►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
350
seem
kind
of
high,
but
then
the
prices
weighed
out
differently
on
other
parts
of
their
proposal.
It
wasn't
like
one
was
consistently
more
expensive
on
everything
they
they
kind
of
all
shook
out
to
be
to
be
fairly,
even
but
just
as
far
as
that
extra.
If
you
have
extra
trash
or
extra
yard
waste
that
you
want
to
put
with
crash
about
a
dollar
fifty
was
fine
and
350.
I
was
hoping
if
we
do
negotiate
or
have
the
opportunity
that
that's
something
we
could
ask
the
republic
if
they
could
come
down
a
little
on
that.
B
A
B
With
you,
but
I
mean
a
dollar
fifty
doesn't
seem
like
much
to
a
lot
of
people
or
350,
but
people
living
on
fixed
incomes.
You
know
all
this
is
making
a
difference
in
their
lives.
What
we
are
doing
here
and
it
is
becoming
so
expensive
to
live
in
this
city
and
now
you're.
We
are
asking
us
to
put
something
else
on
our
water
bill,
and
people
are
very
unhappy
about
this.
I've
spoken
to
people,
my
neighborhood.
B
B
D
Yeah,
just
I
mean
I
think
it's
absolutely.
We
should
be
taking
cost
into
effect
and
and
we
should
be
comparing
what
the
current
average
rates
are
that
are
paid,
which
I
don't
have
it
right
in
front
of
me,
but
I
think,
was
around
25
somewhere
between
25
and
30
bucks
a
month
based
on
the
service.
D
So
my
other
point
was
that
I
think
we
should
be
keeping
as
we're
going
through
these
issues
kind
of
a
running
list,
because
if
we
do
reach
a
point
where
we
want
to
go
back
to
the
haulers
and
say
you
know
whether
it
be
a
full
formal
proposal
or
a
negotiation
like
on
this
yard
waste
point.
For
instance,
I
have
some
others
dane
brought
some
up
that
we
might
wanna.
D
What
these
outstanding
issues
and
questions
are
and
then,
as
a
group,
we
could
make
a
determination
about
whether
you
know
we
feel
like
they
should
resubmit,
supplemental
materials
or
even
consider
a
revised
rfp
all
together.
So
we
can
make
sure
we're
thinking
through
all
these
additional
issues.
F
Yeah
jeff,
I
am
keeping
track
of
I'm
trying
to
keep
track
and
I've
like
for
our
previous
meeting.
I
went
back
through
and
kind
of
noted
things
so
that
I'm
capturing
trying
to
capture
everything,
but
I
think
that's
a
great
approach.
E
Carson,
sorry,
I
interrupted
you
jeff,
I
didn't.
I
won't
do
that
anymore,
carson,
your
name.
C
E
Had
a
question
for
interpretation
member
brinker,
so
you
you,
when
you're
saying
the
dollar
fifty
or
three
fifty
you're
talking
about
the
additional
bag
pickup
on
that,
and
so
like.
Would
that
be
interpreted
as
per
bundle
of
branches.
A
I
was
interpreting
that,
I
suppose
that's
a
question.
I
don't
know
if
I
interpreted
right,
but
I
had
figured
if
the
extra
bundle
of
branches
was
about
the
size
of
a
96
gallon
bin,
then
they
would
charge
you
that
extra
dollar
50
for
it.
E
A
A
E
Also
depends,
you
know
it's
more
of
an
like
an
environmental
event
when
there's
like
at
least
that's
when
I
have
to
deal
with
branches,
is
when
there's
a
big
storm,
and
suddenly
I
have
a
ton
of
branches,
and
it's
piles
of
of
that.
I
have
to
you
know
it
takes
me
hours
to
bundle
a
bunch
of
branches
and
then
so
far
I've
never
had
to
pay
a
dollar
to
have
any
of
that
taken
away.
I
agree
with
remember
kawanabe.
Is
that
right.
E
Kawanabe,
remember
kawanabe,
that
I
would
prefer
it
to
go
and
not
be
in
the
landfill,
but
you
know
if
it's
gonna
cost
me
a
whole
bunch,
I'd,
probably
just
let
it
go
landfill.
A
Yeah
we're
kind
of
all
over
the
place,
but
their
yard
waste
prices
and
compost
prices
were
probably
a
lot
higher
than
any
of
us
would
have
liked
to
have
seen,
and
their
minimum
participation
rates
also
seemed
pretty
high
for
us
to
to
reach,
and
so
that
was
kind
of
disappointing
disappointing
to
see.
I
I'm
not
sure
that
we
would
get.
A
So
I'm
sorry
that
that
takes
us
off
in
a
different
direction.
But
since
we're
talking
about
yard
waste,
I
guess
it
is
relevant,
but
I
didn't
see
that
as
necessarily
being
viable
for
this
first
round
of
of
trying
to
get
this
tested
out
for
the
city
and
get
it
you
know
acceptable
to
all
the
residents.
I
just
didn't
think
we
would
meet
those
minimum.
G
Yeah
and
to
that
point
I
think
what
I'd
like
to
say
or
suggest
is
that
we
put
a
the
scenario
list
to
these
service
providers
and
get
this
matrix
information
as
far
as
like
the
cost
per
scenario,
just
so
that
we
can
look
at
all
these
different
things
like
the
the
trash
and
and
also
talk
to
them
about
historically
in
lafayette.
