►
From YouTube: Clearwater Community Development Board 7/19/22
Description
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
Agenda can be found here: http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
A
A
A
Please
remember
to
turn
off
your
cell
phone
so
that
they
do
not
become
a
distraction
during
the
meeting.
Please
also
refrain
from
having
conversations
in
this
room
so
that
we
might
hear
all
of
the
testimony
given
today
to
ensure
a
complete
record
of
this
board's
actions.
We
ask
that
each
individual
wishing
to
speak,
including
the
applicant,
speak
into
the
microphone
at
the
podium
in
front
of
us,
clearly
state
your
name
and
spell
your
last
name
for
the
clerk.
A
A
I
A
J
Thank
you,
madam
chairman.
Members
of
the
board
just
want
to
share
with
you
difficulty,
william
johnson
269
from
redford
court
west
clearwater,
something
that's
difficult
for
the
members
of
the
public
in
looking
at
and
reviewing
your
documents
and
items
that
will
be
coming
to
you.
It's
my
understanding
that,
on
friday
or
thursday,
before
the
meeting,
you
get
a
package
that
contains
everything
that
is
relevant
to
this
hearing.
J
We
don't
have
access
to
that
package.
Instead,
we
go
to
excela,
which
is
the
planning
tool,
and
there
are
lots
of
documents
in
excela
and
we
have
to
puzzle
through
them
to
find
the
document.
That
is
current
and
has
the
description
of
the
deviation
requested
and
sometimes
like
I
did
yesterday,
I
was
looking
at
the
wrong
document.
J
I
was
looking
at
the
development
agreement
that
went
to
the
drc,
not
the
one
that
was
coming
up,
because
the
one
that
was
coming
up
was
called
the
resolution,
and
so,
if
you
were
to
follow
more
of
the
logic,
that's
used
by
the
city
council,
where
in
granicus,
the
documents
related
to
that
particular
project
are
the
only
the
ones
that
you
need
to
look
at.
That
would
be
helpful,
so
an
idea
hope
you'll.
Consider
that.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr.
A
Johnson,
any
other
members
of
the
public
that
would
like
to
come
forward
to
speak
on
something.
That's
not
on
today's
agenda.
All
right.
We
will
move
on
to
our
consent
agenda.
This
board
has
adopted
a
consent,
agenda
format
and
the
consent
items
are
identified
as
such
on
the
agenda
consent.
Agenda
items
are
those
items
for
which
the
planning
and
development
department
recommends
approval.
The
applicant
is
in
agreement
with
any
proposed
conditions
and
no
not.
A
A
Four:
zero
five
one
forty
devon
drive
the
owner
is
casey
k,
carlson
representative
robert
res
rest,
marine
construction,
company,
the
location
is
.176
acres
located
on
the
north
side
of
devon
drive
approximately
580
feet
east
of
hampden
drive.
The
board
is
reviewing
an
addition
and
extension
to
an
existing
572
square
foot
dock
with
a
proposed
185
square
foot
floating
dock
in
the
low
medium
density
residential
district
for
the
property
located
at
140
devon
drive.
A
G
K
K
A
Opposed
that
item
is
approved,
we
have
a
level
three
application
on
our
agenda
and
a
continued
level,
two
application,
which
was
heard
in
large
part
last
month,
and
the
proceedings
was
nearly
concluded.
We
are
going
to
move
that
item
from
the
bottom
of
today's
agenda
to
the
next
to
be
the
next
item
on
the
agenda.
That
is
case
fld2022-03011.
A
At
1
000
el
dorado
avenue,
the
owner
is
nicholas
r
friedman
and
el
dorado
beach
llc.
The
representative
is
lauren
rubinstein
of
den
hart
and
rubenstein
location
is
0.225
acres
on
the
west
side
of
el
dorado
at
the
terminus
of
island
drive,
and
the
board
is
continuing.
Its
review
of
a
proposed
non-opaque,
four
foot
fence
seaward
of
the
coastal
construction
line
in
this
low
medium
density,
residential
district
for
the
property
at
the
site
I
just
mentioned
is
mr
perry.
A
Are
you
going
to
speak
to
this
when
we
concluded
last
month
at
the
time
of
the
recess,
was
requested,
we
had
reached
the
stage
of
process
where
we
were
having
discussion
by
the
board
and
a
vote,
and
we
received
the
request
just
a
reminder
that
the
entire
proceeding
from
last
month
was
carried
over
to
today.
So
it
is
all
part
of
the
same
record
right,
and
can
you
advise
the
board
where
we
are
with
this.
L
Yes,
all
I
was
going
to
add
was
that
it's
my
understanding
that
attorneys,
from
both
the
budding
property
owner
to
the
north
and
for
the
subject
site,
have
have
been
meeting
they've,
been
working
with
our
legal
staff
to
come
up
with
a
condition
of
approval
that
I
think
everyone
can
can
live
with,
and
I
was
just
simply
going
to
turn
it
over
to
mr
medicare.
All
right.
F
Thank
you
mark
madam
chair,
and
board
members
matthew
midge
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
clearwater.
I
did
have.
I
F
Opportunity
to
meet
with
the
attorneys
on
both
sides
of
the
fence
last
week
and
we
were
able
to
craft
the
condition
of
approval
that
we
believe
works
for
everyone
and
resolves
kind
of
the
issues
relating
to
the
disputed
property
area
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
didn't
build
into.
So
I
actually
had
copies
of
that
condition.
I'd
like
to
pass
around
to
all
of
you
for
your
review.
F
And
essentially,
what
this
condition
would
allow
for
is
for
now
you'll
see
on
page
two
that
there
is
a
survey
with
a
red
line
that
shows
where
the
fence
would
be
proposed
to
be
built.
This
area
is
an
area
that
is
outside
the
disputed
area,
and
we
came
up
with
this
by
looking
at
both
surveys
and
basically
crossing
them
over
one
another,
so
that
we
could
see
where
the
disputed
area
was
and
to
make
sure
that
the
fence
was
built
outside
of
it.
F
I
know
that
the
applicant's
attorney
here-
and
it
looks
like
possibly
the
attorney
for
the
neighboring
property
as
well.
Perhaps
we
should
hear
from
them
and
see
if
they
have
anything
to
add
or
any
additional
information.
I
would
also
like
to
point
out
to
you
that
the
survey
I
provided,
you
does
not
include
a
note
that
I
received
from
ms
rubinstein
this
morning
and
the
note
basically
says
that
the
that
the
red
line
shows
the
location
of
the
proposed
spence
in
accordance
with
agreed
upon
condition.
F
M
Rubenstein
dunhart
and
rubenstein
2700
first
avenue
north
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
el
dorado
beach
llc
and
I
do
have
a
copy
of
the
exhibit
a
that.
I
will
also
submit
to
you
all
that
does
have
the
comment
on
it.
Just
so
for
transparency,
it
has
been
submitted
to
the
city
and
will
be
included.
I
believe
with
the
record.
M
Just
to
echo
what
city
attorney
said,
we
you
know
work
together
to
come
up
with
a
condition
so
that
we're
outside
the
disputed
area.
We
think
this
is
a
way
to
safeguard
all
properties
and
make
sure
that
my
client
is
able
to
build
the
fence,
and
you
know,
secure
his
property
and
his
children
from
running
out
without
affecting
any
potential
property
rights
of
the
neighbors.
N
N
We
have
had
a
conversation
with
the
city
attorney's
office
regarding
the
proposed
inclusion
of
the
condition
regarding
the
pending
lawsuit.
As
you
know,
we
have
a
lawsuit
between
the
two
parties
regarding
the
location
of
the
property
boundary
since
that
time,
and
I
believe
it
was
the
board's
observation
as
well.
We'd
not
seen
a
plan
of
the
actual
you
know
fence
and
where
it
was
proposed
to
go.
I
will
say
that
the
fence
is
currently
proposed
to
be
placed
on
the
side
lot
line.
N
That
is
the
side
lot
line
presented
by
our
surveyor
as
the
position
of
the
located
property
line.
We
do
have
a
concern
over
the
extent
of
the
fence,
as
it's
located
toward
the
water
only
in
that
the
corner
of
the
fence
cuts
off
the
30-some
odd-year-old
path
to
the
beach
that
goes
through
the
dunes
in
that
location.
N
Just
on
that
corner-
and
we
wanted
to
bring
that
to
the
attention
of
the
board
to
see
if
there
was
some
possibility
of
inserting
a
45
or
something
in
that
location,
I
believe
that
it's
a
path
that
the
applicant
uses
as
well,
so
I
don't
know
if
that
had
come
to
anybody's
attention
in
looking
at
the
photographs,
but
as
to
the
location
of
the
fence
north
to
south.
Of
course,
it
appears
to
be
located
on
the
the
property
line
as
we
believe
that
is
located
in
the
lawsuit.
N
I
have
any
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
in
the
meantime,
though,
it
is
as
advertised
on
the
the
side,
property.
N
B
N
Was
able
to
come
today
and
actually
view
the
property
with
the
stakes
in
place
on
the
property
corners?
If
I
may
well,
that's
a
little.
