►
From YouTube: City Council Regular 19 Jun 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
A
C
B
D
B
E
B
B
F
E
It
was
the
approval
of
the
minutes
last
meeting
and
we
amended
the
minutes
to
show
that
the
vote
for
Arden
we
did.
We
did
not.
We
we
amended
it
to
that.
There
were
two
people
who
voted
against
and
that
it
was
incorrect
because
it
was
a
seven
no
vote
before
then
we
amended
it
unfort
and
it's
in
it.
We're.
E
A
B
A
B
E
C
C
C
C
A
B
Know
again
again,
it
is
showing
the
language
of
what
the
amendment
was
and
I
agree.
The
missing
link,
I
think
here
is
that
we
were
just
never
provided
a
copy,
as
amended
and
so
I
think
the
City
Clerk's
office
be
happy
to
provide
that
to
all
of
Council
via
email,
any
further
questions
or
comments.
Regarding
the
minutes,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
to
approve.
Seeing
no
further
comments.
Please
vote.
B
G
The
American
public
is
looking
for
a
clean
and
healthy
environment
to
live
in
and
do
business
in
the
city
of
Inglewood
has,
for
the
most
part,
met
the
standard
of
a
clean,
healthy
and
community.
This
has
resulted
in
more
people
moving
to
Englewood
and
Colorado
for
jobs
and
recreational
activities.
The
increase
in
population
growth
has
caused
overcrowding
of
recreation
areas
like
Rocky,
Mountain,
National,
Park
hanging
lake
and
Chautauqua
Park.
Population
growth
is
also
stressing
fresh
water.
As
our
climate
warms,
we
will
experience
earlier
snowmelt,
resulting
in
less
summer
and
fall
water
flow.
G
It
will
also
cause
more
frequent
and
prolonged
droughts,
as
well
as
more
frequent
and
severe
flooding.
A
warmer
climate
will
result
in
increased
evaporation,
causing
more
risk
of
wildflowers
fires
and
forcing
more
sediment
into
our
waterways.
Our
fresh
water
is
used
by
the
oil
and
gas
industries
in
the
fracking
process.
We
live
in
an
arid
climate
and
we
must
manage
our
water
supplies
with
clothes,
monitoring
and
care.
Long-Term
exposure
to
air
pollution
causes
many
health
problems,
including
exacerbation
of
allergies,
asthma,
bronchitis,
emphysema,
resulting
in
diminished
lung
function,
respiratory
inflammation
and,
in
some
cases
cancer.
G
Additionally,
heart
function
can
be
affected
by
breathing,
polluted
air,
causing
such
issues
as
irregular,
heartbeat
heart
attack,
heart
failure
and,
ultimately,
premature
death.
The
most
susceptible
to
the
heart
effects
of
air
pollution
include
not
only
those
with
heart
and
lung
problems,
but
also
pregnant
women,
outdoor
workers,
children
under
the
age
of
8
14,
because
their
lungs
are
still
developing
older
adults
and
elderly,
as
well
as
athletes
who
train
in
the
out-of-doors
carbon
dioxide
and
methane
are
well
known
to
be
a
heat.
G
Trapping
gases
and
human
activity
is
increasing
the
amount
of
both
carbon
dioxide
and
methane
in
the
Earth's
atmosphere
through
the
extraction
and
burning
of
fossil
fuels
and
the
agriculture
industry,
especially
cattle
ranching.
We
must
reduce
carbon
and
methane
significantly
by
the
mid
century
to
prevent
the
most
severe
issues
with
climate
change.
G
Denver
Metro
now
ranks
eighth,
most
air
polluted
city
in
the
United
States.
It
is
from
car
and
industrial
emissions.
Two
years
ago,
the
Denver
Metro
area
ranked
13th
ozone
is
a
lung
irritant
that
works
like
sandpaper.
On
the
inside
of
the
lungs
experts
say,
the
causes
of
increased
ozone
include
the
population
growth
coal-fired
power
plants,
the
own
oil
and
gas
industries
and
vehicle
emissions.
The
United
States
has
5%
of
the
world's
population
and
uses
24%
of
the
planets
energy
resources.
G
The
city
of
Inglewood
has
a
long
history
of
innovation
and
leadership
in
1958
gold
was
discovered
in
little
dike
Dry
Creek
by
William
Russell,
then
in
1860,
Thomas
Skerritt
considered
the
founder
of
the
city
established
a
home
in
the
area.
He
also
built
the
first
Road
to
Denver.
Next
in
1883,
the
cherylin
horse
car
route
was
laid.
The
trolley
was
moved
up
the
path
by
horse
and
down
the
path
by
gravity
in
1948,
the
city
of
Englewood
bought
250
to
2,500
acres
in
Platte
Canyon
for
the
creation
of
McClellan
reservoir.
G
The
reservoir
established
early
water
rights
and
independence
from
Denver
water.
In
fact,
Englewood
supplies
most
of
the
water
to
the
majority
of
southern
part
of
Metro
Denver.
The
establishment
of
the
Englewood
energy
action
plan
in
February
of
2017
is
the
first
step
in
innovation
and
leadership
for
the
future
energy
needs
and
consumption.
We
would
like
to
do
baseline
readings
of
our
air
quality
in
order
to
track
our
progress
and
wean
from
fossil
fuels
and.
B
G
H
G
B
You
and
thank
you
mr.
Brown,
for
coming
and
speaking
tonight.
Our
next
speaker
is
Mark
Swanson
and
Inglot
resident
present
to
discuss
his
concerns
with
code
enforcement
in
the
courts.
Mr.
Swanson
here
tonight
not
seeing
him
and
move
us
on
to
Jeff,
Fraser
and
Ingrid
resident
addressing
council
regarding
a
commitment
to
lowering
greenhouse
gas
emissions
good
evening.
Mr.
Fraser.
I
Thank
You,
council
members,
my
name
is
Jeff
Fraser
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
service.
First
of
all,
it's
my
first
time
here.
First
time,
speaking
of
the
Council
on
the
relatively
new
angle,
wood
resident
I
actually
grew
up
on
the
East.
Coast
grew
up
camping
in
southern
Vermont.
My
family
used
to
go
to
a
campground
called
White
River
Campground
right
on
the
beautiful
White
River,
with
its
deep
pools.
With
that
held
over
wintering
fish,
we
used
to
tube
down
it.
Went
there
growing
up,
have
a
lot
of
fond
memories.
I
With
my
family
of
that
place,
when
I
was
12
years
old,
my
family
took
a
trip
out
to
Glacier
National
Park
in
Montana
that
trip
kind
of
changed
my
life
and
began
my
love
affair
with
the
West
and
have
now
been
here
in
Colorado
coming
up
on
a
decade
but
I
sort
of
married
and
my
wife
Jessica
grew
up
here.
So
I'll
call
myself
a
native
by
default.
J
I
Those
glaciers
are
now
shadows
of
their
former
selves
where
there
were
35
there's
now,
25
they've
receded
massively,
and
they
have
receded
due
to
the
warming
of
our
earth
due
to
greenhouse
gas
emissions
that
are
warming,
our
planet
and
shortening
our
winters
in
2011,
Hurricane
Irene
dropped
record-breaking
rainfall
on
Vermont
and
it
turned
the
White
River
into
a
shell
of
its
former
self,
where
there
used
to
be
deep
pools
there
now
ripped
out
banks
shallow
shallow
water,
it's
hard
to
tube.
There
aren't
as
many
fish
and
it's
too
bad
because
I
want.
I
It
would
be
nice
for
other
kids
to
have
those
memories.
I
had
to
been
down
that
river
and
catching
fish
in
it
in
Colorado,
you're
all
familiar
with
the
increased
wildfires.
The
floods
we've
seen
are
strained
water
resources
and
our
droughts,
all
all
which
are
in
line
with
climate
projections.
Now,
on
the
national
level,
we
know
that
the
conversations
more
or
less
toxic-
it's
not
really
even
worth
discussing
here,
I-
think
we
should
focus
on
Englewood.
Recently,
it's
been
encouraging
that
about
two
hundred
ninety
eight.
I
Maybe
more
cities
have
committed
to
reduce
in
their
cities,
emissions
by
26
to
28
percent
below
2005
levels
by
2025
and
I'd
encourage
Englewood
to
do
exactly
the
same
thing
now,
obviously,
that's
a
lofty
goal.
We
need
to
learn
a
little
bit
about
how
we're
going
to
do
that
and
what
we're
gonna
measure
to
get
to
that
goal
and
by
the
way,
some
cities
that
have
signed
on
to
do
that,
not
the
ones
you'd
assume
not
all
boulders
Houston,
Salt,
Lake,
City
Georgetown,
that's
Texas,
not
DC.
I
I
As
Jen
mentioned,
the
Front
Range
has
the
eighth
highest
ozone
levels
in
the
nation,
which
has
a
lot
of
health
impacts
upon
our
children,
our
elderly,
those
who
are
outside
who
like
to
recreative
I,
think
that's
embarrassing
and
unacceptable,
and
we
have
commitments
from
several
Front
Range
municipalities
and
cities
to
work
to
lower
their
emissions
and
I.
Think
an
angle
would
should
join
that
effort,
the
jobs
of
the
future
and
clean
energy
and
efficiency
here,
as
you
know,
we're
primarily
funded
by
sales
and
use
taxes.
I
To
me,
the
more
solar
installations
in
angle
would
the
more
sales
and
use
taxes
we're
generating
the
more
net
metering
from
solar
output.
That's
going
out
into
the
grid,
reducing
reducing
our
overall
use
of
fossil
fuels.
That's
a
win
win
and,
as
you
know,
the
good
news
angle,
it
already
has
a
plan.
The
Energy
Action
Plan
is
on
the
right
track,
but
it
does
need
to
be
augmented
to
study
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
how
to
set
goals
to
lower
them,
just
as
it
has
done
for
electricity
and
gas
as
well.
I
I
It's
exciting
there
are
lots,
but
what
I
would
ask
you
tonight
is
to
commit
to
two
things,
first
of
which
I
think
you
can
do
tonight
and
it's
pretty
easy
agree
to
study
and
measure
greenhouse
gas
emissions
in
angle,
wood
and
add
that
to
your
energy
action
plan
and
set
goals
for
the
future.
Now
I
would
also
ask,
as
a
secondary,
asked,
that
you
set
those
goals
to
reduce
angle
Woods
greenhouse
gas
emissions
by
30
percent
by
2025.
I
I
B
K
Fraser,
thank
you
for
coming.
I,
appreciate
you
and
Jan
speaking
about
this
and
I'll.
Give
some
more
general
comments
in
general
comment
time,
but
I
just
had
a
question
so
I
know
you've
got
some
folks
to
organize
together
about
talking
about
solutions
around
this
issue
and
I.
Think
you
guys
had
a
meeting
to
discuss.
Maybe
some
ideas
and
solutions
we.
J
K
I
Had
a
nice
meeting
at
brew
on
Broadway
over
a
couple
of
beers
and
I
think
they're
about
15
a
lot
of
interest.
A
lot
of
conversation
about
this
I
know
that
it's
recently
due
to
the
national
dialogue,
there's
been
a
lot
of
interest
in
this
issue
in
a
lot
of
cities
and
municipalities
are
focusing,
but
a
lot
of
interests.
A
lot
of
great
solutions
posed
a
lot
of
people
who
want
to
get
involved
and
really
want
to
pay
attention
to
the
process
going
forward
and
help
it
go
in
the
right
direction.
Thank.
H
H
B
L
Good
evening,
I'm
continuing
my
speech
from
June
5th
I
hope
you
didn't
throw
it
away
as
I.
Am
writing
my
story
for
a
number
of
weeks
as
I
come
before
you
I'm,
not
sure.
If
there
is
anyone
in
our
city
that
would
like
to
see
that
small
historic
train
depot
restored
to
its
former
glory
more
than
me,
I
am
the
daughter-in-law
of
five
generations
of
the
Kephart
family
and
four
generations
of
the
Nichol
family
who
have
resided
in
Englewood
for
107
years,
the
first
generation
before
the
Depot
was
even
built.
L
It
does
pay
me
to
see
what
has
happened
to
our
historic
Depot
and
the
other
beautiful
buildings,
churches
and
schools
and
Inglewood
that
have
disappeared
for
the
sake
of
new
progress.
When
we
took
when
we
look
at
Littleton
and
other
cities,
they
had
a
vision
for
saving
their
history
and
now
that
great
legacy
belongs
to
their
citizens
in
Littleton's
outdoor
farm
museum,
our
Inglewood
history
lives
on
people,
just
don't
know
it.
The
old
farmhouse
in
the
one-room
schoolhouse
in
England,
where
it
was
in
England
tiny
school,
was
the
first
one
built
in
Arapahoe
County.
L
The
concern
now
is:
what
will
the
City
Council
do?
Well,
they
follow
Linda
Olson,
as
stated
in
Ingrid
Herald
on
May
25th.
The
situation
is
what
it
is,
and
the
city
should
take
steps
to
help
parson
complete
repair
in
restoration
of
the
depot
in
two
other
City
Council
meetings.
She
said
the
same
thing
pushing
for
parson
if
the
historic
Depot
was
owned
by
our
city
and
restored
by
our
own
Englewood
history
and
our
legacy,
which
was
the
original
plan.
I,
would
gladly
give
my
tax
dollars
for
this
restoration.
L
However,
I
am
not
willing
and
I
do
not
want
my
hard-earned
tax
dollars
going
to
pay
for
mr.
Parsons
private
property
woes
one,
our
taxpayers.
The
citizens
of
this
community
lost
big
time,
the
first
time
around
in
June
2013.
Now
the
possibility
of
another
bailout
costing
us
again
3
after
mr.
parson
had
received
all
this
help
again
from
the
city.
He
can
still
simply
sell
that
by
the
property
for
whenever
and
how
much
he
chooses.
So
our
citizens
and
taxpayers
lose
three
times
in
the
parson
deal.
However,
mr.
L
parson,
a
resident
of
Denver
will
win
three
times
money
taken
from
our
citizens.
I
questioned
mr.
Parsons
character
and
repeat
again,
mr.
parson
denied
numerous
times
that
he
said
at
the
June
2013
council
meeting,
where
we
all
heard
him
say
and
I
quote:
I
do
not
have
to
get
a
501c3
I
do
not
I
have
to
get
any
grants.
My
family
has
300,000
and
I
can
start
the
renovation
on
that
building
immediately,
and
it
will
be
a
legacy
for
my
children.
L
That
was
proved
to
be
a
true
statement.
He
said
before
councils
and
citizens
that
were
in
the
audience,
then
the
City
Council
warded
him,
the
Inglewood
historic
train
depot.
As
we
all
know,
he
gave
false
and
deceitful
information
that
has
hurt
our
city
in
our
citizens
and
the
restoration
for
that
Depot
could
be
years
before
being
restored
if
ever
rumor
has
it
that
he
has
his
fourth
board
of
directors
in
four
years.
