►
From YouTube: Historic District Board of Review- December 27, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
C
C
C
A
E
E
B
C
Okay,
now
we'll
get
to
the
introduction.
What
we
are
going
to
do
tonight
is
We'll.
Have
each
of
you
when
your
application
is
called,
come
up
to
the
podium
and
tell
us
your
name
and
the
address
that
you're
filing
for
the
application.
C
C
After
that,
we'll
ask
for
a
motion
and
then
we'll
ask
for
a
second
we'll
have
a
roll
call
vote
and
at
the
end
you
will
either
be
given
your
application
or
your
COA
to
go
ahead
with
your
project,
or
there
may
be
some
modifications
that
you
can
make
at
a
later
date,
but
that'll
be
all
depending
upon
this
discussion
that
happens
tonight.
C
So
with
that
said,
let's
have
the
first
application
and
that
is
Linda
Martin.
A
This
structure
is
a
circa
1960,
non-contributing,
no
style
commercial
building
zoned
in
the
central
business
district.
The
CLA
request
is
to
fill
in
partial
basement
and
build
a
48
foot
by
48
foot
structure
attached
to
the
front
facade
after
an
unsafe
demolition
of
everything,
but
the
front
facade
you
can
see
site
plans
and
a
sketch
of
what
that
Edition
will
look
like
and
the
brick
wall
on
this
drawing
is
to
the
North
or
the
top.
A
These
are
some
sample
of
the
rear
door
and
windows
that
will
be
installed
on
the
south
side
if
they
go
with
Windows
and
that
is
all
I
have.
F
No
I
don't
think
so.
The
front
door
will
be
replaced.
The
window
up
front,
we're
going
to
try
to
rebuild
that
just
to
make
it
look
the
same.
Otherwise,
the
only
thing
that
we
might
change
is
we
might
not
go
48
feet
back.
We
might
go
a
little
bit
less
than
that,
but
I
don't
think
that
matters
in
this
and.
C
E
Miss,
will
you
be
taking
off
the
the
wording
there
I
think
so.
E
E
D
Okay,
since
this
billing
is
in
such
bad
shape,
we're
glad
as
as
said
earlier,
we're
glad
you're
working
on
it.
There's.
D
To
change
who
you're
rebuilding
so
you're
rehabbing
what
you've
got
it
sounds
like
you're,
going
to
keep
some
of
the
key
elements.
That's
already
there.
Keeping
the
brick
front,
I
think
is
a
good
idea,
rear,
lateral
additions,
provide
owners
with
flexibility
and
they're
building
used,
and
since
this
building
hasn't
been
used
in
such
a
long
time,
it's
it's
great.
That
you're,
going
to
put
it
back
into
use.
Yeah
sounds
like
you're,
going
to
use
pretty
much
the
same
materials
that
are
already
on
it.
That
shouldn't
be
an
issue.
H
D
Compatible
with
the
original
building
scale,
you're,
not
raising
the
height
or
anything
like
that,
so
you're,
keeping
that
safe.
The
addition
should
be
distinguishable
since
the
the
what
what
is
there
is
really
not
distinguishable
as
a.
F
C
G
B
And
I
agree
also
with
my.
C
And
I
agree
for
the
same
reasons
and
I
like
Mike
said:
I
also
come
in
you
and
and
putting
that
land
and
that
structure
back
into
you.
So
yeah
we're.
E
I'll
make
the
motion,
based
on
the
preceding
findings
of
fact,
I
move
that
the
Madison
and
story
District
board
of
review,
Grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
Miss,
Linda
Martin
for
the
proposed
work
of
at
128
Mulberry
Street,
to
take
down
all
of
the
building
behind
the
facade
and
leave
the
facade
and
perhaps
go
up
two
feet
above
what
you.
What
it
already
is.
Okay,.
C
C
A
But
you
could
specify
the
48
or
you
could
say
approximately
48
I
mean
that
would
be
up
to
her
on
how
she
wants
to
word
that
in
the
motion
girl.
E
That
would
be
fine,
just
approximately
48
feet.
