►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting
A
B
A
You
a
nice
dinner
and
advice,
is
running
a
few
minutes.
Late
will
be
here
in
a
few
minutes.
All
right
and
commission
or
yeah
yeah
has
to
be
excused.
He
has
a
conflict
in
his
schedule
today.
So
can
we
have
a
motion
excuse
tunnel
mo
ii
motion
in
the
second?
All
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
A
A
B
D
A
A
A
E
E
E
We
need
on
the
user
and
the
special
use
permit.
There's
there's
a
restriction
that
the
plans
they
need
to
be
able
approve
any
change
that
we
do
any
change
or
recommendation.
Don't
body
see,
we
will
need
to
resubmit
once
again
son
on
the
on
the
special
use
permit
and
we
already
have
a
loan
approval,
Bank
and
that's
and
I
have
a
copy
of
that.
E
D
Thank
You,
mr.
chairman,
yes,
that's
staff!
Something
well,
yes,
go
ahead,
mr.
Seidman,
what
why
is
it
that
I
know
he's
going
to
go?
Let's
gonna
explain
right
now
or
bring
support
to
why
it
shouldn't
it
needs
to
go
before
said
offensive
beep,
but
to
you
need
to
say
why,
wouldn't
you
be
pushing
for
an
SUV
here?
Well,.
F
For
the
reason
he
stated
that,
if
he
were
to
make
changes
in
this
plan,
come
back
because
you
know
we're
working
through
the
construction
process
had
to
change
something
he
might
have
to
go
back
through
an
SUV
I.
Don't
think
it's
necessary,
I
think
what
he,
what
he's
planning
to
do
with
his
own
change,
fits
in
with
with
residential
in
that
neighborhood
and
being
on
the
thoroughfare
of
the
road,
so
that
staff
we
decided
to
support
this
well.
D
We
of
course
know
that
you
would
support
the
business
of
the
storage
facilities,
just
like
other
ones
that
we're
going
to
see
where
you
say
no
before
no
way
because
of
then
you're
providing
a
long
list
of
types
of
businesses
that
could
be
tucked
in
in
the
future
I'm
just
asking.
Why
is
this
one?
Why
is
there
trust
on
this
and
not
on
the
others?
This.
A
G
A
G
Guess
have
you
considered
the
idea
that
the
three
Lots
adjacent
to
it
on
the
block,
as
well
as
which
are
P
threes
right
now
and
then
the
B
ones
that
are
on
the
next
block
over
on
Lomas
and
sewers,
are
going?
You
probably
come
to
this
Commission
again
within
the
next
year
or
two
asking
to
get
a
p4,
because
we
allowed
this
applicant
to
go
from
AB
you
to
b3
or
b12
a
B.
G
F
Think
that's
something
to
examine
it.
It's
it's
speculative,
but
we
are
currently
in
the
process
of
looking
at
our
zoning
right
now.
You
know
in
and
would
be
allowing
something
like
this
that's
conducive
to
the
residential,
with
the
rezoning
process
that
we're
actually
going
to
talk
about
other
than
they
are
with
the
recode
process,
and
so
in
this
instance,
where
this
African
is
coming,
for
it
was
something
that
fits
in
with
the
residential
that
a
lot
of
the
people
who'll
be
using.
F
This
torch
Vasilis
will
be
residences
that
are
on
smaller
Lots
that
have
stuff
they
want
to
store.
It
works
in
the
neighborhood
and
is
not
out
of
place
if
somebody's
coming
home
with
something
that
doesn't
fit,
then
staff
would
look
at
that
and
and
suggest
that
that
would
not
be
appropriate,
but
we're
in
the
process
now
of
those
definitions
and
how
we
break
them
down
between
the
varies
between
the
zone.
H
F
The
point
three-year
that's
the
point
I
was
making.
Is
that
word
right,
we're
reading
our
our
zoning
categories
and
we
want
them
to
be
more
intuitive,
because
that
a
storage
facility
that
offers
storage
facility
is
the
biggest.
Maybe
it
was
different
20
30
years
ago,
but
the
biggest
component
of
storage
now
is
people
with
homes
that
just
have
too
much
stuff
from
there
they're
moving.
That
fits
in
very
much
with
with
a
neighborhood
where,
maybe
previously
it
was
something
that's
out
of
put
in
an
industrial
area.
We
have
a
lot
of
our
self
storage,
so.
H
F
Right
so
mayor
intense
uses,
yes
yeah.
Yes,
what's
we're
gonna
be
looking
at
that?
What
we
do
recall,
the
rato
is:
have
those
categories
make
more
sense
or
have
your
categories
and
have
a
way
that
it's
more
intuitive
and
they're
complete
the
ultimate
goal?
What's
guiding
us
is
the
comprehensive
plan
where
citizens
gave
us
the
feedback
we
want
to
see
more
mix
of
uses.
We
don't
want
to
have
such
a
separate
sub
separation
of
uses
and
that's
what's
guiding
us.
Okay,.
C
Isn't
that
why
it
would
make
sense,
then,
in
business
to
use
especially
use
permit,
because
there
may
be
changes
to
the
zoning
categories
and
what
is
allowed
in
them
and
if
we
give
it
before
today,
well
the
uses
that
are
currently
before
be
grandfathered
in
for
future
land
use
for
that
property.
And
then
that
would
address
what
mr.
bekku
Henry
was
concerned.
F
About
no,
they
won't
be
grandfathered
in
what
will
be
grandfathered
in
is
the
current
use
of
the
site.
So
what
they're
doing
they'll
be
legal
to
have
a
legal
non-conforming
status
at
the
zoning
changes
and
with
what
we're
contemplating
with
changing
several
of
the
zones
in
the
city
there
will
for
a
while.
