►
From YouTube: 02-06-19 Technical Review Board Ad-Hoc Committee
Description
02-06-19 Technical Review Board Ad-Hoc Committee
C
C
B
B
The
city
of
a
little
technical
review,
ad-hoc
committee
will
convene
a
regular
meeting
open
to
the
public
at
5:30
p.m.
on
Wednesday
February
6,
2009
teen
city
of
Laredo
City
offers
for
a
conference
room,
1110,
Houston,
Street
Laredo
Texas
to
consider
the
following
out
of
consideration
for
all
attendees
city
of
Area,
Technical,
Review
Board,
ad-hoc
committee
meetings.
Please
turn
off
all
cellular
phones
and
pagers
her
place
and
inaudible
signal.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
B
E
G
C
C
Many
sub
meetings
to
not
come
in
and
do
a
lot
of
I
guess
you
could
say
a
big
item,
kind
of
chop,
it
down
in
small
pieces
and
several
small
special
meetings.
But
you
can't
have
a
quorum
note
so
that,
but
that
special
committee,
or
whatever
you
know,
comes
back
to
the
committee
in
and
says
this
is
what
we
came
up
with
all.
H
H
Guys
need
for
pretty
much
there's
a
great
thing
about
the
app
hug.
You
do
have
people
from
different
perspectives,
kind
of
put
in
their
input,
and
there
is
a
lot
of
back-and-forth,
but
even
though
the
great
thing
I
like
about
this
committee,
even
though
at
some
point
there
might
be
maybe
some
differences
that
everybody.
So
it's
a
really
professional
difference
that
we
have
and
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
do
have
a
good
talk
and,
and
so
whatever
you
guys
need
to
hope
out.
C
Right
in
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
thank
you
Rick
tried.
All
right,
I
should
have
started
with
welcoming
all
right.
I
know.
The
dynamics
of
this
committee
has
done
good
things
in
the
past.
We,
you
know
past
several
audiences.
We
looked
at
it,
so
that
being
the
case,
I
think
we
can
move
forward
with.
You
know
this.
Today's
agenda
with
the
setbacks,
is
what
really
is
on
the
on
the
table,
but
first
I
guess
when
you'd
open
up.
C
C
B
C
B
A
B
E
C
C
E
C
F
C
C
G
F
B
I
J
D
C
C
H
C
Here,
obviously,
it
says
to
review
ordinances
and
provide
recommendations
to
Council,
as
amended,
to
reflect
the
total
package
when
it
comes
to
development
of
a
subdivision
such
as
construction
standards.
So
that's
the
mission
statement
for
this
committee,
so
there's
nine
of
point
P
s.
Currently
we
have
two
vacancies
and
so
and
two
absences.
Obviously,
but
that
being
the
case,
that's
what
this
is
about.
C
A
C
Where
we
moisture
your
things,
unless
you
have
small
watts
that
could
be
considered
presidential
and
and
things
like
that
and
then
the
other
question
is
and
sorry
to
interrupt
you
mr.
Kazu,
it's
is
it
the
use
or
is
it
the
zone?
So
currently
our
land
development
codes
is
based
on.
If
you
have
this,
so
you
can
build
these
type
of
facilities,
but
you
can,
you
can
have
a
commercial
zone,
but
you
can
build
a
residential
housing
all
single-family.
C
C
A
B
B
C
F
C
F
F
A
G
C
C
J
C
F
C
It
to
the
committee
to
how
the
committee
look
at
it
and
so
less
water
for
the
building
perspective.
We
weren't
sure
you
know
building
incorrectly
up
to
code
right
and
there's
different
if
you're
gonna
do
it
by
that
fight
is
different
than
if
you're
gonna
do
an
accessory
structure
was
gonna,
be
them
not
it.
You
know
that
kind
of
thing
is.
If
it's
another
one,
you
can't
have
a
two
families
at
one
lot.
