►
From YouTube: June 8, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
Hey
I've
called
on
people
twice
before
I
I
hear
yes
being
701
and
we
have
a
quorum.
I
would
like
to
call
the
june
8th
2021
in
and
zoning
commission
meeting
to
order,
and
they
ask.
D
B
B
E
E
F
B
Perfect,
the
next
order
of
business
is
a
public
forum.
I
don't
see
anybody,
but
sometimes
my
screen's,
a
little
limited.
Do
we
have
anyone
from
the
public
on
with
us
tonight.
B
We
do
not,
okay,
all
right,
then
being
on
it
looks
like
we're
to
the
meet
of
the
meeting,
which
is
the
city
center
rezoning,
and
am
I
calling
upon
john
is?
Am
I
calling
upon
you
to
do
this.
C
C
So
dan-
and
I
talked
this
morning-
and
he
just
we
decided
that
why
don't
we,
we
kind
of
give
you
a
preview
of
what
we
did
present
to
council
kind
of
help
us
just
refresh
our
memories
about
why
all
this
is
happening
and
give
a
sense
of
what
we
conveyed
to
council
about
the
project.
C
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
do
we're
going
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
short
powerpoint
that
we're
gonna
just
go
through
and
then
once
we're
completed
with
that,
we'll
start
getting
into
the
meat
of
the
black
lines
and
the
specific
plan
document.
And
so
let
me
see
if
I
can
share
the
screen.
G
You
did
it
john
congratulations,
that's
often
the
hardest
part,
so,
just
echoing
what
we
did
last
night,
I'm
going
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
a
warm
up
and
some
background
color
for
john,
so
part
of
what
we
were
dealing
with
last
night
is
this.
It
was
the
first
city
council
live
meeting
in
a
long
long
time
in
the
community
room,
and
so
we
were
all
in
little
plastic
bubbles
and
it
was
a
couple
of
the
council.
People
were
remote,
so
it
was
kind
of
an
odd
setting.
G
The
it
folks
were
working
really
hard
to
figure
out
how
to
get
everything
working.
It
worked
pretty
well
for
the
most
part,
but
it
was
a
little
bit
rough
to
get
things
going,
so
that
just
gives
you
a
little
of
the
flavor,
and
then
that
was
on
top
of
our
very
short
period
of
time
to
talk
about
this
big
topic,
but
going
you
know
what
we
did
is
we
just
tried
to
really
go
through
with
city
council,
some
of
the
things
that
we
had
gone
through
with
you
all
over
the
past.
G
You
know
six
or
seven
months
and
kind
of
there
were
some
aha
moments
in
terms
of
how
we
presented
things
and
I'll
point
some
of
these
out
to
you,
but
on
this
slide
number
two,
we
just
really
tried
to
recap
some
of
the
recent
events
and
trends
contributing
to
the
city
center
area
decline
in
recent
years,
which
really
you
know
lead
to
the
need
for
redevelopment,
but
at
the
bottom
of
this
slide,
I
think
the
key
is
that
the
the
rezoning
strategy
has
been
designed
as
its
evolved
to
make
city
center
zoning
comparable
to
what
other
tod
stations
do
both
in
the
denver
area
and
nationally,
and
you
know
that
was
kind
of
a
concept
that
really
evolved
through
our
various
work
sessions
with
you
all.
G
You
know
at
the
end
of
the
day,
city
center,
you
know
to
attract
the
the
participants
that
we
need
to
attract
has
to
be
comparable,
has
to
be
competitive
with
what
these
participate.
Participants
are
seeing
elsewhere
and
then
related
to
that.
We
have.
G
You
know
we've
put
in
place
over
the
past
two
years,
two
key
implementation
tactics
that
also
relate
strongly
to
the
zoning
rezoning
and
that's
the
preliminary
development
agreement
with
sqb,
which
is
the
city
selected,
master
development
partner
for
the
city
property
and
then
the
framework
agreement
with
lnr
partners
and
that
pertains
to
the
former
weingarten
property
and
you'll
see
the
graphics
of
both
of
those
shortly
john.
G
If
you
would
next
slide
so
here's
something
you've
seen
before,
which
is
really
the
redevelopments
redevelopment
goals
for
city
center
in
terms
of
really
reversing
and
interrupting
a
downward
trending
dated
low
density
retail
focused,
you
know,
development,
we
do
want
to
add
hotel
office,
residential
and
we've.
All
you
know,
come
to
see
kind
of
the
underdeveloped
nature
of
the
overall
project.
G
One
of
the
things
that's
evolved
has
been
the
opportunity
to
support
a
revitalized
central
business
district
in
tandem
with
the
new
downtown
development
authority,
which
is
up
and
running
and
operating
quite
well,
a
lot
of
interest
from
that
board.
We
obviously
on
the
revenue
side,
want
to
really
increase
sales
and
property
taxes
and
generate
other
city
revenues.
G
We've
we've
mentioned
at
times
and
everybody's
surprised
by
that
the
city
receives
no
current
revenues
for
all
of
its
various
real
estate
interests
in
city
center
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
really
want
to
retain
and
attract
englewood
employers,
residents,
new
retailers,
restaurants
and
everything
that's
necessary
to
make
it
a
real
vibrant
people,
place
john,
so
I'll
also
mention
here,
as
it
ties
back
to
our
rezoning
strategy
that
you
know
in
denver-
and
this
is
true
really
across
the
country,
but
particularly
in
denver.
G
The
overwhelming
amount
of
new
development
is
taking
place
at
transit-oriented
developments
like
city
center.
So
that's
the
good
news.
The
bad
news
is,
we
have
an
awful
lot
of
competition
right
now
and
they
really
set
the
standard
for
what
we
need
to
achieve
rezoning
wise
at
city
center.
So
that's
driving
a
lot
of
you
know
where
we're
headed,
and
then
we
spent
a
little
time
just
trying
to
summarize
for
city
council.
G
You
know
these
two
primary
tactics
which
again
the
preliminary
development
agreement
with
skb
and
then
the
framework
agreement
with
l
r.
But
this
is
the
graphic
that
we've
used
now
dozens
of
times
in
our
discussions
with
both
you
all
and
city
council.
It
shows
the
city
property
in
blue,
which
is
the
property
that
skb
is
really
focused
on,
and
the
lnr
partners
or
former
weingarten
property
in
red.
G
And
so
let
me
just
circle
back
to
a
couple
other
of
my
notes
and
and
mention
that
the
redevelopment
participants
that
we
need
to
attract
or
keep
with
the
rezoning
include
include
the
following:
it's
our
master
development
partner
skb
because
they
still
have
you
know
an
opportunity
to
not
fulfill
that
role.
It's
the
special
servicer
on
the
weingarten
property
lnr,
because
they
could
also
go
in
a
different
direction.
G
It's
the
vertical
developers
of
individual
projects
that
both
of
them
will
be
looking
to
attract
and
sell
to
its
potential
anchor
tenants,
its
hotel
operators
and,
importantly,
investors
and
lenders
needed
to
make
all
these
projects
move
forward.
So,
from
a
rezoning
perspective,
all
these
participants
are
going
to
be
looking
at
comparing
tod
opportunities
and
they're,
going
to
look
at
all
the
factors
that
we
really
focused
on
in
prior
discussions
and
its
allowable
heights
density
parking
requirements,
design
requirements
and
then
the
complexity
and
timing
for
special
project
to
pre
for
specific
project
approvals.
G
And
so
those
are
all
the
things
that
city
center
is
going
to
get
judged
on
going
forward
in
terms
of
whether
it's
a
competitive,
tod
project
that
can
attract
these
participants-
and
you
know,
one
of
one
of
my
notes-
is
that
if,
if
we
pull
back
on
the
elements
of
the
rezoning,
we
will
end
up
with
an
uncompetitive
tod
project
that
will
see
little
if
any
new
real
redevelopment
activity.
So
that
kind
of
sets
the
stage
for
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
and
then
just
ended
up
john.
G
I
guess
we'll
look
at
the
next
slide.
I
can't
and-
and
here
was
the
one
that
really
captured
kind
of
the
framework
agreement,
which
is
the
agreement
that
kind
of
forces-
a
coordination,
if
you
will,
between
the
city,
property
in
blue
and
the
former
l
r
property
in
red
here
and
under
this
framework
agreement
with
which
the
city
council
asked
us
last
october
to
pursue.
There
are
three
big
conditions
which
was
to
terminate
the
underlying
ground
lease
in
order
to
facilitate
the
transfer
of
the
former
weingarten
property
parcels
and
those
are
labeled.
G
G
And
so
these
are
the
basis
of
that
agreement
which
will
be
going
up
before
city
council
for
approval
in
july.
Actually
so,
and
then
I'll
just
end
up
with
kind
of
this
reminder,
and
it
relates
to
the
rezoning
if
we
cannot
collectively
deliver
the
rezoning
to
both
skb
and
l
r.
Both
of
them
have
a
contractual
right
to
walk,
and
so
our
you
know,
our
key
implementation
tactics
under
that
scenario
would
go
away
and
it
shows
really
how
important
the
rezoning
is.
G
So
that
really
sets
up
the
overall
framework
that
john's
gonna
talk
about
I'll.
Just
you
know,
use
this
as
an
opportunity.
