►
Description
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/130831?handle=9400176629564B0F90CA2BA913B7C255
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/130830?handle=8BCA961545D34913AFF28D36BCFCB166
1. Call to Order & Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes
4. Recognition of Public Comment
5. New Business
Review draft Citizen Survey
Schedule Next Meeting
6. Chairperson's Choice
7. Committee Member's Choice
8. Adjourn
5. Informational Items
Administrative Fee Memo
Video Recording of Pre-Proposal Meeting with Potential Proposers 09/24/21
Cost Summary by City
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/130831?handle=9400176629564B0F90CA2BA913B7C255
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/130830?handle=8BCA961545D34913AFF28D36BCFCB166
B
C
D
A
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
No
one
is
okay,
we
got,
I
heard
a
no
from
one
of
them
and
nothing
from
the
others.
Okay,
so
we
will
move
on
close
the
public
comment
portion
of
the
meeting
we
actually
we
do
have
an
email
from
mark
w.
That's
in
the
record,
and
everyone
should
read
this.
This
was
a
I
mean
a
summary
of
this.
One
is
he's
asking
about
including
composting
which
obviously
we
we
have
considered,
but
it
hasn't
seemed
to
be
something
that's
necessarily
affordable.
A
As
an
all
city
thing,
although
we've
included,
you
know
options
so
that
mark
w,
if
you
reviews
this
this,
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
information
from
all
of
our
meetings
to
go
over,
but
we
have
requested
this
it.
We
don't
believe,
there's
enough
people
in
the
city
to
make
it
a
city-wide
thing
at
this
point,
but
we
are
interested
in
a
collective
bargaining
kind
of
deal,
so
we
have
the
possibility
of
organizing
that
separately
after
we
do
this
part.
I
appreciate
the
interest.
A
F
Yes,
I
I'm
just
wondering
chair
green
when
would
be
the
appropriate
time
for
me
to
talk
about
when
I
called
republic
and
waste
management
yesterday
and
today
and
I
have
their
quotes,
which
I
think
might
raise
an
eyebrow
or
two
for
if
I
just
wanted
their
pickup
and
I
have
all
the
rates
in
my
hand.
So
whenever
you
deem
that's
the
time
for
me
to
talk
about
this,
please
well
since.
A
D
D
A
Director
deandre,
I
had
a
question
like
just
about
the
whole
survey
in
general,
so
the
city
conducted
the
three
public
hearings,
where
you
know
hundreds
of
people
came
forward
and
said
what
they
cared
about
and
and
then
we
utilized
that
input
as
part
of
our
redoing,
the
rfp
to
better
represent
what
was
brought
forward.
You
know,
as
far
as
citizen
concerns,
etc.
A
D
Yeah,
so
the
previous,
when
we
did
the
meetings
in
the
previous
survey,
it
was
in
the
context
that
we
didn't
have
exact
prices,
and
so
at
that
time
the
discussion
was
with
the
city
council
was
that
we
need
to
get
input
based
on
the
the
actual
prices
that
we
received,
so
as
that
would
make
a
big
difference
potentially
of
whether
people
would
support
this
or
not.
So
that
was
the
intent
of
this
follow-up
was
to
say,
okay,
given
what
we've
received
and
now
that
we
know
approximately
what
the
prices
are.
D
F
B
F
My
thought
is
that
I
know
that
the
next
water
bill
we
will
be
getting
will
have
a
survey
to
the
citizens
about
what
they
think
of
the
water.
So
could
we
not
do
something
like
that?
Just
put
a
survey
of
these
poll
questions
into
that
utility
bill
that
way,
you
don't
have
to
call
the
city
and
go
through
all
of
this,
because
I'm
not
sure
everybody's
going
to
want
to
do
that.
F
D
The
we
can't
use
utilize
the
billing,
the
utility
billing,
because
we
do
basically
one-third
of
the
city
per
month,
so
we
we,
if
we
put
it
in
the
the
survey
in
the
utility
bill,
it
would
take
three
months
to
reach
everybody,
so
that
would
put
us
out.
You
know
if
we
did
it
for
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
hit
the
february
invoices
so
it'd
be
march
april.
May
would
be
the
cycle
that
we'd
have
to
follow.