C
C
C
Okay,
our
next
applicant
is
Tim
and
Sandra.
Is
it
lock,
foreign.
C
A
This
property
is
a
Circa
1840
Federal.
It
is
a
contributing
structure.
Zone
to
Historic
District
residential.
The
COA
request
is
to
build
a
front
porch,
extend
the
existing
rear,
porch
roof
and
install
a
40
or
excuse
me,
a
14
by
32
foot
accessory
building
in
the
rear
yard
and
see
a
survey,
a
site
plan
of
the
property
another
that
is
more
close
up,
showing
where
the
outbuilding
will
be
located
in
relation
to
the
home.
C
Would
you
guys
like
to
add
something
to
the
presentation,
I
think
so
that's
weird
questions
comments
from
the
board.
Yes,.
E
As
I
was
parked
out
in
front
of
your
place,
there
is
your
intent
to
build
the
porch
and
have
a
step
off
to
either
side
as
opposed
to
coming
right
down
onto
the
sidewalk.
You.
E
B
You
your
example,
photos
I
thought
were
good
examples,
except
for
one
which
looks
like
a
craftsman
style
porch
that
gray
one
there
and
see
how
they're
tapered.
So
it
looks
in
your
drawing.
Although
you
know
maybe
your
drawing
is
just
general.
B
Do
well,
of
course,
Lanier
is
not
federal.
Linear
is
Greek
Revival,
but
a
court
of
course
people
over
the
years
you
may
have
bought.
You
know
built
a
federal
house,
but
then
your
kids
maybe
decide.
Oh
that's
out
of
style
now
and
I
want
it
to
be
italianate.
We
have
a
lot
of
those
examples
where
someone
could
have
said.
B
You
know
we
want
Greek
Revival
porch
on
there,
so
you
know
I,
think
if
you
put
something
on
there
like
because
Greek
Revival
looks
a
lot
like
Federal,
but
Craftsman
to
me
is
so
far
in
the
future
that
it's
it's
not
exactly
appropriate.
B
So
that's
my
only
concerns.
My
request
would
be
that
you
try
to
stick
with
either
truly
federal
or
Greek
Revival
and
not
Craftsmen.
So.
H
B
I
J
C
C
To
kind
of
you
know,
upgrade
their
homes
as
architecture
developed
over
time,
and
if
you
can
go
now
to
the
examples
that
were
included
in
the
application
and
not
the
not
these
but
the
other,
the
design
ones
that
guy
they
believe
came,
do
they
come
from
Martha's
article
or
do
you
have
those
in
this
application.
C
Gotcha
so
anyway,
what
I'm
getting
at
is-
and
we
have
many
portraits
that
have
been
added
to
Federal
homes
or
porticos.
If
you
want
to
call
that
I
was
wondering
if
you
would
consider
tightening
up
that
front
porch
to
come
inside
of
both
of
the
windows,
so
that
it
covers
the
front
door
and
gives
you
that
protection
that
you're
wanting
but
doesn't
completely
go
up.
You
know
across
the
the
whole
front
of
the
house,
the.
I
C
B
C
B
I
might
have
been
imagining,
but
it
seemed
to
me
and
I
can't
remember
whether
it
was
in
one
of
the
photographs
that
was
submitted
or
whether
what
I
was
looking
at
on
Google
Maps.
But
it
looks
as
though
in
the
side
of
the
building
you
can
see.
Is
that
an
indentation
or
something
oh,
flashing?
Okay,
and
that,
again,
like
you,
say,
extends
the
complete.
I
H
I
C
I
just
have
a
couple
of
other
questions.
You
see
that
you're
going
to
have
a
concrete,
porch
correct.
Yes,.
I
G
C
And
then
for
your
Steel
on
the
fencing,
that's
going
to
be
a
powder
coated,
steel,
fencing.
C
I
E
I
G
I
H
C
C
Okay
Owen,
would
you
like
to
take
us
through
finding
a
fact.
B
B
Okay,
let's
see
we're
looking
here
at
porches.
Okay,
on
these
on
the
primary
facade,
she's
not
being
closed.
This
is
not
going
to
be,
let's
see,
so
that's
good
with
that.
