►
From YouTube: September 27, 2016 Transportation & Public Works
Description
Minneapolis Transportation & Public Works Committee Meeting
A
Good
morning,
I'll
call
this
meeting
to
order.
It's
the
regular
scheduled
meeting
of
the
transportation
Public
Works
Committee,
the
state
September
27
2016
I'm
counselor
I'll,
be
chairing
the
meeting
I'm
joined
by
my
colleagues,
councilor
Yang
council,
vice-president
glidden,
consumer
palmisano
and
councilmember
bender.
We
are
quorum
and
will
continue
with
today's
agenda
that
we
have
before
us.
We
have
18
items
in
total.
We
have
a
public
hearing
and
a
discussion
item
remainder
a
consent.
I
will
go
through
the
consent
items.
Any
member
can
pull
them
for
further
conversation.
They
wish
item.
A
Nine
is
a
saint
anthony,
parkway
bridge
project,
easement
extension,
railroad
agreement
and
parking
restrictions
that
will
be
referred
to
ways
and
means
item
10?
Is
the
van
Wade
Memorial
Boulevard
right
away
dedication
item
11?
Is
the
zombie
pub
crawl
block
event
permit
for
October
15
2016
I
see
must
view
one
of
the
top
places
for
zombie
enthusiasts.
I
know
if
not
on
a
per
capita
basis
item.
A
Fifteen
is
the
sidewalk
repair
and
construction
assessment,
setting
public
hearing
for
October
25
2016
item
14
as
a
snow
and
ice
removal,
public
sidewalk
assessment
that
public
hearing
is
set
for
october.
Twenty
fifth
item:
15
is
the
bid
for
freedom
softening
plan
tree
carbonation
improvements,
project
that'll,
be
referred
to
ways
and
means
item.
16
is
the
bid
for
revised
signal
systems
and
pedestrian
curb
ramp
improvements
referred
to
ways
and
means
item.
A
17
is
the
bid
for
preform
cellular
concrete
with
the
company
and
the
amount
listed
that
will
be
referred
to
as
means
in
the
final
consent
item
is
a
bid
for
pedestrian
countdown
timers,
and
that
also
is
a
little
bit
of
committee.
Members
wish
to
pull
anything
for
further
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
sent
to
name,
you
move
the
consent
items
forward
now
go
to
the
first
public
first
and
only
public
hearing
good
morning,
director
hutchinson.
B
C
Morning,
mr.
Terry
council
members,
my
name
is
Andrew
Carlson
and
I'm.
The
project
manager
for
special
service
districts.
I,
was
just
here
before
you
at
the
last
committee
meeting
to
present
six
of
our
special
service
districts,
those
we
refer
to
as
our
428
a
districts
and
that
name
comes
from
the
state
statute,
which
allows
for
the
creation
today
we'll
be
looking
at
the
uptown
Dinkytown
Central
Avenue,
each
Street
stadium,
village,
Larry
Hill
48th
in
chicago
and
london,
hill,
special
service
districts
and
they're
seeking
approval
their
proposed
services
and
service
charges.
C
We
refer
to
these
eight
districts
as
our
legacy
districts
due
to
the
fact
that
they
were
formed
under
different
state
statutes,
but
also
do
the
long
existence
and
well
established
branding
names
like
town
central
avenue,
heat
street
that
place
making
is
all
part
of
what
the
service
district
has
to
offer
in
terms
of
the
continuations
of
those
commercial
neighborhoods.
So
what
did
we
do
so
back
in
June,
Public
Works
staff
met
with
the
district
advisory
boards
to
recommend
the
services,
prepare
estimated
budgets
and
review
their
assessment
methodologies
for
the
coming
year.
C
D
C
C
C
Therefore,
recommends
passage
and
the
rebels
resolution
approving
special
services,
the
cost
estimates
service
charges
in
the
list
of
service
charges
for
2017
for
the
previously
stated
special
service
districts
and
directing
the
city
engineer
to
proceed
with
the
work.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I
am
more
than
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Any.
