►
From YouTube: City Council Study Session 13 Aug 2018
Description
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/52279?handle=0A453FBA4C5A44408AA2C95269B58DBD
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/52278?handle=2DB044D04D5041379C8B0E7D71CFFF98
II. Council Member’s Choice
III. City Manager’s Choice
IV. City Attorney’s Choice
II. 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Overview - Directional/Informational - 6:00-9:00 p.m.
2019-2023 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/52279?handle=0A453FBA4C5A44408AA2C95269B58DBD
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/52278?handle=2DB044D04D5041379C8B0E7D71CFFF98
A
Welcome
everyone:
this
is
the
anger
with
City
Council
study
session
of
Monday
August,
13,
2018
and
tonight.
Our
major
focus
is
on
the
2019
to
2023
capital
investment,
our
Improvement
Plan,
and
we
have
several
people
who
are
presenting
tonight.
I
will
let
them
introduce
themselves
as
they
speak,
but
I
believe
that
our
first
part
is
city
manager.
You're
not
going
to
talk.
What's
it,
okay,
I
I
did
want
to
say
at
the
outset.
I
really
appreciate
the
thoroughness
of
this
report
and
particularly
the
beginning
sort
of
executive.
C
B
We're
gonna
look
at
the
two
thousand
19
through
23
capital
budget
tonight,
and
we
will
look
at
the
capital
funds
portion
and
the
TIF,
which
is
the
public,
Improvement
Fund
and
the
capital,
that's
involved
with
the
enterprise's
we'll
look
at
on
the
27th
when
we
go
through
the
actual
operational
budgets,
because
it
ends
up
being
a
portion
of
their
budget.
So
we'll
review
those
that
so
with
that
tonight.
I
have
three
directors
with
me
here
to
cover
their
areas
as
we
go
through.
This
we've
got
Dorothy
Hargrove
with
parks
reckon
library.
B
B
C
B
Okay,
so
with
that
we're
going
to
do
the
overview
of
the
19
through
the
23
capital
improvement
plan,
we'll
take
a
look
at
some
highlights
in
19,
and
also
some
highlights
in
20
through
23
will
discuss
the
deferred
capital
projects.
The
things
were
not
able
to
do
and
then
we'll
take
a
look
at
an
alternative
Inc
in
the
hopes
that
you
will
grant
us
some
additional
funding
to
go
forward
with
them.
B
We've
done
this,
we've
displayed
the
project's
a
little
differently
this
year
we
are
looking
at
them
in
terms
of
actual
expenditure
need
in
prior
years,
we've
kind
of
had
some
fun
building
where
we
would
put
aside
money
for
projects
they
weren't
not
necessarily
well
defined.
It
might
be
like
bridges,
okay,
so
we
don't
know
which
bridges,
but
we
know
we're
going
to
have
to
do
some
work
on
bridges.
So
we'll
put
some
larger
funds
aside
or
build
up
to
a
fund
where
we
can
afford
to
do
some
bridges.
B
We're
also
going
to
take
a
look
at
what
fits
within
the
funding
that
we
believe
we
have
available,
which
at
this
point,
is
funding
from
three
different
tax
bases,
vehicle
use,
building
use
in
roads
and
bridges.
Those
are
the
key
pieces
that
ends
up
being
about
four
million
and
we
typically
request
an
additional
million
from
the
general
fund
reserve.
At
least
we've
done
that
in
the
past
several
years,
and
that
gives
us
gets
us
to
about
five
million
dollars
a
year.
B
D
B
B
Okay,
so
based
on
your
feedback,
we
also
have
an
alternative
capital
plan
which
asks
for
an
additional
funding
for
specific
projects
and
we'll
walk
through
that
as
well.
This
2.1
million
is
applied
to
2019
and
we've
got
about
another
million
and
we're
hoping
for
a
more
proceeds.
Dedication
for
20
through
23.
E
C
B
Things
I'm
noticing
the
fingers.
Sorry,
okay,
so
the
19
through
23
plan,
delivers
funding
for
roads
and
bridges
and
will
also
include
an
assessment
for
pavement
condition
and
overall
asset
assessment.
We'll
look
at
the
Englewood
recreation
center
improvements,
so
we've
got
some
improvements
for
the
front
entry
and
then
the
security
there.
That's
some
activity,
space,
IT
infrastructure,
improvements
for
the
new
police
building
and
some
other
facilities
and
we're
looking
at
significant
investment
in
traffic.
Modernizations
must
be
upgrading
improvements
of
different
intersections.
B
So
the
staff
looked
at
the
criteria
that
we
promised
you
we
would
use
in
evaluating
these
projects
and
which
ones
to
bring
it
forward.
So
does
it
enhance
public
safety?
Does
it
extend
the
life
of
the
asset,
because
the
underlying
asset,
critical
to
the
operation
of
the
city
does
the
underlying
asset
generate
revenue
and
as
the
project
related
to
one
or
more
community
goals?
So
that's
what
the
eyes
and
lens
we
use
to
help
evaluate
these
projects.
B
Now
we're
going
to
look
at
the
highlights
of
some
projects
and
when
I
say
highlights.
You
also
have
an
attachment
to
this
deck.
I
think
it
was
the
second
attachment
behind
the
communication
and
it
has
the
list
of
all
the
projects,
but
we
just
want
to
highlight
a
few
so
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Maria
here
and
she
can
talk
through
the
public
works
once
per
night.
Thanks.
F
Kathy
yeah,
so
just
a
couple
of
key
projects
there
for
2019.
We
do
have
funding
for
our
primarily
for
road
improvements:
road
maintenance.
At
one
point,
five,
nine
million,
so
that'll
go
to
our
annual
payment
maintenance
program.
But
what
we're
gonna
focus
on
in
2019?
We're
really
looking
at
doing
that
assessment.
That
was
previously
mentioned.
We're
gonna
get
that
started
yet
this
year,
so
we'll
have
a
much
better
idea
of
the
condition
of
the
roads
overall
and
then
be
able
to
target
those
in
certain
areas.
F
We're
also
probably
looking
at
more
in
depth
rehabilitation
because
of
the
condition
of
the
sewer
storm,
sanitary
sewer
and
water
as
well,
and
so
we'd
like
to
combine
all
those
projects
together
and
perhaps
depending
on
the
outcomes.
If
we
do
move
forward
with
our
storm
sewer
study
is
we
would
dub
tale
that
potentially
into
some
of
these
projects
as
well,
the
Dartmouth
bridge
project?
We
are
going
out
we're
gonna
be
soliciting
design
services
for
that
within
the
next
few
weeks.
F
So
our
plan
would
be
is
to
be
out
for
construction,
probably
early
summer
late
spring
of
next
year
and
complete
that
by
the
end
of
2019,
that's
about
just
under
two
million
dollars.
We
have
some
pretty
fairly
minor
facilities,
improvements
that
we
try
and
do
in
an
ongoing
basis,
most
of
those
being
maintenance
types
of
projects,
nothing
very
large
for
2019,
and
then
traffic
system
upgrades.
So
we
want
to
continue.
What
has
been
done
in
the
past
is
replacing
one
signal
pretty
much
every
year.
F
We
want
to
focus
more
on
corridors
as
opposed
to
just
replacing
signals,
which
is
also
important
but
upgrading,
especially
in
those
key
quarters
along
Broadway
and
285,
for
which
we
get
money
from
cdot
and
really
look
at.
You
know.
Where
do
we
have
probably
not
the
latest
controllers
so
that
we
can
start
to
better
and
more
proactively
manage
the
traffic
by
changing
the
signal
timing?
G
G
G
E
J
G
F
G
G
G
C
K
F
A
G
A
F
F
E
E
Remind
me
and
anybody
else
you
may
not
be
completely
up
to
speed
on
this-
of
the
difference
between
our
responsibility
in
the
city
of
Danvers
and
maintaining
that
median,
for
example,
when
the
weeds
needed
a
little
love
a
few
months
ago,
and
it
wasn't
100%
our
a
lot
of
businesses
didn't
know
that
and
I
think
some
citizens
don't
understand
just
the
interplay
between
cities.
There
we.
H
E
L
With
respect
to
see
dot,
we
they
don't
allow
people
to
operate
just
pop
park,
a
truck
in
there
right
away
and
start
working,
so
part
of
the
holdup
for
us
was
working
through
the
Department
of
Transportation
to
get
a
traffic
plan
accepted
by
them.
So,
in
other
words,
when
you
are
working
in
the
CDOT
rights-of-way
santa
fe,
hampton,
I
believe,
even
broadway.
To
that
extent,
we
were
required
to
have
a
approved
traffic
management
plan
that
has
flagging
signage.
L
The
workers
have
to
abide
by
certain
rules
and
regs
to
be
see,
and
so,
for
whatever
reason
it's
taking
the
region
that
we
are
within
when
sita
took
him
about
three
months
to
actually
turn
around
a
traffic
management
plan
for
us,
and
so
that
held
us
up
to
with
respect
to
working,
and
so
I
think,
moving
forward
in
the
future.
One
of
the
things
we're
going
to
do
is
start
much
earlier
with
that.
L
The
only
difficulty
is
that,
typically,
they
want
to
have
a
traffic
management
plan
that
is
assigned
to
a
specific
vendor
or
a
consultant
contractor
or
even
the
city
for
that
matter
ahead
of
time.
So
they
want
to
know
who
who
it
is,
and
so,
for
example,
this
year
it
was
Emerald
Isle
who
did
the
weeding
work
on
Hampton
as
well
as
Broadway,
and
so
they
had
to
be
the
entity
that
received
that
traffic
management
approval
from
seedot
and
that
took
longer
than
what
anybody
anticipated.
But.
E
H
L
I
think
they
have
to
plan
ahead
and
just
again
have
an
approved
traffic
management
plan
so
that
when
you
do
begin,
your
work
you've
already
have
that
approval.
They
follow
those
prescriptions
tightly
and
get
out
there
and
do
the
work
as
necessary.
So,
for
example,
if
if
and
when
we
do
bring
forth
the
contract
for
maintenance
of
these
medians,
that
particular
traffic
management
plan
would
work
at
any
time
they
they're
desirous
to
get
out
and
do
work
and
I
think
it
actually
limits
the
hours
they
can
be
out
there
to
not
during
rush
hour.
D
I
actually
have
a
question
on
the
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
the
walk
and
wheel
planning
implementation.
It
seems
to
me,
like
it,
doesn't
necessarily
meet
the
criteria
of
the
budget
decisions.
Does
the
project
enhance
public
safety?
The
Arctic
enhancer
extend
the
life
of
an
existing
asset
underlying
asset
critical
to
the
operations
of
the
city.
Does
the
underlying
asset
or
service
generate
revenue?
Is
the
project
related
to
one
or
more
community
goals?
D
I
know
that
we've
done
this
walking
wheel
master
plan,
but
my
concern
is:
we've
implemented
a
lot
of
plans
that
are
costing
us
money
that
we
don't
have,
and
so
I
want
to
put
that
money
into
question.
It's
not
that
I,
don't
think
we
need
bicycle
trails,
but
I
think
the
things
that
are
going
on
in
the
city
to
survive.
We
need
to
start
dealing
with
the
infrastructure
problems
that
we
have
so
I
would
put
that
one
into
question.
G
So,
if
there's
things
like
that,
where
we're
gonna
be
have
projects
or
money
that
was
out
appropriated
but
was
not
spent
and
I'd
like
to
know
that
for
positions
as
well.
So
if
we
had
a
position-
and
it
was
not
filled
I'd
like
to
know
why,
if
we
had
money
allocated
for
medians
and
it
wasn't
spent,
then
we
need
to
know
why
and
maybe
a
broader
sense
so
that
we
can
go
ahead
and
address
these
next
time.
G
H
For
the
renovation
of
the
front
lobby
at
the
Rec
Center,
we
do
think
it
meets
some
of
the
career
core
criteria.
It
will
improve
public
safety,
it
will
help
maintain
the
value
of
the
asset
and
it
will
we
hope,
increase
revenue.
Keeping
the
rec
center,
attractive
and
accessible
to
all
of
our
guests
is
requires
additional
funding.
Kiss
me.
E
H
C
H
In
and
no
one,
no
one
notices
you
the
very
preliminary
plans
that
we
have
from
the
architect
show
about
a
10-foot
gap
and
an
expanded
area
in
front
of
the
desk
so
that
when
you
come
in,
you
would
be
standing
in
line.
But
hopefully
that's
not
going
to
make
people
stand
in
line
in
the
rain.
But
you
would
have
to
check
in
so
that
we
know
who
is
in
the
building
and
that
they're
in
legitimate
user.
E
K
K
A
G
Mean
I
understand
a
lot
of
the
issue
when
you
have
public
coming
to
watch
a
game
parents
coming
to
watch
their
kids
play
in
a
tournament
kind
of
an
intramural
basketball
game
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
people
who
actually
attend
that
are
kind
of
in
a
different
role:
they're
not
actually
participating.
How
are
you
guys
going
to
handle
that
our.
H
Preliminary
idea,
based
on
our
research
with
other
rec
centers,
who
have
a
similar
point,
is
that
all
you
need
to
do
is
say:
I
am
here
for
XYZ
basketball
game
and
then
then
you're
allowed
to
go
in
and
then
they
make
a
note.
You
know
there
are
ten
parents
and
ten
children.
So
it's
not
going
to
be
a
hundred
percent.
We're
not
going
to
ask
for
ID
or
charge
admission
to
people
who
are
coming.
Ideally.
G
All
a
bunch
of
different
rec,
centers
and
I
saw
and
I
saw
that
where,
even
though
people
had
a
line
to
come
in
to
check
in
I
mean
you're
dealing
with
a
huge
game
or
some
tournament,
if
something's
going
on
you're
always
going
to
have
that
and
I
know
that
there's
been
some
concern
with
mostly
the
locker
rooms
or
for
security.
So
is
there
a
way
knowing
that
we're
really
not
going
to
be
able
to
identify
everybody,
that's
in
the
building,
or
you
know,
kind
of
that.
That's
still
going
to
be
somewhat
of
a
struggle.
G
H
H
H
I
would
also
point
out,
aside
from
the
safety
and
the
idea
of
increasing
revenue,
we're
going
to
refashion
that
Lobby
so
that
what
is
now
basically
unused
space
will
be
a
party
room.
We
had
a
lot
of
requests
for
birthday.
Parties
would
like
to
accommodate
that,
and
it
increases
the
visibility
and
accessibility
to
the
to
the
pool.
So
I
think
it
will
have
a
lot
of
functional
programmatic
improvements
as
well
as
safety.
H
D
H
H
E
H
E
H
I
E
There's
no
way
around
it,
so
one
of
the
considerations
is
in
my
looking
through
this
and
thinking
through
you
know:
seventy
five
million
gap
between
what
we
need
for
certain
infrastructure
needs
and
just
where
we
are
financially
and
what
our
needs
are
just
looking
at
as
a
comparison.
So
it's
a
city
pretty
what
seven
miles
seven
square
miles.
We
have
two
and
a
half
just
like.
E
Recreation,
centers
and
so
I
started
to
wonder
and
look
into
just
do
we
need
to?
Is
our
population
freely
using
both
I
mean
I
was
going
to
Malley
Center
more
and
more
after
my
Pilates
move
there,
but
what
percentage
of
Malley
users
may
could
be
combined
to
be
shift
all
the
funds
into
into
the
Oxford
Station
really
redo
it
cater
to
the
Mallee
population,
not
cut
any
services
or
offerings
just
a
thought.
E
H
G
G
A
Wink
has
suggested
more
data
on
both
terms
of
demographics,
so
we're
gonna
do
that.
I
would
like
to
also
then
look
at
how
much
of
the
area
that's
walkable
around
the
Mallee
Center
is
where
the
draw
is
coming
from
for
those
that
population,
because
I
do
think
a
lot
of
people
that
use
the
Mallee
Center
from
that
area
are
walking
in
and
it
may
not
even
have
cars
or
whatever
it
draws
from
a
certain,
probably
mile
radius
that
may
make
it
almost
might
mean
they
can
use
that
kind
of
back.
