►
From YouTube: IURA Economic Deve. Commmittee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Yeah,
we
haven't
received
any
public
Charleston
hunts,
great
okay.
We
have
meeting
meds
August
23rd
because
it
is
used
anything.
A
B
So
this
is
a
performance
resolution
to
close
out
that
program
in
the
remaining
funds
that
were
on
spent
back
to
the
original
source,
which
was
the
CDU.
What
we
loan
for
so
there's
been
145
is
allocated
for
the
program
we've
been
able
to
process
about
130
000
of
that
to
reimburse
afcu.
They
made
29
business
loans
in
that
time
period.
Unfortunately,
about
ten
thousand
dollars
of
vouchers,
we
can't
justify
as
being
spent
for
operating
expenses
of
small
businesses.
B
Don't
have
access
to
the
records
and
those
businesses
are
not
being
responsible
are
not
able
to
be
found.
So
you
can't
justify
the
reimbursement,
those
expenses
that
they
can't
show
that
they
were
eligible
uses
for
the
program,
the
tour
operating
expenses.
We
tried
for
a
couple
months
to
find
a
way
to
get
substitute
documentation
for
rent
or
insurance,
and
it
just
didn't
work
I
mean
it
did
work
for
several.
So
this
is
a
resolution
to
close
out
that
program
and
re-transfer
that
money
back
to
the
CEO
removal,
foreign.
A
Everything
else
thank
you
session.
C
B
D
B
To
be
a
very
strong
emphasis
to
get
the
money
out
early,
which
was
you
know,
a
crisis
mode
for
those
businesses
and
I
think
they
worked
really
hard
to
get
the
loans
out,
but
the
follow-up
documentation
for
some
of
them
didn't
come
through
and
it
may
be
because
those
businesses
don't
exist
anymore
either.
There's
a
couple
that
have
had
very
difficult
time
contacting
and
getting
that
connection.
E
B
F
B
D
B
A
F
Yes,
today
would
mean
that
it's
just
for
the
amendment
of
them
with
the
addition
of
getting
the
total
amount
of
the
loan
funds
and
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven,
four
yeah.
A
B
I'm
sure
the
yeah,
the
typical
voice
kind
of
scoop
this
on
this.
So
the
report
cap
issued
basically
the
day
I,
was
sending
out
the
message,
and
so
the
email
package,
so
I
wanted
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
as
an
item
to
be
addressed
in
real,
greater
detail
next
month,
so
Tom
Knight,
who
was
working
at
it
for
the
city
as
well
as
Robert,
Kennedy
and
and
other
staff
members
for
working
on
this
program,
but
but
Thomas
traveled.
This
was
today
unavailable.
B
So
we
talked
about
scheduling
this
for
a
November
meeting
to
discuss
it.
You
know
they're
trying
to
look
at
three
major
issues.
You
know
is
the
project
feasible,
you
know,
how
should
it
be
this
feasible
and
I
think
maybe
finalizing
the
space.
You
know
they
were
looking
at
so
this
report
is
very
in-depth
analysis
of
those
questions,
but
it
does
raise
a
you
know,
a
proposed
structure
that
they
think
would
work
if
the
three
different
approaches
so
it'd
be
worthwhile
digging
into
that.
B
The
agency
did
one
part
of
that
part
of
the
study
and,
and
it
seems
to
be
you
know,
the
next
step
is
to
look
at
how
to
move
this
forward
and
to
have
limitations,
and
it
may
come
back
to
the
IRA
for
some
components
of
it
as
well
so
worthwhile
best.
You
know
trying
to
invest
and
look
at
this
next
month.
B
B
Consultant
did
a
lot
of
pro
bono.
It
turned
out.
There
was
probably
a
lot
more
football
than
it
was
in
anticipated
because
they
did
several
revisions
after
going
through
internal
kind
of
you
know,
analysis
and
edits
about
what
information
they
needed.
It.
A
H
Yeah
I
have
two
initial
comments.
The
first
was
that
I
didn't
see
in
the
plan
exactly
how
they
were
finding
the
staff,
the
staff,
the
kitchen
and
in
terms
of
like
recruiting,
needs
and
then
managing
the
recruiting,
the
customers
and
then
managing
all
of
that.
So
I
didn't
really
see
that
in
the
plan.
So
that
was
one
of
my
questions,
but
there
are.
H
H
Yeah,
so
my
my
question
would
be
kind
of
what's
the
worst
downside
scenario
in
terms
of
because
I
know
they
have,
they
have
from
good
to
bad
projections
on
adoption,
but
I
don't
see
any
real
ramp
up
period
or
even
on
the
bad
one.
It
seems
to
start
on
day
one
and
it's
like
all
of
a
sudden.
We've
got
all
these
tenants
and
I.
H
Know
if
that's
really
realistic,
which
is
what
feeds
the
question
of
how
they're
going
to
staff
it.
So
how
are
they
gonna
like
overall
I,
think
it's
great
I'm
glad
we
funded
it.
I'm
excited
to
learn
more
about
it,
but
those
are
my
initial
questions.
It's
kind
of
what's
the
overall
downside
financial
position
if
it
takes
a
really
long
time
to
get
tenants
into
the
end
of
the
space,
so.
A
C
I'm
just
interested
to
know
what
the
next
steps
are,
but
anyone
has
in
motion,
or
at
least
theoretically
in
the
hopper,
because
I
I
have
the
impression
and
I
didn't
have
time
to
read
the
entire
study,
because
I
got
it
this
afternoon
and
it
was
by
long.
But
you
know
it
did
seem
to
indicate
that
time
is
sort
of
of
the
other
Essence,
because
it's
conceivable
that
someone
else
could
go
and
rent
the
steaks
which
is,
as
was
noted,
a
really
ideal
space
for
our
purpose
or
for
this
purpose.