H
I
I
H
For
pretty
much
the
rule
for
the
rear,
if
it's
enclosed
pretty
much,
it
has
to
respect
that
20
foot
setback.
If
it's
open,
there's
different
rules,
open
it
attached
or
open
as
in
a
palapa,
completely
open,
and
so
it
there's
there's
an
array
of
components
but
enclosed,
and
it
does
have
to
to
respect
that.
H
C
C
Up
to
50
percent
of
the
set,
but
it
means
10
feet,
so
you
can
build
up
to
10
feet
from
the
property
line.
Er
and
a
my
carport
is
only
12
feet
long.
My
car
won't
even
fit
in
there.
You
know,
though,
things
like
that
would
come
up
too.
So
those
issues
which
came
up
a
lot.
So
we
this
committee,
we
this
community,
went
in
it
and
three
things:
one
was
the
rear
setback,
one
was
the
front
setbacks
and
another
one
was
strictly
carports
into.
C
We
had
already
proposed
a
new
setback.
Ordinance
went
to
PNC
PNC
wanted
to
get
more
information.
We
came
back
to
the
table
and
talked
to
a
city
management
and
and
directed
to
to
make
it
more
concise
and
to
be
more
specific
on
how
we
want,
in
this
specific
case,
as
the
ordinance
to
make
it
more
clear,
maybe
have
some
kind
of
diagrams
and
I'm
just
trying
to
catch
it
as
a
diagrams
and
and
kind
of
show
what
it
would
look
like.
C
C
H
G
E
B
What
they
intend
to
vote
for
already-
oh
those
guys,
are
kind
of
I
sat
with
him
before,
but
this
specific
committee
we
had
voted
for
a
five
foot:
rear
setback
like
a
minimum
setback
in
the
back
and
a
ten
foot
front
setback
for
new
plans.
So
for
existing
subdivisions
you
need
to
have
a
plat,
node
or
you'd
actually
have
to
have.
The
setback
on
the
plat
itself
for
existing
subdivisions
would
just
stay
the
way
it
is
so
no
one
will
go
and
start
building
up
to
this
10-foot
line
in
front
next
door
to
your
house.
B
F
A
H
C
H
J
F
G
F
F
F
B
B
B
C
If
I
could,
if
I
could
answer
that
again,
one
little
son
for
the
record
did
councilmen
what
he
is
was
asked
by
his
constituents.
We
was
getting
a
lot
of
complaints
that
hey
and
one
of
the
bill.
Department
I
can't
get
this
okay,
so
it
was
like
he
you
wanted
this
committee
to
look
at.
If
it
is
I
mean.
Obviously
you
would
want
it
if
it's
only
a
good
thing,
not
necessary.
C
C
And
mister
towards
not
here,
but
to
go
more
dance.
You
know,
especially
on
existing.
Are
you
punishing
the
guy
said
my
backyard
and
heck?
Everybody
else
is
building
around
me
and
you
know:
hey
I
bought
this
house
because
it
was
supposed
to
be
an
art
wall
or
certain
setbacks
now
everybody's
building,
and
so
that.
C
I
It's
kind
of
know,
who's
saying
this
for
the
record:
Kate
Hamilton,
they
all
I
see,
is
you're.
Gonna
have
a
traffic
issue
by
the
stacking.
The
houses
like
that
people
are
gonna,
be
stacking,
their
vehicles
on
the
streets,
so
you're
going
to
end
up
having
to
make
wider
streets
to
accommodate
for
the
traffic
because,
as
everybody
knows,
there's,
but
you
know,
everybody
has
put
two
three
four
cards.
If
they
live
in
one
house,
there's.
J
F
B
F
E
D
D
That'll
stay
the
same,
so
in
other
words,
if
there's
a
there
used
to
be
like
our
one,
only
and
then
about
say
15
years
ago,
there
was
a
r18
which
brought
them
from
6,000
to
put
about
100,
and
then
two
years
ago
we
brought
they
got
brought
down
from
2100
to
3000
and
when
they
went
to
3,000,
where
the
he
was
was
higher
than
the
required.