C
A
Will
now
open
the
public
hearing,
and
this
is
the
public
hearing
for
the
special
service
districts
as
described
in
the
presentation
and
when
sign
in
and
then
wish
to
come
forward
and
when
we
should
come
forward,
see
knowing
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
hearing
and
approve
the
passage
of
resolution
approving
special
service
districts,
cost
estimates,
service
charges
and
the
list
of
services
that
will
be
provided
in
the
areas
listed.
Any
further
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
sent
a
name
that
carries.
A
B
So
there
we
go
and
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment,
mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
council
members
to
introduce
Jennifer
Hager
and
also
to
offer
a
thank
you
to
Jennifer
and
her
team,
as
well
as
the
members
of
Public
Works,
who
have
also
contributed
and
reviewed
to
this
process.
Jennifer
and
the
transportation
planning
and
programming
team
have
been
working
since
April
on
a
robust
process
and
the
development
of
criteria,
which
is
the
basis
of
today's
presentation.
So
thank
you
very
much
to
the
team
and
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Jennifer.
Now
morning.
A
F
Morning
mr.
chair
committee,
members
I'm
Jennifer,
hey
Gert,
with
transportation
planning
and
programming
here
to
talk
to
you
today
about
where
we're
at
with
the
20-year
street
funding
play.
It
just
like
to
start
with
just
a
really
quick.
Thank
you
once
again
to
the
leadership
here
at
the
city
for
approving
this
ordinance
and
giving
us
this
great
opportunity.
It's
been
a
very
exciting
time
over
the
summer
to
be
able
to
work
on
this
and
we've
been
very,
very
busy.
F
I
also
want
to
start
off
by
acknowledging
some
key
staff
and
thinking
some
key
staff
that
are
not
able
to
be
here
with
us
today.
They
are
in
seattle,
representing
minneapolis
at
the
necto
conference,
so
nathan,
koster
and
kathleen
may
hell
with
transportation,
planning
and
programming.
I
also
want
to
thank
our
consultant
team
with
kimley-horn
and
associates,
who
is
here
today
helping
to
support
me
in
this
presentation.
F
They
have
been
instrumental
in
getting
us
to
where
we
are
today,
with
this
work
real
briefly
today,
just
going
to
review
the
timeline
and
what
we've
been
doing,
our
public
engagement
to
date
and
where
we're
at
with
our
project
selection
process
and
criteria,
and
then
our
ongoing
work.
After
today,
as
you.
F
Was
passed
in
April
and
we
began
working
immediately
in
the
month
of
May
the
first
month
of
our
work.
Our
focus
was
primarily
on
gathering
and
data
assembly,
largely
that
was
meeting
with
other
utility
companies,
internal
and
external
agencies
that
might
have
capital
projects
in
the
city
and
learning
what
plans
they
had
that
we
could
coordinate
with
what
data
they
had
that
they
could
share
with
us
so
that
we
could
bring
all
of
that
into
our
process
and
our
analysis.
Our
consultant
team
also
did
some
research
across
the
nation
about
what
other
agencies
were
doing.
F
What
criteria
was
being
used
across
the
nation?
How
often
did
that
criteria
come
up
and
what
data
sources
were
in
the
background
supporting
that
criteria
in
June
we
engaged
with
the
city's
office
of
equity
and
inclusion
in
the
Department
of
neighborhood
and
community
relations
to
develop
a
framework
for
community
engagement,
public
engagement
on
the
equity
component
of
this
work
and
the
month
of
Jill
are
the
months
of
July
and
August
were
spent
carrying
out
that
plan
and
in
the
background
we
also
started
drafting
our
own
criteria
in
September.
F
We
pulled
all
of
that
together,
and
that
brings
us
here
today
at
the
very
very
beginning
of
our
work.
This
is
just
the
beginning.
This
is
a
20-year
plan.
The
world
will
change
over
the
next
20
years
and
we
must
change
with
it
and
to
that
end
we
have
set
this
plan
up
so
that
we
can
track
evaluate
report
and
continue
to
refine
as
we
move
through
and
progress
on
this.
F
How
did
we
do
that,
as
defined
in
the
ordinance
we
developed
a
criteria
based
system
with
the
focus
on
racial
and
economic
equity?
