►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting (10/10/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
I
have
some
remarks
if
I
may,
before
we
can
get
into
the
agenda
so
just
how
it
how
it
all
works-
and
you
hear
this
from
me
at
every
meeting
or
playing
official
meetings
or
quasi-judicial
nature.
All
decisions
of
admission
work
based
non-confidence,
essential.
A
So
to
speak,
we'll
need
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
with
index
on
this
side
table
by
the
door
and
turn
it
into
the
club.
Each
member
of
the
public
will
be
doing
three
minutes
to
speak
out
in
China.
A
Or
the
audience
and
closer
sharing
happens,
it's
not
encourage.
Please
silence
your
cell
phone
there's
also
something
that
I
wanted
to
address
with
my
fellow
Commissioners.
If
you
guys
are
clients,
I
I
felt
after
our
last
meeting.
I
certainly
was
in
the
need
of
some
additional
training
on
how
best
to
handle
meetings
relatively
new
to
this
hour.
A
B
A
And
so
going
forward,
I
think
it
will
be
easier
to
figure
out
if
that's
true,
if
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
about
what
our
position
is
on
that
motion,
that
will
then
give
us
the
opportunity
to
know
whether
something
excited
to
to
go
through
or
not
so,
I'll
just
vote
on
it.
Some
submissions
was
it
and
that's.
C
Because
if
you
have
discussion
and
then
the
discussion
is
complete
now
we
have
had
a
couple
of
businesses
for
there's
been
a
jackrabbit
motion
before
we've
had
a
chance
to
discuss
right
and
that's
been
I.
Think
pretty
much
talked
through,
and
everybody
understands
that
you
need
to
pause
a
little
bit
and
give
people
the
chance
to
to
discuss.
C
A
More
discussion
well
I
I
will
I
will
talk
to
the
attorney
and
and
I
guess
so
I
guess:
there's
I'm
going
to
sort
of
refine
how
I
run
the
meetings
going
forward
so
stay
tuned,
but
I
guess
the
other
question
is:
is
there
interest
in
having
a
training
that
would
be?
A
A
C
I'm
good
because
I
got
trained
from
the
previous
City
attorney,
but
so
I
think
I
have
a
pretty
good
understanding
of
it.
So
I'm,
okay,
yeah
I,
mean
I'm
open
to
it.
I
think
that
there's
always
Instagram
to
learn
more
about,
especially
out
some
of
the
terms
development
processes
are
going
to
do
it.
Okay,
totally
agree,
I
think
it's
always
a
good
idea
would
be
think
we
know.
We've
got
a
couple
of
network
calls
here.
That's
for
sure
you
know
so.
Okay,.
A
A
D
A
Thank
you.
We
have
minutes
before
us
from
the
meeting
from
September
12th
the
comments
on
the
sales.
Those
changes.
A
So
if
you
can
just
those
in
favor,
please
say:
hi
hi
motion
carries
Mr
Pro
police.
Do
we
have
any
correspondence.
C
B
Good
evening
Madam
chair
and
plenty
Commissioners
Heather,
Ireland
planning
and
development
director
I'm
here
to
present
the
staff
report
for
PC
18-22,
which
is
a
Redevelopment
District,
rezoning
Amendment
application.
So
this
is
an
existing
r
d.
Zoning
that
the
applicant
has
filed
to
amend
slightly
so
I'll
run
through
that
with
you
not
going
to
read
a
staff
report
of
verbatim,
but
I've
got
a
little
presentation
for
you
and
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
applicants
agent
to.
B
And
then
we
can
answer
any
questions
you
all
have
actually
gotta
flip
ahead,
a
little
bit
to
just
make
sure
everyone
understands
the
property
location
we're
talking
about.
This
is
almost
an
entire
block
Bound
by
first
and
second
streets,
North
and
sixth
and
7th
Avenues
North
used
to
be
home
to
a
restaurant
and
I
believe
a
Salvation
Army,
it's
been
vacant
for
quite
some
time.
The
property
was
resumed.