A
third
parking
space.
D
I
H
B
What
how
many
cars
you
can
actually
fit
there,
and
then
we
did
a
35
foot
line
and
it
kind
of
did
the
same
deal.
You
have
more
room
in
there
to
fit
another
car,
so
essentially
he's
still
stacking
the
same
amount
of
cars
on
the
street
that
you
would
with
that
42
foot
modest
of
35,
so
that's
kind
of
like
all
those
things
is
what
we're
supposed
to
be
looking
at
and
kind
of
banging
out
to
see
whether
or
not
these
things
that
make
sense.
H
He
knows
for
the
record
element
and
just
in
case
just
to
add
on
just
to
keep
you
guys
updated.
Then
please
feel
free
to
chime
in
when
we
presented
to
the
PNC
they're
concerned
from
their
perspective,
that
the
one
item
that
they
seem
to
everybody's
kind
of
in
agreeance
as
the
carport
component
structure
for
the
driveways.
But
when
he
comes,
they
had
a
difference
on
the
front
setback
they
weren't
too
much
for
their
concern
with
sight,
distant
and
and
such
things
like
that,
and
then,
when
it
comes
to
the
rear.
H
H
Respectful
neighbor
chamber,
or
do
we
allow
hey
it's
your
property?
You
can
do
what
you
want,
and
so
those
are
kind
of
the
perspectives,
but
from
TMZ
that
they
made.
That
comment
and
the
other
comment
had
to
do
with
the
economic
impact,
meaning
that
you
know
the.
What
was
the
example
that
they
were
using
that
pretty
much
you
know
making
you
know,
subdivisions
high-density,
you
know:
does
it
change
the
environment
cost
the
value
you
know
now
that
there's
no,
you
know
like
landscaping
or
such
or
whatever
backyard
usage
on
the
back.
G
H
F
D
D
D
On
the
on
the
setbacks,
the
setbacks
review,
it's
an
open
structure.
So,
conceivably,
your
bridges
are
home.
Today,
under
existing
setbacks,
conceivably,
you
can
come
back
and
pull
a
permit
for
an
open
structure
and
cover
the
whole
backyard.
If
it's
an
open
and
it's
another
structure,
but
you
can't
come
and
say:
okay,
I
want
to
add
a
bedroom.
D
So
the
whole
kind
of
the
the
part
of
the
thought
process
on
it
from
some
of
the
council
members
where
okay
well
give
the
families
and
opportunities
to
decide
what
they
want
to
do
with
their
backyards.
That's
the
crux
of
the
whole
of
the
whole
deal
and
at
the
same
time,
by
proposing
five
feet
all
around.
It
corrects
some
of
the
issues
that
happen
when
people
are
trying
to
go.
D
D
So
in
looking
at
this
thing,
it's
kind
of
cleaning
up,
if
you
want
to
do
it,
an
accessory
building
on
the
back
now
you're
having
to
stay
five
feet
from
the
from
the
from
the
start
line,
and
you
give
the
family
you
know
more
opportunity
to
to
build
in
their
backyard
today.
You
know
a
lot
of
people,
it's
like
they
won't
sell.
D
You
know
it's:
the
replacement
cost
is
very
expensive
if
somebody
is
wanting
to
to
like
I
talked
to
a
Border
Patrol
guy
a
couple
of
months
ago
and
he's
kind
of
like
well
I
have
a
motor
in
over
there
in
the
San
Ysidro
San
Ysidro,
or
you
get
butter
home
from
West
when
I
guess
about
15
years
ago.
I
guess
it's
a
lot
better
remember.
It
was
next
to
like
village
heights.
It
was
that
little
certain
areas
in
there
next
to
good
Italian,
it's
like.
D
Well,
you
have
to
go
vertical,
you
know,
but
only
when
I
enter
the
room.
