►
From YouTube: July 7, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
A
A
B
A
A
A
And
brenda,
could
you
do
me
a
favor
when
we
get
into
the
public
hearing
through
the
commissioner's
time
to
discuss?
Could
you
just
make
a
simple
statement
that
you
have
watched
the
last
meeting.
B
A
B
F
B
It's
just
a
broad
outline
what's
taking
place
historic
finish.
Center
may
see
new
development
rules
by
ellis.
Of
course,
okay.
C
B
The
city
hopes
the
plan
will
increase
its
sales
tax.
You
know
that
we're
basically
voting
on
this.
E
C
A
Mr
adams
yeah
miss
hubka
here
ms
donaldson.
E
C
E
A
C
C
C
D
E
All
right
nancy
has
instructed
reminded
me
that
we
do
not
have
to
reopen
the
public
forum
because
it
was
not
closed.
It
was
continued
till
today,
but
I
believe
we
do
have
a
short
presentation
from
john.
Is
that
correct.
H
Yes,
this
evening's
agenda:
we
will
have
a
staff
update
on
the
oral
report
and
then
I
will
turn
it
back
over
for
some
additional
public
testimony.
If
there's
any
and
then
we
will
have
some
time
for
commissioner's
request
for
final
clarifications
from
staff,
then
the
commission
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
then
commission
deliberate
on
motions
nancy.
Do
I
need
to
be
sworn
in,
or
am
I
still
good.
H
All
right,
I'm
here
this
evening,
to
do
on
the
continuation
of
the
public
hearing
for
the
case
number
2021-003
title
16,
unified
development
code
text,
amendments
and
eagle
transit
station
area,
specific,
planned
adoption.
H
The
the
original
public
hearing
was
published
in
the
june
10th
edition
of
the
wood
herald,
as
well
as
from
june
2nd
to
up
to
till
day
on
the
city's
website.
Also,
there
was
a
neighborhood
mailing
june
7th
to
11th.
H
H
Community
development
staff,
requests
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
review
and
take
public
testimony
on
and
forward
to
city
council,
with
a
favorable
recommendation
for
adoption
of
proposed
amendments
to
title
16
of
the
unified
development
code
and
the
adoption
of
the
english
tsa
specific
plan.
In
support
of
the
city's
redevelopment
efforts
for
the
city
center
england,
station
area
stafford
amends
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
the
following
findings.
H
That
notice
of
the
public
hearing
was
published
in
the
england
herald
on
june
10th,
and
that
notice
was
provided
to
the
england
city
court
to
be
published
on
the
city
website
from
june
2nd
through
june
22
that
notification
letters
were
sent
out
to
all
property
owners
and
addresses
within
1
000
fee
of
the
proposed
city
center
base,
rezoning
area
and
the
proposed
inwood
tsa
overlay
district
area.
The
week
of
june,
seven
through
eleven,
the
namewood
community
development
department
staff
held
seven
planning
and
zoning
commission
study
sessions
on
the
proposed
title.
H
16,
udc
text,
amendments
and
regulatory
parameters
for
new
transit
station
area
overlay
district.
But
the
proposed
english
tsa
specific
plan
establishes
a
specific
planned
vision
regulating
plant
circulation
design,
built
form,
design,
landscape
and
open
space,
design
and
plan.
Imitation
sections
for
the
purpose
of
guiding
and
regulating
in-field
redevelopment
within
the
english
tsa
specific
plan.
H
At
this
point,
a
staff
would
like
to
address
the
questions
that
came
up
from
the
commissioners
at
the
june
27
22nd
portion
of
the
public
hearing.
First
off,
I'd
like
to
go
through
the
general
understanding
of
the
english
tsa
specific
plan
goals.
H
A
little
few
more
details
on
just
to
go
back
over
the
advisory
specific
plan
design
review
committee.
This
community
will
consist
of
an
outside
architectural
design
firm
on
a
permit
basis,
and
then
there
will
be
a
one
rotating
member
of
city
council
and
a
rotating
member
of
planning
and
zoning
commission.
H
The
this
body
will
be
ad
hoc
advisory.
Only
the
feedback
will
be
used
in
negotiations
between
staff
and
the
developer.
We
also
there's
also
questions
asked
about
major
and
minor
amendments.
The
major
amendments
I'll
go
over
those
one
more
time.
The
the
major
amendments
include
major
relocation
of
building
slot
lines,
runaways
and
easements
change.
Second,
changes
to
establish
land
uses
or
building
types
third
increase
in
building
height
in
areas
where
regulation
is
not
allowed.
H
Fourth
increase
in
maximum
allowed
residential
density
by
more
than
10
percent.
Fifth,
introducing
new
allowed
loud
land
uses
that
are
not
allowed
by
the
base
zone
district
and,
finally,
a
reduction
in
established
residential
and
commercial
parking
range
negotiation
parameters,
and
we
in
the
staff
report.
We
went
ahead
and
tried
to
develop
scenarios
for
each
of
those
where
we,
where
we
believe
that
that
would
trigger
a
major
amendment
and
circumstances
where
it
would
not
trigger
that
major
amendment.
H
H
A
major
amendment
would
include
a
reconfiguration
of
these
blocks
that
eliminated
the
east-west
right-of-ways
in
favor
of
dividing
these
blocks
with
north-south
right
ways
and
corresponding
reconfiguration
of
building
orientations
that
would
be
not
facing
e-wood
parkway.
A
minor
amendment
would
be
the
of
something
similar
but
would
not
trigger.
H
The
plan
also,
basically
differs
the
mu
b1
zone
district
in
terms
of
a
landscaping
area
that
is
required,
which
is
at
ten
percent
and
area
landscaping.
Areas
may
be
pooled
for
two
or
more
adjacent
sites,
if
the.
If,
if
two
property
owners
want
to
come
in
and
propose
a
joint
development,
they
would
be
able
to
do
that
as
long
as
those
two
sites
were
adjacent
to
each
other.
H
H
It
has
was
felt
that
it
was
not
probably
necessary
to
necessarily
address
those
types
of
uses
at
this
time,
because
the
skb
plan
wasn't
really
showing
that,
and
we
also
felt
that
the
upcoming
title
16
rewrite
that
that
would
be
the
best
place
to
re-examine
those
types
of
uses
and
whether
they
should
be
allowed
in
commercial
zone
districts.
H
And
then
there
was
also
some
questions
about.
Would
there
be
any
additional
outreach
for
the
july
7th
continuation
of
the
public
hearings?
And
yes,
we
on
june
28th
signage
was
posted
at
five
locations
throughout
the
area.
On
june
30th,
a
continuation
notice
was
sent
out
to
182
subscribers
and,
on
june
30th,
a
posting
to
the
city
website.
News
section
was
made
about
the
meeting
july
1st
to
second,
the
city's
communications
department,
put
out
a
social
media,
promo
social
media
posting
and
on
july
1st,
an
english
special
article
in
england.
H
There
are
also
limitations
with
some
of
these
spaces,
including
inconvenient
parking
load,
walk
by
traffic,
the
homelessness
situation
and
lack
of
capital
investment,
and
there
is
also
with
this
tsa
specific
plan.
There
is
a
plan
to
address
this,
these
some
of
these
issues
through
relocation
of
parking
increases
in
residential
and
employment
density,
new
motivated
ownership,
including
marketing
promotion
and
programming.
H
First
is
a
mu
b,
one
based
zone
district
text,
amendments
which
adds
all
form
of
visitor
accommodation,
land
uses
as
permitted
throughout
the
mu
b1
zone
district
area
and
restricting
ground
for
commercial
use,
requirements
to
the
commercial
fringe
of
the
3300
3400
and
hundred
blocks
of
broadway.