D
Believe
at
the
and
I
could
be
wrong
at
the
Maui
Center
trust
fund
meeting
I,
believe
staff
member
sac
was
sharing
that
we
have
done
some
or
that
some
studies
have
been
done
about
combining
not
duplicating
services
at
both
facilities.
Right
dividing
it
is
that
correct
I.
Remember
that
correctly,
then,
in
response
to
councilmember,
wink
and
I
just
need
to
know.
If
we
need
more
information
on
this,
the
Maui
Center
was
not
originally
built
by
the
city
of
Inglewood.
Is
that
correct,
or
was
it?
How
did
the
melanie
center
come
into
being.
H
D
G
J
Thank
you.
So
one
of
the
major
projects
that
we
have
for
2019
is
installing
a
fiber
network
from
the
police
building
to
Civic
Center.
Currently
we
have
several
of
our
city.
Facilities
are
on
carrier
services,
not
on
our
fiber
network,
so
over
the
next
five
to
six
years,
we'd
like
to
start
bringing
on
one
building
at
a
time
and
then
building
redundancy
into
our
network
for
those
buildings
that
are
online
at
work.
They
have
a
single
point
of
failure.
J
J
C
J
A
B
So
well
now
we'll
take
a
look
at
20
through
23
I
know.
This
is
outside
of
the
current
year
that
we're
looking
at,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
you
all
had
a
five-year
view.
Projects
available
I
can
mention
before
is
about
our
money
available
funding
available
it's
about
five
million
dollars
a
year.
The
department's
are
going
to
highlight
their
key
projects
in
this
five-year
or
four
year
period
outside
of
nineteen,
and
then
we'll
take
a
look
at
an
alternative
CIP
falling.
F
Yeah
so
as
we
talked
previously
right
now,
what
we're
planning
is
relatively
the
same
level
of
funding
as
in
2019
for
the
years
2020
through
2023
for
road
and
bridge
improvements.
We
also
have
approximately
$400,000
per
year
scheduled
for
traffic
system
improvements
based
on
the
assessment
that
will
finish,
probably
in
the
early
part
of
2019,
we'll
see
if
that
1.7
million
is
enough.
F
Also
just
doing
better
gravel
stabilization
in
a
lot
of
those
alleys,
especially
in
the
steep
portions
and
then
potentially,
as
we've
talked
about
before
doing
some
sort
of
adopt
an
alley
or
outreach
program
to
different
neighborhoods.
Maybe
where
we
put
a
dumpster
out
there
work
with
the
neighborhood
group
to
upgrade
it
and
then
get
rid
of
all
that
junk.
At
the
same
time,
but
at
this
time
what
we're
saying
is
that
we
don't
we
didn't,
have
any
funding
available
based
on
the
budget
for
2019,
so
that
program
would
begin
in
2020.
A
F
So
we
will
continue.
Basically,
what
we're
doing
right
now,
which
is
I,
would
consider
more
pretty
reactive
yeah.
So
if
we
get
a
request
or
a
phone
call,
we
would
still
go
out
and
do
those
kinds
of
things
I
think
what
we're
talking
about
with
this
program
is
trying
to
be
more
proactive
and
work
with
the
neighborhood
to
identify
those
locations
and
provide
dumpsters
for
them
or
some
other
means
of
picking
up
the
garbage
on
a
more
so
we
could
like
they
can
plan
it.
E
K
K
F
I
think
what
we
would
do
in
2019
is
identify
those
those
key
areas.
So
it's
the
alley.
Beautification
we
developed
that
program,
but
we'd
also
look
where
those
areas
as
I
mentioned
may
be,
where
there's
very
steep
sections,
where
maybe
paving
does
make
sense,
I
also
placed
in
the
end
kind
of
that
one
page
right
up.
We
want
to
explore.
We
talked
previously
about
the
permeable
pavement,
maybe
doing
a
pilot
project
somewhere.
G
G
F
M
F
I
think
we'll
certainly
do
the
research
I.
Think
then
the
question
is:
how
do
we
pick?
You
know?
Where
do
we
do
it
so
we'll
have
to
think
about
some
of
those
programs
or
kind
of
guidelines.
As
to
you
know,
I
could
see
a
huge
outpour
of
interest
in
people
wanting
to
do
some
sort
of
alley
beautification
or
doing
something
with
the
city.
So
how
do
we,
you
know
start
to
pick
and
choose
and
get
people
on
a
list
somehow
so
that
we're
not
overwhelmed
so
we'll
have
to
think
through.
D
F
We
will
continue
to
do
basically
what
we're
doing
right
now,
so
I
would
call
that
part
of
our
operating
budget.
So
we
periodically
and
again
it's
more
reactive
when
we
get
it
like
when
we
get
the
heavy
storm
or
down
tree
limbs,
we'll
go
out
and
take
care
of
those
things,
but
it's
on
a
reactive
basis.
So
we're
trying
to
twist
this
a
little
bit
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
proactive
in
terms
of
dealing
with
the
garbage
and
the
grading
and
some
of
the
other
issues
we've
experienced.
A
N
A
F
G
Agree
with
councilmember
Olson:
it
needs
to
be
split
out
because
there
people
already
think
that
we're
not
maintained
in
the
alleys
and
so
to
come
out
and
make
the
statement.
I
mean
these
are
the
things
that
we
end
up
voting
on
and
when
somebody
looks
back
at
the
documentation
they
said
well,
so
you
voted
on
you
weren't
going
to
maintain
the
alleys,
so
we
need
to
be
a
little
clearer
so
that
everybody
is
on
the
same
on
the
same
page.
B
G
To
that.
If
there's
been
a
problem
or
some
lack
of
upkeep,
that,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
holding
everybody
accountable
all
all
of
the
times,
because
we
don't
know
when
the
floods
gonna
happen
or
something's
going
to
happen.
So
how
are
you
working
together
with
code
to
address
those
issues?
Yeah.
F
That's
exactly
what
we've
been
talking
about
is:
how
do
we
identify
perhaps
where
we
have
mattresses?
You
know,
street
staff
is
out
quite
a
bit
during
the
day,
obviously
they're
there,
those
first
responder
eyes
and
ears
who
are
just
out
doing
maintenance.
So
how
do
we
have
them,
write
down
what
they're
noticing
and
get
it
back
to
code
enforcement
so
that
we
can
avoid
the
the
mattress
that
floods
our
rolls
down
the
alley
and
and
covers
the
inlet?
So
we're
talking
about
that
internally,
right
now,
within
pub.
G
And
I
think
a
lot
of
that
conversation
has
to
come
with
a
policy
decision
and
whether
we're
going
to
be
proactive
or
reactive
on
there,
because
we
don't
just
want
the
neighborhoods
where
people
are
willing
to
complain
on
each
other
to
be
the
safe
ones.
I
mean
you
don't
want
to
put
people
in
that
kind
of
position
and
we're
still
what
the
six
and
a
half
square
miles
that
code
enforcement
is
actually
out
just
as
much
there's
four
officers.
G
G
When
you
call
in
it
says
it's
a
reactive
thing,
so
if
we're
going
to
change
the
culture
of
that,
so
that
the
city
takes
a
little
bit
more
responsibility
of
enforcing
those
laws
and
holding
people
accountable,
I
think
we'll
be
better
off.
But
I'd
like
to
see
a
policy
come
forward
so
that
we
know
what's
going
on
Thanks.
A
That's
my
rant.
I
know
that
I
think
that
requires
a
discussion
by
us
to
to
say
that
it's
going
to
be
it
we're
going
to
switch
to
a
proactive
rather
than
this
mixed
method
that
we've
had
that's
been
really
unclear
to
people
so
I
agree.
I
would
love
to
see
us
do
something,
but
we
have
to
decide
together.
Is
that
the
direction
we
want
to
go
and
both
councilmember
Martinez
is
next
a
point
of
clarification.
G
For
what
you
said,
this
council
has
never
made
a
decision
that
it
was
proactive
or
reactive
right,
I
couldn't
find
anything
where
we
ever
voted,
that
we
would
allow
people
not
to
follow
the
law
or
expect
it
or
code
enforcement
not
to
enforce
it.
So
if
you
want
to
have
the
discussion,
that's
one
thing,
but
I
don't
want
it
put
in
a
in
a
format
as
if
the
council
ever
formally
made
some
kind
of
decision
on
that,
because
I
don't
think
we
could
account.
G
G
M
D
Along
the
lines
between
councilmember,
Martinez
and
councilmember,
Barrentine
I
agree
that
we
should
have
the
discussion
about
code
enforcement
and
I
do
believe
that
if
we
became
more
proactive
because
I
do
believe
code
enforcement
used
to
drive
through
the
alleys
and
identify
it
could
be,
then
the
communication
between
Public
Works
and
code
enforcement.
It
might
make
your
job
a
little
bit
easier
if
code
enforcement
was
reporting
to
you
areas
that,
because
you
know
the
delineation
between
what
is
code
enforcement
and
then
what
is
Public
Works
responsibilities
but
and
in2
councilmember
Martinez
a
point.
M
A
A
If
we
move
a
little
bit
more
directly
towards
you
know,
I,
remember
I,
do
remember
when
even
when
I
had
down
children
I
had
code,
that
would
put
things
on
my
door
and
say
you
know:
you've
got
things
out
on
your
sidewalk
or
something
that
the
kids
like
to
try
Kowt.
That
was
very
proactive
that
doesn't
happen
today.
So
what
would
it
take
to
get
to
that
level?
I.
F
Think
we'd
have
to
explore
that
internally,
you
know:
is
that
a
function
of
Communications
to
do
more
outreach
is
that
within
public
works
within
Police,
through
code
enforcement,
or
is
that
a
shared
responsibility
but
I
think
the
from
an
education
component?
You
know:
is
it
probably
developing
some
standard
materials
and
then
it's
distributing
them
through
the
code
enforcement
officers?
I
think
a
better
discussion
is
yeah.
F
What's
that
policy
level
that
the
council
wants
to
set,
and
then
how
do
we
get
the
word
out
in
different
formats
to
the
public,
so
door
hangers
and
then
it's
in
multiple
ways,
because
of
course
we
have
tenants
and
property
owners,
so
I
think
we
can
do
some
thinking
about
that.
I,
wouldn't
I,
don't
know
if
we
need
an
extra
person
in
this
way.
Thank.
A
F
So
as
few
members
experienced
on
the
night
of
the
24th
we
did
have
leaking
in
here
on
the
evening
of
the
storm
event,
and
we
have
over
the
past
several
years,
continued
to
see
roof
the
roof
leaking
and
the
windows
leaking
as
well,
during
not
only
heavy
storm
events.
Beware
which
comes
with
that
wind,
so
it's
driving
it
on
either
underneath
the
edge
of
the
windows
or
in
the
edges
or
over
different
areas
of
the
roof,
and
so
this
is
a
very
expensive
project.
We're
estimating
right
now.
F
Our
latest
estimate
is
2.1
million
dollars,
so
very
significant
and
as
it
says,
there
we're
it's
not
currently
funded,
and
but
yet
as
we
move
forward,
we
know
that
whether
it's
pay
me
now
or
pay
me
later
we're
going
to
have
some
sort
of
repairs
that
we're
going
to
have
to
fund
at
some
point,
and
so,
if
we
do
have
significant
leaking
that
will
have
to
come
from
contingency
at
this
point.
If
we
don't
move
forward
with
this
project,.
A
D
Per
to
muscle,
the
question
that
I
have
is:
we
are
the
tenants
we
have
a
landlord
when
we
have
a
leaky
roof
and
we're
a
tenant.
We
call
the
landlord
and
tell
them
to
replace
the
room.
So
I
mean
this
is
the
leased
building
so
from.
If
you
mean
yes,
if
needs
to
take
it
out
of
their
funds
to
pay
this,
we.
B
G
G
F
F
Was
to
get
us
in
the
ballpark,
you
know
what
are
we
talking
about
and
to
speak
here?
Comments,
councilmember,
Barrentine,
I,
believe
it's
a
combination
of
factors
mostly
due
to
the
the
conditions
of
construction
cost
material
cost,
increases
a
lot
of
that,
but
we'll
formalize
that
why
it
jumped
so
significantly
yeah.
G
And
just
to
make
it
clearer,
I
understand
that
anecdotally,
you
want
to
answer
it
now,
but
I
actually
want
it
documented,
because
I
believe
that
we
didn't
just
pluck
a
number
for
the
1.6
million
dollars
out
of
the
air
I.
Don't
think
somebody
just
came
up
with
that
number
so
and
I,
don't
think
you
just
plucked
this
number
out
of
the
air
too,
but
in
such
a
short
period
of
time
to
have
it
to
be
that
different
between
it,
but
if
it
could
be
documented,
I
would
appreciate
it.
I
A
M
G
A
A
question
about
the
in
the
meantime
the
roof
is
leaking.
It
does
leak
even
when
we
just
have
of
just
a
heavy
storm.
What
happens
with
the
snow
that
could
come?
Do
you
know
that
that
touchpoints,
where
it's
probably
going
to
come
in,
and
can
we
do
some
like
stop
gaps
or
have
we
been
that's
when
I
know
that's
creeping
all
on
and
then
the
second
question
is:
if
we're
talking
about
doing
the
whole
roof,
how
does
that
play
into
the
future
of
the
building
and
our
possibilities
beyond
once
we're
done
paying
for
the
debt.
A
That
question
the
second
one
was:
what
happens
if
we
do,
if
we
do
the
roof
is
that
in
the
best
interest
long-term,
if
once
the
debt
is
done
in
the
building,
what
happens
to
it?
What
if
someone
would
have
you
know?
Who
knows
what
could
happen?
There's
a
lot
of
future.
That's
up
in
the
air
I
know,
that's
partly
why
we've
been
probably
doing
the
band-aids
on
it.
F
I
think
that's
exactly
the
trade-offs
that
were
experiencing,
so
what
we're
saying
now
is
without
committing
to
the
2.1
million
we'd,
be
looking
at
these
kind
of
periodic.
You
know
get
us
by
kind
of
things:
the
band-aids
or
if
we
experience
a
catastrophic
sort
of
failure,
let's
say
a
large
snow
load
or
something
that
caused
a
significant
leak.
Then
we'd
have
to
take
that
out
of
contingency
funds,
and
we
have
to
be
prepared
for
that.
Knowing
that
we're
pushing
this
off,
if
we
choose
not
to
move
forward.
A
C
G
L
Answer
that
question
in
that
we
did
have
an
Assessor
from
Sirsa,
did
come
out
and
examine
this
roof
last
year
to
reevaluate
the
valuation
of
our
building,
so
they
noted
the
condition
at
that
point
in
time.
So
when
we
had
the
storm
on
the
24th,
we
actually
had
search
to
come
back
out
again
because
we
said
we
had
a
roof
failure.
They
said
we
looked
at
your
roof
condition
and
it's
because
of
deferred
maintenance,
not
because
of
failure.
L
L
G
Long
life,
then
he
also
mentioned
that
it
was
deferred
maintenance
and
that's
why
the
insurance
wouldn't
cover
it.
So
could
we
please
get
the
information
on
exactly
the
type
of
maintenance
that
we've
done
to
keep
this
building
and
whether
we've
done
that
properly
or
not,
because
if
we
haven't
really
I
mean
if
they're
claiming
that
we
were
not
entitled
to
our
assure
insurance,
because
we've
deferred
the
maintenance
on
it
and
didn't
keep
our
building
properly,
then
maybe
they
got
a
good
point.
G
I
don't
know,
but
we
need
to
be
aware
of
that,
so
that
we
know
what
we're
facing
here
so
I'd
appreciate
it.
I,
really
don't
think
anybody
wants
to
walk
around
here
for
the
next
seven
years
with
umbrellas,
so
we're
gonna
have
to
do
something
when,
where
the
other,
because
this
building
won't
be
paid
off
for
a
while
seven
years-
is
a
little
bit
much
to
put
up
with
that
kind
of
thing
or
expect
our
employees
to
deal
with
it.
F
I,
don't
think
we're
talking
about
deferred
maintenance
will
certainly
get
those
details
for
you.
I
think
it's
similar
to
you
to
like
my
roof
at
home.
If
it's
supposed
to
last
for
30
years
and
it
lasts
for
30
years,
I
have
to
pay
to
replace
it,
not
the
insurance
company,
but
if
I
got
hail
last
year,
like
I
did
then
the
insurance
company
pays
for
it
and
I
happy
to
get
a
new
roof.
