►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 090221
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 090221
A
A
We
have
quorum.
Thank
you,
we'd
like
to
make
a
motion
before
we
move
on,
to
excuse
someone,
commissioner,
dominguez
and
and
commissioner
nouveau
they're
they're,
both
out
of
town
on
work
related
projects.
So
we
have
motion
in
a
second
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor.
All
right
and
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
the
pledge
of
allegiance
and
everybody
please
stay
with
us.
C
A
Anybody
signed
up
at
this
point,
no
sir,
all
right
moving
right
along
into
public
hearings
and
recommendations
for
an
ordinance
all
right.
The
first
one
that
we
have
is
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
of
the
city
of
laredo
by
authorizing
a
conditional
use
department
for
an
amusement
redemption
machine
establishment
on
lot
nine
block
nine
country
club
commercial
subdivision,
located
at
4302,
east
saunders
and
suites
one
and
two
only
all
right,
we'll
make
the
presentation
back
to
them.
D
Okay,
this.
D
D
I'm
going
to
have
trouble
with
that
name.
One
week,
chad,
applicant
and
craig
a
lawrence
representative.
The
property
is
described
as
law,
9
block,
9
country
club,
commercial
subdivision,
located
at
4302,
east
saunders,
suites
number
one
and
two
the
request
is
for
conditional
use.
Permit
now.
Pardon
me
the
request
is
for
a
conditional
use
permit
and
the
proposed
use
is
an
amusement
redemption
machine
establishment.
D
This
is
an
aerial
view
or
a
location.
We
have
the
street
street
view
or
no
I'm
sorry.
This
is
the
area
right
there
on
saunders.
D
And
here's
the
staff's
recommendation
staff
does
not
support
the
application
for
the
following
reasons.
While
the
proposed
use
is
located
along
the
highway
and
compatible
with
a
mix
of
intensity,
commercial
use
is
already
present.
The
commercial
plaza
sparking
does
not
meet
the
code
requirement
for
the
existing
use.
The
proposed
the
proposed
use
and
the
future
retail
uses
that
might
occupy
the
two
vacant.
Suites
that
remain
I've
included
the
parking
requirements
there.
The
commercial
plaza
would
require
22
spaces.
D
D
A
F
Thank
you,
mr
video.
My
name
is
craig
lawrence
and
I
am
the
representative
of
the
applicant.
I
am
also
representative
of
the
radio
vapor
land
loredo
vapor
land,
just
for
your
edification
consists
of
myself,
ms
garcia
bolvado,
her
son
ramon
hernandez
and
his
wife
alexander
hernandez.
Those
are
the
four
members
of
the
llc.
F
The
reason
I
think
we
operate
as
an
llc
is
that
I
have
to
be
an
attorney
so
when
it
came
time
to
do
the
business,
we're
going
to
do
it
right
and
we
have
sort
of
an
in-house
attorney.
So
that's
why
we're
in
llc
I'd
like
to
thank
mr
navarro
and
ms
gara
for
their
work
on
this
they've
been
most
accommodating,
but
I'm
gonna
respectfully
disagree
with
their
ultimate
conclusion.
F
Let's
first
start
about
what
we
can
agree
upon
in
her
report
that
I
think
is
important
for
everyone
to
notice.
She
has
some
questions
about
the
impact.
The
end
of
the
report
is
the
change.
Contrary
to
the
established
land
use
pattern.
The
answer
she
says
is
no,
and
we
agree
with
that.
As
you
can
see
from
the
map
she
put
up,
it's
a
mixed
use.
F
There's
b4
use
all
around
us,
I'm
going
to
show
a
map
here
in
a
minute
that
wasn't
shown
that
shows
that
even
more
before
use
as
you
go
further
towards
the
loop
and
away
from
us
towards
the
car
dealership,
would
it
create
an
isolated
zoning
district
again?
No,
it
would
not
will
it
change
influence
living
conditions
in
neighborhoods?
Well,
the
only
neighborhood,
as
you
saw,
was
to
the
north
of
us
and
it's
there's
not
even
a
connecting
road
unless
you
go
around
to
the
west
or
the
east.
F
They
have
here
that
the
commercial
plaza,
which
consists
of
five
one
suite,
is
occupied
by
the
radio
vapor
I'll
talk
about
it
here
in
a
minute
and
the
other
four
are
vacant
at
the
moment.
One
and
two
we
plan
to
use
is
this
machinita
establishment.
