►
From YouTube: Columbus Ga Planning Advisory Comm Meeting 09 04 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
As
a
courtesy,
I
just
asked,
if
you
would
please
silence
and
or
and/or
turn
off,
your
cell
phones
and
I'm
gonna
make
sure
mines
that
way,
but
certainly
it'll
go
off.
Thank
you
for
doing
that,
I
remind
those
in
the
audience
and
those
that
are
watching
by
television.
This
is
the
first
hearing
of
any
rezoning,
Tech's
change
or
special
exception
that
will
be
brought
before
us
today.
A
So
this
is
the
first
time
we
will
first
hear
reading
in
the
staff
report,
for
the
case
by
planning
staff
and
as
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
We
would
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
address,
for
or
against
the
request
and
inquire
or
to
inquire
about
the
serve
request.
Commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
on
the
case.
Once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
the
Commission
to
vote
will
be
will
take
place.
A
recommendation
would
then
be
rendered.
A
The
case
will
go
back
to
the
Planning
Department
for
their
independent
evaluation
and
recommendation.
If
a
favorable
recommendation
is
given-
and
the
case
is
forwarded
on
to
the
City
Council,
with
the
two
independent
recommendations,
the
planning
department
makes
a
recommendation
for
denial.
The
applicant
will
have
10
days
from
the
receipt
of
a
letter
stating
that
not
the
denial
to
notify
the
clerk
or
council
that
they
are
requesting
to
be
placed
on
City
Council's
agenda.
City
Council
of
Columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
and
will
be
called
the
first
reading
said.
A
Council
will
consider
the
case,
review
P,
AC
and
Planning
Department
recommendations
and
hear
discussion
on
the
matter.
Council
will
make
a
final
decision
at
another
meeting
which
will
be
called
or
the
second
public
meeting,
which
will
be
a
council
meeting
which
will
be
called
the
second
reading.
Okay,
that's
it
members
do
we,
then
we
have
an
opportunity
to
take
a
look
at
the
minutes
from
the
last
meeting.
If
so,
is
there
any
discussion?
Mr.
rim,
Pro.
A
That
brings
us.
We
have
three
zoning
cases
this
morning,
a
little
bit
of
new
business
to
take
care
of
and
I'll
breathe.
I
think
mr.
smallman
is
I,
think
you
just
walked
in
the
doors,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started
with.
His
first
case
is
rtz
en
0
8
1
9
6,
2
21.
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
0.48
acres
of
land
located
at
three
zero
to
five
and
it's
three
zero
to
one
makin
Road
current
zoning
is
NC.
A
B
Sir,
the
general
Lane
land
use
is
inconsistent
for
planning
area
D
current
land
use
designation
is
general
commercial
futures
and
makes
use
it
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
in
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
an
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
serviced
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
decrease
by
250
trips.
If
used
for
commercial
use,
the
level
of
service
for
will
remain
at
a
level
d.
B
The
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
Columbus
consolidated
government
for
commercial
uses.
There
be
no
school
impact,
no
buffer
requirement,
no
response
from
Fort
Benning,
no
DRI
recommendation
on
the
north
side
of
the
property
that
is
NC
South
is
NC,
East
is
G.
C
west
is
NC.
21
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subjects.
Property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
Planning
Department
received
no
calls
and
or
emails
regarding
the
rezoning
and
there's
no
additional
information.
All
right.
A
C
Plans
are
sir
Ernie
smallman
six
West
Seventh
Street.
We
were
going
to
take
down
the
building,
that's
beside
the
Smoothie
King,
where
it
has
metro
pcs
in
there
and
a
t-shirt
print
shop.
Relocate
them.
Take
that
building
down
to
put
a
take
five
oil
change
in
and
we
just
need
the
change
in
signing
to
make
the
oil
change
conforming
use.
C
Will
keep
the
Smoothie
King
building
keep
the
one
the
Smoothie
King
smoothly.
Just
got
you
all
right,
so
the
other
to
you.
It's
there's
too
much
building
for
the
four
parking
spaces
that
are
there.
It
just
doesn't
really
work
in
its
current
state.
The
minutes,
it's
probably
4,500
5,000
square
feet
with
four
parking
spaces
on
makin,
Road,
yeah.
A
Alright,
thank
you,
sir.
That
appear
to
be.
Does
anyone
in
the
audience
like
to
speak
for
this
case?