I'm.
G
F
Finally,
the
dry
Gulch
floodplain
mitigation
project,
so
this
is
the
large
21
million
dollars
is
the
estimated
cost
at
this
point.
Obviously,
that
could
be
broken
down
into
smaller
phases
and
if
we
wanted
to
implement
that-
and
we
have
already
spoken-
because
that
was
done
in
conjunction
with
urban
drainage
in
the
Flood
Control
District-
that
they
would
participate
in
that
so
I
don't
want
to
get
too
excited,
usually
their
their
contribution
is
probably
in
that
half
million
to
a
million
dollar
range
over
a
couple
of
years.
F
So
we're
not
looking
at
like
a
50/50
split
or
anything
like
that.
But
at
this
point
this
we're
looking
at
there's
is
no
source
of
funding
and
not
moving
forward
with
this
project
at
this
time.
Similarly,
as
we
talked
about
last
week
at
this
time,
we
have
very
limited
funding
within
the
stormwater
fund,
and
so
therefore,
until
we
do
further
studying
we're
making
very
few
improvements
to
the
storm
sewer
system,
airports.
D
And
Russell
so
can
I
ask
if
that
means
in
reference
to
the
storm
sewer
system
on
Broadway
and
a
coma
and
Bannock,
so
that
response
there
and
and
here's
my
concern.
So
we
have
this
scenario
that
we
could
have
a
catastrophic
failure
on
the
roof
of
this
building
and
that's
the
reason
to
go
ahead
and
move
forward
with
this.
What
if
we
have
another
catastrophic
storm
and
those
people
down,
there
are
hit
again
and
here's
the
problem.
D
We
have
not
spent
a
dime
and
now
we're
not
going
to
spend
a
dime
either
and
those
people
are
not
happy
and
so
I
have
been
saying
for
the
entire
time
I've
been
on
council,
we
have
got
to
stop
spending
on
everything
other
than
infrastructure.
One
of
the
women
that
spoke
at
City
Council
last
week
suggested
that
this
council
stop
all
building
until
the
infrastructure
is
prepared
to
handle.
D
F
Think
one
of
the
just
to
address
that
I
think
our
recommendation
last
week
was
to
move
forward
with
rece
re-evaluating
the
storm
sewer
system
in
that
study
and
those
funds
would
be
taken
from
the
storm
sewer
fund,
of
which
we
have
about
a
1.3
million
dollar
balance.
If
I
remember
correctly,
and
so
that
wasn't
part
of
this
cap,
we
did
not
identify
any
capital
improvements
in
this
presentation
tonight.
A
G
Think
at
the
presentation
you
said
that
the
study
was
going
to
take
at
least
a
year,
maybe
a
team
on
something
like
that.
I
think
that
that's
on
top
of
the
information
that
was
already
provided
in
1999
is
not
sitting
well
with
the
community.
Considering
what
happened?
They
don't
believe
that
that
was
a
hundred
year.
Flood
I
mean
what
happened
in
that
very
in
a
very
concentrated
area.
I
mean,
like
councilmember
Russell,
said
before:
they've
been
had
flooding
before
and
so
I
think
we
do
need
to
address.
G
I'm,
a
little
sooner
scale
on
have
some
conversation
on
how
we're
going
to
take
care
of
some
of
them
now
part
of
it.
Part
of
that
I
thought
was
some
good
suggestions.
I,
don't
think
I've
seen
the
I've
been
a
little
busy
I,
don't
know
if
her
list
of
things
that
she
suggested
has
have
been
distributed
to
council
yet
I
mean.
M
A
N
G
G
G
So
if
we
could
have
a
little
bit
of
a
debrief
on
what
we
experienced,
what
we
heard
from
people
along
with
the
community
on
what
they
experienced
in
the
problems
that
they
had
along
with
some
staff
on
experience,
you
know
problems
that
they
think
so
that
we
could
have
a
little
bit
more
robust
debrief
of
exactly
what
happened.
I
think
might
help
us
to
move
forward
in
the
short
term
of
what's
going
on
in.
A
G
And
in
that
case,
that
gives
me
one
more
if,
when
those
things
happen
and
our
requests
or
somebody
could
communicate
him
to
me,
that
then
I
might
not
have
to
ask
the
question
the
other
thing.
The
hundred
million
dollars
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
that
was
a
correction
that
we
got
that
the
hundred
million
dollars
it's
listed
on
this
total
project
cost
for
the
dry
Gulch
floodplain
was
listed
at
approximately
one
hundred
million
dollars.
That's
for
the
entire
project,
including
the
Denver
piece
of
it.
C
G
I
just
want
to
clarify
for
the
public
that
I
assume
that
the
documents
that
are
on
the
site
now
show
it
at
the
21
million
dollars.
Okay,
cuz
I
have
to
admit
when
I
first
saw
that
I
go
wow
if
I
thought
the
roof
cost
jumped
by
a
lot.
This
one
a
lot
in
a
very
short
period
of
time
since
we
talked
to
so.
Thank
you
for
that
correct,
and
so
that's
only
29.
G
A
G
Piece
of
the
once
we
get
this
list.
How
soon
do
you
think
we
can
have
some
kind
of
debrief
with
all
of
us
so
that
we
could
go
ahead
and
move
forward
with
at
least
some
ideas
on
what
we
can
do
in
the
short
term,
while
we're
waiting
a
year
to
18
months
to
do
yet
another
study
to
find
out
what
we're
going
to
do
on
the
longer
term.
L
Thank
you,
I
didn't
realize
we're
gonna
have
this
discussion
now
and
that's
completely
fine,
so
I,
don't
think
anybody
has
sat
around
waited
and
not
tried
to
prepare
for
what
transpired
you
know
on
the
24th
I
think
we've
been
working
towards
that
so
towards
that
end,
I
know
that
our
public
works
director
and
our
engineering
staff
and
Public
Works
have
already
met
with
a
firm
Ekans
to
discuss
a
scope
of
work
for
a
study
and
I'm
uncertain.
You
know
I,
don't
believe
it
was
18
months.
L
It's
gonna
take
him
to
do
the
study
with
six
months.
It's
still
a
long
period
of
time
and
I
get
that
we
have
looked
and
taken
a
comprehensive
analysis
of
the
two
that
are
the
1998-1999
reports
and
and
while
those
came
forward,
I
think
if
you
were
to
actually
read
into
it
in
any
great
detail,
you
see
within
the
report
itself.
It
says,
while
these
recommendations
are
being
made
further
study
and
analysis
needs
to
be
done
and
performed
before
these
improvements
are
made
there
HEC
Raz
model,
which
is
you
as
a
hydrological
engineering
model.
L
That's
used
to
determine
stormwater
had
three
pages
of
exceptions
and
errors.
So
that's
why
again,
that
particular
study
by
TCB,
the
Turner,
Kiley
and
Braden
report,
says
further
studies
necessary.
It's
also
important
to
recognize
and
know,
there's
been
some
criticism,
and
maybe
rightfully
so
from
the
public
to
say.
Why
didn't
something
happen
back
in
1999
with
these
improvements,
but
we
have
to
work
in
concert
with
the
urban
drainage
and
flood
control.
L
As
you
recall,
from
looking
at
the
maps
that
we
provided
to
you
last
week,
you
saw
that
it
showed
basically
Englewood,
but
it
showed
water
coming
from
outside
of
Englewood
into
Englewood.
This
is
a
regional
issue,
so
we're
taking
on
water
from
Cherry,
Hills,
Village
and
Greenwood
Village
that
enter
our
into
our
Basin
and
specifically
the
area
that
the
that
you
know
heretofore
hasn't
been
identified
as
a
flood
hazard
area
that
hat
had
water
and
water
hazards.
So
staff
is
working
on
this.
L
We
expect
to
have
a
scope
of
work
this
week
that
we
will
then
be
formulating
into
a
professional
services
program
to
bring
forward
this
particular
engineering
firm
works
hand-in-hand
with
urban
drainage
and
flood
control.
It's
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
sought
them
out
and
will
bring
forth
an
agreement
to
move
forward,
to
get
an
updated
study
of
our
infrastructure
and
how
we
can
mitigate
this
in
the
future.
L
Continuous
continuing
with
this
particular
vein
of
conversation,
what
I
was
going
to
enunciate
to
the
council
is
that
staff
is
currently
working
with
the
State
Emergency
Management
Office,
as
well
as
FEMA,
to
identify
flood
hazard
mitigation
funding
and
whether
or
not
flood
hazard
mitigation
grants
could
help
with
both
the
study
of
the
storm
water
system.
In
addition
to
construction,
and
so
we're
hoping
to
maybe
file
on
the
grant
cycle.
L
For
that,
and
so
that
cycle
is
pretty
tight,
so
we're
trying
to
look
look
at
that
to
see
if
we
can
actually
obtain
some
federal
funds
as
well
or
state
funds
to
help
with
this,
because,
obviously,
as
we
experienced
in
the
24th
and
as
we
have
experienced
the
past
couple
years
with
northeast
Englewood
flooding,
flooding
is
a
it's
a
vulnerability
that
our
community
is
facing.
So
work
is
ongoing.
L
I
will
say
that
we
do
have,
and
it
was
on
the
agenda
shown
for
next
week
on
the
20th
during
that
six
o'clock
hour,
that
we
wanted
to
have
a
debrief
on
flooding.
While
it's
only
an
hour,
it's
still
an
opportunity
for
gathering
some
of
the
feedback
that
member
Barrentine,
the
others
on
council
have
requested.
So
we
believe
that's
the
start
of
a
longer-term
conversation,
because
unfortunately,
there
isn't
a
quick
solution
for
this
and
for
us
to
move
forward
again.
L
Iva
stated
this
last
week,
but
I
think
it
got
lost
if
we
were
to
move
forward
with
what
was
recommended
in
the
TCB
report
from
1998
and
1999.
Putting
pipe
in
the
ground
doesn't
help
us
putting
pipe
in
the
ground
that
pipe
has
to
go
someplace
an
outfall
someplace
and
that
someplace
is
the
Platte
River.
L
If
we're
going
to
be
pushing
additional
pipe
into
the
river,
that's
going
to
require
a
corps
of
engineer,
approval,
which
is
very,
very
lengthy,
I
think
there
are
other
alternatives
that
we
need
to
allow
the
professional
engineers
both
with
our
public
works
department,
but
more
specifically
with
app
Connect
amend.
What
can
we
do
to
detain
water
that
then
could
be
released
through
existing
floodways
that
are
that
are
available
through
us
through
the
unit,
the
urban
drainage
and
flood
control
district,
as
well
as
the
Southwest
Greenbelt
or
wherever
else
and
and
again.
L
And
specifically,
you
know,
like
the
Northeast
Englewood
area,
nothing
can
be
done
until
we
can
connect
to
a
system
unless
we
built
a
deep,
deep
sister
in
someplace.
That's
that's
a
humongous
that
can
handle
thousands
of
a
graffiti
of
water
and
that's
not
plausible
or
practical,
in
an
urban
environment
which
was
already
built
out
so
I
think
some
points
have
been
raised
tonight
that
require
you
know
further
study.
Certainly
the
the
development
question
as
to
whether
or
not,
as
is
our
storm
water
being
detained
on
a
individual
development
site.
L
L
That's
the
intent
and
so
okay,
one
of
the
things
that
we
will
want
to
do
again.
One
of
the
mayor
and
the
mayor
pretend
me
tomorrow,
is
to
kind
of
gain
some
direction
for
advertising
this,
to
make
sure
that
people
understand
they
can
come
out
and
and
make
comment
there,
which,
aside
from
just
the
the
time
during
that
the
City
Council
meeting
normally
set
aside
for
public
comment,
I
did.
C
A
Have
perspectives
each
one
of
us
I
visited,
you
know
close
to
30
homes
after
the
fact
a
week
later,
and
some
have
called
me
since
they
were
all
gathering
data
that
an
input
that
I
think
is
really
important
for
different
stages.
I,
don't
think
we
could
pull
off
a
really
good
forum
at
that
quick
of
a
notice
and
I
wasn't
talking.
G
In
a
fairness,
I
wasn't
talking
about
a
forum.
I
was
talking
about
having
some
key
representatives
from
maybe
the
different
areas
that
could
sit
at
the
table
as
part
of
the
debrief
of
the
experiences
that
they
had,
along
with
what
we
had
so
that
we
could
go
ahead
and
get
that
process
started.
I
was
not
talking
about
a
forum
yeah.
A
O
Wink
the
city
manager
Keck
answered
the
second
question
regarding
just
waiting
on
Denver
the
aspect,
the
dry
cold,
so
I
guess.
My
first
question
is
one
and
it's
true
of
a
lot
of
the
slides
that
we
have
within
the
presentation
is
that
they
just
prop
they
provide
a
total
number
and
don't
really
provide
like
an
atomized
breakdown.
Or
what
are
you
know?
You
even
send
it
earlier
direct
D'andrea
about.
There
are
certain
aspects
of
the
dry
Gulch
floodplain
that
we
can
do
in
steps.
F
Don't
know
I
would
have
to
check
on
that
I'm
not
familiar
enough
with
the
project.
I.
Think
the
question
is
we
convolve
to
manager
qex
point?
We
could
certainly
build
those
pipes.
Would
they
provide
any
relief?
Is
the
question
so
I
to
clarify
my
previous
point?
We
could
certainly
go
through
that
work
and
do
the
design
and
do
the
construction,
but
would
people
actually
see
any
benefit
at
this
point
so.
O
L
Until
such
time
they
would
have
the
funding
available
to
make
and
move
forward
with
their
drainage
project,
and
that
was
starting
to
move
forward.
But
Dow
has
been
dropped
off
with
the
change
in
leadership
with
Denver,
Public
Works,
and
so
we
hope
to
be
able
to
rebuild
and
rekindle
that
relationship
where
we
can
talk
to
them
about
potential
solutions.
But
the
answer
right
now,
in
the
absence
of
being
able
to
drain
the
water
into
the
South
Platte
River,
is
to
detain
the
water
someplace.
So
the
tension
is,
is
the
answer.
It's
not.
G
To
councilmember
Sierra's
question
and
I
really
appreciate
that
you
asked
that
you
answered
again
that
for
what
the
city
manager
said,
that
we
could
build
pipes,
but
we
have
to
have
someplace
to
hook
it
up
to
and
then,
when
you
answered
it
gave
me
the
impression
that
can
we
afford
to
build
our
section
of
it
right
now
we
have
that
money.
Is
that
the
piece
of
it
I
mean?
Can
we
really
just
build
our
section
of
it
and
just
wait
for
Denver
to
know.
G
Really
can't
we
really
can't
just
build
our
section,
we
don't
have
we
have
we
don't
have
the
money
we
haven't
budgeted
the
money
to
do
any
of
that
piece
of
it
so
I
mean
I.
Think
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
a
little
bit
more
clear
about
that.
It's
not
like.
We
were
sitting
on
the
funds
waiting
for
Denver
to
do
their
piece
of
it
and
and
I
think
that's
it
kind
of
can
be
confusing
or
little
misleading
on
that
and
the
other.
G
We
looked
at
some
other
sections,
like
the
golf
course
for
a
retention
of
water,
so
maybe
for
the
newer
councilmembers.
You
know
to
get
a
little
bit
more
any
of
being
a
new
director
as
well
for
us
I'll,
get
kind
of
a
little
bit
more
up
to
speed
and
have
another
session
on
that
because
it
is
giving
it
gave
me.
The
impression
I'm
sure
would
give
the
public
the
impression
that
we've
got
our
portion
of
the
money
already
and
we're
being
held
up
by
other
entities
and
that
that
really
isn't
the
case.
I.
B
L
N
L
L
I'm,
just
throwing
this
out
there
I
just
talked
to
some
school
board
members
at
the
Charles
Tate
opening
right
about
hey,
taking
down
the
school
right.
We
partner
with
you
to
look
at
using
that
as
a
detention
basin
right
small
mind
you
right
with
that.
Would
that
work
and
I
think
it's
stringing
enough
of
us
together
right
that
might
help
to
mitigate
you
know,
flooding
in
some
of
those
areas
and
not
much
that
may
require
piping
it
to
there.
