►
From YouTube: Evanston City Council Meeting 2-14-2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Council
member
braithwaite,
councilmember
wynn,
councilmember
newsman
here
councilmember
burns
here:
councilmember
sufferden.
C
A
A
First
of
all,
a
proclamation
declaring
tomorrow
february,
15th
2022
north
shore
village
network
day
I'll
quickly,
read
it
and
recognize
the
representatives
of
north
shore
village,
who
are
here
with
us
this
evening,
whereas
the
north
shore
village
network
nsv
network,
our
local
village,
founded
in
evanston
illinois
in
2010,
is
a
member
organization
of
older
adults
committed
to
helping
one
another
by
giving
support
that
helps
them
to
stay
in
their
homes.
A
Celebrating
the
20th
anniversary
of
the
village
movement
and
the
positive
impact
villages
are
having
on
the
experience
of
the
aging
starting
with
the
beacon
hill
village
in
boston.
There
are
now
more
than
300
community-based
villages
across
the
country,
and
the
village
model
is
now
established
as
a
cost-effective,
sustainable
solution
for
healthy,
vibrant
aging,
whereas
the
city
of
evanston
is
pleased
to
recognize
north
shore
village
network
on
this
national
village
day
as
an
asset
to
our
older
citizens
and
to
the
larger
community.
A
A
So
I
want
to
just
also
recognize
the
representatives
of
north
shore,
village,
including,
I
have
to
say
their
treasurer
and
the
one-time
hr
director
here
in
the
city
of
evanston,
judy
witt,
thanks
to
all
of
you
for
your
service
for
your
work,
and
we
very
much
are
honored
to
have
this
chance
to
recognize
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
I
just
want
to
again,
on
the
second
to
last
day
of
her
service
as
a
city
council,
member
thank
council
member
cicely
fleming
for
her
extraordinary
work,
her
diligent
service,
her
fearless
advocacy
and
her
friendship
and
mentorship
of
myself
as
well
and
in
a
small
token
of
recognition
for
her
five
years
of
really
extraordinary
service,
the
city
of
evanston.
A
I
wanted
to
present
you
sicily,
with
this
plaque
of
thanks
and
say
how
much
I
appreciate
all
that
you've
done
for
the
city
and
for
this
council
and
to
say
that
I
know
you're
not
going
to
be
far
or
shy
about
expressing
your
thoughts,
and
I
certainly
look
forward
to
continuing
to
lean
on
you
for
advice
and
wisdom.
Thank
you.
So
much.
E
G
Thank
you
for
having
me
up
here
and
actually
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
edgar,
who
really
does
all
the
work,
but
I
was
remiss
when
I
sent
an
email
to
the
city
council
notifying
you
of
this
award.
I
mentioned
edgar
and
the
two
snow
commanders
at
removed
the
snow
from
the
street,
and
I
was
remiss
in
acknowledging
kevin
johnson
and
stefan
walker,
who
are
the
snow
commanders
that
get
the
snow
off
the
sidewalks.
G
H
Well,
they've
said
their
name
about
four
times,
so
I'm
sure
they'll
be
happy
now,
but
good
evening.
Mayors
of
the
council
mayor
abyss,
city
clerk,
mendoza
city
manager,
gandursky
edgar,
cano,
public
services,
bureau,
chief
and
acting
public
works
agency
director.
As
mr
stoneback
stated,
I
also
oversee
snow
and
ice
operations.
H
I
just
want
to
take
a
few
minutes
here,
just
to
acknowledge
the
award
that
we
won.
It
is
a
very,
very
big
deal
in
our
industry.
It's
the
most
prestigious
award
that
we
can
win
and
it
took
a
lot
for
us
to
get
that
there
was
a
lot
of
hard
work
that
was
put
in
administratively
and
also
by
the
field
staff
and
the
snow
commanders
we're
going
to
be
receiving
the
actual
award
in
the
middle
of
may
during
the
annual
snow
conference.
H
But
one
thing
I
want
to
acknowledge
just
all
the
the
hard
work
that
really
went
into
this
and
it's
not
just
from
public
works.
A
lot
of
city
departments
help
out
during
snow
and
ice,
so
they
should
be
recognized
as
well.
Community
development,
police,
fire
city,
manager's
office,
community
engagement,
I
mean
pretty
much
everybody
here
within
the
city
assist
and
another
player
is,
of
course,
the
city
council,
and
we
really
appreciate
everything
that
you
do
for
us
and
all
the
resources
that
we
are
able
to
get
through
our
recommendations
to
council.
H
So
the
number
one
thing
in
order
to
be
good
at
snow
and
ice
and
be
prepared
is
to
have
all
the
tools
that
you
need.
Preparation
is
number
one,
and
that
comes
with
equipment,
materials,
technology
and
these
past
few
years,
you've
been
wonderful
in
giving
us
the
assets
that
we
need
to
to
win
an
award
like
this.
So
we're
very
honored
we're
very
happy
to
win
this
award
and
just
wanted
to
say.
Thank
you.
B
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
receipt
of
emails
that
were
sent.
I
know
some
members
of
the
community
asked
for
them
to
be
read
in
public,
but
seeing
the
time
it's
not
probably
best
to
just
acknowledge
them.
B
So
annie
coakley
sent
a
letter
from
the
downtown
evanston
accept
board
against
the
518
davis
store,
catherine
lowes
in
support
of
the
aspire
program,
as
well
as
maribel
from
the
assistant
dean
of
health
from
oakland
community
college
and
mark
batista
vp
of
workforce
development
and
dean
of
business
center
technologies,
as
well
as
neil
gambo,
who
also
sent
a
letter
of
support
of
the
north
shore.
Health
systems
aspire
program.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
This
brings
us
to
public
comment.
Ordinarily,
we
begin
these
hybrid
meetings
with
public
comment
from
those
who
signed
up
to
speak
in
person,
but
I
see
none
who
signed
up
and
I
see
none
in
the
room.
So
if
I'm
missing
somebody
just
wait
even
get
my
attention,
but
with
that
we'll
move
to
the
those
who
signed
up
to
speak
online
this
evening,
everyone
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
and
we'll
start
with
samir
desai,
who
will
be
followed
by
doug
silverstein
and
then
neil
gambo.
A
I
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
biss,
and
I
want
to
thank
all
the
city
council
members
as
well
for
giving
me
a
couple
minutes
today.
I'm
doug
silverstein,
the
president
of
evanston
hospital
part
of
north
shore,
university
health
system
and
just
one
slight
correction.
Is
it's
it's
not
north
shore's
aspire
program.
It's
the
evanston
community's
workforce
development
program.
We
happen
to
be
I'm
chairing
the
group.
So
a
lot
of
times.
People
think
it's
north
shore,
but
it
is
really
not
north
shore.
I
Thanks
to
commissioner
sufferden,
with
the
partnership
from
cook
county,
and
so
many
more.
It's
been
as
wonderfully
for
me.
A
just
a
joy
to
have
the
opportunity
to
work
with
such
great
people,
joe
flanagan,
in
the
evanston
business.
Our
recovery
task
force
has
been
phenomenal.
I
The
members
of
the
city
with
folks
like
our
friends,
nathan,
norman
and
paul
zamalczak,
and
so
many
others
kelly's
been
great.
The
mayor
and
what
we
really
hope
to
do
is
really
engage
our
young
people
and
our
young
adults
with
from
job
shadowing
to
career
fairs.
Internships,
helping
with
certification
programs
and
degree
programs
and
really
with
overall
career
pathing.
I
North
shore
is
really
pleased
to
spearhead
this.
With
a
gift
from
our
community
investment
foundation,
which
some
of
you
know
that
with
our
merger
with
edward
alphers,
each
of
our
organizations,
both
north
shore
and
edward
elmhurst,
are
committed
to
a
hundred
million
dollars
each
to
invest
in
our
communities,
which
will
really
spin
off
about
six
to
seven
million
per
year.
I
And
we
are,
at
this
point,
committing
to
200
000
to
really
kicking
off
our
workforce
initiative.
Thrilled
to
be
able
to
do
that
as
a
gift
coming
into
the
city,
hoping
that
tonight
we
will
get
approval
for
matching
funds
coming
from
the
city
and
the
other
piece.
That
was
just
really
wonderful.
As
many
of
you
know,
paul
finnegan
and
his
family
has
a
foundation.
Paul
is
the
co-fought
co-president
of
madison
dearborn
partners
and
with
the.
I
City
will
actually
give
an
additional
200
000
this
year
and
again
next
year,
if
there's
a
commitment
again
so
appreciate
all
the
support.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
time
today
and
enjoy
the
rest
of
your
meeting.
Thank
you.
So
very
much.
A
Thank
you
next
will
be
neil
gambo,
followed
by
muhammad
ali
and
then
dorian
price.
J
Good
evening,
mayor
piss
and
the
members
of
council
city
clerk,
dosa
and
city
manager
at
kentucky,
as
said
my
name,
is
neil
gamble,
and
I
am
the
chair
of
the
mayor's
employer
advisory
council,
otherwise
known
as
meac,
and
we've
been
working
for
the
last
four
years
to
connect
the
local
employers
with
eths
and
now
district
65
to
prevent
career
paths
or
present
career
pathway,
opportunities
for
students
that
technically
aren't
going
to
go
to
college
at
least
right
away,
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
in
support
of
the
request
for
the
arpa
funds
to
support
the
aspire
workforce
development
program
aspire
is
a
solidly
constructed
real
long-term
workforce
development
program.
J
Not
just
an
idea.
This
program
is
walking
the
walk
and
has
committed
significant
resources
to
make
it
work.
Employee
pipelines,
programs
like
aspire
are
vital
to
the
economic
health
of
medicine
because
they
offer
the
opportunity
for
our
young
adults
and
youth
to
gain
skills
leading
to
high-paying
employment
that
enables
them
to
afford
to
stay
in
evanston.