Where
am
I
looking?
Oh
okay,
gulf
of
mexico?
Here
we
go
so
the
fence,
as
proposed,
I
believe,
goes
to
that
corner
right.
B
N
On
the
ground,
in
that
location
is
a
long
used
path
through
the
dune
vegetation
to
the
beach
that
the
property
owner
both
ms
bill
gore
and
I
believe
mr
freeman
use
also,
as
you
know,
there
are
holders
of
an
easement
that
crossed
through
the
southern
port
portion
of
miss
bilgor's
property
that
also
used
that
path.
N
The
only
concern
that
came
to
light,
having
been
able
to
view
the
property
today
was
that
the
fence
extending
to
that
corner
and
then
making
a
90
degree
turn
eight
into
that
beach
path,
which,
of
course,
is
going
to
force
beach
traffic
onto
the
dune
vegetation
to
get
around
it,
which
is,
of
course
something
that
the
city.
N
Could
you
put
you
really
understanding
more
to
have
happen,
so
my
suggestion
was
talking
about
again.
Yes,
sir
this
corner,
so
it
would
be
the
north
west
corner
of
the
property
in
that
location.
We
do
not
dispute
that.
That
is
the
corner
of
mr
friedman's
property,
but
at
that
location,
physically
on
the
ground
is
the
pathway.
N
There's
a
pretty
neat
device
here:
okay,
so
what
you're
looking
at
here
is.
These
are
the
stakes
that
mr
friedman
had
placed
the
stakes
for
the
that,
where
the
fence
is
actually
going
to
go
are
located,
I
would
say
closer
to
a
line
like
this
okay,
but
where
the
fence
gets
to
its
point
and
then
turns
it
cuts
much
of
the
access
of
both
the
property
owners
and
the
easement
holders
onto
this
path
that
goes
up
the
beach.
N
If
you
were
to
look
at
it
on
an
aerial
you
could
see
in
this
location,
it
would
be
trying
to
figure
which
property
is,
which
is
this
one,
so
it
would
be
in
this
location
where
the
path
is
the
fence
is
being
proposed
on
what
we
believe
is
the
property
line
and
again
in
that
corner.
We
are
not
disputing
that.
That
is
mr
friedman's
property,
but
the
only
suggestion
would
make
is
that
perhaps
a
small
45
degree
angle
could
be
added
there
so
that
it
doesn't
force
the
foot
traffic
into
the
dune
vegetation.
F
N
We
do
not
believe
that
the
applicant
owns
the
property
out
in
the
dunes.
It's
my
understanding
that
the
city
takes
a
similar
approach
that
the
property
actually
going
back
to
this.
We
believe
the
property
ends.
At
that
point,
however,
you'll
see
that
the
survey
that
was
that
was
submitted
suggests
that
the
property
continues
all
the
way
to
the
gulf
of
mexico,
but.
N
N
We
would
concede
that
in
our
position,
that
is
his
property.
We
would
just
simply
ask
if
at
all
possible
that
the
fence
have
a
angle
put
in
there
to
not
cut
off
the
the
sand
path.
N
B
B
That
right
now,
unless
we
do
something
with
the
essentially
a
taking
of
their
property,
I
mean
they
might,
there
might
be
nice
people
and
you
could
ask
them
if
they're
pretty
pleased
with
it
for
everybody,
but
short
of
that,
can
we
write
anything
in
there?
I
don't
know
if
we
can.
D
N
And
that's
all
I
was
asking
and
and
to
be
fair.
I've
not
mentioned
this
to
the
property
owner's
attorney,
so
he's
obviously
reacting
to
it.
But
I
only
had
the
opportunity
today
to
view
the
property.
B
C
A
N
We
agreed
to
it
to
the
the
location
of
the
fence
on
the
property
line,
as
we
put
it
all
right.
All
I'm
bringing
to
the
board's
attention
is
that
when
I
saw
it
today,
a
concern
was
voiced
to
me
regarding
the
way
that
it
cuts
that
corner
on
the
outside
and
just
to
simply
see
if
the
board
and
the
applicant
wish
to
address
it.
That's
right.
N
She's
not
happy
about
the
fence,
but
she's
not
going
to
go
to
court
with
you
over
the
fence.
If
that's
what
you're
she
agrees.
Yes,.
M
M
Based
on
the
survey
that
we've
submitted,
showing
the
disputed
property
line.
That
stake
will
be
in
from
the
red
line.
I
believe
it's
about
25
or
26
inches,
so
it's
actually
any
further
end,
and
you
can
see
that
even
behind
it
it's
you
know
it's
a
hard
angle
to
see,
but
there
is
room
to
walk
around
and
access
the
beach
path,
so
we've
taken
it
into
account.
M
O
Thanks,
my
name
is
steve
wolf
I
live
at
one
thousand
man.
Delay
appreciate
wol,
ff
appreciate
the
board's
indulgence.
Thank
you,
the
problem,
russ
and
the
fact
I
think
the
two
parties
that
are
named
here
you
know,
are
working
through
their
issue,
and
you
know
god
bless
I.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
it's
too
rich
people
with
stupid
problems.
Honestly,
we
have
a
beach
that
you
know.
O
O
Again,
that's
relied
on
people
in
your
role
and
I'm
sincerely
hoping
you'll
continue
to
maintain
that
stance.
The
issue
is,
I
see
it
is
that
we
have
a
pool
that
got
put
up
prior
to
the
issue
being
resolved.
We
have
deeded
access
and
I'm
happy
to
provide
a
copy
of
the
deed.
It
says
we're
entitled
to
a
pathway
between
el
dorado
and
the
beach.
O
There
are
three
homes
that
have
that.
Currently
only
two
homes
are
aware
of
it.
Obviously,
if
we
go
ahead-
and
you
know
take
this
further-
it'll
involve
all
three
of
us
and
I'll
reach
out
to
the
third
party
is-
and
I
don't
know
what
the
moving
line
is
because
we
haven't
been
privy
to
and
we
haven't
seen
copies
of,
architectures
or
drawings
or
anything.
So
I
may
be
misspeaking
and
there
may
be
no
concern
at
all.
O
But
my
perception
is
that,
while
that
pathway
starts
out
as
more
than
four
feet
at
the
portion
closest
to
ms
bill
gore's
home
by
the
time
it
narrows
down
to
where
the
fence
will
be
and
where
the
pool
ends
it
narrows
down,
so
you've
got
two
issues:
one.
What
about
the
pathway
that
we're
deeded
to
and
two
where's
ms
bill
gore's
fence
going
to
be,
and
is
she
going
to
go
ahead
and
put
plants
behind
that
pool
to
further
encroach
on
that
walkway
per
se?
O
So
our
concern
in
simply
saying
yes,
is
that
we
still
have
this
open
issue.
What's
the
walkway
what's
reasonable,
and
then
we
furthermore
have
this
issue
that
there's
a
fence
that
may
move
it
may
not
move
and
we're
hoping
to
be
able
to
resolve
this
short
of
litigation.
We're
hoping
it
shouldn't
be
that
hard,
at
least
from
my
very
narrow,
very
biased
perspective,
anyways,
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
If
there
aren't
any.
O
O
O
Because
I
can
tell
you
point
blank:
if
you
cut
that
fence
down
too
far,
I
have
people
going
through
it
to
try
to
respect
everybody's
peace
and
quiet.
You
know,
for
the
obvious
reasons,
being
a
good
neighbor
they're,
going
to
hit
the
fence
you're
going
to
hit
the
fence
with
beach
chairs
you're,
going
to
hit
the
fence
with
you
know,
wagons
with
whatever,
because
it's
too
narrow
a
pathway
and
who
can
use
it
just
three
properties.
It's
three.
O
It's
defined
as
three
properties
d
to
the
access
or
anybody
that
we
choose
to
go
ahead
and
allow
to
use
that
fence
because
they're
staying
with
us,
they're
friends,
whatever
you
know,
which
we've
always
tried
to
be
again
very
respectful
of
the
two
property
owners
and
not
extending
that
to
anyone
else.
I
mean
ms
bill
gore
has
asked
us
to
not
use
the
access
past
8
pm
because
it
disturbs
her
and
for
the
most
part
absent
a
few
times
a
year,
which
I
define
is
under
a
half
dozen.
O
It's
not
used
now,
but
now
at
some
point
it
becomes
a
little
bit
awkward
and
I
think
we're
reaching
awkward
right
now
because
we're
starting
to
talk
about
permanence.
P
Q
I'm
frida
wolfe
same
property,
owner
f-r-e-I-d-a.
Q
When
you
look
at
that
post,
it's
very
clearly
going
across
that
vegetation.
I
mean
it's
in
order
to
put
a
fence
there,
they're
going
to
tear
that
up
like.
Why
is
it
that
he's
got
grassy
area?
You
know
closer
to
his
home
if
you're
really
there
to
protect
your
children,
I
mean
yeah.
I
don't
know
him
from
adam
put
it
where
the
the
grass
is
like.
Why
do
you
need
to
go
ahead
and
get
into
the
the
grassy
area
of
the
dunes
and
go
ahead
and
disturb
the
eco
life
there?
