►
From YouTube: October 29, 2020 Zoning Board of Adjustment
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Good
afternoon,
everyone
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting
today
october
29th
2020..
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13.0
two
one
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic
for
the
record,
my
name
is
matt
perry
and
I'm
sure
of
the
zoning
board
of
adjustment.
D
A
B
E
B
Okay,
we
have
quorum.
Thank
you
for
that.
With
that
we
will
proceed
to
our
agenda,
a
copy
of
which
was
posted
for
public
access
to
the
city's
legislative
information
management
system
available
at
lims.
That's
l-I-m-s,
dot!
B
C
D
D
B
D
C
C
D
E
C
C
B
B
B
Let's
review
the
agenda,
I
will
read
the
agenda
number
and
the
address
of
the
project
and
state
whether
it's
slated
for
consent,
continuance,
withdrawal
return
or
discussion
and
I'll
just
take
a
moment
to
talk
about
what
consent
items
are
and
what
discussion
items
are.
Consent
items
are
those
items
that
will
be
passed
without
discussion
by
the
board.
We
will
be
adhering
to
the
staff
recommendation
found
on
your
agenda
under
the
item's
recommended
motion.
Section
importantly,
any
applicable
conditions
will
be
listed
in
the
same
section.
B
If
you
get
agree
with
this
recommendation,
including
any
applicable
conditions,
you
need
to
do
nothing
and
the
board
will
pass
it
as
recommended.
Please
check
in
with
a
staff
member
assigned
to
that
item.
If
you
have
questions
following
the
decision,
if
you
disagree
with
the
recommendation,
please
indicate
you'd
like
to
speak
against
that
item.
When
I
ask
and
we'll
put
it
on
the
discussion
agenda
discussion
items,
these
are
items
for
which
the
board
will
take
public
testimony
deliberate
on
and
make
a
decision
after
the
public.
Testimony
has
been
heard
for
each
particular
discussion
item.
B
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
for
that
agenda
item
once
I
close
the
public
hearing
for
an
item.
No
additional
public
testimony
will
be
taken,
but
staff
may
be
asked
to
address
board
questions
after
the
public
hearing.
For
an
item
is
closed.
Board
members
will
then
discuss
and
act
on
motions,
and
the
chair
does
not
vote
except
in
the
case
of
a
tie.
B
And
it
I
just
for
the
record,
mr
ogiba,
one
of
our
board
members,
has
just
joined
us
and
can
vote
on
matters
coming
before
us.
Henceforth.
B
B
B
D
H
B
And
that
motion
passes
so
for
those
who
who
are
here
for
agenda
items
number
five
or
seven
good
news,
your
land
use
requests
are
approved.
Good
luck
with
your
projects,
you
can
hang
around
or
you
can.
B
You
can
drop
off
the
call
now,
if
you
were
here
for
those
items,
that's
items
five
or
seven.
Let's
move
on
to
agenda
item
number
six,
ms
roman.
I
I
I
I
I
I
So
a
permitted
obstruction
is
an
accessory
use,
structure
or
projection
of
a
principal
structure
that
may
be
located
in
a
required
yard.
These
permitted
obstructions
have
different
setback
requirements
than
the
primary
structure
on
the
lot
would
covered
front.
Porches
are
allowed
per
the
zoning
code,
but
only
so
long
as
they
comply
with
standard
setback
requirements.
I
The
setback
for
this
property
is
established
by
the
structures
on
either
side
of
the
property,
with
a
string
line
at
13.7
feet
where
11.5
feet
is
proposed
by
the
applicant,
thus
requiring
the
variance
to
the
established
front
yard.
Aside
from
the
setback
requirement,
the
enclosed
porch
would
comply
with
all
requirements
of
the
code
next
slide.
Please.
I
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
enclose
an
existing
open
covered
front
porch
that
is
currently
complying
with
the
ordinance.
The
proposal
also
does
not
meet
the
spirit
and
intent
of
the
ordinance.
The
ordinance
governing
setbacks
is
intended
to
regulate
dimensions
and
use
of
yards
as
well
as
separation
of
uses.
I
I
The
permitted
obstructions
language
explicitly
requires
that
open
covered
front
porches
not
be
enclosed
by
windows,
walls
or
screens
for
the
third
finding.
The
proposed
variants
would
not
alter
the
essential
character
of
the
locality
or
be
injurious
to
the
use
or
enjoyment
of
the
neighboring
properties,
and
the
proposed
variants
would
not
be
detrimental
to
the
health,
safety
or
welfare
of
the
general
public.