C
And
so,
if
you
know,
if,
if
that's
a
concern
like
hey,
we
gotta
jump
on
this,
because
if
we
had
to
build
a
whole
new
one
forget
it.
That
would
be
a
mountain
of
money.
So
if
we
need
to
move,
we
need
to
move
which
means
who's.
A
Okay,
so
we'll
take
this
up
again
in
November
Leslie
you're,
going
to
recuse
yourself
at
this.
A
A
A
C
C
B
C
C
A
A
A
Past
resolution,
which
eventually
that
support
the
full
agency
to
extend
the
timeline
and
have
a
job
as
a
members
of
that
so
we've
gone
through
and
done
that
and
that
provided
to
developer
additional
time
to
provide
responses
to
our
feedback,
both
verbally
on
being
the
23rd
and
then
August
31st,
which
is
in
the
packet
and
then
development
team
last
week,
with
their
revised
response,
so
I
think
we'll
be
useful
once
we
don't
want
to
have
any
other
times
it's
at
some
of
the
world.
A
Just
sort
of
you
know
not
to
explain
everything,
because
everybody
kind
of
have
a
chance
to
do
your
in-depth
response,
but
it
might
be
good
to
hear
a
narrative
from
you
and
kind
of
overview.
Did
you
really
want
us
to
pick
up
on
and
then
I
know
today
too,
so
we'll
pick
that
up
as
well
yeah,
so.
C
G
A
D
Okay,
yeah
apologies.
It's
it's
a.
D
Hard
to
hear
on
our
end,
coming
through
a
little
bit
muffled
so
we'll
try
to
keep
up,
but
can.
D
D
My
screen
to
kind
of
run
through
just
some
of
the
side
plans
that
were
in
the
package
just
to
sort
of
show
where
we've
developed
the
design
in
response
to
the
questions
and
concerns
that
were
raised
at
the
last
meeting
and
in
the
injury
so
we'll
just
kind
of
run
through
this
real
quickly.
And
then
we
can
open
it
up
to
answer
your
questions
directly.
D
I
And
just
sorry
not
to
be
there,
we
have
a
meeting
in
Binghamton
right.
D
G
D
Location
move
everyone's
familiar
with
the
North
End
of
Inlet
Island
and
the
parcels
as
they
currently
exist.
D
Eastman
that
both
come
across
the
island
and
captured
quite
a
bit
of
the
real
estate
here,
so
the
existing
utility
polls-
some
high
power,
comes
through
here
and
so
there's
there's
certain
utilities
that
we
we
can't
touch
and
some
that
we
can
as
far
as
our
site
design
and
then,
of
course,
the
street
easement.
That
also
comes
down
the
length
of
the
island
and
is
the
the
main
access
to
everything.
D
That's
here,
the
existing
Boat
Lift
and
some
of
the
infrastructure
that
serves
the
boat
shed,
the
Finger,
Lakes
boating
Center
and
their
maintenance
programs,
and
we
have
to
design
around
that
and
it's
navigability
on
the
island
as
well,
some
additional
minor
existing
easements
and
required
areas
for
emergency
access
and
the
remaining
area
of
the
site
which
is
available
for
development.
D
So
the
last
plan
you
saw
was
a
little
less
developed,
and
so
we
have
taken
the
time
and
put
some
some
work
in
on
the
site,
design
to
really
address
a
lot
of
the
issues
that
were
raised
previously.
Things
like.
I
Know
the
the
grading
will
change
and
the
design
will
change,
but
by
this
initial
conceptual
design
we
wanted
to
show
our
intention
for
the
site
more
than
specific
design
moves.
D
Previously
saw
this
certainly,
we've
developed
the
Thanksgiving
throughout
and
we
can
set
up
around
Wisconsin,
so
so
specific
items
we're
looking
at
a
public
access
new.
E
D
Launch
ramp
near
the
Route
89
Bridge
overpass,
as
well
as
a
kayak
rack
for
storage.
That
was
something
that
was
specifically
requested
by
the
iura.
D
Ahead,
we're
also
another
key
item
that
was
mentioned
previously
was
the
private
playground,
that
is
at
least
somewhat
required
by
inhs.
However,
there
is
a
stipulation
we
understand.
We
have
Lynn
and
Victoria
here,
and
they
can
confirm
this
that
if
there
is
a
public
playground
nearby,
the
requirement
for
inhs's
private
playground
can
be
waived.
D
So
so
we
are
looking
at
that
as
a
way
to
meet
the
Ira's
request
for
a
public
playground
at
this
location,
as
well
as
to
meet
some
of
the
activation
on
the
waterfront
here,
along
with
that
food
truck
space
and
utility
hookup,
a
small
Plaza
here,
responding
to
the
playground
area
and
as
well
as
the
kayak
launch
that
could
host
a
food
truck
during
events
or
any
times
when
that
might
be
called
for
here,
as
well
as
utility
hookups.
That
can
provide
all
the
necessary
UT
utilities
for
them.
D
We're
also
showing
the
rather
extensive
pedestrian
scale,
Street
lighting
that
we're
proposing
for
the
site
with
the
goal
of
having
extending
the
activity
of
the
site
after
Sunset
and
making
the
space
feel
safe
and
welcoming
the
flex
space
Remains,
the
Same.
We
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
later,
but
there's
been
some
changes
with
the
programming
there.
Due
to
some
requests
from
the
dec
relating
to
dredging,
we
are
preserving
a
small
private
space
to
respond
to
inhs's
Residence
to
provide
them
with.
You
know
some
some
outdoor
space
that
is
private
to
the
residents.
