►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 7-16-2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
This
is
a
public
hearing
of
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals.
The
zoning
ordinance
empowers
us
to
hear
references
from
the
City
Council
petitions
from
other
parties
for
variances
and
special
uses
and
appeals
from
decisions
of
the
Zoning
Administrator.
We
hear
testimony
from
those
in
attendance
and
then
make
formal
findings
of
fact,
based
on
the
evidence
presented,
which
consists
of
testimony
and
exhibits
and
on
our
knowledge
of
the
community.
We
then
either
make
a
determination
or
recommendation
to
the
City
Council.
A
All
testimony
is
taken
under
oath,
although
we
do
not
apply
the
strict
rules
of
evidence
and
procedures.
We
ask
that
you
keep
your
testimony
relevant
to
the
proposal
as
it
relates
to
the
standards
contained
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
When
you
testify,
please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
please
print
your
name
on
the
sign-in
sheet
provided
outside
the
door.
A
If
you'd
like
to
speak
at
this
meeting,
each
case
will
be
introduced
by
staff
and
a
list
of
documents
will
be
read
into
the
record
when
the
applicant,
then
the
applicant
will
give
an
explanation
of
the
proposal
after
that.
Those
who
wish
to
testify
as
either
proponents
or
opponents
of
the
case
will
have
the
chance
to
do
so,
and
then
the
applicant
will
have
a
chance
to
respond
any
case
not
concluded
at
tonight's
hearing
will
be
continued
to
our
next
meeting
Melissa.
Please
call
the
roll.
C
A
A
A
Okay,
I
will
now
swear
in
anyone
who
plans
to
give
testimony
of
any
of
the
cases
scheduled
for
tonight.
Please
raise
your
right
hand.
If
you
plan
to
speak,
do
you
swear
and
affirm
that
the
testimony
you
will
be
provide
in
connection
with
this
case
will
be
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
C
A
B
Just
to
clarify
for
everyone,
the
development
plans
are
the
same
that
we
saw
at
the
last
Zoning
Board
hearing.
However,
we
do
have
some
additional
letters
of
support,
letters
of
opposition,
a
petition
of
opposition
and
a
letter
from
the
aldermen
as
well,
that
have
all
been
handed
out
to
the
Zoning
Board
and
some
documents
from
the
applicant
regarding
financials
that
were
handed
out
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
This.
A
B
D
And
madam
chairman
I
have
written
out
findings
of
fact
for
a
major
variance.
We
submitted
an
application
with
the
findings
that
are
required
for
the
application,
but
for
the
zoning
ordinance
findings
I'm
going
to
address
these
out
loud.
But
if
you
don't
mind,
I
like
to
approach
and
provide
this
final
document
to
you,.
D
We
submitted
last
time
we
showed
plans
for
a
15
unit
apartment
building
at
this
address
and
we
went
through
extensively
the
design
plans.
We
also
talked
extensively
about
the
iho
ordinance
and
the
benefits
of
that
and
the
certain
allowances
or
bonuses
that
are
provided
by
the
iho
ordinance
and
the
public
benefit
by
providing
to
on-site,
affordable
housing
units
for
this
project.
We're
not
gonna
repeat
that,
thankfully,
for
everyone,
but
I
would
like
to
talk
about
what's
new
since
we
concluded
or
continue
the
public
hearing
last
time.
D
First,
you
heard
last
time
if
a
few
single-family
property
owners
who
were
opposed
to
this
and
I
know
you
had
received
written
opposition
to
this.
But
you
did
not
have
last
time
is
any
word
one
way
or
the
other
from
the
properties
that
immediately
surround
this
property.
As
we
showed
to
you,
we
had
an
exhibit
that
showed
this
property
is
wholly
surrounded
by
large,
multiple
family
buildings.
D
My
client
has
spoken
to
the
owners
of
2
2
to
5
Ridge
and
to
to
1/3
bridge
also
multiple-family
apartment
building
owners
in
the
r5
district.
In
this
block
they
too
have
no
objection
to
this.
They
just
have
not
been
able
to
find
time
to
put
into
documentation,
they're
written
support,
but
they
don't
object
to
it
and
you
don't
have
any
objection
from
them.
D
So
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
when
you
and
we'll
get
to
the
findings
of
fact,
but
will
this
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
neighborhood
and
consider
the
immediate
neighbourhood,
which
are
the
buildings
that
surround
this
property?
Every
single
property
owner
supports
it.
They
don't
believe
there
will
be
any
adverse
impact.
D
C
I,
ask
you
a
question
related
to
that
sure.
Did
you
engage
the
neighbors
in
those
meetings
with
the
other
property
owners
and
property
managers,
because
I
saw
that
there
was
a
letter
of
support
from
a
property
manager,
but
not
necessarily
the
property
owner,
and
then
I
saw
that
Garret
Theological
Seminary,
which
owns
the
property
to
the
south
and.
E
D
D
So
we
had
some
difficulties
and
we've
tried
to
resolve
those
by
subsequently
reaching
out
to
everyone
and
in
the
cases
where
you
got
a
letter
from
a
property
manager
that
was
after
consulting
with
the
owner,
because
the
property
manager
did
not
have
authority
to
write
a
letter
without
the
owner's
blessing.
Thank.
D
D
I'll
move
on,
though,
while
you're
trying
to
find
that
I
just
want
to
also
mention
that
we
submitted
preliminary
stormwater
engineering
plans,
which
is
something
that
the
CBA
requested,
that
those
plans
were
reviewed
by
the
City
Engineer
and
found
a
lease
on
a
preliminary
basis.
They
complete
complies
with
the
storm
water
management,
ordinance,
basically
saying
that
providing
on-site
stormwater
management
on
this
property
is
feasible
and
it's
going
to
be
a
combination
of
bioswales
filtration,
as
well
as
an
underground
storage,
vault
and
as
you've
probably
heard
from
past
presentations
as
underground
storage.
F
D
So
and
I
will
kind
of
rush
through
this,
because
I
don't
want
to
take
your
so
much
of
your
time
tonight,
but
as
far
as
the
standards
for
a
major
variance,
the
first
one
is
whether
the
variance
or
that
the
variance
will
not
have
a
substantial
adverse
impact
on
the
use,
enjoyment
or
property
values
of
adjoining
properties.
And
we
have
the
adjoining
property
owners
saying
in
their
opinion,
there
will
be
no
adverse
impact.
D
D
Additionally,
the
owner
has
agreed
to
a
suggestion
by
the
CBA
to
prohibit
tenants
from
parking
on
the
street,
meaning
they
cannot
obtain
a
residential
parking
permit.
So
will
this
development
result
in
a
parking
problem
on
the
street?
We
believe
the
answer
is
is
clearly
known:
will
result
in
more
congestion
in
the
public
street
with
a
15
unit
building
again,
because
there's
off
street
parking
for
the
vehicles
they're
limited
to
one
vehicle
per
unit.
This
is
a
Tod
area
with
public
transportation.
That's
walkable,
there's
community
retail,
that's
lockable,
whether
it's
a
dry,
cleaner,
restaurants,
etc.
D
We
don't
believe
that
adding
15
dwelling
units
is
going
to
result
in
adverse
congestion
traffic
and
certainly
not
parking.
We've
submitted
stormwater
plans.
This
will
not
create
adverse
stormwater
impacts.
It's
not
going
to
create
adverse
light,
noise,
etc
on
properties,
a
block
away,
so
one
of
the
questions
would
be
what
about
the
height?
We
are
within
the
height
limitation
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
We
are
at
52
feet.
We
can
go
as
high
I
believe
is
55
feet.
The
neighboring
properties
I
believe
we
calculated
the
maximum
height
of
their
parapet.
D
So
the
mere
fact
that
it's
52
feet
rather
than
45,
we
don't
think
in
of
itself,
creates
an
adverse
impact.
But
what
that
height
does
it
allows
us
to
provide
a
better
bedroom
mix
that
we
thinks
advantageous
for
the
city
and
advantageous
for
the
neighborhood?
By
having
that
extra
floor
and
going
up
to
52
feet,
we
can
have
three
bedroom
units
and
two
bedroom
units
which
will
allow
more
families
to
move
in
young
couples,
empty
nesters,
they're
not
going
to
want
the
studios
in
the
one
bedrooms.
D
Necessarily
if
we
are
restricted
to
four
storeys,
even
with
15
units,
it
would
be
one
bedrooms
and
studio
units
because
that's
all
that
could
fit
on
them
on
the
property.
That
means
more
college
students,
probably
or
younger
singles
who
are
living
there,
which
might
not
be
the
most
desirable
for
the
neighborhood.
So
we
think
there
are
benefits
to
the
height
believe
it
or
not,
even
though
we
understand
there's
some
neighbors
that
it
that
are
opposed
to
it.
D
The
next
standard
is
that
the
variation
is
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
We
think
it
does,
because
this
this
development
will
enhance
the
taxable
value
of
the
land.
It
complies
with
all
the
setbacks,
block
coverage
requirements,
height
requirements,
parking
requirements
and
use
restrictions
for
the
r5
district.
We
comply
with
off
street
parking,
thereby
minimizing
congestion
in
the
public
streets.
We
believe-
and
we
think
this
will
be
a
significant
aesthetic
upgrade
to
the
property
we
described
before.
This
is
a
two
flat
which
is
in
poor
shape.
D
I
B
D
If
I
may
proceed
that
the
next
standard
is
that
the
the
alleged
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
is
peculiar
to
this
property
and
here's
where
we
think
this
property
is
unique,
one,
it's
a
40
foot
lock
in
an
r5
district.
That
alone
is
not
unique,
as
I
know,
there
other
properties
with
a
kind
of
substandard
lock
twist,
but
this
property
is
unique
in
that
it
is
surrounded
by
these.
You
know
this
property
lives
in
the
shadows
of
three
apartment
buildings
surrounding
it
on
all
sides,
with
an
L
track
behind
it.
D
I
don't
think
there
are
other
properties
in
the
r5
district
that
are
that
are
in
filled
developments
that
are
such
a
narrow
lot
with
surrounded
by
such
large
density
buildings.
So
what
we're
looking
to
do
here,
because
of
this?
What
we
think
is
a
unique
hardship
is
really
being
an
equitable
situation
to
our
neighbors.
Have
some
density
that,
on
a
ratio
basis
equals
the
density
of
our
neighbors,
even
though
our
dwelling
units
of
15
units
is
far
less
than
the
36
or
50
dwelling
units
of
the
surrounding
buildings?
D
Next
to
these
larger
apartment,
buildings
would
really
be
out
of
character
for
the
area
and
what
he's
trying
to
do
is
meet
the
character
of
the
area
and
enhance
the
character
of
the
area
and,
while
I
know
that
economic
hardship
is
not
something
that
you
typically
consider
as
a
factor.
It
is
a
practical
difficulty
in
this
case,
because
the
owner
has
submitted
his
pro
forma
his
financial
data.
D
He
will
earn
about
a
6%
return
after
ten
years
if
he
develops
this
property,
as
currently
shown
he's
going
to
lose
money
with
the
lesser
number
of
units
by
providing
to
affordable
housing
units
on
site
at
a
lower
rental
rate
than
market
rent
would
provide
he's
losing
approximately
1
million
56,000
dollars
over
the
course
of
30
years,
which
is
the
is
the
life
of
his
mortgage.
So
there
you
know,
there's
some
lost
income
by
providing
the
affordable
housing
units.
My
client
is
happy
to
do
that,
but
in
return
he
needs
a
slightly
higher
density.
C
B
D
The
next
standard
is
that
the
variation
is
not
based
exclusively
on
a
desire
to
extract
additional
income
from
the
property,
or
even,
if
that
is
a
desire,
there's
a
corresponding
public
benefit.
That
would
justify
the
variance,
and
we
actually
believe
that
both
are
true.
Our
client
studied
the
IHL
met
with
the
housing
administrator
that
administers
the
eye.
Iho
believes
in
the
affordable
housing
policy,
he's
not
providing
a
payment
in
lieu
he's,
providing
them
on-site,
because
that's
what
the
city
needs.
D
Yes,
it
provides
some
bonuses
and
development
bonuses
that
help
him
make
this
project
feasible,
but
he
is
providing
them
on-site.
So
while
he
wants
to
make
a
reasonable
return
on
this
property,
he
also
wants
to
provide
a
public
benefit,
even
if
you
determine
that
he
is
developing
the
primarily
to
get
an
economic
benefit,
there's
still
a
great
public
benefit
that
goes
along
with
this
property.