What
happened
over
there
like?
How
many
did
you
actually
get
or
was
that
a
city
compelled
program?
G
A
Yeah
good
idea-
and
that
was
one
of
the
questions
that
I
sent
to
maria
like-
why
are
these
costs
so
much
higher?
I
was
looking
at
yard,
waste
and
compost
specifically,
but
why
are
they
so
much
higher
than
the
costs
that
other
cities
that
have
gone
to
organized
trash?
Why
are
compost
prices
so
much
higher?
The
other
range
seemed
to
be
low
in
five
bucks
and
at
the
higher
end,
maybe
11
bucks
and
I'd
kind
of
figured
in
my
head
that
maybe
we'd
bids
around
eight
dollars
extra
for
compost
a
month.
A
So
when
it
came
to
be
what
was
it
like,
16
and
30
that
was
kind
of
shocking
to
see,
and
I'm
just
curious.
That
would
be
one
of
our
questions
to
ask.
The
providers
is
why
the
costs
are
so
much
higher
than
other
cities.
They'll
probably
say
that
we're.
Maybe
we
don't
have
the
same
volume
or
number
of
houses
as
other
cities.
I
don't
know,
but
I'd
still
be
curious
to
find
out.
H
So
first
I'll
say
that
I
agree
with
the
point:
that's
been
brought
up
about
the
branches
you
know
I
I
subscribe
currently
to
republic
and
that's
not
part
of
my
subscription,
but
I
it's
not
something
I
would
use
anyway.
I
would
pay
a
tree
service
to
haul
that
stuff
off.
I've
learned
from
experience
it's
much
easier
to
do
it
that
way
for
me,
but
the
2500
compost.
H
F
Yeah
we
have
about
9
600
accounts
is
what
I've
calculated
but
2500
to
me
that
that
minimum
that
they
said
is
basically
telling
me
they
don't
want
to
do
it,
because
I
don't
think
we
can
get
so.
Let's
say
that's
roughly:
what
would
that
be
a
little
less
than
a
third?
Maybe
they
just
don't
want
to
do
it
and
and
to
try
and
educate
people
at
this
initial
stage.
You
know
just
about
the
base
program
and
then
to
get
them
to
sign
on
for
2500
households
to
sign
on
for
composting.
F
It's
like
wow,
that's
just
it
was
so
deflating
to
see
that,
because
I
I
just
don't
know
that
we
can
get
there
in
this
first
round.
300.
Maybe
you
know
with
with
waste
management,
but
not
2500.,
carson.
E
Just
specific
to
your,
you
wanted
us
to
respond
to
republic.
The
couple
specifics
I
had
on
republic
were
so
they're
pushing
for
a
four
percent
increase
rather
than
three
percent.
I
think
is
that
right,
yeah.
F
I
Matt,
so
I
was
just
wondering
I
agree
that
really.
The
third
thing
we
need
to
compare
here
is
what
people
are
currently
paying.
Is
there
any
way
to
get
that
data
beyond
the
survey
itself?
Is
there
any
way
to
know
what
the
current
rates
are
for
these
companies
or
all
companies
operating
in
englewood.
F
F
We
could
ask
you
know
I
could
ask
each
of
you
maybe
to
send
me
your
bills
just
to
see,
and
we
could
compile
that
as
as
kind
of
a
snapshot
in
time,
but
we
don't
have
good
or
nor
a
source
of
good,
a
way
to
get
good
data
on
a
wide
spectrum
of
people
and
what
I
suspect,
because,
based
on
what
we
heard
at
those
public
hearings
in
our
public
meetings,
was
that
it's
all
over
the
board
and
they
might
lure
you
in
with
that
initial
good
price.
F
And
then
this
just
happened
to
me.
Actually,
my
you
know
they.
They
I've
been
getting
the
same
price
per
month
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
it
was
like,
oh
by
the
way,
here's
your
new
bill.
You
know
that's
12
more
per
month
and
it
was
coveted,
you
know
related
and
this
and
that-
and
maybe
that
is
or
maybe
that's
not,
but
that's
the
what
the
feedback
is.
So
it's
more
qualitative
data
than
it
is
quantitative
data
that
we
have.
A
Do
you
think
we
could
ask
them
the
average
rate
for
all
of
their
customers
in
inglewood,
as
well
as
their
lowest
and
their
highest
yeah?
We
can
ask
them
anything
good,
let's,
let's
do
and
also
a
sense
of
how
their
rates
the
first
couple
years
differ.
Them
differ
from
what
their
rates
would
be
after
the
first
couple
years.
J
J
Well,
I
I
just
wanted
to
mention
a
couple
things
back
to
the
compost.
I
was
just
curious
also
why
the
bins
are
so
large.
Why
would
you
need
a
65
gallon
bin
to
compost,
especially
if
you're
brand
new
at
it,
and
maybe
if
we
could
go
with
smaller
bins,
we
could
reduce
the
cost
and
if
we
could
reduce
the
cost,
maybe
more
people
would
sign
up
for
that
service,
good
question
and
then
okay-
and
I
just
had
one
other
comment
also.
J
This
is
going
back
to
marcy's
comment
about
if
the
recycling
and
the
composting
is
taken
care
of
properly.
I
did
see
in
the
waste
management
proposal
that
they
did
invite
all
of
us
to
go
down
to
the
recycle
facility,
as
well
as
the
compost
facility,
and
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
go
check
it
out.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
is
interested.