We
know
that
we
need
to
maintain
our
overall
Street
pavement
condition,
and
we
know
that
we
want
to
continue
to
review
and
refine
to
be
able
to
report
and
to
be
able
to
continue
to
incorporate
feedback
from
the
community
as
we
go
forward.
F
Quick
summary
of
our
public
engagement
efforts
to
date,
we've
only
completed
our
initial
phase
of
public
engagement.
We
started
by
identifying
a
targeted
working
group.
These
were
folks
known
in
the
community
to
already
be
engaged
in
discussions
surrounding
equity.
We
brought
in
an
external
facilitator.
He
really
helped
us
structure
these
meetings
and
facilitate
these
meetings.
He
set
clear
expectations
for
participants
and
we
we
we
worked
a
long
way
to
adapt
based
on
feedback
that
we
were
getting
so
we
changed
our
process.
F
F
What
inequities
exist
in
the
transportation
system
today
and
what
outcomes
would
demonstrate
success?
Our
process
did
present
us
with
some
very
rich
feedback
and
we
were
able
to
use
that
to
help
us
define
and
weight
our
criteria.
We
were
able
to
pull
some
common
themes.
Essentially
folks
were
focused
on.
How
is
the
transportation
system
used?
What
modes
are
available
and
how
good
community
engagement
be
more
equitable
going
forward?
F
Our
work
also
resulted
in
the
identification
of
some
opportunities
that
went
beyond
project
selection
criteria
and
Public
Works
is
continuing
to
have
ongoing
discussions
about
these
items
as
well,
so
that
they
are
not
left
by
the
wayside.
These
were
revolving
around
things
like.
How
can
we
better
reflect
demographics
and
use
patterns
in
our
work?
F
Through
all
this
work,
we
developed
a
project
selection
process
that
is
represented
by
this
graphic.
It
is
data-driven
and
it
allows
us
to
seize
and
create
opportunities.
The
data-driven
part
of
this
work
is
ninety
percent
of
the
effort,
it's
asset
condition,
plus
equity,
and
it
gives
us
a
list
of
potential
projects.
The
last
ten
percent
of
the
work
is
a
qualitative
lens
that
we
apply
to
that
output,
and
it
allows
us
to
look
at.
Is
this
the
right
fix
at
the
right
time?
Are
there
synergies
that
should
be
grasped
and
seized
to
create
opportunities?
F
So
our
criteria
includes
both
asset
condition,
which
is
focused
on
the
physical
condition
of
the
street
and
also
equity,
which
we
split
into
two
different
subcategories
community
demographics
and
uses
and
mode
asset
condition
is
comprised
of
a
familiar
measure
to
you
pavement
condition
index,
but
it
also
looks
at
things
like
safety,
which
would
be
crash
data
not
just
for
vehicles
but
for
all
modes
and
utility
needs
that
is
bringing
together
the
condition
of
our
infrastructure
that
we
can't
see
underneath
the
surface.
Along
with
that
that
we
can
see
above
community
demographics.
F
Here
we
looked
at
some
Geographic
criteria,
areas
where
there's
a
non-white
majority
shown
here
in
yellow
areas
with
low
income
populations
shown
here
in
blue,
yellow
+
blue
equals
green.
So
there's
also
the
overlapping
areas
previously
known
as
our
caps
or
racially
concentrated
areas
of
poverty,
now
known
as
ACP
50s
areas
of
concentrated
poverty
with
a
non-white
majority
there
the
same
thing
different
acronym.
F
In
addition
to
this
Geographic
criteria,
we
also
looked
at
vehicle
availability
and
potential
users.
Potential
users
are
looking
at
population
density
and
things
like
regional
destinations,
educational
institutions,
job
centers.
Where
are
the
people?
Where
are
they
trying
to
get
to
and
back
again,
then
uses
in
mode?
This
is
where
we
take
a
look
at
our
modal
plans:
plans
of
our
transit
provider,
existing
users
of
the
system
and
overlay.
All
of
that
with
I
recently
adopted
Complete
Streets
policy
in
the
mortal
hierarchy
that
is
embedded
within
it.
That.
F
Gives
us
a
list
of
potential
projects,
and
then
we
do
our
qualitative
screening.
Are
there
other
nearby
projects
that
will
also
be
under
construction?
Can
we
combine
things
to
reduce
disruption
or
cost?