There
may
be
several
properties
that
that
already
there's
many
in
the
city
as
old
as
we
are
that
have
a
legal
non-conforming
status
where
what
they're
doing
is
legal
because
they
can
continue
doing
it,
but
they're
not
conforming
anymore.
F
With
the
current
zoning,
it
doesn't
mean
what
they
were
zone
now
they
could
to
have
all
those
zones.
You
know
all
the
uses
and
what
their
current
zone
is
forever,
doesn't
work
that
way.
It's
just
the
current
use.
If
the
zoning
changes,
then,
if
they
ever
want
to
change
their
current
use,
they'd
have
to
conform
with
the
new
zone.
That's
that's
you.
A
F
C
F
F
Continue
that
same
use
on
they
don't
stop
that
same
use.
They
can
continue
indefinitely
their
grandfather's
down.
They
have
a
legal
non-college
status
and
they
can
even
change
ownership.
They
can
sell
the
property
somebody
nuclear
come
in
as
long
as
they
continue
that
use
without
a
break-in
in
the
continuation
of
that
then
they're
fine,
and
we
have
many
many
properties
in
the
city
that
already
fall
in
that
category.
That's
fine!
That's
very
funny.
F
K
All
right,
yeah,
real,
quick
mr.
chairman,
it's
your
home
is
the
last
time
that
we
looked
in
this
item,
even
though
it's
a,
but
they
are
it's
reported
by
staff.
One
of
the
main
issues
was
what
happens
once
we
allow
this
report
and
the
owner
decides
not
to
go
with
the
project
like
that
see.
Now
we
have
an
area
with
a
before
that
can
turn
into
a
lot
of
things
you
have
bar
there's.
K
We
can
have
restaurants,
we
can
whatever
is
allowable
under
under
deport
in
and
I
believe
that
the
last
time
that
we
are
that
we
were
here.
Mr.
chairman,
one
of
the
of
their
conditions
at
that
I
wanted
to
bring
into
the
enthusing
allowing
the
before
is
that
this
particular
project
we
built
there
in.
If
it's
not
built
there,
then
that
will
be
canceled
or
order.
It
be
change
back
to
the
original,
because
once
we
allowed
to
before
they
can
go
out
that
door
and
make
is
it
we're
not
gonna
build?
F
L
A
E
E
A
A
Gonna
happen,
there's
a
lot
of
documents
here
that
say
that
this
is
a
project
and
that's
I
mean
yeah
I.
Could
it
could
fall
out
anyway,
I
mean,
but
at
least
when
what
we're
being
presented,
the
intent
is
to
alter
your
ecology,
there's
already
a
lot
of
expenditures
on
visit.
So
all
right,
this
is
a
public
hearing.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
Gomez.
Anybody
else
wish
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
project
in
favor.
A
A
L
A
I
was
against
love.
One
against
all
right
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item,
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
met
for
the
silly
writer
by
authorizing
the
issuance
of
a
special
use
permit
for
a
bar
on
South
53.1
lot.
Five
block
21
Western
Division,
located
11
10
Lincoln.
N
A
G
A
A
motion
in
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries
the
next
item.
Public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
City
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
lots
one
two,
three:
five:
six
seven
and
eight
block
94
Eastern
Division.
It's
located
821
Lupus
street
from
b3
to
be
for
highway
commercial.
A
O
O
Alright,
821
Lopez
is
asking
for
a
B
for
zone
change
because
other
businesses
that
require
before
designation
have
inquired
to
lease
or
satellite
dialysis
used
to
be
right.
The
inquiry
is
included
a
hospice
hospital,
a
game
room,
alcohol,
rehab
nurse
convalescence,
indoor
auction
and
used
furniture
that
you
will
consider
this
home
change.
Thank.
A
D
A
D
O
D
C
A
N
N
A
C
I
guess
my
only
comment
is
now
that
I'm
now
that
I
now
that
I
understand
where
it
is
I
mean
that
that's
just
an
area
that
it's
part
of
city,
it's
got
a
lot
of
potential
to
be
a
great
part
of
the
city
and
I.
Think
part
of
the
problem
is
that
there
hasn't
been
a
good
plan
for
that
part
of
the
city,
and
so
you
know
without
really
thinking
this
more
clearly
as
to
whether
this
is
something
that
we
would
want
to
use
and
would
enhance
this
part
of
the
city.
C
D
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye.
All
those
against
motion
carries
next
item
that
we
have
is
a
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
for
the
city
of
loiter
by
rezoning,
approximately
one
acre
out,
of
course,
from
24,
but
evil
digas
located
at
82.
Seventeen,
seven
that
you
have
any
from
b3
to
before
they
proposed
use,
is
a
commercial
parking
lot
for
trucks.
Heavy
equipment-
and
there
was-
is
there
for
owners
in
this
area.
A
B
A
A
P
A
Have
a
motion,
the
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
a
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
City
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
approximately
nine
point,
three
four,
five,
three
acres
out
of
the
four
so
19.
This
is
located
at
a
proximately,
1,400
linear
feet,
south
of
aikido
Boulevard
and
east
of
Bernadette
Lane
from
AG
to
R,
1b
single-family,
high
density
district.
The
proposed
use
is
residential.
N
Q
A
A
Taken
have
motion
the
second
all
those
in
favor
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Next
item
is
a
public
hearing
amending
is
only
an
ordinance
map
by
rezoning,
approximately
22.98
a
to
acres.
This
is
the
Eco
Sentinel
that
easel
original
grant
is
located
approximately
1500
in
your
feet,
south
or
don't
come.
You
know
pull
apart
and
west
of
us
highway
83
from
a
Gina
r18
that
proposed
uses
residential
and
there
was
49
letters
sent
down.
Was
there
any
updates?
Yes,.
A
Q
Wayne
Nance
porous
engineering,
we're
in
favor
of
this
item.