B
Rv,
originally
back
in
2012
for
multi-family
commercial
mixed-use
project
again
was
amended
in
2016
and
2017
a
very
similar
project
ending
in
what
is
the
currently
approved
Rd
reselling,
which
is
for
54
residential
units,
57
hotel
rooms
and
2500
square
feet
of
commercial.
The
applicant
has
applied
to
again
amend
the
Rd
zoning
to
further
clarify
the
commercial
uses
on
the
property
I'm
gonna.
Go
back
would
like
to
additionally
add
that
they
do
have
a
vested
height
of
68
feet
that
was
granted
for
a
judge
in
a
negotiated
settlement.
B
So
really
the
the
component
that
they're
asking
to
amend
in
our
degree,
zoning
the
hotel
rooms
and
multi-family
units
are
proposed
to
remain
the
same.
They
want
to
clarify
the
commercial
uses
as
4
000
square
feet
of
restaurant.
That
would
be
part
of
the
hotel
and
a
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
space.
Again,
the
number
of
hotel
and
apartments
remain
the
same,
and
all
parking
is
being
provided
for
the
requirements
of
the
Land
Development
code.
So
here's
their
proposed
site
plan.
B
It's
pretty
much
the
same
footprint
as
was
approved
in
the
most
recent
2017
Amendment.
The
changes
are
occurring
here,
which
you
see
in
a
kind
of
a
yellow,
color
here,
just
again
clarifying
what
those
commercial
uses
are
a
little
further
than
what
was
in
the
previous
approval.
B
This
was
oh
I'm.
Sorry
I
want
to
skip
this
they've,
provided
some
updated
elevations
with
the
project
application
as
well,
not
significantly
different
from
what
was
in
the
2017
application.
For
those
of
you
who
were
here
and
remember,
the
application
was
reviewed
by
the
community
redevelopment
agency
at
their
September
26th
meeting
and,
as
with
the
previous
iterations
of
this,
zoning
District
was
found
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
downtown
CRA
plan,
and
they
did
recommend
approval
with
just
a
couple
of
notes
that
I
will
read
to
you.
B
One
of
the
first
items
that
the
CRA
wanted
to
see
was
that
the
applicant
reviews
the
site
plan
to
identify
any
opportunities
to
relocate
the
dumpster,
which
is
currently
shown
right
here
again.
The
site
plan
has
been
approved
already.
The
dumpster
location
has
historically
been
here
on
all
iterations
of.
B
Those
commercial
uses
that
you'll
see
here
that
are
friendly,
6th,
Street
From
staff's
perspective.
This
is
actually
a
more
compliant
application.
With
the
current
code
and
the
CRA
downtown
Redevelopment
plan,
it's
up.
It's
offering
more
front
facing
retail
and
Commercial
uses
on
6th
Avenue
North,
so
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
this
Rd
reselling
Amendment
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Mr
Diva.
Now,
who
I'm
sure
wants
to
share
some
information.
B
So
great
question:
thank
you.
The
the
difference
was
really
just
the
commercial
component,
so
it
went
from
2500
square
feet
of
kind
of
unspecified
commercial.
If
you
will
to
a
little
bit
more
clarified
with
they
what
they
know,
they
want
to
do
a
restaurant
now
around
4
000
square
feet
and
then
that
hundred
square
feet
of
retail
space
and
then
there'll
be
a
portion
that
is
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
read
it
from
there,
but
the
center
is
really
that
hotel
and
condo
Lobby
that's
right
at
the
center.
B
Then
you
have
the
retail
over
here
on
the
western
side
and
then
the
restaurant
right
here
on
the
corner.
The
prior
application
really
just
identified
it
as
commercial.
They
weren't
really
sure,
but
not
that
they've
really
nailed
down
what
they
want
to
do.
They've
come
in
to
kind
of
solidify
those
square,
footages
and
sizzling
better.
B
B
A
Thank
you
who
the
African
police
come
forward
and
reported
and
giving
the
presentation.
Of
course,
Steve
even
I
want
to
look
in
the
Drive
Suite.