John
did
an
outstanding
job
last
night,
I
think
representing
not
only
staff,
but
the
discussions
that
have
been
held
with
you
all
and
I
think
really
the
some
of
the
thoughtful
really
thoughtful
conversations
that
have
evolved
in
you
know
in
the
context
of
that
process.
C
The
second
strategy
is
the
development
of
the
what
would
become
the
basis
for
the
english
transit
station
area,
specific
plan
regulating
document,
including
regulate
development,
intensity,
regulations
for
density
and
parking
for
residential
commercial
parking
building,
height
and
architectural
standards
and
guidelines,
and
the
third
part
of
the
strategy
is
a
formal,
the
formal
base
district,
rezoning
of
city
center
from
pud
to
mu,
b1
and
adoption
of
the
t,
english
tsa
overlay
district,
and
I
also
explained
to
them
that
this
these
three
strategies
would
be
packaged
in
two
cases.
C
The
first
case
will
include
the
first
two
strategies:
the
text,
amendments
and
the
tsa
specific
plan
regulating
document
and
now
have
its
own
public
hearing
and
its
own
first
and
second
readings,
and
then
immediately
following
that,
on
the
same
nights.
We
have
a
the
second
case
deals
with
the
actual
formal
base,
district
rezoning
and
the
adoption
of
the
overlay
district,
and
that
will
have
its
own
public
hearing
and
first
and
second
reading
votes
as
well.
C
And
then
I
went
on
to
explain
a
little
bit
more
about
in
details
about
some
of
these.
These
strategies
in
terms
of
land
uses,
we've
told
that
we,
I
iterated,
that
skb
is
interested
in
the
possibility
of
a
hotel
but
mu
b1.
Zoning
does
not
permit
hotels
and
allowed
you,
since
that
that
our
recommendation
was
to
add
all
types
of
visitor
accommodation
to
the
mu
b1
as
allowed
use
and
then
for
the
land
uses
for
the
commercial
ground
floor
requirement.
I
explained
about
how
that
we
currently
in
the
entire
mu
b1
zone
district.
C
We
have
a
requirement
that
51
or
more
of
the
ground
floor
must
be
used
for
commercial
purposes
and
that
this
is
a
significant
barrier
to
residential
only
development
and
that
generally
works
well
for
the
historic
broadway
frontage,
where
we
have
small
parcels
and
that
there's
a
lot
of
demand
for
commercial
on
a
very
visible
corridor,
but
that
demand
tends
to
drop
off
quite
significantly.
C
Once
you
get
off
that
broadway
corridor-
and
we
also
have
these
very
large
parcels
to
the
west,
where
you're
looking
at
a
hundred
thousand
square
foot
floor,
plate
easily
and
you're
trying
to
require
that
over
50
percent
of
that
50
000
square
feet
has
to
be
commercial,
and
that
gets
to
be
quite
a
significant
ask.
And
I
think
that
that
example,
they
got
that
quite
quickly.
C
And
then
I
went
into
the
actual
tsa
specific
plan
document.
Oops
went
too
far.
C
And
so
we
talked
about
the
actual
development
intensity
regulations,
we've
developed
and
how
that
we
developed
a
system
that
is
based
on
a
two-tier
strategy
based
on
distance
from
the
station
platform
in,
and
I
pointed
out,
the
the
quarter
mile
and
a
half
mile
circles
on
this
map
and
then
related
that
the
yellow
we
considered
that
to
be
within
the
quarter
mile
distance
from
the
station
and
that
the
pink
was
the
properties
that
we
consider
to
be
within
the
half
mile
area.
C
And
then
I
show
them
that
this
was.
This
is
really
the
guts
of
the
work
that
you
guys
worked
on
to
come
up
with
because
of
time.
I
really
didn't
go
through
all
of
it,
but
I
did
I
did
want.
I
did
touch
on
the
residential
density
and
I
retired
relate
that
to
certain
projects
we
have
that
they
are
familiar
with.
You
know.
C
I
basically
talked
about
our
typical
density
that
we
have
today
are
typically
50
to
70
units
per
acre
and
the
50
units
per
acres
akin
to
the
art,
walk
apartments
and
with
a
70
units
per
acre
being
very
akin
to
the
belle
cherry
hills
project
and
that
we
decided
that
that
should
be
kind
of
the
minimum
floor
that
we're
looking
for
here
at
city
center,
and
I
talked
about
the
our
maximum
density
that
we
chose
125
units
per
acre,
which
is
very
akin
to
the
live
apartments
in
downtown
englewood
and
was
what
was
recommended
in
our
station
original
stationary
master
plan.
C
C
And
then
I
also
talked
briefly
about
the
commercial
parking,
and
I
reiterated
to
council
that
with
commercial
parking,
that
the
plane
zone
equation
had
a
little
bit
different
of
strategy
and
approach
to
that
and
was
rather
than
looking
at
hard
numbers
to
plug.
In
opted
for
more
of
a
guideline
for
negotiation
authorizing
staff
to
look
at
a
possible
up
to
a
25
reduction
in
all
these
commercial
uses
for
parking
within
the
half
mile
zone
and
within
the
quarter
mile
zone
up
to
a
50
reduction.
C
And
then
I
just
decided
that
we
would
then,
with
the
file
slide
we
wrapped
up
and
we
gave
them
the
anticipated
rezoning
schedule.
So
they
know
what
to
expect
and
when
to
expect
it,
and
that
was
it
and
I
think
it
went
pretty
well
yeah.
It
was
a
little
rough
for
dan
at
the
beginning,
but
once
the
powerpoint
was
worked
out,
I
think
it
went
really
smoothly.
C
All
right,
so
I
think
now.
Let
me
let
me
ask
justin
to
see
if
there's
any
comments
or
questions
about
the
council
presentation.
B
A
C
All
right
again,
I
thought
I
think
I'd
like
to
ask
if
there's
any
questions
or
comments
about
the
council
presentation.
E
Thanks
john,
I
was
just
curious:
if
do
we,
I
that
was
a
great
presentation
for
for
the
council,
and
I
was
just
curious
if
there
is
other
examples
where
we
have
differences
in
parking
requirements
based
on
whether
something's
market
rate
or
income
restricted
and
and
sorry.
If
this
isn't
the
right
time
to
ask
this,
I
just
came
up
since
it
was
in
that
presentation
like
how
does
that?
E
Is
there
a
deed
restriction
like
if
that
were
to
be
approved
by
staff,
or
how
does
that
kind
of
go
from
the
land
use
decision
to
the
site
actually
being
built
as
either
income
restricted
or
a
market
rate.
C
Wow,
that's
a
good
question,
I'm
not
quite
sure
you
know,
I'm
thinking
we
would
follow
the
process
is
that
we
followed
with
the
broadway
coma
lofts.
That's
the
major
workforce,
housing
that
we
have
here
in
inglewood,
I'm
guessing
that
you
know
if
they
qualify
and
they
have
typically
those
projects
they
get
tax
credits
from,
I
believe
the
state
and
feds,
and
so
if
they
have
those
tax
credits
in
hand
and
they're
approved.
C
You
know,
I
think,
then
you
know
they're
credible
and
they
can
put
forth
a
plan
that
basically
says
hey
we're
doing
an
income
restricted
property.
I
think
that
probably
that's
good
enough
to
qualify
that
for
that
income,
restricted
parking
ratio
and
to
your
the
previous
question.
Yes,
there
is,
there
is
a
significant
difference
that
we
are
allowing.
C
I
believe
it's
about
a
25
reduction
in
each
zone
district,
for
you
know
that
within
the
half
mile
and
the
quarter
mile
going
down
from
the
requirement
you
have
in
the
market
rate-
and
I
think
there's
even
some
little
wiggle
room
to
negotiate
even
farther
down
within
that
quarter.
Mile
radius.
C
F
Yeah
I
was
looking
at
the
alta
developer
or
the
out
the
alameda
station.
Their
parking
on
air
is
1.5
and
it
seems
like
pretty
much
all
of
ulta.
Developing
apartments
are
1.5,
so
will
that
restrict
them
from
developing
in
englewood
with
the
requirements
that
are
in
the
the
new
zoning
numbers.
C
No
because,
basically,
what
we've
established
is
parking
minimums,
but
we
have
not
actually
established
any
parking
maximum.
So
a
developer
could
decide
that.
I
feel
I
need
a
little
bit
more
parking
based
on
my
past
experience,
leasing
apartments.
C
I
believe
the
demand
will
be
higher
than
that,
and
so
they
can
opt
for
a
higher
parking
ratio
if
they
so
desire.
F
Okay,
the
the
I'm
a
little
confused
on
the
the
3400
block,
the
33
34
3500
block,
though.
F
Exempt
is
that
an
exemption
for
them
for
the
retail
on
the
ground
floor,
so
the
the
m-1b
would
go?
I
thought
it
only
went
to
a
coma
not
to
broadway.
C
So,
yes,
the
tsa
zoning,
the
specific
zone
or
specific
plan
that
we
are
overlay
that
we
are
working
on
here
does
only
go
to
a
coma.
So
this
that
that
amendment
is
actually
to
the
end
current
muv1
zone
standards
and
what
we
are
looking
at
is
we
feel
that
the
commercial
requirement
on
broadway
is
workable
because
of
this
there
are
small
lots
and
also
because
there's
high
demand
for
commercial
there,
and
also,
just
because
of
the
historic
nature
of
the
district
we
would
we
want
to.
