►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 3-16-23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
C
B
Thanks
Elisha
so
I'd
like
to
start
by
requesting
a
motion
to
amend
the
agenda
to
add
item
3G,
which
is
a
consideration
of
a
motion
to
appoint
council
member
weiner
to
the
intergovernmental
Affairs
committee,
replacing
council
member
friend
due
to
her
voluntary
relinquishment
of
the
seat
and
also
to
correct
item
3F
with
the
language
that
was
sent
out
on
hotline.
So.
F
B
B
So
Elise,
if
we
could
start
with
item
1A,
please.
B
B
Let
us
never
allow
this
third
death
of
our
ten
Fallen
Neighbors.
Let
us
take
the
time
to
speak.
Their
names
celebrate
their
lives,
mourn
their
passing
as
long
as
we
remember
them,
they
will
never
truly
die,
and
so,
as
our
modest
and
humble
gesture,
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Boulder
declares
that
every
year
in
perpetuity,
March
22nd
shall
be
designated
the
boulder
day
of
remembrance.
B
B
So
we
will
now
move
to
open
comment
unless
anyone
else
has
any
further
thoughts.
B
Seeing
none
Ryan,
if
you
could
please
go
over
the
public
participation
guidelines.
G
G
This
Vision
supports
physical
and
emotional
safety
for
community
members
staff
and
Council,
as
well
as
democracy
for
people
of
all
ages,
identities,
lived
experiences
and
political
perspectives,
there's
more
information
on
our
website
and
on
the
next
slide.
Please
we'll
look
at
a
few
examples
of
these
rules
of
decorum.
G
These
will
all
be
upheld
during
this
meeting.
First,
at
all,
our
marks
and
testimony
will
be
limited
to
matters
related
to
City
business.
The
no
participant
shall
make
threats
or
use
other
forms
of
intimidation
against
any
person,
obscenity,
racial
epiphats
and
other
speech
and
behavior.
That
disrupture
is
why
it's
impedes
the
ability
to
conduct
this
meeting
is
prohibited.
G
My
basements
are
required
to
sign
up
to
speak
using
the
name
that
are
commonly
known
by
and
folks
must
display
their
full
name
before
being
allowed
to
speak
online.
Here
we
have
audio
testimony
only
at
this
time
and
in
person.
Please
refrain
from
expressing
support
or
disagreement
verbally
or
with
Applause,
with
the
exception
of
declarations,
please
encourage
to
use
the
American
Sign,
Language,
Applause
or
jazz
hands.
B
H
Hi
I'm,
Sarah,
Mitten
and
I
have
lived
on
the
hill
since
1975.
I
appreciate
the
new
helpful
in
our
ordinances
for
Behavior
control,
but
that
is
not
enough.
I
have
the
lived
experience
to
really
evaluate
occupancy
on
the
hill.
We
need
to
achieve
Boulder's
goals
yet
retain
balance
in
the
neighborhood.
Most
of
us
support
the
desire
for
higher
density
in
some
areas
of
Boulder.
The
overlay
concept
needs
to
be
reconsidered,
specifically
on
the
hill
for
the
unique
and
counter-intuitive
rate
formula
used
between
the
investors
and
the
wealthy
undergraduates.
H
Given
the
time
limit,
I'll
send
you
examples
by
email.
You
might
find
parts
especially
about
racial
inequity
troubling,
as
did
I,
affordable
homes
for
diverse
residents,
that
we
all
want
to
attract
again
were
here
and
then
were
lost
to
investors.
In
recent
decades
they
have
been
occupied
by
Boulder's
workers,
artists,
teachers,
scientists
tonight
I
just
want
to
address
the
issues
of
affordability
and
inclusion.
H
This
endless
stream
of
students
are
at
CU
for
the
perceived
rite
of
passage
of
living
on
the
hill
as
much
as
for
the
educational
experience,
no
matter
how
high
you
raise
the
occupancy
level,
they
have
family
resources
who
will
pay
whatever
the
investors
charge
for
the
property
based
on
the
legal
occupancy
priced
per
maximum
students,
not
bedrooms.
The
investors
are
only
interested
in
the
maximum
profit.
The
price
they
will
charge
will
be
determined
by
the
occupancy
number
and
the
already
predetermined
rent
per
student
to
live
as
they
are
accustomed.
H
Some
of
these
are
good
neighbors
and
their
families
have
great
financial
resources.
The
most
diverse
residents
on
the
hill,
in
both
resources
and
ethnicity,
are
the
local
families.
You
will
reward
the
investors
who
are
making
the
ever
increasing
students
on
the
hill,
whiter
and
wealthier
with
every
added
tenant.
All
you
will
do
is
increase
this
inequity.
This
will
not
help
others
across
Boulder.
Please
listen
to
those
of
us
who
live
it
every
day.
Thank
you.
I
I
Could
have
swear
I
put
it
on
mute
here.
We
go
all
right.
So,
in
the
last
three
of
my
seven
years
in
Boulder,
I've
been
a
victim
to
menacing
burglary,
two
situations
of
justifiable
physical
self-defense
against
previously
convicted
violent
felons
and
countless
instances
of
trespassing
on
my
property
that
didn't
result
in
Theft.
Only
because
I
keep
everything
locked
up.
I
One
of
the
things
I've
noticed
living
downtown
in
Boulder
is
an
influx
in
the
10
cities,
and
things
like
that
that
have
popped
up,
and
my
issue
here
today
is
not
with
the
unhoused
residents
who
are
100
members
of
our
community
and
largely
part
of
the
reason
that
I
moved
here,
because
I
noticed
that
in
large
in
part,
you
could
move
here
and
like
live
out
of
a
car
or
live
out
of
a
tent
until
you
got
on
your
feet
or
if
you
weren't
bothering
anybody
for
as
long
as
you
wanted,
and
it
wasn't
an
issue,
and
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
appealed
to
me
about
this
place
and
back
then
about
you
know.
I
Five
to
seven
years
ago,
the
boulder
homeless,
shelter
was
a
place
where
you
could
go
and
you
could
eat
breakfast
and
it
was
calm.
It
was
safe.
There
were
resources,
it's
another.
One
of
the
things
that
I
loved
about
this
place
is
that
there
were
ample
resources
for
anybody
who
needed
them
and
in
the
last
three
years,
one
of
the
things
that
I've
been
paying
attention
to
is
that
you
know
the
violence
has
increased.
The
mandalism's
increased.
I
There's
just
been.
You
know
that
a
tent
caught
on
fire
this
morning
I
listened
to
that
on
the
the
the
scanner
things
like
that
I
mean
just
this.
This
really
needless
amount
of
crime
has
gone
up,
and
it's
not
just
putting
the
community
from
the
students
to
the
people.
Who've
lived
here.
I
You
know
a
hand
up
in
society
and
can't
get
it
because,
there's
people
who
you
know
this
County
needs
to
pay
Servpro
a
quarter
of
a
million
dollars
or
however
much
a
year.
Oh
goodness,
yeah
I'm
over
my
time,
but
I
think
you
get
the
point
and
I
care
about
this
place
tremendously.
And
if
anyone
wants
to
email
me
I'll
email,
you
guys
and
see
if
y'all
want
to
touch
base
thanks,
Kyle.
K
Hi
guys
no
need
for
introductions,
I
I
thought
I
had
it
all
figured
out
what
I
was
going
to
use
my
two
minutes
for
today
and
right
before
coming
I
checked
my
mail
and
come
across
this.
This
order
from
the
federal
judge
regarding
my
federal
case
asking
me
to
be
present
on
four
six
in
the
federal
court
in
Denver
I
know.
You
know,
I've
been
in
here
trying
to
discuss
my
case
and
advocate
for
myself.
I
am
my
own
attorney
I
notice.
K
It's
got
a
long
list
of
higher
ups
and
stuff.
K
It's
been
sent
to
I
really
hope
that
for
the
first
time
in
in
a
long
time,
I
had
something
planned
on
this
week,
I've
been
accepted
and
and
well
applied
for
and
been
accepted
to
be
part
of
the
peer
support
program
through
Mental
Health
Partners
for
Victor
King
he's
throwing
that
with
some
funding
we
got
through
the
opioid
program
and
I
bought
me
a
new
tablet
and
I'm
trying
to
engage
in
that
and
I
was
really
excited
about
it
and
now
they
they
want
to
see
me
on
that.
One
day.
It's
like
one
week.
K
You
know
I
also
got
approved
this
week
to
be
able
to
start
donating
blood
again
because
when
you're
a
PTSD
Survivor,
they
limit
you
from
being
able
to
engage
in
that
without
a
doctor's
authorization.
For
some
reason,
I
want
you
guys
to
know
about
the
information
that
I
submitted
to
you
that
I
never
in
fact,
was
under
arrest
that
night
I
never
did
end
up
in
jail.
K
I
wasn't
under
any
controlled
substances.
I
have
a
hard
time,
keeping
my
face
up
and
and
keep
an
eye
contact,
which
is
something
I
really
prided
myself
in
before,
is
being
able
to
look
people
in
the
face.
A
lot
of
that
is
the
result
of
the
Haldol.
They
sedated
me
with
that
night
I've
been
deemed
permanently
disabled
through
Social,
Security
and
I'm
on
that
I
really
need
to
be
able
to
talk
with
the
city
before.
B
L
Hi
there
thank
you
so
much
for
having
me
tonight.
My
name
is
Rumi
natanzi
I'm,
an
undergraduate
student
at
the
University
of
Colorado
Boulder
and,
as
an
iranian-american
I,
think
it's
very
important
to
discuss
what's
happening
in
Iran
and
and
open
up
display
or
use
this
platform
to
discuss
the
atrocities
that
are
happening
in
the
current
Revolution.
So
there's
a
woman-led
revolution
for
human
rights
and
secular
democracy
in
Iran.
L
So
far,
22
000
people
probably
more
have
been
detained.
Hundreds
killed,
including
children,
and
while
in
prison,
people
are
subject
to
immense
brutalities.
Torture,
rape,
starvation,
Etc
school
girls
are
being
poisoned
for
the
simple
right
to
seek
an
education,
their
bravery's,
unmatched
and
every
day,
I
examine
the
Privileges
I
have
due
to
my
positionality
and
I
think
this.
L
The
reason
I'm
here
today
is
because
on
April
7th
we're
hosting
Dr
Sharina
body
at
CU,
Boulder
Dr
Sharina
abadi
was
the
first
female
judge
in
Iran
she's,
also
an
acclaimed
human
rights
lawyer,
who's
fought
for
the
rights
of
women
and
children
in
Iran
and
is
very
I
highly
recommend.
You
look
her
up
and
read
a
bit
more
about
the
cases
in
which
she's
fought
for
a
movie
was
made
about
her
life
that
will
be
shown,
and
then
afterwards
there
will
be
a
quick
q.
H
L
Her
life
and
it
it
will
be
very
informative
and
I
highly
recommend.
All
of
you
come
if
you'd
like
to
go
to
that
link
or
if
you
look
up
Sharina
body,
CU
Boulder.
It
is
a
register
only
event,
so
please
register,
while
you
have
the
chance.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time.
I
appreciate
it.
Thank.
M
M
Hello
council
members,
I'm
gonna,
have
to
read
from
here:
I
live
and
work
in
the
city
of
Boulder
and
I'm,
a
board
member
of
the
Boulder
Community
Rowing,
and
it's
Juniors
program.
Colorado
Junior
crew
I
also
act
as
the
liaison
between
the
non-motorized
rowing
user
groups
and
the
boulder
Reservoir
staff.
This
year
the
boulder
Reservoir
hourly
rental
fee
has
increased
from
100
to
297,
with
the
promise
that
it
will
be
380
next
year.
M
We
knew
this
fee
increase
was
coming,
but
it
is
still
my
responsibility
to
inform
you
of
the
flawed
methodology
and
calculating
this
hourly
cost
by
the
reservoir
staff.
That
is
jeopardizing
on
important
Wellness,
offering
to
our
community
they've,
taken
the
entire
cost
of
the
operations
across
the
entire
year,
which
is
1.2
million
and
divided
it
by
the
number
of
hours
the
reservoir
was
opened
to
the
public.
M
Last
year,
36.89,
this
methodology
does
not
account
for
the
fact
that
their
operating
costs
dramatically
increased
from
Memorial
Day
to
Labor
Day,
due
to
extensive
Staffing
facility,
where
and
access
to
their
building
and
bathrooms,
which
are
not
offered
to
US
during
our
5
a.m,
to
7
A.M
rental
period.
This
means
that,
despite
virtually
no
emissions,
minimal
environmental
impact
to
the
water
and
use
of
far
fewer
staff
than
during
peak
hours,
non-motorized
user
groups
are
being
asked
to
pay
an
average
cost
far
beyond
the
actual
cost
of
their
activities.
M
This
average
includes
Staffing
costs
for
the
front
gate
and
Lake
Patrol
boats,
which
are
not
needed
based
on
the
way
the
rates
our
programs
have
been
calculated
using
operational
costs
that
are
not
consistent
for
our
facility
use,
we're
being
charged
for
excess
Services.
We
do
not
use,
we
see
no
consideration
or
understanding
for
the
finances
of
our
program
or
the
benefits.
We
offer
your
community
and
ask
the
city
council
to
support
our
efforts
by
talking
to
the
reservoir
staff
about
this
methodology.
Thank
you
thank.
M
B
Evan
your
time
just
came
up
if
you'd
like
to
walk
up
to
the
podium,
no
worries
we'll
go
to
the
remote
speakers
and
then
come
back
to
you
all
right.
Our
first
three
remote
speakers
are
Brittany
Beecher,
Lynn,
Siegel
and
Amy
Rosenblum.
N
However,
as
I
mentioned,
I
would
like
to
advocate
for
this
Council
to
take
additional
steps
to
tackle
climate
emissions
from
lawn
care
equipment
by
amending
the
land
use
code
to
require
the
use
of
native
plants
and
landscaping
around
the
city,
while
working
to
mitigate
the
impact
of
landscaping
equipment
is
an
important
step.
You
should
take
this
next
step.
The
EPA
has
promoted
what
they've
coined
greenscaping
to
include
reducing
the
amount
of
CO2
in
the
atmosphere
by
two
ways.
N
First,
because
native
plants
often
require
little
to
no
lawn
maintenance,
there
is
substantially
fewer
emissions
by
Lawn,
Care
Equipment.
Second
native
plants
are
much
better
at
working
as
a
carbon
sink
due
to
their
extensive
root
system
and
ability
to
retain
water.
Other
benefits
include:
protecting
waterways,
wildlife,
habitats
and
saving
money
through
reduced
costs.
Council
can
take
action
by
amending
the
land
use
codes
to
achieve
this
in
multiple
ways.
N
One
example
comes
from
Kane
County
Illinois,
where
the
county
applies
its
Landscaping
Provisions
to
residential
commercial
and
Industrial
sites
by
requiring
each
of
the
three
classes
to
set
aside
a
predetermined
percentage
for
their
land
for
planting
native
plants.
A
different
approach
is
exemplified
in
Austin
Texas,
where
the
code
designates
zoned,
where
disturbance
of
natural
vegetation
is
restricted
and
requires
restoration
with
Native
species
if
such
occurs
well.