D
Not
only
is
he
enhancing
the
property
from
its
current
conditions,
in
conformity
with
the
surrounding
development,
heavily
landscaped
meets
the
parking
etc,
but,
as
we
pointed
out
extensively
last
time,
he's
providing
the
to
on-site,
affordable,
housing
units.
So
again,
you
as
a
zba
with
the
final
decision
here
need
a
way.
How
important
is
it
to
carry
on
that
important
public
policy
of
the
city
by
encouraging
on-site
units
and
in
return,
granting
a
variance
for
a
little
more
density
than
what
is
allowed
again?
We
could
build
this
building
footprint
with
a
smaller
number
of
units.
D
Let's
say
five
units,
it's
still
the
same
height
and
footprint
of
the
building.
It
just
has
less
units
so
by
adding
more
bedrooms
to
this,
are
we
creating
a
problem
for
the
city?
Are
we
saving
setting
a
dangerous
precedent?
Well
because
we
handle
stormwater
parking,
etc?
We
believe
the
answer
to
that
is
no.
D
The
last
two
standards
I'll
go
through
really
quickly
has
as
this
hardship
being
created
by
my
client.
The
answer
is
no,
that
this
is
a
pre-existing
lot,
forty
feet
wide
and
those
surrounding
apartment
buildings.
With
the
high
density
which
were
developed
before
the
current
zoning
ordinance
regulations.
You
know
those
were
in
place.
Those
are
pre-existing
so
again,
my
clients
just
trying
to
get
into
parity
with
the
surrounding
development,
with
the
development
that
that
kind
of
fits
the
neighborhood
and
then,
lastly,
are
we
requesting
the
least
deviation
possible.
D
For
this
property
and
again,
given
the
lot
width
and
the
surrounding
development
and
some
of
the
economic
realities
of
the
situation,
we
believe
yes,
this
is
the
least
amount
of
a
density
variance.
We
can
request
while
complying
with
all
the
setbacks
while
complying
with
the
law
coverage
while
complying
with
the
height
while
complying
with
the
parking
etc.
D
So
that
is
it
for
the
the
standards
I've
addressed,
the
height
I
think
I
kind
of
addressed
some
of
the
preemptively,
maybe
some
of
the
objections
of
the
neighbors,
who
are
a
block
or
more
away
or
single-family
property
owners
that
this
is
going
to
somehow
create
an
adverse
impact
on
them,
a
block
or
so
away,
and
while
I
certainly-
and
we
all
do,
respect
the
opinions.
Glad
they're
here
help
thankful
for
their
comments.
I,
just
don't
believe
that
the
fear
of
college
students
moving
in
is
a
legitimate
reason
to
deny
a
reasonable
zoning
variance.
D
This
is
a
college
town.
This
is
an
r5
district.
There
are
existing
apartment
buildings
if
college
students
do
occupy
some
or
all
of
this
unit.
My
client
can't
not
rent
the
college
students.
If
this
is
allowed
to
be
built,
the
last
thing
I'll
point
out
before
I
yield
the
floor
is
that
the
city
has
approved
numerous
other
density
variances
for
other
properties
throughout
the
city,
comparing
density
variances
as
comparing
apples
and
oranges,
because
every
property
is
unique.
Some
of
the
properties
that
commercial
components
some
are
in
completely
different
areas,
more
commercial
etc.
D
But
I
will
point
out
one
in
particular,
which
is
granted
in
2016.
It's
the
property
at
8:24,
828,
Noyes,
Street
they're,
a
52
foot
high
development
was
approved
in
the
r5
/b
one
zoning
district,
the
exact
same
height
as
proposed
here
that
did
have
first-floor
commercial,
this
property
this
project
does
not
and
that
project
with
providing
affordable
housing
units
on
site
was
only
allowed
twelve
dwelling
units
units.
However,
a
variance
was
granted
to
allow
for
44
development
units.
So
by
comparison,
this
development
is
seeking
a
much
less
severe
of
the
variance.
C
C
Would
you
those
are
known
just
so?
You
know
those
are
known
around
town
as
storage
garages
and
and
from
the
addresses
of
the
various
lessees.
Most
of
them
are
used
as
storage
garages,
not
as
parking
garages.
Would
you
make
a
commitment
to
evicting
all
of
the
storage
users
in
those
garages
in
advance
of
beginning
to
lease
the
spaces
so
that
they
are
in
fact
available
for
automobiles?
Well,.
D
That
would
be
a
prerequisite.
I
would
believe
to
getting
a
building.
Permit
is
to
show
that,
yes,
we
have
off
street
parking
available
for
the
tenants,
and
we
would
agree
to
that
as
a
condition
and
in
fact
my
client
testified
at
the
last
public
hearing
that
those
are
all
month-to-month
leases.
They're,
easily
terminated,
you've
spoken
to
all
of
the
lessees
of
those
spaces
that
if
this
project
gets
approved,
you
will
be
giving
them
notice
at
some
future
date
that
they're
out
okay,.
D
So
you
have
to
give
them
nothing
more
than
30
days
notice
and
they're
out
and,
of
course,
he's
going
to
give
them
more
notice
than
when
the
units
are
ready
for
occupancy,
because
he
needs
to
combine
two
of
the
units
into
a
handicapped,
accessible
units.
He
also
needs
to
provide
three
electric
charging
station
in
three
of
those
off
street
parking
garages.
So
he'll
need
some
time
to
get
that
done
before
the
units
are
ready
for
occupancy.
Will.
L
M
D
A
Okay,
then
I'm
gonna
close
the
record
and
we
are
going
to
move
on
to
public
hearing
because
it
seems
like
we
have
a
lot
of
people
here
interact.
Thank
you,
okay,
so
everyone
that
is
going
to
speak
I
have
the
first
person
on
my
list
is
Kevin
Miller
I,
don't
know
who
that
is
at
21-21.
Sheridan
I
would
like
you
to
note
that
your
comments
will
be
reserved
for
three
minutes,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
people
here
tonight,
we'd
like
to
move
through
our
agenda.
A
N
My
name
is
Kevin
Miller
and
I
live
at
300
Main
Street
I
am
the
chief
financial
officer
for
a
Garrett
evangelical,
Theological
Seminary.
We
are
located
at
21-21,
Sheridan
Road,
we
own
the
properties
immediately
north
and
south
of
this
property,
as
well
as
the
parking
lot
immediately
across
the
street.
So
we
surround
this
property.
We
are
in
support
of
this
construction.
I.
Think
the
current
single
do
duplex
house
there
does
not
fit
the
area
there.
I
think
the
new
apartment
building
will
look
very
nice
and
add
to
the
value
of
the
area.
N
As
you
know,
all
of
our
residents
are
students
at
Garrett
evangelical.
So
we
are
not
worried
about
adding
more
students
to
the
area.
In
fact,
the
reason
we
own
apartment
buildings
is
because
we,
our
students,
less
right
because
I
couldn't
afford
to
live
and
go
to
school
in
Evanston
because
of
the
pricing.
So
we
think
that
this
will
add
to
the
beauty
of
the
neighborhood
and
we're
in
support
of
it.
A
N
When
I
wrote
the
letter
that
we
had
had
discussions,
but
not
they
not
send
us
the
final
plans
they
sent
us
soon
after
I
had
written
a
letter,
so
we
review
them,
but
we've
talked
about
them
in
detail.
When
we
talked
about
the
original
plans
that
were
shown
at
the
first
session
that
wasn't
complete,
they
had
to
make
some
changes,
I
think
because
of
request.
N
C
So
I
have
some
questions
for
them.
Do
you
have
you
engaged
with
the
neighbors,
so
you're
immediately
south,
but
immediately
south
of
you
are
quite
a
number
of
single-family
homes?
Have
you
had
a
chance
to
engage
with
the
neighbors
in
those
single-family
homes
with
regard
to
their
rather
strong
opposition
to
this
project?
As
it
stands,.
N
C
Who
manages
your
properties
for
you
you're
the
CFO,
but
who
manages
your
properties
who
might
take
complaints
from
neighbors
with
regard
to
nuisance,
behavior
or
violations,
or
our
parking
violations
or
any
of
those
things?
Who
is
the
property
manager?
And
have
you
had
a
chance
to
speak
with
that
person
about
how
your
properties
are
integrating
with
the
neighbors
to
the
south
of
the
multi-unit
buildings?
We.
N
O
O
P
O
You
and
I'll
come
back
to
a
little
bit
of
the
language.
That's
used
because
I
think
it
needs
to
be
pointed
out
that
earlier
on,
there
was
language
in
the
presentations
were
about
neighborhood
benefits
and
it's
now
slid
over
to
maybe
public
benefit,
but
certainly
there
won't
be
an
adverse
impact
and
I
think
that's
a
very
significant
shift
in
the
way
we
talk
about
this
in
our
neighborhood
I.
It's
not
enough
to
just
not
have
an
adverse
impact.
It's
nice
that
it
improves
the
neighborhood
and
I
agree
that
replacing
the
the
building.
O
O
R
Jerry
Falls
2022
maple
I've
got
three
comments
that
I'd
like
to
make
and
the
first
one
in
my
job
I
work
with
small
business
owners,
many
of
whom
invest
in
real
estate
and
if
I
brought
an
offer
to
any
of
them,
offering
a
six
percent
return
over
30
years.
Is
that
what
the
word
was?
Nobody
in
their
right
mind
who
invests
in
real
estate
would
do
that
so
I'm
sure
you've
got
numbers
that
show
that,
but
I
doubt
very
much.
R
They
are
real
numbers
that
that
is
what
he
expects
and
if
it's
true
then,
what's
the
disconnect
between
this
6%
return
and
all
the
other
buildings
that
this
owner
has
that
our
student
housing,
where
I
am
sure
he
is
making
way
way
way
more
than
6%.
It
just
is
a
huge
disconnect
for
me
that
this
person
who
engages
in
student
housing
that
are
not
kept
up
not
well
policed,
are
difficult
for
the
neighborhood
is
now
gonna
suddenly
become
an
investor
with
a
6%
return
on
this.
That's
a
crazy!
That's
just
crazy!
R
R
Making
noise
and
and
I've
lived
in
my
spot
for
35
years
and
I
accept
it.
What
I
find
hard
to
believe
is
that
this
is
in
the
benefit
of
the
neighborhood.
It
just
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
that
you
would
add
15
more
units
of
student
housing,
which
they've
all
indicated.
That's
probably
who
the
new
tenants
are
going
to
be
to
an
arrant
neighborhood
that
already
is
overrun
by
students
and
then
the
last
thing
I'll
talk
about.
R
Is
they
surveyed
the
property
owners
that
are
surrounding
the
area
and
none
of
those
property
lonely's
have
a
problem
with
it?
Well,
they
don't
live
there.
None
of
those
property
areas
live
in
that
neighborhood.
So
why
would
they
have
a
problem?
Another
15
units
going
in
their
neighborhood?
They
wouldn't
so.
You
talked
to
the
people
that
live
in
the
neighborhood
and
ask
whether
there's
a
proper,
a
problem,
I
think
you'll
get
a
different
answer.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
I'm
Tony
ray
I
live
at
10:20
Grove
in
Evanston
I'm,
representing
joining
forces
for
affordable
housing.
We
are
pleased
that
the
new
incentives
built
into
the
inclusionary
housing
ordinance
has
given
the
potential
for
more
affordable
housing
units
I,
also
like
the
presentation
that
they'll
be
more
three
bedrooms,
so
they'll
be
more
family
friendly
aspect
and
I
like
the
Greenbelt
landscaping.
Thank
you.
K
Evening,
Stuart
Cleveland,
my
wife,
I,
live
at
21:45,
Maple
Avenue
lived
there
since
1988
owner-occupied,
two
very
quick
points
and
I
made
this
one.
Last
time,
I
met
in
a
letter
that
I
sent
to
you,
but
I
want
to
make
it
again
and
it's
sort
of
been
made.
Nobody
parks
in
those
parking
spaces.
Now,
maybe
one
person
does
I,
don't
know,
live
there
for
31
years,
never
seen
anybody
coming
and
going
they're
not
used
as
housing
for
commuting
cars.
So
what
this
is
gonna
do
is
add
15
cars
to
a
rather
small
dogleg
alley.
K
It's
got
blind
spots
coming
on
the
maple
for
moms
and
kids
are
coming.
Cars
are
gonna,
be
coming
out.
There
I've
seen
kids
go
by
in
the
lakes
and
not
notice,
so
this
parking
and
congestion
thing
really
is
an
issue.
