►
From YouTube: Historic District Board of Review- January 23, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
D
A
D
A
F
D
F
A
So
let's
go
ahead
and
did
everybody
have
a
chance
to
take
a
look
at
the
minutes?
Are
there
any
changes
additions?
Cindy?
Did
you
get
your
changes
made
that
you
sent
in
an
email.
A
A
Okay,
I'll
ask
for
a
motion
on
last
month's
minutes.
H
G
A
Next
I'd
like
to
welcome
everybody.
That's
come
tonight
a
little
bit
about
the
meeting
tonight,
we'll
ask
each
of
you
to
come
up
at
a
certain
point
and
present
your
application
for
approval
and
after
we
have
that
we'll
ask
if
well,
Brooke
will
go
through
the
presentation
that
you've
submitted
to
her.
Then
we'll
ask
the
applicant
if
you
have
any
additions,
you'd
like
to
make
to
the
presentation.
After
that
we'll
see
the
board
has
any
questions
or
comments
and
then
we'll
refer
it
back
out
to
the
public
for
questions
and
comments.
A
Well,
that
said,
we've
got
our
first
applicant
and
that
is
Debbie
Morris
and
Debbie.
If
you
could
come
up
and
state
your
name
and
your
address.
B
B
I
Couple
things
first
of
all,
I
was
in
the
middle
of
selling
my
business.
It's
been
sold,
the
building's
been
sold,
the
windows
had
to
go
in,
they
were
rotted
and
there
was
he
being
lost
and
paying
really
high
electric
bills.
So
I
was
told
by
my
contractor
that
they
could
not
be
repaired.
They
were
too
too
much
damage.
They
were
falling
out
of
the
windows,
which
was
dangerous
for
patrons
going
by
and
I
put
in
what
I
could
afford,
which
was
still
very
expensive
for
for
me
anyway.
I
E
I
I
D
B
A
G
G
The
first
guideline
is
retained
and
preserve
historic
windows.
They,
you
did
not
meet
that
obviously
maintain
existing
historic
Windows
where
possible.
Again,
we
don't
really
have
any
evidence
of
the
deterioration
repair
when
possible.
So
none
of
those
have
been
met.
G
G
A
F
A
I
I
G
Based
on
the
preceding
findings,
in
fact,
I
moved
that
the
Madison
historic
board
of
review
deny
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
replacement
of
the
wood
windows.
Nine
vinyl
windows
of
the
same
size
and
design,
as
requested
by
Deborah
Morris
at
the
313
East
First,
Street
location.
A
A
And
as
I
said,
Debbie
you're
denied
COA
will
be
in
the
mail
and
you
can
work
with
preservation
of
staff
to
see
if
we
can
correct
the
issue.
A
And
just
for
the
record,
can
you
guys
State
your
names
and
your
address
again.
B
This
structure
is
a
Circa
1870
Italian
at
duplex.
It
is
a
contributing
structure.
Zoned,
historic,
district
residential.
The
COA
request
is
to
amend
the
previous
COA
and
report
to
replace
the
existing
door
on
the
west
side
of
the
front
of
the
home
with
a
window
and
trim
to
match
other
existing
windows
on
the
front
of
home.
B
The
picture
shown
here
is
be
prior
to
their
project.
Getting
started.
B
These
are
photos
of
photo
of
while
the
work
was
in
progress.
B
B
B
And
these
are
also
photos
of
the
front
of
the
home,
showing
the
window,
restoration
and
other
work
that
has
been
done
and
that
is
all
I
have
there's.
B
L
We
said
we
were
going
to
kind
of
make
a
window
door,
so
we
basically
just
used
a
renovated
I
made
a
real
restored
door
window
built
the
door
around
it
and
left
left.
The
opening
of
the
door
is
still
there,
we're
not
filling
it
in
with
brick
or
anything.
So
it
really
isn't
a
window.
It's
it's
a
door
built
from
a
window.