J
The
more
funding
is
fire
has
the
more
evidence,
people
it
can
bring
into
the
program.
Our
first-hand
experience
with
ikit
summer
internship
program
shows
that
aspire
will
work.
North
shore
has
been
a
did
a
an
iq
summer
program
with
us
last
year
and
put
two
kids,
two
young
fresh
graduates
of
class
of
2021
into
internships
and
ultimately
hired
them,
and
really
this
is
a
life-changing
opportunity
for
these
young
people,
as
is
all
internships.
J
We
are
proud
to
be
on
the
team
that
developed
this
fire
and
planned
to
stay
engaged.
This
is
the
right
use
of
arpa
funds
and
an
exciting
opportunity
for
the
city
to
show
support
for
workforce
development,
and
I
urge
you
to
approve
this
investment.
Thank
you
very
much
folks.
K
Focus
for
my
talk
today
or
my
my
my
public
comment
today,
centers
around
our
culture
and
that
that
it
was
emphasized
in
looking
for
the
next
city
manager
in
the
second
attempt,
and
so
there's
a
they
talk
about
these
metrics
and
they
have
a
system
where
they
look
at
various
factors,
and
so
they
look
at
change
versus
and
my
question
is
change
versus
continuity
and
what
we
seek
in
our
leadership
and
so
culture
fit
is
defined
as
the
third
element
of
the
staten
chase
leadership
framework
assesses
and
they
assess
culture
and
strategy
fit
how
decisions
get
made
in
how
leaders
get
others
to
achieve
results
in
a
particular
team
and
then
is
the
company.
K
This
is
what
will
be
asked
of
the
candidates
or
the
people
looking
for
the
candidates.
Is
the
company
looking
to
hire
for
change
or
for
continuity
and
which
areas
are
the
highest
risk.
This
is
probably
the
most
important
question
and
and
probably
the
best
phrase
question
in
terms
of
the
whole
search
and
I'm
not
so
sure
that
when
you
got
input
it
terms
from
the
public
in
terms
of
what
they
would
see
or
characterize.
K
When
you
look
at
this
particular
approach,
which
is
extensive,
if
you
go
to
the
website
and
you
look
at
their
assessment.
K
K
It
scares
me
a
little
bit
because
what
it
does
is
that
it
it
puts
it
in
a
level
of
so-called
science
and
it
could
exclude
people
you
want
to
include,
even
though
the
goal
is
to
include
more
people,
so
I
don't
know
how
diversity
fits
in.
I
don't
know
how
these
other
factors
fit
in
you're,
trying
to
look
for
the
truth
versus
or
at
least
the
goal
of
this
versus.
You
know
what
someone
thinks
who
they,
who
they
think
they
are
versus,
who
they
really
are
et
cetera.
K
Good,
old-fashioned
intuition
usually
is
good.
I
tend
to
be
pretty
open-minded
initially,
and
sometimes
I
get
snookered
in,
but
in
terms
of
like
including
people,
sometimes
it's
better
to
err
on
the
side
of
of
perhaps
a
mistake
could
be
made
and-
and
it's
it's
best
to
to
try
to
be
positive
as
much
as
you
can.
K
I
know
this
is
competition
for
a
job,
but
it's
also
a
people-oriented
kind
of
activity
and
if
it
gets
down
into
these
metrics,
I'm
I'm
not
so
sure
and
I'm
pretty
progressive
in
terms
of
how
I
look
at
things,
but
there
comes
a
limit
in
terms
of
how
we
do
things
and
what
it
transcends
into
how
we
act
as
a
community
or,
however,
we
act
in
terms
of
ethics,
morality
in
terms
of
the
law.
All
of
that
is
hooked
into
who
we.
K
A
All
right,
it
looks
like
he's
not
available
to
speak
at
this
time,
and
so
that
concludes
this
evening's
public
comment.
So,
let's
move
now
to
the
next
section
of
our
agenda
special
orders
of
business,
beginning
with
sp1.
Would
someone
like
to
make
a
motion
on
item
sp1.
A
L
Yeah
one
amendment
that
I
think
needs
to
be
or
two,
but
one
that
needs
to
be
made
to
this
is
the
requirement
here
requires
that
a
member
of
a
committee
test
negative
within
24
hours
of
a
meeting.
L
I
I
think
the
requirement
should
be
a
weekly
test
requirement,
similar
to
what
staff,
so
if
they
test
negative
within
a
week
of
a
meeting
rather
than
just
24
hours,
that
would
allow
for
folks
to
one
take
a
pcr
test
as
opposed
to
a
you
know,
the
non-pcr
test,
and
presumably,
if
a
member
of
a
committee
served
on
you
know,
there's
a
member
who's,
reimagining
police
committee,
and
then
they
serve
on
a
subcommittee.
L
If
both
those
committees
were
in
person
the
same
week,
they'd
have
to
test
twice
within
that
week,
rather
than
just
testing
once,
which
is
the
standard
for
city
staff.
So
I
would
like
to
update
that
and
have
that
apply
also
for
for
all
of
the
rules
across
the
board.
A
I
see
mr
ogbo's
comment.
Do
you
want
to
address
that
question?
It
wasn't
a
question
really:
okay.
Well,
let's
back
up,
then,
are
you
making
a
motion.
L
So
I
move,
I
move
that
we
amend
the
the
rules
here
to
move
this
testing
requirement
from
within
24
hours
to
within
seven
days
test
negatively,
and
that
would
also
apply
for
council
members
and
the
clerk.
A
D
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
the
language
is
identical
to
10.7,
which
was
adopted
by
the
city
council
at
the
last
city
council
meeting
for
24
hours
of
in
person.
D
So
we
can
certainly
make
the
amendment
to
be
one
week,
but
it
would.
The
city
council
rule
has
already
been.
We
passed
a
resolution
at
the
last
meeting
to
like
make
it
into
the
into
the
rules
so
like
that
would
require
an
additional
resolution
at
the
next
meeting.
If
we
wanted
to
change
10.7
as
well
as
the
proposal
for
5.1.5.4.1.
A
D
Know
what
I'm
saying
we
we've
the
language.
That's
that's
proposed
here
is
identical
to
what
the
city
council
approved
for
itself
the
last
time,
and
so
that
resolution
has
already
been
passed
and
adopted,
and
the
rules
are
now
published
on
the
city
city's
website.
So
if
we
want
to
change
those
that
that
particular
rule
to
match
what
is
being
proposed
for
5.4.1,
that
will
require
another
another
legislative
action.
D
L
Point
of
information
we
we
had
this
discussion
when
we
had
our
oma
experts
come
to
the
rules
committee.
That
just
because
an
item
isn't
directly
on
the
agenda,
I
mean
we're
talking
about
covid
restrictions,
it's
related
and
thereby
would
not
preclude
us
from
amending
another
rule
related
to
covert
restrictions.
It.
D
Certainly
may
allow
the
motion
and
we'll
just
take
it
up
with
the
pack
and
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
debate
with
the
council
member
reid,
but
you
know
it.
The
issue
is
that
it's
not
notice
on
the
agenda.
We
can
change
5.4.1,
but
it
requires
another
legislative
action
to
change
10.7,
because
city
council
has
already
adopted
the
rule
for
10.7.
A
Understood
I
I'm
not.
I
I'm
going
to
go
with
the
corporation
council's
ruling
on
this,
and,
and
I
don't
I
don't
think
the
policy
of
will
resolve
the
dispute
after
the
fact
by
checking
into
the
public
access
counselors
is,
is
the
most
prudent
way
forward.
So
I
would,
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
amend
the
changes
to
5.4.1,
but
if
there's
a
desire
to
change
the
the
other
section
that
was
not
noticed,
I
would
ask
that
we
do
that
at
a
subsequent
meeting
with
proper
notice
to.
L
To
I
highly
think
it's
I
don't
think
that
motion
is
out
of
order
at
all,
and
I
mean
again
we're
changing
a
rule
that
would
only
apply
to
council
members
and
it's
again
we're.
It's
clearly
noticed
that
we're
talking
about
rules
relating
to
covid
there
would
be
seemingly
no
restriction.
That
would
not
allow
us
to
make
a
small
amendment
to
another
rule
that
has
to
do
with
covet.
L
A
M
A
That's
right
so
so
the
the
issue
here
is
that
the
the
thing
that
we
do
is
really
different
than
what
staff
does
right.
Staff
is
in
many
cases
expected
to
come
in
on
a
daily
basis,
be
in
touch
with
folks
on
a
daily
basis
and
to
sort
of
have
them
test
for
every
day
that
they're
on
the
job
interacting
with
people
is
extreme,
and
so
they,
the
reaction,
is
okay,
let's
test
test
once
a
week
for
us,
the
expert
and
to
a
pretty
great
extent
for
board
and
committee
and
commission
members.
A
The
expectation
is
not
they're,
always
on
the
in-person
part
of
the
job,
and
so
the
question
is:
what's
what's
the
sort
of
analog
and,
and
so
the
the
idea
is
to
test
specifically
for
council
meetings
in
our
case
or
bcc
meetings.
In
their
case,
I'm
not
here
to
say
that
one
day
is
right
and
one
week
is
wrong.
A
I
may
well
be
that
one
week
is
right
and
one
day
is
wrong,
but
it's
kind
of
a
it's
kind
of
an
apples
and
oranges
situation,
because
the
rule
for
us
and
pccs
is
written
for
specific
events
that
are
on
the
calendar
and
the
rule
for
staff
is
for
an
ongoing
employment
with
essentially
daily
in-person
contact
council
member
kelly.
N
So
I
know
I
can
be
here
many
days
a
week
and
I'm
at
the
high
school
and
the
rule
is
once
a
week
too.
