►
From YouTube: October 22, 2020 IURA Board Mtg.
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
E
B
F
G
We
didn't
receive
any
written
and
there's
nobody
in
the
waiting
room.
F
Exactly
second
by
chris,
all
those
in
favor
of
approval,
aye.
A
Governance
committee-
oh
sorry,
cevante!
I
didn't.
I
didn't
miss
my
q.
Sorry
about
that.
Yes,
thank
you.
I
first
order
business
yeah
we
met
earlier
this
week
and
a
big
order
of
business
for
today
from
the
governance
committee
would
be
the
adoption
of
the
budget,
which
I
believe
the
public
authorities
act,
requires
by
either
60
days
before
the
fiscal
year
or
november,
which
I
think
translates
to
november
1st.
A
So
we're
you
know,
cutting
it
a
little
close,
but
we've
got
it
here
for
for
the
agency's
consideration,
there's
a
there's
a
memo
from
nels
that
gives
some
background
on
the
budget.
Some
of
the
you
know,
which
basically
is
a
good
budget
with
cushion
thanks
to
the
funding
we
received
from
the
government
around
the
pandemic.
That
gives
us
about,
I
believe,
a
little
over
700
000
and
a
good
portion
of
that
for
administrative
costs.
A
So
so
we
have
that
cushion,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
know
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
is
ask
if
we
could,
if
we
could
move
the
resolution
that
you
see
for
the
adoption
of
the
budget
and
then
open
it
up
for
discussion,
if
not
happy
to
have
that
discussion
now
before
doing
that,
but
but
I'd
like
to
ask
the
you
know
the
chair
and
mayor,
would
you
consider
asking
us
to
move.
H
A
So
in
terms
of
so
there
is
that
memo
with
background
from
nells-
and
I
mentioned
the
cushion
that
we
have-
which
is
great-
you
know
looking
a
little
into
the
future-
we're
going
we're
no
longer
going
to
benefit
on
the
revenue
side
from
the
just
over
60
thousand
dollars
we're
getting
every
year
in
payments
for
the
kuga
green
project.
But
but
we
do
have
all
that
capital.
Now
it
just
means
we're
no
longer
having
that
revenue.
A
So
that's
something
that
this
the
that
we
in
the
governance
committee
looking
forward,
would
like
to
have
as
part
of
a
conversation
about
strategic
planning
for
the
agency
overall,
rather
than
being
sort
of
in
a
reactive
position
where
we're
looking
at
what's
in
the
pipeline
in
terms
of
development
projects,
and
then
we
can
project
out
what
lease
payments
might
look
like.
You
know
or
loan
payments.
Sorry
can
we
take
a
more
proactive
stance
and
and
try
to
drive
revenue
ourselves?
A
I
think
that's
a
great
question
and
one
that
we
would
like
to
maybe
include
members
of
other
committees
from
the
agency
in
having
a
conversation
about
strategic
planning
for
the
agency,
which
is
part
of
the
governance
committee's
oversight
in
the
early
in
the
new
year.
So
I'm
just
putting
that
out
there,
but
it's
related
to
this
budget.
In
that
you
know
next
year
we
will.
We
won't
see
the
revenue.
We
won't
see
that
65
000
coming
in,
but
again,
as
I
pointed
out,
we
we
do
have
a
cushion
next
year.
A
Thanks
to
that
additional
funding
from
the
government
nails.
F
A
I
in
my
very
a
very
abbreviated
you
know
pointing
out
to
the
highlights:
is
there
anything
else
you'd
like
to
highlight
from
your
memo
or
point
out
for
the
committee's
consideration.
G
No,
I
think
you
did
hit
the
high
notes
eric
the
priority
issues.
It's
always
important,
I
think,
to
keep
in
mind
like
the
city
government.
Most
of
our
expenditures
are
staff,
whether
they're
direct
salary,
retirement
or
health
premiums.
The
health
insurance
premiums
went
up
one
percent
this
year,
which
was
a
great
great
assistance
in
their
budget
preparation.
We
expect
they
might
rebound
a
bit
next
year
due
to
you,
know,
pent-up
demand,
but
between
you
know,
salaries
and
benefits
that
consumes
87
of
the
ira's
budget.
G
So
that's
a
you
know,
we're
it's
kind
of
a
fixed
cost.
As
long
as
we're
still
maintaining
our
staff
levels
and
with
the
extra
cares
act
funding
we
really
need
all
the
staff
to
implement
those
projects
successfully.
H
B
B
Was
just
curious
when
you
talk
about
being
proactive,
are
you
talking
about
trying
to
find
projects
to
loan
money
that
there's
interest
returned.
A
That's
that's
part
of
it.
Another
is,
are
there
ways
that
we
can
think
about
how
we
generate
revenue.
B
A
You
know
so
that's
just
that's
more
conceptual
at
this
point
you
know,
but
it's
it's
worth
the
conversation
about
getting
creative,
but
yes,
tracy.
Absolutely
that
that's
part
of
it
thanks.
It's
like
all
of
the
above.
F
F
A
Great
yes,
so
this
is
a.
A
You
know
I
don't
remember
if
we
were
reached
out
to,
I
believe
we
were.
This
is
anti-displacement
network
is
a
state
wide
program
and
there
is
a
team
mythica
assembled
to
be
to
apply
to
be
part
of,
and
there's
a
proposal.
That's
in
our
packets
around
what
it
would
what
that
focus
would
be.
There
was
I
I
won't.
A
I
won't
rehash
what
you
can
see
in
writing,
but
there
was
some,
I
wouldn't
say,
concern
but
or
consternation,
but
maybe
maybe
disappointment
that
the
word
displacement
is
used
in
and
when,
when
the
proposal
that
you
see
from
team
mythica
seems
more
like
displacement
was
seen
when
you
first
hear
it
as
maybe
combating
gentrification
combating,
for
example,
a
tactic
like
combating
the
use
of
airbnb,
which
is
displacing
available
housing
for
long-term
renters.
A
A
That
said,
the
proposal
has
a
big
focus
on
on
on
ensuring
on
not
only
dealing
with
those
who
are
facing
eviction,
but
also
with
the
use
of
the
2-1-1
line,
making
a
good
faith,
making
a
good
effort
to
prevent
people
falling
into
that
position
as
well.
So
it
does
have
that
aspect
to
it,
a
preventative
aspect,
not
just
a
reactive.
You
know
emergency
room
like
fixing
it
while
it's
happening
aspect
to
it
as
well.
A
A
This
is
about
the
potential
this
is
before
us
because
there's
a
potential
that
the
if
the
carbon
renewal
agency
would
be
looked
to
as
the
agency
to
be
the
sponsoring
agency,
the
other
candidate
would
be
the
human
services
coalition,
as
you
can
look
at
all
the
partners
that
make
up
this
team
ithaca.
It's
it's.
It's
quite
a
you
know,
diverse
cast
and,
and
so
what
lead
sponsor
in
this
community,
you
know
is
qualified
to
kind
of
handle.
A
This
nels
did
share
with
the
committee,
his
personal
preference,
and
that
that
perhaps
you
know
this,
isn't
this
isn't
really
what
this
wouldn't
really
play
to
the
strengths
of
of
the
of
our
agency,
and
I
have
been-
or
you
know
we
wouldn't
be
this
this.
This
actually
is
kind
of
new
territory
in
a
way
for
us
because
of
what
some
of
the
partners
do,
it
isn't
necessarily
something
we've
been
doing
and,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
the
human
services
coalition
would
be
the
better
candidate.
A
So
I
know
that
nels
and
kathy
slaughter
are
going
to
continue
that
conversation,
but
nels
is
that
a
fair
and
accurate
representation
of
the
question
you
put
on
the
table
yesterday
or
the
other
day
on
tuesday
to
the
committee,
and
is
there
anything
else,
you'd
like
to
add
to
what
I've
just
shared
with
the
committee
regarding
all
of
this.
G
Thanks
eric
good
effort
to
summarize
things,
we've
been
introduced
them
at
one
meeting
and
we
have
anissa
as
well
as
laura,
who
are
both
very
much
well-versed
in
this
program,
and
I
know
it's
gone
through
a
lot
of
development
to
get
to
where
it
is
today.
I
think
the
the
bottom
line
is.
We
want
to
make
sure
we
bring
in
resources
into
the
city
to
address
evictions
and
a
displacement.
If
we
can
get
outside
resources,
that's
going
to
be
beneficial.
G
We
did
bring
the
question
of
who
is
the
best
entity
to
be
the
grantee
and
also
operate
some
of
the
elements
of
the
program
and
just
clarify
a
little
bit.
My
my
view
on
it
is
because
a
human
services
coalition
has
relationships
already
with
some
of
these
actors,
such
as
law,
new
york,
and
because
there
would
be
internal
human
service
employees
involved
in
the
operation
of
the
program
such
as
the
navigator
and
one
of
the
coordinators.
G
Maybe
you
know
it
seems
like
they
would
have
a
better
ability
to
manage
the
program,
the
overarching
program,
but
the
agency
has
a
better
skill
set
for
that
delivery
of
of
monthly
funding,
support
services
and
arrears,
because
we
do
that
already
in
some
of
our
programs.
G
So
my
ideal
preference
is
when
we
get
the
award
and
two
that
this
the
ira
plays
the
major
role
in
that
delivery
of
the
325
000
of
supports
support
stability,
housing
stability,
support
program,
funding
to
50,
tenants
facing
eviction,
and
that
we
also
play
a
partnership
role
and
monitoring
the
program.