The
every
immediately
to
the
north
is
called
a
tight
subdivision,
which
is
a
war
r1
a.
We
think
that
this
is
a
very
good
fit.
We
have
been
in
the
situation
before
staff
I
believe
is
obligated
to
go
against
this
because
it
goes
against
their
along.
It
points
it
out
right
here
the
comprehensive
plan
which,
which
indicates
that
this
should
go
on
being
agriculture,
which
that
doesn't
make
any
sense
it
just
it's
probably
time
to
update
that.
Q
A
A
We
have
motion
in
the
second
all
those
in
favor
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries
the
next
item
that
we
have
is
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
approximately
two
point:
four:
seven
acres
out
of
the
jbs
comport.
This
is
a
seventy
four
acre
tract
and
it
is
located
at
3116,
south
of
cage,
Avenue
and
east
of
Concord
Hills
Boulevard
from
r1a
to
are
two
multifamily
residential
district
people.
The
site
is
currently
wrong,
developed
land
and
the
staff
does
not
support
the
proposed
own
change.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
I
English
champion
at
work
outside
here
on
behalf
of
the
developer,
we're
asking
for
an
r2,
so
we
understand
stuff
not
supporting
that,
but
I'd
like
to
just
give
you
a
little
brief
history
about
this
property.
Just
to
give
some
background.
I
was
the
original
engineer
of
concord
hills
back
in
1997
and
when
we
did
the
original
master
plan
for
this
location,
there
was
a
very
substantial
amount
of
topo
in
this
property
at
this
location
that
really
did
not
was
not
conducive
for
anything
other
than
then
multifamily
or
another
type
of
use.
I
Our
original
master
plan
from
97
indicated
the
site
as
a
school
site.
At
that
time
we
started
the
development
and,
as
we
were
working
with,
you
is
d,
the
you
is
d
officials
decided
for
another
location,
so
in
2000
we
changed
the
master
plan
for
our
multifamily
use
and
it's
been
at
that
that
use
on
the
master
plan.
Since
then,
when
the
developer
approached
me
for
this
particular
project,
we
started
the
planning
process
and,
in
the
the
previous,
the
previous
owner
to
the
current
owner
had
purchased.
I
I
So
what
I'm
saying
to
you
is
I'm,
saying
that
the
density
of
these
of
these
Lots
will
not
really
be
able
to
achieve
what's
considered.
Maybe
a
high
density
they'll
be
more
into
the
medium
size
density.
The
issue
with
this
particular
project
was
that,
since
the
developer
himself
is
not
going
to
be
developing
the
stuff,
that's
the
development
but
selling
the
Lots.
He
didn't
really
authorize
us
to
develop
a
site
plan
for
this
project
and
I.
Think
that
was
one
of
the
issues
that
staff
had
with
the
developer
was
trying
to
get
more
information
about.
I
How
can
all
this
work
so
I
actually,
and
also
to
add
this
particular
property
fronts
along
to
make
to
collectors
I
know
the
staff
has
made
some
comments
regarding
the
traffic
situation
out
there.
Koko's
boulevard
is
an
80-foot
major,
collector
right
away
that
runs
along
the
west
they're
on
the
north
we
have
gage
Avenue,
which
is
a
60
foot,
local
collector
and
these
load.
These
collectors
were
put
it
in
that
for
that
purpose
to
provide
adequate
circulation
and
provide
for
additional
traffic
circulation.
I
That
area
we
when
it
comes
to
water
and
sewer
this
particular
area
was
master
plan
back
in
the
mid-90s
and
all
this
particular
piece
of
property,
which
is
about
three
three.
Almost
four
acres
was
also
mattre,
but
in
the
water
and
sewer
arena
for
multifamily
high-density
use
all
the
utilities,
all
the
storm
drainage
systems,
all
the
streets.
Everything
is
in
place
to
support
this
type
of
use.
I
And
so
looking
at
just
standard
of
scale,
this
is
what
it
could
like
in
concept.
It
all
begins
with
shared
access
drives
off
public
streets
number
one.
Each
law
can
not
have
its
own
driveway,
that's
depicted
in
green,
so
each
law
has
to
have
a
shared
driveway.
Then
you
have
the
long
side
of
these
property
lines
where
you
would
that
we
would
place
a
building.
The
backside
of
this
area
here
is
that
drainage
easement
it's
42
feet
wide.
You
can't
build
anything
on
it,
because
you're
gonna
spend
all
your
money
in
a
retaining
wall
system.
I
That's
not
gonna
work,
and
so
the
best.
The
best
approach
here
is
going
to
be
some
form
of
a
maybe
each
lock
and
produce,
maybe
8
to
12
units
tops
because
the
land
area
we're
losing
30%
on
each
loss,
and
so
you
still
have
to
meet
parking
requirements
and
etc.
The
good
news
is
that
we
have
enough
infrastructure
in
place
in
public
runways
as
we
speak,
that
can
support
this
use,
and
so
there
wouldn't
be
a
burden
on
that,
and
so
hopefully
we
can
convince
you
that
the
zone
is
appropriate.
I
We
think
r2
is
appropriate
in
this
case,
because
we
are
r1a
to
the
south
Arwen
a
to
the
east,
there's
a
b1
that
was
along
that
was
zone
years
and
years
ago,
but
an
r2.
We
think
you
know
kind
of
works
best
with
the
r1
a
and
it
provides
a
good
buffer
between
r1,
a
and
the
b1,
and
that's
the
reason
why
we're
asking
for
an
r2
in
this
case.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
this.
I
Brought
it
up
so
I'm?
Looking
ahead,
we
other
good
yeah,
when
the
good
news
here
is
that
when
vehicles
exit
they'll
be
exiting
onto
a
major
collector
or
local
collector
streets,
they
will
not
be
impacting
any
local
streets
that
serve
single-family
and
that's
what
you
want
in
development
of
this
type
of
use.