L
Doesn't
that
tell
you
something
shouldn't
you
check
out
who
the
former
board
members
were
particularly
the
very
first
ones
if
few
City
Council
members
are
thinking
of
helping
mr.
Parsons
private
property
with
repair
and
restoration
from
the
city
as
councilmember
Linda
Olson
is
pushing
for
in
every
citizen
of
this
city,
has
the
same
right
and
claim
for
restoration
on
their
private
property
and
I
want
to
tell
you
that
I
want
to
be
the
first
one
anointing
to
receive
that
restoration
on
my
private
property.
L
Now
that
does
sound
pretty
silly,
doesn't
it,
but
in
reality
it
is
not
because
our
citizens
could
have
a
real
good
case
and
may
just
want
to
use
it.
Just
remember
rewarding
mr.
parson
for
his
dishonesty
and
deceptive
manner
is
not
showing
the
leadership
our
citizens
expect
from
our
city
leaders.
I
talked
to
a
lot
of
people
that
I
can
tell
you
that
our
citizens
are
fed
up
with
the
past
bailouts
lying
to
citizens
spending
money
where
it
should
not
go
and
much
more.
L
B
H
Course,
I
have
some
questions.
Have
you
ever
had
a
comment
taken
out
of
context
in
your
life?
I
don't
know
well,
I
have
so
the
one
here
that
I
somehow
want
Parsons
to
complete
repair
is
not
I
mean
I
I,
don't
believe
that
we
should
help
him
out
financially
I
believe.
Do
you
believe
that
the
city
should
actually
have
the
meetings
for
the
DRT
with
him
to
go
over
what's
required
when
they're,
when
he's
asking
for
it?
That
is
what
any
citizen
is
afforded.
B
M
Good
evening,
Council
I
want
to
talk
about
two
things
tonight.
The
first
one
is
rats
its
own
conversation
with
several
for
the
last
several
weekend
weeks
about
rats
what
to
do
about.
It
got
me
thinking
about
the
Black
Plague
during
the
Middle
Ages
and
all
the
people
who
died
there
and
that
fit
right
in
with
our
next
history
society.
Talk
I,
have
some
posters
out
on
the
back
table
here.
M
Kassandra
let
go.
Miller
is
going
to
talk
about
the
1918
flu
that
killed
50
million
people
across
the
world
and
tens
of
thousands
right
here
in
Colorado,
and
not
only
talk
about
that
flu,
but
what
Swedish
hospital
and
other
hospitals
are
doing
to
prepare
for
the
next
one.
So
that's
the
first
piece.
Second
piece:
this
is
a
tease.
M
M
Home
oxygen
came
in
the
big,
it
was
liquid
oxygen
and
the
big
cams,
and
it
was
delivered
by
truck
every
couple
weeks
and
it
was
offloaded
at
this
big
canister
in
your
living
room
in
1978,
Mountain
Medical
Supply,
a
relatively
short-lived
company
here
in
Englewood,
located
on
teak
on
the
street
right
near
the
fire
station,
started
thinking
about
a
new
way
to
provide
it.
Could
we
invent
a
concentrator
that
would
extract
the
oxygen
from
the
air,
a
home
concentrator
for
the
oxygen
they
said?
Yes,
we
can
and
they
did
it.
M
They
invented
the
home
oxygen
contractor
concentrator
to
replace
the
big
tanks
of
oxygen.
The
concentrator
was
invented
right
here
in
Englewood
Colorado
vine,
Mountain,
Medical
Supply.
Then
they
asked
well.
Can
we
make
a
portable
women
that
big
old
box
is
kind
of
here
hard
to
carry
around
they
built
it,
but
we're
having
trouble
figuring
out
how
to
put
a
handle
on
the
box?
M
A
young
mother
working
there
suggested
they
could
use
the
handle
like
the
handle
on
the
sewing
machine
and
the
engineers
looked
really
puzzled
and
the
next
day
this
item
a
nickel,
brought
her
sewing
machine
in
and
they
saw
how
the
handle
was
attached
on
the
sewing
machine
and
that
answered
the
question
item.
A
is
gonna.
Give
you
the
whole
story
about
Mountain
Medical
Supply.
She
worked
there
for
a
time
anyway.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
H
M
B
N
Good
evening
mayor
members
of
council,
Scott
Gilbert
44:25
Fox
good
to
see
you,
you
know
Ms
Brown
and
mr.
Frazier
really
covered
a
lot
of
ground
and
I
think
did
well,
but
I
would
just
like
to
say
that
the
the
Energy
Action
Plan
I,
really
like
it
I
read
it
I.
Think
it's
well
done.
I
hope
we
can
perhaps
step
up
the
goals
from
that
on
energy
reduction
and
also
look
at
like
get
a
good
measure
of
what
our
emissions
are.
N
You
know,
we've
got,
we've
got
the
big
city
property
that
I
drove
by
the
other
day,
the
the
wastewater
treatment
plant.
There's
a
water
treatment
plant
there's
their
City
ground.
That's
not
used
for
say,
parks
and
stuff
I
wonder
if
we
could
get
solar
arrays
on
those
I
wonder
if
we
could
partner
with
businesses
in
solar
arrays.
N
You
know
I
mean
when
we've
got
all
this
building
going
on.
Is
there
perhaps
a
way
to
incentivize
for
for
lower
emissions
and
and
greener
buildings
by
say
waiving
permitting
fees
or
something
we
have
this
good
I
got
the
you
know.
Trees
are
great
for
reducing
greenhouse
gases
and
also
for
shading
houses,
so
they
take
less
cooling
in
the
summer
and
I
went
to
the
the
city
tree
sale
this
year
and
it
was
like
the
scram
before
the
last
lifeboat
on
the
Titanic.
You
know
and
and
I
wonder.
N
If
we
could
say
you
know
if
this
city
could
put
its
its
volume
buying
power
to
work
and
and
offer
trees
a
lower
rate
on
a
frequent
basis.
There's
a
I,
don't
know:
there's
no
there's
a
lot
of
things,
but
I
think
I
think
we
could
look
at
it.
Voluntary
goals,
I
think
I.
Think
people
come
through
when
they're
asked
to
to
do
things
voluntarily.
I
think
we
could.
We
could
just
really
keep
it
a
local
focus
about
us
and
not
sweat
the
big
system,
politics
and
stuff.
N
Also
I
noticed
this
you're,
all
I
assume
some
of
you
are
going
to
see
them
at
all
this
week
and
on
Thursday
at
3:15,
there's
a
presentation,
something
about
planning
for
a
smarter
world
or
something,
but
it
includes
a
segment
on
sustainability,
I'd
be
interested
in
hearing
what
comes
out
of
that
and
I'm
five
seconds
away
from
three
minutes.
So
thanks
for
your
time,
we
really
appreciate
it.
Mr.
H
There
I
just
wanted
to
ask
if
you've
seen
any
metrics
for
once
when
cities
in
particular
have
done
some
of
this
in
terms
of
giving
baseline
measuring
baseline
and
then
figuring
out
how
to
reduce.
Are
there
any
metrics
that
you've
seen
or
the
group
that
you've
been
meeting
with
no
I
haven't
could
find
some
because
I'm
sure
there's
something
there,
but
if
you
find
anything,
send
it
our
way?
We
all
do
this
I
know
you
thanks.
H
B
O
Name
is
Cohen
Dickerson,
28,
35,
south
Pennsylvania
Street.
The
main
driver
of
emissions
in
this
city
right
now
is
the
concreting
over
of
Inglewood
in
the
form
of
high-density
housing
which
increases
traffic,
including
so-called
affordable,
especially
by
PUD
s,
which
are
the
majority
of
the
development
and
are
the
antithesis
of
sustainable
growth
and,
if
anything,
increases
energy
needs
in
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
If
they
are
actually
a
real
problem
here,
it
is
a
scientific
impossibility
to
reduce
carbon
emissions
to
a
lower
percentage
than
is
produced,
naturally,
even
if
all
human
contributions
are
eliminated.
O
A
case
in
point
is
all
to
Cherry
Hills.
When
I
spoke
last
council
meeting
regarding
the
250,000
dollar
tax
credit
afforded
this
development
on
the
historic
flood
school
property
council
comments
said
there
were
no
tax
credits
given
I
did
a
Korra
request
in
the
amount
which
was
called
a
rebate
of
use
tax.
O
In
the
redevelopment
assistance
agreement
signed
on
2013
as
a
result
of
counsels,
actions
most
certainly
did
grant
a
tax
credit
for
the
city,
ditch
relocation
and
easement,
and
a
traffic
light
to
the
tune
of
over
three
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars,
which
included
fifty
nine
thousand
dollars
for
the
park.
Dedication
fee
cut
in
half
as
additional
credit.
The
building
has
been
sold
for
a
forty
two
million
dollar
profit
over
the
cost
of
build,
plus
our
tax
credits
paid
to
the
developer.
O
Why
are
we
paying
for
the
public
improvements
that
developers
cost
us
when
they
are
so
profitable?
A
second
case,
the
Broadway
lofts,
affordable
housing?
Their
documents
show
that
they
got
two
hundred
and
fifty
nine
thousand
dollars
in
fee
waivers
from
the
city
and
have
so
far
not
been
charged.
The
appropriate
use
tax
on
the
residences
on
the
most
species
of
grounds,
the
new
state
law
has
no
applicability
to
eh-eh
being
able
to
make
the
lost
tax
exempt.
Eh-Eh
has
no
ownership
interest
in
the
lofts,
which
is
a
necessary
requirement
of
the
law
granting
an
exemption.
O
There
is
no
evidence
that
supports
the
twenty
thirteen
contention
that
Alta
cherry
hills
will
bring
or
has
brought
revenue
to
the
city
in
the
form
of
job
creation
or
sales
tax
generation.
You
have
to
stop
this
bleeding
no
more
peds,
especially
in
industrial
zoning,
the
main
areas
for
new
skilled
job
creation,
no
more
affordable
housing
or
tax
credits
for
developers
who
would
build
anyway
and
sell
for
double
the
profit
in
this
high-density
housing
and
tax
credit
assistance,
Thank.
B
B
P
P
So
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
give
an
anecdotal
story
in
support
of
what
they're
asking
when
I
moved
to
Englewood
I
lived
and
the
apartments
by
the
light
rail
just
across
the
circle,
and
one
of
the
reasons
we
chose
that
location
was
because
we
didn't
need
a
car.
We
could
take
the
light
rail
train
to
work
to
school
anywhere
we
needed
to
go
a
few
years
later.
When
we
decided
to
buy
a
house.
We
looked
all
over
the
city,
but
we
decided
to
stay
in
Englewood,
largely
because
again
we
wouldn't
need
a
car.
P
We
could
take
the
light
rail
train
anywhere.
We
needed
to
go
so
with
that
being
said,
I
just
wanted
to
say
not
only
would
adopting
these
goals
and
taking
some
of
these
ideas
and
putting
them
to
work
and
I've
only
would
that
be
great
for
our
health
and
our
environment,
but
it
would
be
great
for
the
image
of
the
city
of
Englewood.
P
It
would
be
a
great
opportunity
to
set
an
example
down
here
in
the
southern
suburbs
of
taking
care
of
leveling,
our
planet
and
our
city,
but
providing
opportunities
for
people
to
do
what
they
can
promote
the
light
rail.
Maybe
we
could
also
become
involved
with
the
garden
in
a
box
which
encourages
residents
to
purchase
and
plant
their
yards
with
low
water
native
xeric
plants.
Therefore
reducing
water
usage
in
our
city
and
also
the
ideas
they
shirt.
So
that's
it.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
D
It
will
start
out
with
the
carbon
I'd
like
to
say,
I,
appreciate
your
approach
of
talking
about
our
local
community
versus
trying
to
get
us
involved
in
a
national
issue
which,
frankly,
we
have
very
little
control
over
some
of
the
things
that
the
city
has
already
been
working,
on,
which
you're,
probably
gonna,
be
very
pleased
to
hear.
Is
that
we're
looking
at
creating
a
solar
farm
already
to
help
provide
energy
for
the
use
of
our
own
facilities?
D
The
wastewater
plant
is
doing
a
feasibility
study
study
right
now
to
see
about
reclaiming
all
the
natural
gases
that
comes
off
of
that
facility
and
being
able
to
use
them
in
operations
at
the
treatment
plant
also
to
fuel
vehicles
and
potentially
even
sell
to
other
communities.
So
right,
there's
going
to
be
a
huge
reduction
on
on
carbon
going
into
the
atmosphere
just
from
that
particular
one.
D
D
I
had
no
control
over
that
when
I
campaigned,
I
campaigned
against
that
whole
transaction,
but
the
bottom
line
is
today
the
Parsons
owned
the
property
and
the
only
way
that
we
can
really
get
that
property
back
is
if
we
would
do
something
along
a
long,
eminent
domain
and,
frankly,
we
don't
have
the
authority
to
do
that.
Where
we
wouldn't
be
turning
it
into
a
school,
we
wouldn't
be
turning
it
into
our
Murray.
We
wouldn't
be
doing
anything
along
those
lines,
so
the
city
would
end
up
with
frankly,
a
large
lawsuit.
D
So
at
this
point
in
time
and
and
I
made
the
same
comment
to
Lynn
Linda
made
it's
in
the
city's
best
interest
to
help
the
Parsons
get
that
place
restored.
Now,
neither
one
of
us
either
one
of
us
that
we
were
going
to
give
them
money
or
do
anything
along
those
lines.
What
what
we're
talking
about
is
helping
is
maybe
giving
them
some
guidance.
You
know
hey.
D
D
Yes,
it's
owned
by
a
foundation
that
the
Parsons
owns.
It's
just
the
way
it
is,
but
if
we
want
to
see
that
Depot
stay
and
get
restored
the
community,
he
needs
help.
That's
the
bottom
line
and
we
can
talk
about
all
the
things
he
said
three
years
ago
four
years
ago.
It
doesn't
really
matter
because
we're
here
today
so
I
go
now
for
energy
kind
of
go
back
to
the
energy
issue.
D
We
may
think
somebody
made
the
comment
about
the
higher
density,
creating
more
energy
use
and
all
that
yes,
we're
having
more
energy
use
within
the
community.
But
if
we
start
looking
at
the
the
accumulative
use
for
the
same
number
of
people,
higher
density
housing
like
these
apartments
along
the
light
rail
have
a
lower
consumption
of
energy
because
we're
no
longer
individually
heating
and
cooling
homes.
D
We
have
that
thermal
mass
that's
helping
to
keep
that
temperature
regulat
regulated
within
that
building,
so
the
usage
for
each
individual
person
is
lower
than
an
individual
person
in
a
home.
Yes,
I
still
encourage.