Q
It's
it's
not
necessary,
and,
and
certainly
if
the
objective
is
to
go
ahead
and
protect
the
children
which
I
have
children,
I
mean
I'm
sure
many
of
you
do
at
the
end
of
the
day.
This
is
this
is
not
that
you're
talking
a
couple
of
feet.
Why
are
you
going
to
go
ahead
and
fence
there?
It's
not
necessary,
so
I
I
object
to
it
and
it's
cutting
off
our
path.
Q
Q
A
P
And
actually,
I've
had
some
discussions
with
the
friedmans
after
the
last
meeting
and
with
ellen
bilgore,
and
we
we're
all
kind
of
trying
to
sit
down
and
figure
this
out
without
it.
You
know,
coming
you
know,
continuing
litigation
or
or
having
it
be,
a
big
disagreement,
which
I
mean
I'm
still
open
to
do.
I
think
the
other
parties
are
also
open,
at
least
the
last
I
heard,
but
my
understanding
was
that
the
fence.
P
Okay,
so
you
can
see
this
is
the
walkway
that
we
go
through,
and
my
understanding
was
that
after
the
last
meeting-
and
we
kind
of
talked
about
this-
a
little
bit
after
that,
the
freedmen's-
I
don't
think
anyone's
in
dispute-
that
you
know
they
own.
You
know
potentially
own
this
area
here,
but
just
because
you
own
that
area
and
that's
your
property
line,
you
don't
have
to
put
the
fence
right
on
the
line
and
you
can
see
in
their
backyard.
P
P
Sorry
I
haven't
seen
anything
that
was
recently
submitted
any
of
the
plans,
I'm
just
going
off
of
conversations,
and
so
I
don't
know
I
mean
if,
if
the
city
received
these
plans,
I
guess
if
someone
could
explain
to
me
how
the
plan
like
maybe
on
this
photo
where
the
fence
will
be.
If
it's
going
to
be
outside
of
the
grassy
area,
and
I
guess
to
frieda's
question,
why
I
mean,
if
it's
I
mean
it
there's
already
a
fence
here
that
could
be
connected
to.
P
P
So
that's
my
question:
how
on
what
you
receive
from
the
applicant,
where
will
where
do
you
understand
that
the
fence
will
go.
B
P
The
belgore,
the
steps
the
steps
themselves
were
put
in
by
ellen,
and
so
she
is
the
one
that
as
long
as
I've
lived
there,
which
has
been
about
six
and
a
half
years,
she's
always
maintained
those
steps.
The
path
I
mean
you
know
we
all
kind
of
maintain
the
path.
If
there's
you
know
sand
spurs,
you
know
we'll
break
the
sand
spurs
out,
and
I
mean
we've
been
I've
been
doing
that
for
about
six
and
a
half
years.
I
think
ellen's
been
doing
that
for
maybe
close
to
30.
B
A
Well,
and
that's
partly
my
point
is
we
are
way
beyond
the
record
of
the
official
proceeding
which
was
last
month,
and
I
don't
really
think
we
need
to
reopen
revisit
this.
Clearly,
this
board
is
not
going
to
be
deciding
any
boundary
disputes
or
property
line
issues,
nor.
D
A
As
I
just
said,
it
seems
to
me
that
we
cannot
resolve
the
concerns
that
have
been
raised
by
the
neighbors,
because
it's
just
not
within
the
scope
of
our
authority,
and
at
this
point
I
think
the
question
is
based
upon
the
competent
substantial
evidence
that
was
presented
last
month
and
the
agreement
that's
been
represented
to
this
board
regarding
the
location
of
the
fence,
at
least
initially,
it
would
be
my
inclination
to
support
the
application.
But
what
say
you
all.
H
I
agree
with
you
mary.
I
don't
think
that
we're
here
to
we're,
definitely
not
here
as
jay,
stated
to
renegotiate
an
easement
agreement.
It
there's
parties
that
have
rights
to
it,
the
ones
across
the
street.
The
two
neighbors,
that's
a
legal
issue
if
they
want
to
get
together
and
rewrite
that
easement
agreement,
that's
up
to
them,
we're
just
looking
at
a
very
significant.
You
know
small
area
here
and
I'm
not
apt
to
putting
an
arbitrary.
H
R
H
H
A
Of
the
conditions
that
was
added
for
approval
in
the
report
provided
by
the
staff
was
that
they
had
to
acquire
all
of
the
required
environmental
permits
and
approvals
as
well
correct.
So
this
would
be
a
new
condition.
F
A
B
B
G
Madam
chair,
that
this
doesn't
have,
I
mean
this.
I
understand
the
neighbors
concerns
out
there,
I'm
out
there
in
your
neighborhood
two
or
three
times
a
week.
I
love
your
neighborhood,
it's
fantastic.
I
understand
wanting
to
get
out
there
and
how
people
come
and
go
off
el
dorado
to
to
the
beach,
and
I'm
encouraged
that
you
are
trying
to
work
together
to
try
to
figure
it
out.
G
I
think
I
think
we
as
a
board,
though
after
the
last
meeting
one
one.
Let's
make
sure
the
public
understands
our
role
and
expectations
of
what
we
can
and
can't
do
in
this
case,
this
easement
doesn't
have
anything
to
do
with
the
property
that
we're
discussing
today.
That's
before
the
border,
their
easement
right
is
with
the
bilgor
property,
not
with
this
property.
G
So
I
think
adam
chair
we're
bound
to
stick
to
our
role
and
our
role
in
this
case
is
to
prove
as
to
consider
the
application
on
this
property,
and
this
easement
doesn't
have
anything
to
do
with
this
property
other
than
it's
historically
been.
You
know
made
it
easier
to
use
the
billboard
easement
that
we
need
to
stick
to
the
evidence.
That's
in
the
record,
the
expert
testimony
and
and
to
move,
to,
consider
and
move
forward
to
vote
on
this.
A
All
right,
anyone
else
have
a
comment.
Mr
quataki,
did
you
have
a
motion?
You
want
to
make
sure
I'll
give
it.
A
A
It's
considered
a
legislative
hearing
all
level
three
cases
such
as
a
plan,
amendment
rezoning
or
development
agreement
are
considered
legislative
hearings,
the
community
development
board
reviews
the
application,
the
staff
report,
correspondence
and
all
evidence
presented
today
and
makes
a
recommendation
to
the
city
council
for
level
three
applications.
The
city
council
makes
the
final
decision
the
procedure
for
all
level.
A
50,
north
osceola
and
112
south
osceola
avenue
the
owner
is
the
city
of
clearwater
representative
is
katherine
cole,
hill,
ward
and
henderson.
The
location
is
a
2.6
acre
portion
of
a
parcel
located
on
the
northwest
corner
of
south
osceola
avenue
and
pierce
street,
and
a
1.348
acre
portion
of
a
parcel
located
on
the
west
side
of
north
north
osceola
avenue
approximately
370
feet
north
of
cleveland
street.
A
The
community
development
board
is
reviewing
and
making
a
recommendation
to
city
council
on
a
development
agreement
between
the
city
of
clearwater
and
gotham
property
acquisitions,
llc
and
the
denuzio
group,
providing
for
the
redevelopment
of
two
sites
on
the
west
side
of
osceola
avenue
a
budding
coachman
park
in
the
downtown
core
for
overnight
accommodations
attached
dwellings,
commercial
uses
such
as
retail
food
and
beverage
and
cultural
uses
and
event
space.
Pursuant
to
community
development
code,
section
4-606.
A
Before
we
begin
with
planning
and
development's
presentation,
I
we
received
a
request
by
planning
staff
and
by
the
applicant
to
extend
their
presentation
times
to
20
minutes
versus
the
usual
10
minutes.
Unless
there's
an
objection
by
a
member
of
the
board
and
I'll
pull
you
all
in
just
a
moment,
we
have
the
legal
authority
to
grant
that
request
and
I
think,
given
the
magnitude
of
the
project,
it
would
be
helpful
to
the
board
to
hear
as
much
information
as
we
possibly
can
beginning
with
mr
director.
A
F
To
begin
madam
chair
at
this
time,
I
would
ask
that
the
board
accept
ms
gina
clayton,
our
planning
development
director
as
an
expert
witness
in
general
planning,
zoning
annexations
land
use
and
rezoning
amendments,
demographics,
land
development
code
and
land
development
code,
amendments,
historic
preservation,
comprehensive
planning,
special
area
plans,
overlay
districts
and
all
other
matters.
She
is
about
to
testify
here
off.
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
time
extension.
I
appreciate
it.
I'm
really
happy
to
be
here
this
afternoon
to
present
to
you
tina.
Would
you
just
identify.
E
Gina
clayton
planning
and
development,
as
I
said,
I'm
very
happy
to
be
here
this
afternoon
to
present
to
you
all
the
development
agreement
for
the
redevelopment
of
two
city-owned
bluff
parcels.
The
redevelopment
has
been
planned
for
many
years
and
is
central
to
the
revitalization
efforts
for
downtown
clearwater.
