►
Description
Minneapolis Community Development and Regulatory Services Committee Meeting
A
A
Good
afternoon
call
together
the
regularly
scheduled
meeting
at
the
Community
Development
regulatory
services
committee.
For
today,
which
is
July
11th
I've,
been
joined
by
council
members,
Quincy
fry
and
Reich,
which
is
a
quorum
of
the
committee.
We
have
a
relatively
short
agenda
with
a
number
of
land
sales.
So
before
we
begin
the
land
sale
process,
I
will
move
the
consent
agenda,
which
is
items
number
9,
10,
11
and
12.
This
is
a
rental
license.
A
Reinstatement
some
changes
and
contract
amendments
to
the
great
street
program,
setting
a
public
hearing
for
the
temporary
alcohol
license
for
events
ordinance
and
our
light,
regular
liquor,
business
and
gambling
licenses.
Are
there
any
items?
Anyone
would
like
to
pull
off
the
consent
agenda,
seeing
none
I'll
move
the
consent
agenda,
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
and
the
opposed
that
item
is
approved.
We'll
then
go
back
to
item
number
one,
which
is
a
land
sale
at
forty
five,
thirty
Bryant
Avenue
nor
mr.
Ramadan
welcome.
A
B
45
30
Bryant
Avenue
North
we're
working
in
the
sale
room
in
amplifon,
formerly
the
vacant
housing
recycling
program
for
the
policies.
It
was
a
program
established
by
the
City
Council
on
December
11th
2015
staff
recommends
sale
of
45:30
Bryant
Avenue
north
to
Minnesota
construction
incorporated
for
5,000
social
conditions.
B
45
30
was
acquired
on
October
14
2011
from
hood
for
thirteen
thousand
six
hundred
thirty-two
under
the
Neighborhood
Stabilization
program,
land
banking
activity.
The
structure
was
on
the
property
of
subsequently
demolished
the
staff
market
and
it
reviewed
one
application
received
in
the
courts
with
the
program
manual.
Many
little
construction
proposes
to
build
a
2500
square
foot,
three-bedroom,
two-and-a-half-bath
single-family
home
with
attached
two-car
garage.
The
property
will
be
marketed
for
owner
occupancy
at
SMS
sales
price.
B
For
two
hundred
to
two
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
all
land
sale
proceeds
equal
to
the
fair
market
value
return
to
the
NSP
program.
Construction
management
staff
has
reviewed
the
scope
of
work
and
the
construction
estimate
and
confirms
it
is
sufficient
to
meet
the
program's
new
construction
stand.
Is
the
Linville
Hannon
neighborhood
receive
notification
on
June
7
2017
and
return
11
support
of
Minnesota
construction
Inc?
On
June
6
2017
are
there
any
questions.
A
Are
there
any
questions
for
mr.
Ramadan
on
item
number
1,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
your
report.
We'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number,
one
which
is
a
land
sale
at
forty
five,
thirty
Bryant
Avenue
North.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue,
anyone
anyone
seeing
none,
we'll
close
the
public
hearing,
councilmember
fry
thank.
A
B
Madam
chair
council
members,
we
have
42:36
Snelling
Avenue
style
this
again
through
the
sale
of
Minneapolis
homes.
Formerly
the
vacant
housing
recycling
program
policies
and
the
program
is
established
by
the
City
Council
on
December
11th
2015
staff
recommends
the
sale
of
42:36
Nelly
Avenue
styles
to
Jurong
Korea
for
an
appraised
day
of
30,000.
B
Subject:
conditions
Nestle
and
Korea
fails
to
sales,
a
visa
LLC
for
the
phrase
a
of
30,000
substa
conditions,
42:36
Snelling,
Avenue
South
was
acquired
on
may
19,
2016
from
Hennepin
County's
tax
forfeited
land
for
$25,000
staff
market
and
two
open
houses
were
held
on
the
property
in
April
2017,
with
notification
now
to
listserv
of
over
1,700
staff,
receive
and
review
certain
applications
and
the
courts
of
the
program
manual
and
is
recommending
the
top
two
scoring
applicants
constructed
in
1950.
This
is
a
14880
488
square
foot
tube
ever
won
by
a
single
family
home.
B
The
purchaser
intends
to
rehabilitate
and
expand
as
a
453
bath
single-family
home
to
live
in
as
the
owner
occupant
often
to
purchase
there
tends
to
rehabilitate
is
a
2-bedroom,
1-bath,
single-family
home
and
sell
exclusively
to
owner
occupants.
The
purchasers
proposes
to
invest
one
hundred
seventy
thousand
three
hundred
to
rehabilitate
property.
B
The
ultimate
purchaser
intends
to
invest
one
hundred
and
seventy
eight
seven
fifty,
but
this
includes
ten
thousand
eight
hundred
and
Marketing
Commission
and
15,000
and
developer
fees,
see
Pez
construction
management
staff,
review
the
scope
of
work
and
estimates
submitted
by
the
applicant
and
confirm
their
sufficient
to
meet
the
minimum
rehabilitation
standards
of
the
program.
Notification
was
provided
to
the
Longfellow
community
Council.
They
did
not
provide
respond,
response
and.
A
D
A
A
Of
item
number
2
is
the
move
for
their
comments
or
questions,
seeing
none
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
any
opposed.
That
item
is
approved.