Is
this
the
right
fix
at
the
right
time?
Have
we
addressed
known,
City
priorities
and
goals
and
do
other
agencies
or
utilities
have
projects
that
can
be
coordinated,
data-driven
seizing
and
creating
opportunities?
F
This
is
our
first
attempt
at
developing
this
criteria.
This
is
what
was
used
to
develop
the
amended
five-year
capital
program
that
will
be
presented
on
october,
six
to
the
Ways
and
Means
Committee.
It's
just
the
beginning.
We
fully
expect
that
we
will
evaluate
how
this
is
working
and
refine
it
as
we
go
forward.
One
of
our
first
process,
improvements
that
I
want
to
plug
here
is
automated
pavement
data
collection.
That's
going
to
be
happening
in
the
next
couple
weeks.
F
Here
we
have
the
vans
arriving,
they
will
drive
the
entire
city
within
a
month
and
a
half
or
so
this
fall
and
all
of
our
pavement
condition.
Data
will
be
new
and
current
and
there
will
be
other
ongoing
efforts
that
we're
looking
at
as
we
go
forward
to
improve
our
data
sets
or
expand
upon
our
data
set
continue
to
engage
with
the
community
and
incorporate
their
feedback
and
refine
this
work
as
we
go
forward.
A
Not
only
will
be
updating
our
data,
but
we're
going
to
make
it
more
granular
in
terms
of
psi,
because
right
now,
we've
got
conditions
that
are
kind
of
bundled
in
sort
of
patch
works
throughout
communities,
and
that
doesn't
always
get
to
the
actual
condition
in
some
respects
will
be
able
to
get
granular
with
these
new
datasets.
Mr.
F
A
G
Thanks
mr.
chair
I
had
some
questions
about
the
criteria
and
then
I
had
some
bigger
questions
about
the
process.
Maybe
some
comments
about
that
too.
So
just
some
things
as
I'm
trying
to
kind
of
understand
what
is
the
criteria
and
I'm
kind
of
looking
through
the
presentation?
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
like
an
exact
list
or
you
were
trying
to
give
us
a
flavor
of
what
then
is
articulated
and
maybe
a
little
bit
different.
Looking
list
that
you
have
I
mean
I
can
understand
the
asset
condition.
G
It's
the
other
piece,
I'm
a
little
bit
unclear
on
on
how
that
affects
your
selection,
but
I
just
had
some
other
things
that
you
know.
Sometimes
we've
been
talking
about
and
I
was
curious
if
these
things
make
their
way
into
the
selection
criteria
at
all
or
how
you're
analyzing
some
of
these
things
like
pedestrian
issues
and
stuff,
like
that,
so
the
three
things
that
I
wrote
down
were
connectivity.
G
And
that
is
a
very
big
piece
of
what
happens
with
the
reconstruction
project
is
how
you're
able
to
take
a
place
that
is
not
very
attractive
and
see.
What
are
our
opportunities
to
make
that
more
connected
to
the
place
around
it?
The
businesses,
the
residents
and
all
that
kind
of
thing,
so
I
wonder
if
you
can
respond
to
any
of
those
items
in
terms
of
how
they
may
or
may
not
affect
a
project
selection
criteria.
F
Sure
mr.
chair
councilmember
glidden
with
connectivity,
we
do
look
at
whether
that's
through
the
roadway
itself
or
other
modes
that
might
have
like
a
trail
connection
or
something
that's
not
directly
linked
to
a
roadway
that
is
incorporated
in
our
criteria
in
a
couple
of
different
places
and
specifically
looking
at
the
pedestrian
as
a
mode.
We
have
that
incorporated
into
asset
condition,
but
also
in
the
uses
and
modes
category.
F
One
data
set
that
we
want
to
improve
upon
going
forward
is
collection
of
the
condition
of
our
sidewalks.
We
have
really
really
good
data
about
the
sidewalk
intersections
the
corners,
the
ramps,
but
we
don't
necessarily
have
as
thorough
of
data
about
the
sidewalk
in
between
and
along
a
corridor,
and
so
that
is
something
that
we
want
to
collect
and
have
available
to
us
in
the
in
the
near
future.
