►
From YouTube: City of Boulder City Council Meeting 8-6-19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
D
B
Excellent,
you
guys
may
notice
that
we're
starting
an
hour
late
because
it
was
national
night
out,
and
so
we
went
on
out
in
pairs
to
visit
block
parties
that
are
happening
around
town,
along
with
our
police
officers
and
firefighters,
to
get
to
know
community
members
more
so
because
of
that,
we
are
not
going
to
have
open
comment
tonight
and
we
are
gonna
jump
right
into
the
work
of
this
meeting.
So
with
that,
we
will
start.
B
E
F
Sure
I
support
Mary's
suggestion
and
keep
mine.
This
is
just
first
reading,
so
I
guess
I
think
what
Mary
and
I
are
asking
for
is
if
we're
gonna
pass
all
eight
versions
of
oh
we're.
Just
asking
like
this.
For
ten,
however
many
versions
of
oh
there
are
we're
just
asking.
If
you
would
accommodate
us
and
include
what's
on
the
whatever
color
the
sheet
is
orange
is
sheet
which
Tom
wrote
up
very
quickly
as
93rd
or
eleventh
version
or
whatever.
F
B
E
One
of
the
concerns
that
I
have
about
all
the
other
options
is
that
they
are
taking
ongoing
revenue
and
using
it
for
a
one-time
purpose
and
using
this
option
would
take,
it
will
make
it
a
one-time
purpose.
So
it
would
be
consistent
with
the
operational
process
of
the
city.
It's
not
law,
but
it's
an
operational
process
that
it's
used,
and
there
are
some
other
reasons
which
I'm
happy
to
share
when
we
have
the
full
discussion.
Excellent.
G
H
Get
a
couple
quick
ones
when
I
just
wanted
to
call
out
we're
pointing
dr.
David
gross
to
the
city
audit
committee,
so
dr.
David
Fredrik
did
this
for
many
years
helping
city
with
this
and
thank
him
much
for
his
service.
If
he's
listening,
but
I'm
excited
that
dr.
Krause
is
joining
us,
I
served
with
him
on
the
dairy
board
for
a
couple
of
years.
He
was
the
treasurer
and
now
the
board
chair
and
we're
fortunate
to
have
his
financial
expertise
being
lent
to
us.
So
just
want
to
speak
to
that
and.
H
Yes,
I
look
forward
to
now
the
the
other
one
I
just
got
an
email
from
the
chair
of
the
Human
Relations
Commission
Nikhil
Mon
kicker
about
the
Human
Rights
Ordinance,
and
the
potential
to
include
some
additional
language
around
religious
expression
in
the
updates
that
we're
hearing
and
I
don't
want
to
try
to
suggest
amended
language
on
the
first
reading
tonight.
But
I
just
want
to
have
staff
if
they
could
for
the
second
reading,
investigate
those
concepts
and
maybe
bring
to
us
some
options
for
consideration.
When
we
do
consider
the
ordinance.
D
C
B
B
G
The
question
has
to
do
with
you
know
these
changes
that
are
going
in
now.
Will
they
prevent
we're
gonna,
go
into
the
east,
folder
or
sub-community
plan
and
I
don't
know?
If
this
will
this
parcel
is
included
in
that
or
how
we're
going
to
configure
the
East
Boulder
sub
community
plan,
but
I'm
curious
as
to
if
these
changes
will
negatively
impact
your
potential
development
that
might
happen
there.
So.
J
I,
don't
exactly
know
what
I'm
sorry,
Charles
Farrow
planning
department,
I,
don't
know.
The
East
Boulder
sub
community
plan
defined
boundary
per
se
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
the
vacation
of
these
easements
in
effect
implements
a
site
review
for
a
two-story
office
building
that
was
approved
in
August
of
last
year,
so
it
was
sent
to
the
Planning
Board.
It
wasn't
called
up
so
this
just
effectuates
that
approval
okay.
Thank
you
so
much.
You
bet
my
pleasure.
G
B
E
B
K
Evening,
I'm
kurt
for
an
hour
director
of
housing,
human
services
and
tonight
we're
going
to
be
giving
a
concise
presentation
on
really
the
results
of
the
last
few
months
of
community
engagement.
And
it's
it's
really.
It's
a
strategy
that
you'll
be
you're
being
asked
to
approve.
It's
really
a
road
map
to
our
updated
strategy
of
the
activities
that
we'll
be
focusing
on
over
the
next
couple
of
years
to
positively
impact
the
experience
that
residents
have
in
the
manufactured
home
communities
and
what
we
found
in
you
can
go
to
going
to
these
communities.
K
It
was
reaffirmed
to
us
the
strong
community
that
exists
there.
This
is
Sharon
Simmons
in
the
middle
there
she's
here
tonight.
This
is
her
her
glory
moment
here,
but
she's
representing
the
HRC
tonight.
She
sits
on
the
ADA
stands
for
Human
Relations
Commission,
and
the
point
of
this
is
that
people
in
these
communities
are
involved
in
their
communities
and
insurance
case
she's
involved
outside
of
her
community
as
well.
It's
a
great
example
of
you
know
what
we
observed
in
these
communities.
K
L
Thank
you
so,
in
discussion
in
discussion
of
the
manufactured
housing
strategy
action
plan,
we're
going
to
be
discovering
what
the
policy
is,
because
that's
really
the
background
for
this
strategy,
the
nine
step
decision-making
process
that
we
went
through
to
arrive
at
what
the
product
that's
in
front
of
you
tonight,
and
the
analysis
and
engagement
that
happened
between
the
February
26
study
session
and
today.
So
it
was
before
you
as
a
study
session
and
you
provided
some
input,
and
it's
back
in
front
of
you
today
is
for
adoption.
L
L
On
the
Left,
you'll
see
the
areas
of
focus
for
the
analysis
that
were
prepared
by
staff,
including
infrastructure,
pad
rent
stabilization
licensing,
energy
efficiency
and
land
use
code.
So
there
was
a
staff
analysis
across
a
variety
of
departments
that
informed
those
analyses,
and
then
we
prepared
recommendations,
including
an
updated
guiding
principles.
L
We
took
feedback
from
both
city
council
in
February
and
the
public
to
add
accountability
as
that
as
a
fourth
principle,
and
then
the
proposed
action
plan
was
put
out
to
the
stakeholders
in
the
broader
community
as
well
an
ordinance
ideas
that
fall
within
that
action
plan
in
our
engagement
activities
included
a
staff
office
hours.
There
was
a
survey
that
was
published
in
June
and
it
was
kept
open
until
after
the
Human
Relations
Commission
hearing
in
July.
We
also
in
April.
L
I
think
the
most
significant
thing
that
has
happened
between
when
we
met
in
February
and
today
was
adoption
at
the
state
level
of
the
mobile
home
park
over
act
oversight
bill.
That
was
a
bill
that
was
sponsored
by
Edie
Hooton,
who
you'll
see
they're
talking
to
jerod
Paulus
who's
holding
his
pen
up
to
her,
and
it
was.
There
was
a
city
and
county
staff
team
that
helped
inform
it.
L
The
the
big
kind
of
piece
of
forward
movement
is
the
dispute
resolution
and
enforcement
program
that
will
go
into
effect
on
May,
1st
2020,
so
that'll
be
in
full
operation.
At
that
point,
at
the
Colorado
Division
of
housing.
We
also
through
the
bill
they
also
identified
or
kind
of
clarified,
county
and
municipal
powers
to
enforce
certain
elements
of
the
mobile
home
park
act.
The
it
also
extended
the
termination
period
for
non-payment
to
give
more
opportunity
to
cure,
and
then
it
also
extended
the
eviction
period
to
give
if
a
resident
were
being
evicted.
L
Another
recent
update
was
that
the
city
excuse
me
the
Cu
boulders,
a
boulder,
affordable
housing,
research,
initiative
or
barri
completed
a
survey
that
we
partnered
to
develop
a
survey
and
they
completed
that
survey
and
it
was
distributed
to
every
household
in
the
four
communities
there
within
the
city
of
Boulder,
and
there
was
a
20%
participation
rate
and
and
I
think
it
tells
a
very
interesting
story.
It
certainly
shows
that
high
level
of
home
ownership-
that's
provided
in
these
communities,
and
it
shows
you
know
that
there
are
more
families
living
in
these
communities.
L
There
are
more
households
that
have
at
least
one
member
of
the
community
there
or
excuse
me
of
the
household:
that's
that
are
over
age,
60,
more
Latino,
more
people
who
receive
Social,
Security
income
and
their
households.
Seventy
five
more
than
three-quarters
of
households
receive
or
have
incomes
below.
Forty
pursues
me
$40,000
annually
and
just.
G
M
L
L
L
B
B
L
B
B
L
Address
that
yeah
I'll
just
do
that
now,
then
so:
zero
energy,
modular
housing
is,
you
know,
construction
techniques
to
you
know,
create
a
zero
energy
and
and
then
also
mechanical
equipment
and
monitoring
and
so
forth,
to
create
a
zero
energy
modular
home
and
basically
kind
of
what
it.
What
it
looks
at
is
that
their
overtime,
it's
an
affordable
home
option.
L
You
know
I
think
a
lot
of
times
with
me
with
manufactured
housing,
upfront,
it's
more
affordable,
but
then,
in
the
long
run,
when
you
with
the
energy
cost
that,
because
manufactured
housing
has
higher
energy
costs
than
a
typical
single
family
home.
So
it
does
create
more
affordability.
When
you
look
at
the
cost
of
both
the
housing
and
the
energy,
and
these.
L
So
in
2017
we
visited
the
we
visited
with
Vermont
energy
investments
corporation,
and
we
saw
we
did
site
visits
to
several
mobile
home
parks.
Our
excuse
me
manufactured
home
communities
that
have
zero
energy
modulars
in
them,
and
yeah
I
think
only
manufactured
home
communities
and
we
also
visited
a
production
facility,
so
they
are
being
made
and
they're.
It's
just
an
opportunity,
an
opportunity
to
really
advance
energy
efficiency
for
these
homes
and
we're
also
exploring
it
in
the
context
of
Ponderosa.
L
L
L
And
so,
if
you
wanted
to
look
in
your
packet,
there
is
the
manufactured
housing
strategy.
Is
attachment
a
and
we're
gonna
go
over
that
now,
so
that
strategy
provides
both
a
background
on
the
work
that
it
took
to
get
here
and
then
also
on
manufactured
housing
in
Boulder
broadly
and
the
other
key
piece
of
it.
Separate
from
the
action
plan
is
that
it
has
guiding
principles,
including
accountability,
affordability,
community
and
viability,
and
the
final
section
of
that
strategy
is
the
action
plan
and
that
action
plan
is
set
to
a
time
period
between
2019
and
2021.
L
And
so,
if
you
just
to
help
kind
of
navigate
through
that
there,
the
blue
bars
indicate
the
topic
area
or
that
area
of
focus.
In
this
case
infrastructure,
then
every
action
that
falls
under
that
category
is
is
listed
individually.
Whether
or
not
it
has
an
ordinance
or
funding
is
in
the
next
column.
Who
the
lead
department
would
be
is
is
in
the
column
after
that,
and
then
the
time
period
between
now
and
the
end
of
2021,
that
that
that
work
item
is
proposed
to
take
place.
L
And
finally,
if
it
does
have
an
ordinance
associated
with
it,
what
that
time,
what
that
kind
of
timing
in
terms
of
a
quarter
is
that
we're
proposing
and
then
also
on
the
side.
You
will
see
the
the
five
areas
of
focus
which
I'm
going
to
walk
you
through
now
and
well,
and
highlight
what
the
action
items
are
under
each
so
the
first
area
focuses
infrastructure.
L
L
Identifying
code
constraints,
so
if
a
manufacturer
at
home,
community
owner
is
wanting
to
replace
their
infrastructure,
are
there
elements
of
our
code
that
are
preventing
that
from
happening?
We're
making
it
prohibitive
in
some
way
utility
bill
notice
requirements
so
that
so
that
Park
residents,
who
are
excuse
me
manufacturer
home
community
residents,
would
have
would
wouldn't
know
what
that
bill
is
it's
billed
to
the
manufacturer,
home
community
owner
maintenance,
replacement
and
service
interruption
plan.
So
those
are
three
different
types
of
plans
that
would
need
to
be
available
and
then
also
an
ordinance
related
to
alternative
lodging.
L
So
if
there
was
an
extended
period
of
time
where
the
infrastructure
is
where
water
was
disrupted
than
a
requirement
to
provide
to
pay
for
the
lodging,
the
second
topic
area
is
the
pad
rent,
stabilization
and
action
items
under
that
really
really
at
the
state
level.
Just
a
reminder
that
we
have
the
state
statute
on
rent
control.
L
We
can
continue
our
exploration
through
completing
the
illegal
analysis,
for
a
local
ordinance
also
continue
to
work
with
the
manufactured
home
community
owners
to
explore
voluntary
agreements
and
then
at
the
state
level,
because
the
statute
on
rent
control
prohibits,
you
know,
appears
to
prohibit
pad
rent
stabilization.
That's
certainly
a
place
to
focus
as
well.
