►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Study Session 9-10-19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
C
So
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
a
presentation
from
three
representatives
from
the
police
oversight
task
force,
and
this
is
an
update
to
provide
you
with
information
about
what
they've
been
talking
about
where
they've
been
and
just
Ts
up
for
the
big
study
session
that
will
come
in
October.
So
we
are
very
anxious
to
welcome
them.
Thank
you
for
being
here.
I.
D
Would
like
to
thank
you
all
for
being
here
as
well.
I
hope.
The
meeting
downstairs
went
well
I'd
like
to
start
off
by
acknowledging
that
this
meeting
is
happening
on
occupied
indigenous
land
of
the
Arapaho
you
and
Cheyenne
tribes.
My
name
is
michelle
de
neige
I
lead
a
group
here
in
Boulder
and
the
greater
metro
area
called
families
of
color
Colorado.
That's
basically
what
it
sounds
like
we
bring
together
families
of
color
and
let
the
kids
do
things
and
have
all
kinds
of
activities.
D
B
D
D
D
The
second
quote
is
from
pastor
Nate
Pyle,
and
it
just
sort
of
further
illustrates
why
we're
here
to
understand
racism,
you
need
to
understand
power
dynamics
to
understand
sexism,
you
need
to
understand
power
dynamics
to
understand
poverty,
you
need
to
understand
power
dynamics
and
to
understand
power
dynamics.
You
need
to
listen
and
believe
the
stories
of
the
powerless
a
little
bit
of
a
timeline
on
how
we
got
here.
D
The
current
professional
standards
review
panel
started
in
the
90s
further
in
November
of
2001.
The
community
drafted
a
declaration
to
end
racial
justice
in
the
city
of
Boulder,
and
here
we
still
have
ongoing
issues
in
February
of
2016.
You
might
remember
the
Hillard
Hinds
report
that
came
out.
It
was
an
independent
analysis
of
boulder
police
data
and
review
of
professional
police
complaint
process
which
assessed
the
structure
and
work
of
the
psrp,
as
well
as
other
topics.
D
D
March
18th,
the
council
held
a
special
community
meeting
to
reflect
on
the
March
first
incident
between
boulder
police
officers
and
mr.
Atkinson.
One
of
the
key
requests
by
community
members
was
to
improve
community
oversight
of
the
department
April
2nd
of
this
year.
Council
approved
the
Charter
for
the
police
oversight,
task
force,
May
7th
Council,
approved
membership
of
the
police
oversight
task
force
selected
by
a
committee
consisting
of
two
members
of
council
and
three
representatives
of
the
Boulder
County
branch
of
the
n-double
a-c-p.
D
As
a
result,
we
got
an
incredibly
diverse
group
and
it
is
recommended
as
a
similar
approach
for
other
city
boards
and
think
tanks
in
the
future
May
21st
of
this
year.
The
independent
review
of
the
police
department's
internal
investigation
of
the
March
first
incident
was
issued
concluding
that
the
investigation
met
all
standards
and
there
was
no
indication
of
bias
in
the
investigation.
D
May
30th
of
this
year
was
our
first
meeting
as
a
group,
and
since
then
we
have
invested
over
500
hours
in
the
project,
our
timeline
moving
forward.
We
will
be
back
October
10th
to
meet
with
you
all
and
give
our
final
recommendations
about.
What's
going
to
be
best
for
Boulder,
October
15th
will
be
the
first
reading
of
the
recommended
improvements.
October
29th
will
be
the
second
reading
of
the
recommended
improvements.
D
How
we
got
this
far
as
a
group,
we
started
with
team
building,
we
established
operating
procedures
and
building.
As
a
community
group,
we
did
some
visioning,
we
developed
a
guide
for
internal
decision
making,
and
then
we
started
researching.
We
researched
current
practices
in
law
enforcement
oversight
around
the
United
States.
We
conducted
direct
outreach
to
several
cities
with
different
oversight
models
to
learn
from
their
experience.
We
learned
about
the
boulder
police
departments,
current
internal
investigation
and
review
process.
D
We've
received
public
input
during
meetings
as
well
as
online
via
our
task
force
website.
We
also
reached
out
to
the
current
psrp,
both
on
the
citizen
side
and
the
police
side
and
we're
able
to
meet
with
them
and
figure
out
how
that
works.
Further.
We
spoke
with
the
National
Association
of
citizen
oversight,
law
enforcement,
which
is
essentially
the
the
ones
when
it
comes
to
the
sort
of
thing
they
gave
us
a
lot
of
guidance
on
the
strengths
and
limitations
of
different
oversight
models,
and
that
would
affect
us
here.
D
E
E
E
During
our
time
as
a
task
force,
we
have
worked
with
an
organization
called
Nicol,
the
National
Association
for
civilian
oversight
of
law
enforcement.
This
organization
is
nationally
renowned,
highly
regarded.
They
assist
localities
in
creating
systems
of
civilian
oversight
of
police
departments
from
our
research
with
them.
We
have
learned
that
there
are
three
main
models
of
the
civilian
oversight
of
law
enforcement.
The
first
is
the
investigative
focused
model.
This
model
consists
of
civilian
investigators
that
conduct
independent
investigations
of
complaints
against
police
officers.
They
may
replicate,
replace
or
duplicate
the
police
internal
affairs
process.
E
In
this
model,
the
investigative
officers
may
serve
as
an
intake
point
for
complaints
receiving
the
complaints.
They
would
then
interview
officers,
witnesses
and
complainants.
The
second
model
is
the
review
focused
model.
A
communal
review
board
or
Commission
may
have
anyway
completed
internal
affairs
investigations.
Public
forums
make
recommendations
for
further
investigations,
and/or
conduct
community
outreach.
The
third
and
final
model
is
the
Auditor
slash,
monitor,
focused
model.
This
model
consists
of
one
or
more
professional
staff
that
make
up
an
office
that
is
independent
from
the
police
department.
E
This
model
seeks
to
promote
large-scale
and
systemic
change
of
policing
by
taking
in
data
analyzing
the
data
and
then
making
policy
recommendations
to
the
police
department.
This
model
will
also
can
also
oversee
completed
internal
affairs
investigations
to
make
sure
that
they
are
fair,
complete
and
thorough.
E
E
E
Eugene
Oregon
is
very
similar
to
the
city
of
Boulder,
in
that
they
house
a
major
major
university,
the
University
of
Oregon,
much
like
how
the
older
houses
University
of
Colorado
and
the
Open
University
Eugene
Oregon
has
chosen
to
select
a
hybrid
model
that
combines
an
auditor
slash,
monitor
with
a
civilian
review
board.
Tampa
Florida
is
a
city
with
three
times
the
population
size
of
Boulder
they've
selected,
a
community
review
port
as
their
model
California
is
very
similar
to
both
in
terms
of
population
size.
E
They
specifically
referenced
by
Nicole
as
a
best
practice
with
a
contracted
auditor
model.
A
contracted
auditor
model
is
they
have
an
auditor,
but
they
contract
with
a
private
company
to
oversee
their
Police
Department.
Most
importantly,
we
have
learned
that
every
city
in
the
country
tailors
oversight
to
the
specific
needs
of
their
community.
There
is
no
single
best
model
of
oversight.
It
has
to
be
tailored
to
the
needs
and
desires
of
each
specific
commune
I'll
now,
transition
to
Sofia
we'll
talk
about
community
outreach,
among
other
things,.
F
So
a
major
component
of
what
we
have
been
working
on
as
a
task
force
is
reaching
out
to
the
community.
We
worked
as
a
group
to
come
up
with
an
interview
guide,
and
then
we
took
that
interview
guide
to
community
stakeholders.
Our
focus
for
looking
at
community
stakeholders
was
diversity
and
intersectionality.
We
ended
up
interviewing
over
70
community
members
and
then
we
took
that
feedback
from
them
and
created
graphs,
which
you
will
see
as
an
attachment
to
your
memo.
F
Next,
we
entered
an
analysis
phase,
so
we
took
what
we
learned
previously
in
all
of
our
research
and
then
we
compared
that
to
some
of
our
learnings
from
Nicole.
In
that
we
came
up
with
some
concerns
of
how
the
psrp
is
currently
run.
One
of
those
concerns
is
around
the
composition,
so
it
is
currently
50%
community
members
and
50%
police
staff
and
police
members,
which
was
of
concern
according
to
what
we
learned
from
Nicole.
It
also
lacked
racial
diversity.
F
When
we
looked
at
the
community
member
side,
there
weren't
any
non-white
members
and
then
it
lacked
other
diversity.
We
saw
homogeneity
and
the
type
of
education,
the
professionalism,
the
age
of
all,
of
the
current
members.
As
for
their
training,
the
community
members
currently
receive
one
day,
which
is
an
eight-hour
day
of
training.
When
they
go
through
their
process,
they
can
also
opt
into
a
police
academy
which
some
choose
to
do
and
some
don't.
F
Additionally,
the
police
have
a
PowerPoint
training
that
they
go
through
in
regards
to
their
roles
and
their
responsibilities
on
the
psrp
and
then
every
other
year.
They
receive
some
racial
bias
training,
but
it's
not
specific
to
psrp,
which
means
the
community
members
don't
receive
that
training.
We
also
had
some
concerns
around
the
authority
of
the
psrp.
Basically
they're
handed
a
case
from
internal
investigations
and
told
to
review
a
limited
section
of
that,
and
they
cannot
go
outside
of
that
Purvi
to
examine
any
other
things
that
might
be
of
concern
to
them.
F
They
also
only
ever
see
the
class
1
investigations
that
Todd
mentioned,
which
means,
if
there's
a
pattern
and
class,
two
violations
that
has
never
brought
before
community
members.
Additionally,
there's
rarely
dissent
among
a
few
members
but
as
a
whole
that
psrp
doesn't
ever
dissent
against
the
internal
investigations.
Findings.
Some
may
view
that
as
a
positive,
but
it
disrupts
community
trust.
The
community
doesn't
feel
good
about
the
continued
cycle
of
agreement
between
internal
investigations
and
the
psrp.
And
finally,
our
last
concern
was
around
the
recruitment
process,
which
currently
is
a
passive
process.
F
We
also
had
some
concerns
around
Police
Department
operations.
One
is
a
lack
of
clarity
and
how
to
identify
bias,
especially
racial
bias,
and
also
a
lack
of
ability
to
acknowledge
its
existence,
and
we
know
that
the
independent
reviewers
say
that
the
internal
investigations
process
is
thorough,
but
once
again
there's
an
absence
of
public
trust
around
that
process
and
they
don't
the
public
and
the
community
members,
especially
those
we
spoke
to
don't
believe
that
police
should
be
investigating
themselves.
Finally,
the
promotion
structure
creates
a
potential
conflict.
F
It
may
or
may
not,
but
it's
of
concern
so
of
the
models
that
Todd
mentioned.
We
looked
at
some
of
those
new
models
and
thought
about
what
could
we
include
some
of
the
possible
inclusion
choices
could
be
professional
staff
to
compliment
a
board
or
panel.
It
could
include
increased
scope,
meaning
that
they
could
analyze
trends
in
policing
or
they
could
recommend
future
policy.
And
finally,
there
the
new
model
could
include
increased
visibility
and
public
trust,
and
that
could
be
in
both
the
complaint
process
and
the
review
process.
F
B
F
G
Just
wanted
everyone
to
be
real
clear
about
the
police
oversight
board.
That's
currently
in
place.
The
psrp
one
of
you
mentioned
that
the
source
of
the
complaint
could
be
from
anyone
in
the
community
right.
It
could
come
in
by
email
or
or
phone
call,
as
well
as
through
the
police.
Asking
for
that
review,
and
then
I
thought
I
heard
something
that
contradicted
that.
That
said,
it's
only
the
result
of
internal
police
investigation.
E
F
B
H
You
for
all
your
time,
you've
put
into
this
work.
One
of
the
things
I
noticed
was
you:
did
you
conducted
multiple-choice
interview
questions
some
one
thing
that
was
very
stark
that
came
out
of
this
was
there's
a
huge
divide
between
different
groups
and
how
they
perceive
themselves
how
it
seems
to
me
in
order
for
a
better
Oversight
Committee
to
function
effectively,
it
seems
that
that
divide
needs
to
be
bridged.
How
do
you
plan
on
trying
to
bridge
that
and
bringing
better
understanding,
I.
D
D
So
there's
that
and
then
you
know,
there's
ways
to
incorporate,
there's
so
many
that
involve
police
training
and
outreach,
like
do
you
remember.
Coffee
with
a
cop,
was
like
there's
a
lot
of
things
along
that
line
that
are
incorporated
in
some
of
these
models,
but
it
really
depends
how
we
iron
that
out
in
the
end
mm-hmm,
but
it
is
important.
It's
absolutely
a
part
of
our
consideration
very
stark.
A
I
I
The
classroom
on
average
about
three
or
six
per
year-
mm-hmm,
okay,
great,
that's
helpful
and
then
different
questions
the.
What
do
we
know
for
simplification
for
us
to
think
about
this
as
I
guess:
I'll
call
it
investigation
of
incidents
or
complaints
right,
that's
kind
of
one
category
and
then
and
then
policy,
I,
guess,
I'll
call
policy
stuffs
that
wouldn't
would
be
unrelated
to
a
complaint.
But
there
may
be
a
policy
question
or
staffing
question
or
something
that
has
to
do
with
operations.
I
F
I
mean
definitely
what
you're,
referring
to
as
as
best
practices
and
looking
at
the
recommendations
and
the
policy
side.
That
is,
that
more
auditor
monitor
style
and
that
can
be
combined
with
and
often
is
in,
the
hybrid
models
with
the
investigation
side.
But
it's
not
a
nobler
oversimplification
to
look
at
those
two
very
different
branches
of
overview.
Ok,.
J
And
thank
you
as
well
for
all
the
time
you
put
into
it
and
I
am
I.
Was
several
people
mentioned
to
me
how
amazing
the
group
has
worked
together
and
and
I
hadn't
been
able
to
make
it
to
any
of
the
meetings
I
popped
in
it
was
last
week
and
you
all
were
finishing
up
your
presentation,
so
I
didn't
get
to
see
any
of
the
awesome
discussions
that
everybody
described
so
anyway.
Thank
you
very
much
for
putting
your
hearts
and
souls
into
this.
J
During
your
presentation,
you
mentioned
that
there
are
certain
shortcomings
of
the
current
psrp
in
your
discussions.
Have
you
considered
addressing
some
of
those
things
like
the
that
opaque
nature
of
the
appointments
and
the
lack
of
racial
diversity?
Is
there
anything
there
that
could
be
to
work
with
that?
Could
the
city
could
use
moving
forward
I.
F
Think
that
there
is
possibility
for
addressing
some
of
the
issues,
I
think
it
depends
on
the
overall
model
that
we
come
to
what
you'll
you'll
hear
at
our
final
presentation.
