►
From YouTube: IURA Board Mtg.
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
C
A
B
B
A
B
D
D
E
Site
plan
review,
the
planning
board,
looks
at
the
environmental
impact
of
parathy
and
unless
the
tenant
has
a
particular
environment
to
look
at
that
they're
not
concerned
about
who
the
tenant
is,
except
for
how
the
outside
of
the
building
looks
kind
of
it
complies
with
our
you
know,
regulations
so,
for
instance,
say
look
at
the
signage.
E
They
looked
at
active
Street,
Front
use
and,
and
those
kind
of
aspects
like,
but
the
tenant
did
change,
which
is
not
unusual
when
a
project
is
going
through
cycle
interview
that
when
the
build
up
starts
they
when
the
building
starts
or
the
project
is
going
through
site
plan
review,
they
don't
necessarily
know
who
lieutenant.
So
in
that
regard,
the
landlord
doesn't
have
the
role
in
in.
F
So
the
in
the
urban
renewal
agency
process
was
as
an
urban
real
project.
The
site
in
the
greensbury
garage
site
was
broken
up
into
a
east
and
west
side.
The
East
Side
closest
to
America
to
the
Marriott
hotel,
and
we
sought
developers
to
acquire
it
to
redevelop
it
for
Alexander
parking
and
so
I.
Remember
in
Green
Street
development.
After
getting
Jeffrey
women
and
his
development
team
were
selected
as
the
preferred
developer
to
work
with,
we
call
it
a
sponsor.
They
developed
a
project
in
the
process
of
developing
their
projects.
F
Their
plans
changed
a
couple
of
times
at
one
point:
the
building
extended
from
the
parking
garage
parcel
all
the
way
out
front
to
the
commons
above
the
business.
The
front
of
the
commons
and
the
agency
recognize
that
could
create
some
issues
for
attendance.
F
In
trying
to
mitigate
that
issue.
The
developer
decided
they
would
pull
back
and
not
go
and
impact
existing
businesses
by
building
above
them
over
building
that
portion,
and
so
the
project
the
agency
approved,
was
the
parcel
on
the
parking
garage
not
up
front
that
fronts
out
to
the
front,
had
nothing
to
do
with
the
public.
I
mean
the
physician
assistance
program,
not
even
sure
we
knew
about
that
program,
or
it
wasn't
a
real
program
at
the
time.
F
It
was
in
development
at
that
point,
but
that
was
not
part
of
the
uses
that
the
agency
approved
and
didn't
know.
It
wasn't
controlling
that,
so
the
urban
Rail
Project
basically
had
boundaries
that
were
a
parking
garage
former
site,
but
not
going
out
to
the
commons.
Because
of
those
issues,
though,
with
you
know,
there
were
protections
to
try
to
ensure
that
the
existing
businesses
were
not
negatively
impacted,
particularly
by
the
overbuild,
and
we
start
negotiations
and
we
required
that
the
developer
pay
for
the
businesses
legal
fees,
because
there
were
negotiations
going
forward.
F
Ultimately,
though,
they
pulled
back
the
building
from
that
area
and
the
agency's
development
plan
did
not
include
the
portions
that
brought
upon
the
commons.
So
we
didn't
have
any
jurisdiction
over
that
at
that
point
in
time
and
I
think
if
we
want
to
get
into
deeper
detail,
it's
really
an
executive
session
issue
rather
than
a
public
exception.
Maybe
we
should
discuss
because
there
are
legal
questions
that
have
been
Arisen
from
some
multiple
sides
of
decision.
So
I
want
to
be
careful
to
have
some
advice
of
legal
counsel
and
get
into
deeper
discussions.
D
D
Thank
you
is
your
motion
to
approve
them
back
there.
Their
motion
we're
doing
is
March,
2nd,
yes,
Donna
second,
is
oh
any
modifications
or
changes.
We
recommended.
D
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
of
improving
those
myths
of
19940,
and
you
guys
always
Charles.
Okay,
our
primary
action
item
for
today
is
the
heart
entitlement
action
plan,
so
you
have
a
large
font
version
with
an
FC
online
table.
Thank
you
very
much.
Just
after
that
are
these
are
these
amounts
updated
or
use
the
amount
we've
been
working
with
all
along.
F
F
D
On
and
is
that
I
mean
I
would
expect
that
definitely
for
cdvd
digital
program.
Is
that
true
from
one
two
because
yeah
this
also
don't
line
up
yeah,
it
is
true
yeah
great.
Do
many
numbers
have
a
potential
conflict
of
interest
with
any
of
the
agencies.
Assistance
under.
D
E
D
C
C
I
think
the
person
to
say
that
can
I
think
all
the
committee
members
agreed
with
how
we
approach
this
is
that
we
want
to
support
the
projects
that
of
course
meet
the
city's
Five-Year
Plan
the
comprehensive
plan,
but
we
in
general
support
the
projects
that
assist
the
most
vulnerable
members
of
the
community
and,
in
addition,
support
the
development
of
affordable
housing
and
that
informed
our
discussions
as
we
look
through
the
various
projects,
and
it
also
I
think
informed
the
way
that
we
distributed
the
funding
as
and
you'll
talk
about
more
to
get
to
the
economic
development,
particularly
the
Public
Services.
C
So
that's
kind
of
the
general
philosophy.
If
you
will
that
we
took
when
we
were
discussing
the
projects
in
the
starting
with
the
housing
projects,
projects,
one
three,
nine,
we
in
general
and
historically
have
supported
the
Neighborhood
Housing.
So
we
wanted-
and
you
know
the
development
of
oral
housing
they
and
Habitat
for
Humanity
are
pretty
much
our
own,
affordable
housing,
Developers
and,
of
course,
we
were
constrained
by
the
limited
amount
of
money,
so
the
beacon
which
you
know
we're
gonna,
it's
gonna,
be
Kodak
buns
for
at
least
a
year.
C
So
we'll
talk
about
that
one
too
much
so
that
freed
up,
you
know
more
home
and
CBG
funds
for
us
homeowner
rehab.
We
had
initially
scaled
it.
If
I
remember
correctly,
the
amount
that
inhs
had
asked
for
comes
out
to
approximately
a
little
bit
less
than
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
per
per
graduate,
so
we
initially
scaled
it
down
from
eight
projects
to
five.
C
The
amount
you
see
here
doesn't
equate
to
to
any
scaling.
It's
a
little
bit
more
if
it
if
it
was
I,
think
five
projects
and
I
don't
have
my
nose
switch
to
another
forms
in
my
exact
notes.
So.
A
C
Think
the
kind
of
odd
amount
there
was
some
scaling
plus
we
had
some
funds
left
over
so
to
make
the
the
balance
and
make
the
the
bottom
end
balance.
We
came
up
to
got
up
to
the
156
932.
again,
it's
kind
of
an
odd
amount,
but
that's
how
it
came
to
it.
This
is
some
scaling
I
think
it
was
five
or
six
houses,
plus
what
some
monies
we
had
left
over
when
the
199.9
I
was
taken
out
for
project
number,
one,
the
beacon,
clear,
minor
repair,
but
we
support
that.
C
It's
a
valuable
program
helps
keep
vulnerable
seniors
primarily
in
their
homes.
Keeps
housing
stock
are
deteriorating
further,
strongly
support
that
program,
they're
important
in
Public
Funding,
the
serious
group
development,
not
quite
the
full
funding,
but
again
the
development
of
four
affordable
housing
houses.
Rather,
and
so
we
wanted
to
strongly
support
that
program
and
the
the
amount
is
less.
You
know
the
the
9500
is
again
just
trying
to
balance
out
the
amount
of
funds
available,
but
a
real,
strong
structure
of
support
from
the
community
for
that
project.
C
The
same
with
the
duplex
of
Habitat
for
Humanity
project
number:
five:
you
can
see
that
61
dollars
a
little
bit
over
that
was
okay.
We've
got
61
remaining,
let's
give
it
somewhere,
but
fully
support
that
program
again:
a
duplex,
affordable
housing
for
two
families
that
I
think
if
I
remember
correctly
at
or
below
30
of
Ami
yeah
number
six,
the
housing
scholarship
program,
typically
a
program
we
strongly
support.
C
You
know:
learning
web
is
dealing
with
vulnerable
young
adults
since
the
youth
with
young
adults.
The
really
only
reason
that
we
didn't
support
funding
this
year.
It
was
there
there
are
a
little
over
75
000
is
remaining
from
the
previous
year
and
it
was
an
adequately
adequately
explained
during
the
public
hearing
as
to
those
funds
and
how
it
might
be
spent
down.
C
I
believe
that
they,
the
the
staff
from
learning
web,
did
indicate
that
they
thought
that
they
would
be
spent,
and
so
therefore
come
this
time
next
year
and
these
funds
would
would
be
available.
But
we
had
some
real
strong
questions
about
about
that
program
and
the
funds
that
had
not
been
used
and
the
timing
so
perhaps
come
next
year
see
if
they
get
approved,
it
will
be
sufficient
for
them
to
not
have
any
gaps
in
their
funding.
C
Project,
seven
security,
deposit
assistance
for
Catholic
Charities,
again
a
program
that
we've
strongly
supported
over
the
years
and
still
continuing
to
support
that
security.
Deposit
is
a
big
barrier
for
a
lot
of
people,
so
we
wanted
to
support
them
in
simple
funding.