You
want
your
your
your
vehicles
to
be
accessing
in
collectors
that
can
handle
and
have
the
capacity
for
larger
vehicles
or.
I
In
this
area
we
have
I
mean
the
right-of-way
is
provide
for
adequate
sight
distance.
We
have
their
stop
signs
and
the
illustration
here
at
gauge
and
Concord
Mills
Boulevard,
so
that
provides
the
stop
the
stopping
requirements
that
would
be
needed
to
regulate
traffic
law.
So
you
have
adequate
right
away.
You
have
adequate
Street
with
you,
have
good
visibility
to
allow
that
to
work
together.
A
I
A
I
Now
the
good
news-
also
I
guess
I
can
add-
is
that
a
gage
Avenue
recently
was
improved
to
the
east
and
ties
into
southern
development.
Southern
development
there's
another
project
that
we've
engineered
recently
and
so
there's
a
interconnection
between
wrong
ways.
Now
that
provides
all
other
forms
of
access
in
different
in
different
directions.
To
alleviate
some
of
that
those
traffic
issues,
which
means
people
that
will
be
exiting
off
of
gage
haven't
you
will
not
have
to
always
go
to
the
west
toward
Concord
Hills
Boulevard.
I
They
will
be
able
to
go
east
also
and
drive
on
60
foot
right,
aways
and
70
foot
ride,
aways
all
the
way
to
highway
59,
but
we
are
promoting
the
movement
toward
Concord,
where
you
have
a
traffic
signal
at
three
to
nine,
to
provide
better,
better
control
of
traffic's
push
off
movements,
but
we
also
are
currently
working
on
accessing
we're
trying
to
require
a
piece
of
property
to
the
Sun
develop
project
to
connect
with
us.
We
see
on
it's
also
to
continue
this
form
of
access
integrating
in
between
the
developments.
I
E
F
This
this
was
challenging.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
this.
Our
this
is
another
one
of
situations
where
our
zoning
categories
don't
align
so
well
for
us
to
to
make
good
applications
of
them.
The
art
to
zone
will
allow
both.
You
know
medium
density
multifamily,
so
envision,
duplexes
or
quad-,
and
it
also
allows
departments
garden-style
apartments.
F
So
in
the
middle
of
this
neighborhood,
which
is
all
single-family,
that
would
be
I,
think
a
significant
change
for
what
the
expectation
there
is
in
the
neighborhood
and
and
although
what
was
presented
shows
but
the
site
to
the
west,
that
is
zone
b1
right
now,
so
I
guess
you
were
showing
that
as
if
you
had
reason,
one
that
as
well
art-
and
it
was
all
one
cohesive
street
so
that
you
were
putting
that
traffic
on
concord
hills
so
we're
just.
We
want
to
be
sensitive
to
that.
F
F
How
citizens
feel
about
that,
and-
and
we
also
know
that
for
infill
development,
it
has
to
work
for
the
developer,
the
single-family
residential
for
the
price
they
buy
the
lot
or
sell.
It
probably
wouldn't
work
this
lot
to
do
single
family
or
maybe
that's
why
it's
vacant
because
of
the
challenges
has
with
topography
and
the
cost
of
development
yeah.
So
there
has
to
be
a
little
higher
density.
It's
just
where
we're
concerned
about
that,
going
to
high
density
and
that.
C
C
F
F
N
F
N
F
Crates
challenge
in
a
situation
like
this:
when
you
have
a
neighborhood,
that's
all
single-family,
detached
and
right
in
the
middle
of
your
cut.
So
are
we
strongly
opposed
to
this?
No,
but
we're
very
sensitive
that
the
neighborhood
it's
gonna
create.
It
will
likely
create
some
challenges
there
with
surrounding
neighbors.
K
Grief
mr.
Sherman
actually
I
think
it's
a
very
good
idea
to
allow
the
art
to
there
we're
assuming
that
that
they
would
be
eight
ten,
but
I,
know
the
terrain
in
that
area
and
that's
gonna
limit
the
at
the
construction.
Now
that
particular
area
has
been
undeveloped
for
a
long
long
time
and
I
think
it
will
bring
not
only
beautify
the
area.
K
H
Well,
my
comment
was
similar
to
what
he
had
mentioned.
I
know,
the
area
is
in
I
mean
most
of
our
a
doe
and
thought
this
area
is,
is
in
need
of
housing.
Affordable
housing
apartments
would
be
somewhat
affordable
for
some
people,
I
guess
yeah.
You
have
to
examine
all
angles
right
which,
but
but
the
effective
would
happen,
try
bacon
right,
but
I
think
the
roads
are
adequately
constructed
for
to
sustain
the
traffic.
How
many
apartments
can
you
place
and
what
is
it?
Two
acres
when
I
have
acres
that.
I
D
F
D
D
I
I
What,
but
I
also
knew
he
was
not
going
to
actually
be
the
person
constructing
this
understood
when
looking
at
this
property,
you
know
we
were
looking
at
what's
net
usable
because
there's
a
lot
of
languaging
because
of
the
topography
so
based
on
that
I
know
that
it's
going
to
be
highly
difficult
for
anyone
to
achieve
a
high
density
development
there,
because
if
you
have
there's
parking
requirements
and
all
these
requirements
that
are
required
and
designed.
So
you
know
these
lots
are
averaging
like
16,000
square
feet,
but
we're
losing
over
4,000
to
the
11
bank
minutes.
I
Ok,
now
I've
done
this
for
the
record.
I
did
a
I
did
a
townhome
project
about
15
18
years
ago
on
Shiloh,
and
we
did
a
three
acre
tract
and
we
were
able
to
put
about
64
units
in
a
townhome
project
they're
on
three
acres,
so
we
exceeded
20
units
break
or
how
I
don't
shadow
and
we
it
did
require.