B
Staff,
I'm
not
seeing
anyone,
so
we
will-
and
I
don't
have
any
questions
myself
so
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
and
I
would
like
to
see
if
the
applicant
would
like
to
testify
and
you
do
that
again
by
pressing
stair
six
to
unmute
your
phone
and
and
then
give
testimony.
J
So
we
do
have
a
presentation.
Today
we
had
hoped
to
be
a
virtual
video,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
you
have
a
chance
to
visually,
see
the
people
that
your
decision
will
impact,
but
considering
that
we
only
have
audio
today,
we'll
do
the
best
that
we
can
and
proceed.
J
Thank
you,
members
of
the
zoning
board
of
adjustment
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
you
today.
I
want
to
address
your
concerns
regarding
our
property
at
1511
4th
street
northeast
in
sheridan
neighborhood.
It's
important
that
you
have
some
background
and
context.
My
husband,
john
and
I
have
lived
in
our
home
for
18
years.
The
neighborhood
was
very
different
when
we
first
moved
there,
our
house
had
been
on
the
market
for
over
one
year
before
we
purchased
it
most
of
the
commercial
space
near
us
on
13th
avenue
was
vacant.
J
J
When
I
was
informed
on
october
8th
that
the
planning
department
was
recommending
a
denial
on
our
poetry
model
variant,
I
took
that
very
personally.
You
see,
I
am
not
just
a
resident
of
sheridan.
I
have
served
on
the
sheridan
neighborhood
board
as
a
member
at
large
vice
president
and
president,
and
was
a
member
of
the
northeast
citizen
patrol
for
many
years.
I
have
served
on
the
snowball
committee
and
chaired
the
silent
auction
committee.
J
The
snowball
is
our
neighborhood
fundraiser
that
has
raised
money
for
neighborhood
improvements
which
have
included
street
lighting
on
13th
avenue
and
funds
towards
the
development
of
the
beautiful
sheridan
memorial
park.
In
recent
years,
snowball
has
raised
money
to
support
local
nonprofits,
including
the
sheridan
story,
my
very
own
bed
and
the
northeast
minneapolis
arts
district.
I
was
honored
to
be
named.
The
sheridan
volunteer
of
the
year
for
both
2013
and
2019..
J
My
church
grace
lutheran,
was
a
congregation
that
purchased
holland
elementary
school
at
1500
166th
street
northeast
in
2010..
The
school
had
sat
vacant
for
five
years.
The
building
renamed
grace
center
for
community
life
is
a
thriving
community
center,
including
a
church
charter
school
little
kitchen,
food
shelf
and
event
space.
My
husband
and
I
were
eager
eager
to
help
fund
the
new
handicapped,
accessible
playground
at
grace
center
called
fair
play.
J
This
is
an
interest-free
loan,
with
a
matching
grant
up
to
five
thousand
dollars
and
forgiven
after
five
years.
If
you
remain
in
your
property,
the
loan
is
managed
through
the
center
for
environmental
and
excuse
me,
energy
and
environment.
The
application
includes
a
statement
about
the
project
and
requires
a
licensed
contractor
registered
with
the
department
of
labor.
We
close
on
a
loan
july
30th.
The
work
is
required
to
be
completed
in
120
days.
I
have
already
requested
two
extensions,
given
our
permit
status
over
time.
J
J
J
In
addition,
we
can
better
maintain
a
watchful
eye
out
on
the
street.
The
enclosure
will
fit
in
nicely
with
the
style
of
housing
on
the
block,
as
well
as
add
value
to
our
house.
Our
contractor
applied
for
the
necessary
permits
in
august.
What
we
anticipated
to
be
relatively
straightforward
has
evolved
into
a
frustrating,
disappointing
and
confusing
process.
J
We
were
informed
in
early
september
that
our
permit
was
denied
and
the
city
is
requiring
a
variance
due
to
the
minimum
established
front
yard
setback.
The
survey
of
the
property
is
required
for
the
fairings
on
september
28th,
a
man
came
to
our
home,
dressed
in
street
clothes
with
no
id
and
an
unmarked
vehicle.
When
I
saw
him
on
the
porch,
I
asked
who
he
was
he
identified
himself.
Imagine
my
surprise
when
he
asked
me
if
we
were
building
a
new
garage,
I
had
to
explain
to
him
the
nature
of
our
project.