If
you
look
at
one
of
the
pictures.
K
K
We
don't
we
have
the
entire
opening
still
there.
It
just
has
wood
at
the
bottom.
We
don't
plan
on
putting
brick,
we
actually
plant
a
painting
at
exactly
the
same
white,
the
origami
White,
but
that
is
a
period
correct
window
and
I
saved
the
door.
That
was
there
and
moved
it
to
the
front,
so
the
front
door.
One
of
those
pictures
you
can
see
it
I've
actually
restored
the
door
that
was
sitting
there
is
now
in
the
front.
So
foreign.
K
L
C
E
K
K
Eyebrows
being
worked
on
to
make
it
match
so
the
front
we
had
to
wait.
The
the
scaffolding
was
moved
out,
so
we
can
go
ahead.
E
Okay,
you
originally
asked
to
replace
that
door
with
another
door
and
then,
instead
of
that,
you
made
it
a
window,
is
it.
G
C
L
K
G
A
L
Because
it
it's
not
going
to
look
like
a
window
because
it
takes
the
whole
door
opening.
So
we
didn't
try
to
you
know
all
that's
removable.
We
didn't
fill
it
in
with
brick
or
anything
to
make
it
look
like
the
others.
We're
just
going
to
do
something
decorative,
but
the
whole
intent
was
to
make
it
appear
as
if
it
were
a
window,
and
then
we
just
thought
well
we're
doing
all
this
restoration.
We
might
as
well
use
the
period.
K
L
F
K
K
L
L
L
A
The
original
COA
was,
did
we
approve
that
they
could
be
removed?
No.
B
L
K
A
Also,
I
noticed
that
you
know
it's
like
most
of
our
homes,
stacked
Rock
foundation
and
where
the
steps
were
removed,
you
can
see
the
Stacked
Rock.
How
are
you
planning
to
mitigate
that
I'm.
K
L
A
I
think
you
know
what
some
members
on
the
board
are
concerned
about
is
that
it
does
look
like
a
window
now
and
not
like
a
door,
so
it
looks
instead
of
being
a
shared
wall.
Double
it
looks
like
it's
all
was
built
now
as
one
family,
home
and
I.
Think
that's
some
of
the
frustration
that
that
we're
you
know
experiencing
with
the
questions
that
we're
asking.
G
K
And
I
still
the
sill
is
what
makes
it
makes
it
like.
The
window
didn't
actually
expect
that,
and
he
put
it
in
I
mean
obviously
we
like
it
because
it
makes
it
makes
it
a
rest.
But
if
you
remove
that
seal
it
it's
flattened
front
sprayed
on
the
you
know,
you
still
have
the
door
jamb.
It
looks
like
the
picture.
The
only
thing
that
changes
that
from
the
picture
is
what
we
have
a
seal
now:
wood.
K
M
D
But
this
is,
this
will
actually
then
look
like
a
single
family
home.
It
mimics
some
of
the
homes
that
are
built.
That
way
too.
In
town
I
mean
there
are
some
that
have
the
same
window.
Configuration
I
think
you
all
have
there
it'll
look
like
that,
but
there's
nothing
to
prevent
an
owner
who
wanted
to
turn
it
back
to
make
it
look
like
it
was.
The
original
am.
K
K
D
Well,
I
can
tell
you
that
I've
done
a
couple
Restorations
where
it
was
just
a
single
door
opening
onto
a
sidewalk,
and
it
was
quite
an
ordeal
to
get
the
board
to
allow
me
to
move
that
door
and
a
lot
of
explanation.
A
lot
of
a
lot
of
angst
on
the
part
of
the
board,
but
and
also
I,
think
some
other
folks.
But
you
live
in
it.
Correct
you're,
gonna,
that's
gonna,
be
your
home
and
you
you've
invested
at
quite
a
bit
of
money
already
in
that.