Well,
if
it
was
totally
full,
it
would
require
36
spaces,
the
funeral
home
right
next
door,
mr
aguero,
who
is
a
very
good
neighbor
of
ours.
We
have
a
very
good
relationship,
he's
used
our
parking
and
over
as
overflow
for
particularly
large
funerals
and
rosaries.
F
We
have
no
problem
with
that.
He
has
no
problem
with
us.
If
we
have
an
overflow
for
some
of
our
uses.
Well,
he's
got
40
spaces
he's
only
required
to
have
32.
So
if
you
take
those
eight
and
add
it
to
our
22,
that
gets
you
to
30..
That
gets
us
six
spaces
short
as
a
matter
of
just
what
we
have
to
do
when
we
tick
boxes
and
that's
not
a
criticism,
that's
just
that's
the
staff's
job.
F
I
would
propose
that
those
six
spaces
in
reality
are
not
as
important
as
you
might
seem.
For
instance,
let's
talk
about
mr
elwedo's
funeral
home.
He
is
only
really
busy
on
certain
days
in
the
mornings
and
sometimes
in
the
evenings.
Whenever
there
is
a
gathering
for
a
procession
to
the
cemetery,
there
are
people
that
use
the
parking
lot
or
around
the
six
o'clock
hour
when
there
is
occasionally
a
rosary
that
his
parking
lot
gets
full
or
overflows.
During
the
day,
his
parking
lot
is
almost
totally
empty.
F
F
We
might
have
one
or
two
cars
a
day
now
that
will
stay
and
come
in
and
when
they
come
in,
like
the
cars
that
go
through
the
through
the
drive-through,
they
are
generally
there
to
get
their
product
whatever
they
want
for
their
electronic
cigarette
or
their
cbd.
That's
from
hemp,
not
that's
legal
in
texas,
they're
in
and
out
they're,
not
there
all
day.
F
I've
been
a
lawyer
laredo
now
for
30
years
15
as
a
solo
practitioner
and
my
files
have
run
out
of
storage,
and
so
we
had
a
meeting
we're
going
to
knock
through
a
door
from
our
existing
suite
five
into
sweet.
Four,
that's
gonna
become
storage,
so
that's
gonna,
be
one!
That's
never
gonna
be
occupied
by
anybody
except
my
files.
F
F
F
F
F
F
It's
the
law,
my
point
being
that
all
of
these
conditions
that
they
want
to
have
written
into
the
ordinance
that
say
follow
the
law.
I
don't
think
need
to
be
there,
because
we
we
have
to
follow
the
law.
We
don't
have
a
choice
to
do
it.
It's
not
that
we're
against
them.
It
just
seems
that
it's
kind
of
overkill
to
say,
oh
and
by
the
way
you're
going
to
follow
all
the
ordinances
some
of
them.
I
think
that
that
are
that
would
be
needed
are
particularly
with
regard
to
15
and
16.
F
15
says
the
number
of
machines
should
be
limited
to
the
square
footage
available
for
the
proposed
use.
I
think
that
is
a
good
one
to
add,
because
I
don't
think
we
want
to
put
more
machines
in
there
than
would
be
safe
or
are
required
by
the
current
ordinances.
I
think
that's
something
that
the
that
the
people
that
reply
for
the
permit
can
deal
with,
but
I
think
that's
something
that
does
make
sense
to
put
in
the
statute.
F
It's
very
valuable
work
that
staff
does
but
judge
notson
said
to
me
always,
but
in
the
end,
I'm
the
one
with
discretion,
as
you
all
are
the
ones
that
have
the
discretion
here,
we're
not
just
putting
in
input.
If
that
was
the
case,
all
we
need
would
be
a
computer.
We
just
put
in
our
input
and
say:
okay.
Well,
it's
either
good
or
bad.
I
don't
think
that's
the
purpose
of
commissions
like
this.
I
think
commissions
like
this
exist
for
cases
just
like
this
one
here.
Where
is
it
technically,
not
quite
meeting
it?
F
F
Miss
sepulveda
has
been
watching
the
news
a
lot
lately.
She
sees
mr
eids
on
the
tv,
often
saying
that
the
city
is
hemorrhaging
money
that
we
need
income
for
the
city.
This
is
a
tenant
that,
quite
frankly,
is
going
to
pay
the
city
a
great
deal
more
money
during
its
existence
and
it's
going
to
pay
its
landlords.
This
is
a
type
of
establishment
that
the
city
can
really
get
some
good
income
from,
and
it's
a
voluntary
tax.
