►
From YouTube: Equity and Empowerment Commission - 11/20/2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
I
will
turn
this
over
to
kathleen
all
right
again,
thanks
to
you
kathleen
for
your
time,
your
energy,
your
expertise
that
you're
sharing
with
us
again
much
appreciated
and
thank
you
alejandra
for
all
your
contributions
to
tonight's
meeting.
Yes,
yes,
no
thank.
B
You
everyone,
okay,
just.
C
B
Got
it?
Okay,
just
as
a
point
of
process
in
your
email
boxes,
inboxes
there
is
a
copy
of
this
presentation.
It's
going
to
be
important
for
you
to
be
able
to
access
some
of
the
stuff
that
we're
sharing
so
that
you
can
workshop
this
in
our
small
group
breakouts.
B
So
anyhow,
here
we
are
we're
the
eec
part
two
of
the
retreat.
We
broke
it
out
into
two
parts,
because
that's
the
amount
of
time
you
guys
had
my
name
is
kathleen,
dr
kathleen
young
clayton.
You
can
call
me
kathleen,
don't
worry
about
it,
it's
after
five
o'clock,
now
so
purposes
and
outcomes.
B
So
in
part
two
of
this
retreat.
We
will
finalize
the
mission
statement
for
the
eec,
which
will
form
the
basis
of
rewriting
the
eec
charter
that
we
talked
about
in
part
one
of
our
retreat.
That
was
a
little
bit
miscalibrated
or
just
I
mean
things
have
evolved
and
changed,
and
so
we
kind
of
looked
at
that
and
said:
okay.
Well,
you
know,
probably
it
would
be
a
good
idea.
B
This
is
a
good
time
to
re-examine
that
we
will
also
examine
the
what
we're
calling
or
what
I'm
just
I
I
do
a
lot
of
acronyms
in
my
life,
because
I
can't
say
all
the
words
all
the
time.
So
bcc
stands
for
boards
commissions
and
committees
of
evanston,
so
we
are
just
calling
it
the
bcc
project
to
see
if
it
is
a
fit
with
the
mission
statement
and
brainstorm
other
projects,
if
needed
again.
B
You
know
that
I
don't
have
a
dog
in
the
fight
on
this
one,
so
you
guys
can
think
of
other
things,
but
we're
going
to
use
that
right
now,
so
we
can
really
focus
ourselves,
I'm
hoping
in
the
one
and
a
half
short
hours
that
we
have.
I
don't
know
if
we're
two
or
one
outcomes,
we
will
have
at
least
a
working
draft
of
the
updated
mission
statement.
B
I
was
hoping
we
could
have
the
the
actual
mission
statement,
but
we
need
more
time
for
that,
we're
going
to
review
the
bcc
project
and
then
identify
some
next
steps
and
timeline
for
updating
the
eec
charter.
Okay,
we're
going
to
try
to
get
all
that
done
in
an
hour
and
a
half,
so
our
agenda
is
we're
doing
check-ins
right
now,
I'm
gonna
go
over
the
darcy
model.
B
That
is
in
this
presentation,
but
I
also
shared
a
pdf
with
you
guys,
just
in
case
you
guys,
like
reading
and
whatever
6
45
to
7
15.
we're
going
to
review
the
bcc
project
first.
So
what
I
was
thinking
is
that
you
know
I
really
want
to
just
revisit
it
and
have
a
conversation
about
project
fit
if
it
fits
in
the
mission
that
we're
thinking
about
great.
B
If
it
does,
then
what
projects
might
not
fit
in
our
mission,
all
right
just
for
us
to
test
and
to
see
if
this
is
a
good
litmus
test
like
this,
this
project
or
the
intention
of
the
project,
how
do
we
use
our
mission
statement
to
keep
focused
and
hold
each
other
accountable
to
outcomes
and
then
we'll
spend
another
30
minutes
on
the
mission
statement
for
the
eec
and
then
a
short
15
minutes
just
doing
some
next
steps
and
timelining
for
an
applied
project
and
updating
the
eec
charter
pause
there.
B
I
know
it's
a
lot
of
words.
I
didn't
have
time
to
edit
this
so
you're,
just
getting
all
of
the
words
that
kathleen
thinks
about
when
she's
coming
up
with
agendas.
Okay,
what
is
darcy
it's
darcy
for
equity,
what
it
is
so
essentially
it's
a
project
management
tool
for
establishing
clear
accountability
in
teams
and
organizations.
B
B
B
It
can
create
a
shared
language
for
assigning
and
tracking
accountability.
So
I'm
hoping
one
down
the
road
one
day
when
you
guys
are
working
on
something
awesome,
you'll
be
like
okay,
so
who's
gonna
be
the
r
on
this.
You
say
that
shoot
me
an
email,
because
I
love
hearing
stuff
like
that
and
then
finally,
it
really
does
enhance
organizational
efficiency.
You
would
be
surprised
and
not
alone.
B
If
you
belong
to
projects
or
an
organization
where
there
is
no
clear
project
management
tool
that
everyone
relies
on
and
ultimately
you
can
deepen
trust
by
improving
follow-through
with
this
tool.
Really,
that
is
the
outcome
of
the
tool.
The
tool
itself
is
just
a
tool:
okay,
rc.
The
d
stands
for
decision
maker.
One
of
the
most
unique
aspects
of
this
model
is
that
it
can
be
a
group.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
one
person,
whether
it's
a
group
or
an
individual.
This
model
will
work
so
as
the
decider
or
delegator.
B
B
The
real
anchor
to
this
is
the
a
which
is
what
we
call
the
accountable
a
single
person
fully
accountable
for
making
the
project
happen.
So
for
those
of
you
who
are
science
fiction,
fantasy
nerds,
like
me,
there's
a
movie
called
the
highlander.
It
was
made
like
a
thousand
years
ago
and
sean
connery.
Yes,
was
it
it,
and
basically,
in
the
case
of
the
highlander,
there
can
only
be
one
highlander
if
you
run
into
another
highlander,
basically
they
fight
it
out
and
they
have
to
behead
each
other,
but
there
can
be
only
one.
B
This
model
is
not
that
violent,
but
always
remember
that
story.
There
can
only
be
one
a
the
a
must
be
given
sufficient
decision,
making
power
and
room
to
learn
and
adjust
and
commensurate
with
accountability.
So
you
know
you
can't
get.
Have
somebody
be
an
a
and
you
know
they
actually
can't
make
decisions
that
help
all
of
the
r's
which
I'll
get
to
in
a
second
do
their
work?
Okay,
so
the
a
must
be
given
sufficient
decision
making
power.
B
B
There
can
never
be
more
than
one
a
all
right.
This
is
an
invitation
to
a
lack
of
clear
accountability.
If
no
one
is
being
willing
to
be
the
a
do
not
proceed
with
the
project.
That's
that's
my
that's
my
advice
to
you.