Congratulations
to
you
thank
you
for
being
here
today,
very
rarely
to
someone
come
and
on
these
kinds
of
land
sale.
So
it's
really
wonderful.
You
were
here
today
we'll
move
on
then
to
item
number
3,
miss
Kimball.
E
Cher
Goodman
members
of
the
committee
today
I'm
going
to
be
presenting
about
progress
on
our
infill
housing
staff
recommendation
that
was
originally
approved
by
the
City
Council
on
February
10th.
First
first
is
our
long
term
affordability
program.
Our
original
council
objective
was
to
provide
affordability
for
a
30-year
term.
That's
renewable
upon
each
property,
sale
$250,000
was
provided
for
a
minimum
of
10
properties.
Up
to
$25,000
of
affordability,
gap
would
be
provided
to
homeowners
or
developers
with
a
dollar-for-dollar
is
required
from
non
city
sources.
E
After
that
initial
RFQ
to
date,
CLC
at
City
of
Lake
Community
Land
Trust,
has
been
the
only
responder
city
of
lakes,
Community,
Land,
Trust,
applied
for
two
properties
and
our
current
Minneapolis
Homes
RFP,
long-term
affordability
proposals
were
given
significant
weight
in
the
request
for
proposals
process
that
we
did
through
the
Minneapolis
homes,
development
assistance
process,
and
we
also
encourage
partnerships
with
city
of
lakes,
Community
Land
Trust.
As
the
existing
approved
long-term
affordability
model.
However,
we
did
not
receive
any
partnership
applications
through
our
Minneapolis
homes.
E
Rfps
staff
concluded
that
there's
a
need
to
increase
capacity
of
organizations
to
use
long
term
affordability,
assistance,
and
so
because
of
that
we're
recommending
three
actions.
One
is
to
modify
long
term
affordability
so
that
it
allows
for
either
value
gap
or
affordability
gap
to
be
used
under
the
long
term
affordability
program.
The
second
is
to
allow
for
a
minimum
30-year
to
term
and
remove
the
requirement
for
long
term
affordability
to
renew
upon
each
subsequent
property
sales.
E
That
modification
in
particular
will
allow
Habitat
for
Humanity
that
did
apply
through
our
Minneapolis
home
sarahfey
to
participate
in
the
long
term
affordability
program
effectively.
It
would
change
the
number
of
long-term,
affordable
homes
from
the
two
homes
that
are
proposed
by
city
of
lakes,
Community
Land
Trust
to
a
total
of
six
homes,
including
four
that
are
proposed
by
Habitat
for
Humanity.
E
And
then
our
third
recommendation
is
to
direct
staff
to
research
and
recommend
a
city
sponsored
long-term
affordability
model
that
could
facilitate
other
developers
participating,
build
wealth
Minnesota,
for
example,
expressed
interest
in
participating
in
long-term
affordability,
home
sale
model,
but
wasn't
certain
about
how
to
achieve
it
with
a
particular
formula
or
how
to
move
forward
with
creating
a
model,
and
so
we're
we're.
Looking
for
the
city
to
potentially
come
explore.
Creating
a
city
sponsored
model,
any
questions
about
long-term
affordability
and
the
modifications
that
are
recommended
before
I
move
into
the
remainder
of
the
presentation.
So.
A
E
Minimum
program
requirement
is
affordability
at
one
hundred
and
fifteen
percent
of
area
median
income.
We
did
encourage
proposers
or
developers
to
make
homes
affordable
at
80
percent
of
area
median
income
and
then
also
provided
additional
priority
points
that
they
would
create
a
long-term,
affordable
product
at
80
percent
of
area
meeting
income.
So.
A
Why
are
we
moving
forward
to
this?
At
all?
The
whole
point
of
the
program
was
to
have
long
term.
Affordability
and
I
would
argue.
115
percent
of
the
metroid'
median
isn't
really
affordable
housing
anyway,
but
we
can
debate
that
point
later,
but
why
are
we?
Then?
This
will
looks
like
the
other.
Eight
people
on
this
list
just
got
a
sweetheart
deal
and
our
riad
vert
izing
sweetheart
deals.
You
don't
have
to
just
have
to
have
some
115
percent
of
MMI
and
then
you
can
sell
the
house
after
two
years
make
profit
leads.
E
So
the
the
long-term
affordability
program
was
the
program
that
has
a
30-year
restriction.
Our
Minneapolis
Homes
Development,
Assistance
Program,
was
framed
as
having
115
percent
of
area
median
income
is
its
upper
upper
limit
and
the
assistance
that
we're
providing
in
the
case
of
the
development
assistance
program
is
the
difference
between
the
total
development
cost
of
a
home
and
its
appraised
value
upon
sale.
So
it's
providing
that
difference
in
value
gap.
It's
not
providing
a
subsidy
to
render
to
the
home
buyers
coming.
A
It
is
it
is.
We
can
debate
whether
or
not
we
agree
with
that,
but
it
is
providing
a
subsidy
to
someone
who
then
could
buy
the
house
at
115
percent
and
turn
around
and
sell
it
a
year
later
for
that
price
plus
some
and
not
be
affordable,
and
we
could
have
70
thousand
in
a
deal
like
that
and
looks
to
me
like
some
of
them
have
smaller
subsidies
and
others
have
larger
subsidies
for.