J
We
met
with
the
city
planner
for
the
general
land
use,
reapplication
general
land
use
application
process.
On
october
1st,
we
were
told
at
that
meeting
that
the
planner
would
be
recommending
to
the
zoning
board
to
move
forward
with
our
project.
We
were
pleased
to
receive
notice
on
october
6
that
the
application
was
complete
and
could
be
placed
on
the
agenda
for
a
public
hearing
on
october
29th,
I
called
the
city
planner
on
october,
8th
to
confirm
the
date.
J
J
Our
block
in
4th
street
northeast
from
15th
avenue
northeast
to
16th
avenue
northeast
includes
a
bar
duplexes
one
four
flex
and
and
single
family
homes.
Street
facing
open
porches
are
the
exception
to
the
rule.
With
the
majority
of
the
homes
having
closed
porches
and
stoops,
we
have
submitted
a
picture
graph
of
the
block
and
we'll
get
in
into
that
in
our
powerpoint.
J
The
majority
of
the
homes
in
the
area
were
built
in
the
early
1900s
nearby
homes
with
enclosed
porches
appear
to
be
as
close,
if
not
closer
to
the
curb.
However,
I
was
informed
that
older
homes
were
grandfathered
in
with
respect
to
setbacks
as
a
long-term
resident
of
sheraton.
I
have
witnessed
multiple
developers
coming
to
sheraton
and
surrounding
northeast
neighborhoods
with
rfps
for
apartment
building
buildings
and
receive
the
green
light
with
minimum
pushback
from
the
city.
While
I
recognize
that
minneapolis
is
owned
for
high
density,
there
appears
to
be
a
double
standard.
J
With
respect
to
homeowners,
we
simply
want
to
make
an
improvement
to
our
property.
However,
there
is
a
minor
setback
concern,
whereas
the
setback
at
any
apartment
at
107,
13th
avenue
northeast,
is
so
close
to
the
curb
the
ground-level
apartments
with
floor-to-ceiling
windows
back
right
up
against
the
sidewalk.
J
J
We
have
submitted
four
letters
of
support
for
our
project,
including
the
snowboard,
the
duplex
owners,
directly
to
the
north
and
south
of
us,
and
one
long-term
neighbor
who
has
lived
on
the
block
for
over
26
years.
We
respectfully
respect
we
respectfully
request
that
you
grant
this
variance.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration
in
this
matter.
B
I'm
I'm
going
to
have
to
limit
your
time
to
another
seven
or
eight
minutes.
So
if
you
can
a
lot
of
powerpoint.
B
B
J
F
All
right,
that's
fine,
we'll
have
john
speaker,
so
our
understanding
was
that
you
know
it's
a
small
setback
issue
and
our
interpretation
was
that
it's
not
the
house,
it's
the
staircase.
They
that
may
not
be
the
case,
but
in
the
in
the
plan,
there's
a
quote
that
I
think
sarah
actually.
I
F
F
J
So
slide
five
we're
moving
to
the
west,
I'm
sorry,
the
east.
J
Of
the
block
and
I'm
sorry,
the
west
side
of
the
black
missouri
and
nightcap
bar
is
on
the
far
left.
J
F
J
Our
house
yeah
and
that
white
house
in
the
far
left
was
built
in
1933.
Otherwise,
all
the
homes
were
built
in
early
1900s.
The
duplex
to
the
direct
north
of
us
was
built
in
1895.
F
F
So
you
can
imagine
that's
what
five
or
six
months
and
for
us,
the
enclosed
porch,
would
diminish
street
noise
for
sure.
So
we
think
that
we're
actually
putting
more
eyes
on
the
street
by
enclosing
it.
So
by
having
it.
J
J
So
really
this
project
is
a
net
benefit
to
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
who's,
seeking
the
variance.
I
think
it's
important
that
you
know,
since
you
can't
see
us
it's
important
that
you
know
who
we
are
so
slide.
13
we've
been
here
18
years,
we're
donors
of
the
local
playground
behind
us
at
grace
center
for
community
life.
J
J
And
now
currently
works
for
the
ymca,
we're
both
a
non-profit,
we're
passionate
about
our
work
and
we're
passionate
about
being
in
our
neighborhood
and
minneapolis.
In
general,
last
paint,
last
page
14
of
support
from
our
neighbors
john
aker,
owner
of
15
15
16
north
east
horse
street,
been
in
the
neighborhood
for
26
years.