Just
then
go
rehash
the
project
go
figure
out.
What's
going
wrong,
there
has
to
be
one
a
so
who
are
these
r's?
B
B
B
If
you
don't
like
throwing
your
weight
in
or
or
pitching
in
or
taking
on
a
little
more
responsibility
every
once
in
a
while
or
getting
into
the
trenches
and
working
with
somebody,
who's
dealing
with
a
roadblock
don't
be
an
a
an
a
is
not
a
delegator.
There
are
times
where
you're
gonna
have
to
delegate
work
because
you're
only
one
person-
and
you
only
have
one
head,
but
the
a
is
really
there
as
the
backstop.
B
In
fact,
person
x
is
now
an
r
on
this
right
and
now
you
know
they've
shifted
while
they're
giving
input
the
best
c's
are
those
who
don't
need
or
want
additional
work
they're
there
to
just
give
you
experience
like
you're,
not
using
c's
to
recruit
people
you're
literally
using
them
to
get
the
information
that
you
need,
so
that
your
your
r's
are
feeling
successful,
roadblocks
are
removed
or
whatever
it
is,
and
so
again
you
know
this
is
a
fluid
model,
but
the
initial
darcy
that
you
produce
for
a
project
some
seeds
can
shift
to
become
ours
or
even
join
the
decision-making
team.
B
B
Sometimes
this
is
just
an
agency-wide
announcement.
Sometimes
it's
just
other
teams
working
on
related
issues,
and
this
is
about
strategic
communications
right.
The
last
thing
that
you
want
to
forget
is
that
there
is
a
larger
public
out
there
and
it's
better
for
them
to
be
informed
and
to
be
updated
rather
than
them,
showing
up
and
being
angry
that
they
didn't
know
something
was
happening.
You
know
what
I
mean
so
eyes
really
should
not
use
the
information
to
undermine
the
process,
so
unless
somebody
is
officially
an
eye,
consider
not
see
seeing
them
on
all
emails.
B
B
The
information
is
really
there
to
to
incorporate
to
include,
but
it's
really
not
helpful,
then
to
like
take
a
piece
of
information
to
go
run
over
someplace
else.
Like
keep
the
information
with
the
team.
That's
working
on
the
issue,
I'm
going
to
stop
there.
Are
there
any
questions,
I'm
kind
of
running
through
this
a
little
fast,
but
trying
to
all
right
and
you're
going
to
apply
the
darcy
at
least
a
little
bit
so
that
you
know
you
can
kind
of
get
a
feel
for
it
again.
B
B
Okay,
so,
like
I
said
there
is
this
planning
exercise,
I
want
to
revisit
a
little
bit
around
the
bcc
project,
so
we
can
talk
in
context
about
what
an
example
of
program,
development
timelines
and
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
meet
darcy
again,
okay,
so
we're
gonna.
Do
I'm
gonna
talk
this
through
and
I'm
gonna
put
you
into
small
group
breakouts
and
we're
gonna.
Do
a
large
group
report
back
just
so
we
can
remind
ourselves
of
the
work
that
we
actually
did.
B
B
So
remember
we're
we're
trying
to
get
away
from
these
individual
anecdotal.
Well,
this
person
did
this
or
I
felt
this
way
or
whatever
we're
we're,
trying
to
take
it
to
the
institutional
level,
because
we're
we're
a
group
and
we're
a
commission-
and
you
have
a
public
role
to
play,
and
this
is
possible
for
us
to
think
structurally,
not
just
on
an
individual
level
and
always
just
remember
remind
yourself
to
to
think
in
logical
connections
a
lot
of
times.
B
B
We
can
connect
racial
equity
to
the
dozens
of
boards
commissions
and
committees
of
evanston,
and
we
have
to
remind
ourselves
that
there
are
already
structures
that
marginalize
and
these
the
way
these
bccs
have
evolved
over
the
years
or
the
initial
intention
of
what
they
were
supposed
to
do
or
who
ends
up
just
by
default.
Showing
up
are
part
of
the
the
structures
that
existed
in
the
past.
B
That
already
were
infused
with
a
certain
level
of
assumptions
about
who
had
access,
who
has
resources
all
of
these
things
and
that
the
outcome
we
all
acknowledge
is
that
there
are
important
communities
that
are
marginalized,
that
don't
feel
like
they
are
welcome.
They
don't
even
know
that
these
committees
exist
and
we
have
to
start
building
the
case
right
like
this,
isn't
going
to
just
be
immediately
everyone's,
like
oh
yeah,
I
get
that
we
have
to
build
the
case
that
structures
of
inclusion
are
necessary
to
move
evanston
forward
in
a
meaningful
and
effective
way.
B
All
right
is
that
I'm
not
I'm
not
saying
anything
new.
I
can't
see
any
of
your
faces
either
so
because
I'm
presenting
and
I
have
to
minimize
the
screen.
So
I
can
see
all
the
words
so
feel
free
to
unmute
if
you're
part
of
the
commission,
I
don't
know
how
public
comments
go,
but
whatever
right
that
you,
you
guys
tell
me
so.
B
Here's
where
the
the
exercise
will
will
start
right.
What
are
we
trying
to
accomplish
so
we
talked
a
bit
in
the
last
retreat
about
what
would
it
look
like
to
actually
train
current
board
and
commission
members
on
how
racial
equity
should
factor
into
their
decision
making
and
discussions
around
all
the
various
issue.
Areas
right
like.
B
I
think
that
we
we
kind
of
landed
in
a
space
where
we
looked
at
all
these
boards
and
commissions.
It's
like
how
can
how
it's
not
possible
for
the
eec
to
take
on
every
single
project
that
touches
on
racial
equity,
from
the
library
board,
to
the
police
pension
board
to
the
environment
board
right.
So
we
had
we
we
thought
of
a
way
like
how
do
we
build
the
capacity?
How
do
we
create
a
shared
framework
and
and
vocabulary
and
then
share
it
out
and
offer
training?
B
We
also
talked
about
training,
future
board
and
commission
members
on
the
role
of
these
bccs
and
racial
equity.
Okay,
so
we're
trying
to
accomplish
some
of
this
stuff,
but
again,
let's
finish
the
sentence
right
so
the
the
way
I
want
you
guys
to
always
think
about
it
as
you're
talking
about
stuff,
it's
like
yes,
we
need
to
increase
diversity,
always
in
the
back
your
mind
like
have
like
a
little
image
of
dr
kathleen
papa
and
say
so
that
so
that
what
right?
B
Are
there
is
there
cries
of
outrage?
Is
that
or
like
okay?
That
makes
sense,
I'm
going
to
look
at
some
faces
so
right,
like
we're
doing
all
this
training
or
talking
about
training
or
looking
at
these,
because
we
want
that
sentence
to
be
true
right,
so
that
whether
it's
new
or
ongoing
project
or
whatever
right
projects
and
programs
are
informed
and
improved
by
racial
equity
approaches,
and
what
you
guys
are
proposing
to
do
is
to
really
like.