L
L
So
some
of
the
major
topic
areas
were
infrastructure,
maintenance
and
management
practices
that
were
areas
of
concern
where
the
idea
of
Licensing
was
raised,
and
but
also
from
the
resident
perspective.
There
was
concern
about
being
able
to.
Actually
we
have
a
bunch
of
ordinances
in
place,
but
there
were
concerns
about
being
able
to
navigate
to
navigate
the
city
system
to
try
to
resolve
if
they
had
a
concern
and
then
whether
or
not
they
were
staffing
available.
So
the
licensing
and
enforcement
action
items
are
kind
of
a
package
that
would
focus
on
that.
L
We
found
that
it
was
it
was.
Would
it
be
take
a
lot
of
effort
to
create
a
licensing
program?
We
would
have
to
create
a
new,
a
new
home
for
that
licensing
program
because
it
doesn't
neatly
fit
into
rental,
licensing
or
business
licensing,
so
this
would
create
new
ordinances,
a
navigation
guide
to
help
residents,
understand
how
to
pursue
their
concerns
and
then
determine
and
then
looking
at
our
staffing
and
within
the
adequacy
of
it,
both
now
and
then
into
the
future
as
new
Ida.
L
If
we
look
at
adopting
additional
ordinances,
the
fourth
area
focuses
energy
efficiency,
and
so
this
is
coming
back
to
the
zero
energy
modular.
We
are
planning
on
doing
a
modular
housing
in
Ponderosa
and
we
are
currently
looking
for
a
site
where
a
you
know,
construction
could
take
place.
We
are
also
related
to
energy
efficiency.
L
The
fifth
topic
area
is
the
land
use
code
and
primarily,
the
goal
is
that
we
that
we
saw
trying
to
advance
here
is
manufactured
development
of
new
manufactured
home
communities,
which
hasn't
happened
despite
having
a
policy
in
favor
of
that
outcome.
So
a
parcel
analysis
is
being
proposed
there,
and
then
we
have
the
way
the
action
plan
is
laid
out.
We
have
a
number
of
items
under
infrastructure,
pad
rent
stabilization,
local
enforcement,
energy
efficiency
and
then
this
other
category.
L
D
Have
a
really
brief
comment
and
a
question
at
the
same
time,
literally
in
Vermont,
they
built
these
there's
a
company
called
Burma,
which
is
a
private
company
that
works
with
this
state
agency
to
build
these
zero
energy
modular
homes.
So
when
you
talk
about
looking
for
a
site,
would
you
also
be
looking
for
the
equivalent
of
Vermont
locally,
or
could
you
contract
with
them
or
what
are
your
thoughts
about
that.
K
So
ver
mod
could
help
us
with
this
process,
as
sort
of
a
consultant
on
this
they've
sort
of
made
all
the
mistakes
and
learned
all
the
lessons
of
how
to
do
it
right.
So
we
are.
We
are
looking
for
a
site
within
the
city
of
Boulder
to
be
able
to
do
this.
There's
currently
no
manufacturing
homes
being
completed
in
the
city
in
the
state
of
Colorado
right
now,
they've
all
moved
out,
so
there's
there's
a
real
need
for
that.
K
There's
a
real
niche
for
it
and
what
we
found-
and
you
know
in
the
East
Coast-
is
that
it's
it's
it's
sort
of
a
normalized
product.
It's
it's
occurring
there,
and
so
it's
both
the
local
action
as
well
as
we're
working
with
a
number
of
states
organizations
to
see
if
we
can
help
encourage
this
at
a
state
level
as
well.
Thank.
G
G
H
H
G
If
you
could
go,
I
was
just
trying
to
go
to
our
youth
tables.
You
you
and
one
of
your
sites
near
the
end.
You
said:
there's
no
more
places
for
manufactured
home
communities
in
the
city
of
Boulder,
but
actually
we
have
a
lot
of
potential
in
other
places
and
I
was
reviewing
our
packet
tonight
for
the
youth
tables
and
I
saw
if
I'm
reading
it
correctly
that
we
could
consider
a
lot
other
places
or
zones
than
we
are
using
right
now.
G
There
single-family
houses
and
I
don't
see
why
we
wouldn't
really
start
looking
in
those
kinds
of
places
when
we're
looking.
Do
you
have
any
more
questions?
No
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
looking
at
these
other
zones
and
that
you're
working
with
the
Planning
Department
on
not
just
manufactured
housing,.
L
L
B
L
It's
kind
of
an
open
topic:
it
could
be
helping
with
replacement
of
helping
manufacturer
to
homeowners,
to
replace
their
homes
so
coming
up
with
different
partnerships
with
you
know,
desirable
partnerships,
maybe
with
manufacturers
and
lenders
and
kind
of
coming
up
with
a
whole
package.
It
would
be
one
idea,
but
there's
a
variety
of
ways
that
it
could
potentially
be
deployed.
More
and
more,
the
climate
initiative
staff
is
looking
at
social
equity
and
so
they're
interested
in
looking
at
deploying
it
to
serve
people
in
these
communities.
L
B
Kind
of
broad,
okay,
just
trying
to
understand
as
we
move
forward,
is
that
in
terms
of
state
legislative
priorities
you
mentioned
since
Ron,
the
legislative
committee
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
have
the
ones
one
is
to
look
into
the
state
grant
control
piece,
at
least
as
regards
to
mobile
home
community,
to
our
manufactured
home
communities.
There
are
other
things
on
our
legislative
agenda
for
next
year.
Yes,.
B
B
L
The
original
intent
on
having
it
focus
on
the
city
was
to
look
at
how
we
could
advance
preservation
and
opportunities
in
the
city,
so
it
was
really
about
keeping
the
conversation
focused
because
because
annexation
there
are
a
number
of
communities,
I
think
Columbine
is
one
San
lázaro
and
then
of
course,
Ponderosa
is
kind
of
in
the
process
we
get.
You
know
owned.
Ponderosa
and
Table
Mesa
village
are
all
eligible.
L
B
N
On
the
guiding
principles,
it
says,
under
accountability
and
under
all
four
of
the
main
topics
that
should
is
the
verb,
so
that
agreements
ordinances
and
this
may
be
for
the
city
attorney
agreements,
ordinances
and
requirements
should
have
clearly
defined
and
practical
enforcement
mechanisms
etc.
Why
wouldn't
that
be
we'll
since
should
implies
that
it
may
not
be.
We.
N
Is
on
page
2,
it's
just
the
draft
of
39
I
mean
okay
IDing
principle:
yes,
889
yeah
I'm,
just
looking
at
it
through
there
I
thought
the
will
would
be
very
emphatically
standardized.
What
was
coming
in
there
rather
than
just
we're
trying
for
this
now
we're
trying
for
we're
gonna.
Do
it
yep
so,
but
I'm,
not
a
lawyer.
So.
B
E
So
I
had
I
have
several
questions
when
the
first
one
is
with
respect
to
setting
fixture
limits.
I
thought
that
was
an
interesting
idea
that
was
had
I,
believe
it
was
the
Human
Relations,
Commission
and
I
was
interested
in
hearing
a
little
bit
more
about
how
that
discussion
came
about
and
what
the
aim
would
be
and
how
that
would
affect
setting
the
operational
requirements.
Yeah.
L
Maybe
I'll
start
with
the
concern,
so
it
was
part
of
their
discussion.
Sharon
Simmons
who's
sitting
in
the
audience
is
on
the
Human,
Relations,
Commission
and
she's.
Also
a
resident
and
so
is
familiar
with
those
issues.
I
think
the
concern
the
concern
is
whether
or
not
the
systems
are
adequate
to
handle
more
homes,
larger
homes.
You
know,
I
think
it's
specifically
larger
whom
so
currently
what
they're
you
know,
the
the
older
homes
are
single
wide
fewer
bedrooms
and
the
larger
homes
that
are
coming
in
have
more
so
that's
that's
a
concern.
E
L
But
yes,
that's
a
good
warning
and
I
think
that's
a
nice
opportunity
to
talk
about
how
really
this
is.
This
would
be
just
the
beginning
of
the
conversation
and
then
doing
a
lot
of
work
with
stakeholders
to
understand
what
it's
really
crystallize,
what
we
want
and
then
you
know,
try
to
avoid
those
unintended
consequences.
L
E
L
So
I
the
rulemaking
is
because
they're
setting
up
a
new
program
and
I
mean
I
think
believe.
One
of
the
other
interesting
caveats,
I
heard
about
with
the
$30,000,000,
is
that
a
lot
of
it's
actually
going
to
be
reallocated
to
a
different
Department.
It's
paying
back
something
so
I,
don't
know
how
much
it
will
turn
into
or
how
much
of
it
will
go
to
this.
You
know
category
of
work
of
you
know
replacing
helping
people
remove
their
old
homes,
helping
them
fund
purchase
of
new
homes.
So.
E
L
Yeah
so
I
think,
and
basically,
when
we
had
conversations
with
the
licensing
we
talked
with
both
the
rental
licensing
and
with
business
licensing
and
there's.
Some
of
the
hurdles
include
the
there
would
actually
have
to
be
a
new
look
since
for
the
people
who
are
doing
the
inspections
right
and
and
when
you
think
about
it,
there's
three
communities
that
we
would
have
to
you
know
license
on
whatever
basis
so
every
four
years
or
so
forth.
So
there's
like
there's
not
necessarily
enough
communities
to
justify
that
licensing
would
be
one
of
the
challenges.
L
Another
one
is
that
the
you
know,
just
the
business
licensing
function
isn't
necessarily
set
up
to
look
at
either
of
the
issues
that
were
raised
around
the
topic
areas.
I
should
say
that
were
raised
around
you
know,
management
practices,
I
would
call
it
business
business
practices
or
management
practices
and
then
ensuring
that
infrastructure
is
running
properly.
So
that's
why
that
alternative
approach
of
a
package
of
ordinances
and
just
ensuring
that
people
understand
how
to
you
know,
navigate
a
complaint
and
so
forth
would
be
is
what
we're
proposing?
Okay.
E
Thank
you
and
my
final
question
had
to
do
in
the
in
the
strategy
itself.
There
was
a
line
about
expanding
on-site,
Human,
Services
and
or
recreational
programs,
and
I
was
just
I
guess.
I
was
unaware
that
that
there
was
already
some
human
services
and
and
recreational
program
programs
to
expand
upon
so
I
just
wanted
to
hear
a
little
bit
about
what
is
going
on
and
what
would
be
expanded.
E
L
I
mean
so
probably
at
the
basic
level
and
maybe
expand.
Maybe
we
should
have
used
a
different
word.
Certainly,
groups
like
fo
are
supporting.
Residents
to
you
know,
pay
their
rent
when
they
run
into
a
period
where
they
don't
have.
You
know,
maybe
a
low
employment
period
or
something
like
that
there,
but
in
general
what
we're
looking
at
would
be
excreting,
more
recreational
youth
programming,
so
in
Ponderosa
right
now
they
just
launched
I
think
it's
called
the
rec
on
Wheels
program
and
so
they're
bringing
recreation
to
residents
and.
L
G
They
really
are
questions.
Okay,
so
so
I
have
two
questions,
one
of
them
in
the
document.
You
talked
about
chattel
loans
and
how
much
more
expensive
they
are
and
that
they
their
due
date,
is
much
earlier
than
most
mortgages.
Do
we
have
any
programs
in
the
city
that
people
who
want
to
live
in
a
manufactured
home
community
could
apply
to
and
see
some
kind
of
funding,
support
or
a
loan,
or
something
like
that?
Do
we
have
anything
like
that?
We.
L
L
G
L
B
Well
with
that,
let's
turn
to
the
public
hearing.
We
have
16
people
signed
up
to
speak.
If
anybody
else
wants
to
speak
up,
if
you
could
do
so
quickly
at
that
table,
that
would
be
great.
Everybody
will
get
two
minutes
of
peace
if
you
could
start
with
your
name
and
your
address,
that
would
be
great
and
we
will
start
with
Tina
bogan
and
if
Teresa
could
be
ready
to
go,
that
would
be
great
hi.
P
P
So
as
this
has
moved
along
the
people
that
wish
to
stay
in
their
current
mobile
homes,
which
is
what
we've
been
told
from
the
beginning,
because
they
don't
qualify
or
can't
or
just
don't
want
to
they're
happy
where
they
are
and
have
put
tons
of
money
into
their
home
to
make
it
a
nice
home
really
have
nothing.
But
the
word
of
city
employees
and
written
in
our
resident
guides
that
we
get
every
few
months
with
updates
and
everything.
So
we
have
nothing
legal
and
binding.
That
is
securing
our
future.
P
There,
people
are
getting
nervous,
we've
lost
12
families
already,
and
it's
just
not
making
a
lot
of
sense
to
people
that
you
spend
all
this
money
to
put
affordable
homes
in
for
other
people,
because
it's
looking
like
people
that
are
living
in
Ponderosa
may
not
make
that
transition
or
can't
and
there's
no
reason
for
their
homes.
That
are
there
to
to
leave.