D
Oh
my
God,
mostly
most
rehabbers,
will
not
admit
how
much
they
could
have,
but,
from
my
perspective,
I
think
the
way
you're
going
to
use.
If
you
look
at
the
history
of
these
homes,
not
very
many
of
them
are
being
used.
The
way
they
were
originally
used,
they're
either
been
changed.
They're,
not
multiple
family
houses.
B
D
They're
single-family
houses,
I
mean
goes
back
and
forth,
but
I
think
the
fact
that
you've
you've
got
a
situation
where
you
maintain
the
historical.
L
The
downstairs
is
almost
all
I
mean
we
took
all
the
moldings
off
of
the
windows
and
the
baseboards
clean
them
up
and
put
them
back
in
after
we
built
out
the
walls
in
the
house.
We
we've
used
the
spindles
we've
used
the
newel
posts,
the
original
of
the
original
home
mixed
it
with
the
new
stuff
we've.
Even
it
was
so
interesting
after
we
stripped
the
molding.
We
actually
didn't
paint
the
moldings
in
some
of
the
rooms,
and
you
could
see
all
the
layers
of
paint.
L
So
so
we
have
done
the
best
that
we
can
do
to
keep
and
he
used.
He
got
mad
at
me
because
I
wanted
to
reuse
everything
and
he
was
like
I
don't
want
to,
but
now
that
we've
done
it
and
mixed
the
new
and
the
old
it's
just.
It's
really
really
something
to
see
inside.
D
L
That's
not
how
I
submitted
it.
I
did
not
think
we
changed
our
plan,
I
thought
we
stayed
on
track,
but
and
that's
why
he
keeps
talking
about
the
sill,
because
that
was
a
surprise
to
us
too.
It
was
a
happy
surprise
because
I
like
the
way
it
looked,
but
that
was
not
the
picture,
and
that
was
not
what
you
know
and
you
know
the
contractor
did
the
drawings
and
that's
not
exactly
what
ended
up
happening,
but
that
was
not
something
that
we
specifically
asked
for.
We
were
happy
that.
K
K
We'd
like
to
keep
it,
we
like
to
keep
the
cell,
you
know,
because
if
we
take
the
sill
off,
you
know
it
is
straight
down
and
it
does
look
it
depicts.
You
know
the
picture
with
the
picture
shows,
but
we
've
adds
to
you
know
the
house,
but
a
lot
of
time,
resources
and
effort.
Saving
this
home
I
mean
before
and
after
I
mean
I
mean
this
was
at
the
lap
idated
building
that
most
people
wrote
off.
F
L
K
A
I
understand
it,
you
mean
from
your
first
application:
yeah
yeah
as
I
understand
it.
You
were
going
to
make
a
door
that
had
the
muttons
and
the
pains
that
matched
your
windows,
but
it
was
still
going
to
be
a
door
not
a
window.
K
Appearance
of
the
others
it
would
just
stand
out,
then
we
would
have
to
refabricate
something
with
the
door
that
looked
just
like
the
windows
to
have
to
have
them
correct
that
made
more
sense
to
use.
We
were
going
to
actually
take
the
sashes
and
put
them
inside
a
door
cut.
The
cut
I
mean
that
was
the
easiest
way
to
put
that
in
there
to
have
it
look
the
same.
What
I
got
with
Seth
Elder?
He
was
the
one
to
help
me
restore
the
windows.
K
We
were
asking
for
suggestions
on
what
we
should
do
and
he
said
well,
we
can
use
and
let's
go
ahead
and
just
you
know,
go
around
it
and
then
you
can
build
wood
below
it.
It
would
have
that
same
look
so
where
you
don't
have
to
enter
the
way
that
they
fit,
because
you
you
couldn't
put
them
in,
as
is
I
mean
you
still
have
gaps
on
the
sides,
so
you
have
two.