C
L
K
N
O
N
N
O
L
O
L
L
O
O
N
N
L
N
L
L
A
O
C
C
A
N
A
O
E
E
C
B
A
H
These
are
projects
that
were
not
funded
in
2019.
The
Pirates
Cove
central
play
structure
needs
replacement,
its
original
equipment
about
15
years
old,
and
the
parts
from
the
original
manufacturer
no
longer
available
to
make
repairs.
So
we've
had
to
take
out
a
few
a
few
of
the
features
again
in
terms
of
looking
at
our
criteria
for
projects.
H
It
is
very
safe
now,
but
if
it
it
may
not,
last
long
I
would
never
want
to
risk
the
health
and
safety
of
the
children
who
come
to
Pirates.
Cove
I'd
like
to
be
proactive
on
that
one.
It
also
will
help
with
our
revenue
enhancement.
Keeping
the
amenity
of
pirate
Cove
fresh
and
competitive
in
this
market
would
be
a
top
priority.
H
We
are,
we
have
saved
over
approximately
10
years
money
in
the
Conservation
Trust
Fund,
building
up
that
fund
to
be
able
to
put
some
money
towards
the
replacement
you
can
see
there
about
nine
hundred
and
twenty
seven
thousand
give
or
take
a
thousand
or
two,
and
so
we're
asking
the
723
to
complete
the
project
at
current
estimates,
because
we
had
to
make
some
priority
choices.
We
schedule
this
for
2021.
H
Instead
of
immediately
another
deferred
project
is
improvements
to
Cushing
Park
again
that
was
listed
in
our
Parks
and
Rec
master
plan
as
one
of
our
top
priorities.
The
total
project
cost
is
roughly
five
point,
five
to
five
point:
seven:
five
million,
depending
on
when
there
were
it's
done
because
of
limited
funding,
we
suggest
pushing
off
the
design
work
to
begin
in
2023
to
come
up
with
construction
drawings
and
suggest
that
we
have
the
rest
of
the
money
five
years
down
the
road.
H
Additional
deferred
projects-
Romans
Park,
has
been
discussed
a
lot
right
now.
It
is
not
listed
in
the
five-year
capital
improvement
pan
plan
at
all,
because
it
was
not
one
of
the
top
priorities
and
the
master
plan
we
all
of
our
priorities,
but
the
top
priorities
and
I
should
reiterate
that
in
the
master
plan,
we're
for
pushing
Park
for
jason
park
and
for
miller
fields
and
the
dry
creek
improvements,
little
dry
creek
at
the
Plaza
and
for
improvements
at
our
rec
centers.
H
So
but
most
of
the
park
projects
are,
you
know,
somewhere
in
the
vicinity
of
two
point,
four
to
five
million
dollars,
which
obviously
would
take
up
a
big
chunk
of
the
five
million
dollars
available.
So
most
of
those
have
been
deferred.
We
have
no
money
in
the
2020
to
23
capital
projects
for
building
up
a
fund
to
deal
with
emerald
ash
borer.
We
had
put
it
aside,
$50,000
in
this
year's
capital
budget,
which
will
stay
to
help
mitigate
that
unless
council
decides
to
reallocate
those
funds.
Yes,
that's
a
member,
see
it
so.
O
O
You
know
just
based
on
you
know
where
we
have
basically
5
million,
that
we're
setting
aside
for
capital
projects
for
the
city
overall
for
this
year
for
2019.
So
when
exactly
would
we
get
to
these
projects?
And
since
these
are
the
high
dollar,
since
these
are
a
high
dollar?
Is
there
anything
that
we
can
do
to
just
do
it
piecemeal
or
there's
something
more
important
that
we
could
be
doing
a
percussion
part
or
for
Romans
part?
O
H
That
requires
more
infrastructure
because
they're
talking
about
moving
part
of
the
parking
lot
and
those
become
expensive
projects.
So
we
can
do
some
smaller
things
and
you
know
certainly
our
regular
Park
maintenance
budget.
You
know
we
try
to
address
weeds
and
graffiti
and
all
those
sorts
of
things,
but
in
terms
of
you
know
the
infrastructure
and
the
irrigation
improvements
that
we
need.
There's
no
way
to
pretend
that
those
are
affordable.
Given
our
current
budget.
D
H
D
A
D
H
At
that
point,
the
the
other
question
I
mean
it
depends
on
what
you
do
if
you
just
cut
down
the
trees,
that's
expensive
enough
when
you're
dealing
with
emerald
ash
borer,
because
you
have
to
dispose
of
the
tree
and
a
very
careful
manner,
because
communities
are
quarantined
at
slightly
to
the
expense,
but
then
there's
a
question
of
replacing
the
tree
with
another
species
that
is
not
subject
to
this
disease.
So
it
will
be
expensive.
I
will
add
that
I
think
the
the
response,
the
quite
reasonable
response
of
our
community
to
a
natural
disaster.
H
H
To
build
up
a
small
fund
would
help
help
us
deal
with
it
at
that
point,
because
we,
you
know
we
would
have
a
couple
of
years
if,
if
it
the
disease
has
discovered
nearby
or
in
our
in
our
city
to
deal
with
it,
does
that
help
to
answer
your
question?
We'd
have
to
get
more
specific
about
exactly
how
much
it
would
cost
right.
D
G
H
Are
but
we
we
don't
have
enough
funding
in
our
regular
budget
to
take
care
of
all
the
ash
trees
on
public
land
as
far
as
going
ahead
and
spraying
them
well
spraying.
We
were
not
spraying
at
this
point
that
you
know:
I'm,
not
a
professional
arborist
I'd
be
first
to
point
that
out,
but
my
understanding
is
that
keeping
the
tree
healthy
is
number
one
and
there
there's
not
a
scientific
consensus
that
spraying
the
trees
with
pesticides
on
a
regular
basis
is
necessary.
If
there's
not
clear
indication
that
the
disease
is
very
close
by
right.
G
D
D
G
Information,
so
that
everybody
can
make
an
informed
decision
understanding
where
our
open
space
money
is
going.
We
have
open
space
money
that
is
already
committed
in
future
years.
Still
don't
we,
and
so
when
people
say
they
just
want
to
get
the
open
space
money.
Some
of
that
has
been
committed
into
the
future,
so
how
much
of
that
has
been
committed
and
what
exactly
we're
looking
at
to
use
our
portion
of
open
space
or
open
space
grant
requests,
and
what
we're
focusing
on
doing
that?
M
M
C
A
H
Them
we
we
tried
to
put
updated
articles,
especially
from
the
Denver
forestry,
and
they
call
it
a
state
Extension
Office
on
our
website
to
keep
that
updated
so
that
people
can
look
at
update
it.
I,
don't
know
that
we've
talked
necessarily
about
you
know
mitigation
in
terms
of
your
personal
ash,
trees,
except
you
know
what
is
effective
and
what's
not,
and
where
to
look
for
good
information,
so
I'll
make
sure
that
that
information
is
up-to-date.
What's.
G
To
councilmember
Ciara
brought
up
since
the
there's
totals
without
more
detail
on,
what's
being
put
out
for
each
section
for
each
Park.
Considering
we've
had
some
additional
issues
come
up
with,
say:
brahmin's
Park.
Is
there
an
opportunity
for
us
to
go
ahead
and
reevaluate
some
of
the
priorities
that
we
might
have
with
that
parks,
master
plan.
H
G
H
G
Which
I
know
everybody
enjoys
and
I
mean
ya,
know
it's
it.
The
one
little
park,
I
got
my
I
mean
yeah,
it
did
it
did
well,
but
it
also
came
up
because
of
the
sale
of
the
property
that
used
to
be
school
property,
and
so
there
was
a
catalyst
for
that
to
kind
of
make
that
happen
a
little
bit
different
and
it
is
one
of
the
projects.
That's
using
funding,
still
I
believe
into
the
future
for
Duncan.
B
G
G
H
Will
say
that
the
the
one
park
we
have
very
good
costing
data
on
because
we've
studied
it
and
done
a
good
conceptual
design
and
gotten
not
bids.
Certainly
we
haven't
gone
out
to
be
is
pushing
and
those
you
know
like
I
can
tell
you
exactly
what
it
cost
to
move
the
streetlights.
You
know
type
of
thing
in
that
net
park,
so
we
could
we
that
in
part
could
be
phased
and
that's.
G
E
H
B
So
moving
forward,
we've
talked
at
several
different
meetings
about
needing
additional
funding
to
help
with
the
infrastructure.
We've
talked
about
using
fund
balance,
later
funds,
Englewood
McLellan
reservoir,
lease
funds
and
they're
the
requests
that
we
brought
forward.
We
were
asked
to
bring
forward
specific
projects
that
this
would
cover.
So
in
response,
we
have
the
alternative
CIP,
which
is
requesting
an
additional
2.1
million
in
funds
in
2019,
and
the
use
of
the
Emer
for
I
should
say
the
dedication
of
the
Emer
fleece
proceeds
of
million
dollars
a
year
to
through
2020
through
2023.
F
H
We
would
also
suggest
doing
some
of
the
work
on
roman's
Park.
It's
not
the
complete
park,
design,
we've
got
some
rejected
phasing
and
we
think
the
first
phase
of
the
project
would
cost
about
2.7
million,
including
doing
that
lovely
retaining
wall
and
the
design
work.
We
could
complete
in
2020
and
finish
this
phase
of
the
project
in
2021.
E
Director
Hargrove,
so
could
you
kindly
help
me
understand
why,
in
the
alternative
plan,
the
highly
prioritized
Cushing
Park
work
of
total
five
point?
Seven:
five
million
delayed
past
twenty
twenty
three,
yet
Romans
Park,
two
point:
seven
million
for
this
first
piece
of
it
gets
on
the
list
in
your
parks
plan.
E
Romans
Park
is
ninth
on
this
list.
If
the
additional
park
and
recreation
improvements
is
in
priority
order,
Romans
is
ninth
on
the
list
and,
as
you
just
mentioned
a
minute
ago,
we
have
Cushing
Jason
Miller
and
little
Dry
Creek
Greenway,
in
the
priority
order
of
where
you
prioritize
the
needs
for
parks
based
on
your
needs
assessment.
Any
other
assessments
you
conducted
so
is
it
because
Romans
with
this
smaller
amount
of
funding,
you
can
accomplish
more.
This
kind
of
ties
into
the
previous
conversations
about
parks.
E
H
H
E
This
is
about
citizens
and
data.
Of
course,
not
my
personal
opinion,
however.
I
live
in
District,
one
I
just
drove
my
Romans
the
other
day.
It's
a
lovely
park,
it
has
benches
yes,
some
of
the
structures
might
be
a
little
older,
but
it's
so
lovely.
It's
such
a
lovely
park
it.
It
was
interesting
because
in
the
first
of
our
two
budget
meetings,
the
other
day
there
was
a
particular
citizen
who
was
there
advocating
for
redevelopment
of
Romans
and
citing
you
know
she
has
young
children
and
citing
some
reasons.
Why?
H
H
E
M
F
So
the
a
lot
of
the
windows
would
be
replaced
or
reglazed,
and
if
you
see
in
certain
areas,
there's
the
glass
block
a
lot
of
that
is
leaking
as
well,
and
so
it's
it's
sealing
up
all
of
those
seams
and
then
the
the
covering
of
the
building,
which
is
sort
of
a
the
material
used
also
has
seams
in
it.
That
would
be
sealed
and
protected
and
or
replaced
to
protect
all
those
areas
from
water
intrusion
exactly
with.
F
G
So
I
really
hope
that
we
I
mean
I,
share
your
frustration,
councilmember
wink
that
that's,
that
seems
to
be
a
little
bit.I
decision-making
process
in
order
to
all
of
a
sudden
move.
Something
up
that
looks
like
it
wasn't
in
the
priority
base
and
everything
I
respect
to
people
that
have
to
use
that
Park
and
I
respect
their
opinion
of
it.
I
don't
use
it
a
lot,
so
I'm
going
to
defer
to
their
better
judgment
that
they
think
there
needs
to
be
improvements
there,
that
that's
fine.
G
G
We
don't
really
have
the
money
to
do
the
whole
house,
so
we're
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
defer
that
money,
and
then
those
people
in
that
area
have
to
believe
that
when
are
we
ever
going
to
really
have
that
pot
of
money
where
it
can
all
be
done
and
it's
just
going
to
keep
getting
deferred
because
they
want
to
do
the
whole
thing.
So
I'd
like
to
see
us
have
a
little
bit
better
logic
piece
on
how
we're
gonna
do
this.
G
H
A
A
E
E
K
Thank
you
taking
pirate's
Grove
out
of
the
equation.
What
is
the
life
expectancy
once
we've
done
an
upgrade
on
a
park?
How
often
should
we
be
having
an
upgrade
every
one
of
these
parks?
It
seems
like
they're
all
coming
to
simultaneously
Duncan
was
recent
or
totals
recent
I
know.
Jason
parks
got
some
grant
improvements
coming
along,
but
I
go
down
the
list
I'm
like
which
Park
isn't
on
there.
It
seems
like
they're,
all
simultaneous.
K
H
Caught
caught
up,
I
mean
the
problem
is
that
most
of
our
parks
have
not
had
major
infrastructure
improvement
in
so
many
years.
That
there's
there's
a
lot.
You
know,
like
our
irrigation
system,
I
keep
bringing
that
up,
but
almost
I
think
all
of
our
parks
except
Duncan,
need
we
need
to
reach
wrench
and
reira
gate
and
those
are
expensive
projects
and
if
you're
going
to
you
know,
dig
up
that
move
all
the
sod.
Do
everything
that's
necessary.
That's
when
you
should
do
other
landscaping
and
improvements
to
the
project.
H
That's
that's
one
piece,
but
it's
that
type
of
thing
I
mean
what
we're.
What
we're
looking
at
is
a
deferral
of
capital
investment
in
our
parks.
For
many
many
years,
if
we
were
caught
up,
I
mean
our
irrigation
systems
are
40
years
old.
How
long
would
a
new
one
last
I'm
not
sure
how
long
does
a
playground
last?
It
depends
on
a
lot
of
things,
but
certainly
not.
We
wouldn't
have
to
do
major
infrastructure
repair.
H
K
H
H
The
problem
was,
we
had
one
area
where
the
irrigation
controls
broke,
so
we
fixed
that,
but
not
the
irrigation
system
itself
and
it
was
the
extremely
dry
temperature
come
try
winter,
that
we
had
the
continued
heavy
use
by
our
Athletics
field,
rentals
and
the
general
public
in
that
Park,
frankly,
denuded,
the
turf.
So
we
had
to
close
that
area
and
Jason
just
to
put
new
seed
in
and
grow,
but
the
irrigation
system
was
not
reap.
Okay,.
C
D
In
like
when
we
do
Cushing
Park,
do
we
in
that
price?
Does
it
include
the
ear
replacing
the
irrigation
system
you
betcha,
so
I
mean
what
would
happen
if
we,
the
money
that
we
were
going
to
spend
on
Romans
park,
the
2.7
million
or
whatever
was
set
aside
so
that
Cushing
Park
could
be
totally
done
next
year?
Is
that
that's.
H
E
You
now
that
I
see
that
we're
at
the
final
slide,
I
want
to
add
a
couple
of
other
details
about
what
we've
discussed
here
tonight.
So
I
do
want
to
say
on
the
record.
I
I
am
also
uncomfortable
with
the
mill
funding
plan
from
it
for
the
emerald
ash,
borer
prevention
and
mitigation
in
the
CIP
or
the
alternate
CIP,
and
one
note
on
little
dry,
creek
Plaza.
E
O
E
E
C
C
L
Dry
creek
closet
down
here
on
Broadway
and
Hampton.
The
only
thing
that
we
are
proposing
to
do
in
2019
is
to
put
a
trash
grate
over
the
inlet,
where
the
Fabri
dam
currently
resides
used
to
reside
yeah
the
Fabri
dam
used
to
reside
so
now
that
would
be
closed
up,
so
that
would
help
to
keep
folks
from
entering
that
box
culvert
for
safety
reasons,
it
does
not
include
the
redesign
of
that
Plaza.