Please
come
forward
at
this
time.
I
don't
see
any
activity,
so
anybody
like
to
speak
against
this
case.
Please
come
forward
all
right.
That's
it,
commissioners
over
the
floor
for
a
motion
regarding
this
case.
Please,
okay,.
D
D
As
it
relates
to
matter
are
easy
in
zero,
eight
one,
nine
six,
two
two
one:
our
request
to
rezone:
zero
point
for
a
acres
of
land
located
at
30,
25
and
30
21
Macon
row,
currently
zoned
neighborhood
commercial
proposal,
a
general
commercial
in
consideration
of
the
staff
report
today
and
everything
being
in
compliance,
I
move
that
will
prove
the
request.
All.
A
A
A
Alright
next
case
be
case
number,
our
easy
no.8
one,
nine
six,
two
two
two:
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
11.20
acres
of
land
located
at
8501
Fortson
Road
current
zoning
is
G
C
general
commercial
proposed
zoning
is
PUD.
Planned
Unit
development
proposed
use
of
single-family
detached
homes,
Allen
Development,
Group
Incorporated,
is
the
applicant.
This
property
is
located
in
Council
District,
two
Glen
Davis,
we'll
hear
from
mr.
Renfro.
First
please.
Yes,.
B
Sir
General
Wayne
use
is
inconsistent
in
planning
area.
A
current
land
use
takes
in
the
designation
is
general
commercial
futures
light
manufacturing
industrial.
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
the
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
decrease
about
four
hundred
and
thirty
six
trips.
If
used
for
residential
use,
the
level
of
service
role
remain
at
an
A.
B
The
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
Columbus
consolidated
government
for
residential
use.
There
will
be
no
school
impact
for
buffer
requirements.
Minimum
master
plan
development
standards
located
on
Table,
two
point:
five
point:
two
the
front
will
be
50
feet,
the
Left
will
be
the
left
side
will
be
50
feet.
The
right
side
will
be
100
feet.
The
back
will
be
50
feet.
B
Response
from
Fort
Benton
DRI
recommendation
on
the
north
side
of
the
property
is
re.
One
South
is
re.
One
east,
as
LMI
west,
is
our
15
property
owners
within
the
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
Planning
Department
received
two
calls
and
or
emails
regarding
the
rezoning.
Two
of
those
responses
were
in
opposition.
An
email
was
sent
out
pertaining
to
this
prior
to
the
meeting
related
to
that
and
I
can
read
that
email
or
a
portion
of
the
email.
E
B
A
F
Morning
but
Alan
77,
90
Veterans,
Parkway
I'm,
the
president
of
Alan
Development
Group.
We
acquired
this
property
back
about
six
months
ago.
Our
intention
is
to
rezone
this
property
to
put
plan
unit
development
in
order
to
develop
a
55:58.
Excuse
me
home
subdivision.
Under
a
horizontal
condominium
concept,
it
would
be
a
gated
entry,
private
roads,
private
streets,
the
houses
that
would
be
built
and
they're
going
to
be
1,800
to
2,000
square
foot,
Coastal
Carolina
style,
all
the
landscaping.
All
the
exteriors
of
buildings
be
maintained
by
the
homeowners
association.
F
F
Did
a
we
did
some
research
we
are.
Our
property
is
5,000
140
feet
from
the
quarry,
within
that
five
thousand
140
feet
also
resides
Northside
elementary
Northside
middle
school,
half
of
Northside
high
school,
all
of
Old
Town's,
new
senior
housing
and
half
of
my
Summit
Point
development,
approximately
80
homes.
So
there's
a
considerable
and
of
course,
as
you
go,
north
there's
tons
of
residential
and
other
houses
around
there,
I
don't
think
you
know,
based
on
the
fact
that
there
are
all
those
other
people
in
the
area
that
it's
going
to
be
much
of
an
issue.
F
I
actually
have
a
home
at
forty
thirty
six
Wooldridge
Road
that
we
built
twenty
two
years
ago.
I
just
found
it
interesting
that
they
sent
this
email
out
when
they've
never
communicated
with
any
of
us
that
live
adjacent
to
them,
but
again,
based
on
the
distance
from
the
quarry
I,
don't
think
it's
an
issue.
E
E
If
we're
going
to
consider
putting
in
the
condition
that
Vulcan
suggested
you've
seen
the
email
right,
I
did
see
that
it's
notification,
I
have
a
question
and
I.
