►
From YouTube: November 28, 2018 Housing Policy & Development
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I'm
going
to
take
this
opportunity
to
call
this
meeting
to
order
now
that
we
have
quorum
and
the
cameras
are
on
this-
is
the
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
housing
policy
and
development
committee,
I'm
cam
Gordon,
chair
of
the
committee
and
I'm
joined
today
by
council
members,
Kevin
Wright,
Jeremy,
Schrader,
Lisa,
bender
and
Lisa
Goodman,
as
well
as
Jeremy,
Jeremiah
Ellison
and
the
vice
chair
of
the
committee.
We
have
a
number
of
items
before
us
today,
including
some
discussion
items,
a
public
hearing
on
five
different
land
sales
and
consent
items.
A
What
I'm
going
to
do
is
take
the
consent
items.
First,
any
committee
member
who'd
like
to
pull
one
off
for
questioning
or
comments,
feel
free
to
do
so.
The
first
consent
item,
which
is
number
six
on
our
agenda,
is
authorizing
staff
to
continue
with
analysis
of
Summit
House
condominium
project
to
determine
a
of
housing
improvement
area.
Financing
assistance
is
appropriate.
The
seventh
item,
which
is
also
on
consent,
is
authorizing
staff
to
continue
analysis
of
the
Northside
art
space
blocks
to
determine
if
the
tax
increment
financing
assistance
is
appropriate
and
justifiable.
A
The
eighth
item
also
on
consent,
is
a
passage
of
a
resolution
authorizing
they
carry
forward
of
52
million
six
hundred.
Seventy
two
thousand
eight
hundred
forty-three
dollars
of
year,
2018
tax-exempt
housing
revenue,
bonds
for
multi-family
housing
program,
and
that
would
be
authorizing
it
to
be
moved
forward.
So
we
could
use
it
in
the
future
and
the
final
consent
item
number
nine
on
the
agenda
is
referring
to
C
pet
and
city
coordinators
staff,
the
issue
of
the
Minneapolis
garden
lease
program
for
recommended
improvements
and
report
back
to
our
committee
in
the
first
quarter
of
2019.
A
If
any
one
I
see
no
one
wishing
to
pull
anything
off,
then
I
will
move
the
consent
item
forward
for
approval
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
and
he
opposed
say
no.
Those
motions
are
approved.
Then
we'll
come
back
to
the
beginning
of
our
agenda,
which
is
the
land
sales
I,
think
we're
going
to
take
the
small
side,
yard,
land,
sale
first
and
then
we'll
take
the
other
ones
which
are
all
land
sales
to
greater
metropolitan
Housing,
Corporation,
together
and
I.
Believe
we'll
have
this
Coleman
to
present
on
this
hi.
B
I
am
presenting
on
behalf
of
Erika
Coleman
who's
actually
out
today,
I'm
Roxanne,
Jung
Kimball,
chair
Gordon
and
members
of
the
committee
staff
is
recommending
sale
of
22:08
James
Avenue
north
as
a
side
yard
policies
for
the
side
yard
program
were
established
by
the
City
Council
on
January
15
2016
staff
recommends
a
sale
to
assertive
Minneapolis
properties
to
LLC
for
its
appraised
value
of
$1,200
subject
to
conditions.
The
property
was
acquired
on
May
16th
2018
from
Hennepin
County
tax
forfeited
land
for
$500.
It
is
substandard
in
size
at
3390
square
feet.
B
The
based
on
the
side
yard
program
criteria,
including
verification
of
the
purchasers,
property
taxes
that
they're
currently
current
and
that
the
purchasers
property
maintenance
complies
with
Building
Code
and
zoning
ordinance.
Assertive
Minneapolis
properties
to
LLC
is
recommended,
as
the
purchaser
notification
was
provided
to
the
Jordan
Area
Community
Council
on
September
6
2018
I
can
take
any
questions
at
this
time.
I.
A
Don't
see
any
questions,
thank
you
very
much
and
thanks
for
subbing,
for
your
colleague
appreciate
that
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
on
this
to
see.
If
anybody
is
here
to
speak
to
it,
anyone
like
to
come
up
and
make
any
comments
about
this
land
sale.
Seeing
none
then
Oh,
No,
yes,
I,
guess
not
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
Then
any
discussion
on
this
seeing
none
that
it
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed,
say.
No.
A
C
The
sale
is
through
the
policies
established
for
many
office
homes
by
the
City
Council
in
December,
11,
2015
and
February
10,
2017
and
staff
is
recommending
the
sale
of
again
these
properties
to
create
greater
Matt,
Hoffman
Court,
great
enrichment,
Housing,
Corporation
or
gimmick
for
the
appraised
values
of
four
thousand
nine
hundred
three
thousand
one
hundred
seven
thousand
six
hundred
and
seven
thousand
three
hundred
respectively,
subject
to
conditions.
The
staff
is
continuing
marketing
these
properties
to
an
email
list
service
now
over
2400
recipients,
and
these
were
the
only
offers
received
for
the
properties.
C
The
purchaser
has
secured
a
four
million
dollars
in
new
markets.
Tax
credits
to
invest
in
building,
as
I
mentioned,
total
ten
single-family
homes
to
make
these
homes
more
affordable.