A
Yeah,
definitely
because
that
was
one
of
the
questions
I
had
was
the
differences
in
their
recycling
facilities,
given
that
waste
management
really
touted
their
brand
new
state-of-the-art
facility,
and
I
have
no
way
to
compare
that
to
the
the
one
that
republic
was
using.
I
think
it
was
gfl
and
is
it
just
how
they
wrote
their
proposal
bragging
about
it?
Or
is
there
really
a
significant
difference.
K
I
just
had
a
comment
again
on
the
compost
yeah.
I
definitely
agree
with
the
size,
but
I
was
also
thinking
about
at
least
they
mentioned
picking
up
weekly
with
the
compost
too.
That
seems
a
little
excessive.
I
was
wondering
if
they
would
be
willing
to
do.
You
know
bi-weekly
or
something
like
that
that
might
make
it
more
manageable
in
terms
of
pricing
as
well,
because
you
know
from
my
house,
I
guess,
if
we're
not
including
yard
waste,
I
would
probably
have
you
know,
maybe
a
couple
of
gallons.
K
You
know
at
most
depending
on
what's
there
so
something
like
the
32
gallon
or
whatever
the
smallest
version
was,
would
be
possible,
but
also
spacing
it
out,
and
that
might
allow
us
to
to
cut
down
cost
and
also
increase
the
likelihood.
I
think
that
if
the
price
is
lower,
we're
more
likely
to
hit
our
target.
K
The
other
thing
is
too
is:
can
we
try
an
initial
compelling
everybody
in
the
city
to
compost?
I
know
certain
cities
have
done
that.
You
know
my
brother
just
moved
back
from
san
francisco,
so
that's
an
exaggerated
option,
but
it
is
one
of
those
things
where
they
make
people
compost
and
they
also
charge
more
for
people
who
throw
away
more.
So
it
might
cause
more
people
to
recycle
as
well
as
compost.
K
F
F
D
Oh
real,
quick,
I
was
going
to
bring
mention
the
weekly
part
two,
I
know
in
denver.
They
have
opt-in,
compost,
service
and
it's
bi-weekly,
and
I
don't
know
what
their
experience
has
been.
I
used
to
have
it
when
I
lived
in
denver
years
back
and
I
didn't
have
any
issues
with
it.
You
know
in
a
lid
in
a
large
container.
D
I
do
think
there
are
legitimate
questions
on
this
add-on
compost
point
because
it's
been
a
topic
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
interest
in.
I
think
the
survey
reflected
that
as
well.
I
really
do
think
it's
worthwhile
going
back
or
asking
the
question
to
explore.
Bi-Weekly,
potentially
smaller
bins-
and
you
know
I'm
just
the
minimum
participation.
I
thought
the
exact
same
thing
director
that
the
2500
was
just
no
we're
not
gonna.
D
Do
that
and
as
something
that
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
you
know,
yard
waste
could
become
a
part
of
that
too.
I
do
think
there
should
be
options
for
yard
waste
pickup
aside
from
just
compost.
I
I
no
pun
intended.
I
just
thought
these
compost
bits
were
kind
of
trash
and
it
wasn't
very
30
a
month.
D
On
top
from
the
first
provider,
I
just
don't
see
people
buying
into
that.
So
I
was
pretty
disappointed
in
these
compost
bits.
E
Just
in
regards
to
cost
a
lot
of
people
have
received
these
door
hangers,
I'm
sure
most
of
you
probably
have-
and
I
did
look
into
that.
That's
this
waste
services
I
mentioned
earlier
and
they're,
offering
a
fixed
rate
of
16
a
month
for
96
gallon
waste
five
dollars
extra
a
month,
so
so
for
recycling
as
well,
and
then
that
includes
yard
waste,
obviously
landfill
not
to
the
the
ideal
place.
E
But
that's
what
we're
up
against
as
far
as
like
citizen
perspective,
on
cost
is
16
a
month
guaranteed
for
two
years
for
waste,
and
a
lot
of
people
are
probably
jumping
on
that
and
that's
provided
by,
like
the
service,
is
actually
fulfilled
by
waste
management
and
there's
and
within
that
we
know
that
there's
markup,
because
waste
services
is
the
one
doing
it.
So
you
know
we
know
that
waste
management
can
provide.
It
cost
wise
for
less
than
16.
C
L
A
H
H
At
we
choose
which
one
we
want
so
that
in
and
of
itself
adds
some
cost.
Then
there
are
other
services
that
were
specified
in
the
rfp
that
this
flyer,
they
you
know
they
kind
of
just
get
to
pick
what
they
want.
So
there
may
be
some
room
for
the
committee
to
adjust
the
desired
services
in
order
to
shoot
for
a
lower
target
price.
But
those
are
some
of
the
considerations
that
are
potentially
getting
left
out
when
we
say
oh,
the
private
sector
can
just
do
it
cheaper.
C
B
Everyone
we
got
you,
but
you
know,
with
the
16
a
month
with
waste
services.
You
know
that
does
not
include
an
administrative
fee.
So
I
think
when
we're
talking
about
all
these
services
or
these
additional
fees
for
composting
and
for
some
of
the
people
who
cannot
bring
these
heavy
carts
down
to
the
alley
or
to
the
street
or
curbside,
you
know
that's
an
extra
fee.
