►
From YouTube: Monthly IURA Neighborhood Investment Committee Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Scheduling
Cheyenne
teaching
schedule
will
be
changing,
come
fall
semester
at
IDC,
so
she's
asked
if
we
could
change
our
meeting
in
China.
If
you
would
talk
about
that,
please.
B
Yeah
I'm
sorry
I
I
will
try
not
to
have
I.
Will
try
not
to
have
my
schedule,
be
a
regular
topic,
but
I
just
didn't
have
a
lot
of
control
for
the
fall
semester
and
I
would
not
be
able
to
attend.
I
think
it
was
like
three
of
the
between
August
and
and
August
September
October
November
I
would
Advance
like
two
or
three
of
the
meetings
so
can
try,
starting
in
the
January,
to
have
a
more
permanent.
B
A
B
We
are
usually
on
the
second
week
right,
yes,
so
I
mean
I.
August
should
be
fine
if
the.
E
D
F
B
A
Next
item
would
be
recruiting
committee
members,
so
I
have
a
couple
of
names
and
I've
talked
with
these
folks
I
wanted
to,
and
we
talked
about
this
in
the
past,
so
I
don't
remember
how
long
ago
it
spins
I
don't
know
if
trying
to
ever
see
the
purpose.
But
one
of
the
things
I
I
advocate
for
is
that
prior
to
new
members
being
appointed
that
we
bring
it
to
the
committee
in
case
there
are
any
conflicts,
I
think
it
could
be
a
small
place.
A
You
know
you
don't
want
to
appoint
someone
to
find
out.
You
got
mortal
in
it
committee,
so
I
have
two
names
again:
I
haven't
spoken
to
them.
One
person
is
Mary,
Baker
Mary
is
a
retired
school
psychologist
for
the
icsd,
I
think
Steve
knows
Mary
and
you
know
I
thought
you
knew
John
and
Mary
Baker,
okay,
so
Mary
Baker's
one
person
I
think
she
would
be
good.
She
and
her
husband
lived
in
the
area
for
a
long
time.
A
As
I
said
she,
she
knows
the
area
the
other
person
is
younger,
but
I
thought
she's
shown
a
lot
of
interest
in
local
politics
and
that's
Kayla
Matos,
who
was
the
executive
or
I'm
sorry,
the
assistant
director
of
Southside
Community,
Center
she's,
actually
running
for
common
Council.
So,
of
course,
if
she
gets
elected,
she
wouldn't
be
able
to
serve
on
the
committee.
I,
don't
believe
I
think
elected
officials.
A
G
Cannot
be
more,
there
cannot
be
a
majority
of
officials
or
people
that
are
associated
with
the
city
or
somehow
have
the
interests
that
was,
you
know,
sitting
perhaps
above
Ira,
so
it's
possible
that
she
could
serve
okay,.
A
Yeah
I
would
think
so,
especially
as
a
first
time,
yeah
I,
remember
yeah.
So
if
both
those
names
sound
reasonable
to
you,
I
can
I'll
reach
out
to
them
and
engage
interest.
B
I
have
tried
to
pursue
somebody,
but
they
I
think
are
going
to
be.
They
were
asked
to
be
the
head
of
the
women's
Carpenters
Habitat
for
Humanity
project,
so
I
think
she's
busy,
but
she
was
gonna
get.
C
A
All
right
so
as
three
people
that
will
follow
up
with
and
we'll
have
some
well
so
we'll
have
some
information
either
yes
or
no
or,
and
people
are
always
welcome,
to
come
to
meetings
or
even
view
them.
You
know
all
it
means
archives,
so
someone
can't
or
doesn't
want
to
wait
until
next
month
they
can
go
to
the
city
website,
find
the
Archive
of
Our
meetings
and
and
to
get
an
idea
of
what's
involved
and,
of
course,
the
one
thing
the
sheriff
you're
talking
to
someone
is
to
to.
A
Let
them
know
that
you
know
the
meetings
typically
last
hour
hour
at
two
and
a
half,
but
come
the
first
quarter.
Actually
the
the
December
of
the
of
the
Year
through
March
the
end
of
March.
Those
four
meetings
can
be
long
because
of
the
the
HUD
grants
and
all
the
work
that's
involved
in
that.
So
we
definitely
want
to.
Let
people
know
that
the
workload
does
change
is
seasonal.
I
should
say
that
all
right
thanks.
Secondly,.
A
Okay,
so
we
have
an
agenda,
a
resolution
and
we've
done
a
couple
of
already,
but
this
is
the
reauthorization
of
the
great
Activity
Center
as
a
community-based
development
organization.
A
So
giac
has
been
for
a
number
of
years
at
the
designation.
Their
Hospitality
employment
training
program
is
the
job
training
and
placement
program
and,
of
course,
it's
a
job
placement.
That's
the
important
part
of
that
to
allow
them
to
be
designated
and
you'll
see.
Starting
at
page,
two
staff
has
examined
all
the
requirements
to
ensure
that
the
organization
meets
the
requirements
from
HUD
one
of
the
ones.
That
typically,
is
trickiest,
is
maybe
not
the
right
word,
but
is
the
board
member
composition.
A
G
No
I
think
some
of
those
are
perfectly
Jackie
and
I
did
have
some
back
and
forth
to
to
ensure
that
ready
with
compliant
and
they
were
super
cooperative
and
they
always
are
and
that
let
us
see
where
we
are
today.
E
Well,
I'm,
sorry,
Steve,
Brad,
I.
Just
have
one
question:
can
you
refresh
my
understanding
of
the
difference
between
the
study
organization
G
act
and
what
was
about.
G
Yes,
so
giac
itself
is
a
city
Department
and
yeah.
G
It
predates
me
I,
don't
know
if
Carl
remembers
but
established
a
non-profit
specifically
to
be
able
to
do
the
job
training
piece
that
they
do
so
that
they
could
apply
for
cbdo
status.
To
do
that,
so
the
job
training
portion
of
it
is
not
something
that
the
city
department
is
undertaking.
G
Gx
nonprofit
board
overseas,
that
they
also
probably
do
some
other
activities
that
I'm
as
aware
of,
but
they
are
one
of
the
things
that's
unique
about
GX
application.
Is
that
the
thing
two
different
parts
of
their
organization.