I
just
it
seems
kind
of
crazy
that
we'd
have
people
testing
every
24
hours
before
they
come
to
a
meeting
I
mean
it
seems
like
we're.
I
mean.
Why
would
we
do
that?
Why
wouldn't
we
just
do
whatever
we
have
to
do
to
mend
it?
So
it's
once
a
week
I
mean
I
that
just
sounds
a
little
over
the
top.
A
A
Question
of
do
we
make
the
change
for
bcc
members
tonight
and
council
members
at
the
next
meeting
and
which
is
playing
it
safe
with
oma,
which
is
what
I
prefer
to
do.
The
other
side
would
say:
hey,
don't
worry
about
playing
with
oma
and
just
pass
it
for
both
tonight.
I'd
rather
just
be
careful,
because
I
don't
think
that
the
consequence
of
sort
of
having
this
conversation
out
in
the
open,
choosing
the
kind
of
envelope
pushing
option
and
then
being
slapped
on
our
wrist
by
the
attorney
general
is
a
very
attractive
way
to
approach
it.
A
I'd
rather
be
cautious
on
this
one
council
member
burns.
O
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
understanding
this
correctly
and
making
sure
we
don't
do
something
that
results
in
in
our
committee,
members
and
commissioners
being
tested
even
more
often
than
they
would
otherwise
have
to
so.
If
they
meet
monthly,
does
that
mean
every
week
they
need
to
be
tested,
as
opposed
to
one
time,
24.
L
O
You're
saying
that
a
committee
member
who
is
meeting
more
than
once
in
a
week,
it
would
be
better
for
them
to.
I
don't
even
know
if
that's
happening
one,
but
I
say
it
is
happening,
you're
saying
that
it's
easier
for
them
to
just
get
tested
once
as
opposed
to
once
before.
Every
meeting
is
that
what
you're
saying.
L
L
E
L
To
be
clear,
that
that
would
allow
for
pcr
tests
to
be
done
if
someone
so
chose
and
that's
a
more
accurate
test.
A
A
So
the
motion
is
to
amend
the
testing
requirements
for
board
committee,
commission
members
so
that
they
have
to
occur
within
a
week
before
a
meeting
as
opposed
to
within
24
hours.
Before
a
meeting.
Q
I
don't
know
if
we're
doing
still
virtual
or
not
options,
but
I
guess
I'm
concerned
if
folks
are
testing
a
week
out
and
coming
to
a
meeting
whatever
five
days
later,
they've
been
potentially
exposed
like
are
we
doing
all
we
can
to
make
our
boards
and
commission
members
feel
comfortable,
given
that
they're
volunteers,
some
might
have
you
know,
other
health
concerns
and
already
again,
we
already
have
a
hard
time
finding
a
quorum
in
some
cases.
Q
So
I
get
that
24
hours
is
a
pain,
but
I
also
get
that
you
know
people
are
making
a
choice
not
to
get
vaccinated
which
is
their
choice,
and
so,
if
you're
going
to
come
and
be
around
other
people,
I
mean
I
think
it
does
not
hurt
you
to
get
a
test
24
hours
so
that
the
people
you're
engaging
with
also
feel
safe.
With
your
participation,
so
I
would
object
to
this
just
for
that
reason.
Q
I
think
our
staff
are
a
different
situation,
and
so
I
don't
want
to
compare
those
two,
but
if
you're,
if
you're
you
know,
we
all
live
in
a
new
kind
of
world
now
with
the
covenants,
if
you're
making
some
choices
then
just
like
we
all
have
to
wear
masks,
we
have
to
do
different
things
to
make
sure
other
people
are
comfortable
as
well.
L
Yeah
just
to
respond
to
council
member
fleming's
question,
I
guess
I'll
just
say
that
that
same
person,
you
know
who
might
feel
uncomfortable
our
staff,
people
who
we
pay
are
under
the
same
requirement
they're
going
out
and
about
during
the
week
they
may
be
unvaccinated
and
and
again
we're
paying
that
person
and
that
same
committee
member
would
be
in
a
similar
situation,
regardless
of
if
it's
another
committee,
member
or
a
member
of
our
paid
staff
or
police
officer
or
whoever
we're
paying
to
be
out
in
the
community.
O
Yeah,
my
my
issue
is
similar
to
the
one
that
councilmember
fleming
just
described.
I
mean
it
complicates
it,
but
it
if
there
was
something
that
applied
to
people
who
are
meeting
you
know
more
than
once,
because
they
sit
on
like
what
was
being
recommended
now
makes
sense
for
council
members,
because
many
council
members
are
on
many
different
committee
meetings
a
week
but
for
our
bcc
committee
members
and
commissioners.
Unless
that
applies,
I
just
it.
O
I
would
prefer
to
see
someone
get
tested,
48
hours
out
in
a
week
out,
potentially,
unless
what
you're
saying
apply
to
them,
which
they
happen
to
sit
on
more
than
one
committee,
which
I
don't
think
should
be
happening
that
often
anyway
prior
rules.
So
that's
that's
my
hang
up.
I
think
it
makes
sense
for
council
members.
It
makes
less
sense
to
bcc's
unless
you
know
they're
meeting
frequently.
O
R
R
Nowadays,
it
does
take
about
24
to
72
hour
turnaround
time
for
that
type
of
test.
The
antigen
test
is
quite
a
quick
test,
but
it's
not
as
sensitive
as
the
pcr
test
wears
about
10
to
15
minutes,
where
you
get
the
results
of
that
test.
O
L
Okay,
well,
then,
I
am
happy
to
amend
the
motion
to
70.
L
I
I
think
we
should
keep
it
a
week,
and
I
will
also
say
that
the
rule
10.7
seems
to
only
apply
to
council
meetings
to
city
council
meetings,
and
this
rule
seems
to
apply
generally
to
boards
committees
and
commission
meetings,
and
so
I
think
and
given
that
we
have
very
clearly
set
the
precedent
that
our
committee
member,
that
our
council
rules,
do
not
apply
unilaterally
to
all
committees.
I
think
amending
this
to
say
within
seven
days
would
also
cover
council
members
who
are
attending
committee
meetings
and
not
council
meetings.
L
A
I
think
that's
a
good
point.
I
think
it's
a
good
point.
I
didn't
one
thing
I
didn't
catch,
so
did
you
say
you're
making
a
different
motion
are.
L
You
I'm
going
to
keep
it
at
one
week,
so
I'm
going
to
keep
it
as
as
I
send
to
you.
Okay,.
A
There
are
no
more
lights
on.
I
just
wanted
to
offer
director
ogbo
the
opportunity
to
give
any
additional
thoughts.
On
I
mean
the
amendment
that's
about
to
get
voted
on
is
the
24
hours
versus
seven
days.
Do
you
have
any
other
information
that
could
be
of
use
as
folks
decide
how
to
vote
on
this?
Well.
R
So
the
purpose
of
the
24
hours
in
excellence
is
to
capture
a
recent
infection
particular
to
that
that
meeting-
and
I
know
that
the
argument
has
been
okay-
staff
are
required
to
submit
weekly
credit
tests,
but
that's
an
entirely
different
environment,
then
the
the
meeting
so
so
to
speak.
R
Where
staff
they
might
not
be
as
in
close
contact
with
these
individuals,
they
might
not
be
in
confined
spaces,
they
might
be
out
in
the
community
keeping
their
social
distance,
whereas
in
an
amazing
setting
which
might
be
a
bit
confined,
you
are
more
inclined
to
be
in
close
proximity
to
individuals
where
you
can
spread
the
virus.
So
so
that's
the
reason
why
we
drew
that
rationale.
A
Thank
you
seeing
no
further
discussion
if.
L
L
So
there
are
many
instances
where
our
staff
members,
just
like
a
volunteer
committee
member,
are
in
close
proximity
to
folks
and
I
think,
having
the
rules
apply,
the
same
rule
apply
across
the
board
for
anybody
who
is
engaged
with
business
with
the
city,
whether
you're
an
employee
or
a
volunteer,
or
you
know
a
semi-volunteer
council
member,
I
think,
having
all
of
those
having
a
uniform
set
of
rules,
makes
sense
and
and
and
and
also
I
would
think
that
having
the
pcr
test
would
be
better
than
having
a
far
less
accurate.
L
L
I
think,
with
those
protections
in
place,
we're
achieving
what
we
want,
particularly
as
these
guidelines
are
about
to
be.
You
know,
disposed
of
by
the
governor.
A
Thank
you
so
I'd
like
the
clerk
to
call
the
role-
and
this
is
the
role
has
been
called
on
council
member
reed's
amendment,
which
moves
the
requirement
from
24
hours
before
a
board
committee
commission
meeting
to
seven
days
before
a
board
committee
or
commission
meeting.
R
This
particular
amendment
wouldn't
be
in
line
with
the
one
that
we
have
for
city
council,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
going
to
have
to
to
change
so
this
current
amendment.
If
we
are
going
to
amend
this
to
a
week
to
get
the
test,
it's
not
an
alignment
with
the
council
member
protocol
that
we
already
have
in
place.
So
that's.
L
One
or
two,
I'm
not
sure
how
that's
the
alignment
is
relevant
to
this
conversation,
because
we
are
saying
they're,
two
different
discussions,
and
that
was
part
of
why
I
couldn't
even
make
the
emotion
of
the
motion
for
fear
that
it
would
violate
oma
because
they
were
separate
issues.
So
just
I
think
what
councilman
braithwick.
R
Yeah,
absolutely
so
that's
that's!
What
I'm
trying
to
say
is
that
for
cancer
members
it
is
24
24
hours
if
we
make
any
amendment
to
what
we
currently
are
discussing.
That
will
be
a
week.