The
other
point
I
want
to
make
I
live
as
I
said
that
21:45
Maple
Avenue,
which
is
four
properties
south
of
the
proposed
location,
current
location,
I'm,
a
signatory
to
the
neighbor
petition
petition.
I'm,
also
advised
that
Greg
heartline,
my
neighbor
at
2114
I,
know
Mabel
is
also
a
signatory.
K
E
Good
evening
my
name
is
mark
Dean,
my
my
wife,
Susan
and
I
lived
at
21/28
maple
just
across
the
street,
and
down
I'll
get
I
have
written
a
letter
stating
my
points
which
I
think
has
been
distributed
to
the
board.
So
I
won't
go
through
all
those,
but
I
think
that
it's
pretty
clear
that
this
proposal
doesn't
satisfy
any
of
the
requirements.
Much
less
all
of
the
requirements
for
granting
a
zoning
variance
I
want
to
respond
to
some
of
the
things
that
were
said
earlier
in
other
presentations
by
the
developer.
E
First,
he
completely
ignores
the
impact
his
project
will
have
on
our
neighborhood,
the
zoning
ordinances
that
require
you
only
to
pay
attention
to
the
immediately
next
door
properties.
Your
your
scope
is
wider
than
that
the
developer
has
had,
as
far
as
I
know
no
communication
whatsoever
with
the
homeowners
and
and
other
folks
who
live
in
other
than
the
buildings
immediately
surrounding
him.
That
you've
heard
of
heard
from
today.
Mr.
E
There
is
no
50-foot
entitlement
that
developers
got
the
reference
to
adding
two
and
three-bedroom
homes
so
that
families
will
move
into
that
building
is
I,
think
illusory
and
hard
to
take
seriously.
If
you
look
at
what's
happened
to
other
similar
buildings
that
have
been
built
recently
like
the
building
and
boy
Street,
that's
been
referred
to,
or
the
e2
building
down
at
the
corner
of
emerson
and
maple.
They
are
not
family
properties,
they
are
all
student
properties.
E
E
We
speaking
for
my
wife
and
I
and
I
think
for
the
neighbors.
We
support
affordable
housing.
We
think
that
the
that,
having
inclusionary
housing
units
in
here
in
this
project,
it
is
a
good
idea.
The
inclusionary
housing
ordinance
provides
that
if
they
can
build
a
multi-family
building,
the
number
of
permitted
units
would
be
11.
He
doesn't
there's
no
reason
to
provide
to
give
him
a
variance
to
build
more
than
that.
E
E
And
with
respect
to
the
adjoining
buildings
and
the
testimony
of
the
CFO
of
Gerrit,
I
will
say
that
that
our
neighborhood
has
had
extensive
problems
with
student
behavior
in
our
neighborhood.
The
problems
that
the
city
and
the
school
and
the
landlord's
have
so
far
been
unable
to
meaningfully
respond
to
or
reduce,
but
I,
don't
believe.
We've
had
any
trouble
with
students
from
Garen
Theological
Seminary.
E
S
It
is
by
far
the
best
possible
version
both
for
aesthetics
and
for
public
benefit.
You
know
we
build
up
and
down
the
North
Shore
from
Lake
Bluff
up
to
Chicago
and
not
a
lot
of
developers
put
inclusionary
housing
into
their
projects,
even
when
they
can
and
when
they
do
they'll
pay
into
a
fund
or
the
building
off
site.
So
when
you
have
a
project
like
this,
where
the
developers
putting
the
affordable
housing
into
the
project
itself,
I
think
that's
a
great
benefit
to
the
public.
Aside
from
that,
there's
the
construction
costs.
S
When
you
go
into
a
project
and
the
smaller
scale,
it
is
the
higher
price
per
square
foot,
the
construction
cost
Rises.
You
know
the
larger
the
project,
the
lower
the
construction
costs
and
makes
it
more
economically
feasible.
So
just
wanted
to
see
if
there's
any
questions
and
give
my
opinion
on
the
project.
Just
as
a
builder
20
years
experience
who's,
reviewed,
different
versions
of
the
project,
so.
C
What
would
make
this
aesthetically
unpleasing
if
it
were
say
an
11
unit
building
or
you
know,
perhaps
at
45
feet
like
the
you
know
or
40
feet
like
the
surrounding
buildings?
What
would
make
it
aesthetically
unpleasing
I
know
that
there's
the
the
the
contention
that
economically,
it's
not
feasible
at
that
density.
C
J
C
There's
no
question
and
and
the
neighbors
who
are
in
the
single-family
homes
to
the
South
may
need
to
understand
that
there's
gonna
have
to
be
some
compromise,
but
this
is
really
taking
it
to
the
hilt.
With
the
you
know,
inclusionary
housing
ordinance
giving
for
additional
units
to
bring
it
to
11.
Is
that
correct,
Melissa
or
not?
Is
it
eleven
or
nine
nine.
C
S
Of
what
goes
up
it's
going
to
be
improvement
based
on.
What's
there
what's
existing
right
now,
but
when
we
look
at
it,
we
look
at
scale.
We
look
at
proportion
and
I
think
the
proportion
of
the
building
being
taller
and
higher,
as
as
it
relates
to
other
buildings
in
the
area,
as
it
relates
to
other
buildings
that
can
be
built
in
the
air
in
the
future.
I
think,
if
you
look
ahead
a
few
years,
you
look
to
have
a
four
or
five
storey
building
and
there's
all
the
four
or
five
storey
buildings
around
it.
S
S
A
T
Good
evening
behind
these
inverse
waka
I
live
at
2201
Ridge
I've
been
over
there
since
1995
I've
seen
the
property
throughout
my
years
with
my
kids
and
everything
I
passed
by
there
every
day,
going
to
DMV
and
all
this
business
district
that
we
have
at
Noyes
Street
the
development
project
that
the
mr.
has
the
developer.
It's
a
very
good
project
and
it
will
bring
a
better
appeal
to
the
street
itself.
Just
because
there's
north
and
south
same
buildings,
seven
feet
high,
it's
not
gonna
make
any
big
difference.
T
Also,
there
was
some
mentioning
about
the
back
garages.
I've
been
going
through
those
back
garages
a
lot
of
time
with
my
kids.
Nobody
walks
through
those
it's
an
alley
that
only
a
garbage
truck
goes.
There's
no
kids
walking
around
there.
There's
no
people,
there's
nothing.
You
know,
there's
just
garbage
trucks
to
pick
up
the
garbage,
so
I
think
that's
an
issue
with
the
other
people.
T
U
Q
Know
I
am.
A
Q
L
U
U
Why
would
they
care?
Was
there
meeting
with
neighbors?
Not
that
I
know
of
we
weren't
asked
the
owners
won't
use
the
garages
I
have
a
two-car
garage,
I,
don't
use
it
I
park
on
the
street
and
I
think
they
will
too
and
there's
not
enough
parking
for
all
those
cars
it'll
meet
and
enhance
the
character
of
the
area.
I,
don't
think
so.
U
Families
won't
move
into
it.
Students
well
I,
think
we
know.
I'll
know
that
three
bedrooms
mean
three
students,
at
least
in
those
places.
I
reales
realize
the
city
needs
more
income,
but
we're
losing
our
family.
Neighborhood.
Noise
is
also
not
in
a
neighborhood
its
commercial.
Our
street
maple
is
mostly
houses.
U
We
voted
down
buildings
higher
than
three
stories
I
thought
years
ago
when
they
asked
us
what
we
wanted
in
our
neighborhood.
We
said:
well,
you
didn't
want
high
buildings,
we
wanted
to
one
or
two
storey
buildings,
but
people
developers
want
it
higher.
We
want
our
family
neighborhood,
we
don't
want
to
give
it
up
to
a
five
storey
building.
Thank
you.
Thank.
V
Evans
813,
gaffe-filled
I,
just
think
it's
you've
got
my
letter
of
central
letter.
I
spoke
last
last
time.
I
don't
want
to
take
up
a
lot
of
your
time,
but
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
we
are
a
very
delicate
mix
of
single-family
homes,
two
and
three
flats
and
apartment
buildings,
and
we
have
larger
apartment
buildings
on
our
perimeter
and
I'm
talking
about
the
our
4a
district
zoning
district,
that
that
starts
right
next
to
the
building
that
is
south
of
the
proposed,
so
the
Garrett
building
we
have
handled
loud.
V
We've
had
disruptive
students
in
our
neighborhood
for
the
30
years
that
I've
lived
in
the
in
my
home,
but
we've
worked
really
hard:
the
single-family
homeowners,
the
students
and
Northwestern
University
to
try
to
make
it
a
very
good
and
livable
neighborhood.
So
here's
the
concern,
it's
not
the
students.
V
The
concern
is
the
density
I'm
here,
not
because
I
think
that
there
is
anything
redeeming
about
the
property
that
was
purchased
as
it
is
now
we're
talking
about
the
variation
and
the
variance,
and
that
is
the
concern
that
at
least
I
have
it's
not
about
an
apartment
building
going
on
that
property.
It's
not
about
whether
or
not
we
support
it
or
don't
support
it.
I
personally
have
no
problem
with
an
apartment
building
being
on
that
property.
V
I
do
have
a
problem
if
the
height
is
not
consistent
with
the
vintage
buildings
that
are
around
it
and
I
also
have
a
major
concern.
When
a
builder
comes
up
and
says:
well,
that's
the
height.
They
are
now
because
that's
my
neighborhood
and
I
don't
want
to
have
to
think
about
all
the
houses
in
the
art
or
all
the
apartment
buildings
in
the
our
for
a
district
becoming
taller
and
taller
and
taller,
because
what
I
want
to
do
is
keep
my
neighborhood
in
the
delicate
mix
that
it
is
and
I
do
believe.
V
V
That
is
not
supportive
of
affordable
housing,
but
when
you're
putting
to
affordable
housing
units
in
in
order
for
you
to
get
a
variance,
and
one
of
them
is
a
studio
apartment
I,
just
I
just
have
to
call
question,
and
the
only
other
thing
I
want
to
say
is
that
this
particular
gentleman
and
his
wife
owned
at
least
seven
properties
between
Noyes,
Street
and
Simpson.
That
is
a
very
short
two
block
area.
V
All
of
them
have
students
in
them
all
of
them
or
most
of
them
to
my
knowledge,
have
apartment
or
have
bedrooms
that
have
been
added,
so
they
can
stuff
people
into
those
buildings.
Students
can't
even
complain
about
it
because
they're
afraid
they're
going
to
lose
they're
going
to
lose
their
homes
or
not
be
able
to
stay
in
their
homes.
V
If
it
becomes
clear
that
there's
more
than
three
unrelated,
so
the
students
aren't
the
problem,
safety
is
important
and
density
is
important
and
I'm
not
sure
that
I
see
this
particular
landlord
or
actually
developer
being
being
honest
about
what
the
what
what
he
really
wants
to
do
with
these
properties.
We've
had
absentee
landlords
in
our
neighborhood
for
years,
and
now
it
appears
that
we're
trying
that
developers
are
trying
to
come
in
as
well
and
that's
a
concern
of
us
we're
trying
to
keep
a
delicate
mix
thanks.
Thank.
J
Q
T
W
W
Oh,
my
name
is
Carrie
Brown
and
my
parents
purchased
a
house
at
20:18
maple
in
1988
and
I
have
lived
there
off
and
on
throughout.
My
life
and
I
wanted
to
show
my
support
for
the
developer,
because
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
my
neighbors
on
Maple,
so
I'm
a
block
and
a
half
south
of
the
building
or
the
proposed
building
and
I
just
wanted
to
show
my
support,
because
a
lot
of
my
neighbors
are
what
seems
to
be
they
kind
of
forgot
that
they
moved
into
an
area
where
there
are
northwestern
students.
W
It
is
very
mixed.
Neighborhood
there
are
business
districts
around
it.
There
are
apartment
buildings,
there
are
single-family
homes
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
he
is
a
well-respected,
professional
and
I
know
that,
because
of
what
he's
done
for
the
maple
foster
district,
which
is
a
business
district,
that's
up-and-coming.
He
has
helped
small
business
owners
open
their
businesses
in
the
buildings
on
the
corner
and
I
have
been
a
witness
to
this,
and
I
have
seen
major
positive
changes.