G
That's
a
great
question:
I
see
that
it
doesn't
say
Jack
Inc
under
the
top
of
their
board
list,
but
as
a
city
department,
they
are
not
required
to
have
a
woman,
so
this
would
be
for
their
or
their
background.
Profit
yeah.
A
The
board
is
for
Gia
and
actually
the
the
giac
meat
predates
the
HTTP
program.
I,
don't
remember
exactly
when
it
started,
but
they
had
the
it
may
have
begun.
A
Right
when
they
had
the
CDL
their
commercial
driver's
license
program,
I,
don't
even
remember
what
that
was,
but
it
was
a
while
ago
so
but
yeah
it
does
definitely
predates
http.
C
Above
the
resolution
moved
by
Fernando.
C
A
Investment
all
right.
The
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
a
community
housing
development,
designation.
G
I
should
have
renamed
this
analysis
memo,
but
it
is
considering
their
Showdown
right
and
then
also
part
of
the
resolution
is
as
a
choto.
They
can
qualify
as
a
cbdo
and
so
a
memo
at
times
to
explain
that
all.
A
Right
sorry,
I
I
didn't
read
that
thoroughly
enough.
I
thought
we'd
already
done:
I
NHS
inhs's
designation,
moved
and
okay,
so
this
is
so
the
community.
So
this
is
the
reauthorization
for
inhs
they've
had
both
designations,
the
community
housing
development
organization
and
the
community-based
development
organization,
and
as
a
community
housing
development
organization,
they
can't
qualify
as.
A
Based
development
organization,
I
know
it
gets
a
little
confusing.
The
requirements
aren't
different
for
Community,
Housing,
Development
organization
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
the
ones
that
really
stands
out
is
the
board
composition
so,
and
you
will
notice
that
for
community
housing
it
talks
about
residents
of
a
low-income
organization,
whereas
with
a
community-based
development
organization,
one
of
the
destination
is
as
a
low-income
person.
So
it's
a
distinction
there.
There
are
areas
of
the
city
that
are
designated
as
low
income,
so
you
may
be
a
high
income
person.
A
And
I
I
NHS
meets
all
qualifications.
A
I,
don't
know
if
it's
a
ton
of
work,
but
but
staff
does
have
to
look
at
the
board
member
certifications
and
then
verify
you
know
where
people
live
and
that
those
are
for
those
are
areas
of
the
city
that
are
designated
as
low
income.
G
I
will
say
that,
just
in
general
that
the
application
packet,
the
choto
turns
in
versus
a
cbdo
is
much
larger,
show
those
tend
to
undertake
much
more
complex
and
Technical
work
since
they're
developing
housing.
So
they
have
to
mean
a
threshold
for
you
know,
kind
of
what
their.
G
Have
to
assume
that
their
most
recent
audit
things
like
that,
but
normally
a
cbdo
does
not
have
to
it-
does
not
have
to
do
I
suspect.
G
Part
of
the
reason
that
the
board
composition
requires
33
of
the
board
to
have
you
know
one
of
the
criteria,
because
there
is
a
lot
of
specialized
knowledge
that
is
necessary
to
be
a
choto
that
I,
don't
think
necessarily
for
cbdo
cbdos.
Can
you
know,
undertake
simpler
types
of
I
mean
they
might
not
unassemble,
but
how
does
requiring
a
lot
of
additional
documentation
for
housing
organizations.
A
C
This
curiosity
question
yeah:
it's
the
fact
that
they
need
to
be
different
requirements
like
the
board
members.
Yeah
can
have
multiple
multiple.
H
G
Know
sometimes
dvdos
or
members
also
do
have
multiple
areas
that
they
can
check,
and
this
I
noticed
in
this
case
they
have
more
than
a
couple
but
and
just
as
far
as
process
if
they
meet
one
of
them.
A
I
remember
we
discussed
this,
but
if
you
could
refresh
for
me,
why
is
ironhs
Seeking
a
cbdo
definition.
G
A
For
cdbg
funds,
as
well
as
home?
Yes,
that's,
okay,.
C
D
G
Qualify
them
separately
as
a
Toto,
and
that
has
changed
only
because,
as
as
NHS
has
grown
now,
they
serve
more
than
one
Community,
whereas
before
they
only
used
to
serve.
F
G
So
kind
of
been
looking
into
the
regs,
we
found
that
The
Showdown
or
said
shutters
can
still
be
same
videos,
but
because
their
board
composition,
change,
which
actually,
this
year
didn't
make
a
difference
in
a
previous
year.
It
would
have
that
we,
because
they've
grown
Beyond
this
community,
what
we're,
making
the
and
a
cbdo
usually
only
searched
one
Community
or
making
the
argument
hood
that
this
showed
up,
though
it
serves
more
than
one
Community
has
roots
in
this
community
and
it's
qualified
to
serve
the
community
as
a
CBD
and
included
the
regulation.
G
I,
don't
want
to
use
the
word.
Arcane
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
right
word
is,
but
you'll
see
that
a
cbdo
that
does
not
qualify
under
paragraph
C1
or
two
above
which
it
doesn't
for
the
reasons
that
I
just
said
it's
grown
in
its
service
area,
but
demonstrates
that
it's
sufficiently
similar
in
purpose
function,
scope
which
inhs
has
demonstrated
that
to
us
and
one
of
the
ways
they've
demonstrated
it
is
really
is
having
a
history
as
a
cpdo.
G
A
But
I
think
again,
I
think
for
practical
purposes
is
cbdo
designation
does
allow
the
qualify
for
health
funds
and
I'm
sorry
for.
A
And
so
that
then
gives
them
more
flexibility
on
some
of
their
projects,
where
the
funding
can
be
split
and
I
think
you
may
remember
earlier
this
year
or
one
of
their
products,
we
did
split
some
of
the
funding
between
a
home
and
cdbg
funds.
A
A
So
this
one's
a
little
bit
kind
of
more
complicated
than
if
they
were
asking
for
just
you
know.
One
designation,
but
I
will
move
this
resolution.
A
G
A
A
The
other
item-
Royal
Catholic
Charities,
but
the
other
item
whose
eye
items
sorry
would
be
the
starting
degree.
Grant
summary.
G
G
Instead
of
your
usual,
you
know
Excel
sheet
with
one
tiny
numbers.
G
B
G
Just
at
the
1.5
amount
that
we
have
to
have
1.5
our
previous
years
award.