E
A
Would
qualify
under
my
city
salary
as
needing
affordable
housing
under
this
program?
Okay,
what
we're
not
not
doing
that?
Maybe
everyone
else
wants.
Yes,
I'm,
not
going
to
do
that.
So
why
don't
we
take
you're,
not
going
to
be
able
to
fix
it
in
committee
here
so
either
we
we
can
postpone.
I
want
to
move
forward
with
the
habitat
and
city
of
lakes,
Community
Land,
Trust
actions
today,
okay,
because
I
understand
those
as
being
truly
affordable.
A
E
There
is
a
period
of
time,
that's
established
with
a
$5,000,
that's
provided
as
homebuyer
downpayment
assistance,
it's
modeled
after
our
Neighborhood
Stabilization
program,
and
also
how
the
green
plant
North
program
was
structured
and
that
homebuyer
assistance
is
repayable
upon
sale
of
the
property.
But.
A
F
A
E
An
upper
area
median
income
value
limit
of
one
hundred
and
fifteen
percent
of
area
median
income.
However,
the
people
who
actually
purchase
those
homes
were
typically
at
fifty-six
percent
of
area
median
income,
so
typically
we're
earning
forty
eight
thousand
dollars
a
year,
as
as
the
average
across
the
forty
nine
homes
that
have
been
sold,
that
our
dream
home
from
our
homes.
E
The
projects
that
were
created
through
green
homes
north,
which
again
this
project
is
modeled
after
are
the
most
affordable
new
construction
homes
available
in
the
entire
city
of
Minneapolis,
the
average
sale
price
of
three
homes.
North
homes
was
around
one
hundred
and
eighty
six
thousand.
Through
this
proposal,
the
range
is
anywhere
from
as
low
as
one
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
to
two
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
and,
as
average
sale
phrase
from
2014
through
2016
average
sale.
Price
of
a
new
construction
home
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis
was
566
thousand.
E
So
I
believe
that
there
is
an
argument
and
a
need
for
us
to
fill
that
developing
gap
between
the
amount
that
the
project
cost
and
what
its
end
sale,
prices
and
I
also
believe
that
the
projects
once
they're
complete,
are
an
affordable
option
for
a
new
construction
home
that
doesn't
exist
elsewhere
in
the
city.
Well,
that
might
be
true.
G
Brennan,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
if
I
may,
this
overall
program
is
the
result
of
a
year-long
stakeholder
engagement
process
that
was
led
by
councilmember
yang,
to
look
at
our
infill
lots
of
the
city-owned
and
to
identify
a
strategy
for
developing
those.
So
the
Minneapolis
Homes
program
had
several
different
components
to
it.
One
is
the
developer
assistance.
G
The
other
is
the
long
term
affordability
and
then
there's
another
homebuyer
initiated
model
that
hasn't
been
discussed
yet
so
those
the
strategy
was
presented
and
approved
by
the
council
in
early
2017
after
the
recommendations
were
formed
through
this
committee
process
over
over
2016
prior
to
the
recommendations
that
were
made
out
of
this
committee
in
early
2017.
Prior
to
that,
we
didn't
have
any
long-term
affordability
requirement
or
any
long-term
affordability
focus.
G
So
the
fact
that
we
now
have
more
of
a
focus
on
long-term
affordability
and
some
of
the
funds
are
set
aside,
specifically
for
that,
in
addition,
there's
a
priority,
so
proposals
that
have
long
term
affordability
are
going
to
beat
out
proposals
that
don't
so
we
we
have
added
this
element
of
long
term
afford
it
wasn't
here
before
so.
The
five-year
green
homes
north
program
did
not
have
a
long
term
affordability
priority,
we've
recently
added
that
within
the
criteria
that
have
been
approved
for
the
2017
program.
We
this
2017
program,
is
a
pilot
program.
G
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
we
should
do
is
look
this
year
at
how
the
pilot
program
work
and
to
see
how
we
can
better
encourage
additional
long-term
affordability
and
build
on
that
long-term
affordability.
And,
as
rockland
mentioned,
one
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
do
is
provide
a
mechanism
for
for
developers
to
include
long
term
affordability,
a
lot
of
them
just
you
know
they
build
houses
and
they
sell
houses
to
people
based
on
certain
criteria
that
we
have.
H
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you,
miss
Kimball
and
Miss
Brennan
for
a
kind
of
illuminating.
A
couple
of
concerns.
I
was
initially
when
I
looked
at
this
I
was
very
excited.
We
were
starting
to
move
a
lot
of
property
and
that
was
really
doing
I
think
putting
it
out
it
in
such
a
way
that
these
developers
are
able
to
respond
to
it
and
to
move
forward
with
the
project
that
we
had
established.
H
I
H
Just
speculating
is
we
don't
want
it
to
be
seen
as
a
giveaway
to
somebody
who
will
be
taking
advantage
of
the
program
and
process
and
profit
from
that
when
that's
not
the
intent,
we
don't
want
a
speculator
to
commanded
by
this
purchase
or
purchase
this
property
we'd
like
it
or
affordable
options,
long
term.
So
is
there
a
way
we
can
build
in
a
mechanism
that
would
satisfy
that
that
concern
of
ours
by
still
moving
these
properties
forward,
I.
E
C
It's
the
lost
leader
and
so
I
mean
I.
Think
we
just
need
to
be
thinking
about
very
critically
about
what
that
what
the
goals
are
here.
