►
From YouTube: Collective Bargaining Meeting, 09/29/2022
Description
Collective Bargaining Meeting, 09/29/2022
A
A
There's
a
couple
of
things
that
from
the
city
Side
we
wanted
to
discuss
and
and
present
at
the
table
before
we
move
it
on
to
you.
What?
Because
it's
going
to
affect
our
proposals
as
they
moves
forward
with
regard
to
I
know.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
we
had
some
discussions
about
the
Grievances
that
were
related
to
the
chief's
policy
on
secondary
or
outside
employment.
A
Yes,
they
were
pending
at
that
time
and
I
know
that
we
had
discussed
a
resolution
and
we
were
discussing
it
at
the
table.
I
believe
when
I
spoke
to
the
chief
I
believe
that
there
has
been
a
resolution
in
for
those
three
grievances
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
correct
and
place
it
on
the
record
that
there
were
three.
C
A
Osano
grievance
has
been
dismissed,
okay
and
then
there's
two
other
pending
grievances.
One
was
Mr
chapa's
grievance
and
the
other
agreements
was
Mr
delgado's
degree.
Is
that
correct?
What
is
what's
the
status
of
those
grievances.
A
B
Started
memorized
I
think
it's
still
enormous
thing:
I
think
that
she
was
still
planning
to
put
it
out,
but
when
we
talked
about
it,
it
basically
resolved.
We
actually
had
a
meeting
in
Joaquin
was
here
that
day.
B
B
Yesterday,
because
there
was
an
issue-
I
guess
with
the
wording
of
it,
but
it
did
reflect
how
the
previous
memo
was.
We
cleared
it
up
and
he's
gonna
make
sure
that
that
wording
is
cleared
to
his
his
command
stuff.
Okay,
so
that
basically
addresses
and
cheers
up
all
the
Grievances
from
their
being
resolved.
A
B
I'm
not
sure
if
he
did
mention
I
guess
before
we
move
on.
There
was
also
another
pending
I'm,
not
sure
he
told
you
about
it.
There
was
a
pending
grievance
and
actually
in
reality,
had
nothing
to
do
with
the
wording.
We
aren't
proposed
to
change
any
wording,
and
this
was
concerning
Mr
Juan
Cruz.
B
This
grievance
was
basically
he
was
ordered
to
quarantine,
even
though
it
wasn't
it
was
in
Kobe.
He
said:
hey,
okay,
to
go
back
you're
telling
me
it's
not
covered
they're
like
no.
You
have
to
quarantine,
but
you
have
to
use
your
own
leave
so
that
reason
was
filed,
then
my
opinion,
it
really
has
no
hindrance
on
the
contract
itself
that
was
actually
found
before
even
before
we
started
making
someone
mistakes.
A
Okay,
so
that's
a
contractual
grievance
related
to
a
person's
own
leads.
B
B
B
E
B
Provision,
you
know
and
I've
actually,
since
that
occurrence
it's
occurred
200
times,
and
that
was
resolved
by
basically
just
the
correction
of
how
the
lead
was
how
there
was
supposed
to
be
either
placed
on
leave
or
basically
allowed
to
come
back,
and
it
was
up
to
them
if
they
wanted
to.
You
know,
stay
away
from
the
job,
just
not
to
get
anybody
else.
Sick,
okay,.
B
Works
in
the
process
not
sure
the
guy
I
know,
I
delivered
it
to
the
city
manager's
office
except
I,
believe
there
was
might
have
been
some
kind
of
mixed
week.
I
think
that
was
towards
the.
F
There's
no
federal
response
from
City
management,
but
it'll
be
going
up,
it
will
be
going
to
arbitration
and
then
we
can
talk
about
the
nearest
that
time.
Okay,
but
I
agree
with
Mr
Rosano
that
it
does
not
affect
what
we're
doing
here
right
today
or
any
issues
that
have
been.
G
Brought
up
during
these
negotiations.
A
Okay
and
that's
why
we
had
not
addressed
it
as
we
did
as
when
we
were
speaking
of
the
Grievances
last
time
and
today,
that's
why
we
hit
we
hadn't
addressed.
It
died.
B
And
I
I
was
led
to
believe
that
it
was
going
to
be
resolved
in
a
certain
manner.
It
apparently
didn't
and
we
are
doing
arbitration
and
that's
why
I
haven't
been
brought
up.
Okay,
like
I,
say
it
doesn't
says
it
doesn't
affect
you
know
from
our
part
or
around
the
Department's
part
where
if
something
was
done,
that
would
affect
the
contract.
A
Okay
and
we've
already
tentatively
agreed
to
article
6
on
the
rights
of
management,
because
I
know
that
was
one
of
the
big
issues
in
those
grievances
right.
C
C
A
A
And
then,
once
that's
issued
and
you're
able
to
review
it,
the
grievance
will
most
likely
dismiss
their
grievances
right.
Okay,
we'll
keep
update
we'll
just
keep
updated
on
that
I'm.
B
A
The
command
stuff
all
right
and
then
my
understanding
is
that
the
because
I
know
it
was
brought
up
earlier
about
using
abl
or
because
you
receive
a
stipend
from
the
union
or
some
sort
of
money
that
the
that
particular
policy
with
regard
to
outside
employment
does
not
apply
to
Union
business
or
your
ability
to
conduct.
You
know
to
do
the
union
stuff
such
as
being
here
today.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
okay,.
A
Foreign
okay,
last
time
we
left
off
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
believe
and
I
just
need
to
confirm.
I
have
them
prepared,
but
I
believe
that
we
had
tentative
agreements
on
two
articles
for
no
changes,
and
that
was
article
12.
D
A
A
Let
me
pull
up
the
so
I've
just
prepared
the
tentative
agreement
on
the
Staffing
of
companies
for
no
change,
which
leaves
the
Endeavor
to
staff
or
the
and
the
desired
strength
with
the
engines
crash
fire
and
rescue
the
area,
ladders
at
four
firefighters,
Emergency,
Medical
Services
at
two
firefighters,
emergency,
medical
technicians
or
paramedics,
fire
prevention
and
fire
investigation
at
four
firefighters
and
just
on
the
bottom
I
just
reformatted,
because
it
was
kind
of
difficult
the
way
to
to
read
the
way
it
was,
but
it
the
the
wording
is
the
same.
A
E
E
B
I,
just
this
historical
marker
just
at
that
year,
that's
when
we
got
to
407.
since
that
technically
is
not
changing.
It
can
maintain.
G
D
B
E
E
C
B
Again,
there
was
an
issue,
and
even
when
we
were
he's
trying
to
recalculate
our
numbers
to
make
sure
all
the
adequate
Staffing,
the
previous
numbers
of
where
they
got
it
from
wasn't
in
other
contracts,
it
was
kind
of
some
of
them.
Were
there,
some
of
them
weren't,
so
just
kind
of
just
you
know
kind
of
earmarks
it.
So,
as
of
2018,
we've
been
at
407,
of
course,
with
the
addition
of
different
companies
so
automatically
increase.
B
G
D
Mean
like
excuse
me,
September
23rd,.
D
D
I'm
not
saying
I'm,
not
saying
exactly
what
you
have
here.
Yes,
I
guess
this
one
is
just
to
reflect
whenever
we
add
additional
units,
you
know
what
what
Manpower
I
guess
is
specifically
for
each
unit.
You
know
evidences
we're
doing
nine,
nine,
nine
ftes
and
per
engines
or
ladder
truck
for
doing
15
years,
EMS
supervisors,
which
is
three
individuals
whenever
that
unit
is
implemented
or
a
district
chief,
three
units
as
well.
B
Current,
the
current
practice
says
be
adding
a
mu
or
activation
of
new
units.
D
It
wasn't
currently
add
to
any
any
staffing
or
anything
that
we
currently
have
is
just
you
know,
additional
units
that
have
been
implemented
in
the
future.
You
know
I
know
it's.
The
current
Factor
that's
already
followed,
but
we
just
want
to
I
guess
get
it
done
in
writing
just
for
any
future.
E
E
D
E
B
You
know
it's
because
every
District
I
guess
do.
C
B
D
B
The
same
the
same
thing
with
the
with
the
EMS
surprise
review,
activate
a
new
unit.
I.
Guess
it's
more
considered
units
instead
of
the
rank
itself,
so
District
chief
unit,
a
fourth
district
and
things
like
that
where
it
encompasses
three
because
EMS
supervisor,
basically
Works
similar
to
districts
except
there's,
they're
more
spread
out.