Homeownership
I
still
want
to
see
the
single-family
homes
in
our
family
coming
in
our
city,
our
family
too
I
guess,
but
there
is,
there-
is
appropriate
places
within
our
community
for
the
higher
density.
The
region
is
going
to
see
more
growth.
D
It's
just
the
way
of
way
of
the
world
right
now
and
our
city,
Englewood,
has
always
been
very
innovative.
Doug
has
done
a
lot
of
presentations.
Talking
about
all
the
great
things
we've
done.
People
have
done
in
our
community
we're
always
moving
ahead.
If
we
try
to
stop
and
and
freeze
a
frame,
it's
not
going
to
happen.
D
K
K
This
a
group
that's
here
tonight
with
the
passion
and
energy
and
enthusiasm
you
have
around
this
topic
in
in
getting
together,
taking
it
upon
yourselves
to
get
together
and
talk
about
solutions,
and
not
just
saying
you
know
complaining
about:
what's
not
right
and
what's
not
working
taking
the
time
to
get
together
and
come
up
with
a
brainstorm
of
a
bunch
of
solutions.
I
really
really
appreciate
that
and
I'm
really
inspired
by
that
I
am
a
hundred
percent
committed
as
an
individual.
K
K
I
will
also
be
attending
anything
and
everything
at
CML
that
is
related
to
this
there's
a
lot
of
things
on
energy
efficiency,
sustainability,
climate
resiliency
and
things
of
that
nature,
so
I
will
be
attending
all
of
those
and
I
hope
to
come
back
with
some
really
solid
takeaways
of
things
that
we
can
do
here.
I
think
this
is
a
really
good.
K
First
start
to
the
conversation
and
I
want
like
I
said:
I
want
us
to
do
everything
we
can
and
I
think
we
just
need
to
figure
out
what
those
actual
steps
are
and
then
set
goals
around
those
to
be
attainable.
What
we
can
actually
achieve
and
what
we
can
what's
really
gonna
make
a
difference.
So
I
think
this
keep
coming
and
I
would
love
to
hear
from
you
call
me
anytime,
let's
get
together,
I
would
love
to
hear
from
you
and
I'm
really
excited
about
this
first
step
in
the
conversation.
B
E
E
We
weren't
able
to
use
it
at
home
and
I
was
always
afraid
to
take
him
on
a
long
trip,
because
we'd
have
to
load
the
car
with
all
those
tanks
and
I
thought
we
just
blow
up
so
I
was
I
was
grateful
and
when
that
came
in,
and
certainly
grateful
that
the
oxygen
is
a
medicine
and
it
obviously
made
a
huge
difference
in
his
life
and
made
my
right
shoulder
a
lot
stronger.
But
I
did
not
know
that
that
was
invented
here.
E
Beginner
things
I
have
had
an
opportunity
over
this
last
year
to
attend
a
lot
of
seminars,
a
lot
of
information
about
greenhouse
about
protecting
the
environment,
about
what
we
can
do
at
a
local
level
and
the
issues
around
you
know
covering
covering
the
dirt
high
water
use
cutting
down.
Last
grass.
Half
of
my
backyard
now
is
going
to
be
zero
scape,
trying
to
cut
those
things
down
using
more
pollinator
friendly
environments
and
plants
and
and
being
evaluated
for
solar.
But
my
chickens
are
going
to
get
to
do
the
solar
experiment
first,
so
they
are.
E
When
you
and
the
heat
issue,
when
you're
paving
everything
over
and
the
density,
the
more
concentration
that
you
move
these
out,
there
were
people
that
were
able
to
see
rats
come
out
of
the
sewer
when
we
did
the
flush
when
they
did
the
High
Line
canal,
and
that
happened
both
in
Denver
and
in
Littleton.
This
is
not
something
that's
just
particular
to
Englewood
or
Denver.
It's
all
the
way
along
this
this
route
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
addressing
when
you
put
in
this
kind
of
density.
E
E
But
nobody
really
likes
to
talk
about
rats,
but
I'm,
I'm,
glad
your
cats
are
fat
out
there
Doug,
but
we've
got
to
try
and
get
a
little
bit
bigger,
bigger
issues
on
here
and
admit
with
how
we're
affecting
this.
The.
As
far
as
the
high
density,
the
council
members
said,
appear
that
the
builders
are
going
to
do
what
they're
gonna
do
anyway,
they
can't
do
what
they
want
to
do
anyway.
We
control
the
zoning.
E
You
can't
just
organize
everything
and
not
expect
that
you're
going
to
have
these
problems
with
climate
change,
with
greenhouse
gases
and
with
vermin
you
have
to
expect,
and
then,
if
you're,
going
to
go
ahead
and
be
a
proponent
of
density
and
just
throw
up
your
hands
like
it's
going
to
happen
anyway,
then
you
have
to
make
sure
that
you're
addressing
those
issues
ahead
of
time.
As
far
as
the
depot,
this
council
still
needs
to
find
out.
I
disagree
with
the
comment.
That's
been
made
that
it's
just
sold.
E
There
was
a
request
from
this
council
to
go
ahead
and
find
out
whether
the
sale
was
legal
or
whether
there
was
anything
that
we
could
do
to
change
it.
This
community
had
a
petition
and
put
it
on
to
the
ballot
in
a
City
Council
voted
to
sell
that
park
out
from
under
people
before
they
could
get
it
and
vote
on
it
that
November
they
sold
it
in
September
and
the
vote
happened
in
November
and
they
knew
that
was
coming.
I've
listened
to
all
those
tapes.
Again,
it's
very
sad.
E
If
that's
the
situation
in
persons
hasn't
kept
their
deal.
The
frustration
of
this
council
is
legitimate
to
go
back,
look
at
that
contract
and
find
out
what's
going
on
and
to
help
an
individual
private
property
owner
who
this
community
believes
was
able
to
get
property
out
from
under
them
before
they
were
able
to
vote
on
that,
and
it
is
officially
designated
Depot
Park
now,
as
as
of
that
November
vote
in
2013
I
believe
it
was
so.
E
This
council
needs
to
get
a
little
bit
more
information
before
we
go
making
wide
statements
like
that
that
we
have
no
authority
or
no
power
to
change
anything
or
move
forward,
and
we
need
to
find
out
more
of
what
we
can
do
before.
We
just
throw
up
our
hands
on
everything
and
say
we
have
no
control.
That's
all
I
had
Thank.
E
H
H
That
could
come
our
way
to
take
it
back
if
it
is
what
it
is
and
he
has
it
and
then
my
goal
is
to
make
sure
that
he
makes
good
and
what
he
promised
I
do
not
expect
the
city
to
give
any
money
to
it,
nor
for
you
to
give
any
money
or
anyone
else
that
doesn't
want
to
what
I
do
expect
is
for
us
to
hold
him
responsible
for
what
he
said.
He
would
do
and
I
hope.
H
That's
what
you
want
too,
but
perhaps
what
you
want
is
instead
to
do
some
sort
of
legal
action,
which
would
be
helpful
if
you
would
make
that
really
clear
up
here.
What
is
it
that
you
really
want?
You
want
us
to
take
legal
action.
That's
what
we're
already
asking
about.
The
other
thing
is
that,
just
in
terms
of
the
public
I
think
it
would
be
good
for
you
to
know
that
the
LLC
that
it
was
under
for
the
depo
is
now
being
transferred
into
a
non-profit
will
happen.
H
Probably
within
this
month
and
I
wanted
to
thank
our
city
manager
for
going
over
and
looking
at
the
building
a
bit
more
and
I
know.
Councilmember
Yates
has
been
there,
I've
been
there
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
things
that
we
need
to
continue
to
do
is
keep
showing
up.
Keep
asking
questions
and
keep
pushing.
One
of
the
things
I
think
is
exciting,
as
a
possibility
is
that
they
are
getting
that
first
floor
done
once
they
have
that
done,
they
can
move
their
printing
presses
in.
H
There
begin
their
workshops,
which
will
actually
make
it
sustainable
financially,
which
is
why
we
actually
sold
it
to
them.
The
top
floor,
however,
doesn't
have
a
plan,
and
I
would
hope
that
he
and
his
now
the
board
of
the
nonprofit
will
reach
out
to
the
Historic
Preservation
Society,
which
I've
suggested
over
and
over
and
know
they've
talked
to
mr.
cone
about
using
it
for
the
city.
H
Overall,
for
those
who
are
interested
in
historic
preservation
for
storage
and
display
of
some
of
the
things
that
are
currently
in
the
society
that
could
be
could
be
put
in
there
and
something
along
the
lines
of
open
houses
and
different
kinds
of
events
could
happen
there,
they're
very
open
to
that.
But
I
know
that
has
to
be
another
stage.
They
have
a
lot
to
do
yet
they
have
a
lot
to
do
yet.
I,
don't
know
how
they're
going
to
finish
it,
but
we
got
to
work
all
fronts
on
this.
H
H
Emissions
or
the
water
usage,
the
years
that
we
had
the
droughts
was
that
when
we
had
voluntary
control
of
that
citizens
saved
more
water
than
when
it
was
imposed
so
creating
some
sort
of
goals
for
emissions.
It's
a
great
idea
in
voluntary
control
as
much
always
leads
to
greater
compliance
than
some
of
the
rules.
So
what
do
you?
What
did
you
find
out
about
emissions
yeah.
B
I
mean
what
what
I
wanted
to
share
was
asking
mr.
Keck
about
the
follow-up
for
mr.
Fraser.
Mr.
Fraser
had
provided
some
information
to
mr.
Keck
about
some
resources
about
how
we
might
be
able
to
get
some
data
on
emissions
or
how
we
might
be
able
to
get
our
arms
around
sort
of
tracking
that
and
I
guess.
I
was
just
gonna
ask
for
an
update
on
that.
Could.
Q
Q
So
largely,
we
have
a
lot
of
data,
also
already
from
Xcel
Energy
that
was
utilized
for
the
energy
action
plan
and,
like
anything,
starts
locally,
so
each
resident
actually
has
an
opportunity
to
to
participate
and
incumbent
upon
them
to
take
care
of
where
they
can
and,
of
course,
the
energy
action
plan
sets
out
some
goals
as
well
to
help
educate
the
public
as
well
as
offer
some
resources
there.
The
biggest
area
of
data
collection
that
we
have
right
now
is
actually
for
our
two
major
utilities,
water
and
wastewater.
Q
We
actually
have
an
incredible
amount
of
data
for
the
Littleton
Englewood
wastewater
treatment
plant,
which
is
within
our
community
and
how
much
energy
consumption,
how
much
greenhouse
gas
is
being
generated
by
that
right
now
and
as
you're
well
aware,
council,
we
are
working
diligently
to
reduce
the
carbon
footprint
at
that
facility,
the
biggest
project.
Of
course.
That
will
help
to
do
that
is
to
cease
flaring
off
the
methane
gas
is
created
by
the
the
plant
today.
In
doing
so,
we
would
actually
eliminate
740
to
892
car
trips
in
a
year.
Q
If
we
took
care
of
that,
I
mean
that's,
that's
significant.
That
means
eliminating
them
off
the
road
just
from
the
work
that
we
can
deal
with
the
plant
with
the
the
biogas.
So
we're
looking
at
that.
As
it's
been
mentioned,
the
cats
gone
out
of
the
bag.
We
are
looking
for
ways
in
which
to
leverage
our
properties
to
look
at
land
that
we
have
where
we
could
do
a
small,
solar,
garden
or
small
solar
array.
We're
also
looking
at
ways
in
which
we
can
use
wind.
Q
A
matter
of
fact
today,
I
sent
to
our
our
director
of
the
wastewater
treatment
plant.
We
have
an
incredible
resource
now,
that's
free
because
it's
called
gravity
where
we're
actually
putting
about
20
to
25
million
gallons
of
wastewater
a
day
into
the
South
Platte.
It's
clean
water
by
the
way,
much
cleaner
than
what
you
pull
out
of
the
ground
and
we
could
use
small-scale
hydroelectric.
You
can
put
a
propeller
in
there
and
it
turns
and
gravity
makes
the
propeller
turn
and
creates
energy.
So
we
have
a
number
of
different
products
that
we're
looking
at.
Q
That
will
help
to
reduce
energy,
give
us
ways
in
which
we're
not
pulling
energy
off
the
grid
so
that
we're
reducing
the
number
of
pounds
of
coal
that
we're
gonna
be
burning
a
year.
I
mean
if
we're
successful.
With
some
of
the
initiatives
were
looking
at,
we
could
eliminate
up
to
four
and
a
half
million
pounds
of
coal
burned
each
year
to
power
our
wastewater
utility.
That's
just
waste
water,
that's
not
including
water,
and
so
we
are
looking
at
and
becoming
a
little
bit
more
educated
on
greenhouse
gas.
Q
We
appreciate
the
fact
that
citizens
are
coming
forward
with
that
heretofore.
It
was
something
that
we
would
just
do
swapping
out
lighting
putting
in
solar
arrays,
but
now
we're
actually
trying
to
actually
calculate
the
greenhouse
gas
emissions
that
we're
reducing
with
that
and
so
I
think
30%,
certainly
as
a
goal,
that's
achievable
by
the
city
already
with
plans
that
are
in
place
and
work,
that's
already
being
put
forward
by
your
staff.
H
B
You
I
also
have
a
few
comments.
I
just
want
to
start
with
a
thank
you
for
those
who
spoke
about
environmental
sustainability,
including
Ms
Brown
mr.
Fraser,
miss
Borman
and
mr.
Gilbert.
You
know
the
council
is
aware
of
the
petition
that
has
been
circulated
has
been
provided
to
the
City
Council.
You
know,
I
just
wanted
to
commit
to
you,
folks
that
I
do
support
doing
what
we
can
economically
to
be
is
environmentally
conscious
as
possible
and
I
appreciate
the
focus
on
Inglewood.
B
Generally
so,
I
pre
I
appreciate
that
you
sort
of
revised
a
little
bit
of
the
ass
tonight
in
this
document
that
was
provided,
focusing
more
on
trying
to
understand
and
where
we
are
on
greenhouse
emissions
and
then
come
up
with
some
sort
of
a
commitment
to
the
public
that
we
feel
that
we
can
on
are
moving
forward.
You
know
today,
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
that
30%
or
what
exactly
it
is
I
think
you
just
heard
from
manager
Keck
that
we're
in
the
process
of
doing
some
due
diligence
on
that
and
so
I
would
expect.
B
There
hope
that
this
council
would
take
up
this
issue
at
a
little
bit
of
a
later
date.
So
when
we
have
an
opportunity
to
study
some
of
that
information
as
councilmember
Martinez
shared
I
encourage
you
folks
to
attend
the
e3
kickoff.
This
is
Thursday
right
or
next
Thursday,
29th
yeah!
That's
right!
Thank
you!