If
it's
missing
it
is
appropriate
to
replace
it.
That's
exactly
what's:
Happening
Here
should
replacement,
porches
should
use
materials
and
cells
are
compatible
with
the
building
which
they
are
planning
to
do
they're
not
going
to
do
the
craftsman,
style
and
okay,
we're
moving
we're
not
talking
about
okay,
and
we
did
we
didn't
talk.
B
B
B
So
the
railings
should
be
repaired
with
materials
to
match
the
original
I.
Guess
we
don't
know
what
the
original
was,
but.
B
I'm
sorry
I
was
confused
about
that
part.
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
not
sure,
that's
appropriate.
B
Yeah
well,
I!
Guess
we
don't
know
what
was
there
originally
I
just
would
not
have
thought
that
that
would
be
what
a
federal
or
a
Greek,
Revival
or
Italian
porch
would
have
well
they're
going
to
be
painted
the
same.
I
C
B
B
B
Yeah
I
guess,
in
my
opinion,
the
railings
that
you're
describing
are
not
appropriate
for
that
architectural
style
and
period
aside
from
the
color
the
dimensions,
because
I
assume
I
I'm,
guessing
that
the
dimensions
are
going
to
be
what
we
typically
see
when
we
see
aluminum
railings
and
they
will
not
be
of
the
same
dimensions
as
if
you
were
doing
it
in
wood.
Wood
would
probably
be
larger,
larger
railing
or
so
so
yeah
to
me
that
that
is
not
appropriate.
B
B
You
well
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
that's
true
I
mean
I.
If
can
we
if
we
looked
at
you
know,
if
you
look
at
your
whatever's
in
that
book
or
any
any
example
books
or
even
your
examples,
I
think
you
would
not
often
see
you
wouldn't
see
black,
but
you
would
certainly
would
not
see
a
you
know
wooden
columns
than
with
black
metal
railings
in
between
them.
B
That
would
not
have
been
what
would
be
done
so
to
me
that
it
would
not
be
appropriate
okay,
so,
let's
go
on
then
I'm,
not
sure
everyone
would
agree
with
me,
but
that's
just
my
opinion.
B
Oh
new
construction,
Edition,
so
is
that
or
we're
just
talking
about
the
extended
roof
line
on
the
back
for
that?
Okay
yeah.
So
this
is
in
the
back
in
the
rear.
So
that's
the
best
location
for
an
addition,
and
it
is
secondary
a
smaller
and
simpler
than
the
original,
because
the
slope
is
just
continuing,
so
what's
being
added
on
is
a
bit
smaller,
it's
very
compatible
because
the
roof
slope
is
continuous
and
the
design
materials
roof
materials-
like
you
say,
shingles
was
already
on
there
to
continue
with
that.
B
So
it
seems
to
me
that's
all
assistant
with
the
guidelines.
B
I
always
look
at
these
these
buildings
there,
like
you,
say,
you're
putting
it
on
gravel,
so
it's
not
really
a
permanent
structure
right.
So
when
we
talk
about
Garden
sheds
and
these
kind
of
things
to
me,
this
is
is
not
the
same
as
if
you
had
a
foundation
with
power,
and
you
know
water
in
there.
It's
not
like
you're,
building
out
building
you're,
just
putting
up
storage
building
on
gravel.
B
So
in
my
opinion,
unless
it
was
wildly
wrong
size
or
we
shouldn't
even
worry
too
much
about
the
guidelines,
because
this
is
not
really
a
permanent
structure.
In
my
opinion,.
B
Okay,
I
think
it
is
compatible
with
it
just
in
the
back,
so
it's
going
to
be
compatible
with
things,
you'll
see
up
and
down
the
alley
in
the
back,
and
so
it
should
be
oriented
toward
the
major
street,
but
we're
really
not
talking
about
that.
We're
talking
about
a
storage
shed
for
the
rear,
so
that's
not
appropriate.
It
says
new
garages.
This
is
like
a
garage,
so
it's
built
at
the
rear.
So
that's
that's
appropriate.