You
know
reporting,
programming
and
trying
to
look
at
outcomes
just
because
really
one
of
the
goals.
Here
is
what
isn't
the
most
effective
approach
to
this
issue,
and
we
want
to
really
use
this.
G
You
know
to
figure
out
which
of
these
elements
are
really
successful
and
which
ones
are
you
know,
maybe
not
the
best
use
of
resources.
So
we
want
to
do
a
little
bit
of
evaluation
activity
as
part
of
this
process.
G
So
that's
and
I
think
anissa
would
be
very
well
versed
to
really
give
a
little
more
of
deeper
background
on
this
and
and
maybe
put
it
in
perspective
because
some
when
I
talked
to
the
governor's
committee,
I
didn't
speak
about
the
importance
of
the
arrear
payments
and
that's
really
a
key
component
of
this
program.
So
maybe
anissa
can
just
give
a
little
five-minute
summary.
H
Sure,
and
also
yes,
I
want
to
echo
what
nell
said
eric.
I,
I
think
you've
done
an
admirable
job
summarizing,
what's
been
a
year-long
process,
so
it
it's.
This
proposal
is,
it
is
pretty
complex,
as
you
can
see,
there's
a
lot
of
program,
components
and
just
to
address
what
you
you
know,
the
the
question,
the
concern
that
this
is
more
of
a
eviction
prevention
program
than
anti-displacement.
H
Let
me
speak
briefly
to
how
we
got
there
in
order
to
be
a
part
of
this
group.
Dna
displacement
learning
network
we
needed
to
do
an
analysis
of
our
local
displacement
triggers
in
advance
and,
as
it
turns
out
currently
in
ithaca,
we
have
many
pieces
in
place
that
are
aimed
either
directly
or
indirectly
at
preventing
displacement
and
addressing
our
high
cost
market.
These
are
things
everything
from
things
that
I
you
all
of
you
on.
H
The
board
are
very
familiar
with
security
deposits
and
housing,
scholarships
to
help
lower
the
cost
for
for
people
who
are
lmi
in
our
community
assistance
to
lmi
homeowners,
like
small
repair
and
and
homeowner
rehab
to
to
help
people
stay
in
place.
Not
you
know
kind
of
be
forced
out
of
their
homes
because
they
haven't
been
able
to
get
necessary,
repairs
and
pay
their
taxes.
H
Continual
investment
in
you
know
trying
to
increase
the
number
of
affordable
units
in
our
community
politic
policies
that
have
resulted
in
increasing
density
and
policies
at
the
state
level
like
source
of
income
protection.
These
are
all
things
that
all
of
you
have
supported
over
the
years
and
worked
on,
and
yet
at
the
end.
So
if
we,
if
we
look
at
you,
know,
displacement
triggers
on
a
spectrum
at
the
end
of
that
spectrum
is
eviction,
and
I'm
specifically,
and
everything
about
this
project
is
specifically
addressing
non-payment.
H
Evictions,
not
evictions,
for
other
reasons
that
have
to
do
with
other
lease
violations
or
behavior,
or
anything
like
that.
This
is
strictly
non-payment
at
that
end
of
the
spectrum.
A
20,
an
independent
analysis
of
ithaca
city
court's
records
from
2018
evictions,
showed
that
only
three
percent
of
the
residents
in
the
cases
that
were
analyzed,
which
was
the
majority
of
cases,
but
it
was
hard
getting
all
the
data.
Only
three
percent
of
tenants
had
legal
representation
at
their
eviction
hearing.
Yet
almost
all
landlords
had
representation,
so
this
is.
H
This
speaks
to
the
lack
of
legal
defense
resources
that
are
out
there
in
the
community.
It
also
speaks
to
the
fact
that,
once
somebody
gets
to
the
point
of
eviction,
they
have
to
work
very
quickly
to
find
representation
and
so
on
and
that's
been
difficult
throughout
new
york
state
and
that's
part
of
the
reason
for
the
source
of
income
protections
or
I'm
sorry,
the
the
tenant
protections
against
eviction
that
were
enacted
in
fall,
2019
right
before
the
pandemic.
H
It
kind
of
lengthened
the
timeline
that
people
who
are
facing
eviction
have
to
try
to
marshal
those
resources.
But
I
don't
mean
to
digress.
I
just
mean
that
when
we
looked
at
the
at
the
full
spectrum
of
what
currently
exists
in
ithaca
to
try
to
aid
people
in
accessing
living
in
ithaca
or
remaining
in
ithaca
there,
there
was
a
big
gap
at
the
end,
which
ultimately
causes
people
to
if
they're
evicted,
most
often
move
outside
of
the
city
of
ithaca,
and
if
we
hearken
back.
H
I
know
it's
been
a
few
years
now,
but
one
key
finding
in
the
assessment
of
fair
housing
that
we
did
in
2017
was
that
there
seemed
to
be
a
trend
of
a
long
time.
Ithaca
residents
who
had
lived
in
the
downtown
neighborhoods
of
you
know:
titus
flats,
south
side,
other
downtown
areas
moving
out
of
those
areas
as
they
were
becoming
higher
opportunity
to
lower
west
hill.
H
So
we've
seen
a
migration
primarily
of
african-american
people
away
from
downtown
and
all
the
you
know,
kind
of
resources
and
amenities
that
there
are
in
downtown
to
west
hill
and
then
ultimately,
this
is
more.
I
don't
want
to
say
conjecture,
it's
not
that
vague.
But
ultimately
I
think
what
we
see
anecdotally
anyway,
is
that
people,
then,
if
they're
already
living
in
west
hill
and
can't
afford
to
live
in
west
hill
anymore,
then
they
would
tend
to
go
outside
the
county
and
yeah
outside
the
city
limits.
H
And
once
that
happens,
you
know
it's
much
more
difficult
for
people
to
get
into
the
city
to
access
jobs,
education,
enrichment,
all
those
things,
so
that's
sort
of
how
we
got
through.
That
is
how
we
got
to
formulating
this
program
around:
establishing
a
full
spectrum
of
services
to
prevent
somebody's
getting
to
the
place
of
eviction,
and
once
they
do
get
to
the
place
of
eviction,
full
scope,
legal
defense
and
payment
of
arrears
that
converts
into
a
housing
stability
payment
for
the
remainder
of
the
18-month
time
period
after
the
arrears
are
paid.
B
Yeah,
I
I
just
had
some
questions
sure.
So
the
formal
evictions
there
are
70
support
that
it
looked
like
and
were
those
all
for
non-payment.
H
B
H
Yes,
so
we
did
consider
the
affordable
housing
that's
being
built.
This
program,
enterprise
is
wants
to
see
the
funds
committed
or
expended
within
15
to
18
months,
so
we're
looking
at
a
time
frame
of
15
to
18
months.
We've
been
able
to
have
it
matched
to
be
three
years,
but
tracy
a
lot
of
that
housing
won't
be
coming
online
in
15
months,
so
this
is
kind
of
aimed
toward
you
know
the
immediate
future.
While
those
units
are
being
built
and
yes,
some
people
are
being
evicted
from
affordable
housing.
H
As
you
know,
johanna
anderson
was
on
this
stakeholder
team
now
inhs,
their
method
is
what
johanna
said
is
they
would
always
prefer
and
they
want
to
work
with
their
tenants
to
create
payment
plans
for
tenants
that
are
in
arrears
to
prevent
that
eviction,
but
there
are
private
landlords
in
the
affordable
housing
space
that
maybe
I
I
actually
have
heard
the
private
landlord
to
do
that
too.
H
But
there
are
two
main
large
complexes
in
the
city
of
ithaca
for
which
over
50
of
evictions,
from
which
over
50
percent
of
evictions
occur-
and
those
are
not,
you
know-
that's
not
an
inh.
Those
are
not
inhs
units
which
are
they
west
village
and
chestnut
hill.
B
Okay,
my
one
concern
is:
there's
a
lot
of
salary
money
in
here
yeah.
If
this
is,
I
mean
you
know,
we
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen
with
the
new,
affordable
housing,
and
if,
if
all
this
is
in
place
yeah
then
what
happens?
I
mean,
how
does
it
get
funded?
Then?
B
H
I
mean
I
definitely
share
that
concern
the
because
of
enterprise
had
a
lot
of
guidelines
and
boxes
that
they
wanted
us
to
take
in
terms
of
how
scalable
this
project
would
be,
and
and
so
on,
the
the
various
partners
that
are
involved
here.
You
know
that
include
law,
new
york,
cornell
law,
the
two
one
one
navigator,
hs,
the
the
part-time
staff
person
at
itu.
H
I
mean
there
is
awareness
there
that
this
is
a
soft
money
and
b
will
go
away
after
you
know,
18
months
or
a
little
bit
longer.
So
I
think
that
there
is
commitment
on
the
part
of
those
partners
to
try
to
continue
that
funding
for
the
group
to
work
together
to
try
to
identify
those
sources.
You
know
this.
This
project
comes
at
a
time
where
it
couldn't
there
couldn't
be
a
worse
time
to
try
to
sustain
staff
resources
and
start
new
programs.
H
I
mean
we
weren't,
anticipating
covet
would
happen,
but
because
of
covet,
obviously,
organizations
are
cutting
those
rules.
