►
From YouTube: City of Charleston Special PC Meeting: City Plan 2/22/21
Description
City of Charleston Special PC Meeting: City Plan 2/22/21:
Meeting Agenda:
I. Housing analysis findings, continued
II. Spring engagement schedule updates
III. Racial Equity & the City Plan
IV. Public comment
V. Discussion
Click here to download or view meeting slides: https://www.charleston-sc.gov/DocumentCenter/View/28725/Special-PC-Meeting-Slides-Feb-22-2021
A
Fyi
that's
great
and
I
think,
since
we're
not
taking
any
votes
today,
I
don't
think
there's
any
problems
with.
B
A
A
Phillip,
if
you
can
hear
us,
please
make
the
real.
E
C
C
C
Philip,
can
you
make
chloe
stewart
chloe
stewber
parenthese
real
chloe,
the.
C
E
A
Yeah
jimmy,
if
you
go
to
my
name,
says
chloe
stooper,
real
chloe
and
hover
your
cursor
over
it
and
then
go
click
on
more.
It
should
give
you
the
option
to
make
me
host.
D
A
A
F
Assuming
I'm
going
to
open
up
the
meeting
and
then
we're
going
to
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
staff
for
everything
else.
Correct.
F
A
Thanks
everybody
we're
going
to
try
and
keep
this
short.
We
just
wanted
to
share
some
additional
findings
from
our
housing
analysis.
At
our
last
meeting,
we
were
awaiting
some
some
of
our
final
deliverables
from
the
community
data
platform.
So
now
we
have
those
we're
going
to
give
you
some
additional
updates
from
that,
then
I
am
going
to
go
over
very
quickly
our
timeline
for
spring
engagement
and
something
that
wasn't
on
the
agenda
sent
out
previously
we've
added
in.
We
have
special
guests
with
us
during
this
meeting.
A
Some
graduate
students
from
the
college
of
charleston
masters
of
public
administration
program
graduate
assistants
with
the
community
assistance
program.
There
are
working
with
us
on
incorporating
racial
equity
into
the
city
plan,
so
we'll
have
them
introduce
themselves
and
say
a
little
bit
more
about
that
and
and
then
finally,
well,
we
don't
actually
have
anyone
signed
up
for
public
comment,
so
I
don't,
I
don't
think
we'll
we
can
take
that
off
the
agenda.
Nobody
signed
up
all
right
next
slide,
please,
okay,
so
starting
with
housing
analysis
findings.
A
So
I,
after
the
last
time
we
went
over
the
findings
from
the
survey
I
went
through
all
the
open-ended
responses
and
tabulated
those
and
also
pulled
out
some
housing-specific
findings
from
our
listening
session
notes.
So
that's
what
these
slides
are
going
to
be
about
here
then
response
to
the
question.
There
was
two
questions
at
the
beginning
of
the
city
plan
survey.
A
One
was
what
do
you
find
most
challenging
about
living
in
charleston
and
there
were
a
lot
of
answers
related
to
housing
and
the
cost
of
living
in
charleston,
and
this
the
most
common
were
mentioned
in
relation
to
housing
and
sort
of
disparities
in
charleston,
where
segregation
and
racism,
racial
and
income,
inequality
in
inequity,
unaffordable,
high
cost
of
living,
gentrification,
loss
of
diversity,
lack
of
representation,
rapid
growth
and
development
and
homelessness,
and
then
throughout
the
four
housing
labs
that
we
held
in
the
fall.
A
A
So
again,
gentrification
and
displacement
were
mentioned,
other
things
outside
of
housing,
the
price
of
housing
itself
beyond
mortgage
or
rent
cost
of
maintenance,
high
eviction
rates
so
being
able
to
stay
in
housing
barriers
beyond
that.
So
background
checks
and
other
things
that
limit
people's
entry
into
available
housing,
people
stuck
in
substandard
housing
or
housing-
that's
not
meeting
their
needs
because
they
can't
afford
to
move
absentee
landlords.
A
This
one
was
interesting,
so
neighborhoods
becoming
consumer
destinations,
so
losing
that
sense
of
community
and
that
you
know
investment
in
community
and
being
more
feeling
like
it's
more
of
a
commercial
destination
versus
a
neighborhood.
So
that's
another
type
of
another
way
that
gentrification
has
made
an
impact
in
certain
neighborhoods,
especially
downtown.
A
So
I
tabulated
the
responses
to
sorry.
No
sorry,
this
is
just
the
what
I
showed
you
last
time
was
the
overall
response
to
this
question.
So
are
you
concerned
about
being
able
to
stay
in
your
current
housing,
but
this
one
is
showing
you
broken
down
by
zip
code
and
you'll
see
that
the
so
the
orange
is
very
concerned.
People
answered
very
concerned
about
housing.
A
The
blue
is
somewhat
concerned
and
the
gray
is
not
concerned
at
all,
so
you
can
see
how
the
different
areas
of
the
city
compare
and
if,
if
you're
curious
about
the
higher
percentages
and
south
of
calhoun,
the
next
slide
will
explain.
You
know
why
we're
seeing
some
of
these
higher
percentages
in
places
where
or
that
are
associated
with
you
know:
higher
higher
value
homes
and
homeowners,
people
that
would
maybe
less
likely
be
worried
about
housing
costs.
A
So
if
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide
jim,
I
tabulated
the
reasons
why
people
are
concerned
that
there
was
a
follow-up
question
to
that
first
question,
which
is
why
you
know
explain
the
reasons
for
your
concern
or,
if
you're
not
concerned,
explain
why,
and
so
what
we
saw
is
a
a
very
high
percentage
for
both
who
said
very
concerned
and
somewhat
concerned
cited
flooding
sea
level
rise
hurricanes
as
their
reason
for
concern,
and
so
these
are
not
separated
out.
A
Some
of
some
of
some
people
cited
multiple
reasons,
and
so
they
may
have
cited
flooding
and
cost
of
living,
for
example,
that's
not
being
shown
here.
So
these
are
just
anybody
who
said
flooding
sea
level
rise
in
their
answer
were
added
to
this
tally.
A
Cost
of
living
versus
income
was
the
second
highest
alone,
and
I've
separated
that
out
from
high
rent
prices
and
high
home
ownership
costs,
because
it
does
get
at
that
relationship
of
income
versus
housing
costs
and
also
people
cited
cost
of
living
outside
of
housing
costs.
So
it's
expensive
to
live
in
charleston
housing
costs
included,
and
that
is
just
not
incomes
are
just
not
keeping
up
with
that
price
tag
to
live
in
charleston.
A
A
The
neighborhood
environment
answer
is
this
is
what
that
means
is
different
types
of
things
in
the
environment
that
were
making
it
hard
that
were
deteriorating,
the
quality
of
life
for
people
and
making
them
concerned
about
being
able
to
stay
there
so
things
that
were
contributing
to
that
were:
infrastructure,
noise,
litter
and
pollution
tourists,
college
students,
short-term
rentals
crime,
parking
on
social
and
cultural
changes.
So
everything
from
gentrification
to.
A
You
know
not
having
the
adequate
infrastructure
in
place
to
support
people
living
there.
I'm
not
going
to
read
through
all
of
these.
You
can
see
them
and
we'll
be
sharing
these
slides
after,
but
this
gives
you
a
bigger
picture
of
all
the
different
things
that
contribute
to
people's
ability
and
choice,
to
stay
or
move
somewhere
else,
and
then
I
also
pulled
out
some
of
the
themes
from
people
who
said
they
were
not
at
all
concerned.