F
A
D
D
G
I'm
gonna
disagree
with
this
just
because
most
people
don't
look
at
their
water
bill,
and
so
especially
those
people
that
are
getting
it
online
that
have
gone
or
just
don't
don't
get
the
that
specifically,
I
think
the
we're
getting
off
track.
I
think
what
we
were
requested
to
do
is
just
review
the
survey,
not
the
implementation
of
how
to
deliver
it.
So
personally,
I
think
this
that
we're
treading
water
here.
A
E
I
sort
of
think
that
the
postcard
is
a
reasonable
thing,
because
if
you
care
enough
to
actually
want
to
do
a
survey,
couldn't
you
just
call
it's
not
that
much
of
a
hassle.
You
know
it
takes
20
seconds
30
seconds
to
go.
I
think
it
seems
reasonable
to
do
that.
I'd,
yeah,
I'd,
barely
take
a
look
at
my
water
bill,
usually
other
than
just
going.
Okay
pay.
It
recycle
everything
else.
F
F
A
A
You
had
okay,
all
right,
so
we
know
everyone's
going
to
get
a
postcard,
at
least
so
at
least
everyone's
going
to
get
a
physical
notification
and
they
can
go
online
which
most
people
probably
will
who
are
going
to
participate
or
they
can
when
they
call.
What
is,
I
don't
get
the
call-in
thing
so
if
they
call
in
and
they
get
a
survey
mailed
to
them
or
they
have
to
go
somewhere
to
get
the
survey.
D
A
D
A
A
D
A
A
A
D
D
A
D
A
D
D
D
D
Well,
yeah,
we
could,
I
think
it
was
so
well
used.
This
past
fall
the
lineup,
I
guess,
was
45
minutes
to
get
into
the
service
center
to
drop
off
your
leaves.
So
I
don't
know
if
it
was
just
you
know:
people
aren't
able
to
throw
as
much
in
the
trash
or
there
is
just
an
over
abundance
of
people
who
wanted
to
take
advantage
of
the
program.
We
just
saw
that
there
was
a
huge
increase
in
the
request
for
that
services.
So.
D
A
And
then
on
your
next
point,
the
cost
would
be
included.
I
mean,
I
think,
that
it
would
just-
and
this
is
in
support
of
what
the
city's
pushing
for
here,
but
thus
eliminating
the
need
for
households
to
arrange
and
pay
for
these
services,
because
they
wouldn't
right,
because
then
they
wouldn't
have
to
figure
out
who
they're
dealing
with
etc.
I
mean
that
is
one
of
the
benefits.
Is
you
don't
even
have
to
think
about
it?
It's
just
taken
care
of
as
a
single
thing.
D
B
A
B
A
But
I
don't
I
mean,
I
think
that
it's
misleading
to
say
slight,
because
there's
such
a
like
the
thing
that
we
know
is
raised
by
people
as
the
number
one
thing
the
ali
service
is
being
nearly
wholesale
rejected
by
one
of
the
two
and
then
the
other
on
the
opt
out.
Is
you
know
saying
that
we
have
to
pay
the
full
price,
whether
we
use
them
or
not?
And
that's
not
even
mentioned
yet
in
here.
So.
A
B
C
A
A
C
C
A
C
People
that
you
want
to
make
sure
that
the
people
know
that
we
asked
for
all
of
these
things
and
nobody's
going
to
give
us
all
these
goals.
I
think
that's
a
good
point
to
make.
That's
not
what
I
took
from
the
rfc
that
they're
going
to
go
one
truck
down
the
front
just
for
recycling
and
one
truck
down
the
back
for
your
trash
anybody
else.
That
is
not
what
I
I
I.
A
B
Go
review
that
put
a
pin
in
it
and
go
review
it
if
we
have
time
after
going
through
this
survey
because
yeah
one
of
my
neighbors
has
waste
management
currently
and
they
do
have
recycling
in
their
alley
and
maybe
their
current
policy
for
new
people
has
changed.
But
maybe
we
can
just
go.
Take
a
look
at
exactly
what
they
said
in
the
rfp
response.
A
Right,
well,
I
mean
we'd
like
to
have
them
do
both
in
the
alley
as
we
requested
and
yeah,
if,
if
I'm
wrong
great,
but
currently
they're
providing
mine
and
they
require
it
to
be
split,
which
is
super
annoying-
and
I
know
a
lot
of
people
have
a
big
problem
with
that,
and
a
lot
of
people
are
dealing
with
that
so
yeah.