E
While
a
call
for
development
only
included
two
parcels,
you
will
also
see
on
the
map
that
the
library
parking
lot
has
been
included
in
this
agreement
to
provide
access
to
harborview
site.
I
do
want
to
be
clear,
though,
that
the
city
is
not
selling
that
property
and
will
control
it,
and
the
public
will
continue
to
have
access
to
it.
E
The
the
applicant's
proposal
which
is
presented
on
the
screen
calls
for
a
mix
of
uses,
including
apartments
to
increase
the
number
of
full-time
residents
in
downtown
a
hotel
to
bring
a
steady
flow
of
visitors
and
commercial
uses
to
attract
the
public.
The
proposal
will
bridge
the
gap
that
has
existed
historically
between
the
waterfront
and
the
heart
of
our
downtown
core,
and
this
project,
along
with
the
park,
will
bring
people
to
our
downtown.
E
So
first
I'd
like
to
start
with
the
harborview
site.
It
is
a
1.348
acre
parcel
and
there
are
two
buildings
proposed
along
with
a
concealed
and
underground
parking
garage.
The
north
building
will
be
a
158
unit,
hotel,
it's
going
to
be
13
stories
high
and
a
maximum
feet
of.
Excuse
me
a
maximum
of
157
feet
in
height,
and
at
this
time
they
don't
have
a
specific
hotel
brand,
but
amenities
that
they
are
proposing
include
things
like
a
rooftop
pool
business
center
and
some
conference
space.
That
will
be
available.
E
The
south
building,
which
will
be
much
smaller
in
scale,
will
not
exceed
53
feet
and
height,
and
that's
really
in
line
with
the
commercial
and
townhouse
wrap
that
you
find
on
water's
edge.
It
will
also
include
12
000
square
feet
of
commercial
space
such
as
retail
restaurants,
cultural
uses
and
event
space.
E
The
proposed
garage
will
have
a
total
of
169
spaces,
concealed
from
view
to
accommodate
code
requirements,
as
well
as
50
spaces
dedicated
or
reserved
and
allocated
to
the
city.
The
density
of
the
hotel
is
proposed
to
be
124
units
per
acre
where
95
is
allowed
and
the
developers
will
be
planning
on
submitting
a
request
to
this
board
at
the
time
of
site
plan
approval
for
a
36
unit
allocation
from
the
downtown
public
amenities
incentive
pool.
F
Miss
clayton
and
parking
is
an
ongoing
subject
of
negotiation
between
the
parties
right
now
correct.
E
As
you
can
see,
on
the
site
plan.
The
building
on
the
left
of
the
screen
is
the
hotel
and
it
will
have
a
lobby
that
fronts
on
osceola.
Additionally,
there
will
be
commercial
space
fronting
on
the
street
and
a
plaza
area
between
the
hotel
and
the
commercial
building,
which
is
on
the
right
of
the
screen.
E
The
conceptual
landscaping
plans
illustrate
the
significant
amount
of
publicly
accessible
space
which
equals
about
a
half
an
acre.
These
areas
are
along
the
perimeter
of
the
property
on
the
north
side
and
on
the
south
side
and
then
through
the
interior
of
the
park,
and
this
space
will
be
dedicated
for
outdoor
dining
and
just
public
gathering
and
pedestrian
access
into
the
park.
E
As
you
can
see
from
the
elevations,
the
proposal
has
a
modern
urban
architectural
design
and
it
includes
a
balance
of
glass,
stucco
and
wood.
A
sloped
roof
cover
with
grass
and
seating
provides
a
public
space
between
the
site
and
the
rooftop
of
the
smaller
commercial
building.
This
unique
concept
will
provide
an
interesting
design
feature
from
the
park
facing
side
of
the
property.
E
This
project
really
works
well
to
blur
the
lines
between
the
public
and
private
realms.
It
also
creates
view
corridors
through
the
site
and
it
maximizes
views
of
the
water.
The
building
placement
on
the
site
is
also
sensitive
to
properties
that
are
located
on
the
other
side
of
north
osceola
avenue,
and
then
the
last
thing
I'd
like
to
highlight
about
this
project.
They
are
proposing
to
construct
these
buildings
to
lead
silver,
equivalent
standards,
use
lid
storm
water
techniques
and
include
a
limited
number
of
ev
charging
and
ev
ready
spaces.
E
E
No
okay:
let's
move
on
the
proposal
for
a
city
hall
site
includes
a
mixed-use
project
with
a
large
residential
component
that
includes
two
high-rise
towers
on
a
large
podium
with
parking
located,
mostly
underground
and
concealed
from
grade.
The
project
is
proposed
to
have
a
maximum
of
600
attached
dwelling
units,
along
with
typical
residential
amenities,
as
well
as
40
000
square
feet
of
commercial
uses
such
as
retail
food
and
beverage
and
cultural
uses,
the
apartment,
lobby
and
amenities,
as
well
as
commercial
space,
will
be
located
in
the
building
podium.
E
This
proposal
will
be
27
stories
high
for
a
total
of
289
feet
and
the
project
density
will
be
253
units
per
acre
where
95
is
permitted
and
the
far
will
be
at
3.35
again.
This
will
also
require
an
allocation
from
the
public
amenities
incentive
pool.
So
if
the
development
agreement
is
approved
at
the
time
of
fld
approval,
you
will
be
making
a
decision
on
that
matter.
E
As
you
can
see,
on
the
site
plan
commercial
uses
are
located
on
the
northeast
section
of
the
building
closest
to
south
osceola,
which
is
at
the
top
of
your
screen
and,
as
you
move
south
along
osceola
you'll
see
that
the
south
tower
is
set
back
to
create
openness
on
this
site
and
an
entry
focal
point.
It
also
provides
a
separation
between
the
tower
and
helps
preserve
a
couple
of
trees
that
are
located
at
pearson.
E
There
is
a
space
between
the
portion
of
the
building
in
south
osceola,
which
will
provide
a
drop-off
area,
and
then
there
will
be
a
plaza
area
in
front
of
that
next
to
the
street.
The
garage
entry
is
located
at
the
southwest
portion
of
the
site
and,
as
you
can
see
on
the
drawing,
it
is
concealed
from
the
park's
view
by
some
commercial
space.
There's
also
a
raised
amenity
deck
in
the
center
of
the
project
on
the
rear
side,
overlooking
the
park.
E
The
plan
illustrates
the
significant
amount
of
space
that's
incorporated
into
the
site,
design
for
a
public
plaza
along
south
osceola
to
the
corner
of
pierce,
and
then
you'll
find
a
landscaped
retail
corridor
located
on
the
north
side
of
the
property
adjacent
to
water's
edge.
That
provides
a
connection
from
osceola
avenue
down
into
coachman
park.
E
As
you
can
see
from
the
elevations.
The
proposal
has
a
modern
coastal
design
that
incorporates
the
use
of
glass,
aluminum
and
stucco,
and
the
building
mass
is
mitigated
by
locating
the
towers
on
the
podium
and
creating
a
large
view
corridor
through
the
site
like
harborview.
These
buildings
will
also
be
constructed
to
lead
silver.
Equivalent
standards
incorporate
lead.
Excuse
me,
lid
techniques
and
ev.
E
Charging
here
is
a
view
from
osceola
looking
into
the
project
and
then
one
on
that
landscape
retail
area
that
will
take
you
down
to
the
park
staff
believes
these
projects
are
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
city's
redevelopment
goals
and
generally
consistent
with
the
downtown
district
standards
based
on
the
uses
proposed.
The
projects
will
create
the
needed
edge
to
activate
coachman
park.
Almost
half
of
the
total
3.95
acre
parcels
will
be
dedicated
to
publicly
accessible
space
for
gathering
dining
and
provide
an
opportunity
for
programming
based
on
the
number
of
residential
and
hotel
units.
E
These
developments
will
create
eyes
on
the
park
to
help
keep
the
area
safe.
The
careful
designs
will
also
ensure
the
scale
of
development
does
not
overwhelm
the
park
and,
lastly,
the
two
underground
and
concealed
parking
garage
protect
the
park
from
visual
intrusion
of
cars
and
aid
in
limiting
building
mass
and
height.
To
make
this
project
successful.
The
proposed
30-year
development
agreement
sets
forth
a
series
of
public
and
private
obligations,
so,
in
addition
to
those
things
that
we've
just
walked
through
the
plans,
the
height
densities
intensities
and
ultimately
parking
once
that's
all
worked
out.
E
There
are
a
few
other
precision
provisions
that
I
think
I
would
like
to
point
out
to
you
that
don't
really
have
to
do
with
the
typical
site
plan
issues
that
you
look
at.
There
is
a
prohibition
of
self
storage,
light
assembly
and
nightclubs
unless
the
nightclub
is
located
in
the
hotel
building.
These
are
uses
that
are
allowed
by
the
downtown
zoning
district.
That
would
be
further
restricted
by
this
agreement.
E
There's
also
a
provision
dealing
with
amplified
music.
It
establishes
decibel
levels
consistent
with
background
music
noise
so
that
these
outdoor
dining
opportunities
can
have
music
if
so
desired.
