►
Description
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/161216?handle=08C6220ADD1948C8BF1013E62BD56B77
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/161215?handle=511BE13DF910427A9C5DA009BF4E285B
1. Chair Lesage approved the agenda on May 11, 2023 via email.
2. Call to Order
3. Approval of Minutes
a. Motion to approve the Budget Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes - April 25, 2023
4. New Business
May 23, 2023 Compile a prioritized 2024 Capital Request Recommendation List to be submitted to the City Manager's Office by June 8, 2023.
*** Informational Only - Department Presentation Schedule*** June 27, 2023 – Safety Police and Municipal Courts - Police Chief Sam Watson and Court Administrator Kennetha Julien
5. Member's Choice
Next meeting on June 27, 2023
6. Adjournment
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/161216?handle=08C6220ADD1948C8BF1013E62BD56B77
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/161215?handle=511BE13DF910427A9C5DA009BF4E285B
A
A
C
B
C
B
B
Okay,
so
I
think
we're
so
tonight
we're
going
to
be
going
through
the
budget,
the
sale
or
the
Sip
projects,
I
should
say
so
Jenny,
so
you've
already
started.
I
was
watching
you
you
already
got
us
bridge.
I,
don't
know
is
that
you
Tyson
I,
don't
know,
but
already
have
a
spreadsheet
going
for
tonight.
Okay,.
B
B
Is
there
in
the
the
committee
in
the
committee
recommendation
that
was
there
that
had
City
staff
in
it
they
did
a
priority.
Prioritization
of
each
fund
was
that
Associated
to
because
there's
no
dollar
amount
Associated
to
that.
So
was
that
just
they
just
left
that
aside
and
said,
hey
here's
what
we
think
or
I'm
just
wondering
like,
because
I
I
mean
I
like
it.
It
was
very
easy
to
read,
it
was
straightforward
and
it
was.
B
It
was
interesting
to
see
what
city
staff
you
know
was
kind
of
prioritizing
from
this
membership,
but
I
wasn't
sure
like
because
last
year
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
and
I,
don't
remember
off
the
top
of
my
head
right
now.
What
the
amount
is
even
fine
yeah
and
you
know
we
tried
to
nail
down
to
that
dollar,
as
close
as
we
could
get.
Is
that
the
same
thing
that
the
that
the?
Not
that
we
have
to
take
the
same
approach?
But
is
that
the
same
thing
that
the
committee
did.
J
I'm
happy
to
explain
yeah
so
when
it
goes
to
Council
in
their
final
packet,
we
do
plan
to
provide
the
score
sheets
that
each
member
of
the
internal
CIP
Review
Committee
did
but
in
the
interest
of
time,
so
so
we're
actually
working
with
the
consultant
right
now.
So
I
think
that's
something
that's
important
to
know
to
help
us
kind
of
you
know,
develop
or
rethink
this
this
process
for
next
year.
J
J
So,
given
that
we
had
a
short
amount
of
time-
and
we
wanted
to
get
something
to
the
boards
and
commissions
from
this
internal
committee,
we
made
the
decision
and
to
provide
a
memo
that
you
received,
that
you
are
that
you
mentioned
there
really
is
meant
to
just
kind
of
be
thematic
and
say
here
are
the
top.
You
know
here
are
top
three
four
five
projects
in
each
category.
Based
on
our
reasoning
to
help
inform
the
boards
and
commissions,
as
I
mentioned,
you
know,
we
did
do
score
sheets
for
all
of
them.
G
J
D
Yeah
I
mean
I
can
I
can
share
my
thought
process
which
I
just
briefly
shared
with
you
when
I'm
open
to
whatever
process
you
guys
have
but
I've
even
look
at
the
tier
threes
I
only
focused
on
tier
ones
and
tier
twos,
and
as
I
listed
my
priorities,
I
did
know
if
I
was
in
agreement
with
the
recommendations
from
the
directors
or
if
it
was,
if
there's
any
variation
there
and
then
the
questions
I
always
ask
myself
is:
does
it
have
a
match?
Does
it
generate
revenue?
D
She,
the
project
name
I,
just
I,
kept
found
myself
scrolling
to
the
right
to
see
if
there
was
a
match
or
not.
So
what
I
did
in
column?
G
is
if
there
was
a
match
or
a
grant
or
supplemental
funding.
I
just
turned
it
green
in
column,
G,
yeah,
so
everything
you
have
filtered
with
a
Y
there.