B
So
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
take
a
pause
on
right
now,
just
break
you
guys
out
to
you
know
it's
late,
I'm
tired
to
like
you
know,
get
you
guys
to
smaller
groups,
and
I
just
forgot
your
name
kimberly
kimberly
like
if
you
wanted
to
split
everyone.
I
don't
know
how
many
there
are
so
like
two
groups
or
potentially
three
groups
right.
How
many.
B
All
right,
so
here's
the
breakout
exercise.
I
want
you
guys
to
just
kind
of
work
out
as
as
fast
as
you
can
again.
My
apologies.
This
is
the
time
that
we
had
so,
let's
think
about
this
project.
So
how
would
you
organize
outreach
and
engagement
with
other
bcc's
like
get
a
little
bit
in
the
weeds?
You
don't
have
to
like
take
out
a
calendar
just
yet,
but
you
know
you
you
want
to
think
about.
Okay,
like
how
do
we
actually
start
doing
outreach,
what
kinds
of
training
assets
do
we
need
to
create?
B
B
How
do
you
engage
with?
So
you
know,
bipoc
bypoc
is
the
acronym
for
black
indigenous
people
of
color
and
other
communities
such
as
veterans,
disabled.
You
know
just
those
who
are
not
not
showing
up
on
these
bcc's.
How
do
you
engage
with
them?
Who
usually
do
not
have
the
access
or
resources
to
participate,
and
what
would
be
some
key
roles?
Use
the
darcy
model
right.
You
guys
are
going
to
break
out
into
groups.
So
there's
not
one
right
answer:
it's
going
to
be
interesting
hearing
the
large
group
report
backs
right
so
think
about
who's.
B
The
decision
maker
here
is
it
one
person?
Is
it
all
of
you
who
would
be
the
a?
What
would
they
do
and
what
would
be
some
of
the
discrete
responsibilities
and
if
you
have
time
which
I'd
be
impressed,
if
you
do,
but
what
would
be
a
timeline
treat
it
like
a
pilot
project?
This
is
one
of
the
ways
I
lower
anxiety
and
the
tendencies
of
perfectionism
in
some
of
us.
You
don't
have
to
get
a
perfect
right
out
of
the
gate,
okay,
think
about
it
as
an
iteration.
But
what
are
some
of
the
like?
B
How
long
would
you
want
to
take
right?
What
would
you
want
to
see
at
the
end
of
six
months,
eight
months,
12
months,
18-
I
don't.
I
don't
know
it's
up
to
you,
okay,
so
these
are
the
questions
that
I'd
like
you
to
kind
of
grapple
with
and
have
conversations
around
and
then
finally,
you
can
get
to
this
and
again.
This
is
why
we
really
needed
some
prep
work
and
more
time.
But
how
would
you
measure
success
if
you
can't
get
to
all
questions
answer
a
few
of
them
right?
B
C
What
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
does,
I
would
say,
alejandra
and
jane:
do
you
both
have
access
to
the
slides.
C
C
C
B
I
know
we
have
a
little
bit
of
wiggle
room,
so
I'm
not
too
worried
about
it,
but
I
I
would
like
to
give
the
full
15
minutes
for
the
large
group
report
backs,
because
it's
really
important
for
them
to
hear
how
each
group
was
processing
the
answers.
C
Well,
don't
rush
it.
I
would
tell
you
not
to
rush.
So
if
you
need
the
extra
five
minutes
take
the
minutes.
Our
our
committee
meetings
usually
last
a
couple
hours
anyway,
like
our
meetings,
don't
have
a
set
set
in
time.
So.
B
A
Different
than
so
many
meetings
fill
the
time
allotted
when
you're
on
a
countdown
boy.
B
The
I've
got
the
the
thing
open
and
I'm
going
to
take
notes
because
that's
right,
I
think
so
yeah
well,
okay,
my
note
taking
is
a
little.
Are
you
one?
You
guys
just
correct
me
if
I
miss
something?
Okay,
so,
let's
let's
go
with.
I
just
group
a
group
b
and
my
apologies,
I'm
so
tired,
I'm
just
shorthanding
everything.
So
it's
not
to
dismiss
your
individuality
or
whatever.
I
just
didn't
want
to
write
everything
out
right
now,
so
why
don't?
We
start
with
jane's
group.
A
Okay,
I
know
you're
gonna
say
it
so
carla
max
and
dolores
are
brilliant.
First
of
all,
can
you
write
that
down?
Yes,
wait?
Who
is
it
carla
with
a
k.
A
So
what
we
came
up
with
was
really
really
more
action
steps,
a
plan
for
how
to
make
this
happen,
and
the
plan
starts
with
getting
on
the
agenda
of
our
priority
bcc's,
going
back
to
our
previous
meeting,
the
ones
that
control
money,
that
control
decisions,
policies
and
so
forth,
getting
on
their
agendas
and
bringing
to
this
presentation
on
each
of
their
agendas.
A
Somebody
from
the
equity,
empowerment,
commission,
with
a
standard
slide
deck,
let's
say,
standard
slide
deck
for
both
our
visual
learners,
our
audio
learners,
something
to
show
and
talk
about,
and
we
would
be
then
asking
them
and
it
wouldn't
be
about
equity,
empowerment,
commission.
It
would
be
about
whatever
this
bcc
is
and
their
work.
A
A
We
acknowledge
that
we
are
not
qualified
to
do
that
training
ourselves,
but
rather
we
would
farm
it
out
to
those
better
qualified
which
could
include,
for
example,
the
ywca,
and
then
we
would
also
be
looking
for
there
to
be
a
tool
that
all
of
our
bccs
could
use.
That
would
be
a
tool
to
assess
racial
equity.
A
It
was
max
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
this
would
be
a
tool
that
that
would
be
applicable
to
all
of
our
bccs.
That
would
essentially
be
an
equity
lens
or
a
tool
for
assessing
their
incorporation
of
equity
at
an
equity
lens.
E
Right
like
a
tool
like
if
a
proposal
comes
up,
I
mean
I've
seen
it
used,
even
even
all
the
way
down
to
communication,
that's
going
out
making
sure
there's
a
common
tool
amongst
the
different
committees
so
that
they
have
us
a
symbol.
It's
also
a
way
to
norm
what
we
mean
when
we
talk
about
equity
and
and
ensure
that
we're
considering
multiple
viewpoints,
expect
perspectives
and
backgrounds,
but
that,
but
that
you
know
each
committee
would
share
the
same
tool
to
unify
things.
A
So
kind
of
a
common
vision,
common
tool,
so
we
we
did
not.
We
did
not
get
anywhere
close
to
darcy
or
a
timeline
for
any
of
this
and
again,
the
key
part
was
getting
on
the
agendas
of
these
committees
I'll
editorialize.