We
can't
we're
not
supposed
to
have
more
than
that.
We
actually
got
down
lower
as
you'll
see
right
there,
which
I
think
is
1.34
or
1.3
I.
Guess
that's
adjusted
so
so
I
didn't
I
didn't
have
a
grant
summary
that
actually
showed,
because
our
our
grant
summer
is
a
lot
lagable
behind.
We
didn't
have
one
that
actually
showed
it
with
it.
So
I.
G
Exactly
so,
and
we
have
to
give
credit
to
our
organization
to
get
cdbg
funds,
you
know,
as
you
know,
from
from
the
the
review
process,
when
people
were
applying
for
2023,
we
had
a
number
of
organizations
that
had
quite
a
bit
of
cdbg
on
still
online
and
that's
why
you
know
when
you
were
looking
at
the
Workforce
Development
programs.
You
know
there's
a
very
careful
calculation
of
like
how
much
do
they
have
left.
G
How
much
can
we
expect
of
only
in
the
future,
and
we
really
work
with
those
organizations
to
voucher
for
everything
that
they
had
spent,
and
they
really
did
that
and
they
really
helped
us
catch
up
and
I
will
say.
Yeah
one
organization
even
submitted
a
fairly
small
cdbg
voucher
right
before,
because
they
became
very
invested.
B
G
We're
really
happy
to
to
get
there.
So
now
we
won't
have
a
warning
letter
and
we
can
proceed
with
our.
You
know
drier
record
of
having
having
achieved,
except
for
last
year.
G
I
do
have
a
couple
of
I,
don't
know
if
there's
any
questions
there,
but
I
do
have
a
couple
of
things
for
our
staffers.
A
Before
we
get
to
the
staff
report,
I
want
to
ask:
are
there
any
grants
or
grantees
that
we
should
be
or
the
staff
is
concerned,.
G
H
G
That's
under
Nelson's
profile,
as
you
might
remember,
Nells
as
the
Director
has
the
ability
to
Grant
operating
extensions
of
120
days
for
any
project
that
doesn't
feel
it
incomplete
by
its
contract
expiration
date.
So
the
2021
security
deposits
requested
that
and
he
authorized
that
so
and
those
security
deposits.
As
we're
aware,
it's
still
from
you
know
the
pandemic.
They
had
a
bunch
of
money
built
up
because
nobody
could
move
during
the
pandemic,
and
so
that's
why
they're
still
sitting
down
2021..
They
have
their
2022
online
and
then
2023.
G
They
asked
for
a
small
amount,
because
I
mean
the
hell
is
better,
so
that
was
one
thing.
I
still
need
to.
I
have
not
heard
back
from
the
brands
of
the
Ithaca
Farmers
Market
for
their
final
report
for
the
cdbg
CV
project
that
you
all
renewed
I
really
feel
like
they're
98
there.
They
really
simply
need
to
submit
the
final
report,
so
we
can
check
all
the
boxes.
G
The
director
has
been
away
on
family
leave.
I
think
that's
part
of
the
reason
I
have
reached
out
to
her,
but
I
will
reach
out
again,
who
else.
G
Learning
web
has
submitted
their
first
voucher,
I
believe
that
they're
working
on
their
second
voucher
they've
picked
up
their
first
check
so
they're
slowly
progressing
I
will
say
that
one
thing
that
we
will
need
to
be
aware
of
in
future
years
is
this
year
at
nhs's
request.
G
D
G
Splitted
between
the
two
categories
and
I
will
say
for
reasons
that
I'm
still
understanding
it's
been
they've,
been
slow
to
voucher
on
their
cdb
Gene
portion
of
their
funds.
I
think
when
it's
been
split
is
because
they
attempt
to
use
all
home
funds
first
for
reasons
that
have
to
do
with
it's
harder
to
get
all
those
fun.
G
G
G
You
don't
have
any
things:
oh
I
mean
there.
Will
there
is
one
other
kind
of
not
not
right
back,
but
one
that
we're
watching,
which
is
Catholic
Charities
as
a
service
delivery.
G
A
very
small
amount,
that's
going
into
them
for
Service
delivery,
2500,
which
they
need
to
spend
that
down
before
this
fire.
So
we're
we're
watching
that
one.
D
G
G
Sure
sounds
good,
okay,
so
staff
report,
the
2023
annual
action
plan,
was
approved
at
the
end
adopted
last
night
by
Common
Council,
so
I
will
be
finishing
up
the
funnel
details.
I
tried
to
get
it
as
ready
as
possible
to
submit
to
HUD
and
hopefully
we'll
be
pushing
the
submit
button
within
the
next
year
or
two.
G
So
that
will
finish
up
this
year's
process
to
the
extent
that
usually
now
hug
will
have
a
meeting
with
me
prior
to
their
approving
the
plan.
They
usually
want
to
ask
some
questions
or
have
a
few
Corrections
that
has
to
do
with
the
fact
that
our
HUD
rep
is
really
reads
our
plan.
G
So
a
lot
of
other
Hub
rubs
didn't
pay
that
little
attention,
so
we'll
probably
do
that
in
the
summer
also,
those
of
you
on
Ira
are
aware
that
IRA
has
the
board
has
authorized
meals
to
see
a
temporary
worker
to
work
on
some
elements
of
Charles's
job
that
he
used
to
do
the
minutes
and
so
on.
So
we've
been
in
touch
with
the
staffing
agency
and
that
search
is
underway,
and
if
that
person
is
available
or
they're,
you
know
they
need
more
time
to
fill
their
contract.
G
H
G
Too
I'm
sorry
I
thought
actually
I
thought
we
might
have
covered
that
at
the
beginning.
Yes,
would
you
like
to
speak
about
that.
D
A
So
so
we
an
invitation
to
join
the
Urban
Mutual
agency
board
was
extended
to
Cheyenne.
A
D
A
To
the
mayor's
office,
but
mayor
Lewis
will
kind
of
make
the
appointment
is
the
mayor
and
then
Chris
pru,
as
chairman
of
the
board,
so
Cheyenne
will
be
joining
board,
which
is
wonderful,
so
thank
you.
Cheyenne
who's,
stepping
up.
B
G
B
G
All
right
so
I
think
Michaela
has
turned
off
her
she's
turned
on
her
mic.
