►
From YouTube: Rules Committee Meeting 6-3-2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Before
we
get
started
and
I'll
open
this
up,
we've
we've
had
a
few
joys
and
concerns
both
in
the
community
and
and
nationwide
and
Joy's.
First
go
out
to
all
the
graduates
of
district
65
and
202
I
would
love
to
extend
congratulations
on
behalf
of
our
city,
councilor
mayor
council
members
in
clerk
to
all
the
families
who
celebrated
elementary
junior
high
high
school
college
graduated.
Anyone
who
pays
attention
to
social
media
number
of
graduations
that
were
celebrated
this
past
weekend.
So
congratulations
to
all
the
families
that
are
in
town
a
concern.
A
Obviously,
we've
all
heard
about
the
recent
shooting
in
Virginia,
Beach
and
I
think
it
would
be
very
appropriate
if
we
could
just
have
a
moment
of
silence
to
think
about
our
responsibilities
and,
more
importantly,
about
the
families
and
friends
that
have
been
impacted
by
the
violence
in
Virginia
Beach.
So
if
we
could
just
have
a
moment
of
silence,
please.
B
It'll
be
ironic
for
me
to
say
this,
but
I
really
don't
I
didn't
want
to
come
here
tonight.
I
wasn't
planning
to
coming
here
tonight
until
I
saw
the
agenda
and
I
felt
I
needed
to
I'm,
asking
that
you
vote
against
the
proposed
free
speech
restrictions
signs,
banners
speaking
in
whatever
form
our
First
Amendment
rights,
and
we
should
maintain
those
City
Council
members
should
look
at
ways
to
make
communication
with
constituents
easier,
more
productive
and
more
rewarding.
B
Instead,
the
city
has
gone
out
of
its
way
in
recent
weeks
to
make
communications
with
constituents
more
difficult
and
frustrating,
all
of
which
leads
to
escalating
animosity
and
I.
Don't
know
why
we're
going
down
this
path.
Last
week
the
City
Council
voted
to
restrict
FOIA
FOIA
process
and
to
curtail
the
City
Clerk's
Authority
the
week
before
the
city
manager,
exploited
citizens
who
came
to
a
meeting
hoping
to
be
to
receive
factual
answers
about
Robert
crowd
center.
Instead,
there
was
a
90
minute
meeting
or
I'm.
Sorry
movie
that
really
didn't
answer
any
of
our
questions.
B
There
is
speculation
circulating
that
a
deals
in
the
works
behind
the
scenes
regarding
northwestern
allowing
the
university
society
step.
Zoning
restrictions
and
people
are
already
asking
when
will
that
come
to
light,
trust
and
elected
officials
is
at
an
all-time
low
Trustin
and
the
non
elected
administrators
is
virtually
non-existent
for
the
restrictions
against
free
speech
at
city
meetings
will
sever.
Whatever
trust
is
left,
please
vote
against
staffs
recommendations
to
restrict
First
Amendment
rights.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
I'm
also
in
concurrence
with
regard
with
regard
to
the
fact
that
we
can't
eliminate
the
bad
reactions
that
you
get
people
being
human
when
they're
not
being
heard
and
the
accountability
belongs
on
both
parties
and
it
seems
to
be
pointed
especially
Denver,
which
is
very
conservative
toward
the
victims,
who
are
the
ones
who
are
trying
to
speak
out.
We
have
police
procedures
and
things
that
are
being
discussed.
I,
see
them
also
lacking
in
terms
of
what
I
saw
between
the
two
meetings
are.
C
Comparing
the
comments
between
this
meeting
and
the
human
services
meeting
and
I
see
that
there's
a
deficiency
in
terms
of
outside
input
and
the
outside
input
is
something
the
only
thing
that
we
can
get
and
the
closest
we
can
get
is
to
that
is
through
Clerk
City
city
clerk.
Read
so
I
suggest
that
when
we're
shuffling
things
around,
we
listened
to
him
and
his
wise
advice
and
well
educated
advice,
extremely
educated
advice,
making
mistakes
like
the
rest
of
us,
some
of
which,
if
you
hear
the
whole
story,
it's
not
his
fault.
C
Do
you
have
your
goals
and
those
goals
are
used
to
help
the
next
person
decide
what
they
want
from
that
next
person
either
replaces
you
or
goes
on
to
something
else.
We
don't
I,
don't
have
the
list,
I,
don't
know
if
that's
available,
if
that's
a
FOIA
kind
of
thing,
but
we
should
know
what
Wally's
responsibilities
are
and
if
we're
going
to
work
on
a
future
position,
we
should
find
out
what
are
those
things
as
a
community.
We
say:
hey
Wally.
This
is
really
great.
The
next
persons
has
to
do
the
same
thing
or
Wally.
C
This
could
be
done
differently
so
before
we
get
somebody,
while
I
can
decide
that
he
wants
to
change
something
that
gives
him
that's.
What
I
would
want
is
a
leader
to
know
what
I
could
change
that
would
make
things
better
for
the
people
I'm
working
with
and
I've
done,
it
so
I'm
speaking
from
experience
and
it
works.
So.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
D
Then
the
numbers
of
FOIAs
will
start
to
drop
again.
Then
we
will
start
to
believe
the
things
that
you're
telling
us
that
a
5
o'clock
Friday
before
a
three-day
weekend
was
just
happenstance,
that
that
happened
for
a
vote
on
a
Tuesday
night.
Until
then,
I
don't
think
that
you
squelching
public
input
and
trying
to
limit
what
we're
trying
to
say
to
you
is
going
to
help
the
situation.
Thank
you.
Thank.
E
In
the
seventh
ward,
you've
heard
what
I've
had
to
say
before
I
did
have
a
first
and
Fourteenth
Amendment
lawsuit.
We
were
ten
days
from
setting
the
supreme
court
date
and
when
the
navy
settled
out
of
court-
and
that
was
a
First
Amendment
right-
that
I
thought
I'd
earned
over
here
at
Haven
school
that
there
are
certain
rights
that
can't
be
taken
away
from
you
and
the
Navy
agreed
with
me.
You
can
look
it
up.
It's
the
ACLU
took
the
case.
E
It
was
Cruz
versus
Chafee,
so
I
just
wanted
to
emphasize
that
that
I
believe
some
of
our
rights
are
being
taken
away
here.
The
right
to
clap
it
may
be
prefer
we
did.
This
I
haven't
had
time
to
read
the
the
docket,
but
I
saw
your
the
previous
docket
was
388
pages.
I,
don't
know.
If
all
of
you
have
read
it,
I,
don't
know
how
you
could
expect
everybody
in
town
to
read
it.
E
A
A
F
F
This
was
the
last
place,
I
thought
I
was
gonna,
be
today
until
I
saw
the
agenda
and
I
was
incredibly
disappointed
that
this
is
coming
up
and
again,
but
it
always
feels
like
the
residents
are
being
blamed.
I
agree
with
everyone
who
spoke
before
me.
I
think
that
the
reason
people
are
so
upset
is
because
we
do
not
feel
that
the
truth
is
being
said
and
when
you
talk
to
people
and
you
keep
slamming
the
door
in
their
face
and
have
contrived
conversations
that
are
supposed
to
be
spontaneous
like
the
last
week's
meeting
was
horrendous.