E
Yeah,
which
is
which
includes
a
lot
the
recommendations
for
a
little
dry
creek,
so
my
point,
just
just
a
stateful
record-
is
that
it's
a
pretty
visible
part
of
our
city,
that's
hugely
visible
and
as
population
growth
I
mean
it's
part
of
our
it
part
of
it
encompasses
our
main.
Drag
radar
have
been
correct
and
I
feel
it
might
be
a
missed
opportunity
in
terms
of
our
potential
business
development
as
population
grows
eyes.
Maybe
more
traffic
flows
through
especially
on
hand
in
there
and
Broadway
to
not
tend
to
these.
E
However,
I
mean
I
I've
been
here.
The
whole
night
I
do
know
we're
not
operating
with
the
surplus
of
cash
here,
but
it's
hard
for
me
not
to
mention
that
it
seems
like
a
missed
opportunity
to
not
develop
aesthetically
develop
that
area.
It
looks
so
much
sadder
than
it
did
ten
years
ago.
Even
and
your
recommendations
are
fantastic,
I
think
here
in
the
parks,
the
master
plan,
I
love.
What
I
see
written
here
if.
H
I
could
add
to
that.
Then
we
had
set
aside
some
money
to
replace
the
Fabri
dam
when
it
became
clear
that
in
in
the
open
space
fund,
when
it
became
clear
that
replacing
the
Fabri
dam
was
much
more
expensive
than
possible,
we
spent
a
little
bit
of
that
money
on
a
study
for
updated
design
and
the
public
works
group
has
been
helping
us
on
that.
So
we
do
have
some
conceptual
designs
of
what
that
would
look
like
which
build
on
the
master
plan.
We
shared
those
with
the
Parks
and
Rec
Commission
to
get
their
feedback.
H
E
C
G
Here,
you're
kind
of
mixing
two
things
that
early
the
taper
is
the
is
the
reserve
that's
by
the
state
by
the
constitutional
and
that's
the
reserve.
The
later
fund
was
an
additional
fund
where,
when
we,
the
concept
of
that
was
when
we
sold
off
an
asset
that
we
would
keep
the
money
and
buy
something
that
was
a
like
asset,
a
long-term
asset
that
would
benefit
everybody.
So
those
two
are
separated.
That
3.5
million
that
we
currently
have
and
the
later
fund
is
money
that
we
garnered
from
the
sale
of
property.
G
Some
long
term
lease
things
that
we
did
that
went
into
that
fund,
the
it
started
when
we
long
term
least
off
a
piece
of
property
from
the
golf
course
in
order
for
the
shopping
center
to
exist,
because
without
the
south
exit
they
could
not
have
built
it.
So
they
took
a
lot
of
trash
out
of
there.
We
gave
up
the
little
piece
of
our
golf
course,
and
it
was
about
4.1
million
dollars.
That's
a
70
year.
Lease
I
understand
that
we
had
done
with
River
point
on
that.
G
We
were
going
to
go
ahead
and
make
sure
that
those
were
very
specific.
Obviously
other
money
came
in
they're
like
the
McLellan
reservoir
area,
when
the
RTD
brought
bought
land
for
the
Lucent
station
to
be
built.
At
some
point
it
was
about
a
four
point,
something
a
MuRF
spent,
probably
about
half
of
that
money
to
go
ahead
and
help
develop
land
for
for
these
things.
G
So
the
money
coming
in
and
out
also
being
in
its
own
fund,
like
that,
the
intent
was
that
the
money
would
be
more
trackable
so
that,
if
we
sold
off
an
asset
like
some
land
in
Douglas,
County
I
mean
it
was
eminent
domain.
We
didn't
just
sell
it,
but
I
mean,
but
we
got
money
for
it
that
we
would
be
able
to
track
that
asset
money
more
on
where
it
got
spent.
What
we're
using
it
for
so
that
we
would
be
a
little
bit
more
accountable
to
it
going
to
an
asset
piece.
E
B
G
F
A
B
L
Do
we
have
letters
of
intent,
apparently
I'm
out
on
the
E
Murph
board
I
understand
there
are
three
letters
of
intent
that
are
in
those
letters
of
intent
describe
an
intent
to
enter
into
a
lease
agreement.
They
talk
some
basic
terms,
but
until
you
actually
have
a
lease
document,
a
lease
agreement
in
your
hand
that
you've
approved
it's
hard
to
forecast.
What
that's
going
to
look
like.
Okay,.
E
E
E
C
C
B
Talking
certainly
so,
we've
talked
tonight
about
the
highlights
that
we've
got
in
the
nineteen
budget
in
the
20
through
23
and
in
your
packet.
You've
got
all
the
detail
that
goes
along
with
that
and
to
close
it
out.
We
have
some
direction.
We
would
like
to
have
from
you,
so
let
manager
Keck
take
it
from
here.
B
N
B
B
D
A
Job
I'd
be
totally
in
support
of
that
and
I
think
that
manager
kick
tried
to
bring
some
things
to
us
earlier
in
the
year
to
actually
make
some
decisions
and
I
I
think
some
of
us
were
hesitant
at
that
point
to
do
that.
But
I
agree
with
you
at
this
point.
If
we
know
this
might
continue
it
raining
right
now
the
economy
is
strong,
but
at
least
we
know
in
the
next
couple
years.
A
It
might
continue
a
bit
that
we
have
something
built
in
where
they're
ready
made
things
that
ok,
if
we
end
up
a
million
over,
let's
kick
in
another
project
and
we
have
a
plan
for
that.
So
we
don't
have
to
keep
coming
back
and
saying
well
what?
If?
What?
If
that
I
I,
would
love
to
something
like
that?
Two.
D
L
L
Understand
I
mean
as
a
service
organization,
the
biggest
cost
we
have
is
our
people
and
I
think
I've
enunciated
that
before,
and
so
we
have
built-in
increases
to
the
to
the
budget
predicated
upon
labor
agreements,
whether
that
be
there
are
police
union
or
our
employee
union
and
essentially
that's
what's
been
driving
our
our
increases
with
personnel
and
so
I.
Think
that
again,
as
we
look
at.
B
L
Don't
know
how
to
from
the
top
in
my
head
either
but
I
as
we
look
at
as
we
look
at
at
those
cost.
You
know
to
freeze
that
has
implications,
I
mean
we're
in
a
larger
metropolitan
area
and
we
have
to
remain
competitive.
So,
if
we're
not
keeping
up
with
where
some
of
the
same
interests
that
we
compete
for
employees
are
we're
gonna
see
a
you
know,
a
loss
of
those
employees,
if
we're
not
keeping
pace,
totally
understand
that
again,
our
operational
dollars
are
also
competing
for
their
capital
dollars.
L
Sweet
spot
so
that
we
can
do
retention
of
our
of
our
staff
so
and
I
understand
where
you're
coming
from
and
hear
that
very
clearly,
and
we
need
to
be
able
to
be
agile
enough
to
deal
with
changes
in
the
economy
such
as
you
know,
impending
recessions,
and
things
like
that
to
be
prepared
for
having
conversations
with
our
staff
about
you,
know:
freezing
benefits
and
freezing
those
types
of
increases,
but
in
an
economy
like
we
still
have
here,
that's
robust
and
churning.
We
need
to
be
concerned
with
that
right.
D
L
For
commodities
yeah
yes,
and
we
discussed
that
last
week,
again
I
think
our
commodity
increase.
We
saw
it
about
a
little
over
4%,
so
that's
again,
energies
and
fuels
and
materials
raw
materials
that
we
use
just
like
any
other
business
to
operate.
So
that's
that's
where
we
are
I,
think
our
average,
for
our
increase
for
for
labor
was
a
little
bit
over
3%
as
well,
and
that
followed
the
the
inter-mountain
CPI
as
well
as
just
what
surrounding
jurisdictions
are
doing.
Okay,.
G
C
G
G
Okay,
so
I
thought
we
were
having
a
part
of
that
conversation
tonight
on
kind
of
where
we
were
moving
things
and
two
council
member
shares
point.
When
you
just
have
the
big
number,
not
any
of
the
smaller
kind
of
details,
it
gets
a
little
difficult
to
to
kind
of
make
some
of
those
decisions
about
whether
you
want
something
in
there
or
don't
want
that,
and
that's
kind
of
what
you're
wanting
to
get
some
guidance
on.
So
two
councilmember
Russell's
point
what
we
do
have
control
over
and
we
do
have
control
over.
G
So
you
know
the
employee
piece
of
it
as
well,
but
I
don't
think,
and
we
have
had
some.
You
know
some
over
the
last
five
years,
some
fairly
significant.
If
you
take
in
the
contracts
that
we've
had
we've
had
some,
what
I
would
consider
some
significant
increases
in
some
personnel
additional
personnel,
so
maybe
part
of
it
is
not
having
some
of
the
additional
personnel
and
making
sure
that
the
people
we
have
are
well
treated
well,
funded
and
and
kind
of
look
at
it.
G
G
So
if
we
could
have
a
little
bit
more
information
on
and
I
think
I've
requested
this
before,
but
I'm
gonna
request
it
again
the
exact,
including
contracts,
the
exact
personnel
over
the
last
five
ten
years,
so
that
we
have
a
better
grasp
of
exactly
where
we
are
with
what's
very
much
a
service
organization
on
how
many
people
are
participating
in
that
service
and
the
number
of
employees
that
we
are
responsible
for
and
paying
for
we're
at
or
getting
requests
for.
Some
additional.
G
So
I'd
like
to
know
where
we're
at
I
mean
when
I
first
moved
code
has
been
a
big
issue
when
I
first
moved
here
we
had
four
code
officers
and
a
supervisor.
Today,
we've
got
four
code
officers
and
a
supervisor,
so
we're
not
really
that
far
off,
and
so
maybe
we
can
do
some
better
workflows
or
plans
or
some
other
things
that
kind
of
bring
it
back,
because
when
I
first
moved
here,
everybody
complained
that
everybody
got
a
ticket.
Everybody
got
a
second
it
rained.
If
you're.
G
If
it
grew,
you
got
everybody
on
the
block,
came
out
and
go
I've
got
to
go,
get
the
stuff
in
the
alley,
because
I
haven't
been
checking,
so
it
might
just
be
some
cultures
thing,
some
policy
things
that
we
could
maximize
the
use
of
that
person
a
little
bit
better
as
well.
But
we
got
to
wrap
our
heads
around
where
we
were
before.
We
start
saying
that
simply
personnel
is
the
answer.
Testing
number.
G
I
think
just
basically
the
last,
maybe
five
or
ten
years,
so
that
we
have
because
some
of
the
some
of
the
savings
of
money
that
we've
moved
in
has,
while
some
of
the
savings
that
we're
going
to
have
here,
is
that,
like
we,
we
authorized
some
additional
police
officers,
some
additional
positions.
They
were
never
filled.
The
dispatch
bill,
never
felt
so,
of
course,
that
department
should
have
some
money
coming
back
at
the
end
of
the
year,
along
with
the
additional
revenue
that
we
brought
in.
G
So
it's
not
just
the
additional
revenue,
but
it's
also
positions,
maybe
that
we
funded
that
we
didn't
have
so
that
we
can
make
a
informed
decision
about
how
much
money
at
the
end
of
this
year
can
truly
go
into
capital
improvements
without
hurting
the
next
budget,
without
causing
a
problem
to
where
we're
not
planning
for
the
future,
so
that
we
can
make
some
of
those
decisions.
But
if
we
don't
have
that
information,
we
really
can't
do
that.
We.
G
I
think
that's
what
caused
the
problem
earlier
this
year
for
people
trying
to
decide.
Should
we
put
funds
that
we
are
being
called
a
surplus
from
last
year?
Apparently
we
don't
really,
but
that
we've
garnered
more
revenue
should
we
put
that
into
capital
improvements,
and
then
we
kind
of
have
this
break.
Where
would
be
until
well,
there's
a
fiscal
clip.
L
M
You
for
talking
about
additional
funding
options
for
capital
projects,
if
not
I,
think
maybe
we
should
get
one
at
some
point,
so
at
least
we
can
start
talking
about
if
we
have
other
options.
What
some
alternatives
may
be,
probably
not
in
advance
of
this
budget
discussion,
but
maybe
pretty
soon
well,.
C
L
Left
the
fourth
of
September
open
that
study
session
for
additional
work
on
the
budget.
So
if
we're
going
to
make
changes,
we
can
get
the
budget
books
done
because
they
need
to
be
out
on
the
seven.
So
it's
a
quick
turnaround.
Our
printer
is
gonna,
not
gonna
like
us,
but
we
have
that
ability
or
if
you
wanted
to
schedule
another
special
meeting
on
that
that
would
be
appropriate
to
I.
Do.
A
A
M
If
we're
not
really
ready
to
schedule
yeah,
maybe
you
put
it
on
our
list
of
topics
to
discuss
and
then
I'm,
also
in
favor
of
the
alternative
capital
improvement
plan,
assuming
that
we
have
those
lease
proceeds
and
I'm
just
a
little
bit
hesitant
on
the
additional
project
of
the
Roman
spark
improvement
only
for
the
things
that
were
mentioned
previously.
We
have
a
couple
needs
about
that,
but
I
really
appreciate
it.
M
Looking
at
all
the
projects
in
this
way
and
looking
at
it
in
a
way
of
thinking,
here's
what
happens
if
we
do
it,
here's
what
happens
if
we
don't
do
it
so
then
we're
fully
informed
each
project,
what
we're
getting
ourselves
into
I
think
that
was
really
helpful
for
me
and
in
looking
through
this
well.
Thank
you,
everybody
for
putting
all
that
together.
I'm
sure
it
was
a
laborious
project,
but
again
I'm
in
favor
of
the
alternative.
A
O
O
We're
not
taking
that
2.1
that
million
dollars
into
the
2.1
million
we're
not
taking
3.1
million
I,
guess
what
that's
for
2.1
million
from
the
general
fund
that
we
saw
in
2017
at
the
energy
bubble?
Okay,
so
in
terms
of
where
we're
at
with
the
proposed
CIP
I
prefer
the
alternative
CIP
but
I,
don't
necessarily
agree
with
those
projects
that
gets
to
number
two
I
need
to
understand
a
little
bit
more
about
the
group
itself.
O
There's
just
some
unanswered
questions
there,
as
well
as
what
the
long-term
system
may
have
brought
it
up
earlier.
What
the
long-term
plan
is
for
the
building,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
we
have
any
type
of
information
about
what
the
long-term
plan
is
for
the
building
and
then
the
question
then
becomes
you
know
if
there
is
a
major
failure
of
the
roof
in
the
next
year
or
we
start
drumming
up
other
plans
or
other
ideas
for
the
building
I'm
not
comfortable
with
that
either.
O
L
Only
thing
that
we
know
at
this
point
in
time,
Council
is
this-
are
we're
in
this
building.
We
have
no
plan
to
leave
this
building
currently
and
the
the
biggest
thing
that
we
need
to
be
concerned
with
is
preservation
of
our
asset,
and
so
that's
why
this
particular
project
has
been
brought
forward
for
replacement.
The
roof
has
met.
It's
the
roof
membrane
is
met,
it's
useful
life,
LaHood
lifespan.
O
C
O
A
component
councilmember
Martinez
is
asking
right,
so
it's
just
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
have,
if
any
councilmembers
have
brought
ideas.
Well,
there's
three
or
five
ideas
in
terms
of
growing
revenues
for
the
city
and
what
those
would
be
I'm,
not
sure
the
budget
at
budget
Advisory
Committee
has
done
anything
like
that,
but
I'm
just
curious.
Have
we
even
looked
at
other
ideas,
because
you
know
we
are
there's
only
so
much
that
goes
into
it
in
terms
of
the
expenditures
we're
just
seeing
year
after
year
after
year?
O
O
L
You're,
wise
man,
sir
I,
think
what
you're
gonna
hear
on
the
27th
from
the
budget.
Advisory
Committee
are
some
examples
of
things
that
they
are
recommending
the
council
to
look
at
those
those
things
will
come
for
at
that
point
in
time.
I
don't
want
to
steal
their
thunder,
so
they've
been
working
diligently
on
some
of
these
areas
and
have
some
recommendations
for
you.