He
says
the
quarterback's
plan
will
fit
in
nicely
with
the
eclectic
styles
and
treatments
along
with
three
conor
mccarthy,
owner
of
1505.
That's
the
duplex
directly
south
of
us.
This
he's
he.
He
bought
that.
I
believe
two
years
ago.
J
This
requested
variance
where
closed
porch
will
not
stand
out
as
different
from
the
neighborhood
properties.
Mark
heldenberg,
the
owner
of
the
duplex
directly
north
of
us
at
1515,
northeast
4th
street
fannie
and
john
have
been
great
neighbors
and
closing
their
porch
was
nice.
In
this
neighborhood
karen
peterson
the
snow,
current
snowboard
president
says
I
attended
a
board
meeting
and
the
board
unanimously
agreed
to
pass
to
suggest
a
letter
of
support
to
pass
the
variance
and
in
her
letter
in
the
letter
it
states.
J
B
There
we
might
have
questions
for
you
from
our
board
members,
so
thanks
for
the
presentation
and
keeping
it
in
in
brief
enough
that
we
have
time
to
discuss
it
as
a
board.
D
Thank
you,
chair
perry.
Thank
you.
Applicants
for
your
presentation.
I
just
want
to
say
it
doesn't
look
bad,
it
looks
nice.
The
only
thing
I'm
struggling
with
would
be.
Is
there
anything
specific,
ultimately,
100
specific
to
your
property
that
would
make
this
possible.
Is
there
something
that
stands
out
about
your
property
alone?
B
B
That
would
a
lot
not
allow
you
to
use
it
in
a
reasonable
way,
and
so
staff
has
said
they
can't
find
anything
unique
about
your
property,
and
I
think
mr
hutchins-
and
he
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
he
is
trying
to
seek
the
answer
to
that
question
as
well.
Is
there
something
unique
about
your
property
that
makes
it
not
be
able
to
be
used
in
a
reasonable
way.
F
Well,
I
guess
one
of
the
ways
one
of
the
things
would
be
that
it
faces
west.
So
this
is,
this
is
the
problem.
Obviously
we
live
in
minnesota,
so
an
open
porch
is
not
usable
for
you
know
what
would
you
say
a
quarter
or
a
third
or
more
of
the
time,
and
then
the
fact
that
it
faces
west
means
that
in
the
summer
time,
when
it
is
warm,
it's
really
not
usable,
because
when
it's
warm
and
the
sun
bears
down
on
it,
it's
just
not
comfortable
to
be
out
there.
B
Okay,
I
I
will
just
I'll
say
that
and
I'll,
let
my
board,
my
colleagues
on
the
board,
discuss
this
when
we
close
the
public
hearing
and
discuss
this,
but
I'll
just
say
that
open
porches
facing
west
is
not
a
very
unique
thing
in
the
city
of
minneapolis.
B
J
and
to
me,
if
it's
a
new
newer
property,
it
should
be,
it
should
be
able
to
stay
in
the
neighborhood
longer
and
afford
it
in
order
for
it
to
increase
in
value.
It
seems
to
be
that
it
should
be
more
comfortable
to
live
in
and
to
be
more
comfortable
to
live
in.
Then
it
needs
to
have
some
space
that
you
could
use
throughout
the
year.
A
Thanks
chairperry,
I
have
a
question.
Considering
then,
is
the
noise
from
the
restaurant
and
bars
something
that's
driven
you
to
want
to
enclose
this
porch
for
more
of
a
safety
reason.
J
J
We
live
right
on
a
bar
crawl,
so
they
go
from
one
bar
to
another
and
they
come
down,
and
I
will
tell
you
that
most
of
the
in
the
summertime
we
have
to
keep
the
air
conditioning
on
and
our
windows
closed
because
we
can't
sleep
at
night.
The
window
with
the
the
noise
outside
can
be
pretty
pretty
loud.
So
we
have
to
keep
the
windows
closed,
keep
a
fan
on,
so
we
don't
kind
of
drown
the
noise
out,
but
it
can
be.
J
It
can
be
pretty
loud
and
I
think
that's
one
of
the
reasons
originally
why
the
house
took
forever
to
sell.
Was
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
of
incentive
for
a
family
to
buy
the
home,
given
the
two
bars
across
the
street
plus
at
that
time
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
other
commercial
real
estate
to
draw
in
families.