C
The
St
John's
Community
Services
the
sober
living
facility,
not
full
funding.
We
looked
at
the
notes.
I
should
pull
up
on
another
subject,
but
we
want
us
to
support
to
strongly
support
the
program
and
the
Indy
8000
again,
if
I
remember
correctly,
has
to
do
with
two
components
of
their
of
their
budget.
The
bathroom
Renovations
was
a
major
part
and
then
the
security
system.
A
C
The
village
of
Ithaca,
the
capital
campaign
expansion,
we
thought
a
word-
definitely
awarded
project
to
provide
housing
for
youth,
in
danger
of
homelessness
or
in
conflict
with
the
families
and
youth
meeting
in
place
to
stay
the
primary
issue
with
why
we
didn't
recommend
any
funding
is
they
have
to
fundraise
almost
500
000
I
think
it
was
475
000.
C
and
we
were
told
at
the
board.
During
the
public
period
we
were
told
that
the
board
feels
very
common.
The
village
is
board.
It
was
very
confident
that
they
were
raised
the
funds.
The
committee
thought
there's
a
very
long
timeline
for
this
project
and
come
back
next
year,
again,
not
a
comment
on
the
worthiness
of
the
project,
but
the
limited
amount
of
funding
and
this
one
seemed
like,
unlike
the
other
projects
that
he
could
wait
for
an
initial
year.
C
Economic
Development,
though
we
discuss,
you
know
some
quite
worthless,
discussion
about
about
this
and
our
recommendations,
given
that
the
Ed
committee
typically
takes
the
lead
on
the
recommendations
for
these
projects,
but
we
did
want
to
give
some
thoughts
to
as
we
do
every
year.
A
couple
of
the
new
committee
members
has
some
suggestions
about.
C
C
We
generally
supported
pretty
much
all
of
these.
These
projects,
the
one
that
you
see
with
no
funding
and
I'll
just
skip
to
that.
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
before
I,
do
that,
though,
the
amounts
of
pretty
much
less
than
the
full
funding,
except
for
workers,
are
job
trading
again
have
to
do
with
limited
amount
of
funds.
C
C
I
think
most
of
the
committee
members
felt
that
the
application
was
very
weak,
so
real
concern
about
if
the
application
is.
C
We
heard
from
Harry
Smith
the
I
think
the
executive
director
I'm
not
sure,
if
that's
the
exact
time
will
it
reuses,
but
the
leader
of
it.
There
I
heard
that
work
has
been
done
in
placing
people
with
the
unions.
C
Of
the
12
that
went
through
the
program,
Harry
said
five
had
been
placed
at
the
union
and
the
other
is
the
other.
Seven
were
on
the
waiting
list.
It
was
unclear
if
being
taken
in
by
the
union.
If
that
actually
means
you
were
working
or
if
it
means
you're
on
a
list
to
be
called
for
a
job
and
I
think
that's
the
way
unions
work,
but
it
wasn't
clear
and
it
wasn't
clear
from
the
application
personally
and
I
guess
at
some
point,
we'll
just
get
into
our
our
thoughts
about
each
of
the
projects.
C
I
thought
that
some
funding
should
go
to
to
this
effort.
I
recommended
that
we
fund
the
stipends.
There
was
requests
for
two
years
for
the
stipends
27
000
per
year.
I
thought
it's
important
that
the
people
going
through
this
training,
so
some
of
the
other
programs
would
be
paid
during
the
training.
C
I
guess
we're
continually
talking
about
and
young
adults
to
adults,
and
so
they
need
some
some
income,
while
they're
going
through
a
training,
I
fully
support
the
efforts
to
get
people
into
the
unions
and
other
construction
jobs,
even
at
the
salon
Union,
it's
their
good.
Paying
jobs,
which
is
you
know,
one
of
our
goals
and
that
impacts
everything
housing.
You
know
your
ability
to
live,
to,
support
your
family
and
and
I
believe
that
the
work
is
being
done
on.
This
is
not
oh,
please,.
C
In
many
ways
it
may
not
be
the
type
of
work
that
lends
itself
to
that.
We're
not
used
to
and
lets
us
out
to
putting
down
a
paper,
exact
numbers
I
think
it
can
be
difficult
work,
it's
more
based
on
relationships,
but
that
aside,
I
think
I'll
just
say:
I
think
it's
important
work
and
I
think
with
some
coaching
you
can
get
a
better
coaching
to
the
participant
or
the
people
who
run
the
program,
get
some
better
understanding
of
the
impact
that
they're
having
and
so
at
some
point.
C
C
Facility
is
that's
another
one.
We
had
a
fairly
robust
discussion.
One
of
the
committee
members
felt
very
strongly
that
we
should
fund
upon
this
project.
Follow
the
committee
members
see
the
value
in
it
recognizing
the
residents
of
the
current
residents
of
that
area
and
the
future
residents.
C
You
know
it's
not
having
a
sidewalk
someplace
to
walk
other
than
that
in
the
street
is
very
important,
and
you
know
acknowledging
that
at
some
point
the
trail
the
bridge
will
be
built
over
the
inlet
and
we'll
have
many
more
people
in
that
area.
It's
such
a
huge
amount
of
money,
though,
and.
C
It
would
severely
impact
the
other
projects,
and
so
it
really
came
down
to
the
amount
of
money
and
also
I
will
say
there
was
some
contribution
to
it
about
the
sidewalker
improvement
district.
Even
though
we
got
an
explanation
of
that-
and
it
was
not
not.
You
know,
I
think
about
only
three
thousand
dollars
for
that
District,
but
some
confusion
as
to
you
know
why.
Why
are
the
city,
the
city
handed
us
for
the
money?
You
know
this.
The
city
should
have
it,
but
I
think
it
was
basically
just
the
amount
of
money.
C
Otherwise
we
would
have
been
happy
to
support
this
okay
and
then
going
into
public
services
project
16
through
20.
each
of
these
projects.
We
we
fully
support,
they're,
doing
the
type
of
work
that
we
think
is
valuable
and
again
working
with
the
most
vulnerable
people
in
in
our
community.
Someone
has
so
many
people,
we
had
a
discussion
about.
Do
we
fully
fund
some
of
the
projects
and
not
fund
some
of
the
other
ones,
which
is
is
difficult,
a
difficult
decision
to
make.
C
C
D
D
As
well
as
the
remaining
balances
on
it,
that
that
happens,
10
11
and
12
apartment
house
and
whether
or
not
we
thought
that
they
had
more
funding
than
they
needed
if
we
provided
the
amounts
recommended
by
the
neighborhood.
So
those
were
kind
of
the
three
topics
that
kept
circling
around.
D
Let
me
first
start
actually
14
ehu's,
pre-apprenticeship
program
and
I.
Think
I
think
it
was
similar
sentiment
to
what
Carl
has
said
here,
which
is
we
think,
although
a
little
tough
to
understand
from
the
applications
of
all
the
comments
about
the
application.
We
think
this
is
actually
potentially
a
valuable
program
to
swing
people
into
jobs
that
are
higher
payments.
D
Difficulty
accessing
those
jobs,
I
think
there's
an
overall
sentiment
of
many
words
yeah.
Maybe
there's
still
needs
one
more
Evolution
before
it
is
truly
vulnerable.
Through
our
our
programming,
we
had
some
discussion
about
whether
or
not
to
another
mechanism,
not
the
action
plan.
We
could
provide
some
additional
funding
for
capacity
building
support
to
help
do
that
coaching,
Parliament
you're,
talking
about
in
terms
of
how
to
make
sure
that
they
understand
how
to
construct,
design
and
deliver
a
program
that
can
meet
the
requirements
of
the
city
of
Aging
program.
D
So
we
didn't
have
any
resolution
on
that,
but
that's
something
we
definitely
should
talk
about.
I.
Think
the
idea,
if
you
have
focusing
on
the
study
patterns,
so
it's
a
very
tangible
deliverable
and
they
can
get
kind
of
on,
is
interesting.
We
can
discuss
later
how
we
would
potentially
readjust
and
just
do
that.
I
think.
The
other
thing
that
came
up
that
no
one
seemed
to
have
a
good
answer
on
is:
what
is
the
funding
that
they're
getting
from
the
city
and
what?
How
is
that
funding
being
used?
D
And
how
does
it
relate
to
the
program
or
not,
and
nobody
seemed
to
have
seen
or
thorough
understanding.
So,
if
somebody
here
at
the
table
did
that'd
be
useful,
then
I
would
say
the
rest
of
the
conversation
was
really
about
to
share
the
kitchen
proposal.
Vis-A-Vis
the
other
proposals.
D
There
was
a
recommendation.
It
was
actually
a
motion
full
response
to
their
shared
kitchen
and
to
fund
that,
by
taking
a
small
amount
from
the
work
preserve
where
we
do
think
they
will
end
up
in
the
year,
potentially
with
a
positive
balance
and
what
will
be
the
67
500,
although
it
was
noted
that
we
did
reduce
them
in
an
ni
Community
under
number,
17
and
public
services
can
come
in
and
reducing
in
a
minor
way
that
economic
development
loan
fund.
D
That
motion
did
not
pass
failed
between
the
one
with
one
extension,
so
we
had
one
member
of
the
committee
who
was
unable
to
vote
due
to
a
conflict
of
interest.