Only
second,
the
removal
of
tsa,
but
some
district
provisions
and
adoption
of
tsa
overlaid
district
provisions.
H
It
includes
the
removal
of
the
existing
but
never
used,
tsa
based
zone
district
tax
provisions
and
subsequent
adoption
of
tsa
specific
plan
overlay
district
text
provisions
that
will
establish
the
underlying
foundation
for
the
adoption
of
the
english
tsa
specific
plan
regulatory
document.
And
thirdly,
the
adoption
of
the
english
transit
station
area
specific
plan.
H
This
plan
will
operate
as
an
overlay
district
planning
document,
in
addition
to
the
underlying
mu
b1
based
zone
district,
including
additional
layers
of
staff,
administered
regulations,
standards
and
design
guidelines,
and
that
includes
my
oral
report
and
I'm
now
we
can
now
open
up
for
any
additional
public
testimony
at
this
time
and
after
the
public
testimony.
I
would
be
happy
to
take
any
additional
questions
from
planning
and
zoning
commission.
E
H
There
is
no
plan
for
any
presentation
to
this
evening.
Okay,
all
right!
That
was
the
presentation
that
I
just
gave.
E
I
B
E
Could
you
could
you
please
introduce
yourself
and
also
refer
to
watching
the
last
meeting,
please
thank
you.
B
Yes,
brenda
alternate
I'll,
be
that's
the
last
meeting
in
its
entirety
on
youtube
and
it's
I
I'm
pretty
caught
up
in
the
matter.
I'm
reviewing
the
plan
right
now.
Well,
I
have
before,
but
this
is
just
a
simple
silly
question,
probably
referring
to
page
24
of
the
official
zoning
map
to
rezone
city
center.
B
I
just
was
wondering
why
they
were
broken
up
into
two
different
colors,
the
yellow
and
the
pink,
and
I
want
to
clarify.
I
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
that
the
entire
district
on
page
24,
that's
colorized,
is
the
resulting
tsa
overlays
out.
Is
that
correct.
H
Good
question,
so
the
the
map
on
page
24
shows
a
yellow
area
which
is
directly
west
or
east
of
the
station
area
from
santa
fe
to
aladdi
street,
and
this
is
considered
the
quarter
mile
radius
area
for
the
station.
The
pink
area
is
located
east
of
velade
street
and
it
stretches
to
bannock
and
akoma
street,
and
that
area
is
considered
the
half
mile
radius
area
and
we
what
the
planets
zoning
commission
has
done.
A
A
D
Wanted
to
address
the
advisor
design
review
advisory
group
again
one.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
everybody
was
up
to
up
to
speed
that
you
know
how
the
changes,
the
administrative
changes
and
and
what
triggered
a
minor
in
a
major.
D
I
want
to
understand
who
decides
that
the,
because
I'm
still
not
clear
what
triggers
you
say.
It's
ad
hoc,
the
design
review
commit
think.
So
how
is
that
triggered
somehow
someone,
whether
it's
a
council,
the
council
member
who's,
been
assigned
to
be
a
part
of
that
or
the
planning
and
zoning
member
or
the
architect?
Somebody
has
to
say.
D
I
think
this
warrants
a
a
design
review
and
I'm
not
clear
still
on
what
triggers
that,
because
I
don't
see
anything
that
says
this
warns
this
design
review
committee
to
be
assembled,
and
I
believe,
in
my
personal
opinion,
that
that
should
be
a
city
council
member,
so
somehow
they
need.
Somebody
always
needs
to
be
in
the
loop
on
any
of
these
developments.
D
H
All
right
so
when
a
developer
submits
a
site
plan
it
we
consider
that
automatically
a
trigger
for
the
design
review
committee
for
any
project.
There
will
automatically
be
a
trigger
for
having
going
through
that
process.
E
Okay,
brenda,
I
I
see
that
you
have
stopped
your
video
and
since
you
are
a
commissioner,
you
need
to
have.
We
need
to
have
your
live
video
on,
unless,
of
course,
you
need
to
like
leave
to
go
to
the
restroom
or
something
like
that.
So
just
wanted
to
little
little
rules
that
you're
not
aware
of
so
only.
E
I
have
a
quick
question.
One
of
my
neighbors
said
that
they
heard
from
dan
that
there
was
no
limit
to
the
height
of
a
residential
building
or
other
building
in
this
area.
Can
you
address
that
for
me,
dan
and
refresh
my
memory.
J
H
Okay,
yes,
within
the
half
mile
distance
radius,
the
the
height
of
the
maximum
height
has
been
established
at
125
feet
that
has
also
been
established
as
the
base
height
in
the
yellow
or
the
quarter
mile
area.
However,
there
is
a
provision
which
the
planet
zoning
commission
wanted
to.
The
majority
of
the
group
wanted
to
see.
They
did
not
want
to
limit
necessarily
a
really
good
project
if
it
was
taller,
and
so
it
is
basically
possible
for
staff
to
negotiate
higher
than
125
feet,
and
so
there
is
an
allowance
within
that
quarter.
H
Mile
area
for
going
higher
and
the
the
group
consensus
was
that
we
didn't
want
to
artificially
limit
place
limits
on
ourselves
and
that
that
the
city
needed
to
have
this
kind
of
ability
to
be
able
to
negotiate
a
good
project,
and
if
somebody
comes
along
and
wants
to
do
a
really
spectacular
project,
but
they
want
to
go
higher
and
they
want
to
have
a
they
want
to
bring
a
lot
of
employment.
Let's
say
this,
that's
typically,
what
this
might
be
is
a
an
office
building.
H
H
So
our
cur
the
current
buildings
that
are
in
this
area
that
are
about
that
tall
are
the
chase
tower
and
the
wells
fargo
tower.
Those
are
both
10-story
buildings
and
they're
about
120
feet.
E
C
H
So
I
have
kind
of
looked
up
at
in
different
places.
What
those
what
and
I
have
found
different
heights
for
it.
I
actually
went
into
the
chase
tower
in
its
stairwell
and
it
looked
like
the
stories
were
12
feet
tall
to
me
about
twice
my
height,
and
so
I
I
believe
that
it
is
120
feet.
F
Transit
station's
specific
plan
on
in
on
page
88,
it
said
land
use
and
in
land
use.
It
says
that
to
maximize
the
mountain
views
and
to
maximize
the
the
views
of
down
the
englewood
corridor
to
ingwood
parkway
corridor
to
the
light
rail
station,
how
are
you
gonna
maximize
the
mountain
views
with
125
foot
buildings
scattered
all
over
the
place.
H
That's
a
good
question
and
it's
kind
of
hard
to
answer
what,
when
you're,
not
when
you
haven't
developed
a
when
a
site
plan
hasn't
been
developed
for
it.
Obviously,
not
every
square
inch
of
this
area
will
have
be
able
to
have
a
maximized
view.
That's
just
not
possible,
but
we
believe
that,
with
that
you
can,
through
the
orientation
of
buildings
and
potentially
creating
skinnier
buildings
taller
buildings
that
that
you
can.
H
E
Country
club
towers
is
a
prime
example
of
that.
That's
on
spear
and
downing
ish,
where
the
builder
made
very
tall
skinny
buildings,
two
of
them,
so
that
everybody
could
basically
look
around
their
balcony
and
see
the
the
western
mountains
and
the
developer
there.
Actually
patrick
bro
is
fabulously
wealthy
and
he
also
actually
purchased
all
of
the
buildings
to
the
west
of
those
country
club
towers,
so
that
nobody
can
build
something
to
inhibit
the
view.