These
are
just
a
few
examples
of
the
actions
this
Council
can
take.
N
I
urge
you
all
at
a
minimum
to
implement
a
project
to
further
the
adoption
of
native
plants
into
the
landscaping
design
of
Boulder
County.
Thank
you
for
listening
to
me
this
evening.
I,
look
forward
to
watching
the
progress
of
the
project
aimed
at
addressing
the
emissions
caused
by
the
lawn
equipment
and
I
look
forward
to
the
potential
of
the
project
around
native
Landscaping.
B
O
I,
don't
think
you
need
other
cities,
Aaron
I
think
you
know
pretty
darn.
Well
that
the
noise
and
the
pollution
for
lawnmower.
You
know
like
there's
a
study
for
friggin
everything
you
know
and
guess
who's
paying
for
it.
I
am
you
know
you
are
so
inefficient
with
the
city
and
I,
never
hear
anything
from
you.
Never
a
response,
that's
because
I
guess
I'm
right.
You
know
if
I'm
wrong,
tell
me
about
it
because
see
you
Sal
is
a
disaster
on
Boulder.
O
It
increases
the
density
which
increases
our
cost
of
everything
which
increases
homelessness,
which
we
then
have
to
deal
with,
and
that's
what
you
dealt
with
at
your
your
retreat.
You
know
and
like
you've,
dealt
with
it
for
the
past
decades.
You
know
which
is
not
dealing
with
it
or
conducting
another
study
to
figure
things
out.
Well,
you're
the
freaking
leaders
leave
take
a
stand,
do
something
you
know
the
city's
going
downhill
fast.
You
know
it's
nothing
but
condos
on
Folsom,
Street
and
high-end
ones.
Driving
up
the
cost
of
everything
and
oh
smaller
is
better.
O
No
smaller
is
more
expensive
and
drives
up
the
cost
of
everything
and
drives
up
homelessness.
You're,
inefficient,
you're,
creating
more
homelessness
than
you
have
to
deal
with,
because
you,
like
your
jobs,
I
guess
you
enjoy
this,
you
know
I,
don't
think
so.
You
know
get
real
and
do
something
the
Millennium
had
296
units.
Now
it's
got
942..
Do
you
know
what
that
does
to
Transportation?
You
know
what
that
does
to
the
cost
for
the
transportation
department
for
open
space.
For
all
of
these
things
see
you
South.
O
B
Then
your
time
is
up,
but
thank
you
for
your
testimony.
Yeah
can
I.
Excuse
me.
Amy
Rosenblum
is
next
followed
by
Travis
culley
and
Amanda
grziak.
F
P
Great
thank
you
for
having
me
I'm,
Amy,
Rosenbloom
and
I'm
here
tonight,
to
speak
to
you
as
a
parent
as
the
president
of
the
board
for
Colorado
Junior
crew
and
as
a
constituent
as
a
parent
I
know,
you
are
well
aware
and
Susan
touched
on
it.
The
data
shows
that
mental
health
concerns
are
on
the
rise
for
our
kids,
especially
our
teenage
girls
and
CJC
has
provided
a
safe
and
tough
team
sport
for
my
daughter
and
nearly
40
other
athletes
to
attend
five
days
a
week
outside
enjoying
bold
Earth
Reservoir.
K
P
Or
the
wear
and
tear
that
we
put
on
the
res
we
are
seeing,
we
aren't
seeing
a
commiserate
increase
in
the
services
when
we
go
from
85
an
hour
to
233
dollars
an
hour.
Let
me
be
clear:
there's
not
even
a
restroom,
that's
open
to
our
coaches
and
athletes
to
use
during
the
increased
access
hours.
We
hope
that
the
invoices
this
year
are
issued
in
a
way
that
is
accurate
and
clear,
as
they
were
neater
last
year
and
as
we
are
complying
with
the
extensive
documentation
required
of
us
and
already
for
the
upcoming
year.
P
We
have
been
told
that
our
votes
may
or
may
not
be
inspected
in
a
timely
manner
in
the
fashion
when
I
return
up
on
the
Reds.
This
is
the
service
we're
paying
for
and
then
our
hourly
fee,
and
yet
we
may
not
be
able
to
use
our
own
equipment
because
the
res
is
not
able
to
inspect
it.
Even
after
insisting
that
we
give
them
specific
times
that
our
votes
will
be
returned
to
our
inspection
and,
at
the
same
time,
our
practice
is
dictated
by
school
time.
P
We
have
no
flexibility
on
this,
as
all
you
know,
after
school
activities
and
athletic
sports
and
as
a
constituent
I
have
to
say,
I'm
disappointed.
It
seems
like
we're
having
this
conversation
every
year,
I
pull
up
my
emails
from
last
year
or
my
talking
points
to
counsel,
and
we
could
use
council's
time
and
our
volunteers
time
in
a
more
efficient
way.
I
really
appreciate
your
time
and
thanks
for
hearing
from
me
thank.
Q
Council,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
First,
let
me
acknowledge
you
all
for
your
patience
and
handling
my
comments
and
hearing
my
questions
week
after
week.
Let
me
get
this
on
the
record.
I'm.
Just
a
kid
from
Arvada
I
was
raised
just
one
block
north
of
the
Swanson
Elementary
School
in
Arvada
on
this
map.
I
know
my
audience
can't
see
me,
but
I've
got
a
little
red
dot.
Q
I,
don't
know
if
anyone
can
see
me,
but
you
know
right
outside
of
one
of
the
Rings
of
contamination
of
the
Stewardship
Council
well
of
the
rocky
class
location
I'm
not
going
to
speak.
My
father
came
home
from
work
one
day
and
told
me
if
they
ever
want
to
know
what
the
toxic
waste
is.
Q
Tell
them.
They're
dumping
in
Marshall,
Lake
I
was
five
in
1973..
I
had
no
reference
for
this
at
the
time,
not
seven
or
ten
years
before
Marshall
Lake
was
called
a
minisa
link,
and
it's
because
it's
on
a
Mesa
we
once
we
wouldn't
see
Marshall
Lake
and
it
wouldn't
become
part
of
our
Collective
memory
until
the
Marshall
fire
I.
Q
An
average
kid
from
Arvada
have
raised
this
with
the
rocky
flat
Stewardship
Council,
which
I
understand
to
be
the
correct
forum
for
Community
concern
to
be
raised
where
IT
addresses
or
responds,
or
has
some
acknowledgment
of
the
possible
contamination
on
the
Wildlife,
Refuge
and
I'm
being
blocked.
As
of
the
last
meeting
on
March
7th,
the
executive
board
is
planning
to
restructure
the
rocky
Cloud
Stewardship
Council
at
the
meetings
and
themselves
uninviting
the
doe
and
the
Legacy
management
team,
so
that
David
Abelson
can
pretend
to
answer
the
answer.
Q
The
questions
with
the
help
of
the
CD's
phe
to
answer
the
questions
of
fires
and
framework
forever
chemicals,
while
the
doe
are
not
there.
Miss
Winer
I
hope
urged
it
that
you
scrutinize
this
meaning
for
transparency
and
for
honesty,
because
I
doubt
it's
honest
disposition.
If
you
look
at
the
IG
agreement
of
2018
you'll
see
what
has
been
redacted
from
the
mission
statement.
It
says
that
the
words
oversight,
Travis.
R
You
hear
me
yes,
hello,
my
name
is
Amanda
graziak
I
am
a
member
of
the
environmental
Advisory
Board,
though
I'm,
not
speaking
for
the
board
today
and
I'm.
Only
sharing
my
own
opinions
I
just
wanted
to
also
alert
first,
the
council
that
EAB
did
not
have
a
meeting
in
January,
which
I
kind
of
find
to
be
unacceptable
during
a
climate
crisis,
not
to
be
constantly
bringing
new
projects,
updating
old
ones
to
EAB
and
city
council.
R
I'd
also
like
to
raise
the
issue
of
needing
public
education
on
proper
waste
stream.
Sorting
I've
brought
it
up
with
EAB
members
and
City
environmental
staff
before
our
composting
requirements
have
been
majorly
relaxed
for
businesses
and
the
community
because
of
contamination
issues,
many
people
who
live
in
Boulder,
especially
college
and
graduate
students,
are
here
temporarily
and
have
come
from
all
over
the
U.S
and
in
and
the
world
where
they
might
not
have
experience
with
composting
and
or
recycling.
R
So
this
is
their
first
time
seeing
that
and
I've
been
trying
to
advocate
for
consistent
public
education
campaigns
such
as
pamphlets
sent
to
new
residents
for
proper
waste.
Sorting,
I
would
love
to
see
city
council.
Consider
this
option,
instead
of
limiting
our
composting
options,
and
the
last
point
I
would
like
to
make
is
I
would
also
love
to
advocate
for
placing
an
industrial
composting
facility
on
our
open
space
land.
R
I
know
it
might
be
a
little
content,
but
we
really
need
to
decrease
our
emissions
from
landfill
and
actually
put
our
money
where
our
mouth
is
on
environmentalism.
A
composting
facility
on
open
space
land
would
not
be
close
to
anyone's
private
residence
and
so
would
not
come
up
against
opposition
for
people
who
do
not
want
that
in
their
backyard
and
would
also
put
Boulder
City's
alignments
at
city's
actions
and
alignments
with
our
professed
priority
of
environmentalism.
Thank
you
very
much.
S
B
H
S
I've
lived
here
44
years
council
member
folkerts
asked
on
the
city
hotline
this
morning
why
there
are
less
applicants
for
City
boards
and
commissions
this
year.
If
people
knew
of
my
experience
on
a
city
working
group
and
of
others
on
City
boards
and
commissions,
you
might
have
no
applicants
at
all.
First.
S
Others
remember
how
police
oversight
board
applicants
Sammy
Lawrence
was
basically
called
a
drama
queen
by
former
council
member
Mary
young
and
rejected
Sammy
is
the
disabled
young
black
man,
who
is
brutally
assaulted
by
240
pound
ex-cop,
Whalen
Lola
tie
and
after
three
years
was
finally
awarded.
Seventy
five
thousand
dollars
by
the
city.
Members
of
the
human
relations
commission
were
scolded
by
council
member
Wallach
for
publicly
saying
what
they
thought
about
treatment
of
the
homeless
years
later.
Council
is
finally
talking
about
following
their
advice.
S
I
have
spent
over
4
000
hours,
trying
to
defend
it
against
staff,
lying
cheating
and
defrauding
us
taxpayers
of
over
half
a
million
dollars
and
Counting
I
was
recovering
my
endurance
after
breaking
my
hip
until
this
Onslaught
by
City
staff,
instead
I
a
former
professional
tightrope
artist,
sometimes
have
trouble
walking
around
the
block.
Now
so
I
hate
the
government
of
Boulder,
as
Noam
Chomsky
says,
we'll
have
to
invent
new
words.
The
word
evil
doesn't
even
approach.
It.
T
A
quick
one,
knowing
that
a
thank
you
for
all
the
comments.
We
always
appreciate
them
and
find
it
an
opportunity
to
look
into
some
items.
We
will
certainly
do
that
for
the
comments
regarding
the
issues
at
the
boulder
res
and
Rowing
I
just
wanted
to
remind
staff.
I
didn't
have
that
date
at
my
fingertips.
Last
time
we
will
be
talking
about
that
as
part
of
the
financial
update
on
May
11th.
B
B
D
Yeah
I
just
want
to
respond
briefly
to
Mr
rabbit.
You
know
we
have
vigorous
debates
and
disagreements
on
this
Council.
There
are
things
some
people
like
there
are
things
some
people
love,
but
the
concept
that
this
council
is
acting
out
of
malice
and
his
evil
I
I.
That
to
me
is,
is
a
bridge
too
far.
You
can
disagree
with
what
we
do.
D
You
can
entirely
discredit
what
we
do.
That's
that's
within
your
purview
as
a
citizen
and
your
right
to
do
so,
but
when
you
start
describing
motivations
such
as
evil
to
this
body,
I
really
do
think
you're
off
base
and
I
say
that
as
someone
who's,
often
on
a
losing
side
of
issues,
but
that's
you
know
we.
We
have
good
people
here.
I'm,
sorry,
Mr,
ravitz,
I,
entirely.
Disagree
with
you.
B
Thanks
Mark,
actually
before
we
finish
this
out
Nuria,
you
mentioned
that
the
rowing
issues
will
be
addressed
in
an
update
on
May
11th
I.
F
T
B
V
B
V
Thank
you
and
Nuria
I
just
had
a
quick
follow-up
to
that.
I
believe
that
the
rowing
groups
are
needing
to
fill
out
their
contracts
before
May
11th
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
because
that
I
don't
I,
don't
know
that
if
we
are
discussing
it
on
May
11th,
then
it
will
have
any
impact
on
any
of
their
concerns
for
this
season
and
from
some
of
what
I
understand
from
the
groups
at
the
current
rates
that
it
may
end
some
of
their
programs.
T
Thank
you,
member
council
member
spear
I'll.
Take
a
look
at
that.
I
actually
meant
to
figure
out
what
the
timing
of
those
contracts
was.
So
I
will
take
a
look
at
that
and
get
back.
C
B
I'll
just
make
one
quick
comment:
item
D
is
about
accepting
the
donation
of
0.3
acres
of
land
at
2675,
3rd
Street
from
Boulder
residence,
John,
Eric,
Jansen
and
Elizabeth
Barrow
Jansen
for
open
space
purposes
and
I
would
just
like
to
extend
a
thank
you
to
them
for
this
generous
donation,
that's
going
to
improve
the
trail
access
to
the
Mount
snidas
area
Trails.
So
thanks
so
much
for
being
willing
to
do
that.
D
X
D
B
C
Y
I
I
know
what
you
should
call
it
up.
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment:
I
think
it's
apropos
and
a
little
appointment
that
tonight
we're
looking
at
this
Landmark
alteration
certificate
for
a
sculpture
that
will
appear
in
front
of
the
Museum
of
older
here
in
a
few
months
that
memorializes
the
the
10
people
were
lost
at
Aaron
mentioned
in
the
Declaration
earlier
tonight,
and
I
hope
that
when
that
that
sculpture
is
placed
in
front
of
the
Museum
of
Boulder,
I'm
sure
there'll
be
an
event.
X
F
X
B
Z
Hi
good
evening,
Marcy
Gerwin
principal
historic
preservation,
planner
and
planning
and
development
services
Lauren.
Thank
you
for
your
questions.
The
landmarks
board
voted
to
deny
this
request,
not
for
the
replacement
of
Windows.
It
was
approved
at
the
committee
level
to
allow
the
replacement
of
the
windows
with
wood
windows,
but
the
owner
was
interested
in
pursuing
the
use
of
cloud
Windows
as
the
replacement
material
and
because
the
windows
are
located
in
the
character
defining
feature
of
the
contributing
house
in
a
place
that
is
visible
from
the
public
right-of-way.
X
Thank
you,
and
are
there
wood
window
alternates
that
are
as
high
performing
as
these
windows
would
be
from
an
energy
perspective?
Yes,.
Z
So
what
windows
can
meet
our
energy
code
and
there
are
state
tax
credits
to
help
offset
the
cost
difference
between
the
two
and
so
in
looking
at
a
comparison.