What
we
feel
is
a
best
fit
whether
the
current
psrp
could
be
could
fix
some
of
those
concerns
and
still
function
within
that
model
or
not
it'll
depend
on
what
what
model
we
ultimately
recommend
and.
J
There
is
an
effort
currently
in
the
city
to
address
racial
equity
and
it's
through
the
government
alliance
and
race
and
equity,
and
so
one
of
the
the
things
that
it
calls
for
is
to
look
at
all
of
the
processes
and
in
light
of
a
racial
equity
tool
and
basically
it's
to
dismantle,
if
you
will
systems
that
basically
cause
discrimination.
So
in
your
deliberations
and
your
meetings,
have
you
considered.
D
B
B
K
I
also
would
like
to
thank
you
for
your
work.
There's
quite
some
depth
in
here,
but
just
following
up
on
Mary's
first
question:
I
wondered
I'm
curious
about
this
passive
recruitment
process
that
happens
with
the
current
Professional
Standards
review
panel.
Can
can
someone
explain
that
to
us
to
the
white
audience.
F
Yeah
sure
the
the
passive
process
is
that
an
application
goes
up,
I
believe
through
the
city
managers
page
and
people
are
invited
to
fill
out
that
application,
and
then
they
can
go
through
an
interviewing
process.
If
they're
chosen
by
the
city
manager.
However,
there
is
no
marketing
or
advertising
to
a
diverse
group
of
people
or
output
to
any
of
the
activist
groups
or
any
of
the
more
racially
diverse
aspects
of
Boulder
so
that
they
can
know
that
the
application
exists
or
that
the
time
has
come
to
apply
if
they'd
like
to
so.
K
B
One
more
question
for
me,
since
one
of
your
questions
has
to
do
with
what
the
whether
we,
okay
I,
think
getting
rid
of
the
current
model
for
another
model,
I
was
just
curious.
Did
any
of
your
interviews
include
civilians
serving
on
them
on
the
review
panel,
and
did
they
also
agree
that
the
process
needed
to
be
improved
I'm
just
curious
if
they
recognize
that
or
they
actually
thought
it
was
working
when.
B
D
Okay,
I
think
that
there
was
a
lot
of
enlightening
in
our
conversation
in
both
directions
and
they
showed
up,
and
they
were
very
willing
to
answer
all
of
our
questions
and
they
kind
of
looked
around
and
realized
that
they
did
have
room
to
grow
and
whether
or
not
the
I
don't
know
if
I
would
say
dismantling.
But
they
did
say
if
something
was
to
be
reformed
or
if
the
psrp
was
to
be
excused.
Pardon
me
that
they
would
be
interested
in
continuing
on
whatever
we
created.
They
liked.
What
we
our
discussion.
G
C
We
did
discuss
it
and
what
we
did
is
after
the
Hillard
Hinds
report
came
forward.
We
created
a
community
engagement
panel
that
works
with
the
police,
so
we
created
another
panel.
That
is
all
civilians
that
meets
monthly
with
the
police
or
bimonthly
I'm.
Sorry,
with
the
police
department
and
they've,
been
in
operation
for
at
least
two
years
of
non
free
I'm,
not
exactly
sure
how
long
they've
been
in
place,
but
their
role
is
not
to
review
any
of
the
Professional
Standards
issues.
G
We
did
not.
Okay,
all
right.
So
it's
obvious,
there's
holes
in
what
we're
talking
about
here,
but
I
just
wanted
to
get
on
the
ground
kind
of
like
what
pieces
we
could
pull
from
as
we
think
about
going
forward,
not
to
say
that
what
we're
doing
now
is.
Is
that
all
good
enough?
Just
that
those
are
the
things
that
we
have
in
place
at
the
moment,
so
we're.
B
K
H
Lisa
so
one
of
the
questions
I
have
you
noted
that
panelists
can
serve
up
to
four
years
and
that
that
limits
turnover
and
stuff?
But
it
also
allows
somebody
to
get
more
experience
and
knowledge
of
the
issues
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
you
have
a
recommendation
in
terms
of
term
of
length
of
term
how
you
make
sure
that
you
keep
experience
but
also
get
new
people
in
there.
So
you
have
fresh
eyes.
Looking
at
the
issue.
That's.
D
Definitely
a
part
of
our
consideration.
Currently
nationwide
you'll
see
members
serve
anywhere
from
six
months
to
eight
years
and
I
think
it's
really
relative
to
how
many
complaints
they're
receiving
so
if
they're,
only
currently,
both
are
only
receiving
for
a
year.
They
felt
like
the
psrp
stuff
that
we
talked
to
felt
like
they
have
enough
time
to
really
get
a
feel
for
it
before
they
were
moving
on,
but
alternately
like
you're,
also
not
getting
fresh
fresh
faces.
H
A
D
Currently,
that
is
those
that
3
to
6,
that
you
mentioned
is
reflective
of
what
comes
to
the
psrp.
What
the
number
of
complaints
that
come
through
the
department
is
not
the
same
and
I
think
either
way
would
be
an
issue
of
accessibility.
So
where
are
the
places
you
can
drop
a
forum
where,
where
is
it
on
the
website?
How
are
not
only
how
anonymous
does
it
feel
if
they
have
to
walk
into
a
government
building
to
do
it
so
things
like
that?
Is
it
in
more
than
one
language?
H
And
I
was
wondering
in
addition
to
kind
of
those
you
know.
Is
there
a
Dropbox?
Do
you
come
on
internet
I
know
in
the
federal
system
you
know
sometimes
there's
a
limitation
in
terms
of
days
or
amount
of
time
in
which
you've
experienced
something,
and
sometimes
it
takes
a
while
to
process
that
and
then
to
bring
that
complaint
forward.
Is
there
a
time
limitation
right
now
in
place
in
terms
of
what
people
how
people
can
report
something.
L
D
H
B
I,
don't
wanna
stop
the
flow
of
conversation.
We
want
to
make
sure
we
get
to
answer
the
questions,
because
we're
gonna
have
a
much
longer
discussion
when
you
come
back
to
us
and
it's
important
that
they
walk
away
with
the
two
questions
answered
that
they
need
direction
on
so
with
that,
if
people
will
have
questions
that
are
important
to
us,
giving
direction
go
ahead,
but
otherwise
we're
gonna
move
to
that,
because
we're
behind
already
I
guess.
I
I
You
know
which,
because
it
sounds
like
you're,
suggesting
that
that
this-
that
the
new
organization
new
board
take
on
farther
down
the
stack,
more
complaints
and
more
broad
oversight.
It
so
be
interesting
to
educate
us
on
what
those
that
hierarchy
is
and
then
we're
you're
recommending
that
line
be
drawn,
so
that
would
that
would
be
a
good.
M
However,
it
ends
up
coming
out
to
be
analyzing
kind
of
overall
patterns
right,
so,
like
Bob
was
talking
before
there's
this
reactive
version,
where
you
we
say:
okay,
we
have
a
complaint
what's
going
on
with
that
complaint,
but
then
there's
also
the
question
of
like
okay.
Let's
look
at
everything
that's
going
on
and
are
there
patterns?
Are
there
places
to
get
better
right
because
I
feel
like
what
we
need
from
this
group
amongst
a
variety
of
other
things
is,
is
to
try
to
make
progress
on.
M
You
know
working
on
the
issues
of
the
structural
and
systemic
racism
of
our
society
as
a
whole,
here
in
our
community
and
and
and
I
feel
like
that
needs
a
analysis
and
more
than
just
being
reactive,
so
I'm
sure
you're
all
thinking
about
this,
but
that's
it's
just
the
one
thing
that
I
wanted
to
put
out
there
is
you
proceed
for
it
and
I'm
things
again.
I
really
look
forward
to
the
next
steps.
I'm.
J
K
E
K
Understand
that,
but
in
light
of
what
Erin
just
said,
this
business
of
systemic
outreach
I
mean,
as
I
said,
I
know
that
there
has
been
long
ongoing
issues
with
the
University
and
just
as
an
outreach.
Perhaps
whatever
the
city
puts
together,
would
do
some
outreach
with
the
university,
because
it's
needed
and
in
terms
of
addressing
the
the
larger
issue
I,
would
think
that
it
would
be
very
helpful.
I
would.
D
Say
that
the
intention
of
this
group
is
absolutely
for
it
just
to
spread.
So
while
we
only
have
this
right
now,
I
would
I
would
personally
like
to
see
a
go
to
not
only
see
you
but
the
Sheriff's
Department
and
have
it
I
think
that
this
is
a
necessary
tool
to
build
trust
in
both
directions,
and
these
issues
are
I
mean
they're
pervasive,
so
it
absolutely
needs
to
be
addressed,
but
I
guess.
The
idea
is
we're,
hoping
that
it'll
be
contagious
and
the
work
can
continue
once
this
is
formed.
K
K
G
You
all
again,
it's
much
appreciated
I
think
you
can
hear
how
the
whole
council
appreciates
the
time,
and
we
know
we've
heard
from
lots
of
people
that
you're
putting
many
hours
in
so
good.
You
I
want
to
do
that
what
Mary
said
and
we're
trying
to
build
capacity
with
this
care
process,
and
so,
if
there's
an
intersection,
if
it's
useful
to
you,
then
I
think
it's
worth
taking
a
look
at
so
that
we
here
right,
we
can
hear
back
from
you
as
well.
G
Here's
what
we
didn't
see
there
that
we
would
like
to
have
seen
or
something
along
those
lines.
The
other
thing
I
will
add
to
what
I
heard
from
Bob
earlier.
Is
that
there's
the
procedural
bit
where
you
might
want
to
be
able
to
handle
complaints
and
there's
a
bit
where
you
want
to
look
at
patterns?
And
you
want
to
look
at
you
know
maybe
policy
changes
and
so
on,
but
I
think
earlier
someone
hit
on
something
which
is
the
outreach
to
the
community.
I
mean
I.
G
H
Lisa,
so
I
would
agree
with
what
my
colleagues
have
said.
I
think
there
is
I
know
that
our
boulders
lease
department
do
collaborate
or
work
with
Cu
Police
Department
do
work
with
the
Sheriff's
Department,
so
there's
a
certain
overlap
there.
H
My
only
thing
is:
keep
going
and
you
guys
have
done
a
great
job.
I
would
like
to
see
and
I
don't
know
exactly
how
you
would
establish
it,
but
I'd
like
to
see
some
thought
being
put
into
metrics
and
establishing
a
baseline.
Where
are
we
today?
I
mean
I
like
that
timeline
that
you
showed
at
the
beginning,
and
if
we
could
apply
some
metrics
to
that
and
then
see
overtime?
Are
we
improving?
Are
we
not
improving?
B
So
did
anybody
else
want
to
go?
Let
me
just
add
a
couple
things,
but
yes,
I
think
what
you're
hearing
is
a
lot
of
agreement
on
the
trends
issue,
giving
us
some
thoughts
about
the
complaint
you
know.
Where
do
you
draw
the
line
in
terms
of
complaints?
What
would
make
sense
in
terms
of
overview
and
that's
to
get
that
piece
of
it?
B
So
it
would
be
interesting
if
and
I'll
see
you
as
to
but
I,
don't
know
that
we're
talking
to
each
other
we're
talking
to
each
other
at
the
top
level
about
this,
but
we're
not
below
that.
So
how
do
we
coordinate
and
and
deepen
that?
How
you
think
accept
that
you
have
you
guys,
have
thoughts
on
that
I.
B
Think
that
there's
the
we
talked
about
outreach,
I,
think
and
I'll
just
want
to
broaden
that
thought.
There's
outreach
to
people
to
serve
on
this
entity,
but
there's
also
the
liaison
between
the
department
and
the
community,
which
the
police
department
does
some
of
that
now.
But
if
there's
thoughts
on
how
that
could
be
deepened,
I'm,
also
interested
in
that,
and
also
how
this
conversation
it
sounds
like
you,
you
guys
have
gone
to
a
really
deep
and
wonderful
place
with
this.
How
do
we
continue
that,
or
maybe
not
I
don't
mean?
B
B
We,
the
goal,
is
to
evolve
together
as
a
city
as
a
police
department
as
a
community
and
coming
up
with
a
structure
that
works
for
the
folks
that
have
been
disenchanted
in
franchise
and
do
not
feel
heard
is
important,
also
a
system
that
will
work
for
the
police
department.
Otherwise,
it
will
ultimately
fail
so
figuring
out
how
to
make
it
so
it
it's
it
builds
rather
than
is
resisted
I
hope
you
build
that
into
your
model
of
what
you
bring
forward,
because
that
I
think
will
help
with
the
success
of
it
anything
else.
B
P
Q
F
H
I
Maybe
might
be
half
I
see,
Chris
is
on
the
front
row
I
wonder
if
it'd
be
helpful,
if
Chris
could
share
with
us
I
think
the
Planning
Board
took
this
out
for
a
couple
weeks
ago
helpful
to
hear
from
Chris
what
the
Planning
Board's
recommendation
to
us
is
about
whether
we
should
tackle
this
phase.
One
of
the
project
this
year.
Q
Sure
so
Christmas
check
planning
the
Planning
Board
did
review
the
first
phase
of
large
homes
and
large
Lots
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
I
can
pull
up
their
specific
motion.
They
did
not
adopt
the
staff
recommended
motion,
which
was
to
recommend
approval
of
the
first
phase
of
changes
for
ad
use
and
internal
conversions
for
duplexes
and
triplexes.
What
they
did
recommend
was
a
series
of
of
thoughts
related
to
the
project
as
a
whole,
and
so
I
think
that's
the
perspective
that
the
Planning
Board
had,
and
maybe
what
spurred
some
of
this
conversation
tonight.
B
I
Like
to
light
it,
what
the
Planning
Board
said
and
I
appreciate
them
weighing
in
and
I
like
to
you
might
let
me
back
up
back
in
the
end
of
May.
We
looked
at
this
with
staff
and
I
think
we
broke
a
discussion
about
Adu
density
and
duplexes
and
triplexes,
and
some
other
things
were
leading
to
lots
into
two
phases.
One
phase,
which
was
gonna,
be
a
small
phase
phase.
I
We've
got
a
pretty
full
calendar
here
over
the
next
few
weeks
before
this
council
adjourns
and
the
plane
board
is
recommended
that
we
do
that
as
well.
I
think
we've
all
seen
that
we've
received
a
petition
from
folks
in
the
community.
700
people
have
signed
a
petition
asking
us
to
do
the
same
thing
and
last
time
I
checked
with
with
Carl
Guyler
I,
maybe
the
numbers
a
little
higher
now,
but
last
time
I
checked
with
Carl.