B
D
C
C
D
E
and
it
specified
each
additional
unit
apparatus
so
I
think
it
encompasses
the
district
Chief
you're,
adding
that
additional
units
it
would
count
as
three
right
so
I,
don't
think
it
would
necessarily
I
guess
have
anything
to
do
with
a
nine-to-five
position
right
so
just
an
additional
unit.
It
already
specifies
it
there
I,
don't
know
if
we
need
to
add
it
so.
D
H
A
And
currently,
the
practice
of
the
city
has
been
that
any
additional
unit
or
apparatus
has
been
fully
staffed
with
additional
ftes.
Is
that
correct?
So
we're
not
in
a
in
a
position
right
now,
where
we've
added
a
unit
or
an
apparatus
and
we're
we
didn't
add
FPS
they've
always
done
that
right.
E
B
No,
it's
it's
a
current
practice,
I
believe
Miss
Farrell
said
it
the
second
meeting
when
we
were
covering
this,
where
that's
the
current
practice
anyways
they
just
had
never
been
put
down
on
paper.
So,
okay,
there
also
was
brought
to
my
attention.
There
was
a
discrepancy
on
the
tentative
agreement
on
12.3.
Oh.
A
C
B
Up
it's
because
I
was
I,
guess
it
was
done
on
a
different
when
it
was
version.
A
But
it
doesn't
show
up
on
my
version
of
Word.
Now
it
just
shows
up
like
columns
and
if
I
tried
to
I
had
to
retype
it
and
when
I
think
when
I
deleted
the
column
it
deleted,
a
bunch
of
things,
I
didn't
realize
it
deleted,
but
the
intention
my
the
the
that
needs
to
be
corrected.
The
tentative
agreement
was
was
intended
of
no
change
of
the
current
contract
of
States
d
and
e.
But
we
will
look
through
this
and
consider
this
now.
This
doesn't
necessarily
add
an
additional
cost
to
the.
A
Other
than
it
obligates
the
city
to
budget
not
only
for
the
apparatus
but
for
the
ftes
that
we're
talking
about
which
are
required
to
run
and
supervise
that
apparatus
out
on
the
line.
Is
that
correct,
okay
and.
A
B
G
F
E
A
B
And
that's
also,
why
Tony
when
he
was
rewriting
it
on
the
just
above
the
district
Chief,
why
he
put
unit
apparatus.
It
refers
to
the
actuational
actual
physical
unit
instead
of
I,
say
you're,
not
an
additional
training,
captain
or
training
Chief
or
whatever
rank
that
can
be
activated
one
at
a
time,
because
that's
understood
it's
one
slot
the
unit
itself,
since
it
runs
on
the
shifts
it
would
automatically
trigger.
You
know
times
three.
So
if
it's
one
District
T
would
be
times
three
one,
it
means
countries
times
three.
A
E
A
A
Thank
you
for
that.
You
can
we'll
work
on
that
one
and
get
back
to
you.
Oh
the
other
generative
agreement,
I
believe
in
I
need
to
I
make
sure
I
didn't
mess
up
on
the
formatting
here,
but
it
was
the
article
18
uniforms
I,
believe
you
proposed
no
change
on
that.
A
C
A
Think
I,
don't
believe.
I
had
a
formatting
issue
on
this
one,
but
remember
foreign.
D
D
Contracts
with,
as
far
as
like
boots
and
stuff
for
us
all,
they
really
do
is
you
know
I,
guess
they're
the
middleman
right,
but
they
just
check
up
the
prices.
I,
don't
know
if
the
city
could
ever
there's
a
possibility
to
just
point
directly
for
us
to
go
out
directly
and
just
hit
indirectly.
You
know
their
local
vendor
right
benefits
the
economy.
It
benefits
is,
you
know,
buying
from
somebody.
You
know
that
that
has
an
interest
here
in
the
city
that
you
know.
E
So
the
uniforms
are
are
based
on
RFP
for
best
price
and
then
there's
quality
also
included.
So
whoever
best
of
you
know
best
is
and
then
there's
a
sec
there's
an
alternate
in
case
of
does
not
so
it's
basically
based
on
the
price.
That's
how
it
becomes.
B
But
and
then
I
guess
we
we
were
trying
to
adjust
initially
was
because
we're
not
we
weren't
getting
the
better
price
you
you
know
specifically
from
Casa
Raul.
They
were,
you
know
just
using
numbers
120
for
a
pair
of
boots,
whatever
brand
of
boots
there,
but
because
our
order
of
status
was
going
through
laws,
laws
would
automatically
put
them
at
or
say
140.
B
H
B
A
lot
of
discrepancies,
even
from
their
own
website
of
their
uniforms
that
they
were
Pro.
You
know
511
technical
tactical
year,
the
t-shirts
they
were
on
their
website.
Like
I,
said
a
three
pack
would
come
out
to
thirty
dollars.
When
we
would
order
it'd
be
35,
there
was
a
constant
markup
on
all
our
equipment.
So
that's
where
the
600
is
no
longer
extended
to
the
full
extent.
It
was
constantly
we're
paying
basically
an
up
charge
for
the
same
product
that
they're
providing
not
because
they're
in
the
middleman.
E
As
Coastal
procurements,
basically
I'm
not
sure
when
this
current
contract
expires,
but
then
there's
extensions
renewals,
then
whatever
the
day
is.
A
E
As
an
exception,
yeah,
local,
locals,
but
I
think
it's
a
two
percent
or
five
percent
I'm,
not
sure
what
it
is.
Do
you
remember
I,
don't
remember
what
it
is,
but
but
there's
a
there's
a
local
discount
for
if
we
want
to
go,
if
we
work
for
the
local
vendors,
the
thing
is
they
have
to
also
submit
in
the
RFP.
That's
to
exercise
it.
D
I
think
I
know
I
know
at
this
point
right
we're
under
contract
with
whatever
entity,
but
maybe
in
the
future,
is
something
that
we
could
possibly
look
at
where
you
know
allow
firefighters
to
maybe
purchase
directly
with.
We
know
they
provide
a
lot
of
our
Footwear,
so
maybe
in
the
future
is
something
that
the
city
could
consider
that
goes
back
to
the
procurement
process.
Work.
E
In
the
RFP
process
they
have
to
submit
to
be
what's
it
called
the
best.
A
Yes
and
and
currently
I
know
that
the
the
other
contract
is
current,
any
communication
with
the
city
with
regard
to
any
problems
that
you're
having
with
that
is
imperative
to
us,
making
sure
that
we
fix
those
issues
or
address
those
issues
directly
with
the
vendor
foreign.
A
Okay,
so
we
have
the
proposed
genitive
agreement
for
no
change
to
article
18
on
uniforms
and
we
submitted
further
considerations
and
for
execution
of
the
tentative
agreement.
If
you
agree.
A
C
A
Okay,
so
We've
executed
a
tentative
agreement
on
article
18
on
the
uniforms
with
no
changes.
The
next
item
that
I
have.
E
A
This
is
promotions
is
set
forth
by
chapter
143
of
the
Texas
local
government
code,
all
the
promotional
procedures
and
eligibility.
This
article
changes
and
revises.
A
This
this
article
in
the
current
contract,
just
changes
or
it
makes,
makes
changes
to
whatever
is
required
by
143.
At
this
point,
it
was
20.1
through
20.7
remain
the
same.
A
A
Excuse
me,
but
on
20.8,
one
of
the
things
that
the
fire
chief
wanted
to
do
in
this
particular
provision
is
emphasize
experience
within
the
promotional
within
the
promotional
procedures.
A
A
Those
are
ranks
that
supervise
people
and
it
would
improve
the
department
in
terms
of
it
would
be
somebody
with
a
little
bit
or
if
it
encourages
and
promotes
more
experience.
The
first
change
on
the
first
sentence.
It
said
we'll
earn
one
point
that
was
just
changed
to
a
numerical
number
one.
It
was
previously
indicated
as
an
I,
so
that's
just
a
a
correction,
but
as
it
goes
through
the
seconds,
the
person
says
effective
upon
the
execution
of
this
agreement.
A
Each
firefighter
will
earn
one
point
for
each
complete
year
of
seniority
in
the
rank
held
at
the
time
of
the
promotional
examination
with
a
maximum
of
Five
Points,
and
we
added
for
the
ranks
below
captain
for
the
rank.
Then
we
added
this
or
proposed
to
add
this
for
the
rank
of
Captain
and
above
the
maximum
amount
of
points
will
be
10
points
and
it
continues.
Everything
else
stays
the
same.