B
A
C
Okay,
I'll
ask
for
a
motion.
D
C
That's
right:
yeah
Mike,.
D
I
agree
with
almost
everything:
I
have
a
federal
home
and
if
I
had
my
choice
of
putting
aluminum
railings
in
or
wood
railings,
I'd
pick
aluminum
every
time.
The
maintenance
on
wood
is
pretty
extensive
and
you've
got
to
put
them
in
right.
You
got
to
put
them
in
the
you
know
with
the
but
the
angles
on
them
right,
so
they
shed
the
water
and
Roger
can
tell
you
a
lot
about
that
on
the
wood
railings.
D
But
you
know
I
I,
agree
with
with
Owen
that
you're
meeting
our
guidelines
that
you're
meeting
our
guidelines.
C
We'll
go
to
Owen,
oh,
you
already
did
another
one.
So
I
I
agree
with
everything
that
Owen
just
said,
with
the
exception:
I'm
kind
of
Teeter
back
and
forth
on
the
wood,
rail
versus
the
wrought
iron.
We
do
have
Federal
homes
that
have
wrought
iron
railings,
including
my
home,
which
is
a
stoop,
and
it
has
the
railing
coming
down
and
I.
Think
Mike!
You
have
it
on
the
front
of
your
house
as
well.
C
C
C
C
But
I
will
say
that
your
application
and
the
things
that
you're
going
to
do
this
house
really
is
going
to
make
a
huge
Improvement
to
that
block
and
your
corner.
D
D
So
but
no
it
it's
it's
quite
a
chore
pick
in
the
color.
D
D
I
make
a
motion
that
the
the
house
at
902
West,
2nd
that
Tim
and
Sandra
Lock
okay,
have
proposed
with
the
application
to
be
accepted
as
submitted.
D
G
C
Well,
thank
you
guys
for
coming
in
and
you
will
get
a
COA
in
the
mail
from
the
preservation
staff
and
as
a
reminder,
make
sure
that
you've
got
your
building
permits
and
Zoning
variances
in
place
before
you
start
the
project.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
C
Okay.
Our
next
applicant
tonight
is
Roger
Welch.
K
Roger
Welch
one
25th,
West
5th
Street.
A
A
These
are
interior
pictures.
All
of
this
has
been
previously
approved
in
a
2013
COA
application,
but
this
is
to
show
the
Symmetry
that
the
applicant
desires
on
the
exterior
of
the
building.
The
windows
have
not
been
installed,
yet
he
is
building
those
himself
wood
windows,
but
this
just
shows
the
rationale
for
the
Dormers,
so
these
will
be
the
windows.
This
picture
is
going
to
be
showing
the
West
is
the
west
elevation.
A
This
will
be
the
South
elevation,
the
front
of
the
building.
It
will
have
a
large
octagonal
window
installed
as
well,
and
these
are
the
renderings
now
on
this
image.
The
applicant
was
working
with
his
architect
to
determine
whether
to
do
three
or
four
Dormers.
He
has
decided
to
do
three
rather
than
the
four.
So
although
the
strong
shows
four
it,
the
application
is
just
for
the
three
Dormers.
They
will
be
evenly
spaced
across
the
the
the
roof
line,
and
that
is
all
I
have.
G
K
Were
on
were
all
framed
out,
as
in
the
front
I
was
going
on
your
South
there
there's
the
interior
of
the
basketball
downstairs,
so
the
they'll
be
instead
of
three
double
hung.
Two
over
two
or
four
over
four
Windows
there'll
be
two
because
one
is
a
little
bit
more
wall
space
in
between
the
windows.
Okay,.
H
G
K
Then,
on
the
front
I
was
going
to
put
to
and
then
the
that's
a
rough
frame
opening
and
you
do
that
as
an
octagon
shape
there
that
that's
done
that's
going
to
be
a
big
circle
of
52
inch
circle.
Instead,.
K
The
floor
there'll
be
a
basically
a
3070
pass
each
door
with
two
side
lights
on
each
side,
then
with
the
full
transom
across
and
then
flanking
off
of
each
side.