D
F
F
And
you
can
see
from
the
site
plan
that
I
just
handed
out
that
remind
me
again
how
I
get
the
okay
right
here,
where
it
says
Beach
here
in
retail,
this
little
area
was
shown
as
a
hotel
lobby,
and
then
all
of
this
is
shown
as
basically
lockers
and
storage
areas.
So
there
was
no
activation
at
all
in
sixth.
So
this
this
area
in
the
middle
is
really
what
has
has
come
alive,
I
think
the
original
playing
at
a
2500
square
foot
restaurant
with
about
a
1600
square
foot
Lobby.
F
This
obviously
has
about
a
3
000
square
foot,
Lobby
about
a
four
thousand
square
foot
restaurant
and
then
another
1500
or
1800
square
feet
of
retail
right
in
this
area.
And
so
what
we've
done
here
is
we've.
We've
lived
within
the
footprint
of
the
original
approval,
because
that's
what
the
court
approved.
F
We
had
some
conversations
about
the
setbacks
and
some
clarifications
on
what
setbacks
were
set
pack,
D
here
and
c,
and
then
setback
A
and
B,
and
then
we
did
have
conversations
here
about
the
dumpster
and
we
also
had
conversations
about
this
facade
on
the
first
shoot.
So
let
me
go
the
First
Street
first,
we
agree,
we
hate
horseshoe,
we
hate
the
way
it
was
designed,
there's
nothing.
We
could
do
about
it,
because
this
is
kind
of
how
it
came
as
a
result
of
the
court
order.
F
This
is
one
of
the
properties
grandfathered
Loosely
by
the
courts
to
allow
it
to
go
up
to
68
feet,
but
in
order
to
get
that
grandfather,
you
have
to
build
what
was
approved
by
the
courts.
So
this
L-shaped
building
is
what
was
approved
and
again
reaffirmed
in
the
last
two
resonance.
So
unfortunately,
there's
no
way
to
really
activate
First
Street,
but
what
I
can
say
since
our
last
meeting
is
the
first
street
is
not
going
to
just
be
gray
concrete
beams,
that's
the
side
of
a
parking
garage.
F
It's
going
to
be
activated
somehow,
either
with
art
or
facades
or
a
screen
wall.
We
haven't
had
enough
time
to
actually
design
or
show
what
it's
going
to
be,
but
this
will
have
some
type
of
activation.
It's
not
going
to
be
just
a
concrete
wall
that
has
openings
for
ventilation
for
the
garage.
We
want
it
to
look
nice.
We
wanted
to
look
activated
and.
F
Or
facade
or
different
materials,
it
will
be
second
issue
that
we
discussed
was
regarding
the
dumpster,
and
so
let
me
share
what
we've
looked
at
on
the
dumpster.
So
the
same
group
that
owns
this
also
known
as
this
and
so
right
now,
the
dumpster
for
that
for
this
property
is
right
here.
So
what
we've
done
is
we've
looked
at
the
ability
to
combine
this
and
this
together
and
that's
what
we're
going
to
do.
So.
F
The
only
question
here
is:
how
do
we
memorialize
the
fact
that
this
dumpster
will
move
and
be
combined
with
this
piece
of
property
which
is
off-site
so
I?
Don't
know
exactly
how
I'm
really
hitting
Heather
if
it's
cold,
and
also
the
attorney
Miss
Robinson
as
well
so
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
we're
going
to
do
this,
but
we're
willing
to
forego
this
we're
going
to
do
landscaping
and
parking
here
instead
and
we'll
move
the
dumpster
either
here
or
we'll
move
the
dumpster
somewhere
in
here
so
somewhere
in
the
interior
of
the
property.
F
C
E
A
Right,
thank
you.
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing.
I
don't
have
any
student
cards.
Is
there
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak?
You
can
speak
now
and
then
fill
out
a
part.
E
D
E
That's
located
here
that
we
were
just
discussing.
I
am
the
closest
resident
to
that
dumpster
of
about
a
25
feet
away
from
that.