So
we
would
look
at
things
like
the
width
of
the
sidewalk.
Does.
F
With
access
Minneapolis
and
the
pedestrian
realm
recommendations
that
are
contained
therein
is
the
cross
slope
compliant
with
design
guidance.
Are
there
obstructions
those
types
of
things
we
want
to
collect
that
data
and
use
it?
So
it
was
not.
We
were
not
able
to
use
that
in
this
particular
iteration,
but
it
is
something
looking
at
collecting
in
the
very
near
future
and
that
we
would
be
able
to
have
available
to
us.
F
So
when
we
get
into
place
making
that's
something
that
would
be
something
that
would
be
aware
of
based
on
that
condition,
information
in
the
project
selection
process
and
would
be
considered
then
in
the
project
development
process,
with
the
community
engagement.
What
should
that
pedestrian
realm
look
like
when
the
street
is
rebuilt.
F
Crossings
are
not
specifically
mentioned
in
our
criteria.
It
would
be,
it
would
be
similar
to
our
pedestrian
realm.
So
if
the
freeway
crossing
is
causing
a
barrier
because
the
sidewalk
with
is
too
narrow
because
the
ramps
are
non-compliant
because
it's
not
lit-
and
it
should
be,
that
would
be
captured
through
other
criteria,
but
it's
not
specifically
called
out
as
freeway
crossing
barriers
as
a
criteria
itself.
Okay,.
G
I
just
want
to
say
a
freeway:
we
have
a
lot
of
freeway
questions
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis,
I
have
to
say
almost
like
201
they're,
like
super
problematic,
for
how
you're
able
to
engage
around
those
intersections
safely,
as
of
anything
other
than
in
your
vehicle,
and
also
in
the
vehicle.
Frankly,
too,
and
so
I
kind
of
wish.
G
Think
this
is
a
challenge
for
Public
Works,
that
is
common
throughout
the
city
and
how
we're
trying
to
respond
to
needs
to
do
deeper
and
better
community
engagement
and
then
think
how
how
that
engagement
actually
meaningfully
impacts
the
work,
as
opposed
to
just
you
know,
doing
it
for
the
sake
of
doing
it.
So
that
is
a
little
bit
more
of
how
you
fit
that
into
your
timeline
and
figure
out
what
are
meaningful
questions
and
so
forth.
F
Mr.
chair
councilmember
I
am
unable
today,
to
give
you
a
detailed
plan
of
how
we're
going
to
do
that
engagement,
but
we
know
that
we
need
to
loop
back,
and
our
thought
was
that
we
would
loop
back
with
the
targeted
group
that
we
that
we
were
working
with
this
summer
and
start
with
them.
This
is
where
we
landed.
Thank
you
for
the
input
so
far.
Thank
you
for
your
efforts
to
help
us
on
a
very
challenging
timeline.
So
far,
how
can
we
do
better?
F
How
can
we
bring
our
outreach
out
to
the
community
we're
looking
for
ways
to
go
out
to
the
community
rather
than
ask
the
community
to
come
to
us?
What
can
we
do
better?
We
want
to
start
with
that
group
to
really
define
that
plan
and
get
their
buy-in
and
their
assistance
so
that
we
can
go
forward
with
something
that
will
be
more
meaningful
and
will
be
more
equitable
and
that
we
can
have
that
buy-in
and
support
with
at
the
end.
Thank
you.
G
A
Just
as
a
piggyback
I
think
my
hope
I'm
not
reading
into
it
that
we
can
learn
a
lot
from
doing
things,
we're
going
to
have
a
whole
body
of
work
that
we
can
reflect
on.
You
know,
collections
of
projects
input
through
the
normal
input
processes
may
be
some
reflections
on
those
are
some
cool
back
analysis
of
how
the
process
in
community
input
get
impacted
project,
and
then
you
stack
that
up
over
citywide
over
two
or
three
years
of
projects
a
lot
of
data
reflect
on
so
it
won't
always
just
be.
A
The
big
picture
in
the
abstract
it'll
actually
be
buttressed
by
some
real
world
experience
and
the
results
of
that
experience.