F
I
thought
the
meeting
before
that
90
minute
video
when
people
they
asked
for
a
discussion
is
just
outlandish
and
I
will
also
say
that
their
conversation
and
alderman
Fiske
and
Michelle
Mason
cup
I
thought
was
not
even
close
to
being
spontaneous.
It
was
actually
so
pre-arranged
to
asking
about
the
FOIA
information,
whatever
that
was,
or
maybe
it
wasn't,
but
it
certainly
didn't
look
very
conveniently,
like
you
guys
did
to
say,
I'm
gonna
ask
you
these
foils
and
then
you
all
of
a
sudden
have
the
answer.
I
mean
guys.
We
are
a
lot
of
us.
F
Are
fairly
smart,
we're
not
brilliant
all
the
time,
but
I
wish.
You
would
give
us
the
credit
and
I
think
you
guys
need
as
much
work
with
the
problem.
Solving
there's
people
in
this
town
who
can
do
problem-solving
and
work
it
and
I
know
Eleanor.
We
spoke
with
someone
whose
job
is
to
work
with
corporations
to
do
team
building,
and
you
all
could
use
it
to
doing
that,
and
so.
Thank
you
very
much.
G
Congress
shall
make
no
law
respecting
an
establishment
of
religion
or
prohibiting
the
free
exercise
thereof
or
abridging
the
freedom
of
speech
or
of
the
press
or
the
right
of
the
people
peaceably
to
assemble
and
to
position
to
petition
the
government
for
a
redress
of
grievances
for
years
I
taught
the
constitution
in
this
city.
I
would
like
to
see
it
be
in
effect.
Maybe
you
all
should
go
back
and
read
it
again
to
realize
what
our
rights
are
as
citizens
and
any
attempt
to
try
to
subjugate
supplement.
G
H
H
Okay,
you,
you
gave
an
apology
to
her.
What
about
the
rest
of
us?
Her
complaint
was
the
same
as
ours.
Our
questions
were
not
addressed.
I
watched
the
video
okay
that
you
wanted
us
to
watch
for
90
minutes,
I.
Believe
one
question
was
answered
that
was
on
our
list.
Okay,
this
whole
this
whole
problem
with
decorum.
H
It
boils
down
to
one
word:
it's
I've
been
talking
about
it
for
a
year
and
a
half,
it's
discussion.
Why
do
you
have
a
problem
with
discussion
discussing
with
the
residents
what
what
they
need?
What
they
want?
Peter
said:
there's
agitators
I
suppose
there
are
I,
suppose
I'm.
One
of
them
question
is:
what
are
those
people
agitated
about?
You
might
want
to
ask
that
question.
H
Our
city
manager
said
he
didn't
want
to
have
a
discussion,
because
the
discussions
were
contentious.
Okay,
I've
seen
contentious
discussions
here
from
city
council
members.
It
happens.
You
know,
people
have
their
opinion
and
everybody
has
the
right
to
disagree.
It's
fine
okay,
but
you
need
to
have
the
discussion
refusing
to
have
the
discussion
with
the
people
as
you're
doing
is
not
gonna
work
and,
as
Laurie
said,
that
JISC
is
gonna
get
worse.
So
hopefully
you
know
you'll
be
able
to
have
some
accountability
and
some
transparency
and
have
some
discussion.
H
I
requested
to
have
a
discussion,
a
town-hall
meeting
once
a
month,
so
that
people
can
air
their
thoughts,
their
concerns.
You
know-
and
it's
gotten
worse
rather
than
better
I,
don't
understand
it.
We
have
some
serious
questions
and
they're
just
being
ignored.
That's
a
problem,
big
problem!
Thank
you.
H
I
This
is
my
clerk:
Kat
I
am
taking
it
off
and
I'm
speaking
as
a
resident
today
and
I
am
speaking
to
ask
the
council
to
I've
made
one
of
these
requests
before,
which
is
that
we
need
an
Open
Meetings
Act
designee.
We
currently
have
not
designated
someone
as
such
and
I
believe.
The
clerk's
office
is
well
positioned
to
do
that.
I
Is
our
citizens
police
review
committee
that
existed
here
for
since
thoroughly
since
the
mid
2000s
since
about
around
2008
or
2009
that
committee
that
reviews
police
misconduct
complaints
had
been
meeting
outside
of
the
Open
Meetings
Act,
which
meant
that
there
was
no
public
notice
of
those
meetings
there
was
there
were
no
minutes
kept.
There's
no
public
comment
for
those
meetings
and
that's
a
very
important
committee
for
all
of
those
things
to
occur.
I
I
was
alerted
by
a
member
of
the
public
about
this,
and
I
was
able
to
step
in
and
I
know
that
alderman
Fleming
also
sent
some
emails,
but
I
was
able
to
step
in
and
resolve
that
internally
without
it
having
to
go
to
the
attorney
general's
office.
This
was
about
a
year
ago,
so
I
do
think
it's
important
for
this
rules
committee
to
designate
someone,
if
not
the
clerk's
office
as
the
Open
Meetings
Act.
I
Secondly,
I
believe
it's
important
for
our
city
to
have
someone
designated
as
a
parliamentarian,
someone
who
sees
it
as
their
role
to
look
into
all
of
our
council
rules
and
understand
Robert's
Rules
of
Order
prior
to
any
action
being
brought
forward.
Last
week
we
saw
resolution
57
our
19
brought
forward
as
a
special
order
of
business
and
our
council
rules.
18
point
11
say
that
any
matter
before
the
council
may
be
made
a
special
order
of
business
at
any
future
time
by
action
of
the
council.
I
When
we
put
things
on
the
agenda
as
a
special
order
of
business,
and
we
do
not
allow
that
majority
vote
at
a
previous
meeting,
we
deny
and
and
denigrate
the
rights
of
you
all
the
voting
members
to
to
seek
further
consideration
for
for
an
item.
We
deny
the
rights
of
the
public
to
fully
advocate
for
a
hold
or
for
15
more
seconds.
A
I
Deny
the
rights
of
the
public
to
four
I'm
sorry
I'm
holding
breath
we
didn't
otherwise
to
the
public,
to
advocate
to
their
council
members
to
hold
an
item
or
to
use
whatever
parliamentary
procedures
were
set
up
by
this
committee
and
adopted
by
this
committee
to
ensure
that
there
is
a
full
debate
of
public
policy
and
issues.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
the
time.
Thank
you.
A
J
K
Thank
you
and
the
the
Ethics
Board
has
reviewed
the
draft
proposals
and
I
understand
they're
in
the
process
of
putting
together
another
or
not
another,
but
putting
together
a
memo
with
some
suggested
revisions,
so
my
committee
won't
be
meeting
again
after
we
received
that
memo
from
them
committee
meeting
alderman
Wilson.
We
have
not
scheduled
that
yet
I
don't
have
the
memo
from
the
Ethics
Board,
but
my
intention
is
to
ensure
that
we
get
that
and
we
have
our
meeting
before
the
August
rules
date.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
L
M
Good
evening
Michelle
Mason
comes
City
Attorney
at
this
came
out
of
the
2017
election,
where
there
were
some
issues
with
filing
deadlines
and
the
law
department.