A
firefighter
who
scores
a
70
or
greater
on
his
or
her
exempt
she'll
immediately
receive
their
seniority
points
for
this
purposes
of
the
section.
A
Change
or
the
second
proposed
change
is
on
20.9.
It
has
to
do
with
the
the
sources
and
the
source
materials
for
the
exam.
Currently,
it
says
for
promotional
exam
purposes,
there
shall
be
no
more
than
three
Source
materials.
The
fire
chief
will
select
two
Source
materials.
The
third
Source
material
will
be
selected
by
mutual
agreement
of
the
fire
chief
and
the
association.
Each
promotional
exam
will
consist
of
30
questions
from
each
book,
selected
by
the
chief
and
40
questions
from
the
source
material
that
is
selected
by
mutual
agreement.
A
The
cheat
or
the
city
proposes
to
delete
this
current
last
sentence.
The
department
standard
operating
procedures
will
not
be
included
in
the
promotional
exams.
The
city
believes
that,
from
a
from
an
operational
standpoint
that
especially
for
promotional
examinations
as
you're
moving
up
the
rank,
that
is
extremely
important,
that
the
firefighter
is
familiar
and
has
knowledge
of
the
department
standard
operating
procedures,
in
terms
of
that
helps,
make
sure
that
the
operations
are
efficient
and
that
they're
working
properly
and
it
makes
for
a
better
Department
foreign.
A
20.10
stays
the
same.
We
propose
to
add
a
20.11
firefighters
appointed
to
the
wreck
of
Captain
and,
above
after
the
effective
date
of
disagreement
and
it
so
this
doesn't
affect
anybody.
That's
already
in
the
in
this
position.
A
A
master's,
a
masters
of
structural
firefighter
certification
or
that
requirement
would
ensure
that
the
higher
ranks
of
Captain
and
above
that
are
in
supervisory
capacity,
have
the
Education
and
Training
that
would
improve
the
the
operations
of
the
department
and
the
supervisory
capacity
of
the
people
being
of
the
firefighters
being
promoted.
A
We
believe
that
36
months
is
reasonable
in
obtaining
that
I
believe
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
believe
that
the
fire
department
allows
these
opportunities
and
and
there's
reimbursement
for
this.
Is
that
correct?
No.
A
That
that
is
actually
set
forth.
We
don't
put
those
requirements.
A
Can
provide
you
with
that
information,
but
it
would
be
the
master
structural
firefighter
certification
that
is
subjected
to
an
ad.
It's
the
same
one
as
that
you
get
for
the
ad
pace.
Okay,.
D
But
let's
say,
for
example,
you
have
to
meet
certain
criteria
to
be
able
to
obtain
your
Masters
to
be
in
a
department
within
so
many
years
on
desk
or
you
are
not
able
to
obtain
it
at
all.
I
think
it's
some
there's
some
college
credit.
A
Oh
here,
yes,
I
do
have
some
notes
on
that
I
think
the
Masters
requires
160
hours
of
college
work,
18
of
which
has
to
be
fire
related
and
12
years
as
a
firefighter
on
their
service
time.
Clock.
B
S
I
mean
and
that's
it's
gonna
cause
a
big
hindrance
on
the
operations
of
the
department,
because
some
guys
are
coming
in
and
have
no
college
credit
hours.
You
know
18
19.,
they
make
the
rank
of
Captain
Lottery
attending
cards,
performing
their
duties
here,
learning
or
not
once
they
promote
the
rank
of
Captain
to
obtain
160
hours.
E
B
I
have
to
be
60
college
credit
hours,
18,
structural
firefighting
and
the
qualification
of
10
years
12.
A
Years
I
think
it's
12
years
we
can
it
set
out.
We
can
print
that
out
just
for
everyone's
info,
so
everybody
knows
what
what
that
one
is.
I.
D
Yeah
I
think
this
was
a
big
burn
on
the
firefighters.
As
far
as
you
know,
being
able
to
I
guess
Finance
their
own
education.
You
know
being
obligated
to
go
back
to
school
right
having
a
good
time
go
back
to
school
and
like,
for
example,
my
case
right
I've
been
in
the
department
for
10
years,
I'm
about
to
promote
the
captain.
I
can't
even
do
the
certification,
because
I
haven't
been
in
the
department
for
that
many
years
as.
A
B
Some
actually
go
a
lot
longer,
also
depending
on
appeals
process.
Some
of
those
lists
are
active
for
actually
more
than
a
year,
but
not
they're
active
from
a
year
but
from
the
actual
test
date
you
know
so
some
somebody
can
make
the
rank
of
Captain
a
lot
sooner
than
somebody
else
like
he
states
he
wouldn't
meet
the
criteria,
qualification
and
actually
going
against
143
the
way
it's
stated
right
now,
because.
B
Of
the
way
it
works
right
now,
according
to
the
State
statue,
is
two
years
at
the
next
lowest
rank.
So
we've
we've
understood
that
also
from
two
years
from
graduation,
a
firefighter
can
take
the
promotional
exam
for
a
fire
assistant
driver
from
then
on.
It
can
be
two
years
to
driver
two
years
to
Captain,
so
if
everything
were
to
line
up
right,
they
could
make
it
within
10
years
falling
underneath
that
requirement
beyond
that.
Also
give
me
some
yeah.
We
can
keep.
A
Talking
about
you
and
just
keep
playing
and
one
of
the
things
like
one
of
the
things,
for
instance,
if
we're
looking
at
somebody
that
was
promoting
into
the
rank
of
Captain
at
nine
years,
we've
proposed
36
months,
which
is
three
years,
which
would
equal
the
12
years
to
be
to
be
able
to
obtain
the
matter.
Master,
structural
firefighter
certification.
So
that's
something
that
would
probably
take
a
little
bit
longer
that
that
would
be
something
that
we
could
practically
consider.
A
You
know,
if
we
add
an
additional
year,
I
think
that
the
idea
here
is
not
to
punish
anybody
or
keep
every
anybody
from
being
able
to
promote
it's
a
to
incentivize
that
once
the
promotion
happens,
that
we
have
firefighters
in
the
rank
of
Captain
and
above
to
continue
their
education
and
continue
raising
their
certification.
A
So
so
that's
really
the
idea
behind
this.
It's
not
to
prevent
it
would
not
serve
the
interests
of
the
department
and
its
operations
to
not
to
do
not
have
people
promote
I
think
that
that's
the
natural
flow
of
what
what
it,
what
we,
what
should
be
happening.
A
So
the
idea
is
an
incentivization
to
have
a
to
educate
and
have
a
better
certified
Rank
and
file,
especially
up
in
the
supervisory
ranks
and
we'd,
be
happy
to
hear
to
further
discuss
this
and
talk
about
ideas
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
know
that
the
city
is
doing
is
providing
practice
being
proactive
and
providing
training,
training
opportunities
and
developing
a
succession
plan
so
that
there
is
movement
up
the
ranks
and
that
we
were
able
to.
You
know,
hold
academies,
feel
the
academies
move.
A
The
people
who
have
been
here
up
it
also
incentivizes
retention
and
and
move
up
the
ranks,
and
we
have
a
much
better
educated
and
certified
Rank
and
file.
D
I
mean
I
think
we're
all
for
having
a
better
terrain,
firefighter
right,
but
I
think
especially
I.
Guess
looking
at
this
requirement,
right
I
think
it
faces
an
additional
burden
on
the
firefighter.
It's
a
big
retain
these
things
when
and
we
welcome
the
trainings
and
I
think
it's
something
that,
as
a
department,
the
hard
Chief
has.
You
know
within
his
power
to
be
able
to
educate
the
firefighters
with.
D
It's
something
I
really
agree
with.
You
know
and
I
think
it's
something
that
not
necessarily
because
you
get
a
certification.
It
means
you
become
a
better
firefighter
right,
so
I
think
you
become
a
better
firefighter
by
you
know
being
out
on
the
field.
You
know
going.
H
D
The
calls
you
know,
learning
from
your
peers,
learning
from
your
superiors,
I
think
you
know
having
a
something
like
this,
where
you
know
you're
having
a
specifically
making
a
person,
go
back
to
school
and
start
to
be
able
to
obtain
these
think
you
say
it's
not
a
punishment
right
but
I
mean
I.
Guess
there
is
a
punishment
right,
because
if
you
don't
do
it,
you
get
the
most.
C
A
And,
and
with
the
word,
we're
incentivizing
experience
like
you
said,
and
education
and
certification,
the
timing
is
not
really
the
issue
we
just
want
to
incentivize
and
make
sure
that
the
ranks
of
Captain
and
above
that
are
in
the
supervisory
capacity.