C
We
want
to
preserve
what
that
is,
and
we
and
we
don't
want
it
to
majorly
change,
and
we
want
it
to
be
a
very
small,
nice,
little
historical,
downtown,
main
street
district,
and
so
we
would
not
really
want
to
see
major
housing
developments
come
in
and
and
tear
down
commercial
businesses
and
without
putting
in
new
commercial
areas.
So
we
want
to
preserve
that
rule
there
on
broadway,
however,
we
look
in
terms
of
error,
the
areas
west
of
the
coma
we
need.
We
really
feel
we
need
to
get
away
from
that
it
doesn't.
F
Okay,
yeah
that
that's
kind
of
what
I
was
thinking
it
was,
but
I
it
was
a
little
confused.
Maybe.
C
You
know,
council
will
ask
questions
about
that
too.
So
yeah,
it's
not
surprising.
F
I
don't
see
any
other
hands.
I
got
one
more
question
here:
the
some
of
the
maps
show
that
I'm
a
little
confused
on
the
angular
parkway,
the
commercial
or
the
resident,
the
the
buildings
along
and
being
with
parkway
there.
So
you
have
a
commercial
on
the
bottom
and
then
the
apartments
on
the
top,
some
of
those
maps
show
that
those
are
going
to
be
torn
out.
I
can't
imagine
why
you
do
want
to
do
that,
but.
C
F
C
I
think
that's
still
kind
of
up
in
the
air
skb
has
kind
of
has
kind
of
thought
about
that
as
an
alternative,
where
they
might
knock
that
down
and
build
a
mixed-use
type
development
in
a
more
intensive
density
fashion.
That
would
replace
the
commercial
on
the
first
floor,
but
then
go
up
with
multi-storey
residential,
that's
not
set
in
stone.
However,.
F
Between
well
basically
from
the
the
fountain
park
down
to
down
to
the
parking
lot
for
walmart.
C
It's
that
okay
office
depot
and
harbor
freight
block.
F
Probably
coming
down,
I
I
hate
to
see
harbor
freightly,
but
they
they
got
to
be
doing
some
pretty
business
there.
I
know
where
to
think
three
and
a
half
percent
of
what
they're
doing
is
going
to
the
hangout
seems
like
that's
pretty
good
amount
of
money.
F
Yeah
I
where's
the
for
apartment
buildings.
The
englewood
only
gets
like
13
of
what
their
property
taxes
are
like.
If
there
are,
I
think
it
was
the
alt,
the
alta
apartments
down
in
broadway.
B
Without
john,
I
have
a
question:
I
don't
see
any
other
hands
that
be
either
and
I
don't
see
anywhere
that
there's
any
specifics
for
any
sort
of
entertainment
uses
would
that
be
handled
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
I'm
thinking
you
know
movie
theater,
that
sort
of
thing.
C
It
definitely
doesn't
preclude
those
uses.
We
would
consider
those
uses
as
retail
or
commercial
uses,
and
but
of
course
it
we
have
experience
where
sometimes
you
can't
you
don't
necessarily
want
to
promise
things
either,
because
sometimes
we
there
was,
as
you
probably
know,
there
was
a
efforts
to
bring
a
movie
theater
to
the
city
center
redevelopment
and
unfortunately
that
didn't
work
out
so
we're.
You
know
we're
kind
of
cautiously
optimistic
about
that.
But
you
know
I
don't
have
a
crystal
ball
as
well.
B
Right
no
well
and,
of
course,
the
movie
business
is
changing
and
who
knows
how
that's
going
to
end
up,
but
there's
other
entertainment
things
where
there's
you
know
inside
miniature
golf
and
all
sorts
of
activities
inside,
and
I
was
just
curious
if
there
was
anything
that
was
already
considered
in
terms
of
that.
So,
okay,
any
other
questions.
C
Okay,
then
I'm
going
to
bring
up
the
agenda
here
and
we'll
go
through
some
of
this.
Maybe
here.
C
C
All
right
so
I'll
just
go.
I'm
going
to
hit
the
highlights
of
the
udc
black
line
attachment
so
for
visitor
accommodations.
C
C
That's
pretty
simple,
then
I'll.
Take
you
to
page
67.
C
C
Okay,
so
this
is
where
we
take
care
of
the
commercial
ground
floor
requirements,
so
here
in
number
four
says
residential
use
in
mub1,
and
then
we
add
in
parentheses,
3300,
3400
and
3500
block
frontages
of
south
broadway
only
and
then
that
basically
ends
the
mub1
commercial
requirements
in
the
zone
district,
except
for
those
three
block
frontages
of
south
broadway.
C
C
They
are
based
on
number
one,
the
removal
of
all
language
that
pertains
to
the
transit
stationary
base
zone
district
because
we
opted
to
remove
that
existing
base
zone
district
that
had
never
been
used
in
favor
of
establishing
the
transit
station
area,
specific
plan,
overlay
district
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
of
text
in
there.
That
is
in
there
and
with
a
lot
of
stuff,
crossed
out
all
this
tsa
based
zone
district
references
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
all
that.
C
C
C
Specific
plans
are
designed
to
provide
flexibility
and
predictability
for
city
development
departments
and
private
development
entities
engaged
in
redevelopment
activities.
The
specific
plan
site
development
plan
approval
process
is
designed
to
facilitate
project
approval
in
an
expeditious
manner,
allowing
private
development
entities
to
respond
quickly
to
market
conditions
and
reduce
the
amount
of
time
to
complete
development
projects.
C
And
then
we
go
on
and
we
have
specific
plan
and
specific
plan
site
development
plan
requirement.
I'm
not
going
to
read
that
for
you,
I
I
hopefully
you've
read
it
before
apple
at
c,
applicabilities
of
municipal
codes
to
specific
plan
districts
d.
We
have
part
d,
specific
plan
initiation.
C
They
shall
spec
a
specific
plan
or
major
amendments
to
a
specific
plan
shall
be
initiated
by
city
council
and
then
we
have
letter
e,
specific
plan
content
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
through.
All
of
that.
But
you'll
see
what
that
is
within
the
actual
specific
plan
document
that
we
will
go
through
in
a
little
bit.
D
D
So
the
transit
station
area
would
be
a
you
know,
a
specific
specific
plan
and
there
might
be
other
specific
plans-
is
that
the
way
this
is
being
organized
because
this
doesn't
say,
transit
station
area
specific
plan.
So
it's
it's
a
base,
specific
plan
that
will
allow
us
to
create
different
overlays
as
necessary.
C
So
wade-
and
I
talked
about
that-
and
we
decided
that
there
may
be
in
the
future,
a
use
for
another
specific
plan
overlay.
Primarily,
we
were
thinking
about
the
oxford
station
area.
So
so,
yes,
that's
true
that
this
could
be
used
somewhere
else
in
the
future.
However,
the
the
the
other
part
of
your
question
were,
there
would
be
a
specific.
Where
would
you
progressively
get
smaller
with
more
smaller
specific
plans
within
a
specific
plan?
No,
that
is
not
the
intent.
D
D
C
D
D
Okay,
let
me
reword
that
if,
if
you
were
going
to
create
a
specific
plan
for
oxford,
does
this
wording
change?
Do
we
have
to
go
through
all
of
this
again
or
are
we
going
to
have
unique
items
within
that
that
can
be
specified
for
different
areas.
C
Yes,
that's
the
beauty
of
this
is
that
once
this
is
in
our
code,
it
this
part
if
we
want
to
establish
a
new
oxford
station
specific
plan.
This
does
not
change.
This
just
supports
it
and
that
the
all
the
details
of
it
would
be
contained
in
a
specific
plan
document,
similar
to
the
one
that
we
will
see
shortly
after
these
black
lines.
It
has,
with
its
own
rules,
separate
from
this
okay.
D
C
E
Okay,
I
was
just
wondering
in
the
specific
plan:
is
there
a
minimum
size
or
a
minimum
area
that
would
be
eligible
for
a
specific
plan
like
a
pud
has
to
be
so
many
acres
of
I'm
not
going
to
get
it
right,
whether
it's
continuous
or
contiguous
or
whatnot,
so
yeah?
Is
there
a
minimum
size
and
then
also
can
you
do
a
pud
within
a
special,
a
specific
plan.
C
I
do
not
believe
that
we
do.
We
establish
a
minimum
size,
which
is
it's
an
interesting
question.
I
guess
yeah.
It
didn't
seem
to
me
that,
because
it
was
so
we've
we've
kind
of
made
it
so
that
you
that
private
developers
can't
propose
specific
plans.
We
opted
for
that.
Only
a
city
council
could
initiate
it,
and
so,
based
on
that,
we
didn't
think
that
city
council
would
create
a
postage
stamp
specific
plan.
C
So
I'd
we
never
really
addressed
that
and
in
terms
of
doing
a
pud.
No,
the
specific
plan
is
going
to
govern
the
development
regulations
for
an
area
and
there's
not
going
to
be
a
chance
to
come
in
and
rezone
it
as
any
portion
of
it
as
a
pd.
B
So
john,
that
brings
up
another
question
to
me,
so
there
wouldn't
be
variances
as
well.