It
was
a
b3
zone
with
a
special
use
permit
and
now
it's
dates
back
about
18
years,
and
so,
if
we
were
to
do
even
consider
a
townhome
project.
A
A
A
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
a
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
or
this
of
the
city
loriel
by
authorizing
vision,
is
a
special
use
permit
for
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol
on
a
lot
six,
a
block
one.
They
step
most
of
subdivision
unit,
three
located
55
11,
McPherson
Road.
The
site
is
currently
occupied
by
custom,
Mexico
restaurants
and
the
staff
does
not
support
the
issuance
of
a
special
use
permit
at
this
location.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
N
A
L
A
I
M
Cocea,
okay,
it's
the
students.
You
know
which
is
problemas
selling
tarragon
siento
noventa
is
a
sweet
mas
para
estar
en
contra
para
que
nos
Keaton,
todo,
su
problema
que
tenÃamos
forgiven
us
conned
honest
unless
escuelas
bodegas
services
in
those
sandals
driveways
a
nosotros
este
even
eaten
intersection.
He
kept
rambling
time,
has
Allentown
Balazs
todo,
okay,
yep
asan,
simplify
endothermy
sought
restaurant
okay
until
sour
and
Astana
Volta
P&O
permissive
around
Rostov
ROM
born
as
CMPs
antipathy
MP,
some
of
the
what
applause,
problemas
p.m.
famous.
M
Is
there
a
public
on
me
Sanchez
in
three
guess
the
seem
to
know
and
theis
a
sphere
must
parakeet
arrested.
Problema
is
the
e
in
Korean,
Sol,
escuela
and
human.
The
U
is
V
is
the
eternal,
so
April
Emma
a
photo
Souza
is
periodico,
looks
11
times
fotografÃas
the
rope
enter
your
Katy
Romana
II.
The
loss
condone
s
de
las
drogas.
M
Kieran
in
a
subway
and
eat
a
meal
in
trollese
wellick,
a
la
fiesta
de
los
valores
kiss
to
be
known
as
the
siendo
de
las
casas,
fotos
de
las
casas.
They
don't
d'stefano's
palaces
in
las
Paredes
in
por,
atras
de
las
casas
de
todas.
Las
clases
Janaki
is
humble
t
es
una
persona,
salut
an
irreversible
change.
Everything
has
a
year
so
come
haciendo,
carne,
asada.
H
A
M
Us
that
no
yes
or
no
true
negocios
well,
those
stuff
will
be
n.
Okay
below
is
the
Kira
missile
commentary.
O
de
que
esta
señor
aquÃ
para
de
arica.
Fue
para
mi
casa
por
que
hace
la
caller
:,
like
I'm
in
Parramatta
Los
Feliz
in
MIDI,
hafidah
Melo,
Crosetti
raviga
may
que
lo
que
quieres
que
podemos
Alberto's
inclusive
me:
dijo
que
fuera
fuera.
This
is
surah
surah,
but
also
the
pyramid.
M
It's
a
is
Kamal.
The
weather
is
super.
Active
substances.
Go
back
to
I,
see
no
screams.
Tranquila
das
fast
is
the
mucho
sacrificio
para
ver,
sus
casas,
pagamo
nuestros
impuestos
y
tenemos,
a
tener
el
derecho,
a
preface
lomez
peligros,
okay,
pass
oi
puede
que
los
campeones
que
tiran
la
escuela
es
de
lÃneas
to
be
on
agarrado,
los
Camozzi
param
values,
hamsa
planks.
Okay
is
le
Jia
mo
la
muralla
policÃa
de
un
z,
SE
hizo
todo
siento.
M
Lo
reportes
I
por
favor
no
queremos
que
se
pone
cemento
alcohol,
a
Quinto
Alice
Hollister
police
commander
who
stays
it's
unclear
miles
east
another
sona's
Polaski
knock
Pyramus
arise
in
tow.
This
is
paramo
zk,
Norris,
Palin
and
esto
diem,
so
well.
Over
KT
porque,
anti-roman
yeah
bienvenidos,
a
Senora,
a
blur
based
on
Eva
Pelle,
ammos
e
Larissa
Dora.
Instead,
a
suburban
so
chosen,
and
they
welcomed
me
so
our
a
very
well
Caesarea
stone,
entonces
Mandela
with
assets
of
mementos.
A
F
N
Not
supporting
the
J's
holds
our
current
SUV
for
a
restaurant
for
a
biscuit
riska
that
close
and
therefore
when
another
business
comes
need
to
acquire
a
new
SUV,
which
is
what
the
property
owner
is
doing,
he's
amending
that
ordinance
and
they
change
this
I
plan
and
the
business.
The
reason
we're
not
supporting
is
because
it
doesn't
comply
with
the
parking.
The
minimum
parking
requirement.
This
initially
for
that
current
SUV
stuff,
also
denied
because
of
the
parking
is
the
same
location.
Same
parking
spaces
has
not
chosen.
G
Oh,
this
is
like
the
fourth
time
in
the
time
that
me
and
mr.
Vieira
have
been
on
this
commission
there's
like
the
fourth
time.
This
type
of
see
ups
come
up,
and
it's
because
this
building
was
allowed
to
be
built
with
not
enough
parking
in
the
first
place,
and
it's
always
going
to
be
a
problem,
have
problems
with
the
parking
and
so
I
I
get
what
staff
is
saying
because
of
the
parking,
but
there
is
no
use
that
it
can
be
done.
There's
no
use
for
it
with
the
number
of
parking
limits
there
and
wait.
G
It
was
built
by
mr.