It
also
requires
the
ingress
and
egress
to
publicly
accessible
areas
to
be
dedicated
to
the
general
public.
E
From
the
city's
perspective,
a
key
design
consideration
for
the
bluffs
is
to
limit
the
visual
and
design
implications
of
required
parking.
Therefore,
the
agreement
provides
for
a
city
contribution
to
offset
the
cost
of
providing
that
parking
underground,
and
then
there
is
also
an
exhibit
e
to
the
agreement
that
outlines
sustainability
and
health
and
wellness
initiatives.
F
E
Yes,
it
is
so
the
development
agreement
obligates
the
city
also
to
make
ready
the
sites
for
development
that
includes
demolishing
city
hall
and
conducting
any
sort
of
environmental
site
assessments
that
need
to
be
done
and
if
any
sort
of
issues
are
found
that
we
would
remediate
those
issues.
It
also
addresses
how
the
city
and
the
developers
will
share
costs
for
designing
and
constructing
the
pedestrian
bridge
for
for
coachman
park.
E
And,
lastly,
the
agreement
lays
out
conditions
that
must
be
met
by
december
31st
2024,
in
order
for
the
developers
to
close
on
the
property
and
if
those
do
not
occur,
the
city
can
terminate
the
agreement
if
it
chooses
to.
So
I
think
that
gives
you
a
good
overview
of
the
main
points
of
the
agreement.
But,
as
you
all
know,
this
has
been
a
very
fast
moving
process
and
the
agreement
before
you,
I
think,
was
the
latest
draft
of
that
agreement
provided
by
the
applicant
in
time
to
go
out
for
your
package.
E
Based
on
whether
they're
more
land
development,
oriented
or
if
there
are
more
business
points,
so
first
of
all,
there
is
a
reference
to
surface
parking
in
section
4.01
and
we
would
need
we
want
to
clarify
that.
The
mention
that
surface
parking
is
removed
and
we
really
talk
about
drop-off
areas,
because
there
really
is
no
surface
parking
on
the
project.
So
we'd
like
to
clarify
that
section.
4.12
of
the
agreement
deals
with
the
number
of
spaces
to
be
provided.
E
However,
the
draft
that
you
have
in
the
package
states
that
there'll
be
a
one
per
one
ratio
and
the
reason
why
that
is
important
is
because
there's
a
minimum
number
of
apartments
proposed,
which
is
between
500
and
a
maximum
of
600..
So
if
there's
500
apartments
ultimately
built
this
proposal
before
you
says
500
parking
spaces
and
we're
still
working
on
that
and.
E
We
would
like
to
clarify
sections
5.02
and
03
to
clarify
that
we
intend
those
provisions
to
apply
to
city-controlled
utilities
and
not
others
and
is
currently
drafted.
Section
909
would
create
some
potential
conflicts
between
the
time
frame.
Construction
activities
are
allowed
to
occur
in
our
noise
ordinance,
so
that
needs
to
be
resolved
and
then
section
10.09
and
exhibit
f
addresses
public
realm
improvements,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
what
the
language
says
is
consistent
with
the
graphics
that's
contained
in
that
exhibit.
E
So
there's
just
a
few
business
points,
and
I
know
these
are
not
things
that
you
all
typically
do
discuss,
but
I
would
like
to
bring
them
to
your
attention
if
you
would
like
additional
clarification
on
any
of
those
I'd.
Ask
that
you
have
matthew
do
that,
but
sections
1.01
and
9.06
need
some
further
discussion.
We
are
seeking
some
clarifications
to
the
definitions
of
the
qualified
transferee
and
as
well
as
revisions
related
to
how
changes
in
control
of
the
property
will
be
limited.
E
So
your
role
today
is
to
provide
city
council
a
recommendation
on
the
proposed
agreement
and
pursuant
to
code
4-606,
you
may
recommend
approval.
You
can
approve,
recommend
changes
or
conditions
that
you
think
ought
to
be
considered
by
city,
council
or
disapproval.
So
that
concludes
my
remarks.
I'll,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
I'll
look
forward
to
our
discussion.
T
H
Have
questions
just
for
a
point
of
clarification.
You
mentioned
that
the
developer
will
have
certain
obligations
that
they
have
to
perform
on
prior
to
the
date
of
sale,
the
closing
correct
right
what
they
have
to
do.
What
about
post
closing
as
far
as
development
itself
are
there
going
to
be
any
provisions
as
far
as
construction
and
timelines
post
closing.
H
E
Right
pursuant
to
the
community
development
code,
the
conceptual
plans
that
are
approved
in
this
agreement
are
what
will
govern
the
site
plan
application
if
changes
need
to
be
made,
which
likely
will
because
we're
at
a
very
high
level.
At
this
point,
those
changes
need
to
meet
the
list
of
what
I
can
approve
as
a
minor
amendment
and
that's
very
specific
criteria
and
the
code.
If
the
changes
go
beyond
that,
we
would
have
to
come
back
and
amend
the
development
agreement
to
reflect
the
revised
design
and.
F
I
would
like
to
point
out
too
that
the
conceptual
plans
have
to
substantially
comply
with,
what's
actually
submitted,
to
be
able
to
move
forward
with
their
applications.
So
we
just
wanted
to
kind
of
let
you
know
about
that
as
well,
and
that's
something
we'll
be
keeping
an
eye
on
as
we
move
through
the
process.
E
S
E
Oh,
what
I
there's
a
section
that
talks
about
that,
the
let
me
get
it.
F
It
talks
about
the
utilities,
essentially
that
the
city
is
going
to
be
provided.
One
of
the
things
that
we're
kind
of
looking
to
work
on
here
and
just
touch
up
the
language
on
is
making
sure
that
we
provide
in
the
development
agreement
that
this
section
relates
to
utilities
and
services
that
are
provided
by
the
city.
So
city
control
utilities.
You
know
we're
not
responsible.
That's
water,
sewer.
F
E
Moving
this
is
this
is
ultimately
the
agreement
that
lets
the
properties
be
sold
and
governs
all
the
parameters
for
development
and
business
points
for
the
city
to
sell
it.
Once
the
public
has
approved
a
referendum
for
us
to
sell
it,
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
a
public.
I
mean
an
important
point
that
I
didn't
really
bring
up.
There
will
have
to
be
a
referendum
to
change
the
charter
to
allow
this
development
to
occur.
City
council
will
be
discussing
that
thursday
evening
and
the
election
would
be
in
november.
A
That
was
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
clarify,
because
it's,
the
scope
of
the
project
is
a
little
overwhelming
when
you
first
start
looking
at
it
and
obviously,
for
example,
pages
12
and
13
of
the
staff
report
has
a
bullet
point
summary
of
what's
in
the
development
agreement
as
it
stands
now,
and
it
is
a
long
and
daunting
process
that
involves
a
lot
of
steps,
many
of
which
by
themselves,
could
derail
the
whole
thing
if
they
don't
pan
out
and
so
for
purposes
of
today.
A
It
would
be
my
understanding
that,
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
plans
and
codes
that
govern
this
decision,
we
are
making
a
decision
to
recommend
to
city
council
whether
to
take
this
first
crucial
step
in
this
very
long
process
to
approve
the
development
agreement
as
a
ticket
to
start
moving
through
the
rest
of
the
steps.
Is
that
correct?
A
Yes,
all
right
and
to
the
extent
that
there
are
these
unresolved
issues
that
are
still
under
discussion?
Is
there
anything
about
the
fact
that
these
things
are
still
in
discussion
that
would
preclude
us
from
making
a
recommendation
based
on
our
finding?
If
we
do
that,
the
development
agreement
proposal
meets
the
requirements
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
the
downtown
redevelopment
plan
and
the
cdc.
E
I
think
that
if
you
find
something
that
you
have
questions
about,
then
there
needs
to
be
some
recommendation
to
counsel
on
those
items,
otherwise
based
at
least
on
staff's
analysis.
At
this
time,
we
believe
that
it's
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
the
council
values
your
opinion
and
would
be
looking
for
any
specific
recommendations.
If
you
have
them
to
any
points
that
you
believe.
F
When
we
were
drafting
this
agreement,
we
were
sure
to
include
all
the
necessary
statutory
and
code
provisions
to
ensure
that
they're
all
here
for
you
to
take
a
look
at
and
make
sure
we're
in
compliance
from
that
effect,
and
we
hope
to
have
the
outstanding
issues
addressed
by
the
time
we
have
this
agreement
approved
by
city
council.
In
fact,
we
will
have
them
all
resolved
by
that
point.
Okay,.
A
Now
one
other
thing
that's
just
important
to
me
because
it
comes
up
from
time
to
time
not
in
a
situation
of
this
magnitude,
but
if
we
decide
to
make
a
recommendation
to
city
council
to
approve
the
development
agreement
you
mentioned
and
there's
several
other
things.
You
mentioned
the
transfers
from
the
density
pool
that
would
come
back
before
us.
A
There
are
obviously
a
lot
of
other
decision
makers
in
this
long
and
expanded
process
as
well,
and
I
just
want
to
confirm
that
making
a
recommendation
of
approval
from
this
board
today
will
not
in
any
way
be
binding
on
future
approval
processes
by
this
board
or
any
other
decision
maker
in
the
chain
right.
