
who
can
go
have
an
informal
conversation
at
the
invitation
of
the
city
manager.
P
F
I
was
gonna
say
that
I
fully
support
aaron's
position
to
be
that
person
because
he's
currently
the
mayor
and
he's
privy
to
you,
know
conversations
and
I
just
think
he
would
represent
us
well,
I
have
no,
I
have
full
confidence
that
he
would
bring
back
whatever
he
learned
back
to
us,
transparently
without
any
issue.
Thank
you.
C
Thanks
jenny,
a
question
for
teresa
before
I
call
matt,
is
it
helpful
for
us
to
designate
someone
or
just
to
say,
submit
your
names
and
and
staff
can
invite?
Should
we
be
discussing
who
that
is
or
what's
the
advice
there.
P
I
I
think
it's
perfectly
fine
to
discuss
who
could
represent
an
opinion
that
would
be.
That
would
be
balanced
and
be
a
representative
who
could
bring
back
an
unbiased
opinion.
I
do
think
it.
It
is
potentially
problematic
for
there
to
be
a
sort
of
formal
designation
process.
So
I
invite
you
to
walk
that
razor
thin
line.
M
See
if
I
can
walk,
walk
the
knife's
edge
on
that
I
I.
I
trust
our
mayor
to
one
have
the
deep
knowledge
base
and
the
experience
and
the
relationships
with
those
that
he'd
be
working
with
to
work
on
the
best
possible
outcomes
to
bring
back
to
us.
K
I
I
I
may
not
have
to
comment
depending
on
where
you
all
are,
but
it
sounds
like
a
reasonable
solution
to
a.
I
either
know
who
didn't
want
to
do
it,
but
it
seems
like
there
is
some
perhaps
acclimation,
to
allow
the
mayor
and
his
role
to
move
forward
in
that
stead.
So
I
will
stand
back.
C
Stand
back
you're
welcome
to
stand
forward.
I
was
just
gonna
suggest
that
I
haven't
heard
anyone
else
even
indicate
interest,
so
maybe
by
default.
If
no
one
else
raises
their
hand,
then
we
could
also
be
done
with
this
conversation
and
that's
maybe
a
little
bit
farther
away
from
the
razer
thin
line.
Aaron.