W
A
E
A
X
Virtually
every
one
of
those
garages
is
a
storage
for
a
landscaper
for
contractors
or
whatever
and
I
can
say
that
any
time
I
go
there,
there's
usually
two
or
three
other
garage
tenants,
loading
and
unloading
in
whatever,
and
so
turning
those
garages
from
storage
for
small
businesses
into
parking
for
four
cars
I
think
is
a
plus
for
the
neighborhood.
Okay,
I
do
not
live
on
maple,
but
again
I'm
two
blocks
north
of
there.
I
think
what
is
being
proposed
here
is
a
you
know:
excellent
addition
to
the
neighborhood.
X
X
Any
significant
complaints
about
the
students
or
whatever
and
I
think
to
provide
a
higher
standard
of
housing
for
the
students
is
just
going
to
benefit
the
neighborhood.
Obviously,
it's
going
to
help
the
tax
base
in
Evanston
being
the
significant
tax
payer.
I
can
speak
to
that
so
I
come
here
just
being
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank.
A
Y
Paul
Harbor
I'm
at
107,
Green,
Bay,
Road
and
we'll
Matt
and
I'm
the
developer,
so
I
took
some
notes
and
I'm
trying
to
make
it
in
in
three
minutes,
and
two
of
them
are
shocking
to
me.
They
came
from
and
and
I
used
to
be,
very
good
with
names.
I'm,
sorry
I
do
not
remember.
We
have
someone
who
lives
on
gaff
old
and
the
gentleman
who
came
to
speak
about
the
revenue
and
the
real
estate
and
all
this
investment
missus.
Also
mrs.
barbara
blades
came
adapt
or
they
are
saying
that
I
do
own.
Y
All
these
properties
and
I
made
it
publicly
that
I
owned
one
property
that
is
2141
Maple
beside
this
development,
and
this
I
think
we
are
under
oath
today.
So
I
recommended
mr.
mrs.
barbara
blades
to
go
on
to
the
commissioner
website
and
to
check
who
owns
which
property
before
coming
to
a
public
hearing.
I
do
I
do
say
the
same
to
you,
mr.,
because
I
do
not
I.
Do
not
remember
what
you
said,
but
I
think
you
said
that
I
do
own,
probably
hundred
units
or
something
like
this.
That
is
I'm.
C
Y
Y
C
I'm
trying
to
understand
and
I'm
sorry
I'm,
just
trying
to
understand
what
I'm
hearing
as
a
discrepancy,
so
alderman
Simmons,
seems
to
feel
as
though
you
have
been
involved
for
quite
some
time
in
the
neighborhood.
Yes
and
and
people
who
live
in
the
neighborhood
seem
to
feel
that
you
and
your
wife
have
been
involved
in
the
neighborhood
and
property
ownership
or
management.
For
some
time,
do
you
represent
any
other
ownership?
They.
Y
Y
That's
that's
one
thing
and
then
I
I
have
the
feeling
that
you
have
been
steered
in
a
way
where
you
know
these
two
affordable
units
they
are
I'm
obliged
to
give
them
anyway,
which,
which
is
I,
am
NOT.
I,
am
obliged
to
give
one
unit
and
give
pay
a
fee
a
loop
for
the
other
unit.
Okay,
since
the
beginning,
mr.
mark
beam
or
mr.
Stewart
Cleveland
have
said
that
last
time,
it's
not
true,
it's
false
I
am
obliged
only
to
giving
him
one
unit,
not
only
I'm,
giving
to
what.
I
Y
Can
come
and
say
this
is
one
unit,
and
this
is
a
fee
only
with
the
Sherman
development
right
now
300
units
they
paid
a
fee
on
Lu
for
15
units
and
they
just
did
not
give
more
affordable
units.
So
that's
that's
the
that's
the
other
point,
I
guess
to
to
the
comment
about
the
garages
I
think
III
did
provide
to
to
mrs.
Klotz
a
parking
lease,
and
these
are
parkings
I
advertise
for
parking,
I
pay.
They
pay
me
100
bucks
and
once
they
barely
pay
the
mortgage
so
I.
When
I
heard
the
comment.
Y
Last
time
I
contacted
the
public
storage
facility
and
450
square
feet
they
charge
$100
I
mean
if
I
charge
the
same
I'm
a
public
storage
right.
They
said
that
I
would
be
causing
all
these
16
people
to
move
out
right
away
because
I'm
storage
right
I'm,
not
I,
have
parking
leases.
I
touched
for
parking
speaking
about
students
and
non-students.
Today,
I
was
really
I'm.
Confused
I
mean
mrs.
wall
relates
said
about
things
about
students
get
oh
we're:
housing
students
shopping
in
people,
and
today
we
heard
that
the
concern
is
not
the
student
I
mean
I.
Y
Y
You
know
it's
not
a
building
designed
for
you
know
we
can
put
the
box
and
then
innovation
with
all
windows,
and
you
know
this-
the
students
would
would
move
into
it.
They
don't
care.
So
we
do
we're
really
design
wise
targeting
I.
Think
my
attorney
addressed
this
point
and
you
know
I
told
alderman
Simmons
that
I'm
offering
a
three-bedroom.
Why
I
think
families
moved
to
a
three
bedroom
apartment?
Yes,
we
we
were
offering
smaller,
because
there
is
a
need
for
a
studio-
and
this
has
been
said
by
mrs.
Y
Sara
flax
to
and
I
do
agree
that
you
know
one
blog
house
is
on
Maple
and
single
family
homes
too.
We
look
also
one
block
further
south.
It's
again
commercial,
its
businesses,
it's
a
transit,
oriented
development
area.
So
that's
the
whole
thing.
That's
the
that's
the
whole
thing
about
it
being.
You
know
a
way
to
facilitate
for
families
to
live
in,
to
commute
next
to
the
noise
metro
station.
Y
So
again,
I
own
one:
let's
make
it
clear,
I
own
one
building
one
address
two
units
and
I
think
that
a
6%
to
8%,
depending
on
you
know
what
mortgage
I
get
what
interest
rate
right.
Now,
it's
showing
6.8,
as
you
mentioned
it
beautifully.
It's
that's.
There
are
a
lot
of
variables,
so
I
don't
know
two
years
from
now.
There
is
a
recession
or
not
recession.
I,
don't
know
whether
I
can
I
get
and
I
have
to
unit.
So
I
am
more
than
happy
with
helping
the
neighborhood
with
owning
in
8%
return.
Y
It's
a
great
return.
There
is
no
problem
and
last
thing
is
alderman.
Simmons
sent
you
a
letter
right
I
think
she
spoke
about
me
about
the
integrity
about
everything.
So
I
have
no
idea
what
the
gentleman
said
about
missus
well,.
Y
A
Y
B
I
B
Y
B
B
For
everyone
in
the
audience
there
will
not
be
a
new
mailed
notice
for
this.
The
proposal
has
to
be
smaller
than
what
is
there
now
there
cannot
be
any
new
variations
or
an
increase
to
the
variations
proposed,
so
the
applicant
will
come
back
at
that
date.
We
will
hear
what
the
changes
are
and
then,
if
anyone
has
any
new
comments,
I
would
ask
please
try
to
keep
them
to
the
new
comments,
because
we
do
have
other
cases
that
we
need
to
get
to
both
tonight
and
at
the
next
meeting.
B
A
L
B
B
It
was
proposed,
our
housing
staff
was
comfortable
with
it
because
they
were
offering
more
than
the
minimum
required
number
of
on-site
units.
So
if
the
revised
proposal
only
includes
the
minimum
affordable
units,
which
would
be
one,
then
it
may
need
to
be
a
different
unit.
Size
I'll,
confer
with
them
and
see.
Okay,.
A
A
B
You
potential
lessee
applies
for
a
special
use
permit
for
a
commercial
indoor
recreation
facility,
lock
Chicago
in
the
b1a
business
district
and
O
CSC
Central,
Street
overlay,
district
zoning
code,
sections
695
three
and
six
fifteen
fourteen
seven,
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals
makes
a
recommendation
to
City
Council
of
the
determining
body.
For
this
case.
G
Thank
you
very
much
and
good
evening
good
evening.
My
name
is
bono
Sergeevich,
one
of
the
owners,
along
with
Brian
Lee
and
Alex
Wilson
forelock
Chicago
escape
room
games
currently
we're
at
8:28
Davis
Street
I'd
like
to
take
a
second
to
explain
what
an
escape
room
is.
An
escape
room
is
a
recreational
center
where
people
can
come
in
usually
families
or
corporate
events,
and
they
will
spend
up
to
an
hour
within
one
of
our
rooms.
G
A
room
persists
of
puzzles
and
games,
nothing
really
physically
oriented
its
family-friendly
handicap,
accessible
and
not
active
or
not
in
a
not
invasive
or
interrupting.
In
any
way
its
we
are
requesting
for
a
zoning
variance
to
2510
Green
Bay
Road,
the
location,
25
10,
25,
10,
Green,
Bay
Road,
we'll
be
taking
a
small
portion
of
the
current
square
footage
that
is
there
and
we'll
be
building
our
business
moving.
G
Our
current
existing
rooms,
an
existing
business
as
it
stands
at
eight
ten
to
twenty
five
ten
I
know
some
of
the
concerns
that
have
come
up
for
our
current
business
and
moving
to
twenty
five.
Ten
have
involved
noise
and
parking
I'd
like
to
address
those
for
parking.
The
there
are
currently
ten
spots
allocated
to
25:10
group,
a
road
there's
been.
G
We
there's
been
a
concern
that,
due
to
all
the
people
due
to
the
various
businesses
there,
including
our
businesses,
employees
and
our
customers
will
be
coming
through
that
there
might
not
be
enough
parking
spaces,
our
employees
at
peak
hours.
There
are
three
on
staff.
That's
on
saturdays.
It
is
one
on
Monday,
Tuesday,
Wednesday
and
two
one
Thursdays
and
Fridays.
G
Likewise,
our
hours
are
separate
from
standard
business
hours.
We
operate
on
point
on
Monday
through
Friday
from
5
p.m.
to
10
p.m.
and
then
from
on
weekends.
We
operate
from
10
p.m.
10
a.m.
to
10
p.m.
so
we
will
not
be
coinciding
with
many
of
the
businesses
that
will
be
operating
out
of
25
10,
as
well
as
in
addition
to
us
customers
that
come
through
at
most
we
have
about
on
weekdays.
We
have
on
average
10
there
at
anytime
at
peak
we
can
condemn.
G
We
can
have
about
20
people
there,
not
including
the
one
or
two
employees
that
are
there
as
well,
most
of
them
whether
they
come
from
the
city
they
come
from.
They
come
by
train,
some
do
come
by
car,
but
they'll
usually
come
in
groups
or
car
pools.
Very
rarely
what
we
have
someone
who
comes.
You
know
where
each
person
comes
in
individually.
We've
never
had
an
issue
with
parking
at
our
current
location
and
I.
Don't
believe
that
it'll
be
the
case
of
this
one
as
well
in
terms
of
the
noise.
G
The
question
about
noise,
specifically
in
the
alley,
the
as
I
said,
our
business
is
very
quiet.
We
have
no
loud
music,
we
have
no
running
around.
We
have
no
yelling
shouting,
no
crazy
physical
activity.
All
of
our
business
is
contained
to
the
front
of
the
shop.
Our
current
layout
is
located
at
the
northeast
and
northeast
section
of
the
building,
which
is
towards
the
front
entrance.
The
alley
will
only
ever
be
used
as
a
secondary
secondary
exit
route
in
case
it's
necessary.
G
G
Likewise
in
the
front,
if
let's
say
we
have
all
our,
if
we
have
all
of
our
customers
there
at
one
point
and
be
capacity,
we
will
only
ever
have
20
to
30
there,
and
they
will
have
exactly
one
hour
to
be
there.
There's
no
sticking
around,
they
don't
hang
out
afterwards.
They
usually
go
try
to
find
some
food
in
evanston
or
something
else
to
do
in
the
area.
G
So
I
don't
foresee
any
issues
with
people
sticking
around
and
causing
any
undue
noise
after
they've
completed
our
art
games
and
escape
rooms
in
terms
of
any
kind
of
impact
that
we
will
have
on
the
existing
building.
As
it
stands,
we
don't
have
any
kind
of
specific
requirements
for
our
internal
build-out
other
than
the
size
of
our
rooms.
So
we
are
fully
perfil.
We
are
fully
ready
to
design
anything
that
will
be
compliant
with
anything
required
by
fire
or
safety
standards.
In
terms
of
anything
any
impact
to
the
exterior
of
the
building.
G
We
will
have
a
portion
of
signage
that
will
be
on
there.