So
so
technically
that
didn't
pass
I.
Think
the
principal
discussion
was,
you
know
if
I
would
say,
because
I
was
an
advocate
of
that
is
that
this
is
a
program
trying
to
find
a
way
to
find
for
several
years
now.
D
You
actually
have
a
concrete
proposal
in
front
of
us,
and
we
think
that
this
that
the
economy
can
benefit
from
having
this
service
available
and
that
we
want
that
service
to
be
available
as
equitably
as
possible,
so
that
LMI
populations
can
access
the
service
as
well
with
people
who
are
reported
full
Market
funding,
and
we
acknowledge
that
this
is
the
amount
that's
here.
I
believe
is
covering
the
50
rent
subsidy
and
the
product.
That's
not
being
covered.
Is
the
allocation
towards
the
executive
director's
fine
to
provide
your
passing
building
support
to
the
businesses?
D
So
my
main
argument
was
this:
is
a
startup
startups
tend
to
have
a
higher
risk
and
higher
needs
at
the
beginning,
so
I'd
rather
get
the
money
to
a
strong
start
rather
than
not
believe
on
them
at
the
start,
and
and
then
have
it
not
succeed
to
its
lowest
extent
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
would
create
this
New
Economic
Development
driver
in
this
city.
D
Accessible
as
possible
and
again
recognizing
that
potentially
These
funds
could
get
Deployable
right
away
in
terms
of
our
spend
down
ratio
because
it's
a
new
program.
D
It's
going
to
be
just
getting
off
the
ground
where
these
three
other
programs
are
clearly
carrying
a
balance,
and
that
does
obviously
affect
our
depend
on
that
ratio
and
maybe
creating
a
little
incentive
for
each
of
these
organizations
to
get
their
countries
in
and
do
all
the
things
we
need
to
do
so
that
we're
just
getting
our
spend
down
ratio
managed
is
not
necessarily
A
Bad
Thing
and
a
modest
production
in
job
training
for
preserves
and
make
an
additive
thing,
but
that
didn't
carry
and
so
what
we
don't
actually
have
a
formal
regulation
other
than
what
the
AI
Community
hasn't
thought
about.
D
F
Else
because
the
recommendations
were
scaled
back
for
a
number
of
the
organizations
from
the
ni
committee.
Anisa
did
do
some
Outreach
to
those
organizations
to
say:
do
they
do
they?
You
know
if
their
project
was
scared
or
scaled,
would
they
still
want
to
go
forward?
Yeah
and
I
wouldn't
modify
their
program.
F
Maybe
a
couple
other
questions
in
there
but
yeah.
Maybe
it's
a
good
time
to
just
review.
Okay,
get
an
overview
of
those.
The.
F
E
How
they
would
respond,
how
the
program
would
be
affected
if
they
were
scaled
by
approximately
half
so
2-1-1.
This
is
an
application
for
the
201
helpline,
with
an
enhancement
of
a
housing
navigation.
Also,
I
just
want
to
restate
what
I
stated
in
the
ni
meeting
in
the
previous
meetings
that
I
have
worked
with
2-1-1
on
the
Ithaca
eviction
displacement,
defense
project,
which
included
housing
navigation
so
but
I
don't
understand,
benefit
financially
or
anything
like
that.
E
So
John
Mazzello,
the
the
director
of
two
one,
one
Rob
Appleton
clarification
that
if
they
receive
25,
000
or
less,
they
will
direct
all
of
that
funding
to
General
support
for
two
months,
because
they
didn't
have
another
funny
shorts.
They
can
substitute
in.
They
really
need
that
money
for
General
operations,
anything
over
25
000.
They
would
direct
towards
a
housing
navigation
piece
in
their
Envision.
They
would
like
to
have
three
repositions
within
2-1-1,
with
housing.
E
They
have
some
funding
from
the
Tompkins
County
Recovery
Fund,
that
would
support,
sounds
like
one
position,
but
not
all
three,
so
that
that's
why
they
were
looking
for
some
additional
funding
from
Ira
to
enhance
that
that
piece
they
would
still
implement
the
the
program
on
the
same
timeline.
They
would
still
be
able
to
serve
the
number
of
benefits
you're
in
their
application
if
they
receive
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
again,
that
will
just
be
through
General
201
services.
E
Okay,
when
I
spoke
to
work,
preserves
regarding
their
job
Readiness
program.
She
confirmed
that
the
reason
that
they
asked
for
3000
more
than
previous
years
was
to
try
to
keep
up
with
cost
of
living
and
health
care
and
employee
increases.
They
they
usually
ask
for
twenty
thousand.
E
If
scaled,
they
would
likely
need
to
reduce
the
hours
of
their
traditional
traditional
trade
skills
trainer
who
works
with
the
with
the
participants
on
user
hand,
tools
of
restoring
antique
furnitures
and
repurposing
it
doing
things
like
laying
floors
the
kind
of
Hands-On
work
that
might
kind
of
give
them
an
advantage
of
the
job
market.
They
would
scale
that
position
back
potentially
by
half
that
may
affect
their
marketing
position
as
well.
They
estimate
that
they
would
not
be
able
to
serve
their
20
participants
if
they
list
it
would
probably
be
more
like
10
to
12..
E
So
that's
how
everybody
will
be
affected.
Oh
and
also
there
was
other
timeline
instead
of
doing
a
12-month
program.
I
would
probably
do
attention
immigrant
Services
program
so.
E
The
application
increase
this
year,
they
asked
for
40
000
last
year.
They
asked
for
30
000.
reflects
the
increase
in
new
arrivals,
the
work
that
they're
doing
with
numeral
Rivals
to
the
community
tsuch
AP
estimates
that
there's
been
a
75
increase
in
new
arrivals
to
the
community
and
another
particular
aspect
of
this
program
and
I
asked
for
a
little
more
information
about.
She
speaks
about
in
the
application
of
a
different
immigration
statuses
that
when
immigrants
come
in,
there
are
a
number
of
different
statuses
that
they
may
have.
E
That
means
that
the
staff
has
to
understand
what
people
from
that
country
are
eligible
for.
If
they're
not
eligible
for
you
know,
could
be
public
benefits,
they
could
be
denied
public
benefits.
So
I
asked
her
how
many
immigration
statuses
there
are,
and
she
said
that
she
actually
doesn't
know,
but
they
work
with
15
to
20
different
integration
statuses.
So
that's
15
to
20
different
skills,
us
that
they
need
to
have
she
cited
in
her
application,
an
article
that
was
either
syracuse.com.
D
E
Has
received
more
a
higher
percentage
per
population
of
immigration
of
immigrants
than
any
other
MSA
in
the
U.S?
When
you
look
at
that
chart
you'll
see
that
a
lot
of
these
tend
to
be
smaller
towns,
but
there's
1.8
percent
in
migration
of
immigrants,
so
that
translates
to
1800
immigrants
in
the
period
in
a
year.
Basically,
so
there's
there's
a
lot
more
people
that
they're
trying
to
serve.
So
in
past
years,
they've
asked
for
30
thousands
of
sort
of
100
people,
so
she
scaled
it
up
to
sort
of
20
more
people.
D
E
For
example,
I,
don't
the
article
didn't
say
that
it's
possible?
There
were
some
other
colors
channels
on
that
list.
State
College
was
lower
down
on
the
list.
However,
I
will
say
that
the
majority
of
my
understanding
is
the
majority
of
students
and
professionals
that
are
coming
to
Cornell
receive
assistance
from
Cornell
right
about
their.
E
D
E
Also
I
mean
she
mentioned
that
the
find
Administration,
for
example,
has
expanded
a
program
called
humanitarian
parole.
E
When
administrations,
for
example,
this
Administration
is,
has
expanded,
that
program
I
mean
apply
to
him,
don't
call
me,
but
it
might
be
the
Cuban
Haitian
population.
So
when
that
happens,
more
people
are
able
to
come
in
from
those
countries
when
an
Administration
has
different
priorities
in
making
straight
migration,
immigration,
okay,
so
a
place
to
stay
their
budget
reflects
that
they're.
E
The
entirety
of
the
funding
would
go
to
stat
positions,
so
if
they
had
less
the
Michaela
who
I
spoke
to
said
that
they
would
probably
pull
from
other
resources
to
fund
the
staff
position.
But
then
they
would
not
have
the
resources
to
do
programming
more
programming
within
the
housing
to
assist
the
women
that
are
there.
So
they
would
probably
be
able
to
support
the.
D
E
Position
but
not
other
things
that
they
want
to
do
to
assist
the
woman
on
their
in
their
selfish
self-sufficiency
oer
when
I
reached
out
to
Oar
okay,
this
is
a
little
more
complicated
he.
He
indicated
that
they
would
proceed
with
the
first
phases
of
their
proposed
program,
which
involves
training
Professionals
in
the
community.
E
I
think
staff,
mobile
and
staff
are
volunteers
to
understand
and
be
able
to
identify
sexual
trafficking.
The
organization
that
they
would
work
with
is
called
gems
I
believe
they
are
for
my
research.
They
are
the
recognized
leader
in
working
with
and
advocating
foreign
training
organizations
on
sex
trafficking.
E
We're
not
sure
that
that
meets
the
requirements
of
cdbg's
national
objectives.