I
I
It
seems
like
it's
a
lot
of
it's
a
pretty
heavy
lift
for
probably
not
a
whole
lot
upside
just
to
focus
on
our
you
know
our
our
side,
I
like
to
suggest
that
we
look
at
this
holistically
across
the
city
when
the
next
council
adjourns
could
be
early
in
the
year
I'm
not
fussed
about
when
we
handle
it.
But
I
think
I'd
like
to
recommend
that
and
I
did
speak
to
meerabhai,
and
she
supports
that
as
well.
I
One
is
already
allowed
right
now:
that's
something
did
it,
but
you're
gonna
have
to
go.
I
think
the
this
phase,
one.
It
was
allowing
a
second
Adu
and
re
nrr
zones
and
also
relaxing
the
rules
with
respect
to
conversion
of
single-family
to
duplexes
and
triplexes,
that's
kind
of
the
narrow
scope
of
phase
one
and
then
everything
else
was
in
phase
two
and
I
think
what
I'm
recommending
I
think
Mirabai
supports
is
collapsing.
Those
into
one
phase
that
would
happen
sometime
next
year.
So.
K
Suzanne,
do
you
want
us
to
go
ahead
and
indicate?
Is
this
a
straw
poll
kind
of
deal
or
what
it
is
so
I
agree
with
Bob
I
I
think
that
we've
heard
a
lot
from
the
people
who
are
in
this
part
of
the
community
and
and
in
these
these
zones,
and
during
our
study
session
we
talked
about
having
a
larger
sub
community
conversation
with
that
and
allowing
these
people
who
feel
sort
of
left
out
in
terms
of
how
this
is
all
gone.
M
Yeah
I
mean
that's
fine
with
me
as
well.
I,
like
the
idea
of
looking
at
it
more
holistically.
I
was
a
little
disappointed
when
got
split
into
phase
one
and
phase
two
in
the
first
place,
so
I've
been
doing
it
together,
looking
at
at
citywide
as
next
year
with
you
know
at
that
at
that
time
makes
sense,
and
in
particular
you
know,
we've
heard
from
a
lot
of
folks
in
some
of
these
areas
who
feel
a
little
bit
like
they're
being
focused
in
on
when
this.
M
H
I
will
also
say,
though,
in
our
conversations
with
planning
staff
and
having
been
very
much
involved
with
the
North
Boulder
sub
Community
Plan
I
knew
and
I
know
that
we
would
have
to
make
changes
to
the
North
Boulder
sub
community
plan.
Before
any
of
these,
you
know
changes
could
happen
because
in
the
North
Boulder
sub
community
plan,
the
focus
is
on
the
North
Village
area
and
there
was
kind
of
an
agreement
that
you
know.
We
wouldn't
go
into
these
other
large
lots
and
and
do
subdivisions
or
things
like
that
or
make
much
change.
H
But
there
there
are,
as
Erin
said,
there
is
a
lot
of
change,
that's
going
on
in
North
Boulder
and
how
we
address
that
change
by
maybe
asking
for
reduced
FA
art
or
whatever
I'll
leave
it
to
the
next
council
to
make
that
decision.
We
talked
about
that
early
on,
and
people
weren't
comfortable
with
that.
So
I
think
there
needs
to
be
a
broader
community
discussion.
G
In
agreement,
I
think
we
should
leave
it
it's
late
in
the
game
for
this
council
and
we're
gonna
be
rushing
to
try
and
get
it
done
and
I
think
we
should
be
a
little
more
methodical
than
that.
I
do
think
that
I
would
like
to
have
this
brought
up
as
part
of
the
East
Boulder,
some
community
planning
process,
which
is
asking
residents.
What
would
you
like?
G
J
So
I'm,
okay
with
it
as
well.
This
project
has
struggled
from
the
beginning
with
a
solution,
so
the
the
the
problem
is
again,
as
I
think
Erin
said,
was
in
North
Boulder
with
houses
getting
scraped
and
getting
replaced
by
large
ones,
which
seems
to
me.
The
solution
was
to
address
the
bulk
and
massive
houses,
the
fa
r
as
well-
and
there
was
no
appetite
to
do
that
in
the
beginning.
J
B
It
happens
in
my
neighborhood
too,
and
it
is
ice
low,
but
I
think
I'll
use
the
word
insidious
trend
that
just
puts
things
farther
out
of
reach,
so
I
guess
I
would
say
to
the
new
council.
This
is
a
real
issue
and
at
some
point
we
want
to.
We
need
to
figure
this
out
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
ways
to
come
at
it
and
that's
I
think
what
complicates
it?
Do
you
look
at
the
FA?
Are
you
good
look
into
subdividing
Lots
you
look
at
incentivizing,
smaller
and
more
affordable
units.
B
Do
a
deed,
restricted,
affordability
as
an
element.
There's
a
lot
of
really
creative
ways.
How
would
you
do
it
as
a
part
of
sub
Community
Planning,
so
I
guess
I
would
encourage
the
new
council
to
to
embrace
this
issue
and
maybe
approach
it
a
little
more
methodically
than
we
did,
but
it
needs
addressed.
So
it
looks
like
we've
effectively
put
this
on
the
list
of
things
that
we're
leaving
to
the
next
council,
but.
H
H
We
can't
figure
out
how
to
come
up
with
a
better
model
and
and
I
think
Bob
very
said
that
there
was
a
lot
of
misinformation
and
I
think
that
misinformation
got
people
really
more
freaked
out
than
they
need
it
to
be
and
or
concerned.
I
appreciate
people
writing
us
and
stating
their
concerns,
but
I
don't
think
it
would
have
affected
very
many
people
so
and
it
was
all
voluntary.
B
And
I
it
gets
at
what
Aaron
said,
which
is:
how
do
you
sort
of
steer
change
without
inviting
more
change,
then
there's
an
appetite
for
in
terms
of
you
know:
incentivizing
conversions
and
we're
gonna
happen,
okay!
Well,
thank
you
for
the
work.
I
agree.
What
you've
done
so
far
will
be
useful
to
whenever
it
gets
picked
up
again.
Thanks,
okay,.
C
The
next
item
that
we
added
is
with
regard
to
Cu
south.
So,
as
you
will
recall,
we
had
been
waiting
for
a
letter
from
the
Colorado
Department
of
Transportation,
with
additional
information
about
the
bridge
and
their
right-of-way,
and
so
I've
asked
Joe
Teti,
who
is
our
interim
utilities
director
and
Kathleen
Brockie?
Who
is
our
interim
co
transportation
director
to
come
up
and
give
you
an
update
about?
What's
been
going
on,
we'll
see
yourself.
R
R
Again,
I'm
Joe
Teti
I'm,
the
interim
director
for
utilities
in
our
Public,
Works
Department,
and
so
for
the
last
several
weeks.
There's
been
discussion
about
the
South,
Boulder
Creek
flood
mitigation
project
and
some
questions
or
discussion
around
the
alternatives
and
specifically
variant
one
invariant
to
and
I
think
that,
frankly,
the
real
question
is:
has
variant
to
come
back
to
life.
I
think
there
was
a
perception
that
that
was.
We
had
put
that
behind
us
and
based
on
past
council
direction,
we
were
focused
on
very
one.
R
R
R
They
don't
have
a
position
on
any
of
the
cities,
flood
mitigation
options
or
variant,
one
they're
very
into
they
have
expressed
no
preference
and
they
don't
want
anything
permanently
attached
to
their
to
their
bridge.
So
I
think
that
gives
us
some
clear
boundary
conditions
to
work
from
and
some
desired
clarity
that
we
had
around
their
position
and
I
know
in
talking
to
our
city
staff,
who
have
participated
in
those
discussions
and
conversations
with
C
dot
that
C
dot
has
made
some
concessions
in
in
getting
to
that
point,
which
we
appreciate.
B
In
that
meeting,
one
of
the
things
that
I
thought
was
really
useful.
That
gets
20.3
was
what
the
right-of-way
looks
like
when
you
get
to
the
bridge
and
the
map
of
the
highway.
The
right-of-way
comes
up
much
further
in
and
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
a
slide
of
that,
but
because
that
was
a
key
piece
of
that
conversation
was,
it
would
be
50
feet
away
from
the
brighter.
Where
goes
50
feet
away
from
the
bridge
which
led
to
a
conversation.
B
What
so
you'd
have
to
move
worth
50
feet
from
the
bridge
and
and
do
a
lot
of
hardening
of
the
stream
and
various
things
which
had
an
impact
on
that
conversation?
So,
but
without
that
right-of-way
shown
on
a
map-
and
this
doesn't
get
us
to
south
Boulder,
Creek
I
guess
I
feel,
like
people
are
still
gonna
walk
away
with
different
impressions
of
what
this
means
without
seeing
that
does
that
make
sense
yeah.
So.
S
R
G
L
G
G
S
B
You
know
what
maybe
it'd
be
useful,
because
I'm
trying
to
remember
at
some
point
along
36.
There
was
some
talk,
although
I'm
not
sure
we
got
permission
of
building
the
bike
way
on
top
of
the
berm
and
then
at
some
point
the
burn
becomes
a
wall,
and
so,
in
terms
of
when
we
get
to
this
point,
C
I
don't
know
it'd
be
useful.
If
somebody
could
just
show
us
right
so
I.
S
Want
to
create
some
clarity
on
what
we
talked
about
at
the
meeting,
because
when
we
were
talking
about
the
location
of
the
commuter
bike
way,
it
was
along
the
other
map
that
we
provided,
the
one
that
shows
the
wall
being
built
along
the
existing
right-of-way
line,
and
the
conversation
was
recognizing
that
the
seat
outside
of
that
wall-
they
initially
were
saying
they
don't
want
any
flood
structures
in
there,
but
that
the
commuter
bike
way
could
be
located
in
there
and
it
could
be
designed.
So
they
would
also
serve
as
a
maintenance
access
for
the
wall.
S
So
that's
where,
in
the
conversation
we
were
talking
about
co-locating
the
commuter
bike
way
and
the
wall.
So
that's
on
the
larger
11
by
17
map,
though,
that
we
handed
out
it
wasn't
we
didn't
get
into
that
level
of
specificity
here
at
the
bridge
and
I
guess,
I
also
want
to
say,
and
as
a
follow-up
from
the
are
meeting
with
C
dot.
We
recognize
that
there's
a
lot
more
design
detail
that
we
need
to
go
through
together
with
the
city
will
see
you
with
C
dot.
S
This
was
just
our
initial
conversation
was
seeped
out
to
move
forward
and
be
able
to
reach
a
more
suitable
decision
than
what
they
had
told
us
earlier
in
the
year
where
they
were
saying
the
wall
had
to
be
located
outside
of
the
future
right-of-way
line
which,
again
on
the
11
by
17
I
think,
is
the
red
line.
That's
where
we
started
that
day
and
they
and
what
we
had
previously
been
told
and
now
they've
said
we
could
be
along
the
existing
right-of-way
line.
B
S
R
There's
a
lot
more
to
that
when
you
move
it
outside
the
C
dot
right
away
than
there
was
when
we
thought
we
could
potentially
attached
to
their
bridge
and
that
kind
of
thing
that
combined
with
the
open
space
impacts
and
some
of
the
permitting
challenges.
Frankly,
we
just
don't
feel
like
it's
a
good
investment
to
spend
a
lot
more
staff
resources
and
funds
on
that
concept.
We
just
don't
know
that
we
can
get
to
a
viable
solution
that
works
for
all
of
the
the
interest
involved
here.
So.
M
If
I
could
just
ask
a
couple
of
questions,
I
understand
that
a
little
bit
better,
so
the
so
you'd
have
to
you'd,
have
to
build
kind
of
a
new
bridge,
50
feet
out
or
so,
and
then,
in
order
to
make
that
work,
would
you
then
have
to
kind
of
tie
it
back
to
the
flood
wall
on
either
side?
Like
I
mean
it's,
the
water
would
go
around
otherwise
right
like
how
would
that
work?
If
you
were
to
it.
R
M
M
R
M
R
M
R
Yeah
that
was
one
of
the
comments
I
made
in
discussions
with
our
open
space
staff.
We
feel
like
that's,
that's
a
possibility
and
I
know
our
open
space
staff
and
utilities
staff
are
going
to
be
talking
to
the
open
space
Board
of
Trustees
tomorrow
and
having
some
of
these
conversations
and
in
the
memo
for
that,
the
staff
said,
there
may
not
be
a
mitigation
package
that
could
support
the
variant
two
outside
of
the
seat
out
right
of
way.
R
M
I
just
speak
to
that
real,
quick
so
just
and
that
I
just
wanted
to
be
on
record.
That's
fine
with
me
with
that
I
appreciate
you
all
pinning
this
to
the
ground,
so
I
felt
like
they
were
still
unanswered.
Questions
around
this
now
I
feel,
like
those
questions
have
been
answered,
so
I
appreciate
you
doing
that
and
can.
B
We
put
a
ball
on
this
I
think
it's
really
important.
What
you
just
said
and
looking
at
the
map
and
I
guess
I,
because
I
was
in
that
meeting
and
a
light
bulb,
went
off
going.
Okay,
I
think
I
heard
something
definitive,
but
then
we
wanted
to
go
back
and
make
sure
and
I
guess
having
that
publicly
stated
and
explained
with
the
map,
I
think
it's
really
important
so
that
now
everybody
in
the
community
understands
we
didn't
take
it
off
the
table.
B
It
has
been
taken
off
by
a
coma
the
reality
of
engineering
and
stuff,
but
it's
off
the
table.
If
that's
what
you're
saying
so
yeah
I
guess,
I'm
just
saying
this
one
more
time
is
to
put
it
out
to
the
public
in
a
way
that
everybody
understands
it.
So
we
don't
do
a
a
Groundhog
Day
where
we
wake
up
and
suddenly
we're
re-examining
things
that
have
been
taken
off
the
table.
That
would
be
very
helpful.
Okay,
Bob
and
then
I
agree.
I
I
agree
with
you
Suzanne
and
with
Aaron
I.
Think
one
thing
would
be
helpful
because
we
are
gonna,
get
follow-up
questions
and
we're-
probably
not
thinking-
probably
not
anticipating
tonight,
because
we're
just
doing
this
all
the
questions
that
we
might
get
the
community
I
think
one
thing
that
would
be
very
helpful,
Jane
and
Joe
is,
if
you
guys,
could
just
write
up
a
little
memo
that
summarizes
the
things
that
Joe
is
sharing
and
Kathleen
are
sharing
with
us
tonight.
I
Just
so
we
have
it
kind
of
a
little
bit
of
a
record
about
the
impacts
and
permits
and
open
space
and
staff
recommendation
with
respect
to
Brian
I.
Think
it'd
just
be
nice
to
have
in
a
couple
three
pages
your
this
definitive
recommendation
from
staff.
That
way
when
we
get
questions
from
the
community,
we
can
point
point
them
to
that
sure.