What
you're
saying,
basically,
unless
city
council
initiated
something.
C
No,
that's
not
entirely
true.
We
also
did
allow
for
variances
within
a
certain
parameters,
so
there
is
a
variance
process
that
they
could
go
through
as
well.
Okay,.
C
However,
we
will
be
proving
ours
by
ordinance
going
and
then
continuing
on
minor
specific
plan.
Amendments
may
be
approved
administratively,
at
the
discretion
of
the
city
manager
or
designate
the
city
manager
or
designate
may
also
elect
to
bring
minor
specific
plan.
Amendments
to
the
planning,
zoning
commission
city
council
by
way
of
standard
public
hearing
requirements
so
for
minor
amendments
is
at
the
discretion
of
the
city
manager
or
designate
for
major
amendments.
C
These
will
require
approval
by
city
council
and
those
include
major
relocation
of
buildings,
lot
lines,
right-of-ways
and
easements
changes
to
establish
land
uses
or
building
types
increase
in
building
height
in
areas
where
negotiation
negotiations.
Negotiation
is
not
allowed
increases
in
maximum
allowed
residential
density
by
more
than
10
percent.
C
Introducing
new
allowed
land
uses
that
are
not
allowed
by
the
base
zone,
district
and
reduction
in
established
residential
and
commercial
parking
range
negotiation
parameters.
So
all
of
those
would
trigger
major
amendments
which
would
require
approval
through
the
usual.
What
typical
processes,
but
any
other
types
of
amendments
would
be
considered
minor
amendments
and
could
be
administratively
processed
by
the
city
manager
or.
C
Designate
and
then
we
have
criteria
for
approval
for
specific
plan
amendments.
The
city
council
shall
find
all
the
following.
The
proposed
plan
or
plan
amendment
is
in
conformance
to
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
and
all
city
policy
standards
and
sound
planning,
principles
and
practices.
The
pro
the
proposed
plan
advances
and
implements
the
objectives
and
policies
set
forth
in
section
1632
and
the
properties
associated
neighborhood
area
assessment.
As
set
forth
in
the
state's
comprehensive
plan.
C
Three,
there
is
either
existing
capacity,
streets,
drainage
and
utility
systems
to
accommodate
the
proposed
plan
or
plan
amendment
arrangements
have
been
made
to
provide
such
capacity
a
matter
of
time
frame,
acceptable
to
city
council,
and
the
proposed
planner
amendment
is
in
compliance
with
all
applicable
provisions
of
this
code,
and
then
we
have
specific
plan
site
development
plan
initiation
and
this
this
support,
this
portion
of
the
amendments
follows
very
closely
what
they
would
have
to
do
for
a
planned
unit:
development
in
terms
of
a
site
plan,
all
the
different
things
they'd
have
to
bring
to
the
table
to
be
reviewed
and
that's
a
pretty
long
list
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
that.
C
And
then
the
specific
plan
site
development
plan
criteria
for
approval,
one
consistency
with
adopted
plans
and
standards,
consistency
with
spirit
intended
with
the
comp
plan,
compliance
consistency
with
applicable,
specific
plan
standards,
compliance
with
all
other
applicable
standards,
guidelines,
policies
and
plans
adopted
by
council
impact
on
existing
city
infrastructure
and
public
improvements,
internal
efficiency
of
design
and
control
of
external
effects
and
then
there's
a
part.
L
is
a
specific
plan,
site
development
plan
approval
process.
E
Sorry
this,
maybe
I'm
too
soon
to
ask
this
and
I'm
trying
to
also
just
wrap
my
head
around
this
process
and
having
these
specific
plans
and
having
them
be
driven
by
by
city
council.
So
if
you
can
help
me
think
about
this
in
terms
of
like
sorry,
city
council
is
an
elected
body
that
can
change
every
couple
years
every
two
years.
E
What
about
this
gives
a
developer
like
if
you
change
something
to
a
pud,
I
feel
as
though
you'd
have
pretty
you
know.
You
feel
as
though
that
that's
pretty
solid
for
so
many
years.
You
have
that
that
zoning
change
with
this
and
the
ability
for
city
council
to
kind
of
come
forward
and
say
we
want
to
change
something.
E
What
does
the
developer
have
or
the
person
that
is
coming
in?
What
sort
of
how
are
they
able
to
be
assured
that
something
major
isn't
going
to
be
changed
at
the
whim
of
city
council
within
a
short
period
of
time,
when
they're
in
a
20-year
development
cycle?
Does
that
make
sense
or
is?
Is
this?
Is
this
just
very
similar
to
any
other
process?
But
it
just
seems
different
to
me
because
of
it
the
way
it's
being
presented
right
now,.
C
Well,
it
is,
this
is
very
different
than
wood
and
most
communities
experience.
This
is
probably
not.
This
is
not
something
that's
common
here,
yet
in
colorado.
It
really
is
something
that
has
was
developed
in
california.
It's
using
very
extensively
there,
but,
as
I
will
reiter
talk
to
you
about
later
this.
C
Basically
the
inspiration
for
this
came
from
westminster
and
westminster
opted
for
this
kind
of
a
specific
plan
to
regulate
their
redevelopment
of
the
westminster
mall
site,
and
that
site
is
now
becoming
they've
they're
developing
that
into
their
new
downtown
for
that
city,
and
we
felt
that
that
this
would
be
better
for
us
that
we,
we
saw
a
lot
of
benefits
to
us
as
well
as
to
them
by
following
this
type
of
a
process.
C
That's
true
that
cities,
council
could
that's
true.
The
city
council
could
radically
change
and
they
might
want
to
go
off
on
and
want
to
tinker
with
this.
That's
that's
totally
true,
but
so
there
is
no
guarantee.
I
guess
in
that
sense.
E
C
Yeah
well,
one
of
the
things
about
so
what's
going
on
at
westminster.
Right
now
is
a
lot
of
these
developments
are
coming
out
of
the
ground
and
the
the
beauty
of
what
they're
doing
is
that
so
they
had-
and
I
think
I'll
just
start
talking
about
this
a
little
bit
more,
although
I
was
planning
to
talk
about
later
in
the
presentation,
so
they
had
struggled
for
a
number
of
years
trying
to
redevelop
that
small
site,
and
originally
they
wanted
to
do
it
like
most
people,
do-
is
to
try
to
get
a
master
developer.
C
C
That's
supposed
to
go
all
the
way
up
to
boulder
that
passes
on
the
southern
boundary
of
that
area,
and
it
won't
be
built
for
many
many
years,
but
but
because
they
they
see
that
as
something
they
kind
of
think
that
this
area
as
a
tod
site,
even
though
it's
it
was
going
to
be
a
long
time
before
it
ever
is,
and
probably
a
master
developer,
just
didn't
see
it
that
way,
and
so
they
never
really
could
see
eye
to
eye.
C
And
so
I
think
that's
why
they
they
stop
trying
to
do
it
that
way,
and
then
they
decide
we're
going
to
become
the
master
developer
and
we're
going
to
create
a
vision
for
this
area
and
then
we're
going
to
sell
off
these
developer
parcels
to
smaller
companies
that
and
basically
the
the
attraction.
I
think
is
that
that
you
can.
C
C
We
would
really
need
in
the
context
of
this
and
we're
a
little
bit
different
in
the
fact
that
we're
dealing
with
a
an
infill
site
that
was
developed
they
their
side
is,
is
a
green
field
now,
because
they
demolish
most
that
mall
site,
but
they
are
kind
of
going
at
it
in
a
different
way
in
terms
of
these
smaller
sites
that
where
they
can
kind
of
plug
and
play
different
projects
and
they're
coming
out
of
the
ground
really
fast.
C
C
And
with
that
yeah
is
there
any
more
questions
about
the
establishment
of
the
tsa
overlay
regulations
and
the
requirements
any
more
questions
on
the
dan
yeah.
G
G
This
is
to
give
developers
more
certainty,
as
it
relates
to
the
process
and
more
certainty
about
the
time
and
their
ability
to
deal
with
staff
and
negotiate
with
staff
and
keep
you
know,
somebody's
gonna
hate
hearing
this,
but
keep
city
council
out
of
the
process
once
the
whole
rezoning
scheme
is
established
with
their
approval,
and
you
know
I
think
that
gets
a
little
bit
mixed
up,
maybe
with
the
site
plan
or
this
the
specific
plan
aspects
of
it.
G
G
A
F
I
got
a
comment
on
the
the
uncertainty
of
all
this,
like
the
we're
just
coming
out
of
a
pandemic.
So
who
knows
what's
going
to
happen
with
the
the
light
rail
they
predict?
It
will
take
like
five
years
to
get
back
to
60
percent
of
the
travel
on
it,
and
then
we
have
four
council
members
being
elected
in
in
a
few
months.
F
So
we
haven't.
We
got
a
lot
of
uncertainties
there
and
that's
I
I
don't
know
how
developers
look
at
the
if,
if
the
plan
is
to
approve
before
november,
then
I
I
guess
that
eliminates
the
council
issue
there,
but
the
the
light
rail
is.
F
C
C
Now
we
have
an
introduction
about
what's
going
on
here,
cinderella
city,
mall
kind
of
a
history
of
city
center
and
why
we
need
we
were
looking
for
some
reinvention
here
in
2021.