Here
it's
not
so
much
about
confronting
our
bccs
with
equity,
but
rather
asking
them.
The
question:
are
you
thinking
about
it
and
and
we
hope
providing
resources
to
them
as
well?.
B
Well,
I
mean-
and
I
can
see
that
you
know
your
darcy
or
timeline
was
still
tbd,
but
I
mean
you
could
even
see
based
on
the
bullets
that
we
captured
here.
You
know
it's
going
to
take
time
to
go
talk
with
ywca
and
see
what
they
actually
can
do.
It's
going
to
take
time
to
get
on
the
the
boards
and
commissions
like
it's
going
to
take
time
to
come
up
with
the
slide
deck.
It's
you
know.
A
Like
I,
I
kind
of
think
the
easy
part
is
going
to
be
getting
on
the
agenda,
but
we'd
have
to
be
prepared
to
be
on
the
agenda
and
in
my
experience
that
there
are
so
many
boards
commissions
and
committees
that
are
looking
for
interesting
content
and
meeting
agenda
items.
Okay
and
who's
going
to
say
no
anyway,
I
mean
really
wow.
D
B
A
C
Sure
for
the
outreach
there
were
some
caveats.
I
think
that
I
just
wanted
to
share.
C
We
wanted
to
we
kind
of
had
to
re
reiterate
to
ourselves
that
we
need
to
own
our
own
leadership
and
that
to
the
point
about
reaching
out,
like
you
know,
yeah,
maybe
we
need
the
mayor
to
say
do
as
they
say,
but
that
we
really
need
to
own
our
leadership
as
a
commission
and
to
to
reach
out
to
the
prioritized
bccs
that
we
feel
you
know
have
power,
and
if
we
need
to
id
members
of
those
bccs
to
make
sure
we
get
on
their
agendas,
I
think
at
first
we
were
thinking
this
would
be
more
individualistic
and
we'd
interview
individuals,
because
that's
what
we
talked
about
in
our
the
first
part
of
our
retreat,
but
I'll
just
say
that
I
love
this
concept
about
getting
on
their
agenda
and
going
to
their
meetings,
but
we
definitely
want
to
lift
up
any
relationships
that
we
have
right
to
making
sure
we
get
on
their
agenda
and
that
we
talk
to
them.
C
I
think
that's
it.
In
regards
to
outreach-wise,
we
did
talk
about
you
know
time
we
were.
We
did
think
about
maybe
having
like
a
culminating
meeting
with
the
commission's
like
reaching
out
to
them,
maybe
providing
the
training,
but
we
were
envisioning,
maybe
like
a
culminating
event,
hopefully
by
next
spring
we
actually
can
meet
face
to
face,
but
it
would
be
nice
to
have
a
culminating
effect
with
all
bcc's
in
regards
to
training
assets.
C
We
shared
with
kimberly
that
we've
done
a
lot
of
work
already.
We
actually
have
shared
definitions.
We
spent
many
many
months
coming
up
with
shared
definitions,
so
there's
no
need
to
reiterate
or
start
from
scratch.
We
also
shared
that
we
had
worked
with
kimberly
and
were
familiar
somewhat
familiar.
At
least
I've
seen
the
questions
of
the
reia,
the
racial
equity
impact
assessment,
we're
like
what's
that
eye
for,
but
that
we
have
that
kimberly
has
shared
with
us.
C
The
racial
equity
impact
assessment
that
she's
been
using
as
part
of
her
own
pilot
project
and
so
again
just
lifting
up
some
of
the
work
which
makes
some
of
us
me
in
particular
feel
like
all
this
work
was
worth
something.
So
we've
got
a
lot
of
definitions
and
trainings
that
we
can
work
off
of
and
those
were
some
of
the
assets
we
lifted
up.
C
B
C
B
I
am
got
it
okay.
Thank
you,
any
other
inputs
that
capture
that
pretty
like
as
as
well
as
yeah
yeah.
What
did
what
did
I
not
include?
B
You
know,
I
would
strongly
recommend
that
you
guys
spend
a
meeting
sort
of
practicing
and
and
training
yourselves
to
kind
of
walk
through.
All
of
that,
so
that
you
know
you're,
you're,
feeling
really
confident
and
and,
like
you
know,
you're
you're
ready
for
some
of
the
questions
that
might
come
at
you
and
definitely
you
know,
I
think
it
can
be
at
both
end.
Like
you,
you
can
just
reach
out
directly
to
some
of
the
bcc's
and
ask
to
get
put
on
their
agenda.
B
I
I
would
recommend
that
you
possibly
start
a
little
bit
with
the
one-on-one
outreach
to
people
that
you
know
or
that
maybe
kimberly
richardson
might
be
able
to
point
you
to
to
inform
the
way
you're
going
to
create
this,
the
presentation,
the
slide
deck
and
the
questions
right.
That's
always
a
a
good
heads
up
like
you
know,
you
don't
necessarily
want
to
like
go
right
out
of
the
gate
like
having
trusted
people
who
can
give
you
feedback
and
sort
of
give
you
a
heads
up
like.
Oh,
no,
no,
no.
B
D
Kathleen
question
for
you,
because
you
had
sent
out
that,
like
the
sample
questionnaire
of
and
building
on
that
idea
of
reaching
out,
if
you
have
a
personal
relationship,
if
we
can
identify
as
a
commission
that
we
actually
know
you
know
somebody,
everybody
or
somebody
on
the
committee
knows
somebody
on
most
of
the
boards
and
commissions
that
we're
prioritizing
and
would
be
willing
to
have
a
you
know,
a
one-on-one
conversation.
One
of
the
things
I'm
wondering
is
that
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know.
D
So
there
could
be
boards
and
commissions
that
are
already
doing
something
right
and
maybe
kimberly
richardson
knows
that
they're
not,
but
I
don't
think
it's
safe
to
assume.
D
You
know
in
evanston
that
we're
the
only
ones
thinking
about
equity
and,
like
the
homelessness
commission,
may
already
have
the
gear
tool
or
the
casey
tool
or
whatever
or
they're,
always
or
they're.
You
know
they're,
they're,
so
diverse
and
they're,
so
rich
in
the
the
commission
that
they're,
you
know
thinking
about
it
all
the
time.
D
So
I
guess
one
of
the
things
I'd
want
to
do
is
is
see
what's
out
there
first
before
kind
of
coming
in
with
with
our
stuff,
because
unless
kimberly
richardson,
you
know
that
it's
not
happening
or
you
can,
we
can
safely
or
somebody
else
knows
we
can
safely
say
we're
we're
the
lead
on
this.
You
know,
maybe
we're
actually
not
the
lead,
and
somebody
else
is
doing
this
work,
which
would
be
awesome
right.
If
somebody
was
I.