They
are
very
similar
in
terms
of
both
energy
performance
and
cost.
Once
the
state
tax
credits
are
taken
into
account,.
J
J
If,
if
we're
saying
no
to
something
that
I
mean
from
the
pictures
it
yeah
I,
don't
know
how
much
I'm
supposed
to
comment
at
this
stage,
but
I
guess
I
could
I
could
be
persuaded
to
call
this
up
because
I
don't
know
what
what
a
difference
it
makes
to
the
homeowner
and
and
if
it
is
much
more
expensive
to
do
something,
that's
environmental
or
or
even
a
bit
more.
You
know
not
everyone
can
do
that
looks
like
a
lovely
house,
so
perhaps
they
could
afford
it.
Z
B
X
B
B
V
And
I
just
had
one
additional
question
for
Marcy:
these
rebates
that
kind
of
make
the
costs
more
equivalent.
Is
that
at
point
of
sale
or
is
that
something
that
people
have
to
kind
of
file
their
taxes,
and
then
they
get
a
tax
credit
or
something
for
it?
So
is
it
the
media
or
is
it
delayed?
It's.
Z
The
latter,
it's
a
tax
credit
that
you
filed
with
the
tax
your
tax
forms.
V
B
Got
it
well,
we
got
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second.
E
B
B
We
got
five
so
close,
but
not
does
not
quite
go
through
on
a
four
to
five
vote,
but
thanks
for
raising
the
issue.
B
C
Sir
item
four
C
tonight
is
the
concept
plan,
review
and
comment
for
a
proposal
to
redevelop.
5675
Arapahoe
with
two
new
three-story
buildings
for
research
and
development
uses
totaling
approximately
two
hundred
thousand
square
feet
in
floor
area
at
a
height
of
approximately
45
feet
and
would
surface
and
subterrain
parking
reviewed
under
case
number.
Lur
2022-00040.
AA
All
right,
thank
you
is
my
understanding.
Is
it's
staff
over
there
prefers
to
drive
the
presentation,
or
would
you
like
me
to
share
my
screen
and
do
it
from
here.
T
T
AA
Council
members,
as
noted
I'm
here,
to
present
the
concept
plan,
call
up
for
5675
Arapahoe
and
go
to
the
next
slide.
AA
The
plan
purpose
you're
all
familiar
with,
is
to
provide
feedback
and
comments
to
an
applicant
prior
to
submittal
of
a
site
review
application.
The
purpose
of
this
presentation
is
for
Council
to
decide
whether
they
would
like
to
call
it
up
at
a
public
hearing.
Next.
O
AA
Please
so
in
terms
of
public
notification,
we
followed
protocol.
Written
notice
was
sent
to
property
under
than
600
feet,
as
well
as
posted
on
the
property.
No
comments
have
been
received
next
slide,
so
the
project
location,
as
you
can
see
here,
it's
located
off,
Arapahoe
Avenue,
just
east
of
55th
Street
next
slide.
AA
The
bbcp
land
use
designation
for
the
site
is
light
Industrial
in
terms
of
uses.
The
intent
is
to
consist
primarily
of
research
and
development
like
manufacturing
and
assembly,
media
and
storage
or
other
intensive
employment
uses,
and
there
are
some
allowances
for
residential
and
other
complementary
uses.
AA
Next
slide,
please,
the
subject
site
is
located
within
the
boundaries
of
the
East
Boulder
sub-community
plan.
I
won't
read
all
of
this,
but
of
note
is
that
it's
also
light
industrial
land
use.
It
is
not
located
within
an
area
of
change,
however.
It
is
identified
as
an
area
of
future
study
and
the
area
of
future
study
says
to
accommodate
light
industrial
operations
and
access
in
this
area
and
increase
safety
for
new
residential
and
mixed
use
development.
AA
The
area
should
be
pursued
for
further
study
and
potential
issues
include
increased
network
access
through
the
area
and
consolidation
of
curb
cut
so
long.
Arapahoe
next
slide,
please
in
terms
of
the
zoning
it's
zoned
IG
or
industrial
General
in
terms
of
development
standards
for
IG,
there's
a
maximum
floor
area
ratio
of
0.5,
Max
Building
height
by
right
of
40
feet.
The
parking
requirement
is
based
on
one
space
per
400
square
feet.
AA
The
floor
area,
research
and
development
uses
are
allowed
by
right
and
office
uses
over
50
000
square
feet
require
a
use
review
under
50
000
square
feet
are
allowed
by
right
next
slide,
please
so
just
some
context:
shots
of
the
site
and
surrounding
area.
As
you
can
see,
it's
located
immediately
North
across
Arapahoe
from
the
golf
course
and
otherwise
is
surrounded
by
a
mix
of
Warehouse
manufacturing
light
industrial
and
Auto
Service
uses
next
slide.
Please.
AA
So
the
proposed
project,
the
original
proposal
came
in
was
for
technical
office
use
as
you're
aware
that
use
definition
has
been
removed
from
the
code,
so
now
it
would
either
have
to
qualify
as
office
research
and
development
or
other
light
industrial
uses.
The
applicant
has
indicated
that
they
will
meet
the
definition
of
research
and
development
facility.
AA
AA
The
total
proposed
floor
area
of
the
project
is
206
400
square
feet
about
85
000
in
building
a
and
about
122
000
in
Building
B,
which
brings
the
total
far
for
the
site
to
0.498
so
right,
just
under
the
0.5
limit,
and
the
proposed
parking
includes
60
surface
spaces
and
500
Subterranean
spaces
for
a
total
of
560,
where
516
would
be
required
by
code
next
slide,
please.
AA
So
this
is
just
a
shot
at
the
site
plan.
As
you
can
see,
it's
two
buildings,
a
range
kind
of
on
the
Northern
portion
of
the
site
behind
an
existing
Pond
facility,
there's
surface
parking
lot
to
the
east
of
building
a
and
then
a
kind
of
open
space,
employee,
Gathering
area
in
the
corner
of
Building
B.
There
next
slide,
please.
AA
So
this
is
a
rendering
provided
by
the
applicant
just
giving
a
view
of
the
project
from
Arapahoe
next
slide.
Please
similar
here.
This
is
from
the
north
west
corner
of
the
site,
looking
into
the
open
space
area
tucked
into
Building
B
behind
building
a
next
slide,
please
this
is
an
aerial
shot
of
the
proposed
development
and
how
it
would
fit
in
with
the
surrounding
context
and
and
look
from
above
next
slide
please.
AA
So
the
planning
board
hearing
took
place
for
this
on
February
21st,
2023
planning,
board,
heard
presentations
by
staff
and
the
applicant
and
has
questions
following
each
presentation.
There
are
two
key
issues
discussed.
The
first
key
issue
was:
is
the
proposed
concept
plan
preliminarily
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
recommendations
of
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan,
and
the
second
key
issue
is:
does
planning
board
have
feedback
on
the
proposed
site
plan
and
architecture
next
slide?
Please.
AA
AA
There
was
some
discussion
regarding
the
need
to
update
BBC
policies
related
to
light
industrial
land
use
designations
in
the
next
bdcp
update,
and
it's
worth
noting
that
the
renderings
that
I
just
showed
you
were
not
provided
until
the
day
of
the
planning
board
hearing,
so
they
weren't
included
in
the
original
packet.
They
were
included
in
the
presentation.
So
that's
part
of
why
there
are
some
dissatisfaction
with
the
packet
itself.
Next.
H
AA
Please,
in
terms
of
key
issue
number
two:
the
board
generally
agreed
with
staff's
comments
and
found
that
the
overall
site
design
is
generally
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area,
but
that
Building
architecture
will
be
a
major
Focus
during
site
review
and
the
surface
parking
area
if
kept,
will
need
to
be
relocated
and
or
better
screened
from
you.
Additional
concerns
included
a
desire
to
see
less
parking
overall
and
more
focus
on
Alternate
modes
and
TDM
potential
impacts
of
underground
parking
structure
on
wetlands
and
site
drainage.
The
thought
that
building
design
was
not
inspirational
or
unique.
AA
Building
sustainability
and
Energy
Efficiency
concerns
lack
of
accessory
uses
such
as
a
coffee
shop,
to
serve
employees,
quality
of
the
projects,
landscaping
and
functionality
of
buildings
in
open
space
for
employees
and
visitors.
Next
slide,
please
so
next
steps,
if
not
called
up
by
Council
the
applicant,
will
move
forward
to
site
review
the
site
review
application
is
a
staff
level
decision,
subject
to
call
it
by
planning
board.
AA
If
this
is
called
up
by
Council,
the
console
plan
will
be
scheduled
for
a
council
hearing
within
60
days
and
just
a
reminder
that
Council
also
has
the
authority
to
refer
concept,
plan,
review,
proposals
to
dab
and
or
tab
for
their
respective
opinions,
with
or
without
a
column
and
now
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions
next
slide.
Please.
AA
AA
D
Yeah,
you
know
I
think
I
would
be
interested
in
calling
it
up.
That's
a
lot
of
reservations
expressed
by
the
planning
board.
I
would
certainly
want
to
refer
this
to
a
design,
Advisory
Board,
given
some
of
those
reservations,
and
there
are
enough
Quest.
You
know
the
project
looks
okay
to
me,
but
there
are
enough
questions
that
have
been
raised
by
the
planning
board,
which
I'm
sure
has
given
it
more
particular
scrutiny
than
we
have
that
I'd
like
to
see
the
applicant
respond
to
some
of
those
and-
and
you
know,
make
a
presentation.
J
I,
don't
want
to
call
it
up
or
ask
us
to
call
it
up,
but
I
would
like
us
to
refer
to
dab
and
tab
dab
for
the
reasons
that
councilmember
Wallach
suggested
and
tab
because
of
the
parking
questions,
the
TDM
focus
and
the
underground
parking
and
and
floodplain
I
don't
know
if
tab
can
weigh
in
on
that.
But
it
just
sounds
like
there
were
a
fair
amount
of
parking
and
TDM
concerns.
B
Y
Yeah
I'm
with
Rachel
I
I
work
with
other
respect
I.
While
this
is
a
big
project
and
there
were
a
lot
of
concerns
raised
I'm,
not
sure
that
we're
going
to
do
a
better
job
than
planning
board.
It
sounds
like
playing
board,
did
a
very
thorough
job
and
it
sounds
like
the
applicant
is
content
with
those
comments
and
is
not
seeking
our
call
up
or
second
guessing,
but
I
do
agree
with
Rachel
that
referring
this
to
Tab
and
dab
would
be
a
good
idea.
B
Great
I'll,
Colin
myself
and
agree
with
Rachel
and
Bob
here
that
I
did
think
generally
playing
board
did
a
good
job
in
their
review
and
I
just
want
to
highlight
a
couple
of
things
that
they
said
that
I
that
I
want
to
double
down
on,
and
one
was
the.
It
seems
like
there's
too
much
parking
here.
B
There's
what
I
think
500
spots
in
the
underground
garage
and
then
with,
and
then
with
that
many
spots
in
a
garage
to
have
60
spots
on
the
surface
additionally
seems
like
definitely
more
than
is
necessary
Justified
and
also
gives
a
parking
Forward
Design
to
the
project
that
I'd
like
to
avoid
so
I
would
love
to
see
a
stronger
TDM
project,
less
parking
overall
and
definitely
less
parking
on
the
surface.
B
If
any,
because
if
you
remove
that
parking
entirely,
then
you
could
get
to
one
of
planingboard's
other
points
which
was
more
functional,
site
layout
and
open
space
for
the
the
workers
and
visitors.
So
I
wanted
to
highlight
those,
and
if
maybe
tab
has
some
brilliant
TDM
ideas
that
could
be
useful
in
making
that
happen.
Lauren.
X
Thank
you,
yeah
I
I
agree
with
the
referral
to
Tab
and
dab
and,
with
you
know,
the
focus
on
try
sort
of
the
sustainability
aspects
of
this
project.
The
parking,
the
building
materials,
structural
systems.
X
S
J
S
F
B
Take
the
up
talk
at
the
end.
There
motion
a
second
all
in
favor
show
offense
that
is
unanimous
Okay,
so
we've
decided
I
believe
to
not
call
it
up.
Mark
I
think
you're
the
only
opinion
in
that
direction,
if
you
don't
mind,
but
to
refer
to
Tab
and
dab
I'll,
withdraw
my
request.
Okay,
thank
you.
Chandler
said
good
enough.
Do
you
need
anything
else?
B
C
T
And
John
Morse
is
going
to
walk
us
through
those
I,
don't
know
if
Alicia
you
wanted
to
frame
that
up
while
he
gets
situated,
but
if
we're
not
we'll
give
him
a
hot
second.
B
And
actually
do
you
mind
if
I
just
intercede
here
for
a
second
I,
just
I
thought,
maybe
before
we
get
into
the
all
the
details
on
the
procedures,
it
might
be
helpful
to
address
the
question
that
Lauren
raised
over
hotline
about
the
dab
appointments
to
kind
of
clear
that
procedural
issue
out
of
the
way
before
we
get
into
all
the
appointment
details.
What
do
folks
think
about
that.
C
AB
Sorry
rookie
moment
hello
city,
council,
good
evening,
I'm
John
Morse,
the
elections
administrator
for
the
city
I
also
oversee
our
boards
and
commissions
recruitment,
along
with
the
help
of
the
clerks
team.
So
to
answer
Lauren's
question
regarding
our
dab
applicants
and
a
staggering
terms
on
the
hotline,
I'd
like
to
start
by
saying
that
in
our
general
Provisions
for
boards
and
commissions
and
city
council,
there
is
not
a
provision
right
now
for
all
boards
and
commissions
to
have
city
council
adjust
terms
to
stagger
them
for
all
boards
and
commissions,
including
dab.
AB
Now,
however,
there
are
two
exceptions
to
that.
Just
in
our
code,
the
Arts
commission
and
the
beverage
licensing
Authority
both
have
specifics
in
the
code
that
state
Council
shall
be
able
to
adjust
terms
as
to
stagger
that,
in
addition
to
that,
we
have
a
few
boards
and
commissions
the
downtown
management
commission.
The
human
relations
commission
are
Boulder
Junction
access
districts,
the
Cannabis
licensing,
Advisory,
Board
and
University
Hill
commercial
area
management.
AB
Commission,
all
in
our
code,
have
kind
of
described
how
when
they
were
developed,
the
terms
of
the
members
were
different
as
to
stagger
them
moving
forward.
So
with
all
that
being
said,
there
isn't
a
requirement
for
Council
to
stack
your
terms.
If
that's
something
Council
would
like
to
clean
up
in
in
the
code.
You
know
we
could
definitely
team
up
with
the
CAO
in
the
clerk's
office
to
do
that.
AB
W
U
It
is
not
specifically
prohibited
the
fact
that
it
is
addressed
in
other
parts
of
the
code,
though
infers
that
it's
not
allowed
in
other
parts.
That's
usually
how
legislative
readings
go
if
it's
not
if
it's
specifically
stated,
especially
in
the
entire
boards
and
commissions
title
we've
got
some
that
do
some
that
don't,
and
if
you
want
that
to
happen,
you
would
need
to
make
a
code
change.
U
X
I
think
one
of
the
reasons
this
came
up
is
because
there
was
a
position
that
went
unfulfilled.