Next
Thursday
at
6:30,
you
know
I
think
some
of
the
things
that
we
do
have
been
shared
without
trying
to
double
up
on
a
few
of
those
things.
B
I
would
like
to
just
try
to
list
out
a
few
other
things
that
I
think
shows
that
Inglewood
is
a
relatively
progressive
place
when
thinking
about
environmental
sustainability.
You
know
it's
been
mentioned,
our
partnership
with
Xcel
Energy
and
that
goals
and
plan
there.
We
also
have
launched
an
energy
conservation
program,
a
partnership
with
the
Colorado
Energy
Office,
for
focusing
on
whether
weatherization
measures,
you
know
heating
and
electrical
improvements
and
water
conservation.
One
of
our
most
popular
services
we
offer
is
also
called
III.
B
We
need
to
come
up
with
another
acronym
for
that
or
change
the
name
of
this
program,
because
it
is
more
specifically
in
the
past,
related
to
a
grant
program
funded
through
CDBG
funds
from
the
federal
government
to
help
you
know
low
and
moderate
income
homeowners
update
their
homes
to
be
more
energy
efficient.
You
know
the
city
manager
touched
on
lighting
that
really
is
kind
of
the
low
hanging
fruit
we've
replaced
all
LEDs
and
traffic
lights.
You
know
where
the
process
of
replacing
all
the
lighting
and
all
city
facilities.
B
You
know,
there's
been
some
mention
of
solar
as
well.
You
know,
we've
been
pretty
proactive
on
solar
a
few
years
back.
We
did
a
agreement
with
Ameresco
that
committed
to
producing
10
percent
of
our
local
organizations,
energy
on
our
rooftops
here
at
the
city
center
and
a
couple
of
other
of
the
city
facilities,
but
I
do
believe
that
there's
probably
some
ground
to
be
made
in
in
solar
because
of
the
update
in
technology.
You
know
we
did
what
we
viewed
as
kind
of
a
pilot
project
with
the
county.
B
You
know
I,
think
it's
about
time
for
us
to
sort
of
review
that
solar
operation
and
figure
out.
If
that
was
a
great
model
for
us
and
perhaps
something
that
could
be
done
again.
We
have
some
opportunity
and
just
on
our
rooftops
over
at
the
wastewater
treatment
plan,
I
think
there
might
be
some
some
good
stuff
there,
our
fleet
as
well.
B
You
know
Englewood
uses
83
and
it's
gas
power
early
85
excuse
me
on
it's
gas
powered
vehicles
and
the
two
percent
biodiesel
are
on
our
diesel
fleet
and
we're
currently
piloting
a
Prius
project
for
the
pooled
fleet
vehicles.
So
you
know
I
appreciated
again
meeting
with
Jeff,
Frasier
and
I
think
we
were
able
to
identify
some
ways
that
we
can
really
work
together
for
some
low-hanging
fruit
for
for
the
benefit
of
all
here
in
our
community.
B
Thank
You
Ida
Mae
for
coming
and
speaking
about
the
depot
I'm,
also
disappointed.
You
know.
The
only
thing
I'd
like
to
add
to
that
conversation
is
that
you
know
the
City
Council
in
my
mind,
does
have
the
authority
to
take
that
land
as
long
as
it
is
for
a
public
use
like
a
park
or
a
museum.
Something
like
that
could
be
appropriate,
but
could
be
very
costly.
B
I
think
is
a
tough
decision,
but
you
know
also
wanted
to
thank
Doug
and
Corrine
for
coming
and
speaking
this
evening,
and
that's
all
I
had
to
move
us
on
to
agenda
item
8.
This
is
communications
proclamations,
an
appointment
seeing
on
this
evening.
I'll
move
us
on
a
gel
onto
agenda
item
9.
This
is
our
consent.
Agenda
items
we
have
several
I
would
entertain
a
motion
on
9.
At
this
point.
J
K
B
B
Us
on
to
92
this
is
resource
ex
priority-based
budgeting
contract
for
approval
staff
recommends
that
City
Council
approved
by
motion
a
services
agreement
with
resource
ex
for
the
online
priority-based
budgeting
tool
and
service.
Our
staff
sources
evening
is
finance
and
administrative
services
director
Kathleen
Wrinkle
again,
since
this
is
a
consent.
Agenda
item
well
move
us
on
to
council
member
questions
cancel
my
Russell.
A
A
A
R
It
does
because
what
we
have
say,
one
of
our
community
goals
is
a
vibrant
community.
Okay,
so
if
that
is
what
is
based
on
the
eight
or
nine
criteria,
we've
got
for
measuring
a
program
just
say:
okay,
this
program
and,
let's
say
the
program,
Somali
Center
I'm,
not
sure
that's
an
exact
program,
but
if
it
contributes
to
that,
this
helps
us
measure
based
on
those
criteria.
How
well
it
supports
that
goal,
and
so
it
does
get
the
I
would
say
the
essence
of
what
what
would
how
it
would
serve
the
community
in
that
capacity
manager.
Q
Q
So
actually
it
goes
back
and
looks
at
some
things
that
are
fundamental
to
the
creation
of
Hardy
based
budgeting
or
in
our
case
now,
what
we're
calling
community
goals-
and
it
looks
specifically
at
what
are
called
fundamental
program
attributes
and
there
are
five
of
them
the
first
one
being.
Is
there
a
mandate
to
provide
this
service,
and
so
that's
taken
into
account?
Q
Number
two
is:
is
there
another
entity
or
group
that
provides
this
service
or
could
provide
this
service
that
we're
looking
at
and
so
we're
asking
ourselves
that
question
and
clearly,
in
the
case
of
the
Mallee
Center
or
even
the
recreation
center?
Well,
I'll
keep
the
rec
center
separate,
Mally
Center.
Nobody
else
provides
a
place
for
senior
specific.
There
are
lots
of
private
sector
companies
that
provide
recreation,
but
not
programmatically
base
for
for
seniors.
Q
So
it
goes
through
those
these
questions
and
it
still
rates
them,
according
as
miss
wrinkle,
said
to
saliency
or
relatedness
to
the
results
themselves,
and
so
in
this
particular
instance,
we
have
the
lifelong
learning
educational
recreational
activities
that
were
having
as
one
of
our
high
results.
So,
while
the
concern
would
be,
is
it
funding
itself
in
carrying
its
own
water
you're?
Absolutely
right,
it's
it's
probably
less
than
50%,
but
the
fact
that
matter
is
because
it
has
such
a
high
relevancy
in
high
I
point
where
there's
people
supporting
it.
Q
That's
a
program
that
most
likely
from
a
policy
perspective
will
not
show
up
in
a
lower
quartile
with
the
axed.
However,
there
there
may
be
some
programs
specifically
that
are
provided
at
the
Mallee
Center
and
of
itself
that
don't
score
in
quartile
one
or
two
they're
gonna
be
a
three
or
four,
and
those
are
ones
that
specifically
your
staffs
already
looking
at
to
find
ways
in
which
to
reallocate
those
funds
to
programs
that
do
make
sense.
So
excellent
question.
Okay,.
A
Q
It
goes
deeper
than
that
I
think
we're
doing
trying
to
do
two
things
number
one,
first
and
foremost
is
engage
a
different
audience
in
which
to
participate
with
the
formulation
of
the
budget,
certainly
to
I
think
what
we're
gaining
and
gleaning
from
these
particular
community
workshops.
It
are
some
thoughts
and
ideas
on
this,
the
relevancy,
the
saliency
of
these
programs,
that
we
have
that
we
provide
today,
and
should
they
continue,
should
they
be
curtailed.
A
J
E
None
of
that
information
is
in
there,
nor
kind
of
an
assessment
of
how
much
of
that
contract
they
completed
or
whether
they
did
complete
it
and
what
the
what
the
results
of
that
were.
So
if
we
can
have
that
information
at
this
point,
without
that
information,
I
can't
vote
on
this,
one
I
went
back
to
look
at
it.
E
I've
already
got
51,000
spent
and
now
we're
doing
a
contract
for
another
three
years
for
$20,000
a
year
and
I
need
to
have
all
of
that
information,
and
if
we
could
just
correct
that,
because
you
did
put
in
the
I
guess
that
you've
already
addressed
that
that's
incorrect,
that
the
three
years
that
this
is
$20,000
of
the
94,
that's
only
20,000
of
the
90,000
741.
It
would
be
the
other
other
number.
Then
it
would
be.
The
actual
2017
number
correct,
hey.
B
Q
Just
as
a
point
of
information,
this
is
not
a
merger
resource.
X
is
a
separate
company
that
was
formulated
by
the
owner
of
the
Center
for
priority-based
budgeting.
He
went
into
a
partnership
with
the
technology
arm
heretofore.
The
Center
for
priority-based
budgeting
has
not
had
the
digital
online
tools
that
they've
had
to
present
and
so
resource
X
was
a
separate
company
created,
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
you're
saying
that
tonight
they
are
heavily
collaborative
with
the
Center
for
priority-based
budgeting,
but
they're
separate
so
I,
but
I
appreciate
the
question.
It's.
E
Not
a
crime
in
then
I
would
just
appreciate
having
accurate
information,
then,
because
subsequently,
the
Center
for
priority-based
budgeting
merged
with
resource
acts
and
will
go
forward
under
the
resource,
X
brand
and
so
I'm
going
off
of
information,
that's
being
provided
if
it's
incorrect
than
if
we
could
just
correct
it.
But
for
those
reasons,
I'll
just
not
be
able
to
vote
on
this
until
we
get
these
things
corrected
in
there.
R
B
R
C
B
You
I'd
like
to
move
us
on
to
agenda
item
10
public
hearing
item,
seeing
none
this
evening,
we'll
move
on
to
agenda
item
11.
This
is
ordinances,
resolutions
and
motions
under
11a
approval
of
ordinances.
On
first
reading
we
have
at
11a
1.
This
is
the
Inglewood
senior
living
center
at
the
35:55
South
Clarkson
Street
vacation
of
easement
and
dedication
of
easement
council
bill
41.
S
Evening,
mayor
members
of
council,
before
you
this
evening
to
recommend
adoption
of
a
bill
for
an
ordinance
for
the
vacation
and
edification
of
a
sanitary
sewer
easement
to
kfr
krf
965.
To
give
you
some
background,
krf
965
purchase
plaza
del
médico
and
the
old
Bally's
building
they
developed
the
old
Bally's
building
site.
The
reason
they
purchased
2
is
they
needed
additional
land,
so
they
purchased
both
properties
and
they
adjusted
the
property
lines.
S
This
easement
was
just
north
of
the
Rite
Aid
development
and
at
that
time
they
did
not
know
the
use
in
there
was
a
five
foot
strip
in
the
easement,
so
they
dedicated
all
of
it
as
a
20
foot
easement.
Now
they
have
a
buyer
that
has
done
some
plans
and
they
need
that
additional
5
foot
back
that
15
foot
easement
that
they
are
requesting
is
adequate
space
for
us.
Currently,
a
president
I
shouldn't
say
currently
about
10
years
ago.
We
quit
digging
sewer
lines
for
point
repairs
number
one.
S
B
E
S
J
S
S
J
S
Sanitary
sewer
off
the
site,
they
did
that
at
no
cost
to
the
city.
We've
got
about
four
hundred
feet
of
new
city,
ditch
pipe.
The
previous
lon
one
was
meter,
pits
that
were
butted
together
and
it
was
problematic
for
us
and
and
they
they
moved
roughly
about
800
foot
a
sewer
because
it
cut
a
diagonal
across
the
site,
not
making
it
very
developable.
So.
E
S
S
Property
that
krf
is
going
to
sell.
That
is
where
the
easement
is
and
wait.
They
did
their
site
plan.
They
need.
They
needed
that
additional
five
feet,
because
we
can.
We
can
live
with
a
15
foot,
sewer
easement.
They
needed
that
because
they're
going
to
use
it
for
their
back
storage
entrance,
transformers
and
dumpsters
and
stuff
like
that,
we
don't
allow
that
stuff.
On
top
of
our
easements
okay.
J
B
C
B
I'd
like
to
move
us
on
to
11a.
This
is
an
IgA
with
urban
drainage
and
flood
control
district
for
the
big
Dry
Creek
diversion
pipe
Council
bill.
42,
the
Englewood
water
and
sewer
board
at
their
June
6
2017
meeting
recommended
approval
of
an
IgA
with
you,
DFC
D,
to
construct
the
diversion
pipeline
for
the
big
Dry
Creek
diversion
project.
The
diversion
pipeline
is
within
the
river
run,
phase
2
project
currently
under
the
UDF
C
D
contract
with
a
djaro
civil
construct,
civil
constructors.
B
S
S
We
initiated
this
staff
got
approval
in
march
of
2015
in
June
of
2016,
we
hired
McLaughlin
whitewater
design
group
to
do
to
accomplish
two
things
for
us.
Well,
first,
let
me
back
up,
we
just
said
we'd,
better
break
it
into
two
pieces.
We
didn't
want
to
go
to
a
complete
final
design,
because
there
was
a
lot
of
permitting
in
also
water
court.
They
could
trip
it
up.
So
in
June
of
2015
we
went
under
contract
with
mcLaughlin.
They
performed
two
things
for
us,
preliminary
design.
S
S
The
funding
for
this
phase,
one
of
it-
is
a
hundred
percent.
Coming
from
Denver.
We
had
a
settlement
with
them
to
address
hardness
by
diverting
big
dry.
This
projects
going
to
take
big
Dry
Creek
and
divert
the
low
flows,
five
CFS,
unless
around
our
intake,
that
was
there
prior
to
the
1965
flood,
the
forefathers
realized,
big
Dry
Creek
was
hard
to
treat
and
when
we
discovered
those
old
plans,
that's
when
we
decided
to
move
forward
with
this
project
now
the
reason
for
the
IGA
we
knew
this
River
Run
project
was
coming
for
a
long
time.
S
The
plans
have
been
finalized,
I
believe
in
2010,
and
we
identified
this
path
that
was
supposed
to
go
in
as
the
best
pathway
for
the
pipeline.
Also
now
in
November
of
2016,
the
project
got
awarded
and
when
it
got
awarded
awarded
to
all
three
phases.
So
the
reason
we
need
this
IgA
is
this
work
is
within
the
limits
of
urban
drainages
contract.
So
we
have
to
deal
with
urban
drainage.
S
Urban
drainage
is
an
excellent
organization
and
they
used
they
have
a
it's.
A
project.
Partnership
is
what
they
call
it
and
they
have
pre-qualified
contractors
and
they
pre
qualify
them
on
five
criteria:
capability
of
the
contractor
to
perform
the
work,
experience
and
qualifications
of
proposed
construction
team
understanding
risk
and
identifying
in
mitigate
identifying
mitigation,
value,
engineering
approaches
and
unit
cost
of
the
bid
items.