I
think
you
be
as
telling
as
any
contemplation
and
we
could
come
up
with
in
the
abstract
so
and
I
think
that's
an
understanding
that
may
not
come
out
from
this
presentation,
but
I
think
the
Department
is
looking
forward
to
that
part
of
the
process
too.
Yes,.
H
F
Mr.
chair
councilmember,
we
do
recognize
that
street
assessments
do
come
with
these
projects.
That
was
part
of
our
conversation
with
the
targeted
working
group
over
this
summer.
I
do
know
that
there
have
been
some
conversations
going
on
at
a
policy
level
as
well
about
that
question,
but
as
of
right
now,
our
policy
is
that
we
do
lovey
assessments
with
our
street
projects
and
that
that
is
what
we're
working
from
Isabel.
H
Now
we
have
this
map
on
our
caps
were
AC,
P,
50s
and
let
Seth
I
mean
this
is
a
conversation
getting
to
the
point
where
you
know
we
may
be
looking
at,
let's
say
discounting
assessments
based
on
our
caps
for
acp
50s
or
you
know.
What
are
we
thinking
about
with
regard
to
that
and
if
that's
too
preliminary
I
mean
I
can
stop
my
question
and
just
I
guess
be
a
part
of
the
process
later
on.
B
Mr.
chair
and
councilmember
yang,
we
appreciate
your
question
and
has
certainly
been
a
topic
of
discussion
among
our
team.
I
will
repeat
what
Jennifer
noted
is
that
we
are
working
under
the
assumption
of
the
current
policy.
However,
we
are
aware
that
additional
questions
will
arise
and
we
will
be
talking
about
this
in
greater
detail
as
the
plan
moves
forward,
and
it
will
be
undoubtedly
one
of
the
topic
areas
that
will
be
revisited
as
we
move
forward
this
year
and
the
next
and
the
next.
So
we
look
forward
to
continuing
that
discussion
with
you.
Okay,.
D
You
mr.
chair
I
preached
it
having
this
presentation
when
it's
still
up
kind
of
a
high
enough
level
that
we
can
help
guide
the
work.
So
I
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
it's
still
at
that
kind
of
high
level
I
wondered
so
I
guess.
One
of
my
questions
is:
are
we
thinking
of
this
funding
really
to
be
focused
only
on
resurfacing
and
reconstruction
projects,
or
is
it
open
to
more
targeted
safety
kinds
of
improvements
like
at
freeway
crossings
or
complex
intersections,
for
example,.
F
Mr.
chair
councilmember
bender,
thanks
for
the
question,
Matt
did
come
up
quite
a
bit
over
the
summer
as
well
right
now,
the
criteria
is
really
set
up
to
focus
on
Street
projects,
whether
it
be
resurfacing
or
reconstruction
there's
a
whole
other
component
of
our
capital
improvement
program
that
looks
at
bridges
and
traffic
signals
and
lighting
and
other
targeted
improvements
like
specific
bicycle
or
pedestrian
infrastructure
projects.
F
We
have
in
the
past,
used
criteria
on
those
particular
projects
as
well,
and
we
still
have
that
criteria.
It
needs
to
be
refined
and
go
through
the
same
kind
of
process
that
we
did
to
develop
the
street,
paving
criteria
that
we
have
before
you
today.
So
the
answer
to
your
question
is:
we
will
still
have
those
targeted
improvements
and
we
do
still
look
at
those
through
a
criteria
based
lens
and
we'll
work
to
try
and
make
that
lens,
the
very
compatible
with
what
we
have
developed
for
the
street
paving
projects.
F
D
You
know
31st
and
hennepin
31st
and
lyndale
lake
and
hennepin
lake
and
lyndale.
I
get
a
lot
of
comments
and
questions
and
feedback
about
those
intersections,
and
so
I
know
you
have
a
full
plate
with
this,
but
I
think
as
we're
thinking
about
having
this
major
system-wide
investment.
That's
really
focused
on
pavement
quality.
It
makes
me
think
that
now
we
may
have
pots
of
funding
that
we
could
become
available
for
a
city
wide
approach
to
these
complex,
intersections
or
other
kind
of
targeted
system
approaches.
E
F
Of
that
need-
and
we
have
been
looking
very
closely
at
the
pedestrian
master
plan
as
we
prepare
ourselves
for
an
update
to
access
Minneapolis.