A
So
some-
and
one
of
that
was
most
interesting-
that
I
saw
up
here
in
other
places
too
in
the
survey
results
where
a
lot
of
people
are
are
okay,
where
they
are,
but
they
can't
afford
to
move
so
as
long
as
the
house
that
they're
long
as
the
housing
that
they're
in
is
suitable
for
their
needs,
they're
fine.
But
if
those
needs
change,
if
they're
they're
retiring,
they
want
to
downsize
if
their
family
is
growing,
if
they
are
currently
renting
and
they
want
to
buy,
they
can't
because
there's
nothing
that
they
can
afford.
A
So
they
they
found
that
housing.
You
know
at
some
time
in
the
past
when
it
was
affordable
and
it
no
longer
is
so
they're
having
they're
stuck
where
they
are
or
they're
going
to
be
forced
to
move
outside
of
the
city
or
far
away
from
their
jobs.
So
that
was
something
that
we
I
saw
a
lot
of
and
yeah.
I
think
that's
it
in
terms
of
points
that
I
want
to
make
from
this
information
and
next
slide
jim.
I
think
that's
it
for
me,
oh
and
this
is
backed
up.
A
So
all
these
concerns
that
were
cited
based
on
qualitative
data.
This
is
backed
up
in
the
in
the
hard
data
as
well.
So
this
this
is
information
that
we've
pulled
out
put
on
the
charleston
city
plan
website
on
the
explore.
Tab,
get
go
to
charlestoncityplan.com,
backslash,
explorer,
you'll,
see
this
and
more
data,
but
this
is
showing
that
that
discrepancy
between
the
household
income
and
the
rent
or
home
sales
price,
so
that
discrepancy
between
wages
and
cost
of
living
in
terms
of
housing
costs.
A
And
then,
when
you
break
that
down
further
by
race
that
the
income
disparities,
the
racial
income,
disparities
in
charleston
are
stark,
and
so
when,
if
you
look
at
that
difference
between
cost
of
living
and
income
and
the
income
disparities-
and
we
know
that
this
is
especially
true
and
challenging
for
black
households
in
charleston.
F
Question,
of
course
you
know
it's
really
timely,
because
you
see
all
the
articles
in
the
paper
recently
about
rents
in
this
area
and
things
like
that.
It's
just
amazing
but-
and
you
probably
have
been
through
this
on
the
past
in
terms
of
gentrification.
F
G
F
E
H
All
the
data
we
have
right
now
is:
is
american
community
survey
data
which
is
sampled
every
year?
So
it's
it's
not
a
huge
sample
that
they
use,
but
you
know
so
it
can
vary
from
year
to
year
and
the
you
know,
the
margin
of
error
can
be
pretty
big,
but
the
latest
I've
seen
is
is
we're
looking
at
probably
a
75
to
25
kind
of
split
on.
H
I
appreciate
it
right
and
you
know
we'll
we'll-
have
some
statistics
in
the
in
the
plan,
of
course,
that
that
shows
some
of
the
breakdowns
and
kind
of
breaks
them
down
even
further
than
what
we're
talking
and
shows
you
trends,
and
you
know,
what's
what's
kind
of
happening
happening
demographically
in
the
city.
F
Right
and
then
the
other
point
I
wanted
to
make
is
obviously
we
know
the
cost.
We
talked
about
the
all
the
articles
on
rent
rents
being
so
high
in
this
area,
but
even
home
buying
in
this
area
and
I'll
I'll
I'll
use
miss
jacobs.
This
is
made
such
a
desirable
place
for
burns
now
sunday.
Do
you
have?
Did
you
ever
imagine
how
expensive
helmets
are
and
burns
down?
I
was
looking
it's
unbelievable,
but
I
mean
if
anybody's
buying
burns
down,
I
mean
they're.
Four
hundred
thousand
five
hundred
thousand
dollar
homes.
D
And
and
they
were
built,
as
you
know,
war
housing
for
the
middle
income,
people
affordable
housing
when
they
were
built
and
rental,
affordable
housing,
which
is.
F
I
F
I
Actually,
actually,
burns
down
is
in
keeping
with
with
south
windermere,
and
it
really
is
astounding.
Just
because
of
you
know,
you've
got
the
you
know
the
unfinished
or
the
finished
smaller
second
floor,
but
it's
just
a
great
neighborhood
burns
down
wonderful,
close-knit
sidewalks
and
it
feels
more
neighborly
than
really
south
windermere
does
and.
D
D
H
We
we
will,
unfortunately,
in
fact
I
just
saw
a
press
release
from
the
census
that
they,
they
are
now
saying
that
just
the
redistricting
data
that
we
normally
get
december
30th
or
december
31st
at
the
end
of
the
year
after
a
census
we're
not
getting
until
september
of
this
year.
They
keep
pushing
it
back,
and
so
you
know
it's
and
that's
the
data
that
that
does
break
down
by
age
and
race.
H
So
that's
our
first
opportunity
at
a
new
look
at
you
know
demographics
in
the
city,
but
unfortunately
it
doesn't
look
like
we'll
get
that
until
later
this
year.
Well
past,
you
know
when
the
plan
will
be
adopted.
D
F
I'd
also
be
interested
to
know.
I
know
you
said
it
was
about
75
25
white
black,
I
guess
in
the
entire
city.
I'd
be
curious
and
I
don't
need
this
now,
but
maybe
eventually
in
the
peninsula,
because
I
know
peninsula
used
to
be
50
50..
Now,
I'm
sure
it's
very
small
percent.
I
mean
the
jeff
station's
unbelievable
in
the
peninsula
of
charleston.
I
would
say.
H
I
don't
recall
off
top
of
my
head
what
the
peninsula
is,
but,
but
I
think,
you're
right,
charlie,
it's
it's
a
it's.
E
H
E
F
F
F
And
I
think
I'm
probably
going
back
20
years
ago.
It
was
probably
50
50,
but
40
60,
but
that's
that's
crazy,
so
yeah.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Miss
brian
okay,.
A
A
F
While
he's
doing
that,
anybody
have
any
other
questions
on
in
terms
of
the
what
we
covered
so
far,
I
just
think
the
numbers
are
unbelievable.
K
Charlie,
I
do
have
a
question:
it's
mainly
about
the
first
slide
that
chloe
showed.
Okay,
can
you
go
back
to
the
first?
I
think
it
might
have
been
the
very
first
slide.
A
K
Right
the
engagement
findings
right
in
response
to
the
question:
what
do
you
find
most
challenging
about
living
in
charleston?
So
all
right,
when
you
have
these
answers
here,
are
they
ranked
based
on?
Are
they
ranked
in
terms
of
this
was
the
most
common
answer,
or
is
that
just
kind
of
a
generalization
of
all
the
of
all
the
answers
that
you
had.
A
K
Okay,
so
with
with
the
answer
of
segregation
and
racism
and
racial
and
income
inequality,
but
specifically
on
the
segregation
and
racism
did
were
there,
is
there
some
way
that
we
can
identify
what
particular
pocket
or
part
of
the
city
you
know
was
being
identified
as
being
segregated
or
incurred
racism,
or
was
that
just
kind
of
a
general
statement
at
the
time.
A
There
were
more
general
statements
I
mean
I
could
I
could
it
would
because
it's
open-ended.
I
don't
know
that
it.
I
could
filter
the
way
that
I
process.
This
would
be
very
difficult
for
me
to
go
back
and
sort
of
filter
by
people
who
cited
these
and
where,
like
see
where
they're
coming
from
in
terms
of
zip
code
but
zip
code
would
be
the
closest
that
we
could
get
to
okay,
but
I
think
they
were
talking
you
know.