Just
added
this
to
the
list
of
things
to
review.
So
we
did
so
with
the
clerk's
office
and
with
the
Evanston
Public
Library,
so
that
the
law
librarian
at
the
public
library
looked
at
various
historical
records
and
we
can
find
no
over
act
done
by
the
City
Council
to
change
it
from
the
default,
which
is
a
part
of
an
election
to
a
nonpartisan
election.
M
N
Was
what
was
the
oldest
piece
of
information
you
had?
In
other
words
or
clerk,
read,
had
regarding
an
election?
Did
we
have
any
information
regarding
a
partisan
election
being
held
in
the
city
of
Evanston?
Did
we
have
any
information
regarding
any
kind
of
an
election
being
held?
What
information
did
you
have
I
find
the
information
you've
provided
us
having
no
basis
on
which
I
could
make
it
a
decision
going
forward?
I
mean
you're
telling
us
we
didn't
find
anything.
What
does
that
mean?
What
did
you
find?
You
found
you
found
information
about
elections
for
sure?
N
I
Mason
kept
I
think
bounced
it
to
me
right
now,
so
the
clerk's
office
did
some
initial
research
in
the
law.
Department
verified
our
research.
We
couldn't
find
an
example.
So,
in
order
to
be
designated
as
a
non
partisan
form
of
government,
it
would
require
a
referendum
that
would
go
to
the
public
in
our
research
of
the
records.
We
did
not
find
a
referendum
that
was
placed
on
the
ballot
that
specifically
designated
the
city.
M
N
You
know
I
I
see
you're
nobody's
providing
us.
It
said
all
of
a
sudden,
all
of
a
sudden
we're
saying
we're,
not
a
nonpartisan
form
of
government
and
I'm
I.
Just
would
like
us
to
do
other
than
like
people
are
saying
here
tonight
on
last
last:
Friday.
They
open
those
information
and
Lou
I
understand
what
they're
saying
now
they
open
their
your
packet
and
boom
they're.
N
Having
we're
having
a
meeting
tonight,
all
of
a
sudden
I
opened,
my
packet
and
boom
were
no
longer
than
I've,
been
in
like
40,000
elections
and
I've
run
in
a
nonpartisan
election.
Don't
tell
me
we're
not
a
nonpartisan
government,
because
we
are
and
I'd
like
to
know
every
single
community
in
the
state
of
Illinois
that
is
running
as
a
nonpartisan
away
as
a
nonpartisan
government,
how
many
of
them,
since
1980,
have
actually
had
a
nonpartisan
referendum,
how
many
or
how
many
of
them
have
just
continued
on
as
a
nonpartisan
government.
N
I
M
N
N
But
we
know
those
of
us
who
are
alive
in
1980
and
I'm,
not
sure,
but
we
know
that
there
have
been
nonpartisan
elections
since
then
I
mean
so
there's
just
there's
just
no
reason
to
research
that,
and
we
know
that
there
was
no
referendum
since
1980.
We
know
that
you
don't
have
to
look
any
further.
The
question
is
what
happened
before
them?
You
know,
and
we
know
a
lot
of
people
were
around
before
them.
N
N
N
Don't
want
to
start
thinking
about
having
to
you
know,
disband
the
kind
of
elections
that
we
have.
If
we
don't
have
to
do,
I
don't
mind
doing
it
if
we
have
to
but
I,
don't
think
we've
thoroughly
examined
this.
That's
all
I
say:
okay,
it
might
be
another
opinion,
sir,
but
that's
my
opinion.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure.
N
A
You
Thank
You
alderman
rainy,
so
the
next
speakers
are
in
this
order.
Alden
Wilson,
followed
by
alderman
Fisk,
be
followed
by
alderman
Wynne,
followed
by
alderman
woo
Simmons,
followed
by
alderman
suffered
in,
and
for
those
of
you
who
have
not
taken
an
opportunity
read
the
packet
just
that
the
question
at
the
conclusion
is:
if
the
city
would
like
to
hold
a
nonpartisan
election,
City
Council
should
pass
a
resolution
submitting
a
public
question
to
a
referendum
not
more
than
one
year
but
less
than
79
days
prior
to
the
next
regular
election.
A
I
Quick
statement
is
that
from
my
research,
I
believe,
and
we
can
work
with
corporation
council
to
look
at
this
further
I
believe
we
can
place
this
item
on
the
2020
primary
ballot,
which
I
believe
that
we
should
take
care
of
this
long
before
the
November
election,
because
folks
will
be
filing
for
office
a
few
weeks
after
the
November
20
2011.
So
we
should
have
this
as
well
as
a
number
of
other
issues
that
I
hope
I'll
have
an
opportunity
to
raise
assaults
prior
to
that
time.
Thank.
O
You
autumn
and
Braithwaite
the
clerk
seemed
to
have
a
few
more
thoughts
on
a
couple
of
the
questions,
and
you
were
interrupted
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
completed
your
statement
and,
in
the
future,
make
sure
that
you
are
able
to
complete
your
statement
because
I
respect
you
to
pay
very
close
attention
to
this
matter
and
I
respect
your
information
here.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
K
I
think
most
of
the
points
have
now
been
covered.
I'm
interested
in
more
thorough
research,
I'm
also
curious,
I,
don't
know,
I
know
that
they
were
when
we
went
from
eighteen
to
nine
was
that
by
referendum?
Yes,
okay,
yeah,
okay
I
would
be
interested
in
seeing
the
other
referendum
over
at
referenda
that
they're
dealt
with
elections
in
Evanston,
even
maybe,
if
they're
not
on
point
and
I
I
couldn't
find
him
so.
I
Can
I
quickly
yeah
cover
that
so
and
we
passed
her.
The
city
of
Evanston
passed
a
referendum
I
believe
this
was
1993,
so
in
1991
there
was
a
referendum
passed
to
create
a
mayoral
primary,
and
so
that's
part
of
the
confusion
that
we
saw
in
the
last
election
currently
Evanston
are
under
our
current
system.
Evanston
has
two
filing
periods,
one
for
mayor
and
one
for
the
aldermen
and
that's
what
caused
the
the
large
debacle
last
time.
Also
in
1993
there
was
the
referendum
that
reduced
the
number
of
Alden
from
18
to
our
current
composition.
K
I
N
K
I
N
P
Jessica
Feldman
commented
on
Evanston
now
and
said
as
I
recall,
it
was
in
the
60s
when
Democrats
began
moving
here
in
sufficient
numbers
to
want
to
run
for
office
and
therefore
put
the
party
designation
next
to
the
name.
So
the
powers
to
be
then
went
to
nonpartisan
elections.
So
if
you
don't
go
back
to
the
1960s
and
and
I
would
definitely
check
with
the
League
of
Women
Voters,
because
they
were
very,
very
active
in
in
our
current
form
of
government
council-manager
form
of
government
which
what
dates
I,
think
Elinor
from
the
50
52.
I
P
Okay,
so
so
I
would
definitely
talk
to
the
league
and
we
always
have
a
league
member
here
at
home.
I,
don't
know
what
the
sheer
numbers
are
not
and
of
course,
alderman
Ravel
is
as
a
good
resource
as
well,
but
I
think
we
need
a
lot
more
information
than
this
I
I'm
I'm,
guessing
that
we
are
at
the
very
least
grandfathered
in
and
so
that
this
referendum
is
not
really
necessary,
but
I
I
would
support.