D
This
area
would
be
screened
with
landscaping
and
most
likely,
elevated
up
above
the
surrounding
public
spaces,
we're
showing
extensive
seat
walls
and
benches
along
curvilinear
Pathways
that
provide
interior
site
circulation,
as
well
as
numerous
shade
trees
and
Landscape
plantings
to
make
this
feel
like
a
very
welcoming
and
Lush
space,
particularly
between
these
two
buildings,
as
a
as
a
Central
Plaza
and
access
out
to
the
Waterfront.
Well,.
D
We're
also
showing
widening
the
existing
Paving
along
this
existing
sea
wall
to
act
as
a
connector
to
the
existing
Trail.
The
existing
Trail
does
connect
to
the
concrete
at
about
here
and
it
transitions
from
asphalt
to
concrete
and
then
the
length
of
it.
We
are
looking
at
widening
to
accommodate
a
connection
and
Paving
it
all
the
way
out
to
look
out
for
them.
I
D
I
will
I
will
note
that
the
Cuba
Waterfront
guidelines
call
for
a
12
foot
wide
Trail
and
the
existing
trail
that
we
are
connecting
to
is
only
eight
feet
wide
other
really.
The
majority
of
the
Cuba
Waterfront
Trail
is
not
12
feet
wide
is
a
section
across
the
inlet
is
in
fact
10
feet
wide
and
we
think
think
for
this
location
and
the
amount
of
traffic
that
it
will
have
an
eight
foot
wide
Trail
really
should
be
adequate
and
anything
wider
than
that.
I
D
Right
we'll
have
conversations
with
the
city
planning
staff
as
we
go
through
site
plan
review,
as
well
as
the
cue
the
Waterfront
Trail
group
to
to
make
sure
that
this
is
meeting
the
the
city's
goals
for
trail
and
circulation.
D
We're
also
showing
a
public
Plaza
area
off
the
North
End
of
the
state
L
building
the
stays.
This
area
acts
as
part
of
a
welcoming
location
near
the
drop-off,
as
well
as
it
corresponds
with
some
interior
space
to
the
building,
a
small
Cafe
area
that
would
read
out
into
this
space
and
provide
really
lovely
views
for
patrons
and
the
public
out
over
the
internet.
D
We
are
still
showing
the
public,
the
existing
private
dock
being
made
public
off
the
edge
of
the
inlet
here
with
potentially
some
modifications
to
make
it
a
more
direct
access
from
the
parking
areas,
which
was
something
that
was
raised
as
an
issue
so
that
that
is
kind
of
a
quick
overview
of
the
things
we've
added
and
modified
and
I'll
go
to
the
slide
here,
zoom
out
a
little.
D
So
we
also
wanted
to
address
the
the
concerns
relating
to
where
the
limits
of
the
development
really
are
and
what
areas
are
more
things
that
are
part
of
our
our
team's
vision
for
the
island,
but
not
necessarily
part
of
this
agreement
and
this
development
plan.
So
the
area
is
circled
in
purple.
D
Here
are
areas
that
the
development
team
feels
confident
that
we
can
have
as
part
of
this
agreement
and
things
that
we
are
willing
to
commit
to
including
connections
of
the
sidewalk
connection
to
this
existing
City
sidewalk
crosswalks,
to
accommodate
that
as
well
moving
pedestrians
out
of
the
main
thoroughfare,
where
there
is
a
lot
of
busyness
and
happening
when
the
boats
are
being
removed.
So
there's
a
public
safety
issue
to
this
too,
and
we
feel
it's
really
important
that
we
provide
this.
D
D
That
would
include
all
of
the
work
in
the
dec
easement,
including
that
widening
of
the
existing
Trail
spur.
It
would
include
any
work
with
this
stock
that
will
need
their
approval
as
well,
and
we
also
showed
an
existing
or
a
connection
to
the
existing
Lookout
Point.
On
the
sorry,
that's
the
east
side
from
the
existing
sidewalk
that
runs
along
the
side
of
the
Boatyard
grill
out
to
Lookout
Point
connecting
there.
D
That
is
fully
within
the
state's
owned
land
to
answer
that
question,
so
that
that
would
be
possible
to
make
that
connection
with
State
approval,
along
with
the
floating
dock
off
the
end,
which
is
also
going
to
be
a
public
amenity.
D
So
in
Blue,
We've
highlighted
some
things
that
we've
showed
on
our
overall
plan,
but
which
really
will
require
things
that
are
outside
of
this
development
team's
control,
because
they
are
on
privately
owned
property
of
these
two
businesses,
Finger
Lakes
boating
Center
and
the
Boatyard
Grill.
We
understand
from
our
conversations
with
them
that
these
are
planned
improvements
that
they
they
expect
to
undertake
in
the
future.
D
D
This
is
a
diagram
showing
the
areas
of
the
site
which
will
be
public
and
which
will
be
private.
The
areas
which
are
in
public
are
highlighted
in
blue.
Very
fine
line
I
might
need
to
beat
that
up,
but
you
can
see
the
private
area
in
red
here
is
both
of
the
the
buildings
and
their
immediate
environs.
However,
you'll
see
this
location
off
to
the
North
End
of
the
stays
we
do
expect
that
that
will
be
as
a
as
a
Lobby
space
as
well
as
a
cafe
space.
D
D
There
will
need
to
be
some
conversation
with
inhs
as
far
as
an
agreement
on
some
easements
that
will
be
necessary.
Any
land
that
is
owned
by
the
infs
will
be
required
to
be
private,
and
so,
in
order
to
have
a
sidewalk
Crossing
here,
we
would
need
an
easement
actually
across
their
land.
In
order
to
provide
that
public
walkway,
we
did
move
the
property
lines
of
inhs
as
close
to
the
building,
as
we
felt
was
reasonable.
D
There
are
fire
fire
code
issues
relating
to
this,
and
so
this
would
also
call
for
extensive
easements
around
the
perimeter
of
the
anchor
building
dictating
that
no
building
could
be
built
in
the
future,
but
that
that's
a
that's
a
fire
code
safety
issue.