Certainly
we
could
look
at
race
across
the
city
by
neighborhood
and
see
there
are
metrics.
A
The
census
has
even
for
I
think,
or
maybe
that's
inequality,
but
there
are.
You
know
there
are
metrics
that
we
could
use
to
to
measure
segregation
in
the
city
and
then
I
think
the
the
people
who
cited
racism
were
just
speaking
generally
about
the
city,
but
I
included
those
because
of
you
know:
housing
discrimination
and
the
links
with
that,
and
then
the
housing,
the
segregation
and
the
effect
on
communities
and
warehousing
is
located
and
how
neighborhoods
were
developed.
A
So
it's
related,
but
I
would
say
that
and
it's
something
for
it's
good
for
us
to
keep
in
mind,
but
I
wouldn't
say
that
it
was
a
there
wasn't
a
majority
there.
This
was,
it
was
common
enough
to
include
it
was
cited
by
multiple
people,
but
it
wasn't
a
dominating
response.
J
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
patience,
I'm
so
sorry,
but
I
I,
while
I
was
muted,
I
was
going
to
say
that
this
is
a
good
segue.
I
think
the
question
that
we've
been
talking
about
as
far
as
how
race
breaks
down
around
the
city
is
actually
something
that
we
will
have
the
ability
to
do
with
our
housing
tool.
Our
housing
lookup
tool
is
to
actually
break
down
demographics
by
neighborhood
boundaries,
as
well
as
by
planned
districts.
J
So
I
think
it's
a
good
little
segue
into
my
portion
of
this
slide,
which
is
to
talk
about
the
final
data
deliverables
that
we've
gotten
from
cdp,
and
so
the
biggest
of
those
is
our
charleston
housing
tool,
and
that
is
basically
an
interactive
database
that
allows
us
to
to
pull
different
information
based
on
different
location
filters,
different
boundaries,
and
you
can
see
all
of
the
different
data
housing
data
metrics
that
we
have
within
that
tool
and
then
all
of
the
demographics
information
and
then
here
the
location
filters
that
we
can
pull
that
by.
J
So
this
is
a
awesome
tool
and
you
know
it's
gonna
help
us
answer
a
lot
of
questions
that
we
haven't
even
thought
of
yet
and
so
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
share.
You
know
what
what
is
now
available
for
us
to
look
at
some
of
this
stuff
is
information
that
cdp
compiled
through
their
machine
learning
process
that
I
still
don't
quite
understand,
and
some
of
it
is
from
sources
that
we
already
had
so
like
the
county,
assessors
data.
J
J
And
then
here's
just
a
kind
of
a
little
sample
overview
of
how
I've
how
I
use
the
tool
just
to
find
these.
This
information
for
kind
of
you
know
the
average,
the
median
housing
unit,
the
bedroom
size,
the
square
foot
size.
You
know
we
have
some
time
since
last
sale,
which
is
really
interesting,
especially
when
looking
at
neighborhood
change
got
elevation,
monthly
housing
costs,
and
that
is
rental
and
home
ownership.
They
just
kind
of
lumped
it
into
one
housing
cost.
So
it's
for
both
and
we
have
the
valuation
median
about
evaluation.
J
We
can
pull
all
of
these
by
different
neighborhood
boundaries
as
well,
and
here's
a
sample
of
some
of
the
demographics
information
there
at
the
bottom
in
blue,
and
so
all
of
this
is
really
amazing
stuff
that
we
we
haven't
had
at
our
disposal
to
this
point,
or
at
least,
is
not
not
as
easily
as
we
can
search
now.
J
So
we
wanted
to
dive
in
the
other
two
major
deliverables
that
they
provided
and
those
are
the
visualizations
you
all
have
already
seen
the
first
of
which,
but
we
can
kind
of
look
at
it
again.
J
A
Can
you
zoom
in
some
to
have
this
spread
the
screen
a
little
bit
more,
it's
a
little
hard
to
see
back
up
a
little
bit
back
up
more
there
right.
There.
J
That
good
cool
and
if
anyone
needs
me
to
stop
on
something
or
go
back
just
let
me
know
so-
you
all
have
already
seen
a
lot
of
these
figures,
and
these
are
going
to
be
publicly
available
to
for
people
to
look
up
using
our
city
plan
website.
We
already
have
the
other
visualization
up
right
now,
but
we,
I
think
the
plan
is
to
have
both
of
these
available
to
the
public.
J
J
None
of
this
really
has
changed,
since
you
all
saw
it
last
and
yeah.
Obviously
this
is
kind
of
one
of
the
biggest
takeaways
from
this
data
tool,
so
we
can
stop
here
for
a
second.
J
We
spend
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
that
mismatch
on
our
last
update
to
you
all,
so
I
wanted
to
kind
of
go
over
it
again
and
kind
of
elaborate
on
it
more
with
some
additional
slides
that
are
coming
in
a
few
minutes,
and
so
here
just
to
remind
you,
we
have
the
number
of
households
that
are
falling
within
each
of
these
income
brackets
on
the
left
side
and
when
you
hover
over,
you
can
see
the
actual
numbers
so
yeah.
I
apologize
a
little
bit
small
print
here,
but
basically
this
is.
J
This
is
showing
you
you
know,
by
area
of
the
city
which
you
can
filter
in
over
here.
So
we
can
look
at
a
specific
area
of
the
city.
If
we
want
to.
J
This
is
just
the
entire
city,
so
we
have
the
number
of
households
that
are
falling
within
these
different
income
categories
here
on
the
left
side
and
then
in
the
middle
we
have
the
number
of
units,
the
housing
stock
itself,
so
the
number
of
units
that
cdp's
machine
learning
algorithm
classified
as
being
affordable
to
each
of
these
income
brackets.
So
that's
in
the
middle.
So
I
think
the
term
available
here
is
a
bit
of
a
misnomer.
J
We
have
what
we
call
we're,
calling
the
mismatch,
and
so
this
is
kind
of
showing
that
we
don't
necessarily
have
an
efficient
distribution
of
our
housing
stock,
and
so
we
have
people
that
are
living
with
in
different
income
brackets
that
are
living
in
homes
that
don't
align
perfectly
with
their
income
bracket,
and
so
that
we'll
talk
about
it
later
and
that
is
going
to
be
due
to
a
lot
of
different
factors.
J
So
we
can
talk
about
it
in
just
a
moment,
but
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
give
us
a
refresher,
and
you
can
hover
over
here
and
see
all
the
different
actual
raw
numbers,
and
then
we
can
sort
by
different
areas
of
the
city-
here's
daniel
island,
for
example,
how
it
breaks
out
on
daniel
island
and
kane
and
the
k-9
peninsula
as
well
and
here
at
the
bottom.
J
This
these
figures
are
for
they're,
going
to
align
with
this.
J
This
district,
that,
oh
sorry,
no
they're,
actually
broken
and
already
out
by
different
plan
districts
here
at
the
bottom,
but
these
are
going
to
match
up
with
the
mismatch
figures
above
and
so
what
this
is
is
taking
the
mismatch
in
each
specific
income
bucket
and
then
also
accounting
for
the
our
expected
population
growth
in
the
next
10
years,
and
which
is
something
that
philip
puts
together
for
our
our
kind
of
estimations
for
the
next
10
years,
based
on,
what's
been
permitted
and
approved
through
the
development
process.
F
A
L
A
Mind
it's
also
including
the
wando
area,
and
so
you
know
it's.
This
is
daniel.