Fowler,
not
though
who's
always
had
restaurants
and
for
the
reason
that
it
was
always
built.
It
was
always
built
to
be
a
restaurant.
It's
never
been
anything
else,
other
than
I,
think
next
door.
They
got
to
see
you
pee
for
a
monkey
need
that
place,
even
though
they
didn't
have
enough
parking,
but
it
told
me
this
is
not,
and
this
is
the
same
see
you
pee.
That's
come
forward
a
lot
yeah.
N
K
Mr.
chairman,
the
time
I
noticed
that,
on
the
application
actually
Thea,
the
application
is
for
for
a
special
just
permit
for
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol,
not
a
restaurant
bar
now
I
with
with
the
residents
in
that
area,
because
I
in
one
particular
time
there
was
a
big
problem
in
that
area
because
up
there
other
bars
in
the
and
expense
of
drinking
outside
and
the
people
and
everything
now
this
particular
restaurant
has
been
there
almost
a
year.
Now
like
she
mentioned,
there
has
not
been
any
problems.
K
Now
we
have
allowed
restaurants
to
serve
alcohol
in
previous
instances.
Some
in
fact
we're
trying
to
attract
the
the
investment
and
the
restaurants
into
the
area.
One
of
them
was
was
the
daddy
wings
that
also
was
surrounded
by
residential,
but
they
needed
to
serve
alcohol
without
with
a
foot
I
mean
you
go
into
a
restaurant,
you
want
beer,
you
want,
and
it's
a
compliment
of
the
other
it's
different
than
going
to
a
bar
and
imparting
and
having
beer
and
liquor
all
the
time.
K
Well,
this
particular
incident
being
a
restaurant
I
think
it
complements
being
able
to
sell
alcohol.
Mr.
Sherman,
we
have
done
with
with
kabocha,
which
is
in
the
same
situation
of
this
area.
We
have
residential
in
the
back
and
also
along
Del
Mar,
there's
almost
five
restaurants
that
that
are
restaurant,
that
bar
and
they
may
serve
alcohol
for
see.
Now,
if
it's
going
to
be
a
restaurant
selling
food
and
serving
alcohol,
I
sympathize
with
the
with
the
applicant
I
think
that
we
should
allow
for
her
to
serve
alcohol.
Why?
K
Because
we
have
allowed
it
before
not
allowing
this
lady
for
two
to
get.
The
permit,
then
were
discriminating
on
an
assumption
and
that
that
allowing
alcohol
in
that
area
is
gonna
create
a
problem.
If
we
allow
the
alcohol
it
creates,
a
problem,
I
mean
TABC
will
close
them
down,
they
will
cross
them
down,
but
we
need
to
allow
people
to
to
have
these
that
we
had
cover
the
action
we
allow
them.
They
did
good.
They
are
multiple.
The
businesses
and
no
complaints
in
that
area
see
that's
what
I
wanted
to
mention.
C
I
guess
my
question
is:
what
can
we
do
to
protect
the
residents
from
their
concern?
I
mean
I.
Think
that
I
think
that
13
parking
lot
differences.
I
mean
ii
mean
that's
neglige.
I
don't
think
that's
an
important
thing.
Maybe
it
is,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
it's
a
huge
of
a
deal.
The
question
is
that
I'm
more
concerned
about
is:
if
we
do
proceed
with
the
project,
allowing
them
to
pursue
the
project
with
it
with
the
alcohol
selling
the
alcohol.
Welcome.
What
can
we
do
to
protect
the
residents?
Well,.
F
That's
that's
the
intent
of
the
special
use
Department,
it's
not
always
as
effective
as
we
intended
to
be,
but
there
are
conditions
these
conditions
can
be
enforced
and
there
are
18
conditions
here
that
we've
applied
and
also
there
are.
You
know
there
are
issues
with
parking
and
people
are
parking
illegally.
Those
are
things
that
can
be
reported
and
enforced.
So
we
do
have
those
things
in
place
if
you're
asking
what
we
do
above
and
beyond
that
I
don't
have
anything
to
suggest
above
and
beyond.
L
F
P
Commissioner,
I
think
of
anything
I
think
there
are.
The
hours
of
operation
will
be
key,
I,
don't
if
it
closes
at
a
decent
hour
to
where
they're
not
going
past
the
12:30
1:00
o'clock
their
hour
to
the
two
o'clock
hour,
that
pretty
much
keeps
it
as
a
restaurant,
so
I
think
hours
of
operations
may
be
key
as
far
as
keeping
it.
What
it
is.
Oh
you.
F
D
N
C
A
C
Motion
what
about
the
thing
that
we
did?
I'm
a
police?
Forgive
me
I'm,
not
as
familiar
with
the
rules,
as
you
guys
are.
What
about
the
thing
that
we
did
with
the
other
place
downtown
the
one
that
we
had
two
weeks
ago,
where
we
had
to
be
ancillary
to
the
business
the
sale
Vogel
had
to
be
ancillary
to
the
business.
If
it.
If
it
became
the
primary
purpose
of
the
business,
then
they
would
not
no
longer
be
in
conforming
performance
or
something
that
is
there.
Something
like
that
that
we
could
do
here.
F
C
G
A
Second,
that
motion
in
a
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
those
against
well,
she
carries
the
next
item
that
we
have
is
preliminary
considerations.
I
would
buy
a
the
right
away.
Dedication
play
if
the
post
act
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comment
from
Planning
from
water
utilities
and
a
notice
to
developer
complaining
German
if
I
made,
there
is
some.
A
Me
to
decided
be
people-
oh
yes,
I'm!
So
sorry,
I
did
see
that.
Thank
you,
Frank
ie.
The
motion
to
table
who's
that
we
tabled
it
I'm
7a,
a
motion
and
a
second
all.
Those
in
favor,
hi
hi
motion
carries
the
next
day.