Of
that
South
beside
you'll
have
another
two
double
hung
either
two
over
two
or
four
over
four
and
all
this
will
be
stick
built,
the
19th
centuries
style.
G
K
Modes
and
all
that
and
then
going
back
to
the
Dormers
there'll,
be
a
total
of
eight
Dormers
four
on
the
west
side,
three
to
four
having
made
that
determination
yet
but
three
to
four
on
the
west
and
the
east
side
and
and
then
on
the
west
side,
where
you
have
the
three
there
was
going
to
be
three
double
hungs.
K
K
That
will
be
a
3-0
just
pass
each
door
with
a
transom
in
these
Dormers
I'm
gonna
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
gonna
be
four
Dormers
or
three
it'll
most
likely.
K
K
G
K
H
C
C
Perfect
so
three
to
four
Dormers
depending
on
I,
guess
your
final
design.
That's.
K
C
It
sure
will
any
questions
or
comments
from
the
board
public
questions
comments.
D
Roger
he's
done
some
windows
for
me
and
some
work
for
me
and
very
pleased
with
what
he's
done.
He's
got
a
good
sense
of
history
and
what's
appropriate.
As
far
as
the
century
of
building
he's
he's
a
Madison
commercial
design,
page
63,
construction,
roofline,
Editions,
basically,
you're
not
changing
the
roof
line.
You're
adding
the
Dormers
is
what.
D
D
Rooftop
Edition
should
be
similar
to
reforms
to
the
buildings
to
which
they
are
attached,
which
they
will
be
by
virtue
of
the
windows
you're
going
to
put
in
them,
I'm
sure,
I'm,
very
familiar
with
Roger's
window
additions
should
not
cause
the
removal
of
character,
defining
materials
and
features.
I.
Think
the
what
you're
proposing
Roger
will
add
to
the
character
in
the
19th
century.
Look
you're
attempting
to
get
on
that
building
we're
very
pleased
with
what
you're
doing
down
there.
So
anything
else,
Brooke.
K
And
you
know
I
forgot
to
kind
of
say
and
when
I,
when
I
hit
the
dirt,
which
I
hope
is
many
years
from
now
that
can
be
used
as
a
residential
or
a
commercial
construction.
D
E
E
C
L
And
we
live
at
602,
East,
2nd
Street
and
we're
ignorant,
because
our
Builder
told
us
we
didn't
need
to
get
a
permit
for
it.
L
A
A
C
And
a
half
okay,
well
so
just
to
clarify
for
the
public
and
anybody
else.
That's
watching
this
on
TV
any
exterior
changes.
It's
a
good
idea
to
come
before
a
president
of
innovation
staff-
and
you
know
a
lot
of
the
projects
can
be
signed
off
right
there
and
then
you
can
go
ahead
and
you
know
not
have
to
come
before
the
board,
but
they'll
advise
you
on
which
direction
that
you
would
need
to
take.
So
we
have
any
other
or
questions
from
the
board
or
comments
from
the
board.
C
C
M
C
M
L
M
D
A
To
that
we
did
receive
public
comment
in
the
form
of
email
in
support
of
the
application.
G
C
And
I'll
pass
that
around
everybody
and
take
a
look
at
that.
E
E
Your
contractor
should
have
known
that
and
what
we
see
here,
I'm
new
here,
but
what
I
have
seen
here
is
the
people
who
come
before
us
are
kind
of
the
movers
and
shakers
and
the
people
who
do
things,
and
you
know
we're
dealing
with
a
clientele
that
wants
their
houses
to
look
wonderful
and
it
makes
a
difference
in
our
community
and
if
you
know
of
anybody
and
I
know,
you
all
know
a
ton
of
people.
If
you
know
of
anybody,
that's
going
to
do
any
construction
at
all.
E
If
you
could
just
say
you
might
want
to
check
with
a
story
and
because
a
lot
of
contractors
they
will
say,
I
didn't
know
that
that
was
needed
and
they
really
should.
So
if
you
just
if
we
keep
reminding
people,
because
when
you
come
to
us-
and
we
say,
we've
already
done
it,
it's
not
your
fault
correct.