B
And
so
what
I'm
wondering
is
I
mean
it's
all
well
and
good.
To
say
you
know
it's
15.46,
but
when
you
start
adding
up
all
the
fees,
it's
quite
a
bit
more
than
that.
I
believe
you
know
with
the
administrative
fees
and
then
also
I
know
this
has
not
been
brought
up,
but
I
still
don't
understand
the
part
about
if
your
trash
is
not
picked
up.
B
One
week
that
the
city
gets
the
credit
for
that,
so
I
mean
I
know,
I'm
opening
up
another
can
of
worms
so
to
speak
and
I'm
off
subject,
but
I
would
just
like
everybody
to
you
know
think
about
all
the
fees
that
are
involved
going
forward,
because
this
waste
service
is
16
a
month.
That's
it!
No,
you
know
nothing,
nothing
else,
and
if
I
were
a
citizen,
that's
what
I
would
go.
G
My
question
was
actually
just
towards
the
alley
maintenance.
So
if
we're
having
a
decrease
in
the
street
maintenance
and
upkeep,
are
we
diverting
those
funds
to
upgrading
our
alleys?
Are
we
gonna
get
paved
allies,
which
I
would
love
right,
but
just
a
consideration
for,
if
we're
having
all
the
trucks
now
go
through,
the
alleyway
does
that
cause
additional
harm
to
because
we're
already
getting
the
slipping
and
sliding
in
the
mud
season?
On
my
alley,.
F
So
the
the
way
that
it
was
presented
in
the
rfp
is
that
you,
you
can
put
it
out
either
on
your
alley
alley
or
on
the
street,
and
we
have
another
that
goes
beyond
choice,
because
in
some
cases
people
physically
can't
put
it
in
the
alley
or
physically
can't
put
it
at
the
street.
So
we
have
to
provide
basically
both
options,
but
to
your
point
about
the
paving
of
the
alley.
F
That
was
always,
I
believe
it
was
waste
connections
who
you
know,
refused
to
go
down
the
alleys
and
would
then
force
people
to
go
out
to
the
street
side.
But
we
have
not
been
going
through
we're
about
roughly
40
percent
through
the
city
of
kind
of
regrading,
our
alleys.
We
haven't
gotten
into
a
program
to
pay
them
yet,
but
we
are
re-grading
them
to
make
them
more
stable.
F
We've
been
getting
better
feedback
from
both
citizens
and
the
waste
haulers
that
the
alleys
are
more
accessible.
C
K
Yeah,
I
actually
was
just
responding
to
marcy's
comment
about
the
fees
and
stuff
like
that.
I
was
just
pulled
up
my
waste
management
bill
here
and
I
was
looking
let's
see
here.
I
have
a
fuel
environmental
charge
of
23.97
or
23.56
regulatory
cost
recovery,
charge,
375.
K
K
So
I'm
averaging
out
at
about
forty
dollars
a
month-
and
you
know
at
least
based
on
the
based
costs
of
just
because
all
we
have
is
recycling
and
garbage
we're
already
averaging
out
quite
a
bit
higher-
and
my
guess
is-
is
that
you
know
that
teaser
rate
that
they've
got
everybody
trying
to
come
into
for
the
first
two
years
is
going
to
go
up
significantly
or
they
probably
already
have
those
fees
built
in
there.
K
Until
you
get
your
first
bill,
you
know
they
don't
see
that
there's,
there's
fees,
because
I
don't
know
you
see
that
on
excel
bill.
You
see
that
on
your
water
bill,
you
see
it
on
your
comcast
bill.
It's
all
the
same.
We
all
end
up
paying
fees
and
I
definitely
agree
that
it
stinks
and
we
we
do
need
to
pay
attention
to
that
in
terms
of
our
total
cost.
K
L
K
We
need
to
make
sure
that
when,
if
we
decide
to
go
with
one
of
these
companies,
they
say
yes,
these
are
your.
These
are
the
costs.
There
is
no,
you
know
other
bs
fees
that
just
keep
getting
tacked
on
and
on
and
on,
and
that
might
be
one
big
thing
that
we
don't
have
to
get,
because
we
don't
get
the
coded
19
charge
or
something
like
that
as
well.
C
E
I
I
on
the
fees
when
we
evaluate
this
it'd
be
nice
to
know
like
what
is
the
total
fee?
That's
going
to
hit
the
citizen,
because
what
we're
looking
at
in
the
excel
sheet.
This
is
pre-city
admin
fees
right,
so
you.
H
D
E
I
just
switched
to
it,
but
I
haven't
gotten
a
bill
yet
so
I
my
current
I've
been
at
like
mine,
averages
out
to
like
25
with
waste
connections,
and-
and
so
I
took
this
because
I
wanted
to
see
it-
you
know,
and
but
I
had
already
paid
my
three
months
forward
for
waste
connections.
So
it
switches
for
me
on
october,
1st
and
then
I'll
I'll,
get
a
bill
and
find
out
if
they
put
more
on
it
than
the
you
know,
the
22
bucks
or
whatever
yeah.
D
If
they
have
it,
if
they
have
a
bill
now
we
can
take
a
look
at,
but
while
we're
we're
on
the
cost
subject,
I
guess
it
probably
makes
sense
in
understanding
that
they're.