You
know
that's
something
that
I
don't
think
enterprise
honestly.
I
don't
think
that
they
and
I
mean
who
could
anticipate
in
a
pandemic.
But
that's
I
don't
think
that
their
focus
is
really
there.
Their
focus
is
on
identifying
projects
that
lift
up
and
really
center
racial
equity
and,
in
our
project,
evictions
directly
affect
people
of
color
much
more
than
people
who
are
white.
H
B
Had
one
other
question
which
is
so
what
does
success?
Look
like
in
this
program?
Zero,
non-payment,
evictions
I
mean
if
there
were
70
and
one
might
assume
there
were
the
same
number.
Maybe
more,
would
all
those
people
get
funding?
Is
that
no,
we
don't
have
enough
for
that.
50
would.
H
Yeah,
I
think
success
looks
like
sort
of
staunching
the
flow
of
non-payment
evictions
by
being
ready
at
eviction
court
to
aid
people
in
creating
payment
plans
with
their
with
their
landlords,
if
they're
able
to
and
if
not,
then
provide
this
supplemental
funding
for
arrears
and
housing
stability
so
that
after
18
months,
people
are
still
within
those
units.
So,
yes,
I
think
50
diverted
evictions
will
be
one
metric,
but
also
a
creation
of
an
eviction
database
so
that
we
can
continue
which
doesn't
exist.
H
New
york
state
does
not
require
communities
to
keep
track
of
who's
getting
evicted
and
how
so
starting
an
eviction
database
that
would
allow
us
to
monitor
over
time,
what's
happening
on
the
eviction
front
and
craft
future
strategies
like
as
as
the
situations
change,
those
would
be
two
markers
of
success.
There's
also,
you
know,
production
of
a
landlord,
tenant,
handbook
and
website
giving
brief
legal
advice
to
you
know:
people
who
call
the
housing
hotline
and
providing
full
scope
legal
representation
to
upwards
of
50
individuals.
E
E
If
we're
successful
in
receiving
funding
from
enterprise,
it
has
to
be
either
expended
or
committed
by
2022
march.
So
it's
march
2022.
So
it's
a
really
constricted
time
frame.
One
of
the
comments
I
wanted
to
make
is
that
there
has
been
an
effort
to
partner
and
develop
some
leverage,
have
some
leverage
so,
for
example,
the
work
the
discussions
that
have
taken
place
with
cornell
law
school
they
have
for
the
first
time
this
fall
a
tenant
advocacy
practicum.
E
There
was
a
great
deal
of
interest
from
law's
students
to
participate
in
this
practicum
and
we
were
successful
in
negotiating
working
with
cornell
law
school
so
that
the
funding,
if
it's
received
by
enterprise,
would
create
the
practicum
for
three
semesters
and
then
cornell
law
school
will
match
that
so
that
it
will
continue
for
another
three
semesters
through
spring
of
2023.
E
So
there
really
was
an
interest
in
getting
other
participants
to
contribute
for
the
sustainability
of
some
of
these
programs.
H
I
will
also
say
that
we
have
talked
with
a
park
and
community
foundations
who
who
have
expressed
some
interest
in
seeing
how
the
project
goes
forward.
They're
they're
definitely
interested
in
being
kind
of
kept
in
the
loop.
You
know
they
wouldn't
be
able
to.
H
You
know
sustain
it,
sustain
all
the
staff
roles,
as
you've
already
pointed
out
tracy,
but
you
know
they're
they're
interested
in
this
project.
The
I
mean
one
thing
about
the
enterprise
guidelines.
Is
they
the
number
one
piece
was
centering
racial
equity?
They
really
wanted
to
see
that
happen
and
then,
as
kobud
rolled
out,
they
also
wanted
to
see
how
we
would
prevent
displacement
for
covert
related
reasons.
H
Now
we
are
an
entitlement
community
where
some
of
the
communities
in
this
in
this
learning
network
or
not
so
we've
been
able
to
designate
resources
to
to
prevent
evictions
and
so
on.
For
for
those
reasons
they
wanted
this
to
be
an
innovative
project
that
addressed
systems,
change
and
root
causes
they
wanted
it
to
be
scalable.
They
wanted
there
to
be
broad
impact,
they
wanted
it
to
be
sustainable,
so
you
know
it's.
It
was
a
pretty
heavy
lift
and
you
know
I
think
I
mean
it's
not
I.
H
I
will
say
that
this
this
proposal
came
out
of
a
lot
of
discussion
and
hard
work
and
though
it's
there's
a
lot
of
moving
parts,
I
think
keeping
in
mind
that
what's
really
happening
here
is
creating
establishing
a
full
spectrum
of
services
and
resources
to
prevent
eviction
from
the
very
front
end.
That
is
a
very
light
touch.
H
That's
you
know
having
a
handbook
a
website
available
where
people
can
get
their
own
questions
answered,
you
know,
making
the
housing
hotline
that
exists
in
the
community,
more
robust,
with
a
part-time
staffer
to
ensure
volunteer
management
and
all
of
that
providing
education
along
the
way.
Brief
legal
advice,
that's
that's
legal,
actual
answers
to
actual
legal
questions
given
by
supervised
law
students,
so
not
just
law,
students,
they're
supervised
to
this.
H
You
know
what
you're
seeing
or
I
think
where
we're
focusing
is
at
the
end,
whereas
if
none
of
these
points
along
the
spectrum
have
been,
you
know
one
other
thing:
it's
like
connecting
people
to
resources
that
already
exist
in
the
community
and
if
none
of
that
has
worked
then
to
catch
them
with
the
last
safety
net.
That
does
include
a
lot
of
dollars
to
pay
arrears
and
increase
somebody's
housing,
stability.
D
H
Yes,
so
that's
what
governance
has
been
talking
about
a
little
bit
so
where
it
sits
right
now,
is
we
see
that
hsc
would
be
best
poised
to
do
the
program?
The
services
implementation,
you
know,
maybe
be
more
of
the
coordinator
for
staff
roles,
and
things
like
that
and
the
agency
would
be
best
prepared
to
do
thing.
H
The
financial
management
end
of
things
like
much
like
we
do
with
our
entitlement
funds,
disperse
the
funding
for
the
payment
of
arrears
and
the
housing
supplement,
maybe
doing
the
disbursement
of
like
handle
like
a
vouchering
process.
Much
like
you
know
we
do
for
our
entitlement
recipients
where
they
present
a
voucher,
and
then
we
provide
them.
You
know
with
the
funding
that
they
need
for
that
quarter.
For
example,
it
might
look.
H
Something
like
that
is
is
how
we're
looking
at
it
the
impact
on
staff
time
I
will
say
in
all
honesty,
this
project
has
been
more
time
intensive
than
enterprise
estimated.
It
would
and
more
time
intensive
than
the
additional
estimate
that
we
put
on
top
of
that,
but
for
program
delivery.
This
is
you
know,
we're
really
going
to
be.
You
know
engaging
community
partners
to
do
that.
H
I
and
the
other
core
stat
core
team
members
would
form
an
advisory
body
that
would
probably
meet
monthly
to
kind
of
help
through
the
implementation
process
and
provide
some
oversight,
but
really
once
this
gets
rolling,
it's
going
to
be
implemented
by
other
partners,
primarily,
but
the
impact
would
be
on
charles.
You
know
for
the
vouchering
me
for
oversight
and
you
know
reporting.
H
I
think
that's
how
it
would
look,
and
I
think
that
for
the
18
month
period
for
me.
H
I
think
I
can
organize
my
time
so
that
the
you
know
at
the
be
at
the
front,
end
of
2021
we're
going
to
be
doing
an
action
plan
and
the
cdbg3
planning,
but
I
think
after
that
there'll
be
more
time
loosened
up
for
me
to
be
able
to
do
this,
so
I
think
it
you
know,
I
think
it
can
work.
E
E
We
did
ask
those
questions
going
through
the
process
as
well.
So
there
are
a
number
of
ways
in
which
the
enterprise
guidelines
or
requirements
have
helped
to
define
some
of
what
you're
seeing.
H
C
Yeah,
thank
you,
two
different
tracks
of
comments
and
questions,
so
the
first
is
just
relatively
honor.
The
core
point.
I
think
that
eric
put
on
the
table,
whether
or
not
like
being
the
primary
agency
that
supports
this
project
is
that
within
the
ira's
mandate,
scope
of
expertise,
etc.
C
I
just
want
to
connect
this
back
to
what
we
were
just
talking
about
in
terms
of
the
budget,
which
is,
if
we
want
to
diversify
our
revenue
streams,
it
probably
means
we
also
need
to
diversify
the
things
that
we're
doing,
and
so
it
may
be
that
hsc
is
really
better
suited
to
really
kind
of
take
this
on
and
we'd
be
a
sub-recipient.
E
C
The
second
thing
is,
I
wanted
to
so
like
kind
of
connect,
a
few
things
make
sure
I'm
understanding
it
correctly.
Based
on
the
document.
That's
in
the
report
plus
what
the
conversation
that's
just
been
happening
between
anissa
and
tracy
and
laura
because
it's
going
to
sound
negative
when
it
comes
out
of
my
mouth,
it
doesn't
really
intend
to
come
negative,
but
I
want
to
just
make
sure
I
don't
understand
it
right.