So
would
you
like
me
to
introduce
that.
G
So
Michaela
corporate
is
the
deputy
director
of
Catholic
Charities
at
Thomas
Toyota
and
the
Catholic
Charities
requested.
You'll,
see
the
request
letter
in
your
packet,
a
modification
to
their
2021
contract
and
the
improved
resolution
that
I
handed
out
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
As
in
read
that
we
would
actually
like
to.
They
would
actually
like
to
see
whatever
changes
carried
forward
to
their
future
contracts
as
well.
G
And
reconsidering
their
program
guidelines,
one
of
their
program
guidelines
has
to
do
with
beneficiaries
only
being
able
to
receive
a
superior
deposit
one
time
and
occasionally
they
have
applicants.
Who've
received
a
security
deposit
before
the
issue
that
kind
of
brought
this
forward
was.
There
was
a
homeless
household
who
had
identified
housing
and
they
needed
a
security
deposit
about
one.
G
Member
of
that
household
had
received
a
security
deposit
in
the
past,
so
they
came
to
us
to
ask
us
if
we
could
modify
that
portion
of
our
the
contract
so
that
they
could
Aid
people
that
were
in
that
situation,
not
just
that
one
person,
but
other
people
in
that.
G
Than
as
they
were
reviewing
some
of
the
pro
over
the
years,
they
realized
that
they
might
want
to
modify
other
aspects
of
it.
For
example,
a
question
that
came
up
in
the
ira
board
meeting
was
you
know,
kind
of
why
the
section
is
quoted
there
in
the
resolution
why
there
was
a
rapid.
G
Voucher
exception,
if
the
householding
question
had
one
of
those
so
that
cause
cafeteria's
kind
of
discuss
and
Michaela
I
hope,
you
don't
mind
me
just
mentioning
that
you
mentioned
that
that
that
change
in
the
guidelines
you
weren't
aware
of
why
that
was
made
and
it
predated
your
time
at
the
agency.
G
So
this
brought
up
the
kind
of
the
you
know,
there's
institutional
knowledge
that
maybe
isn't
there
the
time
to
look
at
the
the
guidelines
and
see
what
might
be
updating
I
do
want
to
just
let
you
all
know
here
in
Ni
the
the
IRA
at
their
last.
H
G
G
You
know
changing
guidelines
in
the
2022
Contracting
going
forward
because
those
recommendations
usually
come
from
the
committee
and
they
wanted
it.
The
committee
yeah
to
explore
it
and
advise
them
on
that.
G
Questions
that
you
may
have
about
you.
D
G
D
G
Need
for
for
this
modification
what
changes
the
program
might
undergo
as
a
result,
and
then
Liddy
has
agreed
to
come
and
provide
any
further
context
that
you
might
want
about
homeless
Services,
especially
because,
as
Catholic
Charities
pointed
out
in
our
letter,
they
also
feel,
like
you
know,
given
what's
going
on
in
the
homeless,
Services
Community,
with
a
home
together,
Tompkins
plan
that
the
the
IRA
adopted
in
the
city
endorsed
in
our
most
recent
home
home
art
plan.
G
That's
focused
on
housing,
homeless,
people
they
they
feel
like
eliminating
the
barrier
for
people
who
are
homeless
to
get
us
to
create
a
positive
month.
They've
received
one
before
us
in
one
of
those
things
so
Lydia
might
have
some
backgrounds
to
share
with
us
too.
If
you
have
questions.
A
Honestly
Michaela
is
there
anything
you
want
to
add
to
wanted
me
to
just
break
this
on.
I
You
know
so
I
think
Anissa
kind
of
covered
everything
I
was
going
to
explain
to
you
guys
just
the
fact
that
we're
sort
of
in
the
process
of
this
sort
of
kicked
off
us
revisiting
and
changing
some
of
our
policies
just
to
stay
in
line
with
the
plans
with
the
COC
and
with
the
city.
I
We
are
looking
to
shift
some
of
our
policies,
one
of
them
being
the
the
fact
that,
right
now
you
can
only
receive
this
security
deposit
once
ever
so
we'd
like
to
shift
that
to
every
five
years
which
predates
me,
but
we
used
to
do
that
at
one
point.
So
I've
been
with
Agency
for
about
eight
years,
our
executive
director
has
been
there
about
13
and
she
kind
of
remembers
it
being
five
years.
I
So
we
do
have
a
history
of
doing
that
so
we'd
kind
of
like
to
go
back
to
doing
that,
and
this
would
be
a
little
bit
more
in
line
with
some
policies
that
DSS
has
about
applying
for
every
five
years.
H
D
G
Yeah
my
microphone
over
there
as
long
too,
so
this
is
always
super
fun.
Amazing,
it's
a
hybrid
situation,
so
you
had
mentioned
to
me
that
survivors
of
domestic
violence
also
might
be
affected
by
the
one-time,
the
one-time
beneficiaries
policy.
Do
you
want
to
let
the
community
know
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
I
Yeah,
so
so
what
I
was
going
to
say
was
laughs.
I
We,
we
estimate,
maybe
approximately
five
to
ten
people
in
this
particular
situation
per
year
and
the
circumstances
would
the
people
who
would
need
this
protect
usually
are
those
who
are
either
in
DB
situations,
a
homeless
situation
like
unhouse
or
children
that
have
aged
out
of
their
parents
household
that
had
once
received
a
security
deposit.
So
those
are
reasons
that
we
would.
We
are
wanting
to
switch
back
to
being
able
to
offer
this
more
than
once,
but
yeah
we,
we
estimate
maybe
five
to
ten
people
requests
per
year.
I
They
still
could
be
ineligible
for
other
reasons,
but
it
is
sort
of
hard
to
forecast
this
need
over
a
year,
but
we're
pretty
careful
with
our
data
and
we
don't.
We
don't
anticipate
that
this
is
going
to
create
a
major
impact
on
others
requesting
this
service.
For
the
first
time,
yeah.
A
Well,
I'll
ask
a
good
question.
Then
this
is
from
Libby.
Could
you
talk
to
us
about
the
rapid
re-housing
voucher
because
that's
one
of
the
exceptions,
that's
in
the
in
Catholic
Charities
guidelines,
and
so
it
came
up
at
the
IRA
board
meeting
about
the
rapidly
housing
voucher.