F
It's
a
tax
that
people
do
on
their
own,
so
you're
not
harming
anybody
by
unfairly
imposing
on
others
the
burden
that
this
establishment
put
in.
That's
people
that
do
it
on
their
own.
So
with
that,
I
would
urge
the
approval
of
the
of
the
change
in
the
cup,
and
I
would
like
the
commission
to
do
that.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
ask.
A
The
only
question
I
had
on
you,
as
you
mentioned,
I
think
you
mentioned-
item
15
and
16
and
stuff
like
that-
the
number
of
machines
well,
obviously,
that's
a
given
it's
going
to
be
limited
by
the
square
footage.
It's
a
no-brainer,
really
the
16
to
selling
consumption
of
alcohol
on
premises.
I
know
in
the
past
some
of
these
establishments
used
to
give
away
alcohol
and
when
you
have,
if
you're
planning
to
do
that,
it
says
you
can't
you
can't
consume
alcohol
there.
So
I
don't
understand
that
one.
F
If
somebody
wants
to
give
it
away,
I
would
think
that
that
the
operator
here
wouldn't
do
too
much
of
that,
but
you
are
correct.
You
may
want
to
do
that.
To
get
people
in
I
mean
that
would
be
a
limiting
factor
today.
F
Another
limiting
factor-
that's
in
there
is
item,
number
item,
number
four,
it's
suggesting
operating
only
between
11
and
midnight
and
I
believe
the
the
land
use
mode
actually
says
it's
between
8
a.m
and
2.
2
am
that's
correct
and
I
think
that
would
be
a
limitation
he
probably
wouldn't
want
as
well.
Mr.
F
Why
it
was
limited
to
those
that
is
true?
This
is,
he
has
told
us,
that's
when
he
wants
to
do
it,
but
I
don't
know
that
he
needs
to
be
required
to
do.
If
that's
what
he
says
he'll
do.
I
think
he'll
live
up
to
it,
but.
G
Okay,
I
mean
it's
it's,
mr
chairman,
if
I
may
the
comments
some
of
these
comments,
we
leave
in
here
simply
to
remind
the
applicant
about
some
of
these.
They
might
seem
to
be
redundant
or
whatever,
but
it's
just
a
safe
check
with
them
to
make
sure
that
those
get
done,
that
that's
why
they
kind
of
were
repeating
there.
G
The
other
comment
I'd
like
to
make
is
that
you
know
the
math
that's
being
done
for
the
parking
spaces
he's
not
wrong,
but
we
don't
have
a
written
letter
from
the
neighbor
saying
that
he
will
do
this
so
we're
just
going
under
the
assumption
that
the
neighbor
is
going
to
allow
him
to
do
that
and
not
unless
we
had
something
in
writing.
Could
we
really
take
this?
Take
that
into
consideration.
A
With
the
matter
is
the
parking
requirement
you
know
he's
right
now.
What
14
space
is
short,
14
short
all
right,
but
there
is
an
ordinance
that
allows
you
to
be
within
a
thousand
feet
and
utilize
parking,
but
I
agree
with
you:
I
mean
you
would
have
to
have
written
agreements
to
comply
with
the
parking
requirements.
If.
F
I
can
speak
to
the
rich
man.
I've
brought
that
up
with
mr
awedo
several
times,
and
he
has
told
me
he
just
he
will
it's
an
agreement.
He
will
honor
it
as
we
have
honored
it
with
him,
as
there
have
been
times
when
he's
had
substantial
overflow
into
our
parking
for
one
funeral
or
other.
For
whatever
reason,
I've
asked
him
if
he
put
it
in
writing.
He
says
he
doesn't
want
to
put
that
in
writing.
I
believe
councilman
gutierrez
even
went
by
and
asked
him.
Would
you
put
it
writing?
F
Has
said
that
he
will
honor
that
agreement
and
I
don't
think
it's
a
problem
for
him,
as
I
said,
because
his
hours
of
operation
are
such
and
the
flow
of
traffic
for
him
is
such,
like,
I
said,
there's
only
a
certain
very
distinct
hours,
where
he's
got
a
lot
of
people
there.
Otherwise
it's
a
wide
open
parking
lot.
Let
me
ask
you.
A
This
within
a
thousand
feet,
I
think,
there's
several
other
parking
areas
also
that
can
be
utilized
through
an
agreement
to
make
you
whole,
you
know
that's
an
option,
I'm
just
bringing
that
up,
because
I'm
you
know
I
was.