Does
the
code
address
how
we
are
supposed
to
deal
with
a
position
that
has
been
unfulfilled
because
in
this
case
we've
moved
the
term
back
a
year,
but
could
instead,
we
treat
it
like
a
resignation
and
a
point
to
a
four-year
term
for
the
seat
that
was
unappointed
last
year.
U
And
I
would
say
first
of
all
that
it
doesn't
our
code
and
our
rules
don't
address
that
I
think
this
is
kind
of
a
new
thing
that,
where
we're
really
having
struggling
to
get
people
to
apply
and
we're
having
a
lot
of
vacancies,
so
certainly
seems
like
an
area
that
we
could
probably
focus
on
making
some
changes.
But
I
I
do
think
that
your
idea
is
creative,
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
necessarily
think
that
that
could
should
be
discounted.
U
It's
it's
difficult,
because
we've
got
some
codes
that
already
addressed
this
specifically,
and
so
you
know,
I.
Think
that
part
of
this,
too,
is
that
you
know
we
need
to
look
at
how
it
affects
the
process
and
make
sure
that
that
whatever
changes
that
you
all
want
to
make
that
it
works
with
the
process,
that's
currently
being
applied
and.
C
If
I
may
add
something
real,
quick,
I
think
the
the
one
reason
that
we
were
a
bit
adamant
about
the
the
actual
appointment
being
for
five
years
is
because
it
says
clearly
in
the
code
shall
be
appointed
for
a
five-year
term.
It
doesn't
say
when
that
term
begins
or
like
Sandra
said
there
isn't
a
section
that
addresses
if
we
don't
have
someone
appointed
the
year
before,
do
we
alter
that
term?
It
strictly
says
four
or
five
year
term.
Y
Can
I
build
on
on
what
Lauren
said,
so,
let
me
back
up
in
time.
In
2022,
we
had
a
five-year
term
that
we
could
have
filled
that
would
have
had
a
term
from
2022
to
2027.
Is
that
correct,
but
no
one
applied
for
it?
Y
Thank
you.
So
what
you're
saying
now
tonight
is
a
year
later
is
that
when,
when
Council
didn't
and
couldn't
fulfill
that
term,
we
implicitly
extended
the
term
of
that
seat,
because
there's
no
seats
are
numbered.
One
two,
three
four
five:
we
implicitly
extended
the
term
to
change
the
term,
so
I
I,
don't
you're
telling
us
tonight.
We
can't
do
explicitly
what
we
want
to
do,
but
you're
inferring,
an
action
that
we
took,
which
we
didn't
take
I
was
sitting
here
in
2022.
We
didn't
do
that.
Y
We
didn't
say:
oh
geez,
the
seat
was
just
empty.
It
was
as
long
as
it
was
no
different
than
a
resignation
with
the
resignation
we
don't
start
with
a
new
five
years.
It's
just
the
remainder
of
that
term.
So
there's
a
remainder
of
a
term.
If,
if
this
forget
about
the
fact
that
it
wasn't
filled,
let's
say
we
filled
it
and
the
very
next
day
that
person
quit.
J
J
B
I
add
on
to
that
maybe
a
slightly
different
way
to
think
about.
It
is
if
we
associate
it
with
the
seat
number
right
right,
I,
don't
know
what
the
seat
number
is.
Let's
say
it's
seat
two,
so
so
that
we
appoint
that
person
to
seat
number
two
for
the
remainder
of
c2's
term
to
end
four
years
from
now
we're
doing.
B
And
to
to
kind
of
get
to
Alicia's
point
to
say
that
that
things
should
be
five-year
terms,
but
if
we're
associating
it
with
the
the
course
of
time
of
the
the
seat
has
and
I
think
just
to
bring
it
back
here.
I
think
boards
will
be
much
more
functional
for
five
person
boards
if
we
point
one
new
one
every
year.
B
U
I
think,
with
some
of
the
creative
things
I've
heard
tonight,
I
think
we
could
probably
work
with
that,
and
certainly
we
should
move
forward
on
making
changes
in
our
code
to
make
sure
that
it's
very
clear
what
those
procedures
are
and
I'm
sure.
We
probably
think
of
other
things
that
we
can
improve
on
as
well.
So.
W
I
appreciate
the
flexibility
to
work
with
some
of
that
creativity.
To
make
this
happen,
I
will
say
that
I
I
don't
know
if
that
was
the.
If
there
was
some
early
legislative
intent
but
to
not
allow
changing
terms
of
a
filled
seat,
I
would
get
because
we
don't
want
to
say
we
don't
like
this
person
and
therefore
you
only
you
get
three
shorter
years
on
your
term.
W
So
I
think
if
we
are
going
to
go
down
the
path
that
has
to
do
with
either
vacancies
or
ones
that
go
unfulfilled,
so
we
can
clearly
de-politicize,
or
at
least
there
would
be
no
interpretation
or
or
fear
that
we
could
start
politicizing
terms
of
boards
based
on
affiliation
or
performance.
In
that
sense,.
B
C
No,
but
I
will
need
some
clarity
going
forward
with
the
mid-year
Recruitment
and
we
will
also
need
Clarity
for
positions
that
have
been
open
for
a
couple
of
years.
So
it's
not
just
to
want
this
particular
one,
because
this
will
rotate
backwards
when
we
have
appointments
going
forward
so
again
with
the
process
we'll.
C
W
Can
I
ask
a
different
or
comment
on
on
that
so
I?
What
was
brought
up
about?
Can
we
basically
identify
the
seats
and
the
turns
we
appoint
are
to
a
seat,
not
a
person
and
I
wonder
if
that's
part
of
the
change
we
go
forward
with,
because
that
kind
of
then
just
nullifies
a
lot
of
these
concerns
and
keeps
our
stagger.
W
Terms
of
focusing
Direction
on
what
may
come
from
city
attorney's
office
in
that
sense
and.
B
C
C
C
J
Just
because
I
think
this
could
go
all
night
can
we
express
our
intent
to
appoint
a
second
person
to
that
board
for
a
four-year
term
tonight
and
hope
that
a
City
attorney
will
help
us
to
in
the
minutes,
make
it
in
done.
U
U
Yeah
we
can
do
that
tonight,
but
I
do
think
that
there
are
a
lot
of
issues
to
go
through
and
I.
Don't
think
we
can
figure
them
all
out
here
tonight
so
that
that's
fine,
if
you
want
to
go
forward
on
that
one,
but
I
think
that
there
are
a
lot
of
other
issues
that
we
need
to
to
tackle,
and
so
we'll
come
back
with
that.
Okay.
B
C
Starting
this
officer
tonight,
thank
you
good
evening.
Everyone
Elisha
Johnson
serving
the
city
as
the
city
clerk
and
the
records
manager.
So
tonight
before
we
begin
the
process
of
a
nominee,
our
nomination
and
appointment
to
board
and
commission
candidates
to
fill
our
current
vacancies
I'm
going
to
provide
an
outline
of
our
process
for
this
particular
subject.
There
are
two
steps.
I
would
also
like
to
know
and
I
am
being
supported
tonight
by
our
elections,
administrator
John
Morris.
C
Second
I
will
ask
the
mayor
to
open
the
public
hearing
close
it
when
complete
and
turn
the
discussion
back
to
me
to
provide
counsel
with
guidance
on
how
the
nomination
and
appointment
process
will
proceed.
John.
If
you
will
now
present
the
slides
for
me
for
the
first
board
before
we
begin
I
wanted
to
just
know,
for
the
record,
we
had
29
open
seats
this
year,
60
applications
were
received
and
19
were
deemed
ineligible
or
withdrawn
before
or
after
the
interview
process
began.
C
First,
board
we
want
to
review
is
our
Arts
Commission.
We
have
two
seats
available
for
that
commission.
The
first
seed
is
seat
number
one
to
appoint
a
member
to
an
unexpired
three-year
term
through
331
2026
and
the
second
C
to
seek
three
and
that's
appointing
a
member
to
a
five-year
term.
Through
331-28
we
have
two
candidates
that
have
applied
and
deemed
eligible
show:
cardazzo
and
Jeffrey
cash.
C
C
Next,
we
will
review
our
cannibal
licensing,
Advisory
Board
statistics
C3
is
open
and
that
is
to
appoint
a
member
to
a
five-year
term
through
320
338
28.
That
member
must
be
a
marijuana
or
hemp
business
owner
seat.
Five
is
to
appoint
a
member
to
also
a
five-year
term
through
331-28.
That
seat
must
be
filled
with
a
health
education
person
that
has
that
background
for
seat
three.
We
have
eligible
candidate,
Ethan,
Daniel
and
Kyle
Kraft
for
seat
five
Penny
Feinberg
Thomas
kuntzman,
who
has
been
a
member
of
that
board
since
331
2020,
and
also
David
Timken.
C
Next,
we
have
the
design,
Advisory
Board
seat.
Two
is
to
appoint
a
member
for
a
five-year
term
through
331-28.
They
must
be
a
design,
professional
and
also
C3
is
for
again
a
five-year
term
through
the
same
period
and
also
must
be
a
design
professional.
We
have
Rory,
please
forgive
me
blocking
corrects,
but
little
kervich.
Thank
you.
Rory
has
been
a
member
since
320
2018
on
seat
three
in
seat
three,
and
we
also
have
a
new
applicant
Steven
Eckert.
C
Next
we
have
our
environmental
Advisory
Board
seat
two
is
to
appoint
member
a
member
for
a
five-year
term
through,
of
course,
the
term
period
of
331-28
and
C4
is
a
to
appoint
a
member
to
an
unexpired
one-year
term.
Through
331-24
we
have
two
applicants:
Alexandra
Rothwell
and
Michael
San
Clements
Michael
has
been
a
member
since
3
20,
2018.
C
Next
is
our
housing
reward
is
to
appoint
a
member
to
an
unexpired
one-year
term
through
331,
2024
and
seat.
Five
is
to
appoint
a
member
to
a
five-year
term
through
3
31
2028..
We
have
five
eligible
candidates:
Yvonne
Durbin,
Nicholas,
Hartman,
Karen,
Hoskin,
Karen,
clearman
and
Anna
pavalentco
Anna
has
also
applied
for
the
human
relations
Commission.
C
Our
human
relations
commission.
Appointments
are
two
seats.
Seat.
Three
is
for
a
member
to
be
appointed
for
a
five-year
term
through
331-28
seat.
Four
is
to
appoint
a
member
to
an
unexpired
one-year
term
through
331-24.
Again,
Anna
has
applied
to
that
board,
as
she
has
with
the
other
I'm
sorry,
housing,
Advisory,
Board
and
fakir
Jakob,
who
is
currently
a
member
and
has
been
a
member
since
4-1
2022.,
our
landmarks
board,
we
have
C3
and
C4
C4
is
to
I
mean
I'm.
C
Sorry
C3
is
to
appoint
a
member
for
a
five-year
term
through
331
28
must
be
an
art,
have
an
architecture,
historic
preservation
or
urban
planning.
Professional
C4
is
to
appoint
a
member
to
a
one-year
unexpired
term
through
331-24
we
have
one
eligible
candidate,
John
Decker
John
has
been
a
member
of
that
board.
Since
3
18
2018.
C
C
C
Our
Parks
and
Rec
Advisory
board
has
two
seats:
seat
three
is
and
seat.
Four
are
both
for
the
same
exact,
identical
term
to
appoint
member
for
a
five-year
term.
Through
three
Thirty
One
Twenty
Eight.
We
have
seven
eligible
candidates:
Andrew
Bernstein
Patricia
is
inser
Clifford
Moss,
Jennifer,
Robbins,
Anna,
segur,
Heather,
Smith
and
Matthew
Vader.
C
C
C
B
O
What
what's
the
the
formality,
all
the
time,
I
don't
get
it
individual
yeah,
I'm,
Lynn,
yeah,
John
Decker
for
the
landmarks
board,
Carl
Lawrence
for
the
tab
and
John
gristle
for
osbt
and
I
have
something
much
worse
than
the
description
that
Evan
described
to
you
of
evil
or
even
beyond
evil,
and
that
is
you
lack
many
of
you
lack
the
c
word.
Curiosity,
you
lack
curiosity,
there's
nothing
that
could
be
said.
That
is
worse
than
claiming,
that
of
this
board
of
this
Council.
B
Thank
you,
Lynn,
sorry
for
the
formality,
but
thanks
for
your
testimony,
okay,
so
we'll
bring
this
back
to
council
for
a
discussion
on
this
John.
Is
this
when
you're
going
to
walk
us
through
the
process,
or
are
you
sure
you
can
do
that
I'm.
B
C
That's
okay,
he's
here
to
support
me
and
he's
doing
a
fabulous
job.
I
will
now
outline
the
instructions
on
how
this
process
will
go
and
please
be
reminded
that
it
is
outlined
and
detailed
in
our
bow
to
Revised
Code
and
in
your
agenda
materials.
C
We
will
proceed
through
nominations,
one
board
or
commission
at
a
time,
in
alphabetical
order
by
board
title
council,
members
will
make
nominations
to
fill
vacancies
one
seat
at
a
time
once
nominations
for
the
seat
have
been
made
by
council.
Members
council
is
welcome
to
discuss
with
each
other
before
taking
final
action.
C
If
only
one
person
is
nominated
for
a
seat,
that
deployment
will
stand.
If
there
are
no
objections,
if
more
than
one
person
is
nominated
for
the
same
seat,
we
have
a
specific
process
for
narrowing
the
candidates
down
to
one
finalist.
A
voting
support
will
be
held
for
each
individual.
Nominated
candidates
must
receive
a
minimum
of
five
votes
to
be
declared
the
finalists
for
a
vacancy.
C
C
C
C
B
Y
Because
yeah
yeah
I
think
that's,
we
may
have
been
inconsistent,
yeah
right,
but
I
think
I.
Think
Lauren's.
B
B
Well,
if
we
can
dive
into
it,
then
please,
and
so
we
have
the
Arts
commission.
We
have
a
five-year
term
and
a
three-year
term,
so
I
would
accept
nominations
for
the
five-year
term.
Bob.
F
J
B
Y
Y
On
behalf
of
Arts
organizations
on
behalf
of
the
company
that
he
works
for
so
I
think
he's
going
to
be
uniquely
qualified
to
make
decisions
to
make
arts
grants
to
organizations
here
in
town
he's
been
doing
it
for
many
years
already.
X
On
thank
you.
I
really
appreciated
Cheryl's
experience
working
with
youth
as
an
educator
and
I
also
thought
she'd
hit
the
nail
on
the
head
within
her
application
when
she
recognized
the
cost
of
housing
and
venue
space
as
major
threats
to
our
Arts
community
and
her
definition
of
active
engagement
with
communities
that
are
up
to
underrepresented
in
our
Arts
Community
was
very
aligned
with
our
City's
Equity
goals.
B
A
B
B
And
Nicole
and
I
can
hear
how
you're
really
not
feeling
well
and
you
have
my
sympathies
and
our
sympathies,
but
I
think
you're
gonna
have
to
keep
your
camera
on
for
our
hand,
votes,
okay,
so
all
in
favor
of
Jeffrey
cash
raise
your
hand.