You
know,
but
you
have
to
go.
You
know.
The
only
thing
you
can
do
is
go
vertical
and
then
you
run
into
a
whole
bunch
of
other
issues
going
vertical
and
he
knows
I
want
to
get
rid
of
his
home
because
you
know
he's
in
it
say
one
thing
right
now
and
he's
hanging
with
20
grand
I
can
have
my
room
versus
have
to
sell
my
home
for.
D
Go
he's
in
at
150
because
he
bought
10
years
ago
to
buy
1,700
square
feet,
he's
going
to
be
paying
220
so
thankful
economically.
For
them,
it's
better
to
add
a
room
to
the
back
and
for
the
city.
It's
also
a
beneficial
deal,
because
now,
all
of
a
sudden,
they
have
more
tax
base
on
that
same
existing
subdivision
not
having
to
add
more
roads
not
having
to
maintain
so
they
have
a
higher
tax
base
for
which
they
can
charge.
D
And
if
somebody,
the
way
this
was
proposed,
if
somebody
wants
to
actually
doing
something,
that's
that
exceeds
the
setbacks.
Then,
at
the
pull
of
that
there
go
survey
in
order
to
be
able
to
pull
a
full
apartment
so
that,
in
other
words,
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
easements
on
there
that
there
that.
F
B
D
H
D
D
So
the
other
perp
does.
The
other
component
of
this
thing
is
to
get
people
to
apply
so
that
there
are
non
busting
setbacks.
They
have
more
decision-making
over
what
they
can
do
for
the
with
a
property
if
they
purchased
and
they're
more
apt
to
pull
a
permit
and
that's
where
the
city
can
say.
Okay,
you
know
hey,
you
know
we
need
to
make
sure
that
you're,
you
know
you're
doing
this
to
your
electrical.
You
know
that
they're
checking
the
electrical
box
to
make
sure
it's
big
enough.
F
C
Right,
okay,
so
again
we're
flat
and
then
carport.
This
would
be
like
this
effective
garage.
This
will
be
the
carpet
currently
or
this
is
50
percent.
Here's
a
curvy
girl
over
here
there's
a
sidewalk.
The
proper
line
is
you
know
in
black
and
proposed
right
now
up
to
the
proper
line
for
a
carport
and
we
proposed.
Currently
it
only
allows
50
percent.
So
here
is
your
20
feet.
You
don't
allow
10
feet
of
a
carport,
so
in
most
cases
it
just
didn't
make
sense.
How
could
I
give
me
half
of
a
car
point?
C
C
So
so
that
was
being
proposed
to
carports,
so
we
need
to
now
I
guess:
3d,
it
and
kind
of
show
what
can
be
allowed.
This
is
a
maximum
that
can
be
allowed
to
panettone
so
that
we
can
have
a
better
understanding
of
what
is
being
proposed
by
this
committee
and
then
the
front
said
that
would
be
this
section
here
right,
obviously
50%
so
you're
going
to
be
able
to
do
this
50%
over
here,
not
so
parking.
So
that
would
be
the
issue
with
the
front
here
and
then
August.
C
B
C
H
H
C
What
adjustment
on
these
specific
situations,
obviously
and
they're
being
denying
most
of
the
time
they're
like
oh
I'm
already
being
tonight,
Nick
turnaround
is
gonna,
go
into
the
Board
of
adjustments
becomes
a
weekend
job
in
some
cases,
in
some
cases
it
doesn't
and
so
and
Esther
mister
can
do
is
pointing
out
the
city
in
some
ways
getting
a
bigger
tax
base
that
could
benefit
the
city
now,
as
long
as
as
long
as
it's
safe,
I
think.
That's.
G
Going
to
be
very
important,
this
is
not
an
issue,
that's
just
affecting
my
level.
