►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (4/5/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I
now
call
this
meeting
of
the
board
of
adjustment
to
order
and
before
we
do
our
roll
call,
I
would
just.
A
In
all,
decisions
at
the
board
will
be
based
on
competent,
substantial
evidence,
including
testimony
provided
in
this
meeting.
Any
person
who
is
not
an
applicant
or
agent
who
wishes
to
speak
will
need
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
located
on
the
side
table
by
the
door
and
turn
them
into
the
clerk
that
table
right
back
there.
Each
member
of
the
public,
who
wishes
to
speak
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
on
each
item.
Please
refrain
from
speaking
from
the
audience
or
from
applause
or
cheering,
and
please
silence
your
cell
phones.
A
A
A
B
Okay,
as
a
reminder,
each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
when
we
open
the
public
hearing.
Does
any
board
member
have
any
export
communication
they
wish
to
disclose
about
this
agenda
item.
Okay,.
C
D
D
A
A
It
looks
like
there
is:
it
looks
like
there
are
cars
parked
there,
I'm
guessing
that
they
are
parked
there,
that
their
residence
and
on
the
property
boundary
that's
been
superimposed.
Yes
right
there.
It
looks
as
though
the
vehicles
are
happen.
Half
out
is
that,
what's
sort
of
prompting
the
parking
request
that
people
are
parking
there
right
now,
but
technically
they're
not
parking
spots,
because
the
back
half
of
them
is
on
city
property.
A
A
A
A
So
the
motion
to
amend
the
motion
has
been
approved,
so
I
guess:
do
we
just
vote
on
devotion
as
amended
now?
Okay,
then,
can
we
please
have
a
roll
call
vote
for
the
motion,
as
amended
to
condition
the
property
that
this
I'm
sorry,
the
public
hearing.
D
D
Approved
based
on
the
existing
building,
if,
for
some
reason
you
had
to
completely
replace
the
building,
you
can
go
back
and
build
a
new
building.
It's
just
that
the
provisions
of
the
setbacks
and
those
sorts
of
things
are
unique
to
this
structure,
so
the
new
building
might
need
different
variances
to
be
able
to
comply.
That's
all!
Okay!
Thank
you
very
much.
B
C
C
Thank
you,
and
can
you
please
describe
the
nature
of
your
hardship
at
this
property.
D
This
hardship
is
very
much
similar
in
nature
to
the
previous
hardship.
This
five
similar
building
as
on
the
previous
lost
stage
size,
same
considerations
for
setback
on
the
northeast
west
and
south
property
lines,
parking
and
unit
sizes
old
for
the
property
built
in
1948
according
to
the
property
record
prior
to
the
adoption
of
the
current
use
code.
D
A
Considerations,
same
insurance,
companies
say
market
pretty
much
exactly
the
same
considerations
same
building
built
by
the
same
people.
At
the
same
time.
That's
why
I
said
we
believe
the
other
building
was
built
earlier
on
the
property
record.
We
haven't
found
another
one
built
in
the
60s.
So
but
neither
say
it's
all
built
before
the
current
was
adopted.
A
A
F
A
B
A
Minutes
to
speak
once
we
open
the
public
hearing.
Does
the
board
have
any?
Does
any
board
member
have
any
expertise,
communication
on
this
agenda
item
I've
had
no
I've
had
none.
I've
had
none.
I've
had
no
okay
with
the
applicant
or
owner.
Please
come
forward
to
be
sworn
in
and
give
your
presentation.
C
C
C
A
A
A
C
C
C
These
are
very
small
lots.
We
had
a
real
shoehorning
battle
a
little
over
20
years
ago,
when
we
built
our
house
existing
on
that
lot.
As
you
see
in
the
picture,
is
a
house
and
then
kind
of
a
garage
with
a
a
room.
Above
ever
since
we
moved
in,
we
were
looking
forward
to
redevelopment
and
something.
C
A
So
if
I
have
one
good
neighbor,
the
other
two
might
be
anything.
So
our
hope,
since
we
built
ours,
is
that
there
would
be
some
sensible
redevelopment.
A
A
I
find
it
hard
to
believe
that
one
person
in
one
property
could
have
two
different
rights.
I
would
hope,
but
I'm
not
the
lawyer
here,
that
this
would
supersede
the
other
and
some
future
time
we're
not
living
with
boy
that
was
approved
back
in
22,
and
then
they
approved
something
else,
an
opinion.