B
B
X
Well,
I
did
just
want
to
not
make
a
nomination,
but
maybe
appreciate
the
other
candidate
for
their
service.
I.
Think
Jack
has
done
a
really
great
job
on
this
board,
and
you
know
my
interest
in
not
nominating,
but
supporting
Drew
has
more
to
do
with
just
making
sure
that
there's
a
opportunity
for
people
to
rotate
new
people
to
rotate
onto
these.
Our
boards.
E
Y
I
agree,
Lauren
and
Jack
has
done
a
wonderful
job
and
we
really
appreciate
his
service
and
I.
Think
in
addition
to
what
Lauren
said
there
is
has
been
at
least
a
tradition
on
this
Council
that
if
a
person
has
served
a
full
five-year
term
and
if
there
is
another
applicant
that
we
tend
to
pick
that
other
applicant
for
the
reasons
that
Lauren
stayed
in.
B
F
B
Any
others
seeing
none
Ethan
Daniel
will
get
the
marijuana
business
owner
seat,
and
now
we
have
seat
five.
This
person
must
have
a
health
or
education
background,
I
got
Tara
and
then
Rachel.
B
AC
Okay,
I,
don't
really
feel
good.
Maybe
Rachel
wants
to.
J
Give
it
a
try,
yeah
I,
think
that
Thomas
kuntzman
Dr
kunzman
probably
has
done
a
really
good
job
on
the
board,
and
we
only
created
that
board
three
years
ago,
so
he
has
not
gotten
a
full
five-year
term
yet.
J
So
this
is
a
bit
unlike
the
situation
where
you're
renewing
someone
for
a
five-year
term,
where
they've
already
served
and
that
that
board
has
been
had
some
Growing
Pains
I
would
say
they
had
some
turnover
early
on
in
the
chair
position
and-
and
we
are
getting
ready
to
so
I-
think,
look
at
some.
J
Some
bigger
issues
coming
out
of
the
board
with
hospitality
and
things
so
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
keep
some
keep
building
on
the
institutional
knowledge
there,
while
it's
still
finding
its
footing
and
and
he's
done
a
great
job
thanks
Lauren.
X
Thank
you,
I
I
do
know
Penny
personally,
she
is
on
our
HOA
board
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
really
appreciate.
If
you've
ever
served
on
an
HOA
board,
you
know
how
fraught
those
situations
can
be,
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
really
appreciate
her
about
her
is
her
ability
to
bring
calm
and
understanding,
and
especially
as
we
have
some
difficult
issues
coming
forward
on
this
board.
X
I
think
that
she
would
be
a
great
fit.
I
also
really
appreciate
her
more
holistic
health
background.
B
J
Do
as
Lauren
did
with
the
last
board
when
I
say
that
all
the
applications
of
the
applicants,
even
if
not
nominated,
were
really
outstanding
and
I.
Think
that's
probably
true
for
everyone.
We're
going
to
be
talking
about
tonight.
So
I
hope
that
people
will
feel
free
to
reapply
next
year
because
there
have
been
some
really
good
applicants
that
aren't
getting
appointed
agreed.
B
AD
W
F
B
Okay,
well,
you
haven't
said
anything
yet
Junior.
Do
you
want
to
speak
to
your.
AD
Yes,
okay,
thank
you.
Well,
I
think
he
would
be
a
great
addition
to
the
design
Advisory
Board
because
of
his
work
experience
and
also
passion.
He
has
over
20
years
of
work
experience
as
an
architect
and
he's
had
his
own
practice
for
18
years
and
as
part
of
our
conversation
when
I
asked
them.
What
was
one
of
the
main
issues
here
in
Boulder,
he
talked
about
affordable
housing
and
he
also
you
know.
AD
F
X
Gonna
do
the
same
thing.
I
did
last
time.
So,
even
though
I'm
not
nominating
Rory
I
do
want
to
really
appreciate
him
for
the
service.
I
know
that
we
have
two
seats,
but
just
because
we
are
only
voting
on
The
Five-Year
seat
and
we'll
probably
appoint
by
acclimation
at
the
other.
One
Rory
has
been
a
great
board.
X
Member
I
had
the
pleasure
of
serving
with
him
on
design,
Advisory
Board,
and
he
did
serve
a
full
term,
I
believe,
and
so
this
is
sort
of
more
in
the
spirit
of
ensuring
that
we
do
get
a
variety
of
different
points
of
view
on
our
boards
and
commissions.
B
I
just
have
to
chime
in
and
think
Rory
for
his
service,
looking
forward
to
pointing
him
to
a
four-year
term,
and
then
I've
known
Stephen
personally
and
professionally
for
about
20
years
and
can
vouch
for
the
high
quality
of
him
as
an
individual
and
as
an
architect
and
very
excited
to
get
him
on
the
sport.
B
B
J
B
I'm
sure
we'll
get
some
disagreements
here
at
some
point:
okay,
housing,
Advisory,
Board:
we've
got
a
five-year
term
and
a
one-year
term
Bob.
B
Y
Yeah
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
serving
on
the
for
three
years
on
the
boulder
housing
Partners
board
with
Karen
clearman.
She
was
actually
chair
during
the
time.
I
was
on
the
board.
Karen
has
deep
deep
knowledge
on
housing
having
served
on
the
older
housing
Partners
board
for
many
many
years,
and
she
has
a
deep,
deep
knowledge
of
Finance
matters
as
serving
as
a
senior
officer
with
Wells,
Fargo
and
so
I
can't
imagine
a
resume.
That's
and
she's.
Y
Just
a
super
super
nice
person,
so
I
can't
imagine
a
resume
better
suited
to
help
us
navigate
our
housing
challenges
which
both
have
housing
components
and
financial
commence.
So
I
think
Karen
would
be
ideal.
I
think
these
other
candidates
are
also
great
and
I
know
that
we'll
be
putting
at
least
one
other
to
a
one-year
term,
but
I
I.
Think
Karen
is
the
is
the
superlative
candidate
here.
X
So
I
don't
have
my
full
notes
with
me
and
I'm
going
to
be
doing
this
for
memory,
so
I
apologize
if
I
get
something
wrong
or
miss
something.
But
I
would
I'm
supporting
Karen,
because
I
know
her
personally
through
a
communications
class
actually
I
took
through
the
city,
but
also
through
her
position
with
Board
of
the
co-housing
board
for
the
co-housing.
X
You
for
which
she
served
as
the
Director
and
also
her
lived
experience
in
co-housing
I
think
that
she
has
a
variety
of
skills
and
a
diverse
background
in
housing
types
that
we
don't
always
have
as
much
experience
with
so
I.
Look
forward,
I'm
appreciate
her
applying
and
would
like
to
nominate
her
for
those
reasons.
B
Great
and
Nicole.
V
V
B
Great
and
so
I
think
we'll
probably
only
have
one
round
of
speeches
before
we
go
to
a
couple
rounds
of
voting,
so
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
chime
in
here
I
I
was
also
impressed
by
Yvonne.
B
She
has
some
really
interesting
ideas
and
backgrounds
and
and
I
will
not
be
voting
for
her
this
evening,
but
look
forward
to
her
reapplying
to
housing
or
something
else
another
board
next
year,
because
I
think
she
could
help
our
city
very
well
and
Karen,
Hosk
and
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
knowing
for
a
number
of
years,
also
both
personally
and
professionally,
and
her
lived
experience
is
an
affordable
housing
resident,
as
well
as
with
different
kinds
of
housing.
B
Organizations
like
The
Coho
us
that
you
mentioned
I,
think
will
serve
the
city
extremely
well
and
then
we're
fortunate
that
Karen
clearman
applied
to
this
board.
She
has
spent
years
working
on
improving
housing
in
our
community,
including
Boulder
housing
partner
board
for
many
years.
So
looking
forward
to
getting
some
great
folks
appointed
all
right,
so
I
believe
we're
in
Reverse
alphabetical
order.
This
time,
all
right,
very
good,
so
Karen
clearman.
B
See
we
got
I
think
is
that
six,
okay,
very
good,
so
Karen
clearman
gets
the
first
spot
for
five
years
and
then
we're
gonna
go
in
alphabetical
this
time,
so
Yvonne
Durbin
I
got
one
where's,
the
oh
there's
Nicole,
sorry,
Nicole
I
didn't
see
your
hand
first,
two
for
Yvonne,
so
Karen
Hoskin
gets
the
one
year
turn
okay
great.
B
So
that
was
a
song
to
human
relations.
Commission
we
got
two
seats.
The
first
one
is
a
five-year
term
nominations
Matt.
G
W
I'd
like
to
nominate
fakira
Jacob
for
the
five-year
term
did
great
on
that
first
year
that
we
appointed
him
last
year,
so
I
think
allowing
a
full
term
is,
is
absolutely
appropriate
and
well
deserved.
B
All
right
seeing
none
that
gives
secure
the
five-year
term
and
Anna
the
one-year
term
and
unless
anybody
has
anything
else
to
say
no
very
good.
That
gives
us
human
relations
landmarks
board.
So
we
have
two
seats
open
here
and
one
applicant,
and
here
I
guess
we
do
have
a
bit
of
a
decision,
because
John
Decker
qualifies
for
both
The
Five-Year
professional
seat
and
also
the
one-year
General
seat.
But
I
guess
I'll
start
with
the
The
Five-Year
professional
seat
and
see
if
he
gets
a
nomination
here
since
we're
starting
with
the
longer
terms.
B
Okay,
see
I
mean
seeing
no
objections,
then
we
can
grant
John
the
the
five-year
term
and
thank
him
for
reapplying
he's
done
a
great
job
on
that
board.
So
far,.
AC
B
Very
good,
any
other
nominations.
B
Seeing
none
congrats
to
Miriam
for
the
library,
commission
and
I'll
just
make
a
note
if,
if
Miriam
or
anyone
else
interested
in
library
is,
is
listening,
the
library
commission,
we
still
have
to
determine
its
final
fate,
but
it
will
most
likely
not
be
doing
much
after
a
year
from
now
when
the
library
district
is
fully
formed.
So
if
folks
are
interested
in
participating
in
the
future
of
the
library
district,
the
application
period
is
open
right
now
for
the
library
district
trustees,
so
encourage
you
to
go
find
that
out
on
the
severe
the
Cummings
website.
J
I
I
didn't
draft
anything,
but
you
know:
I
knew
several
of
the
candidates
for
open
space
board
and
and
was
was
probably
not
expecting
to
support
Brady
at
the
beginning
of
this
process
and
then
had
a
lengthy
conversation
with
him
and
watched
his
Ted
Talk
and
reviewed
his
application
and
and
I
just
feel
like
we're
very
lucky
that
someone
of
of
that
caliber
of
expertise
in
open
space
you
know
nationally
and
internationally
is-
is
willing
to
give
their
time
and
so
I
feel
grateful
that
he
has
applied
and
hope
we
appoint
him.
F
X
X
H
B
A
tough
one,
we've
got
a
lot
of
really
well
qualified
applicants,
so
I
had
a
chance
to
speak
with
Mason
as
well
and
was
really
impressed
with
his
deep
familiarity
with
open
space
issues
and
I
know
would
do
a
good
job
on
the
board.
I
will
be
supporting
Brady
Robinson
this
evening
because
of
the
depth
of
his
resume
and
how
many
different
projects
on
what
how
many
different
very
high
levels
he's
worked
on.
B
Harmon
Zuckerman
had
an
excellent
application
and
has
served
the
city
well
in
the
past,
on
on
planning
board,
so
appreciate
his
application,
as
well
as
John
gerstel's
for
his
many
years
of
service
on
the
city's
planning
board,
the
County
Planning
Commission
and
a
variety
of
other
service
in
our
community,
and
that
brings
us
to
a
vote
unless
anybody
else
says
anything
else
say
where:
where
are
we
now
Alicia
alphabetically,
all
in
favor
of
Mason
Roberts?
B
J
I'll
nominate
Anna
Seeger.
She
has
been
very
active
in
advocating
my
whole
time
on
Council
for
the
the
focus
on
equity
in
our
parks
department,
especially
for
kids
and
I,
happen
to
know.
Anna
and
I
think
she'd
bring
a
real,
strong,
Equity
lens
to
the
board.
B
AC
I'm
going
to
nominate
Jennifer
Robbins
do
my
speech
now.
I
was
really
impressed
with
her
desire
to
work
on
facilities
and
maintenance,
as
one
of
the
key
components
of
you
know:
good
parks,
department
and
also
her
dedication
to
children.
She
was
with
the
Girl
Scouts
I
really
enjoyed
her
interview
very
much
so
I
nominate
her.
B
Any
others
see
none
I
believe
were
reverse
alphabetical
at
this
point.
That.
B
W
I
nominate,
Kurt,
nordback
I'll
be
brief,
but
by
no
way
is
my
briefness,
an
indication
of
just
how
qualified
and
awesome
Kurt's
going
to
be.
But
Kurt
has
been
steadfast
on
just
about
everything
in
our
built
environment.
In
many
ways
knows
Title
IX
better
than
just
about
anybody
in
the
community,
and
so
just
a
wealth
of
experience
and
knowledge
and
perspective.
So
I
think
Kurt
would
be
tremendous.
B
Y
Well,
I
I
had
the
honor
of
nominating
last
year,
Trini
willerton
to
a
one-year
term.
We
had
a
stub
term
last
year
and
and
we
were
able
to
get
a
training
in
on
that
I'm.
So
I'm
delighted
to
nominate
Trini
for
a
full
five-year
term.
I
think
many
of
you
know
the
Trini
almost
died
in
a
automobile
incident
and
she
let
started
an
organization
called.
It
could
be
me
and
I
think
I
can't
think
of
anybody
in
our
community.
Y
That
would
be
better
to
represent
us
on
the
transportation
board
than
somebody
who
is
fighting
for
the
rights
of
of
all
people
who
are
transporting
across
our
our
community,
regardless
of
the
mode.
B
Seeing
none
it
goes
to
Trinity
and
I'm,
also
very
grateful
for
her
service
and
that
she
stepped
up
to
serve
for
a
longer
term.
We're
very
fortunate.
All
right.
We
got
one
appointment
for
a
five-year
term
to
grab
nominations
come
on,
you
can
do
it
Bob
well,.
B
I
B
W
I'd
like
to
express
how
emotionally
damaged
I
am
through
this
process
and
how
exhausted
and
beat
up
I
feel
so,
no
in
all
seriousness,
this
was
this
was
just
I
wish.
We
had
more.
Applicants
is
the
only
thing
about
this
process.
That
I
would
say
is
is
a
frustration
but
I
think
we
have
some
work
to
do.
W
I
think
it'll
be
great
to
work
with
staff
in
the
community
to
sort
of
build
our
pool
of
candidates,
and
certainly
if
we
do
a
mid-year
appointment
and
into
next
year,
I
will
just
throw
in
a
plug
not
that
it
would
have
even
applied
this
year,
because
it
was
so
brief
and
easy.
But
I
would
love
us
to
consider
using
instant
runoff
ranked
Choice.
E
W
W
Anyway,
so
I'll
just
throw
that
out.
There
there's
some
great
tools
to
use
and
it
would
be
a
way
for
us
and
the
community
to
further
vet
and
and
display
that
voting
method.