Holding
this
over
to
whatever
data
is,
is
necessary.
P
Q
I
think
most
of
what
I
was
thinking
has
been
already
said,
but
I
can
think
of
like
four
or
five
different
and
I
will
refer
them
to
the
the
law
department,
four
or
five
different
areas,
that
I
would
research
for.
Regarding
legislative
history
and
even
election
petitions
that
were
were
filed
with
the
Cook
County
Clerk.
All
of
those
things
are
on
the
record,
I
mean
to
see
when
the
form
changed.
What
happened
in
Evanston
I
mean
there
are
lots
of
different
ways
to
figure
this
out.
R
I
R
Mean
this
is
fun
and,
like
the
research
project
will
be
exciting.
We're
now
I'll
talk
to
legal
voters,
but
when
we're
when
it's
time
for
people
right
get
their
petitions
in
or
people
were
considering
running,
knowing
how
many
signatures
it'll
be
the
responsibility,
your
office
to
make
sure
that
that
information
is
accurate.
Yes,.
I
We
know
that
there
is
something
called
the
paradox
of
choice
when,
when
there
are
a
bunch
of
candidates
or
even
something
as
simple
as
jelly
beans
in
front
of
you,
you're
less
satisfied
when
you
have
more
choice,
and
so
we
should
make
sure
we're
creating
democratic
processes
that
help
folks,
you
know
feel
more
satisfied
with
with
our
democratic
processes
and
all
the
minitor
Simmons,
for
example,
ran
an
election
and
she
because
there
were
five
candidates
that
filed
in
her
race.
There's
a
weird
provision
of
the
law
that's
triggered
when
there
are
five
or
more
candidates.
I
A
Thank
you
seeing
no
further
lights,
we
have
a
lot
of
information
and
swimming
corporation
council
clerk.
We
don't
have
your
instructions
and
we
have
significant
time
to
bring
this
back
to
our
Rules
Committee
for
consideration
fair
enough.
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
all
right
next
item-
Citizens
Police,
Review,
Board.
L
Mr.
chair
members,
the
committee
good
evening,
as
you
know,
we
are
proposing
to
move
forward
with
the
creation
of
a
new
citizen
complaint.
Assistance
Police,
Review
Board,
which
would
be
a
nine
member
committee
with
staggered.
Three-Year
terms
of
the
board's
responsibilities
would
be
similar
to
the
existing
systems
police
advisory
committee,
as
they
will
review
citizen
complaints
against
sworn
and
not
swear.
Members
of
the
police
department
submit
the
recommendations
to
the
chief
of
police
and
report
to
the
Human
Services
Committee.
L
The
board
would
be
staffed
through
the
city
manager's
office
and
supported
by
the
police
department's
Office
of
Professional
Standards.
We're
asking
this
evening
for
the
Rules
Committee
to
direct
the
corporation
council
to
draft
the
appropriate
ordinance
creating
of
the
new
board
and
whatever
resolution
that
the
corporation
council
feels
is
necessary
to
dissolve
the
existing
processes.
Our
hope
would
be
to
bring
back
both
the
resolution
and
the
ordinance
to
you
in
the
month
of
July.
L
We
would
also
start
to
move
forward
with
your
concurrence
but
to
develop
a
plan
for
the
recruitment
of
the
new
board
members,
so
that
what
time
the
council
approves
the
creation
of
the
new
body
that
we
can
move
forward
with
the
seating
that
group.
So
our
recommendation
mr.
chair,
is
to
direct
operations
console
to
prepare
the
appropriate
for
it.
As
a
resolution.
Thank.
K
J
I
also
support
moving
it
forward.
My
my
request,
though,
is
that
so
if
this
gets
started
in
September,
maybe
we
can
do
a
six-month
check-in,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
the
chief
or
someone
from
the
committee
or
you
know,
whoever
needs
to
do
it
to
come
back
and
just
let
Human
Services
know
how
it's
going.
J
You
know
I
know,
there's
a
couple
more
recommendations
that
we're
not
going
to
move
forward
on
right
now,
but
maybe
we
can
have
an
update
on
its
staff
thinks
we
need
to
move
in
a
different
direction.
I
know
that
automotive
Simmons
made
some
suggestions
for
training
for
the
administrative
adjudication
staff,
so
I'd
want
to
know
kind
of
once
that
training
happens
how
the
intake
process
is
going
and
all
those
kind
of
things.
So
that's
my
only
suggestion
to
add
here's
a
check-in
and
six
months
of
Human
Services.
K
A
L
Chair
members
of
the
committee
at
your
last
meeting,
the
Rules
Committee
recommended
the
City
Council
some
changes
to
the
council
rules.
At
that
time
you
asked
that
this
be
placed
on
a
future
Rules
Committee
agenda
to
consider
additional
changes
potentially
to
the
rules
of
corporation
council
and
I,
have
prepared
a
memorandum
that
you
have
beginning
on
page
16.
L
We
also
shared
with
you
the
rules
of
decorum
for
the
city
of
Boulder
Colorado,
which
we
thought
were
certainly
a
community
that
faces
similar
challenges
that
we
do
with
public
participation,
and
so
we
shared
that
with
you.
I
also
had
the
opportunity
to
chat
with
the
city
manager
of
Boulder,
who
was
in
town
a
few
weeks
ago,
and
the
video
taped
that
conversation
they
made
that
available
to
the
council
on
community.
Based
on
all
of
that,
the
and
discussions
that
have
transpired
over
the
last
few
months,
I
think
there's
just
a
few
areas
in
particular.
L
That
I
would
encourage
the
council.
Consider
one
is
issues
with
banners
and
posters
and
the
memorandum
talks
about
the
concerns
there
really
of
how
banners
and
posters
unregulated
can
have
an
opportunity
to
block
the
view
of
some
folks
in
some
cases
that
be
a
safety
hazard
during
the
meeting.
Secondly,
the
issue
of
standing
during
the
meetings.
You
know-
certainly
that's
also
a
fire
issue,
but
I
think.
Certainly
it
makes
sense
that
there
be
a
rule
dealing
with
the
issue
of
standing
during
the
meeting
remote
electronic
public
comment.
L
K
Any
other
comments-
and
thank
you
for
that-
it's
it
might
seem
like
a
really
tiny
point,
but
with
regard
to
standing
I
think
we
need
to
make
it
clear
that
it's
not
never
stand.
For
example,
if
we're
honoring
someone,
everybody
stands
right.
Anything
so
maybe
don't
word
it
saying
nobody
can
ever
stand,
but
you
know
I
think
it's
useful
to
come
up
with
guidelines.
K
I
realized
that
there's
frustration
from
a
lot
of
people,
but
I've
also
heard
from
people
who
have
told
me
that
they
one
person
said
that
they
will
never
come
to
another
council
meeting
and
I've
heard
other
people
say
that
they've
felt
very
you
know,
intimidated
and
and
personally
attacked
when
they
were
here
and
didn't,
feel
comfortable
or
safe
in
the
space.