That
is
correct.
All
right-
and
this
is
a
little
thing-
the
code
caps,
a
development
agreement
of
this
or
this
type
of
process
to
a
20-year
duration.
You
have
a
30-year
provided,
I'm
sure
there
is
a
basis
for
that.
E
E
F
We
are
going
to
be
processing
a
code
amendment
to
allow
for
the
30-year
development
agreements
as
well,
and
I
did
want
to
point
out
one
other
fact
that,
regarding
the
timelines
too,
is
that
it's
a
condition
of
final
completion
that
a
co
has
to
be
obtained.
So
we
had
talked
a
little
bit
earlier
about
timeline's
approval,
like
I
said,
we're,
focusing
mainly
on
the
front
end,
but
there
are
just
some.
There
are
some
conditions
further
down
the
timeline.
F
A
E
Probably
two
more
years
because
we
would
want
to
have
it
in
conjunction
with
you
know,
a
national
election
all
right.
B
R
As
ms
clayton
said,
this
has
been
a
whirlwind
kind
of
process
for
the
past
month
and
we
appreciate
all
the
effort
of
staff
and
the
city
attorney's
office
to
get
the
agreement
to
you
all
to
review
in
in
its
substantial
form
that
it
is
today
with
me
today.
Is
jordan
behar,
the
architect
of
record
on
in
your
former
colleague
on
the
project
keith
grimminger
from
stantec
who's,
working
on
the
site,
design
and
stantec.
R
As
miss
clayton
said,
there
is
a
proposed
development
on
the
two
sites.
We
won't
belabor
this
at
600
park,
apartments,
158
overnight
accommodation
rooms,
code,
minimum
parking.
I
do
just
want
to
highlight
that.
There's
no
request
by
the
developer
to
develop
parking
less
than
code
and
in
fact
the
developer
has
committed
to
developing
parking
by
code
on
at
the
ratios
identified
in
the
land
development
code,
as
well
as
the
50
parking
spaces
dedicated
to
the
public
at
the
harborview
site.
R
The
city
has
expressed
that,
based
on
the
activation
of
the
park,
the
city
desires
potentially
parking
in
excess
of
code,
and
that
is
not
something
that
the
developer
has
agreed
to
do,
or
at
this
point
is
considering.
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
why
parking
was
flagged
as
an
item
to
continue
negotiation,
retail
and
tenant
spaces,
creating
ground
floor
activity
on
both
sites
in
the
public
square
at
the
intersection
of
pearson,
osceola
two-story
commercial
uses
along
the
park's
entry
at
cleveland
street.
So
that's
the
general
information
about
the
site.
R
U
Good
afternoon,
jordan
baja
our
bay
heart
petronix
architecture,
nice
to
see
you
all
pleased
to
present
the
design
and
vision
for
the
bluffs
development
from
the
onset.
We
recognize
that
there
are
several
core
challenges
that
our
program
and
design
sought
to
overcome.
First,
the
waterfront
park
in
downtown
lack
connectivity
and
do
not
foster
movement
in
and
through
the
park
to
the
downtown.
U
Finally,
we
felt
that
the
size
and
scale
presented
challenges
with
bulk
mass
and
how
to
locate
and
effectively
hide
the
parking
to
solve
these
problems
with
the
site.
We
incorporated
three
guiding
principles.
First,
the
buildings
must
enhance
the
public
realm
by
hiding
parking
and
creating
amenities
that
showcase
local
identity,
while
catering
to
the
entire
community.
U
The
integration
of
the
park
in
downtown
is
seamless
and
there's
an
extensive
number
of
pathways,
including
a
pedestrian
bridge,
to
link
the
park
together.
Both
sites
incorporate
vehicular
access
in
below-grade
parking
garages
and
the
public
facing
edges
of
the
property
are
activated
through
restaurants,
retails
parks,
cultural
activities
and
pedestrian
corridors.
U
Let's
take
a
closer
look
at
the
harbor
view
center
site,
we
sought
to
create
a
destination
hotel
and
commercial
activity
area
that
engaged
both
the
downtown
and
the
park
in
a
way
that
promotes
daily
and
event-based
use.
The
south
building
is
lower
in
height
and
is
programmed
to
include
commercial
retail,
restaurant
and
cultural
uses.
Just
a
quick
note
of
clarification,
I
did
see
on
miss
clayton's
presentation,
like
I
saw
121
000
square
feet
proposed
a
commercial.
It's
21
clarify
that.
U
The
faces
of
the
building
are
activated
and
there's
a
casually
tilted
lawn.
That
brings
the
public
up
to
a
tenant
provided,
rooftop
beer
garden.
The
adjacent
hotel
is
designed
to
embrace
the
park,
improve
park,
access,
maximize
views
and
preserve
view
corridors
in
addition
to
the
guest
amenities.
It
includes
a
conference
center,
restaurant
and
rooftop
bar
that
will
be
open
to
the
public.
U
U
Now
from
the
park
side,
looking
back
towards
osceola,
you
can
see
the
tilted
lawn
that
kind
of
engages
the
park
and
draws
you
up
on
top
of
the
roof,
as
well
as
the
hotel
and
here's
a
shot.
Looking
from
the
pool
deck
of
the
hotel
over
the
rooftop
amenity
and
out
towards
the
wall,
take
a
look
at
the
former
city
hall
site.
Now
the
towers
orient
east
west
are
shifted
and
angled
to
connect
with
the
waterfront
park,
maximize
views
and
preserve
view
corridors.
U
U
Horizontal
lines
and
functional
clean
materials.
Create
the
aesthetic
of
the
tower
depth
and
complexity
are
accomplished
through
projected
balconies
material
contrasts,
shifting
forms
and
a
clear
delineation
between
the
base
and
the
towers
above
glass,
stucco
and
aluminum
work
together
to
form
a
modern
coastal
design.
U
U
U
V
Good
afternoon
keith
creminger
g-r-e-m-I-n-g-e-r
with
start.
V
Keith
kerminger
with
stantec
urban
design,
civil
engineering,
landscape
architecture
and
transportation,
real
quickly,
a
touch
on
the
on
the
traffic
and
we'll
go
through
this
pretty
quickly
here,
but
our
goal
is
design
for
people
first,
a
level
of
service
a
identified
is
not
something
we
want
to
achieve.
Downtowns
need
to
be
active,
their
streetscape
and
their
traffic
patterns
need
to
be
active
to
help
support
economic
redevelopment.
V
The
parking
ratio
of
one
one
to
one
is
something
that
we
currently
use:
we've
actually
designed
water
street
in
downtown
tampa
to
meet
that
same
parking
requirement.
The
amphitheater
really
consumed
the
majority
of
the
transportation
issues
that
are
brought
to
by
to
the
site.
Capacity
of
four
thousand
to
ten
thousand
attendees
would
generate
anywhere
between
sixteen
hundred
to
four
thousand
vehicles.
Our
current
assumptions.
Right
now
we
have
not
completed
our
traffic
analysis,
but
the
development
would
generate
less
than
500
vehicle
movements.
V
I
B
One
thing
is
sales
told
like
for
public
transportation
having
everything
packed
so
well,
yes,
is
going
to
be
many
cities.
Do
that
and
I
know
the
united
states-
that's
rarely
done,
but
there's
going
to
be
some
pretty
good
packages
there,
where
a
bus
can
come
in
or
rapidly.
V
Absolutely
we're
trying
to
plan
to
take
advantage
of
all
the
public
vehicular
modes
that
are
available
as
well
as
micro
mobility.
The
old
the
the
real
adages
is
the
park
once
as
people.
They
reside
here
where
they're
visiting
here
that,
once
they're
located
their
ability
to
move
around
on
foot,
creating
real
pedestrian
activity
is
our
goal
and
we
believe
we'll
be
achieved.
That.
S
V
We
haven't
got
into
that
level.
We're
really
studying
from
osceola
west.
R
Thank
you
so
today,
as
miss
lau
already
articulated
and
as
the
city
attorney
also
advised.
The
ass
before
you
today
is
a
recommendation
regarding
the
development
agreement
and
its
contact
contents
to
the
city
council.
So
with
that
respect,
the
contents
of
the
agreement
include
both
the
conceptual
designs
that
are
presented.
R
The
application
included
a
significant
narrative
that
you
received
as
part
of
your
application,
paragraph
or
package
which
detailed
the
applicant's
view
of
compliance
based
on
its
professional
analysis.
Your
staff
report
also
included
the
analysis
with
respect
to
the
compliance
with
the
downtown
code
and
the
comprehensive
plan
with
respect
to
the
design.
As
mr
mitch
said,
midich
said,
the
city
code
and
state
law
has
very
specific
requirements
with
respect
to
what
needs
to
be
included
in
the
development
agreement
and
the
agreement
before
you
includes
and
meets
those
requirements.
R
I
did
want
to
go
through
some
of
the
items
that
are
just
a
little
bit
different
than
miss
clayton's,
but
it
tells
you
the
developers,
view
of
the
world
as
as
compared
to
the
city's
view
of
the
world
right.