But
we
can
save
that
for
maybe
a
mid-year
or
next
year's
appointments.
B
I'm
guessing
somebody's
very
in
the
Weeds
on
ranked
Choice
voting
at
the
moment
and
now.
C
B
J
To
reiterate
my
gratitude
for
everyone
who
applied
and
and
invite
people
to
reapply
next
year-
and
it
was
a
little
frustrating
this
year-
that
we
had
some
boards
with
a
lot
of
great
applicants
and
so
I
would
encourage
people
also
to
think
about
applying
next
year
for
more
than
one
board,
if
they're
interested,
because
that
helps
us
to
get
great
people
in
positions
where
they
can
help
the
city.
So,
thanks
to
everyone
who
applied
and
please
come
back.
Y
Sorry
well
I'm
actually
trying
to
kill
time
because
I
predicted
an
8
45
end
of
this
meeting
and
at
the
speed
we're
going
right
now
we're
going
to
end
sooner
than
that
so
I'm
just
trying
to
kill
some
time
here.
Talk
really
slowly,
because
we
only
have
one
more
item,
but
actually
I
was
seriously
I
did
have
something
for
Nuria
I.
Y
Think
we're
all
aware
of
the
fact
that
we
had
probably
fewer
applicants
this
year
than
we've
had
in
Prior
years
and
I
think
there's
actually
been
a
trend
the
last
two
or
three
years,
and
that
signals
to
us
that
there's,
maybe
something
not
right
or
not
entirely,
inviting
or
welcoming
to
for
our
boards
and
commissions
process
and
really
I.
Wonder
if
you
could
I
know
that
you're
about
to
launch
a
bit
of
a
process
to
evaluate
our
boards
and
commissions.
Y
You
know
it
could
be
anything
from.
Do
we
have
too
many
do
are
the
terms
too
long,
those
types
of
things.
Could
you
speak
a
little
bit
as
we
kill
time
here
so
I
can
get
my
845
prediction
about
what
you're
going
to
be
doing
here
to
help
us?
Maybe
evaluate
our
boards
and
commissions
holistically
sounds.
T
Good
and
as
I
do
that
maybe
I'll
invite
staff
to
transition
so
that
we
get
to
the
next
issue
as
well.
So
a
couple
things
we
have
talked
about
boards
and
commissions
for
a
while,
and
we
are
going
to
be.
Thank
you
John.
We
are
going
to
be
having
a
consultant.
Take
a
look
at
that
the
issue
of
boards
and
commissions
and
is
not
new
to
cities.
T
There
are
certainly
some
Consultants
that
have
looked
at
a
variety
of
issues
whether
our
city
has
too
many,
in
which
case
that
pool
starts
to
wane,
because
it
is
a
time
commitment.
Looking
at
the
terms,
as
you
mentioned,
because
a
five-year
term
is
indeed
a
commitment
and
a
lot
of
other
cities
have
gone
to
one
two
or
three
year
terms
to
alleviate
that,
because
it
is
or
can
be
daunting
to
some
to
to
commit
to
a
five-year
term.
T
There
are
other
issues
that
I
know:
staff
is
looking
at
as
well,
and
while
these
are
voluntary
boards,
are
there
additional
ways
to
support
from
stipends
to
potential
child
care
to
parking
to
Transportation?
Those
are
all
items
that
other
cities
certainly
have
struggled
with.
Those
all
come
with
a
price
tag
as
well
and
the
more
commissions
and
and
members
that
you
have
the
more
that
price
tag
goes
up,
and
so
those
are
decisions
that
we'll
be
bringing
forward
as
we
move
as
we
bring
that
to
you.
T
The
other
question
I
know
that
other
cities-
and
this
will
be
something
that
we
hope
that
a
consultant
will
help
us
with,
is
really
looking
at
the
scope
of
the
boards.
There
are
some
boards
that
really
might
have
overlapping
Scopes,
and
that
would
be
a
really
interesting
opportunity
to
think
of.
Do
we
really
need
to
rethink
and
maybe
eliminate
two
to
create
one
that
actually
has
sort
of
a
different
or
a
broader
level
of
scope,
just
because
of
the
nature
of
the
issue,
so
I
think
everything
is
on
the
table.
T
T
I
actually
I,
don't
recall
right
now,
I'm
thinking
it's
sometime
towards
the
latter
part
of
the
year,
but
I
can
certainly
get
back
to
you.
Do.
X
C
Yes,
I
can
start
that
and
John.
If
you
want
to
add
anything,
please
feel
free
to.
It
is
typical.
We
normally
have
about
a
10
percent
group
or
10
amount
of
applications
that
are
deemed
ineligible.
X
AB
Just
to
add
to
Alicia's
remarks
the
one
other
requirement
we
have
that
has
been
disqualifying.
People
is
a
one-year
residency
requirements,
that's
something
we
also
have
to
look
at
in
terms
of
our
recruitment.
We
followed
past
precedent
and
I
anticipated
this
question
to
come,
so
we
we
hit
it
in
the
memo
a
little
bit,
but
just
for
the
public
listening
and
staff
to
outline
kind
of
how
we
do
things.
AB
Basically,
the
way
we
start.
You
know
we
have
our
timeline,
December
19th
to
January
30th,
and
we
just
immediately
reach
out
to
our
Communications
and
engagement
department,
and
they
just
start
to
hit
the
airwaves
on
all
our
social
medias,
the
major
ones,
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
next
door,
and
they
during
that
they're
putting
out
notifications
before
during
and
right
before,
the
conclusion
of
our
recruitment.
In
addition
to
that,
our
Communications
team
has
published
an
online
news.
Article
they've
also
sent
out
advertisements
in
the
city
e-newsletter
in
mailed
newsletters.
AB
We
also
include
temporary
ribbons
on
multiple
City
websites,
including
the
city
council
website,
the
clerk's
website,
boards
and
commissions
website,
vol
to
your
website
events
website
and
from
there
Channel
8.
That's
playing
this
has
a
ribbon
for
boards
and
commissions
going
continuously
throughout
the
entirety
of
recruitment.
We
had
physical
Flyers
placed
at
our
recreation
centers
in
the
municipal
building
and
then
lastly,
we
notify
our
boarding
commission,
secretaries
and
Liaisons
to
tell
their
boards
internally
we're
recruiting
to
reapply
and
to
get
the
word
out.
X
I
know
previously,
we
had
discussed
on
the
boards
and
commission
subcommune
subgroup
sort
of
reaching
out
specifically
to
like
for
Boza
or
dab
to
professional
related
industry
related
groups.
Things
like
that
is
and
I
think
we
had
done
that
last
year.
To
some
extent
is
that
something
we
did
this
year
and
is
that
maybe
something
we
should
talk
about
working
with
our
boards
and
commissions
to
come
up
with
a
more
concrete
list
that
we
might
so
it's
because
I
feel
like
that.
C
What
we've
normally
done
in
the
past
is
rely
on
the
boards
and
commission
secretaries
and
Liaisons
and
their
board
members
to
to
actually
give
us
suggestions
or
go
ahead
and
put
that
information
out
to
those
particular
organizations,
because
with
20
boards
and
commissions,
it
would
be
hard
for
us
to
actually
Wrangle
that
information
and
actually
respond
to
it.
So
we
do
rely
on
them
to
actually
promote
that
kind
of
campaign.
But
of
course,
if
we
did
get
a
list
and
we
could
assist
in
any
way,
we
would
but
again
we
do
rely
on
them.
W
Rachel
thanks
John
for
that
update,
I
mean
it's
pretty
comprehensive.
The
the
work
that
we're
doing,
I
I
would
say:
there's
maybe
a
couple
places
I
didn't
hear.
So
if
we're
doing
it
awesome,
but
just
for
clarity,
one
would
be.
Is
we
have
some
very
active
Civic
groups
in
our
community
and
so
I
think
that
if
there's
ways
in
which
we
could
maybe
directly.
W
To
do
some
specific
Recruitment
and
whether
that's
just
helping
them
with
messaging
or
getting
it
out
or
or
maybe
hosting
some
sort
of
just
q,
a
about
boards
and
commissions
or
or
something
like
that.
You
know
I.
Think
of
some
of
our
groups,
like
you
know,
plan
Boulder
or
better
Boulder
and
some
of
them.
You
know
that
have
been
active
and
Community
cycles
and
Sierra
Club
those
groups
and
there's.
W
But
maybe
those
would
be
just
a
helpful
way
to
because
they've
got
a
engaged
membership
and
so
I
think
those
would
be
helpful.
The
other
one
I
didn't
hear
and
I
want
to
check
on
is.
Are
we
leveraging
our
community
connectors
to
do
some
of
that
really
sort
of
deeper
Outreach
to
sort
of
help
find
some
recruits
to
folks
that
otherwise
either
might
have
barriers
or
entry
or
just
not
quite
know,
through
our
normal
communicating
channels
that
we've
got
openings
and
would
value
their
input.
C
I
do
I
do
know.
We
have
been
working
with
our
comms
department
and
I
know
they
have
been
asking
for
the
assistance
of
the
community
connectors
now
to
what
level
I
we
don't
know,
but
we
have
been
working
with
comms
and
they
have
been
our
primary
resource
for
what
we
wanted
to
get
out
there
and
how
fast
we
wanted
to
get
it
out
there
and
and
how
much
we
wanted
to
get
it
out
there.
J
I
want
to
say,
I,
I
think
everybody's,
a
little
frustrated
that
the
numbers
were
low
this
year,
but
I
think
it's
kind
of
awesome,
I.
Think
it's
a
chance
for
us
to
like
flip
the
script
and
and
say
wow.
This
isn't
working
and
and
I
think
what
a
my
first
week
on
Council
I
talked
with
the
former
city
manager
about
like.
Could
we
have
our
boards
and
commissions
members
have
like
we
get?
J
You
know,
Eco
passes
and
Rec
Center
passes,
or
at
least
email
addresses,
and
the
answer
was
no
like,
not
even
the
emails,
so
you
know
I
think
we
could
what's
up
okay,
great
yeah,
we
got
one
so
there
there's
not
a
lot
of
of
you
know.
I
guess
benefits,
sometimes
to
being
a
board
member
for
a
a
hard
job
and
I.
J
Think
it's
even
harder
in
this
current
political
environment,
where
you
know
often
things
turn
toxic,
so
I
will
say:
I'm
I'm
glad
that
we
have
a
chance
to
you
know
with
the
Consultants
regroup
and
reorient
and
I
think
that
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
previous
board
recruitment
came
from
people
like
us
and
I.
Don't
think!
J
That's
the
best
way
to
do
it,
because
then
we're
getting
people
who
look
and
think
like
us,
and
it's
not
a
diverse
pool
of
candidates
and
it's
not
people
that
are
really
representative
of
the
community,
so
I
I
love
it
that
we
kind
of
failed
this
year
and
and
and
not
in
the
people
that
we
pointed,
but
in
the
recruitment
process,
to
get
a
lot
of
people
to
apply
so
onward
to
a
much
much
more
diverse,
broad
Outreach.
However,
that
looks
thanks.
AC
I
think
that
going
back
to
what
I
agree
with
you,
100
Rachel
I,
think
going
back
to
something
Lauren
said.
Is
there
are
specific
boards
that
really
do
not
get
a
big
turnout
in
terms
of
candidates
and
dab
design,
Advisory
Board
I
think
for
a
few
few
years
now
correct
Lauren,
they
haven't
gotten
a
lot
of.
AC
We
haven't
even
been
able
to
fill
that
one
seat
right.
So
in
terms
of
the
boards
that
have
the
we
have
the
hardest
time.
Maybe
we
can
look
at
the
different
professional
organizations,
especially
when
the
requirements
are
specific
and
not
just
community
members.
You
know
we
struggle
we'll.
We
we
just
struggle
in
those
areas,
especially
that's
the
first
thing.
I
want
to
say.
AC
The
second
thing
is
is
I'm
wondering
if
somebody
can
talk
about
mid-year
Recruitment
and
we
are,
we
desperately
need
people,
because
we
can
start
right
now
and
asking
people
if
they
consider
to
be
on
our
boards
for
the
mid-year
recruitment,
I'm,
hoping
that
somebody
can
say
what
that
is.
AB
Yes,
so
the
first
thing
that
will
happen
tomorrow
is
we'll
be
sending
emails.
You
know
congratulating
people
on
their
appointments
tonight
and
then
vice
versa,
we'll
be
sending
emails
to
the
people
who
weren't
appointed
and
then
also
encourage
them
to
apply
for
the
remaining
vacancies
coming
up,
which
some
of
them
do
have
requirements,
such
as
being
a
property
owner,
a
representative
that
will
be
sure
to
specify
in
that
I
have
heard
through
the
grapevine.
AB
We
have
some
interested
in
the
uni
Hill
Board,
so
that
looks
like
at
least
one
we
can
fill,
but
hopefully
we
can
strive
to
get
a
few
more
on
there.
C
C
We
have
beverage
licensing,
Authority,
Boulder,
Junction,
Essex
access
districts,
both
parking
and
travel
demand,
the
downtown
management
commission
and
University
Hill,
and
then
we
also
have
several
boards
that
probably
a
couple
of
boards
I
do
remember
that
we
only
had
one
applicant
for
tonight
that
we
will
reopen
where
there
might
be
another
seat.
That
is
available.
B
This
process,
but
no
those
were
all
great
comments
and
we'll
all
continue
to
look
for
ways
to
improve
these
recruiting
processes.
I
do
just
want
to
absolutely
celebrate,
though
the
Fantastic
set
of
candidates
that
we
have
selected
to
go
on
these
boards.
So
no
failure
here,
I
think
we've
got
a
bunch
of
really
wonderful
people
and
from
a
process
perspective,
do
we
not
need
a
motion
to
adopt
this.
B
Okay
and
Terry,
you
have
your
hand
up
again
before
we
go
to
that.
AC
Sorry,
just
real
quick
I
have
to
actually
leave
early
tonight,
so
I
just
wanted
to
alert
Council
and
community
and
staff.
J
Would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
appoint
this
Suite
of
candidates
to
the
boards
as.
M
J
May
I
make
a
one
one
little
statement
in
support
of
my
motion
just
to
further
tank,
your
prediction
of
efficiency.
I,
don't
know
if
it
happened,
while
I
was
in
the
back
room,
but
I
wanted
to
say
a
huge
thank
you
to
the
staff
who
were
involved
in
this.
They
they've
done
a
lot
of
of
changing
in
the
last
few
years
and
the
process
is
getting
better
and
better.
J
C
H
R
B
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right
before
we
move
on
actually
I'm
going
to
call
out
one
thing
from
earlier
this
evening
on
our
consent
agenda,
we
adopted
some
changes
to
our
rules
and
procedures
about
what
to
do.
If
the
mayor
and
the
mayor,
Pro
tem,
are
not
present
at
the
meeting,
and
so
if,
in
that
case,
then
the
last
serving
mayor,
Pro
tem
steps
in
and
if
that
person
is
not
available,
then
the
current
third
person
on
CAC
steps
in
and
we
exclude
remote
people
from
running
in-person
meetings
and
the
reason
I
bring.
AD
C
T
Thank
you
so
much
and
I
will
not
speak
because
I
don't
want
to
jeopardize
councilmember
Yates
predictions
and
so
I
will
send
it
directly
to
Mark
wolf.