Your
contractor
should
have
told
you,
and
he
didn't
know.
So
if
we
just
inform
our
our
people
in
town,
maybe
more
people
will
come
here
and
say:
I
guess
I'm
supposed
to
get
approval
first,
but.
L
C
B
Okay,
fences
and
walls
should
be
based
on
historic
designs
and
materials.
This
wood
is
mentioned.
That's
what
this
this
one
is
made
of,
so
that
material
is
appropriate.
B
Are
you
going
to
paint
it
at
all
or
you're
just
going
to
leave
it?
That's
my
plan.
That's
treated
okay,
well,
I
can't
ask
you,
could
paint
it
pink
with
sparkles
and
we
have
nothing
to
say
about
it.
B
Okay,
so
so
I
don't
know
where
number
one
is,
but
anyway,
that's
so
too
satisfied.
Three
talks
about
Metal
fences,
four
wood
board
fences,
maybe
located
in
the
backyard.
That's
where
this
is
not
it's
not
eight
feet
so
you're
within
that
constraint,
and
so
hopefully
you'll
play
paint
it
to
blend
with
the
building
I'm
sure
you
will.
G
B
Okay,
so,
given
that
I
would
say
that
this
this
project,
even
though
it's
already
done
and
sometimes
I-
have
a
hard
time
approving
a
c
of
a
for
something
that
is
already
done.
But
it
does
seem
to
be
consistent
with
the
guidelines.
C
That
one
and
I
also
agree
it
ties
in
nicely
with
your
neighbor's
fence,
and
we
can
talk,
call
her
anytime,
you
want
or
no
or
you
know,
leave
it
natural
to
blend
in
with
their
fences.
What
whatever,
but
you
know,
that's
totally
up
to
you
so
I
agree
for
the
same
reasons.
So
I'll
ask
for
a
motion.
B
Okay,
I
move
that,
based
on
the
seeding
findings
of
fact,
that
Martha
benzer
602
East,
2nd
Street
that
her
a
wooden
fence
on
a
perfect
wall,
36
inches
high
and
60
feet.
Long
containing
one
gate
be
approved,
as
it
is
consistent
with
the
findings
with
the
the
guidelines.
C
So
you'll
have
your
great
COA
in
the
mail
and
I.
Don't
need
to
tell
you
about
permits
or
zoning
variances
at
this
point,
but
hopefully
he
did
pull
a
building.
Permit
anyway
go
home
and
enjoy
your
fence
thanks
for
coming
in.
Thank
you.
A
G
A
Stated
she
was
unable
to
attend
tonight.
So
if
that
is
acceptable
to
the
board,
a
motion
would
be
made
to
table
the
application.
Oh
sorry,
sorry
we
don't
need
a
motion.
Sorry.
C
A
C
Our
next
application,
then,
is
Chris
and
Gina
Lynn.
A
G
A
The
application
fee
was
not
paid
by
the
deadline
date
and
nor
were
the
signs
posted
by
the
deadline
date.
Thank.
E
H
B
E
D
A
All
right,
so,
please,
all
right,
so
this
application
is
for
768
West
3rd
Street.
This
property
is
zoned
historic,
district
residential.
It
is
a
front
Gable
contributing
structure.
The
COA
request
is
to
add
one
aluminum
Cloud
window
to
the
front
of
the
home
and
I
will
go
through
the
pictures
submitted.
Sorry
I
know
this
format's
different.
A
This
is
the
staff
report
that
the
Historic
District
board
of
review
receives
so
I
apologize.
These
pictures
are
not
going
to
be
oriented
correctly,
but
you
can
see
what
this
drawing
is.
That
was
submitted
with
the
application
showing
the
two
windows,
so
the
window
to
the
West
Side
would
remain
where
it
in
the
same
location
and
a
new
window
would
be
added
there.
A
J
Not
after
yeah
it
looks
a
little
wider
than
that
was
pictures,
especially
that
first
picture
I,
don't
know
it
stretched
it
out
kind
of
weird.
There.
J
D
J
J
It's
be.