C
So,
if
I
it
looks
to
me
like
okay,
so
the
data
charts
are
really
helpful
in
terms
of
where
we're
seeing
decreased
amounts
of
people
of
color
in
certain
neighborhoods
increase
in
other
neighborhoods.
But
if
I
understand
it
correctly,
you
can't
draw
a
direct
connection
between
that
data
and
the
eviction
data
and
in
fact
it
seems
like
when
you
dig
into
the
eviction
data,
at
least
in
2018.
A
majority
of
those
evictions
are
occurring
where
we
actually
see
an
increase
of
people
who
are
moving
to
the
west
hill
neighborhood
right.
C
So
we're
not
entirely
certain
that
the
evictions
is
the
cause
of
the
displacement
they
seem
to
be
related,
but
we
can't
say
for
sure
right
and
then
that's
related
to
tracy's
question.
You
answered
the
question
about
new
housing
units
that
are
in
the
pipeline,
but
we
have
brought
in
new
housing
units
in
the
community
between
90
and
2010,
and
I'm
kind
of
curious
that
seems
to
have
not
affected
this
data.
C
That
would
be
super
helpful
and
then,
if
I
understand
it
correctly,
also
at
the
end
of
18
months
in
terms
of
the
systemic
benefits
or
systemic
changes
that
will
remain,
they
seem
kind
of
light
right,
which
is
the
handbook,
maybe
maybe
a
website
right,
but
we're
really
going
to
be
able
to
utilize
this
money
to
try
to
like
stop
the
flow
over.
The
next
18
months,
but
without
a
funding
source,
to
continue
the
program
after
that,
in
terms
of
like
systemic
infrastructural
things
we
would
have
put
in
place,
it's
a
little
lighter.
H
Okay,
let
me
attempt
great
questions.
Chris
and
you're
gonna
have
to
help
me
remember
all
of
them
as
we
go
along,
but
okay
to
the
data,
the
point
of
the
data.
One
thing
I
do
want
to
bring
this
back
to
and
your
question
helps
us
get
there
is.
Why
is
iora
involved
in
this?
In
the
first
place?
Why
is
because
you
know
hud
mandated
that
we
do
an
assessment
of
fair
housing
and
that
assessment
of
fair
housing
resulted
in
two
goals.
H
There
are
seven
goals
total,
but
two
goals
that
were
anti-displacement
goals.
We
saw
that
lmi
people
and
people
of
color
have
trouble
staying
in
this
community
because
of
the
high
cost
of
housing.
So
the
analysis
there's
a
couple
different
analyses
that
we
use
one
is
the
data
from
the
assessment
of
fair
housing
that
well
different.
I
mean
this
is
census
data,
and
you
know,
I
think,
nels's
analysis
is
you
know.
Kind
of
you
know.
Kind
of
insights
is
what
helped
us
understand
that
people
are
moving.
H
People
of
color
african-american
people,
there's
been
a
shift
of
people
living
in
those
downtown
neighborhoods
up
to
west
hill.
That's
one
data
analysis.
Point
second,
data
analysis
point
is
looking
at
2018
evictions.
Two-Thirds
of
those
people
were
people
of
color
and
the
main
places
that
people
were
being
evicted
from
were
west
village
and
chestnut
hill.
H
So
two
different
sources
and
you're
right
that
they
don't
like
specifically
draw
the
line.
But
if
you're
looking
at
the
fact
that
people
of
color
have
moved
to
lower
west
hill
and
then
people
of
color
are
getting
evicted
from
lower
west
hill,
then
you're,
seeing
that
eventually
there
isn't
the
opportunity
for
people
of
color
to
live
right.
C
H
Right,
okay
and
so
to
your
point
about
the
number
of
housing
units
that
have
been
created
over
time,
we've
created
quite
a
lot
as
a
community,
and
I
think
that
you
know
in
a
lot
of
ways
because
of
the
work
of
this
board
and
they're.
You
know
it's
very
impressive.
Yet
what
we
see
is
that-
and
you
know
this-
you
know
you
talk
about
this
every
meeting
it's
like
what
we
see
is
that
living
in
ithaca
is
still
very
high
cost
and
it's
still
no
matter
how
many
units
are
created.
H
There
is
just
always
that
need,
and
so
it
you
know,
with
a
million
dollars
available
for
this
project,
and
I
didn't
mention
this,
but
we
will
ask
enterprise
if
we
can
fund
more
of
the
housing
supplements
than
we
initially
asked,
for
we
don't
know
if
that
will
happen,
but
with
a
million
dollars
available
to
create
systems
change,
I
mean
that
was
a
question
that
all
of
I
think
all
the
people
in
the
network
had
for
enterprises
like
how's
that
going
to
work.
For
you
know
18
months,
1
million
dollars.
H
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
a
pretty
big
ask.
I
you
know,
I
think
it's
also
can
seem
sort
of
overly
optimistic
to
be
like
it.
You
know
once
this
program
gets
rolling.
Hopefully
you
know
through
the
eviction
database
and
the
the
data
that
we're
going
to
be
collecting
another
funder,
local
philanthropy,
maybe
enterprise
in
the
future.
Whoever
will
look
at
the
data
that
we've
collected
and
be
like.
Yes,
we
see
that
this
is
making
an
impact
for
for
lmi
and
people
of
color
in
ithaca,
and
we
want
to
continue.
H
C
Yeah,
so
I
that's
really
helpful
additional
context
and
I
get
like
you
know
the
funder
wants
what
the
funder
wants.
Sometimes
I
I
think,
what's
in
with
to
me
what's
interesting
coming
out
of
this,
is
you
know,
assuming
we
get
funded
to
do
this?
We
move
forward.
It's
a
good
project
right,
but
I
think
what
comes
out
of
it
for
me
is,
as
you
say,
we
have
put
a
lot
of
resources,
people
time
financial
resources.
C
Clearly
we're
clearly
there's
still
a
mismatch
or
a
gap
like
if
we,
if
our
goal
is
to
prevent
the
the
continued
displacement
of
especially
people
of
color
from
the
city
of
ithaca
outside
of
the
city,
and
we
think
that's
related
to
affordability
and
we're
building
more
affordability
and
most
of
those
units
are
being
built
in
the
city.
Yes,
there
are
some
in
in
surrounding
communities,
but
majority
of
them
are
being
built
in
the
city
and
we're
not
affecting
that
metric.
We're
not
connecting
that
together.
It
seems
right.
C
So
the
work
that
this
group
has
done
needs
to
somehow
be
connected
to
this
other
work,
so
that
we
could
ask
that
question
right,
because
I
don't
think
that
question
is
being
asked
more
and
there's
other
meanings
that
I'm
in
it's
not
being
asked
more
broadly
we're
just
we're
merely
just
looking
at
numbers
of
units
right,
which
is
a
good
thing.
We
need
to
increase
the
number
of
units,
but
it
seems
like
there
is
still
yet
a
gap
there
there's
something
else
going
on
that.
C
Maybe
we
just
don't
kind
of
can't
quite
see,
that's
related
to
the
broader
issues
of
affordability,
or
I
don't
know
what
it
is.
So
I
can
I'm,
but
I
would
love
to
find
a
way
to
get
some
funding
over
the
next
year
or
two.
That
would
allow
us
as
a
community
to
kind
of
go
and
say
yes,
it's
not
just
about
evictions,
there's
something
else
going
on
and
if
we're
building
more
units
and
we're
still
seeing
these
numbers
change
what's
happening.
H
Yeah,
I
think
that
I
think
that's
an
excellent
point.
Chris.
I
also
think
you
know
there
is
an
aspect
of
this
project
that
we
haven't
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
the
kind
of
theoretical
underpinnings
of
it,
but
the
housing
stability
supplement
payment.
That's
the
arrears
payment
that
converts
into
like
basically
additional
support
funding
for
those
households
once
the
arrears
are
paid.
H
That
is
a
kind
of
way
of
testing
a
guaranteed
basic
income
idea
right,
because
we
know
that
you
know,
41
percent
of
americans
would
be
the
stable
households
would
be
destabilized
by
an
emergency
costing
250.
H
It
goes
up
to
over
50
percent
when
it's
650,
so
you
can
pay
arrears,
and
this
was
a
question
that
that
enterprise
asked
us.
Why
not
just
maximize
the
arrears
payments
and
you
know,
don't
do
a
housing
stability
supplement.
There
are
other
pots
a
little
sprinkled
throughout
the
community
of
arrears
payments
that
we
can
connect
people
to
and
advance
them.
They
won't
get
to
eviction
court.
So
we're
going
to
do
that,
but
the
idea
is:
is
there
a
way
to
supplement
people's
very
limited
incomes
so
that
they
can
get
a
more
stable
footing?
H
You
know
address
their
transportation
needs
or
whatever
family
needs,
that
they
have
that
two-on-one
navigator
can
help
them
connect
to
you
know
other
resources
in
the
community,
but
that
that
part
of
the
project,
I
think,
could
be
a
very
interesting
demonstration
for
what
people
can
do
with
a
small
amount
of
extra
money
in
their
pocket.
They
could
perhaps
address
the
the
question
that
you're
asking
it's
like
we're:
building
units
we're
making
them
affordable
certain
income
levels.
Why
is
there
still?
H
You
know
this
difficulty
in
our
community,
so
I
hope
that
answers
your
question,
but
that
is
you
know
something
that
we
are
intending
to
look
at.
It's
like
how
do
people
use
this
money?
We've
seen
how
they?
You
know,
stockton.