So
I
don't
want
it
to
be
the
situation
where
anybody
ever
doesn't
feel
comfortable
or
safe
in
the
space.
A
J
You
so,
as
presented
in
the
memo
I
think
the
thing
that
I
had
the
strongest
opinion
about
is
the
remote
public
comment.
I
wasn't
here
the
night
that
that
happened
be
a
bit
telephone
but
I
understand
we
can't
always
everyone
can't
always
get
here
to
make
their
statement.
However,
we
have
had
you
know:
people
read
a
friend's
statement
from
the
podium.
People
can
email
us
a
statement.
The
clerk
is
very
good
about
putting
those
in
the
minutes
as
well,
so
I
think
just
for
the
sake
of
fairness
to
everyone
who
gets
here.
J
We
should
honor
that
you
can
make
your
statement
if
you're
here
versus
on
the
phone
and
if
you
can't
make
it
you
know
I,
know
I,
think
all
of
us
I
read
a
statement
from
one
of
our
constituents
who
could
not
make
it
so
there
is
still
opportunity
to
have
your
your
statement
and
thoughts
heard
in
terms
of
the
standing
I
agree
with
alderman
Wilson
I
mean
when
women's
Joanne
from
family
focus
got
her
award.
There
was
all
kind
of
standing
and
cheering
and
it
was
very
joyous
and
I.
J
Don't
think
anyone
would
have
said
you
know.
No,
you
can't
standing
or
you
can
take
a
picture-
I
guess
what
this
is
trying
to
get
to
a
standing.
That
would
be
more
of
a
shouting.
You
know
as
much
as
I've
even
had
to
say
to
some
members
of
the
community
as
I'm.
Making
a
statement
and
they're
screaming
at
me
are
talking
over
me
as
much
as
that's
not
productive
for
the
people
at
home,
or
even
people
in
here
to
hear
me.
You
know
it
is
their
right
as
a
public
to
you
know,
agree
or
disagree.
J
So
it's
hard
for
me
to
do
that
if
whoever
in
the
audience
disagrees,
but
they
can't
disagree,
disagree
respectfully
and
let
me
get
my
thought
across
I
mean
I
think
we
do
a
good
job
when
people
are
giving
their
public
comment
to
not
speak
over.
You
so
I
mean
I
would
love
for
us
to
be
at
a
point
where
we
can,
even
as
we
disagree
at
least
respect
each
other's
four
ways
and
give
each
other
time
to
do
that
in
terms
of
the
posters
and
the
banners
again,
not
something
that
necessarily
bugs
me.
J
I
know
that
there
have
been
some
people
sitting
here.
Who
said
they
can't
hear
in
the
whatever
that
room
is
past.
The
glass
because
there's
a
lot
of
talking
back
there,
which
is
free
to
happen,
but
they
can't
even
hear
on
the
TV,
and
then
there
have
been
people
who
are
in
here
who
say
they
can't
necessarily
hear
because
we
can't
seek
of
the
signs
and
stuff
so
I.
You
know
I
I,
really
don't
want
to
make
a
bunch
of
rules.
J
I
mean
aside
from
not
taping
stuff
on
the
pictures,
because
you
know
people
gave
us
these
pictures
and
they're
part
of
the
art.
I
would
just
like
us
all
to
at
least
be
respectful
when
we
disagree.
Allow
each
person
to
have
their
voice
heard.
Allow
other
residents
who
are
here
speaking,
who
are
have
a
different
opinion
than
yours
to
be
able
to
speak,
because
that
also
I
think
is
more
frustrating
and
more
harmful.
J
In
my
opinion,
when
someone
comes
to
give
an
opinion,
that's
different
than
other
people
in
the
chamber
and
they
get
booed
or
screamed
at
I
mean
they're
citizens
as
well.
They
have
a
right
to
give
an
opinion,
even
if
it's,
if
it's
different
than
yours,
so
you
know
I'm
inclined
to
not
again
make
a
bunch
of
rules.
Cuz,
I,
don't
I!
J
Think
that's
gonna
just
prolong
our
meeting
that
the
mayor
has
to
say
all
right,
Chiefs
go,
take
the
sign
down
or
you
know,
have
this
person
sit
down
and
I
agree
with
you
all
think
it's
gonna
make
things
get
worse,
because
everyone's
gonna
feel
like
now
we're
trying
to
be.
You
know
your
parents
in
here,
but
with
the
one
excuse
them
so
I
digress.
So
the
one
thing
on
here
that
I
would
I
guess
initially
agree
with.
Is
that
the
banners
and
signs
if
we
can
contain
those
and
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
that
means?
O
So
I'd
like
to
say
that
and
then
in
terms
of
just
to
really
second
that
point
about
the
call
in
comments
I
think
it's
really
unnecessary.
We
have
so
many
other
ways
to
get
that
message
and
all
of
the
council.
People
have
been
supportive
in
reading
messages.
The
clerk
has
been
fantastic
in
doing
that,
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
point
about
the
callin
messages.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
P
You
again
mr.
chair
I,
again
want
to
echo
the
comments
of
my
colleagues.
I
said
some
time
ago
we
had
a
council
meeting
how
I
had
heard
from
so
many
people
who
wanted
to
come
and
participate
in
this
discussion
and
I.
Just
didn't
want
to
run
the
gauntlet
out
in
starting
in
the
parking
lot
coming
through
the
building
in
the
anteroom
and
also
in
council
chambers,
and
they
just
felt
that
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
worth
it
that
they
were
being
yelled
at
harassed.
P
Mr.
Friedman
stands
up
at
the
microphone
and
says
we
need
to
have
a
discussion.
We
do
need
to
have
a
discussion
he's
absolutely
right,
but
the
comments
and
the
the
negativity
that's
surrounding
it
and
the
harassment
that
comes
from
the
actions
of
some
people
actually
diminish
our
opportunity
to
not
only
have
the
discussion
but
hear
the
discussion,
and
it's
obviously
there's
frustration
out
there
among
what
I
consider
to
be
a
relatively
small
group
of
people.
P
From
what
I
hear
from
my
ward
and
the
many
meetings
that
I
have
in
my
ward
on
issues,
this
always
comes
up
that
I
used
to
come
to
council
I,
don't
want
to
come
to
council
anymore.
I
too,
want
to
come
and
speak
I'm
not
going
to
come
and
speak
anymore,
because
it's
just
so
harsh
so
I
would
encourage
you
to
think
about
what
your
message
really
is,
which
is
one
of
inclusion
and
discussion
and
think
about
how
how
all
of
us
might
work
to
make
that
better.
P
So
I
also
don't
support
the
idea
of
phoning
in
comments.
If
we're
going
to
talk
about
discussion,
we've
got
to
do
it.
Face-To-Face
I
always
have
a
much
more
productive
discussion
when
I'm
talking
to
someone,
if
I
can't
do
it
face-to-face
and
at
least
on
the
telephone,
but
not
by
email,
not
by
facebook,
not
by
any
other
of
the
other
social
media.
It's
just
not
productive
and
you
really
are
talking
in
a
vacuum.
P
If,
if
this
is
all
gonna
work,
it's
got
to
work
with
everyone
working
at
it
and
I'm
committed
to
helping,
but
when
I
have
people
approaching
me
who
who
say?