I
was
asking
my
other
commissioner
here
to
bring
some
things
up
on
google
earth
and
we're
looking
at
it.
We're
measuring
distances
from
that
establishment.
A
1000
feet
either
way
to
see
what's
available,
they
try
and
get
this
thing
into
compliance.
You
know,
but
again,
that
would
be
something
that
one
of
the
conditions
they're
imposing
is
that
you
must
have
a
written
agreement.
I
believe
that
is
that.
A
I
F
F
In
the
afternoon,
and
that's
the
occasional
rosary,
I've
seen
this
in
my
personal
experience,
I
don't
think
you
know
rosaries
are
set
at
times
when
people
don't
have
other
social
engagements
to
do
so.
People
can
go
the
rosary,
so
I
don't
think
that
would
really
be
an
overlap
there
either.
Just
as
a
practical
matter,
I
just
have
some
questions.
F
But
that
would
be
something
with
the
with
the
operator
to
do
with
getting
the
permit
right.
K
K
F
Mean
I
I
can't
say
no,
I
can
always
ask
it's
certainly
possible.
You
know
the
neighbor
next
door
has
historically
been
difficult
to
deal
with,
but
he's
got
a
big
empty
lot.
It
would
take
care
of
everything.
The
neighbor
on
the
other
side
of
mr
awedo,
you
know,
runs
a
truck
service.
I
don't
think
they're
going
to
want
people
parking
there
across
the
street.
It's
possible.
F
The
vacant
lots
are
to
the
west
that
you
there
used
to
be
a
hotel
there
to
our
east
is
the
the
funeral.
I
think.
G
E
E
D
D
All
the
five
uses
that
are
proposed
there,
so
if
he
keeps
those
two
suites
empty,
that's
four
spaces,
four
spaces
per
suite.
So
that's
eight,
so
he
would
only
be
short.
B
F
I
can
do
that
quickly.
Yes,
that
that's
not
an
issue,
but
then
we
would
still
be
back
to
where
we
are
right
now,
where
we're
six
bases
short,
which
is
where?
Is
there
any
discretion
to
be
exercised
here?
Because
of
the
way
it
is
actually
used?
Because
I
can
tell
you
the
four
spots
for
laredo
vapor
are
not
needed,
as
the
people
are
just
though
there's
another
place.
F
He
he
built
a
crematorium
there.
I
believe,
okay,
that.
F
J
F
E
F
I
have
tried
he
just
doesn't
want
to
put
it
in
writing.
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
him,
but
my
guess
is
he
doesn't
want
to
bind
any.
You
know
any
of
his
family
in
the
future.
Should
something
happen
to
him,
but.
A
A
I
think
at
this
point,
if
we
analyze
his
parking
situation
right
now
with
the
two
things
he
said,
one,
the
vapor
shop
is
usually
mostly
drive-through
and
two
of
the
other
one
is
going
to
become
a
storage
unit
that
frees
up
eight
spaces,
so
that
gives
him
he'll
be
too
short.
At
the
end,
I
guess
more
or
less.
G
N
That
he
could
get
any
other
parking
space
within
a
thousand
feet
of
the
location
and
as
long
as
he
gets
it
in
writing
and
you're
good
without.
G
N
You're
you're
saying
that
if
he
does
that
with
the
sweets
that
he
then
would
be
short
six
spaces
right,
we're
just
trying
to
come
up
with
something.
So
what
we're
saying
is
that
the
ordinance
allows
for
him
to
look
for
those
six
spaces
anywhere
within
a
thousand
feet
of
his
location,
right,
correct,
correct,
right,
yeah,
and
so,
if
he
produces
a
letter,
getting
somebody
to
to
say
that
yes
do.
They
have
to
indicate
at
what
point
in
time
during
the
day
they
would
have
those
spaces.
D
Available
the
code
requires
that
the
hours
not
overlap-
I
put
it.
I
put
this
section
in
your
in
your
packet,
and
so
the
code
requires
for
joint
use
agreements
that
the
the
hours
can't
overlap
so
that
the
two
users
can't
be
vying
for
the
same
spaces.
At
the
same
time,
if
you
were
able
to
find
one
that
met
the
criteria
under
the
code,
then
we
would
attach
it
to
the
ordinance
and
then
the
code
even
spells
out
that
the
agreement
must
continue,
while
the
two
uses
are
in
effect.