So
it's
just
not
in
alignment
with
each
other
and
to
what
nick
stated
earlier,
there's
just
a
conflict
there.
O
Yeah,
I
just
have
one
last
question
for
council
commons:
the
the
vaccine
testing
requirement
on
council
does
that
only
apply
to
city
council
meetings
or
also
committee
meetings
in
your
interpretation.
D
A
E
L
A
With
three
voting
in
favor
and
six
voting
against,
the
amendment
does
not
pass.
This
brings
us
to
the
now
unamended
12-r-22
with
the
clerk.
Please.
L
My
second
amendment
was
to
put
a
an
end
phase
on
this.
We
have
not
decided
that
we
know
that
the
governor,
in
a
few
weeks
folks,
are
going
to
be
able
to
show
up
here
with
no
mask
and
so.
L
You
know
how
long
does
this
policy
go
on?
I
think
we
should
tie
it
to
the
governor's
actions
relating
to
to
takeover19.
I
don't
know
director
over
if
you
have
something
to
state
there,
director.
R
Yes,
so
the
mass
mandate,
which,
hopefully,
if
our
leading
perfect
matrix,
are
continuing
to
improve,
would
be
lifted
february
28th
and
that
does
not
have
any
relationship
to
us
taking
covet
tests
on
a
24-hour
basis.
It
does
not
have
any
relations
to
that,
although
a
number
of
mandates
have
been
considered
to
be
lifted,
but
this
is
not
something
that
has
been
instituted
by
the
state.
R
This
is
something
that
has
been
instituted
locally
here
in
evanston,
and
until
we
enter
a
phase
where
it's
an
endemic,
the
protocol
or
policy
will
be
in
place
until
then
and
honestly,
we
don't
have
a
timeline
as
to
when
that's
going
to
occur.
At
this
point,.
F
C
Out
how
to
it,
so
it
can
kick
in
automatically,
let's
just
revisit
it
when
the
time
is
right
and
I
don't
think
anyone
would
have
an
objection
to
deleting
the
rules
at
some
future
date.
Absolutely.
C
A
To
that
it
seems,
I
think
ms
gandersky's
point
is
really
important
here.
It
seems
to
me
that
this
this
policy
is
parallel
to
our
employee
mandate,
not
to
a
mandate,
a
mass
mandate
for
the
general
public,
not
to
a
vaccine
mandate
for
the
public
to
go
to
a
restaurant.
Those
are
you
know.
Those
are
kind
of
extreme
exercises
of
power
in
the
situation
of
an
emergency,
but
an
employee
mandate
is
one
that's
been
imposed
by
tons.
F
A
A
L
There
yes
well
hearing
hearing
the
discussion
from
the
committee
on
that.
I'm
not
going
to
make
a
motion
on
that
particular
move,
but
I
I
do
think
you
know
for
this
to
a
point
that
you
made.
L
This
isn't
parallel
to
the
staff
proposal
in
that
you
know
we're
having
different
testing
requirements
for
our
volunteers,
then
for
the
folks
that
we
actually
pay
handsome
salaries
to
to
go
out
into
public,
and
so
I
think
you
know
it
should
be
in
closer
alignment,
and
I'm
surprised
why
you
wouldn't
want
folks
taking
pcr
tests
which
are
more
accurate
than
you
know,
some
at-home
tests
that
would
be
valid
under
this
under
this
policy
and
so
creating
that
weak
allowance
would
have
done
that.
O
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
I
do
think
it
is
reasonable
in
in
our
best
interest
to
change
the
to
have
a
policies
that
says
72
hours.
R
Absolutely
it
does
call
for
it
to
be
a
pc
pc
artist,
but
given
that
the
frequency
by
which
meetings
are
being
held,
it
might
not
be
practical
to
get
a
pc
artist,
I
mean
if
we
were
meeting
in
bots
in
commissions
three
times
four
times
a
week.
That
will
be
quite
impractical
because
there
is
a
turnaround
time
for
pcr
tests,
as
I
mentioned
before,
about
24
to
72
hours.
The
antigen
test
is
still
a
good
test.
It's
still
recommended
by
cdc
it's
just
that
the
sensitivity
is
lower
than
a
pcr
test.
O
Okay,
I
mean,
if
you're
comfortable,
with
the
antigen
test
as
opposed
to
72.
I
just
if
the
recommendation
from
you
is
that
we
right
as
a
body
if
some
of
us
are
taking
tests
and
others
or
even
for
boards,
commissioners
and
committee
members,
is
that
it
is
the
recommendation
that
it'd
be
a
pcr
test.
Are
you
fine
with
it
being
an
antigen
test?
So
I'm
fine
with
with.
R
L
Are
there
do
you,
I
haven't
been
able
to
find
any
research
personally,
but
is
there
research
in
the
particulates
that
are
expelled
from
someone's
nasal
palate
passages
or
whatever
and
how
many
of
those
get
through
versus
you
know
if
you're
vaccinated?
If
you
have
a
mask
on,
if
you're
vaccinated
with
the
mask,
do
we
know
you
know
the
kind
of
particulate
spread
in
those
different
scenarios?
R
What
happens
is
that
they
suffer
more
severe
illness,
hospitalization
increases
and
even
deaths
here
in
illinois
just
the
past
month,
ninety
percent
of
individuals,
weren't
vaccinated,
occupied
our
icu
beds
and
covered
beds.
So
that's
why
it's
paramount
it's
very
imperative
for
people
to
people
to
get
vaccinated,
but.
L
As
far
as
spread
to
other
folks
to
say,
you're,
just
unaware
of
the
differences
in
you
know,
vaccinated
versus
mask
versus
vaccinated
with
mass.
R
There's
still
that
possibility,
but,
like
I
mentioned,
the
difference
here
is
the
severity
of
the
illness
for
those
who
are
unvaccinated
on
the
recent
research
from
cdc
is
recommending
k95
max-
and
I
know
you
mentioned
that,
because
it
provides
more
protection
than
the
cloth
mask
in
regards
to
particulate
matter
and
the
spread
and
and
the
speed
of
it
will
be
something
that
I'll
have
to
do
more
research
on,
and
I
can
provide
you
that
data
or
I
can
provide
you
a
link
to
a
cdc
yeah.
L
Just
love
to
know
the
difference
between
being
vaccinated
alone,
being
you
know,
wearing
a
mask
alone
and
then
mask
and
vaccinated,
particularly
with
the
particular
spray,
because
that's
what
we're
trying
to
control
for.
We
don't
want
folks
to
spread
covid
to
other
folks.
Folks,
can
you
know,
make
their
own
decisions
about
their
own
health
care
and
you
know,
live
with
those
consequences,
but
you
know.
Certainly
we
don't
want
folks
to
spread
it,
and
you
know
understanding
those
differences,
I
think,
will
help
guide.
Whatever
policy
comes
for
is
forthcoming.
A
Thank
you
seeing
no
further
discussion
with
the
clerk.
Please
call
the
role.
This
is
now
a
roll
call
on
sp1,
which
has
not
been
amended.
E
L
A
N
A
J
A
M
Item
p1,
please,
this
failed
committee.
A
Item
p1,
you
said,
failed
in
committee,
so
we'll
not
be
coming
up
this
evening.
A
A
A
L
E
A
In
this
matter
there
are
nine
voting
in
favor
and
none
voting
against
and
the
consent
agenda
saved,
for
the
five
items
I
mentioned
has
been
adopted
is
so
this
brings
to
item
a2
councilmember
reed.
Would
you
care
to
make
a
motion
here.
L
I
move
item
a2
approval
of
the
harris
amazon
credit
card
activity
is.
E
L
A
I
appreciate
that
I
just
think
okay.
A
K
S
E
A
Second,
all
right
was
there
was
the
motion
from
your
customer
bracelet,
so
council
member
braithwaite
moves
suspension
of
the
rules
to
allow
for
introduction
and
action
to
both
occur
in
tonight's
meeting
for
items
a
14
and
a
15
council
member
news
from
the
seconds
councilman
reid
yeah.
I.
L
L
I
would
beg
to
differ
because
it's
changing
the
the
fee
for
a
license
and
moving
it
from
2800
to
500,
and
I'm
fine
with
that.
A
I
think,
rather
than
adjudicate
this
question
that
I
think
is
pretty,
I
would
argue
on.
Certainly
in
a
gray
area,
I
would
just
say,
let's
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
suspend
the
rules
the
rule
to
to
allow
that.
I
personally
would
not
characterize
this
as
a
policy
change,
but
I
don't
know
that
that's.
A
A
So
let's
play
safe
and
spend
the
rule,
but
I
think
councilmember
revell
asked.
M
A
M
The
main
per
I'm
having
really
trouble
with
my
frog
in
my
throat
tonight.
The
main
purpose
of
this
change
to
the
class
s
liquor
license
is
actually
not
the
fee.
M
What
we're
doing
is
going
back
to
the
way
the
code
was
written
in
2020,
which,
prior
to
2020
sale
of
alcohol,
was
limited
to
members
of
veterans
organizations
and
their
guests,
and
at
that
time
we
changed
that
we
said
it
could
be
open
to
members
of
the
public
and
therefore
we
increased
the
fee
from
500
to
whatever
we
raised
it
to
that
we're
going
back
for
because
the
idea
was
well
gosh.
It's
going
to
be,
you
know
open
to
some
more
many
more
people.
Therefore,
we
should
increase
the
fee.
M
A
So,
first
of
all,
just
as
a
matter
of
housekeeping,
I
don't
think
I
don't
think
these.
This
discussion
is
really
germaine
to
the
motion
that
was
made
by
council
member
braithwaite
to
suspend
the
rule.
So,
let's,
let's
start
by
taking
a
vote
on
councilmember,
great
weights
motion
and
and
then
I
would
recommend
that
someone
move
that
we
suspend
the
rule
to
allow
item
a14
to
move
forward.