Jenny
excuse
me
it's
green
in
column,
G,
and
that
was
just
my
visual
tool.
C
B
D
Not
and
the
other
thing
that
I
did,
that
was
different
from
the
the
doctor
where
she
is
I
just
listed
one
through
five.
Everything
else
is
just
a
six
like
greater
than
five
or
just
left
Italy.
So
if
there's
16
line
items
fund,
I
didn't
do
one
through
16.
yeah,
so
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
use
a
similar
approach.
B
B
B
Some
other
funds
that
may
come
in,
but
I
think
I
was
looking
at
it
as
if
well,
if
that
doesn't
happen,
you
know,
do
I
still
want
the
train
or
you
know
the
Pirates
Cove
maintenance,
those
types
of
things
you
know,
and
so
that's
kind
of
how
I
took
it
and
then
you
know
trust
that,
and
you
know,
if
that's
all
approved
and
all
that'll,
you
know
kind
of
revisit.
All
of
that.
B
C
I
don't
know
if
this
is
going
to
be
popular
or
not,
but
I
know.
Last
year
we
went
through
it.
It
was
a
little
lengthy.
So
maybe
we
can
shorten
that
tonight,
but
I
wouldn't
be
against
us
spending
your
own
time
and
coming
back
with
ones.
We've
gone
through
all
of
them
between
now
and
June,
8th,
but
I
also
don't
want
to
take
people's
time.
B
Okay
and
I
was
thinking
if
it
were
pretty
well
aligned
on
the
priority,
then
you
know
if
we
have
seven
million
dollars
or
whatever
that
number
is
priorities
just
based
on
a
prioritization.
We
can
start,
you
know,
chopping
off,
you
know
the
lower,
you
know
the
fives
or
the
sixes,
or
you
know
you
know
I
guess
that
was
by
initial
initial
thought
and
I
know
it
won't
go
that
totally
after
the
discussion
points.
Etc.
E
They
have
funding,
and
these
are
the
projects
that
we
would
like
to
find.
Yes,
in
agreement
with
those
that
we
can
easily
just
say:
okay,
we're
going
to
fund
like
all
the
CTF
projects
that
are
listed
here,
as
listed
where,
where
the
benefit
is
from
your
discussion,
is
going
to
help
us
in
prioritizing
the
epip
and
the
capital
projects
fund,
because
that's
where
they
have
nine
million
dollars
worth
of
tier
one
project
Thoughts,
with
only
five
million
dollars
worth
of
funding
available.
Apparently
so
so.
E
B
B
D
You're
welcome
so
one
more
idea
to
make
this
efficient
and
also
allow
us
to
do
simple
workings
between
now
and
June
8..
Would
it
make
sense
to
have
bear
with
me
a
column
for
each
of
us,
and
so
when
we
go
through
each
row,
James
is
like
I
give
that
a
one
appears
like
a
two
Bill's
like
yep,
it's
a
one
that
we
just
go
through
it
and
then
that's
our
working
document
that
we
leave
with.
Or
are
we
going
to
try
to
come
into
an
agreement
which
any
is
going
to
populate
into
column
m.
C
G
F
E
B
So
to
me
the
most
you
know
the
first
thing
that
I
said,
which
is
what
Suzanne
had
mentioned,
was
looking
at
the
ones
where
I
guess
I
was
looking
at.
It
was
the
the
outside,
not
that
that's
really,
we
can
do
all
of
them,
but
certainly
that
plays
a
factor
into
if
we're
going
to
give
we're
going
to
get
into
funding
we're
going.
G
D
D
B
B
F
A
A
F
A
A
A
Okay,
James:
are
you
going
first
I?
Can
this
feels
different
than
last
year?
I
felt
like
we
had
a
lot
of
consensus
and
we're
just
flying
through
this
I
mean
I.
Guess
it's
been
identified
as
a
tier
one
and
I
think
Suzanne
to
your
point.
This
has
the
accessibility
aspect
to
it,
so
I'll
be
in
agreement
with
making
it
a
priority.
One.
A
J
D
D
D
C
D
D
D
J
H
Yeah,
this
is
a
low
priority
for
me.
So
if
we're
just
ranking
one
through
five
on
priority
ranking
because
I
don't
think
every
category
has
five
things
so
we're
gonna
have
multiple
fives,
multiple
threes.