N
D
The
establishment
they
indicated
would
open
at
11,
but
the
funeral
home,
the
funeral
home,
opens
from
eight
to
six
per
their
website
and
they
indicated
in
their
narrative
that
they
would
open
at
11
and
close
at
midnight.
N
D
J
D
K
Do
I
have
a
motion
from
anybody
I'll
make
a
motion
to
recommend
the
cup
and
by
adding
the
condition
that
the
two
suites
that
he
mentioned
remain
vacant.
A
Okay,
well,
the
only
thing
is:
wait,
wait,
wait
a
second
okay,
the
the
to
make
the
sweet
two
sweets
become
vacant,
stay
awake
and
well.
I
can
see
one,
but
we
also
have
to
think
in
terms
you've
got
a
cash
flow
to
make
the
property
whole.
That's
what
your
business
and
that's
why
the
other
suite
would
become
viable
somewhere
down
the
line.
Yeah,
I
think
yes,
come
on
up.
One
of
the
speeds
is
going
to
be
converted.
A
A
I
mean
we
can
we
can
move
this
along.
If
you
know
we
just
kind
of
like
what
johnny's
trying
to
do
is
trying
to
come
in
with
language
that
kind
of
works
for
everybody
yeah,
and
so
I
think
the
language
that
you
try
to
incorporate
would
be
something
very
similar
to
say.
You
know
we
would
grant
the
conditional
use
a
permit
with
this
special
condition
being
added
on.
A
That
would
be
that
one
of
the
units
becomes
a
storage
unit,
and-
and
I
think
that
would
be
it
because
you
really
cannot
say
we're
going
to
restrict
both
the
paper
from
using
parking
because
it's
already
existing,
but
if
one
of
them
does
stay
vacant
because
of
storage
gives
you
a
little
bit
more
parking
and
if
you
analyze
the
thing
in
terms
of
the
hours
of
operation
they're
proposing
11
to
11.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
something
like
that
right,
yeah.
A
A
I
I
O
G
A
K
Yes,
my
motion
is
chicken.
Yes,
just
to
repeat
the
motion
for
record.
Is
that
recommend
the
conditioning
news
permit,
as
the
conditions
are
listed,
plus
what
he
has
stated
that
one
suite
remained
vacant
for
storage
only.
A
A
A
P
Good
evening
good
evening,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
commission,
frankie
style
with
surefie
engineering
speaking
in
favor
of
this
item
and
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
A
I
got
one
question
frank,
yes,
that
whole
area
is
being
developed
right
now
other
than
the
blood.
That's
right
before
us.
There's
a
lot
of
land
movement
going
on
in
there
a
lot
of
cutting
already
right,
not
just
on
that
partial,
but
on
the
whole
parcel.
If
I
saw
what
they
sent
me
today,
it's
all
on
planet.
A
Incorrect,
that's
what
I
was
that's,
why
I'm
asking
the
question,
because
there's
already
been
work
being
done
there
for
some
time
and
I'm
familiar
with
the
area
right,
but
I
saw
the
map
that
they
sent
me
and
it
says
that
it's
unplanned,
and
so
I'm.
P
Done
we
had
in
hand
at
the
time
was
saying
it
was
unplanted.
I
did
recently
go
to
the
site
and
saw
that
dirt
was
being
moved,
which
my
guess
is
that
premier
has
probably
pulled
the
plaque
through
there,
because
they're
actually
in
the
process
of
extending
that
road
which
we're
going
to
be
connecting
to
where
we
actually
submit
it.
Well
we're
going
to
submit
a
preliminary
plaque
showing
where
we're
going
to
connect
to
that
future.
A
P
Gonna
back
up
onto
university
boulevard
when
I
was
out
there
just
this
past
week,
there's
actually
a
road,
that's
being
rough
cut
right
now,
so
yeah.
A
P
A
A
J
P
R1B
you're,
probably
looking
at
some
type
of
condominium,
is
what
you're
looking
down
that
area,
especially
for
that
area.
It's
a
big
professional
area
as
far
as
the
medical
communities
around
there.
I
think
it
lends
itself
to
to
allow
that
type
of
development
to
take
place.
Maybe
for
doctors,
nurses,
I
think
there's
there's
actually
an
accounting
office
near
there
as
well.
So
I
don't
have.
P
A
P
A
Correct
because
that's
the
only
way
it
would
work
now
you're
going
in
right
against
an
r1,
and
I
guess
at
this
point
that's
sort
of
like
a
buffer.
I
guess
today.
G
A
P
At
this
point,
I
don't
believe
there
is
no.