But
this
was
in
response
to
again
the
IRA,
noting
that
there
is
a
discounted
price
for
the
purchase
of
the
property
and
then
it
because
we
wanted
to
make
as
much
of
this
space
public
as
possible.
We're
exploring
ways
that
we
can
reduce
the
scale
of
that
parcel
foreign.
D
This
is
the
final
diagram,
and
this
is
just
a
an
update
to
the
preliminary
zoning
analysis
chart
which
we
provided
previously.
There
have
been
some
changes
on
this,
but
they're
they're,
largely
superficial.
The
building
footprint
of
the
stays
has
shifted
a
little
bit
previously.
The
the
drop-off
was
off
the
corner
here
and
we
have
shifted
it
around
to
be
on
the
side
and
that
that
has
changed
some
of
the
offsets.
D
However,
we
still
have
the
same
condition
where
the
Zoning
for
this
site
is
is
is
not
particularly
strict,
so
we
are
still
looking
at
lock
coverage,
which
is
well
under
the
the
guidelines,
as
well
as
much
more
Street
Frontage
than
necessary,
and
we
are
looking
to
have
the
building
stay
below
the
building
height
limitation.
So
we're
envisioning
this
as
an
as
of
right
project,
and
we
don't
see
any
constraints
even
with
this
update
to
the
site.
E
F
D
I
Other
other
comments
from
members
of
the
team.
We
have
Steve
flash.
We
have
Jeffrey
rimlin
you're
Victorian
Union
from
inhs.
There
might
be
others
I
can't
see
on
the
screen
here.
All
right.
D
So
so
now
that
we've
gone
through
that
that
site
plan
update
just
a
couple
of
the
key
concerns
that
were
brought
up
previously,
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had
addressed.
D
You
know
we
talked
about
the
public
playground.
We
talked
about
the
improvements
to
circulation
on
the
waterfront
Trails,
providing
benches
along
the
trails
as
well.
We
feel
that
we've
adequately,
or
rather
substantially
expanded,
Waterfront
access
and
circulation,
we're
upgrading
the
Promenade
we're
providing
short-term
canoe
kayak
storage
outside
of
the
dec
easement.
They
will
not
allow
it
inside
the
easement
because
of
the
regulations.
D
Some
other
things
that
were
mentioned
specifically
were
relating
to
the
Coast
Guard
auxiliary
and
I
I,
believe
you
do
have
a
a
statement
in
your
your
packets,
identifying
some
of
the
amenities
that
the
development
team
is
offering
to
the
Coast
Guard
to
allow
them
to
continue
their
program.
One
of
the
major
changes
to
that
is
we're
looking
at
relocating
their
existing
radio
tower
to
have
it
be
on
top
of
the
stays
building,
as
well
as
making
the
conference
room
available
to
them
for
their
educational
program.
D
Other
questions
were
related
to
the
marina
operations
which
I
I
believe
we've
also
answered
in
the
packet,
but
just
to
to
state
it
here.
For
the
record,
there
won't
be
any
long-term
boat
storage
on
the
development
site.
The
flex
space
will
be
used
only
during
the
Spring
and
fall
during
boat
haul
out
season
for
maneuvering
and
and
very
short-term
storage,
as
they
get
loaded
onto
trucks
and
will
be
stored
off-site.
D
B
Ed
probably
talk
about
the
flex
space
in
the
dec
negotiations
for
acquisition
of
508
organic
Boulevard
property,
because
originally
DEC
wanted
to
have
flood
Logistics
established
at
the
northern
side
of
the
island,
and
now
they
have,
they
have
revised
their
views
after
Steve
has
negotiated
with
them
a
little
bit
and
they
would
like
you
know,
what's
being
offered,
is
to
have
directly
against
Logistics
by
DEC,
be
focused
on
the
flex
space
at
near
Route,
89
Bridge,
rather
than
up
where
you
see,
on
the
right
hand,
side
EAC,
parcel
that's
where
they
originally
proposed
to
establish
their
their
site
for
Logistics,
which
would
involve
pumping,
and
you
know,
mechanical
equipment
during
the
dredge
activities.
B
So
that's
now
being
discussed
as
more
appropriately
located
at
the
flex
space
which
would
leave
the
dec
parcel,
or
you
know
more
free
of
those
Opera
those
activities
and
would
have
to
coordinate
with
the
boat
all
out
in
launch.
You
know
activities,
but
since
dredging
is
an
event
that
occurs
hopefully
once
every
20
years,
it's
not
not
exactly
a
conflict.
B
We
don't
feel
look
at
that
and
we
have
discussed
that
with
the
City
Department
of
Public
Works
and
the
mayor,
and
they
are
okay
with
that
approach,
because
this
is
currently
city
property
that
would
be
committed
to
an
easement.
It
would
be
part
of
a
transaction
between
the
city
and
the
dec
to
basically
Grant
an
easement
in
return
for
or
it
can
recommend
recognize
the
value
of
an
easement
for
that
activity
in
consideration
of
the
price
of
the
seed,
parsley
or
acquisition.
So
that's
that
seems
to
be
something
you
know.
G
Issues
you
want
to
raise
on
that.
Well,
I
want
the
concern,
the
Demos
in
the
details,
but
we
started
that
discussion
and
it
works
good
and
just
we
wait,
the
dec
would
continue
to
have
its
access
only
easement
at
the
North
End
in
front
the
North
End
of
the
stage
note
right
there,
but
the
arrow
that's
going
up
and
down
right,
yeah.
B
Dc
West
19
the
ability
to
travel
up
and
down
to
easement
along
the
flood
control
Channel
with
25
foot
wide
easement
to
for
maintenance
purposes,
and
probably
also
for
some
activities
during
the
dredge
activities.