Have,
you
know,
have
better
certifications,
have
better
education,
have
better
training,
and
currently
this
is
something
that
the
Laredo
Police
Department
employs
in
their
own
contract
in
order
to
maintain
an
effective
supervisory
there's,
effective
supervisory
ranks.
A
So
it's
something
that
it's
something
that
promotes
a
better
firefighter
a
better
employee
and
a
better
supervisor
which
then
you
know,
flows
down
to
a
better
work
environment,
better
operations
and.
H
Things
like
that,
and
not
only
that,
but
you
also
you're
balancing
a
professional
firefighter
with
the
elevated
responsibilities
according
to
those
managerial
roles,
in
addition
to
I,
want
to
add
that
and
I
know
that
most
of
our
police
officers-
and
some
are
firefighters
there
is
the
state
of
Texas,
also
compensates
the
cost
of
the
higher
education
at
Laredo
college
and
also
at
Tammy.
You
so
I
know.
Most
of
some
of
your
colleagues
have
taken
advantage
of.
D
D
Able
to
recoup
any
of
those
finances
and
I
think
overall,
the
the
firefighters
are
already
incentivized
to
get
that
certification.
You
know
because
it's
a
mixture,
an
additional
percentage
right
because
for
the
master
certification,
that's
when
you
get
at
that
10,
you
get
a
traditional
two
percent
from
your
advance,
so
I
think
the
incentive
is
already
there
for
partners
to
kind
of
to
get
that
certification.
H
And
explore
the
the
education
incentives
that
the
state
of
Texas
also
offers
so
there's
free
education
for
firefighters
and
police
officers,
First
Responders
to
the
Laredo
college
and
also
through
the
university.
It's
there
because
I
sign
off
on
them.
As
a
HR
director
I
know,
police
really
takes
advantage
of
that
benefit.
I.
D
B
Pump
operator
they
have
to
they're
made
to
go
through
that
class
and
become
that
certification,
the
drivers
and
the
captains
are
being
made
to
become
instructors.
We've
drastically
increased
our
instructor
certification
and
they're
being
trained.
You
know
through
our
policies,
so
the
Department's
already
you
know
going
through
that
process.
The
people
that
are
promoting
are
already
becoming
better
certified,
better,
better,
well-rounded
people.
The
thing
about
it
is
that
in
this
demotion
process,.
B
So
it's
not.
It's
not
tied
to
promotion
to
a
promotion
and
just
demotions
in
general.
B
C
A
So
that
0.54
not
45
right
so.
C
A
Demotions,
that's
actually
under
sub
chapter
D
with
regard
to
disciplinary
actions.
What
we're
talking
about
this
is
not
under
a
disciplinary
action.
This
is
with
regard
to
actual
promotions
and
the
eligibility
for
promotions
and
under
sub
chapter
B,
which
talks
about
classification
and
employment,
and
so
what
the
part
that
we're
looking
to
on
the
per
this
this
route.
With
this
talks
about
promotional
procedures,
this
talks
about
chapter,
which
is
addressed
by
chapter
B
classification
and
appointment,
which
is
143.021
through
143.038.
A
This
talks
about
eligibility
for
promotion,
promotional
procedures,
and
this
is
what,
within
this,
what
we're
trying
with
what
we're
proposing
to
establish
is
that
you
have
the
ability
you
know
one
through
143
and
the
changes
made
to
143
through
on
the
promotional
process.
Through
this
agreement,
a
firefighter
appointed
to
the
rank
of
Captain
or
above
has
the
ability
to
be
promoted,
but
is
given
a
certain
time
period,
whether
it
be
what
we
proposed
36
months
or
whether
it
be
48
months.
A
To
complete
a
requirement
for
that
promotion,
and
so
it's
it's
directly
affiliated
with
the
promotion
and
it's
not
part
of
a
disciplinary
process.
So.
A
143.054,
that's
a
separate
issue
that
is,
that
goes
to
the
disciplinary
article
that
we
have
in
this
this
contract.
So
just
with
regard
to
the
law.
That's
just
that
one
143.054
does
not
apply
in
this
promotional
process
that
we're
we're
discussing
with
the
eligibility.
B
But
we're
going
above
and
beyond
what
the
State
statue
recommends
or
what
they
is
specifically
addressed
for
the
purpose
of
what
exactly,
because
our
officers
aren't
being
in
trained
properly
or
they're,
not
coming
out
trained
properly.
Is
that
not
fall
back
on
the
Department's
responsibility
for
have
them
properly
trained,
because
so.
A
This,
so
what
what
we're
negotiating
right
here
on
article
20
and
proposing
is
something
that
is
allowed
under
chapter
174.
The
collective
bargaining
statute
has
been
adopted
by
the
City
of
Laredo,
which
allows
us
to
make
changes
to
one
to
143
requirement
to
set
forth,
including
sub
chapter
B,
on
of
143
classification
and
appointment,
and
that's
what
these
things
do
like.
The
the
Articles
already
in
here
are
things
that
we're
we're
we're
negotiating
and
have
agreed
to
to
better
the
department.
A
So,
yes,
there
are
some
things
in
here
that
go
beyond
what
143
has
established,
because
we
have
negotiated
for
them
and
we
have
agreed
to
them
in
in
contracts.
So
that's
why
we're
putting
it
on
the
table,
because
when
that's
the
purpose
that
we're
actually
sitting
here,
you.
C
A
From
through
174
to
to
negotiate
and
negotiate
changes
to
the
143
requirements
and
our
our
purpose
is
to
create
a
better
environment
for
training
and
experience,
a
better
supervisory
staff
and
rank
and
a
better
department
overall.
D
I'm
sure
of
having
a
better
trained
on
things
right
and
I
think
a
lot
of
the
times.
Our
members
do
go
through
a
lot
of
certifications
and
a
lot
of
those
certifications
are
within
our
working
hours
right,
so
we
go
to
classes
and-
and
just
recently
you
know-
I
obtained
my
instructor
certification
right,
but
I
guess
what
this
would
basically
make
a
firefighter
do.
Is
you
know?
Everybody's
has
different
things
going
on
in
life
right,
different
circumstances,
as
far
as
you
know
what
they
have
going
outside.
Sometimes
our
firefighters
are
having
to
work.
D
You
know
two
jobs,
three
jobs
just
to
be
able
to
make
ends
meet
or
just
because
the
cost
of
living
and
the
railing
and
and
property
taxes-
and
you
know,
cost
of
living
or
the
height
home
prices,
so
I
think
it
basically
puts
a
I
guess
a
constraint
on
our
guys
to
have
to
go
to
these
classes
to
go
to
school
on
their
own
time
when
at
the
same
time,
they're
having
to
deal
with
family
and
kids.
You
know
so
I
I
think
we'll
look
at
it
and
we'll
talk
about
it.
Okay,.
E
A
C
C
A
This
is
the
problem.
Let's
address
it,
you
know
we're
looking
to
okay.
What
can
we
do
to
make
this
a
better
department
and
that's
why
we're
just
proposing
it.
B
B
C
C
A
Requires
legal
elements,
the
obligations
that
the
city
and
the
city
has
in
the
collective
bargaining
agreement
are
set
forth
in
this
collective
bargaining
agreement.
Sometimes
there
are
practices
that
go
beyond
the
clear
language
of
the
contract.
C
A
Or
more
generous,
we're
allowed
we're
not
allowed
to
take.
A
In
a
minimum
or
to
take
away
or
not
fulfill
an
obligation,
but
there
is
an
ability
for
the
city
anytime
that
it
can
and
any
time
that
that
they
that
it
so
benefits
the
the
firefighters
to
be
more
generous
than
what
the
what
the
collective
bargaining
agreement
holds.
That
in
of
itself
does
not
create
a
past
practice
that
doesn't
create
a
contractual
obligation.
It
doesn't
create
something
that
now,
because
we
did
something
that
was
more
generous
than
this.
A
Now
we're
stuck
with
it
that
wouldn't
be
right
that,
because
that
would
create
a
chilling
effect,
you
would
have
a
city
that
would
be
hesitant
to
provide
something
more
generous
and,
and
that's
not
what
we
want
on
either
on
either
side.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
when
we're
talking
about
past
practice,
past
practice
comes
into
play
when
there
is
an
some
sort
of
ambiguity
in
in
the
contract.
A
So
that's
why
I
say
it's
a
very
legal
issue
and-
and
those
are
are
fact-based
and
very
situational,
based
on
a
on
a
certain
incident
or
situation
that
happened.