L
It's
not
comprehensive
by
any
stretch
of
the
imagination,
but
I
think
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
provide
you
with
some
food
for
thought
for
the
future,
and
some
of
these
things
certainly
definitely
need.
Additional
conversation
need
to
be
vetted
with
the
public
as
there
are
different
choices.
You
know,
I
know
that
we
are
confronted
at
each
and
every
day
with
some
groups
that
are
opposed
to
property,
but
might
be
okay
with
sales
tax
and
those
types
of
things
and
I
know.
There's
some
competing
competing
proposals
with
that.
But
yeah
you
you're
right.
I.
L
Think
more
time
needs
to
be
spent
also
on
that
on
that
revenue
side
as
well,
to
make
sure
that
our
assumptions
are
accurate,
I
think,
but
we
found
from
the
budget
advisory
committees
been
very
helpful
matter
of
fact.
They
they
looked
at
the
very
conservative
nature,
as
your
staff
is
with
respect
to
judging
where
revenues
are
and
said,
you're
way
too
conservative
and
look
at
trend,
for
example,
with,
for
example,
marijuana
money.
L
This
year
we
were,
we
were
well
below
where
we
were
I've
already
collected
for
this
year,
and
they
said
you
need
to
increase
that
to
something
that's
reasonable.
So
I
think
that
that
is
an
area
that
we
could
look
at,
but
we
would
be
open
to
ideas
that,
if
you
might
have
them
and
that
something
could
be
studied,
but
it's
not
something
that
could
be
easily
rolled
into
this
next
year's
budget
for
sure.
M
Privy
to
the
list
of
ideas
that
we
came
up
during
our
brainstorming
session
council
members
here
we
had
a
brainstorming
session
right
before
you
got
on
during
our
all-day
meeting,
and
we
just
threw
out
a
bunch
of
ideas.
What
about
this?
What
about
that
and
I
think
somebody
collected
those
ideas
and
I
just
wonder
if
budget
advisory
has
been
those
have
been
shared
with
that
group.
L
K
Thank
you,
Mary
I'm,
gonna
speaking
that
I'm
gonna
excuse
myself.
Please
I
am
going
to
go
back
to
councilman
Russell's
initial
point,
which
is
holding
to
infrastructure.
Very
tight
I
mean
councilmember
Sierra
just
made
the
point.
What
if
there
is
a
disaster
here,
if
there's
another
disaster
in
the
neighborhood,
the
money
we
spend
on
parks
is
not
going
to
come
up
in
our
meeting.
We're
gonna
hear
about.
Why
didn't
you
guys
do
something
more
to
prevent
these
immediate
infrastructure
needs?
K
With
how
long
do
we
keep
the
building
or
if
we're
gonna,
have
major
flooding
again
on
Broadway
and
a
coma
after
we
just
had
it
I'm,
not
sure
how
forgiving
the
citizens
are
going
to
be
so
I
am
going
to
hold
a
really
tight,
as
we
start
to
take
the
scalpel
to
this
on
being
strict
on.
Is
it
infrastructure
or
not,
and
almost
going
back
to
our
list
of
questions
the
first
one
is
public
safety,
and
that's
gonna
outweigh
all
the
others
to
me
by
a
longshot.
K
Do
not
know
in
having
said
that
I
certainly
don't
think
that
we
should
just
run
out
and
spend
money
right
now
unless
it's
the
correct
solution.
Obviously
we
have
a
very
limited
budget,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
spending
it
correctly
and
so
I
don't
want
to
reactionary,
spend
money,
but
we
needed
to
say
the
money's
got
to
be
spent
once
we
determine
where
it
needs
to
go
to
capitalize
on
that
greatest
amount
of
Public
Safety.
So
that
is
certainly
where
I'll
be
focused.
K
C
K
A
E
E
Yeah
little
draping
Plaza,
maybe
the
area
of
it
that's
more
toward
the
Broadway
handed
section
just
like
I
did
in
terms
of
us
discussing
whether
or
not
we
can
do
portions
of
some
of
the
park
and
we've
gotten
a
great
explanation
from
dr.
Hargrove
on
why
some
of
them
are
difficult
to
do
with
peace,
but
maybe
regarding
little
Directory
Plaza.
If
there's
something
we
can
do
there,
I
just
think
the
city
would
benefit
hugely
from
rethinking,
maybe
what
we
can
do
partially
there,
so
that
section
of
it.
O
O
None
of
this
to
say
is
Sherman
but
Franklin,
some
of
these
busier
roads
that
cyclists
are
constantly
on
and
I
just
won't
feel
comfortable
unless
we
do
something
about
just
some
sort
of
painting,
just
some
sort
of
line,
there's
a
reason
why
we
put
lines
and
on
on
roads
because
it
gives
the
cars
and
drivers
an
idea
of
where
they,
you
know
the
borders,
the
boundaries
that
they
can't
pass.
So
we
have
a
solid
line
for
cyclists
on
Dartmouth.
That's
eventually,
because
there
isn't.
O
There
is
a
solid
line,
I
believe
east
of
downing,
definitely
on
the
Denver
side,
once
you're
on
University,
because
that
is
a
feeder
from
the
Highland
Canal
that
a
lot
of
people
take
to
get
back
into
Englewood,
so
I'm
just
curious
about
what
some
of
these
quick
wins
are
regarding
just
yeah
the
walking
wheel
program.
Yes,.
F
Thank
You
councilman
Sierra,
the
quick
wins,
are
exactly
as
you
described
more
striping
and
signage
project,
so
they're,
relatively
low-cost
somewhere
in
that
thirty
to
fifty
thousand
dollar
range.
The
project
on
the
one
quick
win
on
Dartmouth,
which
is
more
extensive
just
in
terms
of
blank
that's
about
eighty
five
thousand
is
the
estimate.
So
what
we're
talking
about
with
attack
is
what
can
we
kind
of
tackle
in
2019
and
what
would
be
the
priority?
And
so
we
actually
talked
about
that.
They
agree
with
you
that
Dartmouth
is
probably
the
top
priority.
F
C
F
C
C
C
A
M
You
Thank
You
councillor
overseer
for
bringing
that
up.
I
was
gonna,
bring
that
up
as
well.
Thank
you
for
addressing
that.
I
think
that
is,
they
are
absolutely
safety
related,
so
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
do,
and
a
lot
of
our
members
of
our
community
are
impacted
by
would
be
impacted
by
that
increased
safety.
So
I
think
that's
important.
Another
project
I
think
we
could
consider
adding
that's
kind
of
a
small.
Lower
dollar
item
is
the
IT
project
for
disaster
recovery.
M
J
Is
scheduled
for
2020
that
is
looking
for
colocation
space.
So
if
something
weren't
happened
to
this
main
building,
we
could
we
have
servers
at
a
colocation
space
and
we
could
just
bring
it
back
up
and
we'd
be
up
and
running
in
no
time
we
pushed
it
out
for
a
reason,
and
that's
because
we
are
not
ready
for
it.
Yet.
Okay,
we
have
so
many
infrastructure
problems.
We
need
to
fix
first,
but
in
2020
we'll
be
ready,
and
at
that
point
in
time,
we'd
like
a
disaster
recovery
site,
okay,.
M
G
D
D
O
D
C
D
That
would
maybe
start
mitigating
that
immediately
and
I.
Think
probably
it's
gonna
be
the
same
thing.
You
start
down
start
down
closer
to
the
river,
because
you
have
to
have
something
you
know
the
river
has
to
be
accessible,
so
that
is
gonna.
That's
being
addressed
right
now,
anyway,
right
between
Sheridan,
like
between
Oxford
and
where
the
sinkholes
were.
Is
that
whole
section
of
pipe
being
addressed?
No.
F
I
mean
we're
we're
fixing
the
situation.
Sheridan's
asked
us
for
to
do
more,
but
I
think
that
would
be
part
of
this
comprehensive
study
is,
is
you
know,
is
there
bottleneck,
errs
or
something
else
that
would
cause
that
that
would
become
a
priority
so
to
your
point,
I
think
we
definitely
would
look
at
both
quantitative
and
qualitative
Lee.
F
L
The
only
funding
that
we
do
have
set
aside
right
now
it
would
be
the
fund
balance
for
the
stormwater
utility
and,
of
course,
with
the
cost
that
we're
having
to
pay
for
the
remediation
of
the
sinkhole.
To
begin
with,
we'll
have
to
see
where
we
end
up.
Obviously,
as
you
saw
from
from
I,
think
last
week's
discussion
too
about
what's
generated
by
that
fund.
It's
you
know,
half
million
dollars,
maybe
a
year,
so
we
have
to
look
at.
L
D
G
The
report
and
your
suggestions
on
here
I
would
challenge
all
of
the
council
members
to
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
this
and
not
box
ourselves
in
tie
their
plan
one
or
planned
two
and
come
up
with
your
individual
projects
that
you
think
might
take
some
more
priority.
I
agree
with
councilmember
cuesta
because
he's
not
here.
G
It
has
to
be
safety
and
the
infrastructure.
All
we've
heard
is
that
the
infrastructure
and
maintenance
has
been
put
off
has
been
deferred,
hasn't
been
taken
care
of.
That's
all.
We've
heard.
We
heard
that
from
you
when
you
first
started
here
that
that
had
been
going
on
for
a
long
time,
and
we
need
to
address
that
and
it
needs
to
stop.
It
needs
to
stop
so
that
in
six
years
we
don't
have
another
calamity
and
people
are
just
going
well,
we
could
have
widowed
shoulda
and
we
didn't
the
issues
with
the
money.
G
Those
are
there's
another
alternative,
and
that's
that
we
have
to
explain
what
we've
done
with
the
ten
million
plus
whatever
that
we've
had
in
the
last
six
years
or
eight
years
of
increase
again,
the
community
has
never
not
provided
more
money
for
this
city
since
I've
been
involved
since
2003,
not
once
not
even
in
the
recession,
they
still
had
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
or
more
that
year.
So
since
its
community
with
its
stagnant
population
and
its
landlocked
situation,
has
always
provided
more
funding.
G
What
have
we
done
to
be
responsible
with
that
additional
funding
every
year
that
we've
gotten
and
I
don't
want
to
just
have
the
only
alternative
be
that
we
tax
them
more,
because
we
have
continually
received
more
revenue
every
single
year.
So
I
know
that
80%
of
our
service
piece
of
it-
and
we
got
a
three
percent
increase
for
that
uncovered-
that
kind
of
cash
that
these
people
are.
Our
citizens
are
continuing
to
give
us.
G
G
If
you
said
less
than
a
year
at
that
presentation,
but
I
believe
you
said
around
a
year
and
that
that
brought
up
some
hackles,
if
it
really
is
about
six
months,
then
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
more
doable.
I
would
like
to
see
a
little
bit
more
conversation
go
on,
especially
since
the
city
continues
to
put
itself
it
a
risk,
especially
when
we
have
a
sinkhole.
That
happens
a
second
time
in
the
same
area,
and
now
we've
got
another
community
that
might
put
some
pressure
on
us.
G
For
that
the
other
is
enforcement
for
the
safety
issue.
I
I
know
you
travel
Dartmouth
a
lot,
but
I
travel
on
Clarkson
a
lot.
We've
already
got
those
sharrows
going
on.
There.
I
actually
had
one
person
that
stopped
as
if
they
could
never
run
over
the
little
painted
bike
person
because
the
cars
you
can't
really
have
two
cars
going
in
there
so
about
I.
Think
it
brings
some
good
focus
in
there
to
make
sure
that
the
bicyclists
are
more
safe,
I
think
they're
a
little
too
far
out.
G
It
kind
of
is
a
little
weird,
but
when
a
bicyclist
is
there
some?
We
should
be
enforcing
those
I
mean
we
need
to
have
police
enforcing
that.
When
people
are
closer
than
the
three
feet,
then
they
should
be
Boston
people
and
we
should
be
giving
out
tickets.
Otherwise,
they're
not
going
to
they're
not
going
to
pay
attention
to
those
things
and
care
about
it.
I
happen
to
think
the
people
in
District,
three
and
especially
on
Clarkson,
are
actually
pretty
respectful
of
the
bikers.
N
G
Like
Dartmouth
that
have
a
little
bit
more
traffic,
the
other
end
of
that
is
in
self-preservation.
I
think
that
we'd
be
better,
be
a
little
bit
more
proactive
in
holding
the
bicyclists
accountable
for
when
they're
breaking
the
law
and
flying
through
these
stop
signs
and
not
making
sure
that
they're
protecting
their
own
best
interests
as
well,
but
they're.
They
have
to
be
held
accountable
too.
I
want
the
motorists
to
be
I,
want
our
Police
Department
to
be
a
little
bit
more
proactive
and
going
after
that,
so
that
we
protect
both.
O
So
one
of
information-
at
least,
if
you
don't
mind
in
terms
of
like
cyclists,
so
I,
do
understand,
they're
all
they're,
obviously
gonna
be
cyclists
that
do
break
the
law
that
do
run,
stop
signs,
I,
guess
and
that's
situation.
I
guess,
I'm
trying
to
understand
when
you
see
cyclists
run,
stop
signs.
Is
it
when
there
are
cars
that
are
crossing
the
road
or
is
it
in
since
mayor
protesters
you
live
on
Dartmouth?
Is
that
when
is
it?
Is
it
just
when
a
cyclist
just
runs
through
and
there's
no
cars
crossing
either
way?
Well,.
O
My
point
is
that
when
I
cycle
there
are
times
that
I
do
run
a
stop
sign
and
but
that
the
only
situation
that
occurs
is
when
I
do
look
both
ways:
I
slow
up
but
I,
don't
come
to
a
complete,
stop.
There's
there's
many
times
where
you
know
you're
on
a
you
know
a
bicycle:
you
know
you
need
the
momentum
to
keep
going,
and
so
there
are
gonna
be
times
that
I
do
run
the
stop
sign.
But
it's
when
I
know
the
coast
is
clear.
O
There
are
situations,
though,
where
I
do
see
it
more
in
the
wash
park
area.
Well,
I
do
see
a
cyclist
run,
a
stop
sign
but
they're
trying
to
keep
up
with
the
car.
That's
going
in
that
same
direction
and
moving.
But
you
know
everyone
breaks
the
rules
or
it
could
be
cyclists.
I
do
break
the
rules.
You
know
there's.
K
O
Joggers
that
I
see
that
just
run
across
looking
but
again
they're
doing
it
when
there
are
no
cars,
so
I
guess
it's
just
I.
Don't
want
to
paint
cyclists
with
a
broad
brush
saying
that
they're
constantly
breaking
the
law
but
I
do
agree
with
Councilman,
fair
and
sign
that
there
probably
should
be
more
enforcement
when
they
are
breaking
the
laws
when
they're
putting
their
safety
or
other
people
safeties
at
risk.
G
The
reason
I
brought
it
up
was
because
I
agree
with
you.
I
am
NOT
some
speed,
bicyclist
I'm
not
going
to
go
the
Tour
de
France
any
time.
So
if
there's
nobody
around
I'm
gonna
keep
paddling,
because
if
I
have
to
stop,
I
have
to
get
my
momentum
going
again.
The
reason
that
I'm
seeing
somebody
blow
a
stop
sign
is
because
I'm
in
a
car
watching
them
go
through
the
stop
sign
so
I'm,
not
slamming
bicyclists
I'm.
Just
saying
that
I
think
they
put
themselves
at
risk
as.
G
In
order
for
us
to
properly
keep
them
safe,
we
need
to
hold
the
cars
accountable,
but
we
also
need
the
cyclists
to
be
held
accountable,
especially
in
those
busy
or
areas.
I
agree
with
you,
if
nobody's
around.
If
a
tree
falls
in
the
forest
and
nobody
I
said:
okay
I
get
that
piece
of
it:
I'm:
okay
with
that
and
I'm,
not
for
just
cops
right
and
bikes
tickets,
because
they're
going
through
and
there's
no
traffic,
that's
fine,
but
the
reason
I'm
seeing
them,
and
especially
on
Clarkson
and
an
ox.