So
just
a
little
anecdotal
thing
here,
but
kate,
I
saw
you
writing
down
things.
E
Kate,
townley,
I'm
guessing!
You
might
have
a
question.
E
F
The
parking
spaces
you
had
multiple
presentations
on
the
knocking,
the
the
spaces
down
from
1.5
to
1.0,
and
then
a
lot
of
the
specifics
you
came
up
with
were
in
denver,
are
those
actually
built,
or
was
that
a
plan
that
they
have.
H
I
think
they've
been
in
place
for
quite
a
while,
and
so
I'm
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
development
going
on
in
denver,
and
so
I
would
have
to
think
that,
in
fact,
I
do
know
of
some
examples
that
actually
I
did
give
in
some
study
session
presentations
where,
yes,
there
are
existing
buildings
in
the
city
and
county
of
denver
that
are
part
of
those
types
of
ratios.
C
J
Michelle
you
may
I'm
not
sure
if
you
fully
recognize
this,
but
we
have
a.
We
do
have
a
presentation
on
the
downtown
plan
of
the
downtown
development
authority,
so
hillary
and
I
will
be
giving
that
after
you're
done
with
this
matter,.
E
C
Hi,
I
just
had
a
question
about.
I
know
the
gentleman
last
week
from
mcmullins
was
talking
about
opening
up
for
athletic
field
use.
I
just
didn't
know
if
there
was
more
to
that.
I
live
right
next
to
miller
field
and
I
can
also
walk
to
that
area.
H
H
He
gave
me
some
examples
of
of
sporting
recreational
use,
type
developments
that
were
located
on
tops
of
major
buildings
throughout
the
world,
so
that
was
quite
interesting
and
it
also
triggered
in
my
mind
the
thought
that
I
had
a
about
a
year
ago,
which
was
there
was
something
questions
asked
about.
Well,
how
do
we?
How
can
we
offer
more
open
space,
recreational
opportunities
in
the
medical
district,
especially
when
we're
having
some?
H
You
know
new
senior
developments
like
atria
opening
up
and
it's
a
very
difficult
situation
over
there
too,
because
there's
just
not
available
land.
It's
all
built
up
and
my
thought
was
well
those
parking
structures
that
they
have
over.
There
are
quite
empty,
and
you
could
do
something
like
that
on
the
top
of
a
parking
structure,
utilize
the
top
floor
for
that
kind
of
use,
and
so
it
was
an
interesting
idea
from
michael
feely
that
I
hope
that
we
keep
in
the
back
of
our
minds
when
we're
soliciting
developers.
H
C
E
C
G
I
guess
just
to
follow
up
on
that
is
that
then,
since
right
now,
athletic
fields
are
our
recreational
use
is
not
allowed
by
right.
If
it's
an
ex
like
a
accessory
use,
essentially
something
that's
put
on
top
of
a
parking
structure
on
a
roof.
Would
that
be
allowed,
or
is
that
something
that
would
still
be
to
be
determined
like
in
an
overall
in
the
the
larger
code
rewrite.
H
F
I
imagined
on
the
the
mountain
view,
you
know,
there's
there's
no
real
plans
here.
So
one
of
the
concerns
I
have
is
there's
very
little
limits
on
what
we're
looking
at
here.
It's
very
it's.
It's
basically
like
signing
a
blank
check
for
a
developer.
F
They
can,
they
can
build
pretty
much
anything
they
want
anywhere.
They
want
is
what
what
are
the?
What
do
we?
What
kind
of
control
does
city,
council
or
planning
and
zoning
have
on
development?
H
Well,
I
would
take
some
exception
to
that.
I
think
that
this
tsa
specific
plan
does
call
out
what
triggers
major
amendments
and
that
that
there
is
a
plan
that
these
developers
have
to
follow.
They
can't
necessarily
do
whatever
they
want.
H
I
think
the
plan
lays
out
a
land
use
pattern
with
right-of-ways
and
expectations
that
they
cannot
necessarily
deviate
from
there's,
also
a
lot
of
architectural
standards
that
inguint
has
never
had
before
that
they
must
adhere
to
in
terms
of
quality
of
construction
and
in
terms
of
applying
for
these
things,
the
they
will
have
to
submit
application.
Formal
applications
to
the
community
development
department
and
the
community
development
department
will
go
over
those,
and
if
they
conform
to
this
tsa
plan
document,
then
they
can
go
approved
administratively.
H
However,
if
they
do,
if
their
plans
are
showing
something
different,
that
would
require
a
major
amendment,
then
the
buying
zoning
commission
that
will
trigger
the
pla
the
administration
to
begin
the
planning
and
zoning
public
hearing
process
and
same
with
the
city
council.
It
will
require
city
council
approval
as
well,
and
then
yes
and
then
I
think
we
also
every
project
will
also
have
to
regardless
of
whether
it
goes
to
have
to
go
through
a
major
amendment.
They're
all
going
to
have
to
go
through
the
design
review
committee.
H
F
F
F
It's
a
bunch
if
it's
going
to
be
parking
structures
and
apartments
which
that's
going
to
be
not
not
real
nice
to
walk
around
down
there.
H
So
to
answer
the
question,
so
the
10
is
comes
directly
from
our
current
mu,
b1
zone
district
designation.
Today,
the
downtown
area
is
intended
to
be
a
more
urban
style
of
landscape,
it's
more
similar
to
something,
probably
like
cherry,
creek
or
downtown
denver,
or
even
something
like
downtown
golden,
as
opposed
to
something
that
looks
more
like
the
denver
tech
center,
which
would
have
much
higher
landscaping
requirements.
A
E
G
I
think
I
asked
this
last
time,
but
I'm
just
wanted
to
double
check
parks
are
still
an
allowable
use
in
mub1
or
would
be
an
allowable
use
in
this.
So
the
10
percent
that
carl's
referring
to
is
for
landscaping
or
greenery
per
site.
But
if
a
developer
came
in
because
parks
really
do
increase
land
value
and
our
great
amenity
for
communities,
they
can
still
build
a
park
or
choose
to
do
that
as
part
of
a
parcel
within
the
redevelopment.
H
Yes,
you're
correct:
there's
no
provision
that
precludes
a
developer
from
providing
much
greater
areas
of
landscaping
if
they
so
choose
to
do
so,
and
they
and
park
use
is
allowed
in
all
zone
districts
throughout
the
city,
and
so
that
is
would
definitely
be
an
allowable
use
here.
G
Kate,
sorry,
that
would
be
something
where
I
would
either
need
to
be.
You
know
a
developer,
has
the
site
or
it
purchases
the
site
and
then
chooses
to
use
it
as
a
park
or
allow
public
use
on
that
site
as
a
park
or
the
city
would
need
to
purchase
or
maintain
a
site
or
sorry
a
parcel
within
the
area
in
order
to
have
that
be
a
public
park
kind
of
like
the
plaza
area
is
now
and
continuing
to
maintain
that
plaza
area.
I
think,
as
part
of
that,
the
station
area
plan.
H
So
the
piazza
area
today
is
is
controlled
and
maintained
by
what's
called
a
cam.
Is
that
right?
What
does
cam
stand
for
dan?
H
It's
common
area,
maintenance,
okay,
yes,
and
so
our
city
parks
department
does
not
maintain
things
at
city
center
and
most
likely
that
some
kind
of
form
of
maintenance
structure
like
that
is
what
will
be
prop
most
likely
going
to
be
in
place
in
the
future
development
as
well.