D
This
is
not
inclusive
of
fees,
but
should
we
just
go
over
really
quickly
what
the
fees
look
like
at
least
I'm
looking
at
the
96
gallon,
which
you
know
is
one
uniform
option.
One
hauler
for-
and
this
is
for
trash
and
recycling
was
1890.
D
Another
hauler
was
1855..
I
think
I
figured
out
which
hauler
was
which
from
something
they
said
in
one
of
their
proposals
throughout
this,
but
I
forget
which
one
it
was
for
the
I
think
for
96
gallon
for
the
options
on
size
of
I
forget
what
we're
calling
it
the
choose,
pay
as
you
throw.
It
was
a
little
bit
higher
and
for
trash
and
recycling
again
1935
a
month
in
1880
a
month,
so
I
mean
they're
they're,
I
think
for
most
depending
on
what
the
fees
do.
D
I
know
for
me
that
would
be
a
reduction,
I'm
I'm
playing
waste
management
right
now
and
I
think
my
bill's
like
90
and
change
a
quarter,
so
it
would
represent
a
reduction
for
me,
but
I
think
it's
worthwhile
for
us
to
just
baseline
and
level
set
what
at
least
they've
come
forward
with.
Obviously,
composting
and
other
things
would
be
an
additional
amount,
but
it
is
a
it
would
be
a
reduction
for
a
lot
of
people.
I
think.
A
One
of
the
questions
I
have
when
we
interview
them
is
why
their
price
for
96
gallons
for
pay
as
you
throw,
is
higher
than
their
price
for
96
gallons
for
their
base.
Everyone
gets
the
same
size.
I
don't
know.
If
any
of
you
know
that
off
hand,
maybe
it
has
to
do
with
the
automation
of
their
trucks.
A
That's
something
I
was
curious.
I
thought
a
96
gallon
would
be
a
96
gallon
and
then
another
comment
on
the
on
the
fee.
Conversation
which
I
think
is
is
really
important,
especially
those
teething
rates.
A
Those
drive
me
nuts,
and
one
of
the
things
I
really
like
about
the
potential
for
a
city-wide
program
is
to
have
a
guaranteed
price
for
five
years,
where
I
know
that
my
bill
is
not
going
to
suddenly
go
up
by
50
without
me,
expecting
it
those
those
those
rates
where
you
have
it
for
a
year
or
you
have
it
for
two
years
that
can
be
really
jarring
for
some
people
when
it
suddenly
goes
up
on
year,
three.
F
D'andrea,
yes,
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
tell
everybody
I'm
trying
to
call
up
some
of
the
documents,
and
so
I'm
going
to
go.
I'm
going
to
get
back
on
my
back
connected
to
my
pc,
and
so
I'm
gonna.
You
know
no
longer
gonna
see
my
video,
but
you
should
still
hear
me
so
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that.
G
Yeah,
oh,
I
agree
with
jeff.
I
wanted
to
to
level
set
as
well
and
then
add
a
question
to
just
the
list.
Is
the
contract
examples
they
provided
over?
They
seem
to
be
all
over
the
board
as
far
as
the
number
of
households
comparative
to
the
the
overall
contracts
and
so
wanted
to
get
a
little
bit
more
insight
into
the
discrepancies
between
those.
E
Okay,
well
to
remember
brinker's
point
about
having
like
a
fix
like
knowing
what
it's
going
to
cost,
that
that
is
a
benefit,
and
that
could-
and
you
know,
if
we
do-
you
know,
get
a
good
deal
basically
and
the
city
admin
fees
aren't
too
high
and
we
are
actually
pulling
this
off
with
an
increase
in
service
by
having
ali
for
both,
then
that
actually
could
be
a
benefit
for
the
fixed
income
people.
E
You
know
I
know
like
when
I've
I
spent
a
period
of
time
knocking
doors,
and
I
talked
to
a
lot
of
people
who
are
fixed
income
and
concerned
about
property
taxes.
I
mean
there
are
a
lot
of
people
in
inglewood
who
that
that
is
an
issue
for
and
if
and
that
could
actually
potentially
be
a
benefit
of.
This
is
a
fixed
price.
Instead
of
the
way
we're
right
now.
You
know
the
providers
raise
the
price
all
the
time,
and
then
you
know
do
things
like
I
do
and
switch
providers
to
try
and
get
it
cheaper.
K
Again,
I
actually
just
had
a
question,
so
I
know
in
these
base
bids
type
of
thing.
It
shows
us
options
for
96,
gallon
64,
gallon
32
gallon
are
residents
allowed
to
choose
one
or
the
other,
or
is
everybody
like
if
we
sign
on
we
say
everybody's
going
to
be
at
96
gallon
everybody's
at
64,
gallon
everybody's
at
32
gallons?
H
D
It
looks
like
on
the
at
least
on
the
cost
proposal.
Summary
though
it's
almost
broken
down
as
a
uniform
96
versus
these
other
options
and
there's
different
pricing
for
it.
It
looks
like
I
thought
the
same
thing
steve
that
the
idea
was
to
provide
flexibility
as
far
as
what
citizens
want
to
select
for
their
size,
depending
on
how
much
they
throw
so
it
was
a
little
I
didn't
realize
we
were
getting
just
one
alternative
we
might
have
baked
that
into
the
rfp.
I
don't
recall.