N
G
Okay,
so
since
you
brought
up
the
issue,
that's
I'm
not
just
slamming
the
bicyclist
I'm
trying
to
go
ahead
and
make
sure
that
we
have
some
additional
enforcement
so
that
they're
safer
on
both
ends
for
the
way
that
they're
handling
things
in
the
way
that
the
cars
are
handling
it
as
well
that
they're
both
held
to
the
to
the
law.
Okay,
so.
G
This
is
our
asset,
and
so
the
point
that
the
city
manager
made
is
well
taken
and
it
may
take
a
disproportionate
priority
because,
after
we're
done
paying
the
rent
we
own
it,
and
so
if
we
want
to
just
own
a
piece
of
property,
that's
crap
and
that
we
haven't
maintained
we're
going
to
have
some
additional
problems
and
I
think
the
citizens
are
gonna,
be
a
little
upset
with
us.
If
we
go
well,
we
just
paid
it
off
and
the
roof
is
terrible.
G
We
didn't
do
anything
for
all
the
years
that
we
were
in
there,
knowing
that
it
was
in
our
agreement,
lease
agreement
that
we
were
responsible
for
it.
So
we
have
to.
We
have
to
understand
that
when
we're
done
with
it,
it's
the
house
we
own
and
regardless
of
what
we
do
with
it.
It's
been
paired
public
knowledge
that
there's
a
problem
with
it,
that's
going
to
affect
it,
even
if
we
make
a
decision
to
go
ahead
and
sell
it.
G
Also,
we
need
to
have
the
additional
information
on
the
agreement
with
the
solar
panels
and
the
damage
done
by
that
and
what
their
responsibility
is.
Since
they
got
all
of
the
tax
credit,
they
got
all
of
the
we're
paying
them
for
the
pleasure
of
having
solar
power,
so
they're
getting
the
money
from
it.
G
G
You
make
a
good
point.
We
are
doing
so
much
work
to
try
and
do
our
downtown
area
and
to
try
and
attract
businesses
down
there
and
try
and
grow
that
retail
and
yet
we're
shoving
it
all
in
the
back
closet
over
here
and
we're
like
don't
go
back
there.
It's
kind
of
crummy
looking
and
a
lot
of
money
was
done
to
put
that
little
plaza
in
over
by
the
by
Big
Lots,
where
that
is
the
fountain
and
that
kind
of
made
it
a
little
bit
more
of
an
attractive
area.
G
I,
don't
know
if
that
landlord
owns
that
property
for
so
long
now
that
they
don't
really
have
to
garner
that
much
lease,
but
nobody's
going
to
want
to
do
something
with
that.
If
we
leave
that,
that
is
a
focal
point,
not
only
because
of
Hampton,
you
made
an
excellent
point,
but
that's
also
where
the
bike
path
goes.
G
That's
that
was
also
the
intention
of
making
that
little
Plaza
thing
for
the
bandstand
and
everything
that
we
didn't
maintain,
and
so,
if
we're
going
to
do
these
things
to
try
and
make
business
it
more
attractive
for
business
to
come
in
people
to
invest,
we
can't
just
make
it
look
good
in
the
front
room
and
make
you
know,
make
make
the
next
street
over
look
like
garbage
the
same
thing
with
the
medians.
That
is
absolutely
reprehensible
that
we
didn't
put
money
into
those
medians
I
had
people
from
denver,
englewood
littleton
call
it.
G
A
Thank
you,
I
wanted
to
I
think
the
two
of
you
have
weighed
in
all
right:
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
weigh
in
and
then
call
him
with
you.
If
that's
okay
with
you
I
like
the
safety,
it's
the
post,
I
would
like
to
see
all
the
alternatives.
I
I
am
not
in
agreement
with
all
the
projects
on
that.
I
think
that
you
guys
have
to
decide.
You
know
which
parks
are
the
best,
but
I
am
good.
I
am
concerned
about
the
roof
and
I
think.
A
A
If
we
think
we
really
have
to
somehow
have
it
ready
for
that
sale
if
we
want
to
do
a
sale
or
whether
we're
going
to
keep
it
and
just
Lisa
even
further
I,
don't
know
I,
just
don't
want
to
be
making
a
decision
that
robs
us
of
some
other
options
in
the
future
and
then
a
third
piece
of
it
for
me
is
a
flood
fund.
I
know
we
have
the
storm
water.
What
is
it
called
the
fund
that
would
storm
utility?
A
Perhaps
we
need
to
set
aside
something
out
of
this
extra
million
that
we
think
could
end
up
at
the
end
of
this
year.
In
anticipation
for
the
six-month
study
of,
is
there
anything
really
short-term
and
I
think
I
think
I
know
some
of
us
asked
you
and
I
think
you're
probably
going
to
do
this
and
director
D'andrea
of
what
right
now
could
we
do
in
the
neighborhoods?
We
know
that,
isn't
you
know
the
big
full-blown
thing
and
then
secondarily,
what
do
we
have
to
do
to
get
it?
A
So
that's
that
it's
up
to
par
for
what
we
thank
the
safe
living
area,
and
we
do
know
that
some
of
this
is
very
complicated.
It's
not
just
it's
not
just
drainage,
it's
a
lot
of
factors
and
it
has
to
do
with
culture
which
has
been
mentioned
before
and
how
we
take
care
of
our
rental
properties.
Properties
places
we
own
our
alleys.
A
That
kind
of
thing
so
I
would
prefer
to
see
somehow
in
that
alternative
CIP
that
it,
the
flood
peace,
is
built
into
that,
so
that
we're
anticipating
what
might
come
from
any
study
on
the
little
dry,
creek
I,
love
that
little
place.
I
have
to
admit,
though,
if
I
had
to
weigh
out
a
park
versus
that
I'd
say:
let's
fix
what
needs
to
be
fixed
for
safety
and
let's
go
with
what
benefits
the
neighborhoods
and
quality
of
life
for
the
people
that
are
living
at
I
was
on
Parks
and
Rec.
A
Making
that
judgment
lease
I
don't
want
to,
and
then
I
do
want
to
see
plans
for
new
revenue
I,
don't
think
we
should
ever
be
afraid
of
looking
at
options
because
we're
looking
at
70
million
dollars,
there's
no
way
a
million
a
year
is
going
to
take
care
of
the
kinds
of
things
that
are
good.
Now
many
of
you
have
admitted
are
just
maintenance
and
to
go
beyond
that
to
something
that's
more
creative
than
creating
a
city.
That's
got
revenue,
that's
generated
for
the
long
term.
We
need
to
do
something
some
serious
thinking
about
that.
A
So
I
I
would
like
to
hear
what
those
ideas
are,
and
maybe
that's
the
next
step
in
January
when
we
get
back
I
know
that
we
can't
be
doing
that
this
year,
but
I
definitely
want
us
to
take
a
look
at
that.
I've
had
so
many
citizens
say,
let
us
make
the
decision.
Don't
you
keep
keep
it
and
if
you
know
maybe
they'll
come
forward
and
put
stuff
on
and
find
the
ballot
anyway
without
are
doing,
and
citizens
have
done
that
many
many
times
in
the
past.
A
I
think
I've
not
seen
them
to
do
that
quite
about
in
the
revenue-generating
area.
So
those
are
sort
of
my
tapes
on
this,
but
I
also
really
appreciate
the
work
that
you've
put
into
this
I.
Really
do
it's
one
of
the
best
layouts
I've
seen
on
budget
presentation.
I
think
mayor
council
member
week
and
then
mayor
pro-tem
thank.
E
You
I
want
to
two
things
related
to
safety
support.
What
mayor,
President
Russell
was
saying
earlier
about
what
perhaps
focusing
I
believe.
This
is
what
you
were
saying,
perhaps
focusing
the
the
purported
six-month
study
on.
Maybe
the
higher
need
areas
in
order,
maybe
that
would
lessen
the
time
frame
of
the
study
I'm
wondering
just
so.
E
L
E
Good
many
instances-
yes,
very
good.
Thank
you.
So
a
lot
of
these
items
here
are
staggered
toward
the
end
of
the
five
years.
I
know.
Historically,
the
chief
Collins
and
his
team
tend
to
really
try
and
use
what
they
can
out
of
their
equipment
and
they
don't
replace
them
early.
They,
you
know,
where
possible
or
where
they
can
to
save
or
are
they
comfortable
I
mean?
Is
this?
Are
these
expenditures
in
these
years?
L
It
isn't
actually
what's
being
held
out
from
this
particular
list.
Is
a
list
of
equipment
that
the
police
would
like
to
have
the
council
consider
spending
premium
bond
premium
funds
upon
that
has
not
been
brought
forward
because
we're
still
in
the
development
phase
of
looking
at
it's
like
filling
a
jar
right
when
you're
trying
to
put
you
know
sand
in
there
with
some
big
rocks,
we
got
to
bring
the
big
rocks
first,
obviously,
the
biggest
rock
is
the
completion
of
the
PD
building
itself.
L
Secondarily,
we've
got
the
Fox
annex
building
that
also
has
a
roof
that
needs
replacement
and
some
other
work
to
accommodate,
moving
stored
items
from
all
over
the
place,
all
over
the
city
into
that
location.
Third,
you
have
the
need
for
a
new
records
management
system
which
I
think
we've
talked
before
in
the
past.
L
My
current
records
management
system,
la
justice,
is
failing
and
that
the
company
is
going
away
and
we
want
to
kind
of
work
with
the
rest
of
the
jurisdictions
in
the
county
to
do
a
cooperative
purchase
of
a
new
records
management
system
to
match
up
with
the
CAD
and
then.
Lastly,
as
a
big
rock,
we
want
to
bring
forward
and
I
think
it's
really
close
to
being
brought
forward.
Our
motorola
radios
that
the
officers
use
and
they
carry
the
FCC-
has
bought
up
or
taken
up,
bought
up
there.
L
Taking
the
spectrum
back
that
the
radios,
the
older
radios
used
and
they're,
forcing
us
to
go
into
a
new
spectrum,
we
have
to
buy
new
radios
and
we've
been
doing
that
piece
by
piece
you
can
see
here.
You
have
replacement
and
repair
for
radios.
That's
just
basically
repair
that
20
grand
that's
just
repair,
it's
not
necessarily
replacement.
So
we
want
to
replace
the
radios.
L
We
want
to
do
it
a
large
period
of
time,
because
if
we
don't
we
be
leading
people
and
behind
when
they
wouldn't
have
the
opportunity
to
have
interoperability
with
other
agencies
and
jurisdictions
and
even
functionality
when
they're
on
the
street
and
the
need
to
get
back
with
dispatch.
So
those
are
three
large
things,
but
then
there
are,
you
know:
there's
some
surf
equipment,
for
example,
there's
a
Kawasaki
mule,
which
is
one
of
those
smaller
vehicles
that
has
reached
its
end
of
life
that
they
want
to
replace.
L
And
you
know
you
can
see
on
here
this
angel
armor,
which
is
the
armor
for
the
doors,
the
passenger
and
the
driver
side,
doors
that
would
protect
them
from
higher
caliber
rounds
and
things
like
that
that
they
would
like
to
bring
forward.
And
so
those
would
come
forward
once
we
have
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
clear
this
budget,
but
yet
still
in
this
year,
describe
where
we're
headed
with
the
police
building.
L
It
is
on
budget
right
now
we're
doing
fine,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
adequate
funding
set
aside
from
that
premium
in
the
instance
that
there
is
something
that
needs
to
be
added
or
done.
That
would
alleviate
capital
expenditures
in
the
future
and
that's
what
some
of
the
things
they
want
to
bring
forward
or
talking
about.
Okay,.
E
L
Those
were
those
were
held
out,
purposefully,
I
suppose
we
probably
should
have
included
those
you
would
see
where
they
were,
because
some
of
them
are
large
I
mean
the
the
Fox
building
in
the
roof
and
the
HVAC
and
the
other
improvements
I
mean
it
could
be
approaching
a
million
dollars.
We
don't
know,
but
that's
being
worked
on
now.
The
motorola
radios
are
a
half
million
dollars
the
records
management
systems,
probably
about
400,000.
D
Okay,
mostly
I,
just
want
to
address
your
it.
None
of
that
was
personal
towards
you.
The
thing
that
I
have
concerned
and
I
agree
absolutely
with
everything
that
councilmember
Barrentine
said.
I
am
concerned
about
the
safety
safety
of
the
by
silat,
bicyclists
and
and
I
do
see
that
the
cars
on
Dartmouth
for
the
most
part,
I
I've,
seen
that
they're
pretty
respectful
of
bicycle
errs.
D
One
issue
that
I
have
is
it's
not
very
wide
and
Dartmouth,
and
especially
it's
probably
worse,
but
sometimes
the
bike
bicyclists
will
ride
two
abreast
and
when
cars
are
coming
down,
the
hill
you
have
to
slow
down
and-
and
that
is
frustrating
for
me
and
stop
signs
are
one
thing,
because
a
bicyclist
can
pull
up
there
and
look
at
stop
signs.
I,
see
them
running
red
lights
all
the
time,
and
that
is
very
frustrating
and
it's
not
safe
either.
So
I
don't
have
an
issue
with
with
bicyclists.
That's
not
I.
D
I
am
interested
in
the
safety
of
all
the
citizens
and
that's
why
I
asked
about
the
number
of
accidents,
because
if
there
aren't
that
many
accidents,
then
it's
not
something
that
I
feel
we
have
to
spend
money
on,
but
I
think
perhaps
bicyclists.
Some
of
them
need
to
be
educated
on
safety
and
courtesy.
Also
I
and
and
I
mean
it
frustrates
me
at
the
driver-
gets
too
close
to
a
bicycle.
Well,.
D
D
I
G
D
Revenue
sources
generating
revenue
I
think
we
probably
need
to
look
at
the
policies
of
the
city
regarding
being
business
friendly
because
I,
don't
think
we're
perceived
as
business
friendly
and
I
keep
hearing
that
we're
relying
on
an
unreliable
source
sales
tax
isn't
totally
unreliable
eat,
but
we
have
to
be
business
friendly
in
order
to
to
continue
to
generate
that.
So
I
think
that
there's
some
policies
that
we
could
look
at
okay,.
L
Thank
you
for
tonight's
discussion.
I
think
it
was
very
insightful
and
helpful
for
us
as
we're
trying
to
gather
information
given
that
tonight
is
the
conclusion
of
just
the
introduction
of
this
capital
piece.
We
do
need
to
schedule
some
more
time
for
this
with
you
and
do
so
in
an
expedient
fashion
begin,
so
that
we're
not
left
to
the
last
minute
of
trying
to
put
things
together
that
the
public
can
examine
and
and
weigh
in
on
at
the
public
hearing
scheduled
for
the
17th
of
September
and
so
I
just
want
to
say.
L
Thank
you
again,
I
think
we
got
a
lot
of
good
information
and
insight
from
you.
If
you
do
have
projects
that
you
would
like
to
see
put
forward
that
weren't
on
the
list
or
if
you
do
require
additional
information,
please
feel
free
to
reach
out
and
ask
us
for
that,
so
that
we
can
prepare
that
information
for
you
as
quickly
as
possible,
but
I'd
like
to
work
with
the
mayor
and
Mayor
Pro
Tem
quickly
to
schedule
another
session,
whether
that's
you
know
at
a
study
session
or
a
completely
different
date.
L
Just
to
finalize
this,
because
this
singularly
is
one
of
the
most
important
things
you're
going
to
be
doing.
Obviously,
with
the
budget
I
mean
operations
aside,
that's
important
as
well.
Don't
get
me
wrong,
but
capital
is
very,
very
important
because
we
have
had
projects
for
many
years
that
have
been
deferred
or
pushed
off
just
because
of
that
lack
of
funding.
We
want
to
start
to
address
those
could.
C
N
N
L
The
27th
is
largely
taken
up
right
now,
with
discussion
of
operating
programs
despit
specifically
getting
into
the
nitty-gritty
of
what
programs
are
being
done,
where
we
see
changes
with
programs,
I'm
not
sure
the
length
of
time
with
that.
Yet
as
I'm
just
still
gathering
the
program
sheets
and
couldn't
tell
you
how
much
we're
gonna
spend
time
wise,
I
think
also
councilmember
Barrentine.
L
You
asked
us
to
spend
some
significant
time
to
looking
at
our
utility
budgets,
which
we
want
to
do
on
that
27th
as
well
as
here
from
the
budget
Advisory
Committee
that
they've
spent
a
lot
of
time.