Notwithstanding
it
not
having
been
heard
by
the
referral
committee,
they'll
say
my
my
my
own
view
of
this
tracks.
Council
member
revels,
mr
cummings.
I.
D
Just
want
to
point
out,
mr
mayor,
that
the
motion
was
to
suspend
the
rules
it
sounded
like
almost
generally,
it
wasn't
a
motion
to
suspend
rule
20.1,
so
you
could
proceed
based
upon
how
the
motion
was
worded
to
councilmember
reed's
point:
that's
a.
A
C
E
L
A
M
M
So
I
it's,
it's
really
a
time
sensitive
issue
to
approve
the
to
get
the
liquor
code
back
to
the
way
we
want
it.
A
D
L
20
save
some
time
I'm
going
to
be
voting
no
without
the
clarity
so.
L
I
get
that,
but
I
still
have
the
right
to
vote
no
on
yeah
the
other
suspension.
Some
a15
can
go
ahead.
That
is
not
that
is
seems.
You
know
reasonable,
but
a14
is
certainly
a
policy
change
and
I'm
going
to
be
voting.
No
we're
gonna
have
to
start
following
the
rules
and
apply
them
equally
or
have
a
clear
understanding
of
what
they
are.
Q
I
was
just
gonna
make.
The
point
to
ottoman
reveals
point
is
the
bigger
issue.
I
guess
if
we
as
I
remember,
changing
the
rules
for
the
vfw
and
all
that,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
if,
if
that
was
a
violation
of
our
zoning
and
that
was
back
in
20
whenever
that
was
20
2020
I
mean
I
guess
just
for
the
record.
Q
I
should
have
taken
us
two
years
to
realize
we
had
a
violation
of
our
zoning
right,
so
I
realized
that
we
need
there's
some
urgency
to
this
now
because
there
look
a
license
expiring,
but
it
seems,
like
you
know,
shame
on
us
or
shame
on
staff
or
whoever's
in
charge
of
such
things
to
know
that
we
changed
a
rule
two
years
ago
and
we're
just
not
realizing.
It
was
in
violation
of
another
role
we
had
so
I
I
sympathize
with
them.
Q
I
actually
probably
think
it's
more
like
council
member
reid,
said
in
terms
of
a
policy
change,
but
I
mean
I
do
sympathize
with
them,
but
it
seems
like
I
don't
know
that
we
should
be
making
a
habit
of
suspending
our
rules
based
on
an
error
that
we
made.
That
was
two
years
old.
Just
my
and
I
realized
we're
in
a
pandemic
too,
but
kind
of
a
big
snaffle
on
our
part.
A
So
let
me
just
I'm
I'll
call
you
in
a
second
I'm
just
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
councilmember
reed.
What
is
it
that
you're?
What
is
it
you're
requesting
that
you're?
Not
that's!
That's
not
on
offer
here,
because
the
the
rule
that
concerns
you
has
been
suspended,
and
so
we
would
not
be
acting
under
anyone's
interpretation
in
violation
of
that
rule
because
it's
been
suspended.
L
I
mean
I
just
reserved
the
right
to
vote,
no
one
suspending
the
rules.
I
I
agree
with
what
council
member
fleming
said.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
make
a
habit
of
suspending
the
rules
and
I
think
we
need
to
be
clear
on
what
our
rules
are.
Overall,
I
mean,
if
I
came
to
this
council
with
a
proposal
instead
of
this
being
a
business
entity,
and
I
want
to
change
the
fee
rates
for
some
finer
ticket
that
residents
in
our
city
are
issuing.
L
I
think
that
would
be
seen
as
a
policy
change
and
would
have
to
go
through
the
referrals
process
and
everything
else,
and
it
seems
that
certain
council
members
and
certain
special
interests
within
the
city,
even
if
it
is
the
vfw
and
their
good.
You
know
folks
get
eight
american
legion,
sorry
american
legion,
if
it
seems
like
they
have
a
different
path
of
getting
stuff
done,
and
so
until
we
can
figure
out
how
to
create
one
single
path.
Where
all
members
have
equal
rights
on
this
body,
then
you
know
exercise
the
rights
that
I
have.
N
So
I
think
maybe
there's
a
misunderstanding,
so
this
is
the
fee
that
they
were
charged
in
the
past
at
for
members
and
during
the
co
the
period
of
covert
there
was
some
some
modification
made
so
that
it
could
open
more
to
the
public,
so
the
fee
was
jacked
up
in
20
and
now
we're
just
saying
that
that
now
they're
going
back
where
we
were
requiring
them
to
only
serve
to
members.
So
it
really
is
administrative.
N
It's
not
a
policy,
so
they're
not
being
charged
a
new
fee
as
a
member's
organization,
we're
going
back
to
the
old
fee
that
they
were
charged
prior
to
the
modifications
that
were
made
during
the
intense
covid
period
of
time,
where
it
was
opened
up
to
the
public.
Is
that
and
alderman
rebel
correct
me
if
I'm
right?
So
it's
really
administrative.
It
really!
There's
no
there's
nothing
different
here
in
policy.
L
I'm
seeing
underlined
I
mean
whenever
there's
something
in
an
ordinance
that
is
underlined.
That
means
that
it's
something
new,
so
there
are
crossed
out
and
underlined
items
which
means
this
is
a
change
to
an
ordinance
that
is
changed
to
a
policy.
A
A
A
A
An
emotion
doing
any
of
the
stuff
that
I
just
talked
about.
A
A
A
A
On
this
matter,
there
are
nine
voting
in
favor
and
none
voting
against
and
therefore
rule
20.1
is
suspended,
and
this
now
allows
us
would
someone
like
to
make
a
motion
on
item
a15
for
direction
in
action.
Mr
mayor.
C
I
will
move
item
a15,
ordinance,
12-0-22
amending
city
code
to
increase
the
number
of
class.
I
liquor
license
holders
from
two
to
three,
and
this
is
for
dollop,
dba,
gallup
general
store
and
cafe
at
1508
sherman
avenue.
A
B
A
C
Mr
mayor
I'll
move
item,
ed1
aspire,
evanston,
community
healthcare,
workforce
development
program
in
the
amount
of
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
american
rescue
plan
act,
funding.
Q
Sorry,
I
removed
this
again,
another
I'm
sure
fine
idea,
but
we
have
continued
to
tell
people
that
we're
making
a
process
and
a
plan
for
the
rescue
funds,
and
I
I
granted-
I
missed
some
meetings.
I
don't
think
I
missed
that
one,
and
so
I
guess
I'm
just
without
like
an
overall
plan
concerned
about
this
spin.
It
sounds
like
north
shore
and
a
resident
would
put
some
money
into
it.
So
you
know
even
without
the
rescue
funds.
Q
Maybe
they
would
still
do
that
because
they
think
it's
a
good
idea-
and
I
know
we
just
promoted
mr
norman
to
do
workforce
development
and
so
it'll
be
nice
to
see
like
what
his
kind
of
overall
plan
is,
and
so
we
know
if
we're
putting
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
here.
Q
If
he's
going
to
have
another
ask,
I
know
that
daryl
presented
about
his
not
fellowship
but
workforce
program
that
he
has
in
the
water
department,
so
it'll
be
nice
to
see
more
of
a
comprehensive
plan
for
workforce
and
then
allocate
the
rescue
funds
accordingly,
so
that
again
people
if
there's
anyone
else
up
there,
who
has
a
workforce
idea
and
they're
like
hey.
I
didn't
know
we
were
accepting
applications
or
doing
funding
for
workforce.
They
had
a
chance
to
come
forward
too.
Q
Just
seems
like
a
more
transparent
way
to
allocate
funds
and
make
sure
we're
doing
a
more
comprehensive
plan
for
workforce.
Since
we
all
can
agree,
it's
definitely
needed.
So
that's
why
I
would
be
voting
no,
but
again
hope
that
you
know
north
shore
and
or
the
resident
who
committed
funds
could
still
do
that,
because
that
would
be,
I
think,
400
000.
It
will
go
a
long
way.
D
Q
J
Q
S
F
S
Well,
I
agree
in
large
part
with
council
member
fleming.
I
think,
the
appropriate
time
to
allocate
the
200
thousand
dollars.
If
that's,
what
we
choose
to
do
is,
after
we
have
a
comprehensive
plan.
S
Otherwise,
as
we're
doing
these
piecemeal
and
in
the
memo
it
even
telegraphs
that
we're
gonna
be
asked
to
do
this
again
in
two
weeks
for
other
projects
like
we're,
undermining
our
credibility
in
terms
of
when
we
do
have
to
say
no
to
people,
so
I
would
advise
that
we
vote
no
tonight
or
hold
it
and
wait
for
a
comprehensive
plan,
and
that's
when
we
can
talk
about
allocating
funds.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
O
Yeah
this
is
challenging
because
you
know
I
I
I
will
vote
for
this
and-
and
I
hope
I
think,
there's
enough
support
up
here.
It
might
even
be
enough
support
tonight
and
I
wish
I
could
vote
for
it,
but
I've.
I
would
be
contradicting
things
that
I've
said
over
and
over,
which
is
that
you
know,
because
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
up-to-date
plans
and
it's
something
that
we
need
to
work
on.
The
only
thing
we're
really
going
off
of,
and
I've
heard
other
council
members
talk
about.
O
This
is
programs
like
storefront
modernization,
programs
say
we
have
these
programs
already.
We
can
just
keep
doing
that.
Well,
that's
a
program,
that's
not
a
plan,
and-
and
the
only
thing
we've
done
is-
is
create
categories
again,
that's
not
a
plan,
that's
that's
a
goals
and
it's,
I
think,
even
just
having
a
conversation
between
all
of
us
on
definition,
so
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
about
what
goals
are,
what
programs
are
versus?