J
Sure
so
I
I
apologize
because
I
I
am
not
totally
clear
on
what
context
it's
related
to
security
deposits,
but
I
can
tell
you
generally
about
the
rapid
what
rapid
rehousing
vouchers
are
and
and
where
they
come
from.
So
a
rapid
rehousing
voucher
is
what
it
sounds
like
right.
A
voucher,
that's
intended
to
rapidly
re-house
a
person
experiencing
homelessness
in
our
community.
They
have
historically
been
pretty
limited,
then
during
covet
and
some
of
the
covid
funding
did
increase
our
sort
of
supply
of
Rapid
rehousing
vouchers.
J
The
ones
that
are
in
our
community
now
are
mostly
coming
through
either
the
office
of
temporary
disability
assistance
administered
by
our
local
DSS
in
the
form
of
step,
rapid
rehousing,
which
stands
for
solutions
to
add
homelessness
program
ESG,
which
was
covet
funding
that
is
winding
down
and
another
project
that
isn't
exactly
a
rapid,
rehousing
voucher,
but
acts
like
one
called
rental
supplement
program.
Then
the
Tompkins
Community
Action
also
administers
about
25
a
year
of
what
are
called.
They
call
them.
J
Tbra
vouchers
I
know
that
this
group
has
a
definition
of
TBR
a
that's
slightly
different,
but
they
act
like
a
raptor,
Housing
Voucher.
So
they're
time
limited
vouchers
that
basically
help
cover
the
cost
of
housing
for
up
to
24
months.
Most
of
our
rapid
rehousing
programs
actually
have
a
goal
of
sun
setting
or
ending
their
assistance
within
the
first
12
months.
J
J
There's
probably
I
could
look
in
the
point
in
time
count,
but
probably
around
65
people
using
rapid
rehousing
vouchers.
At
this
time,.
J
It
depends
on
the
program
it
and
it
and
they
sometimes
have
the
agency
of
Last
Resort
funding
stuff
written
into
it,
which
requires
the
person
well.
As
you
know,
sometimes
people
get
stuck
in
the
thing
where
they
have
to
be
denied
other
places
before
they
can
access
specifically
security
deposits,
but
in
theory,
yes,
they
can
pay
for
security
deposits,
but
that
that's
considered
like
a
it's,
not
automatic.
It's
not
part
of
the
package.
Oh
it's
for
books.
G
And
really,
what
kind
of
household
would
apply
for
a
rapid
rehousing
voucher?
Would
it
be
somebody
who
is
in
danger
of
losing
their
housing
or
literally
homeless
or.
J
People
who
are
in
that
domestic
violence
scenario
do
qualify
under
the
category
of
homelessness
that
we
would
be
talking
about
for
a
rapid,
rehousing,
Patcher
folks
who
are
in
that
prevention.
You
know
imminent
risk.
Category
are
eligible
to
apply
for
a
different
sort
of
part
of
the
same
funding
called
steps,
solutions
to
end
homelessness
program.
That's
a
partnership
between
Tompkins,
Community,
Action
and
DSs,
and
tries
to
stabilize
folks
in
their
housing
or
rapidly
move
them
to
a
new
place.
But
that's
very
time
limited.
It's
about
three
months
of
assistance,
usually.
J
Yes,
it's
possible
that
they
would
and
that
and
people
often
off
immediately.
So
what
heads
or
what
we
know
happens
to
folks
who
are
using
vouchers
to
pay
for
the
cost
of
their
housing.
Is
the
market?
Is
such
that
landlords
are
able
to
just
take
a
cash
deposit
and
lock
down
that
unit
and
be
done
having
to
rent
that
unit
to
anyone.
J
People
who
are
using
vouchers
to
pay
are
just
by
the
nature
of
those
projects
not
able
to
move
as
quickly
to
the
next
stage
of
engaging
with
signing
a
lease
or
securing
a
secure,
getting
a
security
deposit
and
it's
very
difficult
to
line
up
in
advance.
Even
with
like
the
awesome
Services
of
Catholic,
Charities
and
others.
Because
you
need
to
have
the
address,
you
need
to
know
the
you
can't
it's
kind
of
like
this
magical
thing.
J
That
really
needs
to
come
together
for
folks,
where
they
need
to
know
the
the
address
that
they're
moving
into
the
landlord
needs
to
have
agreed
to
take
whatever
method
of
payment
that
they're
using
and
they
need
to
have
as
close
to
cash
in
hand
or
a
letter
very
quickly
or
they
lose
that
unit.
They
lose
the
ability
to
to
lease
up
in
that
unit
and
start
again
in
the
next.
A
J
B
A
B
Good,
but
also
wondering
if
even
having
five
years
might
be,
limiting
I
mean
this
is
to
get
them
to
your
business
of
it.
But
if
it
was
just
written
into
your
written
in
as
Case
by
case,
would
it
be
more
flexible
because
you
could
end
up
with
the
same
situation
like
then
it
would
be
like
oh
just
short
of
five
years
and
then
you've
used
that.
G
You
want
me
to
take
that
Kayla
sure
partially
answer
this,
because
where
we
started
this
conversation
with
Catholic
Charities,
actually
they
wonder
if
they
can
make
a
case
by
case
exception
and
in
discussing
it
internally
with
the
IRA
staff
it
was
mentioned.
That
could
does
not
generally
like
to
see
case-by-case
exceptions.
That's
why
those
are
program
guidelines,
because
at
times
this
question-
and
you
know,
there's
an
element
of
subjectivity-
In
Case
by
case
so
well,
I-
think
that
level
of
flexibility
probably
works
us
for
a
program.
G
There
could
be
some
other
reasons
that
doesn't
like
that
because,
for
example,
perhaps
the
reason
the
person
is
being
approved
is
because
they're
better
connected
they're
better.
Well,
you
know
known
to
the
service
provider
service
writers.
You
know
substantially
likes
them,
but
doesn't
like
another.
You
know,
so
that's
why
I
HUD
likes
to
see
things
in
contracts
referring
to
program
guidelines
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
why
we
got
into
this
whole
program.
Guideline
discussion.
G
However,
whatever
way
we
do,
it
is
going
to
require
having
Charities
to
perhaps
do
a
lot
more
documentation,
so
it
might
just
be
easier
to
for
them
to
revise
their
guidelines
in
the
ways
that
they
explained
to
according
to
what
they
see
the
the
current
means
being,
and
then
the
program
guidelines
you
know
could
be
they
can
revisit
their
program
by,
like
the
earliest,
are
applying
to
us
and
submit
those
as
part
of
their
application.