B
F
B
K
K
Hi,
my
name
is
mark
helmer,
I'm
the
contractor
owner
and
operator
of
wvm
construction.
The
customers
came
to
me
with
a
proposition
to
make
more
use
out
of
their
porch
because
well,
it's
virtually
unusable
in
that
area,
but
the
amount
of
traffic
and
and
street
noise
during
the
summer
months.
So
I
took
on
this
project.
I
didn't
see
it
as
a
problem,
since
it
was
an
existing
open
porch.
K
So
I
thought
that
in
closing
it
wouldn't
have
been
an
issue.
Apparently
I
was
I
was.
I
was
wrong
and
now
we're
here,
but
I
just
I'd
like
to
you
know
just
put
in
my
support
to
my
customers.
You
know
they
live
there.
A
long
time.
They've
endured
a
lot
of
growth
in
the
area
they
give
forth
to
the
community,
and
I
just
hope
that
you
people
and
grant
their
variants
at
this
time,
and
that
is
all
thank
you
all
right.
B
The
next
next
person
in
queue
is
ms
peterson.
If
you
want
to
press
stair
six
to
unmute
your
phone,
I.
L
L
I
know
I'm
short
on
time,
so
I'm
going
to
dive
right
in
and
try
to
speak
fast
about
section
525.500
of
the
code
of
ordinances
point
one.
I
surely
there
is
a
practical
difficulty
existing
in
that
the
house.
The
quarterbinds
built
18
years
ago,
was
built
with
an
open
porch
and
they
can't
actually
pick
up
their
home
and
move
it
back
three
feet
in
order
to
put
a
porch
on
and
comply.
So
it
seems
to
me
that
that
adds
to
the
unique
situation
to
fit
in
a
variance
point
two.
L
What
could
be
more
reasonable
than
seeking
to
be
to
make
a
porch
more
of
use
to
use
her
porch
more
especially
in
minnesota,
with
her
amazing
changing
of
seasons.
Additionally,
adding
a
porch
adds
insulation,
reducing
heat
loss
so
totally
in
keeping
with
the
city's
sustainability
possibility,
which
is
a
win-win
and
has
already
been
discussed.
If
you
have
an
enclosed
porch,
this
will
add
more
eyes
on
the
street
more
security
because
they're
out
there
more
often.
L
Finally,
in
the
third
section,
if
you
look
at
the
length
of
the
street
as
they
were
talking
about,
if
you
look
up
and
down
the
block.
Fourth,
fourth
street,
you
will
not
find
row
of
row
after
row
of
uniform
homes
like
most
of
northeast.
It's
full
of
variety.
You
have
open
porches,
closed
porches
homes
close
to
the
sidewalk.
Some
further
set
back
some
within
longer
going
closed,
porches,
so
enclosed.
They
just
look
like
a
part
of
the
house.
L
L
As
they've
already
stated,
the
core
beans
have
been
very
active
and
involved
in
the
community,
very
active
members,
and
one
final
point:
I
did
research
over
the
last
month's
planning
commission
just
to
see
how
many
of
how
many
setbacks
were
being
approved
for
new
developments,
and
the
answer
was
all
of
them.
Every
single
one
and
some
were
very
significant
for
deviations
and
it
seems
like
we
really
ought
to
give
our
long
time
homeowners
the
same
considerations
as
we
do
for
new
developments.
L
B
Thanks
for
your
testimony,
I
just
have
one
quick
question
for
you,
ms
peterson
just
to
get
clarification,
and
I
could
ask
the
applicants
this
as
well,
but
since
you've
been
there
in
the
neighborhood
for
quite
a
while,
you
said
they
built
the
the
the
home
that
they're
trying
to
get
the
variants
for.
Is
that
correct.
L
B
D
J
B
Okay,
great
thanks
for
clearing
that
up
for
me:
okay,
we
don't
have
anyone
else
in
queue
that
I
see
and
so
we'll
close
the
public
hearing,
and
I
will
take
board
comment.
E
Thank
you,
chair
perry.
I
certainly
understand
the
staff's
position
on
this
with
regard
to
what's
promoted
throughout
the
city,
I
think
like
there,
I
heard
some
unique
characteristics
of
this
property
in
that
it's
very
close
to
a
busy
commercial
intersection
and
which
I'm
sure
incurs
parking
in
front
of
their
house
and
a
lot
of
activity
already.