Island
plus
wando
make
up
the
full
kanoa
peninsula
area,
and
this
is
also
reflective
of
the
current
income
distribution
of
the
city
and
so
the
future.
The
future
housing
needs
are
in
keeping
with
if
we
keep
with
the
current
income
distribution
of
the
city
and
accommodate
future
population.
A
L
To
clarify,
I
think,
on
daniel
island,
we've
done
a
really
good
job
of
integrating
the
affordable
housing
just
within
everything
else,
so
it
doesn't
stand
out
for
the
most
part.
It's
blended.
F
F
A
And
also
another
point
of
clarification
is
for
every
we
are
using
the
income
brackets
here
that
hud
uses
for
for
subsidized
housing
to
determine
the
different
funding
sources
and
the
different
needs
in
terms
of
subsidized
housing,
but
also
some
of
this
housing
could
just
be
naturally,
naturally
affordable.
For
these
income
ranges.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
common
situation
in
charleston
with
prices,
as
they
are
with
the
market
as
it
is,
but
this
is
not
all
necessarily.
This
is
not
all
deed,
restricted
or
subsidized
housing.
A
This
is
just
housing
that
is
priced
renting
at
a
at
a
price
that
is
affordable
to
people
in
these
income
ranges,
so
that
that's
also
something
to
keep
in
mind
with
this
visual
here
and.
A
A
Well,
to
be
in
our
ordinance
in
our
zoning
ordinance
when
we
say
workforce
housing.
A
It
is
referring
to
the
80
to
120
bracket.
So
if
you
look
on
this
table,
that
is
the
yeah
jim's
pointing
those
out
right
now,
80
to
120,
but
when
we
use
the
term
affordable
housing
at
least
most
of
the
time
internally.
We're
talking
about
everything,
sort
of
120
and
below
I'm
falling
within
that
that
which
includes
workforce
housing.
I
Yeah
chloe
is
this
information
in
our
dropbox
we'll
be
able
to
pull
this
up
and
look
at
it?
You
know
where
we
can
see
it
clearer.
A
Yes,
we'll
we'll
have
the
slot
I'll
say
the
slides
to
the
dropbox
after
this
meeting
and
there
will
be
links
so
you'll
be
able
to
click
on
the
links
that
jim
has
clicked
to,
and
these
are
public.
So
we
don't
have
this
one
loaded
onto
our
website
yet,
but
we
will
soon,
but
these
are
public.
This
is
publicly
available
information
at
this
time,
so
we
can
share
those
things.
That's.
J
We've
said
it
before,
but
I
want
to
really
underscore
the
fact
that
these
numbers
down
here
are
not
necessarily
reflective
of
you
know.
If
you
were
looking
at
this
graph,
you
might
think
we
don't
need
any
100
ami
units
within
the
city
and
that's
not
the
message.
We
want
you
to
walk
away
when
looking
at
this,
because
you
know
these
are
kind
of
in
a
perfect
world
if
we
could
put
everyone
out
on
their
street
and
put
them
in
a
home
that
is
affordable
to
their
income
range.
J
This
is
how
it
would
break
down.
So
obviously,
people
choose
to
live
in
homes
for
a
lot
of
different
reasons,
other
than
their
affordability,
and
so,
whereas
you
know,
we
know
for
a
fact
that
there
are
people
cross-burdened
at
each
of
these
income
ranges,
and
so
we
know
for
a
fact
that
we
need
units
at
each
of
these
income
ranges
to
accommodate,
and
so
this
is
really
just
to
balance.
This
mismatch
number.
J
It's
not
necessarily
reflective
of
us
needing
to
build
only
at
certain
ami
ranges,
and
I
think
that's
really
important,
but
before
before,
I
think
we
might
be
able
to
answer
some
other
questions
that
might
be
brewing
in
your
minds.
J
But
I
think
last
time
when
we,
when
we
met
with
you
all,
we
were
looking
at
the
we
had
the
visual
of
the
beaker
that
we
showed
you
all
and
the
the
different
housing
the
different
housing
cost
brackets
arranged
in
a
beaker,
and
we
we
made
the
point
that
you
know
whenever
someone
is
looking
for
for
a
home,
that's
outside
of
their
income
bracket,
they
need
they
have
to
take
housing
stock
from
someone
else
in
theory,
and
so
what
we
wanted
to
really
underscore
this
time
is
to
say
that
that
that
phenomenon
is
occurring
from
both
sides
of
the
income
spectrum.
J
So
we
have
people
that
are
making
more
than
we
have
people
that
are
occupying
homes
that
are
in
the
range
for
someone
making
less
than
they
are
than
they
make,
and
we
also
have
the
the
inverse
taking
place
as
well.
So,
for
example,
if
we
look
at
here
this
is
that
mismatch
graphic.
J
It's
the
same
exact
thing
that
we
we
showed
you
on
the
other
screen
broken
out
a
little
bit
easier
to
see,
and
so
here
you
can
see
that
we
have
a
a
deficit
of
about
7
000
units
per
house
for
the
30
ami
bracket,
and
so
the
phenomenon
here
that
we're
talking
about
is
say
if
you're
a
person
making
that
30
ami
and
you
cannot
find
a
home
or
a
apartment
that
fits
your
income
level,
then
you
might
need
to
take
up
a
home
first
or
apartment
for
someone,
that's
making
it
for
50,
mi
and
so
on,
and
so
on.
J
The
same
thing
might
be
occurring
if
you're,
making
over
120
ami,
we
see
we
have
a
deficit
of
homes
that
that
are
affordable
to
that
income
range
as
well.
So
that's
the
you
know
the
top
half
or
the
the
top
of
our
our
chart
here,
and
so
a
person
making
120
ami
could
also
be
living
in
a
home,
that's
affordable
for
someone
making,
100
emi,
and
so
chloe
made
this
graphic.
That
kind
of
shows
if
these
bottom
and
top
income
ranges
ate
up
the
housing
of
the
next
one
below
it.
J
This
will
be
the
deficits
that
we
would
have.
So
if
a
person,
if
the,
if
all
of
these
7
000
this
deficit
of
7
000,
was
eaten
up
by
that
50
mi
we'd
still
have
a
deficit
of
5,
000
and
so
on
and
so
on,
and
so,
if
in
on
the
other
side
of
it,
if
all
of
them
of
all
the
deficit,
this
17
000
was
eating
up
our
100
20
percent
stock
we'd
still
have
a
deficit
of
seven
thousand.
J
So
eventually
these
these
two,
these
two
will
meet,
and
you
know
this
is
this
is
why
we're
seeing
people
cost
burden
at
all
income
levels.
It
really
comes
from
both
sides
of
the
spectrum,
and
I
hope
that
I
didn't
make
it
more
confusing
and
chloe,
please
chime
in.
If
I,
if
anything,
I
said,
was
confusing.
A
Just
wanted
to
you
know
illustrate
the
fluid
nature
of
this,
and
when
we
have
a
shortage,
housing
stock
for
one
income
range
that
it
affects
the
supply
and
housing
for
other
income
ranges
so
and
it's
and
it's
and,
as
you
can
see
here
below
this
of
the
other
factors
contributing
to
housing
choices.
When
you
combine
this
income
mismatch
with
all
of
these
other
things,
it
leads
to
the
situation
that
we're
in
now,
which
is
with
a
high
percentage
of
the
population
being
cross-bordered
in
charleston,
and
so,
which
is
our
next
visualization.
D
D
But
how
do
we
quantify
in
this
data,
people
that,
let's
say
live
in
hanahan
or
goose,
creek
or
ladson
or
outside
of
the
city
of
charleston
in
a
non-cost
burdened
way
only
because,
but
they
work
in
charleston
would
rather
live
closer.