So
that's
another
process
that
they
concur,
but
right
now
we're
looking
at
their
2022
contract,
which
is
about.
G
And
ultimately,
then,
there's
2023
contract
will
come
along
to
be
executed,
so
they
kind
of
wanted
some
congruency
here.
However,
I
will
say
that
the
exception
that
was
made
by
your
array
for
the
2021
contract
exclusively
has
to
do
with
expanding
the
exception
to
people
who
are
currently
unhoused
and
now
Catholic
Charities,
you
know
has
as
discussed
they've
gone
forward
and
looking
at
their
guidelines,
for
example,
that
rapidly
housing
piece.
G
Maybe
they
don't
want
that
in
there
anymore,
so
they
are
looking
at
some
different
types
of
exceptions
and
probably
they're
wanting
to
get
a
feel
from
this
committee
about
what
you
feel
is
reasonable.
So
they
could
submit
that
to
us
and
probably
on
review
this,
you
know-
maybe
at
the
next
meeting
or
something
like
that-
I
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
land
where
you
want
them
today,
although
you
could
make
businesses
yesterday
so
Michaela
mentioned
that
the
five-year
you
know
making
it
instead
of
a
one-time
beneficiary
that
you.
G
Every
five
years,
accepting
people
who
are
homeless
and
in
the
housing
for
our
school.
H
I
Well,
you
mentioned
the
rapid
rehousing
language.
I
would
like
to
have
that
taken
out.
We
aren't
participating
in
that
program.
We
don't
have
the
we're
too.
We
aren't
we're
pretty
confined
to
what
we
to
the
regulations
we
already
have
with
doing
the
security
deposit,
so
we
can't
move
any
faster,
so
usually
so,
I'm
not
sure
how
that
came
in
so
I
would
like
to
have
that
language
removed
from
our
paperwork,
not
to
say
that
you
know
so.
I
For
me,
in
a
perfect
world,
what
I
would
like
to
have
done
is
change
it
to
every
five
years
to
be
eligible
again,
but
still
be
able
to
have
these
exceptions
for
Case
by
case
whether
it's
limited
to
a
few
a
year
or
whatever,
but
it
would
be
for
people
who
are
literally
homeless
for
DV
situations
or
potentially
for
the
children
that
had
aged
out
of
their
parents
household.
So
that
would
be
a
perfect
world
for
me,
I
feel
like
there
was
something
else.
I
was
going
to
mention.
I
G
He
just
says
it's
causing
personal
success.
I
think
the
repair
is
familiar
with
that
a
review
people
exiting
home
assistant
families
in
bjm,
receivable
security,
deposit
Cheyenne,
have
another
question:
I,
don't
know
if
you
can.
B
Hear
her
I
was
just
trying
to
understand
so
the
five-year
when
the
potential
is
getting
one
benefit
in
five
years
and
in
addition,
if
there's
a
literal,
unhoused
situation
or
DB
situation,
that
would
be
an
exception
to
the
five
years.
I
C
A
My
understanding,
that
is,
that
the
important
part
is
not
so
much
that
every
five
years,
but
it's
people
who
are
homeless,
be
able
to
there
be
an
exception
for
them
to
be
able
to
get.
I
Yes,
but
we'd
also
like
to
include
DV
situations
and
parent
children
who've
aged
out
of
their
households.
Those
would
be
the
exceptions
where
we'd
wanted
to
do
Case
by
case.
I
We
can't
hear
you
I
wish
I
had
my
subtitle,
my
cat
subtitles
on
or
something
I'm.
Sorry.
G
F
H
G
H
G
Yes,
the
head
of
the
household:
are
they
not,
and
this
is
I,
think
more
of
a
I
need
to,
or
we
want
to
understand
your
the
how
the
record
keeping
works.
I
and
became
very
accurate,
more
in
2015
2016.,
but
when
we
enter
a
service
for
somebody
ahead
of
household,
it
applies
to
everybody
in
the
household.
So
if
we
were
to
look
up
Mary
when
she
grows
up
and
now
she's
21
and
we
look
at
her
Services
she's
going
to
have
somewhere
in
her
history,
it's
going
to
show
a
security
deposit,
and
so
we
would
have
to
look
into
that
and
figure
out.
Did
she
get
it
or
did
her
parent
get
it,
and
is
that
possible?
Like?
I
H
D
D
A
So
back
to
Fernando's
suggestion,
if
the
the
situation
that
caused
this,
this
request
of
the
modification
has
been
taken
care
of,
then
there
isn't
the
immediacy
because
it
was
a
person
or
a
household
that
was
homeless
and
they
needed
to
be
able
to
to
to
get
another
deposit
so
and
so
that
was
kind
of
the
well.
We
need
to
make
sure
the
person
is
not
out
on
the
street
somewhere,
but
it
sounds
like
that.
That's
been
taken
care
of,
and
so
we
do
have
some
time.
Yes,.
G
D
D
G
So,
in
terms
of
the
other,
you
know,
I
just
want
to
reiterate
what
what
we
should
say
that
I
think
it
would
be
valuable
for
the
so
for
the
committing
to.
Let
me
know
what
the
parameters
are
of
what
you
want
to
recommend
and
then
I
can
work
with
staff
in
crafting
a
resolution,
and
then
you.
G
Ways
I've
seen
it
happen
before
that.
The
that
the
changer
made
here
on
the
floor,
they're,
specified
and
then
kind
of
the
resolution
comes
forward
to
Ira
with
those
changes.
Carl
would
see
it
before
it
goes
there
or
you
can
we'll
begin
at
the
resolution
next
month
and
it'll
go
Ira
after
it
gets
to
the
state
that
you're
wanting
to
see
it.
C
G
Think
that
makes
sense,
because
the
way
this
situation
has
evolved,
which
yeah
it's
been
an
evolving
situation
and
they
still
have
some
2021
funds
and
it
sounds
like
they're
asking
for
a
more
specific.
You
know
more
expansive
contract
modification
for
their
2022
funding
that
hasn't
been
executed.
Yet
if
they
bring
those
program
guidelines
forward
with
your
kind
of
recommendation,
then
I'm
not
quite
clear
on
the
next
steps
as
it
hasn't
been
executed.