Guess
it's
to
you
in
your
experience,
developing
projects
like
this.
How
many
potential,
homeowners
or
renters
actually
read
and
understand
everything
they
sign?
Well,.
F
I,
don't
think
it
would
have
much
impact,
but
I
am
I
am
opposed
to
them.
Doing
that
you
know
currently
its
own
see
commercial,
general
commercial
as
you're
well
aware,
and
if
you
know,
on
the
one
hand,
they're
arguing
that
that
in
their
email
that
we
don't
create
any
nuisance
for
our
neighbors
and
then,
on
the
other
hand,
they're
arguing
that
we
need
to
notify
the
neighbors,
we
might
be
a
nuisance
to
them,
which
is
counterintuitive
but
I.
F
But
I
would
point
out
that
in
commercial
general
or
general
commercial
you
could
have
an
ophthalmologist
operating
on
somebody's
eyes.
If
the
blasting
is
an
issue
for
residential,
surely
be
an
issue
for
commercial
or
for
general
commercial,
you
could
have
a
dentist
drilling
your
teeth,
so
I
think
there
I
think
there
are
arguments
without
basis
as
far
as
the
blasting
is
concerned
is
concerned,
but
in
any
case
I,
don't
think
it
impacts
us
on
the
way,
the
other,
whether
there's
a
something
that
indeed
or
not.
Thank.
E
A
All
right
anyone
else,
good
questions,
all
right,
Thank
You,
mr.
Allen.
Thank
you
all
right
as
before
I'll
ask.
Is
there
anyone
the
audience
I'd
like
to
speak
for
this
case?
Please
come
forward
at
this
time
and
no
one's
getting
up.
So
is
there
anyone
that
would
like
to
speak
against
this
case?
Please
come
forward
at
this
time.
H
We
can't
go
either
way
and
we're
kind
of
you
know
we
don't
know
I,
don't
want
to
happen
to
our
future
land
and
our
values.
Do
we
get
stuck
in
the
middle?
Considering
and
the
rock
quarry
is
concerned
about
their
residential
it's
further
away
and
we're
half
that
distance.
It
puts
us
in
a
in
an
unusual
circumstance.
So
so
that's
really
my
only
concern
I'm
not
for
it
or
against
it.
At
this
time.
I
just
wanted
to
just
to
put
that
out
there.
Okay.
A
A
I
Name
is
Geno
where
I
live
right.
Next
to
Jack
there
on
overdrove,
2112
Hubbard
wrote,
I
will
say
that
I've
lived
there
since
1969,
so
everything
that's
happened
in
that
end
of
town.
I
know
about
had
been
there
and
been
part
of
it,
but
the
concerns
are
is
like
I
said
right
now,
from
the
interstate
to
forts
and
Road.
Could
we
improve
to
Hubbard
road
that
tract
of
land,
all
the
homeowners
that
live
on,
that
trip
that
whole
square,
that
it's
not
commercial
at
this
time
or
in
this
courtroom?
Right
now?
I
That's
me
Jack
and
mr.
Marley
represents
the
suspense
Keys,
who
owns
the
property
adjacent
to
this
development
and
adjacent
to
jack
and
jack
suggested
of
me,
and
they
own
the
property,
on
the
other
side
of
me
to
the
interstate,
we're
all
in
favor
of
that
property
at
some
time,
going
forward
to
development
to
the
betterment
of
Columbus
Georgia,
and
we
won't
move.
So
that's
where
we
are
I
liked
it
when
it
was
country
I'm,
not
crazy
about
all
the
partners
going
up
behind.
I
My
house
run
them
there
up
through
our
back
fence,
Jack
and
mines
with
the
extension
of
Stevens
Lane
there.
All
the
way
up
to
us
and
y'all
know
what's
going
in
there,
so
there's
a
lot
of
apartments,
assisted
living
and
going
in
there
over
toward
the
interstate.
And
then
you
know
it's
just
a
lot
of
there's
some
there's
a
wood,
some
wood
buffers
in
there
right
now
only
about
some
span
skis
and
Jack
and
me
to
Hubbard
rudder.
I
But
you
know,
as
time
goes
on
more
people
get
in
those
apartments
and
they
trip
they
come
out
of
there
going
into
our
woods
and
this
just
you
know,
residence
is
not
way
to
go
for
that
truck
Elena.