AE
We
were
a
bit
worried
following
words
and
commissions
and
what
shape
you
all
might
be
in,
but
it
looks
good
right
now,
so
I'm
happy
to
be
with
you,
I'm
Mark,
wolf
budget
officer
and
I'm
joined
this
evening
by
Sarah
Hancock
principal
budget
analyst.
We
are
discussing
the
reallocation
of
Library
budget
funds
when
we
last
spoke
with
Council
in
August
about
this
process.
AE
It
was
prior
to
the
vote
to
create
the
library
district
and
since
then,
we've
gone
through
a
fairly
extensive
process,
internal
and
with
the
financial
strategy
committee
and
are
at
a
good
inflection
point
in
that
process.
To
come
back
to
you
get
some
feedback
on
where
we're
at
and
some
proposed
next
steps.
AE
Next
slide,
all
right,
so
just
to
recap
a
little
bit
of
information
on
this
slide
on
the
left.
You'll
see
the
library
budget
for
2023,
that
is
about
11
million
dollars
for
for
2023
you'll,
see
within
that
Library
budget
is
about
1.8
million
dollars
in
the
library
fund.
That
Library
fund
was
supported
by
a
.33
dedicated
property
tax
that
was
repealed
last
year
associated
with
the
creation
of
the
Library
District
2023
is
a
transition
year.
AE
And
to
take
you
through
the
process
to
date,
so
again
we
last
spoke
with
you
in
August
voters
weighed
in
in
November,
and
then
we
met
with
the
financial
strategy
Committee
in
December
and
January
to
review
a
prioritization
process
and
criteria
to
review
funding
needs.
So
we
went
through
the
process
of
of
seeking
information
from
departments
you're
familiar
with
looking
at
unfunded
needs.
AD
AF
Thank
you
so
much,
oh
I
didn't
expect
that
to
be
so
loud.
So
just
kicking
you
off
with
how
we
approach
the
process.
We
definitely
cast
a
wide
net
in
thinking
about
the
unfunded
needs
that
we
had.
We
recognized
that
there
were
a
lot
of
needs
that
bar
exceeded
the
available
funding.
10
million
dollars
isn't
that
much
in
this
in
the
grand
scheme.
AF
So
part
of
what
we
wanted
to
do
was
align
that
with
our
budget
process
and
really
think
through
how
we
could
get
down
to
the
programs
that
were
most
aligned
with
our
need
to
advance
Equitable
delivery
of
services
and
then
further
vet
them
to
really
understand
how
those
needs
best
aligned
with
Library
allocation.
So
we
thought
it
was
really
helpful
to
focus
on
that
Equitable
delivery
of
services,
especially
because
these
are
ongoing
dollars
and
we
think
it's
a
really
unique
opportunity
and
we
recognize
it's
a
unique
opportunity
to
fund
some
things
on
that
ongoing
basis.
AF
So,
to
get
a
little
bit
more
into
detail
about
how
we
actually
collected
the
information,
some
of
this
will
be
familiar.
We
did
ask
departments
to
provide
us
with
additional
needs
that
they
had
and
we
really
wanted
to
look
at
this
inventory
and
refine
it
based
on
the
the
equity
that
I
mentioned
earlier.
AF
From
that
point,
we
did
have
some
input
from
FSC
on
some
criteria
and
prioritization
and
I'll
review
those
in
just
a
moment,
but
to
really
get
a
good
idea
of
how
these
fit
into
a
more
a
criteria
that
was
a
little
more
structured,
and
then
we
also
you
know
part
of
what
came
out
of
that
was
that
it
was
a
good
starting
place.
AF
But
there
were
lots
of
questions
that
started
to
come
up
the
qualitative
review,
the
the
questions
about
prioritization
and
and
thinking
about
how
to
take
such
a
big
need
and
funnel
it
down
to
just
these
dollars.
Big
can
to
bring
up
lots
of
policy
issues
that
we
wanted
to
seek
guidance
from
from
Council
on.
So
that's
where
we
are
today
I'm
wanting
to
review
those
policy
areas
with
you
guys.
AF
So
the
criteria
that
we
use
to
look
at
these
programs
that
were
provided
by
the
Departments
were
really
focused
on
the
immediate
need
and
the
type
of
need,
but
also
how
they
fit
in
with
our
Equity
resiliency
framework,
as
well
as
that
Equitable
delivery
of
services.
So
we
looked
at
the
timeliness
of
the
needs
that
were
provided
by
the
departments
were
the
immediate
needs,
were
they
ready
to
be
invested
immediately?
What
kind
of
ongoing
funding
sources
these
were?
I
mean
we
were
really
looking
at
the
this.
AF
Is
that
unique
opportunity
to
continue
to
fund
something
on
an
ongoing
basis?
So
we
really
wanted
to
look
at
those
that
were
long-term
Investments.
The
type
of
need
that
that
we
had
them
aligned
with
were
really.
This
should
be
somewhat
familiar
core
operational.
You
know
those
immediate.
We
have
to
get
them
done,
but
then
also
looking
at
whether
or
not
their
program
expansions
you
know
based
on
established
policy
or
if
these
are
completely
new
programs
that
represent
emerging
needs
in
the
community.
AF
So
to
step
back
out
and
look
at
what
was
actually
submitted
at
a
very
high
level.
We
did
receive
74
individual
funding
needs
from
the
Departments.
They
totaled
just
shy
of
30
million
dollars,
and
the
majority
of
those
were
related
to
ongoing
needs.
So
the
Departments
really
did
think
thoughtfully
about
those
ongoing
needs
and
didn't
just
give
us
one-time
dollar
items.
AF
Additionally,
the
1.4
million
associated
with
one-time
needs
were,
for
the
most
part
associated
with
those
ongoing
needs,
so
maybe
something
that
needed
to
be
purchased
in
the
first
year,
but
then
would
just
need
that
ongoing
support
in
future
years
there's
also
a
breakdown
here
of
how
the
department
self-identified
what
type
of
need
this
was.
So
you
can
see
that
over
half
of
the
Departments
identified
these
as
core
service
needs
and
then
about
30
percent
identified
them
as
service
needs
that
were
associated
with
established
policy.
But
maybe
they
wanted
to
enhance
that
program.
AF
So
the
next
piece
is
really
going
to
be
getting
into
these
policy
issues.
I'm
going
to
start
at
a
high
level
and
I
promise
we'll
dive
into
it
a
little
bit.
But
what
came
up
were
these
four
areas?
They,
some
of
them
overlap,
depending
on
what
the
particular
program
was
from
the
department.
But
overall
we
realized
that
these
actually
presented
a
pretty
strategic
opportunity
for
us
to
start
thinking
about
what
information
could
We
Gather
to
make
very
thoughtful
decisions
about
how
these
funds
are
spent,
especially
because
they
are.
AF
It
is
a
very
small
dollar
amount
in
the
grand
scheme
of
of
our
entire
budget.
So
these
policy
issues
were
formulated
with
FSC
feedback.
So
some
of
you
may
see
this
as
familiar,
but
the
first
one
was
focused
on
our
core
operations,
and
some
of
the
master
planning
that
has
happened
were
used
as
the
bolster
for
those
and
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
about
that.
AF
AF
With
this
general
fund
pot
of
money,
there
were
requests
related
to
arpa
and
other
one-time
funded
programs,
and
then
there
were
also
other
funding
needs
that
we
just
felt
we
needed
to
explore
that
didn't
necessarily
come
through
the
departmental
process
of
collecting
that
information,
so
I'm
going
to
go
into
each
of
these
policy
areas
and
then
also
talk
you
through
the
action
steps
that
we've
identified
to
try
to
remedy
the
policy
areas
and
get
some
guidance
moving
forward.
AF
So
the
first
policy
area
is
related
to
those
core
operations
and
they
all
all
of
the
ones
that
we've
identified
that
fall
into
this
area
point
to
some
sort
of
master
plan
or
policy
adoption
that
is
guiding
the
program.
So
a
couple
of
examples
of
requests
that
we
received
facilities,
maintenance
and
operation
support.
As
you
know,
we
have
a
backlog
of
facilities,
maintenance.
They
did
ask
for
two
to
four
percent
replacement
value
or
an
investment
in
replacement
value,
but
for
this
particular
request
it
was
isolated
to
new
buildings.
AF
AF
You
know
we
have
lots
of
Maintenance
funding
needs
across
the
parks
and
recreation
properties,
and
then
we
also
have
the
long-term
Recreation
activity
fund
sustain
ability,
question
which
overlaps
with
our
dedicated
funding
policy
area.
So
just
lots
of
questions
that
we
that
were
coming
up
as
we
were
reviewing
these,
so
the
action
steps
that
we've
identified
to
kind
of
answer.
AF
These
questions
are
first
to
review
all
of
our
accepted
plans
and
try
to
understand
the
level
of
investment
that
they
are
they're
requesting
or
that
they
are
calling
for
and
then
also
understand
that
full
operational
need,
as
well
as
how
that
impacts
the
master
plan
and
then
using
that
consideration
of
the
total
need
develop.
That
recommendation
for
what
what
programs
best
fit
in
with
this
funding
mechanism.
AF
The
second
policy
area
is
dedicated,
Another
funding
analysis.
So,
as
you
know,
we
have
a
very
diverse
funding
stream.
We
have
lots
of
different
places
that
funds
come
from,
and
so
some
of
these
programs
overlapped
with
general
fund
as
well
as
just
those
very
specific.
You
know
dedicated
funds
that
call
for
certain
uses
of
those
funds.
So
some
examples
are.
We
have
Parks
and
Recreation
maintenance,
Transportation
maintenance,
Planning
and
Development
Wildfire
resilience.
AF
These
are
all
programs
that
do
have
dedicated
funding
sources,
so
this
was
where
we
thought
it
might
be
good
to
take
a
good
look
at
how
these
different
funding
sources,
how
healthy
they
are,
what
the
Outlook
is
for
them,
and
if
the
library
funding
is
actually
the
right
mechanism
or
the
right
lever
to
pool
for
these
type
of
programs,
there's
other
analysis
that
we
wanted
to
get
into
as
well.
There's
some
staffing
level
analysis
going
on
in
the
fire
master
plan.
AF
We've
got
other
plan
components
that
are
being
explored
there,
we're
in
the
process
of
rolling
out
our
underserved
Business
program
and
that's
still
in
the
early
stages.
In
addition
to
that,
there's
just
other
Revenue
sources
out
there,
including
federal
tax
credits,
and
then
we
also
have
several
of
our
programs
that
were
submitted
through
this
process
include
youth
activities,
and
we
know
that
we
have
some
funds
that
are
set
aside
through
the
Bronco
sales
proceeds.
That
might
be
a
good
fit
for
that.
AF
AF
We
are
starting
to
compile
Charter
ballot
and
code
restriction,
language
and
just
also
understanding
any
formal
or
informal
policies
that
might
be
driving
how
we're
utilizing
our
dedicated
spending,
and
then
we
want
to
compare
those
restrictions
to
how
we're
actually
spending
and
budgeting
that
those
funds
and
then
also
analyze
our
fund
financials,
and
really
understand
how
healthy
all
of
these
dedicated
funds
are
in
the
long
term,
which
we
believe
really
aligns
with
the
call
for
this
long-term
Financial
strategy
strategy
and
really
supporting
good
healthy
revenues
for
the
for
the
city.
AF
There
were
quite
a
few
programs
that
were
provided
to
us
that
really
spoke
to
these
one-time,
piloted
programs
that
have
different
timing
implications,
some
of
which
are
going
to
sunset
in
terms
of
funding
on
in
2026,
because
that's
when
the
arpa
funding
sunsets,
some
of
them
are,
you
know,
have
certain
time
frames
where
we
begin
the
funding
so,
for
example,
building
home
we
have
funding
through
2025,
possibly
through
2026..
We
also
have
some
other
items.
AF
There
are
piloted
right
now
that
we
did
through
one-time
dollars
in
the
previous
budget
budget
cycle
so
the
day,
Services
Center,
Behavioral,
Health,
programming,
safe
and
managed
public
spaces
program.
These
are
all
one-time
dollar
Investments.
So
we
want
to
look
a
little
bit
more
into
the
timing
implications
as
well
as
the
outcome
implications.
AF
You
know
how
how
much
of
a
need
is
there?
How
do
we
continue
to
understand
that
emerging
need
for
these
programs
and
how
well
they're
doing
and
how
effective
they
are,
and
you
know,
kind
of
just
really
understanding
the
positive
impact
they're
having
on
our
communities,
so
the
action
items
that
we
have
proposed
to
examine
these
programs
for
permanent
funding
are
to
compile
comprehensive
lists
of
pilot
programs,
which
we
actually
have
also
already
begun.
AF
AF
With
the
caveat
that
some
of
these
have
different
timing
implications
once
again,
some
have
funding
that
start
in
two
years.
So
we
might
not
necessarily
need
that
funding
until
the
third
year
kind
of
thing
and
then
finally-
and
this
is
the
shortest
one-
I
promise-
we
want
to
look
at
potential
other
needs
that
are
not
captured
in
this
process.
AF
Departments
did
a
great
job
of
providing
us
lots
of
programs
that
were
underfunded
or
unfunded,
and
we
just
recognized
that
there
were
some
things
that
might
have
slipped
through
the
cracks
and
we
wanted
to
acknowledge
those
and
make
sure
that
they
were
included
in
consideration
so
that
it,
you
know,
some
ideas
that
came
up
in
discussion
were
snow
removal
ice
operations.
We
know
that
Street
Route
Paving
is
always
going
to
be
something
that
comes
up
continued
support
of
City
staff
and
then
just
other
arpa
funded
initiatives
that
were
not
submitted
through
this
process.
AE
You
all
right,
so
our
proposed
approach,
I'll,
just
summarize
what
Sarah
spoke
to
that
we'd
like
to
continue
to
refine
the
prioritization
with
the
2024
budget
process.
So
we
think
we
can
make
a
lot
of
progress
within
those
action
steps.
There
are
a
lot
of
them,
but
we
do
think
it
will
be
meaningful
to
prioritizing
These
funds
in
the
2024
budget.
We'll
establish
some
of
that
policy,
Direction
based
off
of
that
within
the
recommended
budget
and
be
seeking
your
feedback
as
we
go
through
that
process.
AE
There's
a
couple
different
ways:
we'll
highlight
it
over
the
next
several
months.
One
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
is
that
we
did
have
a
little
discussion
with
Council
back
in
our
last
budget
process
about
having
a
A
Better
Community
engagement
process.
As
we
approach
the
2024
budget.
We
are
planning
that
for
this
year,
specifically
in
an
early
window
working
with
Community
connectors
to
get
some
feedback
on
priorities,
so
we
plan
to
discuss
this
library,
reallocation,
prioritization
and
then
again
in
August,
both
with
Community
connectors
and
a
lot
larger
Community
engagement
through
our
opengov
platform.
AE
So
a
couple
different
ways
to
engage
there
that
we
think
will
be
helpful
for
both
this
process
and
also
the
2024
budget
and
then,
lastly,
we'll
be
working
with
the
financial
strategy
committee.