You
know,
even
though
we
we
have
problems,
you're
letting
getting
to
be
very
expensive,
there's
not
enough
plan
to
develop
them,
and
so,
but
this
is
happening
nationwide
and
so
they're
discussing
issues
like
this
elsewhere,
the
trustee
Manila
and
their
concern
is
you
know
where
what
are
we
going
to
do
with
a
parking
that
you've
brought
it
up
here?
G
B
Important
thing
every
time
we're
looking
at
this
automatically
with
the
city
council
sees
that
everybody
else
is.
They
started
envisioning
the
whole
town.
Looking
this
way
and
that's
what
happened
when
we
proposed
that
Arwen
be
more
narrow,
a
35-foot
lot,
there's
only
like
four
of
us
that
have
actually
even
built
any
of
those
or
have
them
or
in
the
pipe.
B
D
And
I
think
the
whole
like,
for
example,
as
a
humble
history's
as
a
home
builder.
If
you
bring
everything
that
a
went
to
the
nail
to
the
top
one
yeah,
but
if
I'm
building
a
home,
that's
not
for
let's
for
sale
but
I,
don't
have
a
client
for
I.
Am
NOT
gonna,
build
it
five
feet
from
the
property
back
for
the
back
property
life.
I'm
gonna,
build
it
20
feet.
I'm,
gonna,
I'm
gonna
provide
a
backyard.
I
D
D
D
Typically,
the
home
young
family
is
buying
their
first
home.
They
want
a
place
for
the
kids
in
the
backyard,
but
then
the
dynamics
of
the
family
changes.
So
when
the
that
one
and
then
have
exchange
they're
still
fixed
on
this
cookie
cutter,
you
know
ordinance,
then
we
need
to
give
them
more.
You
know
flexibility,
so
what
do
with
their
with
their
backyards?
So
I
think
from
the
standpoint
of
the
like.
You
were
saying
in
the
presentation,
I
think
the
other
some
of
the
things
that
it
has
more
and
there's
other
make.
D
D
G
D
C
Original
proposal,
so
this
gave
the
comedian
chat
to
come
back.
Then
we
redefined
they
bring
you
a
more
detailed
proposal
for
an
ordinance
change,
basically,
and
so
a
couple
of
things
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up.
Then
you
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
if
they
have
a
garage,
my
code
that
can
enclose
it
right
just.
C
B
G
A
D
D
D
E
J
B
D
D
So
the
proposal
was
basically
twofold:
number
one!
If
you
have
an
existing
subdivision,
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
build
any
or
be
recommended
by
the
previous
company,
you
can't
build
any.
You
can't
build
any
further
than
twenty
feet
from
the
property
line
on
an
existence
of
the
only
thing
that
you
can
do
is
build
your
car
park
to
the
front
and
then
build
to
the
back
now,
which
is
you
know,
you're
more
flexible.
D
B
B
A
Mention
in
photoresistor
point
of
information
we
were
mention
about
inclusive
mirage
is
a
lot
of
times.
He
had
any
restriction
to
say
he
had
to
provide
two
car
garage
or
whatever
the
door,
any
restriction.
The
developer
can
control
that
go
one
t-cells,
fifty
percent
of
the
Lots,
if
the
owners
had
to
set
up
an
association
to
enforce
that
the
developer
does
an
active
force
of
any
more
and
another
point
is,
though,
these
restrictions
have
a
duration,
20
and
25
years
after
that,
they're
not
renew.
A
B
A
C
Idea
has
to
have
a
minute
for
you
by
Monday
and
then
that
way
look
at
it
you'll
have
another
few
years
to
look
at
it
and
think
about
it.
I'm
reading
in
and
probably
also
send
you
the
Kurt,
you
know
a
development
code.
One
is
we
what
you
know
what
is
currently
being
proposed,
I,
guess,
I'm
out
and
then
what's
being
proposed.
We.
I
The
record
Kate
Hamilton
only
two
concerns
that
I
have
is
like
Miss,
Lewis
and
Vinny
were
saying.