K
You
know
roughly
two
inches
on
the
sides
there
it's
hard
to
see
that
in
the
picture,
so
we
would
still
have
to
frame
around
windows
or
we
would
have
to
cut
a
door
and
make
the
door
look
like
depiction
of
the
windows,
which
means
that
it
wouldn't
I,
don't
think
it
would
look
near
as
good.
If
we
would
have
done
that
because
we
tried
to
maintain,
we
have
the
same
weighty
glass.
We
have
the
same
story.
We
used
would
be
hard
to
do
that
with
the
representation
of.
A
It
I
think
the
main
concern
just
to
reiterate
what
I
said
a
little
earlier
is
that
we
do
not
like
to
see
modifications
of
openings
on
the
front
of
the
house.
We
have
approved
modifications
on
sides
of
the
back,
but
we
have
not
approved
one
on
the
on
the
front,
at
least
as
long
as
I've
been
here,
and
there
are
other
examples
of
doubles
with
the
shared
wall
that
have
been
turned
into
single-family
homes
and
they've,
kept
both
doors.
They've
done
them
a
little
bit
differently.
A
L
F
E
I
do
but
I
don't
know
how
to
frame
it.
I
tend
to
agree
that
in
our
strict
definition
that
it
does,
it
is
not
in
compliance
with
how
our
regs
are
written,
but
I
also
tend
to
agree
that,
with
the
way
you
are
handling
it
and
adding
the
window.
That
makes
it
look
like
a
single
house
in
no
way
that
doesn't
bother
me,
even
though
it
is
not
the
compliance
that
the
reg
say.
E
But
I
know
that
in
the
past
we
have
agreed
to
a
small
house
adding
a
window
when
there
was
never
a
window
there
on
the
front,
and
there
was
a
reason
for
that.
So
in
this
case,
because
they
all
look
exactly
the
same
and
you
will
no
longer
have
the
steps
there,
which
were
added
when
your
realtor
had
it
I
believe
right,
yeah,
yes,
I!
Think
I.
Remember
that,
then,
to
me,
it
looks
like
a
beautiful
single
house
and
I
would
have.
E
M
H
H
A
A
Jim
came
before
the
board
with
that
it
wasn't
historically
correct
to
that.
Building.
No
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
F
F
Let's
see
original
door
should
be
maintained
and
preserved.
Okay,.
F
Okay,
again,
retainers
for
original
doors
is
9.1.
9.2
maintain,
observe
original
doors
and
entrances
retained,
historic
entrance
features,
including
the
jams
and
the
Sills,
a
retained
original
primary
doors
on
the
main
facade,
as
they
contribute
to
a
building's
historic
appearance.
It
is
not
appropriate
to
infill
or
cover
historic
door.
Openings.
F
F
Whatever
is
what
else
is
there
appropriate
here
or
applicable.
F
Yeah
I
don't
really
see
anything
there.
We
go.
Okay,
retain
and
Reserve
historic
Windows
we're
talking
about
doors,
though.
F
Okay,
I
could
have
sworn
there's
something
in
here,
maybe
I'm
getting
the
new
guidelines
mixed
up
with
our
previous
ones,
but
not
supposed
to
change
I
believe
the.
Maybe
we
already
said
that
earlier.
This
saw
the
opening
can't
change
the
door
to
a
window
or
window
to
a
door
on
the
primary
facade.
F
So,
given
that
that's
what
we're
doing
here,
I
would
say
that
this
application
that
does
not
meet
the
guidelines.
A
A
D
Your
first
point
of
contact
on
anything
should
be
that
lady
right
over
there,
the
preservationist,
because
any
change
really
well,
you
may
think
it's
minor.
It
may
not
be
in
somebody
else's
eyes,
so
I
would
I
would
but
I
disagree.
I
think
you
have
maintained
the
materials
you've
actually
I
think
gone
above
and
beyond
what
a
lot
of
other
folks
do.
As
far
as
attempting
to
maintain
the
materials
not
only
on
that
door
but
on
the
rest
of
the
house
and
the
window
so
I
compliment
you
on
those.