A
K
I
would
I
would
just
add
to
that
that
it
really
it's
not
how
much
open
space
land
this
is,
but
it's
what
kind
it
is,
and
it's
that
that
that
really
drives
this
in
terms
of
the
impacts
and
the
kinds
of
assessments
that
would
need
to
be
made
environmentally
and
probably
couldn't
get
by
since
they're
endangered
species
on
that
land.
So.
G
Thank
you
for
this.
It
is
extremely
helpful
to
get
something
in
writing
that
we
can
clearly
show
the
the
concepts
that
we
had
in
mind
previously
for
engineering.
That
variant
were
not
supported
by
C
dot.
They
would
not
give
us
permission
to
put
this
flood
restriction
or
effort
Terrance's
on
the
36
bridge
over
South,
Boulder,
Creek
or
adjacent
to
the
bridge,
within
C
dot,
right-of-way
or
within
the
existing
roadway
prism.
G
So
there's
just
a
lot
of
clarity
here
that
I'm
sure
you
guys
got
from
your
conversation,
but
it
wasn't
translating
as
widely,
and
so
this
will
help
us
translate
widely
what
the
technical
restrictions
would
be
and
then
how
that
would
make
a
whole
bunch
of
cascading
impacts
on
really
high-quality
open
space,
so
I
mean
thank
you
for
doing
this.
I
know
that
in
your
minds
it
was
probably
decided,
but
the
community
needs
to
get
this
kind
of
clarity.
You.
H
B
Was
the
other
part?
Is
this
letter
also
says
and
here's
the
way
you
can
go
forward
and
that's
the
other
part,
and
again
you
thanks
edad.
I
guess
I
want
to
thank
them
again,
for
it
wouldn't
have
been
good
if
we
had
to
build
it
outside
the
potential
future
right-of-way
that
they
originally
wanted.
So
this
is
also
the
path
forward.
I
guess
the
last
thing
I'll
say
is
I
know
that
opens
faces
meeting
this
week
and
without
opening
a
can
of
worms.
B
B
It
would
be
on
the
other
side
of
the
right-of-way
line,
but
now
that
we
know
it
that
it
has
to
be
on
our
side
of
the
right-of-way
line,
I,
guess,
hearing
from
open
space
staff
and
the
board
mitigations,
you
know
as
we
as
we
narrow
down
the
the
engineering
options.
What's
the
best
habitat
that
we
need
to
protect.
If
there's
ways
to
to
tweak
the
project
to
make
it
more
palatable,
more
more
permanent
than
say
use,
that's
useful
input,
since
the
world
shifted
a
little
bit.
B
B
Q
Okay,
well,
Kathleen
pulls
up
the
presentation.
I
can
go
ahead
and
kick
things
off
here
we're
here
tonight
to
talk
about
the
East
Boulder
sub-community
plan
that
planning
process
began
earlier
this
year.
Kathleen
King,
who
is
a
Senior
Planner
in
the
planning
department,
is
the
project
manager
for
this
and
is
going
to
walk
us
through
the
presentation,
hello.
T
I'm
excited
to
be
here
tonight:
it's
been
a
while,
since
we've
caught
up
about
sub-community
planning,
nice
Boulder,
I
heard
the
term
sub
community
planning
earlier
tonight.
So
I
know
it's
on
top
of
everybody's
mind.
So
I'm
gonna
go
through
a
couple
of
topics
tonight,
we'll
review
some
of
the
commitments
we
made.
T
So
the
last
time
we
met
as
I
mentioned,
was
back
in
January,
and
at
that
time
we
made
some
updates
to
the
overall
sub
community
planning
program.
We
revised
definitions
to
more
accurately
represent
the
intention
of
sub
community
as
well
as
area
planning.
We
revised
the
sub
community
boundaries
to
better
respond
to
the
city's
areas
of
change
and
align
with
census
tracts.
We
identified
a
scope
of
work
and
deliverables
for
sub
community
planning
projects.
B
T
So
then,
we've
also
strived
to
really
create
greater
clarity
around
the
purpose
of
sub
community
planning.
So
why
do
we
do
these
types
of
projects
and
that's
really
to
implement
the
goals
of
the
Boulder
Valley
Comprehensive
Plan?
So
in
the
East
Boulder
project,
we've
worked
really
hard
to
communicate
this
and
I
think
the
the
work
we've
completed
so
far
has
been
directly
guided
and
informed
by
the
goals
of
the
BBC
P.
T
During
this
initial
phase
of
work,
and
then
we
also
launched
into
the
inventory
analysis
base
and
I'm
going
to
present
some
of
those
results
in
a
bit
and
to
describe
where
we're
at
on
the
city's
decision-making
wheel,
working
towards
the
completion
of
the
inventory
and
analysis
phase
of
work
brings
us
to
stage
four.
So
sharing
that
foundation
of
information
and
inquiry
and
a
lot
of
that
kind
of
information
and
and
the
questions
that
we're
asking
are
included
in
that
inventory
report.
They
think
I
think
everybody
has
a
copy
of
it.
T
So
that
brings
us
to
what
we're
up
to
today,
I'm
gonna
present
some
of
the
work
we've
completed
through
engagement
and
kind
of
data,
collection
and
analysis
and
our
big
questions
for
discussion
tonight.
Our
discounsel
agree
with
the
key
issues
and
conclusions
of
the
draft
inventory
and
analysis
report
and
discounsel
agree
with
the
proposed
next
steps.
So
all
of
your
feedback
that
you
give
tonight,
we
are
going
to
work
to
incorporate
those
thoughts
and
and
really
document
those
in
that
report.
T
T
The
work
we've
done
thus
far
is
striving
to
answer
that
first
question
and
we've
taken
kind
of
a
two-pronged
approach
to
this
we've
conducted
both
the
data
based,
inventory
and
I've
been
developing
an
experience
based
inventory
and
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
each
of
these.
The
data
based
inventory
is
really
about
the
numbers.
What
do
we
have
a
nice
Boulder
today
and
how
much
of
it
is
out
there?
T
Numbers
change
constantly
and
data
doesn't
represent
the
entire
picture,
there's
much
more
to
a
neighborhood
or
sub
community
than
just
the
numbers,
and
so
we've
also
been
developing
a
catalogue
of
experiences
with
project
teams
working
group
members
and
the
community.
We've
walked
different
sites
throughout
East
Boulder
to
document
experiences
of
comfort
or
discomfort.
T
We've
ridden
bikes
and
taken
buses
through
the
area
to
learn
what
it's
like
to
travel
in
East,
Boulder
and
we've
met
with
local
business
owners
and
area
workers
to
hear
about
their
challenges
and
hopes
for
the
future,
and
so
one
of
the
ways
we're
documenting
and
sharing.
This
information
is
through
a
series
of
videos
for
calling
sub
community
stories
and
I'm
gonna
see
if
I
can
play
this
first
one
and
this
features
artist,
Mitch
Levin,
whose
studio
is
in
the
sub
community,
see
if
it
works.
T
T
Okay,
well,
I
can
send
around
the
link
and,
if
you
haven't
seen
it
yeah
it's
worth
looking
at.
This
is
the
first
in
a
series
of
twelve
videos
that
were
creating,
and
so
the
intention
of
these
is
is
to
share
some
unique
experiences
from
members
of
the
community
and
using
a
different
method
to
kind
of
get
people
interested
and
informed
about
the
project.
T
So
another
way
we've
been
collecting
information
about
area
experiences
is
through
our
working
group,
so
we've
established
a
22
member
East,
Boulder
working
group
21
members
of
the
community
that
represent
property
owners,
business
owners,
nearby,
homeowners,
nearby,
renters
and
area
workers,
and
then
we
also
have
one
member
who
serves
as
our
Planning,
Board
liaison
and
I
have
to
say.
This
group
is
awesome,
they've
been
super
motivated
and
I
think
they're
having
really
important
and
productive
conversations
about
how
to
make
positive
impacts
in
the
area.
T
We've
also
collected
experience
based
information
through
a
recent
series
of
events
hosted
by
working
group,
members
and
city
staff
in
August.
We
went
out
to
nine
different
locations
throughout
the
sub
community
to
ask
people
about
their
experiences
in
the
area,
and
this
effort
was
really
focused
on
going
to
where
people
are
so.
We
tried
to
engage
people
kind
of
as
part
of
their
their
daily
activities,
so
over.
For
example,
we
went
to
the
hospital
cafeteria
over
lunchtime
to
chat
with
hospital
workers
and
visitors.
T
We
were
at
Philmont
bike
park
during
a
Wednesday
night
race
series,
and
then
we
hung
out
at
some
of
the
popular
bus
stops
during
rush
hour
to
collect
feedback
from
daily
users
of
the
sub
community
and
I.
Think
I
think
that
series
was
a
great
learning
experience
for
both
our
staff,
as
well
as
the
working
group
members.
We
got
to
speak
directly
with
folks
who
are
directly
impacted
by
this
process
and
we
learned
a
lot
about
different
sites
throughout
the
area.
So
then
I
opened
the
conversation
beyond
just
those
those
events.
T
T
T
So,
as
we
know,
this
areas
and
major
employment
for
Boulder,
so
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
and
the
purpose
of
sub-community
planning
is
to
implement
the
goals
of
the
BBC
P,
and
so
we've
directed
our
inventory
work
to
inform
these
goals
and
aligned
with
the
six
focus
areas
of
the
2015
update.
So
I'll
present
the
goals
and
our
findings
for
each
of
these
focus
areas
we're
going
to
start
with
a
really
easy
one:
housing,
affordability
and
diversity.
T
So,
as
I
mentioned,
there
is
only
one
residential
area
within
the
boundaries
of
the
sub
community
San
lázaro
Park.
The
neighborhood
includes
313
manufactured
home
sites
in
Boulder
County,
and
there
are
no
other
residential
properties
in
the
area
today
and
no
units
that
are
part
of
the
permanently
affordable
housing
program.
So
while
when
we
compare
these
numbers
to
other
sub
communities
in
the
city,
they
can
seem
kind
of
striking,
but
it's
not
super
surprising.
T
The
area
was
historically
developed
as
an
industrial
site,
industrial
area
and
in
the
past,
that
type
of
land
use
was
not
really
compatible
with
housing.
But,
as
we
know,
things
are
changing
during
our
engagement
series,
we
asked
folks
if
they
would
consider
living
in
East
Boulder.
Sixty-One
percent
of
the
people
we
spoke
with
in
person
indicated
that,
yes,
they
would
consider
this
many
offered
the
caveat
that
the
housing
would
have
to
be
affordable
to
them
and
then
online
thirty-eight
percent
said
yes,
they
would
consider
living
in
East.
Boulder.
T
T
T
So,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
lots
of
jobs
in
the
area,
there
are
820
businesses
located
in
East
Boulder,
and
this
includes
some
of
our
major
employers
like
Ball
Aerospace,
as
well
as
many
of
the
area's
important
small
and
local
businesses.
We
have
887
acres
that
are
zoned
for
industrial
or
commercial
uses,
so
that's
around
half
of
the
total
area
and
then
related
to
getting
all
those
people
to
their
jobs
and
businesses,
our
colleagues
and
transportation.
From
that
seventy
six
percent
of
the
areas
daily
commuters
are
driving
alone
to
work.
T
This
is
pretty
consistent
with
what
we
found
through
engagement.
Most
people
are
driving
to
East
Boulder
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
room
for
improvement
to
meet
some
of
the
citywide
goals
on
reducing
the
number
of
single
occupant
vehicles
coming
into
the
city
and
I
know
you're,
considering
the
transportation
master
plan
update
next
week,
which
has
some
pretty
ambitious
goals
surrounding
this
topic.
We've
been
working
closely
with
our
colleagues
in
transportation
to
collect
information
about
transportation
and
options
in
East
Boulder
and
we'll
continue
to
work
with
them
to
identify
solutions
for
some
of
these
issues.
T
Another
issue
to
consider
in
the
area
is
parking,
so
we
asked
people
about
parking
at
two
of
our
engagement
events
at
Boulder,
Community
Health
and
in
Flatirons
Business
Park
at
the
hospital
majority
folks
said:
there's
not
enough
parking,
whereas
at
the
Business
Park
ninety-five
percent
said
that
there
is
enough.
We
did
offer
a
third
response
to
this
question,
which
is
I
believe
there
is
too
much
car
parking
in
East
Boulder,
no
participant
selected,
this
response.
T
T
One
is
a
small
white
house
on
the
south
side
of
Belmont
and
the
there's
a
white
farmhouse
structure,
they're
both
located
in
Belmont
City,
Park,
one
on
the
south
side
and
one
on
the
north
side,
but
they're
not
really
connected
to
other
areas
of
the
sub
community
compared
to
other
city
landmarks,
our
historic
districts
in
the
city.
There
really
isn't
kind
of
a
unified
aesthetic
in
this
area
to
define
a
character
for
East
Boulder.
So
we
think
this
is
both
a
great
challenge
and
a
great
opportunity.
T
When
asked
what
kinds
of
businesses
people
would
like
to
see,
more
of
the
majority
of
responses
also
describe
food
in
restaurants,
and
we
found
that
this
is
consistent
with
the
findings
of
the
city
citywide
retail
study.
We
also.
We
also
asked
participants
about
feelings
of
safety
walking
in
the
sub
community.
Most
people
who
participated
in
person
said
yes,
they
do
feel
safe,
whereas
online
it
was
about
half
who
indicated
yes
and
a
third
of
participants
indicated
that
the
feelings
of
safety
depended
on
the
time
of
day.
T
T
So
the
East
Boulder
sub
community
is
at
the
confluence
of
a
lot
of
the
city's
major
creeks,
including
Boulder
and
South
Boulder,
Creek,
450,
acres
of
land
er
and
the
high
hazard
and
conveyance
zones,
and
we
heard
a
lot
from
community
members
that
this
is
a
great
concern.
We
have
a
lot
of
folks
in
neighborhoods
south
of
Arapaho
who
experienced
the
2013
floods
and
incorporating
flood
mitigation
and
resilience
planning
into
this
project
is
extremely
important
to
them,
and
so
we
will
definitely
continue
to
consider
that
moving
forward.
T
Another
issue
that
we
can
look
at,
which
contributes
to
flood
mitigation
but
also
air
quality
and
energy
use,
is
canopy
coverage.
So
how
much
of
the
area
is
shaded
by
tree
canopy,
an
East
Boulder?
We
have
less
than
five
percent
canopy
coverage.
Our
citywide
urban
forestry
goal
is
16%,
so
there's
a
lot
of
room
for
improvement
here
as
well,
and
something
else
that
is
unique
and
I.
T
Think
it's
kind
of
cool
about
East
Boulder
is
that
we
have
a
concentration
of
waste
and
recycling
and
recycling
facilities
in
this
area,
so
including
eco
cycle
and
resource
which
are
on
the
south
side
of
Arapaho,
but
also
Western
disposal
and
Boulder
County
recycling.