When
we
looked
at
the
codes
that
we
had
to
work
with
working
directly
with
domestic
violence,
survivors
is
a
code
that
we
can
use
the
training
portion
like
arguments
about
his
value,
but
without
doing
more
with
that
population.
What
he
had
proposed
again
I
think
there's
looking
at
the
phases
that
they
would
do
a
comprehensive
needs
assessment
with
18
to
20
by
survivors.
E
So
that's
the
service
that
they
will
be
doing
with
the
Survivor,
so
I
mean
Steph
has
some
questions
about
whether
that
would
be
compliant.
They
also
in
their
their
budget,
discuss
the
staff
lines
that
they
would
be
funding
and
just
as
a
reminder,
they
turned
in
a
different
budget
sheet
than
our
Excel
budget
sheet.
So
it's
it's
a
little.
E
You
look
at
that
application.
It's
a
little
harder
to
compare
kind
of
you
know
see
where
their
matching
funds
are,
and
things
like
that.
So,
if
oer
is
to
be
funded,
I
think
we
would
need
to
get
specific
Direction
around
on
you
know,
being
able
to
reach
a
beneficiary
level
with
Direct
Services.
E
Oh
I
also
reached
out
to
inhs
with
the
question
about
so
homeowner
rehab
and
Sierra.
Street
were
both
scaled.
If
the
funding
levels
were
to
remain
the
same,
but
they
wanted
to
prioritize
to
ask
them
if
they
wanted
to
prioritize
a
particular
project
of
the
other
if
they
said
that
they
would
like
to
prioritize
Sierra
Street.
E
That
would
include
giving
Sierra
streets
on
cdbg
funds,
which
they
can
utilize
as
a
cbdo
they'll,
be
re-certified
in
an
upcoming
meeting,
so
the
in
the
when
you
see
in
the
column,
they
were
given
just
home
funding,
and
this
may
have
been
also
because
and
I
may
have
been
trying
to
keep
things
simple
for
simpler
for
our
Contracting
process.
E
Having
two
students
in
funding
has
a
little
more
complicated.
However,
if
if
we
had
cdvg
in
that
column,
we
could
work
with
that.
E
So
she
she
said
that
she,
the
executive
director,
said
that
she
favored
scaling
homeowner
rehab
further
to
be
able
to
support
Sierra
Street.
D
C
Yeah,
if
I
was
just
just
taking
a
look
at
that,
if,
if
we
scale
it
and
when
I'm
talking
about
scaling
what
we
did
was
Neighborhood
Housing
said
that
there
would
be
eight
houses
repaired
under
for
the
amount
of
195.
So
it's
divided,
you
know,
195
by
eight,
came
out
to
24
375
375
per
house.
C
So
at
a
it
was
scaled
six
houses
that
would
be
146
250,
so
approximately
ten
thousand
dollars
less
than
the
amount
that
we
have
here
on
the
chart.
C
D
D
I
was
doing
some
math
also,
as
you
were,
walking
to
the
public
services
feedback
and
he
said
I
just
this
is
so
I'm
interested
in
the
combination
of
what
you
were
saying,
what
around
16
18,
19
and
20.,
and
if
Scott
has
concerns
that
that
23
000
in
phase
one
for
Oar
may
or
may
not
be
compliant
and
a
two-on-one
says:
okay,
they
had
25
000.
They
would
focused
primarily
on
Staffing
there's
a
case
in
Bay
to
say:
okay.
Well,
if
you
gave
them
25
000,
that
meant
General
operating
score
was
not
211.
D
D
But
now
we
have
actually
1182
left
over
above
and
said
to
Carl's
going
earlier
about
what
the
ni
Community
was
trying
to
do
versus
fully
fund
program
versus
partially
funded
you
that
would
get
us
two
programs
fully
funded
two
programs
partially
funded
and
one
not
funded
at
all
and
I
just
wondered
if
that
was
attractive
as
an
option
and
whether
or
not
we
think
the
dollars
is.
Those
programs
that
have
been
fully
funded
are
the
right
places
to
prioritize.
But
there.
E
D
Four,
no
I
would
take
the
22
between
oer
and
I
would
reduce
at
2.1
by
7
000
get
into
that
25
000,
which
means
therefore
our
general
operating
support,
number,
which
would
mean
they
could
be
fun
how
to
navigate
or
something
or
just
make
sure
that
we
hear
that
that
gives
you
29
000
right.
I
would
be
working
there
alone
for
a
moment,
because
then
you're,
30,
000
short,
hopefully
funding
internet
services
and
places
today
so
and
that
would
be
up
29
000.
And
then
we
just
learned
we
would
have
1100.
C
D
F
D
E
And
I'm
sorry
because
I
actually
did
reach
out
to
reuse
to
understand
their
apprenticeship
program
how
that
was
structured.
So
that
was
from
my
clarification.
She
did
say
in
the
presentation.
The
scaling
one
affects
the
number
of
apprentices.
They
could
engage
so
the
way
that
so
just
to
simplify
they.
Their
proposal
includes
stipends
for
10
apprentices,
which
are
about
a
little
under
10
000
each
and
with
an
option
to
extend
three
of
the
apprentices
for
10
more
weeks
at
the
end
of
the
year
to
serve
their
incoming
cohort.
E
So
the
idea
was
that
they
would
identify
three
apprentices
or
they
felt
could
Mentor
new
people
and
provide
stipends
for
them
to
work
full-time
for
10
weeks
additionally,
and
that
would
cost
about
6600
per
extended
stipend.
So
there's
there's
not
13
benefit
series.
There
will
be
10
benefits
areas
among
the
apprentices.
E
But
done
so
Chris
remind
me
in
your
scenario:
how
much
would
we
allocate
to
number
17.?
Oh
it'd,
be
unchanged?
Oh
so
I
have
concerns
about
that,
because
if
they
reduce
staff
hours
then
we're
having
a
ripple
effect.
So
there's
one
one
person
to
an
employee
who's
not
going
to
make
as
much
money
as
the
other
he
or
she
otherwise
would,
and
then
that
affects
the
people
they
serve.
C
D
Shift
in
that
category
because
of
the
cap,
well,
unless
you
choose,
it
reduce
the
amount
of
money
further
for
health
acceptance.
C
Yeah
Lisa,
so
2-1-1
will
still
keep
the
housing
Navigators.
Is
that
that's
I'm
not
quite
sure
exciting?
That's
a
position
that
I
think
the
committee
thought
was
was
really
needed
and
we,
it
was
really
strongly
support.
Having
those.
E
But
what
he
spoke
about
was
that
sorry
that
their
overall
goal
is
to
have
three
housing
Navigators
they
currently
have
one
and
Tompkins
Community
recovery
funds
seem
to
would
be
able
to
support
one
I
guess
so
he
didn't
like
speak
to
that,
but
it
sounds
like
yeah
by
the
way
when
I
reward,
25,
000
or
less
the
the
amount
that
we
requested
for
General
201
information
and
referral
services,
we
would
probably
prioritize
the
general
G11
component
of
application
budget
that
we
were.
D
E
A
E
E
E
E
Unhoused
and
want
to
support
individuals
who
have
recently
been
housed.
Not
all
positions
would
necessarily
be
housed
at
agency
to
one.
Each
of
these
positions
would
meet.
Individuals
needs
at
a
critical
time
in
their
Journey
Through,
the
housing
system.
Only
approximately
and
a
half
of
the
request
of
tcrf
funding
noise
approved,
meaning
we
will
be
unable
to
develop
each
of
these
three
positions
at
this
point.
Despite
their
inclusion
as
priorities
in
the
2022
Tompkins
County
Housing
needs
assessment.
The
buyer
refunding
is
not
good
people.
E
D
E
More
limited
in
our
ability
to
provide
housing,
navigation
for
people
who
are
unhoused
or
recently
housed.
We
believe
that
prevention,
helping
people
remain
housed
in
the
great
addiction
or
displacement
in
the
first
place
is
the
most
aspect
of
the
three
navigation
services.
So
they
he's
saying
that
they
would
be
able
to
provide
housing,
the
prevention,
housing
navigation
position.
They
will
be
able
to
sustain
that.
E
Also,
as
a
reminder,
ISP
has
been
allocated
and.
E
Received
from
us,
but
will
about
nine
thousand
dollars
in
cdbg
CB
funding
which
they
said
would
go
to
support
their
salary.
D
D
If
you
take
that
away
from
22
000,
that
is
a
ten
thousand
six
five
seven
right
again
leaving
2118
is
if
we
decided
that
the
housing,
navigation
and
prevention
role
is
really
important.
So
that
means
you
know
package
you
would
have
you
could
either
Play
Ten
Thousand
six
five,
seven
towards
you,
know
good
Services.
We
put
them
at
the
same
level,
one
thing
as
they
had
last
year,
but
plus
nine
thousand
CD
program.
So
for
moving
that
to
for
us
to
say,
foreign.
D
E
C
Yeah,
at
least
that
I
actually
talked
about
that
yesterday.
One
of
them
maybe
explain
some
other
complications
is
that
if
that's
the
case
who
gets
credit
or
then
if
the
the
client
gets
placed
in
a
job.