Oh
I,
read
this
and
that
or
whatever
I
hear
your
position
on
something
is
whatever
I'm
hearing
and
that's
not
my
position.
That's
not
as
comment
I've
made.
That's
not,
and
someone
hasn't
even
bothered
to
reach
out
to
ask
me
directly
but
is
is
making
decisions
among
a
small
group
of
people
on
Facebook
or
somewhere
else.
P
That's
not
helpful,
so
standing
here,
listening
to
what
people
say
at
the
microphone
having
conversations
all
of
this
is
going
to
be
incredibly
useful
and
you
folks
have
a
have
an
opportunity
here
to
help
us
with
that.
But
what
we're
hearing
now
is
just
keeping
everybody
else
away
and
the
other
voices
away
we're
hearing
from
them,
but
they
won't
show
up
here
and
there's
no
discussion
without
without
two
sides.
So
to
that
degree,
I
would
support
some
changes
that
that
they
did
make
in
Boulder.
I
would
suggest
that
we
think
about
them.
P
I'd
rather
not
have
signs
or
cheering
or
any
any
form
of
demonstration
that
can
make
people
feel
unwelcome
or
uncomfortable
in
this
room
and
and
in
the
anteroom,
because
that
really
is
an
extension
of
Council.
So
I
would
just
say
we
all
come
here.
We
have
the
conversation,
we
respect
the
other
person
who
may
disagree
with
and
we
carry
on,
and
the
council
makes
the
best
decision
that
we
can.
S
Well,
first
I
have
to
say
I
agree
with
all
my
colleagues
who
talked
about
making
sure
that
people
who
are
addressing
the
council
are
here
in
person
or
if
they
can't
be
here.
They
can
give
it
to
their
comments
to
a
friend
to
read.
So
we
can
certainly
hear
from
everybody
directly
that
way
and
I
too
have
been
hearing
from
constituents
who
are
really
uncomfortable
coming
to
council
because
of
the
acrimony
that
they
feel
in
the
room.
But
I
guess.
The
point
that
I
want
to
zero
in
on
is
the
question
about
banners
and
posters.
S
As
you
know,
I'm
someone
who
doesn't
speak
very
often
and
so
I
would
probably
be
reluctant
to
be
a
member
of
the
public
and
getting
to
the
podium
number
one
and
number
two.
We
have
often
so
many
people
who
do
want
to
speak
that
we
don't
really
have
time
for
everyone.
So
I
guess
I'm
sympathetic
to
the
idea
of
some
banners
and
posters
along
the
side
of
the
room
where
they're
not
blocking
the
view
of
other
residents,
because
I
do
think
it
provides
a
way
for
some
people
to
express
their
opinions
and
I.
S
Q
You
cut
greed,
were
you
going
to
say
something?
Oh
I'll
wait
until
okay,
yeah
you're
I'm,
sorry,
but
you're
blocking
the
people
behind
you,
okay.
Thank
you.
Thanks
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
on
all
of
these
issues.
I
mean
I.
I,
agree
that,
but
with
respect
to
the
issue
of
someone
calling
in,
we
do
have
many
of
other
opportunities
to
have
the
comments
heard
and
we
all
do
read
them
and
the
clerk
does
provide
us
with
those.
Q
Don't
know
that
we
necessarily
need
and
I
would
question
that
we
need
a
specific
rule,
a
council
rule
because
I
on
this
and
because
the
fire
code
I
haven't
read
it.
Maybe
it
isn't
there,
but
you
know
the
from
that
standpoint.
The
the
mayor
or
the
city
manager
is
always
just
politely
explained
that
we
need
to
leave
access
open.
We
need
to
have
everyone
in
a
seat
and-
and
that's
been
the
case
many
many
times
when
we've
had
large
numbers
of
people
here
in
the
in
the
council-
a
chamber
for
a
number
of
issues.
Q
Obviously,
if
someone
is
being
honored
or
their
other
reasons
that
wouldn't
apply,
but
that
that's
been
a
standard
for
since
actually
one
of
the
first
meetings
I
was
ever
council
member,
so
with
respect
to
posters
and
banners,
I've
been
thinking
about
this
quite
a
bit
I,
don't
think
they
should
be
the
size
that
they
block
anybody
else's
view.
People
who
come
here
come
for
a
particular
reason.
We
all
know
that
being
here
in
person
really
is
a
different
experience
than
then
watching
on
television
and
experiencing
all
of
the
different
expressions.
Q
Q
I,
certainly
don't
think
we
should
have
anything
up
on
the
glass
at
the
back,
because
that
really
does
the
block
the
view
of
people
who,
when
we
have
large
groups,
can't
can't
see
into
the
chamber
and
they
bait,
you
can
actually
be
us
from
there,
so
I
know
I
think
perhaps
the
size
limitation
it
looks
like
Boulder,
perhaps
put
that
into
place
and
that's
not
unreasonable.
We
are
in
an
enormous
chamber,
I
think
that
that's
that
would
be
an
appropriate
and
for
everyone
who
has
studied
the
Constitution
it's
time
place
and
manner.
Q
Q
So
there
are
lots
of
different
ways
that
people
can
show
their
solidarity
for
a
particular
issue,
but
it
doesn't
block
the
viewer
or
right
in
the
intimidates
others,
like
my
fellow
council
members,
I,
have
heard
from
constituents
who
said
they
don't
want
to
come
to
the
council.
They
don't
know
they
think
the
meetings
have
gotten
lost
their
civility.
They
don't
want
to
come
and
deal
with
all
of
the
the
the
hostility
that
they
perceive
here
so
I
I'd
like
us.
Q
All
to
take
a
step
back
and
try
to
be
more
civil
with
each
other
and
work
within
the
rules
that
we
have
I,
don't
think
it's
necessary
to
adopt
all
of
at
all
of
the
rules
that
Boulder
had
to
go
to
the
links
they
had
to
go
to
I.
Think
for
the
most
part,
our
meetings,
with
some
exceptions,
are
run
well
and
I.
Think
as
long
as
all
of
us
recognize
that
the
best
way
for
us
all
to
hear
each
other
is
to
give
each
of
us
an
opportunity
to
be
heard
in
an
organized
way.
A
You
alderman
when
and
if
I
guess
I
can
share
a
bit
I
also
hear
from
from
my
residents
as
well
and
I
can
speak
for
many
of
us.
We
meet
multiple
times
during
the
evening.
Residents
have
act
says
to
our
emails.
Residents
have
access
to
our
telephones.
Some
of
us
holds
board
meetings,
neighborhood
meetings,
any
time
you
go
to
the
grocery
store
in
a
public
place.
A
You
all
have
access
to
us
because
we
live
here
if
I
was
to
compare
evidence
into
you
know
what
we're
seeing
on
the
national
scene
and
also
in
the
past
I've
made
this
reference
that
you
know
over
the
last
several
years.
Under
this
current
administration,
we
have
all
agreed
that
we've
never
seen
such
disrespectful
behavior,
that
comes
out
of
the
executive
office
and
I
feel
like
in
a
town
that
is
so
special
and
dear
to
us
all.