P
You
know
those
homes
are
fine,
so
I'm,
just
asking
that
through
this
process,
that
you
really
take
that
into
consideration
and
we've
asked
for
me
like
a
legal
contract
one-on-one
between
the
city
and
a
homeowner.
That's
there
we
were
told
no
on
that.
We
were
told
we'd
be
written,
as
we
first
told
the
zoning
would
never
change
and
that's
changing.
We
were
also
told,
then
that
we
would
be
written
into
the
annexation
and
we're
not
being
around
into
that.
So
you
know
we
don't
really
everything's
been
subject
to
change.
P
B
Q
My
name
is
Sheree,
so
close
breathe.
That's
all
right!
It's
a
bad
name!
That's
why
I'm
a
name
my
kids,
Toni
and
Randy
good
evening,
I
live
in
the
Ponderosa
and
I
was
forced
to
move
there
after
the
violet
crossing
development,
I
I'm.
Just
learning
about
this
study
session,
I
I,
wonder
why
the
Ponderosa
residents
weren't
invited
I,
guess
it's
because
we're
not
in
the
city,
but
that
would
have
been
really
nice
in
my
hand,
now
you'll
find
information
that
was
given
to
us
during
community
engagement
meetings
that
we
all
attended.
Q
The
first
shows
really
amazing
images
of
single-family
homes.
This
is
what
we
were
first
pulled
on
sheets
two
and
three
outlined
the
cost
in
the
beginning,
seven
hundred
and
forty
dollars
to
795
I'm,
finding
out
that
I'll
be
paying
$1,200
more
to
own.
A
Habitat
for
Humanity
home
next
page
is
the
flood
protection
analysis
where
it
shows
on
the
West
End,
where
all
the
flood
water
is
most
likely
to
go.
They
want
to
add
nine
more
homes
in
that
area,
and
the
last
page
is
a
printout
from
the
daily
camera.
Q
Q
The
government's
long
arm
of
encroachment
is
laying
on
the
backs
of
boulders
poorest
residents.
One
of
my
neighbors
digs
through
the
trash
to
find
items
to
sell
during
the
summer,
so
she
can
get
by
I
had
another
neighbor
that
didn't
have
heat
all.
Last
winter.
We
had
be
encouraged
to
voice
what
we
went
for
the
Ponderosa.
We
all
want
single-family
homes
without
shared
walls.
The
plan
has
mostly
multi-family
homes,
I'm
almost
finished.
The
plan
now
wants
to
add
nine
more
homes
on
the
west
side,
so
folks
can
move
to
them.
Q
Well,
the
homes
are
being
built.
Twelve
trailers
are
now
vacant.
Why
can't
we
build
in
these
spaces
instead
of
destroying
the
small
buffer
on
the
west
side
before
the
Rosewood
neighborhood
was
built?
The
city
promised
not
to
build
here
now
they
want
to
add
more
housing,
crowding
and
crowding
us
in
on
land
that
absorbs
reading
during
the
storms.
The
city
plan
is
making
the
Ponderosa
place.
We
don't
want
to
live
in,
we
ask
pleas
for
promises
to
be
fulfilled.
We
asked
for
just
compensation
for
our
homes.
Thank
you.
Thank.
R
My
name
is
Tanya:
petty
I
live
at
Vista,
Village
I've
been
here
many
times
as
a
matter
of
fact
up
and
coming
since
2014.
In
regards
to
the
water
issues,
people
are
being
charges,
thousands
of
dollars
for
water
they're,
not
using
I've.
Given
you
information
from
2014
till
now,
and
it
happened
to
me
in
2016
to
the
tune
of
$500
and
went
to
Dora
and
they
dismissed
it.
Even
though
I
was
discriminated
against,
harassed,
intimidated
to
point
where
I
had
to
have
video
cameras
in
my
own
home
because
of
management
and
owner
involvement.
R
This
has
been
an
issue
for
a
long
time.
It's
still
going
on
the
sewer
back,
backups
$32,000
damage
to
my
home,
$11,000,
hotel
costs
and
$1,000.
Personally
to
me,
the
other
was
covered
by
my
insurance.
Thank
god.
These
backups
have
happened
to
so
many
people,
but
they're
afraid
to
come
in
this
is
raw
sewage
going
into
their
homes.
That
cannot
be
mitigated,
except
for
by
being
removed
and
management's,
not
taking
responsibility
for
the
infrastructure.
They're,
not
taking
responsibility
for
the
sewer
damages
that
came
in
my
home
and
literally
laughed
at
me
thinking.
R
It
was
funny
that
I
had
to
live
in
raw
sewage,
the
existing
laws
and
ordinances
are
there.
We
need
an
officer
to
enforce
them.
We
need
a
Zoning,
Commission
or
officer
to
be
able
to
go
in
and
investigate
the
infrastructure
and
force
the
existing
laws
and
ordinances.
A
code
enforcement
officer
would
be
able
to
give
fines
for
non-compliance.
R
They're
charging
residents
for
leaks,
existing
leaks
in
the
system
as
a
whole.
There's
no
maintenance.
The
HOA
has
been
for
five
years
now
and
we
won't
be
able
to
sustain
ourselves
if
we
don't
have
help
from
the
city
staff
and
from
you
guys
in
regards
to
this
enforcement
code
and
an
officer
to
help
us
no
one's
willing
to
come
in
and
complain
or
make
these
complaints
because
of
fear
and
retaliation,
and
it
continues
to
go
on.
No
enforcement,
no
need
to
comply.
Thank
you.
S
Let
me
introduce
myself:
I'm
Brad
Olson
I
live
at
4902
clubhouse
court
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
Boulder
Vista
village,
as
well
as
Riverstone
Communities
and
Orchard
Grove.
First,
let
me
thank
the
city
staff.
One
of
the
things
that
we've
asked
for
is
what
was
pickle
coined
by
one
of
the
former
council
members
as
the
boulder
way,
and
the
city
staff
has
certainly
done
that
they've
done
an
excellent
job
of
being
a
awful,
respectful
and
productive
process.
S
With
the
discussion
of
important
issues
with
all
stakeholders
and
that's
to
be
commended,
we
would
ask
that
it's
an
indicate
that
it's
critically
important
that
that
process
continue
throughout
this.
The
ongoing
process,
I,
guess
I'm
using
process
too
many
times,
but
we
would
ask
that
it
continue,
especially
as
ordinances
are
being
drafted.
It's
important
that
that
process
also
includes
comments
from
stakeholders
before
the
ordinances
released
at
first
reading.
So
we
would
ask
I
suppose,
primarily
the
City
Attorney's
Office,
to
engage
in
the
same
sort
of
thoughtful
process.
S
S
We
we've
sought
a
path
based
upon
building
community,
not
building
walls,
and
we
do
it
every
day.
Having
a
nice
place
to
live
it's
important
for
everyone.
It
does
not
happen
by
accident.
We
do
have
to
manage
and
operate
our
parks
every
day
so
that
they're
lovely,
safe
and
affordable.
Please
do
visit
us.
I
hold
us
accountable,
that's
fine!
S
Our
parks
are
not
home
to
just
or
even
mostly
vulnerable
residents
have
Vista
village.
The
average
household
income
is
approximately
$50,000.
Homes
are
being
purchased
now
in
the
75,000
to
$150,000
range.
We
have
very
few
evictions.
Orchard
Grove
has
in
you'll,
hear
from
representative
of
orchha
Grove
has
none.
Vista
village
has
two
to
four
in
the
last
ten
years.
We
agree
that
parks
are
an
important
part
of
the
solution,
but
the
reality
is
were
a
small
part
of
the
overall
housing
picture
were
something
at
a
long
line.
2.8
percent
of
the
total
housing
in
Boulder.
T
T
T
We've
invited
the
council
members
to
visit
us
as
of
this
day,
I've,
not
seen
any
council
member
coming
to
my
door
to
visit
us,
and
we
really
would
like
to
welcome
you
to
come
in
talk
to
us
see
what
we
do
we're
very
excited
about
working
with
rec
on
wheels.
They
were
just
in
here
last
week
in
our
office
last
week,
so
we're
gonna
be
starting
that
we
are
at
full
capacity
as
soon
as
a
house
is
ready
to
move
out
of
the
park.
It's
old,
they
bring
in
another
one
and
it's
old
yeah.
T
They
are
going
for
very
high
prices,
I'm
even
shot
to
the
prices
that
they're
going
for.
We
were
on
a
waiting
list.
Vista
Village
is
a
very
nice
place
to
live.
We
do
have
other
happy
people,
but
we
have
majority
of
happy
people
and,
as
I
said,
I
really
really
really
encourage
any
of
you
to
please
come
into
my
office.
Talk
to
me,
let
me
tell
you
face
to
face
from
what
we're
doing
to
help
the
residents
the
resources
that
we
give
the
residents
I.
T
G
T
T
U
We
just
now
this
year,
which
is
amazing,
we're
able
to
figure
out
how
to
recreate
that
and
we'll
be
bringing
that
to
our
community
here
at
Orchard
Grove,
as
well
as
all
of
the
rest
of
our
communities
around
the
country.
So
we're
very
proud
of
the
work
that
we
do
with
that
stuff
and
I
wanted
to
share
that
with
you
to
let
you
know
that
that
will
be
coming
soon
to
our
community
there
and
then
quickly
to
you've
met
elizabeth
organs.
U
She
is
my
right-hand
person
here
and
she
wanted
me
to
give
you
an
update
on
our
infrastructure
as
well,
so
we
have
had
to
shut
off
valves
that
have
been
installed
at
our
property
so
far.
So
if
anybody
is
out
of
water,
we
can
set
the
zones
up,
so
it
won't
infect
the
whole
community
and
we've
also
had
the
entire
thing
inspected,
as
well
as
preventive
plans
and
completely
mapped
out.
So
we're
excited
that
that's
moving
forward
and
we
have
a
clear
plan
with
our
contractor
on
what
we
need
to
do
going
forward.
U
B
D
U
D
I
think
you
would
be
very
helpful
if
the
city
had
the
records
of
the
maps
that
you've
made
simply
because
it
was
a
problem
the
last
time,
and
so,
if
there's
backup
or
redundancy.
As
far
as
what's
available
to
the
city
contractors
to
look
at
when
there's
a
line
break
or
something
that
would
be
very
helpful,
agreed.
B
U
V
Hey
good
evening,
council
members,
as
a
member
of
Orchard
Grove
neighborhood
I
feel
that
it
is
within
my
purview
to
speak
to
you
tonight
regarding
a
few
issues
affecting
mobile-home
residents
and
the
communities
I
want
to
make
it
clear
that
I
speak
for
myself,
having
not
consulted
all
the
members
of
our
group.
First
I
refer
you
to
the
report.
Titled
manufacturer,
Housing,
Strategy
potential
ordinance
citation
is
number
4.1
and
it
says
it
says:
owners
are
to
provide
regular
on-site
office
hours
by
a
manager.
V
Orchard
Grove
has
not
had
an
on-site
manager
since
well
before
our
water
and
sewer
issues
are
a
crisis.
Only
10
managers
sent
from
other
properties
that
they
own
now
but
I
just
talked
to
Sara,
who
you
just
heard
from
downstairs.
I
just
met
her
downstairs
and
the
situation
is
being
resolved
as
we
speak.
So
thank
you.
Sara.
V
Looking
again
at
the
report,
3.1
a
minimum
use
lease
minimum
term
of
lease.
Some
of
us
at
Orchard
Grove,
who
have
lived
there
before
Riverstone
bought
the
property,
have
a
month-to-month
lease.
It
sounds
like
a
disadvantage,
but
actually
there's
a
distinct
advantage
to
that.
The
type
of
lease
and
it's
valid
because
it's
valid
in
perpetuity
unless
there
is
illegal
activity
by
the
resident
or,
if
there's
a
non-payment
of
rent
and
I'm
looking
at
the
city
attorney
she's
nodding
at
me.
V
Therefore,
our
older
leases
and
furthermore
are
over
older
leases,
include
water,
garbage
and
sewer
and
are
still
valid.
So
some
of
us
have
that,
and
the
newer
residents
have
a
newer
lease
that
doesn't
include
that
regarding
the
rent
increases.
I
would
like
the
owners
to
be
accountable
to
the
city
in
some
way.
So
thank
you
for
your
time.
I
really
appreciate
it.
I
also
will
send
you
an
email.
Thank
you.
So
much
thank.
B
V
M
Good
evening,
mayor
and
members
of
council,
my
name
is
tani
Payton
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
Rocky
Mountain
Home
Association,
we
represent
the
entire
industry,
which
includes
not
only
the
manufactured
home
communities
but
also
the
manufacturers,
retailers,
lenders,
etc.
I
would
like
to
echo
what
Brad
said
when
he
acknowledged
staff
and
their
willingness
to
include
the
industry
and
the
community
owners
in
the
study.
M
M
As
mentioned
crystalloid
mentioned
that
House
bill
19
1309
passed
this
year
during
the
legislative
session.
This
program
creates
a
dispute
resolution
program
which
will
help
to
address
many
of
the
issues
that
have
been
brought
up
by
community
residents.