But
I
do
think
that
Ira
would
look.
G
And
change
their
2020
so
that
they
can
have
a
broader
exception
in
their
2022
contract
and
then
probably
from
there
we'll
go
forward
with
those
same
bed
Lanes
in
2023,
and
you
all
can
make
the
recommendation
that
they
visit
there
their
guidelines
periodically
so
that
before
they
bring
their
next
or
you
know
before
they
bring
an
application
to
Ira
for
funding.
You
know
at
the
beginning
of
every
year
they
maybe
already
have
looked
at
their
guidelines
to
understand
if
they
want
to
change
anything
that
year.
So
they
can.
Let
the
reviewers
know
that,
but.
E
So,
if
you're
looking
for
my
input
on
how
to
fix
this
resolution
and
I,
would
probably
leave
paragraph
IX
as
is
and
add
an
additional
paragraph,
that
would
incorporate
the
possibility
of
being
part
of
a
domestic
violence
situation,
aging
out
of
the
home
and
making
sure
and
then
another
paragraph
that
says
that
this
that
you
don't
want
this
to
continue
to
be
an
ongoing
situation.
E
You
don't
I,
don't
feel
you
want
to
limit
it
to
five
years.
I.
Just
think
that
there
must
there
needs
to
be
some
kind
of
statement
that
says
this
exception
can't
be
used
over
and
over
and
over
again
in
some
way
right.
So.
G
B
C
B
You
would
write
that
I
mean
I
feel
like
it
is
probably
the
best
for
Catholic
Charities
to
write
something
and
they
seem
to
have
a
good
sense
of
what
they
are
supposed
to
write
and
what
they
want
to
write
because,
for
example,
they
would
like
to
remove
the
language
about
the
rapid
Housing
Voucher.
If
they
understood
her
correctly
but
I
guess.
If
what
we.
What
we're
looking
for
is
just
a
whole
new
paragraph,
then
we're
sort
of
supportive
in
spirit,
and
they
should
write
it
and
we'll
see.
D
G
That
to
us
you're,
supporting
in
spirit
the
questions
or
the
areas
that
they'd
like
to
update,
but
then
they
submit
the
program
guidelines
to
this
committee
for
final
recommendation
is
that
what
I'm,
hearing
or
I.
B
Think
that's
what
I
would
recommend,
because
otherwise
we
give
them
things
and
then
they're
like
they
come
back
to
us
and
they're
like
that's,
not
really
exactly
what
we
meant:
blah
blah
blah
but
I.
Think
after
this
conversation
we
understand
what
they're
constraint,
how
they
are
currently
constrained,
how
they
haven't
updated
the
guidelines
and
and
you
and
they
know
more
about
what
had
literally
requires
or
doesn't
require.
B
G
I
mean
it's
resolved
in
that
they
can
now
expand
the
exception
for
unhoused
people,
which
is
what
they
originally
asked
for.
So
they
had
that
for
2021,
and
now
it's
like
it's
changed.
You
know
they.
Originally
they
just
wanted
to
carry
that
over
into
future
years,
but
in
revisiting
the
topic
they
realize
that
there's
more,
that.
G
Change
so
in
20,
they'll
submit
I'll,
follow
your
pathway
that
you,
if
everybody
agrees,
they'll,
submit
some
revised
guidelines
for
you
all
to
consider
yeah
recommending
to
Ira
and
those
revised
guidelines.
If
I
already
approved
upon
your
recommendation
will
be
included
in
22
22
contract
and
extensively.
G
That
was
happened
at
the
last
itinerary
meeting.
They
they
approved
it
for
2021
and,
and
the
chair
asked
for
ni
to
discuss
in
the
future
any
future
years
as
a
community
community.
Okay,.
A
And
I
agree
that
Catholic
Charities,
because
they
they
need
their
internal
discussions
about
what
the
exceptions
are,
as
McKayla
said,
they
want
to
add
domestic
violence
and
children
aging
out
of
the
household,
so
that
should
be
in
the
resolved
also,
and
then
it
should
apply
to
future,
because
it
makes
sense
that
you
know
this
will
come
up
again
in
the
future.
One
of
the
things
so
I
think
a
question
from
Michaela
is
so
they
track.
A
Who
has
received
the
the
the
vouchers,
but
do
they
know
the
reasons
why
the
person
doesn't
have
the
funds
in
hand?
So
was
it
right?
Because
the
security
deposit
follows
the
person
and
the
the
goal
is
that
they
move?
They
have
the
security
deposit
for
the
next
apartment.
But
of
course
we
know
that
sometimes
the
landlord
may
have
they
may
have
been
damaged,
and
so
the
landlord
keeps
a
portion
or
majority
of
the
deposit
or
the
person
who
got
the
deposit
back
and
didn't
use
it
for
another.
A
G
I
will
ask
that
question.
I
would
I
would
conject
her
two
things.
Consider
one
is
since
they
only
had
a
one-time
beneficiary,
since
somebody
could
only
get
one
and
then
one
in
their
lifetime
before
they
probably
didn't.
Ask
that
question
would
ask.
Would
this
particular
household
I'm
not
positive,
but
something
that
does
happen
is
more
time
transpires
right.
So
somebody
could
have
a
security
deposit
in
1990.
G
You
know
got
all
or
some
of
it
when
they
left
that
apartment
in
1993
and
moved
into
a
new
apartment
that
they
were
in
2000,
rented,
a
new
apartment
in
2001
and
2005
now
they're
in
a
situation
where
they
are
moving
in
a
security
deposit,
so
their
lifetime
thing
kind
of
follows
them.
So
it's
not
necessarily
one
after
another.
G
There
could
be
cases
where
somebody
like
had
a
security
deposit
and
immediately
the
next
apartment.
They
want
to
move
into
they're
applying
for
one
again
but
I.
Don't
know
that
they're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
record
of
that
because
of
this
one-time
beneficiary
policy
that
they
used
to
have,
but
we
can
discuss
that
with
them
and
ask
them
what
they
think.
You
know
how
and
if
they
should
start
asking
questions
as
to
what
I
need
the
security
deposit.
A
B
Mean
I
think
my
sense
of
the
they're
they're.