You
have
a
subdivision
and
making
sure
that
this
that
happened
in
a
existing
subdivision
and
they
come
in
and
put
all
these
Hummers
around
you
when
that,
wouldn't
that
wasn't
the
deal
yeah,
it
was
that.
F
A
G
A
B
I'm
doing
it,
but
there's
there's
nothing
in
here
from
the
state
point
of
view
than
anybody
can
do
different
what
they
can't
do
now.
The
only
thing
they'd
have
to
do
different
can
go
out
there
and
fill
up
their
backyard
with
stuff
they.
Just
it's
just
got
to
be
separated
from
the
house.
That's
quite
foot,
then
they
they
can
actually
go
two
and
a
half
foot
on
each
side.
B
F
C
Ap
on
a
project
over
the
this
and
it's
congested
and
they
got
easements
in
the
back
and
they're
saying:
look.
We
all
wanted
to
be
back
there,
so
they're
already
trying
to
move
it
over
to
there
right
away,
so
their
honor,
the
in
favor
of
that
I
only
want
to
be
there.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
if
they're
providing
incentive
to
developers
to
port
am
in
the
front,
it's
freedom.
B
B
D
C
C
H
C
H
I
J
I
D
D
D
A
lot
of
information
out
there
that
the
favor
of
more
aggressive
sex,
yeah
and
then
just
as
a
side
note,
if
you
open
last
month,
professional
builder
magazine
it's
two
months
in
a
row
where
they
talk
about
accessories.
Doing
you
know
this
is
like.
Apparently
it
seems
like
California,
where
all
the
fires
we're
at
you
know
where
they're
building
actually
like
a
little
casita
and
the
back
of
their
house
or
their
home.
Was
it
either
for
bringing
somebody
back
home
or
even
renting
them
renting
them
out?
A
C
C
C
Regulate
I,
don't
know,
but
it's
there
and
then
I
think
it's
on
you
cat
or
then
the
other
one
is.
You
can't
have
two
mobile
homes
in
one
like
a
nice
considered
a
single-family,
but
you
can't
have
one.
You
know
how
long
you
have
two
moles.
There
are
three
now
the
ark
threes
you
can
come
in.
If
you
have
a
12,000
square
foot
a
lot,
you
could
have
four
same
family.
G
C
D
This
may
be
also
very
positive.
We
kind
of
discussed
this
a
little
bit
of
the
last,
because
there
was
like
a
little
special
committee.
Like
a
subcommittee,
we
had
a
meeting
there
that
at
the
city
to
kind
of
addresses
and
change
the
exhibits
and
stuff,
but
you
know,
like
all
the
info
box,
you
have
a
lot
of
info
a
lot
so
in
now,
and
typically,
if
there's
an
info
a
lot
and
people
want
6070
thousand
dollars
for
those
you
know
for
those
Lots.
D
D
Itself,
I
believe
will
help
a
whole
bunch
it
out.
Hopefully
we
can
you
know,
or
this
committee
and
say
we
do.
This
committee
can
address
the
the
other
zonings
as
far
as
the
setbacks
when
it
comes
to
apartments
because
what's
happening
right
now,
is
they
change
the
standards
on
the
apartments?
So
you
have
one
of
those
old
46
by
1/3
or
69
by
138.
You
can't
build
the
four
units
in
there
be
easy
to
have
enough
parking
because
you're
having
to
maintain.
You
know
that
20
feet
in
the
in
the
back.
D
So
if
you
are
allowed
to
push
the
structure
to
the
back,
which
has
been
approved
in
certain
instances
in
the
kind
of
vo
in
some
instances
it
hasn't,
then,
all
of
a
sudden.
Now
you
can
go
back
to
having
you
know
before
units
on
that
on
that
log
and
allowing
for
the
parking,
because
otherwise
you
have
to
build
a
weird
structure
to
try
to
park
in
the
back
people
and
they
get
in
there.