What's
the
confines
of
what
we're
doing
it's
like
five,
we
don't
care
if
you
get
to
it
sometime
in
the
future,
great
one
get
to
it,
make
sure
it
happens
this
year,
two,
if
you
have
like,
especially
in
the
public
Improvement
funds,
we're
asked
to
both
if
there's
less
than
five
million
and
more
than
five
million.
H
So
one
is
all
the
time
two
is
partial
fund.
Under
five
million
ad
funds,
over
five
million
three
is
over
five
million.
Four
is
if
something
happens,
to
be
able
to
add
in
five.
Is
we
never
care
about
it?
It's
lowest
priority
like.
Is
that
how
we
want
to
establish
this
number
system
or,
what's
what's
the
continuity
between
how
we're
numbering.
C
B
B
Not
that
we're
trying
to
align
with
them,
necessarily
that
you
know
in
order
that
we
have
to.
But
you
know,
are
there
things
out
of
things
that
don't
make
sense
from
that
one
through
23
in
there
and
then
or
27
and
23,
looks
like
you
know?
Is
there
something
there
that
we
don't
don't
agree
with
I?
Think
and
then
have
the
conversation
on
where.
D
H
So
for
Simplicity
purposes,
because
the
level
of
details,
the
directors
went
into
I,
don't
think
we
have
time
capacity
or
should
go
into
that,
but
their
information
is
I,
think
fantastic,
so
I
would
say.
If
we,
you
know
the
four
numbers
that
Jenny
put
up
there,
one
could
be
prioritized
one:
it
funded
100
of
the
time
fund,
all
of
it
fund
the
amount
requested
fully
funds.
H
H
H
A
G
H
H
A
B
B
F
A
H
A
H
G
A
D
B
A
C
B
E
E
J
A
H
J
I
I
F
H
H
D
J
F
F
F
Hopefully
that
will
give
you
additional
perspective.
Our
goal
is
to
try
to
break
down
all
the
project
by
recurring
and
sure,
because
recurring
truly
is
a
oam
operation,
maintenance
and
one
time
is
true.
The
capital
project
so
just
give
you
additional.
So
hopefully
we
can
break
it
down
in
the
future.
Moving
forward.
No
one
can
project
how
much
we
need
for
True
OEM
how
much
we
need
for
new
Capital
acquisition.
F
B
E
H
D
H
F
J
B
J
B
F
D
A
H
Like
the
only
reason
I'm,
a
three
on
this
one
is
I,
don't
see
how
a
15
million
dollar
one
year
project
should
come
out
of
a
fund
that
historically
doesn't
have
more
than
five
to
nine
million
dollars
to
allocate
from
like
it's
an
important
project.
But
how
can
this
one
explore
some
sort
of
dedicated
funding?
B
H
Okay,
can
we
go
back
a
little
bit
and
I
apologize?
I
missed
some
of
the
calls
and
the
presentation
on
this,
but
the
pavement
by
maintenance
area?
Is
this
the
one
that
we're
hoping
to
mostly
remove
out
of
capital
projects
because
of
the
ballot
measure
like
we
still
have
a
huge
chunk
going
to
this
and
I
thought
we
were
going
to
be
able
to
get
a
lot
of
this
away
from
here
based
off
of
that
ballot
measure.
E
H
Can
I
change
mine
to
two
on
this
one
because
they
are
getting
some
funding
from
the
ballot
measure
and
so
I
know
it's
not
the
gaps
we've
dealt
with
in
the
past
and
I
think
that'd
be
interesting
to
understand.
What's
the
funding
that's
coming
from
and
what
is
the
gap
based
off
of
funding
and
the
consequence
of
it
based
off
of
the
dedicated
funding
from
the
ballot.
I
So
we
still
have
you
know
a
balance
that
we
have
every
year
and
really
as
we
try
to
catch
up
to
what
we
we
need
to
be
at
to
get
us
to
that
grade
of
I
believe
we're
trying
to
get
to
a
c
or
b
instead
of
a
d,
which
is
what
we
were
at
two
years
ago.
We
actually
have
to
kind
of
up
fund
that
a
bit
in
you
know
these
first
years.
H
H
E
A
C
B
H
G
H
A
B
F
B
H
And
and
Bill
that's
where
column
B
is
going
to
give
us
some
guidance
on
that,
because
we
talked
about
this
last
year.
Just
the
nature
of
you
know:
City
Charter
operations,
I
I,
think
there
was
a
salary
coming
out
of
one
of
these
funds
as
well
to
be
able
to
cover
a
person's
or
one
or
one
and
a
half
FTE.