I
knew
hand
was
preliminary
consideration
of
the
reef
out
of
love,
29
block
once
any
sea
turtle,
Southwest
and
they're
crossing
face,
one
into
lost,
29
829
be
blocked.
A
One
San
Ysidro
Southwest
at
are
crossing
phase
one
and
granting
of
a
variance
to
allow
a
zero
foot
setback,
a
five
spike
foot
side,
interior
setback,
a
five
foot
side,
corner
setback
and
a
three
foot
rear
setback
to
la
29,
B
block
one,
which
is
to
be
used
for
the
placement
of
a
subdivision
monument
sign.
A
ten
is
residential.
R
Yes,
sir
mr.
chairman,
to
cut
a
little
yuppie
island,
howling
engineering
good
evening,
all
those
setbacks
sounded
great
when
you
were
a
little
off,
but
I
wanted
to
explain
what
what
the
intent
of
this
is.
So
this
is
in
the
actual,
app
they're
crossing
subdivision,
the
new
one
going
in
the
mall
site,
the
old
mall
site,
110
acres
off
a
southeast
corner
of
I-35
and
loop
20.
R
R
G
R
Aye
all
right
proceed
please.
So
this
is
one
of
the
one
of
the
lot
systems
on
the
north
side,
so
we
have
a
recorded
lot
on
there,
and
so
the
purpose
of
this
is
to
construct
a
monument
sign
after
crossing
somewhat
like
this
hasn't
been
finalized.
But
it's
about
eleven
foot
wide
and
about
ten
inches
thick
the
thing
with
landscaping
around
it,
so
the
current
ordinance
has
five
five,
five
all
around
pretty
much
around
the
perimeter
of
the
lot.
R
As
well,
no
the
key
to
this
was
is
and
I
brought
so
just
to
some
other
I'm
glad
mr.
McGee's
back
there
but
I
know
I
brought
some
more
detail
of
what's
out
there.
So
these
two
roads,
which
is
dark
horn,
Drive
going
into
the
subdivision
and
Springfield
there
right
away,
are
bigger
than
usual.
There
are
120
foot
right
aways.
R
Why
do
I
mention
that,
because
usually
on
a
65
foot
back
to
back
road
on
the
norm,
it's
a
hundred,
so
you
only
have
17
feet
from
the
back
occur
to
where
the
block
wall
is
of
the
of
the
lots
of
the
residential
lots.
In
this
case,
we
have
27
and
a
half
feet
from
the
back
of
curb
to
the
block
wall,
so
that
gives
an
extra
10
feet
on
each
side.
R
So
the
reason
we're
asking
for
a
variance
is
if
we
have
a
5
foot
setback
in
the
front
of
this
lot,
that
pushes
a
lot
another
5
feet
in
the
property
on
that
corner.
When
really
we
want
to
utilize
the
actual
corner
clip
that
was
plaited
within
this
lot.
Now
that
corner
clip
which
this
corner
clip
is
L
for
that
corner
clip
is
21
feet
wide.
R
Usually,
when
you
do
signs
like
this,
you
pretty
much
eat
in
to
the
right
away
a
little
bit
more.
In
this
case,
we
can't
eat
in
I'm.
Sorry
we
can't
eat
in
pass
l6
because
it's
already
recorded,
so
it's
already
City
right
away.
We
can't
go
in
there
and
take
land
off
of
it.
So
what
we
wanted
to
do
is
place
the
sign
right
on
the
property
line
and
it's
10
inches
wide
right.
We
gave
ourselves
from
the
property
line
to
the
back.
R
Setback
is
5
feet,
so
we
gave
ourselves
a
little
bit
of
wiggle
room
in
there
to
put
it
in
there,
so
we
can
actually
put
it
in
on
a
1/2
foot
setback,
but
what
it
creates
is
this
signs
not
too
far
into
the
property
the
sight
distance
on
this
I
had
to
shorten
it
up,
because
the
site
distances
are
actually
pretty
big.
You
have
a
car
parked
at
this
intersection
and
you
look
north.
R
You
have
somewhat
of
a
1600
linear
feet
of
sight,
distance,
which
is
incredibly
large
and
on
the
south
side,
it's
about
1,100
I
took
a
couple
of
snapshots
of
the
Google
Earth
card.
Now
he's
not
quite
standing
right
where
that
cars
gonna
be,
but
it
gives
you
an
idea
of.
If
you
were
at
this
intersection
and
you're
looking
north,
you
have
great
amount
of
sight
distance.
This
next
one
is
looking
south,
since
it's
pretty
much
parallel
to
the
road.
R
R
R
So
instead
about
five
five
five
all
in
front,
we
feel
that,
since
the
sign
is
so
small,
so
then
that
we
can
push
the
sign
up
to
the
front
towards
the
front
of
the
of
I
guess
the
onion
had
bit
of
a
lot
and
I
know.
That
was
one
of
the
comments
you
know
this
lot
doesn't
conform
to
our
winni.
We
need
to
put
Burbidge
on
here
that
it's
going
to
be
uninhabitable.
R
R
D
R
It
doesn't
require
it
to
be
on
its
own
lot
throughout
the
design
process
and
throughout
this,
as
development
started,
it's
gonna
be
a.
He
wanted
to
make
it
a
little
bit
nicer
subdivision
as
opposed
to
just
I'm,
not
gonna,
call
it
generic
but
a
more
basic
sign.
So
he
wanted
he
kind
of
wanted
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
appealing.
So
we
had
to
create
its
own
lot,
and
so
it
doesn't
eat
into
that
already
platted
lot
and
it
doesn't
come
into
the
right-of-way
as
well.