I
am
super
glad
that
they
are
going
to
do
a
bit
over
there
and
I
would
just
hope
that
yeah
Remains
the
case
and
then
it
doesn't
in
the
future,
get
pushed
back
to
its
current
location.
E
Currently,
it
doesn't
look
great
and
we
all
the
neighbors
are
really
excited
for
it
to
happen.
So
if
you
guys
can
help
them
out,
that'd
be
awesome.
That
being
said,
we
do
have
a
drainage
issue
in
the
area
and.
E
Obviously,
as
you
know,
there's
going
to
be
something
right
now,
it's
a
lot
of
dirt
and
trees
that
help
collect
the
water
when
it
rains,
but
if
there
can
be
somewhere
looked
into
helping
the
area
drain
better
because
that's
not
going
to
be
here
anymore
when
this
project
comes
in.
So
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
E
C
A
A
B
C
I
think
the
additions
here
are
great
and
obviously
the
project
is
much
anticipated
and
I
think
I.
Think
what
they're
proposing
here
is
honestly
an
improvement
and.
B
But
that's
correct,
as
Mr
Diva
now
stated,
they,
the
developer
does
own
that
property
I.
Just
don't
have
to
look
at
the
code
and
see
what
Provisions
there
are
to
allow
that
and
then
get
with
Public
Works.
We
usually
talk
about
things
like
dumpster
location,
access
for
other
things,
utilities
missed
as
part
of
the
pre-app
meeting,
so
we'll
just
have
to
install
the
public
works
to
see
what
their
thoughts
are
on
a
different
location
and
making
sure
it
can
handle
the
capacity
for
this
project.
So.
C
C
F
Was
fantastic?
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
helping
me
okay.
So
this
is
a
driveway
and
right
now
the
dumpster
is
right
here
that
serves
the
Ocean
View
Apartments.
So
if
we
are
able
to
combine
the
dumpsters,
then
what
we
would
do
is
we'd
put
them
here
and
we
would
enclose
them
both.
Then
we
wouldn't
have
to
do
anything
with
with
other
than
just
use
the
same
driveway.
F
F
F
That's
basically
I
could
cross
Access
season
between
the
two
that
allows
this
project
to
use
this
sumpster,
not
on
their
property
and
that's
what
we
would
share
with
public
works
and
that's
what
we
will
be
advocating
to
do
if
we
go
exclusively
with
an
Upshur
here.
Obviously,
if
we
go
down
to
here,
we
won't
need
that
agreement,
but
that's
how
we
would
pay
for
it.
F
Still
have
the
agreement,
are
you
recorded,
and
it
would
require
these
guys
to
take
the
trash
from
these
guys
in
this
location
or
someplace.
They'd
be
truly
agree
to
put
it
otherwise,
but
either
way,
I
think
there's
a
way
we,
like
I,
said
we
just
had
conversations
with
the
Architects
and
the
owners
earlier
this
week
earlier
today,
and
so
this
is
definitely
a
condition
that
we
can
get
rid
of,
even
though
it's
been
existing
in
the
last
two
iterations
of
the
approval.
C
B
Is
yeah?
Thank
you.
Mr
doll,
yeah
they'll
be
required
to
do
on-site.
Water
retention.
Obviously
there's
no
Pond
there,
so
it'll
all
be
underground.
Just
like
you've
seen
Margaritaville
Spring,
Hill
Suites,
all
their
storm.
Water
retention
for
the
site
goes
underground
and
ties
into
the
city
system,
so
it
will
be
addressed
in
their
site
planning
right.
C
Yes,
so
just
a
reminder
that
October
27th
is
going
to
be
the
joint
Planning,
Commission
VOA
meeting
asked
me
a
ticket
Workshop
rather
on
the
comp
plan
that
development
code
I
also
wanted
to
point
out
that
our
first
meeting
on
this
project,
which
will
be
a
Citizens
meeting,
is
actually
this
Thursday
and
you
guys
are
welcome
to
attend
that
as
well.
If
you
just
want
to
come
here
with
it
six
to
eight,
so
you
want
to
come
here
with
you
know.