G
B
E
When
I
pulled
up
and
looked
at
that
house,
I
could
see
where
you're
doing
some
work
with
there
I
looked
at
a
lot
of
those
houses
around
you
and
you're
right
Michael
in
that,
so
many
of
those
shotguns
are
not
as
wide
as
that.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
there's
a
shotgun
almost
across
the
street
from
you
that
has
two
windows
and
a
door.
That's.
J
E
E
A
Yes,
I
was
going
to
say
we
did
do
a
staff
approval
on
doors.
There
were
a
few
changes
he
wanted
to
make
to
the
rear
of
the
building,
but
that
was
not
visible
from
any
public
right-of-way.
G
G
B
I
know
that's
just
a
hand
drawing,
but
is
your
new
window
going
to
be
exactly
the
same
dimensions
as
the
existing
window?
Okay,.
C
Any
other
comments
or
questions
from
the
board,
an
Ephraim
of
the
public
Owen.
Would
you
take
us
through
the
findings
of
fact,.
D
B
B
Okay,
I
mean
okay,
so
I
can
just
read
what
Rook
has
written
project
is
not
in
conformance
of
window
guidelines,
because
you
should
not
be
adding
a
window
to
the
primary
facade,
Sun
conformance.
B
Okay,
oh
that's
the
whole
thing:
oh
yeah,
there
we
go
okay,
so
historic
Windows
should
be
retained.
Okay,
the
fact
that
you
say
that
it
fell
on
his
finger
tells
me
it
is
in
fact
functional.
B
H
B
B
B
G
B
Okay,
so
three
Windows
should
not
be
added
on
the
primary
facade,
which
is
what
this
is
the
primary
facade.
So
I
would
say
that
this
proposal
is
not
consistent
with
the
guidelines
at
all.
A
So
it's
a
really
fine
line
definition
on
whether
this
would
be
considered
a
front
Gable
or
a
shotgun
because
of
the
whip
in
either
case.
It's
not
out
of
the
ordinary
to
see
two
windows
on
the
front
facade
of
either
architectural
style.
So
no,
it
would
not
be
totally
out
of
line
for
the
architectural
character
in
in
either
circumstance.
No,
it
would
not
be.
G
E
E
I
can't
exactly
agree
with
saying
that
you
cannot
replace
the
window
because
you'll
never
find
a
window
exactly
like
that.
One
so
you're
going
to
have
two
mismatched
Windows.
If
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
you
add
a
window,
it's
not
exactly
going
to
be
a
six
over
six
with
the
same
buttons
in
it
and
have
exactly
the
same
layout.
They
may
be
similar.
E
C
Have
a
matching,
thank
you
Mike
you.
How
do
you
feel
about
I
agree
with
Carol,
okay,
so.
D
What
Caroline
had
said
is
appropriate
in
this
particular
case.
I
think
we
can
make
an
exception
and
with
these
windows
because
I
understand
what
he's
trying
to
do
and
I
wouldn't
want
to
do
the
same
exactly.
C
So
Mr
heisey
I
think
what
you're
trying
to
do
and
I
I
can't
tell
I,
couldn't
tell
if
that
window
was
original
or
not
is
it?
It
is
wood
right
yeah,
but
you
know
the
fact
that
you
want
to
replace
it
with
aluminum
Cloud
window
I
think
is
fine
in
this
condition,
or
this
situation
where
I,
Teeter
and
Brooke
alluded
to.
That
is
adding
another
window
to
a
facade
of
a
structure.
C
That
said,
we
have
several
already
on
West
3rd
and
yours
is
wider.
C
I
understand
all
of
the
Cosmetic
and
the
light
you
know
concerns
that
you
have
so,
but
I
do
think
that
I
agree
with
Mike
and
Carol
that
it
would
be
okay
to
go
ahead
and
add
that
second
window
and
that
both
of
them
are
consistent
in
appearance.
C
Oh
I'm,
sorry
any
public
comment:
we
have
two
people
right
all
right:
we're
good!
Okay,
now,
I'll
ask
for
a
motion.