The
goals
are,
affordability,
I,
think,
I'm.
All
I
think
all
of
us
are
all
on
board,
which
just
means
we
need
to
further
subsidize
to
allow
for
the
affordability
to
beat
it,
but
that
just
requires
an
additional
funding.
It.
A
C
Disagree:
it's
a
parcel,
a
parcel
that
is
limited
in
what
you're
able
to
do
with
it
and
when
you're
able
to
sell
it
costs
less
money,
I'm
sorry
cause
it
cost
more
money.
So,
in
other
words,
if
you
say
here's
a
parcel,
you
can
do
whatever
it
is
that
you
want
with
it.
You
can
sell
it
off
at
any
time
for
any
price.
That
parcel
is
then
more
valuable.
If
you
restrict
the
use
in
the
sale
of
the
parcel,
it
becomes
less
valuable,
I,
don't
know
how
to
make
sense.
A
J
You,
madam
chair
and
I,
won't
you
know,
reiterate
the
points
that
have
been
observed
here
in
our
discussion
and
made
in
the
presentation
it
seems
like
we've
got
a.
We
have
achieved
a
lot
that
was
set
out
for
staff
on
the
front
end
goals.
You've
highlighted
some
additional
areas
where
we
can
do
on
the
back
end,
the
long
term
we've
done
it
in
other
areas,
we've
actually
just
dumped
ramped
up
our
15-year
requirement
to
third
year.
Just
for
the
very
concerns
that
you're
raising.
There's
no
reason
that
we
can't
do
it
here.
J
If
there's
an
economic
impact
to
that,
then
that's
part
of
the
adjustment,
but
let's
explore
what
we
can
do
on
the
back
end
for
long
term.
Affordability,
in
addition
to
what
we've
done
very
successfully
to
achieve
upfront
goals
which
clearly
are
here
elect
I,
don't
want
to
throw
the
baby
out
with
the
bathwater,
but
maybe
there's
a
little
more
time
to
explore
the
backend
I
resent
up
to
you,
madam
chair,
well,.
A
E
Program
does
require
that
the
homes
are
sold
to
owner
occupants
and
it
does
require
that
developers
sell
the
homes
the
owner
occupants
at
the
at
the
area,
meeting
income
that
they
proposed.
So
there
are
some
proposals
before
you
today
for
80%
of
area
median
income,
which
is
sixty
five
thousand
seven
hundred,
and
there
are
some
proposals
that
go
up
to
one
hundred
and
fifteen
percent
of
area
median
income,
which
is
ninety
eight,
eight
thousand
number,
as
I
mentioned
earlier.
But
again
that's
the
upper
limit
of
what's
allowable
for
sale
of
any
of
these
properties.
E
It
means
that
someone
who
makes
more
than
that
amount
can't
purchase
these
properties.
It
does
not
mean
that
someone
who
earns
that
amount
of
money
is
definitively
going
to
purchase
these
properties,
as
I
mentioned
in
the
experience
of
the
program.
Typically,
people
at
56%
of
area,
median
incomes
and
purchasing
the
new
construction
homes
that
we
create.
Why
wouldn't.
E
Our
our
program
requires
that
projects
are
completed
within
a
12-month
period
of
time
and
there
have
been
some
instances
where
there
has
been
a
need
to
go
above
80%
of
area
median
income
in
order
to
ensure
that
the
home
is
sold
and
and
we're
meeting
our
funders
obligations.
As
a
reminder
on
$500,000
of
city
of
Minneapolis,
funds
are
proposed
as
part
of
the
development
gap
assistance.
We
have
leveraged
those
funds
with
Hennepin,
County's
kind
of
HRA
funds
and
then
also
with
Minnesota
Housing
funds
and
I
think
the
proposal
today,
okay,.
E
The
primary
challenge
that
we
discovered
with
with
requiring
all
homes
to
be
long
term
affordable
and
one
of
the
main
reasons
why
we're
coming
before
the
council
today
with
recommendations
for
modifications
for
the
long
term,
affordable
program,
currently
there's
only
one
organization
that
knows
how
to
provide
for
long-term
affordability
and
that
simulates
community
Lambchop.
Unless
we
modify
our
are
portable.
E
Twin
Cities
Habitat
for
Humanity
can't
participate
and
then
there's
a
further
need
for
us
to
do
a
deep
exploration
of
how
we
might
provide
direction
and
support
to
other
developers.
That
would
want
to
participate,
and-
and
so
that's
why
we're
making
those
recommendations
today,
because
we're
trying
to
explore
ways
to
increase
the
number
of
long-term,
affordable
projects
over
time.
So.
A
Enterprises
we
ask
for
perpetual
affordability,
that's
the
land
trust
model
that
isn't
completely
workable.
So
now
we've
gone
back
to
30
years
of
affordable
that
will
allow
habitat
to
come
in,
but
actions
being
taken
today
mean
means
three
months
affordable
because
there's
absolutely
no
restriction
other
than
if
they
get
more
money
for
homebuyer
assistance,
then
they
write
down
five
thousand,
probably
a
thousand
a
year
for
five
years.
Is
that
what
it
is?
It's.
A
A
F
Yeah
no
I
think
you
Madame.
Chair
is
just
trying
to
think
about
this
with
the
the
intent.