C
Think
that
just
supports
kathleen's
point
of
doing
some
of
the
surveys
in
it.
You
know
before
we
go
and
like
present
to
them,
so
we
get
a
sense
of
where
they're
at,
but
I
also
don't
want
us
to
confuse
any
group
having
diverse
members
and
a
group
being
committed
to
equity,
because
that's
not
brown
people
did
not
equal
equity.
C
C
That
would
be
the
library
board
because
they
have
been
doing
this
work
for
many
years
now
through
their
staff.
I
don't
know
how
well
I
can't
speak
to
so
I'm
not
following
that
closely
in
the
arts
council
and
only
reason
why
I
know
the
arts
council
is
because
I've
been
working
with
them,
one
on
one,
with
their
redesigning
and
implementation
other
than
that,
because
we
haven't
had
a
lot
of
internal
work
with
staff.
C
There's
not
gonna,
see
that
correlation
externally
with
boards
and
commissions.
I
think
there's
some
work
beginning
to
happen
with
the
mental
health
board,
but
the
staff
is
doing
that
work,
not
the
board
itself.
C
So
I
would
say
that
majority
of
our
boards
and
commissions
are
still
on
the
diversity
and
inclusion
aspect
of
the
conversation
and
not
the
equity,
racial
equity.
And
that's
where,
from
my
standpoint,
we're
at.
B
And
you
know
just
to
answer
your
question
kathy,
so
I
I
do
think
it's
a
good
idea,
and
it's
just
a
smart
optics,
move
to
sort
of
do
a
survey
right
to
sort
of
give
people
the
opportunity
to
say
what
they're
doing,
even
though
it
might
not
match
up
with
the
definition,
the
working
definition
you
guys
have
or
what
we
understand,
what
racial
equity
work
really
entails.
So
at
least
you're
hearing
what
people
think
that
means,
and
that
will
arm
you.
B
B
So
they're
probably
going
to
be
happy
that
more
boards
and
commissions
are
tackling
it
through
a
racial
equity
lens,
so
they're,
not
the
only
ones
that
have
to
always
compensate
for
all
of
the
things
that
may
be
a
big
blind
spot
in
certain
groups,
assessment
of
what
they
should
they
should
be
doing.
So
that
is
like
truly
like
the
leveraging
that
structural
role
that
you
guys
the
authority
you
guys
have
as
a
peer
right.
B
So
that's
it!
That's
a
great
question.
Oh
look!
So
here's
the
thing,
so
I
I'm
I'm.
I
wrote
this
down
because
I
do
think
that
a
bit
of
a
an
application
of
the
darcy
and
timeline
like
once
once
we
get
past
the
just
the
discussion
around
the
vision
and
mission
won't
hurt.
I
promise
this
time
around
if
I
send
out
something
I'll
put
time
sensitive
or
something
in
in
the
subject
line.
So
people
know
because
I
guess
that
was
a
little
too
subtle
for
everyone.
B
But
but,
as
you
can
tell
like
again,
I
was
trying
to
adapt
this
for
a
very
short
period
of
time,
but
the
next
steps
really
would
be
thinking
about.
You
know
what
are
these
next
steps?
You
know
around
outreach
and
you
know
who's
gonna
create
the
survey.
Do
we
need
help
doing
that?
I
mean
you
know.
The
point
was
raised
earlier
that
the
ywc
of
evanston
has
been
doing
this
work
and
they
would
probably
be
very
happy
to
partner
or
something
I
don't
know
what
like,
but
that's
all
like.
B
You
need
to
darcy
that
out.
He
said
I'm
saying
like
somebody
needs
to
be
an
r
on
then
reaching
out
to
ywca
and,
having
that
conversation
right,
the
a
of
that
piece
of
work
needs
to
be
held
accountable,
that
you're
meeting
deadlines
so
that
you
can
execute
something
by
mid-year
next
year.
That
would
be
great.
It
would
be
wonderful
to
do.
You
know
after
you've
done
all
the
legwork,
a
big
public
meeting
or
something
that
really
launches
something
a
collaborative
with
other
bcc's.
B
But
you
know
you
got
to
work
backwards
from
that
and
see
if
you
know
what
what
bandwidth
everyone
has
with
that
said,
I
I
want
to
just
touch
a
little
bit
on
the
vision
and
mission
kimberly
raised
the
fact
that
she's,
like
it's
late,
so
I
don't
know
how
much
more
brain
power
people
are
gonna
have.
So
let
me
just
share
with
you
what
I
proposed,
and
maybe
we
all
agree
that
okay
yeah,
we
have
energy
break
us
out
into
rooms
or
oh
hell.
B
B
Just
what
what
is
what
is
an
actual
project
that
contains
those
really
good
elements
of
having
structural
sort
of
leveraging
your
structural
value,
your
authority
really
not
dropping
into
like
individual
projects,
that's
going
to
burn
up
a
lot
of
your
time
or
eat
up
a
lot
of
your
energy,
but
really
helping
you
think
about
like
those
institutional
changes
that
can
be
made.
B
B
We
talked
about
networks
with
other
commissioners
who
are
open
to
incorporating
this
racial
equity
focus
in
their
specific
focus
areas,
training
and
engagement
pilot
projects.
So
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
I
will
predict
is,
if
you
guys,
are
very
successful
in
just
the
the
first,
this
first
project,
which
is
to
seed
racial
equity
and
to
start
connecting
these
commissions
together
around
that
wonderful
outcome,
you're
gonna
get
sucked
into
stuff
right.
People
are
gonna,
start
throwing
things
at
you
or
they're
gonna,
be
like
oh.
No.
B
We
need
your
help
with
this,
and
so
you
know
part
of
what
the
maybe
year
two
and
what
I'm
saying
why
you
need
like
a
three
year
plan.
Is
there
might
be
a
couple
of
projects
that
you
guys
decide
as
a
d
yeah?
We
should
really
work
on
this
and
first
we're
going
to
figure
out
the
darcy
and
the
reality
track
around
the
timeline
and
all
that
stuff.
B
But
we
want
to
try
to
do
this
right,
so
that
still
means
that
we
need
a
mission
statement
because
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
stuff
thrown
at
you,
okay.
So
this
is
what
I
we
pulled
this
from
the
charter
and
I'm
just
calling
it
the
vision.
It's
actually
a
terrible
vision
statement.
So
never
have
a
vision
statement
like
this,
because
it's
about
90
words
too
long,
but
I
just
wanted
us
to
read
this,
because
this
is
what
currently
exists
in
that
charter,
and
when
I
read
it
I
was
like.
B
B
To
achieve
this
goal,
we
are
working
to
identify
and
eliminate
all
barriers
that
limit
or
prevent
residents,
full
access
to
programs,
processes
and
facilities,
regardless
of
all
that
all
the
stuff,
okay,
so
you're
supposed
to
be
working
to
identify
and
eliminate
all
barriers,
all
of
them
that
limit
or
prevent
residents
full
access
to
everything
right.