So
adding
those
programs
versus
projects
help
us
delineate,
which
ones
are
those
ongoing
maintenance
type
needs
versus.
J
B
B
G
A
C
A
D
The
other
thing
that
stands
out
to
me
is
this
note
in
the
memo
that
it
says
it
will
meet
the
city's
goals
related
to
flexible
work
options,
I
think,
considering
all
the
things
we've
heard
about
attaining
and
retaining
staff,
we
can
support
that
and
those
are
flexible
work
options.
I'd
see
out
of
an
incentive
to.
H
C
I
A
A
E
A
E
E
E
E
B
A
F
I
A
B
B
This
is
one
where
it's
like
I
I
feel
like
I.
Realistically
I,
don't
know
you
know,
I
have
things
like
I
have
to
feel
like
you
know,
I
need
to
support
what
it
costs,
to
keep
the
facilities
of
operations
going
and
to
say.
God.
Funding
is
a
difficult
thing
for
me
to
say,
because
it's
like
well,
how
much
do
I
really
see
cut
it
or.
B
E
B
C
F
B
I'm
a
two,
and
so
this
and
I
mean
obviously
it
doesn't,
but
like
facility
backup's,
not
part
of
like
General
operations
like
the
one
above
it
the
facility
and
operations.
One
I,
don't
know
it
just
seems
like
X,
so
I
mean.
Are
we
at
the
point
where,
like
like,
we
don't
have
generators
or
as
a
replacement
or
I,
don't
know
if
you're
trying
to
know.
F
E
B
C
B
Okay,
and
maybe
coming
out
of
this
here,
you
know
being
our
second
year,
and
you
know,
there's
more
information
on
this-
that
you
know
we
kind
of
template.
It
is
approach
we
want
to
take.
You
know
going
forward.
We
probably
said
the
same
thing
last
year,
but
I
think
this.
You
know
being
a
second
time
around
for
the
same
group.
You
know
you
kind
of
finding
our
what
works.
What's
the
best
way
you
know
to
template
it
yeah.
B
D
H
G
B
G
E
B
G
G
E
G
G
E
H
C
A
B
C
H
H
We
did
split
it
up,
and
maybe
this
is
kind
of
a
good
breaking
point
to
not
run
too
late
on
it,
but
do
we
want
to
each
go
through
and
make
our
own
five
million
dollar
funding
level,
the
above
5
million
dollar
funding
level?
If
we
can
ask
for
clarity
of,
is
that
6
million?
Is
that
12
million?
What
does
that
number
look
like
in
terms
of
how
we're
looking
at
it,
as
well
as
with
all
other
funding
levels,
take
an
aggregate
of
that?
B
Yeah
I
think
having
the
I
think
we
talked
about
that.
A
little
bit
last
month
was
having
the
collect
at
the
long
with
the
individual
was
I.
Think
everyone
kind
of
agreed
that
that
was
beneficial
gave
Council
a
little
bit
different
perspective
on
where
we
made.
You
know
where
we
were
where
we
weren't
Delight,
maybe
to
some
extent
all
right
by
remembering
that
correctly
I
think
that's
what
we
said
last
month,
yeah
that's
right:
yeah,
yeah,
I,.
B
H
So
it
sounds
like
it's
a
similar
situation
to
what
we've
seen
in
years
past,
where
the
requests
for
the
other
funds
do
not
exceed
the
available
balance
and-
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
anyone
from
the
city
so
I
think
if
anyone
goes
through
that
list
and
has
things
we
specifically
want
to
call
out,
maybe
things
you're
against
funding.
We
bring
it
up
that
way,
rather
than
if
there's
enough
money
and
and
the
city
says
they
need
the
funding
for
their
departments
from
this
budget.
E
And
you
have
to
also
keep
in
mind
with
these
funds
that
their
appropriation
rolls
forward.
So,
what's
what's
showing
as
available
a
budget
are
ongoing
projects
that
you
know
haven't
completed
yet
I,
so
I
would
typically
conservation.
Trust
fund
has
around
three
to
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year
to
spend
so
I.
Would
that
that
truly
is
their
funding
source?
I
wouldn't
say
they
have
a
million
dollars
to
spend.
G
E
E
G
E
Yeah
I
think
what's
helpful
for
the
Departments
to
appears
from
the
community's
perspective.
You
know
if,
if
you
don't
have
these
other
funding
sources,
do
you
want
to
fund
the
train
and
use
all
of
CTF
money?