They
are
the
ones
that
came
by
weird,
so
I
and
and
that
these
things,
like
domestic
violence
and
aging
out,
are
exceptions
to
The
Five-Year,
and
that
meant
that
they
were
finding
people
who,
like
many
years
down
the
road
were
from
their
initial
benefit,
were
not
a
or
we're
not
eligible,
but
also
they've
run.
These
applicants
through
strict
criteria
in
the
first
place,
so
presumably
that
that
wouldn't
change.
A
Now
there
will
be
certainly
valid
reasons
for
someone
to
come
back.
You
know,
but
then
there
will
also
be
people
who
abuse
the
system
and
so
I.
Just
actually
is
there
a
way
to
distinguish,
and
we
don't
certainly
don't
want
to
put
more
record-keeping
burdens
on
them,
but
it
is
government
money.
So
we
have
to
make
sure
that
this
is
divisive
views
and
I'm
sure
Captain
Jerry.
This
is
doing
you
know
their
new
deal
due
diligence,
yeah.
G
I
think
this
will
require
using
my
declaration.
What
I
will
say
is,
as
you've
already
said,
the
the
security
deposits
administration
of
that
is
quite.
G
There's
a
lot
of
documentation
that
they
need
to
submit
for
each
for
each
reimbursement
and
there's
a
lot
of
documentation
they
that,
therefore
they
gather
from
the
applicant
I
mean
I.
Think
part
of
this
really
goes
to
the
heart
of.
Is
there
a
way
for
them?
That's
acceptable
to
make
case,
like
a
certain
number
of
case-by-case
exceptions,
an
ear,
because
it's
very
hard
to
write
a
broad
policy
to
capture
all
of
the
the
different
factors
that
we've
talked
about
and
which
are
all
very
important
factors
to
consider.
G
G
I
could
see
that
being
requested,
so
I
requested
from
us
or
requested.
What's
that
requested.
B
I
B
G
A
B
Application
for
for
the
to
waive
the
the
aid
exception
or
to
to
create
the
exception,
I
mean
she's,
saying
that
basically
they
have
three
criteria,
and
so,
if
you
don't
meet
that
criteria,
it
might
not
work,
but
also
to
have
a
five-year
have
five
years
where
you
can't
repeat,
and
then
even
within
those
five
years.
You
have
like
these
three
criteria.
If
I
understood
what
you
would
be
investing
and
to
me
that
seems
like
quite
Fair,
okay.
A
Right
they
have
some
internal
work,
that
in
terms
of
their
policy
and
then
once
they
get
that
done,
then
yeah
say
to
to
Anisa
here's.
What
we'd
like
to
included
for
the
exceptions
and
again
there
is
no
Rush
on
this
and
doesn't
appear
to
be
that
it
can
come
back
to
us
next
month
and
then
go
to
the
board
rather
than
us,
rushing
it
to
get
this
done
to
go
to
the
board
next
week
or
two
weeks.
H
A
A
Okay,
any
other
business
I
think
I
mean
so
you
were
able
to
give
us
the
full
stamp
report.
Was
there
anything
else.
A
Had
pushed
out
here,
I
think
that's
one
question
for
you
and
it
may
be
too
early
to
to
know,
but
just
how
things
are
going
in
terms
of
the
transition
with
Charles
being
a
remote
and
you
having
to
take
out
some
more.
G
Was
totally
set
up
and
have
the
YouTube
channel
up
already
before
you
came
in,
but
I
will
ask
the
planning
department
if
they've
experienced
the
difficulty
with
the
microphones,
because
I
know
that
there
was
a
time
that
Charles
had
a
meeting
that
one
of
the
owls
stopped
working
but
as
far
as
I
can
tell
they
both
have
lights
on
so
but
otherwise
no,
it's
I've
asked
him.
G
It
seems
like
you're,
not
set
up
very
quickly,
I
checked
in
with
him
a
couple
times
and
it
seems,
like
things
are
running
fine
and
things
are
fine
on
her
end
he's
just
as
many
responsive
as
ever
and
I
I.
Do
wonder.
If
he's
he,
there
was
the
on
his
first
day.
Actually
there
was
a
problem.
Logging,
like
city-wide
logging
into
our
remote,
promote
access
to
our
shared
drives.
G
A
And
with
a
temporary
hire
to
do
minutes,
will
that
person
go
back
and
review
past
recordings
and
do
minutes
or
when
they
start
from
their
higher
day
taking
medicine
and
the
reason
I
ask
that
is:
are:
are
there
requirements
that
we
have
the
minutes
because
we
haven't
really
approved
any
in
a
while?
So
if
there's
a
requirement
that
we,
then
you
know,
go
through
it
and
make
a
motion
and
approve
each
of
the
past
minutes,
you
know
from
whenever.
G
I
believe
well,
like
I,
said,
I.
Think.
A
lot
of
this
depends
on
how
quickly
that
person
gets
up
to
speed
on
Ira,
Linens
and
eating
nuts,
because
those
are
the
minister
Charles
person.
So
we've
asked
the
per.
G
What
we
would
like
is
for
the
person
to
be
present
at
all
the
meetings
that
are
hybrid,
including
the
mm
meeting,
and
then
take
minutes
and
view
the
recordings
going
forward
for
the
two,
the
board
and
the
Ed
committee
committee,
and
then,
if
they
have
time
they
will
look
back
at
and
nine
minutes,
but
I
would
have
them
go
back
to
the
most
recent.
G
Instead
of
starting
an
apartment
there,
I
will
talk
to
Nells
about
what
to
do
about
the
situation
that
we
haven't
had
and
there's
been
quite
a
while
to
be
able
to
approve
I
know
that
there's
other
that
situations
occurred
in
other
places
in
the
city
that
there's
a
backbone
of
them
is
that
need
to
be
created.
Although
there
are
recordings
of
that
in
the
past,
there
were
never
recordings
of
the
meetings.
That
was
something
there
that
we
started.
A
Yeah,
because
if
there
is
a
requirement
that
we
take
a
vote
and
approve
each
minutes,
you
know
each
month's
minutes,
then
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
honor
that
requirement
yeah,
if
that,
regardless
meant
by
there
being
a
recording,
that's
fine.
Okay,
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
violating
it
absolutely.
Okay,
any
other
business.
Today,
it's
gonna
make
a
motion
to
adjourn
back
a
second
all
right
thanks
everyone
that
was.