Four
million
of
the
of
this
foreman
dollars
represents
approximately
800,000
development
gap.
Assistance
for
an
average
write
down
a
seventy
thousand
per
project.
There
is
no
direct
assistance
from
the
city
for
these
projects.
Notification
was
provided
to
the
Jordan
Area
Community
Council
and
the
foul
neighborhood
on
August
6
2008
on
August.
C
Excuse
me
on
11
21:18
that
is
November
21st
2018,
the
Fowler
neighbor
Association
wrote
email
to
Eden
Spencer
at
gimmick
and
I'll
read
the
following:
assists
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
meet
with
us
last
night,
foul
on
Neighborhood
Association
is
committed
to
having
sustainable,
affordable
housing
in
the
area.
We're
excited
that
you
have
these
six
projects
in
the
neighborhood
we'll
work
with
you.
However,
we
can
to
make
them
as
affordable,
sustainable
and
as
efficient
as
possible.
Please
use
my
email
as
a
direct
line
to
the
Fowler
neighborhood
board
barrel,
Lamberton
fowl
Neighborhood
Association.
C
A
D
We
did
meet
I'm
going
to
start
at
the
beginning,
because
last
time
I
didn't
know,
I
was
going
to
speak,
but
after
I
heard
that
the
house
is
the
affordable
houses
were
going
to
be
220
to
250.
I
was
kind
of
thrown
off
guard
because
I
don't
know
how
that's
affordable
in
North
Minneapolis,
even
with
all
the
programs
to
homeowners,
so
in
other
for
other
people
Minneapolis
those
homes
could
be
affordable
and
that's
what's
happening.
D
So
I
want
to
start
out
by
addressing
the
things
that
are
with
the
affordable
homes
that
are
going
to
be
built.
North
Minneapolis
now,
with
these
2
additional
properties
in
the
fall,
all
neighborhoods
there's
going
to
be
8
houses
within
Fallwell
neighborhood.
It's
going
to
have
an
impact,
so
I
want
to
address
to
true
affordability,
super
energy,
efficient
and
resiliency,
sustainable
and
durable,
with
low
maintenance
costs
and
low,
or
no
energy
costs
in
the
future.
I
have
a
packet
for
you
guys
here
that
I
put
together
since
I.
D
Just
found
out,
they
were
buying
more
houses,
which
we
met
with
gimmick
the
housing
is
they
came
to
our
housing
meeting
last
Tuesday
and
we
met
with
them
and
they
didn't
mention
that
they
were
buying
two
more
properties.
We
just
talked
to
them
about
the
six
that
they
were
I
was
a
little
miffed
that
they
had
mentioned
that
there
were
two
more
on
the
agenda,
which
I
thought
was
kind
of
disingenuous.
D
D
These
houses
are
going
to
be
sell,
selling
for
one
hundred
and
fifty
percent
more
than
the
average
price
of
houses
currently
Christelle
in
those
neighborhoods,
the
phils
price
will
facilitate
faster
gentrification
in
the
neighborhood,
especially
in
fall
well,
where,
with
these
two
Lots
they'll
be
eight
new
homeless
by
June
that
are
listing
above
the
current
average
of
$150,000.
This
is
a
bigger
discussion
that
we
can
do
here,
but
I
I
think
they
all
know
the
impact
of
what
happens
when
a
house
sells
for
a
high
dollar
amount.
D
The
next
house
that's
listed
within
the
comparable
area
is
listed
for
more
than
it
should
be.
I
have
an
example:
we
paid
one
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars
for
a
house
that
was
appraised
at
one
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand
dollars,
because
we
knew
it
was
important
teaching
tool
for
energy
efficiency.
This
one
hundred
and
eighty
thousand,
that
whistles
price
was
used
to
list
the
next
renovated
house
down
the
street,
which
was
listed
than
for
two
hundred
and
nineteen
thousand
dollars
it
didn't
sell
for
that,
but
they
listed
it
for
them.
D
Then,
a
year
later,
the
small,
dilapidated
house,
next
to
us
that
was
sold
for
$30,000
the
flippers
put
forty
thousand
dollars
in
it
and
sold
it
for
a
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
dollars
based
on
the
comparable
of
our
house.
So
you
can
see
what's
happening.
This
is
part
of
the
gentrification
around
where
come
in
build
new
houses.
D
They
sell
for
too
high
of
a
price
to
people
that
are
probably
not
within
the
neighborhood
and
then
now
our
house
is
currently
listed
on
zealand,
zero
for
being
worth
two
hundred
and
twenty
one
thousand
dollars
which
we
never
ever
ever
thought
we
see
in
our
lifetime.
We've
been
there
three
years,
and
now
this
has
caused
an
increase
in
property
tax.
As
you
know,
our
property
tax
is
going
up
next
year,
twenty
three
percent.
D
So
since
the
last
meeting
I
told
you
we
got
together
with
gimmick
to
discuss
how
to
build
a
super,
simple,
energy-efficient
house
myself
and
a
couple.
Other
people
know
how
to
do
this.
We
have
the
data.
We
also
have
supportive
information
on
the
simplicity
of
doing
this
type
of
bill.
It
needs
at
the
minimum
at
least
two
things
to
start
a
lot
more
insulation
and
super
great
windows
from
windows.