So
if
bhu
sends
someone
to
through
reuse
this
program,
for
example,
and
that
person
subsequently
gets
a
job
who
is
responsible
for
that
person
getting
their
job
and
maybe
that's
relatively
minor
I
mean
the
person
got
a
job
which
is
the
end
result,
but
the
organizations
do
have
to
figure
that
out.
C
You
know
who's
going
to
claim
that
person
and
I
believe
that
that
there's
already
some
collaboration,
I
think
probably
the
documentation
is
going
to
be
much
better.
So
we
understand
who
you
know
black
answer.
Universe
was
spoken
to
who
they
referred
to
a
number
of
people
that
referred
to
other
training
programs,
and
we
heard
from
work,
preserve
or
historic
I
should
say
and
that
they
were
working
with
reuse
in
terms
of
collaboration.
C
I
think
there
used
to
be
a
said,
the
same
thing,
so
there
is
some
collaboration
going
on
out
there
I'm,
not
sure
how
well
informed
we
are
or
staff
are
in
terms
of
how
that's
working,
I'm,
I'm,
I,
think
black
hands.
Universal
has
some
great
ideas
and
they
also
have
connections
in
the
community
of
these
other
organizations.
Don't.
E
They
haven't,
we
don't
have
the
contract
ready
for
them,
yet
they
have
continued
their
operations
through
other
funding
that
they
have,
but
what
we
funded
for
2022
has
to
do
with
their
pre-apprenticeship
program,
which
involves
instruction
and
training
as
part
of
their
program.
But
we
because
that
project
hasn't
been
fully
hasn't,
received
our
funding.
Yet
they
haven't
started
reporting
on
our
goals
for
that.
Yet
so
next
year,
at
this
time,
I
think
we'll
have
more
information
about
how
that
reprogramming
and
I
think
this
vision
is
to
do
more
training.
E
D
E
Thanks
I
agree
with
George
that
I
think
bhu
is
pretty
much
a
startup
organization,
a
community
based
organization
that
has
great
ideas.
E
Question
came
up
about
funding
from
the
city
and
how
that's
being
used
and
I
think,
because
this
is
such
a
relatively
new
organization,
we
don't
have
strong
documentation
on
how
City
funds
are
being
used.
It's
my
hope
that
this
organization
will
be
in
a
much
stronger
position
to
present
a
more
complete
and
stronger
application
next
year,
but
they
need
some
funding
to
you.
A
E
Themselves
grounded
so
that
they
can
present
a
stronger
application
next
year,
but
I
think
asking
very
for
further
clarification
on
how
the
city
funds
are
being
used,
how
much
of
the
city
funds
are
being
used
and
how
they're
being
used?
I
do
have
questions
about
the
pre-ordination.
E
The
documentation
would
come
from
the
hu
to
the
controller.
There
is
no
one
that
I'm
aware
of
who
is
responsible
for
tracking
those
funds,
but
rather
responding
to
documentation.
That
would
be
provided
such
that
your
lease
of
funds
can
happen.
D
C
Before
she
lies,
she
was
keeping
track
of
those
things
in
general
I'm
not
talking
about
any
particular
African
in
general.
There's
a
difference
between
being
really
good
at
making.
C
E
Yeah,
just
a
follow-up
I
think
this
comment
was
made
incoming
this
point-
that
it
would
be
very
helpful
for
new
organizations
in
particular
to
have
a
coaching
coaching
as
they
develop
their
programs
as
they
develop
a
proposal
requests
for
for
funds.
We
don't
really
have
a
clear
mechanism
for
that.
I,
don't.
C
D
D
Yes,
yes,
so
I
just
want
to
keep
track
of
all
the
difference
right.
The
conversations-
that's
okay,
George
I,
think
you're,
asking
a
very
important,
valuable
question.
I
just
want
to
close
the
loop
on
the
Public
Services,
because
then
what
will
be
left
is
that
kind
of
common
and
we
can't
really
move
money
into
public
services.
So
I
think
we've
got
a
hard
cap.
I,
don't
think
we're
compat
advocating
to
spend
less
on
public
services,
so
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
George
coins
we
can
come
back
to
black
hands,
Universal
and
I.
D
Think
there's
also
some
process
points
being
raised
here
as
well.
We
can
come
back
to
I
think
the
reason
we
got
off
on
this
additional
conversation,
because
workers
are
showed
up
in
local
categories
and
I.
Think
that's
how
we
ended
up
here.
A
D
But
maybe
we
could,
because
I
think
they
seem
to
be
done
looking
at
how
to
reallocate
the
housing
funding
to
address
how
I
Inhibitors
have
their
project
funded.
So
I
think
we
just
if
we
could
make
some
closure
on
the
Public
Services,
then
we
can
talk
with
what's
remaining
just
at
912,
okay,.
C
Specifically
Public
Services,
as
we
heard
from
from
Sue
Champion,
is
Anisa
reiterated
they
are,
they
have
seen
increased
need.
It
doesn't
appear
at
this
point
that
that
need
is
going
to
decrease.
You
know
we're
going
to
continue
to
see
large
numbers
that
have
record
numbers
of
immigrants
coming
in
to
the
community.
C
The
work
they
do
is
unique.
Aside
from
you,
know,
Cornell
and
probably
I
see
during
their
serving
their
own
populations.
So.
C
C
Is
well
if
we
fully
fund,
so
we
have
22
000
it'd
be
fully
fund.
Immigrant
Services,
that's
20,
maybe
2
000.
D
Yeah,
the
difference
would
be
so
I
think
there
were
three
hours
right
now
would
be
32
000,
13,
657,
40,
000,
10
000.,
looking
at
those
down
in
order,
and
then
your
proposed
on
it
was
to
fully
find
work
with
every
23
000,
which
we
would
have
been
had
to
basically
reduce
eye
kindergarten
Services.
By
about
ten
thousand.
A
D
Each
release
has
that
lesson:
projects
appeal
to
it
but
I
know
but
I.
Imagine
in
pearls
proposal
would
ensure
that
places
they
would
have
money
Thursday,
plus
some
support
for
the
prevention
of
homelessness.
Somehow
the
Navigator,
that's
even
important
work
Reserve
would
still
have
a
reduction
in
Staffing
and
then
American
Services
would
need
be
able
to
meet
the
increased
need
of
immigrants.
D
D
Okay,
so
where
do
we
end
up
so
yeah?
So
we're
doing
it
again.
So
two
one
one
get
32
000,
as
recommended
by
ni,
wherever
they
will
get
13
657,
which
would
be
a
reduction
by
intercepting
area
service.
It
would
be
at
forty
thousand
ten
thousand
workplaces
a
which
would
cover
their
Core
Staffing
web
Mountain
programming
and
and
the
women's
empowerment
Services
would
be
zero
right.
D
D
C
So
before
we
well
as
we
get
an
executive
develop,
my
question
is
about
the
The
Loan
Fund
and
so
the
current
balance.
From
our
conversation
yesterday
I
thought
it
was
approximately
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
correct.
C
F
Demand
for
the
fund
would
a
hundred
thousand
or
I'm
sorry
200,
000
balance
be
sufficient
in
this
next
year.
Well,
it
depends
on
the
demand
and
we've.
F
F
now,
because
money
flows
in
on
a
monthly
basis,
but
really
remember
this
is
the
program
income
category
line.
So
this
is
money
that's
going
to
come
into
the
Loan
Fund
throughout
the
12-month
period,
so
we
won't
have
the
full
balance
in
August.
We'll
only
get
the
full
balance
at
the
end
of
the
year.
So
it's
really
kind
of.
F
It's
really
not
that
large
until
you
get
to
the
whole
the
end
of
the
program
year,
so
we
would
have
a
restricted
balance
of
you
know.
It
would
be
started
at
100
000
now
and
work
its
way
up
ten
thousand
per
month
on
average
as
it
went
forward.
So
that's
just
something
to
keep
in
mind
so
200
000
would
be
just
enough,
probably
managed
two
loans
to
manage
the
portfolio
higher,
hire
the
underwriter
and
work
with
those
issues.
That's
probably
the
way
it
would
work
in
practice,
it's
hard
to
make
a
it's.
F
It
could
undermine
the
program
to
not
have
enough
money
to
address
needs
and
people
start
coming
to
the
program.
If
you
say
well,
we're
closed
for
six
months
come
back
and
we
do
know
that
the
downtown
Alliance
has
got
a
retail
strategy
they're
trying
to
implement
for
the
downtown
to
fill
some
of
the
vacancies
and
they're
gonna
they're
doing
a
strategic
analysis
of
how
can
they
reposition
the
downtown
to
bring
in
more
detail?
F
C
And
we
certainly
understand
the
need
for
income
from
the
agency
or
the
agency,
and
so
loans
is
are
one
way
to
do
that.
D
Right
and
it's
also
it's
the
one
tool:
We
have
basically
the
support,
stop
creation
right.
Everything
else
here
is
is
doing
placement
of
training,
but
this
is
the
only
thing
we
have
that
really
does
job
creation
and
so
may
not
be
thousands
of
jobs,
but
it
is
job
creation
and
in
a
Target,
because
it's
usually
seems
you
want
the
targets,
job
application
for
Li
and
visuals
right,
so
I
always
feel
like
I.
Don't
want
to
underfund
this
because
then
we
take
that
flexible
tool
away.
D
D
Question
because
I
think
it
affects
everything
else
is:
does
anyone
have
a
concrete
proposal
for
providing
some
funding
to
Black
cancer
Universal?