Let's
clarify
that.
B
B
B
B
D
B
B
A
Right
and
I
think
when
you
go
through
the
details,
we're
gonna
find
that.
So
I
think
then,
what
member
brinker's
saying
honestly,
I
think
better
than
this
paragraph
style
would
be
like
a
bullet
point.
Yes
or
no
for
the
things
that
matter.
Like
the
key
points,
you
know
alley
service
for
waste
alley
service
or
you
know
full
alley
or
curbside
waste
for
sorry,
full
alley
or
curbside
pickup.
A
D
D
A
A
E
A
D
B
B
A
Yeah
I
mean-
and
it
also
should
probably
be
really
clear.
This
is
how
company
a
responded-
or
you
know
they
accepted
the
base
service
with
these
differences
right,
because
the
com,
yeah
or
just
company
a
accepted
the
base
service
definition
with
these
changes
or
differences.
And
then
then
you
can
just
list
the
things
that
are
different
than
what
was
requested.
A
I
I
think
it
makes
it
more
simple
to
read
if
it
says
that
they
accepted
the
base
service
as
defined,
except
for
because
we're
pointing
out
the
things
that
are
different
than
what
are
what
we
requested
right.
We
defined
what
the
base
service
is
company
accepted,
based
service,
except
for
these
differences.
B
B
B
A
C
C
C
So
that's
it
then
does
this
mean
that
anyone
can
opt
for
ali
service,
regardless
of
whether
or
not
they
have
they
currently
have
it?
No,
if
not,
which
households
will
be
allowed
to
have
ali's
service
customers
currently
receiving
ali
service,
can
maintain
that
service.
The
rfp
did
not
stipulate
the
number
of
alley
customers,
nor
did
it
provide
the
number
of
potential
ali
customers.
C
The
pricing
provided
by
waste
management's
response
was
based
on
the
percentage
of
ali
customers
that
waste
management
currently
has
today,
through
our
knowledge.
At
the
time
of
the
rfp
waste
management,
was
the
only
service
provider
providing
service
to
ali,
not
true
in
order
to
provide
the
city-wide
pricing
as
requested
the
number
percentage
of
current
alley,
customers
was
utilized
with
the
city,
considering
allowing
a
hauler
to
charge
an
additional
fee
for
alexa.
I
don't
think
we've
said
so
and
then.
C
Then
we
asked
them,
could
households
put
their
garbage
out
in
the
alley
and
the
recycling
at
the
curb,
or
vice
versa,
as
we
asked
them
if
they
could
do
that
waste
management
only
provides
curbside,
recycle
currently
or
automated
sites
for
our
automated
side
load
recycled
trucks
are
not
compatible
with
alleys.
According
to
the
city's
rfe,
there
are
42
miles
of
alley
and
4.8
miles
of
its
paved.
C
C
Weird
so
yeah
we
recognize
that
ali's
service
is
convenient
for
some
residents,
but
providing
ali
services
dangerous
and
negative
impacts
our
service
providers.
So
it's
just
a
weird
answer.
I
don't
think
he
meant
to
say
if
we
get
this
rfp
we're
going
to
go
up
and
down
the
alley,
we're
going
to
go
down
the
alley
for
one
thing
and
I'll
stay
on
the
other
side
for
the
other,
when
they
have
both
trucks.
Yeah.
All
along
my
block.
A
G
Yeah,
so
when
I
heard
that
I
think
you're
you're
both
right
right,
because
in
my
neighborhood
we
have
the
recycling
they
have,
they
have
to
take
it
to
the
front,
and
so
I
think
what
this
sentence
here
in
the
parentheses
then
would
be
curbside
and
ali's
service
is
consistent
with
current
offerings
or
or
something
to
that
to
that
effect.
So
for
and
this
would
be
for
both
the
the
top
line
and
the
in
the
second
bullet
as
well.
That's
what
they
say
clear.