We
are
currently
discussing
what
that
size
will
be,
but
it'll
be
anything
that
is
within
reason
and
within
any
kind
of
restrictions
that
are
created
for
that
building,
as
I
said,
we're
a
very,
very
unobtrusive
business.
You
know
most
of
our
most
of
our
customers
who
come
in
are
young
professionals.
You
know
mid
to
late
20s
or
families
for
birthday,
parties,
get-togethers
or
corporate
outings
and
I,
don't
believe
that
they
will
be
causing
any
kind
of
undue
disturbance
to
the
area.
A
G
So
our
three
main
groups
are
corporate
outings,
so
anybody
from
any
of
the
businesses
around
Evanston
or
Chicago
they
they
wore
one
of
our
most
frequent
customers
for
regular,
no
necessary
pattern
kind
of
customer.
It's
about
the
mid-20s
range
about
25.
We
do
have
some
northwestern
students
who
come
as
well.
They
make
about
15%
of
our
current
employee
base
and
then
we
also
have
birthday
parties
and
get-togethers
for
families.
So.
G
G
The
rooms
don't
can't
contain
unlimited
amounts
of
people
we
each
room
at
most
can
contain
10
people,
so
there
are
limits
to
the
size
of
those
and
I
even
know
it
so
far
not
had
any
issues
with
parents
coming
in
we've
never
had
a
group
bigger
than
maybe
you
know
the
full
25
30
people
that
we
can
have
at
once
coming
through.
So.
G
No,
no,
we
don't.
We
don't
allow
food
or
drinks
at
the
location.
Location
is
strictly
people
come
15
minutes
before
the
escape
room,
for
you
know
explaining
them
how
the
escape
room
works,
making
sure
the
group
gets
there,
they
have
exactly
one
hour
or
a
little
bit
less
if
they
succeed
earlier
in
the
within
the
room,
and
then
they
have
another
15
minutes
for
photos
and
those
kinds
of
things
and
then
they'll
leave
and
they'll
usually
go
to
some
other
party.
I
haven't
sent
her
to
somebody's
house
for
eats
egg
cake.
Those
other
things
do.
G
A
Can't
thank
you
and
you're
only
going
to
take
up
like
the
front
half
of
the
building.
Are
you
in
the
back
half
so.
G
The
the
both
both
lobbies
for
the
building
as
far
as
I'm
aware
it'll,
be
a
shared
Lobby
space
through
the
front.
We
do
not
plan
to
encourage
or
in
any
way
advertise
that
the
back
is
an
entrance
to
our
building
it'll
be
used
as
I
said
as
a
employee,
and
it's
a
employee
exit
if
necessary,
or
an
emergency
exit,
is
necessary.
All
business
will
be
told
to
come
into
the
front
off
the
street
entrance.
L
G
So
for
in
terms
of
drop-off,
so
far
our
birthday
parties-
we
don't
allow
parent
children
to
be
unsupervised,
so
parents
will
usually
stick
around
with
this
with
the
children,
because
the
rooms
you
know
with
their
delicate
we
try.
We
we
build
everything
by
hand,
it's
all
very
good
constructed,
so
we
require
the
parents
stay
with
the
children.
U
C
My
understanding
from
my
daughter-in-law,
who
was
in
town
from
San
Francisco
and
she
said
escape
room
status,
is
that
it's
really
more
of
a
brain
game.
Yes,
it's
it's.
You
know
like
a
puzzle
within
a
puzzle,
and
so
it
is
I
think
inherently
quiet
and
I
would
say
that
it's
not
the
type
of
business
that
generally
is
going
to
attract
Rowdies.
Z
G
Yes,
so
that
so
layout
is
in
flux.
That
is
just
an
example
of
the
amount
of
space
that
we
would
be
able
to
take,
or
if
you
would
decide
to
have
the
rooms
be
multi
room
escape
room,
sometimes
escape
rooms.
You
need
to
go
into
one.
It
opens
up
into
additional
rooms
as
part
of
the
puzzle.
Okay,
all
rooms
will
be
able
to
be
accessed
with
some
flow
to
the
inner.
Z
Z
G
We
have
on
weekdays,
we
have
overlapping
hours
on
the
half
hour
and
then
was
on
weekdays.
We
run
every
two
hours
as
one
of
our
rooms
Monday
through
Wednesday
is
we
have
two
rooms
running,
so
we
only
have
a
little
bit
of
overlap.
There,
Thursdays
Fridays.
We
have
three
rooms
running
and
on
Saturdays
we
have
hour
and
a
half,
so
we
have
all
three
rooms
overlapping
for
30
minutes
or
so
so.
G
Space
now
so
our
rooms
are
all
independent
of
one
another.
We
have
the
shared
Lobby
that
is
part
of
the
building
where
we
will
be
able
to
have
people
get
together,
while
the
group
gathers,
but,
as
I
said
they're
only
there
for
15
minutes
beforehand,
it's
a
very,
very
strict
schedule
because
we
have
rooms
coming
and
going
so
we
try
to
enforce
people
to
stay
at
that
time
and
then
the
rooms
are.
G
I
C
G
A
G
G
AA
My
name
is
IRA
Smith
I
resided
18:35,
Lincoln,
Street
I
owned
that
too
flat
building
and
I
also
lived
there.
We
are
the
property
that
is
the
absolute
closest
to
25,
10
Green
Bay
Road
off
of
the
alley.
Okay,
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
think
we've
heard,
but
this
sounds
like
a
pretty
good
idea
right
as
compared
to
some
things
that
were
considered
a
few
months
ago
for
that
property.
This
seems
like
a
pretty
good
use
of
that
space.
I've
I've
actually
never
met
any
of
these
folks,
so
I'm
learning
about
it.
AA
You
know
we
always
were
just
really
worried
about
the
parking
situation
and
I
know
that
they're
not
worried
about
it,
but
I
know
that
building
and
I
know
that
there
are
ten
spaces
there.
We
don't
know
who
the
other
tenants
may
be
that
are
going
into
that
building
I
haven't
heard
how
many
spaces
have
been
reserved
for
their
use
with
something
that
they
might
want
to
want
to
speak
to.
AA
It
doesn't
sound
like
there's
going
to
be
a
hundred,
and
fifty
people
showing
up
like
we
were
worried,
might
have
happened
with
some
other
uses
for
that
space.
So
it's
probably
not
that
big
of
a
deal
I
just
hope
that
they
have
a
plan
for
what
are
they
going
to
do
when
a
dozen
parents
show
up
and
there
cars,
because
there
is
no
alternative
in
that
area?
There's
a
lot
of
restricted
parking,
so
they're
gonna
have
to
have
a
plan
for
it,
but
otherwise,
as
as
their
closest
neighbor
closest
residential
neighbor.
AA
A
P
AB
AB
For
the
record,
for
the
record,
the
other
addresses
your
address.
My
address
is
657
ash
Street
in
Winnetka.
Thank
you.
I've
owned
businesses
that
made
the
buildings
that
main
in
Chicago
on
Davis
Street
at
Green,
Bay
in
central
and
and
now
let
it
be
known
that
I
well
I,
don't
own
25:10
tonight.
I
do
expect
to
close
before
the
end
of
July.
The
parking
has
been
an
issue
when
you
are
in
business
and
Everson.
AB
AB
I've
spent
considerable
amount
of
time
with
the
buildings
that
I've
owned
on
Central
Street
and
nearest
cent,
Green,
Bay
and
central
I
believe
that
there's
going
to
be
sufficient
enough
parking
in
at
the
building,
as
well
as
in
the
neighborhood,
particularly
on
the
other
side
of
the
railroad
tracks
at
evening
and
and
weekends.
If,
indeed-
and
it
would
be
needed,
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
foresee
12
parents
dropping
off
their
kids
all
at
the
same
time
for
a
party
and
I,
don't
I,
don't
want
to
minimize
it.
AB
But
bonnie
has
a
very
broad
base
selection
of
clientele
and
to
dwell
on
twelve
twelve
parents
dropping
off
their
ten
year
olds.
I
think
this
would
be
doing
a
disservice
to
the
business,
so
we
have
made
arrangements
with
neighbors
Scott
Rogers
I've
spoken
with
about
parking
off
hours
as
well,
but
there
is
ample
parking
on
the
other
side
of
Green
Bay
Road
by
the
train
tracks
for
for
any
evening
or
weekend
traffic.
Most.
If
you
have
the
concern
most
of
the
other
businesses
that
are
going
to
be
in
there
are
local
single
family
owned
businesses.
AB
So
quale
is
well
aware
of
my
work
with
the
technology
Innovation
Center,
which
is
a
36
year
old,
nonprofit,
small
business
incubator
which
operate
out
of
this
will
be
the
third
building
for
that
we
have
at
the
peak
reached
42
high
tech,
startup
companies.
Most
of
them
are
ones
single
or
double
office
users
for
services.
Software
development
made
some.
Maybe
some
product
development,
but
no
food,
no
beverage,
no
drink,
no
abuse
most
of
the
people.
AB
AB
Hope
so,
yes,
I've
spoken
with
a
number
of
client
companies
in
and
around
the
area
and
we
hope
to
attract
more
startup
companies.
You're
well
aware
of
my
work
in
Edison
with
Economic
Development
Bonnie,
who
also
was
maybe
too
modest,
to
mention
the
fact
that
at
8:20
Davis
Street
not
only
do
corporate
clients
come
in
for
team-building
efforts
and
families
come
in,
but
they
they
come
into
town
and
they
spend
money
in
restaurants,
downtown
Avastin
and
maybe
doing
some
shopping
before
or
afterwards.
AB
C
AB
AB
AB
A
AB
Thank
you.
They
won't
even
know
it.
I
I
do
I'm
not
prepared
with
a
stack
of
or
a
list
of
good
neighbors,
but
I've
run
a
fairly
successful
business
in
Evanston
for
about
45
years.
I
remain
available
in
case
other
people
have
some
questions
that
would
like
to
be
addressed,
but
thanks
for
the
opportunity.
L
Just
and
the
parking
for
just
one
more
question:
if
I
understand
the
brief
correctly,
you
have
a
15-minute
before
your
scheduled
time
period
and
a
15-minute
roughly
after
your
scheduled
time
period.
But
then
the
appointments
are
stacked,
I
think
you've,
given
some
variations
on
the
hour
every
hour
and
a
half
whatever
it
may
be.
L
If
you
do
start
to
get
feedback
from
customers
or
from
neighbors
that
the
parking
is
an
issue
because
you
are,
if
there's
20
people
and
every
am
at
a
time
there
is
gonna,
be
a
period
where
people
are
coming
and
people
are
going.
So
that's
gonna
be
a
stress
on
the
parking.
So
if
that
does
start
to
become
an
issue,
would
you
take
another?
Look
at?
You
are
available
scheduler
yep.
AC
Absolutely
and
my
name
is
Brian
Lee,
one
of
the
other
owners
as
well
and
yeah.
Absolutely
so
on
our
website.
We
list
out
very
clear,
hey.
This
is
the
best
way
to
get
to
us.
We
always
recommend
you
know
Metro
a
lot
of
the
other
public
transportation
as
well
as
even
at
a
twenty
just
to
limit
the
amount
of
cars
kind
of
coming
through
but
yeah.
Absolutely
we
actually
change
our
schedules
pretty
frequently
to
what
suits
our
employees
the
best.
AC
Z
AC
We
actually
have
like
kind
of
a
question
there
like.
How
did
you
find
out
about
us
one
of
the
questionnaires,
as
well
as
similar
transportation?
So
that's
we're
body
and
we
got
our
fax
on
a
lot
of
people
taking
the
metro
or
the
L
or
the
buses.
So
we
can
kind
of
gauge
those
metrics
and
that's
certainly
something
we
can.
It
takes
a
click
of
a
button
and
we
can
make
sure
where
you.
Z
A
So
we
are
going
to
move
on
to
the
special
use
standards
for
the
CBA
to
recommend
in
the
City
Council
grant
a
special
use.
The
CBA
must
find
at
the
proposed
special
use.
One
is
one
of
the
listed
special
uses
for
the
zoning
district
in
which
the
property
lies.
Commercial
indoor,
recreational
facilities
are
allowed
under
the
special
use
section
of
the
b1,
a
business
district
and
as
an
eligible
special
use
for
active
ground-floor
use
in
the
Central
Street
District.
A
Number
two:
it
complies
with
the
purposes
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
general
plan
and
the
zoning
ordinance.