So
they
would
retain
that
that
area
or
an
easement
for
that
area
all
the
way
up
and
down
the
west
side
of
the
island
into
the.
B
But
that
seems
it
seems
it
seems
like
like
it
would
facilitate
dredging
activities
and
minimize
disturbance
of
public
access
and
use
of
the
island
which
is
situated
at
the
flex
space
there.
So.
A
Can
I
ask
a
question
about
that?
So
so,
first
of
all,
how
does
that
interact
with
the
proposed
launch
the
kayak
on
us
about
that
location,
and
then
would
that
mean
the
DC
is
under
running
equipment
across
the
Waterfront
Trail
at
that
location?
And
then
this
question
Adobe
knows:
is
this
one
in
20
one
in,
however
many
years,
judging
activity?
How
long
will
that
I
wish.
G
It
would
be
once
they
get
started
depending
on
where
they
get
started
and
depending
upon
how
much
they
actually
dredge
it
would
be
for
a
few
months
and
then
it
would
stop
and
then
return
the
following
year
or
so,
and
that
space
is
obviously
much
larger
than
the
dec
parcel
at
the
North
End
of
the
state.
So
hopefully
we
will
be
able
to
coordinate,
use
it's
going
to
take
some
coordination
with
them
so
that
they
can
get
in
get
out.
If
we,
if
they
happen
to
do
it
during
fall.
D
So
also
to
answer
your
question
about
the
the
boat
ramp
and
how
that
would
interact
with
their
dredging
activities.
Currently,
this
is
a
a
steep
rip,
rap
Bank,
and
we
would.
We
would
anticipate
that
their
dredging
activities
would
be
mostly
to
access
the
sea
wall
for
for
barge
access,
so
I
think
I.
Think
the
critical
piece
is
the
the
fact
that
they
can
come
through
this.
This
access
and
get
to
the
sea
wall
uh-huh.
E
B
Yeah
we've
been
negotiating
by
email,
but
there's
a
lot
of
different
divisions
of
DEC
that
have
to
sign
up.
So
it's
currently
under
Court
to
finalize
whether
the
framework
that's
been
negotiated
is
acceptable
to
all
parties.
If,
if
that's
the
case,
we'll
try
to
develop
a
term
sheet
which
could
be,
you
know,
form
the
basis
for
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement.
B
It's
not
you
know
we
don't
have
to
do
appraisals
to
figure
out
the
value
of
permitt
easements
versus
the
land
value,
so
I
mean
there'll,
be
several
steps,
but
we're
hoping
to
be
able
to
frame
the
agreement
in
a
way
that
we
get
agreement,
written
agreement
from
DEC
and
we
can
bring
something
to
the
County
Council
to
to
review
as
well.
G
G
Just
want
to
make
sure
just
the
northern
triangle
that
there
would
be
an
easement
over
it,
no
matter
who
owns
it,
they
may
keep
it
I,
see
or
not,
but
just
a
northern
one
so
or
perhaps
we'll
acquire
it
well.
That
has
to
be
negotiated
all
right.
All
right.
A
A
F
Thank
you
for
responding
to
us
just
a
couple
questions
on
the
North
End
there.
Could
you
expand
the
dec
parcel
image
there
again.
F
F
D
Yes,
the
reason
was
to
avoid
the
most
direct
route
that
any
vehicles
that
are
accessing
this.
This
eec
parcel
might
take
out
of
the
the
drive
area.
D
I
Yeah
I
think
that
makes
sense
as
this
develops
Doug.
That's
a
it's
a
good
point,
depending
on
how
the
conversations
go
with
DC
yeah.
D
If,
if
this,
if
this,
the
existing
easement
that.
I
D
By
that
out
of
that
route,
so,
but
that
yes,
that's
a
that's,
certainly
something
that
we're
looking
at.
F
D
Is
eight
feet
wide?
The
existing
concrete
that
that
connects
to
it
is
about
six
feet
wide.
D
So
along
here
we
were
proposing
between
four
and
five
feet
of
additional
pavement
to
expand
that
width
to
being
at
least
eight
feet,
but
because
we're
so
close
to
the
water's
edge
and
we
have
a
vertical
drop-
we
were
thinking
closer
to
10
or
even
11.
Feet
would
be
more
appropriate
here
so
that
you
know
as
you're
as
you're,
walking
or
biking
along
here.
You
don't
feel
excessively
close
to
the
the
drop
off
which,
which
is
is
more
the
feeling
we
get
as
you
walk
through
here
today.
D
F
D
I
think
we
envisioned
them
approaching
here
on
the
the
flex
space
area,
just
because
it's
it's
already
going
to
need
to
be
designed
to
hold
up
to
a
lot
of
weight
and
tear
from
the
the
boats
that
will
be
moved
through
this
location
on
the
boat,
lift.
So
we're
looking
at
a
reinforced
lawn
design
for
this,
something
that
maintains
this
as
a
green
pervious
space,
but
can
hold
up
to
to
heavy
traffic.
Here.
D
D
I,
don't
I
don't
believe
that
any
that
the
current
plan
is
for
no
long-term
boat
storage.
Here
Steve,
maybe
you'd
be
better
able
to
answer
that
question.
G
Yeah
there
wouldn't
be
any
seasonal,
we're
not
restoring
those
over
the
winter
there
there
will
be
some
equipment,
trailers,
cradles
jack
stands,
which
will
help.
Boats
and
boats
may
be
there.
You
know
in
transition
overnight
before
we
take
them
by
what
we
hauled
them
out
of
the
water.
We
have
to
clean
them
off,
and
then
we
have
to
winterize
them
before
we
move
them
off
site.
G
G
Year
round
or
nothing
year
round,
we
have
this.