A
The
I
mean
it
unless
we're
keeping
it
as
no,
because
it
is
no,
they
didn't
accept
it
for
everyone
who
wants
it
right
there
and
it
and
they're,
and
maybe
this
requires
further
clarification
from
them
director
d'andrea,
because
when
I
read
their
response
on
recycling,
I
get
that
it's
no,
and
I
know
that
they
won't
do
recycling
in
the
alley
at
my
house
right
now.
So
I
I
you
know,
I
know.
C
I'm
starting
to
think
I'm
sorry
raise
hands,
lower
hands,
I'm
starting
to
think
it's
because
I
I'd
love
to
see
your
alley,
because
mine
is
why
and
have
a
bit
saved
and
more
of
it's
getting
paid,
and
it
might
be
that
they
can
pick
up
your
trash
in
the
small
area,
but
wherever
it
has
to
do
with
the
side,
trucks,
the
trucks
that
pick
it
up
on
the
side
and
the
trucks
that
loaded
on
the
back.
It.
C
C
A
F
D
F
D
A
C
C
D
E
E
A
I
disagree
completely,
I
think
it's
very
important
since
we're
not
even
going
into
all
the
detail
of
what
we
requested
we're
just
listing
four
of
the
primary
things
that
we
knew
were
the
most
important
based
on
citizen
input.
This
is
what
we
asked
for.
This
is
what
the
two
responded
with.
I
think
we're
going
in
a
very
good,
simple
direction
with
what
we
have
remember,
boring
vice
chair
borman,.
E
B
A
Which,
I
think,
is
a
good
justification
for
telling
the
story
simply
like
this:
the
citizens,
the
city,
took
input
from
citizens.
We
made
an
rfp.
These
are
the
top
four
points
of
our
65
page
rfp,
and
then
these
are
the
responses
about
the
top
four
points
that
we
heard
mattered
the
most
to
citizens.
I
think
we've
got
it
real
simple
here.
A
A
A
B
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
complete
disservice
to
the
input
of
citizens.
I
I
there's
you
know
if
someone's
not
going
to
read
it
they're
not
going
to
read
it.
If
they
don't
care,
they
don't
care.
But
this
is
a
the
you
can't
get
more
simple
than
that.
One
sentence
in
those
four
bullets
about
what
happened
in
the
background
and
then
the
basic
we're
not
talking
about
a
ton
of
information.
F
A
A
We
came
up
with
these
top
four
bullets
of
what
citizens
made
a
point
was
most
important
to
them
and
we're
saying
we
tried,
even
though
we
didn't
get
a
response
from
either
hauler
that
what
we
asked
for
has
been
completely
agreed
to
and
and
then
we're
pointing
out
exactly
what
they
did
and
didn't
of
those
top
main
important
points
agree
to.
I
don't
understand
why
anyone
thinks
this
is
difficult.
This
is
not
complicated,
it's
not
overly
long,
it's
it's
about
as
simple
as
you
can
get
and
actually
be
honest.
F
C
Okay,
it's
getting
wordy,
it
is
getting
wordy
this.
This
could
be.
Why
don't
we
settle
on
a
certain
number
of
bullet
points?
Maybe
five
six.
We
have
four
not
done
speaking
as
far
as
the
citizens,
knowing
what
we've
asked
for
and
what
we've
done.
All
of
this
is
on
the
englewood
website.
We
all
of
it
says
we
have
not
been.
We
have
been
very
open,
it's
all
recorded.
All
of
these
meetings
are
recorded.
C
C
There's
no
arbitrariness
here,
we're
just
trying
to
keep
it
simple
and
we're
not
going
to
re-litigate
the
entire
two
years
of
meetings.
We
want
to
tell
everybody
hey:
these
are
our
options?
Would
you
be
interested
in
a
remember
we're
not
asking
everybody
to
pick
one
of
these
companies
we're
asking
everybody.
Do
we
want
universal
service,
one
trash
hauler,
that's
really
what
we're
asking
here.
They
don't
need
to
know
the
whole
history
of
why.
A
G
I'm
just
gonna
if
we
need
to
vote
on
the
motion.
That's
fine!
My
suggestion
is
to
hold
the
vote
until
we
actually
get
a
first
draft
done
just
so
that
we
can
see
if
it's
even
an
issue
at
the
end
of
this
I
agree.