So
we're
thinking
about
how
we
can
take
advantage
of
this
concentration
and
work
with
area
businesses
to
improve
their
sustainability
efforts
also
related
to
resilience.
T
This
is
a
very
important
area
of
the
city
for
emergency
management,
Boulder,
County,
sheriff's
office,
the
office
of
emergency
management
and
the
hospital
and
emergency
room
are
all
located
in
East
Boulder,
so
these
are
considered
critical
facilities
to
the
community
and
important
places
to
incorporate
in
our
future
planning.
As
I
mentioned
related
to
this
topic,
we've
heard
a
lot
from
community
members
concerning
flood
impacts
and
storm
water
control.
So
I
want
to
reiterate
that
we
hear
those
concerns
and
we'll
be
taking
those
very
seriously
in
future
planning.
T
The
next
focus
area
is
about
small
local
business
and
the
major
goals
are
to
support
and
retain
small
small
local
businesses
and
to
provide
affordable
business
space
in
the
city
and,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
there
are
820
businesses
in
East,
Boulder
and
a
lot
of
these
businesses
or
what
really
define
the
area
for
community
members
in
February,
we
did
a
Valentine's
Day
campaign
where
we
asked
people
what
they
loved
about
East
Boulder
and
an
overwhelming
majority
of
responses
to
scribe
some
of
the
businesses.
People
love
and
cherish
in
this
area
related
to
affordable
space.
T
We're
looking
at
a
couple
of
different
resources
to
better
understand
rates
for
renting
space
in
the
area
listed
here
are
some
of
the
median
rates
for
office
flex,
space
and
industrial
or
warehouse
space.
We
found
that,
while
these
rates
remain
lower
than
rental
rates
and
other
sub
communities
like
central
Boulder,
we
have
seen
some
significant
increases
in
rates
since
2009,
and
this
is
described
by
community
members
as
well.
T
The
industrial
and
office
space
is
really
important
to
businesses
in
this
area,
but
rates
have
definitely
been
increasing.
This
is
a
major
topic
taken
on
by
the
working
group
and
they've
been
having
some
really
candid
conversations
about
how
to
make
improvements
in
the
area
without
creating
an
environment
that
becomes
unaffordable
to
the
businesses
who
are
there
today.
T
So
we'll
continue
to
explore
that
the
final
focus
area
is
surrounding
arts
and
culture
and
major
goals
include
including
arts
and
community
benefit
policies
in
supporting
arts
and
cultural
experiences
as
essential
to
well
being
one
of
the
things
we
looked
at
in
our
city.
Data
was
the
availability
and
access
to
public
art,
so
I
think
the
city
has
around
a
hundred
pieces
throughout
throughout
the
city.
T
Three
are
located
in
East
Boulder,
two
in
Belmont,
City
Park
and
then
there's
one
at
an
accent,
access
point
to
the
Boulder
Creek
path
and
then
something
really
fun
that
we've
discovered
through
this
process
is
that
the
sub
community
has
a
ton
of
arts
and
culture
related
businesses,
artists,
galleries,
studios
performance
venues
and
places
to
learn
about
art
are
kind
of
clustered
in
these
pockets
of
East
Boulder.
So
we
have
a
great
opportunity
to
celebrate
the
work
of
these
artists
and
find
ways
to
expose
some
of
this
arts
culture
to
the
rest
of
the
city.
T
When
we
ask
people
if
they
consider
East
Boulder
a
destination
for
arts
and
culture
today,
the
majority
of
people
we
asked
in
person
said
yes.
However,
I
should
mention
that
we
asked
this
question
to
folks
attending
a
matinee
at
the
boulder
dinner
theater.
So
that's
me
skewed
their
responses
there,
but
participants
online,
as
you
can
see,
do
not
consider
East,
Boulder
a
destination
for
arts
and
culture.
T
So
all
of
this
inventory
work
as
well
as
other
detail,
is
included
in
the
draft
inventory
and
analysis
for
report.
We've
provided
copies
for
each
of
you,
and
the
intention
of
this
report
is
to
really
capture
and
document
a
holistic
understanding
of
both
the
data
and
the
experiences
of
existing
conditions
in
East
Boulder
today,
as
well
as
identify
the
ability
and
capacity
for
the
sub
community
to
contribute
to
the
citywide
goals
of
the
BBC
P.
T
So
what
we
found
through
this
process
is
that
East
Boulder
has
the
ability
to
make
significant
contributions
to
citywide
goals
in
all
of
these
focus
areas.
I,
don't
think
that
will
be
true
for
every
sub
community,
but
that's
what
we
found
in
East
Boulder
as
we
move
forward
into
concept,
development
and
scenario
testing.
The
challenge
will
be
prioritizing
where
how
and
when
we
can
make
impacts
on
these
goals.
T
R
J
So
thanks
for
the
memo
in
the
presentation
in
your
presentation,
you
were
talking
about
the
number
of
parcels
and
the
sizes
of
the
parcels
and
I
was
wondering,
and
you
also
said
that
there
was
I
believe
like
no
affordable
housing
in
this
area.
So
in
looking
at
those
parcels,
have
you
identified
parcels
that
belonged
to
the
city?
Yes,.
J
J
T
Don't
have
a
statistically
valid
survey
as
part
of
our
scope
of
work.
Currently,
if
that's
something
that
we
consistently
I
think
here,
people
really
want
will
certainly
explore
it
they're
very
expensive
to
conduct,
but
we
have
budget
for
this
project
beyond
beyond
that.
I
think
we're
really
trying
to
combine
feedback
from
users
of
the
area
who
may
not
be
included
in
a
statistically
valid
survey.
They
don't
live
in
Boulder
today
with
the
rest
of
the
city
and
so
we're
trying
a
couple
of
different
approaches.
T
Definitely
sort
of
this
direct
contact
kind
of
pop
up
where
we
speak
with
people
as
part
of
their
their
daily
activities,
as
well
as
hosting
things
kind
of
online
hosting
larger
meetings.
Things
like
that
to
get
a
broader
sense
from
from
other
community
members
as
well,
what
their,
what
their
input
is
and
kind
of
what
their
take
is
on
the
area.
We
do
document
everything
and
we
do
apply
metrics
to
all
of
the
the
input
that
we've
accumulated
I.
J
T
B
Can
I
just
call
the
cui
on
that
one,
which
is
like
the
issue
of
enclaves
actually
I'm
gonna
I'll
I'll
defer
and
wait
in
line
I
had
some
questions
around
how
we
address
those
things,
but
I'll
just
wait.
We
have
Lisa
and
then
Sam
and
then
me
thanks.
H
Catherine
for
your
presentation,
I
want
to
go
back
to
the
beginning
where
you
talked
about
that
the
boundaries
of
the
East
Boulder
sub
community
plan
included
both
sides
of
Arapaho
and
so
I
guess.
My
question
is
where
that
line
is
D
marked?
Wouldn't
you
want
that
one
property
line,
one
property
in
to
the
south
side
of
Arapaho
and
right
now
that
line
is
on
Arapaho
yeah.
T
A
T
Is
helpful
in
that
it
gives
us
a
picture
of
area
demographics
without
kind
of
skewing
the
numbers
by
including
an
entirely
or
an
additional
census
tract
that
has
a
much
larger
population
that
would
represent
a
community.
That
is
not
really
representative
of
that
East
Boulder
area,
and
then
you
know
the
other
thing
about
sort
of
that
boundary
line
is
it
is
serving
as
as
kind
of
our
clip
area
for
data,
but
it
is
not
serving
as
a
boundary
for
engagement
for
collecting
input
for
recommendations.
T
H
Know
it's
just
that
if
you
know
if
you
did
bring
it
to
this,
I
mean
in
the
first
place
it
seems
kind
of
by
looking
at
that
it
seems
a
little
bit
if
you
were
looking
at
and
you
were
in
the
neighborhood
and
you
would
say:
oh
okay,
that's
not
my
sub
community,
but
you
live
at
what
is
it
Park
mosaic
now
somebody
else
might,
but
but
anyway,
that
would
include
residents
right
mm-hm.
So
then
you
would
change.
H
You
know
your
demographics
that
way,
but
I
get
what
you're
trying
to
say
about
the
census
plan
and
stuff,
but
I
think
somehow
that
needs
to
be
represented
because
I
think
it's
somewhat
little
misleading
to
somebody
just
looking
at
that,
or
maybe
you
put
a
caveat
or
something
like
that,
but
I
think
people
need
to
understand
that
it
does
include
both
sides
of
Arapahoe
and
all
those
buildings
that
are
facing
rapaho
and
then
again
on
the
boundaries
and
I.
Just
looked
at
this
and
I.
H
H
Q
Correct
those
no
sinner,
those
residents
actually
go
west
to
either
diagonal
Plaza
or
the
Safeway
right
as
their
commercial
center,
and
so
that's
why
that
geographic
area
actually
is
more
logically
connected
to
the
rest
of
paylo
park,
sub-community
right.
So
that's
why
that
boundary
change
was
made
last
year.
Okay,.
H
T
So
our
urban
forestry
plan
today
has
a
goal
of
16%,
and
my
understanding
is
that
goal
is
to
maintain
our
existing
canopy
I
misheard.
T
H
So
it's
not
a
square
footage,
no
okay
and
then
my
last
comment
is
kind
of
takes
off
from
Mary's
in
terms
of
land
that
owned
by
the
city,
and
most
of
that
is
a
lot
of
that
are
parks,
but
the
one
significant
property
that
I
would
hope
we
do
look
at
is
the
airport
for
future,
affordable
housing
and
a
center
a
neighborhood
center.
Obviously
we
want
to
keep
some
of
that
for
emergency,
but
a
good
part
of
that.
H
T
A
G
The
neighborhoods,
which
are
on
the
south
side
of
Arapaho
I,
think
we
made
this
mistake
before
when
we
were
doing
just
the
road
project,
except
that
everybody
who
uses
that
road
many
of
them
lived
to
the
south,
and
so
it
was
a
really
big
concern.
What
was
gonna
happen
with
Arapaho
and
so
I
think
you
know,
as
you
say,
doing,
the
outreach
is
great
I
think
you
could
even
do
some
numbers
that
say
how
many
people
live
within
a
short
commute
of
all
of
the
jobs
which
are
there.
G
We
know
that
something
like
a
big
fraction
of
the
jobs
are
in
this
sub
community
and
then
some
are
just
to
the
west,
and
so
this
is
an
important
mobility
corridor,
which
we've
already
noted.
There
are
some
missing
bike
connections
out
here.
So
if
I
want
to
come
up
via
the
creek
path,
either
and
I'm
at
55th
and
central
I
want
to
come
up
via
the
creek
path,
the
most
convenient
way
for
me
to
go
is
west.
G
On
western
you
know,
and
then
you
end
up
with
a
series
of
parking
lots
that
you
have
to
get
through
and
there's
people
intentionally
trying
to
stop
bikes
from
going
through
those
parking
lots
for
reasons.
I
don't
understand,
but
it
sure
seems
to
me,
like
a
connections
plan
to
get
from
55th
to
Boulder.
Creek
would
be
really
nice,
there's
a
decent
connection,
of
course,
to
Goose
Creek
path.
As
you
go
north
on
55th,
you
can
just
hop
onto
Goose,
Creek
I.
G
Think
some
of
the
bike
facilities
in
that
direction
are
in
really
good
shape,
but
going
in
the
other
direction
may
be
not
such
good
shape
and
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
part
of
the
sub-community
plan,
but
it
sure
you
know
working
with
Ball
Aerospace,
and
you
know
some
of
the
other
parking
lots
over
there
if
there
would
be
a
way
to
put
a
bike
path
through.
That
gets
you
over
to
the
Boulder
Creek
path.
G
That
would
be
a
great
convenience
without
having
to
go,
because
it's
really
just
not
all
that
appealing
to
go
out
55th
to
Arapaho
and
then
go
on
that
multi-use
path.
So,
anyway,
that's
and
I
think
improving
the
bike
connection
to
Ball,
Aerospace
and
Flatirons.
It's
pretty
good
for
a
ball
right
now,
but
all
the
way
into
the
park
might
improve
people's.
You
know
concept
of
being
willing
to
bike
to
get
out
there.
It
is
very
clear
that
many
people
are
coming
from
outside
of
Boulder
who
worked
there
so
and
then
I
guess.
G
Another
thing,
I
thought
Lisa's
point
about
King's
Ridge
is
interesting
as
well.
I
agree
with
you
that
they
probably
use
shopping
centers
to
the
west,
mostly,
but
they
still
are
a
part
of
this
and
they're
part
of
the
connections.
For
this
too.
So,
however,
you
would
think
about
doing
the
home
south
of
the
rapaho.
You
might
include
King's
Ridge
because
they
probably
have
opinions
about
getting
out
onto
the
Belmont
Road,
for
instance,
and
and
other
issues
like
that,
the
connectivity
over
there
has
improved
dramatically,
of
course,
with
Wunderland
Creek
project.
G
It's
not
the
450
residents
of
San
Lazaro,
even
though
they're
important
as
well
and
and
we
want
to
hear
from
all
those
folks,
but
it's
the
17,000
employees
that
work
here
and
how
they
get
here
and
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
to
get
their
mode
shift
moving
because,
as
we
know,
three-quarters
of
them
are
driving
in
alone
to
work
in
this
part
of
town.
And
if
we
don't
talk
to
them,
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
find
out
what
would
it
take?
I
mean
I
know.
G
One
thing
you'll
hear
is
better
bus
service
over
there?
It's
it's,
not
that
there
isn't
any
it's
just
the
headways
are
really
long,
and
so
you
get
I
mean
I've
had
people
who
have
commuted
by
bus
with
me
and
they
get
frustrated
with
if
they
missed
that
one
bus,
that's
now
half
an
hour
or
45
minutes
or
an
hour
until
they
can
get
to
the
next
one,
and
so
I
know
that's
not
under
our
direct
control.
G
But
it
is
certainly
something
that
we
should
be
keeping
aware
of,
because
I
think
I
would
suggest
doing
a
statistically
valid
poll
of
the
employees
and
the
employers
in
this
particular
sub
community,
because
they
so
outweigh
the
resonance.
So
I
guess
that's
enough
for
now.
I
really
like
the
way.
This
is
going,
though,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
inventory.
B
After
me,
okay
and
at
this
point
we're
just
doing
questions
and
input
at
the
same
time,
okay,
a
couple
I
got
actually
I
got
a
list
building
on
what
you
said
about
commuting
and
whatnot.
We
got
the
chamber
who's
very
active
in
that
conversation
and
commuting
solutions,
who's
very
active
in
rather
than
have
you
guys
do
all
of
that
work.