C
And
then
we
come
in
with
a
specific
plan
vision
which
is
based.
We
link
this
plan
to
our
english
forward
2016
comprehensive
plan,
and
we
reiterate
the
following
strategies
that
are
laid
out
for
the
english
station
city
center
neighborhood
assessment
that
apply,
which
and
includes
in
the
plan
in
the
conference
plan,
develop
a
financing
district
such
as
the
downtown
development
authority,
combination
of
tif
capability
and
middle
level
without
blight
remedy
domain
is
ideal
and
then
also
oh,
I
guess
that
was
the
off
broadway
corridor.
Then.
D
C
Station
city
center
area
strengthened
the
retail
street
city
center
by
improving
visual
access
for
both
hampton
and
england.
Station
created
a
master
plan
for
englewood
city
center
in
downtown,
looks
reconfigure,
vehicle
access
to
transit
and
parking
to
increase
users.
Exposure
to
retail,
enhance
the
streetscape
attract
a
retail
anchor
with
appropriate
incentives.
C
If
city
functions,
officers
are
relocated,
strive
to
place
them
in
a
more
central
position,
and
then
we
also
include
a
language
that
comes
from
our
downtown
development
authority.
The
downtown
matters
plan
of
development
that
supports
the
station
area
specific
plan
and
I
don't
think
I'll
walk
through
all
that.
C
C
We
know
some
parcels,
including
you
know
the
north
parcel,
where
the
park
and
ride
is
that
that
likely
will
be
some
kind
of
multi-unit
residential,
as
well
as
the
south
half
of
the
block
of
c
block
c,
which
is
the
lnr
property,
and
we
also
have
some
idea
for
that.
We've
heard
going
around
that
this
ingwood
marketplace
is
looking
to
do
some
residential
development
as
well,
and
then
we
follow
that
up
with
section
2.3,
the
development
intensity
standards
and
guidelines.
C
We
lay
out
our
quarter
mile
and
half
mile
transit
station
area
zones,
and
then
we
have
the
table
two
one:
the
development
intensity
regulations
that
which
I
showed
you
previously
in
the
council's
presentation
once
again
these
this
is
all
your
hard
work
to
come
up
with
these,
and
this
is
kind
of
the
guts
of
the
tsa
plan.
C
C
We
establish
setbacks
that
are
very
comparable
to
our
meb1
or
medical
zone
districts
we've
given
a
little
bit
more
cushion,
I
think
in
the
in
the
mub1,
is
zero
and
nor
more
than
10
and
based
our
experience
in
the
medical
district
with
redevelopment,
we
have
favored
instead,
five
and
no
more
than
15
for
the
areas
adjacent
to
streets
and
taking
from
the
medical
zone
district
regulations.
We
also
have
a
minimum
linear
street
frontage
requirement.
C
B
John
is
the
side
side
adjacent
down
to
zero
feet?
Is
that
a
change
from
what's
current.
C
No
side
adjacent
side
that
allow
that's
like
similar
to
so
on
on
broadway
downtown.
All
those
buildings
are
all
abutted
to
each
other,
and
so
they
have
a
zero
foot
side
to
side
setback
and-
and
we
we
are
not
precluding
that
to
happen
here
as
well.
If
that
is
indeed
something
that's
desired
by
developer,
if
they
want
to,
if
they
decide
to
lot
things
that
way
and
want
to
build
that
way,
that
that's
allowed.
C
Chapter
three
is
circulation
design,
and
this
part
of
our
plan
is
something
we
need
to
still
work
on.
Actually
because
there's
a
lot
of
things
here
that
we
haven't
figured
out
yet
and
that's
why
we
wanted
to
beat
this
to
be
a
kind
of
a
living
document,
because
we
feel
that
we
still
have
to
do
a
lot
of
work
here
on
some
of
the
stuff.
C
As
I
as
I
might
have
mentioned
to
you
before,
we
have
gotten
a
green
light
to
make
an
application
of
dr
cog
to
look
at
a
lot
of
this
type
of
circulation
things,
and
hopefully
that
some
of
the
things
that
we
come
up
with
in
our
next
round
of
funding
from
dr
cogg.
We
can
plug
and
play
into
this
portion
of
the
plan,
and
so
we
we
look
at
we're
going
to
need
to
look
at
transit
access.
C
Can
the
connecting
bus
stop
bays?
We
think
that
they're
probably
going
to
be
located
where
they
are
now,
but
there
may
be
a
different
way
that
the
buses
circulate
through
the
development
that
might
be
more
conducive
to
activating
the
entire
development,
maybe
through
the
creation,
some
new
streets
and
some
new
connections
where
they
don't
exist
today
and
so
we'll
be
looking
we'll
be
trying
to
look
at
that.
C
We
also
have
a
section
on
the
shuttle
bus,
the
redevelopment
city
center
and
establishment
of
the
downtown
development
authority
will
allow
improvements
to
be
made
to
the
existing
shuttle
bus
system.
Improvements
are
envisioned
to
be
made
in
terms
of
reduced
headway
waiting
times.
Expansion
of
service
hours
include
nights
and
weekends
and
vehicle
and
technology
upgrades
in
terms
of
the
station
platform,
and
this
comes
directly
from
citizenry
during
the
station
area
master
plan
that
citizens
advocate
for
improvements
to
the
station
platform.
C
That
would
include
wind
shelters
that
would
protect
waiting,
transit
riders
from
fierce
winds
and
blowing
rain
and
snow,
and
I'm
sure
that
they
were
speaking
there
from
their
experience.
When,
when
you're
up
there
up
high
during
inclement
weather,
it
can
be
pretty
miserable
because
there's
nothing
to
block
the
wind
up
there.
C
They
recently
have
completed
a
planning
and
environmental
linkages
study
for
that
corridor,
and
they
will
be
eventually
moving
into
a
more
detailed
alternatives
and
something
that
we
might
be
able
to
advocate
for
is
is
a
way
to
bridge
over
floyd
avenue
so
that
we
could
build
a
new
connection
over
to
the
river
and
and
maybe
encourage
redevelopment
over
there.
According
to
our
stationary
master
plan,
that's
a
long
ways
in
the
future,
however,
but
that's
something
we
put
in
here
as
a
placeholder
and
then
in
terms
of
the
bicycle
pedestrian
network
english
park.
C
Major
improvements
are
needed,
beginning
at
the
walmart
property
and
continuing
east
to
broadway
bicycle
routes
identified
in
the
walk-in
wheel,
master
plan,
includingwood,
parkway
and
flight
avenue
and
aladdin
street
as
the
primary
north-south
route,
and
these
routes
will
include
enhanced
forms
of
dedicated
bicycle
lanes
and
then
also
looking
at
the
little
dry,
creek
trail
connection
and
looking
to
try
to
make
a
little
bit
more
coherent
wave
finding
for
that
connection
to
the
mary
carter
greenway
through
the
development
and
then
there's
just
a
few
statements
about
street
networks.
New
streets
envisioned
to
better
connect.
C
The
existing
grid
network
in
close
proximity
to
the
station,
the
transit
station
airplane
divisions,
breaking
the
most
southwestern
block,
includes
the
existing
civic
center
into
s'more
four
smaller
blocks,
the
development
of
new
north
south
streets
and
a
new
east-west
street
and
to
the
east.
The
transit
station
airplane
envisions
road
diet,
results,
redesigns,
the
portions
of
floyd
avenue
west
civility
street
and
cherokee
street
englewood
parkway
england
parkway
will
be
straightened
when
the
existing
eagle
marketplace
site
is
redeveloped.
G
Yeah,
I
would
say
michelle:
that's
just
really
an
ongoing
planning.
You
know
exercise
for
skb
in
terms
of
evaluating
the
alternatives
for
the
city
offices
and
whether
they
stay
together
or
get
split
up.
They
have
a
number
of
different
ideas,
but
nothing
has
really
been
finalized.
Yet
I
think
all
the
possibilities
fit
into
the
overall
rezoning
scheme
in
one
way
or
the
other,
and
of
course
you
know,
there's
going
to
be
somewhere
along
the
way.
There
will
be
some
public
discussion
about
the
civic
center
building.
G
You
know
there
there's
someone
out
there
with
a
petition
who's
very
adamant
against
the
potential
demolition
of
the
civic
center
building.
So
I
I
think,
there's
just
generally
a
consensus
that
this
site
is
very
inefficiently
used
because
of
the
way
that
the
building
and
the
dated
parking
structure
fits
on
this
site
and
the
city
is
in
in
effect
giving
up
a
tremendous
amount
of
opportunity
cost
because
of
that
would
be
attributed
to
continued
occupancy
of
this
building.
As
is
so
that's
all.
I
can
tell
you.
D
When
you
say
this
is
a
living
document,
I
understand
that
there
this
allows
you
to
do
administrative
changes
all
of
the
things.
If
I
understand
correctly,
all
of
the
things
that
you
talked
about
in
chapter
three-
none
of
them
fall
under
the
major
amendments,
so
that
I
that,
unless
I
miss
something
so.
D
Concern,
I
guess
I
feel
like
you
are
if
things
start
changing,
nobody
here
likes
change,
that
they
didn't
get
an
opportunity
to
say
something.