A
So
I
agree
with
Owen
and
Sandy
for
the
reasons
that
we
talked
about
a
little
earlier
tonight.
You
guys
have
done
a
tremendous
job
on
that
property.
The
unfortunate
thing
is
is
we're
basically
on
the
historic
Madison
Campus
and
each
of
those
houses
are
very
important.
We
have
a
very
important
block
with
that
said,
changing
anything
on
the
facade
of
that
at
how
it
was
initially
used
and
lived
in
is
just
you
know
it.
A
It
goes
against
our
guidelines,
so
you
know
that's
that's
where
I
fall
in
on
this,
but
unfortunately
we
need
what,
for
first.
L
Can
I
just
say
one
more
thing
just
I
would
like,
if
you
guys
could
just
you
know,
take
another
look
at
the
original
certificate
that
was
approved.
As
I
said,
there
was
no
doorknob,
it
was
approved
to
never
not
to
be
a
door,
I
mean
to
fill
the
door,
but
not
to
have
a
doorknob,
and
that
was
in
the
original
application
and.
A
I
think
it's
okay
not
to
have
a
doorknob,
because
it's
still
the
door,
but
you
know
now,
with
the
cell:
it's
a
it's
a
window.
It's
no
longer
a
door.
K
So
I
think
the
trade-off
is:
do
you
want
a
home,
that's
falling
down,
dilapidated
and
just
destroying
upon
itself,
or
do
you
want
something
that
is
is
stored
to
a
level
that
maintains
that
appearance
of
that
block
and
I
do
understand
what
you're
saying
about
the
the
differences
of
what
was
submitted
and
where
we
ended
up
today?
I
think:
that's
why
we're
here?
We
understand
that,
but
I.
K
A
Chris,
there's
no
doubt
that
you
guys
have
done
an
incredible
restoration
of
that
property
for
us
that
have
been
there.
You
know
a
little
bit
longer
before
you
guys
came.
We
knew
what
we
lived
with.
It
trust
me.
However,
you
know
again
it
from
the
function
of
the
house,
how
it
was
traditionally
built
and
originally
built
to
alter
that.
You
know
it
could
impact
the
way
that
we're
evaluated
in
the
future
as
well.
A
It's
obvious
I
think
to
people
who
have
architecture
backgrounds
that
come
and
do
these
surveys
every
now
and
then
that
that
was
a
double
and
they'll
see
it's
a
modification
I,
don't
know
how
they
would
rate
it
going
forward,
but
our
guidelines,
you
know
strictly
say
no
modifications
to
openings
on
the
front
of
a
building,
so
I
mean
this
is
tough.
A
It's
not
a
you
know.
It's
not
easy,
but
anyway
I
think
we've
got
everybody's
opinions
any
did
you
have
anything
else?
You
guys
wanted
to
say
before
we
take
a
motion.
B
L
L
The
only
thing
that
happened
was
that
the
implementation
of
our
Vision
was
different
and
that's
why
it
appears
a
little
bit
different
than
the
picture,
because
the
Contra
you
know
because
they,
you
know,
took
a
little
bit
of
leeway,
trying
to
make
us
happy
and
I'm,
making
a
little
look
a
little
bit
more
like
the
other
structures,
but
but
yeah
I
just
felt
like
what
we
submitted
showed
the
intent
that
we
were
trying
to
make
it
look
like
a
window
without
hurting
the
door
frame
itself,
and
that's
why
I
mentioned
you
know
that
there
was
no
doorknob
in
the
picture,
because
the
attempt
was
number
for
it
to
look
supposed
to
look
as
much
like
a
window
as
we
could
without
you
know,
doing
any
major
structural
changes
to
that.