How
do
we
integrate
that
information,
or
is
it
integrated
into
this
analysis?
In
some
format?
D
J
That
make
sense,
I
think,
yeah.
I
think
it
definitely
makes
sense
and
I
think
it
was
outside
of
the
scope
of
what
we
did
in
you
know.
We
we
looked
at
homes
that
are
within
the
urban
growth
boundary.
D
J
You
know-
and
so
I
think
that
is
definitely
a
a
great
question
to
have,
and
it
is
something
that
we
need
to
to
understand
better,
but
I
think
for
the
purposes
of
cdp's
analysis,
we
stayed
within
the
urban
growth
boundary
in
in
and
that's
how
they
did
their
valuations,
but
it
would
be
that
it's
definitely
very
interesting
and
something
that
is
is
contributing
to
all
of
this
is
when
people
you
know
when
all
of
this
stock
is
eaten
up,
people
are
forced
to
to
go
elsewhere,
and
I
think
this
next
graphic
that
we're
going
to
show
that's
related
to
housing
and
transportation,
will
kind
of
is
kind
of
speaks
to
that
as
well.
G
D
Well,
that's
where
I
was
going
was
that
you,
you
create
a
the
secondary
problem
of
transportation
when
people
are
forced
outside
of
the
city
for
their
housing
stock.
So
I
I
was
just
curious
how
that
was
factored
in
because
it
does
it
probably,
even
though
we
don't
get
the
data
we're
aware
of
it,
and
it
creates
an
opportunity
for
a
planning,
you
know
implementation,
you
know
objective.
Okay,
thank
you.
E
Of
our
employees
lived
on
john's
island
and
we're
probably
pushing
60,
somerville
and
goose
creek
today,
so
this
data
doesn't
even
capture
those
folks,
so
it's
probably
worse
and
what
you're
able
to
represent.
J
Definitely
definitely
and
yeah,
and
then
I
you
know
we
we
went
back
and
forth
when
we
were
working
with
cbp
and
kind
of
the
beginning
stages
of
what
area
do
we
want
to
look
at
for
for
this
analysis,
and
I
think
because
it's
the
city
of
charleston's
comprehensive
plan-
and
you
know
the
data
sources
that
we
had
available
internally,
that
we're
dealing
with
with
the
city
within
the
city's
boundaries,
I
think,
is
why
we
made
that
choice,
but
absolutely
something
to
really
think
about.
J
J
So
yeah
so
here's
the
other
big
public-facing
deliverable
that
cdp
provided
and
I'll
zoom
in
on
this
too.
J
Maybe
that's
even
been
a
little
bit
too
far.
So
with
this
one.
This
background
slide
just
has
some
information
on
you
know
what
we
were
looking
at
and
and
the
data
sources
that
we
use
so
for
for
this.
J
These
pie,
charts
are
showing
the
percent
of
households
within
a
certain
area
of
the
city,
in
this
case
we're
looking
at
the
city
as
a
whole,
the
percent
of
households
paying
more
than
30
percent
of
their
income
on
housing,
and
then
this
is,
if
we
cut,
if
we
throw
transportation
costs
into
that,
that
that
housing
cost,
and
so
this
is
still
within
the
30
threshold,
and
we
use
that
30,
because
you
know
hud
hud
deems
that
as
acceptable
to
pay
for
housing.
J
When
you
go
above
that
30
year
cost
burden,
and
so
each
of
you
know
this,
we
can
look
at
different
areas
of
the
city,
which
I
think
is
great.
This
is
already
up
on
our
city
plan
website.
J
J
Yeah
so
yeah,
so
here
we're
looking
at
john's
island
and
I'll,
give
you
some
background
on
the
transportation
data
that
we
use.
J
We
used
a
source
called
the
housing
and
transportation
index
and
what
they,
what
that
group
has
done,
is
created
an
algorithm
that
looks
at
urban
forum
and
street
design
to
estimate
the
vehicle
miles
traveled
for
different
census
blocks,
and
so
you
can
search
the
city
of
charleston
or
even
a
single
census
block
to
see
the
average
vehicle
miles
traveled,
and
so
they
do
that
calculation
and
then
they
also
use
the
acs
data
for
the
amount
of
cars
owned
per
household,
and
so
what
we
did
was
multiply
that
fixed
cost
of
car
ownership,
so
how
many
cars
you
own
per
household
and
then
multiplied
by
the
variable
vehicle
miles
traveled,
and
then
we
also
added
in
dmv.
J
J
You
go
out
a
little
bit
that
shows
the
different
areas
of
the
city
broken
out
by
their
costs,
and
I
think
that
this
is
for
me.
This
is
a
big,
a
very
interesting
data
point
that
we
found
and
looking
at
you
know
as
we
would
expect
some
of
the
places
that
are
further
out
the
kenyan
peninsula
and
john's
island
are
going
to
have
higher
transportation
costs.
J
People
are
more
car
dependent
and
own,
more
cars
per
family,
they're,
also
traveling,
more
vehicle
miles,
and-
and
so
one
of
the
big
you
know,
illuminating
things
for
me-
was
that
sometimes
those
vehicles,
those
transportation
costs,
are
kind
of
eating
into
the
savings
that
you
get
for
for
living
in
a
less
expensive
home
and
so
on
john's
island.
We
see
a
lot,
you
know
a
lower
valuation
for
the
homes,
but
then
you
know
that
savings
of
the
housing
cost
is
kind
of
even
up
by
transportation.
J
It
becomes
almost
almost
the
same
as
living
on
the
charleston
peninsula.
When
you
account
for
transportation,
which
I
think
is
really
interesting-
and
you
know
with
this
pie
chart
we
included
that
transportation
cost
into
the
30
percent.
As
like
the
cost
burden
threshold,
but
hud
doesn't
actually
provide
a
figure
for
how
much
homes
or
households
should
pay
for
transportation.
J
So
I
wanted
to
note
that,
because
you
know
that
30
percent
might
not
be
fair
to
say
that
you
know
if
we
put
transportation
in
to
that,
that
someone
has
cost
burdened,
but
it's
just
a
way
that
we
can
compare
across
different
areas
of
the
city
so
yeah
this
is.
This
is
available
up
online.
We'll
share
the
link
to
that
and
you
can
look
around
down
here.
We
just
have
some
information
about
how
we
calculated
everything.
J
Right
and
I'm
almost
finished
with
my
portion
yeah,
so
one
let
me
present,
so
I
I
think
all
of
this
is
kind
of
building
to
you
know,
looking
especially
looking
at
that
mismatch
data
and
looking
at
kind
of
all
the
factors
that
that
play
into
housing
choice,
and
then
we
also
wanted
to
look
at
some
of
the
how
the
outside
factors
that
are
that
are
contributing
to
the
state
of
our
housing
stock.
J
One
of
them
was
market
supply
and
demand,
and
I
think,
throughout
this
process
we
spoke
with
developers.
We
spoke
with
the
association
of
realtors
and
some
other
folks
that
talked
about
housing
stock.
You
know
the
housing
shortage,
and
you
know
any
housing
is
good
housing
to
be
built
right
now,
and
so
this
was.
This
was
a
graph
or
an
article
that
we
found
online.
That
was
an
interesting
point
that
charleston
really
is
building
a
lot
of
new
homes.
J
You
know
comparing
to
some
of
these
other
cities
that
have
a
high
demand
at
the
moment
we're
actually
building.
We
have.
We
have
a
higher
growth
rate
than
a
lot
of
these
other
cities,
so
we
just
thought
that
was
really
interesting
and
then
the
next
one.