I
feel
that
the
community
residents
and
the
owners
need
an
opportunity
to
utilize
this
program
before
implementing
additional
regulations
and
oversight
at
the
local
level.
M
In
addition,
you
all
were
talking
about
me
and
you
factoring
facilities
and
bringing
manufacturing
back
into
Colorado
and
I'm
also
excited
to
share
that
House
bill.
19
1238
passed
this
year
during
session.
That
was
our
effort
to
encourage
factories
to
come
back
to
Colorado,
by
giving
them
more
flexibility
in
the
codes
that
they
are
required
to
be
built
to.
So
hopefully
we
will
welcome
factories.
M
And
so
one
other
thing
that
that
is
mentioned
in
the
strategy
is
to
promote
manufactured
housing
and
to
develop
new
communities
and
Boulder
at
some
open
houses
that
some
of
you
have
attended
that
I've
attended.
There
have
been
conversations
around
the
fees
specific
to
water
and
ways
to
reduce
those
fees
so
that
the
communities
aren't
assessed
the
higher
rate
because
they
have
one
big
master
meter.
The
items
like
that
would
help
to
reduce
the
just
the
operation
costs
and
also
maybe
a
program
of
providing
vacant
land
I
know
there's
opportunity
zones.
M
Is
there
a
way
to
zone
something
to
welcome
a
community
investment?
Maybe
creation
of
some
sort
so
and
on
that
note
thank.
W
Thank
You
Nikki
woman
keiko
the
trail
of
the
human
relations
commission
and
just
want
to
lend
support
for
some
issues
that
have
come
up
not
only
at
the
Human
Relations
Commission
meeting,
but
I've
been
attending
a
HOA
meetings
and
see
mob
meetings
with
the
mobile
home
communities
since,
like
28
2015
16,
so
just
some
some
top
qualities.
The
council
should
think
of
there's
Wanda
need
for
a
full-time
employee
in
code
enforcement
to
handle
manufactured
housing
issues.
As
of
now
the
existing
city.
W
Employees
do
not
have
the
capacity
to
take
this
on,
and
this
issue
has
come
up
repeatedly
at
manufactured
housing,
HOA
and
coalition
meetings,
I've
attended
and
with
the
many
discussions
with
residents
and
a
point
of
mines
in
the
park.
We
need
at
the
local
level
in
an
enforcement
mechanism.
So
since
2015
we've
been
passing,
you
know
good
laws
and
ordinances,
but
if
we
don't
have
them
that
means
to
enforce
them.
It's
kind
of
all
for
naught.
W
W
We
have
a
lot
of
unfunded
needs
in
the
city
budget,
but
I
believe
that
the
community
members
that
you
see
who
came
out
tonight
having
a
special,
have
a
special
need
for
the
city
and
the
council
to
protect
them
and
enable
this
to
additionally
overwhelmingly
infrastructure
needs
have
come
up
and
they
need
to
update
and
fix
them
and
I
understand
this
is
expensive.
But
this
is
a
a
public
health
issue
and
people
need
clean
water
and
honest
billing
with
water
than
utilities
and
the
enforcement
mechanisms
to
enable
this.
W
One
idea
that
came
up
is
to
tie
Laughlin
increases
to
improvements
and
infrastructure
than
in
the
plugs.
Let's
see,
and
last
year
the
Human
Relations
Commission
City
Council
passed
Human
Rights
Ordinance
protections
against
discrimination
and
housing
with
us,
paying
with
section
8,
affordable
housing
vouchers
and
based
on
citizenship
status.
W
Well,
what's
come
up
since
then
is
I
found
that
residents
they
need
some
kind
of
assistance
and
inflammation
and
how
to
apply
for
and
use
section
8
vouchers
I
get
a
lot
of
questions
coming
to
me
if
I
can
assist
with
this
and
it's
an
unfamiliar
new
process
to
them,
so
just
electing
them
to
a
website
isn't
cutting
it.
So
I've
been
asking
the
city
to
provide
some
kind
of
formal
assistance
to
navigate
this
process
to
be
made
available
to
them.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration.
Thank
You.
B
X
Evening
my
name
is
Amy
bové
and
I
am
an
attorney
and
I
specialize
in
the
manufactured
home.
Business
I
represent
over
20
parks
in
the
Front
Range,
so
I
deal
with
a
great
number
of
counties
today,
I'm
here
to
represent
Boulder
Meadows
Glen
is
not
able
to
make
it
today,
but
he
did
want
to
offer
just
to
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
be
part
of
the
process.
One
of
the
things
I
can
say
is
that
Boulder
has
been
the
most
open
in
terms
of
staff
on
hearing
from
stakeholders.
X
Glen
and
I
have
had
significant
meetings
where
we
believe
that
we
were
heard
and
I
possibly
even
see.
Some
of
those
thoughts
in
the
proposed
ordinances,
boda
Meadows,
is
proud
to
be
a
boulder
and
I.
Think
Boulder
can
be
pretty
proud
of
Boulder
meadows
as
well.
We
are
committed
to
a
long-term
commitment
within
Boulder
we
provide.
We
are
the
largest
of
all
the
parks
and
provide
a
consider
amount
of
housing
that
is
needed
here
in
Boulder
and
we're
glad
to
be
part
of
the
process.
X
With
that
being
said,
and
as
a
lawyer,
one
of
the
concerns
I
would
like
you
guys
to
think
about
as
we
go
forward
with
the
ordinances
is:
does
this
ordinances
work
with
the
new
amended
mobile
home
product
and
what
may
be
coming
next
year?
The
gentleman
who
spoke
before
me
was
concerned
about
enforcement.
That
has
been
a
concern
across
Colorado
and
the
new
mobile
home
park.
X
Y
Y
Also
because
I
live
on
a
very
limited
income
as
a
senior
and
I
have
physical
problems,
so
I
can't
really
work.
Full-Time
I
can
just
do
little
odds
and
ends
I
looked
into
receiving
some
kind
of
assistance.
I
heard
about
section
eight
and
I
found
out
that
that
program
had
like
a
two-year
waitlist
and
it's
closed
now.
Y
Available
even
to
mobile
home
park
residents
are
not
aware
that
it
was
so
far
as
I
know
there.
There's
no
safety
net
for
seniors
really
and
I
know
that
Boulder
is
committed
to
helping
homeless
people
and
I
well,
I
hope
they're
committed
to
preventing
people
from
becoming
homeless
as
well.
Senior
citizens
in
particular,
oh
and
I,
did
check
into
HUD
by
the
way
to
see
if
I
could
get
a
reverse
mortgage
and
that's
not
extended
to
mobile
home
park
to
mobile
home
owners.
Y
Z
I'm
curious
about
the
I
purchased
a
home
in
the
orchard,
Grove
community
and
I'm,
a
believer
in
restoration
and
I'm
interested
in
the
leap,
grants
and
I
under
and
that
it
it's
being
operated
through
the
city
of
Longmont,
but
I
have
not
heard
anything
from
it.
So
I'm
very
interested
in
upgrading
and
restoring
the
mobile
home
I
bought
is
produced
in
1968,
so
an
upgrade
would
be
ideal.
Okay,.
B
B
AA
Hi
I
lived
there
since
2016
and
I
have
to
say
and
I'm
also
involved
in
the
Colorado
coalition
of
manufactured
home
owners
and
residents
Association,
which
were
trying
to
make
changes
across
the
state.
I
have
to
say
that,
unfortunately,
all
of
your
efforts
have
not
proved
successful.
The
ordinances
are
not
enforced
and
the
fear
is
tremendous.
AA
There's
there.
These
people
stand
up
and
lie
and
I'm
banned
from
the
office.
I
cannot
come
in
to
my
own
office
at
Vista
Village,
because
I
asked
about
rent
increases.
We
are
not
as
an
HOA
allowed
to
actually
use
our
community
building.
The
section
eight
that
does
get
handed
is
not
it
being
accepted
by
our
management.
So
every
time
you
make
some
sort
of
effort
to
protect
the
vulnerable
people
that
live
in
the
parks.
That
is
completely
undermined,
I'm.
AA
AA
AB
Good
evening,
thank
you
for
the
time.
Thank
you
for
your
efforts.
I'm
Christian
Hendrickson
I'm,
a
lawyer
with
Sherman
and
Howard,
and
we
work
with
the
Rocky
Mountain
Home
Association,
you
heard
from
Tanya
earlier
today.
We
do
appreciate
being
involved
in
this
process.
We
just
want
to
reiterate
that
there
are
multiple
sides
to
all
these
issues
and
that,
as
these
issues
are
reviewed
as
we
go
forward
that
the
RMH,
a
and
industry
concerns
are
considered
as
we
look
for
workable,
practical
and
fair
solutions
to
all
involved.
AB
This
is
an
important
unsubsidized,
affordable,
housing
type,
but
you
have
to
remember.
The
lack
of
subsidies
goes
both
ways
to
the
residents
and
the
housing
providers.
We've
talked
about
carrots
and
sticks,
we're
all
about
carrots.
Carrots
are
things
like
rent
subsidies
for
residents,
rezoning,
pushing
on
our
friends
at
the
county
to
also
free
up
some
space
because
they
to
have
land
that
would
work
great
and
candidly
I
think
we've
all
seen
educational
opportunities
encourage
residents
to
really
come
to
the
city,
come
to
other
providers
to
see
what
is
out
there
for
them.
AB
In
addition
to,
and
candidly
instead
of
over-regulation
of
this
industry,
we
appreciate
the
the
not
that
rent
control
is
precluded
by
state
law.
We
note
in
the
report
50
to
$100,000
per
home
site
to
upgrade
these
facilities.
So
keep
that
in
mind
when
you
hear
about
these
complaints
about
rent
increases,
think
about
50
to
$100,000
per
home
site.
To
make
these
improvements.
We
are
concerned
that
this
small
sliver
of
housing
is
being
looked
at
more
closely
than
other
parts
of
Boulder
housing
where
2%
or
2.3
percent.
AB
Look
at
how
the
other
places
are
being
regulated
again,
we
focus
on
the
need
for
data
to
see
what's
actually
needed
to
be
addressed
instead
of
what
just
feels
good
or
looks
good
to
be
addressed,
we
emphasize
that
state
law
has
just
changed
and
that
you
should
see
how
that
plays
out
before
we
put
too
much
regulation
on
this
industry,
and
we
reiterate
we're
here
to
work
together
and
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you
on
the
specifics.
Thank
you.
H
Mr.
Hendrickson,
thank
you
for
that.
You,
you
noted
the
expense
to
upgrade
some
of
the
infrastructure
or
to
take
care
of
some
of
the
infrastructure
needs.
Yes,
we've
heard
from
the
orchard
grove
management
about
some
of
the
steps
that
they're
taking
but
I
guess
it
would
be
helpful
and
I
know
you
don't
directly
represent
the
different
parks,
but
it
would
be
helpful
if
we
hear
from
other
parks
if
they're
undertaking
major
infrastructure
improvements.
That
would
be
helpful
to
hear
about
as
we
continue
moving
through
this
process
and.
AC
My
name
is
Julie
Van
Tomlin
I'm,
the
executive
director
at
the
emergency
family
assistance,
Association
Mississippi,
a
boulder
resident
and
I
come
tonight
to
first
thank
the
council
and
staff
for
putting
forth
a
mobile-home
strategy
that
seeks,
above
all
else,
to
preserve
and
expand
what
will
have
housing
in
Boulder,
because
this
is
the
last
reservoir
for
of
affordable
market
housing
in
the
city
f.
We
feel
that
we
consider
ourselves
a
significant
stakeholder
in
this
condition.
AC
To
give
you
an
example
in
the
guiding
principle,
the
affordability
says
to
remain
no
more
extensive
than
the
average
expensive
than
the
average
for
market
rate
rental
housing.
So
that
can't
be
the
metric
because
rental
rate
market
housing
is
about
$1,900
a
month
for
apartments.
The
lot
rentals
are
about
700
to
800
and
a
affordability
principle
for
someone
making
low
income
would
be
about
$600
a
month,
so
there's
very
little
headspace
and
raising
expenses
to
mobile
home
park
residents
without
displacing
them.
AC
We'd
also
encourage
you
to
continue
to
engage
directly
in
your
discussions
with
the
mobile
home
park
residents
themselves.
You've
heard
a
lot
tonight.
They
are
the
best
way
to
take
the
temperature
of
what's
really
going
on,
what's
really
affecting
their
lives,
and
we
offer
to
work
very
closely
with
you
in
preserving
the
ability
to
live
in
Boulder
affordably.
So
thank
you
for
your
time.
B
AC
AC
AC
I
think
the
unintended
consequences
of
Licensing
and
business
permits
we
see
and
all
kinds
of
things
in
the
city,
and
it's
just
I'm
worried
that
that
translates
as
much
as
you
think
you
may
be:
charging
the
owner
or
the
company
most
of
those
costs
get
passed
on
to
the
residents
and
mobile,
and
so
just
be
careful.
There
should
be
some
tracking
what's
actually
going
on
with
costs,
as
these
regulations
and
enforcement
stuff
get
rolled
out
and
then
invest
in.