We
have
storage,
we
store
boats
at
Freeman
Marina
and
we
have
an
off-site
right
now,
I'm
just
wanting
to
manage.
It
would
actually
avoid
the
cradles
and
stuff
which
we
would
then
they
stayed
there.
The
boats
are
in
the
water,
they
stay
up
there
and
when
the
boats
come
out
in
the
fall,
we
bring
them
down
from
them
too,
and
we
might
put
down
you
know
10
and
then
the
next
day
we
take
out
five
boats.
Bring
them
by.
F
So
that
I,
yeah
and
well
I
guess
on
the
the
Turner
from
the
lookout
point
turnaround.
Could
we
go
back
to
the
to
that?
I
mean
it's
pretty
convoluted
on
that
the
east
side
of
the
Boatyard
Grill
at
this
point?
So
can
you
explain
what
your
ID
or
plan
ideally
would
be
on
that
whole
He
said.
E
D
What
we're
showing
and
again
we
we
can't
promise
or
commit
to
this,
because
this
is
fully
on
private
property,
even
a
neighboring
business.
But
what
what
we
are
proposing
is
a
connection
to
the
existing
sidewalk
which
connects
across
there
is
a
route
that
pedestrians
can
travel
through
here.
Currently
it,
but
it
it
ends
at
the
the
property
line
here
at
the
edge
of
the
Boatyard
Grill
and
the
rest
of
this
is
owned
by
the
state.
So
we're
proposing
a
connection
to
that
existing
sidewalk
beyond
that.
D
The
modifications
in
here
would
would
need
to
be
looked
at
pretty
carefully
to
make
sure
that
they
can
happen.
But
what
we're
showing
currently
is
the
removal
of
a
section
of
the
the
Finger
Lakes
boating
Center,
which
is
something
that
we
understand,
is,
is
something
they're
planning
to
do,
which
provides
these
additional
parking
spaces
and
would
also
allow
for
a
connection
of
the
sidewalk
along
this
area.
D
There's
also
a
section
of
existing
boat
shed
at
this
end,
that
is
being
shown
removed
and
again,
that
is,
that
is
part
of
what
we
understand
as
a
plan
in
the
works,
and
so
we
feel
that,
with
that
demolition,
there
is
an
opportunity
to
make
that
connection
through.
D
E
G
It's
a
complicated
process
and
I've
got
that
come
down
and
watch
as
far
the
attraction
of
being
down
here,
but
basically
they
can
pull
it
out.
I
think
let's
go
to
travel
with,
transferred
and
transfer
to
a
trailer
there's
a
lot
of
maneuvering
trailers
are
long
and
boats
are
long.
It
has
to
happen
in
that
area,
going
straight
back
and
then
around
up
to.
D
G
North
under
Boulevard
back
into
the
shop
ready
for
those
right
there
yep,
so
they
travel
from
traveling
from
underwater
and
put
them
on
a
trailer,
however,
and
we
may
store
them
in
that
area,
you
know
on
the
Eastern
side
of
catanic
Boulevard
or
take
them
into
the
shop
or
transfer
them
for
transport
to
offset
storage
that
all
happens
down.
At
that
end,.
E
G
D
Yeah
go
ahead
well,
yeah,
so
one
thing
that
we
took
into
account
when
we
were
doing
this.
This
design
was
to
allow
for
two-way
traffic
on
on
the
development
property
so
that,
while
the
boat
lift
is,
is
essentially
blocking
this
section
of
traffic
cars
are
able
to
bypass
all
of
that
that
loading
and
maneuvering
on
the
other
travel
and
there's
a
there's
a
break
in
back
at
this
location
where
they
can,
you
know,
bypass
and
and
go
back
onto
the
main
Road
here,
relax.
G
A
D
So
that
that
is
this,
this
lane
of
travel
is
on
the
development
parcel.
Only
a
very
small
portion
up
here
at
the
North
End
is
actually
on
the
city
right
of
way.
A
A
G
H
Yeah
hi,
so
we
had
a
time
about
requests
for
a
public
restroom
on
the
space.
So
has
that
been
addressed
at
all.
D
So
there
will
be
a
restroom
in
the
lobby
of
the
stays
in
that
Cafe
area
which
will
be
open
during
you
know:
regular
business
hours.
It's
not
something
that
will
be
a
24,
7
bathroom,
of
course,
but
there
will
be
a
bathroom
in
that
that
Lobby
foreign.
B
G
G
Yes,
I
meant
to
make
a
comment
before
and
that
wow
the
circuit
in
Orange
and
certainly
I
mean
access
to
it
probably
exists
which
brought
state
property
and,
as
I
say
in
a
little
memo
there,
showing
the
Boatyard,
Grill
and
federal
exploiting
Center
for
that
matter
would
be
supportive
of
of
that
voting,
doc
and
I
would
think
we
would
help
make
that
happen.
G
But
again,
that's
a
commitment
to
three
rights.
Development
at
this
point
can't
make
on
behalf
of
Finger
Lakes
voting,
Center
or
Courtyard
rails
for
that
matter,
but
I
don't
foresee
that
as
the
train
issue
with
the
permittiness
there
to
put
in
a
broken
dock
of
some
sort,
I
would
think
because
of
benefits
beneficial.
Well,
you
already
growing
benefits
for
your
exploding.
Center
we'd
love
to
have
it.
This
is
not
a
formal
commitment
to
say
the
upper
graduates
of
cost
or
design
or
whatever
you
have
to
do
it.
B
I
am
so
but
I
have
other
partners.
Okay,
but
I'm,
saying
the
plan
for
pedestrian
access
was
based
on
going
through
the
development
on
the
west
side
of
the
island
and
then
looping
back
around
and
without
the
cooperation
of
bringing
that
loop
around.
We
don't
have
a
loop.
We
have
kind
of
a
dead
end.