The
only
thing
that
needs
to
be
done
extra
is
to
buy
better
windows
and
with
the
lowest
you've
hour.
D
You
factors,
the
installation
is
the
same,
so
there's
no
additional
labor
charges
and
some
of
the
best
ones
are
made
in
Milwaukee.
The
insulated
walls
are
also
simple
thing
and
adds
a
little
to
the
construction
documentation,
since
this
builds
already
been
approved
by
the
city.
Twice,
the
exterior
wall
is
the
same
type
of
wall
being
built.
Currently,
then,
a
blanket
of
insulation
is
laid
in
the
center
and
another
wall
identical
to
the
one
they
and
the
exterior
is
built
in
the
interior.
That's
it
I
designed
it
to
be
simple.
D
It
only
uses
three
products
for
all
three
walls.
This
is
what
this
was
used
to
reduce
the
over
amount
of
waste.
Also
I
have
some
numbers
in
here
that
I've
run
on
my
own
to
show
you
that
the
up
charge
is
very
little
and
I'll
get
to
that.
In
a
minute,
this
house
can
be
even
more
healthy
and
fire
resistant,
adding
additional
$1500
using
mineral
insulation
rather
than
fiberglass
I'm,
almost
done
alright.
D
I
know
mineral
doesn't
mold,
isn't
mildew,
it
doesn't
slump
and
it
takes
3,000
degrees
for
it
to
burn.
I've
done
a
cost
analysis
on
the
upgrades,
but
should
only
cost
about
$8
a
square
foot
around
$15,000
for
a
house,
that's
selling
for
$250,000,
and
this
can
be
recuperate
ydynt,
eight
to
ten
years
without
solar
panels.
D
So
this
new
health
type
can
address
wealth
building,
which
is
a
big
issue
if
they
build
these
houses
to
code
them
like.
Currently,
the
homeowners
would
be
buying
in
a
living
in
a
house,
that's
already
outdated.
As
far
as
energy
efficiency
and
a
homeowner's
current
and
future
energy
needs,
the
house
will
end
up
being
a
long
term
negative
on
any
family
over
time,
not
only
with
maintenance
issues,
but
with
energy
costs
that
are
not
capped
or
under
control.
A
D
We
have
a
really
small
time
to
react
and
if
you
guys
don't
start
taking
the
leadership
position
in
this,
it
really
doesn't
matter
if
they
build
those
houses
or
not,
because
in
10
to
12
years,
it's
going
to
be
a
kind
of
a
moot
point,
as
indicated
by
the
current
climate
reports
that
are
released
so
I'm
going
to
leave
this,
for
you,
I
have
all
what
I
did
is
I
put
together
at
the
very
back.
Some.
D
A
A
A
Seeing
none,
then
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed,
say
no.
We
will
move
forward
and
I
believe
that
is
the
last
of
the
ten
gimmick
homes,
mr.
Romano
okay.
So
let's
move
on
to
item
10
and
actually
what
we're
going
to
do
is
we're
going
to
discuss
item
10
and
11
at
the
same
time,
one
they
both
have
to
do
with
our
inclusionary
housing
or
inclusionary
zoning
policy.
A
E
E
So
the
inclusionary
housing
policy
proposed
actions
and
timelines
are
listed
here.
They
are
all
intended
to
culminate
at
the
December
7th
City
Council
meeting,
where
the
council
is
scheduled
to
consider
adoption
of
the
Minneapolis
2040
comprehensive
plan.
This
was
very
intentional
to
ensure
that
the
framework
for
the
inclusionary
housing
policy
is
is
approved
alongside
the
Minneapolis
2040
comp
plan
to
support
the
affordable
housing
goals
of
that
plan.
E
So
listed
here
are
the
December
7th
items
adoption
of
the
Minneapolis
2040
comp
plan,
the
framework
for
a
permanent
inclusionary
housing
policy
approve
of
an
interim
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance
that
would
be,
in
effect,
January
1,
adopt
unified
housing
policy
amendments
to
support
and
list
the
affordability
requirements
of
the
policies
and
Sapru
vast
after
action
to
return
with
financing
program
for
an
interim
IC
ordinance.
So
that's
a
lot.
E
So
first
I'll
start
with
the
the
actual
inclusionary
housing
policy
framework.
Again
in
the
Minneapolis
2040
plan,
the
proposal
is
to
allow
for
greater
residential
and
mixed-use
building
density
and
capacity.
So
the
inclusionary
housing
policy
is
intended
to
support
the
affordable
housing
goals
of
the
Minneapolis
2040
plan
and
promote
mixed
income
development.
E
The
framework
is
for
a
policy
that
would
apply
citywide
to
any
project
seeking
site
plan
approval,
and
it
would
also
be
subject
to
a
certain
threshold
size
which
is
yet
to
be
determined.
The
affordability
requirements
recommended
are
to
have
two
different
options:
one
where
10%
of
units-
and
this
is
for
rental
projects,
10%
of
units-
would
be
affordable
to
households
with
an
income
at
or
below
60
percent
of
the
area,
median
income
or
20%
of
the
unit
affordable
to
households.