We
should
keep
this
simple
as
simple
as
possible,
just
so
that
we
get
the
highest
number
of
returns,
but
we
haven't
even
got
a
draft
one
done
we're
trying
to
to
cut
and
paste
this
thing
and
we're
only
a
quarter
of
the
way
through.
F
B
A
A
C
C
E
Yes,
we
have
full
alleyway
service
for
for
people
who
already
have
it
company
b,
full
alley
service
period,
and
we
maybe
go
through
our
five
points
that
we
have
in
that
upper
paragraph
in
terms
of
whether
they
covered
or
not,
so
that
we
give
them
a
big
highlights.
But
I
think
that
way
we
can
compare
apples
to
apples
with
that's
not
just
a
a
wall
of
text
for
us,
so
that
way
people
can
see
it
a
little
easier.
A
I'm
not
opposed
to
a
table,
but
I
don't
think
it's
actually
going
to
make
it
more
simple,
because
right
now
what
is
going
in
there
is?
It's
not
you
know
it's
misleading
like
there's
the.
What
we
had
up
above
is
pretty
accurate
and
clear,
and
then
the
questions
in
the
survey
can
make
it
even
more
clear
when
we're
asking
the
specific
questions.
Remember
brinker,.
E
Sorry,
let
me
jump
back
in
just
really
quick
again,
I'm
sorry!
I
I
think
it's
just
maybe
you
know
we
say
we
put
out
an
rfp
with
these
things
that
we
really
wanted,
but
unfortunately
neither
of
the
providers
came
back
with
that.
So
we
keep
it
to
a
sentence
similar
to
that
and
then
we
just
say
based
on
the
actual
responses
we
were
able
to
get
from
these
providers.
E
This
is
what
they're
willing
to
offer
what
we're
able
to
come
up
with,
and
then
that
way
we
end
up
with
saying
that
we
did
work
on
on
creating
a
a
very
detailed
proposal
that
we
really
wanted
stuff
on,
but
nobody
satisfied
it
period
and
that
pretty
much
summarizes
the
end,
the
the
last
two
years,
because
what
they
really
care
about
is
cost
and
they
care
about
what
the
services
are
actually
going
to
be.
Who
cares
that
if
we
wanted
large
item
pickup,
you
know
or
compost?
E
E
Because
maybe
we
just
include
that
in
the
table
just
say
based
on
our
responses
from
citizens
in
the
past,
these
are
the
things
that
we're
really
wanted,
and
these
are
the
differences.
Was
it
provided?
Yes,
if
both
of
them
provided
it
then
great,
but
if
they
don't,
then
that's
where
we
we
show
the
contrast.
I
just.
E
A
C
A
E
A
B
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
I
really
like
vice
chair
borman's
suggestion
of
a
table.
I
think
that
it
helps,
simplify
and
also
allows
us
to
compare
exactly
what
he's
saying
apples
to
apples.
I
think
otherwise
the
details
are
easy
for
us
to
read
because
we've
been
doing
this
for
two
years,
but
I
think
for
people
just
picking
this
up,
it
would
be
great
for
them
to
just
see
something
side
by
side
so
that
they
could
really
weigh
in
based
on
a
simple.
A
A
B
G
B
D
D
A
Wait
we
haven't
well,
let's
we'll
get
to
there.
I
was
asking
that
only
because
it
was
about
the
price
but
we'll
get
to
there.
Okay,
so
remember,
brinker
suggested
adding
what
something
in
between
oh,
I
see
yeah
neutral.
I
also
think
we
should
add
three
additional
questions
that
are
relevant.
One
is:
do
you
have
ali
service
for
waste?
A
A
A
A
A
lot
of
people
have
that
a
lot
of
people
want
that,
and
that
should
be
a
people.
A
lot
of
people
brought
that
up
in
the
meetings,
even
though
we
didn't
include
that
in
the
rfp.
That's
still,
we
know
that
a
tremendous
number
of
citizens
have
that
included.
Bundled
branches
bags
of
grass
trimmings
leaves.
D
So
four,
as
you
can
see,
there
is
there's
a
part,
a
and
a
part
b.
So
if
depending
on
which
way
you
answer
the
first
quest,
the
first
part,
do
you
currently
receive
recycling
services
as
a
part
of
your
service?
Then
you
go
to.
If
you
get
an
yes,
then
you
go
to
this
one.