J
And
I
might
just
mention
john
quickly-
I
you
know
we
don't
have
it
for
viewing
tonight,
but
the
evolving
redevelopment
plan
of
skb
had
two
major
plaza
public
spaces
on
block
b.
Then
they
envision
redeveloping
the
plaza
area
into
a
festival
street.
So
right
in
that
immediate
area
of
the
station
there'd
be
three
big
public
open
spaces
and
a
couple
of
them
had
a
high
percentage
of
landscaping.
E
Well-
and
I
did
notice
john
in
your
presentation,
one
of
the
questions
I
had
in
our
last
meeting
was:
could
developers
get
together
and
share
their
open
space
so
that
there
could
be
potentially
a
larger
one?
And
I
think
you
said
two
today,
but
I
guess
it
could
possibly
even
be
three
could
get
together
and
make
a
larger
public
space.
H
Yes,
I
would
agree,
and
the
key
is:
are
they
adjacent
right
there
if
one
is
way
over
here
by
santa
fe
and
one
is
over
by
a
coma
that
doesn't
work?
No,
no.
A
We're
closing
the
public
hearing
on
this
particular
case,
then
john
it'll
be
we'll,
can
go
into
the
next
public
hearing
on
the
official
map.
Okay,
thank
you.
After
we're
done
voting
and
the
commission's
done
voting
and
things
on
this
case.
A
Yes,
and
I
just
noticed,
we
have
lost
judy.
Oh
kate,
townley.
G
A
A
A
D
E
C
E
Looks
like
judy's
trying
to
log
back
in
again.
I
would
second
meg's
comments.
It's
been
a
lot
of
work
and,
to
be
honest,
this
is
a
really
bold
step
for
englewood.
Both
of
these
propositions
are.
E
It
turns
a
lot
of
the
future
development
of
the
core
part
of
inglewood
over
to
staff
with
our
input
and
it's
a
huge
step
forward.
So
please,
if
you
have
comments
or
questions,
let's,
let's
air,
those
now.
E
F
I
I
agree
with
you.
This
is
this
is
a
huge
project
and
it's
big
I've
been
here
38
years
and
I've
never
seen
anything
even
close
to
this.
In
reading
the
tsa.
F
Walmart
and
petco
is
what
I
understand,
but
it's
it's
huge.
It's
gonna,
be
a
very,
very
big
project,
it'll,
take
probably
over
10
years
to
accomplish
the
to
get
it
up
and
running,
and
this
is
really
amazingly
it.
I,
the
the
work,
that's
gone
into
this.
I
can't
imagine
all
the
work
that's
been
in
this.
It's
been
years
in
the
making,
but
it's
a
huge
huge
amount
of
data
and
information
and
whatnot
all
right
on
a
comment.
F
F
300
per
square
mile
and
lithium
is
3.
800
people
per
square
mile
and
golden
is
half
of
wedding.
Good
is
the
issue
with
that
that
I
have
is
englewood
and
her
littleton
and
golden
both
have
really
very
prosperous,
downtown
areas,
and
their
density
is
a
lot
less
than
angular
is
so
is,
and
golden
does
have
a
dda
there,
but
their
funding
is
fairly
low.
It's
not
going
to
be
nearly
what
the
dda
is
going
to
be
here.
F
So
this
is
a
huge
project
and
it's
built
on
density,
and
I
I
just
don't
see
that
the
density
is
gonna
and
and
right
now,
there's
like
1500
apartments
that
are
being
either
being
built
or
in
the
planning
stages
and
will
be
built
fairly,
soon,
1500,
more
apartments,
and
then
the
this
project
will
build,
probably
a
couple
of
thousand
thousand,
maybe
possibly
it's
unknown,
how
many
of
their
criminals.
So
nobody
really
knows
the
density
is
a
big
part
of
this
project
and.
F
G
You
know,
potential
issues
with
more
traffic
or
things
like
that,
but
having
it
in
the
downtown
core
area
and
on
the
light
rail
line
and
on
the
rail
trail
line,
and
I
think
this
is
the
right
area
to
to
add
that
density
in
and
to
create
a
vibrant
space,
because
I
think
if
we
were
to
go
a
lower
density,
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
do
us
any
any
favors
in
the
sense
that
you
know
just
because
there's
the
allowed
density
doesn't
mean
the
developers
necessarily
going
to
build
to
that.
G
A
B
Yeah
I'll
just
kind
of
mirror
what
we're
talking
about
here
as
far
as
density
goes,
I
think
that
that
is
a
good
place
for
apartments
and
density
too,
but
and
we're
counting
on
that
people
are
going
to
want
to
continue
to
move
to
englewood,
and
I
I'm
for
this
for
this
amendment
tonight.
B
Just
so
you
know
I'm
I
if
I
were
to
vote
for
it,
I'm
gonna
vote
for
it,
but
do
keep
in
mind
city
of
englewood
that
they've,
you
have
approved
an
apartment,
a
new
apartment,
complex
across
the
street
south
of
hampton,
where
that
old,
classic
building
stood
right
behind
the
by
the
south
and
then
just
to
the
east
of
that.
Next
to
me,
I
too
live
right
by
miller
field
there
and
they're
going
to
be
put
in
a
little
park,
but
it's
a
another.
B
Another
stream
about
town
homes
is
picking
up
the
half
right
behind
code
enforcement
and
there's
going
to
be
a
little
park
and
that's
nice,
but
it
is
a
lot
of
residents
and
this
has
got
to
be
done
in
such
a
way
that
we
don't
end
up
with
the
same
thing
with
retail
stores
and
belmar
in
lakewood
has
going
under
foreclosure.
B
So
I
don't
want
to
go
through
that
again,
but
the
light
rail
we
really.
I
hope
that
we
have
some
places
to
shop
and
and
get
you
know,
I'm
cold
with
the
density.
But
when
you
get
off
the
light
rail
there
should
be
things
to
shop
and
buy
and
do
and
why
they
couldn't
even
put
a
7-eleven
there.
I
don't
know,
but
that's
that's
my
my
only
thoughts
on
this
right
now.
Thank
you.
F
Yeah,
the
we
we
need
to
be
very
careful
on
what
kind
of
apartments
we
put
in
affordable
apartments
are
gonna
bring
in
people
that
don't
have
any
disposable
income
spend
in
the
shops
that
are
going
to
be
in
the
in
the
english
area.
F
F
That's
I
mean
it's.
It's
I'm
I'm
kind
of
talking
out
of
both
sides
of
my
mouth
here,
but
it's
just
you.
You
want
to
bring
people
in
that
have
money
to
spend.
That's
the
purpose
for
bringing
them
in
to
to
bring
them
in
here.
So
they
can
spend
money
in
the
shops.
We
can
open
more
stores
and
then
have
more
spending
going
on
make
more
tax
money
for
city,
so
the
well
that
brings
up
another
point:
is
the
tax
property
tax
on
apartments?
F
F
I've
seen
police
over
at
the
the
bells,
cherry
hills,
apartments
a
lot
and
you
get
a
fire
truck
an
ambulance
and
three
cop
cars
over
there,
and
you
can't
do
a
whole
lot
of
9-1-1
calls
and
then
still
make
any
money
for
the
city.
F
We
lost
the
angelwood
fire
department
because
we
had
equipment
that
wasn't
able
to
handle
the
higher
buildings
that
we
were
getting
so
these
these
are
125
foot.
Have
we
checked
with
the
fire
department
to
see
if
they
have
equipment
that
will
handle
those
buildings
and
if
so,
if
they
need
to
get
new
equipment.
As
I
can,
I
raise
our
contract
with
them.