It
is
the
only
tract
of
land
in
Muscogee
County
that
is
suitable
for
a
light
manufacturing
without
any
opposition
to
residents.
I
Because
on
one
side
is
the
interstate,
then
you've
got
all
commercial
development
going
down.
Williams
wrote
from
the
interstate
to
Fort
Sam
wrote
to
the
full
way:
stop
you've
got
all
commercial
development
coming
down,
forts
and
Road
on
the
east
and
the
west
side
of
forts
and
Road.
All
the
way
past
Hubbard
wrote,
all
the
property
in
front
of
our
houses
is
already
owned
by
commercial
entity,
which
is
the
rock
quarry.
I
I'm
telling
you
if
any
traffic
comes
out
of
this
development
on
a
daily
basis,
own
two
forts
and
Road
in
the
areas
where
there
won't
come
out
at
right
there
at
84
lumber
company
going
up
the
hill
is
suicide.
People
and
I'll
tell
you
one.
The
dump
trucks
coming
from
the
4-way
stop
off
the
interstate,
going
to
the
quarry
or
empty
and
they're
running
a
hard
and
heavy
to
go
back
and
get
another
load
more
loads.
They
can
get
get
in
a
day's
time
more
money.
I
They
make
the
dump
trucks
coming
from
the
quarry
going
to
the
full
way
start
up.
Forts
and
Road
are
running
fully
loaded
and
that's
a
pretty
good
climb
that
he'll,
so
they
come
by
Hubbard
Road
the
curve
get
to
go
to
make
that
climb
up
that
hill
loaded
and
now
you've
got
on
that
map
right
there.
You
got
two
roads
that
there
won't
be
put
right
in
front
of
them
and
when
those
two
roads
come
out
at
84,
lumber,
company
or
the
next
cut
above,
which
is
where
the
little
small
commercial
developments
going
in
there.
I
Now,
if
you
get
several
hundred
traffickers
coming
in
and
now
they're
on
the
daily
basis
in
front
of
dump
trucks,
somebody's
gonna
get
killed,
I
mean
it's
just
that's
just
the
way.
It
is
I
mean
those
dump
trucks,
there's
plenty
of
them.
I,
don't
know.
If
y'all
took
a
toll
as
how
many
dump
trucks
go
up
and
down
forks
and
Road
every
day,
but
there's
plenty
of
them.
I
So
you
know
it
just
doesn't
make
any
sense
to
put
residents
in
that
that
tract
of
land
right
in
there
to
me,
commercial
yeah,
you
know
and
as
far
as
a
road
extension
to
alleviate
any
traffic
that
might
be
come
in
which
I,
if
they
build
what
I'm
told
they're
gonna
build
behind
us
own
extension
of
Steven's
Lane.
That
traffic
needs
to
come
through.
They
need
to
extend
Stevens
Lane
all
the
way
through
to
Hubbard
Road,
because
Hubbard
Road,
the
dump
trucks
can't
come
in
up
and
down.
I
I
If,
if
the
Stevens
Lane
came
all
the
way
through
to
Hubbard
road,
they
could
develop
both
sides
of
it,
and
that
would
bring
that
that
piece
of
property
that
development
right
through
my
prop
Jaka
property,
because
that's
where
they
are
right
now,
they're,
even
with
us,
coming
our
way
going
north,
so
that
makes
sense
and
Jack
and
I
are
willing
to
sell
but
and
move.
But,
like
I
said
not
for
residence,
you
know
I
just
I,
just
don't
remember
our
pinion,
it
doesn't
make
sense.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
On
just
for
the
clarification
on
the
traffic
count,
if
I'm
reading
this
correctly,
if
it
were
to
say
DC
and
the
eleven
point,
two
acres
were
developed,
you're
asking
for
six
hundred
and
fifty
one
more
trips
is
that
correct.
That's
right
versus
the
58
of
the
third
housing
only
generates
215
trips
right.
Yes,
so
just
for
clarification,
if
it
was
developed
to
be
commercial
to
be
three
times
the
amount
of
traffic
versus
the
third
development
at
this
point
by
our
calculation,
correct,
not
true.
Now.
A
For
clarification,
all
right,
any
other
questions,
gentlemen:
I
have
a
question
about
the
fact
part
of
the
property
is
their
future
plans
for
development
on
that
that
you
know
of
mr.
Allen,
because
that's
quite
a
large
piece
of
property
back
there
and
I
didn't
know
if
this
was
in
your
long-range
plan,
so
to
speak.