A
There
are
some
members
of
our
council
who
receive
threats
on
a
regular
basis
and
you
may
for
those
in
the
public
may
snicker
and
laugh
at
that
when
I
think
of
the
families
that
have
been
impacted
by
Virginia
Beach
families
that
have
lost
loved
ones
staff-
and
that
is
not
too
far
in
our
distant
history,
we
have
had
something
similar
happened.
My
concern,
sometimes
in
the
mayor
and
I,
have
spoken
about
this.
A
The
rise
of
active
shooters
in
this
country
is
off
the
scale
off
the
scale,
and
so
why
I
make
that
that
reference
for
those
that
would
shake
their
heads
and
say:
where
are
you
going
with?
This
is
yeah?
Where
are
we
going
with
this?
That's
that's
what
my
reflection
point
is
to
our
residents.
Where
are
we
going
with
this?
A
A
When
I
read
comments
on
Facebook
that
someone
is
looking
forward
to
a
meeting,
not
because
of
the
substance
of
what
we're
discussing
with
the
decisions
that
we're
making,
but
just
because
of
the
antics
I
feel
like
we've
somehow
lost
our
lost
our
way.
So
I
am
giving
very
close
consideration
to
some
of
the
ideas
and
thoughts
Center
on
this
paper,
just
as
a
way
of
returning
to
our
civility
bye.
God
bless
Mayor
Morton
and
the
advice
that
she's
given
to
all
of
us.
Anyone
that's
met
with
her.
A
I
can
hear
every
substance
of
your
arguments.
Sometimes
I
will
disagree
and
if
you
give
me
the
time,
I
will
explain
why
I
don't
need
the
agitation
to
be
convinced.
In
fact,
sometimes
it
has
the
opposite
effect,
and
maybe
that's
where
I'll
wrap
up
and
just
ask
for
that
reflection,
but
I
think
it
is
really
worth
repeating
that
if
members
of
our
City
Council
are
threatened,
you
didn't
do
it.
Anyone
sitting
here,
but
someone's
doing
it.
A
I
Wanted
a
point
of
privilege
and
so
I
appreciate
the
discussion
and
a
number
of
folks
raised
the
issue
about
folks.
Members
of
the
public
being
able
to
phone
in
and
I
did
make
that
recommendation
for
someone
to
move
this
on
to
the
Rules
Committee.
For
exactly
this
point
to
make
sure
when
residents
came
to
me
and
asked,
can
we
phone
in
there?
I
So
if
we're
gonna
enact
rules
to
kind
of
clamp
down
on
the
public's
right
to
express
themselves
to
the
council,
I
think
a
good
trade-off
is
creating
a
there's,
a
piece
of
legislation.
A
few
years
ago
in
the
State
House,
it
was
a
bill
33:44
in
the
house.
House
bill
33:44
in
like
2016
in
that
house
bill
would
require
all
public
bodies
to
respond
to
any
questions
that
are
posed
to
them
at
public
comment
within
40
45
days.
I
I
think
that
we
should
enact
a
local
version
of
that
to
be
again
leaders
on
transparency
and
good
government.
You
know
allow
a
45
day
period
or
some
period
we
can
work
with
the
clerk's
office
and
3-1-1
may
be
in
conjunction
because
3
1
1
answers
a
lot
of
questions
that
folks
have
already,
and
so
maybe
the
two
of
our
in
our
two
bodies
can
work
together
to
get
within
45
days.
J
So
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
that,
because
as
much
as
I
you
know,
I
have
been
to
many
of
pickets
and
all
kind
of
stuff
and
I
appreciate
hearing
from
people
when
people
who
call
me
generally
I
think
will
tell
you
that
they
hear
back
from
me.
I
took
a
phone
call
today
when
I
was
walking,
my
dog,
it
was
supposed
to
be
my
45
minutes
of
leisure
time
and
I
spoke
to
a
lady
in
my
entire
45
minutes.
J
I
say
that
not
because
I'm
doing
anything
remarkable,
but
just
that
I
don't
know
how
we
squeeze
in
answering
every
question
from
this
podium
and
I
say
that,
because
we
start
at
6:00
for
the
first
committee,
I
mean
you
all
are
regular,
so
you
know
how
long
we
can
sometimes
go
just
having
public
comment
and
then
discussion
amongst
ourselves
because
again,
this
is
the
time
when
we
all
get
together
to
talk
about
these
things.
So
I'm
not
opposed
I
mean
several
of
us
have
a
warm
meeting
every
month.
J
J
Hopefully,
you
would
get
a
response,
but
I
as
much
as
I
love
public
comment.
I
do
not
see
a
way
for
us
on
a
Monday
night
to
answer
questions
and
I
know.
The
curb
dimension
is
45-day
return
time.
You
know
unless
honestly,
unless
someone's
going
to
remind
me
of
that
when
I
leave
here
Monday
night,
it's
you
know
midnight
or
after
I
have
three
kids
to
deal
with
in
the
morning.
J
I'm
not
going
to
remember
your
question,
if
I'm
being
so
for
me
to
you,
know
having
some
kind
of
calendar
which
I
responded,
your
question
plus
there's
nine
of
us
and
we
all
have
very
different
opinions.
So
are
we
supposed
to
do
nine
different
answers
and
then
have
some
kind
of
email,
dialogue
back
and
forth?
Do
you
want
just
one
answer?
I
mean
I.
Think
as
Auden
Braithwaite
said,
this
is
a
very
small
town.
You
know
I
almost
didn't
under
Gretel
II.
J
Don't
do
any
shopping
in
this
town
anymore,
because
I
can't
get
through
the
grocery
store
and
get
to
my
list
without
someone
having
a
question
which
is
their
right
to
do
and
I
don't
want
to
be
rude,
but
if
I
have
20
minutes,
I
can't
go
to
Valley
produce.
So
that's
that
to
say
I
think
that
for
the
most
part,
we're
accessible
I,
don't
know
what
your
experiences
with
each
one
of
us
but
I
think
for
the
most
part
we
are
accessible.
It
might
not
be
the
answer
that
you
want.
It
might
not
be.
J
J
The
next,
however
long
work
on
a
list
of
questions,
because
every
week
we
know
that
question
list
is
going
to
get
longer
right.
It's
not
like
we're
going
to
get
to
that
question
and
not
have
a
follow-up
or
not
have
more
questions
so
again
as
much
as
I
respect,
public
comment
and
I'm
willing
to
work
with
the
signage,
and
you
know
hope
that
people
can
just
be
on
their
best
behavior
and
then
understand
that
we
have
opinions
and
they
might
not
jive.
J
With
your
opinions,
I
will
oppose
the
idea
that
we
are
now
going
to
go
home
with
with
more
questions
that
we
that
we
need
to
answer.
Unless
it's
like.
You
said
if
a
person
can't
get
their
elected
official,
that
maybe
the
clerk's
job
or
the
mayor's
job
can
be
to
step
in
and
say,
hey
can
you
you
know
get
back
to
something
you
also
have
to
realize.
We
get
a
lot
of
emails.
Sometimes
we
just
get
kind
of
behind
on
those
things,
but
I.
Just
really.
You
know.
A
A
H
Is
a
discussion?
Okay,
public
comment
is
public
comment?
Okay,
we're
asking
for
a
discussion.
If
we
had
the
discussion
there
wouldn't
be
any
animosity
here.
There
wouldn't
be
any
hard
feelings.