Would
that
be
where
you'd
want
to
put
all
put
your
money
so
like
in
your
prioritization
that
you
know
that
kind
of
feedback
from
you
I
think
is
helpful
to
the
Departments.
B
H
Yeah,
because
if
we
only
had
say
worst
case
scenario,
three
hundred
thousand,
we
would
have
to
go
into
what's
already
appropriated
in
the
past
to
make
up
the
215
000
deficit
of
what
the
train
requests
is.
Otherwise
we're
not
getting
the
full.
You
know,
train
requests
and
that's
that
balance
of
like
day
one
the
numbers
don't
work
for
this
request
based
off
of
what
we
expect
to
come
available.
We've
got
to
go
take
from
the
past
or
take
from
the
future.
B
H
B
H
H
Yeah
I
think
the
big
ones,
the
Pirate
Cove
expansion
to
me
that
project's
related
to
the
measure,
the
Bellevue
train,
that's
related
to
The
Measure,
so
those
would
both
be
pundit
until
future
years
when
we
have
more
information
based
off
of
the
measure,
not
that
they're
not
important
projects,
but
just
funding
sources
isn't
right
for
the
CTF.
In
my
opinion,.
H
Oh,
what
100?
The
question
is:
if
you
have
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
split
across
these
10
projects,
and
one
of
them
is
asking
for
5
15
like
it
just
doesn't
work
there,
it's
getting
different
money
to
support
that
or
money
that
300
000
needs
to
go
up
to
a
higher
level
and
get
more
transfers
into
CTF
to
support
something
like
this
I.
B
So
I
guess
we
could
provide
our
that.
Are
that
our
thoughts
on
that
and
and
I
guess
it's
kind
of
someone
a
Member's
Choice
but
I
don't
last
month,
I
brought
up
I
mean:
do
we
want
to
I
think
it's
in
June
that
council
is
leading
further
with
Parks
and
Rec
on
the
proposal
for
the
for
the
measure.
I
believe
it's
next
lesson.
B
Do
we
want
to
provide
a
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
aligned
with
I
think
the
June
8
th
date?
But
do
you
know
before
our
next
meeting?
Maybe
do
we
want
to
say
take
a
stance
on
you
know
from
a
community
perspective
that
might
be
difficult
to
do
over
email,
especially
because
you
know,
given
the
constraints,
do
we
want
to
provide
a
they
Stacks
to
count
on
whether
it
be
supported,
or
you
know,
supported.
A
Modified
or
don't
support
it
at
all,
if
I
recall
correctly
Bill
last
year,
we
did
take
a
position
on
both
of
the
the
question.
I
think
our
position
was
somewhat
General,
though,
and
that
we
recommended
referring
it
to
voters
and
that
we
were
generally
in
favor
of
that
I.
Don't
think
we
got
down
to
the
the
detail
of.
Did
we
support
a
mill,
Levy
change
versus
a
sales
tax,
I,
don't
think
yeah.
You
know
we
dug
down
to
that
level
of
detail
on
the
specific
approach,
but
broad
conceptual
support.
B
A
And
I
think
voters
are
going
to
be
in
a
pretty
testy
mode
already,
as
they
consider
the
governor's
proposal,
which
is
very
confusing
to
a
lot
of
people.
I
mean
I,
don't
know
how
people
are
in
your
neighborhoods.
My
entire
block
is
livid
and
active
in
terms
of
appealing
and
all
that
good
stuff.
I
can't
imagine
voters
being
pretty
open-minded
about
kind
of
that
limousine
proposal
that
we
saw
from
Parks
and
Rec
I
think
you're
right
Suzanne.
It
would
have
to
be
scaled
back
considerably.
Yeah.
D
B
Yeah
and-
and
maybe
that's
as
simple
as
that-
that
you
know
that's
our
recommendation,
accounts
was
definitely
feel
like
that's.
You
know
again
if
we
were
all
aligned,
but
you
know
using
that
creative
thoughtless.
We
feel
a
modified
approach
to
that.
Is
that
the
you
know
and-
and
you
know,
do
we
think
personally
my
focus
would
be
to
say:
hey,
you
know
the
revenue
generating
items
out
of
there,
such
as
the
Pirates
called
expansion.
B
I
B
H
H
B
B
H
And
and
that
follow-up,
because
it
sounds
like
we're
all
going
to
put
our
own
numbers
and
do
we
have
Clarity
on
the
above
5
million
funding
level
and
all
other
funding
funds
funding
level
I'm.