California
did
a
similar
project
so
we're
trying
to
look
at
what
are
the
overall
effects
that
that
additional
supplement
will.
A
Sure,
okay,
one
I'd,
be
very
interested
in
the
results
from
the
looking
at
universal
income.
I
know
this
is
kind
of
an
ersatz
version
of
that
like
not
not
not
really
guaranteed
but
kind
of
it.
A
It
behaves
like
it,
but
one
thing
I
and
another
group
community
leaders
of
color
I've
been
discussing
in
terms
of
universal
basic
income,
and
we
had
johann
johanna
with
us
at
this
meeting
was
the
unintentional
consequence
of
universal
basic
income
on
other
programs
that
people
are
a
part
of,
so
you
can,
all
of
a
sudden
disqualify
be
disqualified
out
of
something
else,
that's
helping
you
because
of
the
income
that
you're
receiving
from
this
other
program.
A
So
we
don't
want
that
to
happen
because
other
than
people
are
in
the
same,
and
I've
been
tasked
by
clock
to
to
research.
You
know
how
how
is
stockton
and
other
in
any
other
place.
That's
implemented
this
managing
that,
if
you
have
that
answer
already
I'd
love
to
not
not
not
here,
but
you
know
I'd
love
to
know
what
you
may
have
found.
So
that
was
just
that.
H
Okay,
johanna
brought
up
that
same
concern
and
many
members.
H
Team
did
that's
why
the
payment
is
three
hundred
dollars,
set
it
three
hundred
dollars,
and
we
did
some
analysis
that
allowed
us
to
see
that,
even
if,
okay,
so
a
household
has
a
housing
choice,
voucher
and
this
additional
income
of
300
lowers
the
amount
of
the
housing
choice,
voucher
that
the
the
overall
gain
will
still
be
greater.
H
If
that
makes
sense,
does
that
make
sense?
Also
people
will
you
know
when
they're
approached
to
see?
Do
you
want
to
you
know
we
can
pay
your
arrears
and
do
you
want
this
housing
stability
supplement?
That's
part
of
the
role
as
a
navigator
to
explain
any
potential
to
look
at
the
you
know
their
what
kind
of
benefits
they
receive
now
and
how
it
would
impact
their
benefits.
H
H
So,
there's
that
seed
and
magnolia
mother's
project,
our
two
demonstration
projects
that
we
looked
at
seed,
is
the
stockton
group
we've
reached
out
to
seed
and
we'll
be
setting
up
a
meeting,
and
I
can
include
you
in
that
and
also
send
you
some
information
that
we
have
thank.
A
You,
yes,
that'd,
be
great,
the
other.
The
other
point
I
wanted
to
make-
and
this
is
not
based
on
any
evidence
just
just
a
feeling
and
based
on
some
things-
that
I've
members
of
community
leaders
of
color
have
seen
with
the
robin
fund
and
other
things
is
that
you
know
in
terms
of
why
some
people
may
be
more
impacted
than
others
and
people
of
color.
A
I
I
just
throwing
out
there
that
I
don't
know
how
many
of
these
organizations
that
are
the
givers
or
providers
of
these
of
the
help
are
really
culturally
competent
or
have
connections
in
the
community
or
make
presentations
at
churches
or
make
presentations
or
seek
out
the
latino
civic
association
of
tompkins
county
and
say:
hey.
Can
we
make
a
presentation
and
we
have
someone
who's
bilingual?
A
Oh,
hey
2-1-1!
You
can't
speak
english.
Well,
we
can
have
someone
connect
with
you
who
speaks
this
and,
and
so
you
know
time
and
again,
I'm
I'm
seeing
what
I'm
hearing
and
it's
all
anecdotal
is
people
from-
I
guess
I'll,
just
say:
majority
population
who
are
now
taking
advantage
of
these
programs
in
increasing
numbers
because
they
qualify
for
them,
but
they
also
bring
much
more
cultural
capital
a
much
more
sophisticated
understanding.
A
A
So
you
have
these
family
networks,
cultural
capital
sophistication
understanding
and
you
might
have
someone
three
blocks
away:
who's
lived
in
ithaca
for
generations,
who's
part
of
the
black
community,
or
even
more
recently
from
the
latinx
community,
who
doesn't
have
any
of
those
things
and
they
could
qualify,
but
they
don't
know
about
it
so
that
I
am
describing
you
know,
obviously
before
the
analysis
has
been
done.
It's
just
conjecture
on
my
part
based
on
this
anecdotal
evidence,
but
I
think
that's
a
big
part
of
this.
A
H
I
eric
thank
you
so
much
for
for
bringing
that
to
the
floor.
I
think
what
you
bring
up
is,
I
agree,
definitely
needs
to
be
dug
into
in
a
more
conservative
way
by
the
service
providing
community,
and
I
think,
because
one
of
the
things
that
we
see
is
in
an
attempt
to
establish
fairness,
a
lot
of
programs
with
limited
funding
such
as
the
one
that
we're
describing
often
rely
on
first-come,
first-served.
H
You
know
a
first-come,
first-served
model
and
people
who
come
first
are
the
ones
who
have
more
extensive
networks
who
have
those
cultural
capital
resources
that
you're
talking
about
who
are
already
connected
in
some
way
and
or
heard
about
this
know
about
it
whatever,
and
I
think
all
of
the
things
that
you
brought
up
are
so
important
for
us
to
address,
and
I
know
your
time
is
extremely
limited,
but
I
would
love
to
reach
out
to
you
afterwards.
H
You
know
to
perhaps
further
the
conversation,
and
I
will
bring
this
forward
to
the
team.
That's
been
working
on
this
as
something
that
we
need
to
understand
from
the
very
beginning,
in
our
advisory
capacity
to
to
really
try
to
make
a
broader
impact
and
a
more
important
and
deeper
impact.
G
G
Thanks
yeah,
this
is
this
is
really
great
discussion.
I
think
it's
raising
a
lot
of
great
points.
I
want
to
pull
it
back
to
what
chris
had
mentioned
earlier
and
and
really
emphasized
that.
One
of
the
main
reasons
to
bring
this
forward
is
to
really
understand
the
ira's
appetite
for
getting
involved
in
this.
Do
you
want
to
be?
G
And,
if
we're
you
know,
kind
of
operating
as
a
sub
grantee
we're
going
to
be
in
a
much
more
limited
role.
Although
I
know
the
human
services
coalition
very
much
wants
to
collaborate
and
it's
not
as
if
you'll
be
frozen
out,
but
just
keeping
that
in
mind
that
you
know
if
you've
been
put
on
that.
That's
a
real
different
focus
and
whether
we're
kind
of
a
lead
player
or
whether
a
support
player,
two
more
small
points.
G
One,
is
that
at
our
staff
meeting
ira
staff
meet
this
week,
we
actually
talked
about
what
is
the
racial
breakdown
of
affordable
housing
units.
We
think
it's
very
strong,
actually
and
and
quite
over
representation
in
inhs
housing,
but
we
want
to
pull
together
that
data
and
take
a
look
at
what
it
is
to
get
to
that
point
of
if
we
have
publicly
assisted,
affordable
housing.
How
does
that
break
out
in
terms
of
racial
characteristics
and
other
characteristics?
G
One
data
point
I
want
to
make
about
the
you
know
that
kind
of
the
two-step
process
that
we
were
discussing
about
you
know
living
in
the
flats
and
moving
to
west
hill.
I
want
to
be
careful
that
we
don't
think
that
those
are
exactly
statistics
that
say
a
person
living
in
south
side,
move
to
west
hill
and
then
move
the
city.
It's
really
more
a
data
analysis
of
the
rep.
G
You
know
what
is
the
population
of
persons
of
a
certain
racial
characteristic
of
those
neighborhoods,
so
be
a
little
cautious
about
pulling
that
together
exactly
as
a
step-
and
I
think
one
of
the
reasons
why
we're
seeing
still
a
continuing
problem
as
we
build,
affordable
housing
is
that
persons
of
color
tend
to
be
in
the
lowest
income
they're
over
represented
in
the
lowest
income
range.
Thirty
percent
ami
and
a
lot
of
affordable
housing
doesn't
even
reach
down
to
thirty
percent.
G
Unless
you
have
a
housing
voucher,
you
know
so,
for
example,
art
house
project
has
got
no
fun,
no,
no
housing
below
fifty
percent
ami.
Unless
you
have
a
housing
choice.
Voucher
now,
there'll
be
a
lot
of
house
in
choice,
voucher
people
who
will
choose
to
live
there
in
a
likelihood,
but
it's
not
a
program
designed
like
immaculate
conception,
has
a
set
aside
for
30
ami,
for
example
the
9
tax
credits
and
are
much
more
able
to
do
that
than
the
four
percent
tax
credit
project.
So
just
another
factor
to
keep
in
mind.
F
Well
further
discussion,
so
if
the
question
is
how
much
I
need
the
interest,
I'm
sensing
a
lot
of
agency
interest,
carl,
let's
just
see
your
hand.
D
Yes,
just
quickly
all
right.
First,
thank
you
eric
for
bringing
up
a
point.
I
was
thinking
about
too,
and
I
think
you
you're
you're
absolutely
right
and
nells.