So
you
know
I'm
really
supportive
as
a
long-term
affordability
component
and
that's
something
that
folks
in
my
ward,
are
really
concerned
about
giving
the
rising
rents
the
stagnant
wages
and
and
the
rising
cost
of
homes
in
areas
like
Phillips
and
Powderhorn.
E
We
effectively
asked
we
asked
developers
or
home
sale
models
to
propose
to
us
how
they
would
achieve
affordability
over
a
30
year
term.
That's
renewable
at
the
time
that
we
did
the
request
for
qualification.
Cities
like
communal
and
trust
responded
Habitat
for
Humanity
did
not
respond
at
the
time
of
the
RFQ.
That
said,
they
would
have
interest
if
we
limited
to
a
30-year
term.
K
N
I
M
M
K
M
K
A
A
Losses
on
each
of
these
Lots
they're,
not
just
the
purchase
of
the
property,
it's
the
acquisition
and
demolition
cost
the
cost
to
assemble,
and
almost
every
one
of
these
is
it
a
loss.
I'm
looking
at
them
should
I
read
them
out
loud
too.
I,
don't
know
how
there's
program
income.
The
income
is
money,
property,
tax
money
that
goes
into
the
program,
Goodman.
K
M
K
M
K
A
I'm
glad
you
brought
this
up
because
I'm
going
to
actually
introduce
to
staff
a
staff
direction
at
the
end
of
this
to
see
an
audit
of
all
the
properties
that
have
been
sold,
how
much
we've
paid
for
them.
How
much
our
demolition
costs
were,
how
much
our
acquisition
costs
were
and
how
much
money
we
actually
make,
and
this
program
I
would
argue-
and
we
have
argued
in
affordable
housing-
advocates
that
these
efforts
cost
us
money
and
that
their
contribution
towards
our
affordable
housing
efforts.
A
C
You,
madam
chair
I,
could
be
wrong,
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
that
elfric
is
saying
that
we
make
money
on
the
net
I
think
what
he's
saying
is
that
we
we
certainly
we
lose
money
on
the
net.
We
knew.
We
know
that
just
given
the
differentials
that
we
have
to
pay
out,
where
we
make
money
incremental
II
is
on
the
sale
of
some
of
these
properties,
where
we
get
them
for
a
dollar
and
sell
them
for
30,
so
on
the
whole
I
think
you're
right,
there's.
A
Let's
just
use
45
30,
Bryant
Avenue
north
something
mr.
Ramadan
just
brought
up
today
purchase
price
13,000
632
acquisition.
Sixteen
thousand
nine
hundred
ninety
three
total
cost
to
assemble
thirty
thousand
reused
value:
option
for
sale
to
a
homeowner.
Five
thousand
dollars
see
ped
write-off,
twenty
five
thousand
six
hundred
and
twenty
five.
They
all
go
like
that.
So
if
it's
about
whitewashing
money
that
that
I
buy
that
argument,
we
get
money
from
the
federal
government
or
others.
We
do
this
and
then
it
becomes
clean
for
us
to
spend
to
do
something
else.
A
G
Committee,
you
are
correct.
Overall,
the
program
does
not
make
money
ii
ii
ii
ii
lee.
If
it's
alright
with
the
committee,
we
could
post
on
this
item
and
come
back
in
the
next
cell
and
provide
some
additional
information.
I
think
that
there's
been
a
little
bit
of
confusion
about
what
is
being
requested
here.
There's
two
different
actions
that
I
think
have
been
somewhat
confused
and
we
would
like
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
take
the
next
cycle
and
clarify
some
of
those
points
of
misunderstanding.
It's.
G
The
proposal
the
requested
action
today
is
to
move
forward
with
the
land
sales,
as
well
as
the
development
assistance,
as
well
as
to
change
our
definition
of
long
term
affordability.
So
the
proposed
land
sales
and
the
proposed
development
assistance
are
completely
in
line
in
accordance
with
the
policies
and
the
procedures
and
the
guidelines
that
were
adopted
by
the
council
earlier
this
year.
So
we
issued
an
RFP
in
accordance
with
that
council
direction.
We
received
proposals
and
rubric
you
making
commendations
in
accordance
with
the
criteria
that
that
were
established
by
consul.
G
In
addition
to
that,
we've
asked
for
flexibility
in
how
we
define
on
some
affordability
so
that
it's
not
just
the
Community
Land
Trust
model,
which
really
is
perpetual
affordability,
but
to
allow
for
a
habitat
affordability
model
which
allows
for
30
years
of
affordability
and
as
well
as
other
models
that
allow
for
30
years
of
affordability,
but
maybe
not
beyond
30
years
or
perpetually
affordable.
So.
J
It
seems,
though,
if
we
went
just
going
back
to
the
project
proposals
themselves,
as
we've
noted,
like
the
Land
Trust,
actually
has
the
sort
of
back
end
affordability
that
we
want.
So
it
seems
like
they're
getting
caught
up
projects
like
that
I
should
rather
phrase
it
are
getting
caught
up
in
a
broader
conversation.
So
I
don't
know.
If
we
can
it
would
there
be
any
harm
to
the
building
schedule
for
those
who
clearly
comport
to
our
objectives
of
long-term
affordability,
as
presented
its.
A
A
A
E
Goodman,
would
you
like
this
completes
the
staff
presentation
I
had
initially
intended
to
present
about
the
long-term
affordability
and
then
separately
presents
about
the
Development
Assistance
Program
manual
and
the
recommendation?