That's
a
very
engaged
group
and
you
could
ask
them
to
play
a
big
role
in
talking
to
employers
in
this
region
and
getting
them
to
the
table.
B
B
Want
to
say,
I'm
gonna
agree
with
what's
been
said.
This
is
awesome.
This
is
cool.
I
think
this
subcommittee
plans
on
its
way
to
being
another
model
of
how
the
city
wants
to
do
public
process.
It
already
feels
that
way,
and
we
just
had
one
with
the
open
space
master
plan.
You
know
just
kudos
to
you.
B
A
couple
questions
we
made
are:
there
are
a
bunch
of
enclaves
in
here
and
I
wonder
if,
as
part
of
sub
Community
Planning,
we
have
I
know
some
people
don't
want
to
be
an
X,
but
there's
probably
an
invitation
in
a
subject
community
plan
to
invite
those
who
haven't
thought
about
it
in
a
while
to
come
in
and
we
had
a
bunch
of
marijuana.
Businesses
come
in
whether
they
wanted
to
or
not
along
55th,
but
I
guess.
B
T
Q
A
key
part
of
sub
community
planning
is
to
look
at
the
entire
sub
community,
everything
inside
the
service
area,
so
all
the
properties
in
area
1
and
area
2,
so
those
Enclave
properties
and
as
a
part
of
that
I
think
in
this
sub
community.
There
aren't
as
many
enclaves
as
say
like
when
we
did
the
North
Boulder
sub
community
plan.
That
was
a
key
focus
was
as
annexations
occur
in
this
area.
Q
How
do
we
make
sure
that
all
those
urban
services
are
delivered
effectively
and
so
I
think
we'll
think
about
it
in
the
same
way
here
in
East
Boulder
as
with
all
other
sub
communities,
and
if
there's
any
focus
areas
or
specific
recommendations
that
we
need
to
look
at
related
to
future
annexations?
We
can
do
that
as
a
part
of
the
sub
community
plan.
If,
if
it
looks
like
they're
warranted,
especially
around,
let's
say,
there's
an
area
that
that
we
may
need
to
do
some
infrastructure
upgrades.
B
That
means
that
we're
talking
with
the
county
about
San,
lázaro
and
they're
a
part
of
that
another
question:
Belmont
power
plan
that
is
kind
of
a
huge
influence.
It's
sitting
over
there
and
I,
don't
know
how
does
that
factor
into
this
and
is
there
conversations
about
the
future
of
either
what
cells
gonna
do
with
that
or
I'm
just
curious.
T
B
A
A
M
Think
saying:
I'll
just
did
it
at
that
last
point.
That
was
a
great
point
thanks
for
saying
that
I
might
also
do
all
the
praise
for
for
this
you
know
draft
in
toward
its
was
extremely
well-put-together
and
really
kind
of
a
delight
to
read
through
it's
really
interesting,
great
information,
graphics,
etc,
etc.
So,
thanks
for
that,
a
few
a
few
quick
points,
one
is
I,
just
really
look
forward
to
the
an
updated
transportation
and
connections
plan
as
part
of
this
process.
M
Sam
made
some
great
detailed
points
about
that,
but
you
know
the
transportation
master
plan
has
certain
changes
designed
for
this
area,
but
obviously
we
would
revise
that
right
as
we
go
through
this,
so
that'll
be
great
and
I
know
you're
doing
these
kind
of
walk
and
bike
and
thing
audits
and
but
hopefully,
that'll
really
closely
inform
the
revisions
to
the
transportation
and
the
connections
plan.
So
look
forward
to
that.
M
To
my
colleagues
on
the
question
of
boundaries
so
I,
you
know
the
rapaho
is
an
arbitrary
boundary
line
and
we
need
to
incorporate
ideas
from
people
south
of
it
as
well.
But
I
would
I
would
worry
about
just
drawing
a
line.
Just
you
know,
I,
don't
know
how
many
hundred
half
a
mile
further
south
or
quarter
mile
further
south.
You
know
east-west
going
on
there,
because
some
of
those
residential
neighborhoods
would
be
cut
in
two
by
doing
that
right.
M
So
so
the
the
ones
over
by
63rd
are
right
up
next
to
Arapaho
and
then
further
west
to
the
west
of
55th
Street,
you,
those
go
south,
quite
a
big
deal,
quite
a
distance,
and
so
it
feels
like
those
residential
neighborhoods,
properly
belong
as
one
as
their
own
units
in
the
other
sub
community
plane
to
the
south.
But
I
wonder
if
we
might
consider
if
we
wanted
to
think
about
extending
it
south.
If
we
might
look
at
irregular
boundaries,
I
mean
I'm
personally
I'm.
M
Finally
me
to
rapaho,
but
if
we
were
to
draw
it
further
south
of
a
regular
boundaries
that
captured
like
the
commercial
areas
like
along
55th
or
63rd,
so
the
the
things
that
really
are
really
participating
directly
in
a
rapaho
and
that
our
own
that
where
we
could
include
the
entirety
of
those
areas
in
the
plan,
as
opposed
to
cutting
residential
neighborhoods
in
half
into
two
sub
communities.
So
I'll
leave
that
to
my
my
colleagues
to.
B
Just
the
idea
of
kind
of
having
you
talked
about
an
influence
zone
and
I
think
there
would
be
a
way
to
visually
show
that
some
sort
of
not
a
sharp
boundary
but
a
great,
a
great
out
yea.
The
fuzzy
thing
that
goes
around
the
census.
The
census
thing
makes
sense
right,
but
showing
that
puzzy
area
of
I
think
would
be
helpful.
Is
that
what
you're
kind.
M
G
M
Yeah,
so
maybe
a
little
little
extra
fuzzy
thing
to
show
we're
not
changing
the
hard
line
of
the
boundary,
but
you
know
show
we're
incorporating
you
put
in
particular
from
those
areas
might
be
a
good
thing
and
just
one
little
point:
the
the
packet
itself
didn't
have
a
map
of
the
area
until
kind
of
deep
down
into
the
package,
so
just
in
the
future,
I
think
it's
handy
to
get
the
map
right
front
and
center
and
all
the
all
the
bits
that
was
it
thanks.
So
much.
J
So
I
just
wanted
to
add
one
comment
with
respect
to
the
engagement
and
the
the
city
process
and
just
to
kind
of
reiterate
and
emphasize
how
the
open
space
master
plan
did
the
engagement
windows
and
we're
really
really
clear
about
the
opening
and
closing
of
the
engagement
windows
and
what
the
goals
were
of
each
engagement
and
then
communicating
the
outcomes
to
the
next
engagement
window.
I
thought
that
worked
really
well
and,
and
that
was
I,
think
communicated
really
well
to
the
community.
J
B
K
B
We
just
talked
about
it
in
particular,
if
there's
and
with
scenarios
right
that,
yes,
you
really
need
to
so
far.
We
haven't
uncovered
the.
We
really
need
to
know
what
you
think
part
yet,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
that
will
probably
be
revealed
and
then
that
will
become
more
clear
and
and
that
we
need
one.
Yes,.
K
H
B
J
And
I
think
Sam
made
a
good
point
about.
The
vast
majority
of
the
people
who
are
here
are
here
for
jobs.
So
I,
don't
know
how
you
do
a
statistically
valid
survey
to
all
the
employee,
all
the
employees
or
but
but
it
seems
really
critical
to
include
their
input
because
that's
a
lot
of
the
people
that
are
probably
aren't
residents.
G
Just
to
follow
up
on
that
one
thing
that
you
will
learn
at
some
level
of
granularity:
70
people
in
that
area,
Flatiron
Park
in
the
hospital
and
so
on,
come
from
within
Boulder
and
how
many
come
from
outside
of
Boulder
and
so
you'll
figure
out
what
the
balance
in
that
sub
community
is
of
in
commuters,
who
are
coming
from
maybe
further
away
than
and
folks
who
might
just
be
going
across.
Boulder
and
I
think
that
could
be
valuable
for
transportation.
J
B
Will
just
note
that
you
also
mentioned
recycle
row.
I
know
this
is
my
day
job
so
I'll
just
say
this
real
quick
that
just
like
there's
a
lot
of
unique
assets
that
exist
throughout
this
area.
Like
the
hospital
like
recycle
row
like
I,
don't
know,
there's
a
bunch
of
them
listed
here
and
I
think
figuring
out
how
to
support
and
emphasize
those
uses.
As
not
just
I
mean
you
said:
hey
the
recycle
roads
there.
Let's
make
sure
all
the
businesses
recycle
I!
Think
it's!
Yes,
but,
more
importantly,
it's
like
just
cuz.
B
We
have
a
hospital
they're,
not
gonna,
make
sure
everybody
has
healthcare
there
we're
thinking
about.
How
do
we
make
the
most
of
that
asset
and
and
I
guess
the
same
thing
I
would
say
would
apply
to
these
other
two
assets.
How
do
we
support
them
in
the
land
use
in
the
connectivity
and
and
what
we
highlight
about
the
area
so
I
just
offer
that
perspective.
C
C
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
we've
got
staff
members
from
every
department
in
the
city
organization
here
so
that,
if
you
have
questions
at
the
end
of
the
presentation,
they're
available
to
answer
them,
mostly
Department
directors
and
finance
staff
from
the
different
departments,
they
have
done
an
amazing
job
this
year
and
presenting
what
I
think
is
a
budget
that
you
will
be
very
pleased
with
and
many
of
the
items
that
council
has
indicated.
Our
council
priorities
and
community
priorities
are
reflected
in
the
budget.
Katie's
gonna
go
over
all
of
those
at
the
very
end.
C
U
I
think
I
know
your
grams
prizes
as
well.
It's
gonna
touch
on
it
yeah,
as
you
can
see,
I
travel
well,
so
I
have
a
lot
of
friends
happy
to
help
me
out,
even
though
I'm
gonna
be
the
one
doing
the
majority
of
the
discussion
so
good
evening.
We're
here
tonight
to
present
the
city
managers
recommended
2020
budget
again.
We're
very
proud
of
this
budget
worked
hard
to
incorporate
council
and
community
priorities
and
we
will
dive
right
into
the
context
setting.
So
we
recognize
that
there's
anticipated
slowing
economic
growth.
The
u.s.
U
GDP
is
expected
to
be
about
2.4
percent
in
2019
and
dropping
down
to
1.8
percent
in
2020
Colorado,
continually
outperforms,
the
county
or
country
I
apologize
and
there's
also
coupled
with
a
tight
labor
market.
Boulder
unemployment
rate
is
continually
less
than
the
state
and
national
and
it's
been
challenging
to
fill
positions
in
addition
to
having
wage
pressures.
So
all
of
that
led
us
to
continue
to
be
conservative
when
we
look
at
our
sales
tax
projections
for
the
coming
years.
U
U
The
2020
staffing
level
is
1475
FTE,
which
stands
for
full-time
equivalent.
This
includes
staffing
that
were
added
to
off-cycle
during
the
2019.
To
accomplish
many
new
priorities
also
included
this
year,
both
here
and
in
the
budget
book
is
an
estimation
of
our
non-standard
staffing
or
what
you
may
typically
refer
to
as
seasonal
employees.
I
think
it
was
important
to
include
here
because
they
do
help
supplement
standard
staff
during
peak
seasons,
especially
within
the
parks,
public
public
works
and
open
space
departments.
So
they
are
important
part
of
our
workforce
before
we
dive
into
the
numbers.
U
We
wanted
to
preview
how
this
budget
is
able
to
fund
key
council
and
organizational
initiatives
outlined
here,
we'll
dive
into
each
initiative
later
on
in
the
presentation.
It's
also
important
to
note
or
pause
here
that
the
2020
budget,
like
Jane
said,
tries
to
accomplish
a
number
of
council
requests
and
we've
incorporated
them
into
the
recommended
budget
versus
waiting
for
first
reading.
So
we
hope
that
that
achieves
a
lot
of
your
key
priorities
with
that
being
said,
if
the
council
does
wish
to
make
adjustments
for
it,
it
doesn't
need
to
come
at
the
expense
of
offsetting.
U
U
The
three
largest
revenue
sources
are
the
sales
and
use
tax,
utility
rate
charges
and
property
taxes,
and
these
three
funding
sources
represents
71%
of
the
total
sources
of
city
funds
and
pausing.
Here,
for
a
moment,
it's
important
to
note
that
the
2020
recommended
budgets
does
not
include
any
potential
adjustments
to
revenue
or
expenses
as
a
result
of
any
November
ballot
issue.
Those
are
typically
caught
up
in
January
February,
first
adjustment,
abase.
U
Excluding
revenues,
you
can
see
that
when
you
take
out
citywide
revenue
sources
without
water,
wastewater,
stormwater
utilities,
the
reliance
or
importance
of
sales
and
use
tax
and
property
tax
increases,
we
take
these
out
to
demonstrate
kind
of
our
revenue
sources
because
root
ility
fees
are
based
on
the
use
of
the
system
and
not
reflective
economic
conditions.
The
2020
recommended
budget
for
the
general
fund
has
a
revenue
of
one
hundred
and
fifty
seven
point
four
million
dollars,
and
it
represents
a
three
point:
one
increase
over
the
2019
budget.
U
The
increase
is
largely
due
to
the
city's
portion
of
property
tax
revenues
and
a
slight
projected
increase
in
retail
sales
tax
and
Bob.
This
slide
is
for
you
next
one.
If
you
look
at
the
cost
allocation
in
purple
and
you
take
where
those
funding
sources
come
from,
you
can
see
that
putting
the
originating
funding
source
that
the
contribution
from
sales
and
use
tax
funds
increases
this
ratio,
as
well
as
service
and
utility
rates,
really
we're
taking
if
parks
contributed
to
cost
allocation
that
came
from
those
sales
tax
fund.
U
This
also
was
presented
last
year
just
for
information
regarding
the
reliance
on
city
of
Boulder
sales
tax
compared
to
other
four
major
cities.
It's
important
to
note
that
we
are
in
the
middle
kind
of
compared
to
pure
communities,
which
is
important,
and
it
speaks
to
our
diverse
revenue
structure,
where
we
don't
rely
too
heavily
on
any
one
source
of
revenue.
U
We
also
find
it
helpful
to
look
at
inflation-adjusted
figures
when
looking
at
trends.
We
call
this
slide
the
revenue
or
the
buying
power
slide,
and
what
it
shows
is
the
difference
between
raw
taxable
sales
and
purchases
shown
in
blue
and
an
inflation-adjusted
number
shown
in
green.
That
widening
gap
represents
that
our
sales
tax
growth
has
not
been
keeping
pace
with
the
rate
of
inflation.
G
G
U
U
So
July
we
had
estimated
that
property
tax
increases
would
be
around
15%
and
because
of
countywide
reports.
But
due
to
timing
within
the
property
tax
cycle,
we
received
reports
from
the
county
itself
late
last,
where
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
our
citywide
property
taxes
are
actually
just
increasing
at
a
lower
rate
than
the
rest
of
the
county
at
ten
percent.