But
that's
all
I
have
thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who's
not
filled
out
a
speaker's
card
that
wishes
to
speak
and
if
so,
please
fill
out
a
speaker's
partner.
Anybody.
Okay,
hearing,
no
further
public
speakers.
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
the
item
back
before
the
board
for
discussion.
Is
there
a
motion.
A
A
Riveting
I
mean
twists
and
turns,
I
know
I
think
most
of
us
have
sat
through
all
the
times
that
this
property
has
come
before
the
board.
So
it
is
very
nuanced
and
there's
a
lot
of
context
there.
So
thank
you
for
spelling
that
all
out-
and
I
agree
with
mr
true
it's
nice
to
see
it
come
to
this.
F
A
A
A
A
A
So
there's
two
sheds
that
have
been
removed,
which
is
the
one
on
the
south
east
corner,
which
was
in
three
feet
of
the
property
line
that
has
been
removed
on
the
west
south
side
as
well,
which
is.
B
B
F
F
F
B
B
B
So
you
are
receptive
if
we
go
to
one
side
stepping
stones.
Yes,
that's
a
possibility.
G
So
I
wasn't
going
to
address,
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
don't
I
don't
agree.
I
have
a
house
down
the
street
and
my
neighbor
went
through
the
same
thing
where
she
decided
to
pave
her
whole
backyard
or
whole
side
yard,
and
it
flooded
my
yard
consistently.
I
I
don't
know
what
we're
doing
to
change
any
of
that,
but
I
went
out
of
variance
and
I
followed
the
rules
and
I
put
drainage
in
and
I
make
sure
that
I'm
not
the
problem
in
this
neighborhood,
where
we
are
very
tight.
G
But
it
looks
to
me
like
we're
putting
papers
right
on
the
property
line.
Those
are
going
to
flood
the
neighbors
and
I'm
not
one
of
the
neighbors,
I'm
just
telling
you
I
went
through
it.
This
is
painful
because
you
again
they
can't
they
can't
keep
that
from
happening.
Unless
they,
you
guys,
put
some
kind
of
drainage
in
there.
You
know
you
can
look
at
her
pull
back
in
the
back
and
again,
I'm
not
picking
on
just
her.
G
G
C
F
And
we
discussed
if
it
was
necessary.
F
F
F
Now
you
know
to
the
applicant's
concerns
about
her
crap.
F
Letting
her
repave
the
driveway
or
replace
it
with
stone
papers
as
it
current
you
know,
in
its
current
footprint.
Would
there
still
be
because
I
know
there's
no
sorry.
This
is
a
very
long
motion.
A
A
A
A
A
E
C
A
And
christian,
the
extra
driveway-
that's
not
required
by
code
at
this
time.
F
A
E
Kind
of
tonight
as
well,
but
the
building
department
is
working
on
some.
E
G
G
A
A
A
A
Or
that
short-term
rentals
for
uses
such
as
airbnb
were
allowed
in
the
city
as
long
as
you
go
through
the
proper
process,
we're
not
allowed
to
make
decisions
based
on
that
criteria
and
then,
as
for
the
hardship,
it
really
has
more
to
do
with
the
code
and
the
properties
than
this
board.
I
know
we
seem
very
authoritative
up
here
in
our
chairs,
but
we
really
are
bound
by
six
actually
six
very
specific
criteria,
as
it
relates
to
the
land
development
code.
A
A
hardship
is
created
if
a
person
has
aspects
of
their
property
that
don't
conform
to
the
wind
development
code.
So
if
you
know
most
of
jacksonville
beach,
or
at
least
the
standard
size
lot
is
supposed
to
be
10
000
square
feet.
So
if
somebody
purchases
a
home
in
residential
rs1,
which
has
a
10
000
square
foot
standard
lot
size
and
the
lot
that
they
purchase
is
only
8
500
square
feet,
they
purchase
a
non-conforming
lot
and
that's
not
their
fault
per
se.
A
It's
just
non-conforming
based
on
the
code
and
that's
why.
As
you
heard
our
staff
member
mentioned,
we
are
beginning
the
process
with
the
consultant
to
review
the
code
and
make
amendments
to
it
to
potentially
alter
aspects
like
that,
so
that
fewer
lots
of
record
are
by
default
non-conforming,
which
would
then
lead
to
fewer
variances
having
to
be
granted.
But
that's
where
the
need
for
variance
comes
in
is
when
lots
are
non-conforming
just
because
of
the
way
that
they
were
planted.