D
It's
good
to
hear
the
staff
is
going
to
be
looking
at
the
affordable
housing
and
and
trying
to
make
an
analysis
of
you
know,
broken
down
by
by
race
and
ethnicity,
about
who
is
getting
those
units
that
will
require
some
cooperation
from
the
landlords,
and
I
would
imagine
that
inhs
will
be
fully
cooperative,
possibly,
oh
goodness,
I
can't
think
of
the
name-
art
house,
the
developer
there,
but
I
wonder
about
some
of
the
other
developers
and
and
private
landlords
if
they
will
be
cooperative,
but
whatever
you
know,
staff
can
do.
A
F
F
A
I
was
going
to,
I
was
going
to
try
to
address
the
question
that
nels
has
brought
us
back
to
and
that
I
was
trying
to
telescope
out
and
that
chris
also
brought
up,
but
then
something
chris
said
about
you
know
tying
this
back
to
the
other
point
about
diversifying
revenue
gave
me
pause,
but
my
my
take
on
this
would
be
my
my
opinion
is
we
should
be
a
sub
partner
like
hsc,
should
be
the
lead
sponsor
and
then
we're
we're
a
partner
in
a.
A
I
forget
what
how
you,
how
you
describe
that
nails,
but
as
a
subcontracted
out,
I
don't
know
how
that
would
work
to
take
on
those
other
functions,
and
I
know
hsc
would
be
open
to
our
input.
You
know
on
the
strategic
level,
they'd
be
they'd,
be
looking
for
that,
and
these
questions
and
issues
that
we're
bringing
up.
I
don't
and-
and-
and
I
don't
know
that
that
would
preclude
us
from
earning
some
of
that
revenue
chris
too,
even
in
that
position.
A
So
I
think
we
could
meet
all
of
those
things,
but
and
at
the
same
time
that
that
that
arrangement
would
align
better
and
in
a
more
optimal
way,
I
think,
to
hsc
strengths
with
their
existing
relationships
with
most
of
those
partners
and
our
strengths
with
what
we
do
best.
But
our
input
and
advice
is
going
to
be
seriously
taken
by
hsc
and
looked
for,
and
we
could
still
count
some
of
that.
A
We'd
still
earn
some
of
that
revenue
because
we
we'd
be
doing
an
administrative.
If
I,
if
I'm
understanding
this
correctly,
we
should
be
paid
for
that
part
that
we're
responsible
for
so
that
would
be
my
take
if
my
understanding
about
all
of
this
is
correct.
B
I
agree
that
I
would
prefer
to
be
the
subcontractor,
the
agency
as
a
subcontractor,
and
I
was
just
thinking
about
the
way
we
have
money
for
administration
and
staff
is
through
our
grant
process.
Does
this
go
through
something
like
that?
We
don't
quite
know
yet
probably,
but
it
seems
that
we
should
have
money
coming
in
from
it
to
do
it,
and
I
think
that's
a
good
role
for
us.
H
B
B
F
D
Just
a
quick
question
for
anissa
the
the
ithaca
fact
sheet:
the
can
that
be
shared,
or
we
want
to
keep
that
kind
of
private.
For
now,.
H
That's
a
really
good
question,
carl:
the
analysis
that
we
did,
that
it
relies
on
the
eviction
analysis
that
was
done
by
going
literally
to
the
city
court
and
a
person
manually
going
through
the
records
I
le
I.
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
question
to
bring
to
the
team,
because
I
think
this
really
provides
a
lot
of
really
great
information
and
if
people
are
interested
in
sharing
it
community-wide,
that
seems
very
important.
But.
H
H
F
F
A
Other
discussions,
one
one
other
quote
one
other
point
that
came
up
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
discussed
now,
and
he
said
we
could
do
this
in
follow-up
unless
you
had
a
quick
answer
to
this,
and
that
was
that
one
member
of
the
governance
committee
was
questioning
the
right
here
on
the
sheet
that
we're
looking
at
right
now
on
this
on
this
portion
that
number
27
percent
of
white
renters
versus
43
percent,
47
percent
of
latinx
supply
yeah,
the
question
was:
does
white
renters
include
students
at
cornell
and
I
think
a
college.
A
You
know
this
person
felt
that
that
number,
that
proportion
of
white
renters
who
are
cost
burden
should
be
higher
based
on
their
own
anecdotal
information
that
there
are
more,
you
know,
poor
white
people
and
and
and
and
and
that
that
proportion
just
seemed
low
and
it
seemed
to
be
factoring
in
the
majority
of
white
populations
in
those
institutions.
H
Yes,
this
is
information,
okay,
so
the
citation
right
there
for
the
consolidated
plan
if
the
person
wants
to
to
like
read
a
more
complete
description.
Yes,
but
this
it's
important
to
note
that
we're
talking
about
severe
cost
burden,
severe
cost
burden
is
paying
over
50
percent
of
one's
income
for
rent,
so
white
people
tend
to
be,
they
are
cost
burdened.
They
do
pay
over
30
percent
of
their
income
and
and
and
also
white
people
pay
over
fifty
percent
of
their
income
rent.
H
But
people
of
color
are
more
often
severely
cost
burdened
than
white
people,
so
the
the
term
severe
cost
burden
and
cost
burden
are
very
confusing,
but
over
50
of
ithacans
are
cost
burdened
of
that.
H
E
F
C
Mean
the
data
is
what
it
is,
but
you
know
again
because
it
because
population
demographics
are
significantly
white,
you
could
still
have
a
significant
number
in
absolute
terms
of
white
people
who
are
severely
cost
burdened
and
still
have
it
be
a
smaller
percentage
of
the
of
the
total.
So
it
depends
on
which
angle
that
anecdotal
view
is
coming
in
at
in
terms
of
like
numbers
of
people
or
percentages.
F
Yeah
and
I'll
say
for
what
it's
worth,
I
I
don't
think
27
27
of
folks
of
white
renters,
paying
half
their
income
in
rent,
is
a
lot
yeah
and,
and
that
will
jive.
With
my
you
know,
I
mean
that
that
checks
out
to
me,
anecdotally,
it's
that
you
know
43
is
of
black
renters
is
horrifying.
F
A
I
think
I
covered
all
the
the
majority
of
what
we
discussed
that
and
and
put
out
there
the
strategic
planning
conversation
that
we'll
get
back
to
the
agency
about
great.
F
D
Thank
you
for
that,
mr
mayor.
The
the
only
thing
I
will
mention
is
that
tom
knight
joined
us
at
our
meeting
and
gave
a
report
on
the
the
small
business
relief
fund,
which
the
agency
was
a
contributor.
D
It
was
very
interesting
and
there's
still
analysis
to
be
done,
including
excuse
me
over
the
coming
couple
of
months
or
so,
as
you
know,
those
funds
begin
to
be
paid
back,
but
it
will
be
interesting.
I
think-
and
this
is
for
staff
to
to
invite
tom
or
time
to
appear
in
person
or
perhaps
for
him
to
submit
the
report
so
that
we
can
have
a
look
at
the
impact
of
of
of
our
funds
with
this
program,
which
is
really
important
to
a
lot
of
small
businesses.
D
Here
in
the
city.
There
were,
I
remember,
correctly,
121
businesses
that
received
funds
from
this
under
this
program,
so
it
had.
I
think
it
really
profound
impact
on
the
small
business
community
here,
so
I
think
that's
something.
The
agency
should
take
a
look
at
yeah
and
that's
it.
F
Unbelievable
now
that
we've
all
sort
of
adapted
to
this
new
normal,
but
remembering
back
to
when
the
painting
started
and
how
fast
everybody
was
scrambling
to
figure
out
how
to
support
folks
that
was
it
good
good
initiative.
So
thank
you.
Thanks
for
that
report,
we
go
to
other
business
now.
First
up
sorry:
seven
hey
updated
policy
on
the
loan
deferments.
G
Okay,
this
is
didn't,
go
through
any
committees
in
part,
because
we
brought
the
loan
deferment
original
resolution
back
in
march
to
the
full
ira,
and
secondly,
because
it
was
the
only
agenda
item
for
the
ed
committee
if
they
were
to
meet.
G
So
we
we
emailed
a
little
bit
to
describe
this
to
the
committee
members,
but
we
didn't
there
was
no
action
on
it
when
the
agency
authorized
deferments
of
loans
in
during
the
coveted
emergency
up
for
up
to
six
months,
we
started
that
process
and
our
loan
servicer
then
has
recently
informed
us
that
they
usually
when
they
have
a
loan
deferment.
They
don't
extend
the
months
of
repayment,
in
other
words,
the
payments
after
the
deferment
period
go
up
to
pay
off
the
loan,
and
we
said
that's
not
what
we
expected.
G
We
wanted
that
to
be
a
pause
in
their
payment
schedule
and
they
said
well,
if
you
pass
a
resolution
to
clarify
that
we
can,
we
can
make
that
work.
So
this
is
a
resolution
that
one
clarifies
that,
if
there's
a
six-month
interest
only
deferment
period,
then
we're
going
to
add
six
months
of
loan
repayments
on
the
end
of
the
loan
repayment
period,
thereby
keeping
the
payments
roughly
equivalent
to
what
they
were
before
the
deferment
period.
So
it
that's,
that's
that's
resolved
number.
G
One
resolve
number
two
in
this
is
to
recognize
that
the
emergency
disaster
has
not
ended
and
we're.
You
know
we're
still
into
this,
and
several
of
these
borrowers
are
seeking
extensions
such
as
the
state
theater,
which
really,
you
know,
is
still
in
a
position
where
they
can't
open.