E
With
an
income
at
or
below
50%
of
meeting
income
and
the
deeper
affordability
target
at
50%
am,
I
would
make
projects
eligible
for
city,
financial
assistance,
the
ownership
projects,
affordable
portable
'ti
requirements.
Those
would
still
need
to
be
determined
and
recommended,
based
on
further
analysis.
The
affordability
period
would
be
twenty
years
for
a
project
that
do
not
receive
any
study
financial
assistance
in
30
years
if
city
financial
assistance
is
provided,
and
that
is
our
understanding.
A
Just
wanted
to
make
clear
when
we
talk
about
the
requirement
as
ten
percent
at
sixty
percent.
The
requirement
is
that
it's
at
least
ten
percent
at
sixty
percent
and
at
least
20
percent
50
percent
people
can
exceed
those
yes
and
it's
at
least
20
years
and
or
at
least
30
years.
People
can
also
exceed
those
so
correct.
E
E
The
affordable
requirement
that
we're
proposing
for
the
interim
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance
are
the
same
that
we're
recommending
for
the
permanent
so
for
rental
projects.
10%
of
the
units,
at
least
10%
of
the
units
would
be
affordable
to
households
at
or
below.
60%
of
the
ami,
or
at
least
20%
of
the
units
would
be
affordable
to
households
with
incomes
at
or
below
50%
of
the
area.
Median
income
and
those
projects
would
be
eligible
to
apply
for
financial
assistance.
E
For
the
interim
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance,
we
are
recommending
that
ownership
projects
and
student
housing
projects
be
exempt.
The
rationale
for
that
is
that,
with
an
effective
date
of
January,
1
staff
doesn't
have
a
strong
recommendation
for
how
to
incorporate
those
specific
projects.
So
we
are
requesting
additional
time
to
do
analysis
and
determine
and
recommend
feasible
affordability
requirements
for
both
of
these
two
categories.
I.
A
E
A
So
then,
I'll
just
share
that
I
think
it's
gonna
be
really
important,
that
we
define
it
and
we
define
it
narrowly,
and
will
you
define
it
well,
if
it's
a
dormitory
built
by
a
university
that
would
make
total
sense,
but
in
the
second
ward,
first
board
the
Third
Ward,
there's
lots
of
apartment
buildings
that
put
in
and
are
put
in
and
built
and
constructed,
and
everybody
knows
the
market
is
students
and
they
talk
about
it
student
housing.
But
of
course
it's
not
restricted
only
to
students.
They
can't
do
that.
A
F
F
E
A
E
There
are
some
other
changes
that
are
recommended
to
the
unified
housing
policy
that
really
are
just
intended
to
be
consistent
with
the
goals
and
policies
in
the
language
of
the
minneapolis
2040
plan.
The
policy
currently
in
place
really
reflects
the
language
of
our
existing
comp
plans.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
is
consistency
there
and
then
adding
new
statements
related
to
city
goals,
around
anti
displacement
of
existing
residents,
particularly
low-income
tenants
and
low-income
residents,
and
as
well
as
adding
language
in
support
of
tenant
and
homeowner
supports.
E
E
The
as
I
said,
the
interim
isay
ordinance
is
proposed
to
be
in
effect,
January
1,
and
there
is
more
work
that
is
needed
on
the
financial
assistance
option
of
the
policy.
So,
in
addition
to
requesting
approval
of
these
amendments,
we
are
asking
for
staff
direction
to
return
to
this
committee
in
March,
with
proposed
interim
inclusionary
zoning
tax,
increment
financing
policy
and
program
to
support
a
feasible
inclusionary
housing
policy
that
supports
continued
production
of
housing
in
the
city.
E
A
couple
of
things
to
note
here:
the
public
purpose
of
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance
to
add
affordability
and
what
would
otherwise
be
a
100
percent
market
rate
development
there
in
in.
In
some
cases
there,
the
financial
assistance
may
be
necessary
for
feasibility,
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
evaluate
and
bring
back
recommendations
and
information
about
the
potential
financial
and
resource
implications
of
this,
and
and
also
note
that
effective
inclusionary
zoning
policies
around
the
country-
and
there
are
many
of
them-
the
effective
policies
are
simple.
E
They
provide
clear
rules
for
compliance
and
they
are
administered
on
a
reasonable
timeline
and
at
a
reasonable
cost.
So
we
will
be
looking
at
our
financial
modeling
for
the
financing
option
of
the
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance
and
come
back
with
with
recommendations
for
for
that.
So
here
are
the
proposed
options
in
connection
with
the
unified
housing
policy
amendments
to
adopt
the
amendments
and
to
direct
staff
to
return
with
the
financial
policy
that
I
just
spoke
about.
A
A
I
also
have
to,
and
I
also
have
to
thank
all
the
community
folks
out
there
who
weighed
in
on
this
I,
know
that
during
that
and
grounded
solution
study
process,
there
were
focus
groups
and
developers
who
met
and
I
know
that
there
was
lots
of
dialogue
and
pushing
and
pulling
about
where
to
go
and
how
to
land
and
I
know
that
we
also
heard
a
lot
from
advocates.
We
certainly
had
a
great
comments
about
modifying
our
unified
housing
policy.