I
mean
I
we're
doing
this
one
particular
zone
change
with
platinum
involved
as
well,
but
I
I
think,
from
the
master
plan
I've
seen
there's
no
residential
development
taking
place.
A
N
E
A
A
So
it's
now
going
okay,
so
it's
going
to
go
to
the
second
reading
this
next
cycle,
the
city
council,
okay,
so
that's
going
to
become
platinum.
Okay,
so
I
move
to
approve
this
home
just
a
minute
just
a
minute.
I
need
to
do
one
more
thing:
okay,
anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
against
the
zone
change
against
his
own
change.
H
A
We
have
a
motion.
We
have
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
hi,
all
right.
All
right.
Anybody
against
motion
carries
thank
you
all
right.
Moving
into
public
hearings
and
consideration
of
the
following
preliminary
replace
public
hearing
and
preliminary
consideration
of
the
replay
of
block
eight
oak
ridge
subdivision
into
eastwood
subdivision,
I'm
sorry
ironwood
into
ironwood
estate
subdivision
intended
single-family
residential.
Yes,.
M
A
Okay,
I
do
have
a
question.
I
know.
One
of
the
comments
from
planning
is
that
emily
street
is
more
than
700
700
liter
feet
as
opposed
to
500..
A
E
R
The
item
that
really
concerns
our
intent
here
is
that
particular
one
where
the
dead
end
is
more
than
500
the
code,
the
development
code,
chapter
3,
section
3-2,
subsection
j
states
that
we
cannot
do
that.
However,
I
do
see
several
constraints
that
are
not
in
our
per
se
control.
As
you
see,
we
do
have
some
easements
that
really
limit
the
how
we
can
develop
this
property
and
make
reasonable
use
of
it,
and
I
want
to
let
you
know
that
in
the
international
fire
code,
section
d,
103.4.
E
I
R
A
R
We
already
have
a
cul-de-sac,
design
and
the
cul-de-sac
that
we
have.
It
is
in
compliance
with
this
particular
section
as
well.
It
requires
a
96
foot
diameter
which
is
big
enough
to
make
that
fire
truck
to
turn
around
and
and
leave
the
site.
So
I
just
like.
I
say
you
know
that
all
the
other
comments
I
think
we
can
address
those
and-
and
we
have
no
issues
with
it,
but
this
one
in
particular
it
will
limit
our
density
and
again,
you
know,
given
the
constraints
of
how
we
are
landlocked.
R
A
R
Not
we're
complying
with
the
sony
and,
like
I
said
you
know
my
the
main
concern
that
we
have
based
on
the
comments
that
we
receive
is
the
dead
end.
Condition
that
that
it's
in
conflict
with
the.
R
You
know
we
we're
trying
to
to
pretty
much
adhere
to
all
the
other
requirements,
but
this
one
in
particular
will
make
a
significant
impact
to
the
development.
So
I
request
that
you
guys
can
approve
the
current
layout
that
we
have
so
that
we
can
make
a
reasonable
use
of
the
land
and
and
be
able
to
put
this
subdivision
on
the
ground.
Okay,.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
30
is
a
threshold
where's
chief
dominguez
30
for
fire
yeah,
anything
over
30
yeah.
It's
in
the
second
end.
They
go
over
30
and.
A
N
M
H
Good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
garcia
and
I
live
on
the
corner
of
emily
and
kimberly,
which
is
which
is
probably
going
to
be
the
main
entrance
to
that
proposed.
H
I've
been
living
there
for
three
years
already,
and
it
is
a
problem.
The
street
saint
john,
coming
into
kimberly.
It's
curved
street
cars
there
go
like
crazy.
There's
no
stop
signs,
except
on
emily,
which
will
probably
make
it
even
worse
from
22
houses
proposed
trying
to
come
out
of
that.
Neighborhood
there's
no
other
way
to
come
out,
except
through
emily.
H
H
For
the
for
the
traffic
and
the
safety
of
that-
and
I
live
right
in
the
corner
so
automatically
it
affects
me-
it's
not
even
a
whole
street
from
from
86.01
to
that
dead.
End
entrance,
it's
not
even
a
whole
street,
so
it
is.
It
is
a
concern.
Okay,
sorry,
all.
S
About
opposing
as
it
as
you
said,
it's
going
to
be
one
way
and
one
way
out,
yeah
right.
Yes,
that
area
right
there,
the
the
people
who
already
live
there
kind
of
take
up
the
entrance
there,
so
you'd
be
kind
of
creating
an
issue
for
them
as
well.