This
diversion
pipeline
is
located
underneath
the
contract,
underneath
the
concrete
trail
being
constructed
under
Phase
two,
which
is
currently
underway.
S
This
location
is
the
most
economical
location.
The
alternative,
if
we
waited
in
put
it
out
to
open
bid,
would
be
we'd
have
to
bore
under
Union
and
also
close
the
brand-new
trail
down
and
take
several
sections
out
in
front
of
our
River
intake.
We
have
that
hydropower
vaults
going
to
be
20
foot
deep,
so
this
I
GA
will
authorize
not
to
exceed
of
$400,000.
That
is
with
a
8%
contingency,
because
we've
been
bumping
into
shale
down
there
and
we're
not
quite
sure.
S
It's
about
I
think
I
covered
pretty
much
everything.
If
you
have
any
questions,
there's
a
there's.
A
lot
is,
you
can
tell
there's
a
lot
of
moving
parts.
You're
gonna
see
phase
2
of
this
professional
service
agreement.
You're
gonna
see
it
next
council
meeting
that
is,
for
final
design.
We
hope
to
put
that
out
to
bid
next
summer
with
construction
next
fall,
that'll
be
for
the
diversion
structure,
that'll
be
located
in
big
Dry
Creek,
that
is
outside
the
limits
of
the
river
run,
so
we'll
be
able
to
competitively
bid
that
face.
S
Additionally,
got
the
best
part.
This
is
also
going
to
help
with
our
residuals.
Big
Dry
Creek
has
been
identified
not
only
as
the
source
of
our
hardness,
but
is
the
primary
source
of
our
radioactive
material,
and
our
residuals
by
diverting
the
low
flows
down
will
substantially
decrease
that
the
level
in
our
process
residuals.
Thank.
J
B
H
A
Have
a
couple
of
typographical
errors?
One
of
them
is
in
the
bill
itself
on
page
one
third
paragraph
from
the
bottom.
It
says
where,
as
a
preliminary
design
of
the
diversion
structure
and
complete
diversion
pipeline
design
have
been
completed
as
well
as
hydropower,
vault
to
prove
for
the
generation.
I
think
it's
supposed
to
be
provide.
J
A
B
This
is
our
tabled
motion
of
the
city
of
mango.
It
does
not
charge
the
school
board,
use
tax
and
honor
their
tax-exempt
status
with
agenda
item
four
council
bill
48
on
deck
I'd
suggest
that
the
holder
of
the
motion
and
the
second
or
agree
to
remove
this
motion
City
Attorney,
do
you
have
any
suggestion
on
who
needs
to
do?
What
no.
T
E
I
think
the
desire
of
this
council
should
be
to
just
make
it
very
clear
that
we
are
not
going
to
divert
any
of
the
voted
on
money
to
the
city
and
tax
of
tax
exempt
school
district
and
mess
with
any
of
their
their
project
and
I
want
to
make
that
very
clear
and
I.
Think
council,
member
of
Russell's
motion
to
not
tax
a
tax
exempt.
School
District
is
very
clear
and
I.
E
Her
motion
makes
it
very
clear
that
we
will
not
tax
this
school
district,
so
I
would
prefer
to
go
through
with
this
and
then
work
on
the
ordinance
and
a
little
bit
more
in
depth
and
try
and
get
some
more
information
before
for
our
other
tax-exempt
entities
that
we're
going
to
try
and
tax
and
make
that
a
little
clearer
for
them.
While
letting
our
school
district
move
forward
under
the
weight
and
get
out
from
under
the
weight
of
this
ridiculousness
Thank.
A
Actually
in
it,
this
is
much
more
clear
than
the
ordinance
it
does
muddy
the
ordinance
there
is
no
vehicle
for
the
city
to
tax
the
school
district
because
they
the
school,
has
to
get
a
building
permit
from
the
city
in
order
to
pay
use
tax.
The
school
is
not
getting
their
building
permit
from
the
city
they're
getting
it
from
the
state
and
how
this
happened
back
in
2012
or
2013
with
a
what
are
they
yeah?
It
was
by
contract
the
school
board
contracted
with
them.
We
can
leave
it
the
way.
A
B
B
B
And
I'm
not
so
sure,
really
it
gets.
You
know
I
think
councilmember
Russell,
where
you
want
to
get
which
is
I,
think
you
know
honoring
all
tax
exempt
status
is
citywide.
You
know,
I
do
think
that
the
appropriate
action
when
you
want
to
modify
an
ordinance
is
a
modification
to
that
ordinance.
You
know
I
feel
like
this
might
leave
some
ambiguities.
Other
comments
or
concerns
counts
about
Russell.
A
A
Churches
probably
do
have
to
go
through
the
city
for
a
building
permit.
We
don't
have
the
right
to
tax
the
church,
but
if
a
contractor
is
doing
the
work,
then
that
would
there
is
a
vehicle
to
do
that.
We
don't
have
to
address
that
right
now.
There
is
no
vehicle
to
tax
the
schools
the
way
it
is
right
now,
unless
the
school
would
willingly
decide
to
enter
into
a
contract
with
us.
E
E
They
went
into
a
separate
contract
and
the
reason
that
they
went
into
a
separate
contract
in
order
to
deal
with
this
issue
and
the
threat
from
the
city
that
they
were
going
to
take
him
through
court
and
just
kind
of,
in
my
opinion,
cajole
him
into
agreeing
to
do
this
just
to
stay
out
of
court
and
wasting
their
money.
The
only
way
the
city
was
able
to
get
the
tax
get
this
money
from
the
school
was
through
contract.
It
wasn't
through
this
ordinance.
E
E
Think
that's
why
councilmember
Russell's
ordinance
to
go
ahead
and
our
motion
to
go
ahead
and
do
this
directly
so
that
we
can
get
them
out
from
under
the
weight
of
this
and
the
the
the
ridiculousness
of
the
over
wording
on
this
with?
Oh
well.
Only
if
it's
a
bond
issue
and
it's
approved
and
we're
only
going
to
not
tax
people,
you
know
tax
exempt
and
it's
just
running
down
that
rabbit
hole
again.
E
People
organizations,
government
entities
are
either
tax
exempt
or
they
are
not,
and
for
us
to
keep
trying
to
stick
our
hands
in
the
cookie
jar
and
take
this
money
away
from
her
children
is
absolutely
important.
I
think
councilmember
Russell's
motion
makes
that
very
clear,
and
then
we
can
deal
with
the
the
convoluted
kind
of
I
think
we're.
Actually
it
makes
it
worse.
E
They,
the
other
ordinance
it
gets
into
prop
personal
property
and
that's
not
even
the
use
tax
and
so
the
wording
in
there
there's
some
things
that
we
would
want
to
spend
some
time
and
really
look
this
over.
Instead
of
rushing
by
changing
the
ordinance,
the
schools
do
not
come
under
this
ordinance.
I
think
that's
why
I'm
supporting
comes
from
under
Russell's
proposal
that
we
just
don't
go
ahead
and
go
through
some
convoluted
process
of
contracting
to
try
to
cajole
and
and
stronger
on
the
school
district
into
giving
us
money.
We're
not
entitled
to
thank.
D
This
whole
issue
of:
do
we
support
a
motion
versus
an
ordinance
I'm
finding
it
somewhat
frivolous
argument
if
we're
going
to
do
something,
we
need
to
follow
our
ordinances
and
if
we
need
to
change
our
ordinance
in
order
to
give
the
tax
exempt
to
the
public
schools,
you
know,
then
we
need
to
do
it
through
an
ordinance.
It's
not
about
what
happened
four
years
ago
or
happened
10
years
ago.
It's
about!
How
are
we
going
to
handle
this
situation
and
are
we
going
to
be
doing
a
use
tax
on
our
public
schools
and
I?
D
B
H
Appears
to
me
that
we're
all
trying
to
get
the
same
thing
we
do
not
want
to
charge
these
tax
to
the
schools
and,
from
my
understanding,
countable
number
48
makes
it
clearer
that
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do,
City
Attorney!
If
we
leave
it
the
way
it
is
tonight
and
vote.
No
all
of
us
know
on
this.
You
believe
we
have
the
right
to
then
charge
use
tax
to
the
public
schools
Oh,
be
the
opposite
of
use.
T
T
B
One
other
concern,
I
suppose
is
that
for
me,
would
be
that
it
doesn't
take
care
of
the
adjacent
right
away
public
improvements.
What
I
like
about
Council
of
48
is
that
it
takes
some
of
those
issues
into
account
and
shifts
the
burden
of
some
of
those
adjacent
right-of-way
improvements
like
a
DA
access
like
the
300
plus
thousand
dollar
public
improvements
that
we've
all
identified
as
a
group
and
and
shifts
that
burden
to
them.
You
know
again,
I
think
numbers
nine,
eight
three.
B
He
is
very
unclear
about
where
that
burden
lies
in
the
future
and
I
worry
that
you
know
right
now.
We've
got
a
great
relationship
with
the
school
district
they've
committed
to
us,
they're
gonna.
Do
it
and
I
believe
them,
but
we're
not
all
gonna
be
around
forever
and
I
worry
about
the
institutional
knowledge
of
that
and
I
would
like
to
memorialize
that
and
that's
why
I'd
support
48
over
93
council
member
parent
I
believe.
E
Let's
have
a
quick
question
for
the
city
manager:
when
the
school
came,
they
you
said
we're
not
holding
up
your
building
project,
and
this
would
be
done
through
a
contract
if
they,
why
is
it
being
done
through
a
contract?
If
this
ordinance
applies
to
the
school,
why
is
it
necessary
to
write
a
separate
contract
to
get
use
tax
from
them?
That.
Q
Council,
member
I,
don't
want
to
quibble
on
this
particular
matter.
However,
the
matter
of
the
matter
of
fact
was
the
school's
approached
the
city
two
or
three
months
ago
and
said
we
need
to
enter
to
an
agreement
again
in
order
to
take
care
of
the
use
tax
and
deal
with
the
the
public
improvements
that
were
required
through
the
DRT
process.
For
this,
the
two
elementary
schools,
and
so
that
was
the
path
we
were
going
down
to.
We
held
a
study
session
at
which
time
I
was
enunciated
by
every
member
of
council.
Q
Almost
that
we're
not
we
don't
want
to
tax
them.
We
don't
want
double
taxation
and
then
that's
the
that's.
The
new
Avenue
that
we've
been
proceeding
down
so
I'm,
not
certain
how
to
answer
your
question
other
than
it
wasn't
my
proposal
to
do
the
to
do
the
the
vehicle
of
using
the
agreement.
I
think
it
was
that
was
proposed
by
the
schools
to
go
down
that
road
until
you
as
a
council
had
the
opportunity
to
enunciate.
We
don't
want
you
to
pay
tax
I.
E
Think
that
came
because
of
the
experience
that
they
had
before,
but
the
only
way
that
the
money
can
be
taken
from
them
is
through
this
contract
and
not
because
because
they
end
up
having
it
that
this
ordinance
of
applied
to
them.
The
other
concern
with
thee,
with
the
way
that
48
is
written,
is
that
all
cost
associated
with
municipal
infrastructure
projects
connected
to
I
mean.
E
The
other
concern
here
is
is
that
it
specifies,
except
for
a
tangible
personal
property
which
is
not
used,
tax
and
I,
don't
think,
can
be
enforced
within
this
section
of
our
code.
I,
don't
think
that
we're
taking
the
time,
nor
did
we
allow
the
city
manager,
our
city
attorney
the
time
to
really
kind
of
look
at
the
other
implications
of
this
for
personal
property
tax
of
the
first
10,000
is
is
is
exempt,
so
there
are
other
issues
that
are
going
here.
E
That
I
think
are
controversial
too
and
conflict
with
some
of
the
state
laws
as
well
and
would
like
to
really
spend
if
we
are
going
to
do
something
as
drastic
as
changing
this
ordinance,
that
we
do
it
right
and
that
we
do
it
thoughtful
and
we
do
it
after
we
have
released
the
school
district
made
it
very
clear
to
them.
We're
not
going
to
charge
them
and
then
do
a
thoughtful
job
on
this
ordinance,
which
I,
don't
think
is
what's
happening.
B
B
H
B
B
C
B
B
Q
B
Q
Q
B
Q
E
D
E
E
E
Only
issues
that
have
been
voted
on
by
the
citizen
by
the
electorate
is
the
only
thing
that
we're
going
to
tax
exempt
so
I
think
that
we're
just
playing
games
with
the
school
district
still,
and
we
ought
to
make
a
very
clear
statement
that
we
are
not
going
to
tax
our
tax
exempt
school
district,
and
that
is
not
what
this
does
and
they'll
not
be
voting
for.
It.
A
Perhaps
the
way
to
solve
this
problem
instead
of
adding
all
of
this
is
just
remove
the
phrase
in
the
original
ordinance
about
taxing
the
contractor
in
regard
to
the
school
system,
and
then
that
way,
the
whole
ordinance
does
not
have
to
be
changed.
I
actually
agree
with
councilmember
Barrentine
in
the
fact
that
if
the
schools
were
responsible
or
any
government
entity
was
responsible
and
saved
their
money
and
paid
for
it,
it
still
would
come
back
to
bite
them.
B
Thank
you,
I
get
a
couple
comments,
I,
certainly
understand
or
councilmember
Barrentine
and
Russell
are
coming
from.
You
know
this
is
what
we
studied
in
our
study
session
regarding
option
number
two.
You
know
there
was
kind
of,
in
my
mind,
a
continuum
of
options
that
the
majority
of
council
could
have
chosen
from.
This
is
what
we
have
I'm,
certainly
open
to
you
know.
A
motion
to
amend
that
you
know
voter
approved
portion,
it
seems
like
is
the
most
problematic.
However,
you
know
I'd
like
to
caution
us.
You
know
against
voting
against
council
bill.
B
K
I
just
want
to
reiterate
some
of
the
things
we
said.
I
think
we're
all
on
the
same
page.
We
don't
want
to
charge
them
anything.
So
that's
why
I
was
supportive
of
the
first
thing
that
came
forward.
My
concern
is
that
the
attorney
provided
us
with
what
we
advised
her
to
do
with
what
we
came
up
with
together,
and
so,
if
there
are
changes
to
this
I
think
you
know
we
need
to
make
the
changes.
K
E
To
address
councilmember
Martinez's
concern
right
now
we
have
no
vehicle
to
charge
the
school
district
unless
they
agreed
to
do
a
contract
with
us,
though
they'll
paint
them
they'll
pay,
no
money,
because
we
don't
have
a
way
to
enforce
that
because
we
don't
do
their
permitting.
So
we
have
time
to
go
ahead
and
do
a
thoughtful
ordinance
that
doesn't
through
the
backdoor
tax
them
in
another
way.
That
I
think
is
wholly
inappropriate.