A
I
think
some
of
those
were
taking
into
consideration
and
some
things
were
cleared
up
and
we've
landed
here
and
I'm
excited
about
pivoting,
taking
this
next
step
and
then
also
being
there
in
the
morning
for
the
other
phase
at
the
zoning
committee.
So
congratulations,
everybody
and
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
how
the
interim
ordinance
goes
and
what
we
end
up
with
next
year
as
well.
Councilmember
traitor,
I.
G
F
You
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
I,
appreciate
very
much
like
fine
words,
so
I
think
I'll.
Try
to
make
the
motion-
that's
not
described,
might
need
help.
That's
for
today
is
the
long
day.
So
so
we
have
to
stack
traction.
The
first
is
to
direct
staff
to
develop
the
comprehend
comprehensive
inclusionary
housing
policy
consistent
with
the
framework
and
that's
what
we
have
in
front
of
us
and
I
have
those
four
items,
and
then
we
also
are
would
be
adopting
item
10.
So
I
would
move
adoption
of
item
10
and
move
that
dr.
A
Under
ten
as
well
so
what
under
ten,
whether
were
adopting
the
amendments
to
our
unified
housing
policy
and
also
directing
staff
to
return
in
my
was
March
with
the
policy
about
how
do
we
use
tax,
increment
financing
and
the
program
to
support
the
affordable
housing
requirements?
Thank
you
very
much
for
making
that
motion.
Well,
then,
would
you
like
to
speak
to
it?
Yes,.
F
Thank
you
I'll,
just
briefly
today,
a
very
long
day
at
City,
but
I
just
I
want
to
thank
staff
very
much
for
all
the
work
that
went
into
this.
It
really
has
been
a
complex
process
that
went
across
many
departments
in
the
city
and
I
just
want
to
say
a
couple
things
here:
number
one,
there's
many
ways
to
support
housing,
affordability
in
our
city
and
I
think
this
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance
will
be
one
of
many
tools
assuming
it
passes
tomorrow
at
znp
and
through
the
council,
and
so
that's
really
I
think.
F
The
way
that
we've
been
looking
at.
It
is
one
of
a
whole
host
of
tools
that
we
are
using
as
a
city
to
support
housing,
affordability.
We
are
making
it
easier
to
develop
over
time
that
that
happened
in
the
city
in
the
90s.
You
know
when
went
downtown
was
up
zone
when
we
started
reducing
parking
requirements,
and
so,
unlike
other
cities
that
are
more
restrictive,
we've
given
away
a
lot
of
the
incentives
that
City
is
used
to
promote
affordability
and
more
current
projects
by
making
it
easier
to
develop
overall
and
I.
F
Think
that's
a
good
thing
in
our
city.
We
need
more
housing,
and
so
this
is
ordinance
has
been
carefully
crafted
to
not
stop
this
needed
supply
of
new
housing
in
our
city.
So
in
this
interim
period
we'll
get
a
chance
to
see
how
the
penalty
is
working
as
staff
works
to
develop
the
tip
portion
or
the
funding
portion
of
the
final
ordinance
and
I
do
want
to
say.
You
know,
I
think:
we've
been
anticipating
potential
downturn
in
our
housing
market,
potentially
a
lack
housing
construction.
F
So
we
will
have
to
look
in
the
short
term
at
how
our
ordinance
is
working,
but
this
is
really
intended
to
be
a
long
reaching
policy
that
is
a
tool
to
promote
affordability
in
every
Minneapolis
neighborhood,
and
we
know
our
housing
markets
go
through
cycles.
You
know:
had
we
had
this
policy
in
place
during
this
last
housing
boom,
we
would
have
hundreds
of
affordable
units
in
neighborhoods
across
the
city,
including
hundreds,
inward
ten,
and
it's
hard
to
get
market.
F
A
You
I
don't
see
any
other
comments,
then
questions
so
on
the
motion
approving
the
recommendations
for
both
10:00
and
11:00,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed,
say
no,
those
motions
Kerry.
Thank
you
very
much
in
congratulations.
Those
will
go
on
to
the
council
for
consideration
at
the
last
meeting
of
the
year
and
now
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
12,
and
this
is
passage
of
resolution,
establishing
guiding
principles
in
support
of
investments
in
public
housing
and
the
people
who
live
there.
Welcome
Thank.
E
You
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee
I
would
like
to
acknowledge
that
we
have
here
with
us
today
several
folks
from
Minneapolis
public
housing
authority
and
PHA
Greg
rusts,
our
executive
director
Tracy
Scott,
deputy
executive
director
at
least
agreeable,
their
general
counsel
and
Jeff
Horowitz,
their
communications
director.
So
thank
you
for
joining
us.
E
The
minneapolis
public
housing
authority
owns
and
operates
approximately
6,000
public
housing
units
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
providing
homes
to
more
than
25,000
low-income
residents
in
neighborhoods
across
the
city.
These
homes
are
subject
to
an
agreement
between
the
mPHA
and
the
United
States
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development,
pursuant
to
which
federal
funds
are
provided
to
support
the
operations,
repair
and
renovation
of
these
homes.
Unfortunately,
for
decades,
the
federal
government
has
underfunded
the
operational
and
capital
needs
of
public
housing
in
Minneapolis
and
in
cities
and
towns
throughout
the
United.