Well,.
F
There
is
a
there's:
can
there's
consultation
going
on
with
my
neighbors
about
extending
a
road
from
Stevens
Lane,
parallel
to
between
my
property
and
the
adjacent
property
on
the
sorry
I'm,
getting
my
south
side
of
the
south
side
of
my
property,
all
the
way
to
Fortson
we
would
dedicate
half
of
the
right
away
and
the
the
neighbors
would
dedicate
half
the
right-of-way.
We
pay
the
expense
to
extend
the
public
road
through
there.
F
F
J
Case
our
ez
n
0
8
1
9
6
2
African
is
bud
Allen
or
Alan
Development
Group,
8,
501,
forks
and
roads.
Approximately
11
point
2
acres,
current
classification,
GC
proposed
classification,
is
perd,
Planned,
Unit
development
being
that
it
is
compatible
with
addicting
Lane
Nisha's
I
move
that
we
approve
all.
A
A
A
All
right!
We've
got
a
case.
Thank
you
very
much.
Will
you
go
to
case
number
three,
which
is
our
easy.you
0
8
1
9
6
2,
4
5?
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
7.89
acres
of
land
located
at
120
20th
Street
current
zoning
is
RMF
to
residential
multifamily
proposed
zoning
is
ro
residential
office.
The
proposed
uses
residential
multi-family
Verona
Campbell
is
the
applicant.
This
property
is
located
in
council
district
7
Woodson,
we're
here
from
mr.
Renfro
regarding
staff
report.
First,
please
and.
B
Sir
general
Keith
land
uses
consistent
planning
area
F
current
land
use
designation
is
multifamily
residential
futures,
multi-family
residential.
It
is
compatible
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
in
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
improved
drainage
plan
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
the
permit
is
required,
the
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
three
hundred
and
seventy
three
trips.
B
If
used
for
multifamily
use
that
the
level
of
service
will
remain
at
a
level
c,
this
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
columbus
consolidated
government
for
multifamily
usage.
It
will
have
no
school
impact.
That's
like
this.
Excuse
me.
The
site
shall
including
category
c
buffer
along
all
proposed
lines,
bordered
by
the
RO
zoning
district.
B
The
three
options
under
category
c
are
20-feet,
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees,
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
ten
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
in
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
undisturbed,
natural
buffer
and
no
response
from
fort
benning.
No
comment
or
dri
recommendation
on
the
north
side
is
RMF
to
south
is
g
c
as
well
as
LMI
East
is
the
Chattahoochee
River
West
is
general
commercial
50
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
B
Property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
Planning
Department
Department
receive
one
call
and/or
email
regarding
the
rezoning.
That
call
was
just
an
inquiry.
It
wasn't
opposed
or
approval
additional
comment.
Council
did
approve
abandoning
the
city
abandoning
20th
Street.
That
resolution
number
was
2
to
6
1
9,
that's
it
that's.
It.
A
D
K
The
application
before
you
is
for
a
redevelopment
project
that
we
are
working
on
these
days
didn't
really
take
about
four
years
from
start
to
completion,
including
planning.
We
are
we've
proposed
to
HUD
to
allow
us
to
demolish
the
existing
chase
homes.
There
108
units
and
the
plan
calls
for
102
units
to
be
rebuilt,
as
well
as
a
community
center
leasing,
office
and
health
clinic
and
other
amenities,
such
as
outdoor
gathering
areas
covered,
grilling
area,
benches,
etc.
K
We
are
asking
for
a
reason,
because
when
this
property
was
built
as
many
of
our
properties
where
it
was,
it
was
pre
firm.
In
other
words,
floodplain
was
the
floodplain
areas
were
not
even
established
at
this
time.
Hud
will
not
allow,
in
fact
they
are
forfeiting
all
property
within
a
flood
away,
so
no
part
of
any
project
making
contain
any
part
of
a
flood
way.
K
Not
even
if
a
lady
grabs,
you
know
you
before
it
was
we
could,
we
couldn't
put
a
you,
couldn't
build
in
the
floodplain
without
elevating
but
flood
way
being
the
regulatory
flood
way.
We
cannot
even
include
that,
so
we
had
to
have
a
new
survey,
a
new
legal
description
drawn
up
for
the
project,
so
we
lost
some
acreage
there.