That's
before
the
council
and
I'm,
assuming
that
even
there
Alfred
shaking
his
head?
No
okay.
A
Okay,
okay,
yeah,
so
I
think
what
we're
going
to
do
is
postpone
item
three
sections,
one:
two
and
three
aside
from
item
three
section:
three
number
three
Thank
You
Casey
Carl.
For
that
confusing
ordering
and
we'll
take
up
the
sale
of
26:31
sixth
Street
northeast
twenty
five.
Twenty
eight
14th
Avenue
South
are
there
four
did
I
miss
two
of
them,
just
those
two
okay.
So
this
is
a
public
hearing
on
the
staff
report
regarding
Minneapolis
homes,
long-term
affordability,
program
modification
and
development
assistance,
land
sales.
A
There
could
be
a
number
of
people
who
work
for
these
wonderful
organizations
who
are
here
today
want
to
do
this
work
and
we
will
postpone
this
item
and
have
another
public
hearing
to
be
fair.
So,
if
you're
here
and
want
to
speak
today,
you
should
speak
today
if
you'd
like
to
come
back
and
speak
when
we
take
this
up.
That's
okay,
too,
so
I'm
opening
the
public
hearing
plea
if
you
want
to
speak
just
line
up
behind
the
podium
and
just
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
P
O
P
Not
only
people
at
Hennepin,
County,
property
tax,
but
I've
also
been
talking
to
Roxanne
and
my
chair,
a
city
council
member,
about
this
land
because
I've
been
watching
this
property
since
I
bought
my
house
because
there's
I
thought
it
was
one
bigoted
lot
next
to
my
house,
but
it's
technically
when
I
talked
to
Roxy
and
she's
like
honey,
there's
a
another
lot
between
the
two
of
your
houses
that
you
might
want
to
buy.
First
before
you
move
on,
because
we
have
some
plans
and
my
mother
owned
the
house
directly
next
to
this
house.
P
Next,
this
land
and
I
had
expressed
an
immense
amount
of
serious
interest.
I've
been
diligently
calling
them,
and
the
only
reason
why
I
knew
it
was
even
for
sale
is
because
I
was
just
continuously
looking
on
the
county,
property
tax
information
and
I.
Actually
before
it
got
sold.
The
HRA
I
was
just
waiting
for
it
to
come
for
sale.
P
So,
every
time
someone
come
in
from
the
city
in
Mose,
Alana's,
okay,
just
keep
me
posted
on
when
it
comes
up
for
auction
I
like
to
buy
it,
because
it's
so
close
to
my
house,
because
we
had
intentions
on
buying
the
house,
the
level
to
build
another
house
for
our
family,
because
we
have
such
a
large
family.
But
then.
E
P
Also
wanted
to
buy
the
land
on
the
corner
as
well
to
turn
it
into
a
community
garden
because
the
land
is
in
vacant
for
three
years,
so
we
were
talking
with
Rocklin
at
the
city
level
to
try
to
get
that
established
and
I.
Guess
she
just
kept
telling
me
just
wait
for
the
auction
away
for
the
option.
Well,
it
never
came
and
when
I
was
told
that
it
was
sold,
it
was
very
disheartening
because
I
was
like
I
really
really
want
this
property.
P
P
Three
jobs
and
I
can't
afford
what
they
were
hosting
and
I
was
just
like
commending
you
from
where
we're
sitting
in
like
thank
you
for
somebody
for
speaking
up
for
it.
I
worked
three
jobs
and
I
can't
afford
these
houses
that
they're
supported
so
for
them
to
buy
the
land
right
next
to
my
house,
I
couldn't
buy
that
house
for
my
family,
so
I'm
here
today
to
ask
you
all
to
take
this
house
or
this
land
off
of
this
proposal,
so
that
I
can
buy
it
as
a
court
of
interest
sale,
because.
F
P
Totally
survived
this
land
for
$2,500
I'm.
They
told
me
that
I
have
to
take
ten
thousand
dollars.
So
first
big
business
to
get
it
for
$2,500
is
like
stagnant
because
I
want
it
because
I
my
neighborhood
I
want
a
baby
and
I
just
ever
gonna
get
pushed
out
if
I
can't
afford
it
so
I
just
asking
day
and
just
look
frustrated
so.
A
P
A
Unless
you're
going
to
build
a
house
next
to
you,
so
that
there
probably
is
time
for
more
conversation,
but
we
don't
sell
buildable
Lots
for
side
yards
or
community
gardens
either.
So
if
this
is
being
postponed,
that's
like
a
fluke
of
the
program
thing
that
happened
here
today
was
a
lot.
Next
to
you
is
napping
so
today,
so
there's
still
time
to
discuss.
Okay,.
P
P
But
from
what
I'm
understanding
of
what
the
laws
are
within
the
city
and
the
county
is
that
you
don't
have
to
initially
build
on
this
lot
within
twelve
months.
A
lot
of
the
lots
of
rounded
because
of
city-owned
has
to
be
built
on
within
twelve
months
and
I.
Just
don't
have
that
money
readily
available,
but
this
being
taken
and
purchased
by
me
and
my
family
over
time
can
be
built
on
which
is
the
intention,
but
because
it's
a
tax
forfeit
of
property.