So
it
would
give
authority
to
extend
loan
deferments
for
an
extended
period
as
long
as
we're
still
in
the
emergency
disaster
period,
which
currently
runs
through
november.
G
G
No
latin
is
the
real
estate
owner
of
of
lot
10
well,
yeah
lot.
10
is
no
longer
operating,
but
the
loan
we
made
was
to
the
owner
of
the
property.
It's
not
not
latent
itself,
so
there
was
a
business
that
operated
there
that
made
their
loan
repaid
it.
Then
we
made
a
loan
to
delante,
which
was
mia,
madeleine's
madeline's
changed
and
the
collateral
was
the
latent
building,
and
so
this
is.
G
This
is
really
repaying
that
that
madeleine's
loan
is
what
this
amounts
to
and
they
have
they're
not
seeking
any
further
extension,
but
they
did
seek
an
extension
the
first
time
around,
so
that
this
would
close
the
books
on
the
madeleines
loan
really
once
they're
paid
off.
F
B
F
G
Right
this
is,
as
I
reported,
the
governance
committee.
This
is
a
good
boring
grant
summary
there's.
No,
no,
no
sub
grantees
that
are
behind
in
a
particular
concerning
way,
even
with
covet
we're
seeing
good
progress
on
most
grants
where
there
is
some
money
still
on
balance,
there's
good
reasons
for
it,
for
example,
in
the
2018
activities
near
the
top
of
the
sheet
where
we
usually
want
to
see
2018
activities
you
know
spent
down
by
now.
G
Those
are
all
projects
where
we've
basically
closed
out
the
program
and
we're
that
38
000
is
part
of
that
money.
We
have
available
to
reallocate
towards
activities
like
a
friendship,
center
activity
or
a
warming
center
activity,
so
that
money
is
waiting
for
a
new
use,
but
those
projects
are
really
essentially
closed
out.
There
they've
all
been
completed
in
other
way
and
and
we've
added
now
the
2020
action
grant
2020
program
here
at
the
bottom,
as
well
as
the
first
tranche
of
the
cdbg
coven
onto
this
sheet.
G
Those
have
just
recently
been
added,
so
I'm
all
told
we're
we're
in
good
stead
and
the
biggest
balances
are
are
for
projects
like
inhs's
homeowner
rehab
program,
and
they
have
a
number
of
projects
that
are
currently
underway
there,
so
we're
expecting
further
drawdowns
on
those
projects.
G
D
Now
smash,
if
you
remind
us
on
the
on
the
grant
summary
for
2018
the
domestic
violence
shelter,
there
still
was
about
1600
dollars.
Unexpended.
Did
you
remind
us
why
or
why
the
project
came
in
under
budget.
G
And
he
said:
can
you
address
the
exact
question
it's
completed.
H
Yes,
that
they
designated
our
funding
for
their
roof
and
their
roof
came
on
in
under
that
cost
and
they
completed
the
roof.
F
All
right
next
is
reports.
I
have
anything
to
report.
I
should
have
thought
of
that
before
just
this
moment
laura
in
a
stalling
tactic,
he
asked:
do
you
think
the
council
liaison
have
any
report.
E
The
dogs,
the
dogs,
what
what
yes
pdc
voted
unanimously
to
circulate
resolution
to
allow
dogs
on
leash
on
the
commons.
E
E
We
don't
want
to
take
up
the
time
of
ipd
to
enforce
something
which
you
know
in
essence
is
unenforceable
and
we're
seeing
an
increase
in
population
in
the
center
of
the
city,
and
there
will
be
more
residents
as
herald
square
and
eventually
the
austere
project
come
on
board
and
some
of
those
residents
will
have
dogs,
so
it
seemed
better
to
have
an
approach
that
is
consistent
with
the
rest
of
of
the
city,
so
that
will
be
coming
forward
for
for
circulation,
making
a
lot
of
dog
families
happy.
Yes,.
E
That
came
up,
we
didn't,
we
didn't
address
cats,
but
dogs
were
good
on
just
if
I
could
add
a
couple.
Other
things,
budget
meetings,
city,
budget
meetings
are
continuing.
There
is
a
meeting
this
evening
continuing
department
reviews,
also
at
last
night's
pedc
meeting,
heather
mcdaniels
from
tcad,
came
to
the
meeting
and
announced
that
the
agency
has
decided
on
a
new
name,
one
that
is
more
accurate
and
more
descriptive
of
the
agency's
work.
E
Which,
I
think
is
a
great
great
change.
I
should
point
out
too
that
at
the
recent
ida
meeting
iaed
meeting
the
agency
moved
carpenter
park
and
astairy
both
projects
forward
to
public
hearings,
so
those
public
hearings
have
just
recently
been
scheduled,
I
think,
early
november,
one
of
them
yeah.
Those
are
those
are
the
things
I
was
thinking.
Most
important
dogs
ended
up
top
of
my
list.
E
F
Thank
you
yeah
I'll.
Just
add
that
you
might
have
seen
it.
Maybe
you
haven't
about
two
weeks
ago,
the
city
harbor
project
broke
ground.
E
But
I
had
one
other
thing,
and
that
is
this
weekend:
there
will
be
a
lot
of
activity.
Early
voting
begins
on
saturday,
the
24th
there
is
early
voting
on
saturday
and
sunday
from
9
00
am
to
2
pm
on
both
days.
E
There
is
also
a
demonstration
I
understand
on
saturday
that
is
organized
by
some
trump
supporters
and
their
anticipated
will
be
another
sunday
weekly
meeting,
a
weekly
protest
and
chief
mayor
put
out
a
public
statement.
I
think
the
mayor
also
commented
on
this
and
there's
real
concern
about
these.
These
protests
and
the
ipd
has
been
so
restrained
in
not
reacting
hastily
in
some
of
these
protests,
but
they
ipd
are
in
a
really
tough
spot.
F
Yeah,
it
depends.
We
really
are
the
the
there
are
two
organizers
of
this
trump
rally.
I've
been
trying
to
encourage
everybody
throughout
the
summer
to
assume
the
positive
intent
even
of
your
opponents,
but
at
some
point
that
strains
credulity,
these
folks
do
not
have
a
positive
intent.
They
are
hoping
to
cause
violence
and
hoping
to
either
physically
hurt
their
opponents
or
use
violence
and
or
use
violence
to
their
benefit.
F
Politically,
you
know,
inform
propaganda,
so
we
are
encouraging
everybody
else
to
stay
home.
You
know
to
not
engage
to
go
someplace
else.
I
hope
that
the
leftward
organizers
will
heed
that
warning
that
caution.
That
advice-
and
you
know
we
are
discouraging
that
the
trump
supporter
organizers
from
holding
their
event.
F
But
they
are,
you
know,
they're
intent
on
causing
trouble.
So
yes,
if
you
any
help,
you
could
have
and
encouraging
folks
that
the
the
best
thing
to
do
this
weekend
is
to
not
engage
with
that
protest.
That'd
be
all
the
better.
It's
likely
to
be
a
small
crowd
and
of
course
the
difference
is,
I
understand
very
much
the
impulse
to
not
allow
an
ideology
that
you
disagree
with
to
go
unanswered,
but
there
could
be
two
different
outcomes.
F
F
It
not
worth
it
the
risk
that
somebody
could
get
hurt,
but
of
course
it
plays
exactly
into
the
hands
of
the
people
who
are
trying
to
stoke
violence
and
chaos
so
yeah
any
help.
You
can
give
us
encouraging
your
neighbors
to
treat
this
like
the
behavior,
that
it
is
it's
a
it's
a
trolling
temper,
tantrum
of
a
protest
and,
and
the
best
way
to
respond
to
it,
is
to
ignore
it.
D
Where
is
that
trump
rally
going
to
be
held
in
what
time.
D
F
C
It's
a
very
small
line,
but
but
we,
the
city,
the
county,
the
town,
someone
is
prepared
to
enforce
the
100-foot
election
airing
line
right,
yeah
yeah,
I
mean
the
comments
and
town
halls
are
close
together.
It
doesn't
really
matter,
but
presumably
they're,
going
to
be
gathering
before
two
o'clock
for
a
two
o'clock
event
and
that
event
is
permitted
or
not.
F
F
Yeah,
and
so
we
do
have,
we
do
have
an
operational
plan,
the
our
office
service,
combined
with
sheriffs
and
state
troopers.
I
have
an
operational
plan
so
we'll
have
a
heavy
presence
on
saturday,
but
it'll
make
our
office's
jobs
easier
and
keep
everybody
safer.
If,
if
there
are
no
counter
protesters.
F
Okay,
any
other
reports
you
asked
now
for
for
staff
report.
G
Yeah,
just
just
a
couple
quick
items,
one
is
to
update
you
on
the
green
street
garage
redevelopment
project,
both
vecino
and
the
rothschild
project
has
advanced
through
the
is
advancing
through
the
site
plan
review
process.
They
both
have
received
neg
decks
for
the
environmental
review
process,
which
allows
them
to
then
formally
go
to
the
ida
for
assistance
and
to
pursue
further.
You
know
locking
up
their
their
projects.
In
this
case,
the
seeker
also
allowed
them
to
seek
their
area
variances.
G
They
both
had
required
and
the
bga
did
approve
the
area
variances,
so
they've
gone
through
a
lot
of
the
entitlement,
steps
necessary,
they're,
really
down
to
the
final
site
plan,
review
issues
that
relate
along
more
detailed
issues
of
materials
and
landscaping
and
design
issues.