A
I
think
we
wanted
to
get
their
their
pricing
on
both
just
to
weigh
them,
because
the
benefit
of
having
the
pay
as
you
throw,
which
would
be
the
32
64
96
gallons,
is
that
we
could
potentially
households
that
have
very
little
trash,
say
that
they're,
just
a
single
person
or
or
senior
so
forth
that
they
could
pay
less
because
they
don't
have
as
much
trash,
and
you
pay
more
if
you
have
a
lot
of
trash
and
that
kind
of
makes
sense
from
an
economist's
perspective.
A
H
D
And
it
looks
like
the
cost
savings
for
the
32
gallon
versus
the
96
gallon,
it's
less
than
a
four
dollar
difference,
1935
for
the
96
and
1545
for
the
32.
I
would
expect
that
would
be
a
little
bit
better
than
that
for
one-third
the
size,
but.
A
I
had
two
especially
based
on
the
pricing
we
had
seen
from
a
number
of
other
cities.
You
definitely
got
a
significant
price
cut
if
you
used
only
a
little
bit
of
trash,
whereas
this
there's
not
much
incentive
to
go
to
go
lower,
so
that
was
kind
of
a
surprise.
A
To
me
and
one
of
the
things
I
was
hoping
that
either
we
could
ask
them
about
or
put
in
our
wish
list
for
negotiating
with
them
about,
because
one
of
our
goals
should
be
encouraging
people
to
have
less
less
waste
overall
and
getting
a
much
lower
price,
for
that
is
one
of
the
ways
to
incentivize
that
behavior.
C
C
J
Okay,
so
on
that
topic,
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
on
the
sixth
tab.
It
does
talk
about
size
change
of
containers
and
I
just
thought
that
for
forty
dollars,
if
you
needed
to
change
the
size
of
your
container
after
a
one
time,
free
change
was
a
little
excessive.
So
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out.
J
C
G
Just
in
the
interest
of
time,
we've
got
about
a
half
hour
left.
I
just
wanted
to
check
in
and
see
what
next
steps
we're
going
to
be
or
or
what
we
should
be
looking
to
accomplish
in
this
meeting
to
set
us
up
for
success
for
the
next.
I
there's
several
questions
that
I
have,
but
is
this?
Are
we
continuing
just
to
pepper
questions?
So
it's
more
of
a
logistical
question
for
the
director.
C
F
Yes,
oh
good,
okay,
I
will
lower
my
hand
yeah.
I
think
you
know
what
we
can
do.
I
I
would,
I
think,
we're
having
a
good
discussion
right
now.
I
would
like
to
save
a
little
time
to
go
over
the
schedule
and
some
of
the
other
documents
that
were
in
the
agenda,
but
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
we'll
con.
F
We
can
continue
this
discussion
for
a
while,
but
then
ask
for
each
of
you
to
send
me
back
comments
or
questions
and
then
I'll
compile
those
within
the
next
few
days
and
get
those
back
out
to
you
so
that
we
can
have
a
complete
list
of
what
we'll
send
to
the
companies
so
no
need
to.
If
you
don't
feel
like
you
can
get
get
all
of
them
down
now.
I
think
the
discussion
is
of
more
value
than
just
throwing
out
the
questions
that.
E
I
know
the
top
we've
been
all
over
the
place,
but
you
had
originally
asked
to
respond
to
specifically
republic,
but
I
had
a
couple
specific
to
waste
management:
okay,
okay.
So
on
page
20
on
there's
it's
it's
kind
of
interesting
where
they're
talking
about
their
equipment
and
they're,
saying
that
they're
going
to
use
the
rear,
end
load
trucks
in
inglewood
with
the
the
corrado.
E
I
guess
that's
partly
what
I'm
confused
about
so
they're
they're,
saying
they're
going
to
use
corrado
canned
trucks,
but
that
because
of
our
alleys,
they're,
going
to
use
the
rear
end
load,
but
then
the
rest
of
their
document
talks
about
the
great
aspects
of
the
front
load
trucks.
And
then,
when
I
looked
at
the
corrado
can
truck
like
the
company
website.
They
actually
say
that
their
front
load
trucks
work
great
in
alleys,
so
I
was
just
kind
of
that's
something.
E
I
think
we
should
ask
them
about
just
to
understand
like
what
equipment
they're
actually
planning
on
using
and
why
they
why
they
touted
the
the
front
end
truck
in
their
proposal,
but
then
have
a
little
thing
that
says:
they're
going
to
use
the
rear
end.
One
and
even
though
the
the
manufacturer
says
the
front,
end
works
in
alleys
and
I
guess
the
front
end
ones.
You
know
there
is
a
safety
benefit,
because
it's
all
in
front,
so
the
driver
can
see
in
front
of
them.
F
Anyone
else
have
thoughts
or
comments
yeah,
please
open
it
up
to
both
way.
Waste
management
as
well.
G
A
couple
of
questions
I
had
was
if
we
could
get
metric
insight
as
far
as
the
carbon
footprint
that
they
have
projected
for
both
companies,
because
I
know
that
they
had
a
discrepancy
about
the
type
of
fuel
that
they
would
be
using
and
the
other
one
was
just
the
sharing
of
metrics.
I
I
like
the
idea
that
they
would
be
sharing
the
the
week
to
week
or
month-to-month,
pickup
and
recycling
to
the
city
and
wondering
if
they
would
make
that
visibility
to
the
citizens
as
well.