So
the
development
agreement
does
authorize
the
sale
of
the
properties
to
the
developers
pursuant
to
purchase
and
sale
agreement.
R
We
anticipate
there
just
from
for
business
purposes
and
financing
purposes.
This
would
be
two
separate
transactions
between
the
city
with
respect
to
each
site.
It
limits
the
transfers
and
assignments
of
both
the
agreements
and
the
sales
contracts
and
the
conveyance
of
the
property
in
the
future
to
authorize
authorized
persons
as
identified
in
the
agreement.
R
It
allows
one
project
to
proceed
even
if
there's
a
default
regarding
the
other
to
ensure
that
development
continues.
This
is
something
we
talked
a
lot
about:
balancing
the
need
to
stimulate
and
continue
on
development
on
the
bluff
to
provide
that
inner
connectivity
once
the
activity
begins
after
the
construction
of
the
imagine
park,
it
creates
timelines
for
permitting
and
construction
of
the
projects,
and
I
know
that's
important,
so
I
wanted
to
walk
through
those.
R
As
mr
mitch
said,
the
city
indicated
that
their
most
important
deadline
was
the
property
closing
and
it
was
important
to
both
parties
that
the
developers
were
ready
to
put
a
shovel
in
the
ground
at
the
time
of
property
closing,
and
so
we
anticipate
having
full
building
permits
by
december
of
2024..
You
all
are
on
this
board.
R
You
see
how
the
development
process
takes,
and
so
you
can
imagine
that,
with
a
dis
november
referendum,
beginning
site
plan
drawings
in
january
to
have
full
construction
documents
for
two
projects
of
this
magnitude
in
24
months,
inclusive
of
in
this
house.
Looking
I
mean
it
is
quite
the
feat,
but
this
is
what
the
developers
have
committed
for
it's.
What
the
city
council,
our
city
attorney's
office,
has
pushed
for,
and
so
absent
force
measure,
government
delays
and
some
of
those
things.
R
That
is
what
we've
committed
to
so
we
anticipate
closing
and
upon
the
issuance
of
building
permits
in
december
of
2024
and
immediately
starting
construction
thereafter.
It
is
anticipated
that
construction
would
begin
and
take
about
four
years
depending
on
which
pieces
of
the
pie
are
being
constructed.
Candidly.
R
With
respect
to
the
question
of
phasing,
that's
really
going
to
be
a
decision
that's
made
based
on
the
market,
can
both
market
conditions
as
well
as
the
construction
pricing
once
it
comes
back.
So
this
is
a
pretty
sophisticated
tower
construction
on
a
podium
for
the
city
hall
site,
and
there
are
various
ways
that
they
could
do
that,
and
so
the
owner
developers
are
simply
going
through
that
process,
consulting
with
their
development
team
and
construction
team
as
to
what
the
best
way
to
proceed
with
that
is.
R
The
decision
probably
won't
be
made
until
we
are
into
construction
drawings,
that
it
does
provide
the
city
funding
in
the
amount
of
22
million
dollars
from
the
city's
parking
fund
to
support
the
design
and
construction
of
the
subterranean
garages
on
the
property,
and
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
to
the
first
point
that
authorizes
the
sale.
The
developers
are
committed
and
have
offered
in
the
rfp
response
and
proposing
to
pay
the
appraised
value
for
the
sites
which
is
in
excess
of
the
22
million
dollars.
R
C
Question
everything
being
wonderful
and
property
goes
forward
and
the
development
goes
forward.
That's
you
know,
that's
what
we're
all
wanting
if
there's
a
default.
If,
for
some
reason
the
developer
decides,
he
can't
he's
not
going
to
complete
the
project
or
only
do
one
phase
he's
going
to
own
bookies
properly,
so
he's
going
to
have
the
right
to
sell
to
anybody.
R
No
there's
restrictions
in
the
agreement
that
restrict
the
conveyance
and
who
an
authorized
person
would
be
with
respect
to
purchasing
the
property
or
having
the
property
conveyed
to
you.
Okay,.
C
R
There
is
a
limitation
on
amplified
sound
that
is
in
excess
of
what
the
city
code
requires.
This
is
to
balance
both
the
neighbors
at
skyview
and
heckwater's
edge,
as
well
as
to
reduce
conflicts
with
the
park's
activity,
sets
the
floor
for
the
number
of
units
constructed
at
the
city
hall
site
to
ensure
the
intensity
of
development.
R
It
does
call
for
the
future
application
of
an
allocation
of
public
amenities
pools
and
provides
options
to
the
developer
in
the
event
that
this
board
doesn't
approve
the
site
plan
or
the
public
amenities
incentives
defines
force.
Major
and
government
delays
provides
for
maximum
height
of
both
projects
and
it
obligates
the
developers
to
meet
these
lead
silver
standards,
as
was
part
of
the
response,
including
ev
parking
station
obligations.
R
R
So
there
are
some
kind
of
aspirational
comments
in
in
the
development
agreement
that
were
important
to
both
parties
with
respect
to
the
future
success
of
the
private
development,
as
well
as
the
park,
including
the
public
realm
areas,
ensuring
that
there
was
appropriate
consistency
between
the
public
and
the
private
spaces,
cooperation
and
planning
regarding
the
downtown
marina,
whether
there
could
be
an
expansion
that
marina
how
the
marina
would
support
the
park
in
the
future,
etc.
R
Not
saying
that
there's
any
changes
proposed
just
those
discussions,
cooperation
regarding
potential
tdc
funding
for
visitor
activities
at
the
sites.
As
you
heard,
the
hotel
is
anticipated
to
have
significant
convention
in
conference
space,
and
so
it's
important
to
both
the
city
and
the
hotel
developer
to
ensure
that
there's
opportunities
for
conferences
to
be
located
in
downtown
clearwater,
not
just
out
on
the
beach
and
then
cooperation
with
the
city,
developer
and
psta.
R
So
with
that,
our
team
is
here
to
answer
any
questions
and
continue
this
discussion,
but
we
certainly
feel
that
the
city's
investment
in
coaching
park
has
created
this
opportunity
for
significant
private
investment
at
a
scale
that
has
not
been
seen
before
to
the
chairperson's
comment.
This
is
a
very
significant
and
large
development
project.
R
That's
come
before
you
and
we
know
the
terms
of
the
agreement
hopefully
went
through
it
very
specifically
and
intentionally
for
you
all
to
see
the
balance
of
equities
between
the
private
sector
and
and
the
developer
in
the
city
the
agreement's
drafted,
to
provide
the
developer
with
the
flexibility
it
needs
to
go
through
the
site
plan
process
and
get
its
construction,
drawings
done,
and
candidly
obtain
financing.
The
very
practical
result
of
all
of
this
is
no
matter
what
we
say
we
want
on
the
bluff.
R
A
All
right,
thank
you,
miss
gold
all
right
at
this
time.
We
will
have
comments
by
the
public
if
anyone
wants
to
come
forward
and
make
a
comment,
come
forward,
remember
to
state
and
spell
your
name
for
the
clerk.
W
My
please
is
deborah
d
ebra
king
king.
I
reside
at
100
pierce
street
down
by
the
harbor
and
I'm
all
for
revitalization,
I'm
a
full-time
owner.
I
live
here
full-time,
but
I
am
concerned
about
the
traffic
congestion
not
in
the
park
as
well,
because
all
the
parking
spots
that
have
gone-
and
I
know
you
intend
to
bus
folks
in-
but
I
also
know
folks-
don't
always
listen
to
what
you'd
like
them
to
do
and
they're
going
to
find
places
everywhere,
particularly
maybe
our
parking
lot
or
other
places.
So
I
hope
that
works
for
you.
W
But
I'm
even
more
concerned
beyond
that
that
we
have
600
new
units
that
will
probably
be
full-time
residents
as
well
as
153
and
understand
the
gentleman
talked
about
traffic
patterns,
but
I
think
that's
something
you
really
should
consider
seriously
about
that
kind
of
traffic
on
those
small
roads
that
we
have
around
here
and
that's
not
to
mention
spring
break,
which
we
all
deal
with
right
now,
but
it'll
be
like
spring
break
a
hundred
percent
every
day.
So
the
traffic
patterns
have
me
concerned.
W
It's
been
great,
with
the
with
the
park
and
being
able
to
get
into
our
units,
although
we've
had
some
bumps
in
the
road
with
those
trying
to
get
to
their
boats
and
wanting
to
park
in
our
lots
as
well
as
park,
their
cars
and
our
lots
to
unload
relatively
speaking,
the
the
equipment
down
there
has
been
well
staged
and
they
haven't
given
us
any
problems
getting
in
and
out
of
our
location,
but
I
do
have
concerns
as
we
build
on,
where
the
staging
of
the
equipment's
going
to
be
with
fewer
places
to
have
it
and
how
that's
going
to
affect
us
getting
down.
X
Hello,
francis
stacy,
five,
north
osceola,
stacey,
s-t-a-c-y
and
first
name
is
francis
f-r-a-n-c-e-s.