K
We
also
have
a
rules
now
about
sound
attenuation,
environmental
rules
from
HUD
and
because
this
property
is
adjacent
to
a
railroad
track
and
because
it's
adjacent
to
second
Avenue,
the
traffic
generation,
and
we
also
have
to
consider
any
flight
patterns
for
the
for
the
airport,
but
because
of
all
sound
sources
combined,
it
pushes
us
quite
a
bit
into
the
existing
property
before
we
can
begin
to
even
put
infrastructure.
So
to
this
another
reason
that
we're
looking
for
more
dense
zoning
allowance,
RMF
I,
think
it's
sixteen
point.
K
K
If
we
receive
that
award
from
DCA,
which
could
be
around
9
million
dollars,
cash,
which
could
turn
into
14
million
dollars
of
investment
cash
to
us
to
help
us
build
this
property
and
make
it
a
nice
property
and
still
be
able
to
pay
the
bills
going
forward
with
low
income
and
depressed
rents.
Vs.
market
study
properties,
we
can
still
build
a
market
like
property,
with
the
low
income
housing
tax
program,
so
to
abide
by
IRS
rules.
K
Georgia
DCA
rules
who
administers
the
HUD
at
the
IRS
hi-tech
program
and
HUD,
who
has
to
have
strict
environmental
requirements?
Not
all
of
our
site
is
actually
usable.
Then
we
have
the
additional
desire,
not
because
it's
required,
but
because
we
think
it's
a
better
situation
for
our
residents.
We
desire
to
move
northward
as
far
as
we
can
away
from
the
existing
Georgia
power
sub
section.
At
present,
one
of
our
buildings
is
maybe
10
feet
from
the
perimeter
fence
around
the
Georgia
power
substation,
it's
not
a
regulated
thing
with
HUD.
K
They
don't
regulate
against
building
directly
next
to
a
power
station,
but
there's
a
noise
that's
generated
by
that
again,
it's
not
considered
by
HUD
in
their
noise
studies,
but
we'd
like
to
move
our
residents
as
far
away
from
that
power
substation,
as
well
as
build
a
robust
and
beautiful
landscape
or
fencing
buffer.
Whatever
you
know,
the
architects
and
designers
can
present
to
us
we'll
go
for
the
most
robust
option
that
is
affordable
in
order
to
benefit
the
residents.
K
So
I
know
that
this
area,
it's
been
at
least
considered
or
talked
about
creating
a
zoning
overlay
such
as
C
Rd
or
u
PT,
and
in
light
of
the
fact
that
with
Georgia
DCA,
this
is
our
only
year
to
apply
for
this.
We
we,
we
came
out
with
a
really
high
scoring
application
of
all
applications
in
the
state
for
this
hi-tech
award,
because
a
very
strong
contingent
of
community
partners
in
that
area
have
come
together
to
support
us.
K
The
schools,
Mercy
med,
many
others
who
are
interested
in
seeing
that
part
of
our
city
become
a
vibrant,
thriving
community,
and
we
want
to
be
a
part
of
that.
Every
city
has
portable
housing
and
we
want
to
make
the
very
best
affordable
housing
possible
for
our
residents
and
for
the
city
overall,
as
a
benefit
to
the
city,
I
sort
of
like
what
we
did
at
bTW
down
at
Victory
and
veterans.
We
had
392
units
built
in
1941
and
we've
replaced
it
with
108,
very
nice
market
right.
K
Looking
apartments,
I,
don't
know
if
you've
been
down
there,
but
it'll
be
the
same
type
of
redevelopment
project
here
so
and
for
that
we
are
asking
our
architects
we're
still
we're
still
not
there,
where
we
need
to
be,
as
far
as
building
placement
and
site
plan
to
really
work.
So
we're
asking
for
you
to
consider
the
the
setbacks
that
are
included
in
the
UPT
and
Ciardi
for
mixed-use,
and
that
would
be
zero
setbacks
for
this
property.
K
K
We
have
a
green
space
walk
planned
where
you
can
see
from
2nd
Avenue.
You
can
see
straight
down
to
the
river,
so
it's
it's
nothing
that
will
be
taking
the
river
away
from
the
city.
It'll
be
sharing
it,
because
sharing
that
space
with
everyday
citizens
normalizes
the
lives
of
our
residents,
and
so
that's
the
goal
of
ours
as
well
being
a
part
of
the
overall
community
encouraging
access
to
the
River
Walk.