F
G
D
Yeah
kanji,
we
must
be
on
this
same
wavelength,
but
I
I
think
it's
worth
noting
that
it
looks
like
waste
management.
I
think
they
said
80
of
their
fleet
is
powered
by
clean,
burning
near
zero
emissions
compressed
natural
gas
fuel.
I
don't
think
I
think
republic
is
sound.
Are
they
straight
diesel?
It's
also
something
to
consider.
D
You
know,
for
these
trucks
are
going
to
be
driving
through
our
neighborhoods
and
we'll
be
breathing
that
air
for
a
long
time,
not
necessarily
a
dollars
and
cents
consideration,
but
I
thought
that
was
a
a
worthy
distinction
to
note.
A
Yeah
my
comment
was
on
that
exact
subject.
I
noticed
on
the
republic
website.
They
do
brag
that
they
use
a
lot
of
cmd
trucks,
and
I
was
surprised
that
in
this
proposal
specifically,
they
said
they
proposed
buying
new
diesel
trucks,
and
that
was
one
of
the
questions
I
would
like
to
ask
them
in
an
interview
is,
did
they
consider?
A
Would
they
consider
a
cng
truck
and
then
some
details
going
along
with
that,
and
this
goes
for
waste
management
as
well,
I'm
wondering
what
percentage,
if
any,
of
the
cng
going
into
those
trucks
comes
from
their
own
landfill,
in
other
words
using
waste
to
turn
it
into
essentially
a
renewable
fuel,
so
to
speak,
and
I
I
think
that
waste
management
does
that
and
I'd
be
curious
for
this
proposal
or
just
in
general,
what
percent
of
their
fuel
for
these
trucks
would
come
from
their
own
land,
landfill
versus
just
regular
natural
gas
and
then
the
same
kind
of
along
the
same
lines
for
republic?
A
Do
they
own
a
landfill?
Could
they
get
landfill
gas
from
that?
Could
they
put
that
into
c
d
trucks?
Is
that
something
they
do,
or
is
it
that
diesel
is
our
is
our
only
option
here.
A
Carson,
oh
sorry,
can
I
add
one
more
thing
on
that
subject:
sorry
about
that.
I
would
also
like
to
ask
them
in
their
interviews
if
they
have
looked
at
and
if
they
would
consider
in
the
future
not
right
away,
but
in
the
future,
doing
a
cause
comparison
about
moving
towards
electric
trucks,
especially
considering
their
state
grants.
Now
that
cover
the
incremental
difference
between
an
electric
truck
and
a
regular
truck.
A
So
in
theory
they
could
get
in
the
coming
years,
get
a
truck
for
the
same
price
if
they
got
that
grant
from
the
state
and
I'm
sure
that's
on
their
radar.
But
I
would
just
like
to
hear
their
answers
for
that.
E
This
is
a
little
bit
more
out
there,
but
maybe
not-
I
think,
some
of
you
all
know
about
this
stuff,
but
so
the
our
waste
water
treatment
plant
has
that
modification.
Now
that
generates
that
fuel
that
comes
off
of
it
right,
I
think,
remember,
frasier,
you
know
about
that
right.
Is
it
possible
that
that
could
be
something
that
we
could
tie
into
this
whole
deal,
that
that
could
be
fuel
that
that
this
that
they
use
for
the
trucks
I.
D
Think
it's
injected
straight
into
excel's
pipeline
on
site,
but
there
could
presumably
be
a
way
to
fuel
it
right
there,
and
I
know
other
cities
have
done
that
who
have
similar
options
that
would
be
kind
of
cool
fueling,
our
own
trucks
off
our
own
waste,
totally.
F
F
G
F
Absolutely
so
maybe
let's
talk
for
a
few
minutes
about
logistics,
so
I'm
just
gonna
stop
sharing
this
screen
and
go
to
the
share.
F
F
So
if
we
go
down
to
the
schedule
here
so
the
idea
was
is
that
we
would
talk
about
questions
tonight
and
then
give
those
to
the
firms
and
then
set
up
some
time
to
come
back,
set
up
interviews
with
them,
but
then
come
back
either
in
a
couple
of
weeks
or
three
weeks
to
review
our
scoring
sheets.
We
don't
have
to
do
that
step.
F
So
what
we
could
do
instead
is
set
a
date
for
when
you
want
to
get
questions
back
to
me
and
then
to
your
point
kanji,
we
could
get
that
initial
list,
maybe
I'll
just
throw
out
some
dates,
but
by
next
friday
we
should
give
you
guys
a
little
over
a
week,
but
there
is
a
holiday
weekend
in
here.
But
let's
say
next
friday
we
get
questions
back.
F
I
send
those
out
to
the
group,
you
can
either
add
on
or
we
can
see
where,
if
you've
answered
all
the
questions
and
then
so,
basically
one
iteration
before
they're
sent
to
the
companies
or
that
we
can
extend
that
longer
or
shorter
or
whatever.
L
F
Sure
so
that
schedule
that
I
have
pulled
up
here
so
are,
would
it
be
possible
to
meet
then
either
the
week
of
september
14th
or
the
21st
to
kind
of
go
over
those
questions
and
then
continue
to
kind
of
have
some
of
these?
These
discussions
about
you
know
where
we
go
from
here
or
do
you
want
to
do
the
interviews
first
or
would
you
do
you
want
me
to
try
and
schedule
that
tour
with
the
waste
management
facility.