D
Hopefully
my
internet
mom,
just
I
had
to
reset
my
router
anyways
enough,
complaining
yay
for
comcast,
so
my
my
only
concern
goes
back
to
the
design
review
and
I
know
I
harp
on
this,
but
I
really
want
to
make
sure
the
public
feels
like
they're
involved.
D
D
The
design
review
committee
basically
has
no
say
I
mean
they
have
they're
an
advisory
situation,
but
I
personally
would
prefer
to
see
something
that
says
that
if
that
advisory
committee
sees
something
that
they
feel
should
have
more
public
input,
that
they
should
have
the
ability
not
just
as
an
advisory
but
simply
to
say
this
needs
to.
D
I
mean
have
some
power
in
making
it
go
down
a
different
path
if
necessary,
and
I
and
I
understand
the
need
for
flexibility
and
the
ability
to
respond
quickly.
But
that's
my
only
heartburn
is
that
that
advisory
committee
doesn't
really
have
any
final
say
since
they're
just
an
advisory,
and
I
know
what
we're
trying
to
do.
But
I
I
just
feel
like
that
might
be
a
step
too
far.
G
Can
I
ask
something
to
follow
up
on
judy's
comment,
okay,
sure
and
then
it'll
be
kate,
fuller,
okay!
Well,
it's
just
wondering:
if
judy
is
there
something
you
would
recommend
we
put
in
either
like
as
a
in
addition
to
what's
presented
tonight
or
just
something
to
consider
down
the
road,
I'm
just
wondering
if,
if
there's
different
language
or
or
something
else
that
could
be
put
in
there
to
to
make
it
stronger,
okay,.
C
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
add
on
to
what
carl
was
saying.
I
wonder,
because
you
are
raising
a
concern
about
leaning
in
too
much
to
affordable
housing,
but
I
wonder
what
options
we
have
to
encourage
the
developers
to
subsidize
a
percentage
of
units
in
their
buildings
or
to
maybe
create
spaces
that
they
have
like
a
slim
down
amenity
package,
so
they're
able
to
be
afforded
by
people.
They
don't
have
like
a
fancy
pool
or
something
like
that.
C
That
way,
we
could
have
teachers,
social
workers,
people
that
work
in
the
businesses
nearby,
maybe
they're,
just
getting
started.
We
still
want
to
include
those
people
in
our
economy
because
I
just
think
that's
really
important,
especially
in
this
area
of
town.
So
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
in.
A
E
So,
are
we
recommending
that
case
2021.003
beef,
we
are
approving
it
and
sending
it
on
to
city
council?
Is
that
what
we're
doing
nancy
we're
making.
E
A
D
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
place
to
do
to
make
the
comment
on
what
kate
asked
of
me.
I
I
would
like-
and
I
don't
know
that
I'm
gonna
be
putting
in
the
I'm,
not
not
sure,
I'm
going
to
say
the
language
properly,
but
in
my
mind
I
would
like
to
see
that
design
review
committee
do
something
similar
in
terms
of
the
report.
You
know
recommend
you
know.
Based
on
our
review.
We
recommend
that
this
go
forward
without
any
modifications
based
on
our
review.
D
So
no
modifications-
and
maybe
even
if
it's
just
concerns
about
x
y
z
and
we
just
sort
of
have
a
a
the
thing
that
says
we
we
we
like
this
or
we
would
like
to
see
changes
in
x
y
z,
but
there
has
to
be
some
way
for
them
to
voice
that
and
then
feel
like
the
who's
ever
the
designee
or
how.
Whoever
in
planning
is
going
to
be
approving
this
to
move
forward
that
that
there's
some
written
recognition
that
the
concerns
that
may
or
may
not
come
up
have
been
addressed.
D
I
don't
know
I
feel
like
there.
It
needs
to
be
a
two-way
communication,
not
like
okay,
you
guys
go
spend,
you
know
x,
number
of
days
and
hours
and
yay
thanks
for
your
input
and
you
get
to
feel
heard,
but
not
really
because
we're
going
to
do
whatever
we
want
anyways.
So
somehow
that
there's
a
a
written
communication
of
why
maybe
their
recommendation
wasn't
why
why
the
final
decision
did
not
take
into
account
what
their
concerns
were?
D
D
D
So
I
don't
know
how
we
put
that
in
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
place.
I
wish
I
had
better
wording.
I
just
couldn't
come
up
with
anything.
E
Nancy,
would
it
be
possible
for
us
to
do
a
motion
to
recommend
this
to
city
council
and
ask
them
to
please
listen.
I
mean
I
don't
think
we
can
actually
make
them,
but
please
listen
to
the
comments
that
we
expressed
to
this
evening.
Do
could
you.
C
I
believe
you
could
you
know
you.
You've
got
three
choices,
you
can,
you
can
approve,
approve
it
as
is
approve
it
with
conditions
or
you
could
not
approve
it
at
all,
which
I
don't
think
that's
where
the
board
is
going.
C
Obviously,
but
you
could
approve
it
with
a
condition
that
council
review
the
the
commission's
discussions
tonight
and
I
would
think
it
would
be
just
for
the
july
7th
meeting
and
not
necessarily
for
the
the
meeting
we
had
what
two
weeks
ago
now,
because
I
think
that's
where
this
discussion
is
going
primarily
is
on
tonight.
C
D
Yeah,
I
think
that
would
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
I'm
sorry.
I
don't
have
the
number
in
front
of
me.
My
computer,
I
just
don't
have
anything
up
anymore,
but
on
this
plan.
D
D
2021.003.003
plan,
with
the
request
that
council
listen
to
the
comments
portion
of
the
july
7th
planning
and
zoning
commission
review.
C
G
Question
real
quick
sure:
do
we
need
to
add
the
the
elements
around
the
visitor
accommodation,
ground
floor,
commercial
requirement,
those
specifics
to
the
motion
or
that
just
carries
as
part
of
the
the
case
number.
It
carries.
G
G
It's
in
you
know,
aligns
with
our
comprehensive
plan
in
terms
of
being
able
to
provide
more
of
a
mix
of
housing,
as
well
as
provide
visitor
accommodations
in
our
downtown
area
and
in
the
mub1
area,
and
also
provides
an
opportunity
to
really
have
more
of
a
say
in
terms
of
this
catalytic
area
of
the
city
by
not
only
doing
the
base
rezone,
but
also
by
adopting
the
tsa
specific
plan
and
having
more
say
in
terms
of
what
the
architectural
features
and
the
character
of
the
development
within
that
site
will
look
like.
G
A
Is
perfect,
it's
perfectly
good
judy
brown.
D
I
vote
yes,
I
agree
specifically
with
the
adding
the
visitor
accommodations
and
the
other
items
related
to
the
changes
to
title
16.
I
feel
like
we
did
a
very
thorough
job
of
reviewing
those,
and
I
appreciate
everybody
on
staff
and
on
the
planning
and
zoning
commissioning,
because
we
did
a
lot
of
work
on
that
portion
of
it
and
I
felt
like
we
did
a
good
job
on
the.
D
That's
for
the
text
amendments
and
then
the
amendment
of
the
city,
englewood
official
zoning
map,
all.
D
Fine,
I
just
wanted
to
the
text
amendments
and
the
tsa
specific
plan
adoption,
and
I
appreciate
the
work
that
the
staff
has
done
to
answer
the
questions
and
adding
of
the
design
review
committee.
So.
C
Yes
and
I'm
encouraged
by
the-
I
guess
what
I
would
sum
up
as
smart
density.
So
thank
you
to
staff
for
this
long
long
process
and
I'm
happy
of
where
we
are.
F
I'm
going
to
vote
no
on
this.