B
Is
this?
Is
this
number
certificates
of
occupancy
issued,
or
is
this
units
approved
to
be
built.
J
And
so
and
here's
here's
another
data
point
that
is
up
on
our
explorer
tab
and
just
covering
you
know
the
amount
of
homes
that
have
been
built
within
the
last.
I
believe
this
is
yeah
2010
to
2019.,
and
so
you
know
we
we
have
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
units
going
up
around
the
city
down.
Here
we
wanted
to
share
the
the
vacancy
rate,
which
I
think
is
an
interesting
data
point.
Is
that
there's
always
a
certain
amount
of
units
that
are
vacant
at
any
time?
J
Ours
is
about
9.6
percent
and
the
u.s
average
is
around
8.6
of
units
that
are
unoccupied
for
whatever
reason,
so
that
could
be
second
homes.
It
could
be
vacation,
rentals
or
units
that
are
that
are
unoccupiable
for
whatever
reason
which-
and
I
thought
this
number
was
interesting
when
you
compared
to
charleston
county
as
a
whole
granted.
J
This
is
cdp's
calculation
here
for
vacancy,
and
this
is
the
acs
so
we're
not
comparing
the
exact
same
data
sources,
but
I
think
it's
interesting
that
charleston
county
is
showing
an
18
vacancy
rate
compared
to
the
city
of
charleston's
9.6,
and
then
we
wanted
to
compare
like
another
tourist
kind
of
tourism
dependent
place
within
kind
of
near
us,
and
so
we
looked
at
horry
county
that
has
a
38
vacancy
rate,
which
is
kind
of
to
be
expected
with
with
all
the
vacation
properties
around
there,
but
and
then
the
last
thing
that
we
wanted
to
talk
about.
J
I
think
last
time
we
we
met
with
you
all
we
expected
to
have
a
third
visualization,
and
we
have
not
forgotten
about
that.
Third
visualization.
We
have
all
the
data
a
lot
of
the
data
packaged
for
it,
but
we're
we're
we're
still
kind
of
playing
with
that
internally
and
it's
it's
something.
We've
decided
we
wanted
to
build
out
on
our
own,
and
so
that's
going
to
be
a
gentrification
and
displacement
analysis.
F
J
Neighborhoods
have
changed
based
on
some
of
these
different
data
point
data
metrics
that
have
that
we
have
that
research
has
shown
to
be
contributing
to
gentrification
or
kind
of
beacons
for
gentrification
to
each
of
these
points,
and
so
we're
tracking
those.
We
have
a
lot
of
this
data
packaged
already
that
you
know
it's
kind
of
a
how
we
can
measure
gentrification
and
how
a
neighborhood
has
changed,
and
then
we
also
wanted
to
look
at
priority
areas.
So
one
of
the
big
takeaways
from
our
housing
labs
was
people.
J
People
are
interested
in
gentrification,
but
they're,
more
interested
in
identifying
places
before
they've,
gentrified
and
so
being
proactive
about
displacement
is
something
that
we
wanted
to
do,
and
so
this,
the
other
part
of
that
visualization
we'd
like
to
look
use
kind
of
these
three
different
metrics
percent
cost,
verdan
percent
renter
occupied
and
then
a
climate-related
risk
from
our
water
analysis
to
try
to
identify
different
neighborhoods
that
may
be
at
risk
of
displacement
in
the
future
and
so
in
the
short
term.
J
F
Jim,
that
would
be
really
interesting,
because
I
tell
you,
I
I
think
about
like
west
oak
forest
and
exo
forest,
and
I
remember
those
were
pretty
diverse
and
now
I
think
they're,
almost
all
the
young
whites
moving
into
those
areas.
I
think-
and
it
concerns
me
that
area,
but
also,
then
I
think,
about
maryville
and
more
and
more
maryville,
probably
becoming
gentrification
in
the
maryville
area
as
well.
D
Yeah
charlie
I'd
like
to
back
you
up
on
that,
because
a
lot
of
neighborhoods
west
ashley
were
built,
you
know
for
low
income,
they
transitioned
to
another
type,
now
they're
tradition,
transitioning
back
to
even
a
third
type.
So
there's
a
cycle
in
there
that,
even
in
modern
time,
people
don't
completely
understand
they
think
that
certain
neighborhoods
were
built
for
african
americans
and
that's
been
a
transition
that
happened
in
history
and
then
we
went
from
white
to
an
african-american
to
a
mixed
use
and
now
we're
you
know
moving.
F
J
Anyway,
yeah,
I
think
this.
This
breakdown
is
also
interesting
for
kind
of
thinking
about
how
we
can
tailor
different
policy
approaches
to
achieve
the
outcomes
that
we
want,
because
you
know,
a
lot
of
neighborhoods
are
changing
in
different
ways,
so
the
same
solutions
won't
fit
each
neighborhood
and
we
can
look
at
kind
of
the
different
factors
that
go
into
that
and
maybe
tailor
some
policy
solutions
to
those
specific
issues.
D
Donnie
yeah
y'all
are
getting
a
huge
amount
of
data
here.
Are
you
all
beginning
to
see
some?
You
know
planning
opportunities
or
questions
or
thoughts
coming
from
this
data
at
all,
are
you
that
you
all
again,
you
know,
as
you
write
the
plan
based
on
the
data,
I'm
just
wondering
are
the
questions
coming
to
your
mind,
because
one
question
that
immediately
popped
into
my
mind
is
that
this
concept
of
the
missing
middle,
that
we
don't
have
all
the
right
types
of
housing
stocks.
D
D
J
Yeah,
I
think,
up
to
this
point,
we've
really
been
trying
to
make
sure
that
the
product
that
we
received
from
cdp
is
something
that's
going
to
be
really
useful
for
us
and
for
other
departments
in
the
city,
and
so
that
has
been
a
task
in
itself
and
I
think
all
the
questions
that
come
with
all
this
data
is
is
the
other
elephant
that
we've
gotta
swallow.
So
it's
really,
I
see
that
miss
harrison
has
her
handbrake.
K
Go
ahead
man,
so
I've
got
kind
of
two
observations:
number,
the
first
going
just
to
the
data
that
y'all
presented
about
the
various
areas,
so
I
think
it
just.
I
don't
know
how
we
educate
the
public
about.
K
You
know
all
about
the
the
number
of
housing
units
that
are
coming
online
or
are
permitted,
because
I
know
we,
you
know
consistently
see
certain
areas
such
you
know
what
specifically
james
island.
They
have
only
2
000,
I
think
total
units,
but
seemingly
you
know,
I
was
underneath
the
impression
that
they
had
significantly
more
coming
online,
but
yet
west
ashley,
the
peninsula
and
other
areas
are
carrying
a
greater
weight
of
those
number
of
units.
So
I
think
it
you
know.
K
I
think
that
particular
data
point
is
something
I
think
we
can
utilize
to
to
kind
of
talk
about
housing
and
plans
and
developments.
K
The
second
thing
I
I
wanted
to
kind
of
you
know
talk
about
is
is
how
we
utilize
the
word
gentrification
just
because
there
are
various
ways
that
people
define
it,
and
you
know
what
does
that
really
mean
some
people?
You
know
how?
What
does
that
really?
Look
like
I've?
Never
really
heard
a
solution
for
how
you
stop
gentrification
or
or
what
the
or
what
you
know,
how
you
implement
ways
to
to
reverse
gentrification
or
or
to
to
stop
it.