The
use
is
compliant
with
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
comprehensive
general
plan,
because
the
project
promotes
growth
and
adaptive
reuse
of
this
existing
commercial
structure
number
three:
this
will
not
cause
a
negative
cumulative
effect
in
combination
with
the
existing
special
uses
or
as
a
category
of
land
use.
There
are
no
other
special
uses
in
the
immediate
area
and
the
proposed
commercial
indoor
recreation
facility
is
complementary
to
nearby
commercial
uses.
A
Number
four
does
not
interfere
or
diminish
the
value
of
property
in
the
neighborhood.
The
proposed
business
will
occupy
an
otherwise
vacant
existing
commercial
space
and
will
not
generate
an
abundance
of
noise
or
parking
and
traffic
issues.
If
it's
developed
in
accordance
with
the
testimony
presented,
error
number
five
is
adequately
served
by
public
facilities
and
services.
The
building
is
served
by
adequate
streets
sidewalks
and
is
in
close
proximity
to
multiple
public
transportation.
Uses
number
six
does
not
cause
undue
traffic
congestion.
This
facility
is
located
less
than
250
feet
from
the
Central
Street
metro
station.
A
All
employees
use
public
transportation
and
customers
typically
carpool
or
ride,
share
to
this
type
of
business
in
accordance
to
the
testimony
number
seven
preserves
significant
historical
and
architectural
resources.
This
building
and
the
property
are
not
identified
as
a
local,
historic
landmark.
The
building
facade
was
renovated
approximately
five
years
ago.
No
exterior
changes
are
currently
proposed.
Other
than
signage
number
eight
preserves
significant
natural
and
environmental
resources.
A
C
A
AD
B
B
Zoning
code,
section
6,
8,
4,
7
C
to
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals,
is
the
determining
body
for
this
case.
Documents
included
as
part
of
the
record
pink
variation
application
submitted,
May,
2nd
2019
zoning
analysis,
plat
of
survey,
site
plan,
elevations
photos
of
property
from
applicant
photos
of
similar
properties,
image
of
property,
aerial
view
of
property,
zoning
map
of
property
and
dapper
meeting
minutes.
Excerpt
of
July
3rd
2019.
AD
AD
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
all
right
as
Patrick
asked
me
to
come
to
the
property,
he
is
looking
to
purchase
the
property,
but
and
in
his
opinion
he
felt
like
we
needed
to
do
something
there,
because
this
property
needs
major
renovation
so
when
I
walked
into
the
property.
The
first
thing
that
I
noticed
from
the
first
floor
to
the
second
floor.
They
have
a
staircase
that
is
in
in
the
beginning
in
the
front,
and
it
goes
straight
up
and
the
problem
is,
it
was
a
complete
fall
hazard.
AD
It
was
not
too
cold,
so
that
was
the
first
issue,
the
second
issue.
On
the
second
floor,
there
was
one
bedroom
going
into
another
bedroom,
so
it
was
no
hallway
and
then
the
the
third
issue
was
that
there
was
no
bathroom
up
there
either.
Now.
Currently,
this
existing
house
is
a
three-bedroom
house.
The
bedroom
downstairs
is
like
an
8
by
8,
it's
not
even
too
cold.
So
what
we?
AD
The
stairs
as
as
I
was
going
up
there
I
had
to
hold
onto
both
walls.
So
technically
this
house,
even
if
it's
purchased,
you
cannot
put
a
second-story
addition
on
there,
because
you
have
a
15
foot
setback
on
one
side
and
you
have
a
5
foot.
Setback
on
the
other
only
got
5
feet.
So
that's
not
gonna
work,
so
we
tried
to
come
up
with
a
solution
so
that
we
could
just
extend
those
existing
walls
going
straight
up
as
it's
not
a
two-story.
The
massing
is
still
the
same.
A
AD
AD
I
C
AD
It's
on
the
rear,
the
front
stays
the
same
right,
the
the
way
that
we
are
going
to
approach.
This
is
we're
gonna,
try
to
we're
going
to
keep
the
gables
as
is
and
the
front
and
the
back
we're
gonna
cut
the
middle
of
the
roof
and
then
create
an
inverted
gable
so
that
it
doesn't.
It
still
keeps
the
massing
of
the
of
the
house,
except
that
bad
new
Ridge
will
be
three
feet
higher
than
the
existing
raised.
It
comes
from
the
front
and
the
back,
but.
C
U
A
AD
C
B
Because
the
North
facade
of
the
house
is
within
three
feet
of
the
property
line,
there
are
building
code
issues
with
windows.
There
are
ways
around
it
where
you
can
get
certain
kinds
of
rated
windows.
The
property
owners
are
aware
of
it
and
they're
looking
into
it.
They'll
have
to
comply
with
the
code.
Okay,
another
thanks.
A
AD
A
You
is
there
anyone
here
that
like
to
speak
with
the
project,
because
it's
getting
late,
I'm
gonna,
ask
you
to
keep
your
comments
brief.
If
the
person
before
you
says
what
you
want
it
to
say
just
say,
I
agree
with
them.
Could
you
please
step
up
I,
don't
have
you
on
the
sign-in
list?
Okay,
so
could
you
just
step
up?
Did
I
swear
you
I
the
whole
truth,
nothing,
but
the
truth.
Okay,
thank
you.
My.
AF
AF
A
A
C
From
the
board,
not
a
question
but
I've
I've
been
by
this
property,
I
walk
by
it
frequently,
and
there
is
no
question
that
it
has
to
be
if
it's
either
a
teardown
which
allows
you
to
do
nothing
or
it
is,
as
you
pointed
out,
something
that
will
require
quite
a
lot
of
work
and
and
I.
You
know
looked
at
the
plans.
I
A
Thank
you.
I
will
read
the
standards,
okay,
variance
standards
for
the
CBA
to
recommend
approval
of
this.
They
must
find
that
the
proposed
variance
one
will
not
have
a
substantial
adverse
impact
on
the
EU's
enjoyment
or
property
values
of
adjoining
properties.
The
surrounding
properties
are
a
mix
of
single-family
structures
in
a
public
park.
The
massing
height
and
size
of
the
proposed
additions
are
consistent
with
the
proximate
buildings.
Number
two
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
A
The
proposed
additional
addition
promotes
the
public
health
morals,
general
welfare
and
objectives
of
the
comprehensive
general
plan,
as
well
as
enhances
the
taxable
value
of
a
currently
dilapidated
property.
Number
three
has
a
hardship
or
practically
difficulty
that
is
peculiar
to
the
property.
The
substandard
corners
slot
size
and
width
are
existing
and
cannot
be
altered
without
impacting
adjacent
properties.
Number
four
property
owners
would
suffer
a
particular
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
as
distinguished
from
a
mere
inconvenience
construction
without
zoning
relief
would
result
in
a
considerably
narrower
and
unusable
second
floor.
A
That
would
not
provide
reasonable
space
for
a
future
family
or
corman
or
accommodate
needed
code
updates.
Number
five
is
not
based
exclusively
upon
a
desire
to
extract
additional
income
from
the
property
or
public
benefit
to
the
Hall
will
be
derived
the
proposed
repairs.
An
additional
habitable
space
will
rehabilitate
a
currently
dilapidated
in
unsafe
property
and
improve
the
quality
of
the
neighborhood
number.
Six
does
not
have
a
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
that
was
created
by
any
person
having
an
interest
in
the
property.
A
The
property
was
planted
and
construction
at
its
size
and
with
prior
to
the
current
ownership
number
seven
is
the
minimum
change
necessary
to
alleviate
the
particular
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
The
proposed
addition
to
the
existing
residence
is
the
minimum
necessary
to
provide
a
habitable
and
functional
residence
within
the
existing
lot
limitations.
A
The
proposed
roof
deck
is
modest
in
size
incited
to
comply
with
the
interior
side,
yet
setback
to
minimally
impact
adjacent
neighbors
due
to
the
small
footprint
on
the
primary
residence
additional
usable
space
provided
in
the
garage
addition
reduces
the
bulk
of
the
primary
residence
and
is
cited
to
minimally
impact
adjacent
neighbors
can
I.
Have
someone
call
the
motion?
Please
I.
AG
C
L
A
M
M
B
The
property
owner
applies
for
major
zoning
relief
to
convert
a
two
family
residence
into
a
multiple
family
for
unit
residents
in
the
are
four
general
residential
district.
The
applicant
requests
a
lot
with
the
40-feet
existing
where
50
feet
is
required
for
multiple
family
residential
uses.
Zoning
code
section
six,
eight
five,
five
four
dwelling
units
where
two
dwelling
units
are
permitted
do
should
a
lot
size.
B
Zoning
code
section
six,
eight,
five,
four:
zero
additional
parking
spaces
where
three
additional
parking
spaces
are
required:
zoning
code
sections,
616
table
16
B
and
a
building
height
of
three
storeys,
thirty
one
and
a
half
feet
at
the
highest
point
of
the
flat
roof,
where
a
maximum
building
height
of
35
feet
or
two
and
a
half
stories
is
permitted.
Zoning
code
section
six,
eight
five,
eight,
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals,
makes
a
recommendation
to
City
Council
the
determining
body
for
this
case.
B
Documents
included
as
part
of
the
record
include
variation
application
submitted,
June
6th
2019
letter
from
applicant,
affordable
unit
description,
plat
of
survey,
zoning
analysis,
site
plan,
floor
plans,
elevations
neighborhood
photos
from
applicant
letters
of
objection,
image
of
property,
aerial
view
of
property.
Zoning
map
of
property,
dapper
meeting
minutes
excerpt
of
July
3rd
2019,
as
well
as
I,
believe
one
additional
letter
of
opposition
that
was
handed
out
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
and
revisions
from
the
applicant
that
reflect
the
third
story
coming
off
of
the
top
per
the
dapper
recommendation.
Absolutely.
M
M
For
the
record
1013
rosemary
Terrace
in
Deerfield
Illinois,
thank
you.
The
project
that
we're
proposing
is
a
addition
to
the
existing
two-story
apartment,
building,
adding
two
additional
units
to
the
rear
of
the
building.
As
you
can
see
in
the
site
plan,
they
would
be
two-bedroom
units,
one
on
the
first
floor
and
one
on
the
second
floor,
identical
to
each
one.
So.
A
M
We
had
a
roof
over
the
stair,
we're
anticipating
putting
the
air
conditioning
units
on
the
roof
for
maintenance
and
we've
kind
of
wanted
to
protect
the
the
stair
and
offer
stair
up
to
the
top.
But
I
think
the
dabber
meeting
made
a
reasonable
point
that
it
looked
a
little
funny
and
that
can
be
accessed
through
a
scuttle
in
the
top
of
the
stair.
So
that
came
off.
M
M
M
We
are
required
for
four
total
units,
ten
thousand
square
feet.
We
currently
have
five
there's
a
minimum
lot
width
that
we.
That
lot
is
currently
a
40-foot
wide
lot
and
we
would
be
required
to
have
50
for
the
additional
two
units
and
parking
is
also
in
question,
because
we
we
are
kind
of
landlocked.
We
can't
get
back
to
the
rear
of
the
property
to
add
surface
parking,
so
we
are
unable
to
provide
the
additional
one
and
a
half
per
unit
in
terms
of
the
site
plan
that
you
have
on
sheet.
M
The
unit's
themselves
on
the
following
clad
the
following
page,
is
simply
the
existing
are
the
basement
plan,
my
apologies,
which
will
be
mechanical
and
storage
for
tenants,
the
sheet
three,
which
is
the
existing
building
itself,
just
as
a
reference
to
the
two
units
that
do
exist
on
that
property
and
your
sheet.
4
is
the
new
floor
plan
layout,
showing
the
two
bedrooms,
a
living
and
dining
space
in
a
kitchen
and
those
are
all
accessed
through
a
stair
off
to
the
east
side.
The
the.
M
Elevations,
for
this
are
as
simple
as
they
can
be
really
nothing
much
to
comment
about:
they're,
all
abiding
by
code
for
light
invent
and
egress
as
well.
The
primarily
the
the
two
units
in
size
will
only
allow
two
people
occupancy,
so
the
additional
load
on
the
property
is
minimal
compared
to,
if
more
than
two
were
allowed
to
stay
in
that
property.
M
M
That
would
make
50%
of
the
total
units
as
affordable
housing.
The
I
think
the
the
afford
I'll,
let
Farouk
kind
of
discussed
the
affordability
criteria,
but,
for
the
most
part,
I
think.
The
the
idea
to
provide
more
affordability
is
paramount.