So
that's
really
good
news
for
advancing
the
projects
forward.
G
The
article
78
filed
by
harold's
holdings
owner
of
the
herald
square
project
has
been
settled
now
between
vecino
harold's
holdings
in
the
city,
so
they
have
that's
no
longer
a
pending
legal
issue.
That
settlement
had
a
number
of
issues
that
address
some
of
their
concerns.
The
main
one
is
it
separated
that
the
residential
tower
is
further
away
from
each
other,
so
now
they
will
be
a
minimum
of
44
feet
between
each
other,
those
upper
tower
levels
and
and
much
of
it
will
be
60
feet
away.
G
So
that
gives
more
more
space
between
the
buildings
that
extra
space
comes
at
a
cost,
though
they
are
no
longer
able
to
maintain
217,
affordable
housing
units.
So
now
the
number
has
been
dropped
to
181
housing
units
in
the
project,
still
a
sizable
project,
because,
if
you
think
of
the
next,
the
largest
project
we
have
in
the
city,
west
hill
is
235
units
or
right
around
there.
So
it's
still
a
large
scale
project,
but
not
quite
as
large
as
it
was
originally
and
the
other
there.
G
Rather
some
some
other
concessions
related
to
providing
some.
You
know
loading
spaces
in
the
parking
garage
for
public
use
and
those
kind
of
things
as
well.
The
other
notable
feature
is
a
part
of
that
settlement
is
vesino,
receives
a
an
option
to
acquire
acquire
property
at
chain
works
to
build
up
to
100
unit,
affordable
housing
project,
so
kind
of
a
land
transaction
to
identify
a
future
prospective
affordable
housing
project.
G
So
there's
some
good
and
some
bad
in
that
settlement
all
told
the
most
important
thing
is
it
keeps
moving
forward
and
doesn't
get
stalled
out,
because
a
legal
challenge
can
easily
add
12
months
or
more
to
a
timeline
before
it
gets
resolved,
and
we
know
the
state
will
approve
affordable
housing
projects
if
there's
a
pending
lawsuit
until
it's
been
resolved.
So
really
good
news
on
on
those
grounds
of
settlement
was
reached
and
moving
forward
because
of
that
change
in
the
housing
count.
G
So
at
the
ed
committee
we'll
be
bringing
a
revised
disposition,
development
agreement
to
update
it
for
to
reflect
the
facts
on
the
current
project
with
casino
and
that
will
need
to
come
to
the
full
ira
for
approval.
And
if
we,
the
timing
of
that,
we
think
will
be
november
ira
meeting
for
approval.
That
then
it
goes
to
a
public
hearing
at
the
planning
and
economic
development
committee
in
early
december
or
mid-december,
and
common
council
would
then
be
in
place
to
approve
the
final
dispositional
development
agreement
at
january
6..
G
So
we're
hoping
for
a
december
6th,
comprehensive
action
by
the
common
council
to
finalize
that
and
then
go
right
to
financing
for
the
project
and
the
major
means
of
financing
the
parking
garage
and
the
conference
center
are
lease
bonds,
bonds
that
are
backed
by
the
lease
signed
by
the
city
or
guaranteed
by
the
city,
and
that
that
would
be
a
a
bond
issuance
through
the
ida,
as
as
their
as
an
issuer,
to
support
the
project.
G
So
that's
the
the
framework
we're
starting
we're
talking
about,
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I
can
update
you
on
any
other
aspects
of
the
project
that
you
have.
Concerns
about.
Rothschild
is
also
moving
on
on
a
time
forward
timeline
with
private
financing
they're,
both
working
through
the
ida
for
incentives.
A
No,
no,
that's
just
good
news
again
again
about
the
article
78,
no
longer
yeah
they're
being
withdrawn,
but
as
you
pointed
out
that
it
doesn't
matter
that
that's
the
good
part
and
we
can
move
forward,
although
chain
works,
doesn't
technically
own
the
property.
You
know
it's
still
owned
by
emerson
power,
but
I
it's
a
contingency.
G
A
contingent
action
agreement
yeah
right,
we
did
hear
an
update
from
representatives
of
chain
work
that
they
are
moving
closer
and
closer
to
to
getting
that
ownership
and
expect
it's
within
sight.
Now.
I
guess
simply
the
best
way
to
think
about
it
rather
than
multiple
years
off.
G
The
other
thing
I
just
want
to
make
you
aware
of
was
the
the
community
housing
development
funds
program
oversight
committee
met
earlier
this
week
and
recommended
a
number
of
projects
for
our
funding
assistants.
That's
in
a
one-page
memo
in
your
meeting
packet
chris
could
update
you
on
any
questions
you
have
about
any
of
them
because
he
was
at
the
meeting
has
reviewed
closely
those
projects.
There
are
several
in
the
city
as
well
as
a
mix
of
several
smaller
scale
projects
outside
the
city
just
in
this
round.
G
C
The
only
thing-
maybe
I
would
add
to
to
that
and
the
materials
in
your
packet
is,
you
know,
we've
spent
what
we
believe
to
be
the
last
available
money.
That's
been
approved
by
the
three
funding
partners,
so
that
will
be
coming.
I
think,
there's
some
additional
funding
planned
in
the
common
council
budget
etc,
but
for
this
year,
but
we
need
to
renegotiate
the
mou
so
starting
in
2022
there's
no
current
funding
available.
Now
some
of
the
funding
that's
been
allocated
may
come
back.
C
If
some
tax
credit
projects
don't
go
forward,
which
we
anticipate
that
some
tax
credit
projects
won't
go
forward,
and
we
did
you
know
there
are
now
two
associate
members
which
is
the
town
of
dryden
has
put
in
50
000
and
that
funding
has
been
allocated
to
a
project
in
dryden
through
this
round
and
martha
robertson
just
informed
us
this
week.
The
town
of
ithaca
is
getting
involved
with
a
50
000
contribution
towards
the
next
round.
C
So
it's
good
to
see
other
communities
in
addition
to
the
city,
the
county
and
cornell,
now
engaging
in
affordable
housing,
which
I
think
is
just
a
positive
thing.
Overall,
you
know
it's
going
to
be
it's
a
difficult
environment
now
for
the
city,
the
county
and
cornell,
to
negotiate
from
2022
forward
a
new
round.
I
think
everyone's
probably
committed
in
principle.
It's
just
you
know.
We
all
know
the
economic
realities.
Affordable
housing
is
more
needed
than
ever,
but
we
need
to
be
creative
with
how
we
fund
it.
C
But
there's
a
committee
to
work
on
that
nels
is
serving
on
that
committee
to
try
to
negotiate
and
develop
a
new
mou
said,
thank
you,
nels
and,
and
the
other
members
on
the
poc
are
doc
ceph
and
george
all
common
council
members.
So
we
have
good
representation
from
the
city.
D
Just
second
wind
dryden
is
that
related
to
carmageddi's
new
field.
Second,
one.
C
Yeah,
it's
an
expansion
to
dry
in
with
a
specific
emphasis
on
homeless,
women
and
homeless
women
with
children.
It's
a
really
interesting
project,
an
extension
of
what
he's
been
doing
in
newfield.
So
again,
this
is
one
of
these
kind
of
smaller
developers
coming
forward.
I
mean
in
general
we're
seeing
a
diversification.
It
used
to
be
a
lot
of
these
projects
for
inihs.
C
Now
you
have
some
smaller
people
coming
forward
wanting
to
do
projects,
but
also
you
know,
like
vism
and
other
developers
getting
engaged
trying
to
do
more,
affordable
housing.
So
that
was
one
of
the
goals
of
the
program
in
the
last
mou
was
trying
to
diversify
the
types
of
people
coming
forward
and
recommending
projects
and
there's
still
some
challenges
with
that
that
we
have
to
work
through
small
projects
versus
large
projects
are
really
quite
different
in
terms
of
not
only
their
funding
requests,
but
their
management
and
governance,
and
you
know
honestly,
capability
to
execute
affordable
housing.
C
We
know
it's
a
complicated
business,
so
I
think
we'll
probably
be
trying
to
address
that
in
the
next
round
to
try
to
continue
to
encourage
small
developers,
but
not
pit
them
necessarily
against
large
developers
if
we
can
help
it
because
on
face
value,
a
large
project
with
a
sophisticated
developer
always
looks
better
than
a
small
project
with
a
small
developer.
But
we
want
to
diversify
the
types
of
units
and
the
types
of
developers
who
are
developing
these
projects,
but
yeah.
G
So
if
you
we
can
either
try
to
do
that
now,
instead
of
set
a
target
date
or
we
can
try
to
work
through
schedules
over
email,
one
idea
is
to
meet
the
third
thursday
of
november
the
week
before
that
which
would
be
november
19th.
G
I
think,
or
we
could
look
at
sometime
earlier
in
the
thanksgiving
week
if
that
works
better
for
folks
in
other
years,
we've
had
like
one
meeting
for
both
november
and
december,
but
I
think
that
with
the
urban
renewal
project
on
the
green
street
garage,
it's
all
it's
likely
we're
gonna.
We
may
very
well
need
one
in
each
of
those
months,
so
we
we
could
also
look
at
the
first
week
of
december
and
see
you
know
and
see
if
that
would
work
as
well.