So
I
mean
I
just
explained
to
me
how
that
portion
is
specifically
three:
how
that
what
is
going
to
be
the
internal
process
that
you
all
will
use,
because
it's
just
sort
of
like
it,
unless
I
miss
something
in
my
reading,
there's
just
some
guy
who's
going
to
be
because
the
city
manager
is
not
doing
this.
D
C
Well,
that's
a
good
question.
I
think-
and
you
are
right-
that's
true
that
that
this
all
this
here
in
this
chapter
three
is
intended
to
be
administrative.
C
However,
that
does
not
preclude
that
there
won't
be
any
public
process
in
terms
of
the
next
round
of
dr
funding
that
we
are
pursuing,
we
will
definitely
be
having
public
being
involved
in
that
that
planning
process.
C
D
D
D
Some
guy
in
an
office
says
yeah.
This
is
okay,.
C
So
we're
going
to
be
investigating
a
lot
of
these
transportation
related
issues
we
we
will
be
getting
a
grant
from
dr
cogg.
C
Hopefully,
to
do
that,
we
will
be
hiring
a
consultant
to
help
us
with
that,
and
we
will,
through
their
scope
of
work,
they
will
be
required
to
have
a
public
process
that
includes
the
public
heavily
in
engaging
alternatives
for
these
different
transportation
options
and
hopefully
coming
to
a
desired
transportation
option
and
the
planning
zoning
commission
will
also
be
involved
in
meetings
with
the
consultants
as
well,
but
there
will
be,
but
by
at
the
end
of
the
day.
Yes,
this
will
be
once
there
is
a
plan
that
we
have
consensus
on.
D
Okay,
so
I
guess
this
goes
more
back
to
not
this
overlay
that
we're
talking
about
here,
but
the
specific
plan
process,
where
you
say:
okay,
anything,
that's
not
major
is
administrative
and
I'm
I
don't
know,
maybe
I'm
not
communicating.
Clearly
I
don't
understand
how
administrative
changes
work
in
the
city.
That's
my
question.
C
I
felt
I
just
explained
it
to
you.
I
said
well.
D
You
explained
what
you
would
do
in
this
specific
case.
That's
not
my
question,
I'm
saying
for
any
other
specific
plan
overlay
plan
like
this.
If
you
decided
to
do
oxford,
that's
a
whole
new
plan
and
there's
going
to
be
administrative
changes
to
that.
Potentially,
I'm
wondering
what
the
underlying
process
is
internally
to
handle
administrative
plans.
D
Because
it's
always
going
to
be
different
right,
it's
always
going
to
be
a
different
change
in
oxford.
It
could
have
nothing
to
do
with
bicycles.
It
might
have
to
do
with.
I
don't
know
a
big
turnaround
for
cars
who
are
dropping
people
off.
I
I
don't
think
I'm
making
myself
clear
enough
for
what
I'm
asking,
and
so
I
guess
I
won't
beat
the
dead
horse,
but
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
how
you
make
administrative
plans
internally.
C
That's
a
good
question
and
because
I'm
not
nursely
involved
in
in
those
types
of
decisions,
I
I
suppose
those
who
that's
going
to
be
done
by
the
planning
manager
or
the
director
it's
hard
for
me
to
talk
about
it,
because
I'm
not
really
experienced
in
how
those
processes
operate.
Okay,.
C
F
I
thought
I
got
that
on
the
hearing
that
we're
going
to
have
and
plan
for
planning
and
zoning
next
meeting.
F
Can
you
explain
what
the
the
mailings
are
gonna
be
on
that
where
the
notice
notifications
are
going
to
be
posted
on
that
and
who's
going
to
be
notified
and
when.
C
Okay,
so
we
we
are
following
the
exact
same
mailing
list
as
we
did
for
the
neighborhood
community
meeting,
so
every
address
or
property
that
is
within
a
thousand
square
thousand
feet.
Distant
of
the
boundaries
of
the
tsa
area
is
being
notified.
F
The
poster
boards,
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
them
the
big
red
signs.
Where
will
those
be
located.
C
So
we
asked
our
attorney
about
that
and
we
believe
that
there
is
a
section
of
our
code
that
says
that
in
this
case
that
it
does
not
in
terms
of
multiple
properties
like
this
or
a
large
area,
that
that
is
not
required
and
the
attorney
agreed
with
that.
And
so
we
will
not
be
posting
signs
throughout
the
area.
B
It
seems
it
seems
to
me
that
that
this
proposal
affects
way
more
than
just
people
a
thousand
square
feet
away
or
a
thousand
feet
away
from
from
this
area.
Was
there
any
consideration
to
doing
a
much
wider
mailing
to
the
city,
citizens.
C
You
know
that's
a
good
question
and
maybe
we
we
probably
should
actually
we
did
this
for
the
community
meeting.
We
actually
had
our
communications
department
put
out
the
word
through
their
various
community
social
media
accounts.
C
A
B
B
A
Sorry
this
is
nancy,
but
just
to
follow
up
on
what
john
was
saying.
It
is
on
the
in
the
news
section
on
the
front
page
of
the
city's
website
that
the
public
hearing
will
be
held
on
the
22nd.
F
Next
door
would
be
a
good
one
too.
I
don't
know
that
many
people
that
look
at
the
englewood
website,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
going
to
really
do
a
whole.
F
C
Okay,
let
me
just
continue
here.
C
So
going
into
chapter
four,
this
is
built
form
design,
and
so
we
have
in
the
previous
regulating
plan.
We
have
done
a
lot
to
make
it
easier
for
development
to
occur
at
greater
intensities
than
we
had
previously
allowed
in
this
area.
However,
chapter
four
is
a
little
bit
different
in
the
fact
that
english
has
never
really
put
a
lot
of
architectural
design
standards
or
guidelines
within
zoning
districts.
C
However,
we
felt
that
we
need
to
do
that
to
ensure
that
we
have
a
very
high
level
design
in
and
redevelopment
of
this
area,
and
so
in
this
portion
of
the
document
I
borrowed
very
heavily
not
from
the
westminster
specific
plan,
but
rather
from
a
few
stationary
plans
that
have
been
created
to
regulate
denver,
tod
stations,
including
the
broadway
station
area
and
the
central
park
station
area
in
the
stapleton
area,
and
so
I
borrowed
very
heavily
from
those
documents
to
create
comparable
architectural
standards.
A
H
Hi
sorry,
this
was
actually
about
the
architectural
standards.
I
maybe
I
missed
it,
but
I
I
was
curious.
Is
there
any
discussion
of
or
possibility
of
including,
maybe
a
design
review
board?
Who
would
kind
of
think
holistically
about
about
some
of
these
architectural
elements
and
the
reason
I
suggest
it
is
because
you
know
sometimes
in
order
to
like
adhere
to
the
letter
of
the
code.
C
That's
a
very
good
point,
and
that
is
something
that
I
did
come
across
in
arvada.
They
do
have
such
a
review
committee
like
that
and
for
particularly,
I
believe,
it's
the
old
town
area,
and
I
thought
that
could
be
a
a
nice
addition
to
our
reviewing
these
things.
C
Developments
for
these
types
of
things,
however,
I
believe
it
may
have
sort
of
and
I've
it
may
have
gotten
lost
amongst
staff
a
little
bit,
and
so
I
think
what
I
should
do
is
maybe
bring
that
possibly
back
up
to
my
superiors
to
see
if
they
how
they
would
feel
about
that.
C
E
I
was
just
wondering
what
the
the
public
plaza
is
that
something
then
so
it's
publicly
accessible,
but
would
it
be
considered
like
a
city
park,
or
is
this
something
within
like
the
development
agreement
or
something
like
that?
A
developer
would
maintain
that
build
and
maintain
it
or
is
it
like?
I
was
just
trying
to
figure
out.
How
does
that
actually
get
built
and
then
who,
who
would
maintain
it
based
on
this
plan,.
C
So
the
festival
street,
of
course,
is
is
would
be
located
where
the
where
the
station
stairway
is
towards
inca.
It's
that
area
where
today
we
have
the
fountain
and
the
green
ovals
and
that's
the
site
of
the
concert
series
and
things
like
that,
and
so
in
our
conversation
with
skb
they
they
have
the
main
interest
in
doing
that.
Fest
redoing
that
festival
street
because
they
in
the
land
swap
they're
going
to
be
getting
that
retail.
C
That's
along
that
plaza
area,
and
it's
it's
in
there
strongly
in
their
interest
to
create
a
very
special
festival
street
that
has
a
lot
that
is
much
better
program
than
it
is
today.
You
know
so
the
city.
Of
course
we
have
our
concert
series
and
that's
about
the
extent
of
it,
and
I
think
they
want
something.
That's
like
there's.
They
want
to
have
something
there
that's
going
to
be
something
happening
every
week
and
to
draw
people
there.
C
C
However,
they
may
be
able
to
get
a
lot
of
help
in
terms
from
the
dda
in
terms
of
tiff
and
being
able
to
finance
some
of
that,
and
maybe
dan
can
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
G
Yeah,
I
would
just
mention-
and
it's
a
good
backdrop
to
a
number
of
these
questions-
that
there's
a
vision
that
a
lot
of
this
stuff
would
be
controlled
by
contract,
not
only
in
terms
of
our
agreements
with
l
and
r
with
skb,
but
with
the
rights
that
we,
the
city,
have
then
to
step
into
contracts
with
the
buyers
that
they
bring
in
the
developers
for
specific
projects.