That's
why
those
grievances
are
filed
and
those
individually
go
to
arbitration
and
they're
they're
looked
at
for
the
facts
that
that
surround
that
particular
issue.
E
A
question
could:
could
you
move
on
to
20.12.
A
I
think
that
we
need
to
caucus
first,
we
need
to
I've
been
asked
by
my
team
to
caucus
very
quickly
on
this
issue
and
and
so
we're
going
to
caucus
for
about
five
minutes
and
and
then
we'll
come
up
because
we
haven't
moved
yeah.
We
need
to
move
on
to.
A
On
the
in
incentive
on
or
the
excuse
me,
no
I'm
saying
that
on
2011,
the
requirement
of
a
master
structural,
firefighter
certification,
where
I'm
gonna
get
some
more
information
on
this,
that
that
I
need
to
share.
But
I
did
get
this
information
that
when
you
come
out
of
the
fire
academy
that
the
the
City
of
Laredo
pays
Pace
work
right,
yes,
but
the
contestants
do
not
pay
for
the
fire
academy.
The
City
of
Laredo
actually
pays
him
a
salary
to
attend.
A
You
actually
get
out
of
the
a
firefighter
receives
42
hours
of
college
credit
for
EMS
and
there's
23
hours
of
college
credit
in
the
fire
portion
of
that
Academy.
That
would
count
towards
that
fire
related
requirement.
A
C
A
That's
something
that
that
is
a
a
practice
and
that
has
been
allowed.
B
Now,
to
clarify
that
the
coming
out
of
the
academy,
it
is
recognized
that
they
have
hours,
but
it's
not
through
an
accredited
college,
and
these
college
hours
have
to
be
accredited
in
order
to
for
tcfp
to
recognize
it
to
get
your
Masters.
So
there
is
a
conversion
there
and
the
conversion
has
a
fee
to
it
and
it's
a
kind
of
a
hefty
feat.
B
Fee,
depending
on
how,
if
it's
a
full
load
or
less
I
mean
it's
I,
think
like
three
quarters
of
the
college
credit,
whatever
the
college
hour
would
be.
A
B
You
have
to
convert
them.
Okay,
there
is
very
few
people
that
either
they
went
through
paramedic
on
their
own
or
there
was
an
academy
where
the
city
lost
their
coordinatorship,
so
they
actually
enrolled
their
Cadets
when
I
Cadets.
Actually
the
Reliant
Personnel.
A
A
B
There's
an
issue
with
that,
because
I
was
part
of
that
one
paramedic
class
that
was
enrolled
still
to
this
day.
They
won't
graduate
me
for
our
paramedic.
A
I
was
talking
about
here
in
Laredo.
B
They're
saying
they're
missing
hours,
okay,
so
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
full!
You
know
coming
out
because
in
the
the
medic
actually
will
carry
depending
on
the
classes
that
you
have
will
carry
an
Associates
with
it,
which
would
complete
more
than
the
60
hours,
but
they're
still
stating
that
they're
I
just
have
my
certification,
not
my
license.
B
D
Right,
just
because
I
have
60
hours
right,
so
I
think
it's
just
converting
them
I
think
it
I,
guess
it.
It
doesn't
really
I
guess
really
get
to
the
fact
that
this
person
going
to
become
a
better
person
on
the
line.
I
think
you
know,
like
I,
said
the
chief
is
able
to
implement
trainings.
You
know
classes
he's
already
able
to
do
that.
He
has
done
that.
So
I
think.
C
D
Know
if
he
specifically
thinks
that
we
should
get
other
certifications
or
you
know,
do
certain
classes
or
certain
trains
out
in
the
field.
I
think
that's
the
way.
It
should
be
implemented
right
for
these
individuals
to
be
able
to
become
better
individuals.
I,
don't
know
why.
A
Okay,
well,
we
can
continue
to
discuss
this,
there's
an
information
that
I'm
going
to
obtain
and
if
there's
any
information
that
you
can
provide,
that
would
be
helpful
and,
and
we
would
consider
any
counter
proposals
we'll
move
on
to
20.12..
A
This
is
the
a
proposed
Edition
on
the
review
and
appeal
of
a
promotional
examination.
I
have
a
glaring
typo
that
I
thought
I
had
fixed
and
the
reason
yeah
it
actually
says.
Police
Department
is
supposed
to
be
a
fire
department.
The
reason
it
was
like
that
is
because
it's
the
exact
same
language
that
we
pulled
from
the
Laredo
Police
Department,
the
Laredo
police,
collective
bargaining.
A
This
is
and
I'll
read
through
it.
A
First
20.12
is
a
review
and
appeal
of
promotional
examination,
a
on
request
each
eligible
promotional
candidate
for,
and
it
should
say
the
fire
department
is
eligible
and
I'll
correct
that
and
send
a
new
one
from
the
fire
department
is
entitled
to
examine
the
person's
promotional
examination
and
answers
the
examination,
grading
and
the
source
material
for
the
examination,
a
candidate
with
a
raw
score
without
seniority,
points
of
65
or
higher
May
appeal
within
five
days
to
the
commission
for
review
B
the
eligible
promotional
candidate
may
not
remove
the
examination
or
a
copy
of
a
question
used
in
the
examination.
A
A
It
seems
that
there
are
instances
where
firefighters,
who
got
an
extremely
low
score
and
missed
a
majority
of
the
questions,
are
appealing
each
and
every
question
where
you
come
up
with
a
an
appeal:
a
person
appealing
of
50
50
questions,
something
like
that,
and
that
is
an
extremely
long
process
and
requires
a
lot
of
time
and
work
from
the
the
board
Commissioners
or
the
Commissioners.
A
From
the
Civil
Service
Commission,
who
volunteered
their
time
to
do
this
and
it's
it
is
pretty
difficult
to
get
them
that
you
know
they
all
have
jobs
and
and
other
personal
things,
so
they
they
volunteer
their
time
to
do
this
as
an
appoint
as
it's
an
appointment
and
to.
A
Ols,
it
takes
a
lot
of
work.
Do
you
have
anything
else.
H
C
H
C
B
Yeah-
and
it's
understood
that,
yes,
the
the
process
is
lengthy
depending
on
the
ranks.
You
know
they
have
a
lot
more
individuals
or
assistant
driver
and
I
believe
almost
100
people
and.
B
Somebody
is
actually
the
only
thing
that
this
I
didn't
think
it
would
have
been
an
issue
up
until
this
current
promotional
cycle.
B
This
limits
to
who
can
appeal
this
current
promotional
cycle
had
an
error
on
the
book
that
was
used.
So
if
somebody
had
the
wrong
book
that
was
or
a
test
was
produced
off
of
a
wrong
book
that
was
put
out,
there's
a
chance
that
they
get
the
majority
of
that
one
wrong.
H
That,
and
as
a
matter
of
fact,
it
was
the
it
was
the
Third
Edition.
It
was
a
revised
that
was
the
key
to
that
one.
We
also
asked,
and
they
said
that,
the
two,
the
only
difference
we
asked
the
editor
of
the
book.
What
was
the
difference?
They
said
that
it
was
two
charts
that
were
in
in
the
in
the
revised
version.
C
G
H
G
C
H
Where
this
was
the
first
time
it's
happened
and
also
I,
don't
know
if
any
of
your
members
might
have
been
aware
that
the
provisioned
revised
Edition
was
out,
but
no
one
that
ever
made
mention
of
it
as
well.
But
it's
a
learning
experience
for
the
City
of
Laredo
and
we
are
going
to
correct
it.
Moving
forward
31
days
to
prior
to
any
promotions,
we
will
make
sure
that
there
is
no
other.
A
That
may
be
something
that
you
know,
because
it's
no
fault
of
the
firefighter
taking
the
exam.
Obviously
it
was
a
an
error
in
the
book
that
may
be
something
that
the
Civil
Service
Commission
can
address
in
their
rules.
C
H
C
H
H
B
B
Oh,
it
is
out
of
control
the
other,
both
sides,
so
I'm
saying
that
would
limit.
In
that
case,
like
I
say
it's
never
happened
before,
but
for
the
future
there
is
a
possibility
and
where
that
would
limit
it
to
these
people
like
hey,
you
just
got
the
wrong
book.
I'm.
Sorry,
you
know
you
kind
of
peel.
It.
A
We
would
we
would
consider
any
proposals
that
would
address
that
an
exception
to
that
or
that
that
that
particular
issue,
because.