What
plans
are,
and
I
think
if
we
could
figure
that
out,
we
can
move
a
lot
quicker
on
this.
O
I
wouldn't
be
against
bringing
in
a
project
manager
for
upper
funds.
I
know
other
cities
have
done
that.
I
didn't
think
we
would
need
that
in
the
beginning
of
this
discussion,
but
more
and
more,
I
feel
as
though
that
could
be
helpful,
because
what
I'm
looking
for
in
order
to
get
behind
anything
is
just
some
plan.
Some
conversation
about
strategy,
not
just
goals,
not
just
working
off
of
existing
programs,
but
some
conversation
around
strategy.
O
L
Yeah,
I
am
curious
manager,
gandursky,
and
you
seem
to
be
the
only
person
here
that
can
answer
this.
I
guess
I
know
that
we
have
a
few
projects
with
arpa.
I
know
we
have
a
million
dollars
in
our
coming
up
pretty
soon
for
the
the
aux
and
then
two
million
dollars
for
north
light
coming
up.
So
that's
three
million
aside
from
that
three
million
that
has
not
yet
been
approved,
but
has
every
indication
that
it
will
be
likely
approved
by
this
body.
L
F
We
do
but
our
budget
and
finance
manager
just
left,
so
I'm
in
the
middle
of
trying
to
replace
a
dwindling
workforce.
So
we
are
working
on
updating
our
website.
I
do
plan
on
having
a
comprehensive
report
out
to
the
council
this
week.
I
was
hoping
to
have
it
out
last
week,
but
we're
still
finalizing
some
information
if
there's
any
further
questions
on
and
I'm
just
going
to
go
back
a
little
bit
on
these
economic
development
items.
Council
member
bracelet
is
the
chair
of
economic.
J
F
Asked
that
these
items
go
forward,
there
was
some
urgency
with
regard
to
this
particular
item,
because
north
shore
needed
to
get
the
partnership
agreement
done
in
order
to
guarantee
the
funds.
So
we
were
asked
to
bring
this
forward
with
some
urgency
from
north
shore
and
council.
Member
braithwaite
chose
this
chair
to
hear
this
on
the
agenda.
If
I'm
not
mistaken
and
and
paul
zalmazak
is
on
the
line,
they
can
speak
to
this
item.
In
particular.
T
I
am
available
if
you'd
like
me
to
speak
for
just
a
minute
I
can
or
I'll
answer
questions.
If
there
are
questions.
C
I
do
have
my
version
of
an
answer
to
councilmember
reed's
question
by
my
score
sheet
and
it's
caveat.
It's
my
score
sheet.
It
hasn't
been
audited.
Council
has
committed
15
million
six
hundred
and
seventy
seven
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
That
sounds
about
right.
E
L
Money
that
we
received
already
that
we
had
received
in
2021-
and
that
is
maybe
you're-
probably
better
at
this
in
your
head-
faster.
That's
like
40
45
of
like
all
of
the
money
that
we
are
going
to
receive
for
arpa.
Let's
just
get
a
a
grip
on
you
know
handle
on
that
that
we
have
spent.
You
know
a
third
or
more
of
the
money
that
we're
going
to
receive
and
so
well.
I
think
this
particular
program
is
good.
R
L
L
You
know
an
ad
hoc
arpa
spending,
and
that
is,
if
that's
a
process,
that's
a
process,
because
that's
what
it
seems
like
it
is
given
the
amount
of
money
that
we've
spent
without
really
thinking
about
it
and
to
switch
paths
now,
would,
I
think,
be
bad
policy.
A
So
we're
going
to
continue
first
with
those
who
haven't
spoken
yet,
which
will
be
council
member
new
smith,
followed
by
ravel
and
then
go
back
to
folks
for
a
second
crack.
C
I
will
just
echo
what
has
already
been
said.
I
have
requested
for
several
months
now
a
more
strategic
and
thoughtful
approach,
a
plan,
if
you
will
on
how
we're
going
to
address
our
arpa-related
decisions.
M
Yeah
well,
I
would
agree
that
quite
a
few
months
ago,
I
think
we
all
expected
that
we
would
have
a
grand
spreadsheet
and
we
would
really
know
how
we're
going
to
allocate
all
the
money
sort
of
in
one
one
goal
round,
but
that's
obviously
not
not
the
way.
It's
proceeding.
M
The
economic
development
committee,
though,
has
been
meeting
and
vetting
the
economic
development
proposals,
so
I
think
we've
sort
of
suggested
that
that
was
a
process,
and
so
I
am
prepared
to
vote
yes
on
this
aspire
program.
It's
has
tremendous
community
support
from
a
number
of
really
great
partners
in
the
community
who
are
ready
to
jump
in
and
make
this
initiative
a
success.
M
I
think
it's
a
really
well
thought
out
initiative
and
and
has
every
indication
of
success
and
my
you
know,
reaching
to
district
65
district
202
students
and
then
also
really
intentionally
providing
opportunities
and
training
for
young
adults
ages,
18
to
25
or
whatever.
It
is,
I
think,
it's
it's
really
hitting
all
the
the
groups
that
we
are
continually
concerned
about,
reaching
with
workforce
training
and
opportunities,
so
I'll
be
voting.
Yes,.
N
So
we
do
have
over
half
of
you
know
over
20
million
dollars,
that's
a
lot
of
money,
so
I
am
going
to
ask
continue
to
ask
that
we
do
form
an
organized
that
staff
or
you
know
that
we
look
at
some
organized
fashion
so
that
it
doesn't
at
least
appear
that
we're
shooting
from
the
hip
anymore.
With
this
money.
N
I
will
not
support
this.
For
that
reason,
I
think
we
really
do
need
to
with
remaining
funds
approach
this
in
a
more
organized
fashion.
Thank
you.
P
P
So
I
am
ready
to
support
this.
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
initiative
with
with
a
hospital
bringing
much
needed
jobs
to
our
community
and,
let's
circle
back
by
the
end
of
the
week,
so
we
can
find
that
tape
and
remind
everyone
what
they
supported
before.
Thank
you.
U
Yes,
I've
been
a
member
of
economic
development
committee
for
a
very
long
time,
and
while
I
understand
that
we
would
all
like
to
know
exactly
where
every
single
one
of
these
arpa
dollars
is
going
to
go
in
advance,
but
this
money
is
right
has
has
arrived.
These
proposals
are
rolling
in.
We
had
several
meetings
here
of
the
council,
in
which
we
determined
what
buckets
that
we
would
have.
U
U
Of
course,
these
economic
development
proposals
have
come
forward
because
arpa
was
passed
months
ago.
We've
had
these
proposals
at
economic
development
committee
for
several
months.
We
all
have
agreed
that
workforce
development
is
one
of
the
most
important
issues
here
in
evanston.
It's
an
investment
in
our
future.
That's
exactly
what
this
arpa
money
has
been
designed
to
do
to
invest
in
our
economic
future.
U
This
here
it
is
here,
is
a
plan
right
now
and
it's
not
that
expensive.
It's
two
hundred
thousand
dollars,
that's
relatively
small.
We
have
our
hospitals
joining
in
on
this.
We
have
the
university
the
types
of
jobs
they
were
talking
about
are
so
far
beyond
I
mean
yes,
there's
health
care,
but
there
there's
hvac,
there's
plumbing,
there's
all
kinds
of
finance
business
side,
all
kinds
of
job
opportunities
that
are
available
right
here
in
our
own
community
and
this
aspire
program
starts
that.
U
U
We've
had
multiple
long,
thoughtful,
productive
meetings
about
how
to
spend
this
money.
Yes,
we
have
the
aux
coming
up
and
we
have
north
light
coming
up
that
have
come
forward
with
incredible
amounts
of
detail
in
terms
of
what
the
value
will
be
to
the
economic
health
of
evanston,
their
investments
in
evanston.
If
we
continue
to
just
wait
and
debate.
U
U
When
are
we
going
to
do
that?
Instead
of
spending
35
minutes
on
that
issue?
Yes,
it's
a
valuable
issue.
Did
it
need
35
minutes
of
our
valuable
time?
No,
I
am
really
prepared
to
move
on
this
because,
frankly,
I
have
no
idea
when
we'll
ever
get
to
it
at
the
pace
and
the
fidenzaling
that
we
do
here.
I
have
no
idea
where
it
comes
from.
My
grandmother
spoke
yiddish
and
about
five
other
languages.
Okay,.
U
Please,
let's
move
this
forward.
Northlight
has
been
ready
to
go.
They
know
what
the
economic
impact
is.
We
had
restaurant
owners,
we
had
business
owners,
we
had
business
leaders
come
and
say
get
this
going.
We
know
this
is
proven.
I
am
I'm
a
member
one
of
the
few
members
of
this
council.
I
think
the
only
one
who
was
here
when
we
voted
on
the
movie
theaters
that
was
so
dramatic
in
our
downtown.
All
of
us.
U
Many
of
us
lived
here
in
what
happened
within
a
year
of
when
that
movie
theater
the
first,
the
movie
theaters
open.
They
sold
a
million
tickets,
a
million.
So
let's
get
going.
I
think
we
have
a
sense.
We
have
the
buckets,
we
know
what
we're
doing.
Where
are
the
other
projects
that
we
might
spend
this
money
on?
These
are
the
ones
that
we
know
will
prove
will
prove
out
this
isn't
these
are
not
wastes
of
our
money.
U
A
You
so
now.
Actually
everyone
has
spoken
once
so
we'll
go
to
folks
asking
to
speak
a
second
time
which
will
begin
with
council
member
burns,
followed
by
nusma,
braithwaite,
sufferden
and
councilmember
burns.
You
have
three
minutes
15
seconds
left.
A
O
Think
I
was
on
there
because
I
would
have
said
the
same
thing
I
said
at
every
meeting.