G
With
with
detailed
you
know,
design
information,
specifications
requirement,
performance
requirements
on
programming
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
That,
typically,
isn't
you
know
in
a
zoning
code
per.
A
C
Okay,
the
open,
sp
landscape
and
open
space
plan
has
a
section
here
on
landscape
plant
materials.
A
H
Hi,
I'm
sure
you're
expecting
some
landscape
questions
from
me
it
as
far
as
the
individual
words
of
various
elements
of
the
landscape
document
is
this.
H
Do
you
want
me
to
go
line
by
line,
or
should
I
maybe
yeah
under
the
design
standards
number
six
says
areas
within
the
public
right-of-way
shall
be
subject
to
the
public
works,
review
and
approval.
H
Sorry,
we're
getting
some
feedback
over
here,
who's,
knowledgeable
in
plant
material
and
irrigation.
C
Okay,
which
can
you
specify,
which
number
that
is
again
under
which
section?
Oh.
H
Sure
it's
on
page
41,
under
5.2
general
landscape
requirements,
design
standards,
number
six
areas
within
the
public
right-of-way
shall
be
subject
to
public
works,
review
and
approval.
H
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
public
works
typically
does
not
have
someone
on
staff
who
who
is
knowledgeable
in
like
landscape,
specific
elements.
C
No,
that's
very
true.
I
think
it's
they're.
What
they're
going
to
be
looking
at
is,
does
this
landscaping?
Is
it
obstructing
site
triangles
most
likely?
That's
probably
what
or
is
there
something
that
they
find?
That
might
be
somewhat
dangerous.
C
Potentially,
maybe
growing
too
close,
or
eventually
growing
too
large,
maybe
to
encroach
on
the
right
of
way.
That's
why
I'm
kind
of
guessing
that's
what
their
purview
will
be.
I
don't
think
they'll
be
saying:
well
you
you
gotta,
you
can't
plant
this
certain
species
and
you've
gotta
plant
evergreens,
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
like
that.
I
think
it's
they're
they're
going
to
be
looking
specifically
at
is
it
is
that
is
the
the
tree
that
you're
looking
to
plant?
C
Is
it
far
enough
pulled
far
enough
back
from
the
intersection
that
it
doesn't
interfere
with
the
sight
distances.
H
H
Oh
no
problem
under
number
5.5
landscape
plant
materials
on
page
45..
D
H
H
E
I
had
a
question
kind
of
connected
to
the
landscape
requirement
principles
and
then
also
permitted
uses
and
with
one
of
the
first
principles
you
know
being
about
creating
spaces
that
encourage
recreation
and
social
interaction
and
but
community
gardens
are
not
allowed
right
now
in
mub1,
and
would
that
be
something?
Although
it
may
not
pencil
out
super
well,
but
could
it
be
something
that
could
be
either?
C
All
right,
so
you
so
add
that
to
the
mub1
table
of
allowed
uses
community
garden.
E
That
would
be
my
suggestion.
I
don't
see
what
the
risk
would
be
of
having
that
as
an
allowable
use
and
like
thinking
of
a
place
like
the
feedery,
not
quite
a
community
garden,
but
such
a
great
innovative
business
that
wasn't
an
allowed
use.
We
had
to
do
a
conditional
use,
so
some
of
those
things
that
you
know
it
would
be
great
to
have
those
be
allowable
by
right
within
within
the
site.
C
Okay,
and
is
there
any
things
anything
that
we
need
to
change
within
the
principles
or
standards
here,
or
is
that
would
that
just
be
enough
if
we
just
add
that
to
the
land
use
table.
C
B
I'd
like
to
support
what
diane
was
saying
about
the
plant
materials
and
I'll
go
back
to
one
of
my
favorite
places
called
the
chick-fil-a
on
broadway
in
dartmouth,
where
the
things
that
were
planted
there
are
not
doing
well,
and
some
are
obviously
dead.
B
So
I
do
think
that
some
sort
of
review
board-
or
something
like
that
might
be
helpful
since
public
works
may
not
have
that
depth
of
knowledge.
For
things
that
would
be,
you
know,
are
better
at
to
surviving
because
some
of
the
areas
we're
talking
about
you
know
the
health
strip
survivability
is
is
can
be
very
harsh
on
many
many
plants.
So
I
just
want
to
support
what
diane
was
saying
about
materials.
C
B
You
know
you
folks
down
at
that's.
You
know,
city
building,
can't
know
everything
so
or
and
do
every
things.
So
you
know
just
something
to
think
about.
B
F
I
have
a
comment
on
the
the
is
there
a
percentage
of
ground
coverage
that
lot
coverage
that
needs
to
be
green
for
apartment
buildings
or
whatever
any
any
development?
That's
done.
Is
there
because
I
I
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
pretty
good
percentage.
You
know
10
to
20
25
of
the
developing
the
area
as
some
kind
of
like
trees
or
grass,
or
you
know
some
kind
of
garden
of
some
type
or
another.
C
I
think
that's
an
area
where,
where
we
decided
to
rely
on
the
mu
b1
based
zone
district
for
as
I,
I
believe
that
the
mu
b-1
zone
district
requires,
I
believe,
it's
10
landscaping
area,
and
so
we
thought
that
we
would
probably
just
stick
with
that.
Some
of
there's
other
areas
that
we
are
kind
of
doing
the
same
thing
like
the
signage
code.
We
decided
that
we.
Why
should
we
reinvent
our
signage
code?
F
With
one
one
quick
note
there,
there
is
sod
available
in
fescue.
They
they
have
long
fescue
grasses
takes
almost
no
water
and
it's
basically
comparable
to
kentucky
bluegrass
very
close.
A
E
Thanks,
I
was
just
wondering
within
here
within,
like
the
landscape
requirements.
I
haven't
seen
it.
What
are
the
drainage
requirements?
I
guess
one
of
the
things
that
I
would
like
to
avoid
are
a
bunch
of
individual
fenced
off,
really
deep,
stormwater
detention
ponds,
rather
than
is
it
possible
to
have
more
like
of
a
a
regional
or
a
district
approach,
or
something
like
that,
because
site
by
sight,
some
of
those
can
be
pretty
unsightly.
So
I
was
just
trying
to
think
of
how.
How
would
each
site
address
something
like
that
in
terms
of
drainage.
C
That's
a
pretty
good
question
so,
as
I
understand
it
not
too
long
ago,
the
public
works
kind
of
changed
their
policies
on
that
and
I'm
not
all
that
familiar
with
it,
but
they
but
they've
started.
C
C
But
that's
a
good
point,
I'm
not
quite
sure
we
might
need
to
be
talking
to
our
utilities
in
public
works
departments
about
how
they
would
you
know.
If
we
are
successful
in
getting
skb
and
l
r
to
redevelop
these
areas,
are
they
what
are
they
going
to
require
and
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
that
will
be.
H
Oh,
I
I
think
I
meant
to
lower
it,
but
I
would
completely
echo
kate's
comment
regarding
drainage.
I
think
large
and
unsightly
detention,
basins
or
detention
ponds
and
even
just
you
know,
catch
basins
that
are
extraordinarily
depressed.
I
would
say
something
like
at
charles
hay
world
school,
where
my
kids
go.
The
catch
basins
are
kind
of,
in
my
opinion,
extremely
depressed,
presumably
to
be
very
conservative
about
you
know
how
water's
flowing,
but
it
really
makes
for
far
less
usable
space,
because
you
have
these
essentially
gullies
in
the
middle
of
a
lawn.
C
Yes,
and
I,
I
believe,
because
of
what
we're
trying
to
achieve
the
site,
it's
we're
trying
to
develop,
develop
a
more
intensive
site,
and
you
know
going
with
you
know:
open
detention
areas
is
antithetical
to
that
antithetical
to
that,
it's
it's
not
going
to
get
us
there
if
we,
if
we're
doing
it
that
way,
so
we
need
to
be
yes
looking
at
drainage
methods
and
structures
that
are
not
intrusive
and
do
not
take
up
lots
of
space.
F
Is
there
any
talk
about
pulling
a
little
dry
creek
out
of
the
ground
and
create
a
green
belt
to
go,
would
go
from
probably
from
logan
to
santa
fe,
with
the
creek
in
the
middle
of
the
green
belt?
F
Is
there
any
talk
about
that.
G
Yeah,
it's
kind
of
that
idea
has
come
up
on
occasion
throughout
the
planning
process,
and
actually
there
have
been
some
specific
costing
exercises
on
it
and,
as
you
can
imagine
it's
just
the
cost
is
really
excessive
and
the
way
that
it
flows
it
flows
diagonally
across
most
of
the
parcels
that
it
crosses.
So
that
creates
a
lot
of
other
problems.
G
So
I
think,
generally,
there's
been
a
thought
to
try
to
just
you
know,
handle
or
or
produce
the
green
areas
without
without
daylighting
dry
creek
and
also
there's
a
thought
that
merged
with
some
of
the
additional
funding.