H
D
B
Actually,
the
current
practice
right
now
is:
you
can
just
I'm
gonna
appeal,
one
through
ten,
because
I
got
one
through
ten
wrong.
You
literally
need
to
put
down
your
your
your
abandoned
argument,
addressing
the
page
number
addressing
a
chart
addressing
a
paragraph
and,
of
course,
there's
nothing
there
and
you
just
put
oh
just
because
that's
automatically
gonna
get
thrown
out,
so
the
appeals
process-
you
know,
has
you
know.
B
Actually
civil
service
has
addressed
this
issue
because
before
in
the
past
it
was
you
know,
I'm,
gonna,
I'm,
gonna
appeal,
1,
10,
15
20
and
however
many
whatever
number
I
got
wrong
and
we
would
present
it
right
there.
If
we
had
an
argument
or
not,
we
didn't
have
an
argument
on.
We
would
draw
the
appeal
if
we
had
the
argument,
we'd
step
up
there
and
actually
read
so
that
that
issue
has
already
been
addressed
in
the
past.
B
When
my
God
only
said
it
is
just
a
fact
of,
normally
people
have
scoring
you
know
below
70s
unless
they're
at
a
67,
68
69,
especially
on
cases
where
they
found
things
in
within
the
chart
within
the
book.
Where
hey
there's
a
discrepancy
here,
the
not
the
page
or
this
is
not
the
chart
that
was
used.
You
know,
whatever
the
reason
being
where
that
would
get
to
it.
Okay,
now
in
the
history
of
it,
the
last
time
that
Five
Points
have
been
given
out,
the
most
I've
ever
seen
is
three.
B
There
has
been
in
the
past,
but
of
course
that
was
another
different
appeals
process
of
the
actual
appeal
itself.
Now,
it's
being
addressed
more
more
accurately
and
it's
expedited
the
the
the
actual
appeals.
D
Process,
okay
and
understand
that
the
commission
is
a
volunteer
basis
right,
I
think
they've
launched
it
their
own
time
to
do
the
work
and
we
appreciate
that
from
them,
but
I
think
with
any
any
volunteer
basis,
I
guess
event
or
or
I
guess
committee
that
you're
involved
in
you
know.
If
you
don't
have
the
time
to
do
it,
you
know
you
usually
don't
volunteer
right.
D
So
I
think
the
the
individuals
know
what
they're
getting
into
I
think
it's
an
important
process
that
each
member
has
a
fair,
I
guess
process
to
be
able
to
appeal
their
certain
questions
and
they
feel
that
they're,
you
know,
have
a
specific
questions
that
they
were
wrong
or
that
that
could
have
been
right.
I
think
we
should
allow
those
members
to
I
guess
voice
their
concerns.
A
Yeah
and,
and
so
the
bar
right
here
is
Set
You
Know
It
without
seniority
points
a
65
or
higher.
So
it's
not
a
it's
a
pretty
low
score
that
the
thresholds
low
and
you
know
if,
if
the
practice
is
that
you
know
know,
you
know
that
if
you
made
a
low
score,
you
don't
appeal
it.
A
Then
what
we're
looking
is
to
formalize
it
to
prevent
any
abuses
of
the
process
of
the
Appellate
process
that
had
happened
before
and
to
make
better
use
of
the
of
the
commissioner's
time
and
and
their
Volunteers
in
in
this.
In
this
aspect,.
A
A
D
Those
are
I
guess,
look
at
the
numbers
accurately
I
think
that
that's
really
tied
into
you
know:
I
guess
you
know
conversation
as
far
as
you
know,
wage
increases
and
stuff
like
that.
So
I
think
it's
something
more
as
far
as
you
know
us
being
able
to
tie
it
in
at
the
end,
to
see
how
much
you
know
our
members
would
be
willing
to
increase
and
how
much
would
we
increase
with
the
retirees
I
think
you
know.
Currently
the
fund
is
healthy
and
it
will
be
healthy
for
the
end
of
the
year.
D
So
I
think
it's
something
that
we've
been
talking
about,
but
I
think
it's
something
that
we
can't
really
put
something
I
guess
in
writing.
Without
knowing
okay.
A
We
currently
have
our
proposals
on
there
that
have
a
propose,
a
an
increase
in
the
base
wages,
and
currently
we
have
an
ad
pay
proposal
that
leads
the
ad
page
the
same
for
the
current
members
and
creates
a
different
structure
for
new
members.
A
So
we
were
hoping
to
get
some
information
on
that
article
in
counter
proposal
from
that
article,
because,
although
the
fund
may
be
healthy
right
now
and
it
may
be
healthy
in
the
next
at
the
beginning
of
the
next
fiscal
year,
it
dips
down
into
the
negative
the
way
that
it's
going
on
year.
Two.
D
G
D
Year
in
the
first
year,
yes
and
I
think
it's
something
that's
in
writing
on
the
contract
as
far
as
even
as
this
and
work
the
numbers
out,
it's
not
something
that
the
city
would
be
valuable
for
I
think
we
would
continue
doing
it.
Whatever
that
goes
into
the
right
is
something
that
we're
responsible
for,
but
I
think
when
it
comes
to.
We
have
proposed
counter
proposal
and
we
haven't
received
anything
as
far
as
wages
or
anything
like
that.
A
Okay,
so
on
the
ad
page,
we
have
been
asking
for
we're
working
on
our
end
and
we
had.
We
had
a
discussion
about
it
at
the
end
of
the
session.
B
Counter
proposal
there
was
a
request
for
information
before
we
moved
on
for
any
any
type
of
counter
proposals
or
anything,
and
we
can
get
a
breakdown
of
the
55
million,
that's
being
used
as
a
as
an
earmark
on
the
Monies.
What's
included
in
that
55
million.
G
B
F
G
Which
is
a
million
dollars
about
a
million
dollars
of
it's
in
the
very
top?
Everything.
F
Else
is,
Savage
is
salaries.
Ad
pages.
B
A
B
F
F
F
Already
put
yes,
but
okay
and
Roxy,
what
happens
is
when
we
do
a
percentage
on
a
base,
pay
that
base
pay,
there's
other
benefits
that
are
used
that
are
tied
to
that.
So,
for
example,
if
I
have
a
hundred
dollars
and
that's
my
base
pay,
then
on
top
of
that
I
have
to
pay
a
pension
of
20.
So
for
every
that
for
every
dollar
there
I
have
to
pay
20
20
cents.
So
we
have
the
Social
Security
Medicare.
We
have
the
workers
comp.
We
have
several
benefits
that
are
percentages.
As
my
base
pay
increases.
F
F
B
On
your
half,
that's
not
on
ours
right!
So
we're
not
we're
not
asking
for
a
raise
on
our
overtime
budget,
but
you
get
it.
B
B
B
See
even
in
there,
but
what
I'm
saying
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
that
even
on
that
graph,
it
was
reflecting
overtime
and
in
the
base
pick
in
two
scales,
so
where
it's
inflating
the
numbers
so
I'm
trying
to
again
I'm
trying
to
get
a
breakdown
of.
How
do
we
get
to
55
million
when
it's
actually
only
less.
F
F
A
B
F
B
B
A
We
have
updated
the
costume
sheets
as
we
went
through
so
I
think.
First,
we
need
to
identify
which
costume
sheet
that
you're
talking
about,
so
that
we
can
all
be
on
the
same
page
and
looking
at
the
same
numbers.
F
B
In
agreement
that
this
was
the
original
one
that
was
given
to
us
all
right
where
it
included
over
time,
I
had
Pace
yes
right,
but
you
just
told
me
that
in
this
calculation
includes
overtime
and
ad
page,
so
even
on
this
one,
can
you
say
you
were
removed?
It
you
didn't
remove
it.
It
was
it
stayed
in.
Here
is.
B
G
F
C
F
C
F
Initial
one,
what
I
was
trying
to
do
is
anticipate
the
overtime
because
there's
going
to
be
an
impact
and
it
was
about
approximately
I
had
472
000.
I
actually
removed
it,
because
I
wanted
to
be
conservative
and
I
removed
it
from
the
equation
completely.
But
there
is
a
component
that
when
we
have
an
increase,
whatever
overtime
is,
there's
going
to
be
an
increase
as
well,
so
that
Force
turn
into
a
hand.
F
C
F
B
F
B
F
3.25,
where
determine
it
is
based
on
a
percentage
increase.
I
have
a
projections,
software
that
I
plug
in
the
numbers
yeah.
A
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
F
C
F
Then
I
have
an
increase
on
workers
comp
because
workers
come
is
based
on
a
percentage.