D
Oh
yeah
so
I
think
that
for
infill
this
is
kind
of
like
when,
when
the
r1b
locks
came
on
board,
it's
like
how
can
you
reduce
the
acquisition
cost
without
costing
the
city
any
money
r1b,
you
know
all
of
a
sudden
it
what
it
did
was
it
maintained
a
minimum
price.
The
sales
price,
as
opposed
to
you,
know,
raising
raising
the
price
making
housing
more
accessible.
How
can
we
redevelop
the
inner-city
Lots?
Okay,
make
it
a
little
bit
more
flexible,
but
still
fire
accepts.
D
D
C
F
C
B
You
gonna
make
it
a
permanent
community,
rather
the
things
in
our
pipe
and
this
this
deal
here
did
at
the
beginning.
We
were
looking
a
lot
of
different
things
and
then
it
got
kind
of
decided,
I,
think
with
staff
and
and
maybe
the
old
man
that
that
anything
that
we
looked
at,
because
the
the
way
that
her
committee
set
up
would
need
to
be
directed
specifically
by.
B
D
Result,
the
original
intent
was
that
before
an
ordinance
goes
to
Council
that
affects
development,
but
it
should
flow
through
the
TRB
I
mean
that
was
kind
of
the
the
energy
of
the
original.
The
original
intent
was
to
address.
You
know
the
street
pavement
ordinance
as
far
as
what's
happening
in
the
residential
streets,
which
it
was
a
committee
tackled,
and
it
was
also
for
any
ordinances
that
affect
the
development
that
one
of
which
was
the
drainage
ordinance,
so
we're
able
to
make
some
recommendations
and
some
of
the
drainage
ordinance
changed.
F
C
G
E
C
More
I
guess
reactionary
and
me
faster
at
producing
this
again.
This
is
not
my
only
hat
that
I
wear,
but
that
being
the
case,
that's
not
excused
I
try
I
want
to
get
the
richer.
We
need
to
blessing
on
this
to
be
a
City,
Council,
I,
guess
committee,
but
I
would
need
for
us
I,
don't
know
if
the
council
would
want
this,
but
we
we
need
direction.
What
do
you
want?
The
tre
to
be
functioning
as
it
currently
is
an
ad
hoc
committee
that
technically
under
charter
says
it's
for
a
temporary
thing.
So
suppose,
though,.
C
C
D
G
D
F
F
D
You're
doing
a
development
according
to
what's
being
recommended
to
to
council
before
on
the
medians
you'd,
be
able
to
put
your
landscaping
all
the
way
to
the
curve.
So
now,
you're
gonna
have
to
have
no
landscaping
for
the
first
four
feet.
The
positive
thing
of
the
of
the
deal
is
that
before
they
wouldn't,
let
you
put
any
nozzles
within
the
city's
right
away
unless
they
were
underground,
but
now
they're
now
we're
gonna
be
able
to
put
the
nozzles
so
long
as
their
them
their
water-saving
type.
D
F
H
H
H
C
Before
I
do
that
I
had
a
question:
it's
you
know,
because
I
wrote
down
several
things:
how
we
were
going
to
do
the
existing
organs
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
guys
need
to
make
a
motion
existing
or
does
propose
or
nets
the
border.
Just
those
stats,
other
City
setbacks
that
come
up
economically
effects
and
then
provide
that
like
a
detail
like
a
3d
setback
in
a
to
be
set
back
so.
C
B
C
C
F
D
G
G
A
G
J
C
G
What
we
need
to
do
I
mean
your
developer.
There's
you
know,
other
people
are
doing
commercial,
developing
that
you
might
ask
them
what
concerns
you
have
with
your
project.
I
deal
with
some
guy
building
commercial
buildings
and
they
tell
me
their
problems.
You
know
I
thought
well
go
to
a
TR,
Vietnam
abide.
You
know
there
are
certain
problems
facing
this
guy's
up
there.
You
know
we
just
have
to
approach
it.