D
Okay,
so
then
the
other
question
is
that
they
did
you
all
proposed
some
solutions
and
those
were
deemed
inadequate
and
you
all
comment-
or
actually
we
did
not
have
a
full-on
conversation
on
this
item
with
engineers
we
did
not.
So
the
only
solution
here
other
than
a
variance
is
the
lot
I
guess
to
the
subdivision:
identity
sign.
So
if
there
was
an
identity
sign
which
is
the
one
well,
the
other
alternative
is
replying
and
changing
the
size
of
logs.
F
Yes,
that
would
be
one
option.
Another
option
would
be
to
to
provide
an
easement
on
the
property.
There
doesn't
have
to
be
there's
nothing
in
the
science
requirement,
there's
nothing
in
the
sign
Horace.
That
requires
a
monument
sign
to
be
on
its
own
lock,
so
they
could
have
the
sign
on
these
corner
Lots
and
an
easement
so
that
that
sign
could
stay
there
rather
than
having
a
piece
of
property
that
is
owned
by
the
by
the
development
or
the
HOA,
and
and
meant
to
be
maintained
long-term.
R
R
The
the
the
lot
would
be
too
large
for
what
that
actual
sign
actually
is,
even
though
we're
still
calling
for
the
five-foot
setbacks
on
both
sides.
It's
just
one
of
those
where
the
sign
we
would
want
it
right
on
the
corner
clip
now
we
do
have
six
seven
feet
behind
the
sign
to
put
your
electrical
irrigation
boxes
so
on
so
forth,
and
that's
why
we
didn't
kind
of
show
it
in
the
middle
now
there
is
still
a
chance
that
we
move
it
back
a
foot
or
two.
R
You
know
so
there
might
be
some
setback
because
it's
you
kind
of
sometimes
don't
want
it
right
on
the
property
line
in
case
there's
a
property
dispute
with,
in
this
case,
a
city
because
it
would
be
a
right
away.
But
when
we
looked
at
all
this
and
I
did
speak
to
the
right
away,
agent
with
the
city
of
Laredo
I
spoke
to
him.
If
he
had
any
problem,
he's
the
one
that
pointed
me
to
the
actual
I
guess
the
the
formula
that
he
looks
at
when
he
approves
something
like
this
sight
distance.
R
A
R
F
I
messed
up
just
just
if
all
of
you
had
a
chance
to
read
through
we
included
section
2
3
s
7
on
variances
that
allows
the
Commission
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
all
have
reviewed
this
to
be
careful,
because
this
doesn't
come
up
often
where
you're
granting
viruses
and
the
ordinance
is
very
specific
on
when
you
can
grant
an
ordinance
and
as
staff.
We
don't
concur
that
this
is
one
of
those
instances
of
courses.
Planning
Commission,
don't
always
have
listen
to
staff,
but
but
the
the
intent
of
a
variance.
F
Is
there
something
unique
about
the
lot
that
they
did
not
create
a
hardship
they
did
not
create?
They
created
this
hardship
when
they,
when
they
planted
it
the
way
that
they've
planted
it
so
there's
not
a
unique
characteristic
there.
That's
not
allowing
them
to
reasonably
use
their
property.
Now.
The
reason
that
we
need
to
be
careful
when
we
grant
variance
is
because
you're
you're
you're
setting
a
an
expectation
for
others
that
will
come
to
you
and
say
wow.
We
kind
of
messed
up.
F
G
E
A
All
those
against
all
right,
there's
one
against
motion,
carries
item
17.
This
is
preliminary
consideration
of
replated
lot
three
o'clock:
one
lorry
farms,
subdivision
unit
1,
&,
2,
lakh,
5a
and
6a
block
1
and
re-plump
subdivision.
The
intent
is
fast-food
restaurant
that
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
planning
for
modern
utilities
from
traffic
and
a
notice
to
developer
from
plenty.
A
Second,
a
motion,
the
second
all,
those
in
favor
all
right.
Those
against
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is
preliminary
reconsideration
of
the
plateau
San
Ysidro
North
East
LA
possum
division,
the
intended
residential.
This
item
is
in
place
on
the
agenda,
for
the
reconsideration
at
the
request
of
the
plan
is
only
commissioned
all
right.
The
proposed
action
is
poop,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
planning
from
fire
in
a
notice
to
developer.
Yes,
sir,.
Q
D
S
Associates
we
concur
with
most
of
the
comments.
We
do
have
a
request
on
the
traffic
safety.
We
were
wanted
to
request
to
see
if
lot
six
could
be
removed.
From
from
the
comments,
I
had
a
brief
conversation
with
the
traffic
department
director
about
lot
six.
It
has
a
long
frontage
along
I-35
and
we
were
wondering
if
that
could
be
removed
so
that
the
access
to
IH
35
from
that
lot
could
be
coordinated
with
the
Traffic
Safety
Department
and
text
life
at
the
time
of
development
for
that
offices.
Okay,.
B
H
J
Evening,
mr.
chairman
mercy,
okay
discusses
where
mr.
watch
I'm
sorry.
This
is
an
area
where
we
have
a
deceleration
lane
coming
into
that
street.
It's
just
further
south
over
we're
talking
him
up
until
if
it's
for
purposes
of
office
workers,
something
small,
we
can
possibly
consider
that,
ultimately
them
to
come
down
at
Tech,
stop
monte
development.
There
there's
a
lot
of
trucks
that
are
stacking
up
on
that
area.
J
L
D
A
Six
yeah,
second,
a
motion
in
the
second
all
those
in
favor
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries
the
next
item
that
we
have
is
in
subdivision
unit
16,
and
this
is
a
consideration
of
the
model
subdivision
rule
compliance
to
the
planner
better
than
subdivision
into
16,
and
the
action
is
to
approve
grab
emotional
Oh
motion
to
have
seconds
that
I
could
in
a
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is
the
presentation
of
the
recording
Laredo.