If
you
answered
no,
then
you
go
to
this
one.
Does
that
make
sense.
A
It
does,
but
I
think
that
the
prices
based
on
what
I
know
are
should
be
adjusted
a
little
bit.
I
think
that
the
bottom
one
should
be
20
number
a
should
be
22
because
I
know
so
remember
brinker.
We
talked
about
that
last
time.
As
far
as
signing
up
for
waste
services,
my
neighbors
signed
up
for
waste
services
last
month
and
got
22
dollars
a
month
for
trash
and
recycling.
A
D
A
A
B
A
F
E
F
F
A
F
E
A
Right,
well,
I
think
if
we
keep,
I
don't
know,
does
anyone
disagree
with
the
bottom
being
22
for
both
and
19
for
just
trash,
because
if
it
is
12
or
it's
less
than
that,
that'll
still
be
informative,
because
we
know
that
19
is
less
than
any
of
our
responses.
Are,
I
think
it's
it's
just
a
little
bit
more
accurate
for
getting
what
the
low
end
is.
A
A
A
G
A
It's
possible
because
people
have
been
forced
to
do
it
for
a
while.
So
some
of
them
might
you
know
how
people
are
about
change
some
people,
because
they
they
might
have
moved
into
the
neighborhood
before
or
I
mean
after
it
was
no
longer
an
option
and
they're
used
to
having
their
recycling
by
their
front
door
and
their
waist
in
the
alley
like
having
it
as
separate
questions.
Just
handles
that
that's
fair.
A
A
A
B
B
A
So
if,
if
a
bunch
of
citizens
say
that
if
it
has
ali
or
curbside
and
large
item-
and
they
all
say
very
amenable-
then
that's
a
very
strong
signal
that
city
council
can
say:
hey
haulers,
you
know
we
told
you
what
we
wanted
you.
You
didn't
necessarily
give
us
what
we
wanted,
but
we
know
that
the
citizens
want
it.
So,
let's,
let's
get
those
terms,
adjusted,
there's
no
reason
they
can't
negotiate.
F
D
A
D
F
F
A
They
both
push
back
on
that
and
they're
saying
that
it
goes
up.
Basically,
what
we
got
back
is
it's
going
to
be
three
percent
every
year
right
for
both
okay
and
then
my
suggestion
on
amenable,
because
I
agree
that
that
word
may
not
be
in
everyone's
vocabulary
strongly
in
favor,
somewhat
in
favor
neutral,
not
in
favor
or
strongly
against.
I
mean
those
are
makes
it
more
clear.
A
A
A
A
G
A
F
G
B
A
D
A
A
I
mean
I
feel
like
that
is
is
too
general
because
it
doesn't.
You
know
like
given
the
conditions
of
on
the
proposals
like
which
one
are
we
talking
about,
and
and
if
we're
going
to
do
this,
I
mean
isn't
that
what
these
ones
above
it
are
really
asking
is,
if,
like,
I
feel
like
that's
that
one's
not
good.
B
B
A
B
Yeah
that
one
caught
my
eye
as
well,
especially
because
it
doesn't
lay
out
the
pluses
and
minuses
of
either
one
I
mean
at
a
glance.
Everyone
would
like
to
have
an
input,
a
ballot,
but
we
talked
about
in
previous
meetings
how
that
would
really
tie
the
hands
of
the
city
and
not
be
able
to
adjust
things
over
time.
B
B
A
Yeah
and
to
add
to
the
nuance
of
that,
if,
if,
if
it
went
on
a
ballot,
I
mean
what
would
go
on
the
ballot,
what
some
description
of
terms
right
and
then,
if
the
city
couldn't
you
know
if
those
those
terms
would
either
be
not
very
reflective
of
what
citizens
want,
which
we
put
so
much
effort
into
sorting
out
or
it
would
be
something
that
if
it
was
what
citizens
want,
then
it
might
be
something
that
the
city
couldn't
even
fulfill
and
find
find
a
provider
to
provide
go
ahead.
Vice
chair,
mormon,
yeah.
E
I
don't
like
this
question
because
of
the
nuance
behind
it,
because
yeah
I
do
think
that
people
would
probably
vote
for
having
their
own
input
for
it,
but
if
it's
set
in
stone
as
a
law,
essentially
that
needs
to
be
repealed
by
the
people.