I
I'm
just
concerned
about
the
size
of
the
project
and
the
it's
all
based
on
the
light
rail
connection
right
now.
The
light
rail
has
a
pandemic
is
basically
shut,
the
light
rail
angular
station
down
and
I
would
like
to
see
it
recuperate
a
little
bit
before
we
jump
on
too
much
planning
on
this.
I
appreciate
the
staff's
work
on
this
project.
F
This
is
huge
and
it's
got
there's
a
lot
behind
it
that
we're
not
even
being
so
it's
I
just
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
I
would
like
the
hotel,
definitely
for
the
hotel
and
a
couple
of
some
apartments,
but
not
an
over
abundance
of
them.
F
Some
of
the
buildings
need
to
go
and
we
need
to
get
new
businesses
in
here
and
there's
a
lot
of
good
things
about
this,
but
I
just
I've.
I've
seen
changes
in
inglewood
and
this
is
just
a
huge
change.
F
I
was
reading
the
the
tsa
specific
plan
that
it's
really
really
involved,
so
the
70
million
dollars
that
they're
going
to
get
if
they
get
that
will
probably
not
cover
all
everything.
That's
going
to
be
done.
If
the
angular
pays
for
it,
if
we
have
developers
pay
for
it,
that'll
help
out
a
huge
amount
right
at
this
time.
I
I
just
can't
go
with
it.
E
Carl,
I
appreciate
your
comments
and
I
think
that
you're
correct
that
there
are
some
issues
with
rtd
and
the
light
rail
and
things
like
that.
My
hope
is
that
those
things
will
sort
themselves
out
over
time.
This
is
not
a
project,
that's
going
to
happen
tomorrow,
or
even
the
next
day
or
even
the
next
year,
and
I'm
hoping
that
your
your
questions
and
issues
will
sort
themselves
out,
so
I
am
going
to
go
ahead
and
vote
yes
on
this
project,
but
I
appreciate
your
comments
very
much.
Thank
you.
Motion
passes.
E
A
H
All
right,
I'm
here
this
evening,
to
continue
the
public
hearing
from
june
or
jul
just
june
22nd
on
case
number
zone,
2020-002,
amendment
of
the
city
of
inguinal,
official
zoning
map
to
rezone
city
center,
inwood
from
pud
planned
unit
development
to
mub1,
mixed-use,
central
business,
district
and
adoption
of
the
inglewood
tsa
specific
plan
overlay
district.
H
Once
again,
we
had
publication
of
the
original
public
hearing
on
ju
from
for
june
22
in
the
june
10
edition
of
the
england
herald.
It
was
also
published
on
the
city's
website
from
june
2nd
through
today,
the
week
of
june
7-11.
There
was
a
neighborhood
mailing
to
all
property
owners
and
businesses
and
residents
within
1
000
feet
of
the
subject
area
on
june
28th,
five
signs
were
posted
and
I
have
proof
certification
of
posting
for
those
locations.
H
They
were
at
the
rt
park
and
ride
the
piazza
oval,
the
800
block
west,
hampton
avenue,
the
corner
of
floyd
avenue
and
south
cherokee
street
and
the
corner
of
england,
parkway
and
south
ladies
street,
on
june,
30th
continuation
notice
was
sent
out
to
182
subscribers
june
30th.
A
posting
was
made
on
the
city's
website
in
the
news
section
july
1st
and
through
second,
the
communications
department
of
the
city
did
a
social
media
posting
and
july
1st.
A
a
feature.
H
Article
ran
in
the
englewood
herald
on
the
city
center
rezoning
project,
community
development
department
staff
requested.
The
planning
and
zoning
commission
review,
take
public
testimony
on
and
forward
to
city
council,
a
favorable
recommendation
for
amendment
of
the
city
of
england,
official
zoning
map
to
rezone
city
center,
england
from
pud
planned
unit
development
to
mu,
b1,
mixed
use,
central
business
district
and
adoption
of
the
inglewood
tsa
specific
plan
overlay
district.
H
H
That's
a
proposal
to
rezoning
with
city
center
from
pud
planning
to
development,
to
mub1
mixed-use
central
business
district,
an
area
generally
bounded
by
hampton
avenue
on
the
south,
santa
fe
drive
on
the
west,
eastman
and
floyd
avenues
on
the
north
nalay
street
on
the
east
and
adoption
of
the
english
pacific
plan.
Overlay
district
generally
bounded
by
hampton
avenue
in
the
south.
H
On
the
east
and
adoption
of
the
england
specific
plan
overlay
district
generally
bounded
by
hampton
avenue
in
the
south,
santa
fe
drive
in
the
west.
Eastman
and
floyd
avenues
in
the
north
and
bannock
and
cope
streets
on
the
east
should
be
adopted.
As
an
amendment
to
the
city
of
england.
Official
zoning
map,
and
then
I
would
just
quickly
want
to
go
through
a
few
areas
of
concern,
some
questions
that
were
raised
at
the
last
june
22nd
meeting.
H
The
first
question
was:
is
there
a
reason
to
not
go
forward
with
the
official
zoning
map
amendment
before
the
text
amendments,
and
the
answer
to
that
was:
is
that
text
amendments
are
essential
to
establishing
the
tsa
overlay
district,
which
needs
to
occur
prior
to
the
official
zoning
map
amendment,
and
so
there
is
an
order
to
those
of
these.
That
makes
rational
sense
and
I
think
we
are
following
that
order.
H
We
have
just
approved
the
first
case
and
now
we're
on
here
for
the
question
of
the
second
case,
the
actual
rezoning
of
the
official
zoning
map,
and
then
the
second
question
was:
will
text
or
zoning
map
amendment
establish
downtown
development
authority,
tax,
increment
financing
district,
and
the
answer
to
that
question
is
no.
The
text
and
zoning
amendments
do
not
establish
the
downtown
development
authority,
tax,
increment,
financing,
district.
H
The
the
station
area,
the
transit,
the
transit
station
area,
specific
plan
district
extends
out
from
the
station
approximately
one
half
mile,
which
is
a
generally
acceptable,
walkable
distance
for
light
rail
station
areas
and
the
air.
The
the
tsa
area
overlay
area
does
not
extend
beyond
bannock
and
a
coma
street
to
include
the
historic
broadway-oriented
corridor,
and
with
that
I
conclude
my
presentation
on
this
case,
and
at
this
time
we
could.
A
E
That
thank
you.
Any
discussion.
E
C
B
C
A
A
E
No
problem,
I'm
generally
confused
about
this
time
of
the
day.
Do
I
hear
such
a
motion.
E
Do
I
hear
a
second
I'll
second
that
thank
you
and
now
is
there
a
discussion.
E
G
Questions
I'll
just
add
a
comment,
and
I
guess
with
my
with
my
vote-
is
fine
I'll
vote.
Yes
and
the
rezoning
meets
the
minimum
size
for
a
base
rezoning.
G
G
In
addition
to
providing
more
assurances
to
developers
by
having
know,
what's
allowed
in
terms
of
use
by
wright
and
nub1,
as
well
as
in
the
overlay
district
and
then
by
doing
nothing
and
keeping
the
planned
unit
development
right
now,
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
really
move
forward
with
some
of
the
visions
and
the
goals
of
the
city.
So
I
vote
yes.
C
A
E
J
We'll
try
we'll
try
to
make
this
a
little
bit
exciting,
for
you
guys,
and
the
other
thing
we'll
try
to
do
just
to
set
expectations
is
to
limit
this
to
about
30
minutes,
so
try
to
wrap
up
about
nine
o'clock
and
just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background.