Let's
just
this
is
a
vision.
B
B
B
A
A
couple
thoughts
kathleen
the
second
paragraph
is
really
mostly
about
public
engagement
and
empowerment,
and
the
doesn't
seem
to
have
a
lot
to
do
with
equity
right,
maybe
tangentially
and
and
the
first
is
so
general.
B
I
just
kept
on
asking
how
like
just
I
and
and
how
there
is
an
answer,
and
actually,
when
I
started
thinking
over
and
over
again,
I'm
like.
I
really
think
this
is
the
case.
I
don't
know
for
those
of
you
who
remember
having
to
write
papers
for
grad,
school
or
undergrad
or
in
high
school
or
whatever
right,
especially
when
you're
writing
a
paper
for
like
a
sociology
class.
A
It's
something
I
find
myself
wondering,
there's
a
human
being
who
wrote
this
and
who
knows
if
you
know
where
it
came
from,
did
they
pull
it
from
some
other
municipal
website
that
this
sounds
like
pretty
good
basic
language,
we'll
put
this
into
the
the
enabling
ordinance
and
they
might
be
surprised
to
know
that
we're
looking
to
parse
some
of
this
to
divine,
if
it's
relevant
to
us-
and
I
think
to
your
point-
maybe
this
is
not
our
our
thesis
statement
here.
B
And
whatever,
so
you
know,
my
my
recommendation
is
change
the
thesis
paragraph
to
fit
what
it
is
that
you've
learned,
what
the
analysis
is
really
leading
you
to,
so
that
it
it's
just
a
it's
reflecting
better.
What
you
have
actually
discovered
in
the
in
that
time
can
I
move
forward.
C
B
Can't
see
you
guys,
so
I
don't
know
so
breaking
down
the
vision
statement.
Right
so
remember,
our
mission
should
focus
on
what
the
eec
has
the
most
reasonable
control
and
influence
over
right.
So
when
you
have
a
vision
statement,
that's
like
you're
gonna,
eliminate
all
the
barriers
in
all
of
the
things,
that's
already
kind
of
setting
up
expectations
that
I'm
like.
Oh,
I
would
never.
No
that's
that's
a
lot
right,
keeping
in
mind
that
capacity
of
the
capacity
and
time
constraints
of
members
and
so
we're
breaking
it
down,
and
really
I'm
just
trying
to
get.
E
B
Right,
I
mean
we
didn't
know.
Covert
was
going
to
happen
this
year,
so
you
know
the
exercise
would
have
been
refer
to
the
vision
language
shared
in
the
previous
slide
and
identify
some
sentences
where
I,
the
only
way
I
could
think
of,
like
more
specific
mechanisms
of
implementation
of
implementing
racial
equity
can
happen
so
use
the
exercise
we
just
went
through
with
the
bcc
review
project
as
an
example
right.
So
as
we
started
drilling
in-
and
you
know,
you
guys
really
started
thinking,
okay.
B
B
B
B
B
So
easy
specific
right
so
think
about
a
three
year.
Oh
sorry,
all
right,
so
here
the
second
one
right
I
just
repeated
so
remember
our
mission
is
focusing
on
what
we
have
reasonable
control
and
influence
over
right,
because
the
mission
statements
also
like
people
are
going
to
want
to
know
like.
Why
are
you
talking
to
me
like
I'm
on
the
library
board?
Why
are
you
reaching
out
to
me
mission
statement
right?
B
So
the
eec's
three-year
mission
is
two
dot
dot
dot.
I
know
this
is
the
hardest
part.
Everyone
everything
I've
seen
it's
like,
try
to
keep
it
at
20
words
or
less.
So
you,
the
word
smithing,
is
the
first
version
is
going
to
probably
be
50
words,
and
then
you
have
to
keep
on
scrubbing,
so
use
the
list
of
specific
actions
and
impacts.
You
all
identified
to
create
the
mission
statement.
C
B
C
C
Would
they
like
some
time
to
sit
and
look
at
this
language
a
little
bit
more
and
kind
of
work
through
themselves
and
then
come
back
at
the
next
meeting
to
do
breakout
groups
or
do
you
all
want
to
go
ahead
and
do
the
breakout
groups
tonight
being
that
is
7
42?
So
I
just
want
to
give
you
that
option
and
then
you
all
can
decide.
C
B
And
again,
just
like
our
first
breakout,
there's
no
right
answer.
This
is
really
about
you,
guys
connecting
and
communicating
and
thinking
through
what
what
the
first
steps
or
what
should
be
in
there
right.
So
I'm
not
expecting
perfection
right.
It's
just
it's
really
like
using
using
these
prompts
to
to
start
thinking
about
what
what
should
our
mission
be
right,
so
I
mean,
if
you
guys,
are
I'm
here,
I'm
not
going
anywhere
like
you
alejandra,
I
I
mean
I
probably
would
have
been
watching
30
rock
reruns
with
my
daughter.
So
it's
really
okay,
it's
still
fun!
B
I'm
forgoing
that.
But
you
know
why
don't
we
break
out
oops
and
then
that's
really
and
I'll
set
it
up.
So
I
can
take
notes,
but
you
guys
have
these
slides
right
and
really
the.
Let
me
just
highlight
this:
it's
really
to
use
this
structure
and
again,
if
you
guys
can't
get
it
to
20.
Don't
worry
about
the
word
limit.
It's
that's
the
ideal.
Okay.
B
What
we're
saying
is
that
you
know
try
to
think
through
and
start
with
slide
just
start
with
a
section
right
slide.
19
has
some
of
the
things
that
we
we've
been
talking
about
slide
20
has
the
current
language
that
you
probably
will
be
like
wait.
What
I
mean
there's
some
things
in
here
that
I
think
you
should
keep
right,
but
it's
it's
a
lot
so
and.
A
Then
yeah
I
was
thinking,
could
we
use
the
the
time
and
breakout
rooms,
maybe
not
to
write
our
20
word
statement
if
it
actually
strings
together
in
a
few
sentences?
Great
but
maybe
just
kind
of
identify?
What
would
be
the
the
essential
nuggets
for
us
of
a
mission
statement
and-
and
I
I
for
wordsmithing-
I'm
sorry-
I'm
gonna
be
better
at
nine
in
the
morning
for
wordsmithing
than
close
to
nine
at
night,
but
maybe
we
could
just
identify
those
things
that
we
think
would
be
our
top
priorities
to
be
included
in
a
mission
statement.
A
So
whether
it's
phrases,
whether
it's
and
I
think
about
the
mission
statement-
is
how
do
we
define
what
our
lane
is
and
and
maybe
there's
a
way
to
then
just
in
our
breakout
rooms,
kind
of
distill
it
down
to
its
essence,
is.