You
know
that
we
did
change
that
from
zero
to
something
it
obviously
overflow
through
everything,
so
rather
than
kind
of
everything
else
around
an
error
right.
It's
just
magnet
adjustments,
but
if
we
want
to
make
any
changes
to
this
has
been
kind
of
discussed
offhand,
we
would
have
to
yeah
we'd
have
to
make
a
alternative
recommendations.
London
does
not
mean
okay
call
weaving
currently.
C
Yeah
I
hear
the
concerns
about
whether
the
work
is
being
done
and
they
go
by
Finance
Universal
I'm
still
unsure
whether
that's
basically
just
a
reporting
issue.
C
C
My
initial
proposal
was
to
support
the
stipends
of
27
000.
Where
can
we
find
twenty
seven
thousand
dollars
in
cdbg
that
we've
already
decided
in
housing
that
the
some
funds
would
be
shipping
for
home
number
rehab?
That's
really
the
only
place
that
I
see
amongst
that
I
would
support
being
provided.
You
know,
can
we
reviewed
somewhere
to
rehab,
but
we've
already
decided
that
or
perhaps
we
haven't
yeah,
he
decided
where
any
reduction
in
homeowner
rehab
might
go.
C
The
other
Ed
projects
they're
all
except
for
you,
know,
work
preserve,
number
11,
they're,
already
reduced
and
fairly
substantially.
D
That
might
be
yeah
I've
been
thinking
about
this
a
little
bit
more
though
since
our
meeting
last
week,
and
if,
if
we
can
confirm
the
32
500,
it's
covering
the
50
event.
Subsidy
for
and.
D
E
D
Was
the
subsidy?
That's
the
most
targeted
intervention
we'd
be
making
where
the
Staffing
allocation
before
passive
drinks
a
little
less
targeted.
So
I
can
be
convinced
to
just
leave
this
at
32
by
knowing
that
we're
providing
an
actual
direct
Financial
subsidy
for
an
online
businesses.
D
D
182
per
balance
at
the
moment
a
whole
bunch
of
different
places,
but
you
you
really
how
many?
How
many
apprentices
for
side
pens
so
27
000
is
how
many
excitement
would
be.
A
E
C
D
A
E
D
F
I'm
not
sure
that
training
is
a
long
duration
kind
of
activity,
though
I
mean
there's
they're
they're
going
through
sessions.
But
it's
hard
to
interpret
actually
exactly.
C
D
F
The
project
description
for
the
program
does
have
a
seven
week
program,
but
I
think
one
week
is
safety
OSHA,
but
no
way.
You
know
how
long
would
that
what
portion
of
the
week,
but
that
involves
contact.
E
532
I
believe,
but
the
participants
decide
whether
to
use
it
all
at
once
is
a
full-time
job.
For
you
know,
however,
many
months
that
that
goes
or
extended
over
a
year
and
more
10
hours
a
week
right.
D
D
So
don
is
the
major
concrete
emotion,
not
by
motion
a
recommendation
to
leave
economic.
Basically
out
of
this,
so
I
think
we
would
say
if
there's
an
alternative,
this
would
be
the
time
that
our
community.
D
A
D
A
C
Yeah
looking
at
excuse
me
on
page
three
of
nine
of
their
application.
It
indicates
the
stipends
27,
000
or
I'm.
Sorry
54,
000
foot
a
year,
two
cycles,
27
000
each
for
15
stipends.
So
it's
thirty
six
hundred
dollars
per.
D
C
It's
difficult
to
make
a
firm
argument
for
the
the
funding,
because
even
on
our
committee,
we
have
some
folks
who
bought
just
based
on
the
application
of
model
that
that
the
case
was
not
proven,
and
we've
certainly
heard
you
know
George
and
Donna,
and
perhaps
others
who
deal
that
we
should
be
enough
funding.
C
D
A
D
D
E
Oh,
but
that's
a
pain
for
Anita.
No
part
of
it
is
yeah.
E
D
D
Okay,
anyway,
so,
yes
there's
the
resolution
that
we
adopt
the
entire
summer
table,
which
review
this
summary
table.
I
recommend
include
activities
as
funded.
D
Laura
only
that
seconded
by
Laura,
yes,
any
other
further
discussion.
D
Right
away,
yes,
by
the
way,
means
that
we
do
not
need
to
meet
next
week.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
thank
you
again
to
all
that's
happening.
D
C
C
D
You
in
the
morning,
yeah
yeah
so
again
and
a
couple
new
members
of
community
too
so
California
knowledge
is
good
as
well.
All
right
are
there
other
business
6A.
We
have
a
resolution
in
your
packet
to
your
door,
but
once
you
have
a
Content
plan,
so
we
saw
about
a
month
ago
our
presentation
Continuum
care
on
their
yeah.
Their
proposed
plan,
which
is
called
home
together
assumptions
and
well.
D
This
resolution
does
is
endorse,
says
the
IRA
divorces
it
and
recommend
that
the
city
of
intercom
Council
also,
you
know,
which
is
the
same
necessarily
present-
emotions
at
Laura
segment.
F
Yeah
and
also
yeah,
there's
there's
the
options
available
for
the
common
Council.
Not
necessarily
the
IRA
are
to
accept
statistics,
the
promoter
of
the
documentary
and
told
them
to
go
away.
Essentially,
endorse
means
you
prove
it
in
concept,
but
you're
not
committing
yourself
to
every
single
line
in
the
document,
and
the
third
option
is
a
doubt
which
is
our
strongest
of
the
tree
so
endorses
you
know
every
conceptually
would
be
with
the
document,
but
not
necessarily
every
word.
F
You
know
in
all
places,
I
think
the
adapter
also
talks
about
committing
to
endorse
the
recommendations
if
he
was
being
condemned.
This
is
a
general
plan
that
he
calls
calls
for
lots
of
different
players
to
play
roles
in
supporting
technology.
So
it's
not
really
it's
not
a
city
specific
plan.
It's
a
county-wide
community
way
oriented
plan.
E
Endorse
it,
but
it
doesn't
entail
funding
from
either
any
of
those
that.
A
E
D
Yeah
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
interesting
ideas
in
here.
You
know.
Obviously
we
can
debate
The,
Narrative
and
one
of
them
the
further.
The
data
is
that
there's
an
evening
community
and
I
succeeded
that,
and
by
endorsing
it
and
it's
a
common
Council
and
the
legislature,
it
actually
provides
the
communion
care
adult
and
World
leverage
when
seeking
that
digital
audience
method,
individual
funding,
loss
right,
but.
D
I
think
is
going
to
happen,
is
Right.
Each
of
these
are
going
to
be
individual
projects
led
by
different
agencies
right
and
those
will
be
fun,
and
some
of
those
might
come
back
and
show
up
as
an
action
kind
of
project
in
the
future,
but
others
might
seek
additional
funding
from
the
RSA
and
the
federal
government
and
I
think
our
endorsement
says
Hey.
The
community
stands
behind
soften.
D
A
A
D
E
D
D
D
If
you
remember
my
question
when
we
had
it
was
about
the
relationship
in
the
city
and
the
county
right,
if
I
worry
at
all
about
anything
here,
is
that
there's
there's
a
problem
accused
me,
you
know
much
more
acute
in
the
city
than
in
the
county
Berkeley
large,
but
this
is
a
county-wide,
even
though
it
must
be
right.
Social
services
are
counter
responsible
right.
A
D
E
D
Yes,
right
and
the
economy
might
think
I
have
other
priorities.
C
Right
and
I
won't
go
on
my
hobby
horse
issue
about
that.
So
my
concern
with
me,
similar
to
Adonis,
in
that
there
are
core
strategies
listed
here,
to
reduce,
subject,
homelessness
and
the
wood
and
endorsement
obligate
us
to
provide
funding
for
these
strategies.
C
What
you
already
do,
but
again
you
know
the
point
is
competitive
process,
so
Neighborhood
Housing,
for
example,
you
know
if
we
had
someone
who
came
up
with
a
proposal
to
to
have
a
unit
or
units
that
were
permanent,
Supportive
Housing,
we
would
have
to
juggle
affordable
housing
or
it's
a
sport
permanently
supported
housing
and
what
an
endorsement
I'm
not
obligated,
but.
C
No
just
towards
endorsing
the
the
permanently
supported
housing
so
from
what
I'm
understanding
is.
They
said
that
an
endorsement
does
not
obligate
us
or
put
any
obligation
upon
us
to
support
any
of
these
four.
F
I
would
argue
that
we've
got
multiple
plans
that
we're
trying
to
implement
the
Consolidated
plan
talks
about
affordable
housing
extensively.
The
city's
comprehensive
plan
has
neighborhood
focused
recommendations.
You
know,
a
fair
housing
plan
has
recommendations
for
that.
This
would
be
one
more
though.
It's
going
to
focus
on
how
to
address
on
shoulder
homelessness
and
try
to
develop
like
a
common
framework
for
that,
and
they
would
all
have
to
compete
against
each
other
when
they
come
forward
for
funding
to
the
NRA
as
well.
E
And
I
would
also
add
that
most
for
many,
many
affordable
housing
projects
include
some
elements,
support
passing,
so
it's
not
like
what
you're
choosing
between
projects
or
either
one
or
the
other.