Aside
from
that,
the
fact
that
it's
one
way
in
one
way
out
it
would
create
possible
problems
if
fire
or
pd
would
be
going
in
and
out
of
there.
S
I
don't
think
it's
a
really
good
idea
to
put
something
there
like
that.
I
mean
I'm
not
in
favor
of
putting
parts
everywhere,
but
it
seems
more
suitable
to
put
a
park
in
that
area,
considering
that
there
are
no
parks,
super
close
right
there
other
than
the
san
miguel
park.
You
know
further,
but
that
would
be
like
another
ideal
area
for
park,
not
necessarily
for
for
homes.
You
know
it's
a
nice.
G
So
if
you
were,
if
you
were
coming
from
the
the
country
club
entrance
where
the
tennis
courts
are
whatever
you
would,
you
would
go
one
block
north
on
country
club
boulevard
and
take
a
left
onto
kimberly
and
then
drive
straight
down
kimberly
so
yeah
that
piece
of
property
plantation,
the
one
now
the
butts
plantation
so
on
that
picture
to
the
south
is
plantation
and
country
club
boulevard.
S
N
G
N
E
O
R
Want
to
remind
that,
we're
not
doing
anything
that
is
not
allowed.
What
we're
proposing
is
a
lot
of
the
code.
We
have
the
so
many
and
we're
not
we're
not
deviating
from
it
other
than
the
length
of
the
street.
That
has
nothing
to
do
with
how
many
options
so
that
the
I
do
relate
to
the
concerns
that
the
citizens
have
in
this
particular
intersection.
R
I
think
that
we,
maybe
we
can
put
something
in
place
where
there's
no
parking
allowed
in
that
intersection,
and
I
mean
it's
it's
something
that
I
can
propose,
but
ultimately
it
will
be
up
to
you
to
make
that
recommendation
to
help
get
like
a
free
access
or
where
is
no
obstruction,
but
we
still
have
the
minimum
width
of
the
street
to
be
big
enough
to
to
comply
with.
R
J
R
R
That
the
length
of
the
street
is
the
issue
and
I
don't
think
what
we're
proposing
goes
against
the
you
know.
Okay,.
K
Thank
you
johnny.
My
question
is:
is
this?
Is
this
like
part
of
the
main
master
plan
that
is
that
last
phase?
Is
this.
O
I
I
R
R
N
C
J
A
R
To
be
building
in
the
easement
for
sure,
but
the
structure
will
be
outside
of
that
easement
and
again,
that's
100
feet
of
backyard
that
those
houses
are
gonna.
R
R
That
is
the
easement
itself.
Is
the
area
that
that
governs,
and
I
mean
those
those
requirements
are
set
when
they
pretty
much
built
them.
A
N
R
R
So
you
have
about
physically,
you
probably
have
about
25
feet
all
from
the
transformation.
A
Okay,
now,
let's
looking
at
the
at
the
aerial
there,
look
at
that,
let's,
let's
look
at
the
piece
of
groundwork
and
you
see
the
lines
right
there.
Yeah
all
right
now
go
to
the
vacant
property
and
let's
just
see
where
those
lines
are
which
is
right.
There
you
have
a
pointer
out
that
you
can
just
kind
of
there.
You
go
right
there.
That's
your
transmission
line
right
there.
A
A
R
A
A
G
A
A
But
no,
but
for
us
for
making
it
you
know.
In
other
words,
if
you
want
to
sell
a
lot
to
a
property,
the
commission
should
know
how
much
of
it
is
that'll
come
at
the
one
stop
shop.
I
understand,
but
you
know
sometimes
these
are
important
issues
for
the
commission
to
be
able
to
have
all
this
information
together
to
be
able
to
make
a
good
decision
a
ballot.
A
You
know
answer
on
on
whether
this
goes
forth
or
not
the
way
it
is
because,
if
we'd
have
the
information
at
hand
as
opposed
to
having
to
wait
by
the
time
we
get
this
thing
back,
it's
going
to
come
back
as
a
final,
and
you
know
it
could
be
that
well,
there's
only
60
feet
a
lot
and
what
was
your
concern?
G
A
R
R
Although
we're
concerned
about
you
know
that
we're
wasting
a
hundred
feet,
you
know
in
our
eyes,
but
it
is
what
it
is
and
we're
constrained
by
that,
but
the
matter
that,
whether
we
have
enough
buildable
area
we
we
do
have
we're
anticipating
putting
twenty
five
hundred
experts
for
the
home.