B
B
A
C
Right
so
we
got,
I
feel
like
we
got
a
lot
done.
We
we
wanted
to
differentiate
the
vision
and
mission
because
we
felt
like
in
our
vision
we
really
wanted
to
talk
about
the
championing
like
we
want
to
really
champion
the
dismantlement
of
structural
racism,
but
that's
the
big
vision
right,
and
so
we
wanted
to
one
use
at
least
create
some
language
in
our
vision.
That
is
broad,
big
picture,
but
that
also
calls
out
structural
racism.
C
We
wanted
to
be
very
specific,
and
so
we
talked
about
the
development
and
facilitation
of
shared
language
on
racial
equity
across
bcc's
we
want
we
will
develop
and
facilitate
the
use
of
a
shared
reia
across
bcc's,
and
we
wanted
to
develop
maybe
like
a
bi-annual
or
every
five-year
kind
of
reia
r-e-I-a
like
index
or
report
card
that
possibly
bcc's
would
be
you
know
evaluated
on.
B
E
A
Which
means
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
defer
to
max
here
all.
E
Right,
can
you
maybe
kathleen
if
you
click
on
the
one,
because
your
your
screen
is
being
shared?
If
you
click
on
the
one
in
the
chat,
I
think
kimberly
just
put
in
there.
E
A
B
Just
I
gotta,
I
just
realized,
I'm
just
sharing
right,
voila,
nice.
E
So
I
can
start,
but
any
anyone
jump
in
we
kind
of
started.
Well,
we
we
wanted
to
put
racial
equity
in
in
the
center.
It
was
more
just
riffing
trying
to
capture
key
things.
We
want
in
the
mission
statement
some
verbs,
you
know,
act,
active
action,
verbs,
advance
and
power
direct.
E
The
outstanding
questions
of
with
whom
who's
the
audience
and
for
whom
and
then
maybe
carla,
do
you
mind
you
want
to
talk
about
the?
How.
C
Sure
I'm
zooming
in
here,
because
I
can't
see
so
we
don't
need
to
be
some
piece
about
bringing
the
interests
and
the
priorities
of
the
community
to
guide
our
work,
so
we're
not
deciding
what's
a
priority,
taking
an
asset-based
view
of
racial
identities.
Instead
of
focusing
on
what's
wrong
and
what's
broken
but
like
what's
working
and
how
can
we
improve
what's
working
and
what
what
is
being
done?
C
You
know
I
don't
have
the
priorities
yet
I
may
not
still
be
desired
but
somewhere
and
they
should
say
with
an
emphasis
on
housing,
city,
employment,
meaning
employment
within
the
city
or
creating
more.
I
don't
know
what
what
what
lanes
we
want
to
focus
on
equity
within,
but
we
should
go.
We
should
outline
that,
as
opposed
to
boiling
the
equity
ocean
having
a
space
for
items
that
seem
important,
but
they
aren't
within
current
parameters,
so
I
don't
think
a
space.
C
I
don't
know
if
it's
all
about
space,
but
we
should
have
some.
I
think
this
was
a
side
note
that
we
should
create
some
sort
of
tool
that
would
help
us
decide
what
decide
whether
something
comes
onto
our
docket
and
is
something
we
work
on
based
on
how
we,
what
we
have
decided
our
mission
and
our
focus
should
be
on
and
then
evaluating
all
our
decisions
based
on
some
sort
of
relative.
You
know
equity-based
tool,
so
that's
it.
B
So
carla,
can
I
ask
you
just
a
clarifying
question:
how
how
it
or
does
it
does
the
the
bcc
project
fit
in
like
when
you
were
talking
about
employment
in
the
city
and
stuff?
Is
there
a
connection
in
in
your
mind
of
how
some
of
the
stuff
fits
together,
or
is
this
a
completely
separate
thing
or.
C
I
was
in
the
impression
this
is
a
mission
statement
for
the
entire
group,
not
a
mission
receiving
for
that
project.
Am
I
wrong?
No.
B
You're
not
wrong
yeah,
but
you're
does
that
did
that
project
inform
some
of
the
thinking
around
like
so
what
what
is
the
connection
then
like
when
you
talk
about
employment
in
the
city
right
because
we
we
started
going
the
way
I
started
us
off
was
like
getting
into
details
like
just
kind
of
getting
into
those
mechanisms
of?
How
would
we
create
that
change?
How
do
we
influence
those
structural
processes?
B
C
Equity
is
important
to
the
city
and
when
they
employ
new,
when
they
employ
new,
you
know
when
they
bring
on
new
employees,
then
there
should
be
some
sort
of
equity
pass
in
there.
Somehow.
C
So
right
now,
there's
no
lens
factory
as
we
do
unemployment,
so,
if
part
of
our
job,
if
we
we
decide
we're
going
to
focus
on
the
employment
at
the
city,
how
are
we
creating
a
system
or
process
or
helping
oversee
or
whatever
the
nice
verbs
we
have
over?
There.
B
C
We
decide
that
housing
is
one
of
our
emphasis.
How
are
we
working
to
align
move
forward?
Push
advance
housing,
zoning,
whatever
changes
again
we're
not
making
the
final
decisions,
but
how
are
we
helping
advance,
more
affordable
housing
in.
B
A
D
C
A
C
That's
just
the
police
environment
right,
it's
just
police
and
fire,
but
it
is
a
one-word
commission
that
does
have
that.
But
it's
it's
based
off
of
federal
guidelines,
so
yeah
right,
but
internally,
that's
something
that
we
should
look
at
as
an
internal
structure
to
create,
because
internally,
policies
and
procedures
when
it
comes
to
the
human
resource
side
of
things,
it's
a
sign
off
by
the
city
manager.
So
I
think
that
is
something
that
should
be
internally
reviewed
as
a
policy
process.
E
B
If
you
want
to
talk
about
employment
process,
if
there's
no
border
commission
that
even
touches
on
that
and
then
just
understanding
that
there's
a
lot
of
federal
and
state
regulations,
how?
How
would
we
get
there
without
this?
Turning
into
like
that
big
project
that
would
suck
up
everyone's
time
to
try
to
get
there
and
note.
A
A
C
C
B
Let
me
let
me
share
the
final
slide,
so
we
can
wrap
up
a
little
bit.
Oh,
I
shared
the
wrong
slide.
Sorry,
okay,
here's
what
I'm
sharing!
If
I
can
my
my
motor
functions
are
failing
me
now.
So
excuse
me,
pardon
me
so
I
know
this
was
not
enough
time,
but
I
really
appreciate
you
guys
spending
the
time
even
just
getting
there.
What
I
captured
was
alejandra
your
groups
stuff
and
then
I
just
cut
and
pasted
this
into
the
second
slide.
So
we
have
it.
B
So,
let's
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
next
steps
and
action
items.