And
then
it's
important
to
note.
That
is
an
assessment
year,
that
the
state
oops
changed
its
percentage
for
the
residential
property,
two
main
compliance
with
the
Gallagher
amendment.
U
U
The
proposed
budget
also
reflects
the
following
increases
to
the
base
utility
rates.
It
represents
seven
percent
to
water,
five
percent
to
wastewater
and
seven
percent
to
stormwater
and
flood
management,
and
while
the
base
charges
going
up
by
seven
percent
for
the
water
rate,
how
much
each
customer
pays
is
dependent
on
how
much
they
use,
and
we
know
that
over
the
years
there's
been
a
decline
in
water
use.
So
while
the
typical
bill
rate
has
been
roughly
five
percent
over
the
last
ten
years,
the
actual
average
single-family
residential
bill
has
increased
by
just
three
point.
U
Moving
on
to
the
2020
recommended
budget.
So
it
totals
to
three
hundred
and
sixty
nine
million
dollars
and
represents
a
four
point.
Three
percent
increase
over
the
2019
budget
for
all
funds
and
the
primary
increase
in
this
budget
is
due
to
additional
15
million
dollars
in
capital
spending
in
2019,
and
the
proposed
operating
budget
of
288
million
represents
a
modest
1.8
percent
in
compared
to
2019.
U
U
So
in
July
I
showed
you
a
slide
with
a
lot
of
numbers
of
how
we
went
about
balancing
the
2019
budget
and
a
lot
of
numbers
and
words
and
saw
a
few
glazed
eyes.
Understandably
so
I
thought
I
would
show
this
more
visually
and
then
compare
it
to
how
we're
balancing
the
2020
budget.
So
our
budgeted
expenses
in
2019
were
158
million
dollars.
U
We
had
budgeted
revenues
of
152
million
dollars
so
how
we
completed
the
balancing
of
this
budget
was
drawing
from
our
reserves
for
the
utility
occupation
tax,
which
we
knew
due
to
the
timing
of
attacks.
We
would
need
to
draw
for
reserves,
and
then
we
also
drew
from
our
fund
balance
for
two
one-time
projects:
the
Hogan
parent
cost
loan
and
part
of
the
hospital
deconstruction.
U
So
in
balancing
the
2020
budget,
we
have
budgeted
expenses
in
the
general
fund
of
160
point:
eight
million
dollars
budgeted
revenues
of
157
million
dollars,
we're
doing
a
small
draw
from
reserves
for
the
utility
occupation
tax
and
a
small
dollar
amount
from
the
homelessness
Reserve.
That
1.9
million
dollars
that
was
set
aside
several
years
ago
can.
U
And
I
can't
remember
the
year,
I
apologize,
but
several
years
back,
a
council
dedicated
one
point:
nine
million
dollars
to
hold
in
a
reserve
to
use
for
various
homelessness
initiatives,
including
the
shelter
and
we've
been
drawing
from
that
reserve,
as
opposed
to
taking
it
from
our
budget
annually.
So
it's
been
set
aside
for
that
specific
purpose,
and
so
this
year,
there's
about
five
hundred
and
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
that
were
using
towards
that
those
programs
as
well
and.
U
And
then
in
May
I
came
before
you
to
talk
about
the
2019
adjustment
to
base,
but
also
highlighted
that
we'll
be
drawing
from
our
excess
fund
balance
to
fund
the
hospital
deconstruction.
So
there
is
a
large
portion
in
2019-
and
this
is
just
the
remainder
of
the
total
project
costs
that
we
said
we
were
being
drawn
from
fund
balance.
So
that
is
how
the
2020
balance
was
budget
and
the
general
fund
to
provide
a
host
of
variety
and
of
climb
community
goals.
So
the
general
fund
is
one
of
the
most
flexible
funds.
U
In
the
proposed
2022
2595
CIP,
eighty
five
point:
six
million
dollars
is
recommended
for
2020
and
the
figure
on
the
Left
we
shown
the
last
year.
It
really
highlights
where
the
CIP
falls
in
with
this
overall
steps
of
capital
planning
it's
a
second
step
and
also
demonstrates
at
various
levels
where
the
community
engagement
occurs.
So
you
can
see
in
the
first
step,
which
is
master
planning.
That
typically
involves
a
large
level
of
community
engagement,
and
you
have
decreasing
community
engagement
as
you
get
closer
to
project
closeout.
U
One
of
the
core
tenets
of
our
capital
principles
as
in
investing
and
maintaining
what
we
own
and
you
can
see
that
the
chart,
the
darker
blue
and
orange
sections
combined,
which
include
capital
enhancement
and
maintenance,
represent
about
82%
of
our
six-year
CIP,
want
a
note
here.
Both
that
you
can
see
the
CIP
fluctuates
based
on
timing
and
availability
of
dollars
and
just
project
timing,
and
so
the
spike
in
2222
reflects
large
projects
and
the
utilities
specifically
around
regulatory
improvements
to
the
boulder
water
resource
recovery
facility,
which
is
about
18
million
dollars.
U
South
Boulder
Creek
mitigation,
which
is
estimated
at
40
million
dollars
currently
and
small.
Several
there
smaller
that
I
joke
about,
because
it's
still
utilities
multi-million
dollar
projects
like
the
Albion
Dam
and
the
lower
grooves
Creek
sewer
replacement
so
big
anticipated
year
in
2022,
and
then
you'll
also
see
in
the
2020
budget
that
the
general
fund
continues
to
support.
Cip
projects
included
in
key
council
priorities
outlined
a
little
bit
later
on.
M
U
Then
the
CIP
includes
many
other
projects
beyond
what
we
just
listed.
These
are
some
notable
investments.
I
go
through
the
whole
CIP
pro
yearing
yearly
says
through
2025
and
we've
set
aside
ample
time,
and
you
can
see
it
lots
of
folks
here
to
talk
about
any
specific
once
EAP
project
that
you'd
like
to
talk
about
later
on
so
jumping
into
the
core
of
the
presentation.
U
These
are
the
2020
key
council
and
organizational
initiatives
that
we
outlined
in
the
city
manager's
message,
starting
with
electronic
signatures
and
petitioning
measure,
2g
authorize
the
council
to
allow
for
online
signatures
of
Oringer
endorsements
of
initiative.
Petitions
and
this
project
aims
to
identify
the
requirements
needed
in
order
to
achieve
the
goals
of
this
measure.
Staff
are
currently
in
the
process
of
selecting
vendors
for
this
project,
with
hopes
to
begin
work
later
this
year.
In
anticipation
of
the
2020
elections,
the
total
budget
is
one
time
of
400,000
and
then
ongoing
maintenance
of
about
$40,000
is.
U
U
All
right,
the
Municipal,
Building,
East
or
interests
will
add
back
an
exterior
building
entry
on
the
northeast
side
of
the
municipal
building
facing
Broadway.
It
includes
adding
flood
proof
and
exterior
doors,
sidewalk
and
sister
plaza
reconfiguration
to
address
the
new
entry
and
in
interior
modifications
to
the
current
reception
desk
to
better
address
the
new
entry
point,
and
the
budget
is
one
time
of
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars.
B
U
Okay,
the
2020
budget
continues
investment
in
the
library's
master
plan
by
bumping
up
to
the
addressing
community
demand
master
plan
level,
we're
gonna
be
adding
a
new
bilingual
Youth
Services
specialist,
a
new
volunteer
service
specialist,
look
at
the
George
Reynolds
public
space
reconfiguration,
as
well
as
planned.
Investment
in
the
North
Boulder
library
operating
expenses,
beginning
in
2021,
so
wanted
to
show
a
brief,
visual
and
not
to
scale
but
hopefully
to
give
order
perspective
of
in
2019
based
upon
the
master
plan.
U
2020
moves
the
needle
a
little
further
in
the
meet
community
demand,
but
recognizing
that
most
of
the
meet
community
demands
master
plan
level
was
for
North
Boulder
operating
costs,
so
I
wanted
to
show
by
2021.
We
anticipate
that
we
will
be
darn
near
close
to
fully
meeting
the
community
demand
master
plan
level
and.
I
U
U
O
M
Thank
you
for
that
and
very
glad
to
see
those
changes
in
the
library
funding.
That's
good
to
see,
but
one
thing
I
don't
quite
understand
so
we're
approving.
Well,
we
will
be
approving
eventually
the
2020
budget
right
so
you're,
including
intentions
that
we
have
for
2021.
How
does
that
get
included
in
the
2020
budget
other
than
in
a
slide
that
you're
showing?
Yes,
it.
U
K
V
You
counsel,
David,
Farnum
library,
notes
director,
it's
slightly
higher
Cindy.
One
reason
is
we're
planning
for
a
full-time
security
at
North
Boulder,
and
that
is
something
that
we
have
plans
for
with
the
other
branches
at
some
time
in
the
future,
but
not
in
the
near
future,
but
yeah.
It's
I
think
it's
1
ft
higher
1
ft,
plus
the
security
guard,
so
2
ft
si
so.
V
V
Monitoring
it
I
mean
so
we
may
be
fresh
in
the
last
two
weeks.
We've
seen
an
increase
at
the
branches,
but
I
they've
been
relatively
steady.
The
master
plan
calls
for
initially
a
piloting,
a
program
where
they
would
be
a
rotating
guard
between
the
two
locations
and
perhaps
more
you
know,
regular,
but
not
scheduled
visits
by
PD,
so
both
of
those
things
would
help,
and
in
the
instance
we've
had
the
past
couple
of
weeks.
Pd
has
been
very
responsive.
Thank.
K
K
M
H
U
B
Note
that
we're
gonna
be
talking
about
the
transportation
master
plan
update
here
shortly
and
so
between
the
budget
discussions
and
that
I
don't
know
where
the
best
place
to
have
this
discussion.
But
it
talks
about
vision,
zero
safety
actions
and
there
is
a
capital
component
to
that
as
well
and
I
think
it
would
be
useful
as
we
look
at
that
kind
of
get
a
break
out
of
you
know
we're
looking
at
30th
Street
at
some
point,
actually
making
it
safe
to
bike
versus
I
assume.
B
U
G
I
guess
we'll
get
this
in
the
breakdown,
but
when
we
have
the
full
budget
to
look
at,
but
we've
got
Public
Works
and
there's
some
division
between
utilities
and
transportation
there.
So
then
there's
a
big
annual
transportation
budget
and
it's
hard
looking
at
a
slide
that
says
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
put
that
in
context.
You
know
what
is
that
getting
us
relative
to
what
we're
already
going
to
be
paying
for
many
of
those
things?
G
If
it's,
you
know,
I
think
when
we
do
the
transportation
master
plan
we'll
be
able
to
answer
that
with
more
certainty.
But
then
we'll
want
to
see
the
breakdown
of
that
six
hundred
thousand
and
see
how
much
of
that's
going
towards
what
is
a
life
safety?
You
know
set
of
actions
for
our
roads,
so
I
mean
I,
think
just
giving
that
whole
context
and
making
sure
that
you
know
at
least
I'm
sure
some
of
us
will
be
asking
questions
both
during
the
budget
process
and
during
the
TMP
process.
Just.
I
J
B
W
First,
let
me
clarify
and
correct-
and
I
apologize
for
this-
that
$600,000
does
not
represent
any
vision:
zero
safety
actions
that
is
for
snow
and
ice
removal,
potholes
street
repair
and
median
maintenance.
There's
a
separate
line
item
for
a
vision,
zero
position,
that's
included
in
the
budget,
but
it's
not
included
in
that
six
hundred
thousand.
So
sorry,
you
just
had
all
that
conversation,
okay,
but
that
this
is
essential
services,
not
vision,
zero.
W
S
W
H
J
J
W
X
I'm
Garrett
Slater
the
principal
transportation
engineer
for
the
transportation
division
and
I
coordinate
the
activities
of
the
pavement
management
program
from
the
capital
maintenance
side,
and
so
it's
I'm
true.
What
you're
saying
that
it's
good
that
we've
got
this
operational
budget
to
be
able
to
increase
the
rate
at
which
we
can
fill
potholes.
But
we
don't
want
to
chase
that
metric
right.
If
we
get
to
a
point
that
we're
filling
5,000
potholes
a
year,
that's
not
something
to
be
proud
of.
X
J
B
S
U
Moving
on
to
the
tribal
consultation,
so
there's
a
budget
request
for
seventy-five
thousand
dollars.
As
many
of
you
are
aware,
the
city
participated
in
a
government-to-government
consultation
with
several
American
Indian
tribes
in
2019
and
based
upon
the
effort,
the
team
agreed
to
hold
future
consultations
in
2020
with
the
goal
of
updating,
existing
and
outdated
agreements
and
rebuilding
relationships
with
the
people
who
are
indigenous
to
the
boulder
region.
So
this
budget
request
continues
that
key
priority.
C
B
Just
note
from
being
a
part
of
those
discussions
that
a
big
area
focus,
at
least
for
the
foreseeable
future,
it's
figuring
out
how
to
address
some
of
the
charges
are
most
interested
in
that
overall
issue
around
open
space
and
where
they
might
feel
welcome
to
come
and
how
their
stories
might
be
better
told
in
relationship
to
those
lands.
So
I'll
just
add
that
there's
some
relevance
that
having
holding
that
conversation
in
that
space
anyhow
or
whatever
that's
worth.
U
Alright,
the
next
items
touch
on
is
housing
opportunities
for
people
experiencing
homelessness
or
what
we
otherwise
call
the
housing
voucher
program.
This
funding
includes
direct
voucher,
financial
assistance
and
case
management,
support
for
permanent
supportive
housing
units.
The
funding
is
also
part
of
an
overall
coordinated
housing
response
and
is
lined
with
the
goal
of
providing
200
plus
permanent
supportive
housing
resources
in
Boulder
County,
as
well
as
alignment
with
homeless
solutions
for
Boulder
County
year.
One
recommendations,
more
information
regarding
the
homelessness
strategy
will
be
discussed
and
is
planned
for
in
greater
detail
in
October.
L
U
All
right
next
in
2019,
the
open
space
Board
of
Trustees
and
City
Council
made
recommendations
are
on
increased
support
for
prairie
dog
management
and
soil
health,
upon
review
of
the
prairie
dog
working
group,
recommendations
through
budget
reality,
Asians
the
budget
or
the
open
space
mountain
parks
will
dedicate
two
hundred
thousand
annually
for
the
next
three
years,
and
it's
also
important
to
note
that
in
2019
we
did
hire
three
additional
staff
members
to
help
with
this
effort
funded
out
of
the
general
fund.
So.
U
H
B
Well,
without
opening
a
can
of
worms
is
that's
something
we
can
get
more
just
more
information
on
some
of
the
AG
you
you
don't
have
to
do
it
now,
just
activities
over
the
next
few
years.