Well,.
B
Put
it
there
so
I
just
want
to
note
that
the
planning
board
is
a
difficult
time
and
come
making
somebody
do
a
project
for
improvements
off
site,
whereas
the
IRA,
where
it's
conceivably
can
create
any
kind
of
Standards.
We
want
that
we
can
negotiate
on,
but
don't
expect
the
planning
board
to
be
able
to
induce
an
off-site
improvement,
don't
expect
that
they
have
the
authority
to
do
that.
So
that's
one
issue
to
consider
because
this
these
are
some
off-site
improvements
for
the
from
the
Developers
for
the
safety
process.
Anyway,.
B
No,
no
I
think
just
the
Terry
and
the
group
that's
shown
on
the
planet
area
that
and
I
guess
again,
the
floating,
the
floating
dock
of
the
northern
and
the
island
again
would
be
another
example.
Any.
H
I
B
Serve
well
in
the
DDA,
they
would
commit
the
things
that
are
in
the
red
line
and
I
guess:
we'd
have
to
figure
out
how
the
floating
dock
puts
into
that,
because
it
seems
to
be
something:
that's
that's
will
be
pursued,
but
there's
no
guarantee
that
it
would
be
completed,
whereas
other
things
we're
seeing
on
here.
We're
expecting,
would
you
know
some
of
the
developers?
Property
would
be
improved
and.
G
A
A
B
Dda
and
it
would
have
could
be
pursued
by
the
development
team
to
get
towards
approvals.
It's
like
asking
for
an
easement
or
something
over
somebody
else's
property.
It
may
not
be
easy.
It
might
be
a
lot
of
problems
with
it,
but
we
were
shown
these
connections
and
these
improvements
in
the
original
proposal.
That's
on
now
they're
kind
of
potential.
With
with
the
you
know,
it's
a
lot
of
work
for
a
project
to
go
for
site
plan
approval
for
site
conditions.
Most
developers
don't
want
to
do
it
if
it's
not
directly
beneficial.
B
So,
like
you
know,
maybe
a
long
time
before
we
see
those
improvements
occur,
but
that's
all
and
I
think
that
the
route
that
goes
around
from
Lookout
Point
back
actually
does
have
kind
of
a
barrier
Where,
the
Sidewalk
Ends
and
it's
just
kind
of
Shrubbery.
At
one
point
you
can
walk
across
the
grass,
so
we
can
get
there,
but
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
very
friendly
connection.
You
know
at
this
point:
it's
it's
it's
feasible
to
do.
B
A
Right,
so,
what's
I
guess,
maybe
just
a
sense
of
beginning
in
terms
of
the
overall
response
to
the
overall
development
packages,
do
we
want
to
look
at
trying
to
get
additional
concessions
from
those
assistant
property
owners
for
those
pieces,
because
most
people
are
telling
me.
H
Yeah
yeah
I'm
really
positive
about
the
changes
and
thanks
for
making
them
I
mean
I.
Think
it's
it's
in
all.
It's
in
all
that
business
is
best
interest
to
to
pursue
those
changes,
so
it
doesn't
seem
like
anybody's
interests
are
unaligned
to
do
them
so
I'm
comfortable
equipment
as
far
as
presented
here.
Yes,
that's
right.
A
E
A
B
Thank
you,
so
one
other
point
that
you
might
want
to
consider
is
is
the
commitment
regarding
the
accommodations
for
the
Coast
Guard
auxiliary,
acceptable,
because
I
think
it'll
be
an
issue.
They'll
come
before
public
bodies
and
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
they
feel
comfortable
with
where
that
is
in
this
report.
A
A
It's
not
what
they
have
now.
I
understand
that
the
original
plan
was
not
the
tear
down
the
building,
but
we
have
to
tear
down
the
building.
That's
right,
but
maybe
guys.
E
I
did
have
one
question
about
that
with
them
in
the
winter
memo
that
there's
a
paragraph,
postcard
auxiliary,
it
says
we'll
have
opportunity
to
use
a
conference
room
at
the
state's
building
for
their
home
remedy
meetings.
The
cost
to
them
for
this
use
will
be
any
Services.
They
request.
What
does
that
mean?.
G
G
But
if
they
want
who
delivered
or
something
like
that
services
or
you
know,
significant
cleanup
got
it
and
the
extent
beyond
that,
for
if
they
have
classes
or
training,
it's
really
hard
to
figure
out
we're
not
going
to
give
them
a
card
launch.
A
G
Conference
room
every
time
they
also
now
decide
they
want
to
have
the
class,
but
they
haven't
had
one
in
a
couple
of
years,
so
I
know
I
haven't
been
able
to
get
really
what
their
demands
are.
So
all
we
can
do
is
make
a
reasonable
offer,
which
hopefully
everything
is
enough.
That's
that's
good
and
we'll
play
ball
as
best
we
can
with
them.
E
A
Right
what
I
would
recommend
if
you're
an
animal
to
this
is
something
you
just
couldn't
talk
about
base
space
for
their
monthly
meeting
at
no
cost
not
coming
any
services.
That
seems
reasonable
to
me
and
it's
these
reasonable
that
they
need
additional
space,
that
you
know
you
offer
them
your
most
preferred
price
whatever.
That
is
right,
so
that
would
be
reasonable
to
me,
but
you
can't
predict
what
that
demand
is,
if
you
don't
know
how
to
open-ended
thing
for
30
years
right.
So
that
would
be
my
recommendation.
G
Involved
there
so
I
don't
invited
discussions
in
we
just
offering
this
Communications
and
I
came
back
with
with
the
radio
tower
on
top.