K
But
then
you
know
in
the
same
vein,
you
know:
there's
always
the
person
who
is
you
have
to
have
a
willing
seller
and
a
willing
buyer,
and
so
that
to
me
also
is
something
that
you
know
doesn't
necessarily
speak
of
gentrification.
It
just
speaks
of
you
know,
holding
on
to
a
piece
of
property
for
generations
and
then
saying
it's
time
to
to
let
go
for
for
for
of
myriads
of
reasons.
So
how
are?
How
are
we
presenting
that
definition
or
saying
what
is
gentrification?
A
That's
a
great
question
I'll
take
this
one
jim,
so
the
way
that
we
have
this
drafted
right
now
in
the
in
the
third
visualization
that
that
still
needs
more
tweaking,
which
is
the
reason
why
we
don't
have
that
ready
for
you
all
is
just
showing
how
the
neighborhood
is
changing.
Like
you
said,
it's
people
have
different
definitions
of
gentrification.
People
have
different
experiences
with
it
and
there's
so
many
different
factors
contributing
to
it.
A
So
our
plan
is
not
to
it,
is
to
bring
out
this
data
and
make
it
available
for
people
to
see
and
to
just
to
understand
how
our
neighborhood's
changing
around
the
city
pulling
out
these
indicators
that
have
been
attributed
or
have
been
associated
with
gentrification,
you
know,
and
and
by
the
definition
of
a
lower
income
neighborhood,
let's
say
nationally:
lower
income
becoming
higher
income
generally
speaking
and
then
charleston
gentrification
having
that
racial
component
as
well,
you
know
being
very
significant
and
relevant
here
for
our
local
context,
so
racial
and
income
change
from
a
neighborhood,
lower
income,
higher
black
population
to
higher
income
and
higher
white
population,
and
these
other
indicators
too,
are
helpful
in
understanding
how
our
neighborhood's
changing
so
we're
not
planning
to
assign
value
to
whether
you
know
what
it,
what
it
means
and
if
it's
good
or
bad,
but
just
being
able
to
draw
out
how
our
neighborhood's
changing
what
we
are
going
to
focus
on
in
terms
of
planning
recommendations.
A
And
you
know
what
can
what
tools
do
we
have
as
planners?
Is
we're
going
to
focus
on
the
displacement
part
of
this,
which
is
not
all
does
not
always
go
along
with
gentrification
or
neighborhood
changing
and
displacement
definition
being
you
know,
sort
of
some
level
of
involuntarily
having
to
move
having
to
leave.
So
that's
why
we
focused
on
looking
at
percent
of
the
population.
A
That's
cost
burdened
in
a
neighborhood
percent
of
homes
that
are
renter
occupied,
so
you
know
they
have
less
control
if
their
rent
goes
up
versus
a
homeowner
can
have
pretty
reliably
know
how
much
their
health
annual
housing
costs
are
going
to
be,
and
then
the
climate
factor
as
well.
So
we're
going
to
focus
on
this
part
we're
going
to
show
how
neighborhoods
are
changing
and
we
want
to.
A
We
want
to
provide
that
data
because
we
think
it's
important
for
the
community
to
have,
and
for
you
know,
staff
and
elected
officials
and
commissioners
to
have
access
to
and
to
have
conversations
about,
but
I
think
we're
really
going
to
focus
on
in
the
plan
in
terms
of
any
kind
of
policy,
recommendations
or
land
use.
Recommendations
will
be
on
the
risk
of
displacement
and
what
kind
of
interventions
whether
it
be
on
the
planning
side
or
the
housing
side?
K
And
thank
you
chloe,
there's
one.
I
did
have
one
other
question
and
I
know
that
we
that
y'all's
data
has
broken
it
down
to
the
various.
I
guess
we
call
it
the
burrows
of
charleston,
but
in
particular,
can
you
is
it
possible
to
break
that
data
on
the
peninsula
down
a
bit
further?
Where
we're
looking
at?
You
know
north
of
calhoun
street.
K
In
terms
of
that
breakdown
of,
like
the
displacement,
the
cost
of
housing,
rentals
versus
non-rentals,
you
know
the
I'd,
you
know
accommodations
uses
because
you
know
the
peninsula
has
its.
You
know
various
parts
to
it
that
are
either
commercial
housing
related.
But
you
know
we
don't
know,
you
know
what
which
neighborhoods,
which
neighborhoods
are.
Are
you
know
even
at
further
risk.
A
Yes,
so
all
we
have
all
of
this
data
at
a
neighborhood
level,
so
we're
pulling
out
well
the
cost
burdened
for
the
two
visuals,
that
jim
showed
the
affordability
analysis
and
then
the
cost,
the
housing
and
transportation
cost
burden
to
visuals
that
are
interactive.
Those
are
just
by
main
area
of
the
city,
but
the
information
that
jim
has
displayed
right
now
on
the
screen.
We
have
all
we.
We
have
this
information
on
every
single
housing
unit
in
the
city
and
so
for
the
gentrification
and
displacement
analysis.
A
Our
plan
was
to
look
at
those
indicators
on
a
neighborhood
scale
on
a
neighborhood
level
versus
of
just
the
larger
area
of
the
city,
so
yeah.
We
can
there's
a
lot
that
we
can
answer
with
this
data.
I
will
say
that
we
probably
can't
answer
all
questions
for
the
comprehensive
plan,
but
we
hope
that
a
lot
some
of
these
bigger
picture
recommendations
will
lead
to
more
in-depth,
smaller
scale
analysis
going
going
forward.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
want
to
echo
miss
harrison's
comment
on
the
definition
of
gentrification,
because
I
think
what
it
might
have
meant
20
years
ago.
It's
probably
changed
in
modern
time.
There
are
lots
of
communities
where
people
actually
own
their
property,
and
I've
had
conversations
with
these
people
where
once
they
choose
to
sell
their
property,
they
the
dynamic,
will
change
because
of
the
buyer,
and
I
think
we
need
to
understand
that.
D
So
I'm
glad
she
brought
this
issue
up
and
that
there's
a
good
conversation
about
it
and
that
we'll
continue
to
understand
it
and
the
city's
beginning
to
see
it
in
a
really
big
picture.
So
I
just
wanted
to
echo
her
comment
on
that.
Thank
you.
B
Yeah
I'd
just
like
to
say,
mr
chairman,
I
I
agree
with
both
donna
and
erica.
You
know.
I've
always
kind
of
seen
gentrification
as
not
necessarily
racial
is
which
so
many
people
feel
like,
but
it's
really
about
the
loss
of
diversity
in
a
neighborhood,
whether
it's
age
or
income
or
race,
or
any
of
those
other
categories
that
we're
looking
at
on.
Those
data
points
that
this
that
we're
gathering
here.
F
Good
point
harry,
and
you
know
one
of
the
things
I
think
when
I
talked
about
the
differences
in
the
and
the
changes
in
the
it
was
just
so
devastating
for
me
or
unbelievable,
the
african-american.
So
I
just
point
that
that's
just
me
on
that,
but
I
agree
with
you.
Defecation
is
a
lot
bigger
word
than
just
race,
so
I
appreciate
that.
That's
good
comments.
Anybody
else
comments,
questions
jim,
thank
you
for
your
work
and
your
presentation.
Chloe.
A
Thanks
charlie,
before
I
move
on
to
this,
I
just
put
it
out
there
yeah.
This
is
one
of
the
things
that
we'll
have
to
define
in
the
plan
itself.
You
know
if
we
are
referencing
gentrification
displacement,
we'll
need
to
include
definitions.
I
think
that
will
be
important
in
the
narrative.