L
F
F
Is
that
a
better
okay
getting
better
okay,
so
the
options
would
be.
Is
that
so?
What
are
our
next
steps?
So
we've
kind
of
got
a
game
plan
to
formulate
our
series
of
questions
for
the
two
proposals
proposers
and
then
I
either
we
go
straight
to
the
interviews
or
we
have
another
meeting
of
just
our
group
before
the
interviews
and
then
do
we
want
to
slot
in
that
tour
of
the
waste
management
merv
facility
sometime
in
there.
G
Could
I
add
an
additional
one
in
there
if
we
could
get
that
matrix
fee
visibility
both
of
those
on?
So
if
we
could
just
list
out,
you
know
those
various
different
scenarios,
as
well
as
the
the
price
breakdowns
and
then
the
end
to
end.
I
think
that
would
really
inform
a
lot
of
the
questions
that
we
have.
M
F
Yeah,
I
could
certainly
ask
republic
to
make
that
same
offer.
Marcy.
L
F
C
I
believe
director
d'andrea
said
september
11th.
Is
that
correct.
L
F
Okay,
so
I
will
ask
so
any
any
feedback
on
like
what
we
do
first
or
second
after
we
get
the
interview
or
the
quest
the
first
set
of
questions
finalized
and
back
to
the
two
firms.
Do
we
want
to
have
us
have
another
meeting
before
we
have
the
interviews
or
should
I
set
those
up.
D
D
L
F
And
I
will
work,
though,
and
get
you
those
that
kind
of
complete
view
of
the
of
the
prices
that
people
would
be
charged.
So
really
it's
the
price
from
the
company
that
admin
fee
and
then
the
tipping
fees
that
we'd
have
to
cover.
As
I
wrote
in
the
memo,
the
tipping
fees
I'm
I
took
that
out
of
the
equation
so
that
we
would
keep
that
apples
to
apples
for
any
proposers
that
would
come
in.
So
that
will
be.
F
F
K
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
could
do
when
we
answering
questions
is
maybe
again
get
both
companies
to
answer
questions
for
us
at
the
same
time
you
know,
so
they
have
a
little
bit
of
peer
pressure
to
to
all
to
live
up
to
their
competition
a
little
bit
too.
K
F
F
D
E
A
We
could
also
just
have
one
person:
ask
them
the
same
list
of
questions
right.
A
M
They
can
we'll
send
those
out.
You
know,
I
mean
separately,
I'd
still
like
to
tour.
Both
facilities,
but
same
list
of
questions
go
out
to
them
separately
and
confidential
confidentially,
and
then
they
have
an
opportunity
to
provide
those
answers,
written
and
maybe
invite
them
to
a
meeting
if
we
want,
but
I
think
written
ought
to
be.
L
A
This
is
kind
of
a
question
I'm
formulating
in
my
head.
Written
could
not
allow
us
to
propose
some
negotiating
points
about
potentially
tweaking
or
lowering
some
of
the
prices,
whereas
if
we
just
ask
them
directly
in
a
meeting,
they
would
say
well,
we'd
have
to
go
back
to
our
bosses
etc,
and
we
can't
give
you
an
answer.
E
Some
things
would
be,
you
know,
lend
themselves
to
conversation,
though
like
the
types
of
trucks
and
why
using
one
truck
over
another
and
some
of
the
environmental
concerns
we
have
like,
I
think,
discussion
with
them,
there's
value
to
that
as
well,
and
we
can
always
follow
up
with
getting
anything
that
comes
out
of
that
conversation
and
writing.
M
Well,
I
think
that
lends
towards
service
level
agreement
that
we
need
to
kind
of
iron
out
in
this
proposal
too,
and
those
I
think
that
having
a
conversation
with
them
later
on
is
important,
especially
in
regards
to
service
level,
but.
M
Meeting
is
getting
long.
Aren't
we
supposed
to
appoint
a
chair
and
I'd
like
to
nominate
jeff
frazier
for
that.
M
Oh,
I
think
kanji
should
be
the
be
a
co-chair.
So
those
are
my
ideas.
K
C
C
J
K
C
Going
once
going
twice:
okay,
so
the
first
motion
oops
sorry,
I
lost
my
sheet
our
first
motion,
which
was
made
by
brenda,
hupka
and
seconded
by
kanji
kawanabe.
I
know
I
said
that
wrong
and
I
do
apologize
so
that
is
to
the
nomination
is
for
jeff
frazier
to
be
your
chair.
C
K
C
E
C
C
D
I
C
K
E
K
G
C
B
I
H
C
M
C
C
E
G
B
C
H
F
Great,
so
the
next
meeting
steve
will
run
that
and
meanwhile
I'll
put
together
those
questions
that
were
asked
internally,
that
I
could
answer
that
I'll
get
those
out
to
you
tomorrow
and
then
we'll
shoot
for
friday
september.
F
11Th
summary
of
the
questions
for
the
the
both
respondents
and
I'll
start
actually
I'll
prompt
you
with
the
questions
christine
had
already
created,
as
well
as
the
ones
that
we've
discussed
tonight
so
just
to
get
you
started
and
I'll
try
and
get
those
probably
not
tomorrow,
it'll
probably
be
tuesday
before
that,
and
then
you'll
you
can
return
those
any
new
questions
or
additions
to
that
back
to
nancy
by
september.
11.,
all
right
sound,
like
a
game
plan.