At
this
point
it
was.
D
Let
the
city
views
right
the
same
action,
but
you
know
we
could
be
clear
because
we
do
have.
You
know
these
funding
things
in
view
that
we
don't
have
somebody
to
come
back
and
say:
well,
you
endorse
this
and
now
we
expect
to
tell
on
the
end
of
it,
but
but
we
could
make
that
clearer.
D
I,
don't
understand
how
how
Nuance
you
know
explain
would
endorse
me
happy
before
that
and
then
evaluating
a
future
thing,
and
so
you
know,
then
we're
not
finding
them
as
well.
So
a
national
recommendation
is
that
an
amendment
on
the
resistance.
F
Yeah,
for
the
result
that
this
endorsement,
you
know,
does
not
constitute
navigation
in
the
area
to
find
any
specific
initiative
or
project.
Yes,.
D
D
Probably
to
capture
sorry
Charles
in
Japan,
okay,
so
we
have
an
immediate
Revolution
which
adds
and
then
you
get
resolution
it
has
an
impositional
resolved
any
other
discussion.
D
And
then
we
have
an
additional
resolution,
which
is
the
draft
home
ARP
allocation
plan
to
see
that
we
also
had
a
report
exception
with
some
sad
at
the
same
time.
So
this
is
to
a
DOT
to
nuclear
endures.
This
is
to
adopt
the
job
plan.
If
you
have
in
your
packet.
E
Or
what
we
are
in
the
process
sure
so,
just
as
a
reminder
of
this
plan
is
required
for
us
to
turn
in
by
March
31st
to
provide
a
framework
to
HUD
for
how
we
are
planning
on
Distributing
the
funds
among
the
eligible
home,
art
programs.
E
In
homework
funds
is
a
one-time
funding
consultation
to
understand
what
stakeholders
service
providers,
seven
specific
types
of
service
provider
that
have
required
Consulting
there.
What
what
did
they
see
is
the
biggest
gas
in
our
own
service
homeless
response
system.
So
one
main
Gap
that
everybody
talked
about
is
the
lack
of
affordable.
The.
E
Gaps
include
ways
to
assist
the
persistent
population
of
unsheltered
people,
people
who
are
literally
homeless
living
outside
that
there
have
not
been
enough
ways
to
assist
people
in
getting
into
housing
and
staying
in
housing.
E
Another
much
discussed
Gap
is
the
32
percent
of
people
who
return
to
homelessness
once
placed
in
permanent
housing
after
24
months.
How
to
assist
people
in
preventing
eviction
once
they're
inside
housing.
So
to
that.
A
A
E
Housing
so
when
Lincoln's
come
up
in
housing
or
there
are
small
problems
at
snowball,
it
ends
in
an
eviction
notice
and
at
that
time
people
need
to
scramble
again
and
to
try
and
find
assistance
to
prevent
themselves
from
making
a
video.
E
So
what,
through
the
process
of
this
this,
this
consultation
and
planning
process,
we
determined
that
there
were
two
primary
goals
that
we
feel
we
could
use.
American
Funding
world
that
have.
We
have
not
had
the
resources
to
support
in
the
past,
so
one
is
to
support
a
Housing
search
for
people
who
are
literally
homeless
and
want
us
to
prevent
return,
stuff
homelessness
from
people
who.
E
Homelessness,
but
is
a
high
predictor
of
becoming
homeless
again,
so
the
the
intervention
will
be
to
provide
eviction
prevention,
Supportive,
Services,
home
Arts,
Supportive
Services
program
allows
final
assistance
and
other
types
of
financial
assistance,
including
paying
utilities,
and
things
like
that,
which
is
not
something
we
can
do
under
our
regular
entitlement
program.
E
The
home,
Arc
Supportive
Services
do
not
have
a
cap
like
our
regular
I'm
entitlement
funding
him,
so
we
feel
that
it
will
be
the
most
cost,
cost
effective
and
flexible
means
of
achieving
the
two
goals
that
I
just
stated
by
allocating
the
majority
of
the
funds.
969
350
dollars
to
Supportive
Services,
to
support
a
housing
service
for
people
who
are
literally
homeless
and
to
prevent
returns
to
homelessness
for
people
who
have
who
have
been
housed
are
already
dangerous.
Again.
E
We
were
also
allocate
sixty
thousand
dollars
for
a
non-profit
capacity
building
to
assist
organizations
in
their
ramp
up
to
be
able
to
serve
the
homework
needs
and
the
remainder
of
the
funding
would
be
used
for
administration
and
plan.
So
this
funding
had
a
very
long
Sunset.
E
The
funds
need
to
be
extended
by
September
of
2030.
That
means
that
Ira
needs
to
be
monitoring
the
programs
for
their
duration
that
time,
so
that's
what
they
administrative
line
would
go
for
in
terms
of
who
would
be
served.
So
this
is
a
very
complex
and
I'll
try
to
make
it
as
simple
as
possible.
People
who
are
literally
homeless,
living
outside
in
a
place
unfit
for
human
habitation.
A
E
In
an
emergency,
shelter
would
be
the
first
to
be
served
under
this
under
this
plan,
along
with
people
who
are
at
risk,
people
in
most
need
Supportive
Services,
who
do
not
have
another
Supportive
Services
Network
and
have
been
temporarily
housed
or
have
some
other
type
of
assistance
to
allow
them
to
be.
E
A
house
that
are
in
danger
of
eviction
will
be
the
second
group
that
would
be
targeted
for
services,
then
so,
and
then,
after
those
two
populations
are
served,
their
wider
population
they
belong
to,
would
be
served,
and
then
anybody
else
who
qualifies
for
a
homework
I
know
that
last
part
was
a
little
complicated
and
I.
E
There's
detailed
discussion
of
that
under
preferences
in
the
report.
Homework
has
four
four
groups
of
eligible
recipients
and
there
they
include
among
the
people
who
every
every
group
from
people
who
are
literally
homeless,
to
people
who
are
at
risk
of
becoming
homeless
to
people
who
are
leading
domestic
violence
to
people
who
are
in
danger
of
addiction
and
have
other
other
housing
instability
factors.
D
E
D
E
F
Because
the
money
is
going
to
be
utilized
under
this
plan
for
rental
assistance
and
kind
of
wrap
around
Supportive
Services,
so
it
wouldn't
be-
it
wouldn't
be
used
for
developmental
housing
or
expanding
an
actual
hard
Escape
housing
units.
That
would
be
you
know,
that's
a.
A
Choice
to
use,
but
you
know
it
really
does
tend
to
go
that
far
more
Construction.
F
No
okay
settling
communities,
the
state
of
New
York,
received
an
award
for
about
90
million
dollars,
they've
dedicated
the
land
share
of
their
funding
towards
construction
and
development
of
affordable
housing.
So
in
some
ways
we
could
match
up
with
them
because
by
not
for
profit
I
was
an
organization
could
apply
to
the
state
for
construction
and
if
they
didn't
have
rental
assistance
or
they
didn't
have
Superior
Services,
then
we
could
fill
that
Gap
if
it
was
serving
the
right
population.
F
E
Social
Services,
which
are
offered
by
the
county.
How
would
the
city
how
the
dental
name
is
program,
entail
coordination
with
the
county,
so
I
consulted
with
the
County's
office
of
mental
health
and
also
DSS,
so
they
have
different
coming
streams,
so
the
support
of
services
that
we
would
be
funding
have.
We
would
be
either.
E
Proposals
from
organizations
about
how
they
intend
to
provide
this
photo
services,
or
we
would
be
following
a
process
as
a
competitive
process
of
similar
to
what
you
just
did
with
the
cut
and
title
funds.
The
the
County's
services
that
exist
consultations
say
that
they're
a
high
barrier
that
it's
difficult
for
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
to
access
the
help
that
they
need
when
they'll
either.
So
it
would
remain
to
be
seen
what
proposals
come
through
related
to
mental.
E
Could
see
some
proposals
coming
through
that
look
like
providing?
You
know
mental
health,
counseling
or
services
on
the
spot
about
having
to
wait
to
get
into
the
the.
E
E
Whatever
issues
may
come
up
with
responding
to
landlord
requests
or
requirements,
responding
to
complaints
that
they
may
receive
from
Neighbors
being
able
to?
You
know
ensure
that
they
are
doing
the
things
they
need
to
do
to
sustain
their
housing,
paying
utilities
things
like
that.
That's
the
type
of
services
that
we're
envisioning,
helping
people
stay
into
in
housing
as
far
as
mental
health
and
other
things,
I
think
we
would
need
to
see
from
the
from
those
who
are
proposing
projects
what
they
think
is
most
important.
Okay,
sorry
I
have
another
question.
E
It
concerns
me
that
this
is
focused
on
the
city
of
Ithaca
and
because
I
wonder
to
what
extent
the
the
number
of
people
who
are
unheld
will
become
infinite,
because
if
it's
known
that
the
city
of
Ithaca
has
certain
services,
people
from
elsewhere
will
come
here
to
use
those
services
in
the
city
of
Ithaca
and
said.
Look
that
if
and
so
the
need
will
never
be
met
because
the
city
of
Ithaca
is
trying
to
reach
a
regional
imperative
in
a
Statewide
need.
Is.
D
E
Anyone
share
that
concern
or
I
mean
what
do
you
think
about
that.