H
Sorry
I
had
another
one
pop
up
on
5.7
the
site
furnishings
on
design
guidelines
number
two
trash
receptacles
that
allow
for
separate
recycling
containers
should
be
used
to
promote
sustainability.
H
I
completely
agree
with
this.
However,
I
would
just
bring
up
more
than
one
of
my
clients
before
has
said:
recycling
doesn't
pencil,
so
they
just
throw
the
recycling
in
the
trash
anyway,
and
I
know
there
have
been
a
number
of
documentaries
about
how
say
number
five
plastics
don't
actually
get
recycled,
they
get
shipped
off
somewhere.
H
I
guess
all
of
this
is
just
to
say
how
do
we
make
sure
that
when
we
recycle
something
that
it
gets
recycled,
is
there
any
process
in
the
city
that
would
help
you
know
developers
be
able
to
make
a
pencil,
or
do
you
have
any
thoughts
on
that?
I
feel
I
don't
know
everything
about
why
the
developer
would
have
told
me,
but
I
have
had
more
than
one
client
tell
me
that.
C
Hire
a
sustainability
coordinator
within
their
office
and
that
I
believe
that
keeping
wood
beautiful
would
then
transfer
from
community
development
to
the
city
manager's
office
under
this
new
sustainability
coordinator.
So
that
with
a
hiring
of
someone
like
that,
who
would
be
an
expert
in
sustainability
practices
that
might
be
able
to.
C
Help
us
out
there,
but
at
this
point
you
know,
I'm
I'm
no
expert
either,
and
I
and
I've
heard
that
too
that
plastics
might
you
know
they
vote?
They
don't
go
where
we
think
they
they
do
and
they're,
not
they're
being
you
know,
maybe
they're
going
to
a
foreign
country
or
something
like
that.
H
Thank
you
yeah.
I
think
that
sort
of
conceptually
I
totally
agree
with
it,
and
I'm
just
trying
to
think
of
what
can
we
as
a
city
do
to
help
ensure
that
it
that
it's
working
the
way
we
want
it
to?
So
I
think
when
the
sustainability,
if
the
sustainability
expert
is
hired,
will
we
get
to
meet
them
as
a
commission.
G
Yeah,
I
just
echo
that
john,
that
the
sustainability
value
has
just
increased
so
much
from
city
council
that
I
think
you're
going
to
see
that
flow
through
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
different
initiatives
and
the
new
development
of
city
center
will
definitely
be
one
of
those.
C
Yeah,
there's
quite
a
bit
of
sustainability
in
the
new
city's
strategic
plan
as
well,
which
was
developed
by
the
city,
administration
and
sean
lewis,
so
yeah.
I
think
that
we
are
moving
that
in
that
direction.
As
a
city.
B
F
Let
me
let
me
make
one
comment:
there
is
there
any
apartments
in
inglewood
that
does
recycling.
I
E
All
right,
I
was
just
wondering-
and
maybe
this
will
come
up
in
staff's
choice,
but
so
our
next
meeting
is
the
public
hearing
on
all
of
this
correct
and
I'm
just
wondering
michelle
or
john
or
folks
like,
if
there's
anything
like
some
guidance
right
now,
for
how
we
should
either
bring
forward
additional
questions
or
how
you
see
kind
of
us
working
through
all
of
this
in
one
hearing
and
then
the
also.
E
C
There
will
be
two
public
hearings
that
night.
The
first
hearing
will
be
on
the
udc
text:
amendments
plus
this
inglewood,
tsa
specific
plan
document
and
then
I'll
be
followed
up
with
a
the
second
hearing,
which
it
will
be
actually
the
formal
application
to
rezone
the
city
center
pud
to
mub1
and
the
adoption
of
the
tsa
overlay
district.
C
So
there's
the
plan,
that's
the
document
you
saw
here,
but
then
there's
a
district
that
becomes
part
of
the
official
zoning
map,
and
so
we
have
to
once.
We
have
developed
adopted
the
plan
and
then
you
see
text
amendments.
Then
we
can
formally
approve
the
official
map
amendments
that
changes
the
pod
to
muv1
and
creates
the
area
for
the
tsa
overlay
district.
E
And
so
like,
for
you
had
mentioned
before,
there
may
be
changes
to
things
like
the
connectivity
section
or
the
bike
ped
section
based
on
like
other
plans
or
things
that
could
be
coming
up.
Those
would
be
administrative
changes
to
this
plan.
They
wouldn't
necessarily
come
back
to
us
for
any
kind
of
like
change.
E
C
B
Okay,
any
further
questions
all
right,
I'm
on
to
you
wade
with
staff's
choice.
I
Hey
thank
you
very
much.
I
wanted
to
update
you
on
the
udc
update
process.
You
all
interviewed
two
consultants
a
few
weeks
ago.
I
apologize.
I
could
not
be
there
that
evening,
but
we
are
moving
forward
with
gold
evans
and
the
contract
has
actually
just
been
sent
out
today.
I
So
we
are
moving
forward
with
getting
them
under
contract
that
will
have
to
go
before
city
council
for
approval
and
hopefully
all
goes
well.
We
can
get
that
wrapped
up
in
june,
yet
here
in
a
couple
of
weeks
with
city
council,
but
it
was
a
unanimous
choice
essentially
to
to
proceed
with
gould
evans
and
that's
what
we
are
are
working
towards.
I
Secondly,
city
council
did
hold
its
first
in-person
meeting
last
evening.
It
was
a
hybrid
meeting,
meaning
some
people
were
in
person.
There
were
also
still
some
people
virtual
through
through
zoom.
They
are
meeting
in
the
community
room
and
they
have
the
room
set
up
very
specifically
for
city
council
meetings.
I
There
are
different,
there
are
partitions
for
each
council,
member
and
then
for
public
and
so
forth.
It
is
the
community
room
is
not
going
to
be
available
for
any
other
board
and
commission.
However,.
I
I
So,
given
that
scenario
I
wanted
to
get
your
all's
preference
planning
and
zoning
commission
does
have
the
option
we
are
free
to
meet
in
person
again,
however,
it
would
be
in
the
city
council
meeting
room
and
there
would
be
no
kind
of
separation.
There
would
be
no
kind
of
partitions
or
anything
like
that.
I
So
all
boards
and
commissions
are
in
this
same
scenario,
but
we
we
have
the
option.
So
I
wanted
to
get
your
preference
as
to
do
you
wish
to
meet
in
person
in
the
conference
room
on
the
third
floor
of
the
civic
center,
where
we'd
all
be
very
snuggled
together
for
meetings
or
do
we
want
to
continue
to
use
this
format
and
and
continue
until
those
larger
rooms
become
available,
do
not
need
any
decisions.
I
Tonight
just
wanted
to
get
your
thoughts,
your
preferences
as
to
how
you'd
like
to
move
forward
for
at
least
until
october,
if
not
a
little
longer
they
are,
they
are
retrofitting
those
rooms
with
new
sound
systems
and
new.
You
know
precautions
for
covid,
so
there
will
be
some
some
protections
like
that
installed
as
well.
There
will
be
some
plexiglass
and
that
sort
of
thing,
in
addition
to
the
new
audio,
sound
systems.
I
B
Yeah,
what
that
begs
the
question:
what
is
the
format
for
the
meeting
on
the
public
hearing
on
the
22nd.
I
The
the
format
right
now
is
that
it
will
be
a
zoom
meeting
and
we
would
proceed
as
we
have
been.
Virtually
nancy
would
bring
in
speakers,
swear
them
in,
and
they'd
they'd
offer
their
comments.
Virtually.
A
D
B
Okay,
next
staff,
remember,
would
be
john
dan
nancy.
A
But
just
let
you
know
that
on
beginning
the
first
part
of
june
july,
excuse
me:
meg
will
be
moving
into
a
regular
member
position.
She's
been
the
alternate,
but
acting
as
a
regular
member.
Since
we
had
a
vacancy
and
then
brenda
hupka
was
appointed
as
your
alternate.
F
Carl,
happily,
I
guess
this
is
for
nancy.
How
will
the
people
that
come
to
talk
to
the
hearing
be
notified
and
whatnot
do
they
have
to
put
in
a
notice
like
a
few
days
ahead
or.
A
It's
on
the
agenda
how
they
can
hold
on.
I
gotta
mute.
Some
people
hold
on
I'm
getting
way
too
much
feedback.
Thank
you!
So
it's
on
the
agenda
every
night
or
every
meeting.
If
you
wish
to
speak
on
how
they
can
do
that,
so
they
just
click
the
link
and
then
they
come
in
as
a
different
rather
than
a
panelist.
They
come
in
as
an
attendee.
A
A
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
really
appreciated
diane's
comments
about
recycling,
because
I've
heard
a
lot
about
that
too
lately
and
I
would
love
for
our
recycling
to
be
as
legitimate
as
possible.
So
I
really
appreciate
you
bringing
that
up
and
thanks
to
staff
for
preparing
your
presentation
for
city
council
and
for
everything
tonight.
That
was
a
bear.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
your
dedication.
B
Right
all
right,
yes,
I
would
like
to
thank
staff
to
a
lot
of
information
for
all
of
us
to
digest
and
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
the
public
reaction
to
it.
So
seeing
no
further
comments,
I
will
say
that
this
meeting's
adjourned
and
thank
you
all
so
much
for
your
good
work.