You
know
if
that
helps
I,
don't
know
what
the
licensing
is
or
the
permittee
so
wow
and
all
that,
and
that
quite
frankly,
is
up
to
them,
but
if
they
need
space
on
the
roof,
to
put
it,
which
dhf
is
it's
a
visual
line
of
sight,
it
would
significantly
expand
the
VHF
Services.
A
Okay,
so
there's
a
resolution,
I
found
it
it's
operation,
yeah.
A
There's
a
resolution,
the
primary
component
of
this
resolution
is
that
we
find
that
the
updated
sponsor
solution
10-4
is
addresses
that
remain
non-resolved
issues,
the
structure,
disposition,
development,
mineral
projects,
subject
of
qualifications,
presentations
which
I
think
what
we
just
talked
about
in
terms
of
Coast,
Guard,
Missouri
and
the
space
and
how
that's
available.
A
A
A
B
B
That
project
has
moved
forward
through
the
common
Council
and
they
have
endorsed
that
and
we
are
finalizing
the
terms
of
the
disposition,
development
agreement
with
the
sponsor
309
College
311
College
Avenue
Associates
LLC,
and
we
expect
that
the
that
the
IRA
will,
once
that's
executed,
probably
very
soon
that
the
agency
will
exercise
the
option
to
purchase
to
bind
it
as
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement
this
week,
and
so
it
looks
like
it's
moving
forward.
B
The
the
project
has
also
been
moving
forward
through
the
secondary
review
process
and
they're
scheduled
this
month
for
finalizing
their
environmental
review,
determination
of
that
project,
and
then
the
next
meeting
would
probably
be
a
site
plan
approval
along
their
approval.
So
they
have
not
run
into
any
major
issues.
It
seems
like
it's
moving
forward
on
all
at
all
aspects,
so
it
looks
like
a
very
successful
implementation
of
this
project
conclusion
to
it.
Hopefully,
so
no,
no,
no
problems
to
to
report.
B
Report,
everybody
is
currently
acceptable
whether
our
records
are
showing
that
companies
from
the
action
is
one
month
late.
They
have
sent
us
information
that
they
think
they
are
current,
so
we're
working
through
the
two
reports
to
see
where
we
stand.
We
use
a
third-party
loan,
servicer
m
t
bank
and
that
creates
a
middle
person
that
usually
goes
into
these
discussions.
The
auditor
very
strongly
recommends
having
a
third-party
service
or
facility.
So
it's
a
very
good
report
in
that
regard.
B
Over
at
least
is
our
current,
where
one
was
shown
this
late,
but
they're
late
by
three
days
and
they've
made
payments
since
that
time.
So
it's
looking
pretty
strong
I,
don't
have
any
further
supports
on
a
financial
semester.
Questions.
B
Report
that
we
did
disperse
a
good
chunk
of
loans
for
it
for
the
personal
best
Brewing
project,
so
that
one
is
still
in
process
of
being
dispersed
and
hopefully
they'll
you'll
see
improvements
that
you
can
see
from
the
street
soon.
We
have
a
couple
of
leads,
but
we
don't
have
any
applicants.
The
several
of
the
leads
didn't
progress
towards
an
application.
B
That
was
first
year.
Sorry,
we
have
completed
a
restored
New
York
Grant
application,
which
the
agency
staff
is
has
historically
done,
has
played
a
role
in
facilitating
that,
so
the
submission
was
made
for
two
million
dollars
to
support
renovation
and
Rehabilitation
of
the
two
properties
from
the
corner
of
Cuba
and
Green
Street.
B
So
right
next
to
City
Hall,
the
one
that
connects
for
the
bridge
and
our
property
just
adjacent
to
that
would
be
dramatically
renovated
in
terms
into
a
green
building,
new
new
facade
work
and
a
lot
of
conversions
of
vacant
office
space
to
residential
usage
of
these
16
new
residential
uses,
Apartments
spoken
to
that
all
affordable
80,
their
immune
income,
which
is
a
is
a
moderate
rent.
It's
not
a
low
rent,
yeah
right
next
door
right
next
door.
So
that's
that's
an
interesting,
a
good
project
for
the
downtown.
B
The
second
phase
of
the
Restore
New
York
application
project.
We
are
allowed
one
more
application
in
January
and
the
mayor
is
selected.
The
second
project
for
that,
unless
Things
Fall
Apart
from
the
feasibility
point
of
view
and
that's
the
chainworks
project,
building
24,
is
the
building
closest
to
the
street.
They're
proposing
to
renovate
that
for
housing
with
Brownfield
commercial
we'll
deal
with
Randy
Owens
on
that
project.
B
So
those
are
these
round
six,
which
is
the
one
downtown
and
round
seven
would
be
in
chain
works,
and
then
the
other
thing
I
want
to
note
is
that
the
city
has
submitted
a
downtown
deregulization
initiative,
application
to
the
state
for
10
million
dollars.
They've
done
this
five
times
before
and
have
been
successful.
B
It's
a
one
community
in
the
region,
the
seven
tier
region
gets
the
funding,
and
this
year
they
have
been
selected
as
a
finalist
again,
and
their
focus
is
on
the
west
states
reporter
in
the
West
End
and
addressing
needs
of
the
city.
Rather
prior
applications
are
focused
on
the
strengths
of
the
city
and
in
larger
development
projects,
and
this
application
is
focused
on
addressing
the
needs
of
the
300
block
and
Wesley
three-quarter.
So
it's
a
much
more
Equity
focused
kind
of
application,
so
basically
want
to
make
you
aware
of
that.
B
I
can't
remember
they
send
a
link
to
it
to
me
to
make
sure
I
can
share
it
with
everybody.
It's
going
for
the
presentation
this
week.
So
we
have
no
control
over
this
application
process
and
they
will
be
probably
making
a
decision.
It
is
rumored
before
the
election,
but
we'll
see.
Okay,
so
I
just
want
to
update
you
on
those
two
big
projects.