I
think
we
just
let
city
council
decide
whether
they
want
to
put
it
on
there
or
not,
and
you
know
they'd
have
to
come
up
with
some
sort
of
wording,
but
you
know,
hopefully
this
input
will
come
back
and
it'll
either
favor
or
it'll,
not
favor
and
they'll
just
decide.
A
F
A
A
D
Headed
on,
as
you
know,
would
you
like
to
see
this
placed
on
a
future
ballot
for
consideration
by
englewood
voters
with
a
yes
or
no,
and
the
council
actually
requested
that
it
be
worded
this
way
where
there's
some
options
given
as
to
how
the
decision
should
be
made.
So
this
was
specific
feedback
from
them.
G
Yeah
so
from
that-
and
I
get
it
if
we
have
visibility
into
this
and
then
it's
non-binding
absolutely,
but
if
it's
visible,
I
don't
see
how
that
was,
would
benefit
the
city
council
whatsoever.
If
everybody
said
that
they
wanted
to
have
it
as
a
future
ballot
and
then
they
decided
not
to
put
it
on
the
ballot.
E
I
was,
I
feel,
like
I
remember,
a
ballot
initiative,
or
maybe
it
was
just
a
thing
that
the
city
council
put
on
there,
but
it
was
like
the
ability
for
us
to
provide
internet
via
this
from
the
city
or
something
like
that.
It
was
like
more
of
a
ballot
question
about.
Would
you
be
okay
with
the
city
allowing
us
to
negotiate
for
this
or
something
like
that?
And
maybe
it's
more
like
a
I
don't
know.
E
A
E
G
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
F
A
We
haven't
talked
about
that
yet
that
that
can
be
in
our
next
meeting
as
well,
and
you
know
we
are
going
to
have
meetings
because
of
the
response
of
this
and
then
putting
together.
Our
recommendation
to
city
council,
which
is
the
ultimate
goal
of
this
committee,
is
to
provide
something
to
city
council,
okay.
So
let's
so
we
can
schedule
our
next
meeting
and
and
go
over
that
part,
because
there
is
discussion
and
we're
already
past
time.
Remember:
brinker.
A
D
Or
so
so,
I'm
still
scheduling,
also
probably
for
that
first,
just
or
that
first
full
week
of
march
the
two
public
meetings
so
again
we're
going
to
do
one
virtual
or
online
and
one
in
person,
and
so
we
want
that
information
on
the
postcard
as
well
and
so
yeah.
So
I
think
if
we
can
shoot
for
finalizing
this
and
getting
the
postcard
out
next
week,
so
we
would
probably
leave
the
survey
open
through
those
public
meetings.
I'm
just
going
to
pull
up
my
calendar,
real,
quick,
so
we'd
probably
have
data
back.
A
D
A
A
D
Yeah
because
we
can
hold
them
through
that
oops
sorry
well,
yeah,
so
we'll
we'll
have
them
coincide
with
ending
the
the
at
this
at
the
meetings.
So
then
we
would
spend
that
next.
I
guess
you
wouldn't
receive
it
until
the
night
of
the
meeting,
because
we'd
be
putting
them
together
that
day
before.
Well,
then,
what.
A
D
B
A
A
Oh
sorry,
I
was
looking
at
a
calendar
all
right.
I
want
to
make
it
the
29th
then,
because
I
want
to
make
sure
we
have
all
the
data
and
have
some
time
to
process
that
and
work
on.
You
know,
then
any
of
us
who
want
to
be
putting
together
any
language
or
thoughts
for
our
response.
We
can
be
working
on
that
and
then
we
can
meet
at
six
on
the
29th
and
work
on
our
response
to
city
council.
F
F
F
A
D
Yeah,
excuse
me
so
the
multi-year
contractor
are
you
talking
about
member
brown?
Yes,
yeah,
there's
there's
language
specific
to
the
state
of
colorado
that
restricts
municipalities
from
entering
into
multi-year
contracts,
and
so
there's
specific
language
that
says
it's
annual
appropriation
and
so
there's
somewhat
of
a
risk
in
there.
You
know
that
the
new
council
or
a
new
council
might
not
approve
it,
but
it's
typical
across
the
entire.