AC
Making
those
but
our
communities
so
okay
and
and
we
will
be
there
to
work
on
the
human
service
side
and
prevent
evictions
and
legal
aid-
is
a
big
issue
that
we
don't
get
to
involved
in
others.
Benson
work
at
the
state
on
eviction
prevention
and
in
the
city,
but
certainly
residents
need
legal
support
if
they're
facing
eviction.
AC
E
AC
No,
no
honestly
I
think
we'd
refer
someone
to
the
city
because
we're
not
experts
in
ordinance,
navigation,
we're
experts
in
resource
referrals,
so
that
may
be
something
we
can
work
on.
What
are
those
like?
What
would
be
a
referral
of
Etha
that
would
be
effective
to
get
support
the
city
on
how
to
navigate
organized
ordinances,
and
we
could
follow
up
with
you
on
that.
Thank.
I
AC
AD
I'm
James
Feeney
from
North
Boulder
I,
cannot
stress
enough
the
importance
of
city
council
addressing
to
the
characterization
regulation
of
land
lease
contracts
in
a
mobile
home
park.
If
you
do,
nothing
else,
do
that,
the
city
of
Boulder
must
recognize
the
common
law
right
of
exclusive
possession
for
land
leased
by
tenants.
A
mobile
home
park
is
not
an
apartment
building,
considering
the
need
for
shelter.
That
means
not
just
a
roof
over
your
head.
It
also
means
the
ground.
Under
your
feet,
mobile
home
park,
tenants
have
already
lost
the
financial
competition
for
land
ownership.
AD
All
they
have
is
this
leasehold
interest
in
a
parcel
of
land
on
a
planet
of
over
37
billion
acres
of
dry
land.
Some
people
think
they
own
the
land
and
some
people
are
forced
to
pay
rent
to
sleep
on
it.
Let
me
illustrate
for
the
City
Council
the
direct
consequence
of
the
Carn
poorly
regulated
mobile
home
park,
land
lease
contract.
Firstly,
city
manager,
wage
is
a
campaign
of
non-enforcement,
refusing
residents
full
protection
under
the
law.
There's
a
slide
that
lists
over
a
dozen
statutes
and
ordinances
that
are
not
enforced
by
city
managers.
AD
Officers
I
can
attest
to
that
personally
and
to
put
this
another
way,
non
enforcement
of
the
laws
is
no
less
racist
than
over
enforcement
of
the
laws.
Secondly,
City
Attorney
wage
is
a
silent
campaign
of
terror
in
which
home
oval
home
park
residents
are
forced
to
fend
for
themselves,
while
that
characterization
may
seem
excessively
hyperbolic.
Look
at
the
real
and
present
consequences
to
residents
who,
whether
realistically
or
delusionally,
are
too
afraid
to
speak
out
for
fear
of
retaliation
by
park
operators
and
too
afraid
to
exercise
what
rights
they
have
otherwise
granted
by
state
statute.
AD
I
know
this
because
I
have
spoken
with
these
people
with
the
ever-present
threats
of
eviction.
They
tell
me,
don't
speak
out,
you
may
get
us
in
trouble
and
yet
these
people
are
not
wrong
to
fear
when,
for
instance,
City
Attorney
continues
to
claim
their
property
lines
and
mobile
home
parks
do
not
exist.
I
have
a
slide
of
cities,
attorneys
implied
theory
of
code
and
see
which
fails
city
attorney.
AD
County
legal
counsel
also
appears
to
contradict
contract
requirements
of
CRS
30,
a
12,
a
mobile
home
park
act,
property
description
required,
particularly
a
three
location
of
a
space
number
upon
which
the
mobile
home
it's
situations
and
requires
understanding
the
specific
meets
and
bounds
of
that
location
or
space.
Number
I
request:
City
Council
under
the
city's
authority
to
regulate
commerce
address
the
characterization
of
this
mobile
home
park,
land
lease
contract;
okay,
thanks.
AE
I'm
Elizabeth
hahndorf
I've
looked
at
4th
and
Alpine
since
1976,
except
for
seven
years
in
Florida.
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
traffic
study
for
Alpine
balsam
I've
been
to
a
lot
of
the
meetings.
I
haven't
seen
very
many
of
you
there,
but
I
wish
you
would
come.
The
staff
I
think
is
incorrect
in
the
TAF
the
traffic
study.
AE
No,
the
staff
is
making
big
mistakes
the
company
hired
to
do.
The
traffic
study
has
made
some
mistakes.
I
have
a
marketing
background
degree,
I've
done
surveys,
statistics
so,
and
here
we
go
with
somebody
who
just
mentioned
that
you
may
put
mobile,
hung
not
even
recreate
a
great
environment
for
them
on
iris,
which
was
not
considered
in
the
traffic
study
for
Alpine
balsam.
Okay,.
B
AF
Renee
home
all
Vista
village,
I,
don't
have
a
concise
statement.
I
just
have
some
comments
on
various
things
that
were
said
tonight.
First
I
want
to
say
I
do
think
this
village
is
a
good
park.
I
do
appreciate
the
work
that
Cathy
and
Lester
do
to.
You
know,
keep
it
nice
and
all
that
managing
300
homes.
It's
not
an
easy
job
and
at
the
same
time
there
are,
you
know,
dissatisfied
residents
more
than
they
know
I'm
sure,
because
people
will
not
speak
up
to
them
about
issues
because
of
fear
of
retaliation.
AF
In
terms
of
their
comment
about
evictions
2
to
4
in
the
last
10
years.
Maybe
that's
true
and
actual
evictions,
but,
as
we
all
know,
people
are
forced
out
they're
threatened
with
eviction.
Then
there
are
stipulations
you
can
move
out
in
60
days.
If
you
don't
protest,
otherwise
he'll
be
out,
and
you
know
48
hours
or
whatever.
The
new
requirement
is
in
terms
of
what
Christian
Hendrickson
said:
I'd
love
to
see
rent
subsidies
for
residents.
Well,
why
don't?
AF
The
comment
regarding
from
Adelson
about
being
able
to
make
comment
on
ordinances
before
first
reading,
I
think
is
really
good.
I
think
we
all
should
be
able
to
do
that,
and
also
having
some
review
after
the
fact
I'll
be
sending
you
some
information
about
804,
3
and
sale
of
pre
HUD
homes,
which
seems
kind
of
questionable
right
now.
AF
AG
One
Siegel
5:38:
do
we
I
think
the
first
time?
The
first
thing
you
need
to
do
to
affect
affordability
is
not
be
giving
subsidies
to
like
five
different
subsidies.
Subsidies
were
given
to
the
311
project.
The
hospital
demolishing
the
hospital
is
just
plain:
dumb,
not
okay.
This
is
entire.
Look
at
these
mobile
home
hands
that
we're
talking
about
from
68
and
earlier
you
know,
maybe
those
need
to
be
replaced,
but
that's
serious.
AG
It's
facing
I've
seen
the
windows.
It
looks
great,
so
you
get
some
creative
architects
to
figure
out
how
to
make
it
very
livable.
And
that's
what
you
do.
You
do
not
throw
my
tax
dollars
away
with
16
million
dollar
demolition
and
say
you're,
trying
to
get
affordable
housing
in
Boulder
and
help
out
these
mobile
home
people.
That
is
just
counterintuitive.
AG
B
K
K
Well,
I
think
the
people
that
spoke
know
exactly
how
to
navigate
the
process
because
they're
they're
part
of
the
process.
Some
of
them
are
on
the
the
leadership
team
at
Ponderosa
and
we
had
a
meeting
with
him
last
night
about
some
of
these
issues,
but
other
issues
as
well.
It's
far
I'll
just
hit
a
couple
high
notes.
K
K
K
Another
is
a
letter
that
I've
written
to
the
residents
describing
that
as
well,
and
then
we're
also
looking
at
a
way
that
that
could
possibly
be
captured
in
a
new
lease
as
well,
and
it's
also
in
the
resident
guide,
which
is
a
document
that
they
have.
That
has
all
the
sort
of
the
answers
and
questions
in
its
as
well.
E
K
Here
sure
so,
the
the
the
Ponderosa
annexation
process
has
intersected
with
an
existing
project
under
Public,
Works
and
transportation
for
sort
of
the
North
Boulder
area
there
on
Broadway
I
think
it's
about
the
last
ten
blocks
or
so
of
a
Broadway
on
the
north
side.
That
is
a
project
that
will
be
beginning
in
early
2020
and
I.
Believe
it's
a
process
that
started
around
2014,
which
shows
that
certain
exits
from
the
community
onto
Broadway
will
be
eliminated
as
as
parcels
are
upgraded
for
this
particular
exits.
K
Yourselves
and
Planning
Board,
when
we
were
here
about
a
year
ago,
gave
us
direction
to
try
to
keep
that
exit
open
on
to
Broadway.
However,
this
flood
mid
as
part
of
this
project
there's
flood
mitigation.
That's
that's
going
on!
In
that
same
location.
Our
engineer
has
worked
with
their
engineers
to
try
to
find
a
solution
where
we
could
keep
the
exit,
as
well
as
complete
the
flood
flood
mitigation.
There
simply
isn't
enough
land
to
do
both
so
in
the
annexation
agreement
that
you
will
see
in
October.
K
B
N
N
K
K
H
G
Could
you
explain
I
thought
recently
we
had
agreed
with
the
mobile
home
community
owners
that
rent
increases
would
be
limited
to
one
time
a
year.
Maybe
we
didn't
or
could
you
just
expand
upon
that
and
I've
heard
recently
from
residents
at
Boulder,
Meadows
and
I
think
that
order
to
Grove
that
their
rent
has
gone
up
two
times
this
year.
L
A
G
K
That's
correct,
so
owners
of
manufactured
home
parks
have
to
accept
section
8.
They
can't
discriminate
against
that.
One
of
the
things
that
Crystal
talked
about
earlier
is
pretty
a
document
together
that
every
resident
of
a
mobile
home
community
would
have
to
say
I'm
having
this
problem.
This
is
who
I
contact
mm-hmm,
and
you
know
that's
that's
something
that
we're
trying
to
put
together
to
give
an
easier
path.
You
know
for
enforcement.
I
would
ask
that
that
anyone
that
feels
that
they're
having
that
concern
now
that
they
contact
us
okay,.
G
And
then
I
still
I
know
people
are
trying
to
address
it,
but
I'm
still
concerned
about
some
of
the
the
age
of
the
infrastructure
and
the
failing
of
the
infrastructure
and
I
totally
understand
miss
Simmons
concern
about
overloading
that
infrastructure,
since
it
seems
already
somewhat
over
overloaded,
so
I
guess
I'm
curious.
How
are
you
going
to
move
forward
on
addressing
that
and
I
know
at
some
point
in
this
total
conversation
we
had
talked
about?
Would
there
be
an
ability
to
look
at
some
of
this
infrastructure?
L
L
The
next
opportunity
listed
here
is
identifying
code
constraints,
so
maybe
there
is
a
there
was
a
request
to
get
more
information
on
what
has
been
updated.
Maybe
there
isn't
an
interest
in
by
communities
in
this
and
just
trying
to
understand.
If
there
are
barriers,
you
know
and
then
have
a
conversation
from
there.
B
K
G
And
then
somebody
well
I
think
he's
the
chair
of
the
HRC
maquila.
He
brought
up
the
need
to
maybe
have
a
full-time
enforcement
officer
on
our
on
our
staff
and
what
would
be
the
likelihood
of
doing
something
like
that
and
I
want
to
pay
attention
to
what
Julia
and
onling
had
said
to
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
enforce
so
much
that
now
we're
causing
these
increases
to
the
residents.
But
these
are
residents
of
Boulder,
and
so
they
should
have
exactly
the
same
standards
as
any
other
resident
Boulder
right.
G
G
Your
guidance
has
really
tried
hard,
but
I
don't
know
if
it's
been
fully
successful,
and
so
what
happens
is
that
you
have
residents
there
being
the
eyes
and
ears
and
calling
the
city
and
then
calling
the
county
and
our
wonderful
neighborhood
liaison
and
really
trying
to
get
somebody
to
address
this
concern
and
I.
Don't
think
it
should
be
upon
the
residents
to
have
to
be
the
watchdog
of
their
community
I
mean
we
all
need
to
be
watchdogs
to
some
extent,
but
it
just
gets
a
little
bit.
G
Okay,
so
one
other
comment
I
will
make,
is
that
I
do
think
we
have
plenty
of
land
for
more
mobile
home
parks
and
I've
said
it
before
we
have
this
Airport
that
is
utilized
by
maybe
200
people,
not
all
residents
in
the
city
of
Boulder,
that's
140
acres
and
we
did
get
it
onto
the
Boulder
Valley
comp
plan
that
we
can
consider
that
for
other
uses
than
just
airport
uses,
and
so
I
would
really
encourage
you.
Looking
at
this
Airport,
it
is
out
of
the
floodplain.
It's
a
beautiful
site.
G
I
would
likewise
a
and
Cindy
brought
it
up
a
few
weeks
ago
that
there
was
a
property
owner
in
area
2
who
has
I
think
about
12
acres
of
land
along
Jay
and
I
would
encourage
you
to
reach
out
to
mr.