Our
questions
would
be
answered.
We
had
a
town
hall
meeting
with
the
mayor.
It
went
perfectly
fine.
There
was
no
hard
feelings.
Some
questions
were
answered,
some
weren't,
that's
the
only
that's
the
only
discussion
that
I
know
of
in
the
three
years
that
I've
been
here.
We
need
to
have
a
regular
discussion
with
the
residents
so
that
we
can
get
answers
to
our
questions,
but.
A
K
I
If
I
may
just
answer-
because
this
is
related
to
the
whole
decorum
thing,
I
think
that
this
is
a
part
of
it
and
just
answer
some
of
very
quickly
to
second
some
of
the
things
that
alderman
Fleming
raised.
So
it
wouldn't
be
upon
the
aldermen
to
respond
to
his
questions.
So
if
someone
came
in
and
said,
I'd
like
to
know
how
you
know
X,
you
know
how
certain
funds
were
spent
and
it's
not
something.
That's
readily
available
and
they'd
like
to
know
how
a
certain
process
works
and
that
process
isn't
available
online.
I
It
would
be
incumbent
upon
the
clerk's
office
or
three-on-one
or
some
other
office
to
provide
a
response
to
that
question
that
was
posed
at
public
comment,
so
it
wouldn't
be
on
it
wouldn't
be
answered
immediately.
It
would
be
answered
in
writing
at
some
later
point
and
it
wouldn't
be
incumbent
upon
wall
to
answer
those
questions
and
I.
I
J
J
A
A
T
Mayor
with
two
items,
one
at
future,
Rules
Committee
meeting
I'd
like
to
have
a
update
on
FOIA.
We
talked
about
at
the
last
meeting,
but
I'd
like
to
have
really
get
into
some
of
the
data.
You
know
we
talked
about
how
we
were
from
700
to
1400.
You
know
who's
asking
for
all.
You
know
I'm
just
curious.
T
You
know
why
the
big
jump
in
requests
also
there's
been
a
big
jump
in
complaints
against
the
City
filed
with
the
attorney
general's
office
and
I'd
like
to
see
an
analysis
of
that,
as
well
as
understanding
where
those
complaints
are
coming
from
thinking
we're
from
19
different
people.
Are
they
coming
from?
You
know
a
handful
of
people
who
are
filing
multiple
complaints,
I'm
interested
in
that
second,
there
was
a.
T
Recommendation
before
I
guess
several
months
ago,
this
was
in
regards
to
the
ethics
complaint
with
aldermen
alderman
Rainey,
where
people
felt
that
there
was
a
recommendation
that
wasn't
heard
by
the
Rules
Committee
or
the
council
I
forget
who
it
was
that
it
went
before,
and
you
know,
I
can
only
speak
for
myself.
I
heard
the
right-
and
this
is
in
regards
to
the
recommendation-
that
if
a
council
member
ever
forwards
an
email
from
a
resident
that
the
resident
shady
copied
on
that
on
that
email,
I
think
that
was
their
recommendation.
A
I
will
from
time
to
time,
even
today,
all
of
them
savings
if
there's
a
resident
who
is
not
in
the
second
Ward
out
of
a
courtesy
I
will
copy
the
award
all
of
them
so
I
mean
I,
have
a
long
list
and
I'm
sure
the
other
people
who
have
their
lights
on
will
speak
to
this
as
well.
Whoever
made
that
complaint
can
we
just
get
a
little
bit
of
clarification
on?
T
I,
and
was
that
my
image
is
my
understanding.
This
is
on
a
mozzie,
the
other
life
it
was.
It
was
on
an
issue
where
there
are
two
asides
right
opposing
opposing
sides
on
an
issue
and
alderman
Ford,
something
to
someone
on
the
opposing
side
and
from
you
know,
someone
on
the
other
side
of
the
issue
they
were
upset
about.
It
went
to
the
ethics
committee
and
that's
how
that's
how
it
came
up
to
your
point.
T
I
agree:
we
get
lots
of
emails,
we're
constantly
forwarding
emails
on
a
lot
of
times,
I'm
forwarding
off
with
a
note
to
the
city
manager,
some
city
director
saying:
could
you
please
look
into
this
and
write
and
call
this
person
or
take
care
of
this
and
I
just
use
my
good
judgment
in
terms
of
one
I
think
I
need
to
copy.
You
know
the
resident
themselves
or
not
I.
Think
that's
what
most
people
up
here
do.
A
N
N
The
crux
of
the
matter
is
the
person
who
wrote
the
letter
feels
that
in
the
future,
anybody
who
fought,
who
forwards
an
email
written
by
her
or
anybody
who
forwards
an
email
written
by
anybody,
must
get
the
permission
from
the
person
who
originally
wrote
the
letter
and
I
am
saying.
I
will
never
comply
with
that
request.
If
you
don't
want
that
letter
forwarded,
you
better
darn
sure
make
sure
you
stamp
confidential.
On
that
letter,
how
many
I'm,
like
you
say,
I
bet
I,
can
count
at
least
a
hundred
emails.
N
N
And
lately
I've
been
doing
a
lot
of
snail
mailing
and
it's
just
nobody
could
constantly
be
controlling
your
communications
now
I
will
I
will
do
everything
humanly
possible
and
and
Michelle
Mason
cub
has
trained
us
on
this
to
try
not
to
violate
the
Open
Meetings
Act
with
you
know,
multiple
copies
of
things
going
back
and
forth
among
the
council.
Members
I
sort
of
understand
that
rule
now.
N
But
if
somebody
sends
me
an
email
and
doesn't
tell
me
it's
confidential
I
feel
that
that's
my
property
and
I
can
just
share
it
with
Eleanor
or
Robin
or
sleep
or
the
anybody.
I
mean
I.
Rarely
share
things
with
the
press.
Every
barely
and
I.
Don't
remember
having
done
that,
but
if,
if
somebody
is
you
know
a
attacking
somebody
or
saying
something,
nice
I
constantly
I'm
sharing
things
with
staff.
N
N
R
O
You
and
I,
don't
remember
where
we
landed
on
this
I,
remember
having
discussion
about
diversifying
our
boards
and
commissions
and
committees
and
I,
don't
remember
if
we
landed
on
any
updated
policy,
for
that
did
we
just
yes
or
no?
Okay,
so
I
want
to
I
want
to
make
a
referral
or
recommendation
I
want
to
request
that
it
is
on
the
agenda
that
it
be
policy,
something
like
our
MWBE
goals,
but
a
stated
policy
of
diversity
and
inclusion
on
our
boards
committees
and
commissions.
Thank.
A
You
and
so
an
interest
of
time
not
to
be
disrespectful
and
just
a
reminder
to
the
public.
Our
meetings
there's
a
there's,
a
meeting,
Human
Services
that
was
supposed
to
start
at
7:00.
We
have
members
of
our
staff
as
well
as
citizens
that
showed
up
ready
to
begin
our
meeting.
If
there's
anything
comments
that
you
may
have
or
issues
that
were
not
raised,
I
encourage
you
to
please
email
or
contact
your
appointed
Alderman
or
or
the
mayor's
office,
or
our
city
manager.
Seeing
no
further
lights
is
there
a
motion
to
adjourn.