E
States
mPHA
is
considering
the
use
of
various
funding
strategies
to
preserve
the
permanent
affordability
and
quality
of
this
critical
housing
resource
in
the
city.
The
resolution
before
you
proposes
it
states
the
city's
support
for
the
permanent
preservation
and
improvement
of
public
housing
and
establishes
guiding
principles
for
the
use
and
implementation
of
funding
strategies
to
accomplish
this
goal.
E
In
addition
to
the
resolution
and
the
staff
are
in,
the
requests
here
is
for
staff
to
be
directed
to
negotiate
terms
for
a
Memorandum
of
Understanding,
with
mPHA
regarding
principles
for
public
housing,
financial
conversion
and
report
back
to
the
City
Council
in
the
first
quarter
of
twenty
nine.
Twenty
nineteen
and
mPHA
is
here
and
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
as
well.
A
That's
wonderful
I
also
want
to
note
that
we've
been
joined
by
councilmember
Warsaw
me
and
the
resolution
is
actually
authored
by
councilmember
Warsaw
me
and
Jenkins
I
plan
to
move
it
forward
on
their
behalf,
since
they
don't
sit
on
the
committee
and
if
somebody
from
public
housing
would
like
to
come
up
and
just
share
their
any
of
their
thoughts
about
this
you're.
More
than
welcome
to
do
so.
A
H
I
Gordon
and
members
of
the
committee
and
councilmember
Warsaw
me
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I'll.
Be
brief,
we're
really
very
excited
about
the
resolution
and
the
opportunity
to
establish
what
we
think
is
groundwork
and
framing
document
that
would
allow
us
to
undertake
steps
necessary
inside
the
federal
rules
to
try
and
bring
more
income
and
opportunity
for
the
preservation
of
our
housing.
I
And
the
second
thing
we
want
to
be
mindful
of
is
that
we
very
much
are
interested
in
making
sure
that
this
is
done
with
minimal
relocation
issues
that
we
define
the
relocation
rights
of
each
of
the
families,
the
right
to
return,
which
I've
talked
to
many
of
you
about
and
how
all
that
would
be
handled
inside
a
relocation
rights
contract
that
would
be
made
available.
Each
time
we
take
on
an
opportunity
to
do
a
conversion,
so
both
the
resolution
and
our
chance
to
work
with
city
staff
on
coming
to
agreement
around
MOU
are
welcome.
A
H
H
I
Let
me
start
with
who
else
is
doing
this?
There
are
probably
not
any
major
cities
that
are
engaging
in
a
housing
effort.
Quite
like
this.
The
closest
one
I
can
think
of
is
a
property
specific
effort
that
the
Tacoma
Housing
Authority
is
working
on
where
they've
engaged
the
school
district
with
minimal
support
from
the
city
in
that
case,
but
in
a
very
defined
way
to
advance
both
the
opportunities
of
the
students
and
require
parents
in
exchange
for
housing
support
to
be
participatory
in
the
school
system.
This
particular
program
is
based
on
a
couple
of
principles.
I
The
first
is
that
the
goal
would
be
15.
Schools
were
selected
in
combination
with
discussions
with
the
school
system
and
the
mayor's
office.
Those
have
the
highest
proportion
of
families
at
risk
or
homeless,
and
the
notion
is
that,
if
we
could
address
that,
we
could
stabilize
those
folks
in
the
schools
the
neighborhood
schools
that
they're
attending
and
make
sure
that
the
kids
have
the
opportunity
to
learn
in
advance.
There's
a
range
of
opportunities
proposed.
I
We
have
foundation
funding,
I
believe
half
a
million
from
the
pohlad
foundation
to
do
emergency
or
sort
of
maybe
they
need
a
month's
rent
or
a
security
deposit
or
something
to
stay
in
place.
That
component
is
there,
we'd,
be
working
with
the
social
service
people
in
the
school
system
to
identify
the
families,
and
the
idea
is
to
support,
if
needed,
using
a
voucher
type
subsidy.
I
The
families
stay
in
the
unit
to
continue
the
stability,
so
that
they're
able
the
kids
are
able
to
attend
the
school.
The
voucher
part
of
this
is
very
unique
and
it
is
a
split
between
city
and
federal
funds,
60%
city
funds,
40%
federal
funds,
so
that
would
get
us
to
a
voucher
that
we
think
would
be
able
to
find
a
unit
in
some
of
the
areas
where
we
we
would
need
to
find
them
to
keep
the
kids
and
families
in
those
schools.
I
We
would
hope
that
we
would
be
able
to
roll
the
program
out
in
conjunction
with
supportive
services
from
others
and
begin
to
identify
families
and
then
lease
them
up.
Our
role
really
is
to
provide
the
federal
subsidy
and
in
exchange
for
that,
whatever
the
city
decides,
would
complement
that,
and
this
gets
back
to
something
we've
talked
about
before,
which
is
that
the
amount
of
money
that
comes
to
us
for
vouchers
is
fixed
in
ways
that
limit
the
number
and
type
of
vouchers
we
can.
I
H
I
H
I
would
just
love
to
see
the
program
guidelines,
the
schools
that
apparently
have
already
been
picked
without
our
any
of
our
permission.
I
would
like
to
see
what
the
goals
and
objectives
are
kind
of.