I
think
you
were
gonna
talk
to
us
some
time
about
acreages
we
were
hoping
to
treat
and
that
sort
of
thing
that's
it
I
knew
that
we
had
talked
about
this.
Okay,
so
we'll
see
it
an
IP.
Thank
you.
U
All
right,
the
next
item
it
highlight
is
a
language
access
access
specialist,
it's
a
position
that
will
support
the
city's
efforts
to
identify
and
implement
best
practices,
to
support,
inclusive
and
meaningful
communication
and
engagement,
and
specifically
this
position.
It
will
spearhead
the
creation
of
a
language
access
plan
which
will
chart
short
midterm
and
long
term
goals
and
strategies
for
when
and
how
the
city
will
offer.
J
Let
me
just
say:
yay,
no
I
think
this
is
really
great
and
I
think
it
will
really
improve
the
quality
throughout,
as
stated
in
the
goals,
but
question
I
have
noticed
oftentimes
in
situations
where
there'll
be
a
bilingual
city,
employee
who
is
safe,
for
example,
in
police
and
because
they
are
bilingual.
They
get
pulled
into
some
other
department
to
use
their
skill,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
and
Jana
and
I
had
had
this
conversation
about
a
pay
compensation
for
having
that
skill,
because
you
do
use
it
and
you
are
working
extra
yeah.
C
N
I'm
Abby
Pawnee
and
toski
we've
been
working
on
coming
up
with
alternative
pay
to
recognize
skill,
that's
outside
of
the
normal
requirements
for
the
roles,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
different
skills
that
can
be
acknowledged
through
alternative
pay,
and
so
that's
what
we're
planning
to
do
to
recognize
the
language
access
specialist.
So
if
you
have
another
language
or
you
have
another
specialty
skill
would
give
you
alternative.
Pay.
U
Alright,
so
we've
mentioned
living
wage,
a
lot
saying
that
we
were
planning
on
incorporating
the
updated
self-sufficiency
wage
rate
which
is
1742
an
hour
into
the
2020
budget,
and
so
we're
continuing
our
promise
to
look
at
this.
Whenever
the
self
sufficiency
report
comes
out
and
again,
it's
updated
in
the
recommended
budget
include
my
employees
as
well
as
our
contracts,
for
which
the
living
wage
rate
applies
to.
U
So
the
city
of
Boulder
also
manages
a
cybersecurity
program
through
our
technology
or
a
chief
information
security
office
officer,
and
this
has
been
in
operation
since
April
of
2016,
with
goals
of
coordinating
security,
improvements
to
the
technology
infrastructure,
providing
insight
into
emergency
or
emerging
cyber
security
risks
and
protect
everyone
from
data
breaches,
service
interruptions
and
financial
loss
and
other
damage.
So
what
we're
doing
here
is
providing
an
additional
resource
employee
to
help
with
the
cybersecurity
program,
as
well
as
support
server
administrative
tasks
that
have
a
security
or
resilience
component.
M
Y
Good
evening,
Julia
Richmond,
chief
innovation
and
technology
officer,
so
this
role
right
now
we
have
one
security,
professional
for
the
entire
city,
and
so
this
is
doubling
our
staffing.
So
this
person
will
support
overall
task
management,
including
things
like
remediating
old
systems
and
security
audits
and
all
of
those
kinds
of
things.
So
it's
a
general
support
role
across
all
of
our
makes
sense.
Secure.
M
Y
Continually
working
that
we
have
a
number
of
legacy
systems
across
the
city,
so
it's
an
ongoing
effort
across
all
of
our
technology
infrastructure
and
applications.
So
the
answer
is
some
time,
but
as
we
term
out
old
technologies,
new
technologies
also
become
old
technologies,
and
so
it's
just
kind
of
a
continual
cycle.
G
C
So
after
the
Hillard
Hinds
report,
we
were
asked
to
take
a
very
serious
look
year-over-year
at
stop
data
from
the
police
department,
and
we
did
so
by
getting
a
new
records
management
system
that
came
up
I.
Think
in
the
2017
time
frame.
At
the
end
of
last
year,
we
were
able
to
finally
take
the
data
that
we
had
received
from
that
system
and
start
to
analyze
it.
We
analyzed
it
over
the
first
few
months
of
this
year,
I
made
a
report
at
the
end
of
April
or
early
May.
C
That
report
actually
coincided
was
the
work
of
beginning
the
oversight
task
force
and
in
the
work
that
we
had
done
to
present
that
report,
it
became
really
clear
to
staff
that
we
need
a
person
who
is
really
focused
on
data
related
to
the
police
department,
particularly
around
our
stock
data,
our
equity
data,
our
trend
data,
those
sorts
of
things,
and
we
did
not
have
a
person
in
either
IT
or
the
police
department
that
was
able
to
take
on
those
responsibilities,
and
so
we've
added
that
to
the
budget.
It's
on
page
115,
its
line
48
there.
C
It
was
a
request
when
we
heard
tonight
from
the
oversight
task
committee
I
wanted
to
bring
up
the
fact
that
many
of
you
on
Council
suggested
that
we
have
a
person
that
would
really
focus
on
trend
data
for
the
police
department,
and
it
has
been
our
intention
that
this
budget
recommendation
would
meet
those
needs.
And
so
we
think
that
we
are
already
ahead
of
the
curve.
C
U
Next
steps
include
first
reading
a
public
hearing
of
the
2020
budget
on
October,
first
and
then
second
reading
of
the
public
hearing
and
then
first
reading
of
all
of
our
special
districts
were
you
switched
off.
You
had
and
become
the
board
of
something
else,
but
those
first
readings
occur
on
October
15th.
B
J
So
in
the
memo
there
was
like
one
page
of
requests
that
did
not
get
funded
and
which
made
me
think
back
to
that
April
memo
that
a
study
session
memo
that
you
provided
that
had
like
pages
and
pages
of
unfunded
needs,
so
I
would
be
interested
in
seeing
what
of
those
unfunded
needs,
aren't
getting
funded
and
through
this
budget
process
and
and
to
see
them
separated
out
capital
and
operating
and
yeah.
In.
U
Their
term
sure
I
believe
that
a
lot
of
this
not
a
lot
I,
believe
that
there
are
several
key
priorities
in
that
unfunded
list
that
have
either
been
achieved
in
2019
or
2020
budget
recommendation,
and
a
lot
of
the
unfunded
continues
to
be
large
capital
dollars.
That
would
require
additional
funding
sources,
but
we
can
certainly
outline
it
more
comparable
to
what
you
saw
in
April.
What's
funded
and
what's
remains,
unfunded
yep.
M
So
I
had
one
actually
a
question
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up,
which
was
so
the
Planning
Board
considered
this
right.
They
and
they
had
a
motion.
I
think
was
run
the
CIP
specifically
right
and
I'm,
not
finding
language
here
exactly,
but
they
recommended
that
we
look
at
I
believe
increasing
our
work
with
minority
and
women-owned
businesses
do
I.
Remember
that
correctly.
A
U
There's
work
that
we
are
doing
and
I
think
that
Julia
could
speak
to
some
of
the
work
that
she's
doing
on
the
her
most
recent
RFP
with
becoming
more
inclusive
and
also
just
a
more
broad
understanding
from
the
Planning
Board
member
of
what
our
practices
already
are,
which
we
have
engaged
with
them
to
meet
with
our
purchasing
manager
to
better
understand
it
as
well.
But
we
certainly
take
that
serious
and
again
I
think
have
done
a
lot
of
work
with
a
recent
RFP
to
make
it
more
broad
and
inclusive
through
it.
Y
Hello
again,
so
the
city
of
Boulder
is
a
partner
with
Bloomberg
philanthropies
and
something
that's
called
what
work
cities
and
the
idea
is
capacity
building
in
municipal
governments
across
the
country
as
part
of
that
they
helped
align
resources
from
various
institutions,
Harvard
Johns,
Hopkins,
Hopkins,
etc
to
city
priorities
and
city
capacity
building.
So
we're
actually
working
with
the
Harvard
government
performance
lab
to
evaluate
our
procurement
practices,
particularly
looking
from
an
equity
standpoint
and
a
couple
of
findings
there
in
general.
It's
just
the
kind
of
data
that
we
collect.
Y
We're
not
getting
good
data
right
now
on
the
kinds
of
vendors
that
we
interact
with,
and
so
we
don't
have
a
good
baseline
measure
of
those
minority-owned
women-owned
businesses
that
we
have
been
buying
from,
and
so
there's
there's
some
efforts
that
were
identifying
in
terms
of
the
future
needs
and
how
we
gather
data.
And
then
we
are
piloting
some
of
those
efforts
through
the
broadband
procurement.
So
we
are
kind
of
changing
the
way
that
we
do
capital
procurement
in
the
city,
looking
from
starting
from
the
broadband
perspective.
Y
So
a
couple
of
things
that
we're
trying
to
do
are
expand.
The
number
of
participants
in
the
process
engaging
prime
vendor
x'
and
subcontractors
in
new
ways
and
allowing
them
to
engage
with
each
other,
providing
longer
runways
for
folks
to
understand
the
procurement
that
we're
doing
so
that
they
can
better
prepare
and
brought
a
better
partner.
As
part
of
that,
we
launched
the
first
stage
of
this
activity.
Y
Maybe
two
weeks
ago,
with
pre
RFP,
vendor
webinar,
we
had
90
firms
or
90
participants
sign
up
and
70
people
participate
in
that
call,
and
that
was
basically
to
talk
about
the
purpose
of
the
project.
What
we
were
trying
to
build
some
of
the
goals
that
we
have
from
an
equity
standpoint,
some
of
the
different
ways
that
we
want
to
engage
with
funders.
So
we're
trying
this
out
on
a
big
procurement.
We
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
terms
of
policies
and
procedures.
M
Thank
you
for
that
Julia.
So
I
guess
I
just
make
a
request
that
we
highlight
these
efforts
in
the
budget
as
we
go
forward
and
maybe
to
talk
about
what
we're
doing
now
and
what
we
think
we
could
do
in
the
future.
So,
of
course,
the
city
spends
a
fair
amount
of
money
and
it's
one
of
the
tools
that
we
in
our
toolbox
to
increase
equity
in
our
communities
through
the
procurement
process.
So
thank
you.
B
Y
B
C
Gonna
jump
in
just
quickly,
though,
the
work
that
our
gare
1.0
team
is
doing
has
been
to
focus
in
a
couple
of
different
areas
and
they're,
not
all
coming
to
me
right
now,
but
one
of
them
is
procurement,
and
so
we
are
gonna,
be
focusing
on
trying
to
improve
our
equity
and
establish
goals
like
that
through
our
procurement
processes,
so
that
work
is
already
underway.
It's
not
completed
and.
Y
G
It
seems
to
me
like
this
is
a
very
good
thing
to
be
doing,
and
it
also
seems
like
the
next
council
should
bring
it
up
during
the
retreat
and
say.
Does
the
council
want
to
participate
in
this
goal,
setting
because
I
think
if
that
might
be
the
kind
of
activity
that's
appropriate
for
the
council
to
weigh
in
on
with
appropriate
staff
kind
of
support.
M
I
Z
Katie
Cheryl
patellae
CFO.
We,
the
finance
department,
saw
this
as
a
pretty
high
priority
for
us.
A
lot
of
it
has
come
about
through
some
of
the
things
that
have
occurred,
such
as
our
a
recent
issue,
a
recent
issue
with
the
Accounts
Payable
scam
that
we
had,
and
also
just
looking
at
best
practices
for
an
organization
of
this
size
having
an
internal
auditor,
it's
something
that
the
city
used
to
have
and
during
the
recession
back
in
the
late
2000s.
It
was
the
position
that
was
eliminated.
Z
C
This
would
have
been
my
selection
for
the
one
staff
member
and
theirs
is
one
more
item.
I'm
gonna
lift
up
on
that
list.
That
made
me
sad
not
to
include
was
the
tree.
Imagine
Boulder
campaign
incentive
program,
which
is
to
add
more
trees
to
the
city,
but
you
know
the
dollars
only
go
so
far,
and
so
those
were
the
ones
that
were
on
the
bubble
and
did
not
make
it
so.
I
So
let
me
just
maybe
follow
up
on
that.
Are
there
to
be
now
on
first
reading.
Are
there
some
things?
I
am
send
this
to
tight
budget.
We
don't
have
like
hundreds
of
thousands
laying
around
and
just
we
can
find
our
own
wish
list,
but
are
there
things
within
the
incremental
budget?
So
you
just
pilot
the
key
that
we
could
dial
back
a
little
bit
Jane
and
pick
up
either
the
thing
I
mentioned,
or
the
thing
you
mentioned
I
mean
these
are
some
flexibility
any
of
those
things
I.
Don't.
G
Guess
I
think
that
we
got
one
of
the
cleanest
audit
reports
that
we've
ever
gotten
this
year,
so
it
might
be
an
okay
thing
to
wait
a
year
and
see
how
the
next
one
comes
out.
That
would
be
the
fifth
year
of
the
five-year
cycle
for
the
audit
firm,
so
I
don't
know
Bob,
because
you
and
I
are
on
the
Audit
Committee.
It
seemed
like
it
was
so
clean
this
year
that
maybe
we
don't
need
this
function.
G
I
I
I
guess,
I.
You
know
to
the
extent
I
know
you
guys
keep
a
running
list
of
adjustments
to
base
I.
Guess
I'd
put
that
on
the
deejay
and
I
put
that
on
the
list
and
if
to
the
extent
that
we
are
as
we
get
into
next
year,
we
look
like
we
have
a
little
bit
of
extra
money
because
of
revenue.
Positive
revenue
surprised
as
I
would
put
that
pretty
high
up
in
the
list.
Thank.
C
G
Z
Have
hired
our
external
auditors
for
certain
forensic
type
audits
that,
like
we
recently
did
one
of
P
cards,
so
the
internal
person
would
would
replace
some
of
what
we
would
hire
an
external
auditor
to
do.
An
internal
auditor
would
also
work
more
with
departments
on
their
internal
control
procedures
around
cash
and
other
highly
sensitive
processes
that
are
ripe
for
for
problems
could.
G
Z
B
G
B
O
Carolyn
with
climate
initiative,
so
if
you'll
recall,
I
came
to
you
earlier
this
year
to
discuss
bringing
the
fund
in-house
from
Boulder
County
who
had
been
previously
collecting
it.
So
we're
now
collecting
that
as
part
of
our
total
budget,
and
that
is
our
annual
estimate
of
what
our
funding
is
going
to
be
accumulated.
So
that's
the
fee
we
charge
to
marijuana
cultivation,
businesses
that
are
unable
to
offset
their
electricity
through
on-site,
solar,
and
so
that's
the
fee,
they're
paying
us
and.