So
once
you
add
those
up,
you
get
to
550
million
I'm
picking
up
vacancies
as
well,
because
I
need
to
budget
or
stay
scenario.
I
need
to
budget
worst
case
scenario.
That's
where
the
one
percent
comes
from
that
550
000
is
one
percent
of
all
that
amount.
You
cannot
get
only
base
paid
and
say:
40
million
dollars
might
cost
you
four
hundred
thousand,
because
there's
going
to
be
an
impact
for
Social,
Security
and
pension.
C
G
F
C
B
E
F
C
B
F
G
A
Information
no
I
mean
there's.
F
That's
30
numbers
the
same
starting
number.
The
thing
is
I'm,
taking
into
account
engine
workers,
comp
Social
Security,
and
that's
why
it's
an
additional
cause.
That's
why
you're
you're
just
taking
that
number
and
reversing
it
to
the
you're
backing
into
the
amount,
and
you
can't
do
that
because
there's
other
components
in
my
550
000..
Well,
that's
why
you
can't
do
that
because
act
like
I
mentioned
I
cannot
just
say
it's
going
to
cost
me
400
000
for
a
one
percent,
because
how
do
I
cover
a
first
comp
pension.
C
A
D
I
guess
if
we
could
get
a
a
breakdown
of
the
cost
pressure
floors
and
and
I
guess,
I'm
gonna,
move
on
to.
A
Thank
you,
So,
based
on
those
numbers
we
can,
we
can
get
those
and
I,
don't
know
how
quickly
we
can
I
don't
know
if
we're
gonna
have
to
I
need
to
visit
with
Jesus
to
see
how
quickly
we
can
get
those
to
you.
D
We
spoke
about
it
last
time,
I
don't
know
if
y'all
were
going
to
price
out,
but
I
guess
a
verbal
proposal
that
we
had.
We
still
haven't
finished
with
it.
Yet
specifically,
but
okay
I
know
it's
something
that
we
were
looking
at.
I
know
we
talked
about
it
last
time,
I
don't
know
I
normally,
maybe.
D
I
don't
know
last
time
we
mentioned
maybe
increasing
in
an
extra
10
on
the
on
the
incentives
or
maybe
incentivizing
the
guys
to
to
give
up
the
percentages.
I
don't
know
if
it's
something
that
y'all
had
time
to
look
at
as
far
as
numbers
and
costs,
but
it's
something
that
we're
still
working
on
typing
it
out.
F
I
did
not
cause
the
additional
additional
I
think
the
way
I
understood
it
was.
For
example,
we
have
EMT
it's
10,
so
what
you
were
saying
instead
of
10
would
be
twenty
percent
no.
D
Right
now
right,
you
would
increase
that
to
15
Block
in
that
amount,
whatever
it
would
give
you
and
let's
say
that
certification.
If
the
guy
had
a
an
advanced
firefighter,
they
get
an
eight
percent
currently,
so
then
you
would
factor
in
at
13
and
get
that
set
figure
and
do
it
for
each
Rank
and
see
the
only
times
that
you
would
move
up
is.
B
B
F
E
F
D
Addition
I
think
it's
we
with
the
city's,
argued
that
you
know
you
pay
about
a
17.5
average
right
whatever,
with
the
incentive,
might
be
a
little
bit
higher
depending
on
overtime,
right
I,
don't
know
how
much
at
17.5
moves
up
or
down
right,
I'm,
not
sure
when.
F
The
cumulative
report
is
just
the
total
that
we
paid
during
the
year
has
nothing
to
do
with
budget
or
base
pays
or
anything.
It's
just
what
we're
paying.
What
I
think
I
did
is
I
looked
at
total
pay
divided
by
ad
pace,
and
so
it's
picking
up
everything
it's
already
picking
it.
Yeah,
okay,
I.
D
Guess
we
will
have
something
as
far
as
maybe
writing
writing
it
out,
but
that's
something
that
we
have
been
looking
at.
I
guess
just
maybe
Studio
can
I
guess
I,
don't
know,
prepare
her
yeah.
A
What
we'll
do
is
we'll
we'll
work
on
costing
it
out
and
we'll
during
a
caucus,
we'll
let
you
know
what
what
that's,
what
the
time
is
going
to
look
like
in
order
to
get
that
that
cost
and
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
because
I
know
that
you're
asking
for
a
counter
proposal
on
the
base
paid.
But,
as
I've
said
before,
from
the
city's
perspective,
we
only
have
a
little
a
limited
amount
of
money
that
we
can
work
with,
and
so
we
need
to
look
at
the
entire
economic
package.
A
So
if
there's
going
to
be
an
increase
to
the
ad
page,
that's
really
that
that's
going
to
affect
how
how
we,
you
know
how
we
are
going
to
deal
with
all
the
economic
issues
that
that
are
on
the
table.
So
that's
why
we're
wanting
to
have
the
discussion
so
that
we
can
have
an
educated
and
informed
yeah
be
able
to
be
educated
and
informed.
A
So
we
can
caucus
and
figure
out
where
we're
going
to
go
from
here
and
if,
if,
if
you
can
provide
the
ad
pay,
that
could
that
could
move
move
things
forward
for
up
on
our
side?
A
lot
more
and
we
can
at
the
same
time
be
getting
the
costing
and
the
information
on
the
categorization
of
of
where
those
costings
came
from.
A
Okay,
then,
oh,
the
next
big
thing
on
article
30
I
know
that
there
was
an
issue
about
the
legality.
On
from
your
side,
there
was
an
issue
brought
up
about
the
legality
of
the
citizen,
board
members
and
them
being
objective
in
this,
putting
a
condition
on
that
money.
I
had
requested
the
information
from
the
pension
attorney
that
had
that
and
I
didn't
get
it
yet
so
if
I
could
get
provided
that,
so
that
I
could
set
up
a
conference
without
attorney
and
discuss
that
with
them.
A
A
You're
working
on
that
article
as
well,
we
placed
in
a
I
actually
have
one
I
need
to
print
out
during
the
caucus,
I'll
print
out
the
verbal
article,
so
that
you
have
the
written
article
that
we
proposed
verbally
on
the
table.
At
the
last
meeting.
A
And
then
just
we're
gonna
take
the
caucus.
I
think
that
we're
gonna
take
a
caucus
after
this
to
work
on
the
information
requested
and
we're
working
on
our
side
and.
A
Article
4
and
article
31.,
those
were
the
city's
proposals.
I
think
31
was
no
changes
and
I.
Think
four
was
also
oh
wait.
Let
me
look
I
misspoke.
Anyone.
A
Was
disciplinary
action
that
one
added
a
that
one
I
misspoke
31
added
I,
think
an
extra
step
on
an
inform,
an
informal
attempt.
You
know
which
one
was
that
31.
D
A
Right,
oh,
and
so
we
did.
We
proposed
no
changes
right
because
it's
it's
established
by
case
law
and
the
legal
issues
anyway.
So
we
proposed
that
one
and
then
we
proposed
on
article
four
foreign.
A
A
And
I
think
that
you
had
added
something
else
and
we
just
proposed
to
include
the
4.1
4.2
and
the
changes
to
4.3.
So
we
ask
that
you
consider
that
for
a
possible
possible
tentative
agreements
on
Article
4
and
article
31.
C
C
C
D
D
We
gave
a
counter
on
that
one.
We
countered
with
no
chance
okay.
B
A
Because
that
the
Hawaiian
Garden
and
Garrity
or
established
case
law,
that
the
city
must
follow
in
the
employ
the
firefighter
has
those
rights
and
the
cases
may
be
superseded
by
president
or
so
the
case
law
may
change.
But
the
case
law
is
what
the
case
law
is
and
I.
A
Don't
think
that
there's
ever
been
an
issue
with
that
and
it
is
clearly
established
the
Wine
Garden
that
Union
representation
is
afforded
to
the
firefighters
at
their
request
and
Garrity,
that
you
can't
self-incriminate
yourself
or
and
if
you're
required
to
in
the
face
of
disciplinary
action,
to
cooperate,
an
investigation
that
that
any
information
you
provide
will
not
be
used
in
any
other
investigation
other
than
that
one
administrative
investigation.
It
can't
be
used
in
a
criminal
investigation.
It
can't
be
used
in
any
other,
an
HR
investigation.
Anything
that's
that's
separate
and
apart.
A
C
B
Pension
attorney's
response
to
contact
number
contact.
A
A
Okay,
well,
we
requested
it.