E
E
If
we
take
a
little
time,
but
if
they
don't
enter
into
that
contract,
we
don't
have
they're,
not
giving
us
any
money
and
they
don't
have
to
so,
and
we're
not
going
to
be
threatening
threatening
them
like
they
did
in
2011
with
a
lawsuit
and
taking
this
to
court,
because
I
think
that
the
will
of
counsel
is
a
little
bit
different.
This
time
remember.
B
H
H
If
we
still
have
conversations
about
it,
we
can
do
it,
but
I,
don't
like
us
saying
no
to
this
and
and
suggesting
that
our
city
attorney
and
our
city
manager
have
not
read
our
code
correctly
and
that
there
isn't
a
vehicle
for
them
to
for
us
to
actually
collect
this,
because
we've
done
it
once
before,
which
was
the
very
reason
why
supposedly
there
was
going
to
be
a
lawsuit
and
there
wasn't
so
I
would
prefer
us
to
move
forward.
Let's
go
ahead
on
it.
H
B
D
I
think
it's
important
that
we
go
ahead
and
pass
this
particular
ordinance
in
order
to
allow
the
schools
to
move
forward.
I
do
find
it
rather
concerning
the
there's
comments
being
made
about
past
things
that
have
been
done
with
past
councils
and
past
school
districts
and
making
it
sound
like
we're
going
to
do
the
same
thing,
I
find
that
as
a
total.
Well,
it's
it's
a
frivolous
argument.
It's
just
meant
to
confuse
the
whole
issue,
so
we
need
to
take
care
of
this
business
and
concentrate
on
these
issues.
Now.
B
B
E
That
was
not
correct
in
2011
and
it
isn't
correct
now.
My
concern
is
that
this
ordinance
does
not
apply
to
the
school
district.
That
is
why
a
contract
has
to
happen
in
order
for
us
to
get
the
money
from
them,
and
if
we
do
this,
the
way
that
this
is
written,
I
think
it's
too
fast.
I
think
we
need
some
more
conversation
about
it
and
nothing
that
we
do
is
going
to
stop
the
schools.
We've
already
agreed
that
we
won't
take
them
to
court
or
threaten
them.
E
I've
listened
to
the
tapes
of
what
happened
with
brats
mañana's
council
before
and
that's
exactly
why
they
went
ahead
with
it
in
2011,
because
they
were
quite
honestly
bullied
into
it.
Now,
we've
told
them
that
we're
not
going
to
go
ahead
and
take
this
money.
They
have
a
little
bit
of
time
and
I
think
we
can
do
a
thoughtful
process
with
this
ordinance,
because
I
still
think
that
in
the
back
door,
just
the
school
districts
and
is
not
in
their
best
interest,
there
are
tax
exempt
in
India.
E
We
ought
to
make
it
very
clear
and
I.
Don't
think
that
this
is
and
we
need,
we
didn't
really
even
have
a
study
session
on
it.
We
had
some
of
this
information
come
up
and
we
just
said
well:
here's
some
options
without
really
having
a
more
in-depth
conversation
about
the
unintended
consequences
of
where
we
were
going
with
us.
E
Think
that
they're
very
capable,
if
not
given
a
$600,000
like
it's,
been
requested.
Thank
you.
They
will
hold
off
on
that,
because
what
was
requested
from
them
was
that
they
just
hand
over
the
money
and
then
will
that
we
would
wait.
They
don't
want
to
do
that.
We
need
they
can
not
hand
over
the
money.
We
can
have
time
to
look
at
this
issue,
do
a
thoughtful
process
and
then
make
a
decision.
That's
me,
Russell.
A
I
absolutely
agree:
I
do
believe
the
schools
are
tax
exempt.
I.
Do
believe
that
this
is
something
that
and
I'm,
not
saying
that
anybody
did
anything
wrong.
Our
discussion
was
just
pushed
through,
and
I
really
do
agree
that
we
didn't
really
have
time
or
take
the
time
so
I
can
I
cannot
support
this
because
I
want
them
to
be
totally
tax
exempt.
A
B
A
Why
didn't
we
take
up
this
issue
before
we
had
consensus
at
least
five
people
that
first
night
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
it
comes
back
and
the
school
board.
Three
days
after
three
days
after
we
had
five
people
saying
consensus,
we're
not
going
to
charge
the
school
board.
The
school
board
come
to
us
at
the
State
of
the
City
and
tell
us
that
city
staff
wants
the
money
and
they'll
hold
it
in
escrow
to
give
it
back,
and
so
why
didn't
it
go
ahead
when
we
already
had
consensus
the
first
time.
Q
Q
Q
We
can
pay
on
a
monthly
basis,
because
the
project
is
over
a
three
million
dollars
and
I
said
I'm
open
to
that,
and
then
again
because
of
politics
and
policy,
you
as
a
council
and
the
school
board,
trustees
took
over
and
we're
bystanders
so
we're
waiting
for
consensus
direction,
which
we
believe
that
we
received
last
week
to
bring
something
forward
to
help
promulgate
the
school's
ability
to
make
this
happen.
So
we
need
to
be
very
careful
counsel
that
again,
there's
no
aspersions
being
casted
staff,
doing
something.
That's
that's
untoward
or
inappropriate.
Q
A
B
H
I
think
your
questions
there
in
comments
are
really
well
taken.
How
it
got
here
because
I
was
one
of
those
five
was
that
I
specifically
asked
for
more
information
about
use
text
because
they
were
being
claims
being
made
up
here
that
were
incorrect
or
were
a
little.
We
didn't
have
all
the
information.
So
that's
why
I
waited
and
said:
let's,
let's
bring
it
here
and
we
did
and
we
and
we
did
do
what
councilmember
Martinez
did
we
say
we
did
come
up
with
a
sort
of
a
combined
agreement
about
what
we
wanted.
H
The
city
attorney
to
work
on
and
that's
what
she
came
forward
with.
No
I
want
to
say
what
this
just.
What
just
happened
here
is
an
example
of
really
unfortunate
bad
development
of
the
way
you
helped
us
converse.
You
very
specifically
said
when
we
were
talking
about
continuing
the
motion
which
councilmember,
Russell
and
Councilman
Barrentine
talked
about
the
tabled
motion.
You
were
very
clear
mayor
that
you
were
going
to
be
voting
no
on
that,
but
you
were
gonna
vote
YES
on
48,
and
why?
H
Because
that's
what
we
asked
him
to
come
forward
with
now
you're
holding
these
two
hostage
on
this
one
in
some
ways.
Let
me
finish
because
you
don't
you
want
it
to
be
a
complete
agreement
with
everyone.
It
isn't
gonna
happen
every
time.
Had
you
told
me
that
I
would
have
gone
with
the
motion
to
keep
going
on.
Three
I
would
have
because.
B
E
Order,
yes,
ma'am
we're
off
subject
here.
If
the
council
member
has
a
problem
with
the
way
that
you're
handling
the
meeting,
then
she
needs
to
take
that
up
separately.
This
hasn't
anything
to
do
with
with
this
and
to
accuse
other
council
members
of
being
held
hostage.
That's
for
those
council
members
to
determine
I
think
this
use
Gaius
to
do.
This
kind
of
thing
is
inappropriate.
I.
H
B
Know,
I
guess
I'm
I'm,
very
surprised
by
the
lack
of
consensus
for
48.
We
heard
multiple
times
in
the
study
session
that
there
was
a
consensus
on
48.
So
this
is
taking
me
by
surprise
as
well
and
with
new
information.
You
know
comes
comes
a
new
decision
and
so
I
apologize.
My
intention
was
not
to
misguide
you
as
a
voter.
You
know
I
apologize
if
you
relied
on
my
comment
that
much
to
make
this
decision
City
Attorney.
Is
it
possible
for
us
to
go
back
to
11
a
three.
B
A
O
B
That
puts
the
school
district
in
better
and
that's
what
I
would
my
main
concern
was
coming
into
tonight,
so
I
actually
feel
fairly
comfortable
with
that
and
again
I
can
I'll
vote.
My
conscious
here,
which
is
not
to
support
an
exemption
council
member
anything
else,
comes
from
over
Olsen
I
apologize
so.
H
B
B
Information
surprises
me
that
the
council
is
still
having
issues
coming
to
consensus
on
this
issue.
I
thought
we
had
Ken
came
to
consensus
very
clearly
early
on
then
in
study
session.
Again
so
I'm
as
surprised
as
you
are
and
hearing
that
we
can
go
back,
you
know
we
can
remake
that
motion
of
1183
I.
Don't
know
why
you're
so
upset.
You
still
have
an
opportunity
to
make
that
motion
here
in
just
a
moment,
because.
K
Equally
frustrated,
just
like
everyone
has
up
here,
we've
had
to
study
sessions
on
this
time's,
the
majority.
Not
all
of
us
supported,
not
charging
the
school
use
tax.
Fine
mayor,
you
have
not
been
supportive
any
time,
so
that's
fine!
The
rest
of
us
are
supportive
of
that.
So
I
don't
think
we
need
100%
majority
on
this.
We
can
just
move
forward
with
what
the
majority
thinks
is
best
like
we
do
with
every
other
decision,
amen.
J
K
So
I
think
you
know:
let's
go
forward.
I
supported
councilman
Russell's
motion
I
was
ready
to
support
this
I
want
to
do
whatever
we
can
to
get
it
to
where
the
school
district
does
not
have
to
pay
use
tax
and
whichever
method
we
go
forward
at
this
point,
I
think
it's
fine.
If
we
go
back
to
the
councilmember
Russell's
motion,
I
would
support
that.
If
we
go
with
the
council
bill,
48
I
would
support
that.
We
could
also
amend
it
later
down
the
line.
K
If
we
don't
like
the
language,
it's
enough,
so
I
think
whatever
we
need
to
do.
We
need
to
get
back
to
the
goal,
which
is
not
charging
the
school
use
tax
and
we
don't
need
to
bicker
and
argue
and
talk
about
the
past,
like
let's
just
put
it
on
the
table.
Here's
our
choices
and
let's
move
forward
chants.
U
B
K
E
J
J
E
Gonna
make
the
comment:
again:
it
still
taxes,
the
school
district
and
I
can't
support
this
and
I.
Don't
think
the
comments
of
well.
This
moves
you
closer
to
where
you
want
to
be
warm
oatmeal,
prozac
kind
of
ordinances.
Are
ridiculous:
I'm
not
doing
something
half-hearted
here
when
it's,
obviously
the
intention
of
this
council
not
to
charge
the
school
district
tax,
so
charging
them
a
little
tax.
E
E
D
D
Me
rephrase
that
if
you
think
this
is
an
appropriate
motion
or
a
appropriate
ordinance,
then
vote
for
it,
we're
at
that
stage
right
now,
if
it's
a
matter
of
you're
looking
for
a
a
hundred
percent
vote
on
it,
we're
not
always
gonna
have
that
you
see
that
all
the
time
you
know
what
is
in
the
best
interest
of
our
community.
What's
in
the
best
interest
of
our
schools,
all
right,
I'll.
B
Support
for
you
I
again,
I,
don't
like
it
I
feel
like
the.
Ultimately,
the
council
is
going
to
end
up
tax,
exempting
the
school
district
thinking
this
through
I
would
much
rather
have
48.
That
leaves
some
mechanism
for
us
to
be
able
to
collect
use
tax
rather
than
going
back
to
1183
fine
I'll
support
it.
Any
further
comments:
councilmember
Russell.
A
T
A
T
Member
of
the
Council
can
amend
the
this
proposed
language
and
that
that
is
an
intermediary
step
and
you've
done
that
on
other
ordinances
in
the
past.
So
if
there's
some
portion
of
the
proposed
language
that
you
want
to
remove
or
modify
or
change
in
any
manner,
someone
can
make
a
motion
to
modify
the
language.
However,
and
then
in
vote
on
that
modification
prior
to
voting
on
the
ordinance
itself,.
E
T
E
E
T
Do
don't
what
you're
wanting
to
do?
The
that
use
tax
itself
already
provides
that
school
districts
as
a
government
governmental
entity
are
exempt
you're
not
acting
to
exempt
the
school
district
you're
acting
to
exempt
a
contractor
working
for
the
school
district,
so
until
the
language
has
changed
having
to
do
with
the
contractor,
staff
still
has
to
follow
this
ordinance
and
collect
that
use
tax
from
the
contractor.
Then.
E
I
would
go
ahead
and
make
the
motion
that
it's
exempting
the
contractor
working
for
the
school
district.
If
that's,
what
would
make
that
clear
for
now
and
not
muddy
it
up
with
all
of
that
voting
and
bonding.
So
just
simply
I
would
make
the
motion
that
we
exempt
the
contractors
that
work
for
this.
That.
E
B
E
It
would
it
would
take
away
everything
that
is
underlined
and
exempt
the
contractor,
and
we
can
work
on
since
this
project
is
not
affected
by
any
municipal
infrastructure.
That's
already
been
taken
care
of
previously
in
their
agreement
for
their
plans
that
were
submitted.
So
since
that's
already
been
taken.
Care
of
with
this
project
will
give
us
time
to
go
ahead
and
continue
to
work
on
this,
and
it
will
exempt
them
from
any
tax.
T
Would
be,
and
and
follow
this
closely,
I
believe
that
the
motion
would
be
to
modify
the
proposed
ordinance
section,
4,
4,
5,
2
D,
to
be
accept
any
tangible
personal
property
to
be
used
by
a
contractor
for
construction
projects
associated
with
any
public
school
district
that
removes
anything
having
to
do
with
the
capital
improvement
project.
The
voter
approved
financing
and
school
district
is
a
responsibility
for
municipal
infrastructure
projects,
I
believe.
E
D
Before
we
actually
vote
on
the
amendment,
I
would
like
to
have
us
go
to
recess
so
that
our
city
attorney
could
write
this
out.
So
we
can
actually
have
a
piece
of
paper
in
front
of
us,
giving
the
exact
wording
so
I
know
exactly
what
we're
voting
on
you
know.
It'd
only
be
I
would
assume
it
wouldn't
take
very
long.
I
mean.
D
H
H
A
T
H
H
All
the
way,
through
all
costs
associated
with
municipal
infrastructure
projects
are
connected
to
such
that
would
also
go
away.
So
we
say
what
we've
removed
from
this
is
an
articulation
of
the
infrastructure,
surprised
projects
being
embedded.
That's
what
I
don't
agree
with.
I
am
fine
with
deleting
up
till
there
and
leaving
all
costs
associated
so
that,
if
we're
good
have
done,
40
I
would
have
gone
back
to
the
tabled
motion,
because
it's
the
exact
same
thing,
this
one
articulates
the
infrastructure
issues
that
I
think
the
mayor
was
concerned
about.
B
H
B
E
The
all
costs
associated
with
municipal
infrastructure
isn't
needed
here
that
already
happened.
That
happens
in
the
in
approving
the
plans.
It
already
happened
for
this
project.