What
the
outcomes
are,
how
you're
gonna
get
them.
I
mean
I,
know
nothing
about
this
and
I
know
what
the
Affordable
Housing
Trust
Fund
is
and
I
know
what
we're
doing
to
build
and
preserve
affordable
housing,
because
it's
an
actual
program
that
we're
being
asked
to
fund.
But
here
it
seems
like
we're
being
asked
to
fund
an
idea
so.
A
I
would
say
that
perhaps
you
could
set
up
a
meeting,
or
maybe
the
America
set
up
a
meeting
outside
of
the
committee
to
talk
about
this
I
appreciate
the
council.
Member
Goodman
wants
to
have
some
of
our
budget
debate
going
on
right
here
right
now
about
this
program
of
the
mayor's.
But
if
you
do
have
a
website
or
a
link
or
a
packet.
H
A
I
A
K
You
Jeff
Gordon
and
members
of
the
committee
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
at
your
committee.
Thank
you
to
this
to
our
city
staff,
for
the
work
they've
done
on
this
resolution
and
for
the
continuing
dialogue
that
they
happen
with
minneapolis
public
housing
with
regards
to
the
MOU.
The
reason
why,
and
also
thanks
to
council
vice-president
jenkins
for
working
on
this
with
me
and
for
her
time
and
effort
she
couldn't
be
here,
but
I
will
speak
on
her
behalf
as
well
in
order
to
thank
everybody.
K
This
is
centered
on
the
individuals,
not
the
authority,
not
the
city,
but
our
residents,
the
people,
the
actual
people
that
live
in
Minneapolis,
Public
Housing
people
who
are
members.
You
know
senior
citizens,
immigrants,
folks
with
disabilities,
the
most
vulnerable
members
of
our
society
who
live
and
whose
only
real
possession
in
life
is
the
apartment
that
they
have
and
I
wanted
to
relate
it
concerns
and
to
give
them
certain
protections.
Yes,
the
minneapolis
public
housing
authority
is
a
separate
entity
to
the
city
of
minneapolis,
your
spun-off
I
think
a
couple
of
decades
ago.
K
However,
the
people
that
live
in
mPHA
who
reside
there
are
constituents
of
ours
they
vote
for
us,
they
live
in
our
city
and
they
deserve
as
much
protection
as
possible.
The
reason
why
we
are
doing
this
is
because
there's
a
lot
of
concern,
there's
been
a
lot
of
you
know:
information
on
social
media
that
has
been
campaigns
going
on,
which
has
created
a
great
deal
of
anxiety
and
fear
with
the
people
that
live
in
the
housing
and
I
wanted
to
reassure
and
I've
had
a
very
good
relationship
with
the
media.
Public
Housing,
Authority
leadership.
K
We've
had
many
discussions,
we've
been
to
many
meetings
with
residents,
but
again,
what
comes
back
is
the
concerns
and
anxiety
of
residents,
and
they
see
the
city
as
their
protectors.
They
see
the
City
Council
as
champions
of
housing,
including
our
esteemed
chair
of
the
Housing
Committee,
and
they
look
to
us
for
leadership
and
that's
why
we
came
up
with
this
resolution
and
again
I'll.
K
Thank
the
members
of
the
a
public
housing
authority
who
are
here
our
city
staff
leaders,
while
he
who
worked
on
this
and
I
wanted
to
reassure
and
have
a
document
and
that's
why
the
everything
is
very
important.
I
wanted
to
have
a
document
that
I
could
take
back
to
the
residence
to
show
that
the
protections
that
I
in
place
most.
K
Is
already
there
with
you
know
some
of
the
we've
taken
some
of
the
information
from
the
website
of
APHA.
These
protections
are
federal
level,
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
they
articulated
in
a
way
that
is
very
simple,
very
direct
and
comes
from
the
City
Council.
So
that's
what
we're
working
towards
and
I'd
like
to
thank
everybody
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
chair
and
the
members
of
this
community
for
their
support.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
know
that
I
have
many
constituents
who
are
also
grateful
that
the
city
is
taking
an
interest
in
this
and
they're
keeping
an
eye
on
things.
We
want
to
protect
their
interests
through
this
process
as
well.
There
any
other
comments
or
questions,
I
think
that
I've
already
moved
the
action.
A
So
if
not,
though
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
moving
to
pass
this
resolution
establishing
the
guidelines
and
also
to
direct
step
to
negotiate
a
memorandum
of
understanding
with
the
mPHA,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed,
say
no.
That
motion
carries
then
we'll
move
on
to
our
last
item,
and
this
is
the
Minneapolis
Advisory
Committee
on
housing,
appointments
kind
of
thing
that
might
have
been
on
consent,
but
this
is
actually
the
first
appointments
to
this
new
committee
and
I
thought.
A
L
You,
chair
Gordon
and
committee
members,
I'm
Katie,
pink
on
the
housing
policy
coordinator
at
the
ped
and
I,
am
presenting
the
recommendations
for
the
members
of
the
new
Minneapolis
Advisory
Committee
on
housing.
Just
as
a
reminder,
the
council
approved
a
resolution
establishing
this
committee
in
May.