We
have
more
time
by
the
city.
P
If
it's
a
city
lot,
we
have
to
build
within
12
months,
and
unlike
some
of
these
people
that
have
the
money
to
do
that.
We
don't
have
that
money,
but
with
overtime
by
building
the
equity
in
the
house,
and
we
have
by
doing
some
of
the
things
that
we
need
to
do
to
our
house.
We
will
be
able
to
take
that
equity
out
and
build
on
that
lot,
which
we
intend
to
do.
Okay,
I
appreciate.
A
P
O
Madam
chair
councilmembers,
my
name
is
Stacey
Horowitz
and
I'm
with
the
operations
director
at
the
city
of
lakes,
Community
Land
Trust.
We
just
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
this
committee
and
the
City
Council
ncpad
staff
for
the
long
term
affordability
program
that
we
talked
about
today
and
its
commitment
and
purpose
to
keeping
homes
affordable
beyond
30
years.
The
city
of
lakes,
Community
Land
Trust,
has
now
over
250
perpetually,
affordable
homes
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis
and
is
close
to
being
one.
The
largest
urban
Community
Land
Trust
in
the
country.
O
In
large
part,
thanks
to
the
support
from
the
city
and
the
funding
that
has
been
received
with
homes
appreciating
at
a
wicked
pace
in
our
community,
it's
incredibly
important
for
both
policy
and
funding,
which
has
been
discussed
today
to
ensure
permanent
affordability
in
portions
of
our
ownership.
Housing
stock
policy
decisions,
like
the
long
term
affordability
program,
provide
us
a
chance
to
leverage
additional
funding
investments
many
times
over,
especially
through
the
Community
Land
Trust
strategy.
O
Through
past
opportunities
with
the
Twin
Cities
kept
at
free
humanity,
as
well
as
other
nonprofit
and
for-profit
developers.
We
have
been
able
to
create
and
ensure
permanent
affordability
throughout
the
city
of
Minneapolis
moving
forward.
We
believe
the
partnership
approach
allows
us
to
add
to
stock
of
perpetually
affordable,
sustainable
home
ownership
housing
while
complementing
the
work
of
one
another
and
leveraging
investments
30
years
and
beyond.
Thank
you
thank.
O
O
A
H
A
A
E
We
do
try
to
enforce
the
12-month
completion
deadline
if
a
project
is
not
complete
within
twelve
months
than
we
typically
have
a
conversation
with
that
developer
and
and
will
not
approve
any
additional
projects
that
homebuyer
or
developer
until
the
people's
is
is
cured
of
the
project
is
completed.
Nice.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Is
there
anyone
else
here
to
speak
to
this
issue,
anyone
anyone
seeing
none
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
I'm
going
to
move
to
approve
item
three
subsection,
3
land
sale,
3,
which
is
the
sale
of
2631
6th,
Street,
North,
East
and
25
28
14th
Avenue
south
to
the
city,
Lakes
Community,
Land,
Trust,.
A
O
A
Eirene,
can
you
note
that
for
these
two
properties
so
that
they
can,
we
can
clear
them
out
and
they
can
get
going?
They
only
have
12
months
currently
to
get
this
done
so
and
then
the
balance
of
the
report,
which
is
item
3
sections,
1,
&
2
in
sections
3
1
&,
2
4
through
12,
will
be
and
will
be
postponed
an
item
4.
Is
that
correct?
Okay?
That's
the
motion
on
the
table
did
I
close
the
public
hearing.
The
public
hearing
is
closed.
A
N
You,
madam
chair,
we
have
an
application
by
Blarney
to
Inc
doing
businesses
Barney's
pub
for
a
on
sale,
liquor
license
with
Sunday
sales
class
c-2
at
9:03,
Washington,
Avenue
South,
and
this
will
be
the
second
on
sale.
Liquor
license
in
that
building
for
Barneys
pub.
The
two
couldn't
be
connected
to
a
second
license
was
required.
This
is
in
the
Downtown
East
neighborhood
in
Ward
3,
the
new
location
lab
sitting
inside
for
50
persons
outside
for
30.
This
is
owned
by
1%
by
Michael
ma
Rooney.
A
public
hearing
is
required.
N
Norris
has
revealed
to
residents
and
property
owners
within
400
feet
of
the
premises.
On
June
26th
of
this
year
we
notified
East,
downtown
Council
and
the
warehouse
district,
Business
Association
and
the
downtown
Minneapolis
Neighborhood
Association.
We
received
no
responses
for
or
against
this
application.
We
finally
meet
all
of
our
requirements
and
recommend
that
the
application
be
approved
are.
A
I
A
C
A
N
Chair,
we
have
an
application
by
Cochino
latina
restaurant
at
37,
64
Nicollet,
and
they
are
adding
a
sidewalk
cafe.
This
will
be
on
the
38th
Street
side
of
the
premises
in
the
king
field.
Ward
8,
Kingfield,
neighborhood,
Ward,
8
you'll
have
exterior
seating
on
the
sidewalk
for
16
persons.
Public
hearing
is
required.
We
notified
all
property
owners
and
residents
and
neighborhood
groups
and
business
associations.
We
received
eight
responses
from
that
notification
process.
All
of
them
are
in
support
of
the
application.
Staff
is
also
in
support
of
the
application
and
recommend
that
it
be
approved
are.