Luna
and
see
if
there's
some
ability
for
us
to
at
least
start
discussing
land,
banking
and
then
and
that's
all
area
2
and
then
I'll
bring
up
that
beloved
area
3.
And
there
are
some
parcels
in
area
3
that
are
right,
adjacent
to
developments
right
now.
G
That
would
love
to
participate
and
and
help
on
lower-income
and
in
maybe
mobile
home
type
community,
but
I
think
there's
lots
of
places
to
go,
and
so
I
wouldn't
say
we
don't
have
many
opportunities.
I
would
say
that
we
have
a
lot
of
opportunities
and,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
have
our
ours
and
our
our
ease
and
our
L
zones
that
we
could
also
look
into
and
allow
manufactured
homes
to
occupy.
B
So
I
had
a
quick
question
and
then
we
have
Aaron.
My
question
is
somebody
I
think
I'll
Park
owner
or
a
representative
zero
who
talked
about
that?
We
charge
the
park
at
the
higher
level
of
the
water
budget
because
they
are
considered
one
users
and
as
we
look
for
ways
to
both
incentivize,
that
kind
of
win
wins
here:
I'm
just
wondering
whether
in
exchange
for
infrastructure
upgrades
grades
or
even
meters
at
each.
K
I
mean
currently
from
what
I
understand
they're,
actually
at
the
the
lowest
rate
they
could
be
because
it's
a
rate
for
the
whole
community.
It
becomes
more
expensive
when
you
meet
her
individually.
The
water
rate
becomes
more
expensive,
but
there
there
may
be
other
ways
to
accomplish
the
same
thing
without
changing
to
a
separate
the
city
type
meter
system
and.
H
I
want
to
follow
up
on
a
point
that
Julie
vandeman
from
FMA,
and
it
was
about
affordability,
so
I
think
it's
very
important.
That
affordability
is
one
of
our
key
guiding
principles,
but
she
she
zoomed
in
on
the
language
that
guiding
principle
says
that
the
manufactured
housing
should
remain
no
more
expensive
than
the
average
for
market
rate
rental
housing.
I
thought
she
made
a
great
point
that
that's
probably
too
low
of
a
bar
that
we
should
seek
to
have
it
be
no
more
than
average
market
rate
rental
cos.
H
H
H
All
right,
great,
so
moving
in
the
comments.
Thank
you
for
all
of
your
work.
I
think
this
is
a
great
step
forward,
appreciate
from
hearing
from
all
the
residents
and
you're
deeply
how
much
they
care
about
that.
Can
you
use
how
much
they
love
their
communities
tonight
see?
This
is
a
great
step
forward
in
terms
of
helping
them
stay
in
their
communities,
allowing
them
to
continue
to
thrive.
So
I
look
forward
to
adopting
this
tonight.
H
E
Just
had
some
comments
it
regarding
the
public
comment,
it
yeah
I,
think
ill
team,
I
didn't
so
the
code
enforcement
and
code
navigation,
how
you
know
how
that
will
work
with
the
oversight,
legislation
that
were
just
passed
and
to
make
sure
that
residents
are
clear
on
how
that
navigation
and
enforcement
happens,
because
it
sounds
like
there's
still
a
lot
of
residents
that
either
aren't
aware
or
don't
know
how
to
lodge
a
complaint
against
an
ordinance.
So
raising
awareness,
that's
something
that
that
seems
like
is
sorely
needed
again
to
julievan
dominance.
E
Point
about
unintended
consequences
of
things
like
the
upgrading,
the
infrastructure
and
how
that
could
affect
so
just
as
just
to
remain
cognizant
as
we
move
forward
of
those
unintended
consequences
and
that's
it.
But
I
really
appreciate
all
the
work
that
you
all
put
into
it,
and
also
understanding
that
a
lot
of
the
implementation
will
be
part
of
future
work
plans
for
council
to
decide,
and
so
you
know
prioritizing
what
those
should
be
would
be
helpful.
E
D
B
Just
gonna
ditto
that
and
just
add:
let
us
know
about
legislation
next
year,
I
guess
you
have
sort
of
a
prioritized
plan,
but
I
would
think
doing
a
mix
of
new
ordinances
or
whatever,
if
they're
needed,
but
also
just
making
sure
people
are
being
taken.
Care
of
kind
of
that
makes
us
what
I
think
we
need
taking
into
account
what
Julie
just
said
in
the
end,
we
need
to
make
sure
people
stay
housed
and
you
can
get
what
they
need.
B
While
we
look
to
kind
of
the
longer
term
as
well,
so
that
a
nice
mix
that
the
next
council
is
going
to
get
to
deal
with,
it
seems
to
me
that
you
might
want
to
take
this
page
of
the
strategy,
was
kind
of
the
timeline
and
make
sure
it
makes
it
into
the
next
councils
thinking
of
their
work
plan
so
that
it
becomes
a
working
document.
I
do
appreciate
all
the
work
that's
gone
on
to
it
and
the
feedback
and
we'll
just
keep
trying
to
get
it
right.
We
are
all
in
this
together
anything
else.
B
D
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
from
just
what
the
point
you
were
making
about
this
being
a
working
document.
You
know
we've
kind
of
talked
at
CSC
about
as
we
handoff
from
phase
ones
and
projects
to
phase
twos
of
projects
that
there
will
be
kind
of
briefing
packets
around
several
different
subjects
for
new
council
members.
I
think
that's
a
fantastic
idea,
and
so
zan
suggestion
is
perfect
for
this
component
of
it.
But
I
just
wanted
to
mention
to
the
full
council
that
it's
easy.
G
I
would
just
add
to
my
colleagues
comments
a
big
THANK
YOU,
and
this
has
been
a
lot
of
work,
but
I
think
it's
been
well
worth.
The
work
and
I
would
just
ask
people
to
just
stay
involved,
and
while
people
try
to
diminish
that
you're,
a
small
population,
a
small
slice
of
our
population,
you're
a
critical
part
of
our
community,
so
I
just
thank
you
for
for
doing
this
and
truly
look
for
more
opportunities
for
mobile
home
works.
B
AH
Well,
staffer
getting
settled
on
tonight's
presentation
will
be
led
by
Julia
Richman,
the
chief
innovation
and
technology
officer,
as
well
as
Cara
Skinner,
the
Assistant
Director
for
finance.
There
will
be
a
brief
overview
of
just
where
we've
been
with
broadband
before
we
get
into
the
financial
aspect.
AI
As
a
reminder,
why
we're
doing
this?
The
backbone
is
the
first
step
in
building
the
future
desired
model
of
a
city
owned
or
city
run
ISP.
We
believe
its
core
connectivity
and
core
infrastructure
for
the
city
and
it
will
serve
as
the
base
of
technology
for
city
and
community
operations
going
forward.
And
you
know
this
is
an
essential
part
of
future
proofing.
The
city.
AI
This
is
a
slide
with
tiny
font,
but
where
we
are
with
the
project
is
we're
just
entering
30%
design,
which
means
we've
moved
from
the
high-level
design
to
detailed
design
and
our
first
meeting
internal
meeting
on
that
is
tomorrow.
Actually
so
we're
meeting
with
you
at
a
timely
point
in
the
project
and
what
that
means
is
in
the
high-level
design.
We
just
talked
about
what
streets
it's
on
and
in
the
detailed
design.
AI
We
talked
about
what
side
of
the
street
in
the
hardscape
and
the
soft
scape,
where
the
connections
are,
how
the
Rings
are
laid
out
and
and
the
like.
We
will
then
move
quickly
into
60%
design
and
will
begin
to
issue
the
construction
procurement
documents
in
late
to
mid
September
and
hopefully
select
a
vendor,
mid-october
or
no
mid-november,
between
mid
October
November
and
aiming
to
start
construction
in
December
of
this
year.
So
that's
all
progressing
forward
nicely.
As
a
reminder.
AI
The
backbone
model
that
we're
looking
at
is
about
60
55
miles
of
dark
fiber
backbone
and
about
10
miles
of
fiber
laterals
off
of
the
backbone,
which
will
connect
high-priority
areas
that
we
met
with
you
to
discuss
in
April
and
that
financial
model
that
we
reviewed
in
April,
we've
subsequently
refined
as
a
result
of
fielding
work
around
the
city.
Reviewing
the
city's
existing
conduit
and
updating
the
cost
model
in
the
refinement
of
the
backbone.
The
backbone
cost
estimate
is
currently
running
at
fifteen
point:
eight
million.
AI
If
you
recall
from
two
years
ago,
when
we
started
to
do
this
with
you,
our
estimate
was
at
about
fifteen
million.
So
we're
pretty
close
to
the
estimate
that
we
started
with
a
couple
of
good
news
updates.
From
the
last
time
we
met
when
we
met
in
April,
we
had
talked
about
how
we
could
reuse
the
city's
existing
conduit,
and
at
that
time
we
had
begun
the
process
and
we're
having
pretty
bad
luck
with
looking
at
our
existing
conduit.
AI
Since
that
time
we
finished
that
work,
and
it
actually
turns
out
that
we
can
use
a
significant
amount
of
existing
conduit
which
saved
us
about
a
million
and
a
half
dollars.
So
that's
great
news
and
brought
the
cost
down
so
good
news
on
that
side,
and
then
one
note
on
the
proofing
for
the
existing
conduit
that
line
item.
There
will
actually
be
less
we're
waiting
for
the
final
invoice
and
we've
spent
probably
40
or
50
thousand
dollars
versus
170,000
dollars.
AI
Then
the
second
table
you
see
on
this
slide
refers
to
the
additional
investment
in
laterals
that
we
talked
with
you
and
got
approval
for
in
April
and
just
to
remind
you
what
that
is.
It's
sort
of
the
difference
between
the
highway
and
a
side,
road
or
the
highway
and
Broadway,
and
the
laterals
will
help
the
city
to
connect
with
a
number
of
high-priority
areas.
AI
So,
just
to
refresh
your
memory,
the
design
will
go,
will
touch
about
a
hundred
and
sixty
signals
in
the
city
and
so
we'll
be
able
to
connect
the
traffic
signals
in
the
city
with
fiber
laterals,
which
will
allow
us
to
advance
a
lot
of
the
transportation
goals
that
are
in
the
recently
discussed
transportation
master
plan.
We
will
connect
about
20,
affordable
housing
sites,
managed
and
partnering
with
bhp.
AI
We
have
gotten
a
couple
of
laterals
to
our
TD
sites
and
one
of
the
follow-ups
from
counsel
at
that
time
was
to
ask
RTD
to
pay.
For
that
and
what
you
see
there
is
a
cost
reflected
and
we're
at
the
point
where
we've
gotten
to
now
is
that
RTD
actually
has
really
valuable
fiber
that
runs
along
36.
That
will
be
important
to
our
fiber
infrastructure
as
well,
and
so
we're
gonna
end
up
doing
a
fiber
swap
with
them
and
that
so
that
isn't
reflected
there.
But
that's
the
net
cost
for
that.
AI
Construction
will
connect
the
safety,
the
public
safety
towers
for
the
radio
system
in
the
city
and
then
of
course,
and
then
the
new
library
site,
so
all
told-
and
that
is
our
estimates-
are
at
about
eighteen
point:
five
million.
This
can
includes
a
twenty
percent
contingency
that
is
reflected
in
the
the
primary
backbone
build
cost
as
well,
so
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Carra.
Thank
you.
AJ
Car
scanner
assistant
director
of
finance-
the
item-
that's
before
you
tonight-
is
actually
requesting
approval
of
the
project
financing
and
what
is
proposed
is
taxable
certificates
of
participation
and
we're
proposing
simple
because
of
the
proposed
use
of
the
proceeds,
and
we
need
flexibility.
Co-Pays
are
a
form
of
lease
purchase.
Financing
between
the
city
and
bumpa
or
people
know
it
is
bump
a
boulder
municipal
property
authority
and
COP
investors
are
actually
buying
an
interest
or
a
share
in
the
annual
rental
payments
that
the
city
makes
to
bumpa
for
the
leased
property.
AJ
This
type
of
financing
is
subject
to
annual
appropriation,
so
it's
not
considered
a
multiple
year.
Fiscal
obligation
under
Tabor
and
the
ordinance
and
the
resolution
before
you
tonight
are
such
that
you'll
be
approving
the
financing
per
certain
parameters,
and
those
parameters
are
that
we
will
issue
twenty
million
dollars.
The
maximum
annual
rental
payments
will
be
less
than
one
point:
six
million
dollars.
Currently
the
financial
adviser
believes
those
manual
acts.
Maximum
annual
rental
payments
will
be
about
1.4
million
dollars.
AJ
AJ
So
with
that
we
do
have
a
number
of
motion.
The
first
would
be
essentially
a
motion
to
approve
the
financing
to
not
to
exceed
20
million
dollars,
to
fund
the
backbone
of
the
project
as
described
by
Julia
and
to
approve
other
financing
documents,
and
that's
the
emergency
resolution
that
you
would
approve
as
City
Council.