This
is
an
overview
of
the
downtown
planet
development
that
is
the
basic
business
plan
for
the
inglewood
downtown
development
authority,
the
edda
as
we
refer
to
it
and
you've
received.
J
And
so
what
we
want
to
present
to
you
is
the
downtown
plan.
This
was
recently
approved
for
recommendation
to
the
city
and
under
the
state.
Dda
statute
is
to
be
reviewed
by
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
and
then
you
all
get
to
hopefully
recommend
it
for
approval
to
the
city
council
and
you
can
add
approval
or
endorsements
to
that
motion.
J
So
our
goal
for
tonight
is
really
give
you
a
comfort
level
about
the
plan,
very
little
change
in
the
plan
since
last
summer,
since
there
was
a
draft
to
the
plan
that
we
reviewed
with
you,
then-
and
so
that's
our
goal
and
hillary
is
really
has
this
down.
So
I
will
turn
it
over
to
her
and
just
add
comments
along
the
way
or
at
the
end,
hillary.
I
Thanks
dan
thanks
everyone
for
having
us
here
tonight,
I
look
forward
to
presenting
to
you
again.
We've
come
a
long
way
since
2020,
since
we
started
in
january
of
2020,
we've
been
through
four
seasons:
one
pandemic,
several
closure
orders
and
reopenings,
and
we
have
a
city
council
appointed,
very
dynamic
group
of
civic
business
leaders
who
are
now
steering
this
organization
on
the
board
of
directors,
and
it's
really
a
pleasure
to
work
with
them
and
kind
of
hit
the
ground
running
with
this
downtown
initiative.
I
So
I
guess
the
first
good
news
to
share
with
you
is
that
our
downtown
plan,
which
was
directly
informed
by
hundreds
of
community
members,
business
owners,
property
owners
in
the
downtown
district
and
yourselves,
was
named
best
downtown
plan
recently
by
the
governor's
award
for
downtown
excellence
and
that's
a
statewide
competition.
I
So
we're
happy
to
be
recognized
for
the
effort
and
really
enjoying
now
trying
to
make
things
a
reality.
Nancy,
I'm
not
sure.
If
I
can
make
the
slides
go.
I
can
okay,
so
quick
review.
The
ingowa
downtown
plan
redefines
the
downtown
district
as
much
larger
than
the
traditional
main
street
along
south
broadway.
So
what
we're?
I
Looking
at
is
a
central
business
district
that
includes
the
city
center
area,
the
south
broadway
area
and
the
medical
district
area
which
we're
starting
to
call
the
wellness
district
because
of
the
different
uses
that
are
that
are
clustered
there.
It's
about,
let's
see,
185
acres,
comparable
to
downtown
longmont
or
downtown
golden.
I
I
These
are
kind
of
the
big
ideas
that
that
the
org
the
plan
is
organized
around
the
first
one
we've
achieved,
we've
created
the
inglewood
downtown
development
authority.
The
second
one
extend
the
vibrancy
of
downtown
by
adding
more
restaurants,
jobs
and
entertainment.
I
We
want
to
have
more
activity
more
time
more
times
of
the
day,
create
a
distinct,
authentic
brand
identity
for
downtown
we've
started
to
work
on
that
cultivate
street.
Sorry,
if
you
can
see
the
street
level
activation
throughout
downtown
connections
and
multimodal
is
a
big
theme
in
this
plan.
We
have
these
three
kind
of
distinct
areas,
each
with
their
own
context
and
history
and
identity,
but
they're
not
very
well
connected
physically.
I
I
should
mention
real
quick,
and
I
meant
to
this-
is
not
a
detailed
year
by
year
implementation
plan.
This
is
a
big
picture.
Long-Term
document
meant
to
extend
a
vision
and
recommendations
to
last
for
the
next
20
years,
or
so
so
it
it.
It
has
these
various
sections.
It
gives
a
existing
conditions,
analysis
for
each
section,
and
then
it
gives
some
specific
recommendations
for
each
sub
area
in
that
topic
area.
It's
the
job
of
the
ingua
dda
to
create
annual
operational
implementation
plans
that
flow
from
this
bigger
picture
document.
I
So
in
the
first
section
you
know
we're
really
looking
at
economic
vitality,
you
know
trying
to
fill
vacant
store
fronts
attracting
new
investment
to
the
downtown
area
working
with
local
businesses
and
employers
really
encouraging
a
variety
of
home
types
and
prices,
especially
in
areas
that
are
directly
served
by
light
rail
and
transit.
So
our
workforce,
our
essential
workers
who
work
so
hard
all
last
year
have
places
that
they
can
continue
to
live
in
in
the
city
of
englewood.
I
Get
involved
in
public
policy.
Issues
such
as
services
for
people
experiencing
homelessness,
marketing
and
programming
is
pretty
straightforward.
Establishing
a
brand
identity
for
downtown
a
new
integrated
marketing
program.
We've
started
that
with
the
limited
funding
we
have
available
this
year
with
a
new
website
and
an
e-newsletter
and
a
facebook
page
and
a
print
newsletter
coming
out
on
a
quarterly
basis,
we're
contributing
to
downtown
events.
I
Trying
to
stay
very
public
places
and
spaces
are
very
important
in
this
plan.
We're
looking
at
clean,
safe
initiatives.
We
just
did
some
spot
maintenance
on
both
south
broadway
and
old
hampden.
I
That's
all
about
you
know
getting
rid
of
the
grit
and
and
the
grime
and
the
graffiti
and
the
litter
places
that
look
picked
up
and
clean,
tend
to
draw
in
customers
and
tend
to
discourage
nuisance.
Behavior
places
that
look
neglected
and
and
left
behind
tend
to
draw
in
nuisance,
behavior
and
discourage
customer
behavior.
I
So
you
know
you,
you
want
to
keep
things
looking
clean
and
neat
to
the
best
of
your
ability,
we're
also
looking
at
enhancing
existing
spaces
in
the
downtown
area.
We
just
were
awarded
a
150
000
grant
from
cdot
to
improve
the
crosswalk
and
two
paseos
on
south
broadway
by
making
them
safer,
multimodal
more
accessible
and
more
connected
to
surrounding
businesses.
I
That's
one
economic
recovery
grant
we've
been
able
to
secure
and
we
anticipate
pursuing
more
of
those
opportunities.
I
I
Mobility
and
transportation
is
all
about
connections
between
the
sub
areas
that
I
mentioned
yesterday
or
yesterday,
that's
funny
a
couple
of
slides
ago,
possibly
improving
the
engle
wood
trolley
service,
looking
at
other
multimodal
projects
and
services
for
the
area,
including
analyzing
parking
and
making
sure
that
we
were
providing
for
that
in
each
sub
area.
I
I
should
also,
I
should
add
it's
not
just
about
parking.
It's
about
encouraging
alternative
transportation
options,
so
we're
going
to
maintain
parking.
We're
also
going
to
make
it
easy
to
bicycle
or
use
a
wheelchair
or
use
a
shuttle.
I
There
should
be
a
variety
of
ways
for
people
to
get
around
downtown
safely,
depending
on
their
are
without
regard
to
their
age
or
a
bill.
I
My
back
okay,
the
way
that
the
way
to
pay
for
this
per
state
statute
is
tax,
increment
financing,
which
is
not
a
tax
increase
for
anyone.
It's
simply
a
way
to
capture
new
tax
revenues
generated
in
the
downtown
district
and
reinvest
them
into
downtown
projects
and
improvements,
and
the
way
it
works
is
that,
as
the
dda
starts
getting
involved
in
all
of
these
activities
and
investing
in
marketing
and
safety
and
public
spaces
and
catalytic
developments,
the
the
amount
of
taxes
that
the
amount
of
new
tax
activity
that's
created,
which
is
the
blue
here.