So
if
you
can,
if
we
can
request
it
again,
so
that
I
can
visit
with
the
pension
attorney,
do
you
know
if
there's
any
kind
of
legal
opinion
he'd
be
wishing
to
he
he'd
be
willing
to
like.
C
A
A
With
no
changes,
the
only
difference
and
I
think
you
all
had
included
this
in
your
proposal
as
well
is
just
the
identity,
the
the
numbering
of
31.1
and
31.2
of
the
paragraphs.
It
wasn't
numbered
in
the
initial
in
the
current
contract,
but
all
all
the
language
Remains,
the
Same.
A
A
Okay
and
as
far
as
the
costing
that
was
requested
or
the
information
requested
on
the
55
million
dollar
and
the
costing
we're
Jesus
is
working
on
that
I.
Don't
know
that
we'll
have
it
available
by
the
end
of
the
day,
but
we're
going
to
continue
working
on
it
and
we'll
email
it
to
you
as
soon
as
it
becomes
available.
It
should
be,
it
should
be
before
then.
A
We
anticipated
before
the
meeting
the
next
meeting
on
Thursday
yeah
so
and
just
yeah,
and
just
so
we
haven't
discussed
it,
but
we're
still
planning
on
having
the
next
negotiation
sessions
for
Thursday
and
Friday
I
think
the
Thursday
is
going
to
start
about
1,
1
or
1.
30
I
need
to
look
at
the
schedule
and
then
the
Friday
will
be
all
day.
So
since
we'll
be
here,
we
can
start
early
at
nine
if
necessary.
C
E
B
C
D
Was
it
was
as
far
as
the
appeals
that
to
be
able
to
do.
B
D
10
points,
even
though
it
doesn't
really
equate
to
really
being
a
better
firefighter
at
that
position.
Right
I
think
we
already
give
all
our
members
a
Five,
Points
and
I
think
I
had
some
experience
of
that
person
really
applies
himself
to
to
Really
study,
or
you
know,
and
so
I
think
they
already
have
an
extra
two-point
Advantage.
A
B
A
Because
that
makes
it
the
problem
is,
it
makes
us
difficult
to
cost
it
and
work
on
our
counter
proposals
as
well,
because
we
need
to
know
how
the
ad
page
is
going
to
look
and
or
what
the
proposal
is
going
to
be
on
the
table.
So.
A
Already
discussed
it,
but
you
know
we,
we
don't
know
if,
if
that's
going
to
be
what
the
proposal
is
and
we
and
we
can
cost
it
based
on
what
we've
discussed.
A
That
kind
of
he
has
to
go
through
because
we're
trying
to
determine
what
would
actually
show
the
better
the
estimate
right
rather
like
an
average
rather
than
per
person,
because
it
it
tends
to
be
a
pretty
tedious
and
difficult
costume.
We
want
to
make
sure
we
get
it
right,
but
we
are
working
on
it
and
we've
started
so
we'll
we'll
be
doing
that.
In
the
meantime,
I.
B
Guess,
I
guess
to
being
I
guess
be
more
time
effective
I
mean
we
understand
how
this
is
a
package.
Basically
one
affects
the
other.
If
we
can
visually
here
be
working
on
it,
you
know
in
person,
instead
of
kind
of
proposal,
kind
of
proposal
we're
just
going
back
and
forth
on,
you
know,
shooting
our
shot
in
the
Wind.
We
know
that
one's
going
to
have
effect
on
the
other,
so
we
can
work
on
it
together
on
both
articles
to
see
where
we're
getting
at
I.
B
Think
we'll
make
more
Headway
like
that
other
than
trying
to
figure
out
one
and
then
come
back
to
do
the
other
right.
A
I
think
that
the
reason
that
we're
asking
for
this
information
is
because,
from
here
on
out
my
vision
is
you
know
where
we
need
to
get
to
the
big
meaty
items
that
are
difficult
and
we
know,
and
we've
said
on
the
table
that
doesn't
be
a
pack.
You
know
it
looks
like
a
package
deal,
so
our
our
our
our
Envision
of
how
this
is
going
to
work
is
that
we're
going
to
put
package
proposals.
C
A
C
A
So
yes,
I
agree
that
it
we
probably
need
to
start
talking
about
package
proposals
from
here
on
out.
We
still
do
need
the
ability
to
caucus,
because
I
need
to
caucus
with
my
team
and
you
know
be
able
to
discuss
what
those
packages
are
going
to
look
like
how
the
counter
packages
are
coming
up.
A
But
now
that
we're
gonna
start
doing
package
proposals,
I
think
things
can
probably,
since
all
those
are
going
to
be
intertwined-
or
you
know,
the
pieces
are
going
to
be
put
together,
that
things
can
move
a
little
bit
faster,
so
we're
working
on
putting
our
package
proposal.
That's
why
we're
hoping
that
maybe
we
could
get
some
input
or
a
proposal
on
the
ad
pays.
We
do
have
verbally
what
you're
thinking
about.
C
D
I
think
the
only
one
that
really
I
guess
that
everybody
specify
I
know
like
captains
like
the
tiers
of
captains
right
and
District
Chiefs,
there's
different
tiers
and
deputies.
So
as
far
as
that,
as
far
as
the
costume,
you
might
I
guess,
have
a
question
as
far
as,
if
you
look
at
it,
which
one
are
we
looking
with
it,
not
to
do
one
specific
for
each
one
for
each
step
increase,
basically
just
just
doing
that
that
highest
increase
on
you
proposal.
D
A
You
email
both
of
us,
because
what
we're
doing
is
we're
working
on
the
we've
started,
working
on
the
costing
and
the
things
that
you've
requested,
including
the
the
ad
pay.
You
know,
proposal
that
we've
talked
about
that
might
be
on
the
table.
C
A
Gather
information
I
also,
you
know,
there's
a
bunch
of
other
things:
I
need
to
reach
out
to
Mr
Chapa
and
make
sure
that
I
get
the
like
the
pension
attorney.
So
we
can
work
out
that
issue,
there's
a
lot
of
different
little
issues
that
we
could
be
that
we're
going
to
try
and
work
work
out
before
we
sit
back
here
on
Thursday
and.
B
B
Concerning
the
results
of
the
voting
for
the
pension,
do
you
need
Chapa
to
email
that,
for
that.
C
A
Email
both
of
us,
because
sometimes
our
meetings,
cross
and
I
don't
get
to
talk
to
him
until
the
end
of
the
day,
and
we
for
we,
you
know
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
everything
touched
on
that
we
requested.
A
It
should
be
pretty
quick,
okay
and
then
from
one
what
I'm
hearing
on
article
29
on
the
Insurance
Fund.
What
I'm
hearing
is
that
y'all
are
willing
to
work
on
that.
You
just
wanted
to
see
what
the
economic
proposal
package
proposal
would.
D
Look
like
we
kind
of
we
just
need
to
go
over
a
little
bit,
yeah,
I,
guess
and
just
make
sure
everything
on
it
is
correct.
You
already
have
most
of
everything
over
here.
I
guess
two
dot
comments.
A
D
Oh
yes,
okay
I
mean
we
know
that
the
problem
is
there
and
we're
responsible
for
it.
We're
not
looking
for
it
to
go
in
the
red.
You
know
at
any
point
right
or
just
to
be
able
to
fix
it
at
that
minute.
You.
G
A
A
So
if
you
we
don't
have
anything
else
to
present
today,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
background
work
that
we're
working
on
and
and
we're
going
to
start
we're
going
to
utilize.
At
least
the
next
I'm
probably
going
to
be
here
to
we're
going
to
probably
be
here
for
another
over
an
hour
to
just
continue
our
team
meeting
utilize,
the
time
that
we
have
today
and
then
we'll
continue
working.
A
But
let's,
let's
make
an
effort
to
keep
in
touch
before
and
and
try
to
get
some
of
the
little
issues
resolved.
You
know
on
one-on-one,
with
the
that
way
when
we
sit
at
the
table,
we'll
be
talking
about
our
package
proposals
and
and
hopefully
move
back
and
forth
and
hopefully
maybe
come
up
with
an
agreement
soon,
so
hopefully,
okay,
all
right-
that's
all
I
have
for
today
and
I.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
and
the
stuff
that
we
did
today.
A
We
got
some
Tas
done,
we've
got
some
movement
and
we'll
get
the
information
I'll
make
sure
to
talk
to
or
try
to
get
a
hold
of
the
pension
attorney,
and
we
look
forward
to
finding
out
the
results
of
the
pension
vote.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Thank
you
all
very
much
and
we're
adjourned
at
3,
45.