A
So
if
anybody
in
their
work,
I
mean
has
found
a
really
good
definition
that
they
like
and
wants
to
send
it
our
way
where
we're
happy
to
you
know,
take
suggestions,
of
course,
we'll
be
doing
our
own
we've
done
our
own
research
and
we'll
be
incorporating
that
into
the
plan
for
and
we'll
be
putting
that
to
the
community
and
to
you
all
for
feedback,
but
if
anybody
has
spent
some
time
with
this
and
has
some
good
good
definitions
that
they
want
to
send
along.
A
Thank
you
be
happy
to
see
him
okay,
so
where
I
know
we're
over
the
expected
time
for
this,
so
I'm
gonna
go
through
this
very
quickly,
so
to
recap:
round
one:
some
of
the
high
level
numbers
from
that
we
had
approximately
480
people
participate
in
either
a
city-led
or
a
community-led
gathering.
A
This
is
not
including
survey
response,
just
people
who
showed
up
to
some
sort
of
gathering,
virtual
or
in
person
39
of
people
who
participated
in
a
listening
session
said
in
the
or
in
the
beginning
poll
that
they
had
never
or
have
rarely
participated
in
any
kind
of
planning
process.
So
that's
a
great
number
of
new
people
to
this
conversation
and
something
else
we
learned
from
round
one
is
the
community
led
conversations
and
that
that
partnership
with
community
partners
was
essential
in
increasing
the
diversity
of
our
participants.
A
So
city-led
meetings
were
a
little
less
diverse,
but
those
community-led
meetings
really
made
a
huge
difference
in
increasing
the
diversity
of
our
overall
participation.
So
for
round
two.
Our
priorities
are
going
to
build
on
progress
in
round.
One
continue
targeting
you
know,
prioritizing
getting
more
participation
from
underrepresented
groups,
so
we
still
have
definitely
a
lot
of
progress
we
can
be
making
in
that
regard
and
continue
to
prioritize
the
quality
of
engagement
over
quantity.
A
So,
just
making
sure
that
those
are
you
know,
positive
experiences
and
that
so
that
people
come
back
and
continue
to
stay
engaged
and
also
providing
a
variety
of
options
for
engagement.
So
we
offered
a
variety.
We
were
going
to
expand
that
variety
even
more
in
round
two.
The
next
slide.
A
A
Two
of
those
will
be
for
primers
or
orientations
for
people
who
are
coming
in
fresh
that
were
not
part
of
round
one
and
are
may
need
some
introduction
to
what
the
city
plan
is
so
we'll
have
two
of
those
in
mid-march,
and
then
we
will
have
five
sessions,
one
for
each
of
the
geographic
areas
of
the
city,
to
go
over
the
specific,
the
recommendations
specific
to
those
areas,
and
then
we
will
have
two
topic
based
sessions.
A
A
This
will
be
no
contact,
drop-in
stations,
where
they'll
have
a
set
time
where
they're
set
up
in
a
certain
area
of
the
city
and
there'll,
be
one
strategically
located
in
each
area
of
the
city
and
we're
going
to
be
choosing
those
locations
based
on
you
know,
prioritizing
areas
where
there's
likely
to
be
more
people
who
are
don't
have
access
to
the
virtual
meeting,
such
as
our
elderly
population,
so
in
late
april,
is
when
we
will
we're
going
to
be
wrapping
up
engagement
mid
to
late
april
and
move
into
synthesizing
that
feedback
incorporating
to
the
plan,
and
that
is
when
we
anticipate
to
schedule
the
first
public
hearing
before
you
all.
A
That's
that
date
we're
waiting
to
schedule
that
date,
because
this
is
really
a
moving
target
still
with
covid
and
also
when
we
can
actually
wrap
up
having
the
draft
plan
itself
in
document
form
and
in
may
is
when
we
anticipate
continuing
that
public
hearings
and
bringing
it
to
the
council
and
planning
commission
for
a
joint
workshop.
So
that
is
the
plan
and
again
dates
and
times
to
be
confirmed,
and
this
is
subject
to
change.
This
is
a
fluid.
This
has
been
a
fluid
process.
A
A
Oh
backup,
actually,
can
you
go
back
jim,
go
back
to
the
engagement
any
questions
about
engagement
before
I
go
into
the
next
surprise,
update.
A
A
The
community
assistance
program
have
two
awesome:
graduate
students
graduate
assistants
working
with
us
on
incorporating
a
racial
equity
lens
into
charleston
city
plan,
and
so
I'm
actually
going
to
call
on
ryan
and
caitlyn
now
to
introduce
themselves
and
if
y'all
want
to
say
a
little
bit
what
what
you're
doing
with
us
and
then
I
can
wrap
us
up.
G
G
Gotcha,
like
my
mic,
has
always
been
low.
My
name
is
ryan
green,
I'm
a
second-year
cap
student
and
I'm
a
charleston
native
I'll.
Let
katelyn
go
next.
Thank
you,
sir
yeah.
M
Hi
everyone,
my
name
is
caitlin.
I
am
a
first
year
graduate
student
at
college
of
charleston
and
I'm
actually
in
the
concurrent
program
with
the
mpa
in
evss
and
I'm
it's
my
first
year
of
cap
being
a
grad
assistant
and
I'm
originally
from
rhode
island.
So
I'm
new
to
the
charleston
area,
but
we're
both
really
excited
to
be
on
this
project.
G
Yes
and
a
bit
of
an
overview
of
what
we're
doing,
we
are
basically
looking
at
other
cities,
comprehensive
plans
and
research
and
data
through
the
mpa
program
at
cfc
to
have
a
racial
equity
lens
over
the
plan
because,
as
been
stated
before,
like
there's
a
steady
declining
black
population
and
historically
it's
not
been
that
way.
So
some
things
are
going
on
in
a
background
that
most
of
us
feel
need
to
be
addressed,
and
this
is
the
first
steps
to
do
it.
A
And
I'll
add
this
is
cap
is
also
working
with
our
commission
on
equity,
inclusion,
equity
inclusion
and
racial
conciliation
on
developing
their
framework
for
racial
equity,
and
so
we
will
be
naturally
coordinating
with
those
efforts
as
well
and
we're.
A
Actually,
you
know
a
little
bit
ahead
of
them
in
some
ways
in
terms
of
actually
defining,
and
you
know
deciding
what,
how
what
does
racial
equity
mean
in
terms
of
charleston
city
plan
and
recommendations
that
we're
putting
forward
and
also
what
we're
you
know,
the
questions
that
we're
asking
and
the
recommendations
that
we're
proposing
so
they'll
be
doing
some
interviews
with
staff
we'll
be
we've
already
looked
over
some
best
practices
from
other
cities
with
them.
A
That
conversation
is
ongoing
and
they're
also
going
to
be
participating
in
the
engagement
sessions
and
helping
to
take
notes
and
help
synthesize
that
feedback
so
really
excited
about
this
partnership
and
the
the
good
intention.
You
know
we
we
wanted
to
be
explicit
about
this,
and
not
just
not
just
do
it,
but
also
make
sure
that
we're
articulating
it
and
that
we're
having
someone
else
take
a
look
at
what
we're
doing
and
help
us
see
where
we
can
fill
some
gaps.
D
B
N
Thank
you,
I'm
so
sorry.
I
missed
the
first
part
of
the
meeting.
I
had
a
last
minute
council
committee
meeting
that
the
mayor
needed
me
on,
but
I
hope
to
watch
the
first
hour
on
youtube.
It'll
be
some
of
my
viewing
tonight,
because
I
hear
that
you
all
had
lots
of
good
comments
and
I'm
excited
to
see
those.