With
I
think
we
tried
to.
We
tried
to
provide
as
much
space
as
we
could,
based
on
the
site
plan
and
the
zoning
restrictions.
M
We're
staying
within
the
five
foot
setback
on
either
side
we've
actually
reduced
the
width
of
the
addition
on
the
west
side
to
stay
within
the
existing
step
back,
even
though
the
existing
building
itself
is
encroaching
in
on
that
west
side
of
dish,
Westside
setback
and
the
rear
yard
setback
we
are
staying
within.
So
that
kind
of
drove
the
size
and
shoehorning
as
much
as
we
can.
M
AG
A
AG
AG
AG
B
M
E
M
M
M
B
I
L
M
M
M
C
Melissa,
this
is
affordable
housing
for
ten
years.
Only
right.
B
Correct,
since
there
is
a
proposal
for
a
total
of
four
units
on
the
property,
this
is
not
a
covered
development.
There
is
no
affordable
housing
requirements,
but
a
staff
is
requesting
it
based
on
the
variations
requested,
which
we
then
traditionally
do
it
for
a
10-year
period,
and
alternatively,
staff
did
discuss
this
a
little
bit
with
the
applicant,
but
housing
staff
has
suggested
an
alternative
that,
instead
of
having
the
two
new
units,
both
be
affordable,
that
it
would
also
be
acceptable
to
make
one
of
the
existing
units
affordable.
B
Instead,
because,
with
the
the
way
the
units
are
laid
out
in
their
size
requirements,
the
new
units
can
house
two
people
each
and
the
existing
units
can
house
up
to
four
people,
so
we'll
get
the
same
number
of
people
housed
in
one
affordable
unit
if
it's
the
existing
unit.
So
it's
kind
of
up
to
the
applicants,
preference
if
you
would
prefer
that
and.
C
M
M
M
AG
AG
AG
L
M
A
AG
AG
AG
I
A
E
A
AH
As
owners
of
1325
from
Wall
Street,
we
reached
quest
step.
This
proposal
be
rejected
from
our
25
years
of
living
in
Brunel
Street.
We
have
seen
a
drastic
uptick
in
limited
parking
spaces
within
this
area.
The
addition
of
two
more
stories
would
greatly
reduce
the
limited
parking
spaces
we
already
have
available.
In
addition,
this
would
cause
current
residents,
especially
older
ones,
to
park
and
walk
in
blocks
further
away
from
this
residence
from
their
residence.
AH
Moreover,
the
four
four-story
addition
would
interfere
with
our
ability
to
obtain
tenants
and
sell
a
property
within
this
area
due
to
the
needed
parking
for
the
potential
tenants
residing
in
1321.
Also,
the
fourth
storey
would
raise
property
taxes,
taxes
within
this
area.
This
would
cause
landlords
and
Bruno
Street
to
raise
the
rent,
and
this
Bret
increase
will
cause
current
tenants,
who
have
lived
here
for
a
very
long
time
to
search
for
more
affordable
units
which
will
essentially
counteract
mr.
Ali's
idea
of
affordable
housing.
AH
From
mr.
Ali's
purchase
in
of
the
property
in
2018,
he
has
not
been
an
effective
absentee
landlord.
For
instance,
his
garbage
was
overflowing
with
garbage.
His
garbage
can
was
in
overflowing
with
garbage
because
it
had
not
been
picked
up
by
local
waste
management.
Due
to
mr.
Ali
and
his
tenants
refusal
to
follow
the
paper
trash
pickup
schedule,
this
resulted
in
the
presence
of
raccoons
in
the
air
within
the
area.
Moreover,
his
tenants
opted
to
throw
their
trash
in
our
trash
can
because
of
the
overflowing
of
garbage
that
was
not
picked
up
in
their
building.
AH
Currently,
the
site
of
mr.
Lee's
property
has
a
broken
fence.
If
these
simple
property
may
maintenances
were
an
issue
for
mr.
Ottley
with
a
two-story
addition,
how
could
he
effectively
maintain
a
four-story
unit
since
the
more
tent,
since
the
addition
of
more
tenants
would
result
in
more
maintenance,
which
is
already
a
struggle
for
this
property
owner
due
to
the
potential
potentially
negative
outcomes
from
limited
parking,
parking,
increased
taxes
and
negative
impacts
on
the
environment?
I
ask
that
the
council
reconsider
the
proposal.
Thank.
AI
A
F
Been
so
patient
he's
been
very
impatient,
so
my
name
is
Jeffrey
Kairos
I
am
at
141,
North
has
Barry
and
my
concern
is
parking.
There's
from
what
I've
read
that
there
supposed
to
be
three
additional
spots
located
under
the
zoning,
as
my
neighbors
have
stated,
though,
parking
is
very
tight.
F
Our
condo
association
there's
usually
multiple
people
with
with
multiple
vehicles
in
the
neighborhood,
and
you
know
you
have
a
right
to
as
many
vehicles
as
you'd
like,
but
parking
in
this
area
is
very
tight,
as
is
now
people
coming
home
and
I'm
not
being
able
to
find
parking,
especially
when
we
have
cleaning
every
other
weekend.
Heaven
Stan,
it's
really
a
concern
for
us,
it's
just
a
quality
of
life
and
it
also
be
a
disservice
to
the
tenants
now
and
future
tenants
not
to
have
parking
for
themselves,
we're
not
right
by
a
CTA
station.
F
There's
a
couple
of
bus
routes
that
come
by
you
know
but
and
I
assume
you
can
bike.
But
you
know
this
is
Chicago
Evanston
area,
so
the
weather
is,
you
know
pretty
torrid
and
unpredictable.
So
parking
would
be
my
primary
concern
that
affects
me
and
the
tenants
of
141
Asbury
directly.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
C
AG
C
I
AG
Just
this
is
basically
I.
I
read
these
comments
too
before
so.
This
is
today's
video
for
the
same
property,
around
6:45
641
for
the
5
in
between
so
I
just
wanted
to
show
that
the
property
surrounding
in
about
the
parking
concerns
which
we
have
seen
so
far
and
as
far
as
the
I
mean
645
is
already
a
p-card.
Most
of
the
people
already
back
home,
so
I
mean
if
we
assume
the
parking
moving
forward.
The
same
way
I
mean
this
is
what
actually
the
the
area
the
exact
same
area
as
of
today
641.
AG
A
This
building
there's
no
alley
and
back
of
these
buildings
right
because
the
river-
and
there
is
no
CTA
right-
there's
no
parking
alright
for
this
building.
A
AG
AG
AG
AG
My
point
is
definitely
I
mean
I
totally
understand
concern,
then
I
respect
whatever
my
suggesting.
Definitely
there
is
parking
available,
but
that's
not
the
case.
My
case
is,
if
you
can
see
the
recommendation
from
the
data.
The
city
has
been
reduced
in
affordable
housing
units
in
the
last
decades
and
is
in
need
of
new,
affordable
housing.
It's
not
about
only
the
addition
in
the
building
it's
about
what
actually
we
are
looking
for
today.
Are
we
moderate,
affordable
families,
or
are
we
looking
for
only
for
the
part,
I
mean
I
totally
understand.
AG
This
is
one
of
the
concern.
This
is
not
only
the
concern
in
the
city
or
in
the
same
neighborhood,
but
it's
the
same
concern
is
everywhere
variable
we
are
going
in
Chicago,
especially
Menston.
We
also
have
the
same
issue,
but
on
the
other
end,
we
also
have
a
bigger
issue
about
nobody
would
love
to
or
liked
to
have
the
affordable
families
in
the
place,
and
that's
why
I
mean
you
know
whenever
they
this?
This
suggests
that
you
know.
Instead
of
going
to
one,
we
should
go
for
two
I
said:
that's
fine.
AG
Now
we
don't
know
because
the
ultimate
object
is
to
to
assist
these
needy
people
there's
not
only
to
adding
two
more
years,
also
so
I'm
very
much
open.
If
there
is
any
suggestion,
if
we
have
to
commend
it
anything
else.
Definitely
we
would
love
to.
But
at
the
end
of
the
day
is
more,
like
you
know,
it's
more
something
more:
to
giving
back
to
the
community,
I
mean
I
totally
understand
down.
The
road
more
vehicles
will
be
on
the
road.
Eventually
we
have,
we
have
to
accommodate
these
vehicles.
AG
At
the
end
of
the
day,
I
mean
every
year
we
have
more
vehicles
on
the
road,
and
if
we
only
consider
the
parking
I
mean
we
may
not
be
able
to
ending
up
with
anything,
I
think
I
live
up
to
our
count,
so
that
you
know
you
should
gauge
what
actually
we
are
looking
as
as
a
community.
Are
we
looking
for
helping
the
more
of
multiple
families
or
I
totally
understand?
The
only
issue
is
we.
We
have
a
land
lock
on
the
back
and
we
cannot
offer
the
parking
on
our
back.
AG
Otherwise,
I
can
have
something
in
the
basement
like
the
basement
parking
something.
But
at
this
point
of
time
we
I
mean
you
know
unfortunately
online
log
and
we
don't
have
any
other
exits
from
Baxter.
So
that's
the
only
thing
and
I
respect
whatever
they're
saying
they're
very
right,
but
this
is
what
actually
we
are
offering
to
put
them
in
it
again
giving
back
to
the
database
100%
whatever
the
Edition
is
hundred
percent
going
back
to
the
government
can.
AG
I
mean
so
we
as
as
soon
as
I
heard
about
that
we
have
made
already
roasted
that
was
going
to
take
care
of
those
things,
so
I
mean
I
totally
understand,
and
the
fence
is
basically
it's
on
my
neighbor's
property,
so
I
have
called
them
like
once
only,
but
they
were
so.
We
cannot
cross
that
property
until,
as
we
spoke
to
my
my
neighbor.
So
that's
why
I'm
just
waiting
but
I
mean
I
totally
understand
I'm
and
I.
I
can
give
my
words
today
that
I
will
reach
out
to
them.
AG
Once
again,
I
will
make
sure
that
whatever
the
maintenance
concerns
are,
we
are
going
to
address
those
notes
and
for
sure,
and
as
soon
as
I
mean
I'm
I'm
also,
you
know
making
sure
that
we,
maybe
maybe
I,
mean
once
once.
We
have
all
these
four
units,
probably
I'm,
going
to
add
a
property
management
are.
AG
AG
C
AG
AG
M
There
was
some
discussion
with
the
fact
that
we
were
taking
up
more
rear
yard
part
of
the
thinking
not
only
to
get
to
the
roof
with
the
stair,
and
that
type
of
thing
for
AC
was
to
generate
a
green
roof.
That
was
something
that
was
in
the
back
of
our
minds
too.
We
were
gonna
structure
it
well
enough.
Someone
could
do
that.
A
C
Quite
sure,
I
see
how
the
neighbor
benefits
from
a
green
roof.
I
mean
the
the
environment
will
benefit,
but
the
neighbor
will
still
be
looking
at
a
vinyl
sided
edition
in
what
used
to
be
a
green
backyard
and
I
think
that
that
affects
quality
of
life,
I'm
I'm
troubled
by
this
on
a
number
of
fronts,
and
primarily
because
I,
don't
you
know,
I
think
that
rents
in
the
neighborhood
around
Brahmo
are
fairly
affordable.
So
the
differential
is
not
huge
and,
yes,
we
need
more
affordable
units.
C
AG
AG
This
is
something
we
can
consider
like
as
far
as
the
I
mean
not
100
percent
100
percent
green
roof,
but
definitely
we
can
plan,
we
I
mean
we
can
address
those
issues,
I
mean,
as
you
just
mentioned.
We
may
not
right
right
from
the
beginning.
We
may
not
be
able
to
go
hundred
percent
to
green
roof,
but
we
can
definitely
address
those
issues
to
incorporate
with
our
roof,
not
100%,
but
maybe
like
50
percent
or
25
percent.
We
can
cover
with
our
with
the
Caminos,
is.
AG
A
Z
So,
but
let
me
comment
on
the
main
issues:
is
the
parking
issue
balanced
with
the
affordable
housing
I
believe
in
this
zoning
board
will
always
give
the
advantage
to
the
affordable
housing
a
kind
of
in
front
of
the
parking
issue,
because
we
need
more
housing.
No
matter
of
the
I
would
not
say
no
matter,
but
with
the
travel
of
less
parking
available
for
this
new,
affordable
housing.
Z
So
in
this
aspect,
and
also
having
in
mind
that
this
is
self-created
for
sure,
hardship,
I
would
prefer
the
affordable
housing
in
front
of
the
parking
issue
for
the
the
rest
of
the
things.