As
we
approach
the
recommended
budget
date,
release
which
is
currently
scheduled
for
September
1st
and
then
the
last
thing
I'll
mention
before
we
get
to
questions
is
just
we
had
a
really
interesting
conversation,
productive
conversation
with
financial
strategy
committee
yesterday
about
a
longer
term
Financial
strategy,
and
so
we
think
all
of
these
policy
issues
are
really
elements
of
that.
AE
That's
probably
coming
later
this
year
into
early
next
year,
but
I
think
it
really
sets
the
foundation
for
understanding.
What's
a
healthy
Revenue
mix.
That
really
complements
all
of
our
budgeting
for
resilience
work
in
in
looking
at
how
we
spend
our
money
and
making
sure
that
our
dollars
have
the
impact
that
we're
really
seeking
all
right.
So
questions
a
few
of
them
and
happy
to
take
them
in
whatever
order
is
productive.
Starting
with
a
question
about
our
approach
in
refining
the
funding
priorities
based
on
the
further
research
analysis
and
Community
feedback.
AE
Does
council
agree
with
our
recommended
approach
to
seeking
Community
connectors
feedback
related
to
this
process?
Does
council
support
the
approach
of
revisiting
the
priorities
during
the
budget
process
and
then,
lastly,
and
I,
think
we're
really
interested
in
this
question
as
well
is?
Are
there
any
gaps
that
you
see
other
policy
issues
that
we
didn't
raise
or
other
funding
needs
that
we
should
really
be
focused
on
as
we
approach
that
2024
budget
process.
B
So
much
for
that
marking
that
for
that
excellent
presentation
by
the
both
of
you
really
really
appreciate
that
was
very
thorough
and
good
information.
So
what
I
might
suggest
is
I
appreciate
the
detailed
questions
which
we've
absorbed.
Maybe
we
can
start
with
any
questions
that
we
have
for
you
and
then
I
just
might
invite
Council
to
have
give
broad
feedback
on
whatever
portion
of
the
work
that
you're
doing
that
they
might
be
interested
in
so
questions.
B
J
I
figured
my
hand
would
be
up
for
a
while,
so
I'll
go
I,
guess
I'm
I'm,
maybe
a
little
bit
confused
at
this
whole
conversation
because
it
you
know,
10
million
feels
like
such
a
drop
in
the
bucket
for
our
budget,
that
for
us
to
be
looking
at
this
Library
reallocation
but
separately.
When
we're
going
to
fold
it
into
the
2024
budget,
feels
maybe
like
an
exercise
in
futility
for
staff
and
us
so
I.
J
Just
throw
that
out
there
in
terms
of
prioritizing
I,
want
to
note
that
we
many
of
us
had
a
participated
in
a
tribal
consultation
over
the
last
few
days,
which
was
really
awesome,
and
you
know,
gave
us
a
lot
of
food
food
for
thought
and
and
I
I
haven't
processed
it
well
enough
to
like
know
exactly
how
to
draw
it
broadly
into
this
discussion,
but
we'll
just
maybe
invite
others
to
filter
it
and
I
also
happen
to
have
seen
Jane
Goodall
last
night
and
and
she
recommended
that
that
you
know
when
you're,
making
decisions,
you
sort
of
think
about
how
how
it
will
impact
people,
animals
and
the
environment
and
I
haven't
quite
had
time
to
integrate
that
yet.
J
But
I
would
just
invite
us
to
to
think
broadly
about
our
our
budget
and
our
processes
and
our
thinking
as
an
example
from
the
tribal
consultation,
I
I
noticed
a
bridge
that
was
pretty
badly
cracked
today.
J
I
also
happen
to
have
biked
down
Folsom
near
Arapahoe
and
almost
flipped
over
from
a
big
pothole,
and
that
got
me
thinking
about
you
know
in
terms
of
the
the
people
aspects
of
that
the
the
cities
really
do
need
to
first
and
foremost
do
what
cities
are
supposed
to
do,
I
think,
and
so
we
we
do
need
to
kind
of
fill
the
proverbial
potholes
and
so
in
terms
of
priorities
I,
you
know
I
I,
love
all
that
we
did
with
the
arpa
funding
and
and
all
of
our
pilots
and-
and
we
also
need
to
do
Wildfire
mitigation
and
flood
prevention.
J
And
you
know
we
need
to
to
update
the
the
rec
centers
in
a
lot
of
our
buildings.
So
you
know
I,
don't
have
precise,
you
know
comms
and
dollars,
but
I
think
you
know
within
the
the
sort
of
broad
thinking
of
considering
you
know,
multiple
different
groups
of
of
those
impacted
by
the
city
budget.
J
One
is
sort
of
the
the
basics
of
of
you
know:
kind
of
taking
care
of
the
fish
in
the
creek
and
and
the
humans
that
are
trying
to
ride
in
bike
lanes
and
not
have
to
Veer
away
from
potholes.
So
that's
just
general
feedback
for
I'm,
not
sure
why
we're
looking
at
the
specific
10
million.
J
But
when
we
do
look
at
the
big
budget,
make
sure
that
we're
not
losing
the
forest
for
the
trees
and
we
do
need
to
to
do
what
what
all
cities
have
to
provide
to
people
and
then
in
terms
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
including
the
community
connectors
early,
because
that
was
my
request
and
I'm
glad
to
see
that
you're
incorporating
it.
D
Yeah
I'm
kind
of
keying
off
what
Rachel
said
and
I've
gone
back
and
forth
on
this
a
bit
and
thinking
about
it
and
I
I
I'm,
just
not
sure
we're
not
expending
an
inordinate
amount
of
staff,
time
and
resources
to
allocate
a
discrete
source
of
funds
that
represents
under
two
percent
of
the
budget
and
I
and
and
money
is
money
I.
Don't
know
why
this
tent
this
10
million
dollars
is
special.
D
When
it's
going
to
be
folded
into
the
more
General
budget,
the
more
General
budget
may
have
other
holes
in
it
that
we
don't
anticipate
and
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
know
it
we're
expending
a
lot
of
energy
to
treat
this
as
a
discrete
source
of
funding,
and
we
had
no
idea
what
our
other
needs
are
going
to
be
and
again
it's
2024
budget.
So
I,
you
know
I,
don't
quibble
too
much
with
the
priorities,
but
there
should
be
priorities
for
all
of
our
funds
and
I
I.
D
D
This
is
a
an
exercise,
that's
kind
of
interesting.
But
again
you
know
the
money
is,
is
the
money
and
I
don't
know
that
it
should
be
put
into
a
separate
pot
when
we
don't
know
anything
at
this
point
about
our
two
2024
Outlook
and
resources?
O
V
So
my
understanding
and
maybe
Mark
well,
if
you
all,
can
clarify
that
what
is
being
proposed
here
is
to
include
the
library
funds
reallocation
as
part
of
the
broader
budget.
So
it
pretty
much
is
not
treating
it
separate
as
as
that
much
of
a
separate
process,
but
maybe
misunderstanding
so
I
was
just
wondering
if
Mark
Wolff
could
clarify.
AE
Yeah
that
that's
correct,
I
think
our
understanding
was
that
council
did
want
to
have
this
discussion
at
some
point
before
the
2024
budget
process,
and
so
we're
taking
you
through
kind
of
our
thought
process
and
where
we
got
to
is
is
indeed
it
really
should
be
folded
into
the
2024
budget
process.
Because
then
we
we
can
have
that
holistic.
Look
that
both
Mark
and
Rachel
were
speaking
to.
W
I
might
actually
come
at
this
from
a
different
angle
in
the
sense
that
I
I
think
when
we
look
at
our
overall
budget
of
nearly
half
a
billion
dollars,
10
million
seems
like
a
little,
but
when
we
look
at
the
impacts
that
10
million
dollars
can
make
on
certain
aspects
of
the
work
we
do,
it
can
be
transformative
and
so
I
I
think
it's
the
lens
we
use
that
offers
us
the
greatest
insight
as
to
maybe
where
this
money
could
be
best
spent
our
normal
budget
out
process.
W
W
I
I
was
anticipating
that
this
roughly
10
million
dollars
would
be
treated
slightly
different
for
the
opportunity
it
had
to
make
perhaps
a
a
broader
impact
on
our
community,
a
new
impact
on
our
community,
taking
advantage
of
the
lump
sum
that
may
not
otherwise
be
available
for
certain
things,
things
that
we've
just
said.
W
We
won't
do
because
we
don't
have
the
money
so
I,
I
I'd,
love
to
see
this
be
something
we
can
hang
our
hat
on
five
years
down
the
road
after
the
library,
districts
formed
and
say,
look
at
all
the
stuff
we've
did
with
the
library
district
money
or
the
money
that
we
saved
by
forming
a
Library
District
by
folding
it
just
purely
into
the
regular
budget
process.
After
this
year
there
will
be
no
a
legacy
of
that
Evolution
to
a
Library
District,
because
it'll
have
just.
W
Dissolved
into
the
overall
budget
process,
so
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
here.
I
look
back
at
our
Retreat
and
we
talked
about
the
Strategic
opportunities
around
homelessness,
around
planning
and
development
and
I
go.
Why
is
this
money
seems
perfect
to
sort
of
seed,
some
of
those
larger
strategic
things
that
we're
hearing
about
on
a
daily
basis.
I
looked
at
the
greatest
Community
concerns
that
we
hear
about
all
the
time.
W
It's
homelessness,
it's
planning
it's
it's
maintenance
and
services
at
parks
and
rec,
and
then
the
other
piece
would
just
be
like
leveraging
other
funds
and
having
a
big
pot
of
money
that
says
boo.
We
can
give
you
three
dollars
for
everyone.
You
invest
and
say:
hey!
Look.
We
got
three
million
dollars
sitting
right
here.
Bam
and
the
project
that
was
out
of
touch
now
becomes
not
just
in
reach
but
is
now
accessible.
W
B
Y
I
guess
I'm
Matt
I'm
going
to
agree
more
with
Mark
than
than
you
on
this.
If
Joel
Wagner
came
here
next
week
and
said,
oh
my
god
we're
30
million
short
on
sales
tax.
Well,
the
predict
we
completely
screwed
the
predictions,
we're
30
million
short.
Would
you
still
want
to
spend
that
10
million
dollars
on
the
special
project
or
or
whether
you
roll
that
into
our
overall
budget?
Now
there's
this
false
Precision?
Here
we
don't
know
for
10
million
up,
we
could
be
40
million.
Y
B
So
wait
in
a
little
bit
well,
first
of
all,
I
think
you'll
have
done
a
phenomenal
job,
so
I
think
all
the
steps
that
you
laid
out
I
think
look
like
really
good
ones.
The
the
work
that
you
did
in
going
out
to
the
Departments
and
saying
what
are
your
needs
and
hearing
about
those
and
then
funneling
them
in
to
see
what
they're
related
to
the
rough
amount
unless
you
that
we're
anticipating
in
savings
I
think
this
really
great
process,
because
we
do
have
a
change
in
our
budget.
B
So
so
we,
you
know
we're
getting
over
it's
over
five
percent.
You
know
of
of
the
general
fund
right
as
so.
It's
not
not
insignificant.
That's
that's
a
significant
opportunity.
So,
while
I
agree,
you
know
with
some
of
what's
been
said
about
money
is
all
fungible:
it's
not
a
red
dollar
or
a
blue
dollar
they're,
all
green.
B
That
I
think
we.
This
is
a
significant
opportunity,
so
I
appreciate
the
work
that
you're
doing
to
analyze.
What
how
we
might
take
advantage
of
that
that
opportunity,
so
I
think
you're
on
the
right
track
and
and
and
while
of
course
you
know
so
like
so
far
knock
on
something
our
sales
tax
receipts
have
been
up
recently.
B
They
they
could
go
down
or
you
know
we'll,
probably
have
additional
revenues
in
2024
because
our
sales
tax
has
been
doing
well,
so
we'll
have
additional
monies
of
different
types,
but
I
think
it's
still
worth
keeping
in
mind
saying.
Well,
we
were
able
to
move
forward
with
additional
initiatives
that
we
would
not
have
been
able
to
do.
X
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
it
is
a
little
bit
of
a
special
opportunity
because
it's
always
it's
hard
to
claw
back
a
budget
right
there.
Having
this
amount
of
money
that
is
not
currently
budgeted
towards
anything
does
represent
a
significant
opportunity
and
also
I
do
want
to
you
know,
I
think
it's
looking
at
it
in
terms
of
the
larger
budget
and
balancing
you
know,
I
think
you
guys
have
done
a
great
job
of
bringing
forward
really
great
recommendations.
B
W
One
one
other
point:
I
made
I
think
so
Lauren
kind
of
triggered
this
a
little
bit
is
I.
Think
part
of
the
Allure
about
this
roughly
10
million
dollars
is
that
in
our
normal
budget
process,
we
as
a
council
may
be
discretionarily
quobble
over
60
000,
here
30
000
there,
and
so
our
input,
albeit
is
is
more
philosophical.
W
When
it
comes
time
to
the
budget,
we
really
don't
have
much
discretion
as
to
where
that
money
ultimately
ends
up
in
terms
of
the
dollars
the
amount
and
so
I
think
there
was
an
attractiveness
to
seeing
10
million,
because
that
is
two
orders
of
magnitude.
Maybe
three
in
some
instances
more
than
we
ever
get
to
play
with
as
a
council
and
I
don't
say,
play
in.
B
F
W
But
I
mean
in
terms
of
like
sculpting
like
like
I,
think
in
terms
of
how
we
would
manipulate
clay
that
there's
an
opportunity
that
is
just
normally
never
afforded
to
this
body
in
the
way
we've
structured,
our
government
and
and
I
think
that's
what's
attractive
is
to
be
able
to
really
think
big.
That's
normally
not
a
chance
for
us,
because
we
again
talk
about
five
figure
sums,
and-
and
this
is
a
chance
for
a
a
you
know-
a
much
bigger
opportunity.
So
I
think
that's
an
Allure
piece
that
I
wanted
to.
B
Okay,
thank
you
thanks
again
for
all
your
hard
work
on
this
all
right,
I
believe
that
was
our
last
agenda
item.
Any
any
final
thoughts
before
we
wrap
up
here
tonight.
J
I
mean
just
I
want
to
make
Bob
worse.
I
just
wondered
if
we
debriefed
the
the
tribal
consultation
at
all
or
when
that
might
happen
or
I
mean
I.
Think
a
lot
of
us
participated
and
probably
you
know
it
was
an
exciting
thing
and
I
think
if
we
made
some
I,
don't
even
know
what
we're
allowed
to
say.
Frankly,
because
those
are
closed.
B
T
Was
just
about
to
say
that
I
think
that
would
be
great
and
we
should
have
so
part
of
this
will
be
after
the
tribal
consultation
which
a
lot
of
that
does
happened
under
closed
doors
to
reflect
the
confidential
and
sensitive
nature
of
those
intergovernment
relations.
There
will
be
notes
that
are
created.
J
Okay,
Mom
well,
I
will
just
say
that
I
was
I
was
grateful
to
participate.
B
It
was
deeply
yes
to
all
of
those
those
of
us
who
are
privileged
enough
to
attend
anything
else
going
once
and
twice.
Gavel's
closed
8
49
PM
thanks
everybody
for
another
good
meeting.