The
pedestrian
master
plan
has
a
lot
of
problem
statements,
but
the
solutions
are
not
clearly
identified
in
that
plan,
and
so,
in
order
to
be
poised
to
do
some
of
these
improvements
that
need
to
be
done
or
take
advantage
cease
and
create
opportunities.
F
We
need
to
understand
what
those
solutions
should
be
or
want
to
be
in
those
in
those
complex
intersections
and
so
we're
beginning
that
work
we're
starting
to
look
at
those
more
closely
we're
working
with
the
pedestrian
Advisory
Committee
as
well
to
have
them
help
us
identify
their
priority
locations
and
where
we
should
be
focusing
so
that
as
these
pots
of
money
become
available,
or
we
can
do
something
with
a
roadway
reconstruction
project.
We
know
what
the
right
thing
to
do
is
I.
A
E
E
It
also
made
me
think
about
the
importance
of
our
click
capital
on
recruitment
committee
and
that
they're
going
to
have
to
kind
of
understand
the
vetting
or
the
scoring
that
happened
in
within
Public
Works.
To
get
there
and
I
noticed
they
weren't
included
on
the
community
engagement
over
the
summer.
That
makes
sense
they're
not
meeting
over
the
summer
necessarily,
but
the
thought
was
well.
This
might
be
an
opportunity
to
even
bring
in
some
of
the
cliq
members
to
help
understand
the
process
better
and
give
input
on
what
what
they
think
could
help
go
into.
E
The
evaluation
of
these
kind
of
projects
also
appreciated
the
idea
of
maybe
we
could
also
use
a
similar
process,
but
not
the
same
for
the
smaller
projects
that
we're
looking
at
to
understand.
Better
I
did
it.
I
was
wondering
if
you'd
talked
to
the
NCR
department
of
the
coordinators
office.
I
know
that
they're
trying
to
start
a
new
group
to
help
with
community
engagement
kind
of
just
done
a
round
table
I
think
you
can
go
in
with
what
you
what
your
problem
or
your
issue,
is
and
get
some
great
advice.
F
E
Excellent
I
love
that
kind
of
you
know,
in
collaboration
between
divisions
and
departments,
in
it,
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
that
new
initiative
was
was
helpful
in
this
process.
I
guess
the
the
last
thing
I
just
wanted
to
note
is
I've,
been
intrigued
by
our
uniform
assessment
project
and
the
way
we
fund
construction
projects
all
the
time
that
I've
been
here
and
wondered.
If
it's
the
right
way
to
do
it
or
not.
E
A
You
thank
you
in
further
questions
or
comments,
/,
their
presentation,
which
is
an
update
of
some
significant
work.
That's
been
accumulated
to
date,
but
also
it's
really
about
the
work
moving
forward.
You
know
this
is
a
the
you
know.
The
public
really
listened
to
us
when
we
quantified
what
they've
been
telling
us
there's
a
great
and
profound
need
out
there
and
what
our
quantitative
analysis
showed.
Wasn't.
They
were
right
in
the
here
and
now,
but
they
were
even
more
right.
A
You
know
and
if
you
projected
it
out
into
the
future,
our
asset
management
sort
of
scope
really
showed
some
need,
and
this
is
to
address
that
need
and
clearly
it's
not
going
to
completely
get
the
job
done.
We
actually
had
a
larger
need
that
was
identified,
but
I
think
this
puts
us
in
a
better
place
down
the
road
so
to
speak
when
we
get
to
that
point
and
of
course
will
be
judged
by
by
that
that
moment.
I
also
say
the
comments
about
public
input
and
process.
He's
moving
forward
is
great.
A
A
We
might
have
to
do
another
of
your
appropriation
of
funds
to
get
even
more
work
done.
Particular
when
you
think
about
all
the
things
that
are
under
the
street
that
are
also
old
and
need
attention.
So
sorry
for
the
additional
opining
up
here,
but
I
just
want
to
make
that
comment,
see.
None
I
will
mana
to
receive
and
file
the
presentation
that
we
have
before
us.
Any
further
discussion
see
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
thank
you
and
with
that
we
are
adjourned.