E
I
also
see
some
unique
characteristic
in
this
property,
in
that
I
think
in
general,
in
the
neighborhood,
the
setbacks
are
very
close
to
the
street
and
that
kind
of
precludes
large
trees
for
shading
of
properties
which
occur
in
quite
a
few
other
areas
of
the
city
where
open
porches
are
much
more
predominant.
So
I
think
I
would
say
that
there
are
a
few
unique
characteristics
of
the
property,
but
I'd
like
to
hear
from
other
boards.
B
Sure,
and
do
you
have
any
thoughts
before
we
talked
we
go
down
to
mr
o'giva
and
then
mr
softly,
on
the
second
finding.
E
The
second
finding
is
whether
it's
a
reasonable
use
of
the
property
yeah,
and
I
think
it.
E
Well,
I
think
an
enclosed
porch,
if
it
can
be
used
as
a
porch,
is
probably
reasonable
in
that,
as
the
applicant
has
stated,
they
can't
use
it
as
a
porch
now,
so
I
would
say
that
it's
reasonable
it
would
being
used
as
a
porch
and
not
as
a
as
a
sleeping
area
or
something
provide
eyes
on
the
street
that
don't
occur
there
now.
E
So
I
think
with
that,
with
regard
to
that,
it
could
be
reasonable.
B
Okay
thanks
mr
ogiba.
H
Thank
you,
chair
perry.
I
actually
had
a
question
of
staff.
I
just
was
a
point
of
clarification
on
the
calculation
of
the
13.7
feet
required
for
the
front
yard
setback.
Can
staff
just
clarify
how
that
number
is
is
devised
for
this
particular.
I
Property,
thank
you,
chair,
perry,
members
of
the
board,
so
in
this
case
for
a
reduction
in
a
required
setback.
G
Thank
you,
chair
perry.
I
just
want
to
comment
that
I
am
in
favor
of
approving
the
variants.
I
agree
with
the
comments
that
board
member
sandberg
shared
with
us
regarding
the
traffic
and
the
noise
and
the
concerns
about
being
in
such
a
busy
commercial
area
and
with
not
one
but
just
two
bars
very
close
by
both
knight
cap
and
may
slacks.
G
I
also
agree
that
the
the
close
close-up
backs
restrict
the
about
the
ability
to
to
grow
trees
in
the
front
yards
of
these
homes,
both
on
the
west
side
and
the
east
side
of
the
street.
I
was
actually
taken
by
some
of
the
photographs
in
the
applicant's
presentation
that
showed
just
a
distinct
lack
of
tree
cover
on
the
west
side
of
the
street
and.
A
Thanks
jerry
perry,
I
agree
with
comments
already
made
by
sandberg
and
some
of
our
others.
I
think
there's
a
way
we
can
find
out
to
make
this
work
for
him.
B
Okay,
anybody
else
wish
to
comment.
B
Or
anybody
have
any
additional
questions,
I'd
like
to
ask
staff,
if
the
oh,
mr
softly.
G
Thank
you,
chair,
perry
yeah.
I
just
realized
the
the
additional
point
that
I
wanted
to
make,
and
it
again
relates
back
to
the
presentation
from
the
applicants.
It
shows
the
incredible
diversity
of
the
front
of
each
home
and
how
an
enclosed
porch
is
a
reality
is
how
most
of
the
homes
do
not
even
have
porches,
let
alone
open
porches,
and
in
that
sense
I
think
what
the
applicants
are
proposing
is
consistent
with
the
neighborhood
in
every
possible
way,
and
I
think
that
it's
consistent
with
the
regulations
that
do
relate
to
setbacks
in
the
neighborhood.
B
G
B
E
This
is
sandberg
I'll
move
approval
of
the
variants
with
the
findings,
as
discussed
by
myself
and
the
other
board
members.
B
C
E
C
H
E
C
B
So
that
motion
passes,
and
that
means
the
land
use
request,
is
approved.
So
good
luck
with
your
project
and
thanks
for
taking
time
to
for
everyone
who
called
in
and
for
the
applicants
for
for
providing
the
testimony.
B
With
that,
we
have
completed
all
the
items
on
the
agenda
for
this
meeting
I'll
ask
members
and
staff
if
there
are
other
matters
to
come
before
this
meeting,
and
I
see
that
there
is
no
new
or
old
business
and
we
have
no
announcements
so
without
objection.
I
will
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
november,
12
2020.