Just
calling
that
out
to
make
sure
you
know,
if
you
want
us
to
do
a
5
million
10
million
and
7
million
just
to
see
different.
You
know
levels
and
ideas
to
get
that
balance,
but
just
some
clarity
other
than
above
and
all.
E
I
know
that
the
tiered
one
project
or
Capital
request
was
about
nine
million
dollars,
I
mean
potentially,
you
know
there
is
the
unassigned
fund,
balance
from
the
general
fund
that
could
you
know,
fund
that
difference,
but
I
mean
I.
Think
that's
where
city
council
is
looking
for
guidance
in
terms
of
okay.
E
If
we
only
have,
if
we
have
five,
we
know
we
can
fund
the
5
million
now,
if,
if
there's
extra
funding,
whether
it
comes
from
the
unassigned
fund,
balance,
whether
it
comes
from
capital
projects
within
the
community
that
we
we
don't
have
that
number
yet,
but
hopefully
we'll
have
some
idea
with
our
June
meeting
that
could
be.
You
know,
potential
funding
that
city
council
would
would
like
your
guidance
or
input
in
terms
of
okay
above
500
million.
E
H
So
would
you
want
like
five
million
plus
net,
because
if
we
have
nine
million
dollars
to
allocate
it's
easy
to
allocate
up
to
nine
million
dollars
versus
if
you,
if
you
want
a
next
dollar
allocation,
my
next
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
would
go
to
this
project,
followed
by
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Going
to
this
project
and
kind
of
say
that
way.
That's
kind
of
a
different
mentality
of
just
a
big
bucket
of
nine
million
dollars
right.
H
E
E
H
And
it
makes
sense,
I
I
think
it's
a
great
great
approach.
It's
thinking
about
the
best
way
to
display
that,
because,
if
there's
a
project
that
at
5
million
we're
only
going
to
fund
for
75
and
let's
say,
there's
an
extra
fifty
thousand
dollars,
we
don't
fund
my
third
step
next.
Fifty
thousand
dollars
might
be
back
to
that
project
where
steps
one
and
two
are
for
new
projects,
so
I
can't
think
of
an
easier
way
other
than
just
writing
out
a
list
of
like
next
dollars
and
prioritizing
my
own
projects
outside
this
spreadsheet.
H
E
So
if
you
had
to
so,
if
the
five
million
so
right
now
we,
if
you
know
your
current
list,
you
would
have
to
cut
325
000
from
this
list
today
for
the
five
million.
Let's
say:
if
we
have
a
hundred
thousand
or
two
hundred
thousand
say
one
of
those
projects
is
two
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Well,
if
we
had
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
we'd
like
to
fund
this
next
project
or
list
list,
the
next
projects
that
are
available
or
that
you
you
would
like
to
fund
yeah.
H
B
J
H
C
D
B
C
C
H
I
was
gonna,
say
the
big.
The
big
thing
is
the
5
million.
We
know
we
have
yeah
like
and
focusing
on
that
and
getting
a
solid
number
around
that
and
then
saying
it's
literally
if
we
have
5.1
million.
This
is
what
it
is.
It's
5.2
and
just
flowing
that
waterfall
down
I,
don't
know
how
we
aggregate
everything
past
the
5
million.
B
C
H
I
mean
collectively
as
a
group
as
soon
as
you
have
a
next.
You
know.
Next
dollar
goes
to
the
1.6
projects,
the
1.8
projects
followed
by
the
2.0
project,
so
that
follows
kind
of
our
group
vote
of
it,
and
so
do
we
want
to
go
in
and
say
by
each
of
these
chunks,
1.6
prioritize
your
one
two
and
three
1.8
prioritizer
one,
two
three
four,
however
many
in
there
and
then
it
keeps
kind
of
our
group.
You
know
feelings
about
funding
priorities,
balance
with
our
individual
feelings,.
B
B
B
A
C
B
B
C
D
D
B
Don't
remember
it
being
listed
on
the
I
could
have
missed
it
too
on
the
social
media
posts,
because
we
were
a
weird
time
frame
that
the
city
had
already
gone
out
and
said:
hey
here's,
our
openings
and
then
we
you
know,
then
we've
had
our
switch
and
I
don't
but
I
I
again
I
could
have
missed
it,
but
I
don't
remember
it
being
listed
on
that
list
of
all
the
games.
They.