I
think
you're
going
to
appreciate
the
analysis
that
they've
done
on
six
briefs.
I
think
they've
done
six
briefs
on
specific
area.
So
everything
from
you
know
staffing
to
revenue.
L
G
G
L
I
H
L
G
G
That
can
get
us
to
the
end
result
that
we
need
right.
Apparently,
the
city
has
been
very
efficient
and
sometimes-
and
we
ended
up
in
a
lot
of
trouble,
so
I
don't
want
to
be
efficient
with
the
time
and
not
come
out
with
a
good
product
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
So
that's
why
I
was
asking
about
how
much
time
you
think
it
would
be
because
I
think
it's
very
useful
when
we
all
get
together
that
we
have
additional
information,
I
mean
councilmember.
Wink
has
brought
up
several
issues
that
I
go.
G
You
know
what
she's
right.
There
are
some
focal
points
here
that
we
might
need
to
put
a
little
bit
more
emphasis
on
if
we're
going
to
attract
business
and
make
business
things
that
we're
serious
about
making
that
area
useful,
lockable,
whatever
we
claim
it
is
or
the
bike
issue
on
some
of
those
that
I'm
haven't
thought
of.
So
we
bring
other
things
to
the
table.
G
B
B
N
A
B
B
Then
what
I
also
heard
was
that
a
lot
of
the
council
felt
very
strongly
about
targeting
that
towards
infrastructure.
Now,
if
that's
the
case,
then
we
may
have
a
larger
conversation
about.
So
what
do
we
want
to
do
about
our
jewels
of
the
city,
the
ones
that
help
us
attract
people
make
the
residents
feel
like
very
proud
of
the
city,
the
parks,
what
kind
of
alternative
funding
do
we
want
to
consider
around
that,
if
possible,
and
what
might
that
look
like
for
us.
C
A
A
L
No
I
think
it's
helpful.
Thank
you.
We'll
work
out
dates.
Some
suggested
dates.
One
of
the
things
I
was
gonna
suggest
counsel
is
that
we
probably
need
to
go
through
the
operating
programs
first,
because
it
might
be
beneficial
to
also
have
a
discussion
not
just
on
capital
but
operating
so
sometimes
up.
Certainly
there
after
the
27th,
which
is
our
last
study
session
of
this
month,
I
think.
A
It
makes
sense
because
I
think
in
this
member
Barrentine
mention
do
you
want
to
know
something
about
operating
I.
Do
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
both
done
and
then
move
on
to
the
next
that
the
following
week
is
Labor
Day
week
where
we
meet
on
a
Tuesday
night
for
a
meeting
that
week,
so
it
that
is
a
short
week
and
the
tenth
was
going
to
be.
What
was
on
the
tenth
note.
Was
it.
C
L
A
L
A
L
L
M
A
A
O
I
G
Many
people
have
taken
advantage
of
the
thousand
dollars.
I
mean
it's
the
article
in
here
and
I.
Remember
that
we
had
talked
about
it,
that
the
city
was
going
to
be
offering
some
recovery
assistance
and
I
see
here.
I'm
reminded
that
its
maximum
of
$1,000
and
to
qualify
you
had
to
have
at
least
$2,500
of
uninsured
storm
related
damage.
How
many
people
have
taken
advantage
of
it?
Good.
L
G
Other
issue
is
that
at
the
last
council
meeting,
when
this
assistance
came
up,
I
asked
for
there
to
be
a
review
process
so
that
if
anybody
was
denied
that
there
was
some
process
that
for
why
it
was
denied
in
some
other
appeal
process
that
they
could
go
to
if
it
was
denied.
It's
not
really
a
lot
of
money,
but
if
somebody
needs
that
and
I
want
to,
you
know
kind
of
make
sure
that
we
have
some
grasp
on
how
that's
being
handled
and
who's
handling.
G
G
C
G
And
get
their
hands
on
when
they
know
most.
So
if
we
could
get
a
little
bit
of
information
on
how
many
people
have
applied
and
exactly
the
process
to
apply,
I
still
haven't
gotten
a
copy
of
the
application
that
the
Community
Development
Director
held
up
at
the
meeting
and
I
asked
for
counsel
to
go
ahead
and
have
that,
because
there
was
some
verbage
at
the
bottom
that
they
referred
to.
That
I.
Think
counsel
should
know
what's
in
that
application,
so
that
if
anybody
asks
you
can
pass
it
along.
G
Also
councilmember
quest
and
councilmember
Ciera
asked
for
information
on
the
two
hundred
and
thirty-six
thousand
dollars
that
was
done
in
an
emergency
basis
and
whether
that
money
was
allocated
or
not,
we
were
told
it
was
allocated
and
then
I
went
to
the
budget
and
looked
to
find
it
and
couldn't
see
where
the
allocation
was
I
asked
the
chief
financial
officer,
Kathleen
wrinkled
heads-up,
before
I
asked
for
it
at
the
study
session
last
week
and
I
have
still
not
received
that
information.
I.
G
Ask
that
we
please
start
the
study
session
the
next
time
with
the
information
that
should
be
very
quick
and
straightforward.
I
still
have
constituents
that
are
concerned
that
we're
not
following
process
and
procedures
when
we
have
an
emergency
situation
like
that
come
forward,
and
then
we're
all
put
into
a
situation
where
we're
voting
on
something
at
this
point
that
I
might
regret.
G
Having
looked
at
that
contract,
more
and
gotten
more
information
from
people
that
there
might
actually
be
some
other
problems
with
that
contract
in
there,
but
I
asked
for
the
information
to
come
forward
so
that
we
can
see
where
it
is
and
I'll
have
it
from
the
budget
book.
I
don't
want
it.
Just
anecdotally
that
was
in
the
budget.
I
looked
for
it
I
couldn't
find
it
I'm
being
honest,
just
want
to
see
it
and
if
we
could
just
get
that
done
so
we
could
get
this
off
our
plate
and
move
on
I
would
appreciate
it.
L
G
I
actually
want
the
information
brought
to
study
session
in
public
with
the
documentation
available,
because
where
it's
saying
that
it's
appropriated
is
also
being
moved
from
2017,
but
it
is
not
in
the
appropriation
column.
So
if
we
could
all
just
all
together
here,
look
at
the
budget
so
that
we
know
that
it
was
appropriated
money.
Ask
any
questions
that
we
have
publicly
in
the
and
in
the
open
in
public
and
be
able
to
go
ahead
and
let
our
constituents
know
that
we've
had
that
conversation
and
show
what
we're
doing
with
the
budget.
A
G
A
D
There
was
questions
on
the
the
budget
and
the
spending
really
when
it
came
up
before
that.
There's
about
two
hundred
and
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
in
the
malli
center
trust
fund.
There
is,
but
there
are,
there
are
not
there's
not
a
lot
of
money
coming
into
that
fund,
and
and
so
there
the
discussion
was
that
they
will
use
that
probably
for
projects
in
the
malli
center,
so
other
than
that
the
meeting
was
fairly
short.
D
C
E
E
Let's
be
sure
to
appropriately
collect
as
much
data
from
the
citizenry
as
we
can
regarding
how
they
would
like
the
city
to
rectify
the
challenges
we
have
in
light
of
repeated
flooding.
We
all,
of
course,
have
our
opinions
and
term
knowledge
pieces,
but
but
I
want
to
make
sure
we
collect
the
appropriate
data
from
the
citizens
in
in
the
right
way
whether
it
starts
at
the
forum
or
whatever.
That
looks
like
just.
Let's
make
sure
we
do
that
and.
G
I
have
a
point
of
information
for
what
the
mayor
answered
you.
What
she
answered
was
is
that
next
week
is
just
for
the
council,
I
asked
twice
that
we
go
ahead
and
have
some
representation
from
the
public
at
that
meeting,
so
that
we're
in
this
debrief
that
they
are
included
in
that
I
think
it
is
important
that
some
of
the
information
come
from.
G
A
G
E
Yeah,
you
got
it
right
and
point
number
two
I'd
like
to
rhetorically
ask
counsel
if
any
of
us
still
feel
there's
not
enough
work
to
be
done
to
warrant
hiring
an
emergency
manager
for
our
city.
If
that's
the
case,
maybe
if
you
don't
mind
my
job
but
I,
think
if
any
of
us
do
feel
that
maybe
we
can
have
I
would
look
like
at
least
like
to
share
some
information
with
us,
with
counsel
via
our
city
manager,
that
I
come
in
to,
since
we
had
that
last
discussion
that
might
help.
A
L
Put
that
forward
at
this
point
in
time,
just
so
you're
aware
I've
we
have
just
today
met
with
the
city
of
Littleton.
They
have
also
have
a
need
for
an
emergency
manager
with
the
departure
of
their
fire
department
to
the
South,
Metro
Fire
and
Rescue
District.
We
decided
to
meet
today
and
talked
about
jointly
sharing
an
emergency
management
position,
so
we're
working
in
that
direction.
L
I
think
I
can
bring
forward
at
some
point
in
time,
a
proposal,
perhaps
during
that
budget
cycle,
but
we
just
had
our
first
meeting
today
to
discuss
that,
and
so
we
are
hopeful
that
we
can
get
agreement
from
both
councils,
littlez
and
Inglewood
to
collaborate
on
this
position
that
would
we'd
share
between
the
two
jurisdictions
to
help
us
and
I.
Think
that
would
be
helpful.
E
G
M
You
I'm
glad
we're
talking
about
what
we're
gonna
do
about
a
person
see
management.
Obviously
we
all
know
that
we
need
to
do
something.
It's
late
just
quickly.
I
attended
the
open
house
for
the
two
new
schools.
Well,
several
of
you
did
as
well.
It
was
amazing
so
exciting
in
the
minute
manager
kick
was
there
so
much
great
energy
enthusiasm
for
our
students
and
our
schools.
L
A
I
don't
know
if
we've
talked
enough
yet
about
the
meeting
next
week.
There's
two
parts
of
it.
One
is
the
study
session
in
how
we
handle
talking
about
the
flood
in
our
reaction
in
how
we
things
that
we've
been
hearing
elsewhere,
Barrentine
suggested
that
we
have
some
one
or
several
people
from
the
community
being
represented
in
that
one
hour.
Discussion
I
want
to
ask.
A
E
A
A
E
E
A
I'm
sure
that
a
lot
of
us
have
heard
different
things
too,
so
that's
what
I
would
hope.
We
would
bring
all
this
right.
Okay,
so
by
2:30
tomorrow,
send
us
any
ideas
that
you
have
about
how
you'd
like
next
week's
on
Monday.
The
second
part
of
Monday
is
just
long-lived
that
you
were
given,
and
yet
you
were
sent
by
email
and
there
are
lists
of
what
what
we
mayor,
Parton
and
I,
and
the
manager
thought
maybe
would
be
palatable
for
consent,
agenda
items
and
which
ones
were
maybe
not.
This
is
an
extremely
long
list.
C
L
Certainly
I
think,
since
we
moved
to
the
new
ERP
system
that
we
have
the
tiler
new
world
program,
a
lot
of
expenditures
now
are
very
visible,
and
so,
when
anything
meets
our
purchasing
policy,
it
comes.
It
comes
to
me
to
decide,
you
know:
does
it
move
forward?
Does
it
get
paid?
Is
it
something
that
needs
to
council
approval
or
not,
and
so
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
expenses
that
we
haven't
seen
before,
because
our
procurement
policy
does
need
some
work.
L
You've
heard
me
say
this
before:
where
there's
some
in
congruous
language,
if
you
will,
in
that
purchasing
policy
itself,
and
so
a
lot
of
what
you're
starting
to
see
is
a
new
normal
of
purchasing.
That's
going
to
come
forward,
so
chemicals
commodities
are
starting
to
come
forward
that
heretofore
the
purchasing
policy.
Before
was
it
again,
it
doesn't
jive
with
what
the
Charter
says.
L
So,
for
example,
if
you've
seen
the
purchasing
policy,
which
I'm
sure
many
of
you
have
I've,
given
it
to
the
council
before
it
says
commodities
if
you're
buying
chemicals
and
things
like
that,
they
can
just
go
ahead
and
do
it
if
the
money's
been
appropriated
in
the
budget.
Well
again,
that
goes
against.
L
Here's
who
bid
here
where
their
cost
years
are,
we
chose
so-and-so.
We
felt
like
that's
something
that
could
go
on
a
consent,
calendar
other
items
such
as
receiving
a
grant
like
we're
getting
some
grant
funds,
which
is
great
news.
One
of
those
grants
is
a
post
grant
for
trauma,
Gua
mats
for
the
new
police
building
for
ninety
nine
hundred
dollars.
That's
great!
We
also
got
a
grant
from
obviously
at
Polk
County
open
space
to
do
a
new
playground
at
Jason.
So
we
felt
like
that
is
something
that
could
go
on
consent.
L
G
I
I
L
G
A
Our
point
in
having
this
sent
out
that
I
think
manager
Tech's
point
is
that
there
are
24
items.
We've.
Never
we've
never
had
anything
like
this
in
the
nine
years
I've
been
on,
and
so
we
want
to
give
you
a
heads
up,
and
so,
if
there's
a
problem,
you
think,
oh,
my
goodness,
I'm
not
going
to
accept
all
these.
You
know.
A
A
Bit
of
a
heads
on
it,
just
public:
yes,
you
will
it's
a
heads
up
to
you,
though,
that
okay
yeah,
maybe
if
you
read
it
on
Monday
afternoon,
maybe
if
you
could
move
it
up
a
little
earlier.
So
if
there
are
a
lot
of
yeses
that
we
said,
we're
consent
that
you
look
at
them
a
little
earlier
and
maybe
ask
some
questions
so
that
maybe
they
can
stay
in
consent.
Okay,
so
you
get
your
answers,
which
is
the
way
our
policy
reads
anyway.
That's
how
we're
supposed
to
do
it,
but
coming.
G
I'm
concerned
now,
because
you're
already
saying
that
you
think
24
is
too
many
and
I
the
reason
that
we
bring
the
consent
agenda
pieces
when
we
have
questions
should
be
brought
in
front
of
the
public
is
so
that
those
questions
that
other
people
might
have,
including
most
of
the
constituents
that
it's
answered
in
public.
That's
our
the
answer
is
in
public.
G
So
if
you
end
up
with
a
question
on
something
on
the
consent
agenda-
and
it
could
say
answered
privately
and
you
just
go
ahead
and
push
the
consent
agenda
through
and
then
there's
some
issue
later
and
you
go
but
I
asked
that
question
and
they
said,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
on
the
record.
So
those
are
some
of
the
concerns.
If
you
already
believe
as
our
leadership
that
24
is
too
much,
then
maybe
24
is
too
much
I,
don't
know
all.
A
M
With
that
I
think
24
is
too
much
and
I
think.
Maybe
one
thing
we
could
is
the
line
item
16
the
synergy,
medical
canopy
encroachment
we
haven't
talked
about
that
before
together
and
so
I
think
we
might
want
to
pull
that
out
and
talk
about
that
separately,
especially
since
the
Planned
Unit
development
is
on
the
second
reading.
That
night
I
think
it'll.
C
L
And
I
think
that's
why
we
we
put
that
on
consent
because
it
follows
and
it
goes
together:
they're
actually
three
items:
there's
a
vacation
of
easement
and
transportation,
utility
easement
and
the
canopy,
which
is
anytime.
They
canopy
hangs
over
a
public
right-of-way,
whether
it's
a
sidewalk
or
public
property.
They
need
to
get
a.
You
know
permission
to
do
that
and
that's
what
that
is.
I.
I
G
A
Sorry,
our
intent
is
to
try
and
help
us
I'll
manage
the
meeting.
I
don't
want
you
dare
we
used
to
spend
far
too
much
time
there
last
week.
It
was
important
to
do
that,
and
but
this
is
a
lot
of
items
in
one
meeting,
so
we
probably
will
have
to
come
up
with
some
other
ways
of
handling.
So
many
of
this
continuous
just
to
make
sure
everybody
can
stand
the
meeting
and
make
sure
that
we're
making
good
decisions
when
were
there
I
think
that's
it
for
me
tonight.