L
The
Advisory
Committee
is
charged
with
advising
city
leaders,
including
the
council,
the
mayor's
office
and
city
departments
on
matters
related
to
housing,
policy
and
development,
rental
licensing
and
other
areas
that
affect
the
accessibility,
maintenance
and
development
of
stable
quality,
sustainable,
healthy
and
affordable
housing
in
the
city
and
a
staff
team
of
Kelly
Rose
Jones
and
Ron
Harris
from
regulatory
services.
Lisa
Smith
dad
from
the
health
department
me
representing
steep,
steep
ed
staff
from
the
mayor's
office
and
then
staff
from
the
chair,
and
vice
chairs
offices
and
staff
from
councilmember
Goodman
office.
L
As
chair
of
etrs
reviewed
all
the
applications
we
received
and
are
bringing
the
recommendations
forward,
we
received
more
than
100
applications
for
the
21
spots
on
the
committee,
which
was
great
but
it,
but
it
made
the
task
of
reviewing
and
making
selections
pretty
difficult.
Unfortunately,
there
are
many
highly
qualified
applications
that
we
were
unable
to
bring
forward
for
recommendation,
but
we,
we
reviewed
all
the
applications
and
and
brought
forward
a
list
of
recommendations
really
trying
to
balance
a
wide
range
of
life,
experiences
and
perspectives
to
have
really
thoughtful
and
and
productive.
L
Conversations
on
the
committee,
the
recommended
committee
members
are
made
up
of
renters
home
owners,
rental
property
owners
advocates
for
affordable
housing.
There
are
recommended
members
from
11
of
the
13
wards
in
the
city,
and
there
are
I
would
like
to
know.
There
are
at
least
a
few
of
the
people
who
are
being
recommended
here
today.
We
didn't
tell
folks
they
had
to
be
there,
but
a
few.
L
If
you
wanted
to
come
and
see
this,
we
there
are
eight
resident
members
appointed
by
the
council,
four
members
appointed
by
the
mayor
and
then
also
as
part
of
this
committee.
There
are
recommendations
for
nine
representatives
of
organizations
that
work
on
housing
and
just
as
a
reminder
that
those
organizations
that
were
named
were
the
Hennepin
County
continuum
of
care
operating
committee,
Minneapolis,
Public,
Schools,
Minneapolis,
public
housing
authority,
an
organization
that
provides
emergency
overnight,
shelter
and
that
organization
will
be
represented
by
the
bridge.
L
An
organization
that
advocates
for
renters
and
there's
a
member
from
Lee
aid,
a
nonprofit
community
development
organization
and
project
for
pride
and
living
will
be
representing.
That
has
that
an
organization
that
advocates
for
rental
property
owners
and
there's
a
board
member
from
multi
Housing
Association,
an
organization
that
helps
support
homeownership
and
the
elimination
of
racial
disparities
and
homeownership
rates,
build
wealth.
Minnesota
will
be
representing
that
organization
and
then
an
organization
that
works
for
equity
and
housing.
And
we
have
a
member
from
the
Alliance
for
metropolitan
stability
being
recommended.
L
So
the
committee
will
begin
we
anticipate
meeting
in
January
and
and
will
meet
monthly,
and
we
anticipate
certainly
will
work
with
the
members
to
figure
out
what
what
works
well
for
them,
and
it
will
continue
to
be
staffed
by
the
same
city
staff
team
that
reviewed
the
application.
So
cpad
regulatory
service
then,
and
the
health
department
so
that'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions.
I.
M
Currently
I
live
in
transitional
housing
at
the
Salvation
Army,
but
my
permanent
resident
is
in
Ward.
9
I
have
been
homeless
numerous
times
on,
Lake
Street
I
want
to
advocate
for
people
because
I
know,
affordable
housing
is
very
rough,
because
I
am
employed.
I'm,
a
junior
at
Metropolitan,
State,
University,
Human,
Services,
/,
Family,
Studies
I'm,
an
intern
at
the
Family
Partnership
in
the
pride
program.
M
A
J
Well
just
say
hello,
I'm,
Jeff
Moore,
which
the
director
policy
and
external
affairs
for
the
Housing
Authority
and
know
it's
an
honor
and
we're
looking
forward
to
being
a
part
of
the
committee
I
think
in
settings
like
this,
we
often
find
that
we
take
much
more
away
than
we're
able
to
contribute
and
I
think
this
will
be
no
exception
to
that
we're
looking
forward
to
it.
Thank
you.
Well,.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
I
appreciate
that
and
I
certainly
appreciate
everybody
who
applied
but
and
the
people
that
have
stepped
up
and
will
be
serving
on
this
we're
gonna
have
a
lot
of
work
for
them,
a
lot
of
things
for
them
to
look
at
and
help
us
figure
out
as
we're
grappling
with
housing
issues
in
the
city
right
now
and
am
I
thinking.
This
is
a
really
important
piece
of
the
infrastructure
that
we
need
to
make
sure
we're
making
the
best
decisions
as
we
try
to
move
forward.
A
So
thank
you
so
much
Matt.
Seeing
no
other
comments,
then
I
will
move
the
recommendation
as
presented
for
the
appointments
to
our
Minneapolis
Advisory
Committee
on
housing,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed,
say.
No.
That
motion
carries
then,
and
that
concludes
our
meeting
for
today.
So
we
are
adjourned.