I
am
I'm
frustrated
too.
O
I
sent
an
email
and
I
won't
say
who,
because
it's
not
I'm
not
trying
to
name
call,
but
I
sent
an
email
after
the
last
economic
development
committee
meeting,
anticipating
that
we
would
actually
be
potentially
approving
more
than
just
this
arp
of
recommendation
today
to
say:
look
it's
here's
a
suggested
path
where
we
could
get
something
down
before
that
meeting,
so
I
can
vote
for
it
and
did
not
receive
a
response
at
all,
and
so
I'm
frustrated
too.
O
This
should
not
take
that
us
that
long,
which
is
why,
if
I
would
have
known
it
would
have
taken
this
long,
I
would
have
made
a
motion
to
hire
a
project
manager
because
it
this
does
not
take
that
long.
I
could
do
it
if
I
had
to
die
right
like
so
whose
job
is
it
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
plan
for
arpa
and.
O
For
that
position
and
we
have
not
been
able
to
got
a
role,
and
so
what
I
want
to
make
clear
is
that
if
the,
if
categories
are
a
plan,
then
let's
vote
on
it
and
if
that's
the
best
that
this
body
can
do
then
vote
on
it
tonight,
and
if
that
is
successful,
then
I
will
continue
to.
O
I
will
support
everything
that
we
see
that
I
agree
with
based
on
that
plan,
but
I'm
not
even
sure
we've
adopted
that
as
our
plan,
but
if
that
is
our
plan,
those
buckets
that
exercise
that
we
did
then
call
the
question
tonight
on
it.
If
it
passes,
I
will
approve.
You
know
everything
else
after
that,
based
on
that,
that
is
our
plan,
but
we
haven't
solidified
anything
right
now.
F
It's
my
responsibility
to
move
this
forward,
so
I'm
just
going
to
say
that-
and
I
have
tried
my
hardest
to
do-
that.
We
have
met
time
and
time
again
in
a
special
city
council
meeting
to
talk
about
the
arba
plan
we've
put
together.
10
page
memos,
we've
had
community
members
bring
proposals
forward
for
discussion.
F
F
No
one
on
council
can
agree
on
anything
fully
which
I
totally
understand.
There's
nine
different
opinions
in
nine
different
communities
represented
here.
Staff
has
spent
countless
hours.
Mr
zamazak
miss
flax,
myself,
one
of
our
interns
and
and
even
mayor
best
has
been
invited
to
those
meetings
where
we
sat
and
we've
roundtabled
the
buckets
and
the
different
policy
considerations
with
regard
to
each
bucket.
F
While
there
have
been
a
few
million
dollars
committed,
there
hasn't
been,
the
vast
majority
of
the
upper
funds
have
not
been
spent.
We've
talked
about
the
buckets
and
the
allocations,
and
even
with
this
proposal,
the
full
amount
that
was
given
the
nod
by
council
of
the
seven
million
for
economic
development
will
not
have
been
spent
with
this
council
voting
on
this
item
tonight.
So
these
things
are
rolling
forward.
We
did
try
to
hire
an
arab
specialist
to
kind
of
project,
manage
this
entire
initiative.
F
We
have
not
been
able
to
hire
anybody
and
that's
not
from
a
lack
of
trying.
We
got
one
applicant
out
of
the
whole
posting
and
that's
just
one
issue
we're
having.
We
are
on
multiple
recruitments
and
we're
actually
set
to
go
over
budget
on
recruitments
this
year,
because
we
are
having
difficulty
finding
people
qualified
people
to
do
the
job
so
I'll.
Take
the
blame.
F
If
the
council
feels
that
I
have
not
moved
this
forward
and
I'll,
you
know
the
buck
stops
with
me,
but
in
my
in
my
mind
and
sitting
here
over
several
meetings,
I
I
really
do
feel
that
we
did
the
best
we
could
to
come
up
with
the
consensus
from
council
and
to
push
forward
these
items.
And
if
council
member
braithwaite
wanted
these
items
on
the
economic
development
committee
agenda
as
the
chair,
that
was
his
prerogative.
F
So
I
suppose
that
if
council
is
unclear
as
to
how
these
items
got
pushed
forward,
the
chair
of
that
committee
wanted
these
items
on
his
agenda.
I
remember
him
clearly
stating
at
that
special
city
council
meeting
we
had
in
december,
and
these
items
will
be
on
the
economic
development
committee
meeting
because
I
am
the
chair.
So
that's
how
this
was
pushed
forward.
That's
not
to
say
we
don't
have
other
initiatives
coming
forward
for
the
early
childhood
council.
F
Ms
flax
is
working
on
that
we
have
affordable
housing
initiatives
coming
forward.
We
have
carp
initiatives
coming
forward.
All
of
these
are
going
to
be
coming
forward
through
committee.
I
just
don't
have
the
arpa
specialist,
we
hope
to
have
the
project
manager
if
you
will
hired
on
we'd
hope
to
have
that
person
hired
on
already.
So
with
that
I'll
stop
talking.
O
Could
I
quickly
respond
to
that
just
as
far
as
I
understand
the
the
position
we're
looking
to
hire
was
more
around
compliance
and
art,
but
not
a
project
manager.
I
want
to
be
really
clear
here
because
we
discussed
that
position,
but
it
was
compliance
both.
F
F
Not
everyone
has
has
allocated
the
funds
and,
in
some
communities
have
allocated
the
funds
just
to
one
thing.
One
thing
that
they're
pretty
sure
they
won't
get
deemed
from
the
federal
government
on,
I
think
evanston
in
my
opinion,
is
doing
a
really
good
job
in
diversifying
its
portfolio
on
this
between
social
service
initiatives.
Carp
initiatives,
affordable
housing,
economic
development,
which
is
exactly
what
this
was
supposed
to
do,
but
the
most
important
thing
it
was
supposed
to
do
is
combat
covid,
which
we
earmarked
those
funds,
and
we
also
earmarked
funds
for
revenue
loss.
O
I
just
want
to
be
clear:
I
don't
I
don't
remember
ever
discussing
a
project
manager
position
and
even
what
you
described.
Most
of
that
is
compliance
and
not
project
management,
because
if
we
did
go
out
to
try
to
find
a
project
manager,
I
would
hope
the
next
time
we
try.
You
just
inform
all
of
us.
You
know
we'd
certainly
push
the
job
out
there.
I
don't
think
it
would
be
difficult
to
find
a
project
manager
for
this
city
to
do
this
work.
In
fact,
most
there
are
other
places
that
have
a
similar
position.
O
A
Next
is
councilmember
newsman,
who
has
four
minutes
and
25
seconds.
C
C
If
what
I'm
still
a
little
bit
frustrated
on,
is
not
actually
the
economic
development
committee,
because
we
have
at
that
committee
discuss
the
criteria
by
which
we
would
be
evaluating
economic
development
proposals,
but
I
still
bemoan
the
lack
of
an
overall
plan
to
address
each
of
the
buckets
we
defined
and
I
it
unless
I
am
wrong,
which
is
entirely
possible.
We
never
actually
voted
on
the
on
the
bucket
allocations.
It
was
just
discussed
and
we
left
it.
We
did.
We
didn't
have
a
vote
and.
L
Point
of
information,
my
recollection,
if
it
could
be
corrected
for
this
point
of
information,
is
that
the
reason
that
we
didn't
vote
on
on
those
buckets
which
would
maybe
put
us
in
a
better
place
now
is
because
we
had
an
over
cautiousness
about
oma,
and
I
think
we
need
to
understand
what
the
heck
is
in
omaha,
so
we
can
make
the
decisions
that
we
need
to
make.
L
So
we
can
not
be
in
positions
like
this
because
it
was
for
listed
for
discussion,
but
we
could
have
voted
on
it
and
that's
why
we
didn't,
and
so
we
need
to
be
a
bit
more.
We
need
to
stop
fedex,
I'm
sorry.
Can
you
teach
me
the
new
word
again.
L
With
oma,
and
and
and
do
things
that
can
help
us
move
forward.
A
Next
is
council
member
braithwaite
with
four
minutes
left.
P
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
These
are
just
my
couple
of
points
of
information
and,
as
we
are
all
here,
recycling
inefficiency,
I
hope
to
provide
just
a
little
bit
of
clarity
on
december.
First
myself,
council
member
kelly,
nussma
burns,
as
well
as
reid,
sat
through
economic
development
and
with
our
economic
development
director
paul
zalmazak
created
the
framework
for
what
we
called
vitality
measures,
and
maybe,
as
I
read
these
off,
you
may
recall,
if
you
were
the
one
that
listed
this
criteria
yeah
you
were
there,
we're
all
there.
P
Out
of
that
meeting,
we
identified
critical
measures
being
hiring
local
climate.
That
was
probably
you,
council,
member
nusma,
public
health,
personal
finance,
wellness,
job
training,
workforce
opportunity
to
create
well-paying
jobs,
career
path
opportunities.
I
don't
know
who
said
that
jobs
created
jobs,
retained
property
tax
generated
that
was
me
sales
tax
generated.
That
was
me,
other
local
attacks,
the
mutants
liquor,
etc.
P
P
It
comes
to
our
committee
for
discussion
before
it's
put
on
the
agenda
and
then
typically
it'll
come
back,
and
I
think
this
had
two
readings.
I
also
recall
saying
at
that
meeting.
You
are
right,
city
manager,
so
you
don't
have
to
take
the
blame
for
anything
when
we
have
the
groups
came
in
front
of
us
in
the
public
and
made
their
presentation.
I
asked
us
all
what
other
questions
do
we
have
for
the
ox?
I
asked
us
all
what
other
questions
do
we
have
for
north
light?
P
Theater
crickets,
I
said:
let's
make
sure
we
put
it
on
the
agenda.