It
doesn't
need
to
be
there
at
all.
We
already
have
vehicles
to
make
sure
that
those
things
happen
with
any
of
the
projects
it
was
already
included
in
the
school
districts
plans
in
their
projects
already
cost
it
out.
They
were
already
paying
for
it
and
it
was
already
approved
by
the
city.
E
H
I
agree,
except
that
it
was
in
the
context
of
having
use
tax
being
applied.
So,
yes,
it
was
because
it
didn't
they
came
with
it,
knowing
that
this
was
part
of
it,
so
I
mean
am
I
wrong
manager,
no
yeah.
So
I
why
you
just
tell
people
you're
wrong,
you're
wrong.
You
know
we
have
differences
of
views,
we're
difference
of
views.
I,
don't
read
it
that
way.
So
what
I'm
concerned
about
is
that
that
be
clear
now,
otherwise,
I'd
rather
go
back
to
the
tabled
motion
and
just
say:
let's
go
back
to
that.
H
D
D
D
Do
I
have
the
floor.
Okay,
at
this
stage
of
the
game,
this
thing
has
gone
back
and
forth
twisted
and
turned
gone,
so
many
different
directions.
It
is
just
a
big,
confusing
pile
of
excrement
and
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
I
will
the
way
we
sits
right
now.
Any
motions
to
him
and
I
will
say
no
right
now.
Unless
we
can
get
it
in
writing.
D
We
can
set
back
pull
back,
read
it
get
it
all
hashed
out
inside
our
heads,
because
we've
got
someone
who
is
an
attorney
saying
that
it
means
something
we
have
our
city
attorney.
That
says
it
means
something:
we've
got
another
person
over
there
saying
something
else,
it's
crazy!
It's
absolutely
crazy
and
it's
very
embarrassing.
What
is
happening
up
here
so
can
we
take
a
rest,
a
recess
gather
our
thoughts.
Come
back
act
like
adults
and
be
professional.
D
B
E
D
D
E
H
If
you
have
you
misunderstood
him,
I
heard
him
saying
that
he
wants
a
break
and
he
wants
our
city
attorney
to
write
it
up.
So
we
can
see
it
I,
don't
know
if
you're
gonna
do
it
by
email
or
not.
My
only
question
was
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
what
we
directed
her
on
to
write
was
what
we
all
agreed
on
and
not
have
it
come
back
and
we
say:
oh,
you
still
didn't
write
it.
The
right
way,
so
I'm
fine
to
take
a
break.
Let
her
do
it.
I'm
gonna
go
to
the
bathroom.
H
B
C
B
K
B
A
A
E
D
B
To
move
forward,
do
you
need
a
recess?
If
multiple
members
tell
me
that
the
recess
to
understand
how
this
issue,
then,
let's
do
that,
but
if
it's
just
a
matter
of
you
know
trying
to
get
consensus
on
this.
Let's
vote
on
this
issue
and
let's
move
on
for
it
on
48
I've,
changed
my
position:
I'm
willing
to
support
48
to
save
the
school
district
and
this
council
a
ton
of
brain
damage,
because
that's
where
we're
gonna
end
up,
which.
H
C
H
J
T
B
H
E
Q
Hopefully,
though,
they
would
be
of
the
mindset
that
they
are
today
to
say,
we
recognize
that
this
project
is
interrupting
the
drainage
and
we
need
to
put
a
new
drainage
way
in
at
Clayton
or
we
need
to
put
in
some
ata
sidewalks
and
things
like
that,
but
really
I,
guess,
there's
nothing
that
we
can
hold
them.
Keep
you
know
hold
them
to
making
those
improvements,
because
again
they
pull
their
permits
through
the
state
of
Colorado,
as
opposed
to
the
city
of
Inglewood.
D
D
B
A
Believe
the
school
has
been
responsible
in
doing
this
themselves
before
we
they
ever
had
any
responsibility
to
do.
This
I
believe
that
school
districts
are,
for
the
most
part,
responsible,
they're
not
going
to
try
to
create
any
problems
that
would
be
safety
issues
for
the
children
or
the
parents
that
are
coming
to
the
school
I.
Don't
think
that
is
going
to
be
a
problem,
I
think
we
could
move
forward
with
this
and
have
a
hundred
percent
tonight,
and
then,
if
we
need
to
talk
about
it
again,
I
think
we
should
do
that.
Thank.
C
B
You
now
we're
gonna
go
back
to
council
bill
48,
not
amended
and
again
I'll
make
the
final
comment
that
you
know
again,
even
though
I
do
not
support
exemption.
I
will
be
supporting
this
this
evening.
I
appreciate
that
it
looks
after
the
city's
interest
in
making
sure
that
the
public
adjacent
public
improvements
in
the
right
of
ways
will
be
taken
care
of,
and
there
is
a
mechanism
for
that.
B
I
am
supporting
this,
because
I
recognize
that
there
is
a
majority
of
council
who
supports
use
tactic,
tax
exemption
for
the
schools,
and
this
one,
in
my
mind,
is
narrowly
tailored
to
that
exact
issue
and
again
I
want
to
save
the
school
district.
A
ton
of
heartache
and
I
want
to
save
this
council
a
ton
of
brain
damage
of
trying
to
bring
this
issue
councilmember
Valentine.
This.
E
Doesn't
save
the
school
district,
it's
just
another
way
to
try
and
get
money
we're
only
at
the
slightly
lessening
their
load
and
causing
them
problems
in
the
future.
This
is
ridiculous
and
we're
still
charging
a
tax
exempt.
School,
District
and
siphoning
off
money
and
I,
don't
think
that's
appropriate
at
any
time.
C
B
H
B
Okay,
guys
I'd
like
to
call
this
meeting
back
to
order.
The
time
is
now
951
p.m.
you
know,
as
promised,
I
would
like
to
do
some
triage
of
this
agenda.
You
know
having
spoken
with
the
city
manager
during
our
recess,
really
only
11
c1
is
not
urgent,
so
I
suppose
I
would
consider
opposed
to
this
council
whether
we
should
skip
11
c1
to
table
this
for
next
time
or
if
you
want
to
just
try
to
plow
through
the
rest
of
this
honestly.
B
11
C
2
through
6
are
fairly
critical
to
get
this
business
of
the
city
done
for
this
week,
you
ready
this
one's
going
to
be
a
little
more
potentially
substantive.
It
is.
It
is
the
you
know,
strategy,
workforce
alignment,
a
strategy,
advisement
service
for
anything
everybody
good
with
plowing
through.
E
B
C
B
Move
on
to
11
c2:
this
is
the
Englewood
Littleton
wastewater
treatment,
plant
service
area
population
study.
The
plant
recommends
that
a
council
move
by
motion
a
professional
service
agreement
with
economic
and
planning
systems,
inc
eps,
to
conduct
a
population
study
for
the
Littleton
Englewood
wastewater
treatment,
plant
sanitary
sewer
service
area
in
the
amount
not
to
exceed
forty
thousand
six
hundred
and
ten
dollars.
B
U
U
So
this
is
a
a
current
map
of
our
service
area
boundaries
that
represents
both
the
cities
of
England
Littleton,
also
18,
connector
districts.
This
is
encompasses
108,
two
square
miles
of
service
area.
A
previous
population
study
was
conducted
as
part
of
a
master
plan
update
in
2013.
In
that
master
plan,
the
population
forecast
was
conducted
as
part
of
the
dr.
cog
traffic
analysis
zone
information
so
which
forecast
population
based
on
traffic
patterns
and
it's
not
necessarily
a
comprar
sum
to
a
tool
used
to
define
population.
U
So
it's
addressed
the
council
request
staff
actually
reached
out
to
two
consultants
known
in
the
industry
that
conducts
population
studies.
The
first
was
clarion
associates
and
the
next
was
economic
and
planning
systems
incorporated
or
EPS
Clarion
actually
declined
to
submit
a
proposal.
Eps
did
submit
a
proposal
and
based
on
a
review
of
their
scope.
We
believe
that
their
scope
is
with
our
goals
and
objectives
for
this
project,
so
for
the
27
update,
EPS
will
conduct,
in
addition
to
looking
at
the
dr.
U
cog
information,
the
city
census,
information,
they'll,
look
at
city,
sewer,
tap
information,
County
Assessor
data
they're,
going
to
be
looking
at
the
Bureau
of
Labor
and
Statistics
they'll,
also
look
at
office,
retail
and
industrial
information,
and
then
land-use
planning
data
ups
will
also
acquire
as
needed.
A
parcel
information,
a
floodplain
and
topographic
information,
and
also
zoning
and
planning
information.
So
all
of
this
information
and
data
will
be
combined
into
one
combined
geographical
information
system
and
then
to
be
used
for
analysis.
U
So
with
that
they
can
estimate
the
amount
of
vacant
land
that's
available
in
our
service
area,
they'll,
look
at
infill
and
redevelopment
opportunities
and
also
look
at
identify
major
physical
constraints
such
as
whether
a
piece
of
property
is
located
located
in
a
floodplain
or
whether
there's
elevation
issues
for
actual
constructibility.
So
they'll
also
assess
the
market
viability
of
some
of
these
areas
and
all
of
that
will
be
used
to
calculate
development
for
housing
and
commercial
use
and
then
ultimately,
project
out
a
population
for
our
service
area.
U
So
our
goal
is
to
calculate
build-out
to
the
Year
2040,
and
this
will
be
hopefully
or
the
goal
is
to
have
it
by
each
city
and
each
sanitation
districts.
So
we
can
have
good
information.
So
we
believe
that,
with
this
deeper
dive,
we'll
provide
a
more
comprehensive
look
for
our
service
area
population
and
then
this
population
data
will
then
be
used
to
tender
services
to
another
consultant
which
will
actually
do
the
wastewater
flow
projections.
U
So
EPS
has
relevant
experience
in
conducting
population
projections
and
make
this
quick
their
proposal
in
the
mouths
of
forty
thousand
six
hundred
and
ten
dollars
will
be
expensive,
expensed
as
part
of
our
engineering
maintenance,
contractual
services,
a
budget,
as
shown
here
at
approximately
five
hundred
and
sixty-two
thousand,
and
the
cost
will
be
shared
by
both
cities
in
England
in
Littleton
I'll.
Happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
thank.
A
B
Move
us
on
to
11
C
3.
This
is
award
pre-construction
services,
formerly
police
headquarters.
Staff
recommends
council
award
by
motion
a
contract,
AIA
document
1
33
with
Alderson
and
Peterson
construction
for
construction
management
and
general
contractor
services
for
the
police
headquarters.
Project
tonight's
award
will
authorize
pre-construction
services
only
in
the
amount
of
55,000
$76.00,
our
staff
sources.
Public
works
director,
Dave
Henderson,
director,
Henderson,
TV,
good.
F
Evening,
Council
I'm
Dave
Henderson
public
works
director
and
I'm
here
to
present
a
motion
to
award
a
contract
with
adolfson
and
Peterson
construction.
This
contract
would
be
for
construction
management
and
general
contracting
services
for
our
new
police
facility.
Mp
is
a
highly
qualified
firm.
They
have
extensive
experience
in
the
metro
area.
They've
recently
completed.
Police
substations
for
the
city
of
Arvada
they've
also
completed
a
South
Metro
Fire
Rescue
station
staff
used
a
competitive,
formal
selection
process,
and
it
was
in
conformance
with
the
request
for
qualifications.
F
It
was
publicly
advertised
tonight's
award
will
authorize
the
pre-construction
services
only
at
the
amount
of
fifty
five
thousand
and
seventy
six
dollars.
We
will
bring
forward
a
guaranteed
maximum
price
for
the
construction
of
the
building
sometime
in
September
for
your
approval
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
F
E
Then
the
general
kind
of
formatted
professional
services
agreement
that
we
have-
we
have
a
section
5
in
there
that
explains
to
them
that
they
expect
that
the
city
will
not
does
not
expect
any
taxes
to
be
charged
in
their
bid
and
says
that
the
city
is
tax
exempt.
I
was
unable
to
find
that
in
this
particular
95
pages
of
stuff,
I.
E
F
E
E
I
mean
in
the
previous
contract
I
mean
that's
a
standard
contract
that
we
use
pretty
often
I
mean
I've.
Seen
it
enough
times,
section
5
says
the
city
is
not
subject
to
taxation
of
federal
other
taxes
and
not
to
include
it
in
the
bed,
and
these
are
professional
services
agreement.
The
management
of
this
is
a
professional
service,
so
I
don't
understand
why
we
would
change
that.
For
this
point,.
Q
Of
information
Council
this
particular
item:
this
is
for
design
services
and
we
cannot
tax
services
under
Colorado
state
statutes.
However,
if
it's
for
construction-
and
you
or
does
you
would
you
would
see
that
perhaps
in
a
construction
agreement
but
we're
not
they're
not
buying
any
materials
to
construct
anything
at
this
point
in
time,
it's
merely
advice
and
working
with
our
architect.
That's
already
on
staff
with
DLR
architecture.
E
E
Q
E
Just
because
it's
a
template
and
they're,
not
necessarily
because
most
professional
services
agreement
would
be
services.
So
then,
in
that
case,
I,
don't
understand
why
it's
in
here
either.
Maybe
the
city
attorney
will
take
a
look
at
it,
but
it's
because
they
were
different
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure.
So.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thanks
a
lot
for
the
95
page.
E
P
H
H
B
On
to
11
see
for
investment
management
services,
contract
amendment
for
the
Englewood
police
headquarters,
building
bond
proceeds
staff
recommends
that
council
approved
by
motion
an
amendment
to
the
city's
current
investment
management
manager.
Contract
with
inside
investment
previously
cut
water
to
include
services
for
managing
the
Englewood
police
headquarters,
building
bond
proceeds,
our
staff
sources,
finance
and
administrative
services,
director
Kathleen
wrinkle
directory
:.
Thank.
R
R
They
are
offering
us
the
same
costing
that
we
have
in
the
main
contract,
with
a
caveat
of
$500
when
it
drops
below
a
certain
amount.
Now,
that's
a
monthly
amount,
the
bond
proceeds
we
will
we
have
priced
so
we
know
how
much
we're
getting
on
the
twenty
seven
million
dollar
par.
We
will
be
getting
thirty
two
point:
six
million
and
the
it
closes
tomorrow,
so
we'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
invested
in
a
in
a
let's,
say,
maximizing
area
where
we
can
get
as
much
interest
as
possible.
R
R
R
E
M
E
E
Maybe
be
within
the
bond
limitations,
but
that
is
not
what
the
voters
voted
for.
They
voted
for
27
million
and
I
believe
any
additional
monies
that
come
through
through
handling
this
well
should
go
to
pay
down
that
money
and
not
change
what
the
voters
voted
for.
They
voted
for
27
million
and
we
are
already
spending
every
dime
of
that
and
I.