E
A
E
Doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
service
providers
in
the
community
don't
know
who
those
people
are
they've
lived
there
for
a
long
time.
Outreach
workers
have
words
with
them.
One
potential
way
to
administer
a
program
that
supports
a
housing
surge
is
through
a
referral
system,
including
a
binding
with
some
kind
of
technical,
but
it
would
identify
people
who
already
have
lived
in
the
city
for
a
number
of
years
for
the
housing
research,
okay
for
the
people
that
are
in
housing.
A
E
Need
Prevention
Services,
those
are
people
who
live
in
housing
right
now,
who
have
been
homeless
in
my
house
and
are
living
in
our
city
right
now,
who
are
being
in
danger
of
addiction
and
therefore
receiving
services.
So
in
terms
of
helping
anybody
who
might
be
new,
it
is
a
requirement
of
accounting
of
every
County
to
assist
people
in
their
County
who
have
situations
and
conferences.
There
are
other
entitlement
communities
throughout
the
state
who
are
eligible
for
homework.
Funding,
I,
don't
know
how
many,
but
so
far,
11
countries
in
there
homework
plans.
E
So
we
are
not
the
only
community
that
is
getting
the
set
of
funding
in
our
region.
Even
there
are
several
of
State
regions,
okay.
So
this
is
a
nationwide
effort
to
decrease
homelessness
and
increase
housing
stability.
It's
not
just
happening
within
the
city
of
that
they
have
so
I
I
think
that
there
are
resources
available
in
other
communities
as
well.
C
My
question
has
to
do
with
the
process
for
the
distribution
of
the
funds,
so
once
our
approves
an
economy,
Council
will
approve.
What,
then,
is
the
timeline,
of
course,
accepting
accepting
applications
or
putting
up
the
RP
accepting
applications?
Is
it
kind
of
all
or
as
much
of
the
money
as
as
the
Blackboard
goes
out
during
the
first
round?
Or
do
we
divide
the
money
up
into
whatever
seven
six
seven
years
and
then
have
a
around
each
year?.
E
So
the
first
thing
I
want
to
say
is
HUD
is
still
developing
is
implementation
guidance,
so
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
information
at
this
time.
On
implementation,
we
do
know.
I
have
been
told
by
a
technical
assistant
that
we
will
need
to
create
our
policies
and
procedures
manual
for
how
we
how
we
will
be
advocating
the
funds.
What
that
process
looks
like
again,
there's
been
no
guidance
on
that.
I
just
understand
that
people
have
to
do
that.
So
I
think
what
I
mean,
how
I
would
respond.
E
Has
not
let
us
know
what
all
of
its
requirements
are
and
how
we
are
going
to
comply
with
those.
So
until
we
know
that
we
can't
fully
take
an
implementation
steps,
but
what
I
would
expect
is
instead
of
doing
a
yearly
process.
Is
that
with
a
solicit
proposals
or
request
proposals
that
have
a
plan
for
using
the
funds
for
the
duration
of
the
availability
of
the
funds,
and
so
they
are
extended.
F
Well
we'd
like
to
try
to
coordinate
with
a
search
if
we,
if
there's
a
search
about
a
homing
surge,
you
know
implemented
this
year,
so
we
would
like
to
be
included
in
that.
Obviously
that
would
be
a
good
use
of
the
funds
to
reduce
the
number
of
people
who
are
living
unsheltered,
but
it
may
not
coincide.
We
don't
know
if,
once
we
want
to
prove
this
plan,
but
once
submitted
and
a
quick
turnaround
or
I
can
think
of
a
while,
or
they
have
comments
that
they
want
to
have
us
respond
back
to.
F
But
we
don't.
We
don't
think
there's
that
many
agencies
that
have
the
skill
set
to
do
this
kind
of
work,
and
so
a
traditional
RFP,
where
we
you
know
like
we
do
with
the
action
plan,
may
not
be
the
best
way.
It
might
be
wiser
to
do
an
RFQ
process
and
see
what
firms
are
out
there
for
profits
are
interested
in
doing
this
and
have
some
experience
working
in
this
area
and
then
negotiate
with
them
rather
than
getting.
F
You
know
kind
of
this
more
elaborate,
informal
submission
process,
because
it's
helpful
that
there's
more
than
four
or
five
that
are
premium
a
universe
who
are
going
to
be
able
to
do
this
in
Ithaca.
So
I
think
you
know.
So
we
wanted
to
keep
the
options
open
for
how
to
implement
and
do
more
consultation
with
your
day
of
care
who's
going
to
be
working
a
lot
in
this
area
to
kind
of
coordinate
what
what
what's
the
best
way
to
go
forward.
So
it's
it's
a
learning
process.
F
So
if
you
didn't
want
to
lock
ourselves
into
one
method
and
then
find
out
well,
if
you
change
it,
we
have
to
come
back
and
do
an
amendment
to
the
substantial
Amendment
and
go
through
a
process
of
the
IRA
and
the
County
Council
approvement
again.
So
the
goal
is
we're
pretty
flexible
and
when
you
can
come
back-
and
we
always
have
the
option
to
limiting
this
again
but
substantial
minutes
required
both
Ira
accounting,
Council
and
HUD
approval.
So
they
would
want
to
minimize
that
as
much
as
we.
F
Right,
I
think
they
in
my
mind
the
the
long
time
period
it
takes
into
account
the
fact
that
development
of
affordable
rental
housing
takes
many
years
is
one
issue,
especially
if
you're
applying
on
a
competitive
basis,
where
Logan
was
a
tax
credits
or
other
funding
sources,
and
also
that
communities
receive
what
four
to
five
times
their
usual
home
award.
So
for
us,
1.2
million
is
a
lot,
but
communities
like
Rochester
are
not
only
in
the
states.
F
D
D
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
almost
a
paper
all
right
as
you
guys
for
a
girl
as
well
Nelson
review
with
the
financials.
F
Yeah
we
live
in
shape
with
all
the
projects.
I
mean
we're
getting
the
2022
implemented
projects
implemented
we're
working
towards
that
expenditure
deadline.
We
made
some
good
progress
recently
with
economic
Global
training
programs,
so
this
this
month
submitted
one's
gone
out,
but
we're
going
to
be
right
down
to
the
line
in
terms
of
the
meeting
that
spend
that
requirement.
F
F
You
know
orientation
or
programs
we're
in
a
very
good
shape
loan
repayment
report
for
the
first
time
in
many
many
months
without
any
major
issues,
the
only
one
there's
one
issue
in
which
personal
best
ruling
is
behind
in
their
interest-only
payments,
but
particularly
send
those
out
a
couple
of
days
before
they're
due
because
we're
calculated
one
by
one
so
there's
a
little
bit
shorter
time
period
for
them
to
make
those
payments
and
the
least
repayments,
look
solid
as
well
ribs
the
ribs
buildings
behind
by
two
months,
so
we're
notified,
which
tends
to
make
a
10
month
payment
at
one
lump
sum.
F
So
the
the
500
and
one
dollar
rent
payment
due
so
we're
reminded
that
they
catch
up
on
their
names,
but
otherwise
things.
E
Conducted
right
now,
so
things
are
very
busy
as
we
look
at
near
ahead
in
an
increasing
changes,
including
the
theme
to
council
management
student
management.
So
there
will
be
a
great
deal
of
what's
going
on
this.
D
Thank
you.
My
report
is
just
to
say
that
efforts
are
ongoing
to
recruit
a
member
of
the
board,
Class
Bill,
the
current
agencies
and
ni,
and
many
we
have
our
number
of
leads
I
hope
you
have
some
income
reports
soon.
D
A
C
A
good
process
question
going
back
to
appointing
another
member
to
the
committee.
Do
we
anticipate
the
names
coming
to
the
board
prior
to
someone
being
appointed
and
the
reason
I
ask
you
about
that?
Is
you
know?
Ithaca
is
a
small
town
and
so
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
input
before
someone
is
appointed
because
we
don't
know
what
either
personal
you
know.
Relations
may
be
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
to
have
some
input
from
the
current
board
before
appointing
someone.
D
D
Obviously,
someone
who
joins
the
board
as
a
member
other
than
the
mayor
served
on
a
committee,
so
there's
a
bit
of
a
Rubik's
Cube
in
this
Quest
comes
in
first
or
second
year
right.
So
it
will
be
a
point
number
four.
Then
that
presents
going
to
committee.
We
do
have
another
applicant
who
potentially
is
interested
in
the
community
role
and
the
current
process
we've
been
doing
with
that
is
the
committee
chair
and
or
the
board
chair,
that's
the
German
person
and
so
I
have
an
opportunity
to
engage
with
that
individual
prior
to
the
appointment.
E
No
I
have
consulted
with
nails
and
with
Chris
as
chair
in
thinking
about
possible
additional
board
members,
certainly
happy
to
share
with
the
board
individuals
who
are
being
considered
who
may
have
interest.
It's
tough,
the
timing.
You
know
reaching
out
to
someone
to
describe
forward
responsibility
and
see
if
they
would
be
interested
yeah
I'm,
certainly
open
to
sharing
that.
A
C
Yeah,
it's
certainly
not
talking
about
having
veto
power
over
an
appointment,
fully
understanding
that
it's
the
mayor's
purview,
but
perhaps
some
valuable
feedback
could
be
gained.