And
then
you
would
adjourn
as
the
City
Council
and
convene
as
the
board
of
directors
of
bumpa
and
then
again
motion
to
approve
the
financing
and
then
again
a
journey
as
the
board
of
directors
and
reconvening
is
the
Boulder
City
Council.
AI
The
current
model
that
we're
working
through
and
we
don't
have
formal
agreements,
but
this
is
in
the
discussion
phase
with
bhp
is
that
will
provide
fiber
to
the
site
and
then
they
will
provide
public
Wi-Fi,
basically
in
the
building.
So
we'll
light
the
fiber
using
the
Front
Range
Giga
pop,
which
is
the
city's
ISP
and
then
basically
create
a
free
public
Wi-Fi
model
in
each
of
those
facilities
and
that'll
be
an
interim
approach.
AI
AI
E
N
N
AJ
D
N
And,
and
also
saying
things
like
I,
don't
understand
why
it
says:
on
November,
2nd
1999
voters
approved
an
amendment
to
the
city's
Charter,
removing
term
limits
for
council
members.
I.
Think
that's
just
the
opposite
of
what
has
happened
in
1999
doesn't
seem
to
be
very
pertinent
here
in
terms
of
how
we
are
actually
governing
this
city
now.
So
something
I
can
go
through
these
things,
but
I
could
also
just
send
them
in
or
what.
B
AJ
These
are
assembled
by
a
financing
team
bond
Council.
We
have
new
financial
advisors
and
so
possibly
you
know
the
learning
curve
for
the
new
financial
advisors.
But
these
are
preliminary
documents
and
Erin
may
also
want
to
speak
to
this.
But
what
you're
approving
tonight
is
these
documents
in
substantially
the
same
form
and
we
can
still
make
changes
to
them
and
correct
these
mistakes
before
the
official
statement,
or
that
even
the
preliminary
official
statement
is
posted.
So
we
will
definitely
make
a
thorough
review.
Okay,.
AJ
N
N
B
H
Yeah
kudos
for
the
detail
of
the
details,
so
just
on
the
how
much
we're
paying
going
forward.
So
it's
approximately
1.4
million
dollar
annual
payments
and
those
are
just
being
incorporated
in
our
annual
budgets
out
of
the
general
fund.
Correct,
that's
correct,
and
so
it's
just
it's
just
a
new
line
item
in
the
budget
that
we
just
have
a
room
for
correct.
AH
H
AK
Don't
know
this
is
quite
pertaining
to
we're
talking
about
that
backbone
leading
into
the
bhp,
affordable
housing
units,
as
well
as
hopefully
into
our
mobile
home
parks,
but
just
for
residents
who
are
listening
right
now
and
interested
in
how
individual
households
are
gonna
get
this.
Can
you
guys
just
speak
to
that
for
just
a
few
minutes
on
when
the
feasibility
so.
AI
At
this
time,
the
only
plan
that
we
have
is
for
the
backbone,
the
difference
in
cost
between
building
the
backbone
and
getting
to
a
full
ISP
is
about
a
hundred
and
twenty
million
dollars,
and
at
the
time
we
met
with
council
to
pick
this
option.
There
wasn't
financing
available
for
that.
So
council
at
any
time,
has
the
option
to
figure
out
how
to
pay
for
that,
but
for
now
we're
focusing
on
making
sure
that
the
backbone
is
optimized
and
then,
when
you're
ready,
we
can
start
to
make
the
next
plan
great.
AH
And
if
I
can
add
to
the
that
this
is
the
very
important
step
that
the
council
is
making,
and
this
is
a
step
that
many
communities
who
do
have
community
broadband.
This
is
the
first
step
into
that
conversation
that
you're
referring
to
mayor
by
and
the
conversation
of,
is
the
city,
the
ISP,
or
is
there
a
partnership?
That's
for
me.
This.
G
AJ
Well,
we
did
look
at
the
possibilities
across
the
city
and
the
financial
advisor
did
advise
that
we
use
facilities
that
are
considered
essential
for
core
municipal
services,
so,
like
we
could
said,
considered
some
recreation
centers
possibly,
but
they
said
that
it
would
be
better
collateral
if
we
use
the
municipal
building
in
the
atrium
building.
So
they
actually
thought
that
these
were
good
sources
of
collateral.
AH
So
so
the
reason
the
parks
facilities
were
not
chosen
is
because
the
future
capital
needs
that
parks
has
and
the
need
to
reserve
those
for
potential
Co
PS,
for
example,
reinvestment
in
one
of
the
community
centers.
For
example.
If
the
council
makes
a
decision
on
the
two
assets
this
building
or
the
atrium,
then
we
would
have
the
opportunity
to
relook
at
this
financing,
and
then
the
debt
would
have
to
initiate
in
essence
be
renewed,
both
buildings,
both
buildings,
yep,
but
so,
let's
say,
there's
a
decision
hypothetically
on
the
atrium.
G
What
will
this
bring?
What
will
be
our
total
CEO
piece
debt
that
this
will
bring
us
to
I
mean
because
we
enough
made
this
comment
before,
but
we
never
started
doing
this
until
really
recently,
and
this
makes
me
really
uncomfortable
because
we're
I
mean
you
just
talked
about.
Oh,
if
we
want
to
know
revamp
our
rec
centers,
we
can
use
CEO
piece
on
those
and
I
I'm
very
nervous
doing
this,
because
this
is
putting
us
in
debt.
This
is
putting
us
in
our
assets
and
debts,
and-
and
somebody
I
mean
it's
like
15.
G
B
Had
two
questions,
one
question
one
is
here
today:
we've
been
opportunistic
about
laying
down
fiber
whenever
we
had
to
rip
up
the
road
for
something
else,
starting
in
December,
we're
gonna
move
from
being
opportunistic
to
actually
go
digging
up
going
under
construction
and-
and
then
you've
probably
already
said
this.
But
can
you
remind
the
public
how
long
that
will
take?
We.
AI
Expect
construction
to
take
two
years
and
part
of
the
next
phase
of
the
project
that
we're
in
right
now
before
we
begin
construction
is
optimizing
the
design
based
on
what
we
know
of
other
projects
happening
in
the
city.
So
we
can
also
be
opportunistic
in
that
where,
if
a
part
of
the
street
is
ripped
up
or
another
project,
we
can
put
the
you
know
backbone
assets
in
there
at
the
same
time.
So
you
know
some
of
the
work
that's
happening
on
Broadway
will
do
that.
AI
B
G
AI
The
municipal
ization
team
is
a
part
of
the
broadband
team
and
we
work
really
closely
with
them.
If
you
recall
from
our
council
meeting
last
I
think
January
time
frame,
we
looked
at
optimizing,
the
cost
and
putting
in
municipal
municipal
ization
assets,
energy
assets
at
the
same
time,
and
it
it
saved
a
little
bit
of
money,
but
it
was
so
perspective
that
it
create
additional
financial
risks.
B
H
It
a
true
statement
that,
if
the
construction
of
the
backbone
will
always
necessitate
digging
up
streets,
that
you
might
be
able
to
put
it
in
the
right-of-way
outside
of
the
street
itself,
so
wouldn't
always
have
to
dig
up
a
street.
That's
right!
Yeah,
because
I
think
we'll
see
a
lot
of
the
construction
will
be
lower
impact
right.
N
So
mine
follows
under
sans
and
lisas
and
Erin's,
which
is
I'm
looking
at
the
the
map
of
where
the
fiber
is
supposed
to
go
the
backbone
and
it
goes
up
119,
and
then
it
looks
as
though
you
just
go
cross-country
from
one
1981,
though
I
don't
know
what
page
it
is
it's
the
one
the
map
is:
oh
there
we
go.
Okay
and
the
backbone
goes
up
119
somewhat
somewhere
around.
N
It
looks
like
settlers
park
or
that
area,
and
then
it
cuts
over
to
sunshine,
Canyon
Drive
and
comes
back
down
sunshine,
Canyon,
Drive,
and
then
it
continues
up
4th,
Street
and
I'm
wondering
why
that
route
was
particularly
chosen,
and
if
that
has
I
mean
because
there
you're
digging
into
practically
the
Red
Rocks.
We.
N
That's
right,
the
new
pipe
did
I,
think
that
is
right,
and
that
just
happened
so
that
was
City
right.
I
got
a
listing
having
to
do
with
an
O
would
probably
annexation.
Possibly
that's
right.
At
any
rate,
I
was
just
wondering
that
looks
opportunistic
as
well
the
way
that
it
goes,
but
it
it
also
goes
by
the
new
311
site
or
the
old
311
site.
AJ
AJ
G
O
Can
try
to
answer
that
a
little
bit
I
think
because
it's
the
way
around
Tabor,
so
if
some
municipalities
may
have
jumped
on
that
back
when
bag
bandwagon
earlier,
but
since
Tabor
has
been
introduced,
this
has
been
the
way
to
have
something:
that's
not
debt
that
is
subject
to
Tabor,
so
so
I
believe
it
has
become
more
common
in
Colorado,
even
though
we
may
be
relatively
new
to
it.
You.
G
AJ
Could
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
the
collateral?
The
other
thing
to
note
is
that
the
buildings
get
released
as
we
pay
down
principal,
and
so
the
first
building
scheduled
to
be
released
is
the
atrium
building,
but
we
can
always
swap
out
collateral
anytime
during
the
term
of
the
CEO
piece.
So
if
we
wanted
to
substitute
a
different
building
for
one
of
the
two
currently
proposed
buildings
to
be
pledged,
we
can
do
that
great.
F
So
my
question,
probably
parlays
off
of
that
on
financing-
may
I
ask
a
good
question
before
about
this.
These
are
flexibility,
options
open
to
either
run
an
ISP
ourselves
or
to
maybe
sell
some
or
all
of
this
fiber
to
somebody
else.
If
I
run
an
ISP
later
down
the
road,
if
that
second
thing
happened,
if
somebody
came
to
us
and
said
Jesus
we
relied
run,
an
ISP
will
invest
the
money,
but
you
guys
had
some
really
sweet
fiber
hair.
F
You
spent
20
million
dollars
on
it,
we'd
like
to
buy
it
from
you,
for
whatever
that
number
is
I,
assume
care
that
we
can
pay
down
debt,
as
is
there
any
prepayment
penalty
of
some
in
20
million
dollars
in
our
lap?
Could
we
go
back
to
the
CFP
holders
and
pay
off
somewhere
all
of
that
debt
at
our
discretion?
I.
B
AI
The
broadband
project
is
actually
tying
together.
A
number
of
different
initiatives
that
the
city
is
working
on
and
the
racial
equity
project
is
part
of
that
or
program
as
part
of
that,
so
we're
working
with
a
partner
at
the
Harvard
Kennedy
School
through
our
Wetwork
Cities
program,
the
city
of
boulders,
at
what
work
city
and
Harvard,
is
giving
us
some
resources
to
help
improve
our
procurement
processes,
focusing
on
the
equity
lens.
AI
B
B
AH
I,
just
add
to
that,
we
will
include
updates
in
our
quarterly
racial
equity
updates
that
council
receives,
as
part
of
the
IP
a
little
context
on
the
procurement
before
entering
into
the
contractual
relationship
with
Jerr
this
year.
Under
the
guidance
from
our
two
council
members
who
serve
on
the
subcommittee,
the
guiding
coalition
Gere
interviewed,
approximately
20
community
members
and
procurement
was
one
area
that
the
community
members
expressed
desire
for
the
city
to
look
at
through
a
racial
equity
lens
and
so
we're
following
through
on
that
feedback
that
we've
received
with
this
project.
AH
AJ
AI
D
There
an
opportunity
to
leverage
what
brand
put
in,
because
my
breath
election
when
that
went
in
is
they
over
built
capacity?
I,
don't
know
if
it
was
conduit
or
just
dark
fiber
capacity,
but
it
certainly
seems
like
that
would
be
one
way
to
avoid
digging
up
anything
in
certain
parts
of
the
city
where
pretty
core.
We.
B
AL
Next
month
and
I'm
here
tonight,
representing
Boulder
5g
action
and
recently
we
were
talking
to
you
about
the
dangers
of
5g
and
the
preemption
of
5g
and
the
loss
of
local
control
through
some
of
the
state
legislation
and
FCC
rulings.
And
we
want
to
thank
you
for
pursuing
a
fiber
optics
municipal
broadband
infrastructure.
AL
AM
Greetings.
Everybody
thank
you
for
being
here
and
holding
this
public
hearing.
My
name
is
you?
Why
you
legally
you
MA,
nickname
and
everything
that
Carolyn
been
in
ski
just
said?
I
did
oh
I,
don't
just
spend
time
going
through
the
same
information
again
that
she's
just
given
to
you
as
far
as
the
support
that
we
are
really
encouraging.
You
keep
moving
forward
with
this
wiring
broadband,
bring
it
into
the
city's
control.
AM
AG
35
38:
do
we
I,
don't
think
we
need
the
Pentagon
I
think
we
need
WW,
Rendell's
Steven
Tebow,
some
of
the
developers
in
town
that
are
causing
our
housing
crisis
here
and
I
think
they
need
impact
fees
and
I.