I
encouraged
all
the
groups
to
reach
out
to
all
the
council
members,
I'm
not
going
to
start
calling
any
names
but
you're
all
contacted
by
all
the
groups.
They
gave
their
presentation.
You
voted
on
those
presentations
at
the
last
economic
development
meeting.
So
that's
how
they
get
here,
simple
workflow.
You
got
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
and
then
you
all
have
to
vote
and
guess
what?
If
you
don't
vote
it
on
the
agenda?
P
If
it
doesn't
pass
on
the
agenda,
then
it
doesn't
end
up
here
on
the
council
package.
So
that's
how
it
gets
here.
So
there's
no
surprise.
No
one
should
be
surprised.
No
one
should
question
the
process,
especially
because
everyone's
sitting
on
behind
the
stairs
who
sat
on
economic
development
had
an
opportunity
to
vote.
P
I
even
remember
some
of
you,
councilmember
byrd,
saying
I'll
vote
it
to
council,
but
then
I'm
going
to
vote
no,
which
you'll
have
the
right,
and
the
second
will
just
take
the
vote,
but
I
think
to
continue
to
tell
our
public
that
there
is
no
process
when
you
yourselves,
engage
in
that
process
is
not
accurate
and
I
just
hope
at
the
end
of
this
discussion
that
we'll
just
call
the
question.
You
tell
your
voters
where
you
stand
on
this
issue.
It's
really
straightforward!
P
O
S
S
U
E
U
S
T
U
K
U
Council
member
suffered
an,
I
mean
the
movie
theaters
opened,
you
know
if
the
north
light
theater
is
not
the
same
size
as
those
movie
theaters
are
so
I
I
my
point
is
the
movie
theaters
were
an
overwhelming
success.
I
don't
you
know
to
north
light.
I
don't
know
how
many
tickets
they're
going
to
say
I'll
sell.
I
don't
know
that
they'll
have
movies
showing
multiple
times
every
day.
U
A
L
Yes,
thank
you
counting
votes.
I
see
where
this
is
going
and
I
I
think
I'm
gonna
put
it
over
the
edge
and
allow
this
to
move
forward,
potentially
because
I,
if
we
are
now
committing
that
the
process
that
we
have
gone
through
for
the
for
spending
45
of
the
money,
is
the
process
and
we're
you
know
cowboy
sams
and
sally's
out
there
just
shooting
from
the
hip.
I'm
fine
with
that.
L
I
I
said
for
a
while
that
I
think
arpa
is
not
as
much
money
as
we
make
it
out
to
be,
and
I
think.
I
L
And
yeah
so,
and
so
since
that
is
the
process
that
we
seem
to
be
operating
by
I'm
you
know,
that
is
a
process.
It
may
not
have
been
the
process
that
I
think
many
of
us
envisioned,
but
you
know
to
councilmember
braithwaite's
point.
You
know
it
went
through
committee
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
all
of
us
are
gonna
be
able
to
now,
as
other
ideas
are
moving
through
committees,
that
will
be
able
to
look
at
a
proposal
at
its
face
value.
Is
it
good
policy?
L
L
I
think
this
is
a
good
project
and
you
know
looking
at
it
through
the
lens
of
what
we're
now
saying
is
the
process
it
makes
sense
and
so
I'll
I'll
go
with
it
as
long
as
those
who
have
been
saying
that
are
going
to
commit
to
to
keeping
that
same
energy.
A
Council
member
burns
with
50
seconds
left.
O
Yeah,
like
I
said
if
this
is,
is
approved
today
I
mean
again,
I
support
the
project
and
I
would
hope
we
we
bring
back
the
bucket
process
as
our
official
kind
of
arpa
plan,
unless,
if
we
haven't
already,
let's
adopt
it
and
and
then
that'll
be
what
we
go
off
of,
but
I
was
under
the
impression
when
we,
when
I
brought
this
up
on
many
other
occasions,
that
there
was
something
else
that
we
could
do,
that
could
provide
a
bit
more
detail
and
strategy
to
how
we
direct
our
for
funds.
O
I
think
some
of
those
discussions
have
happened
in
economic
development
committee,
but
they
haven't
made
their
way
back
to
the
full
council
for
to
be
recognized
and
voted
on
by
the
by
the
full
group.
So
again,
whether
this
is
success
or
unsuccessful.
I
would
like
to
see
some
either
that
plan
the
bucket
plan.
You
know
formally
adopted
by
this
group
or
or
a
clear
indication
that
we're
going
to
go
in
a
different
direction
to
create
that
plan.
O
A
N
Board
meeting
this
thursday
at
seven
o'clock,
hope
to
see
y'all
hope
to
see
lots
of
first
ward
residents
there
this
this
thursday,
where
we'll
look
at
in
depth
a
little
bit
of
the
his
historic
downtown
evanston,
with
special
guests
from
both
the
preservation
commission,
as
well
as
from
evanston
history
center.
Thank
you.
C
March
ward
meeting
will
be
tuesday.
The
1st
of
march
7
pm
place
tbd
and
office
hours
in
march
will
be
the
second
saturday
as
usual
march,
12th
at
berry
pike
cafe
10
to
12.
A
Councilmember
burns
no
report
councilmember
suffered.
M
Just
a
reminder
to
seventh
ward
residents
that
I
have
a
ward
meeting
on
wednesday
this
week,
7
p.m,
and
back
in
no
back
in
december,
when
council
member
fleming
announced
that
she
was
going
to
be
retiring
early
from
her
seat
on
the
council,
I
had
signed
off
from
the
meeting
before
we.
She
got
to
council
call
of
the
wards,
and
so
I
didn't
get
a
chance
at
that
time
to
say
how
much
I
really
enjoyed
working
with
council
member
fleming
and,
in
particular,
serving
with
her
on
the
alternative
9-1-1
response
committee.
M
I'm
certainly
looking
forward
to
continuing
to
work
with
her
going
forward
because
there's
still
a
lot
to
do
on
that
whole
issue
and
and
then
I
also
have
certainly
followed
her
work
as
alderman
in
the
ninth
ward
and
she's,
the
the
community
engagement
initiatives
and
community
building
initiatives,
I
guess,
is
the
way
I'd
phrase
them
that
you've
carried
out
in
your
ward
are
just
remarkable
and
you're,
leaving
really
big
shoes
to
fill
for
your
successor,
and
I
wish
you
all
the
best.
L
And
so
I
I
certainly
said
my
piece
then,
but
also
I'll
just
add
now,
knowing
that
you're,
not
a
huge
fan
of
this
kind
of
thing.
I'll
just
say
again,
thank
you
for
your
service
and
thank
you
for
thank
you,
for
you
know,
leaning
over
and
nudging
me
whenever
you
thought
appropriate.
I
appreciate
the
reminders
of
my
loquaciousness
as
bill
smith
has
dubbed
me.
L
So
with
that
our
award
meeting
for
the
eighth
ward,
oh-
and
I
will
say
you
know
we
have
an
eighth
ward
meeting.
I
think
we
may
have
to
reschedule
that
we'll
figure
out
the
timing
changes
and
that
will
go
out
hopefully
late
this
week
on
exactly
if
and
when
that
meeting
will
be
rescheduled
and
I'll,
say.
Ninth
warders
are
welcome
to
come
to
that
meeting.
You
know
in
the
absence
of
council
member
fleming,
the
eighth
ward
will
welcome.
Welcome
you.
L
A
Let
the
annexation
begin.
Councilmember
fleming.
Q
Yes,
so,
as
I
said
last
time,
thank
you
so
much
to
the
residents
of
the
ninth
ward.
They
continue
to
be
the
best
residents,
so
I
just
remind
them
that
on
thursday
the
mayor
is
hosting
a
town
hall,
I'm
assuming
on
zoom.
I
can't
remember
the
details
for
the
brave
people
who
are
looking
to
sit
on
this
council
for
the
next
two
or
three
years.
Q
Whatever
the
term
will
be
so,
please
other
ninth
orders
participate
and,
as
we
have
talked
about
per
alderman
ravel's
reminder
of
our
community
building
that
we
are
kind
to
one
another.
So
please
be
gentle
to
the
folks
stepping
forward
to
my
peers
on
council
now
and
prior.
Q
Although
I
probably
disagree
with
you
more
than
I
agree
with
you,
I
will
say
that
I
realize
that
no
one's
up
here
for
the
paycheck,
and
so
I
always
applaud
people
who
are
willing
to
put
themselves
out
to
the
service
of
the
community.
So
hopefully
you
all
will
get
past
whatever
aldermen
one's
word
is
that
I
won't
try
to
say
and
get
some
more
stuff
done
in
the
next
three
years.
Q
I
will
continue
to
participate
with
councilmember
revell
and
the
alternative
9-1-1
response,
which
is
actually
moving
along
quite
nicely
thanks
to
senator
peters
and
other
folks
in
the
state,
so
that's
very
exciting,
as
well
as
guaranteed
income.
That
seems
like
it's
moving
slow
as
mud,
but
we
are
almost
through
the
irb
process
at
northwestern,
and
so
we
will
be
back
before
you
all
to
talk
about
that
last
final
step
there
to
get
those
cash
payments
out
to
our
citizens.
A
Just
do
want
to
follow
up.
Procedurally
on
council
member
fleming's
point
the
applications
to
be
a
the
next
ninth
word,
council
member.
The
due
date
was
given
as
today,
and
so
someone
applied
as
as
recently
as
6
54
p.m.
Tonight
you
still
have
two
and
a
half
hours.
If
you
want
to
get
your
application
in
and
there
will
be
a
public
meeting
that
will
be
held
here
in
this
room
and,
of
course,
also
on
zoom
on
thursday
evening
at
7
pm,
and
there
is
also
a
web
page
online.