A
K
A
Q
A
N
N
Public
hearing
is
required
for
this
application.
We
notified
all
property
owners
and
residents
in
450
feet
and
the
downtown
Minneapolis
Neighborhood
Association
warehouse
district
business
association.
We
received
no
responses
for
against
the
application
and
staffs
recommendation
is
that
it
be
approved,
are.
A
Q
Good
afternoon
collab
member
Goodman
members
of
the
council,
my
name
is
Kate
a
kyanite,
and
the
attorney
here
in
the
Twin
Cities
has
been
working
with
staff
in
connection
with
Comcast
liquor
license
with
me
today,
I
have
Kevin
Kozak,
who
is
the
vice
president
for
the
company
and
handled
all
the
construction
and
development,
and
he
is
happy
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
business
right.
Please
do
yes,.
R
We're
very
excited
to
come
to
town.
This
will
be
our
14th
location
that
we
have
across
the
Midwest
we
partner
up
with
local
breweries
in
Minnesota.
We
actually
have
30
of
them
on
draft
at
all
times,
and
then
we
have
50
other
draft
beers
that
we
serve
that
would
team
up
with
Brewers
around
the
world
where
scratch
kitchen,
we
like
to
sell
ourselves
as
stretch
food
that
your
mom
would
like
if
she
like,
faster
Guinness.
R
R
A
A
N
You,
madam
chair,
we
have
an
application
by
not
corp.
They
do
business
as
it's
Greek
to
me
at
626,
Westlake
Street,
and
they
are
seeking
a
sidewalk
cafe.
This
will
be
on
the
lyndale
side
of
the
premises.
This
is
a
Whittier
neighborhood
in
Ward
10,
and
this
new
cafe
said:
why
can't
they
will
see
18
persons,
we
notified
all
residents
and
top
the
owners
of
today's
application.
N
A
L
N
Chair
we
have
an
application
by
team
dhw
LLC.
They
do
businesses
blaze,
pizza
at
1,000,
Washington,
Avenue,
southeast
they're,
seeking
a
sidewalk
cafe
license
and
a
special
late-night
food
license.
They
currently
operate
with
an
on
sale.
Wine
and
beer
license
Class
E,
and
they
have
been
at
this
address
since
November
of
2015.
When
the
building
was
newly
constructed
sidewalk
cafe
will
have
18
seats,
I
mean
are
requesting
to
the
open
late
night
until
3:00
a.m.
Thursday
through
Saturday
alcohol
service
will
stop
at
1:00
a.m.
for
all
those
nights
and
late
night.
N
In
the
Prospect
Park
East
River
Road
neighborhood
in
Ward
2,
we
notified
all
residents
and
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
today's
public
hearing.
We
also
notify
the
Prospect
Park
East
River,
Road,
Neighborhood
Association
and
the
stadium
village,
commercial,
Business
Association.
We
received
no
responses
for
or
against
the
application
and
staff
recommends.
Approval
are.
A
L
A
A
N
We
believe
we
do
oil
to
set
a
license
conditions
that
will
address
the
concerns
raised
at
the
last
public
hearing
and
also
our
environmental
management
staff
did
conduct
on-site
evaluations
and
testing
of
the
amplified
sound
equipment
that
is
used
at
Clubhouse.
Jäger
maximum
levels
were
determined
and
so
that
they
could
be
set
during
operating
hours.
N
Eight
specific
license
conditions
were
developed
that
are
included
in
today's
packet
that
we
believe,
if
followed,
will
allow
the
business
to
operate
with
a
Class
B
license
and
not
negatively
affect
nearby
residents
and
property
owners.
The
conditions
include
amplified
sound.
A
club
alternator
will
remain
in
compliance
with
the
Minneapolis,
sound
ordinance
and
the
recommendations
made
by
an
environmental
management
staff
at
their
site.
Visit
on
June
23rd,
the
speakers
in
the
outdoor
patio,
a
club
or
shaker
will
be
turned
off
by
10:00
p.m.
N
Dedicated
staff
will
ensure
that
patrons
do
not
leave
club
all
takers
premises
with
containers
of
alcohol.
They
will
control
the
dumpsters
on
the
property
and
secure
them
correctly,
which
I
know
has
already
been
completed.
They
will
perform
litter
patrol
around
their
premises,
as
is
already
required
by
chapter
360.
95
of
our
code
and
the
licensee
will
send
a
representative
to
attend
at
least
50%
of
our
liquor
in
the
city
industry.
N
A
N
A
Perhaps
we
should
add
these
conditions
that
they
notify
the
neighbors,
should
they
see
seeking
an
outdoor
amplification
permit
for
the
first
year,
just
ensure
there's
some
sort
of
notification,
because
that's
what
we
were
hearing
from
folks
that
they
didn't
want
to
confront
the
business
owners
when
there
were
problems
before
and
they
could
all
be
more
proactive.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
I
think.
N
A
M
A
A
M
C
You,
madam
chair
I,
move
approval
of
this
item
and
I
want
to
thank
the
owners
of
club
Jaeger
for
your
willingness
to
engage
and
and
work
together
to
find
a
solution
that
really
works
for
everybody,
and
thank
you
for
your
10
years
worth
of
organic
growth.
I
think
you
know,
club
Jaeger
is
a
stable
right
now,
North
Loop
there
and
I'll
help
you
there
for
another
30.