Today,
okay,.
A
We
have
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second
well
wait,
a
minute
subject
to
all
the
comets,
even
the
one
in
planet,
on
the
seven
hood
700
feet,
you
see
he's
asking
he
needs
on
that
comment
that
the
street
is
700
feet.
The
streets
cannot
be
more
than
500
feet,
so
the
only
way
to
do
that
is
that
comment
has
to
be
strictly
looted.
Yeah.
S
A
The
table
it
has
to
be
done
before
you
take
a
vote
on
it.
Yeah,
it's
done.
Okay,
move
it
right
along
next!
Please.
Okay.
Next
item
item
consideration
of
the
following
preliminary
plans
and
preliminary
replats.
M
A
All
right,
I
don't
see
engineer
here-
is
anybody
here
representing
guerra
engineering.
A
Okay,
what
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission?
No
on
the.
A
Second-
and
we
have
a
second
almost
in
favor
signify
by
saying
those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you
next
item
that
we
have
is
motion
to
table
item
8b,
so
we
have
a
letter
here
at
the
table
in
it.
So
we
have
motion.
We
have
a
second
circle.
Second,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
hi.
A
Gary's
next
item
is
letter
c
preliminary
consideration
of
the
plan
of
central
village
subdivision
based
to
the
attendance
residential
and
commercial.
M
Mr
chairman,
for
the
record,
the
applicant
is
l,
91,
vc
properties,
llc,
the
engineered
record
isabella
consulting
llc,
the
proposed
use
is
residential
commercial.
The
zoning
size
172
adult
is
b3
and
r1a
the
general
location,
approximately
11.65
acres
located
south
of
us
highway,
59
and
west
of
balboa
loop,
burial
view
street
view.
M
T
T
E
G
Below
it
are
the
the
s
and
stables,
oh
okay,
where
is
that?
Oh.
N
It's
it's
actually
to
the
west
of
that.
T
There
is
a
stream
that
goes
through
there,
the
commissioner,
and
that
was
a
review
by
the
environmental
engineers.
We
had
that
information
with
the
master
plan
and
they
deemed
it
that
is
they're,
not
jurisdictional,
they're,
not
wireless
of
the
us,
and
they
have
the.
We
have
the
concurrence
from
the
core
of
engineers.
O
L
Yes,
sir
reuben,
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
comment.
Our
plans
examiner
accidentally
left
off
a
comment.
This
west
side
of
this
subdivision
were
this
sorry
and
sherratt's,
where
they
intersect
from
that
point,
west
there's
no
secondary
means
of
egress.
I
just
wanna,
let
you
know
our
examiner
left
it
out,
but
we
did
speak
to
mr
castillo.
He
did
mention
that
they
are
gonna,
add
an
exit,
a
secondary
exit
on
the
south
side
of
this
planet,
but
that
area
that
west
side
does
need
a
secondary
access
point.
T
K
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
adding
fire
comment
number
two:
adding
the
secondary
egress
system,
correct.
A
M
Residential,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record,
the
applicant
is
ariel
alfredo
garza
and
ada
gonzalez
the
engineer
of
record
smb
infrastructure,
cara,
victor
linare,
victor
gelinares
pe
the
proposed
uses
residential
and
the
zoning
for
this
one
lot.
Development
is
not
applicable
and
it
is
located
outside
the
city
limits,
but
within
the
etj.
Q
Yes,
sir
victor
great
good
evening,
mr
chairman,
commissioner
staff,
my
name
is
victor
leonardis,
I'm
with
smb
infrastructure,
I'm
here
to
represent
the
owner,
and
we
do
concur
with
the
staff
comments.
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions.
Okay,.
O
N
Q
The
leus-
I
know
this
area,
the
subdivisions,
there's
water
and
sewer
that
were
done
at
the
colonias
many
many
years
ago,
and
so
I
I
know
the
demands
there
from
from
my
point
at
the
one
stop
shop,
I
would
have
to
provide
the
demand
use,
but
but
they
use
this
only
for
one
single
residential
use.
A
We
have
motion,
we
have
a
second,
that's
the
second
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
All
right
motion
carries
next
item
is
the
consideration
of
the
following
final
plants
and
final
replants,
and
I
guess
we
can
take
these
nine
or
ten
together,
yeah,
nine
and
ten
together,
so
we
can
have
motion
to
hear
them
together.