I
Maybe
it's
new
customer
spending
in
downtown,
maybe
it's
new
business
is
moving
downtown
or
new
development
occurring
downtown.
This
new
revenue
can
be
utilized
by
the
dda
to
reinvest
in
more
downtown
projects
as
set
forth
by
the
downtown
plan.
The
city,
the
county
and
the
school
district
continue
to
receive
the
base
level
of
revenue.
I
So
when
we
we
are
able
to
turn
on
a
tiff
clock
and
we'll
get
to
that
in
a
minute.
The
the
base
level
of
revenue
is
set
and
the
city
county
and
and
school
district
continue
to
receive
that
revenue
for
the
30-year
period.
It
will
go
up
over
time
as
well
as
property
values
are
re-assessed
every
two
years
at
the
end
of
the
tif
period,
which
is
30
years,
the
city,
the
county
and
the
school
district
get
100
percent
of
tax
revenues
generated
by
the
downtown
district.
I
I
Tiff
can
be
used
for
dda
operations,
public
improvements,
programs,
catalyst
development
projects,
financing
of
large
or
multi-year
projects.
A
lot
of
the
projects
in
the
downtown
plan
are
big.
You
know:
redesigning
old
hampden,
for
example,
redesigning
the
inglewood
parkway
investing
in
new
new
street
trees
along
south
south
broadway.
Those
things
can
take
several
years
to
plan
design
and
implement
in
terms
of
the
approval
to
use
tiff.
I
So
we
have,
as
we've
gotten
started
with
the
board
and
started
to
analyze
tax
increment
financing
in
in
the
downtown
area.
We've
refined
the
sub-area
boundaries,
so
the
initial
sub-area
for
the
englewood
city
center
area
was
was
right
in
here
and
ended
at
the
white
line.
We're
now
suggesting
moving
it
to
to
the
black
line,
because
this
area
is
more
consistent.
I
Now,
with
the
overlay
zoning
that
john
just
presented
the
land
uses
in
the
city
center
area
and
the
potential
use
for
tiff
over
the
long
term,
south
broadway,
we
initially
had
ending
roughly
right
here
at
sherman
street,
now
we're
proposing
moving
it
over
to
south
logan
street
to
capture
the
safeway
multi-tenant
retail
over
in
here.
That
does
relate
more
to
the
south
broadway
retail
mix
than
it
does
to
the
medical
district
area
and
is
more
consistent
with
its
zoning
along
south
broadway
and
then
the
medical
advisor.
E
I
This
one
here
is
a
coma
street
up
to
oh.
What
is
that
is
that.
I
You
yeah
yeah,
sorry
and
then
the
medical
district
would
go
from
logan
street
out
to
lafayette.
Each
subdistrict
can
potentially
have
two
tiff
increment
sub
districts
in
it,
there's
property
tax
and
there's
sales
tax
in
each
area.
I
So
we
are
proposing
turning
on
three
tiff
collection
areas
right
now,
one
is
property
tax
and
sales
tax
in
the
medical
district
area
and
the
other
one
is
sales
tax
along
south
broadway,
and
the
reasoning
for
that
is
that
there
is
a
considerable
new
residential
and
commercial
development
underwear
in
the
pipeline
along
old
hampden
right
now,
something
like
10
projects
with
about
357
residential
units
and
over
100
000
square
feet
of
medical
office.
I
Similarly,
as
the
area
starts
to
recover
from
the
economic
downturn
as
more
economic
recovery,
funds
are
invested
into
the
downtown
area
and
as
the
dda
gets
going
with
its
programming
and
activities,
we
expect
that
sales
tax
revenues
will
start
to
recover
along
the
medical
district
area
and
within
south
broadway,
probably
gradually.
You
know,
and
that's.
Okay,
but
let's
go
ahead
and
set
up
those
increment
areas
so
that
we
can
capture
that
little
bit
of
extra
revenue
every
year
to
reinvest
back
in
the
downtown
area.
I
A
E
Nancy,
I
need
your
help
on
with
hands
that
are
raised.
E
Just
to
clarify
this
is,
is
this
is
an
informational
presentation?
Are
there
active
are?
Is
there
some
action
that
we
need
to
do
dan
or
hillary.
J
Yes,
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
see
a
motion
from
the
commission
to
recommend
approval
of
the
downtown
plan
to
city
council,
and
you
know,
along
with
that
recommendation
can
be.
You
know,
an
approval
or
endorsement
of
the
plan
by
the
commission
as
well,
and
this
is
what
this
is.
A
required
step
under
the
state.
Dda
statute
is
for
review
and
recommendation
by
the
commission
prior
to
consideration
by
city
council.
J
I
will
say
that
we
have
had
quite
a
bit
of
review
of
dda
matters
with
the
council.
Just
in
recent
weeks
we
had
a
very
detailed
briefing
study
session
with
them
on
the
21st
of
june.
We
reviewed
a
lot
of
this
and
then
last
evening
we
had
three
items
up
for
council
votes,
all
of
which
were
successful
and
that
they
approved
by
motion
the
2021
budget
and
operating
plan,
and
on
first
reading,
the
debt
authorization
ordinance
and
the
intergovernmental
agreement
between
the
city
and
the
dda.
J
So
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
going
on
as
the
dda
gets
established
this
year
and
council
seems
to
be
well
on
board
with
that.
They
gave
us
the
direction
in
december
to
go
ahead
and
take
all
steps
to
fully
establish
the
dda,
and
the
city
has
effectively
loaned
the
first
year
of
operating
funding
to
the
dda,
which
is
200.
000
that'll,
eventually
be
paid
back
through
collection
of
the
tax
increment
financing
that
hillary
mentioned,
so
just
to
give
you
a
flavor
that
this
recommendation
of
the
downtown
plan
fits
within
the
overall
game
plan.
C
E
C
C
C
C
E
Are
really
doing
a
lot
of
work
here
and
it's
great
to
see
it
happening
so
fast,
that's
great!
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
C
Yeah
thanks
good
evening,
everyone
other
than
apologizing
for
being
late
to
the
meeting
due
to
some
technical
difficulties.
I
don't
have
any
other
report
other
than
commissioner
hubka
welcome
on
behalf
of
the
community
development
staff
to
the
commission,
we're
looking
forward
to
working
with
you
and
that's
it
for
me
tonight,
and
I
appreciate
your
work
this
evening.
As
always.
A
E
Okay,
dugan,
I
think
it's
attorney's
choice.
Now
I
have
nothing.
C
C
E
We're
a
nice
family,
it's
okay,
judy
brown.
E
B
Thank
you
all
for
welcoming
me
in
this
very
exciting
commission
and
in
this
opportunity,
and
thank
you
all
for
your
work.
Welcome.
E
Well,
he
wasn't
austin
for
a
while,
but
now
he's
already
he's
forsaken
us
and
now
he's
back
to
atkins.
So
I
don't
know
what
that
says
about
my
family,
but
that's,
okay.
I
have
no
further
comments
either,
except
for
to
say
thank
you
to
all
obviously,
staff
and
hillary.
You
guys
have
all
done
an
enormous
amount
of
work
that
we
learned
today
and
nancy.
E
Thank
you
as
always
for
keeping
us
on
track
and
and
keeping
me
on
track
in
particular,
and
steering
me
the
right
direction,
making
sure
that
we're
doing
things
legally
and
in
the
appropriate
manner.
So
without
any
further
comments,
I
will
announce
that
this
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you
all
so
much.