E
I'll
make
a
motion
based
on
the
preceding
findings
of
fact,
I
move
that
the
Madison
Historic
District
board
of
review,
Grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
Chris
and
Gina
Lynn
at
214,
West
2nd
for
the
proposed
application,
as
it
is
stated
in
the
let's
see,
to
replace
the
existing
door
on
the
west
side
of
the
front
of
the
home
with
a
window
and
trimmed
to
match.
Other
existing
windows
on
front
of
the
home.
D
A
A
B
G
B
A
Okay
with
that
said,
we
needed
four
right
to
deny
the
COA,
so
you
guys
will
get
your
COA
to
go
ahead
and
complete
the
work
on
the
front
of
your
house
and
I
know.
You've
got
all
the
work
permits
and
everything
else
in
place,
so
you
won't
need
to
do
that.
Thanks
for
coming
I
appreciate.
A
B
B
You
also
see
this
view
from
about
100
yards
out
south
of
the
building,
and
you
can
see
arrows
to
where
these
solar
panels
will
be.
J
D
A
J
A
A
Thank
you,
okay,
with
that
said,
do
we
have
any
questions
from
the
board.
J
D
J
D
J
A
As
at
least
how
I
interpret
your
question
are
the
Raptors
that
are
underneath,
it
will
be
able
to
support
the
new
editions
of
the
solar
panels.
Weight.
C
N
To
address
that
concern
for
the
board
he'll
need
a
building
permit
for
the
solar
panels
and
we'll
address
any
deficiencies
during
that
review.
D
And
I
think
the
fact
that
you're,
looking
for
a
easier
way
to
get
some
electricity
into
your
place
is
a
great
idea.
Rick
I,
think
from
the
standpoint
of
historic
dwellings,
were
constructed
with
wide
Eaves
and
large
floor-to-ceiling
Heights.
Of
course,
this
this
structure
in
the
back
was
I
think
a
little
bit
newer
than
most
of
our
historic
structures
here
in
town,
so
that
really
doesn't
apply
and
I
think
from
the
standpoint
of
putting
on
the
rear
of
the
building
and
it
being
visibility
would
be
limited
to
those
panels.
That'll
be
great.
D
D
20
feet
20
feet:
let's
see
pretty
close
locate
solar
panels
in
the
side
or
rear
yards
which
you're
doing
which
you're
actually
on
the
side
of
rear
roof,
do
not
use
Hardware
frames
piping
with
a
reflective
finish
which
I
don't
believe
you're
going
to
so.
D
J
Yeah
yeah
I
would
think
that
up
on
the
shingles,
the
panels
are
pretty
much
going
to
cover
the
racking
that
will
be
there.
Okay,
that's
in
the
racking
supplies.
This
could
be
a
flat
black
coating.
My
assumption.
Okay,
the
panels
that
are
out
on
the
flat
part
of
the
roof
will
be
standing
up
a
little
bit.
J
Don't
know
what
material
they're
using
okay,
since
you
could
ask
for
a
white
finish
on
them.
If
it's
available.
A
A
I
agree
for
the
same
reasons
and
I
really
want
to
commend
you
on
doing
this.
I
think
you're
going
to
be
a
leader
with
you
know
a
lot
of
the
commercial
buildings
downtown
as
well,
and
maybe
even
residential
Carolyn.
A
F
F
D
A
D
A
Okay
with
that
said,
I
believe
that's
our
last
applicant
and
we
are
ready
for
new
and
old
business.
We're
going
to
start
with
old
business
tonight
and
has
everybody
seen
the
COA
review
Brooke.
B
You
have
the
copy
to
please
pass
around,
and
that
is
with
the
color
and
The
Branding
yeah.
A
B
B
N
If
the
board
chooses
to
approve
these
changes,
it'll
be
need
to
be
contingent
on
legal
sign
off.
Devin
hasn't
seen
the
last
version
of.
A
N
D
B
B
You
have
a
motion
in
a
second
you're
good
to
vote.
Okay,
all
right,
Thomas,
Stark,
I,.
A
F
A
N
C
A
Sounds
good
any
comments
on
that
nope?