K
In
fact,
if
a
mother
and
her
children
want
a
walk
to
a
grocery
store,
they
can
walk
out
the
front
of
Chase,
go
up
to
the
14th
Street
pedestrian
bridge
and
cross
at
a
very
safe
intersection
to
the
grocery
store
just
ever
in
piggly-wiggly.
So
it
really
is
an
ideal
location
and
will
greatly
improve
the
lives
of
our
residents
and
so,
in
short,
we're
just
asking
for
your
help
to
give
us
some
flexibility
to
make
that
happen.
D
K
K
E
A
D
K
Yeah
it'll
be
what
I
meant
when
I
compared
it
to
bTW,
is
that
it
will
on
the
when
you
look
at
it,
you
won't
say:
yeah,
there's
public
housing,
I
had
many
people
tell
me
that
that
development
looked
like
market
rate,
housing
for
sale,
market
rate
housing
and
some,
so
it
won't
be
the
design
of
Columbus
Commons.
It
won't
be
the
design
of
Arbor
point.
It
won't
be
the
design
of
Ashley
station,
but
it
will
be
a
modern
community
befitting
the
city
village
area
because
that's
sort
of
a
mixed
juice.
K
There's
industrial,
there's
commercial
and
you
know
so
it
will
be
something
that
will
be
fitting
and
we'll
have
a
community
shred.
We've
already
met
with
residents,
I
I
know
at
least
four
times
now
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
to
let
them
know
what's
coming
and
talk
to
them
about
their
opinion
of
what
should
happen
and
what
they
want
to
see
happen
and
will
also
hold
a
larger
community
shred.
Well.
D
K
D
15
I
know
106
is
pretty
good.
Yes,
that's
that's
very
decent.
Okay
I
just
want
to
request
that
you
guys
give
the
same
level
of
a
priority
and
it
sounds
like
you're
already
doing
that
and
I
applaud
you
for
that,
because
I
know
it
was
a
huge
disturbance
for
many
of
them
in
the
community.
A
lot
of
it
was
the
unknown
people
didn't
know
how
this
was
gonna
work
out
and
how
the
transition
would
happen.
But
there
was
a
lot
of
concern
for
the
folks
that
lived
there.
D
So
many
of
my
questions
are
beyond
beyond
zoning,
but
it's
more
about
the
concern
of
the
current
residents
and
making
sure
that
they
have
a
smooth
transition.
You
know
somewhere
to
be
placed
and
have
the
aid
that
they
need
for
the
transition,
but
a
newer
facility
would
be
better
serving
to
them
and
something
that.
D
A
D
G
A
Right
all,
you
need
any
further
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
raise
your
right
hand.
Pen
all
opposed
this.
You
know.
Thank
you
very
much,
miss
Campbell
all
right.
We
don't
have
a
one
item,
new
business
to
attend
to
today.
Thank
you
for
your
presence
and
your
participation,
there's
no
meeting
scheduled
for
September
18th,
and
we
need
to
move
some
meetings
due
to
some
meetings
that
the
Planning
Division
has
to
attend.
So
do
you
want
to
address
that?
Mr.
moon
from
and
yes,
sir.
B
A
B
B
A
Now
the
night,
the
night,
okay,
all
right
and
they
have
been
notified
all
right,
very
good,
all
right
if
everybody's
okay
with
that,
we'll
just
go
ahead
and
let
them
have
that
flexibility
to
change
those
dates.
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
all
good.
With
that,
all
right,
any
other
new
business.
We
need
to
bring
up.
A
Right,
let's
make
a
motion
to
someone
who's,
make
a
motion
to
give
them
the
flexibility
to
change
these
days
to
the
night
in
the
23rd
so
moved,
and
we
got
a
second
all
right.
We
got
a
second
all
those
in
favor
raise
your
right
in
and
it's
done
so
it's
official
thank
you
again
again,
no
meeting
on
September
the
18th
and
we
don't
have
any
old
business
and
we
are.
D
Want
us
to
be
mindful
of
the
fact
that
there's
a
monster
of
a
storm
off
the
coast
right
now,
many
of
our
friends
in
coastal
Georgia,
as
well
as
North,
Lawrence
and
Carolinas,
are
watching
it
closely.
I
know
we
have
residents
now
that
are
here
at
the
Civic
Center
flea,
and
so
we
just
want
to
keep
them
in
our
prayers
and
encourage
our
residents.