I,
don't
see
how
you
can
make
more
backyard
space,
it's
simply
impossible.
I
can
see
that
very
clearly
the
the
bulk
of
the
building.
It's
it's!
Okay,
it's
not!
In
contrast
with
the
adjacent
properties,
it
is
longer
than
the
immediately
adjacent
property,
but
it
is
smaller
than
the
ones
on
both
sides
of
the
two
properties,
practical
things.
Z
If
you
want
to
make
a
green
roof,
that
is
always
I
would
say
we
shuffle
and
you
can
do
it.
It
is
very
expensive,
it's
very
hard
to
maintain,
and
you
should
put
more
effort
than
that
and
your
neighbors
should
be
happier
if
you
put
big
efforts
in
maintaining
the
property,
including,
if
you
have
a
green
roof.
The
AC
units
on
the
top
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
removed
this
ugly
thing
from
the
roof
over
the
staircase.
Z
L
Right
I
share
some
of
the
concerns
about
kind
of
the
livability
of
the
spaces
that
you're
creating
on
your
site
and
the
impact
on
the
livability
on
your
adjacent
property.
To
the
way
I
I
do
have
concerns
about
the
public
benefit
of.
In
the
cases
I
thought
proposed
in
the
packet
of
the
potentially
the
two
units,
the
two
660
square
foot
unit
being
allocated
to
affordable
housing,
I.
A
Also
have
a
problem
with
the
exchange
between
the
parking
and
the
affordable
housing
units.
While
we
do
need
affordable
housing
units,
like
Commissioner
McCauley
said
there
are
I,
think
this
neighborhood
is
affordable,
and
so
there
are
some
there,
but
the
parking
issue
I
understand
that
you
gave
us
am
a
video
of
what's
going
on
there,
but
I
think
that
the
parking
is
already
a
issue.
Even
you
know,
the
video
shows
what
it
is
at
a
certain
point
in
time,
but
overall
I'm
sure
that
that
has
a
problem
I'm
sure
of
it.
AG
A
A
AH
Three
things:
first,
his
video
was
only
for
today
and
when
it's
warm
outside
and
people
go
out
when
it
comes
to
like
the
fall
and
winter
I
can
guarantee
you
that
people
are
fighting
for
parking.
I've,
seen
it
for
myself
that
people
have
been
three
cars
fighting
for
one
parking
and
on
top
of
that
for
the
fence,
the
fence.
I,
don't
know
if
it's
his
photo
has
the
fit
the
photo
of
the
fence.
AH
But
I
took
a
photo
today
and
the
fences
his
that,
because
the
person
who
bought
the
house
originally
built
that
trench-
and
this
is
the
photo
of
the
fence
currently
as
a
today
and
on
top
of
it
for
the
rent.
He
said
that
he
would
put
the
affordable
housing
around
1300
on
my
parents,
rent
a
house
up
the
building
of
apartment
above
us
for
1200
for
a
three
bedroom
apartment.
So
it's
not
really
affordable.
AH
AI
Parking
is
horrible,
I
have
come
out.
The
alleyways
people
are
blocking
the
alley
where
it
makes
it
almost
impossible
to
turn
out
of
the
alley,
ultra
bummer
to
turn
westbound
and
this
cars
packed
all
along
the
street
he's
showing
a
video
from
today.
But
if
you
go
over
there
right
now,
there's
parking.
AI
There's
people
parked
illegally
all
over
the
place
because
there
is
no
place
for
them
to
park,
so
they
park
up
close
to
crosswalks
and
they
get
tickets
all
the
time
and
right
now
it
is
warm
outside
and
people
are
just
not
home
from
work.
Yet
we
fight
for
parking
lot,
a
parking
spot
say
in
my
area.
People
come
from
that
street
and
park
on
our
street
on
Dobson
I'm,
closer
to
Dobson.
They
parked
from
Brahma.
We
see
them
walking
from
that.
You
know
through
the
alley
to
to
park
and
I.
AI
Couldn't
do
that
if
I
you
know,
I
do
have
a
parking
spot,
but
there
are
people
in
my
building
that
do
not
have
a
parking
spot.
I
personally
could
not
walk
from
that
area
to
it
where
they're
parking,
because
our
specially
in
the
wintertime
so
parking
is
a
very
big
issue
over
there
garbage
rats
and
if
they're
not
gonna,
keep
up
with
their
property.
It's
just
going
to
create
more
rodents
in
the
alleyways
that
we're
already
fighting
against,
so
I
do
think
it's
out
there
and
I
hope
the
council
listens
to
us.
Thank
you.
AI
P
Q
My
name
is
Mary
chakra
and
even
1325
Bam
Bam
Bam,
oh
for
21
years,
so
I've
been
there
a
long
time
than
him.
So
if
I'm
unable
to
have
in
a
pocket
his
resident
is
a
tenant
going
to
have
a
parking,
6
o
clock,
the
title
goes
back
in
the
tech.
Dos
picture
is
the
time
people
going
they'll
go
to
work
at
that
time
is
the
time
everybody
go
to
what
nobody
cannot
stay
home.
They
ought
to
go
to
work.
Q
You
going
to
see
a
parking
stop
by
for
thirty
two
five
six
o'clock:
seven
o'clock:
you
cannot
see
any
spot
to
pack
in
your
car
if
you
have
to
park
in
you
have
to
go
to
that
Sun.
If
you
don't
I,
don't
want
that
that
Sun,
you
can
file
means
some
packing
I'll
still
be
on
the
street,
and
that's
doing
are
you
going
to
make
for
uni
and
then,
when
he
make
up
for
Union
his
house
is
next
to
my
building.
This
is
built
in
this.
Q
My
building,
so
that's
mean
we
are
unable
when
he
put
another.
My
I
was
going
to
be
darker
because
the
Sun
not
going
to
flash
on
my
building
anymore
because
he's
building
going
to
cover
my
building
because
he's
going
to
be
higher
than
my
so
I
see
this
in
fear.
That's
not
I'm
fine
I
pay
a
tax.
So
he's
not
going
to
be
good
for
me
and
then
I'm
not
going
to
be
appreciate.
Q
Somebody
to
take
my
privacy
for
me
is
like
he's
going
to
take
my
privacy
from
me:
I,
don't
like
I,
don't
like
it
do
it
I,
don't
want
it
build
that
place
because
I'm
the
one
going
to
be
hurt:
okay,
listen
they're
coming!
They
are
not
next
to
him,
going
to
get
the
problem,
deliver
a
load
of
garbage
and
they
throw
the
pick
up
garbage
a
lot
of
mess
and
for
21
years
I
live
there
they're!
The
first
then
lo,
leave
garbage
like
this
on
the
floor.
Don't
clean
and
then
raccoon
was
a
la.
Q
Do
a
lot
is
a
mess
you
know,
and
then
you
tell
not
have
to
come
in
on
my
garbage
game
to
put
that
there.
You
know
to
put
garbage
in
there.
That's
not
fair,
for
me,
that's
not
fair!
For
me,
I,
don't
say
if
you
want
to
build
rebuild
up
Lisa
do
whatever
you
want
to
do
not
on
email,
1321,
women.
They
don't
deserve
to
get
for
union
and
then
another
thing
going
to
be
tapping
attacks
going
to
be
happy.
It's
only
two
flat
I
have
when
they
say
is
touch
this
book.
P
Q
Business,
you
don't
live
there,
you
want
to
run
his
business,
so
you
don't
care
about
what
my
neighbor.
If
we
live
with
me
on
a
semi
bone,
you
will
understand,
don't
make
any.
You
need
o
floor
whatever
you
want
to
make,
because
he
will
understand
the
pain.
When
you
finish
to
work,
you
tired,
you
cannot
find
a
parking.
You
have
to
run
run,
run,
run
some
time
to
work,
walk
clock
at
night.
I'm
finished
work
is
on
I
wanna
eat
ten
o'clock.
Q
U
P
Name
is
Mihaly
arethe
I
live
at
1013
Dewey
I
just
want
to
thank
y'all
for
being
here.
I
know
it's
late
and
thank
you
for
for
allowing
all
the
comments
this
late
into
the
night.
My
only
comment
is
that
you
know
you
spoke
of
you
know
having
to
make
this
trade-off
between
parking
and
affordability
and
I.
Think
the
other
component
that
we
leave
out
of
this
is
in
Evanston.
P
We
care
about
equity,
and
we
sat
here
earlier
this
evening
and
had
half
of
Northern
Evanston
complaining
about
a
variance
that
was
being
asked
for
and
they
were
providing
15
parking
spots
and
garages
for
those
folks.
So
when
we
look
at
this
and
they're
asking
for
four
major
variances
here
in
an
area
where
there's
no
parking
already
I
think
we
have
to
also
add
equity
to
that
component
and
say
you
know
some
something's
not
right
here.
If
we're
gonna,
you
know,
stop
a
developer
in
north
north
Evanston.
P
M
Want
to
clarify
that
the
building
addition
is
the
same
height
as
the
existing
building
and
the
same
height
as
the
neighboring
building.
It
won't
be
any
taller,
it's
still
a
two-story
addition.
So
in
terms
of
its
the
existing
some
issue,
it
would
be
the
same
and
I
think
there
were
just
three
variations
that
we
okay.
A
Thank
you
so
much.
Okay,
now
I'm
going
to
close
the
record,
it's
getting
late,
I'm,
going
to
read
the
standards
I'm
going
to
remind
everybody
that
we
are
not
the
determining
body
for
this.
This
goes
on
to
City
Council.
After
this,
so
whatever
happens
here,
we've
had
our
public
hearing
and
we
will
just
vote
on
it
and
move
it
forward
to
City
Council
okay,
for
a
variation
to
be
recommended
for
approval.
The
CBA
must
find
at
the
proposed
variation.
A
One
will
not
have
a
substantial
adverse
impact
on
the
use,
enjoyment
or
property
values
of
adjoining
properties.
The
proposed
building
addition
and
density
will
bring
the
property
to
closer
similarities
surrounding
multifamily
buildings,
with
similar
bulk
in
architectural
style.
I
am
NOT
going
to
speak
to
the
third-floor
roof
over
the
egress
stair,
because
I
understand
that
you
are
not
going
to
do
that.
Well,.
C
A
L
I
A
Okay,
I
agree
that
the
standard
has
not
been
met.
Okay,
the
second
one
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
Although
the
property
does
not
meet
the
required
lot,
size,
width
or
parking
for
a
multi-family
residence,
the
zoning
ordinance
allows
for
consideration
of
zoning
relief
when
a
public
benefits
such
as
affordable
housing
is
provided.
The
requesting
zoning
relief
is
substantially
similar
to
the
existing
conditions
on
surrounding
properties
on
the
block
I'm
going
to
take
a
vote
for
this
standing
being
met,
how
many
votes
for
this
standard
being
met?
L
A
All
right
has
it
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
that
is
peculiar
to
the
property.
The
practical
difficulty
is
that
the
surrounding
properties
feature
a
larger
scale,
multifamily
residential
that
divorce,
the
subject
property.
Additionally,
the
property
does
not
feature
alley
access.
How
many
agree
that
the
standard
has
been
met
has
not
been
not.
It
has
not
been
met.
In
my
opinion,.
L
A
The
property
owner
would
suffer
a
particular
hardship
where
practical
difficulty
as
distinguished
from
a
mere
and
convenience
without
the
requested
zoning
relieves,
a
property
can
only
feature
a
two
family
residence
which
would
not
utilize
the
full
potential
of
the
property
when
compared
to
surrounding
structures
and
density.
How
many
agree
with
that.
I
A
C
L
A
To
affordable
units
you
as
well,
so
this
standard
has
yes
been
met.
Okay
does
not
have
the
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
that
was
created
by
any
person
having
an
interest
in
the
property
and
I
feel
like
the
hardship
was
created
by
the
current
owner.
I
think
the
standard
has
not
been
met.
Who
else
agrees?
My.
A
So
the
standard
has
not
been
met.
Number
seven
is
limited
to
the
minimum
change
necessary
to
alleviate
the
particular
hardship
or
practical
difficulty.
The
applicant
proposes
to
construct
an
additional
an
addition
off
the
rear
of
the
existing
structure
that
will
only
be
minimally
visible
from
the
street
and
complies
with
all
other
zoning
requirements
that
proposed
okay,
I'm,
not
going
to
read
that
one,
because
that
is
off
the
table.