E
Thank
you
stu
for
the
proposed
to
add
one
aluminum
cretinol,
add
one
acclimate,
aluminum,
clad
wood
window
to
the
front
of
the
home
or
two
aluminum,
clad
wood
windows
to
the
front
of
the
home.
C
C
So
Mr
heisey,
you
will
get
a
COA
in
the
mail
and
just
make
sure
that
you
have
any
permits
poll
that
you
need
to
have
before.
You
start
construction
and
thank
you
for
coming
in.
C
C
And
I
with
that
I
believe
is
that
it
yeah
okay.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
do
we
have
any
old
business
I'm
sorry,
new
business.
A
Old
business
to
note
okay,
new
business
before
the
board
and
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
pass
this
to
Carol,
Ann
and
forward
before
I.
Do,
let
me
explain
what
we're
wanting
to
do
is
to
propose
looking
at
a
change
in
the
format
only
of
the
coas,
so
in
this
packet,
you'll
have
a
copy
of
what
we're
proposing
the
new
format
to
look
like
the
remainder
of
the
packet.
A
This
is
also
a
sign
proposed
that
once
someone
receives
An
approved
COA
similar
to
a
building
permit,
this
would
be
posted
as
well,
so
that
the
community
knows
that
that
person
did
receive
an
approved
COA,
so
they
would
receive
both
the
COA
and
this
to
post.
A
C
A
A
That
wording
with
our
attorney
for
the
board,
the
wording
is,
has
just
been
a
blanket
statement
regarding
zoning.
That
wording
is
not
always
accurate
and
applicable
to
every
application
so,
rather
than
having
to
change
zoning
wording
for
each
individual
COA.
If
we
omit
that,
because
the
application
applicants
are
already
required,
if
necessary,
to
go
before
the
bza,
the
Appeals
appeals.
So
if,
if
required,
they're
already
going
to
that
step
prior
to
receiving
their
building
permit,
that's
where
the
zoning
regulations
are
enforced
and
regulated.
So
rather
than
mixing
the.
G
A
G
C
So
that
said,
then,
when
we
tell
an
applicant
that
there's
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
has
been
approved,
then
do
we
still
need
to
include
the
wording
on
make
sure
you've
got
your
zoning
permits
or
your
building
permits
and
your
variances
or
do
we
leave
that
out?
It.
A
A
H
N
E
H
Typically
use
just
so
that
applicants,
when
they're
opening.
A
Wait,
the
one
thing
we
do
would
like
to
do
is
the
building
permits
are
issued
in
blue
paper.
We
definitely
want
a
different
color
than
that.
We
want
it
to
be
distinguishable
from
the
building
permit
I'm.
A
C
So
on
the
appropriateness
it
says,
failure
to
comply
with
the
conditions
of
this
approval
is
subject
to
Fourth
to
a
forfeiture
of
up
to
500
a
day.
C
A
N
N
C
Sounds
good
sounds
good
you'll
check
with
Devin
on
that
then,
okay,
so
Brooke
do
you
want
to
lead
us
through
the
staff
report.
A
Sorry
this
says
November
it
is
December's.
Actually
let
me
that
is
not
the
correct.
Once
I
can
pass
this
before
the
board,
if
you'd
like
so
I
apologize,
the
visual
is
not
correct.
A
So
December
staff
approvals
was
Ian
Coombs
for
618
East,
2nd
Street
to
install
a
wood
staircase
on
the
rear
side,
elevation
and
then
Jim
Pruitt,
with
702
West
Main
Street
to
replace
an
existing
door
with
a
window
that
was
based
on
historic
evidence.
I
did
go
out
to
the
structure
and
very
carefully
look
at
that
on
multiple
occasions,
and
that
is
on
the
facing
wall.
A
The
December
2021
COA
review
Dale
Wells
at
1037,
West
Main
Street
to
build
a
rooftop
rear,
rooftop,
slash,
rear
Edition
as
proposed,
that
is
in
progress.
The
other
is
for
HMI
at
118,
West
3rd
Street
to
infill
a
non-historic
rear
doorway.
Opening
completion
status
on
that
is
has
been
completed
and
that
is
all
I
have.
Okay,.