Think
you
need
to
figure
out
how
to
do
impact
fees
to
each
development
towards
the
public,
broadband
and
the
digging
of
the
dark
fiber.
AG
So
let
the
people
that
that
were
you
know
we
have
a
deficit
so
much.
We
never
have
enough
for
affordable
housing
and
we
never
have
enough
to
have
our
own
to
own
our
own
broadband.
We
have
two
partnership
with
people.
No,
we
don't.
We
can
do
fine
on
our
own.
We
need
to
charge
the
people
that
are
causing
the
problem
in
first
place.
AG
I'm
I
applaud
you
for
doing
the
dark,
fiber
and
forgetting
it
online
and
I'm
completely
opposed
to
5g
and
I
heard
that
some
of
the
production
from
Julia
last
time
and
the
other
guy
that
showed
the
spectrum
is
really
broad
and
we
aren't
going
to
use
5g
anyway
and
where
it's
dangerous,
we're
gonna
use
it
in
the
lower
level
parts
of
the
spectrum.
I'm.
AG
If
we
allow
5g
anywhere
at
you,
know
south
boulder
part
where
you
know
the
verizon
thing,
then
we've
got
the
slippery
slope
where
we
could
get
in
to
five
g's,
so
I
I'm
opposed
to
any
kind
of
5g
thing
in
any
way
and
let's
just
get
our
fiber
laid
and
then
we've
still
got
our
cell
phones
if
we
want
so
it's
good
to
go,
and
thanks
for
for
supporting
the
dark,
fiber
networks,
the
backbone.
Thank
you,
yeah,
thanks
and
and
to
everywhere.
Of
course,
it's
gonna
you
know,
and
to
the
lower
able
populations.
AG
B
AD
When
you
have
to
dig
up
for
anything
and
I,
don't
know
to
what
extent
there
might
be
other
utilities
that
could
share
it
share
a
utility
chase,
but
I
know
that
in
some
communities
where
I
grew
up
back
east
there's
a
very
old
infrastructure,
that's
in
some
cases
never
been
upgraded,
and
so
they
end
up
digging
up
and
burying
and
digging
up
and
burying
and
digging
up
and
burying
so
I'm
just
curious
if
there's
been
any
examination
of
the
opportunity
to
run
utility
chase,
that
could
be
used
for
multiple
purposes.
Thanks
good,
thank.
F
O
F
F
It's
not
exactly
all
the
way
to
where
we
like
to
be,
but
it
certainly
is,
is
a
good
first
step
of
a
good
first
phase,
one
the
request
I'd
make
Julia
is
because
I
know
that
you've
had
some
pleasant
surprise
here
on
the
use
for
the
conduit
and
I
imagine
you've
had
some
continues.
Disease
contingencies,
built
in
here,
so
you're
a
little
hopefully
little
Headroom
and
I
know
we're
borrowing
a
little
bit
more
money
than
we
actually
need.
F
AI
One
note
on
that,
so
one
of
the
benefits
of
Ponderosa
is
that
we
can
build
fiber
into
the
neighborhood
and
the
difference
with
the
other
communities
is
that
we
can
build
fiber
to
the
community,
but
maybe
not
in
it
and
that's
a
whole
separate
negotiation.
But
I
just
want
to
ask
a
clarifying
question
if
we
fit
within
the
envelope.
Do
you
want
me
to
come
back
for
approval
or
just
add
it
to
our
plan?
I'd.
F
Be
happy
to
add
at
someone
you
might
make
it.
This
is
I'm
just
speaking
for
myself,
it
might
be
the
information
point
you
might
just
let
us
know
where
you're
doing
it
and
how
much
it
cost.
But,
from
my
perspective,
I'd
be
happy
to
give
you
authority
tonight
to
do
the
laterals
if
it
fits
within
the
findings
can
envelope
you
have
on
how
others
feel
about
that.
B
H
So
I
support
that
just
keep
in
mind
that
you
know
like
with
a
bhp
apartment
building,
you
can
build
to
one
place
and
then
have
wireless
serve,
probably
the
whole
building,
or
they
can
do
a
little
bit
internally.
Just
with
like
Boulder
Meadows
is
a
very
large
place.
All
right,
so
I
just
I
agree
with
that,
but
just
not
to
set
false
expectations
that
suddenly
everyone
will
have
internet
within
the
mobile
home
parks.
If
we
build
a
lateral
to
one
entrance
so
worth
doing,
you
focus
it
on
the
community.
H
N
Looking
at
this,
this
119
there
if
it
had
gone
if
it
had
been
on
Pearl
Street,
it
would
have
gone
right
by
Glen
willow,
which
is
affordable,
housing,
low-income
housing-
that's
been
there
forever
and
there
isn't
that
much
going
up
Canyon,
so
I
would
just
point
out
that,
where
it's
feasible,
that
those
things
are
done
and
I
wish
I
had
been
able
to
draw
the
map.
It's
my
regret.
D
Are
there
ways
to
do
that
kind
of
last
mile
kind
of
access
so
that
if
you
have
the
fiber
that
comes
to
the
edge
of
the
property,
there
are
various
approaches
you
can
take
to
get
people
wireless
and
I
think
that
that
would
be
in
the
scope
of
what
we're
talking
about
right,
so
the
lateral
to
the
edge
of
the
park
and
then
whatever
it
takes
to
get
access
to
people
within
the
park.
So
I,
that's
how
I
would
would
say
it.
I
think
this
is
great.
D
Thank
you
for
teeing
it
up
so
nicely
you're,
making
it
so
clear
and
what
the
budget
is
going
for
and
what
we're
gonna
get.
I.
Think
when
we
talked
about
this,
when
we
decided
to
move
forward
with
it.
The
phrase
we
used
was
no
regrets,
and
this
is
one
of
those
no
regret
steps
that
keeps
our
optionality
fully
open
as
to
what
we
do
going
forward
for
business
arrangements
for
the
Muni
broadband.
So,
thank
you
and.
D
I
D
I
A
B
D
H
Zoning
of
the
district
and
upon
trying
to
pull
apartment
discover
that
there
was
this
medium
density
overlay
zone
that
allowed
nothing
other
than
single-family
homes
to
be
built
in
this
six
block
region
of
the
University
Hill.
So
just
that,
knowing
that
we've
been
talking
a
lot
about
trying
to
look
for
alternatives
to
very
large
single-family
homes,
which
is
apparently
the
only
thing
that's
allowed
because
of
this
overlay
zone,
I
just
thought:
I'd
bring
forward
to
see
if
we
could
find
an
alternative
to
that,
you
know
six
or
seven
thousand
square
foot.
AN
I
thought
it
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
put
together
some
maps
so
after
the
intro
from
Aaron.
Thank
you
tonight
is
really
to
talk
about
the
medium
density
overlay
zone.
What
I
thought
would
be
helpful.
First
is
first
to
just
explain
a
little
bit
of
what
what
is
this
overlay
zone,
and
why
do
we
have
it
as
we
described
in
the
short
packet
materials,
the
medium
density
overlay
zone
was
created
in
1995
and,
as
you
can
see,
it
was
an
actually
in
several
area
surrounding
downtown.
AN
We
were
going
through
the
integrated
planning
project
and
of
what's
best
what's
left
and,
and
we
had
up
zoned
a
whole
bunch
of
neighborhoods
in
the
1970s
around
the
downtown
core
warehouse
behind
the
house
came
from.
If
you've
heard
of
that
and
in
the
early
90s,
we
were
hearing
lots
of
concern
from
residents
about
the
really
the
character
of
their
neighborhoods
changing.
AN
So
when
you
see
the
overlay
zone
today,
it
really
is
limited
to
four
areas
of
town
all
limited
in
the
rm2
zoning
districts.
So
at
the
top
of
the
map,
you
can
see
that's
kind
of
near
KC
middle
school
and
then
you
can
see
in
the
middle
of
the
map.
That's
Grand,
View,
Terrace
and
then
in
the
bottom
of
the
map
is
the
University
Hill
area,
which
is
the
subject
of
our
conversation
for
tonight.
AN
If
we
zoom
into
that
just
to
kind
of
orient
you,
the
block
areas
are
from
Aurora
at
the
north
to
baseline
on
the
south
and
then
from
basically
17th
Street
to
19th
Street,
and
so
that's
the
geographic
area
that
this
overlay
zone
applies
to
and
again
it's
just
limited
to
that
medium
density
area.
That's
on
the
hill,
when
we
zoom
in
there's
a
hundred
and
thirty-two
parcels
within
this
geographic
area.
There's
208
housing
units
in
this
area,
so
most
of
the
properties
are
already
duplex
or
triplex
in
this
area.
AN
AN
According
to
the
base
zoning,
you
could
build
a
triplex
on
that
property
by
right,
but
with
the
overlay
zone
it's
limited
to
a
single-family
home.
You
could
subdivide
the
parcel
based
on
its
size
into
two
single-family
homes,
so
they
could
go
through
a
subdivision
process
and
build
two
detached
dwelling
units,
but
no
attached
dwelling
units
with
the
overlay
zone.
What's
the
exact
address,
756,
18th,
Street
and.
AN
AN
That
great
questions
so
think
of
zoning
kind
of
describes.
What
what
can
you
do
on
a
piece
of
land?
So
what
can
you
what
uses
can
go
on
it?
How
big
can
buildings
be
on
it?
How
many
housing
units
can
be
on
it?
So
that's
zoning,
an
overlay
zone
is
a
tool
that
can
be
used
to
think
of
it
as
truly
an
overlay
on
top
of
the
zoning
that
can
then
add
additional
restrictions
or
allowances.
AN
B
AN
Part
of
what
we
wanted
to
look
at
is
okay
of
all
of
these
properties
that
are
in
with
this
area.
How
many
of
them
could
you
build
a
duplex
or
triplex
on
today,
and
so
we
did
that
quick
analysis.
30
of
the
132
parcels
based
on
the
zoning
regulations,
would
be
eligible
for
a
duplex
or
a
triplex
today.
So
then
we
asked
the
question
of
okay.
AN
Yeah
I'm
about
to
answer
that
so
of
those
30
parcels,
how
many
of
them
are
a
duplex
or
a
triplex
or
a
single-family
home
today,
and
how
many
of
them
have
additional
dwelling
unit
potential,
and
the
answer
to
that
is
for
four
of
these
parcels
could
have
additional
dwelling
units
for
a
total
of
six
additional
housing
units
so
of
those
four
parcels
that
are
shown
on
green
on
the
map,
the
one
that
is
the
label
on
the
top
left.
That's
this
property
that
we've
been
talking
about
currently
has
zero.
F
AN
Some
guidance
on
that
would
be
helpful.
What
we
were
were
thinking
about
is,
if,
if
counsel
were
to
give
a,
not
a
five
for
us
to
go
work
on
this,
we
would
do
some
outreach
directly
to
those
property
owners,
as
well
as
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
have
a
conversation
and
walk
through
what
this
would
mean
to
be
able
to
get
some
input
from
folks
and
then
based
on
that
input,
then
come
back
to
Council,
with
a
recommendation
on
whether
to
lift
the
zone
or
not
or
the
other
option
is.
AN
E
H
AN
AN
G
D
Have
some
concerns
about
the
approach
where
we
lift
just
one
property
out
of
an
overlay
zone
I
mean
I'm
sure
that
we
would
do
it
in
the
most
clever
way
possible,
but
it
would
also
be
potentially
thought
of
as
spot
zoning
and
that's
not
what
we
usually
do
so
I
think
in
general
I
would
be
supportive
of
the
process
of
going
forward
and
learning
more.
We
don't
want
to
do
this,
I,
don't
think
suddenly
and
without
public
input.
D
So
most
important
is
that
I
think
that
we
go
through
the
right
process
at
outreach
and
that
we,
let
folks
know
it's
coming,
but
this
is
a
pretty
convincing
slide
and
so
I
think
what
most
people
would
see
a
slide
like
this.
Then
they
would
say:
okay,
it's
it's
outlived
its
usefulness
as
a
tool
at
this
point,
because
things
have
already
gotten
to
where
they're
gonna
get
to
mostly
as
far
as
intensity
goes.
B
And
I'll
just
throw
in
there
to
me,
given
the
level
of
complexity,
to
just
about
everything
related
to
planning
in
this
town,
to
simplify
by
getting
rid
of
an
overlay
zone.
That
sort
of
you
lived
its
purpose,
there's
just
some
rather
than
cut
a
little
hole
in
it,
at
least
on
the
face
of
it.
I
know
you
need
to
go,
do
a
little
research,
but
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
to
just
deal
with
the
whole
thing.
Yeah.
H
E
H
I
appreciate
people's
receptiveness
to
the
idea
and,
of
course
those
are
phenomenal
presentation
of
the
allows
us
to
really
see
what
the
potential
implications
are
and
what
I
might
say
is
we
do
want
to
do
public
outreach
around
this,
of
course,
and
I'm
perfectly
happy
to
leave
it
to
CAC
I
know
we
have
a
pretty
crowded
schedule
for
the
rest
of
this
council.
If
this
comes
forward
and
there's
a
spare
hour,
you
know
great
and
if
it
needs
to
wait
until
December,
that.