I
think
that
we
did
learn
about
the
darcy
we
weren't
successful
in
applying
darcy,
but
hopefully
that's
something
that
you
know
we
can
resurrect
like
later
on.
In
a
future
session,
we
did
map
out
what
a
bc
pro
bcc
project
would
kind
of
look
like
in
detail,
and
we
began
to
refine
the
eec's
mission
statement.
B
Really
the
two
next
steps
that
I
could
think
about,
and
I
mean
again
like
there's
when
kimberly
asked
me
to
help
with
the
facilitation
the
structuring
of
your
strategic
retreat.
She
told
me
that
there
were
two
sessions,
and
I
was
happy
to
do
this,
because
I
see
this
as
both
the
inside
environment
game
that
you
know
I
have
to
focus
on
in
terms
of
government
and
public
administration,
but
the
external
strengthening
external
allies
and
what
they're
doing
is
very
important
as
well
to
the
success
of
the
internal
environment.
B
So
I
committed
to
that,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
talk
a
little
bit
about,
like
just
my
lack
of
bandwidth,
to
really
engage
in
a
lot
of
deep
thinking
about
these
next
steps.
But
I
think
that
at
least
the
two
that
I
could
imagine
is
to
finalize
a
full
plan
for
this
bcc
project,
including
the
darcy,
and
you
know
a
timeline
just
just
a
just
for
you
guys
to
even
to
say:
okay
does
this
have
legs
like
can?
B
B
I
do
think
that
that
would
be
a
real
concrete,
like
I
wouldn't
spend
months
and
months
on
it,
but
especially
if
you're
going
to
start
doing
this
outreach
or
issue
a
survey
and
engage
with
people,
you
probably
do
want
at
least
something
revised
so
that
they
see
that
this
is
part
of
like
what
you
guys
are
doing
like.
This
is
a
very
clear
activity
in
lane
to
use
your
term
jane
like
this.
This
is
a
clear
lane.
This
is
the
lane
that
we're
in
we're
going
to
get
this
done.
A
A
I'm
always
looking
just
to
try
to
figure
out
how
this
translates
to
an
agenda.
You
know
a
public
agenda
for
our
next
meeting
and
what
would
be
on
that
agenda
and
perhaps
at
our
next
meeting
in
december,
if
we
had
a
an
outline
for
what
the
plan
would
be
for
the
bcc
project,
like
a
a
draft
that
we
could
respond
to,
which
could
be
the
darcy
for
what
this
looks
like,
and
I
think
we've
got
enough
information
about
how
we
would
how
we
would
go
at
it.
B
Well,
so
this
is
where
the
darcy
becomes
handy,
jane,
so
there's
two
very
concrete
things
that
have
to
be
prepped
for
next.
The
next
agenda-
I
know
we're
all
busy,
but
is
there
somebody
who's
willing
to
step
up
and
be
the
a
for
one
of
these
two
things
right
so,
for
example,
under
revising
the
charter,
you're
gonna
need
someone
to
actually
draft
draft
new
language,
ensure
commission
reads
and
provides
feedback,
probably
not
a
bad
idea
to
include
kimberly
richardson
in
feedback
loop,
okay,
so
that
can
be
three
separate
people
right.
B
If
somebody
loves
drafting
stuff,
you
should
be
the
r
on
drafting
new
language.
If
somebody
likes
sort
of
hurting
cats,
then
you
should
ensure
commission
reads
and
provides
feedback
and
looping
in
kim
and
then
maybe
jane
or
alejandra,
as
coaches
like
you
guys,
should
be
the
a's.
That
means
if
this
doesn't
happen,
you
are
the
accountable
and-
and
you
will
then
reach
out
and
make
sure
it
does
happen
right,
but
you
need
more
help
like
you
can
shouldn't
have
to
do
all
of
this.
C
B
B
All
right,
jane
is
a
so
jane
that
what
that
basically
means
is
alejandra's
just
said
you
know,
and
and
rightfully
so
hey
I'm
gonna
have
this
done,
but
that
means
you
might
need
to
loop
in
with
alejandra
and
be
like
hey.
I
just
heard
from
kim
that
she's
going
on
vacation.
So
actually
she
needs
this
like
in
two
and
a
half
weeks.
Can
we
do
that
right?
Like
you
you're,
the
one
that's
gonna
have
to
bring
it
across
the
finish
line
and
just
loop
in
make
sure
that
you
know.
B
Alejandra
knows
if
there's
like
changes
in
timeline
make
sure
that
everyone
on
the
commission
signs
off
or
lays
eyes
on
it.
How
about
something
like
the
draft
outline
for
the
bcc
project?
Does
anyone
have
a
burning
desire?
I
I
love
stuff
like
this.
I
don't
have
any
time
to
do
it,
but
I
love
drafting
out
new
program
ideas
but
who's
who's
down
for
taking
a
crack
at
this.
B
So
here
let
me
let
me
just
draft
activities,
deliverables
and.
B
E
I
don't
I
don't
mind
I
could
take
a
stab
at
it,
I'm
a
little
bit
for
both
of
these
things.
I
wanna
I'm
a
little
bit
intrigued
by
car.
What
carla
brought
up
with
one
two
three
with
having
three-
and
I
know
that
will
be
very,
very
hard
to
settle
on
those
one
two
three,
but
I
think
both
for
the
mission
statement
and
for
the
project.
E
It
would
help
to
have
some
parameters
about
how
many,
how
much
which
ones,
I
think,
what
I'm,
what
I've
been
learning
through
these
retreats
and
through
these
meetings,
is
when
we
say
all
of
evanston
or
all
boards
and
commissions
or
when,
when
we
go
off
and
select
our
own,
I'm
not
sure
we're
going
to
get
the
data
that
will
actually
help
us
have
an
impact,
I'm
trying
to
think
of
it
like
smart
goals
right
like
like,
when
we
actually
have
some
parameters
around
what
we're.
What
we're
gathering
then.
B
E
E
B
Okay,
so
we
have
to
come
up
with
an
r
title
for
you,
so
max
is
going
to
draft
it,
but
kimberly
k,
y
m
d
e
r
is.
B
A
B
B
You
know,
and
and
again
like
the
this
can
and
the
d
is
all
of
you
guys
right
who's
going
to
be
the
a
see.
This
is
where,
like
you
well,
I
think.
That's
me
again.
B
B
Next
meeting
is
december
17th,
so
I
know
that
you
all
have
copies
of
this
slide
deck.
You
might
not.
You
know.
The
best
thing
to
do
guys
is
when
you
are
when
you
want
to
change
them,
because
I
think
I
only
have
you
as
viewers,
because
I've
done
it
before
where
everyone's
had
editing
and
then
I
go
to
get
my
slide
deck
and
everything's
like
all
messed
up.
B
E
B
C
I
think
we're
good
I'll
hand
you
over
to
jane
and
you
waiting
out
the
meeting.