Don't
think
this
is
appropriate.
R
R
J
A
B
A
E
I
still
think
that
this
Mendota
conclusion
part
where
it
says
the
the
contract
for
investment
of
authority,
where
it's
his
best
opportunity
for
higher
interest
earnings,
which
will
be
reinvested
in
the
city
of
Englewood
police
headquarters,
building,
project
and
I.
Think
that's
what
I'm
voting
for
and
I'll
not
vote
for
it.
They
said
made
it
very
clear.
It's
27
million
and-
and
this
should
have
been
written
to
make
sure
that
it
was
clear
that
that
issue
was
coming
back
and
that
we
didn't
have
the
intention
of
putting
it
back
in.
E
B
T
B
B
You
we're
gonna
move
on
to
11
C
5.
This
is
resolution
for
2017
budget
supplemental
appropriation
for
security
staff
recommends
City
Council
approved
by
resolution.
A
supplemental
appropriation
to
the
2017
budget
for
city
security
needs
our
staff,
sources,
finance
and
administrative
services
director
or
Kathleen
wrinkle
again.
Thank.
R
You
so
we're
asking
for
supplemental.
This
is
based
on
the
amounts
and
the
I
would
say
the
security
measures
that
were
discussed
at
executive
session,
so
I
won't
be
going
into
detail
as
to
what
those
are.
Hopefully,
everybody
remembers
pretty
well
we're
looking
at
460
1909
total
to
cover
the
facilities
in
the
police
department
costs
I.
Think
that's
pretty
much.
All
I
have
to
say
on
that.
One.
B
E
I'm
concerned
about
just
saying
that
we
discuss
this
an
executive
session
as
if
that's
some
secret
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
give
the
details.
But
it
does
say
on
here
that
this
is
used
for
the
capital
improvements
for
security
at
the
Civic,
Center
and
Recreation
Center
that
those
particulars
on
that
don't
may
not
need
to
be
divulged.
But
that's
what
it's
for
and
I'm
just
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
clarify.
W
Mr.
mr.
mayor,
if
I
may,
I
can
give
I
think
councilman
Barrington
is
right
and
I
can
give
a
little
bit
of
a
quick
overview,
so
the
facilities
updates
that
the
that
those
funds
will
include
is
our
turnstiles
for
the
Civic
Center,
as
well
as
RFID
card
re-entry
points
that
you
will
see
in
a
contract
coming
to
you
here
shortly,
as
well
as
panic
button
and
lockdown
buttons
that
will
be
added.
Hopefully,
that
gives
just
a
little
taste
of
what
we're
talking
about
here.
A
R
A
B
No
staffing
and
over
time
I
would
like
to
see
you
know.
I.
Think
us
kind
of
look
at
that
issue
after
we've
had
some
more
time
with
this
and
perhaps
try
to
bring
that
number
down
a
little
bit.
But
I
know
that
the
you
know
facilities
capital
costs
really
need
to
come
in
in
order
to
be
able
to
supervise
a
secure
environment
for
a
lot
of
our
building
and
a
lot
of
our
employees.
Counselor
very
good.
E
Aside
from
not
knowing
the
unassigned
fund,
balance
balance
after
this
gets
taken
out,
I
greatly
appreciate
the
way
that
you
submitted.
This
I
know
where
the
money
is
coming
from
and
what
what
this
is
for
its
clear
and
accurate
and
I
greatly
appreciate
the
work
you
did
on
this.
Thank
you
very
much.
Any.
B
B
This
is
security
central
on
the
amount
of
one
hundred
and
thirty
four
thousand
five
hundred
and
twenty
two
dollars
and
thirty
seven
cents
or
1482
monthly
service
fee,
as
well
as
Schindler,
elevator
Corp
for
four
thousand
three
hundred
and
fifty
six
dollars
our
staff
sources,
facility
services
and
maintenance
manager
dan
long.
Even
mr.
long,
thanks
for
sticking
around
good.
V
Evening,
mayor
and
council,
this
is
the
executive
information
that
was
shared
with
you
back
in
March.
This
is
now
giving
you
the
cost
of
what
you
saw
then,
and,
as
was
previously
stated,
the
actual
plan
of
what
this
is
doing
is
as
discussed
in
executive
session
is
not
here.
You
saw
that
before
there's
no
changes
to
that,
it's
just
its
cost
to
everything
we
talked
about.
A
A
V
At
the
door
coming
into
the
building,
what
happens
there
now,
if
you're
in
that
Lobby,
there's
a
motion
detector
in
that
Lobby,
you
as
an
employee,
could
be
standing
in
that
Lobby
and
that
door
would
open,
even
though
the
card
readers
on
the
outside
it's
sensing,
the
fact
that
somebody's
on
the
inside
trying
to
go
out
so
the
door
releases.
So
there's
the
ability
to
say
if
somebody
come
in
through
the
building
right
now
get
into
that
elevator
if
somebody's
standing
in
their
Lobby.
That's
about
okay,.
B
C
B
H
Two
things
one
is
I,
really
had
been
looking
forward
to
talking
about
11
c1
I
know
that
I
seemed
weird
that
I
would
vote
against
table
in
it,
but
I
want
to
express
my
agreement
with
it.
I
will
be
out
of
town
the
next
time.
This
is
heard
and
I
I
think
this
kind
of
openness
to
restructuring
and
thinking
through
how
we
work
is
really
incredibly
important.
H
We
have
a
lot
of
consent,
agenda
items
being
pulled
off
and
I
would
prefer
that
we
figure
out
how
to
bring
them
under
11:00
to
begin
with,
rather
than
have
to
do
that,
so
are
there
any
sort
of
criteria
that
we've
all
noticed
that
and
I
can't
think
of
what
they
might
be,
but
maybe
the
two
of
you
can
that
we
could
just
make
sure
that
our
staff
know
that
we're
not
going
to
have
those
under
consent
agenda.
So
you
don't
have
to
do
that.
H
Every
time
sometimes
I
know
you've
caught
mistakes,
which
is
really
helpful,
but
there's
sometimes
maybe
just
theoretical
or
philosophical
things
that
you
see
are
constantly
coming
up
and
if
there
aren't
fine
but
I,
see
some
nodding
over
here.
I
think
staff
would
rather
have
them
under
a
11
under
what
do
we
call
it?
What
do
we
call
have
and
ordinances
resolutions
and
motions
rather
than
consent?
H
A
Yeah
actually
I
think
tonight
we
only
pulled
one
so
I
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
can't
I'll
go
back
and
look
and
see
yeah.
H
E
I
think
this
is
something
that
was
a
little
bit
easier
to
address
when
we
had
a
recorded
public,
Mayor
manager
meeting
and
so
I
think
that
there's
at
least
from
the
recordings
in
my
night
and
was
able
to
attend
those
meetings
that
there's
some
miss
reading,
sometimes
from
the
mayor
and
where
the
council's
going
on
some
things
or
issues
that
are
coming
up
and
he's
perceiving
that
they're
not
and
sometimes
I've,
been
very
surprised
why
they
didn't
why.
They
would
think
that
that
should
be
on
the
consent
agenda.
E
So
maybe
just
try
and
do
some
more
communications,
but
given
that
I
don't
get
to
listen
to,
they
may
or
manager
meeting
and
I
only
get
to
pack
it.
You
know
late
on
Thursday,
given
that
time,
I,
don't
really
think
that
I'm
gonna
have
enough
time,
most
of
the
time
to
try
and
contact
staff
and
say
that
I
have
an
issue
with
it.
I
I
think
that
it's
kind
of
disrespectful
to
the
process.
E
If
we're
going
to
do
this
agenda,
setting
this
way,
I
think
it's
disrespectful
to
the
process
for
me
to
go
ahead
and
and
do
that
I
think
it's
appropriate
for
it
to
just
be
pulled
and
then
discussed.
It
doesn't
really
hurt
anything.
It's
going
to
be
discussed
one
way
or
the
other,
so
it
doesn't
matter
whether
we
find
out
here
then
I
mean
if
I
find
out
something
early
enough.
I
can
certainly
try
and
communicate
it
to
the
mayor,
but
otherwise
I'm
not
really
sure
how
we're
going
to
how
that's
going
to
happen.
H
Thank
you.
That's
an
answer.
No
I'll
take
it.
No.
There
isn't
anything
that
so
that's
helpful
to
know
and
I.
Think
from
my
perspective,
we
bought
you've,
always
pulled
consent,
agendas
and
I,
don't
mind
at
all.
I
just
think.
If
there's
a
way
to
streamline
it,
these
meetings
are
sometimes
unproductive
and
shortening
even
that
small
piece
could
sometimes
be
helpful.
H
I'm
looking
forward
to
CML
and
big
thanks
to
the
city
for
a
number
of
things,
you
guys
have
been
extremely
busy
and
we
can
see
it
by
some
of
the
things
coming
in
and
the
thank-yous
from
the
community
are
strong.
So
I
want
to
thank
you
for
hanging
in
there
with
us,
and
I
will
miss
you
all
on
July,
3rd
or
whatever.
That
is
I.
E
Always
think
the
discussion
is
very
productive
and
when
those
issues
get
brought
up
so
I'm
sad
that
you
don't
see
that
productivity
in
there,
because
they
get
a
lot
from
making
sure
that
those
discussions
happen.
If
I
have
questions
on
every
councilmember
Russell
does
I
want
to
know
why
I'm
so
disappointed
that
we're
planted
we're
having
a
Planned
Unit
development
meeting.
Why
are
we
doing
that
when
councils
gone,
because
I
won't
be
able
to
attend
that
and
that's
a
big
PUD
to
be
doing
a
public
meeting
and
putting
more
apartments?
E
That
I
was
a
little
surprised
to
see
in
their
apartments
into
the
Sports
Authority.
That's
a
big
project,
and
that
has
a
big
impact
on
us
and
I
would
really
have
liked
to
have
been
part
of
that.
They
only
I
mean
to
put
this
together
kind
of
quickly
and
then
have
it
be
when
we're
out
of
town
is
very
disappointing,
they
could
have
done
it
the
next
week.
It
wouldn't
have
made
that
much
of
a
difference
for
it,
the
also
on
the
memo
under
council
a
newsletter.
E
There
is
a
memo
and
let's
see
if
we
can't
move
that
and
see
what's
going
on,
because
this
is
really
very
important
to
the
community
and
I
would
like
to
make
sure
that
they
they
have
enough
notice
and
that
council
can
attend
to
hear
that
in
person.
What's
going
on
with
that,
especially
the
since
there's
been
such
a
push
from
several
council
members
on
not
wanting
to
do
any
more
PDS
and
certainly
not
more
apartments,
then
there's
a
memo
in
here.
That's
the
private
activity
bond
allocation
and
it
looks
like
you're
asking
for
action
here.
J
Q
Issues
privately
bonds,
private
activity,
bonds.
Basically,
what
the
city
has
done
with
excess,
I
shouldn't
say
excess,
but
some
of
the
fun
things
that
we
get
from
the
county
from
CDBG.
We
push
it
into
the
private
activity
bond,
so
it
allows
arapahoe
county
to
determine
how
to
to
fund
those
projects
when
industries
come
forward
and
asking
for
governmental
participation
in
their
projects.
B
B
Q
E
Gave
an
update
last
time
on
the
Englewood,
Housing,
Authority
and
I
appreciate
that
the
city
attorney
and
the
mayor
are
looking
into
some
concerns
about
the
transparency
and
how
the
board
is
handling
some
issues.
Another
issue
that
I
would
like
to
bring
up
concerning
them,
as
this
angle
would
senior
living
center
at
35,
55,
Clarkson,
that
we
know
that
they're
selling,
that
property
and
I
would
like
to
know
ahead
of
time
the
process,
how
we're
going
to
deal
with
the
Housing
Authority,
or
at
least
getting
the
information
and
being
part
of
this
process.
E
If
they
decide
to
make
yet
another
project
and
our
community
tax-exempt
the
kind
of
tax-exempt
we
actually
don't
charge,
which
I
don't
know
how
all
of
that
works,
but
the
kind
of
tax-exempt
where
they
get
away
with
not
paying
us
anything
when
their
developers
and
actually
should
and
why
our
Inglewood
Housing
Authority,
has
been
making
these
partnerships
for
just
$100
to
go
ahead
and
tax-exempt.
These
developers,
so
I
would
like.
I
would
like
to
have
some
information
or
figure
out.
E
If
there's
some
way,
we
can
put
some
criteria
on
this
so
that
we
have
some
we're.
Not
blindsided
again
and
just
end
up
with
yet
another
tax-exempt
development,
senior
and
low-income
housing
in
our
community,
where
we
have
to
have
people
that
somebody's
got
to
pay
the
bills.
Eventually,
the
budget
meeting
at
the
Mallee
Center
I
wanted
to
thank
staff.
It
was
really
well
done.
There
was
about
a
hundred
a
little
over
a
hundred
people.
There
I
think.
E
Unfortunately,
some
of
them
were
there
because
they
believe
that
mallory
center
was
going
to
be
closed.
So
the
rumor
up
the
at
the
charge,
the
census
of
people
that
were
in
attendance
and
our
city
manager
quickly
took
care
of
that
at
the
beginning
of
the
presentation
to
make
sure
that
people
knew
that
we
were
not
going
to
close
Meli
center.
At
the
end,
we've
tried
to
make
it
very
clear
to
people
at
malli
center
in
attendance
that
it
was
not
ever
discussed.
E
It
was
not
even
brought
to
the
table,
it's
just
so
that
I
could
clarify
the
city
manager
Tech's
comments,
because
during
the
break
I
had
people
coming
up
and
thanking
me
for
not
closing
it
and
I
said.
While
I
would
like
to
take
credit
for
something,
we
were
never
going
to
do,
I
wanted
to
make
it
clear
that
we
were
never
going
to
do
it.
E
They
greatly
appreciate
and
I've
heard
over
this
last
two
weeks,
yeah
two
weeks
that
they
really
appreciate
it.
The
police
have
stepped
up
and
they
believe
that
there's
more
patrols
there's
at
least
more
of
a
police
presence,
and
they
appreciate
it.
They
think
it's
making
some
difference
not
as
much
as
they'd
like
to
see
but
I
greatly
appreciate
that
the
police
are
listening
to
the
concerns
of
that
area
and
and
I
hope
that
you
pass
that
along
please.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
I
appreciate
the
budgeting
meetings
also
I
think
the
people
at
the
Mallee
probably
misunderstood
their
assignment
because
they
were
spending
more
money
instead
of
so
maybe
mark
just
has
to
make
sure
that
he
clarifies
you
need
to
save
money,
but
no
I
know
that
people
appreciate
it
and
I
just
assured
them
that
we
are
going
to
work
hard
to
save
programs.
I
also
went
to
the
Uli
meeting
this
last
Thursday
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
that
I
think
our
comp
plan
is
wrong.