Oh
Brooke,
would
you
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
upcoming
training.
B
Yes,
so
Nicole
and
I
have
been
looking
into
doing
training
for
the
historic
board
members
we're
investigating
possible
training
with
our
napc,
which
is
National,
Alliance
preservation
commissions,
it's
called
Camp
many
I
know.
Many
of
you
are
familiar
with
that.
Having
attended
that
in
the
past,
we
are
investing
and
looking
into
a
possible
virtual
session
three
sessions
regarding
legal
basics,
essentially
how
to
make
a
defensible
motion
how
to
do
defensible.
B
Like
I
said
we
were
in
the
phase
of
gathering
information
and
looking
at
potential
scheduling
dates.
If
that
does
not
work
out
for
whatever
reason,
then
we
still
will
be
doing
a
training
session
on
the
same
or
similar
topics,
but
it
would
be
in-house
training
with
staff,
but
we'll
let
you
know,
as
we
get
more
information.
Thank.
A
You
Brooke
with
that
said,
is
there
any
old
or
new
business
that
we
need
to
cover
before
we
move
to
the
staff
report?
B
All
right,
so
in
looking
at
the
January
Fast
Track
applications,
we
had
Jay
wood
at
108,
East
Main
Street.
This
is
the
HH
Apothecary
amend
a
previous
COA
to
include
a
72
inch
by
30
inch
aluminum
sign.
Essentially,
they
have
been
approved
previously
for
a
sign
and
they're,
replacing
the
wording
and
design
with
a
new
one.
B
Rick
Cole
at
752
Jefferson
Street
to
replace
six
existing
wood
windows
with
two
aluminum
clad
picture
windows
on
the
south,
facade
Mark
veterna
at
526,
Walnut
Street
replace
existing
vinyl,
siding
with
cemented
siding
replacement,
metal
door
with
wood
and
glass
door
and
vinyl
windows
with
aluminum,
clad
wood
windows
and
I
will
note.
As
of
this
morning,
I
went
out
with
the
building
inspector
and
code
enforcement
officer.
They
did
uncover
some
original
historic
wood
siding
and
he
is
hopeful
to
try
to
save
that.
B
B
Then
the
January
2022
COA
review
William
Peck
and
Paul
at
912,
First,
Street
edition
of
doors
and
windows
that
is
in
progress,
Chad
Gray,
928,
Park,
Avenue
Ada
ramp
indoors.
That
has
been
done.
Louis
Joyner
and
John
Morgan
at
403,
West,
First,
Street,
porch
columns
and
roof
modifications
that
has
been
done.
B
Matthew
and
Daniel
Chandler
at
111,
East,
2nd,
Street
to
replace
windows,
overhead
door
with
double
doors
and
side
lights.
Install
awning,
slash,
sign,
install
two
new
doors
in
the
East,
that
is
in
progress
and
Van,
and
Trevor
Crafton
at
422,
St
Michaels
Avenue
to
install
new
doors
on
the
east
and
south.
Add
six
Windows
build
a
shotgun
rear.
Edition
rebuilt
the
East
porch
replaced
two
Eastern
windows
with
sliding
glass
doors.
A
Thanks
Brooke,
can
you
go
back
to
the
the
page
prior
to
this,
so
help
me
understand:
Rick
call
it
on
Jefferson
752.
He
saw
those
existing
wood
windows.
What
one
over
one
and
are
they
original?
Were
they
original.
B
So
those
are,
those
were
existing
wood
windows.
I
do
believe.
Yes,
they
were
one
over
one.
I
would
have
to
I'm
pretty
positive.
Those
were
original
to
helm,
but
the
home
is
non-contributing
I,
believe
it
was
a
Circa
in
1950
or
1960
structure.
B
C
A
Well,
that
said.
Is
there
anything
else
Brooke
on
your
plate,
I'll
ask
for
a
motion
to
adjourn.