I
would
just
like
to
it's.
These
are
beautiful,
but
the
traffic
thing.
We
have
two
things
that
limit
access
for
me
to
go
home,
particularly
during
spring
break,
which
is
that
we
painted
a
double
yellow
line
on
the
way
into
the
garage.
So
we
are
not
technically
supposed
to
make
a
left-hand
turn
and
we've
also
closed
cleveland
street.
X
So
we
are
supposed
to
go
all
the
way
down
to
pierce
from
fort
harrison
and
all
the
way
around
and
up
osceola
to
actually
access
our
driveway.
So
I'm
not
really
sure
what
the
traffic
studies
say
about
all
of
this,
but
it's
already
very
restricted,
and
I
know
that
getting
home
from
the
grocery
store
during
spring
break
is
already
very
difficult.
X
The
other
thing
is,
I'm
wondering
if
the
board
is
confident
that
they
have
done
an
economic
analysis,
because
water's
edge
being
our
precedent,
which
was
bankrupt
for
a
number
of
years,
if
even
if
these
guys
obtain
the
financing,
how
are
they
going
to
sell?
What
are
the
provisions
in
those
contracts?
Many
contracts
were
cancelled
with
the
water's
edge
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
this
development
was
caught
in
a
mid
sequence
for
quite
some
time.
J
The
biggest
concern
I
have
in
that
area
is
what
kind
of
activities
are
going
to
be
designed
on
the
waterfront
that
will
get
people
to
want
to
come
down
to
the
waterfront
and
hang
out?
Is
it
paddle
ducks?
Is
it
squirt
guns?
Is
it
hammocks?
Is
it
a
push?
Cart
that
aspect
of
this
project
doesn't
seem
like
it's
gotten
enough
attention,
but
to
me
it's
critical
for
the
referendum
success
and
for
the
activation
of
this
and
the
activation
of
the
huge
investment
that
the
folks
behind
me
are
making.
E
T
A
T
C
And
it's
becoming
bankrupt
at
some
point,
and
I
know
this
is
two
years
away:
they
won't
be
really
making
a
decision
as
whether
or
not
they're
going
to
go
forward
economically
until
two
years
comes
up
because
they'll
see
what
the
economic
status
is
at
that
point,
but
my
concern
is:
that's
a
that
any
part
of
it
become
dormant
or
not.
You
know,
I
don't
know
how
far
you
can
control
ownership
of
the
property.
I
don't
know
when
it
conveys
so
does
it
convey
in
two
years.
Does
it
convey
immediately?
C
F
So
the
closing
is
scheduled
to
take
place
at
the
latest
december
31st
2024,
okay,
and
if
any
of
the
conditions
precedent,
such
as
applying
for
site
plans
or
your
building
permits
the
referendum
failing
before
them
were
to
happen,
then
the
city
would
have
the
right
to
go
ahead
and
terminate
that
agreement
and
the
property
wouldn't
transfer.
Obviously,
until
the
closing
has
taken
place
in.
F
As
far
as
the
development
plan
for
how
they're
going
to
be,
how
they're
going
to
be
constructed
is
still
an
ongoing
point
that
we're
kind
of
working
out
here
at
this
time,
so
we'll
have
to
kind
of
navigate
that
as
we
move
forward,
but
there
may
be
a
phased
approach
where
certain
buildings
are
built
before
others,
for
example,
with
the
city
hall
site.
There
are
two
towers
they
might
not
both
be
constructed.
F
93
of
the
units
built,
like
I
said
we
are
providing
flexibility
once
closing,
has
taken
place,
we're
going
to
move
forward
with
this
project.
T
F
Yeah,
in
fact,
prior
to
substantial
completion,
the
project
can
only
be
transferred
to
a
special
purpose
entity.
That's
set
up
to
navigate
and
kind
of
control,
the
development
of
the
property,
and
then
once
substantial
completion
is
completed.
At
that
point,
the
developer
or
the
special
purpose
entity
would
have
the
ability
to
transfer
to
a
qualified
person
or
group
based
on
conditions
and
requirements
that
we've
provided
in
the
development
agreement.
So
we're
being
very
careful
about
that,
we're
still
kind
of
negotiating
that
out
to
make
sure
we
have
those
terms
exactly
as
we
want
them.
S
F
B
Cities
are
blessed
with
a
bluff,
a
lot
of
cities
in
florida.
Don't
that's
the
geology
of
clearwater
sort
of
unique
and,
if
you're
going
to
put
something
high
and
I
design
other
planners
no
more
than
me
as
a
cis
as
a
civil
engineer,
but
putting
people
as
residents
together
where
they're,
happy
and
getting
nice
locations
is
something
you
need
to
take
an
opportunity
to
do.
B
It
seems
like
this
doesn't,
and
I
do
like
the
fact
that
it
doesn't
feel
like
I'm
looking
at
the
size
of
a
boulder
dam
or
something
or
a
bunch
of
things
looking
out
at
the
water
that
they
sort
of
split
up
like
almost
like
sales,
they've
done
it.
It's
a
it
looks
nice,
it's
a
package,
and
I,
if
they're
going
to
do
it,
I
sure
would
be
glad
it
would
be
done
in
one
shot
like
this.
Instead
of
piecemeal
with
one
group
and
one
another.
B
With
the
toys
and
the
things
that
they
have
looking
out
over
that
park
and
but
they're
going
to
get
the
benefit
of
that
jewel
of
the
of
a
library
but
well,
I
think
that's,
okay,
that's
a
good
place
to
be
there,
and
maybe
the
library
will
get
more
used
to.
I
think
the
project
I'm
happy
to
see
it
as
a
whole
package
and
congruent
and
and
well
designed.
A
Anyone
else
I
think
it's
important
to
keep
in
mind
the
the
narrow
decision
that
we're
being
asked
to
make
today.
We're
not-
and
I
appreciate
the
public
comments
it's
great
to
have
people
participate
and
follow
these
things
along
so
that
you
have
some
input,
but
we're
not
authorized
today
to
do
anything
in
particular
about
traffic.
A
That's
part
of
that
long
process.
We
talked
about
a
little
earlier,
the
layers
and
layers
of
steps
that
need
to
be
taken
and
hurdles
that
need
to
be
overcome.
That's
where
public
input
on
the
information
that
comes
to
light
during
the
process
would
be
most
helpful.
All
we're
asked
to
do
today,
based
on
the
information
that
we've
been
presented.
A
Can
we
fairly
recommend
to
city
council
approval
of
this
development
agreement,
because
if
the
project
survives
that
gauntlet
of
steps
and
hurdles
and
actually
becomes
a
reality,
is
it
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
does
it
further
the
downtown
redevelopment
plan,
and
is
it
consistent
with
the
cdc,
and
I
think
we
would
have
to
conclude
from
the
information
we've
been
provided
that
it
does
those
things
and
there's
a
justification
to
move
on?
Further
in
the
process.
Y
I
would,
I
would
agree,
I
think
it
does
meet
all
those
requirements.
Certainly
I'm
sensitive
some
of
the
concerns
of
the
community
a
little
closer
to
sorry,
certainly
sensitive.
Some
some
of
the
concerns
the
community,
but
the
safeguards
and
the
hurdles
that
remain
for
the
developer
are
are
as
best.
I
understand
it's
significant
and
I
think,
there's
a
number
of
different
opportunities
for
the
city
to
continue
to
refine
the
project
that
that
works
best
from
a
feasibility
standpoint,
but
also
for
the
citizens
citizens
of
the
community.
Y
You
know,
at
the
end
of
the
day
I
go
back
to
what
you
said:
we've
got
to
stay
with
within
our
parameters
and
if
the
alternative
is
move,
the
ball
forward
on
a
piece
of
property
that
has
been
really
non-productive
for
years
or
be
a
hurdle
to
keep
it
from
continuing,
I
would
absolutely
lean
toward
keeping
the
ball
moving
forward
and
would
support
the
project.
G
I'm
sure
I've
read
the
development
agreement,
the
actual
draft
of
the
document
and
and
believe
it
has
adequate
protections
for
the
cities
to
accommodate
the
concerns
that
have
been
addressed
here
today.
At
the
hearing-
and
I
agree
with
your
comments
about
our
role
in
this
and
and
I
will
vote
to
recommend
a
program
all
right.
A
There's
no
further
comments
is
with
somebody
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
can.
K
A
C
D
All
right,
okay,
I
don't
chair
the
development
agreement
will
be
before
the
city
council
on
thursday
night.
So
I'd
like
you
to
announce
that,
for
the
record,
all
right,
the
second
and
final
public
hearing
for
the
development
agreement.
A
A
All
right,
I
believe,
we've
concluded
that
matter.
Does
the
director
have
anything
for
us
today.
E
The
only
thing
that
I'd
like
to
say
is
that
we
understand
the
comments
brought
forward
by
mr
johnson
about
the
difficulties
of
accessing
some
of
our
material.
It's
a
little
confusing
on
isella
and
we
are
working
on
some
solutions
to
make
it
easier
for
the
public.
So
hopefully
we'll
have
something
for
you
relatively
soon.
On
that.